Waivers and Alternative Requirements for Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Grantees, 60821-60828 [2020-21359]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
60821
Community
Community map repository address
Unincorporated Areas of Charleston County ...........................................
Charleston County Lonnie Hamilton, III Public Services Building, Building Inspection Services Department, 4045 Bridge View Drive, Suite
311, North Charleston, SC 29405.
Fort Bend County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
Docket Nos.: FEMA–B–1753; FEMA B–1944
City of Fulshear ........................................................................................
City of Houston .........................................................................................
City of Simonton .......................................................................................
City of Weston Lakes ...............................................................................
Unincorporated Areas of Fort Bend County .............................................
Village of Fairchilds ..................................................................................
Village of Pleak .........................................................................................
City Hall, 30603 FM 1093, Fulshear, TX 77441.
Public Works and Engineering Department—Floodplain Management
Office, 1002 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor, Houston, TX 77002.
City Hall, 35011 FM 1093, Simonton, TX 77476.
Weston Lakes City Hall, 8045 FM 359, Suite 200, Fulshear, TX 77441.
Fort Bend County Drainage District, 1124 Blume Road, Rosenberg, TX
77471.
Fairchilds Village Map Repository, Fairchild Volunteer Fire Department,
8715 Fairchild Road, Richmond, TX 77469.
Pleak Village Hall, 6621 FM 2218 South, Richmond, TX 77469.
Llano County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
Docket Nos.: FEMA B–1523, FEMA B–1923
City of Llano .............................................................................................
Unincorporated Areas of Llano County ....................................................
Code Enforcement Department, 301 West Main Street, 2nd Floor,
Llano, TX 78643
Llano County Permitting and Emergency Management, 100 West
Sandstone Street, Suite 200A, Llano, TX 78643.
Frederick County, Virginia and Incorporated Areas
Docket No.: FEMA–B–1817 and B–1955
Town of Middletown .................................................................................
Town of Stephens City .............................................................................
Unincorporated Areas of Frederick County ..............................................
Town Office, 7875 Church Street, Middletown, VA 22645.
Town Office, 1033 Locust Street, Stephens City, VA 22655.
Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Suite
202, Winchester, VA 22601.
Independent City of Winchester, Virginia
Docket No.: FEMA–B–1817 and B–1955
City of Winchester ....................................................................................
[FR Doc. 2020–21305 Filed 9–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–6219–N–01]
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
for Community Development Block
Grant Disaster Recovery Grantees
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice governs
Community Development Block Grant
disaster recovery (CDBG–DR) funds
awarded under several appropriations.
Specifically, this notice provides
waivers and establishes alternative
requirements for certain grantees that
have submitted waiver requests for
grants provided pursuant to Public
Laws. This notice also provides further
clarification on the waiver and
alternative requirement for use of a
FEMA-approved alternative to the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
Rouss City Hall, 15 North Cameron Street, Winchester, VA 22601.
CDBG–DR elevation requirement for
nonresidential structures. Additionally,
this notice revises action plan
substantial amendment requirements for
CDBG-Mitigation (CDBG–MIT) grants.
DATES: Applicability Date: October 5,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessie Handforth Kome, Director, Office
of Block Grant Assistance, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room
7282, Washington, DC 20410, telephone
number 202–708–3587. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339. Facsimile inquiries may be sent to
Ms. Kome at 202–708–0033. (Except for
the‘‘800’’ number, these telephone
numbers are not toll-free.) Email
inquiries may be sent to disaster_
recovery@hud.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Law 113–2 Waivers and
Alternative Requirements
II. Public Law 114–113, 114–223, 114–254,
115–31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–254, and
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
116–20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
III. Public Law 115–31, 115–56, 115–123,
115–254, and 116–20 Waivers and
Alternative Requirements
IV. Public Law 115–56 and 115–123
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
V. Public Law 115–123 Waivers and
Alternative Requirements
VI. Public Law 115–56, 115–123, and 116–20
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
VII. Public Law 115–254 and 116–20
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
VIII. Finding of No Significant Impact
I. Public Law 113–2 Waivers and
Alternative Requirements
Authorizing Specific Housing Activities
for the ‘‘Reshaping the Urban Delta’’
Initiative (City of New Orleans Only)
The Department awarded
$141,260,569 in Community
Development Block Grant National
Disaster Resilience (CDBG–NDR) funds
made available under Public Law 113–
2 to the City of New Orleans to
implement activities described in the
city’s application, which the city
collectively refers to as the ‘‘Reshaping
the Urban Delta’’ initiative. This section
of the notice specifies waivers and
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
60822
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
alternative requirements and modifies
requirements for CDBG–NDR funds
awarded to the City of New Orleans
under Public Law 113–2, for necessary
expenses related to disaster relief, longterm recovery, restoration of
infrastructure and housing, and
economic revitalization.
Public Law 113–2 authorizes the
Secretary to waive or specify alternative
requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary
administers in connection with HUD’s
obligation or use by the recipient of
these funds (except for requirements
related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment). Regulatory waiver
authority is also provided by 24 CFR
5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. The waiver
and alternative requirement provided in
this section is in response to a request
by the City of New Orleans explaining
why there is good cause for the waiver
and is based upon a determination by
the Secretary that good cause exists and
that the waiver or alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the
overall purposes of title I of the Housing
and Community Development Act of
1974 (HCDA).
The City of New Orleans will use its
CDBG–NDR funds to create the city’s
first Resilience District in the Gentilly
neighborhood, a low- and moderateincome community with a particularly
high risk of flooding. The city is
requesting a waiver to establish an
alternative requirement to create a
CDBG-eligible activity that comprises all
of the activities proposed in the
community adaptation component of
the Resilience District initiative.
The city’s initiative is comprised of
four components: (1) Urban water:
consisting of public improvements to
improve storm water management; (2)
reliable energy and smart systems: to
enhance the reliability of the electrical
grid and energy asset monitoring; (3)
coastal restoration: A series of coastal
protection and restoration projects to
mitigate flooding impacts; and (4)
community adaptation: to support
improvements to private residential
properties in the neighborhood as a
means of improving storm water
management.
Certain activities under the
community adaptation component, as
proposed by the City, are not CDBGeligible as housing rehabilitation
activities as they do not involve the
rehabilitation of the housing structure
itself. Accordingly, the Department is
granting a waiver and establishing an
alternative requirement to create a
CDBG-eligible activity that comprises all
of the activities proposed for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
improvements to residential properties
under the community adaptation
component of the initiative. In its
approved CDBG–NDR action plan, the
city describes activities that will be
eligible for funding and that entail
improvements to private residential
properties. These improvements may
include the installation of permeable
driveways, rain cisterns, bioswales and
other site and exterior adaptations and
resilience retrofits which are on the
property of homeowners, but generally
do not involve physical improvements
to the housing unit.
To clarify the eligibility of these
activities as outlined in the city’s
approved CDBG–NDR application and
action plan, the Department is
approving a waiver and alternative
requirement to expand section 105(a)(4)
of the HCDA only to the extent
necessary to create a new eligible
activity for the city’s CDBG–NDR grant.
This new eligible activity shall be
comprised of activities described in its
CDBG–NDR application and approved
action plan for residential
improvements under the community
adaptation portion of the initiative,
through installation of improvements
and implementation of stormwater
management practices on residential
properties for the purpose of enhancing
the resilience of the residential building
and preventing neighborhood flooding.
II. Public Law 114–113, 114–223, 114–
254, 115–31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–254,
and 116–20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
This section of the notice specifies
waivers and alternative requirements
and modifies requirements for CDBG–
DR funds awarded to grantees that
received an allocation for a 2015, 2016,
2017, 2018, or 2019 major disaster
under Public Laws 114–113, 114–223,
114–254, 115–31, 115–56, 115–123,
115–254, and 116–20 for necessary
expenses related to disaster relief, longterm recovery, restoration of
infrastructure and housing, economic
revitalization, and mitigation. Public
Laws 114–113, 114–223, 114–254, 115–
31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–254, and 116–
20 authorize the Secretary to waive or
specify alternative requirements for any
provision of any statute or regulation
that the Secretary administers in
connection with HUD’s obligation or
use by the recipient of these funds
(except for requirements related to fair
housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment).
Regulatory waiver authority is also
provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and
570.5. As required by Public Laws 114–
113, 114–223, 114–254, 115–31, 115–56,
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
115–123, 115–254, and 116–20 the
waivers and alternative requirements
provided in this paragraph are based
upon a determination by the Secretary
that good cause exists and that the
waivers or alternative requirements are
not inconsistent with the overall
purposes of title I of the HCDA.
II.A. Waiver and Alternative
Requirement for Use of FEMA-Approved
Elevation Standards for Nonresidential
Structures
Grantees that received an allocation
for a 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, or 2019
major disaster under Public Laws 114–
113, 114–223, 114–254, 115–31, 115–56,
115–123, 115–254, and 116–20 are
subject to different federal requirements
established by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and HUD,
with respect to the elevation of
nonresidential structures in a
floodplain. Grantees that have received
an allocation of CDBG–MIT funds
pursuant to Public Law 115–123 are also
subject to these different federal
requirements.
Specifically, CDBG–DR and CDBG–
MIT grantees under these
appropriations and corresponding
Federal Register notices are required to
elevate, or floodproof in accordance
with FEMA floodproofing standards at
44 CFR 60.3(c)(3)(ii) or a successor
standard, nonresidential structures up
to at least two feet above the 100-year
(or 1 percent annual chance floodplain),
i.e. two feet above the base flood
elevation. Critical Actions, as defined at
24 CFR 55.2(b)(3), within the 0.2
percent annual chance floodplain (i.e.,
500-year floodplain), must be elevated
or floodproofed (in accordance with
FEMA standards) to the higher of 0.2
percent annual floodplain flood
elevation or three feet above the 1
percent annual chance floodplain (i.e.,
100-year floodplain). Under current
CDBG–DR and CDBG–MIT requirements
for these grantees, if the 500-year
floodplain or elevation standard is
unavailable, and the Critical Action is in
the 100-year floodplain, then the
structure must be elevated or
floodproofed to at least three feet above
the 100-year floodplain elevation.
