Settlement Policy for Legal Enforcement Actions Involving Medical Certificate-Related Fraud, Intentional Falsification, Reproduction, or Alteration, 60057-60059 [2020-21111]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 186 / Thursday, September 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the FAA’s
analysis of the Model 737 fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. The
FAA is issuing this AD to prevent ignition
sources inside the center fuel tank, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Modification
Within 72 months after the effective date
of this AD, modify the fuel quantity
indicating system (FQIS) to prevent
development of an ignition source inside the
center fuel tank due to electrical fault
conditions, using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) Alternative Actions for Cargo Airplanes
For airplanes used exclusively for cargo
operations: As an alternative to the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, do
the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(2) of this AD, using methods approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD. To exercise this
alternative, operators must perform the first
inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD within 6 months after the effective
date of this AD. To exercise this alternative
for airplanes returned to service after
conversion of the airplane from a passenger
configuration to an all-cargo configuration
more than 6 months after the effective date
of this AD, operators must perform the first
inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD prior to further flight after the
conversion.
(1) Within 6 months after the effective date
of this AD, record the existing fault codes
stored in the FQIS processor and before
further flight thereafter do a BITE check
(check of built-in test equipment) of the
FQIS. If any nondispatchable fault code is
recorded prior to the BITE check or as a
result of the BITE check, before further flight,
do all applicable repairs and repeat the BITE
check until a successful test is performed
with no nondispatchable faults found, using
a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD. Repeat these actions thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 750 flight hours.
Modification as specified in paragraph (h)(2)
of this AD does not terminate the repetitive
BITE check requirement of this paragraph.
(2) Within 72 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the airplane by
separating FQIS wiring that runs between the
FQIS processor and the center tank wing spar
penetrations, including any circuits that
might pass through a main fuel tank, from
other airplane wiring that is not intrinsically
safe, using methods approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Jon Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3557;
email: Jon.Regimbal@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued on August 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–19809 Filed 9–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No.: FAA–2020–0809]
14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65 and 67
Settlement Policy for Legal
Enforcement Actions Involving Medical
Certificate-Related Fraud, Intentional
Falsification, Reproduction, or
Alteration
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of enforcement
policy.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a policy
for the prompt settlement of legal
enforcement actions against individuals
who have violated FAA regulations
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60057
proscribing any: Fraudulent or
intentionally false statement on an
application for a medical certificate or
other document used to show
compliance with any requirement for a
medical certificate; reproduction of a
medical certificate for fraudulent
purposes; or alteration of a medical
certificate. The policy is expected to
afford eligible individuals who hold an
airman or ground instructor certificate
and who are the subject of such a legal
enforcement action the opportunity to
apply for a new airman or ground
instructor certificate sooner than in the
absence of this policy.
DATES: This notification of enforcement
policy is effective September 30, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Barry, Manager, Policy/Audit/
Evaluation, Enforcement Division,
AGC–300, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–8198; james.barry@
faa.gov; or Brandon Goldberg, Attorney,
Enforcement Division, AGC–300,
Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337;
telephone (404) 305–5230;
brandon.goldberg@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under longstanding FAA policy, the
revocation of airman, ground instructor,
and medical certificates, and the
withdrawal of all special issuances or
SODAs, is the appropriate sanction for
violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)
through (4).1 The period between the
discovery of an apparent violation of 14
CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4) and, if
appropriate, the issuance of an order
revoking airman, medical, and ground
instructor certificates can be lengthy,
making the date on which an order of
revocation will be issued uncertain.
