Commercial Driver's License: Ohio Department of Public Safety; Application for Exemption, 60873-60874 [2020-21325]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
Mr. Passegger holds a valid German
commercial license. As explained by
Daimler in its exemption request, the
requirements for that license ensure
that, when operating under the
exemption, he would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
by the current regulation. Daimler
requests that the exemption cover the
maximum allowable duration of five
years.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or
Greater Level of Safety
FMCSA has previously determined
that the process for obtaining a German
commercial license is comparable to, or
as effective as, the requirements of part
383, and adequately assesses the
driver’s ability to operate CMVs in the
U.S. Since 2015, FMCSA has granted
Daimler drivers similar exemptions:
March 27, 2015 (80 FR 16511); October
5, 2015 (80 FR 60220); December 7,
2015 (80 FR 76059); December 21, 2015
(80 FR 79410); July 12, 2016 (81 FR
45217); July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48496);
August 17, 2017 (82 FR 39151);
September 10, 2018 (83 FR 45742).
V. Public Comments
On September 24, 2019, FMCSA
published notice of this application and
requested public comments (84 FR
50096); no comments were submitted.
VI. FMCSA Decision
Based upon the merits of this
application, including Mr. Passegger’s
extensive driving experience and safety
record, FMCSA has concluded that the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to or greater
than the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption, in accordance
with § 381.305(a).
VII. Terms and Conditions for the
Exemption
FMCSA grants Daimler and Thomas
Passegger an exemption from the CDL
requirement in 49 CFR 383.23 to allow
Mr. Passegger to drive CMVs in this
country without a State-issued CDL,
subject to the following terms and
conditions:
(1) The driver and carrier must
comply with all other applicable
provisions of the FMCSRs (49 CFR parts
350–399);
(2) The driver must be in possession
of the exemption document and a valid
German commercial license;
(3) The driver must be employed by
and operate the CMV within the scope
of his duties for Daimler;
(4) At all times while operating a
CMV under this exemption, the driver
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
must be accompanied by a holder of a
U.S. CDL who is familiar with the routes
traveled;
(5) Daimler must notify FMCSA in
writing within 5 business days of any
accident, as defined in 49 CFR 390.5,
involving this driver; and
(6) Daimler must notify FMCSA in
writing within 5 business days if this
driver is convicted of a disqualifying
offense under § 383.51 or § 391.15 of the
FMCSRs.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), the exemption will be
valid for 5 years unless revoked earlier
by the FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if:
(1) Mr. Passegger fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption;
(2) The exemption results in a lower
level of safety than was maintained
before it was granted; or
(3) Continuation of the exemption
would be inconsistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31315 and
31136.
VIII. Preemption
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(d), as implemented by 49 CFR
381.600, during the period this
exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation applicable
to interstate or intrastate commerce that
conflicts with or is inconsistent with
this exemption with respect to a firm or
person operating under the exemption.
James W. Deck,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–21320 Filed 9–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2019–0044]
Commercial Driver’s License: Ohio
Department of Public Safety;
Application for Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to deny the Ohio Department
of Public Safety’s (DPS) request for an
exemption to modify the mandatory
skills test requirements for qualified
military veterans. FMCSA has
determined that the applicant did not
provide an alternative to ensure that an
equivalent level of safety would be
achieved under the exemption.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60873
Furthermore, although a majority of the
docket comments favored the
exemption, none provided supporting
data.
DATES: This decision is effective
September 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Telephone:
(202) 366–2722; Email: MCPSD@
dot.gov. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, contact Docket Services,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, FMCSA–2019–0044 in
the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
button and choose the document to
review. If you do not have access to the
internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA
must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews the safety
analyses and public comments
submitted, and determines whether
granting the exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49
CFR 381.305). The Agency’s decision
must be published in the Federal
Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)) with the
reasons for denying or granting the
application and, if granted, the name of
the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory
provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must specify the
effective period (up to 5 years) and
explain its terms and conditions. The
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
60874
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 188 / Monday, September 28, 2020 / Notices
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
form, currently found on FMCSA’s
website.