CDBG–DR funds may be used to meet
the non-federal match requirements for
programs funded by FEMA. CDBG–DR
grantees using FEMA and CDBG–DR
funds to fund the same activity,
however, have encountered challenges
in certain circumstances in reconciling
CDBG–DR elevation requirements with
those established by FEMA. CDBG–MIT
grantees will encounter similar
challenges in the implementation of
projects when using FEMA funds
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
together with CDBG–MIT funds. FEMA
regulations at 44 CFR 9.11(d)(3)(i) and
(ii) prohibit new construction or
substantial improvements to a structure
unless the lowest floor of the structure
is at or above the level of the base flood
and for critical actions, at or above the
level of the 500-year flood, while 44
CFR 9.11(d)(3)(iii) allows for an
alternative to elevation to the 100- or
500-year flood level, subject to FEMA
approval, which would provide for
improvements that would ensure the
substantial impermeability of the
structure below flood level.
As programs funded by FEMA are
pursuant to an annual appropriation,
FEMA funded projects generally
commence soon after a disaster and well
in advance of the availability of CDBG–
DR funds. When CDBG–DR funds are
used as match for a FEMA project that
is underway, the alignment of HUD’s
elevation standards with any alternative
standard allowed by FEMA may not be
feasible and may not be cost reasonable.
Accordingly, the Department is
waiving the elevation requirements
applicable under the Federal Register
notices for the referenced
appropriations, and establishing an
alternative requirement for the use of an
alternative, FEMA-approved flood
standard when each of the following
conditions is in place: (i) CDBG–DR or
CDBG–MIT funds are used as the nonfederal match for FEMA assistance; (ii)
the FEMA-assisted activity, for which
CDBG–DR or CDBG–MIT funds will be
used as match, commenced prior to
HUD’s obligation of CDBG–MIT or
CDBG–DR funds to the grantee; and (iii)
the grantee has determined and
demonstrated with records in the
activity file that implementation costs of
the required CDBG–DR elevation or
flood proofing up to two feet is not
reasonable as that term is defined in the
applicable cost principles at 2 CFR
200.404. HUD and FEMA will issue
joint guidance to assist grantees in the
compliant implementation of this
provision and with other requirements
that apply when CDBG–DR or CDBG–
MIT funds are used to meet the nonfederal match requirements of certain
FEMA programs.
II.B. Changes to the DOB
Implementation Notice for Grantees
That Received a CDBG–DR Allocation
for a 2015, 2016, or 2017 Disaster Event
On June 20, 2019, the Department
published a Federal Register notice,
‘‘Updates to Duplication of Benefits
Requirements Under the Stafford Act for
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Disaster Recovery Grantees,’’
(84 FR 28836) (‘‘2019 DOB Notice’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
This notice reflects the requirements of
recent CDBG–DR supplemental
appropriations acts and amendments to
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act. HUD’s
corresponding DOB implementation
notice, ‘‘Applicability of Updates to
Duplication of Benefits Requirements
Under the Stafford Act for Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Disaster Recovery Grantees,’’ (84 FR
28848) (‘‘DOB Implementation Notice’’)
makes conforming amendments to other
notices governing CDBG–DR grants
received in response to a disaster
declared between January 1, 2015 and
December 31, 2017. The DOB
Implementation Notice advises these
grantees of the applicability of the 2019
DOB Notice to their existing CDBG–DR
activities. In the DOB Implementation
Notice, the Department imposed the
requirements of the 2019 DOB Notice
for: (a) New programs and activities
added to the action plan after the date
of the implementation notice; and (b)
existing programs and activities, to the
extent that the grantee amends its action
plan to change its treatment of loans in
accordance with the 2019 DOB Notice.
The Department recognizes that not
all grantees include this level of
specificity in their action plan and is
broadening the applicability of the 2019
DOB Notice to include existing
programs and activities, to the extent
that the grantee amends its action plan
or its policies and procedures to change
the treatment of loans in accordance
with the 2019 DOB Notice. Therefore,
this notice deletes and replaces the first
bullet of the third paragraph of section
III of the DOB Implementation Notice,
which follows the sentence: ‘‘This
notice makes the following changes to
the Prior Notices.’’ The first bullet in the
third paragraph of section III is revised
to read:
• ‘‘The 2019 DOB Notice shall
supersede the 2011 DOB notice for any
new activities submitted to HUD in an
action plan or action plan amendment
on or after the effective date of this
notice, and for existing programs and
activities, to the extent that the grantee
amends its action plan or its policies
and procedures to change the treatment
of loans in accordance with the 2019
DOB Notice. If a grantee opts to revise
its policies and procedures for one or
more existing programs that were
included in an action plan for disaster
recovery before the effective date of this
notice, the grantee must amend its
action plan to reflect any resulting
changes in benefits to program
participants or to correct any resulting
inconsistencies with duplication of
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60823
benefits policies described in the action
plan.’’
II.C. Use of the ‘‘Upper Quartile’’ or
‘‘Exception Criteria’’ for Low- and
Moderate-Income Area Benefit Activities
(State of Texas only)
The State of Texas was awarded a
total of $74,568,000 from Public Laws
114–113 and 115–31 for recovery from
2015 disasters; a total of $238,895,000
from Public Laws 114–223, 114–254,
and 115–31 for recovery from 2016
disasters; a total of $5,734,190,000 from
Public Laws 115–56, 115–123, and 115–
31 for recovery from Hurricane Harvey
disaster; a total of $72,913,000 from
Public Laws 115–254 and 116–20 for
recovery from 2018 disasters; and a total
of $212,741,000 from Public Law 116–
20 for recovery from 2019 disasters.
HUD has also awarded $4,297,189,000
of CDBG–MIT funds to the State under
Public Law 115–123 for mitigation
activities. This section of the notice
specifies waivers and alternative
requirements and modifies requirements
for CDBG–DR and CDBG–MIT funds
awarded to the State of Texas under
Public Laws 114–113, 114–223, 114–
254, 115–31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–254,
and 116–20 for necessary expenses
related to disaster relief, long-term
recovery, restoration of infrastructure
and housing, economic revitalization,
and mitigation.
The State is seeking a waiver and
alternative requirement to apply
exception criteria in determining that an
activity qualifies as meeting the lowand moderate-income (LMI) area benefit
national objective when the area
contains fewer than 51 percent of LMI
persons. This waiver and alternative
requirement will allow the State to use
the ‘‘upper quartile’’ or ‘‘exception
criteria’’ for LMI area benefit activities
for non-entitlement counties impacted
by the 2015 and 2016 floods, as well as
areas impacted by Hurricane Harvey.
Section 105(c)(2)(A) of the HCDA
generally provides that assisted
activities designed to serve an area
generally and clearly designed to meet
identified needs of LMI persons in the
area, shall be considered to principally
benefit persons of low- and moderateincome if the area served in a
metropolitan city or urban county is
within the highest quartile of all areas
within the jurisdiction of such city or
county in terms of the degree of
concentration of persons of low- and
moderate-income. In some cases, HUD
permits an exception to the requirement
that at least 51 percent of the residents
of the area qualify as LMI, when certain
requirements are met.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
60824
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
The exception provided by HUD
under this waiver and alternative
requirement is typically applied to those
entitlement communities that have few,
if any, areas within their jurisdiction
that have 51 percent or more of LMI
residents. Under the exception,
communities are allowed to use a
percentage that is less than 51 percent
to qualify activities under the LMI area
benefit national objective criteria. In
these communities, activities must serve
an area that contains a percentage of
LMI residents that is within the upper
quartile of all census-block groups
within its jurisdiction in terms of the
degree of concentration of LMI
residents. HUD assesses each grantee’s
census-block groups to determine
whether a grantee qualifies to use this
exception and identifies the alternative
percentage the grantee may use instead
of 51 percent for the purpose of
qualifying activities under the LMI area
benefit national objective criteria. HUD
determines the lowest proportion a
grantee may use to qualify an area for
this purpose and advises the grantee
accordingly. CDBG–DR grantees are
required to use the most recent data
available in implementing the exception
criteria. The ‘‘exception criteria’’ applies
to disaster recovery activities funded by
a State grantee pursuant to the
applicable Federal Register notices in
jurisdictions covered by such criteria,
including jurisdictions that receive
CDBG–DR funds from a State.
The State of Texas is requesting this
waiver and alternative requirement for
only those non-entitlement counties in
which fewer than one quarter of the
block groups within each jurisdiction
have 51 percent or more of LMI
residents. When the ‘‘upper quartile’’ or
‘‘exception criteria’’ methodology is
applied to block groups within those
counties that do not fall within an
entitlement community, fewer than one
quarter of the populated-block groups in
those counties contain 51 percent or
more of LMI persons.
To enable the State to undertake the
activities it has determined to be most
critical for its recovery, and to ensure
that LMI persons are sufficiently served
and assisted, HUD is waiving section
105(c)(2)(A) of the HCDA and
establishing an alternative requirement
to authorize the State to use the ‘‘upper
quartile’’ or ‘‘exception criteria’’ for LMI
area benefit activities for nonentitlement counties for any current or
future grants made under Public Laws
114–113, 114–223, 114–254, 115–31,
115–56, 115–123, 115–254, and 116–20.
The non-entitlement counties that
qualify under this alternative
requirement, and the calculated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
‘‘exception percentages’’ for each, will
be posted in tables on the HUD website.
These tables will be updated annually
by HUD. The ‘‘exception percentage’’ for
each of the counties that qualify will
represent the new threshold for
qualifying block groups in those
counties under the LMI area benefit
national objective criteria. In granting
this flexibility to the State of Texas, the
Department will not consider any
request to lower the State’s
requirements in regard to the overall
percentage of funds that must be used
for activities that benefit low- and
moderate-income persons for its CDBG–
DR funds for 2015 to 2019 disasters, or
its CDBG–MIT funds.
III. Public Law 115–31, 115–56, 115–
123, 115–254, and 116–20 Waivers
and Alternative Requirements
Use of Standardized Area Median
Income (State of Texas Only)
The Department has awarded
$5,734,190,000 in CDBG–DR funds to
the State of Texas for recovery from
Hurricane Harvey from Public Laws
115–56, 115–123, and 115–31. HUD has
also awarded $4,297,189,000 of CDBG–
MIT funds to the State under Public
Law 115–123 for mitigation activities.
