Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on the Acquisition of Tantalum (DFARS Case 2020-D007), 61500-61502 [2020-21121]
Download as PDF
61500
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
48 CFR Parts 212, 225, and 252
[Docket DARS–2020–0035]
RIN 0750–AK94
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Restriction on
the Acquisition of Tantalum (DFARS
Case 2020–D007)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Interim rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing an interim rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2020 that prohibits the
acquisition of tantalum metal and alloys
from North Korea, China, Russia, and
Iran.
SUMMARY:
Effective October 1, 2020.
Comments on the interim rule should
be submitted in writing to the address
shown below on or before November 30,
2020, to be considered in the formation
of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2020–D007,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2020–D007’’ under the
heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select ‘‘Comment
Now’’ and follow the instructions to
submit a comment. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘DFARS Case 2020–D007’’ on any
attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2020–D007 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES3
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Sep 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Ms.
Amy Williams, telephone 571–372–
6106.
DoD is revising the DFARS to
implement section 849 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116–92). Section 849
adds tantalum to the definition of
‘‘covered materials’’ in 10 U.S.C. 2533c.
With some exceptions, 10 U.S.C. 2533c
prohibits the acquisition of any covered
material melted or produced in any
covered country (North Korea, China,
Russia, or Iran), or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country,
that contains a covered material.
‘‘Covered material’’ also includes
samarium-cobalt magnets, neodymiumiron-boron magnets, tungsten metal
powder, and tungsten heavy alloy or
any finished or semi-finished
components containing tungsten heavy
alloy.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule adds tantalum to the
restriction at DFARS 225.7018, by
amending the title of the section, adding
‘‘tantalum metal and alloys’’ to the
definition of ‘‘covered material’’ at
DFARS 225.7018–1, and including
tantalum in the explanation of
exceptions at DFARS 225.7018–3
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) (exception for
commercially available off-the-shelf
(COTS) items inapplicable to a mill
product that has not been incorporated
into an end item, subsystem, assembly,
or component) and (d)(1) (meaning of
nonavailabilty of a covered material in
the required form). Although the 10
U.S.C. 2533c provides that the
exception to the restriction on tungsten
for COTS items does not apply to a
COTS item that is 50 percent or more
tungsten by weight, DoD notes that
section 849 does not add a similar
condition with regard to tantalum metal
and alloys.
In addition, a new paragraph (c) is
added at DFARS 225.7018–2,
Restriction, to explain that the
restriction on production of tantalum
metal and alloys, including the
reduction of tantalum chemicals such as
oxides, chlorides, or potassium salts, to
metal powder and all subsequent phases
of production of tantalum metal and
alloys, such as consolidation of metal
powders.
These same changes are also
incorporated in the clause at 252.225–
7052, now titled ‘‘Restriction on the
Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten,’’ and there are
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
conforming changes to the clause title at
DFARS 212.301(f)(ix)(FF) and
225.7018–5. There are no changes to the
procedures for nonavailability
determinations.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule amends the clause at DFARS
252.225–7052, Restriction on
Acquisition of Certain High
Performance Magnets and Tungsten, to
apply to tantalum. DFARS 252.225–
7052 does not apply to acquisitions
below the simplified acquisition
threshold, in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1905, but applies to contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items, except
as provided in the statute at 10 U.S.C.
2533c(c)(3).
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below
the Simplified Acquisition Threshold
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the
applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater
than the simplified acquisition
threshold. It is intended to limit the
applicability of laws to such contracts or
subcontracts. 41 U.S.C. 1905 provides
that if a provision of law contains
criminal or civil penalties, or if the FAR
Council makes a written determination
that it is not in the best interest of the
Federal Government to exempt contracts
or subcontracts at or below the SAT, the
law will apply to them. The Principal
Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting (DPC), is the appropriate
authority to make comparable
determinations for regulations to be
published in the DFARS, which is part
of the FAR system of regulations. DoD
does not intend to make that
determination. Therefore, this rule will
not apply below the simplified
acquisition threshold.