III. Request for Exemption
V. Public Comments
On April 18, 2019, FMCSA published
notice of the application and requested
public comment (84 FR 16330). The
Agency received 37 comments, 35 of
which favored both the exemption and
its extension to all SDLAs. Among the
advocates for the exemption were the
Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation (PennDOT); the
American Beverage Association; the
Ohio Trucking Association; the Ohio
Propane Gas Association; and the
National Propane Gas Association
(NPGA); and two individual
commenters. Additionally, 27 Members
of Congress jointly expressed support
for the application. A primary reason
cited for the exemption was the trucking
industry’s serious need for qualified,
skilled drivers. Commenters believed
that the exemption would be a positive
step toward addressing that need and
would simultaneously credit the
relevant skills and experience gained
through military service toward
obtaining a CDL.
NPGA stated, ‘‘. . . It is clear that the
depth and breadth of military vehicle
training is beyond the civilian skills
assessment for a CDL. Similarly, it is
evident that military supervisors
possess considerable expertise to assess
the adequacy of an individual’s skills
during military service. Thus, the
training, assessment, and supervision
that a veteran received during military
service presents at least the same level
of safety, if not greater, as the level of
safety achieved by administering the
skills assessment of the CDL exam to
military veterans.’’
Two individuals opposed the Ohio
DPS request. One commenter noted that
‘‘No length of time is stipulated, hence
a driver who drove a military vehicle 10
years ago would qualify even though he
has no recent experience. Vehicles
change frequently with upgrades to
safety and technology.’’
The Ohio DPS requested an
exemption from the requirement in 49
CFR 383.77(b)(2)(i)(A) and (C) that an
applicant for a skills test waiver certify
that he/she (1) is regularly employed or
was so employed within the last year in
a military position requiring operation
of a CMV, and (2) operated a vehicle
representative of the CMV that the
driver operates or expects to operate for
at least 2 years immediately preceding
discharge from the military. In lieu of
those requirements, Ohio DPS proposed
that the applicant be required to have
held a military position that required
operation of a CMV for at least 2 years
sometime during his/her military career,
thus eliminating the current 1-year
window to apply for a skills test waiver.
According to Ohio DPS, its goal is to
promote the opportunities for
experienced CMV operators who have
served in the military by reducing the
regulatory burden of obtaining a CDL.
By doing so, Ohio DPS hopes that an
increase in the population of CDL
holders will benefit the Ohio
transportation industry, and create
better civilian employment
opportunities for Ohio veterans and
service members.
In addition, as this issue could be
applicable in each of the States, FMCSA
requested public comment on whether
the exemption, if granted, should cover
all State Driver’s Licensing Agencies
(SDLAs).
A copy of the Ohio DPS’s application
for exemption is available for review in
the docket for this notice.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or
Greater Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent or greater
level of safety, Ohio DPS proposed a
skills test waiver process in which the
applicant would submit the following
documentation to the Bureau of Motor
Vehicles: (1) A violation-free driving
record for the last 2 years; (2) proof of
being regularly employed in a military
position requiring operation of a CMV;
and (3) proof of experience operating a
representative vehicle which was
exempt from the requirements of 49 CFR
383.113(c) for at least 2 years. In
addition, applicants would be required
to submit an Ohio waiver form similar
to FMCSA’s Military Skills Test Waiver
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
VI. FMCSA Response and Decision
FMCSA has evaluated the Ohio DPS’
application and the public comments
and has concluded that the applicant
did not provide an alternative that
would ensure an equivalent level of
safety under the exemption. Although a
majority of the docket commenters
favored the exemption, none provided
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
supporting data. The Agency does not
have data to determine whether the
skills required to operate a CMV decline
over time when not used regularly,
which the exemtion application would
allow. For these reasons the Agency has
decided to deny the exemption request.
James W. Deck,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–21325 Filed 9–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
of one or more persons that have been
placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
based on OFAC’s determination that one
or more applicable legal criteria were
satisfied. All property and interests in
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of
these persons are blocked, and U.S.
persons are generally prohibited from
engaging in transactions with them.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for effective date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Associate Director for Global
Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant
Director for Sanctions Compliance &
Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–2490;
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
202–622–2480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Availability
The Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Actions
On September 23, 2020, OFAC
determined that the property and
interests in property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction of the following persons are
blocked under the relevant sanctions
authorities listed below.
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 188 (Monday, September 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60873-60874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21325]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2019-0044]
Commercial Driver's License: Ohio Department of Public Safety;
Application for Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to deny the Ohio Department of
Public Safety's (DPS) request for an exemption to modify the mandatory
skills test requirements for qualified military veterans. FMCSA has
determined that the applicant did not provide an alternative to ensure
that an equivalent level of safety would be achieved under the
exemption. Furthermore, although a majority of the docket comments
favored the exemption, none provided supporting data.