Additionally, the State was awarded a
total of $72,913,000 from Public Laws
115–254 and 116–20 for recovery from
2018 disasters, and a total of
$212,741,000 from Public Law 116–20
for recovery from 2019 disasters. This
section of the notice specifies waivers
and alternative requirements and
modifies requirements for CDBG–DR
and CDBG–MIT funds awarded to the
State of Texas under Public Laws 115–
31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–254, and 116–
20 for necessary expenses related to
disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and
housing, economic revitalization, and
mitigation.
Public Laws 115–31, 115–56, 115–
123, 115–254, and 116–20 authorize the
Secretary to waive or specify alternative
requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary
administers in connection with HUD’s
obligation or use by the recipient of
these funds (except for requirements
related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment). Regulatory waiver
authority is also provided by 24 CFR
5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. The waiver
and alternative requirement provided in
this paragraph is in response to a
request by the State of Texas explaining
why there is good cause for the waiver
and based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists and that
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the waiver or alternative requirement is
not inconsistent with the overall
purposes of title I of the HCDA.
The State is asking to modify
requirements and coordinate recovery
efforts across multiple CDBG–DR and
CDBG–MIT allocations under Public
Laws 115–31, 115–56, 115–123, 115–
254, and 116–20 through use of a
standardized area median income for
purposes of meeting the low- and
moderate-income national objective
criteria.
42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) defines the
terms ‘‘persons of low and moderate
income’’ and ‘‘low- and moderateincome persons’’ to mean families and
individuals whose incomes do not
exceed 80 percent of the median income
of the area involved, as determined by
the Secretary with adjustments for
smaller and larger families.
The State has presented data
indicating a large range in area median
income (AMI) in the Harvey-impacted
areas of the State, ranging from $40,200
to $91,100 for a family of four. This
statewide variation can have
unintended consequences for
participation in CDBG–DR funded
activities, for example, the State affirms
that ‘‘while the cost of living varies
between communities throughout the
state, the cost to rebuild or reconstruct
a new home does not vary on the order
of magnitude evidenced by the disparity
in AMI across Texas counties.’’ As the
State seeks to primarily serve LMI
individuals and areas in the disasterimpacted counties, the variation
between county-level AMI limits the
participation of families and individuals
in the State’s recovery programs in those
counties with very low AMI, because
these families and individuals have
incomes that are at or above the 80
percent of AMI in the respective county
even though their incomes are less than
80 percent of the statewide median
income.
Based on the above circumstance, the
State of Texas has requested a waiver
and alternative requirement to allow the
State to make LMI determinations across
the most impacted and distressed (MID)
areas for 2017, 2018, and 2019 disasters
based on a determination that the
incomes of families and individuals are
below 80 percent of statewide median
income. In its request, the State
emphasizes the importance of providing
assistance to the households most in
need through a housing rehabilitation
and reconstruction program, through
buyouts and acquisitions that remove
homes from harms’ way, and through
other flood drainage infrastructure
activities.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
In the circumstances outlined in the
State’s request, the broadening of 42
U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) is warranted given
the variance in AMIs across the affected
counties. Thus, the Department finds
that good causes exists and waives 42
U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) to the extent
necessary to allow the Secretary to
enable the State of Texas to make LMI
determinations based on statewide
median income instead of otherwise
applicable AMI when local AMI is
below statewide median income data (as
published by HUD annually with
adjustments for smaller and larger
families). In areas where this waiver and
alternative requirement permits the
State to use statewide median income
for LMI determinations, the State may
also use statewide median income data
(as published by HUD annually with
adjustments for smaller and larger
families) to calculate 120 percent of
statewide median income, and to use
120 percent of statewide median income
as a substitute for 120 percent of AMI.
This will allow the State of Texas to
standardize the median income for the
counties impacted by Hurricane Harvey,
and 2018 and 2019 disasters that have
an AMI below the statewide median
income. This alternative requirement
also includes the MID areas identified
by the State and HUD for its CDBG–MIT
funds. However, if those counties have
an AMI above the statewide median
income, LMI eligibility will continue to
be defined by the county’s higher AMI
standard.
This waiver and alternative
requirement is provided for the
purposes of assisting the most at-risk
populations who are in need of recovery
assistance in each of the MID areas
identified by HUD and the State for
2017, 2018, 2019 disasters, and its
CDBG–MIT funds. In granting this
flexibility to the State of Texas, the
Department will not consider any
request to lower the State’s requirement
in regard to the overall percentage of
funds that must be used for activities
that benefit low- and moderate-income
persons for its CDBG–DR funds for
2017, 2018, or 2019 disasters or its
CDBG–MIT funds.
IV. Public Law 115–56 and 115–123
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
Base Flood Elevation Requirement and
Reimbursement in the ‘‘Homeowner
Reimbursement Program’’ (State of
Texas Only)
The Department awarded
$5,024,215,000 under Public Law 115–
56 and $652,175,000 under Public Law
115–123 to the State of Texas for
recovery from Hurricane Harvey for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
necessary expenses related to disaster
relief, long term recovery, restoration of
infrastructure and housing, economic
revitalization, and mitigation due to a
qualified disaster. This section of the
notice specifies waivers and alternative
requirements and modifies requirements
for CDBG–DR funds awarded to the
State of Texas under Public Laws 115–
56 and 115–123.
Public Law 115–56 and 115–123
authorize the Secretary to waive or
specify alternative requirements for any
provision of any statute or regulation
that the Secretary administers in
connection with HUD’s obligation or
use by the recipient of these funds
(except for requirements related to fair
housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment).
Regulatory waiver authority is also
provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and
570.5. The State of Texas has submitted
a request for the waiver in this section
with an explanation of why the waiver
is required to facilitate the use of the
funds. The waiver and alternative
requirement provided in this section is
based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists, and
that the waiver and alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the
overall purposes of title I of the HCDA.
The State is implementing a
Homeowner Reimbursement Program
designed to assist homeowners in
recovering up to $50,000 in out-ofpocket expenses paid by the homeowner
for residential rehabilitation due to
Hurricane Harvey. To be eligible for this
program, the State’s rules require that
the home must be the owner’s primary
residence and the eligible repairs must
have been completed prior to the
program’s application launch date of
February 28, 2019. Because the State’s
Hurricane Harvey response and
recovery efforts commenced on the date
of the disaster and before CDBG–DR
assistance was available, some
homeowners participating in the State’s
Homeowner Reimbursement Program
may have repaired their homes to meet
program requirements of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and local permitting
requirements, rather than the CDBG–DR
program requirements.
Some homeowners seeking assistance
from the State’s program elevated homes
to meet the requirements of their
municipalities but did not elevate their
homes to meet HUD’s requirement that
residential structures be elevated to at
least 2 feet above base flood elevation as
required by the Federal Register notice
governing the use of these funds.
Because the homeowners did not
anticipate receiving federal assistance,
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60825
the State is requesting a waiver to
reimburse homeowners that are
otherwise eligible for assistance but
elevated their homes to comply with the
local jurisdiction’s freeboard
requirements, which may be lower than
the HUD-mandated standard to elevate
to base flood elevation plus 2 feet.
HUD’s February 9, 2018 notice
provides that: ‘‘All structures, defined at
44 CFR 59.1, designed principally for
residential use and located in the 100year (or 1 percent annual chance)
floodplain that receive assistance for
new construction, repair of substantial
damage, or substantial improvement, as
defined at 24 CFR 55.2(b)(10), must be
elevated with the lowest floor, including
the basement, at least two feet above the
base flood elevation (83 FR 5861).’’
HUD finds that good cause exists to
waive the language in the Federal
Register notice requiring the 2 feet
above base flood elevation for
homeowners seeking reimbursement in
the State’s Homeowner Reimbursement
Program and to establish an alternative
requirement to permit the State to
reimburse those homeowners for costs
of rehabilitation completed before the
program’s application launch date of
February 28, 2019, subject to the
following requirements:
• The homeowner’s reimbursed
rehabilitation costs complied with the
elevation requirement of the local
jurisdiction.
• The activity is eligible under title I
of the HCDA or by waiver and is
consistent with CPD–15–07: Guidance
for Charging Pre-Application Costs of
Homeowners, Businesses, and Other
Qualifying Entities to CDBG Disaster
Recovery Grants.
• The activity meets a CDBG–DR
national objective and otherwise
complies with CDBG–DR requirements
not waived by this section.
• The State uses not less than 70
percent of the aggregate CDBG–DR grant
for activities that benefit low- and
moderate-income persons.
The State must ensure that all costs
charged to this program and to the
CDBG–DR grant are necessary and
reasonable expenses related to disaster
recovery.
V. Public Law 115–123 Waivers and
Alternative Requirements
Substantial Action Plan Amendment
Requirements for CDBG–MIT Grants
Public Law 115–123 authorizes the
Secretary to waive or specify alternative
requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary
administers in connection with HUD’s
obligation or use by the recipient of
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
60826
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
these funds (except for requirements
related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment). Regulatory waiver
authority is also provided by 24 CFR
5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. As required by
Public Laws 115–123, the waiver and
alternative requirement provided in this
paragraph is based upon a
determination by the Secretary that
good cause exists, and that the waiver
or alternative requirement is not
inconsistent with the overall purposes
of title I of the HCDA.
The Department’s August 30, 2019
Federal Register notice (84 FR 45838)
included requirements for CDBG–MIT
grantees that must be followed for
substantial amendments to a CDBG–MIT
action plan. Section V.A.2.g.(1) of the
August 30, 2019 notice requires grantees
to follow the same procedures for a
substantial action plan amendment as
are required for the preparation and
submission of the initial CDBG–MIT
action plan, including multiple public
hearings in various geographic
locations, except that that a substantial
action plan amendment shall require a
30-day public comment period. HUD,
however, has generally not established a
public hearing requirement for
substantial amendments to a grantee’s
action plan for CDBG–DR grants. This
alternative requirement will better align
CDBG–MIT substantial amendment
requirements with those established for
CDBG–DR substantial amendments,
with the addition of continued
engagement of the public through a 30day public comment period and through
the citizen advisory committees
required by the CDBG–MIT notice. For
these reasons, HUD is replacing V.A.2.g.
subparagraph (1) of the August 30, 2019
notice with the following:
(1) Substantial amendment. The grantee
must provide a 30-day public comment
period and reasonable method(s) (including
electronic submission) for receiving
comments on substantial amendments. In its
action plan, each grantee must specify
criteria for determining what changes in the
grantee’s plan constitute a substantial
amendment to the plan. At a minimum, the
following modifications will constitute a
substantial amendment: The addition of a
CDBG–MIT Covered Project; a change in
program benefit or eligibility criteria; the
addition or deletion of an activity; or the
allocation or reallocation of a monetary
threshold specified by the grantee in its
action plan. The grantee may substantially
amend the action plan if it follows the same
procedures required for CDBG– MIT funds
for the preparation and submission of an
action plan, provided, however, that a
substantial action plan amendment shall
require a 30-day public comment period and
is not subject to the public hearing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements in section V.A.3.a. of this
notice.