B. Applicability to Contracts for the
Acquisition of Commercial Items,
Including COTS Items
10 U.S.C. 2375 governs the
applicability of laws to contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS
items, and is intended to limit the
applicability of laws to contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS
items. 10 U.S.C. 2375 provides that if a
provision of law contains criminal or
civil penalties, or if the Under Secretary
of Defense (Acquisition and
Sustainment) (USD (A&S)) makes a
written determination that it is not in
the best interest of the Federal
E:\FR\FM\29SER3.SGM
29SER3
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Government to exempt commercial item
contracts, the provision of law will
apply to contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items. Due to delegations of
authority from USD (A&S), the Principal
Director, DPC, is the appropriate
authority to make this determination.
DoD has made that determination to
apply this rule to the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS
items, if otherwise applicable.
10 U.S.C. 2533c specifically exempts
the acquisition of an end item that is a
COTS item, other than a COTS item that
is 50 percent or more tungsten by
weight, or a mill product that has not
been incorporated into an end item,
subsystem, assembly, or component.
Although 10 U.S.C. 2533c does not refer
to 10 U.S.C. 2375 and does not provide
that, notwithstanding that statute, it
shall be applicable to contracts for the
procurement of commercial items, it is
the clear intent of 10 U.S.C. 2533c to
cover commercial items other than those
specifically exempted. Therefore, DoD
has signed a determination of
applicability to acquisitions of
commercial items, except as exempted
in the statute.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771, because this
rule is issued with respect to a national
security function of the United States.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES3
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this interim rule
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) has been performed and
is summarized as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Sep 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
This rule is required to implement
section 849 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2020.
The objective of the rule is to prohibit
acquisition of tantalum metal and alloys
from North Korea, China, Russia, or
Iran.
Based on Federal Procurement Data
System data for FY 2017, DoD awarded
in the United States 13,400 contracts
that exceeded $250,000 and were for the
acquisition of manufactured end
products, excluding those categories
that could not include tantalum (such as
clothing and fabrics, books, or lumber
products). These contracts were
awarded to 5,073 unique entities, of
which 3,074 were small entities. It is not
known what percentage of these awards
involved tantalum, or what lesser
percentage might involve tantalum from
China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran.
There are no projected reporting or
recordkeeping requirements. However,
there may be compliance costs to track
the origin of covered materials.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
DoD is exempting acquisitions equal
to or less than the simplified acquisition
threshold in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1905. DoD was unable to identify any
other alternatives that would reduce
burden on small businesses and still
meet the objectives of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2020–D007), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
VIII. Determination To Issue an Interim
Rule
A determination has been made under
the authority of the Secretary of Defense
that urgent and compelling reasons exist
to promulgate this interim rule without
prior opportunity for public comment.
Section 849 adds tantalum to the other
covered materials prohibited by 10
U.S.C. 2533c if melted or produced in
any covered country or any end item
that contains a covered material
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
61501
manufactured in any covered country.
Covered countries are North Korea,
China, Russia, and Iran.
Implementation of this prohibition is
urgent, because the law was effective
upon enactment (December 2019) and
decreasing our dependence on covered
materials that originate in covered
countries is a matter of national
security. It is a matter of national
security to reduce U.S. dependence on
the covered countries specified in
section 849, because tantalum is an
important element in the supply chain
for production of both U.S. military
systems, and nonmilitary systems that
DoD uses. A shortage of supply of these
covered materials would therefore
hinder maintenance and replacement of
many DoD military systems, and would
also have a negative impact on the
broader industrial base upon which DoD
depends. Restricting acquisition from
China and the other covered countries
will promote growth in domestic
capability and reduce dependence on
foreign sources that are not our allies.
However, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707
and FAR 1.501–3(b), DoD will consider
public comments received in response
to this interim rule in the formation of
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 212,
225, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 212, 225, and
252 are amended as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
2. Amend section 212.301 by revising
paragraph (f)(ix)(FF) to read as follows:
■
212.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(ix) * * *
(FF) Use the clause at 252.225–7052,
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain
Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten, as
prescribed in 225.7018–5.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
3. Amend section 225.7002–2 by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\29SER3.SGM
29SER3
61502
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 189 / Tuesday, September 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
225.7002–2
Exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) The supporting documentation for
the determination shall include an
analysis and written certification by the
requiring activity, with specificity, why
alternatives that would not require a
domestic nonavailability determination
are unacceptable.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend section 225.7003–3 by
revising paragraph (b)(5)(i) to read as
follows:
225.7003–3
Exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) The Secretary of the military
department concerned is authorized,
without power of redelegation, to make
a domestic nonavailability
determination that applies to only one
contract. The supporting documentation
for the determination shall include an
analysis and written documentation by
the requiring activity, with specificity,
why alternatives that would not require
a domestic nonavailability
determination are unacceptable.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise the section 225.7018
heading to read as follows:
225.7018 Restriction on acquisition of
certain magnets, tantalum, and tungsten.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In section 225.7018–1 revise the
definition of ‘‘Covered material’’ to read
as follows:
■
225.7018–1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Covered material means—
(1) Samarium-cobalt magnets;
(2) Neodymium-iron-boron magnets;
(3) Tantalum metal and alloys;
(4) Tungsten metal powder; and
(5) Tungsten heavy alloy or any
finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend 225.7018–2 by—
■ a. Redesignating paragraph (c) as
paragraph (d); and
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES3
225.7018–2
Restriction.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For production of tantalum metal
and alloys, this restriction includes the
reduction of tantalum chemicals such as
oxides, chlorides, or potassium salts, to
metal powder and all subsequent phases
of production of tantalum metal and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Sep 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
alloys, such as consolidation of metal
powders.
*
*
*
*
*
225.7018–3
[Amended]
8. Amend section 225.7018–3 by—
a. In (c)(1)(ii) removing ‘‘tungsten
heavy alloy mill product’’ and adding
‘‘tantalum metal, tantalum alloy, or
tungsten heavy alloy mill product’’ in
its place;
■ b. In (c)(2) removing ‘‘PGI 225.7018–
3(c)(1)(ii)’’ and adding ‘‘PGI 225.7018–
3(c)(2)’’ in its place;
■ c. In paragraph (d) introductory text
removing ‘‘concerned,’’ and adding
‘‘concerned, as specified in 225.7018–
4,’’ in its place; and
■ d. In paragraph (d)(1) removing
‘‘tungsten heavy alloy’’ and adding
‘‘tantalum metal, tantalum alloy, or
tungsten heavy alloy’’ in its place.
■ 9. Amend section 225.7018–4 by—
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2); and
■ b. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii) removing
‘‘individual waivers’’ and adding
‘‘individual nonavilability
determinations’’ in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
225.7018–4
Nonavailability determination.
(a) * * *
(2) The supporting documentation for
the determination shall include an
analysis and written certification by the
requiring activity that describes, with
specificity, why alternatives that would
not require a nonavailability
determination are unacceptable. The
template for an individual
nonavailability determination is
available at PGI 225.7018–4(a)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
225.7018–5
10. Amend section 225.7018–5 by
removing ‘‘Magnets and Tungsten’’ and
adding ‘‘Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten’’ in its place.
■
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
11. Amend section 252.225–7052 by—
a. Revising the section heading, clause
title, and clause date;
■ b. In paragraph (a) revising the
definition of ‘‘Covered material’’;
■ c. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
paragraph (b)(4);
■ d. Adding new paragraph (b)(3);
■ e. In paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(B) and
(c)(2)(i) removing ‘‘tungsten heavy
alloy’’ and adding ‘‘tantalum metal,
tantalum alloy, or tungsten heavy alloy’’
in both places; and
■ f. Adding a paragraph heading to
paragraph (d).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
252.225–7052 Restriction on the
Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum,
and Tungsten.