DATES: This decision is effective September 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Telephone: (202) 366-2722; Email:
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material
to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, FMCSA-2019-0044 in the ``Keyword'' box and click
``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket Folder'' button and choose
the document to review. If you do not have access to the internet, you
may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews the safety analyses and public comments
submitted, and determines whether granting the exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The
Agency's decision must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must specify the effective period (up to 5 years)
and explain its terms and conditions. The
[[Page 60874]]
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
The Ohio DPS requested an exemption from the requirement in 49 CFR
383.77(b)(2)(i)(A) and (C) that an applicant for a skills test waiver
certify that he/she (1) is regularly employed or was so employed within
the last year in a military position requiring operation of a CMV, and
(2) operated a vehicle representative of the CMV that the driver
operates or expects to operate for at least 2 years immediately
preceding discharge from the military. In lieu of those requirements,
Ohio DPS proposed that the applicant be required to have held a
military position that required operation of a CMV for at least 2 years
sometime during his/her military career, thus eliminating the current
1-year window to apply for a skills test waiver.
According to Ohio DPS, its goal is to promote the opportunities for
experienced CMV operators who have served in the military by reducing
the regulatory burden of obtaining a CDL. By doing so, Ohio DPS hopes
that an increase in the population of CDL holders will benefit the Ohio
transportation industry, and create better civilian employment
opportunities for Ohio veterans and service members.
In addition, as this issue could be applicable in each of the
States, FMCSA requested public comment on whether the exemption, if
granted, should cover all State Driver's Licensing Agencies (SDLAs).
A copy of the Ohio DPS's application for exemption is available for
review in the docket for this notice.
IV. Method To Ensure an Equivalent or Greater Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent or greater level of safety, Ohio DPS
proposed a skills test waiver process in which the applicant would
submit the following documentation to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles: (1)
A violation-free driving record for the last 2 years; (2) proof of
being regularly employed in a military position requiring operation of
a CMV; and (3) proof of experience operating a representative vehicle
which was exempt from the requirements of 49 CFR 383.113(c) for at
least 2 years. In addition, applicants would be required to submit an
Ohio waiver form similar to FMCSA's Military Skills Test Waiver form,
currently found on FMCSA's website.
V. Public Comments
On April 18, 2019, FMCSA published notice of the application and
requested public comment (84 FR 16330). The Agency received 37
comments, 35 of which favored both the exemption and its extension to
all SDLAs. Among the advocates for the exemption were the Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation (PennDOT); the American Beverage
Association; the Ohio Trucking Association; the Ohio Propane Gas
Association; and the National Propane Gas Association (NPGA); and two
individual commenters. Additionally, 27 Members of Congress jointly
expressed support for the application. A primary reason cited for the
exemption was the trucking industry's serious need for qualified,
skilled drivers. Commenters believed that the exemption would be a
positive step toward addressing that need and would simultaneously
credit the relevant skills and experience gained through military
service toward obtaining a CDL.
NPGA stated, ``. . . It is clear that the depth and breadth of
military vehicle training is beyond the civilian skills assessment for
a CDL. Similarly, it is evident that military supervisors possess
considerable expertise to assess the adequacy of an individual's skills
during military service. Thus, the training, assessment, and
supervision that a veteran received during military service presents at
least the same level of safety, if not greater, as the level of safety
achieved by administering the skills assessment of the CDL exam to
military veterans.''
Two individuals opposed the Ohio DPS request. One commenter noted
that ``No length of time is stipulated, hence a driver who drove a
military vehicle 10 years ago would qualify even though he has no
recent experience. Vehicles change frequently with upgrades to safety
and technology.''
VI. FMCSA Response and Decision
FMCSA has evaluated the Ohio DPS' application and the public
comments and has concluded that the applicant did not provide an
alternative that would ensure an equivalent level of safety under the
exemption. Although a majority of the docket commenters favored the
exemption, none provided supporting data. The Agency does not have data
to determine whether the skills required to operate a CMV decline over
time when not used regularly, which the exemtion application would
allow. For these reasons the Agency has decided to deny the exemption
request.
James W. Deck,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-21325 Filed 9-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P