Investigative personnel compile an
1 Under 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4), a person is
prohibited from making or causing to be made: A
fraudulent or intentionally false statement on any
application for a medical certificate or on a request
for any Authorization for Special Issuance of a
Medical Certificate (Authorization) or Statement of
Demonstrated Ability (SODA); a fraudulent or
intentionally false entry in any logbook, record, or
report that is kept, made, or used to show
compliance with any requirement for any medical
certificate or for any Authorization or SODA; a
reproduction, for fraudulent purposes, of any
medical certificate; or an alteration of any medical
certificate. Under 14 CFR 67.403(b)(1)–(2), a
violation of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4) is a basis for:
Suspending or revoking all airman, ground
instructor, and medical certificates and ratings held
by the violator and withdrawing all Authorizations
or SODA’s held by the violator. See also FAA Order
2150.3C, chap. 9, para. 8 (revocation is appropriate
for a violation of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4) since such
a violation demonstrates a lack of qualification to
hold a certificate).
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
60058
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 186 / Thursday, September 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
enforcement investigative report (EIR)
containing evidence relating to the
apparent violation. Such investigations
include gathering, among other
evidence, legal and/or medical
documentation from various
governmental entities or healthcare
providers. Investigative personnel also
include as evidence letters of
investigation (LOIs) to apparent
violators and any information provided
in response to LOIs. Following the
compilation of evidence, investigative
personnel provide analyses as to how
the evidence relates to the violation and
recommended sanction type. The EIR is
subject to various levels of review
within the FAA program office. If the
program office deems the EIR sufficient,
it transmits the EIR to the Office of the
Chief Counsel’s Enforcement Division
(AGC–300) for evaluation and, if
appropriate, initiation of legal
enforcement action. Accordingly, a
variety of factors affect the timing of the
issuance of an order of revocation for an
apparent violation of 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1) through (4).
In addition, FAA regulations
generally proscribe individuals whose
airman and ground instructor
certificates have been revoked from
applying for new airman and ground
instructor certificates for one year
following the effective date of an order
of revocation. Under 14 CFR 61.13(d)(2),
unless otherwise authorized by the
Administrator, a person whose pilot,
flight instructor, or ground instructor
certificate has been revoked may not
apply for any certificate, rating, or
authorization for one year after the date
of revocation. Under 14 CFR 63.11(d),
unless the order of revocation provides
otherwise, a person whose flight
engineer or flight navigator certificate is
revoked may not apply for the same
kind of certificate for one year after the
date of revocation. Under 14 CFR
65.11(d)(1) and (2), unless the order of
revocation provides otherwise, a person
whose air traffic control tower operator,
aircraft dispatcher, or parachute rigger
certificate is revoked may not apply for
the same kind of certificate for one year
after the date of revocation; and a
person whose mechanic or repairman
certificate is revoked may not apply for
either of those kinds of certificates for
one year after the date of revocation.2 In
short, following the requisite
investigation and case evaluation
processes that take place prior to the
issuance of an order revoking airman
2 The one-year application restriction applicable
to revoked 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65 certificates
does not apply to certificates issued under 14 CFR
part 67.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
and ground instructor certificates for a
14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4)
violation, an applicant may have to wait
up to one year following the issuance of
an order to make application for any
new such certificate.
The prompt settlement policy
announced in this notice for violations
of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4) will generally
afford an individual eligible for the
policy the opportunity to apply for any
airman and ground instructor certificate
sooner than had the case proceeded in
the absence of the policy. The
individual would still be subject to the
one-year post-revocation bar applicable
to applications for new airman or
ground instructor certificates, but would
have the opportunity to apply for such
certificates generally sooner than under
the current process because much of the
investigation and evaluation processes
would be abbreviated or eliminated.
Moreover, this policy will generally add
predictability as to when the FAA
would issue the order and, accordingly,
when an individual could submit an
application for a new airman or ground
instructor certificate.
The policy will also apply when any
controlled substance conviction or
motor vehicle action that is the basis for
a violation of 14 CFR 61.15(a), (d), or (e)
also forms the basis for an intentional
falsification violation under 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1).3 For example, the policy
will apply to: (1) Violations of 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1) and 14 CFR 61.15(e) when
the violations were related to the same
driving under the influence conviction;
(2) violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) and
14 CFR 61.15(a) when the violations
were related to the same controlled
substance conviction; and (3) violations
of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) and 14 CFR
61.15(d) and (e) when the violations
were related to the same motor vehicle
action or actions.