*
*
*
*
*
Restriction on the Acquisition of
Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten (Oct 2020)
(a) * * *
Covered material means—
(1) Samarium-cobalt magnets;
(2) Neodymium-iron-boron magnets;
(3) Tantalum metal and alloys;
(4) Tungsten metal powder; and
(5) Tungsten heavy alloy or any
finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) For production of tantalum metal
and alloys, this restriction includes the
reduction of tantalum chemicals such as
oxides, chlorides, or potassium salts, to
metal powder and all subsequent phases
of production of tantalum metal and
alloys, such as consolidation of metal
powders.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Subcontracts. * * *
[FR Doc. 2020–21121 Filed 9–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Parts 203, 205, 211, 212, 215,
217, 219, 225, 228, 236, 237, 246, 250,
and 252
[Docket DARS–2020–0002]
RIN 0750–AK76
[Amended]
■
■
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Inflation
Adjustment of Acquisition-Related
Thresholds (DFARS Case 2019–D036)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement the inflation
adjustment of acquisition-related dollar
thresholds. A statute requires an
adjustment every five years of
acquisition-related thresholds for
inflation using the Consumer Price
Index for all urban consumers, except
for the Construction Wage Rate
Requirements statute (Davis-Bacon Act),
Service Contract Labor Standards
statute, and trade agreements
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SER3.SGM
29SER3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 29, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61500-61502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21121]
[[Page 61499]]
Vol. 85
Tuesday,
No. 189
September 29, 2020
Part V
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 203, 204, 205, et al.
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations; Interim Rules and Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 85 , No. 189 / Tuesday, September 29, 2020 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 61500]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 212, 225, and 252
[Docket DARS-2020-0035]
RIN 0750-AK94
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on
the Acquisition of Tantalum (DFARS Case 2020-D007)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing an interim rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 that prohibits
the acquisition of tantalum metal and alloys from North Korea, China,
Russia, and Iran.
DATES: Effective October 1, 2020.
Comments on the interim rule should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before November 30, 2020, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2020-D007, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2020-D007'' under the heading ``Enter keyword
or ID'' and selecting ``Search.'' Select ``Comment Now'' and follow the
instructions to submit a comment. Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ``DFARS Case 2020-D007'' on any attached document.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2020-D007 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372-
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is revising the DFARS to implement section 849 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92).
Section 849 adds tantalum to the definition of ``covered materials'' in
10 U.S.C. 2533c. With some exceptions, 10 U.S.C. 2533c prohibits the
acquisition of any covered material melted or produced in any covered
country (North Korea, China, Russia, or Iran), or any end item,
manufactured in any covered country, that contains a covered material.
``Covered material'' also includes samarium-cobalt magnets, neodymium-
iron-boron magnets, tungsten metal powder, and tungsten heavy alloy or
any finished or semi-finished components containing tungsten heavy
alloy.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule adds tantalum to the restriction at DFARS 225.7018, by
amending the title of the section, adding ``tantalum metal and alloys''
to the definition of ``covered material'' at DFARS 225.7018-1, and
including tantalum in the explanation of exceptions at DFARS 225.7018-3
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) (exception for commercially available off-the-
shelf (COTS) items inapplicable to a mill product that has not been
incorporated into an end item, subsystem, assembly, or component) and
(d)(1) (meaning of nonavailabilty of a covered material in the required
form). Although the 10 U.S.C. 2533c provides that the exception to the
restriction on tungsten for COTS items does not apply to a COTS item
that is 50 percent or more tungsten by weight, DoD notes that section
849 does not add a similar condition with regard to tantalum metal and
alloys.
In addition, a new paragraph (c) is added at DFARS 225.7018-2,
Restriction, to explain that the restriction on production of tantalum
metal and alloys, including the reduction of tantalum chemicals such as
oxides, chlorides, or potassium salts, to metal powder and all
subsequent phases of production of tantalum metal and alloys, such as
consolidation of metal powders.
These same changes are also incorporated in the clause at 252.225-
7052, now titled ``Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten,'' and there are conforming changes to the
clause title at DFARS 212.301(f)(ix)(FF) and 225.7018-5. There are no
changes to the procedures for nonavailability determinations.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule amends the clause at DFARS 252.225-7052, Restriction on
Acquisition of Certain High Performance Magnets and Tungsten, to apply
to tantalum. DFARS 252.225-7052 does not apply to acquisitions below
the simplified acquisition threshold, in accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1905, but applies to contracts for the acquisition of commercial items,
except as provided in the statute at 10 U.S.C. 2533c(c)(3).
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater than the simplified acquisition
threshold. It is intended to limit the applicability of laws to such
contracts or subcontracts. 41 U.S.C. 1905 provides that if a provision
of law contains criminal or civil penalties, or if the FAR Council
makes a written determination that it is not in the best interest of
the Federal Government to exempt contracts or subcontracts at or below
the SAT, the law will apply to them. The Principal Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting (DPC), is the appropriate authority to make
comparable determinations for regulations to be published in the DFARS,
which is part of the FAR system of regulations. DoD does not intend to
make that determination. Therefore, this rule will not apply below the
simplified acquisition threshold.