VI. Public Law 115–56, 115–123, and
116–20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
Use of Standardized Area Medium
Income (U.S. Virgin Islands Only)
Public Laws 115–56, 115–123, and
116–20 authorize the Secretary to waive
or specify alternative requirements for
any provision of any statute or
regulation that the Secretary administers
in connection with HUD’s obligation or
use by the recipient of these funds
(except for requirements related to fair
housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment).
Waivers and alternative requirements
are based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists, and
that the waiver or alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the
overall purposes of title I of the HCDA.
Regulatory waiver authority is also
provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and
570.5. For the waiver and alternative
requirement described in this section of
the notice, the Secretary has determined
that good cause exists and that the
waiver and alternative requirement is
not inconsistent with the overall
purposes of title I of the HCDA.
Grantees under Public Laws 115–56,
115–123, and 116–20 may request
waivers and alternative requirements
from the Department as needed to
address specific needs related to their
recovery activities. Public Laws 115–56,
115–123, and 116–20 also authorize the
Department to provide waivers and
establish alternative requirements
absent a request from a CDBG–DR
grantee.
The Department awarded the U.S.
Virgin Islands (USVI) $242,684,000 of
CDBG–DR funds under Public Law 115–
56, $779,221,000 of CDBG–DR funds
under Public Law 115–123, and
$53,588,884 of CDBG–DR funds under
Public Law 116–20. The Department has
also awarded the USVI $774,188,000 of
CDBG–MIT funds under Public Law
115–123 for mitigation activities.
The USVI has requested that HUD
provide a waiver to establish higher
income limits for the purposes of
determining low- and moderate-income
benefit, due to the USVI’s extremely
high cost of living. The USVI contends
that ‘‘the data used to set HUD area
medium incomes (AMI) and the
associated income limits for the U.S.
Virgin Islands is uniquely outdated
compared to other grantees due to the
lack of recent American Community
Survey (ACS) data from the Census
Bureau. This results in compounding
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inaccuracies as estimates are based on
data collected over eight years ago.’’ The
USVI contends that granting this waiver
and alternative requirement will allow it
to more accurately reflect the number of
residents that are financially burdened
and who are in greatest need of CDBG–
DR assistance.
In order to establish consistent LMI
income limits across all three islands of
the USVI and recognizing the high cost
and other unique characteristics of the
USVI identified above, the Department
finds that good causes exists and waives
42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) to the extent
necessary to standardize the AMI across
the entire territory of the USVI by
allowing the USVI to use the area
median income (as published by HUD
annually with adjustments for smaller
and larger families) of the Island of St.
John for all islands in the territory, since
those LMI income limits are the highest
of the three islands within the Territory.
This waiver also permits the use of AMI
of the Island of St. John (as published
by HUD annually with adjustments for
smaller and larger families) for all
islands in the territory whenever grant
requirements necessitate the application
of AMI, including when it may be
necessary to calculate 120 percent of
AMI. In granting this flexibility, the
Department will not consider any
request to lower the USVI’s requirement
in regard to the overall percentage of
funds that must be used for activities
that benefit low- and moderate-income
persons.
VII. Public Law 115–254 and 116–20
Waivers and Alternative Requirements
This section of the notice applies to
certain grantees that received an
allocation of funds appropriated under
Public Laws 115–254 and 116–20 for
major disasters and events that occurred
in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Public Laws
115–254 and 116–20 authorize the
Secretary to waive or specify alternative
requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary
administers in connection with HUD’s
obligation or use by the recipient of
these funds (except for requirements
related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and
the environment).
Waivers and alternative requirements
are based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists, and
that the waiver or alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the
overall purposes of title I of the HCDA.
Regulatory waiver authority is also
provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and
570.5. For the waivers and alternative
requirements described in this section
of notice, the Secretary has determined
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
that good cause exists and that the
waivers and alternative requirements
are not inconsistent with the overall
purposes of title I of the HCDA.
Grantees under Public Laws 115–254
and 116–20 may request waivers and
alternative requirements from the
Department as needed to address
specific needs related to their recovery
activities. Public Laws 115–254 and
116–20 also authorize the Department to
provide waivers and establish
alternative requirements absent a
request from a CDBG–DR grantee.
VIII.A. Authorizing Tourism and
Business Marketing Assistance
Activities (The Northern Mariana
Islands Only)
The Department has awarded
$188,652,000 of CDBG–DR funds under
Public Law 115–254 and $55,294,000
under Public Law 116–20, for a
combined allocation of $243,946,000 to
the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI). CNMI has requested
that HUD authorize the use of up to
$10,000,000 of CDBG–DR funds for
tourism and business marketing as
activities necessary for recovery from
Super Typhoon Yutu. Tourism is the
primary economic contributor to
CNMI’s economy. The Marianas Visitors
Authority (MVA), the CNMI’s tourism
office, is mandated to promote Saipan,
Tinian, Rota, and the Northern Islands
as an ideal destination to travelers from
countries in Asia, Oceania and
throughout the world. CNMI’s current
main tourism markets are Korea, China,
and Japan.
The total value of tourism within the
CNMI economy amounts to $1.1 billion
(or 72 percent) of overall Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) and the
accommodations and amusement sector
provides for an average of 21.5 percent
of total employee compensation within
the Commonwealth. Due to the
influence of the tourism industry in the
CNMI and the scale of Super Typhoon
Yutu, the impacts of the disaster on the
economy were wide-ranging and
pronounced. In total, arrivals for
November (after the typhoon in October)
fell by 88.35 percent or 42,444, marking
the sharpest year-over-year downturn in
recent history. The closure of the Saipan
International Airport also led to a
decrease in arrivals by 30 percent (over
400,000 visitors).
Tourism and business advertising
campaigns are in general ineligible for
CDBG–DR assistance. HUD, however,
recognizes that such support can be an
important means of economic recovery
in a damaged regional economy that
depends on tourism and seeks to attract
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
new business investments to generate
jobs and create tax revenues.
HUD has previously granted similar
waivers for other CDBG–DR grantees
with tourism-dependent economies. As
CNMI is proposing advertising and
marketing activities rather than direct
assistance to tourism-dependent and
other businesses, and because the
measures of long-term benefit from the
proposed activities must be derived
using indirect means, 42 U.S.C. 5305(a)
is waived only to the extent necessary
to make eligible use of no more than
$10,000,000 for assistance for tourism
and business marketing activities to
promote travel and to attract new
businesses to disaster-impacted areas.
No elected officials shall appear in
tourism or business marketing materials
financed with CDBG–DR funds. Given
the importance of tourism to the overall
economy, HUD is authorizing this use of
these funds without regard to unmet
housing need. This waiver will expire
two years after the Commonwealth first
draws CDBG–DR funds under the
allocation provided in the January 27,
2020 Federal Register notice (85 FR
4681).
In providing similar waivers for other
CDBG–DR grantees, the Department has
often identified issues in the
procurement of tourism and business
marketing services, with grantees
adding CDBG–DR funds to existing
tourism and business marketing
contracts procured with other sources of
funds. In providing this waiver, HUD
advises the Commonwealth to ensure
that contracts funded pursuant to this
waiver with CDBG–DR funds comply
with applicable procurement
requirements. The grantee must also
develop metrics to demonstrate the
impact of CDBG–DR expenditures on
the tourism and other sectors of the
economy and shall identify those
metrics in its action plan.
VIII.B. Financial Certification
Requirements Under Public Laws 115–
254 and 116–20
The Department’s January 27, 2020
Federal Register notice (84 FR 4681)
included requirements for the
certification of financial controls and
procurement processes and adequate
procedures for grant management for
Public Law 115–254 and 116–20
grantees, allowing them to use their
prior 2016 or 2017 certifications for the
purposes of the allocations provided by
that notice. The notice, however, did
not include or reference the financial
certifications provided for a grantee’s
CDBG–MIT funds as also being a valid
form of certification for the allocation.
Since the Department’s August 30, 2019
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60827
CDBG–MIT Federal Register notice (84
FR 45838) requires grantees to provide
evidence of proficient financial controls
and procurement processes as well as
the establishment of adequate
procedures to prevent any duplication
of benefits as defined by section 312 of
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford
Act), 42 U.S.C. 5155, the Department is
adding the CDBG–MIT certification as
an acceptable certification that may be
used for grants allocated by Public Laws
115–254 and 116–20 for 2018 and 2019
disasters. HUD is deleting and replacing
the second paragraph of section IV.B.1.
of the January 27, 2020 notice with the
following:
A grantee that received a certification of its
financial controls and procurement processes
pursuant to a 2016 or 2017 disaster or for its
CDBG–MIT allocation may request that HUD
rely on its previous certification for purposes
of this grant, provided, however, that
grantees shall be required to provide updates
to reflect any material changes in the
submissions. This information must be
submitted within 60 days of the applicability
date of this notice. The grant agreement will
not be executed until HUD has approved the
grantee’s certifications. The grantee must
implement the CDBG–DR grant consistent
with the controls, processes, and procedures
as certified by HUD. HUD is requiring each
grantee to submit (or update and resubmit, as
applicable) all policies and procedures
pertaining to its duplication of benefits
procedures as outlined below:
HUD is also deleting and replacing
the first bullet in section III of the
January 27, 2020 notice with the
following:
• Within 60 days of the applicability date
of this notice (or when the grantee submits
its action plan, whichever is earlier), submit
documentation for the certification of
financial controls and procurement processes
and adequate procedures for grant
management, as amended in section IV.B.1 of
this notice. A grantee that received a
certification of its financial controls and
procurement processes pursuant to a 2016 or
2017 disaster or for its CDBG–MIT allocation,
may request that HUD rely on its previous
certification for purposes of this allocation,
provided, however, that grantees shall be
required to provide updates to reflect any
material changes in the submissions.