In 2018, the FAA implemented a
similar policy for commercial pilots
who violate certain FAA drug and
alcohol-related prohibitions, including
3 Under 14 CFR 61.15(a), a conviction for the
violation of any Federal or State statute relating to
the growing, processing, manufacture, sale,
disposition, possession, transportation, or
importation of narcotic drugs, marijuana, or
depressant or stimulant drugs or substances is
grounds for suspension or revocation of any
certificate, rating, or authorization issued under 14
CFR part 61. Under 14 CFR 61.15(d), except for a
motor vehicle action that results from the same
incident or arises out of the same factual
circumstances, a motor vehicle action occurring
within three years of a previous motor vehicle
action is grounds for suspension or revocation of
any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under
14 CFR part 61. Under 14 CFR 61.15(e), each person
holding a certificate issued under this part shall
provide a written report of each motor vehicle
action to the FAA not later than 60 days after the
motor vehicle action.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
those involving a disqualifying DOT
drug or alcohol test result or refusal to
submit to DOT drug or alcohol testing.4
The appropriate sanction for such
violations is the revocation of airman,
ground instructor, and medical
certificates held by the commercial
pilot. As with violations of 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1) through (4), a violation of
drug and alcohol testing regulations is
subject to comprehensive investigation,
which, in turn, is subject to program
office and Office of the Chief Counsel
review before the FAA issues a
revocation order. Further, as mentioned
above, an individual whose part 61
certificate is revoked may not apply for
a new part 61 certificate, rating, or
authorization for one year after the
effective date of the revocation order.5
The FAA’s drug and alcohol prompt
settlement policy allows eligible pilots
to promptly settle their case with the
FAA and avoid a potentially lengthy
investigation and FAA case evaluation
process. In turn, eligible pilots can
benefit from an earlier start of the oneyear application waiting period
specified in 14 CFR 61.13(d)(2). Further,
the policy affords both the pilot and
FAA the opportunity to better allocate
resources.
Statement of Policy
Under this prompt settlement policy,
following the issuance of an LOI for
violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4), an
eligible individual who is the subject of
the legal enforcement action would have
the opportunity to enter into a
settlement agreement providing for (1)
the acceptance of the prompt issuance
of an order revoking the individual’s
airman or ground instructor certificates;
(2) the immediate surrender of the
affected certificates in response to the
order; and (3) the waiver of appeal
rights. This policy is expected to afford
eligible individuals who are the subject
of legal enforcement action for violating
14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4) the opportunity
to apply for a new airman certificate
under 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65, or
a new ground instructor certificate
under 14 CFR part 61, sooner than in
the absence of such a policy. The policy
will also apply when any controlled
substance conviction or motor vehicle
action that was the basis for a violation
of 14 CFR 61.15(a), (d), or (e) also forms
the basis for an intentional falsification
violation under 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1).
Under this policy, the FAA will send
notification to individuals who appear
to have violated those provisions that
they may contact the applicable
4 See
5 14
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
83 FR 34040 (Jul. 19, 2018).
CFR 61.13(d)(2).
24SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 186 / Thursday, September 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
program office within ten days of
receipt of the notice to request
consideration for a prompt settlement of
the legal enforcement action. The FAA
will send the notification in conjunction
with the LOI.
Following an individual’s request to
be considered for application of this
policy, the FAA will determine the
individual’s eligibility for the policy.
The policy is not available when there
is a question about an individual’s
qualification to hold a part 61, 63, or 65
certificate other than that presented by
the 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4)
violation. It is also not available for
individuals who the FAA has found to
have previously violated 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1) through (4).