B. Applicability to Contracts for the Acquisition of Commercial Items,
Including COTS Items
10 U.S.C. 2375 governs the applicability of laws to contracts and
subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items, including COTS
items, and is intended to limit the applicability of laws to contracts
and subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items, including
COTS items. 10 U.S.C. 2375 provides that if a provision of law contains
criminal or civil penalties, or if the Under Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition and Sustainment) (USD (A&S)) makes a written determination
that it is not in the best interest of the Federal
[[Page 61501]]
Government to exempt commercial item contracts, the provision of law
will apply to contracts for the acquisition of commercial items. Due to
delegations of authority from USD (A&S), the Principal Director, DPC,
is the appropriate authority to make this determination. DoD has made
that determination to apply this rule to the acquisition of commercial
items, including COTS items, if otherwise applicable.
10 U.S.C. 2533c specifically exempts the acquisition of an end item
that is a COTS item, other than a COTS item that is 50 percent or more
tungsten by weight, or a mill product that has not been incorporated
into an end item, subsystem, assembly, or component. Although 10 U.S.C.
2533c does not refer to 10 U.S.C. 2375 and does not provide that,
notwithstanding that statute, it shall be applicable to contracts for
the procurement of commercial items, it is the clear intent of 10
U.S.C. 2533c to cover commercial items other than those specifically
exempted. Therefore, DoD has signed a determination of applicability to
acquisitions of commercial items, except as exempted in the statute.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13771, because
this rule is issued with respect to a national security function of the
United States.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this interim rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has been
performed and is summarized as follows:
This rule is required to implement section 849 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020.
The objective of the rule is to prohibit acquisition of tantalum
metal and alloys from North Korea, China, Russia, or Iran.
Based on Federal Procurement Data System data for FY 2017, DoD
awarded in the United States 13,400 contracts that exceeded $250,000
and were for the acquisition of manufactured end products, excluding
those categories that could not include tantalum (such as clothing and
fabrics, books, or lumber products). These contracts were awarded to
5,073 unique entities, of which 3,074 were small entities. It is not
known what percentage of these awards involved tantalum, or what lesser
percentage might involve tantalum from China, North Korea, Russia, or
Iran.
There are no projected reporting or recordkeeping requirements.
However, there may be compliance costs to track the origin of covered
materials.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
DoD is exempting acquisitions equal to or less than the simplified
acquisition threshold in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1905. DoD was unable
to identify any other alternatives that would reduce burden on small
businesses and still meet the objectives of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2020-D007), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
VIII. Determination To Issue an Interim Rule
A determination has been made under the authority of the Secretary
of Defense that urgent and compelling reasons exist to promulgate this
interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment. Section 849
adds tantalum to the other covered materials prohibited by 10 U.S.C.
2533c if melted or produced in any covered country or any end item that
contains a covered material manufactured in any covered country.
Covered countries are North Korea, China, Russia, and Iran.
Implementation of this prohibition is urgent, because the law was
effective upon enactment (December 2019) and decreasing our dependence
on covered materials that originate in covered countries is a matter of
national security. It is a matter of national security to reduce U.S.
dependence on the covered countries specified in section 849, because
tantalum is an important element in the supply chain for production of
both U.S. military systems, and nonmilitary systems that DoD uses. A
shortage of supply of these covered materials would therefore hinder
maintenance and replacement of many DoD military systems, and would
also have a negative impact on the broader industrial base upon which
DoD depends. Restricting acquisition from China and the other covered
countries will promote growth in domestic capability and reduce
dependence on foreign sources that are not our allies.
However, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707 and FAR 1.501-3(b), DoD will
consider public comments received in response to this interim rule in
the formation of the final rule.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 212, 225, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
0
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 212, 225, and 252 are amended as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 212--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
0
2. Amend section 212.301 by revising paragraph (f)(ix)(FF) to read as
follows:
212.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial items.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(ix) * * *
(FF) Use the clause at 252.225-7052, Restriction on the Acquisition
of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten, as prescribed in 225.7018-
5.