VIII. Finding of No Significant Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in
accordance with HUD regulations at 24
CFR part 50, which implement section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is available for
public inspection between 8 a.m. and 5
p.m. weekdays in the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
60828
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance
appointment to review the docket file
must be scheduled by calling the
Regulations Division at 202–708–3055
(this is not a toll-free number).
Hearing- or speech-impaired
individuals may access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339 (this is
a toll-free number).
Dated: September 23, 2020.
John Gibbs,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Community
Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–21359 Filed 9–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[201A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
HEARTH Act Approval of Wilton
Rancheria, California Business Site
Leasing Act
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) approved the Wilton Rancheria,
California (Tribe) leasing regulations
under the Helping Expedite and
Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH
Act). With this approval, the Tribe is
authorized to enter into business leases
without further BIA approval.
DATES: These regulations were approved
on September 23, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services,
sharelene.roundface@bia.gov, (505)
563–3132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary,
alternative land leasing process
available to Tribes, by amending the
Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955,
25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter
into agricultural and business leases of
Tribal trust lands with a primary term
of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms
of 25 years each, without the approval
of the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary). The HEARTH Act also
authorizes Tribes to enter into leases for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
residential, recreational, religious or
educational purposes for a primary term
of up to 75 years without the approval
of the Secretary. Participating Tribes
develop Tribal leasing regulations,
including an environmental review
process, and then must obtain the
Secretary’s approval of those regulations
prior to entering into leases. The
HEARTH Act requires the Secretary to
approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal
regulations are consistent with the
Department of the Interior’s
(Department) leasing regulations at 25
CFR part 162 and provide for an
environmental review process that
meets requirements set forth in the
HEARTH Act. This notice announces
that the Secretary, through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved
the Tribal regulations for the Wilton
Rancheria, California.
II. Federal Preemption of State and
Local Taxes
The Department’s regulations
governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that,
subject to applicable Federal law,
permanent improvements on leased
land, leasehold or possessory interests,
and activities under the lease are not
subject to State and local taxation and
may be subject to taxation by the Indian
Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR
162.017. As explained further in the
preamble to the final regulations, the
Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development,
self-determination, and Tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72440, 72447–48
(December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of
State law in the field of Indian leasing
and the taxation of lease-related
interests and activities applies with
equal force to leases entered into under
Tribal leasing regulations approved by
the Federal government pursuant to the
HEARTH Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization
Act, 25 U.S.C. 5108, preempts State and
local taxation of permanent
improvements on trust land.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411
U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 5108
preempts State taxation of rent
payments by a lessee for leased trust
lands, because ‘‘tax on the payment of
rent is indistinguishable from an
impermissible tax on the land.’’ See
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg,
799 F.3d 1324, 1331, n.8 (11th Cir.
2015). In addition, as explained in the
preamble to the revised leasing
regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
courts have applied a balancing test to
determine whether State and local
taxation of non-Indians on the
reservation is preempted. White
Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448
U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker
balancing test, which is conducted
against a backdrop of ‘‘traditional
notions of Indian self-government,’’
requires a particularized examination of
the relevant State, Federal, and Tribal
interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker
analysis from the preamble to the
surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at
72447–48, as supplemented by the
analysis below.
The strong Federal and Tribal
interests against State and local taxation
of improvements, leaseholds, and
activities on land leased under the
Department’s leasing regulations apply
equally to improvements, leaseholds,
and activities on land leased pursuant to
Tribal leasing regulations approved
under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
overarching intent was to ‘‘allow Tribes
to exercise greater control over their
own land, support self-determination,
and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
stand in the way of homeownership and
economic development in Tribal
communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
(May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
[Tribes] to approve leases quickly and
efficiently.’’ H. Rep. 112–427 at 6
(2012).
Assessment of State and local taxes
would obstruct these express Federal
policies supporting Tribal economic
development and self-determination,
and also threaten substantial Tribal
interests in effective Tribal government,
economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782, 810
(2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
(determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
Federal Government is to render Tribes
more self-sufficient, and better
positioned to fund their own sovereign
functions, rather than relying on Federal
funding’’). The additional costs of State
and local taxation have a chilling effect
on potential lessees, as well as on a tribe
that, as a result, might refrain from
exercising its own sovereign right to
impose a Tribal tax to support its
infrastructure needs. See id. at 810–11
(finding that State and local taxes
greatly discourage Tribes from raising
tax revenue from the same sources
because the imposition of double
taxation would impede Tribal economic
growth).
Similar to BIA’s surface leasing
regulations, Tribal regulations under the
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 188 (Monday, September 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60821-60828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-6219-N-01]
Waivers and Alternative Requirements for Community Development
Block Grant Disaster Recovery Grantees
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice governs Community Development Block Grant disaster
recovery (CDBG-DR) funds awarded under several appropriations.
Specifically, this notice provides waivers and establishes alternative
requirements for certain grantees that have submitted waiver requests
for grants provided pursuant to Public Laws. This notice also provides
further clarification on the waiver and alternative requirement for use
of a FEMA-approved alternative to the CDBG-DR elevation requirement for
nonresidential structures. Additionally, this notice revises action
plan substantial amendment requirements for CDBG-Mitigation (CDBG-MIT)
grants.
DATES: Applicability Date: October 5, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessie Handforth Kome, Director,
Office of Block Grant Assistance, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 7282, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202-708-3587. Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service at 800-877- 8339. Facsimile inquiries may be sent to Ms. Kome
at 202-708-0033. (Except for the``800'' number, these telephone numbers
are not toll-free.) Email inquiries may be sent to
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Law 113-2 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
II. Public Law 114-113, 114-223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56, 115-123,
115-254, and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
III. Public Law 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 Waivers
and Alternative Requirements
IV. Public Law 115-56 and 115-123 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
V. Public Law 115-123 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
VI. Public Law 115-56, 115-123, and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
VII. Public Law 115-254 and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
VIII. Finding of No Significant Impact
I. Public Law 113-2 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
Authorizing Specific Housing Activities for the ``Reshaping the Urban
Delta'' Initiative (City of New Orleans Only)
The Department awarded $141,260,569 in Community Development Block
Grant National Disaster Resilience (CDBG-NDR) funds made available
under Public Law 113-2 to the City of New Orleans to implement
activities described in the city's application, which the city
collectively refers to as the ``Reshaping the Urban Delta'' initiative.
This section of the notice specifies waivers and
[[Page 60822]]
alternative requirements and modifies requirements for CDBG-NDR funds
awarded to the City of New Orleans under Public Law 113-2, for
necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and housing, and economic revitalization.
Public Law 113-2 authorizes the Secretary to waive or specify
alternative requirements for any provision of any statute or regulation
that the Secretary administers in connection with HUD's obligation or
use by the recipient of these funds (except for requirements related to
fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment).
Regulatory waiver authority is also provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600,
and 570.5. The waiver and alternative requirement provided in this
section is in response to a request by the City of New Orleans
explaining why there is good cause for the waiver and is based upon a
determination by the Secretary that good cause exists and that the
waiver or alternative requirement is not inconsistent with the overall
purposes of title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974 (HCDA).
The City of New Orleans will use its CDBG-NDR funds to create the
city's first Resilience District in the Gentilly neighborhood, a low-
and moderate-income community with a particularly high risk of
flooding. The city is requesting a waiver to establish an alternative
requirement to create a CDBG-eligible activity that comprises all of
the activities proposed in the community adaptation component of the
Resilience District initiative.
The city's initiative is comprised of four components: (1) Urban
water: consisting of public improvements to improve storm water
management; (2) reliable energy and smart systems: to enhance the
reliability of the electrical grid and energy asset monitoring; (3)
coastal restoration: A series of coastal protection and restoration
projects to mitigate flooding impacts; and (4) community adaptation: to
support improvements to private residential properties in the
neighborhood as a means of improving storm water management.
Certain activities under the community adaptation component, as
proposed by the City, are not CDBG-eligible as housing rehabilitation
activities as they do not involve the rehabilitation of the housing
structure itself. Accordingly, the Department is granting a waiver and
establishing an alternative requirement to create a CDBG-eligible
activity that comprises all of the activities proposed for improvements
to residential properties under the community adaptation component of
the initiative. In its approved CDBG-NDR action plan, the city
describes activities that will be eligible for funding and that entail
improvements to private residential properties. These improvements may
include the installation of permeable driveways, rain cisterns,
bioswales and other site and exterior adaptations and resilience
retrofits which are on the property of homeowners, but generally do not
involve physical improvements to the housing unit.
To clarify the eligibility of these activities as outlined in the
city's approved CDBG-NDR application and action plan, the Department is
approving a waiver and alternative requirement to expand section
105(a)(4) of the HCDA only to the extent necessary to create a new
eligible activity for the city's CDBG-NDR grant. This new eligible
activity shall be comprised of activities described in its CDBG-NDR
application and approved action plan for residential improvements under
the community adaptation portion of the initiative, through
installation of improvements and implementation of stormwater
management practices on residential properties for the purpose of
enhancing the resilience of the residential building and preventing
neighborhood flooding.
II. Public Law 114-113, 114-223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-
254, and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
This section of the notice specifies waivers and alternative
requirements and modifies requirements for CDBG-DR funds awarded to
grantees that received an allocation for a 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, or
2019 major disaster under Public Laws 114-113, 114-223, 114-254, 115-
31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 for necessary expenses related
to disaster relief, long-term recovery, restoration of infrastructure
and housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation. Public Laws 114-
113, 114-223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20
authorize the Secretary to waive or specify alternative requirements
for any provision of any statute or regulation that the Secretary
administers in connection with HUD's obligation or use by the recipient
of these funds (except for requirements related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment). Regulatory
waiver authority is also provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5.
As required by Public Laws 114-113, 114-223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56,
115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 the waivers and alternative requirements
provided in this paragraph are based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists and that the waivers or alternative
requirements are not inconsistent with the overall purposes of title I
of the HCDA.
II.A. Waiver and Alternative Requirement for Use of FEMA-Approved
Elevation Standards for Nonresidential Structures
Grantees that received an allocation for a 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018,
or 2019 major disaster under Public Laws 114-113, 114-223, 114-254,
115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 are subject to different
federal requirements established by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) and HUD, with respect to the elevation of nonresidential
structures in a floodplain. Grantees that have received an allocation
of CDBG-MIT funds pursuant to Public Law 115-123 are also subject to
these different federal requirements.