If the FAA deems application of the
prompt settlement policy is appropriate,
AGC–300 enforcement counsel will
provide the individual, or his or her
legal representative, a formal agreement
that sets forth the conditions for prompt
settlement. The terms of this settlement
agreement will normally include the
following provisions.
(1) The settlement agreement must be
executed by the parties within ten days
after the FAA sends the agreement to
the individual.
(2) The FAA will issue an emergency
order revoking all airman, ground
instructor, and unexpired medical
certificates the individual holds
immediately upon receiving the fully
executed settlement agreement.
(3) The order of revocation will (i)
require the immediate surrender of all
airman, ground instructor, and
unexpired medical certificates the
individual holds to enforcement
counsel; (ii) notify the individual that
the failure to immediately surrender
these certificates could subject the
individual to further legal enforcement
action, including a civil penalty; and
(iii) inform the individual that the FAA
will not accept an application for any
new airman or ground instructor
certificate for a period of one year from
the date of the issuance of the order of
revocation.
(4) The individual will waive all
appeal rights from the order of
revocation.
(5) The individual acknowledges that
this agreement only concerns this
enforcement action brought by the FAA
and does not affect any actions that
might be brought by State or other
Federal agencies (whether civil or
criminal), and that this agreement does
not prevent the FAA from providing
information about this matter to State or
other Federal agencies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
(6) The parties will agree to bear their
own costs and attorney fees, if any, in
connection with the matter.
(7) The individual will agree to not
initiate any litigation before any court,
tribunal, or administrative entity
concerning any costs, damages, or
attorney fees, including applications
under the Equal Access to Justice Act,
incurred as a result of the abovereferenced matter.
(8) The individual will agree to waive
any and all causes of action against the
FAA and its current and/or former
officials and employees relating to the
above-referenced matter.
This policy is expected to allow
eligible individuals to more quickly
apply for new certificates under 14 CFR
parts 61, 63, and 65 following violations
of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)–(4). It will also
reduce uncertainty about the date of
issuance of orders of revocation related
to such violations, eliminate the
unpredictability of litigation, and
promote better resource allocation.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
21, 2020.
Naomi Tsuda,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2020–21111 Filed 9–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
15 CFR Part 285
[Docket No.: 200128–0034]
RIN 0693–AB67
National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program—Amendment
to the Procedures and Requirements
To Accredit Testing and Calibration
Laboratories
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Director of the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) is issuing a final rule amending
the regulations pertaining to the
operation of the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP) and the operation of its
accreditation programs. The regulations
are being revised to include recognition
of proficiency testing as an accreditation
activity, add or revise terms, and update
NVLAP mailing information, in
accordance with the applicable
international standard. These changes
will not impact the public directly, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60059
will only result in minor changes to
NIST’s internal practices.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 24, 2020. The incorporation
by reference of certain publications
listed in the rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
September 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Dana S. Leaman, Chief,
National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program, 100 Bureau
Drive, Stop 2140, Gaithersburg, MD
20899–2140 or by sending email to
nvlap@nist.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dana S. Leaman, Chief, NIST/NVLAP,
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2140,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2140, Phone:
(301) 975–4016 or email: dana.leaman@
nist.gov. Information regarding NVLAP
and the accreditation process can be
obtained from https://www.nist.gov/
nvlap.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title 15, part 285 of the Code of
Federal Regulations sets out procedures
and general requirements under which
NVLAP operates as an unbiased third
party to accredit both testing and
calibration laboratories. The NVLAP
procedures were first published in the
Federal Register on February 25, 1976,
and have been revised several times.
NVLAP currently operates in
accordance with ISO/IEC 17011:2004,
Conformity assessment—Requirements
for accreditation bodies accrediting
conformity assessment bodies. The
Laboratory Accreditation Programs
operated by NVLAP are established
based on the criteria in ISO/IEC 17025,
General requirements for the
competence of testing and calibration
laboratories. Revisions to ISO/IEC 17011
and ISO/IEC 17025 were published in
November 2017 with a three-year
implementation period. These revisions
include recognition of proficiency
testing as an accreditation activity,
addition and/or revision of terms, and
update of the NVLAP mailing
information. The purpose of this
amendment is to incorporate these
revised requirements into the
regulations.