* * * * *
PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
0
3. Amend section 225.7002-2 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
[[Page 61502]]
225.7002-2 Exceptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) The supporting documentation for the determination shall
include an analysis and written certification by the requiring
activity, with specificity, why alternatives that would not require a
domestic nonavailability determination are unacceptable.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend section 225.7003-3 by revising paragraph (b)(5)(i) to read as
follows:
225.7003-3 Exceptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) The Secretary of the military department concerned is
authorized, without power of redelegation, to make a domestic
nonavailability determination that applies to only one contract. The
supporting documentation for the determination shall include an
analysis and written documentation by the requiring activity, with
specificity, why alternatives that would not require a domestic
nonavailability determination are unacceptable.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise the section 225.7018 heading to read as follows:
225.7018 Restriction on acquisition of certain magnets, tantalum, and
tungsten.
* * * * *
0
6. In section 225.7018-1 revise the definition of ``Covered material''
to read as follows:
225.7018-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Covered material means--
(1) Samarium-cobalt magnets;
(2) Neodymium-iron-boron magnets;
(3) Tantalum metal and alloys;
(4) Tungsten metal powder; and
(5) Tungsten heavy alloy or any finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend 225.7018-2 by--
0
a. Redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (d); and
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (c).
The addition reads as follows:
225.7018-2 Restriction.
* * * * *
(c) For production of tantalum metal and alloys, this restriction
includes the reduction of tantalum chemicals such as oxides, chlorides,
or potassium salts, to metal powder and all subsequent phases of
production of tantalum metal and alloys, such as consolidation of metal
powders.
* * * * *
225.7018-3 [Amended]
0
8. Amend section 225.7018-3 by--
0
a. In (c)(1)(ii) removing ``tungsten heavy alloy mill product'' and
adding ``tantalum metal, tantalum alloy, or tungsten heavy alloy mill
product'' in its place;
0
b. In (c)(2) removing ``PGI 225.7018-3(c)(1)(ii)'' and adding ``PGI
225.7018-3(c)(2)'' in its place;
0
c. In paragraph (d) introductory text removing ``concerned,'' and
adding ``concerned, as specified in 225.7018-4,'' in its place; and
0
d. In paragraph (d)(1) removing ``tungsten heavy alloy'' and adding
``tantalum metal, tantalum alloy, or tungsten heavy alloy'' in its
place.
0
9. Amend section 225.7018-4 by--
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2); and
0
b. In paragraph (a)(3)(ii) removing ``individual waivers'' and adding
``individual nonavilability determinations'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
225.7018-4 Nonavailability determination.
(a) * * *
(2) The supporting documentation for the determination shall
include an analysis and written certification by the requiring activity
that describes, with specificity, why alternatives that would not
require a nonavailability determination are unacceptable. The template
for an individual nonavailability determination is available at PGI
225.7018-4(a)(2).
* * * * *
225.7018-5 [Amended]
0
10. Amend section 225.7018-5 by removing ``Magnets and Tungsten'' and
adding ``Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten'' in its place.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
11. Amend section 252.225-7052 by--
0
a. Revising the section heading, clause title, and clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a) revising the definition of ``Covered material'';
0
c. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(4);
0
d. Adding new paragraph (b)(3);
0
e. In paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(B) and (c)(2)(i) removing ``tungsten heavy
alloy'' and adding ``tantalum metal, tantalum alloy, or tungsten heavy
alloy'' in both places; and
0
f. Adding a paragraph heading to paragraph (d).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
252.225-7052 Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets,
Tantalum, and Tungsten.
* * * * *
Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and
Tungsten (Oct 2020)
(a) * * *
Covered material means--
(1) Samarium-cobalt magnets;
(2) Neodymium-iron-boron magnets;
(3) Tantalum metal and alloys;
(4) Tungsten metal powder; and
(5) Tungsten heavy alloy or any finished or semi-finished component
containing tungsten heavy alloy.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) For production of tantalum metal and alloys, this restriction
includes the reduction of tantalum chemicals such as oxides, chlorides,
or potassium salts, to metal powder and all subsequent phases of
production of tantalum metal and alloys, such as consolidation of metal
powders.
* * * * *
(d) Subcontracts. * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-21121 Filed 9-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P