Specifically, CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT grantees under these
appropriations and corresponding Federal Register notices are required
to elevate, or floodproof in accordance with FEMA floodproofing
standards at 44 CFR 60.3(c)(3)(ii) or a successor standard,
nonresidential structures up to at least two feet above the 100-year
(or 1 percent annual chance floodplain), i.e. two feet above the base
flood elevation. Critical Actions, as defined at 24 CFR 55.2(b)(3),
within the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain (i.e., 500-year
floodplain), must be elevated or floodproofed (in accordance with FEMA
standards) to the higher of 0.2 percent annual floodplain flood
elevation or three feet above the 1 percent annual chance floodplain
(i.e., 100-year floodplain). Under current CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT
requirements for these grantees, if the 500-year floodplain or
elevation standard is unavailable, and the Critical Action is in the
100-year floodplain, then the structure must be elevated or
floodproofed to at least three feet above the 100-year floodplain
elevation.
CDBG-DR funds may be used to meet the non-federal match
requirements for programs funded by FEMA. CDBG-DR grantees using FEMA
and CDBG-DR funds to fund the same activity, however, have encountered
challenges in certain circumstances in reconciling CDBG-DR elevation
requirements with those established by FEMA. CDBG-MIT grantees will
encounter similar challenges in the implementation of projects when
using FEMA funds
[[Page 60823]]
together with CDBG-MIT funds. FEMA regulations at 44 CFR 9.11(d)(3)(i)
and (ii) prohibit new construction or substantial improvements to a
structure unless the lowest floor of the structure is at or above the
level of the base flood and for critical actions, at or above the level
of the 500-year flood, while 44 CFR 9.11(d)(3)(iii) allows for an
alternative to elevation to the 100- or 500-year flood level, subject
to FEMA approval, which would provide for improvements that would
ensure the substantial impermeability of the structure below flood
level.
As programs funded by FEMA are pursuant to an annual appropriation,
FEMA funded projects generally commence soon after a disaster and well
in advance of the availability of CDBG-DR funds. When CDBG-DR funds are
used as match for a FEMA project that is underway, the alignment of
HUD's elevation standards with any alternative standard allowed by FEMA
may not be feasible and may not be cost reasonable.
Accordingly, the Department is waiving the elevation requirements
applicable under the Federal Register notices for the referenced
appropriations, and establishing an alternative requirement for the use
of an alternative, FEMA-approved flood standard when each of the
following conditions is in place: (i) CDBG-DR or CDBG-MIT funds are
used as the non-federal match for FEMA assistance; (ii) the FEMA-
assisted activity, for which CDBG-DR or CDBG-MIT funds will be used as
match, commenced prior to HUD's obligation of CDBG-MIT or CDBG-DR funds
to the grantee; and (iii) the grantee has determined and demonstrated
with records in the activity file that implementation costs of the
required CDBG-DR elevation or flood proofing up to two feet is not
reasonable as that term is defined in the applicable cost principles at
2 CFR 200.404. HUD and FEMA will issue joint guidance to assist
grantees in the compliant implementation of this provision and with
other requirements that apply when CDBG-DR or CDBG-MIT funds are used
to meet the non-federal match requirements of certain FEMA programs.
II.B. Changes to the DOB Implementation Notice for Grantees That
Received a CDBG-DR Allocation for a 2015, 2016, or 2017 Disaster Event
On June 20, 2019, the Department published a Federal Register
notice, ``Updates to Duplication of Benefits Requirements Under the
Stafford Act for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster
Recovery Grantees,'' (84 FR 28836) (``2019 DOB Notice''). This notice
reflects the requirements of recent CDBG-DR supplemental appropriations
acts and amendments to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act. HUD's corresponding DOB implementation
notice, ``Applicability of Updates to Duplication of Benefits
Requirements Under the Stafford Act for Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery Grantees,'' (84 FR 28848) (``DOB
Implementation Notice'') makes conforming amendments to other notices
governing CDBG-DR grants received in response to a disaster declared
between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The DOB Implementation
Notice advises these grantees of the applicability of the 2019 DOB
Notice to their existing CDBG-DR activities. In the DOB Implementation
Notice, the Department imposed the requirements of the 2019 DOB Notice
for: (a) New programs and activities added to the action plan after the
date of the implementation notice; and (b) existing programs and
activities, to the extent that the grantee amends its action plan to
change its treatment of loans in accordance with the 2019 DOB Notice.
The Department recognizes that not all grantees include this level
of specificity in their action plan and is broadening the applicability
of the 2019 DOB Notice to include existing programs and activities, to
the extent that the grantee amends its action plan or its policies and
procedures to change the treatment of loans in accordance with the 2019
DOB Notice. Therefore, this notice deletes and replaces the first
bullet of the third paragraph of section III of the DOB Implementation
Notice, which follows the sentence: ``This notice makes the following
changes to the Prior Notices.'' The first bullet in the third paragraph
of section III is revised to read:
``The 2019 DOB Notice shall supersede the 2011 DOB notice
for any new activities submitted to HUD in an action plan or action
plan amendment on or after the effective date of this notice, and for
existing programs and activities, to the extent that the grantee amends
its action plan or its policies and procedures to change the treatment
of loans in accordance with the 2019 DOB Notice. If a grantee opts to
revise its policies and procedures for one or more existing programs
that were included in an action plan for disaster recovery before the
effective date of this notice, the grantee must amend its action plan
to reflect any resulting changes in benefits to program participants or
to correct any resulting inconsistencies with duplication of benefits
policies described in the action plan.''
II.C. Use of the ``Upper Quartile'' or ``Exception Criteria'' for Low-
and Moderate-Income Area Benefit Activities (State of Texas only)
The State of Texas was awarded a total of $74,568,000 from Public
Laws 114-113 and 115-31 for recovery from 2015 disasters; a total of
$238,895,000 from Public Laws 114-223, 114-254, and 115-31 for recovery
from 2016 disasters; a total of $5,734,190,000 from Public Laws 115-56,
115-123, and 115-31 for recovery from Hurricane Harvey disaster; a
total of $72,913,000 from Public Laws 115-254 and 116-20 for recovery
from 2018 disasters; and a total of $212,741,000 from Public Law 116-20
for recovery from 2019 disasters. HUD has also awarded $4,297,189,000
of CDBG-MIT funds to the State under Public Law 115-123 for mitigation
activities. This section of the notice specifies waivers and
alternative requirements and modifies requirements for CDBG-DR and
CDBG-MIT funds awarded to the State of Texas under Public Laws 114-113,
114-223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 for
necessary expenses related to disaster relief, long-term recovery,
restoration of infrastructure and housing, economic revitalization, and
mitigation.
The State is seeking a waiver and alternative requirement to apply
exception criteria in determining that an activity qualifies as meeting
the low- and moderate-income (LMI) area benefit national objective when
the area contains fewer than 51 percent of LMI persons. This waiver and
alternative requirement will allow the State to use the ``upper
quartile'' or ``exception criteria'' for LMI area benefit activities
for non-entitlement counties impacted by the 2015 and 2016 floods, as
well as areas impacted by Hurricane Harvey.
Section 105(c)(2)(A) of the HCDA generally provides that assisted
activities designed to serve an area generally and clearly designed to
meet identified needs of LMI persons in the area, shall be considered
to principally benefit persons of low- and moderate-income if the area
served in a metropolitan city or urban county is within the highest
quartile of all areas within the jurisdiction of such city or county in
terms of the degree of concentration of persons of low- and moderate-
income. In some cases, HUD permits an exception to the requirement that
at least 51 percent of the residents of the area qualify as LMI, when
certain requirements are met.
[[Page 60824]]
The exception provided by HUD under this waiver and alternative
requirement is typically applied to those entitlement communities that
have few, if any, areas within their jurisdiction that have 51 percent
or more of LMI residents. Under the exception, communities are allowed
to use a percentage that is less than 51 percent to qualify activities
under the LMI area benefit national objective criteria. In these
communities, activities must serve an area that contains a percentage
of LMI residents that is within the upper quartile of all census-block
groups within its jurisdiction in terms of the degree of concentration
of LMI residents. HUD assesses each grantee's census-block groups to
determine whether a grantee qualifies to use this exception and
identifies the alternative percentage the grantee may use instead of 51
percent for the purpose of qualifying activities under the LMI area
benefit national objective criteria. HUD determines the lowest
proportion a grantee may use to qualify an area for this purpose and
advises the grantee accordingly. CDBG-DR grantees are required to use
the most recent data available in implementing the exception criteria.
The ``exception criteria'' applies to disaster recovery activities
funded by a State grantee pursuant to the applicable Federal Register
notices in jurisdictions covered by such criteria, including
jurisdictions that receive CDBG-DR funds from a State.
The State of Texas is requesting this waiver and alternative
requirement for only those non-entitlement counties in which fewer than
one quarter of the block groups within each jurisdiction have 51
percent or more of LMI residents. When the ``upper quartile'' or
``exception criteria'' methodology is applied to block groups within
those counties that do not fall within an entitlement community, fewer
than one quarter of the populated-block groups in those counties
contain 51 percent or more of LMI persons.
To enable the State to undertake the activities it has determined
to be most critical for its recovery, and to ensure that LMI persons
are sufficiently served and assisted, HUD is waiving section
105(c)(2)(A) of the HCDA and establishing an alternative requirement to
authorize the State to use the ``upper quartile'' or ``exception
criteria'' for LMI area benefit activities for non-entitlement counties
for any current or future grants made under Public Laws 114-113, 114-
223, 114-254, 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20.
The non-entitlement counties that qualify under this alternative
requirement, and the calculated ``exception percentages'' for each,
will be posted in tables on the HUD website. These tables will be
updated annually by HUD. The ``exception percentage'' for each of the
counties that qualify will represent the new threshold for qualifying
block groups in those counties under the LMI area benefit national
objective criteria. In granting this flexibility to the State of Texas,
the Department will not consider any request to lower the State's
requirements in regard to the overall percentage of funds that must be
used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons for
its CDBG-DR funds for 2015 to 2019 disasters, or its CDBG-MIT funds.