II. Incorporation by Reference
NIST Handbook 150 presents the
basic procedures under which NVLAP
operates, and considers the
requirements contained in ISO/IEC
17025, General requirements for the
competence of testing and calibration
laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025 and NIST
Handbook 150 contain the general
requirements that testing and calibration
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 186 (Thursday, September 24, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60057-60059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21111]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No.: FAA-2020-0809]
14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65 and 67
Settlement Policy for Legal Enforcement Actions Involving Medical
Certificate-Related Fraud, Intentional Falsification, Reproduction, or
Alteration
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of enforcement policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a policy for the prompt settlement of
legal enforcement actions against individuals who have violated FAA
regulations proscribing any: Fraudulent or intentionally false
statement on an application for a medical certificate or other document
used to show compliance with any requirement for a medical certificate;
reproduction of a medical certificate for fraudulent purposes; or
alteration of a medical certificate. The policy is expected to afford
eligible individuals who hold an airman or ground instructor
certificate and who are the subject of such a legal enforcement action
the opportunity to apply for a new airman or ground instructor
certificate sooner than in the absence of this policy.
DATES: This notification of enforcement policy is effective September
30, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Barry, Manager, Policy/Audit/
Evaluation, Enforcement Division, AGC-300, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267-8198; [email protected]; or Brandon Goldberg,
Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone
(404) 305-5230; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under longstanding FAA policy, the revocation of airman, ground
instructor, and medical certificates, and the withdrawal of all special
issuances or SODAs, is the appropriate sanction for violations of 14
CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4).\1\ The period between the discovery of an
apparent violation of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4) and, if
appropriate, the issuance of an order revoking airman, medical, and
ground instructor certificates can be lengthy, making the date on which
an order of revocation will be issued uncertain. Investigative
personnel compile an
[[Page 60058]]
enforcement investigative report (EIR) containing evidence relating to
the apparent violation. Such investigations include gathering, among
other evidence, legal and/or medical documentation from various
governmental entities or healthcare providers. Investigative personnel
also include as evidence letters of investigation (LOIs) to apparent
violators and any information provided in response to LOIs. Following
the compilation of evidence, investigative personnel provide analyses
as to how the evidence relates to the violation and recommended
sanction type. The EIR is subject to various levels of review within
the FAA program office. If the program office deems the EIR sufficient,
it transmits the EIR to the Office of the Chief Counsel's Enforcement
Division (AGC-300) for evaluation and, if appropriate, initiation of
legal enforcement action. Accordingly, a variety of factors affect the
timing of the issuance of an order of revocation for an apparent
violation of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4), a person is prohibited from
making or causing to be made: A fraudulent or intentionally false
statement on any application for a medical certificate or on a
request for any Authorization for Special Issuance of a Medical
Certificate (Authorization) or Statement of Demonstrated Ability
(SODA); a fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any logbook,
record, or report that is kept, made, or used to show compliance
with any requirement for any medical certificate or for any
Authorization or SODA; a reproduction, for fraudulent purposes, of
any medical certificate; or an alteration of any medical
certificate. Under 14 CFR 67.403(b)(1)-(2), a violation of 14 CFR
67.403(a)(1)-(4) is a basis for: Suspending or revoking all airman,
ground instructor, and medical certificates and ratings held by the
violator and withdrawing all Authorizations or SODA's held by the
violator. See also FAA Order 2150.3C, chap. 9, para. 8 (revocation
is appropriate for a violation of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4) since such
a violation demonstrates a lack of qualification to hold a
certificate).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, FAA regulations generally proscribe individuals whose
airman and ground instructor certificates have been revoked from
applying for new airman and ground instructor certificates for one year
following the effective date of an order of revocation. Under 14 CFR
61.13(d)(2), unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, a person
whose pilot, flight instructor, or ground instructor certificate has
been revoked may not apply for any certificate, rating, or
authorization for one year after the date of revocation. Under 14 CFR