III. Public Law 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 Waivers
and Alternative Requirements
Use of Standardized Area Median Income (State of Texas Only)
The Department has awarded $5,734,190,000 in CDBG-DR funds to the
State of Texas for recovery from Hurricane Harvey from Public Laws 115-
56, 115-123, and 115-31. HUD has also awarded $4,297,189,000 of CDBG-
MIT funds to the State under Public Law 115-123 for mitigation
activities. Additionally, the State was awarded a total of $72,913,000
from Public Laws 115-254 and 116-20 for recovery from 2018 disasters,
and a total of $212,741,000 from Public Law 116-20 for recovery from
2019 disasters. This section of the notice specifies waivers and
alternative requirements and modifies requirements for CDBG-DR and
CDBG-MIT funds awarded to the State of Texas under Public Laws 115-31,
115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 for necessary expenses related to
disaster relief, long-term recovery, restoration of infrastructure and
housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation.
Public Laws 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 authorize
the Secretary to waive or specify alternative requirements for any
provision of any statute or regulation that the Secretary administers
in connection with HUD's obligation or use by the recipient of these
funds (except for requirements related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment). Regulatory
waiver authority is also provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5.
The waiver and alternative requirement provided in this paragraph is in
response to a request by the State of Texas explaining why there is
good cause for the waiver and based upon a determination by the
Secretary that good cause exists and that the waiver or alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the overall purposes of title I of
the HCDA.
The State is asking to modify requirements and coordinate recovery
efforts across multiple CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT allocations under Public
Laws 115-31, 115-56, 115-123, 115-254, and 116-20 through use of a
standardized area median income for purposes of meeting the low- and
moderate-income national objective criteria.
42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) defines the terms ``persons of low and
moderate income'' and ``low- and moderate-income persons'' to mean
families and individuals whose incomes do not exceed 80 percent of the
median income of the area involved, as determined by the Secretary with
adjustments for smaller and larger families.
The State has presented data indicating a large range in area
median income (AMI) in the Harvey-impacted areas of the State, ranging
from $40,200 to $91,100 for a family of four. This statewide variation
can have unintended consequences for participation in CDBG-DR funded
activities, for example, the State affirms that ``while the cost of
living varies between communities throughout the state, the cost to
rebuild or reconstruct a new home does not vary on the order of
magnitude evidenced by the disparity in AMI across Texas counties.'' As
the State seeks to primarily serve LMI individuals and areas in the
disaster-impacted counties, the variation between county-level AMI
limits the participation of families and individuals in the State's
recovery programs in those counties with very low AMI, because these
families and individuals have incomes that are at or above the 80
percent of AMI in the respective county even though their incomes are
less than 80 percent of the statewide median income.
Based on the above circumstance, the State of Texas has requested a
waiver and alternative requirement to allow the State to make LMI
determinations across the most impacted and distressed (MID) areas for
2017, 2018, and 2019 disasters based on a determination that the
incomes of families and individuals are below 80 percent of statewide
median income. In its request, the State emphasizes the importance of
providing assistance to the households most in need through a housing
rehabilitation and reconstruction program, through buyouts and
acquisitions that remove homes from harms' way, and through other flood
drainage infrastructure activities.
[[Page 60825]]
In the circumstances outlined in the State's request, the
broadening of 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) is warranted given the variance
in AMIs across the affected counties. Thus, the Department finds that
good causes exists and waives 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) to the extent
necessary to allow the Secretary to enable the State of Texas to make
LMI determinations based on statewide median income instead of
otherwise applicable AMI when local AMI is below statewide median
income data (as published by HUD annually with adjustments for smaller
and larger families). In areas where this waiver and alternative
requirement permits the State to use statewide median income for LMI
determinations, the State may also use statewide median income data (as
published by HUD annually with adjustments for smaller and larger
families) to calculate 120 percent of statewide median income, and to
use 120 percent of statewide median income as a substitute for 120
percent of AMI. This will allow the State of Texas to standardize the
median income for the counties impacted by Hurricane Harvey, and 2018
and 2019 disasters that have an AMI below the statewide median income.
This alternative requirement also includes the MID areas identified by
the State and HUD for its CDBG-MIT funds. However, if those counties
have an AMI above the statewide median income, LMI eligibility will
continue to be defined by the county's higher AMI standard.
This waiver and alternative requirement is provided for the
purposes of assisting the most at-risk populations who are in need of
recovery assistance in each of the MID areas identified by HUD and the
State for 2017, 2018, 2019 disasters, and its CDBG-MIT funds. In
granting this flexibility to the State of Texas, the Department will
not consider any request to lower the State's requirement in regard to
the overall percentage of funds that must be used for activities that
benefit low- and moderate-income persons for its CDBG-DR funds for
2017, 2018, or 2019 disasters or its CDBG-MIT funds.
IV. Public Law 115-56 and 115-123 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
Base Flood Elevation Requirement and Reimbursement in the ``Homeowner
Reimbursement Program'' (State of Texas Only)
The Department awarded $5,024,215,000 under Public Law 115-56 and
$652,175,000 under Public Law 115-123 to the State of Texas for
recovery from Hurricane Harvey for necessary expenses related to
disaster relief, long term recovery, restoration of infrastructure and
housing, economic revitalization, and mitigation due to a qualified
disaster. This section of the notice specifies waivers and alternative
requirements and modifies requirements for CDBG-DR funds awarded to the
State of Texas under Public Laws 115-56 and 115-123.
Public Law 115-56 and 115-123 authorize the Secretary to waive or
specify alternative requirements for any provision of any statute or
regulation that the Secretary administers in connection with HUD's
obligation or use by the recipient of these funds (except for
requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment). Regulatory waiver authority is also
provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. The State of Texas has
submitted a request for the waiver in this section with an explanation
of why the waiver is required to facilitate the use of the funds. The
waiver and alternative requirement provided in this section is based
upon a determination by the Secretary that good cause exists, and that
the waiver and alternative requirement is not inconsistent with the
overall purposes of title I of the HCDA.
The State is implementing a Homeowner Reimbursement Program
designed to assist homeowners in recovering up to $50,000 in out-of-
pocket expenses paid by the homeowner for residential rehabilitation
due to Hurricane Harvey. To be eligible for this program, the State's
rules require that the home must be the owner's primary residence and
the eligible repairs must have been completed prior to the program's
application launch date of February 28, 2019. Because the State's
Hurricane Harvey response and recovery efforts commenced on the date of
the disaster and before CDBG-DR assistance was available, some
homeowners participating in the State's Homeowner Reimbursement Program
may have repaired their homes to meet program requirements of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and local permitting
requirements, rather than the CDBG-DR program requirements.
Some homeowners seeking assistance from the State's program
elevated homes to meet the requirements of their municipalities but did
not elevate their homes to meet HUD's requirement that residential
structures be elevated to at least 2 feet above base flood elevation as
required by the Federal Register notice governing the use of these
funds. Because the homeowners did not anticipate receiving federal
assistance, the State is requesting a waiver to reimburse homeowners
that are otherwise eligible for assistance but elevated their homes to
comply with the local jurisdiction's freeboard requirements, which may
be lower than the HUD-mandated standard to elevate to base flood
elevation plus 2 feet.
HUD's February 9, 2018 notice provides that: ``All structures,
defined at 44 CFR 59.1, designed principally for residential use and
located in the 100-year (or 1 percent annual chance) floodplain that
receive assistance for new construction, repair of substantial damage,
or substantial improvement, as defined at 24 CFR 55.2(b)(10), must be
elevated with the lowest floor, including the basement, at least two
feet above the base flood elevation (83 FR 5861).''
HUD finds that good cause exists to waive the language in the
Federal Register notice requiring the 2 feet above base flood elevation
for homeowners seeking reimbursement in the State's Homeowner
Reimbursement Program and to establish an alternative requirement to
permit the State to reimburse those homeowners for costs of
rehabilitation completed before the program's application launch date
of February 28, 2019, subject to the following requirements:
The homeowner's reimbursed rehabilitation costs complied
with the elevation requirement of the local jurisdiction.
The activity is eligible under title I of the HCDA or by
waiver and is consistent with CPD-15-07: Guidance for Charging Pre-
Application Costs of Homeowners, Businesses, and Other Qualifying
Entities to CDBG Disaster Recovery Grants.
The activity meets a CDBG-DR national objective and
otherwise complies with CDBG-DR requirements not waived by this
section.
The State uses not less than 70 percent of the aggregate
CDBG-DR grant for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income
persons.
The State must ensure that all costs charged to this program and to
the CDBG-DR grant are necessary and reasonable expenses related to
disaster recovery.
V. Public Law 115-123 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
Substantial Action Plan Amendment Requirements for CDBG-MIT Grants
Public Law 115-123 authorizes the Secretary to waive or specify
alternative requirements for any provision of any statute or regulation
that the Secretary administers in connection with HUD's obligation or
use by the recipient of
[[Page 60826]]
these funds (except for requirements related to fair housing,
nondiscrimination, labor standards, and the environment). Regulatory
waiver authority is also provided by 24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5.
As required by Public Laws 115-123, the waiver and alternative
requirement provided in this paragraph is based upon a determination by
the Secretary that good cause exists, and that the waiver or
alternative requirement is not inconsistent with the overall purposes
of title I of the HCDA.
The Department's August 30, 2019 Federal Register notice (84 FR
45838) included requirements for CDBG-MIT grantees that must be
followed for substantial amendments to a CDBG-MIT action plan. Section
V.A.2.g.(1) of the August 30, 2019 notice requires grantees to follow
the same procedures for a substantial action plan amendment as are
required for the preparation and submission of the initial CDBG-MIT
action plan, including multiple public hearings in various geographic
locations, except that that a substantial action plan amendment shall
require a 30-day public comment period. HUD, however, has generally not
established a public hearing requirement for substantial amendments to
a grantee's action plan for CDBG-DR grants. This alternative
requirement will better align CDBG-MIT substantial amendment
requirements with those established for CDBG-DR substantial amendments,
with the addition of continued engagement of the public through a 30-
day public comment period and through the citizen advisory committees
required by the CDBG-MIT notice. For these reasons, HUD is replacing
V.A.2.g. subparagraph (1) of the August 30, 2019 notice with the
following:
(1) Substantial amendment. The grantee must provide a 30-day
public comment period and reasonable method(s) (including electronic
submission) for receiving comments on substantial amendments. In its
action plan, each grantee must specify criteria for determining what
changes in the grantee's plan constitute a substantial amendment to
the plan. At a minimum, the following modifications will constitute
a substantial amendment: The addition of a CDBG-MIT Covered Project;
a change in program benefit or eligibility criteria; the addition or
deletion of an activity; or the allocation or reallocation of a
monetary threshold specified by the grantee in its action plan. The
grantee may substantially amend the action plan if it follows the
same procedures required for CDBG- MIT funds for the preparation and
submission of an action plan, provided, however, that a substantial
action plan amendment shall require a 30-day public comment period
and is not subject to the public hearing requirements in section
V.A.3.a. of this notice.