63.11(d), unless the order of revocation provides otherwise, a person
whose flight engineer or flight navigator certificate is revoked may
not apply for the same kind of certificate for one year after the date
of revocation. Under 14 CFR 65.11(d)(1) and (2), unless the order of
revocation provides otherwise, a person whose air traffic control tower
operator, aircraft dispatcher, or parachute rigger certificate is
revoked may not apply for the same kind of certificate for one year
after the date of revocation; and a person whose mechanic or repairman
certificate is revoked may not apply for either of those kinds of
certificates for one year after the date of revocation.\2\ In short,
following the requisite investigation and case evaluation processes
that take place prior to the issuance of an order revoking airman and
ground instructor certificates for a 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4)
violation, an applicant may have to wait up to one year following the
issuance of an order to make application for any new such certificate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The one-year application restriction applicable to revoked
14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65 certificates does not apply to
certificates issued under 14 CFR part 67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The prompt settlement policy announced in this notice for
violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4) will generally afford an
individual eligible for the policy the opportunity to apply for any
airman and ground instructor certificate sooner than had the case
proceeded in the absence of the policy. The individual would still be
subject to the one-year post-revocation bar applicable to applications
for new airman or ground instructor certificates, but would have the
opportunity to apply for such certificates generally sooner than under
the current process because much of the investigation and evaluation
processes would be abbreviated or eliminated. Moreover, this policy
will generally add predictability as to when the FAA would issue the
order and, accordingly, when an individual could submit an application
for a new airman or ground instructor certificate.
The policy will also apply when any controlled substance conviction
or motor vehicle action that is the basis for a violation of 14 CFR
61.15(a), (d), or (e) also forms the basis for an intentional
falsification violation under 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1).\3\ For example, the
policy will apply to: (1) Violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) and 14 CFR
61.15(e) when the violations were related to the same driving under the
influence conviction; (2) violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) and 14 CFR
61.15(a) when the violations were related to the same controlled
substance conviction; and (3) violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) and 14
CFR 61.15(d) and (e) when the violations were related to the same motor
vehicle action or actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under 14 CFR 61.15(a), a conviction for the violation of any
Federal or State statute relating to the growing, processing,
manufacture, sale, disposition, possession, transportation, or
importation of narcotic drugs, marijuana, or depressant or stimulant
drugs or substances is grounds for suspension or revocation of any
certificate, rating, or authorization issued under 14 CFR part 61.
Under 14 CFR 61.15(d), except for a motor vehicle action that
results from the same incident or arises out of the same factual
circumstances, a motor vehicle action occurring within three years
of a previous motor vehicle action is grounds for suspension or
revocation of any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under
14 CFR part 61. Under 14 CFR 61.15(e), each person holding a
certificate issued under this part shall provide a written report of
each motor vehicle action to the FAA not later than 60 days after
the motor vehicle action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2018, the FAA implemented a similar policy for commercial pilots
who violate certain FAA drug and alcohol-related prohibitions,
including those involving a disqualifying DOT drug or alcohol test
result or refusal to submit to DOT drug or alcohol testing.\4\ The
appropriate sanction for such violations is the revocation of airman,
ground instructor, and medical certificates held by the commercial
pilot. As with violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4), a
violation of drug and alcohol testing regulations is subject to
comprehensive investigation, which, in turn, is subject to program
office and Office of the Chief Counsel review before the FAA issues a
revocation order. Further, as mentioned above, an individual whose part
61 certificate is revoked may not apply for a new part 61 certificate,
rating, or authorization for one year after the effective date of the
revocation order.\5\ The FAA's drug and alcohol prompt settlement
policy allows eligible pilots to promptly settle their case with the
FAA and avoid a potentially lengthy investigation and FAA case
evaluation process. In turn, eligible pilots can benefit from an
earlier start of the one-year application waiting period specified in
14 CFR 61.13(d)(2). Further, the policy affords both the pilot and FAA
the opportunity to better allocate resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 83 FR 34040 (Jul. 19, 2018).