VI. Public Law 115-56, 115-123, and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative
Requirements
Use of Standardized Area Medium Income (U.S. Virgin Islands Only)
Public Laws 115-56, 115-123, and 116-20 authorize the Secretary to
waive or specify alternative requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary administers in connection with
HUD's obligation or use by the recipient of these funds (except for
requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment).
Waivers and alternative requirements are based upon a determination
by the Secretary that good cause exists, and that the waiver or
alternative requirement is not inconsistent with the overall purposes
of title I of the HCDA. Regulatory waiver authority is also provided by
24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. For the waiver and alternative
requirement described in this section of the notice, the Secretary has
determined that good cause exists and that the waiver and alternative
requirement is not inconsistent with the overall purposes of title I of
the HCDA.
Grantees under Public Laws 115-56, 115-123, and 116-20 may request
waivers and alternative requirements from the Department as needed to
address specific needs related to their recovery activities. Public
Laws 115-56, 115-123, and 116-20 also authorize the Department to
provide waivers and establish alternative requirements absent a request
from a CDBG-DR grantee.
The Department awarded the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) $242,684,000
of CDBG-DR funds under Public Law 115-56, $779,221,000 of CDBG-DR funds
under Public Law 115-123, and $53,588,884 of CDBG-DR funds under Public
Law 116-20. The Department has also awarded the USVI $774,188,000 of
CDBG-MIT funds under Public Law 115-123 for mitigation activities.
The USVI has requested that HUD provide a waiver to establish
higher income limits for the purposes of determining low- and moderate-
income benefit, due to the USVI's extremely high cost of living. The
USVI contends that ``the data used to set HUD area medium incomes (AMI)
and the associated income limits for the U.S. Virgin Islands is
uniquely outdated compared to other grantees due to the lack of recent
American Community Survey (ACS) data from the Census Bureau. This
results in compounding inaccuracies as estimates are based on data
collected over eight years ago.'' The USVI contends that granting this
waiver and alternative requirement will allow it to more accurately
reflect the number of residents that are financially burdened and who
are in greatest need of CDBG-DR assistance.
In order to establish consistent LMI income limits across all three
islands of the USVI and recognizing the high cost and other unique
characteristics of the USVI identified above, the Department finds that
good causes exists and waives 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20)(A) to the extent
necessary to standardize the AMI across the entire territory of the
USVI by allowing the USVI to use the area median income (as published
by HUD annually with adjustments for smaller and larger families) of
the Island of St. John for all islands in the territory, since those
LMI income limits are the highest of the three islands within the
Territory. This waiver also permits the use of AMI of the Island of St.
John (as published by HUD annually with adjustments for smaller and
larger families) for all islands in the territory whenever grant
requirements necessitate the application of AMI, including when it may
be necessary to calculate 120 percent of AMI. In granting this
flexibility, the Department will not consider any request to lower the
USVI's requirement in regard to the overall percentage of funds that
must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income
persons.
VII. Public Law 115-254 and 116-20 Waivers and Alternative Requirements
This section of the notice applies to certain grantees that
received an allocation of funds appropriated under Public Laws 115-254
and 116-20 for major disasters and events that occurred in 2017, 2018,
and 2019. Public Laws 115-254 and 116-20 authorize the Secretary to
waive or specify alternative requirements for any provision of any
statute or regulation that the Secretary administers in connection with
HUD's obligation or use by the recipient of these funds (except for
requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, labor
standards, and the environment).
Waivers and alternative requirements are based upon a determination
by the Secretary that good cause exists, and that the waiver or
alternative requirement is not inconsistent with the overall purposes
of title I of the HCDA. Regulatory waiver authority is also provided by
24 CFR 5.110, 91.600, and 570.5. For the waivers and alternative
requirements described in this section of notice, the Secretary has
determined
[[Page 60827]]
that good cause exists and that the waivers and alternative
requirements are not inconsistent with the overall purposes of title I
of the HCDA.
Grantees under Public Laws 115-254 and 116-20 may request waivers
and alternative requirements from the Department as needed to address
specific needs related to their recovery activities. Public Laws 115-
254 and 116-20 also authorize the Department to provide waivers and
establish alternative requirements absent a request from a CDBG-DR
grantee.
VIII.A. Authorizing Tourism and Business Marketing Assistance
Activities (The Northern Mariana Islands Only)
The Department has awarded $188,652,000 of CDBG-DR funds under
Public Law 115-254 and $55,294,000 under Public Law 116-20, for a
combined allocation of $243,946,000 to the Commonwealth of Northern
Mariana Islands (CNMI). CNMI has requested that HUD authorize the use
of up to $10,000,000 of CDBG-DR funds for tourism and business
marketing as activities necessary for recovery from Super Typhoon Yutu.
Tourism is the primary economic contributor to CNMI's economy. The
Marianas Visitors Authority (MVA), the CNMI's tourism office, is
mandated to promote Saipan, Tinian, Rota, and the Northern Islands as
an ideal destination to travelers from countries in Asia, Oceania and
throughout the world. CNMI's current main tourism markets are Korea,
China, and Japan.
The total value of tourism within the CNMI economy amounts to $1.1
billion (or 72 percent) of overall Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the
accommodations and amusement sector provides for an average of 21.5
percent of total employee compensation within the Commonwealth. Due to
the influence of the tourism industry in the CNMI and the scale of
Super Typhoon Yutu, the impacts of the disaster on the economy were
wide-ranging and pronounced. In total, arrivals for November (after the
typhoon in October) fell by 88.35 percent or 42,444, marking the
sharpest year-over-year downturn in recent history. The closure of the
Saipan International Airport also led to a decrease in arrivals by 30
percent (over 400,000 visitors).
Tourism and business advertising campaigns are in general
ineligible for CDBG-DR assistance. HUD, however, recognizes that such
support can be an important means of economic recovery in a damaged
regional economy that depends on tourism and seeks to attract new
business investments to generate jobs and create tax revenues.
HUD has previously granted similar waivers for other CDBG-DR
grantees with tourism-dependent economies. As CNMI is proposing
advertising and marketing activities rather than direct assistance to
tourism-dependent and other businesses, and because the measures of
long-term benefit from the proposed activities must be derived using
indirect means, 42 U.S.C. 5305(a) is waived only to the extent
necessary to make eligible use of no more than $10,000,000 for
assistance for tourism and business marketing activities to promote
travel and to attract new businesses to disaster-impacted areas. No
elected officials shall appear in tourism or business marketing
materials financed with CDBG-DR funds. Given the importance of tourism
to the overall economy, HUD is authorizing this use of these funds
without regard to unmet housing need. This waiver will expire two years
after the Commonwealth first draws CDBG-DR funds under the allocation
provided in the January 27, 2020 Federal Register notice (85 FR 4681).
In providing similar waivers for other CDBG-DR grantees, the
Department has often identified issues in the procurement of tourism
and business marketing services, with grantees adding CDBG-DR funds to
existing tourism and business marketing contracts procured with other
sources of funds. In providing this waiver, HUD advises the
Commonwealth to ensure that contracts funded pursuant to this waiver
with CDBG-DR funds comply with applicable procurement requirements. The
grantee must also develop metrics to demonstrate the impact of CDBG-DR
expenditures on the tourism and other sectors of the economy and shall
identify those metrics in its action plan.
VIII.B. Financial Certification Requirements Under Public Laws 115-254
and 116-20
The Department's January 27, 2020 Federal Register notice (84 FR
4681) included requirements for the certification of financial controls
and procurement processes and adequate procedures for grant management
for Public Law 115-254 and 116-20 grantees, allowing them to use their
prior 2016 or 2017 certifications for the purposes of the allocations
provided by that notice. The notice, however, did not include or
reference the financial certifications provided for a grantee's CDBG-
MIT funds as also being a valid form of certification for the
allocation. Since the Department's August 30, 2019 CDBG-MIT Federal
Register notice (84 FR 45838) requires grantees to provide evidence of
proficient financial controls and procurement processes as well as the
establishment of adequate procedures to prevent any duplication of
benefits as defined by section 312 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5155, the
Department is adding the CDBG-MIT certification as an acceptable
certification that may be used for grants allocated by Public Laws 115-
254 and 116-20 for 2018 and 2019 disasters. HUD is deleting and
replacing the second paragraph of section IV.B.1. of the January 27,
2020 notice with the following:
A grantee that received a certification of its financial
controls and procurement processes pursuant to a 2016 or 2017
disaster or for its CDBG-MIT allocation may request that HUD rely on
its previous certification for purposes of this grant, provided,
however, that grantees shall be required to provide updates to
reflect any material changes in the submissions. This information
must be submitted within 60 days of the applicability date of this
notice. The grant agreement will not be executed until HUD has
approved the grantee's certifications. The grantee must implement
the CDBG-DR grant consistent with the controls, processes, and
procedures as certified by HUD. HUD is requiring each grantee to
submit (or update and resubmit, as applicable) all policies and
procedures pertaining to its duplication of benefits procedures as
outlined below:
HUD is also deleting and replacing the first bullet in section III
of the January 27, 2020 notice with the following:
Within 60 days of the applicability date of this notice
(or when the grantee submits its action plan, whichever is earlier),
submit documentation for the certification of financial controls and
procurement processes and adequate procedures for grant management,
as amended in section IV.B.1 of this notice. A grantee that received
a certification of its financial controls and procurement processes
pursuant to a 2016 or 2017 disaster or for its CDBG-MIT allocation,
may request that HUD rely on its previous certification for purposes
of this allocation, provided, however, that grantees shall be
required to provide updates to reflect any material changes in the
submissions.
VIII. Finding of No Significant Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the
environment has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR
part 50, which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The FONSI is
available for public inspection between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in
the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel,
[[Page 60828]]
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance appointment to review the docket file
must be scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-3055
(this is not a toll-free number).
Hearing- or speech-impaired individuals may access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this
is a toll-free number).
Dated: September 23, 2020.
John Gibbs,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2020-21359 Filed 9-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P