\5\ 14 CFR 61.13(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement of Policy
Under this prompt settlement policy, following the issuance of an
LOI for violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4), an eligible individual
who is the subject of the legal enforcement action would have the
opportunity to enter into a settlement agreement providing for (1) the
acceptance of the prompt issuance of an order revoking the individual's
airman or ground instructor certificates; (2) the immediate surrender
of the affected certificates in response to the order; and (3) the
waiver of appeal rights. This policy is expected to afford eligible
individuals who are the subject of legal enforcement action for
violating 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4) the opportunity to apply for a new
airman certificate under 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65, or a new ground
instructor certificate under 14 CFR part 61, sooner than in the absence
of such a policy. The policy will also apply when any controlled
substance conviction or motor vehicle action that was the basis for a
violation of 14 CFR 61.15(a), (d), or (e) also forms the basis for an
intentional falsification violation under 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1). Under
this policy, the FAA will send notification to individuals who appear
to have violated those provisions that they may contact the applicable
[[Page 60059]]
program office within ten days of receipt of the notice to request
consideration for a prompt settlement of the legal enforcement action.
The FAA will send the notification in conjunction with the LOI.
Following an individual's request to be considered for application
of this policy, the FAA will determine the individual's eligibility for
the policy. The policy is not available when there is a question about
an individual's qualification to hold a part 61, 63, or 65 certificate
other than that presented by the 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4)
violation. It is also not available for individuals who the FAA has
found to have previously violated 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1) through (4).
If the FAA deems application of the prompt settlement policy is
appropriate, AGC-300 enforcement counsel will provide the individual,
or his or her legal representative, a formal agreement that sets forth
the conditions for prompt settlement. The terms of this settlement
agreement will normally include the following provisions.
(1) The settlement agreement must be executed by the parties within
ten days after the FAA sends the agreement to the individual.
(2) The FAA will issue an emergency order revoking all airman,
ground instructor, and unexpired medical certificates the individual
holds immediately upon receiving the fully executed settlement
agreement.
(3) The order of revocation will (i) require the immediate
surrender of all airman, ground instructor, and unexpired medical
certificates the individual holds to enforcement counsel; (ii) notify
the individual that the failure to immediately surrender these
certificates could subject the individual to further legal enforcement
action, including a civil penalty; and (iii) inform the individual that
the FAA will not accept an application for any new airman or ground
instructor certificate for a period of one year from the date of the
issuance of the order of revocation.
(4) The individual will waive all appeal rights from the order of
revocation.
(5) The individual acknowledges that this agreement only concerns
this enforcement action brought by the FAA and does not affect any
actions that might be brought by State or other Federal agencies
(whether civil or criminal), and that this agreement does not prevent
the FAA from providing information about this matter to State or other
Federal agencies.
(6) The parties will agree to bear their own costs and attorney
fees, if any, in connection with the matter.
(7) The individual will agree to not initiate any litigation before
any court, tribunal, or administrative entity concerning any costs,
damages, or attorney fees, including applications under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, incurred as a result of the above-referenced
matter.
(8) The individual will agree to waive any and all causes of action
against the FAA and its current and/or former officials and employees
relating to the above-referenced matter.
This policy is expected to allow eligible individuals to more
quickly apply for new certificates under 14 CFR parts 61, 63, and 65
following violations of 14 CFR 67.403(a)(1)-(4). It will also reduce
uncertainty about the date of issuance of orders of revocation related
to such violations, eliminate the unpredictability of litigation, and
promote better resource allocation.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 21, 2020.
Naomi Tsuda,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2020-21111 Filed 9-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P