Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Rated Orders Under the Defense Priories and Allocations System (DPAS), 57820-57821 [2020-20206]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
57820
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Notices
• EPA.
The restoration planning activities are
proceeding in accordance with the Final
PDARP/PEIS. Restoration Types
evaluated in the RPII/EA include:
Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore
Habitats; and Oysters. Information on
the restoration types that were
considered in the RPII/EA, as well as a
general overview of the OPA NRDA
criteria against which project ideas were
evaluated, can be found in the Final
PDARP/PEIS (https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/
restoration-planning/gulf-plan) and in
the Overview section of the PDARP/
PEIS (https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/
restoration-planning/gulf-plan).
The MS TIG posted a Notice of
Solicitation calling for project ideas on
June 11, 2018 2 through August 10, 1018
(June 11, 2018, Notice). Project ideas
were requested for the following
restoration types: Wetlands, Coastal,
and Nearshore Habitats (WCNH);
Nutrient Reduction; Oysters; Sea
Turtles; and Marine Mammals. During
the planning process the MS TIG
decided to focus only on WCNH and
Oyster Restoration Types in RPII. On
October 10, 2018, the MS TIG published
a Notice of Initiation of Restoration
Planning in Mississippi.3
The notice of availability of the Draft
RPII/EA was published in the Federal
Register on April 22, 2020 (85 FR
22393–22395). In the Draft RPII EA, the
MS TIG evaluated seven alternatives
and two No Action Alternatives for the
WCNH and Oysters Restoration Types,
respectively. In the Draft RPII/EA, the
MS TIG determined that the actions
proposed for selection would be
consistent with the programmatic
restoration alternative selected in the
Final PDARP/PEIS and would be
funded by $4,887,500 from the WCNH
Restoration Type and $10,500,000 from
the Oysters Restoration Type allocations
to the Mississippi Restoration Area. The
MS TIG provided the public with 30
days to review and comment on the
Draft RPII/EA and hosted a public
webinar to provide an overview of the
Draft RPII/EA and to provide
opportunity for public comment. Public
comment was also received
electronically through the Trustee-wide
public website, the Regulations.gov
website, and by mail and email
correspondence. The MS TIG
considered the public comments
2 https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/2018/
06/mississippi-trustee-implementation-groupwelcomes-publics-project-ideas.
3 https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/2018/
10/notice-initiation-restoration-planningmississippi.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
received (See Chapter 8.0 of the RPII/
EA), which informed the MS TIG’s
analysis of alternatives in the RPII/EA.
The MS TIG also considered the OPA
NRDA criteria against which project
ideas are evaluated, which can be found
in the PDARP/PEIS and in the Overview
of the PDARP/PEIS (https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/
restoration-planning/gulf-plan).
Administrative Record includes the
relevant administrative records since its
date of inception. This Administrative
Record is actively maintained and
available for public review. The
documents included in the
Administrative Record can be viewed
electronically at the following location:
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/
adminrecord.
Overview of the RPII/EA
The RPII/EA is being released in
accordance with the OPA NRDA
regulations in 15 CFR part 990, NEPA
(42 U.S.C. parts 4321–4347), and 40 CFR
part 1500.
In the RPII/EA, the MS TIG selects
four alternatives to be funded from
Restoration Type funds as specified
below. Specifically, the MS TIG selects
the following projects for
implementation:
• Wolf River Coastal Preserve Habitat
Management—Dupont and Bell’s Ferry
Tracts (WCNH);
• Hancock County Coastal Preserve
Habitat Management—Wachovia Tract
(WCNH);
• Oyster Spawning Reefs in
Mississippi (Oysters); and
• Mississippi Oyster Gardening
Program (Oysters).
The total estimated cost of the four
selected alternatives is approximately
$15 million.
The RPII/EA evaluates a reasonable
range of alternatives and a No Action
Alternative for each of the Restoration
Types. As a result of its evaluation, the
MS TIG determined that the restoration
projects selected for funding are most
appropriate for providing partial
compensation to the public for injured
natural resources and ecological
services in the Mississippi Restoration
Area. The selected alternatives are
intended to continue the process of
restoring natural resources and
ecological services injured or lost as a
result of the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill. Additional restoration planning
for the Mississippi Restoration Area will
continue.
In accordance with NEPA and as part
of the RPII/EA, the Trustees issued a
FONSI which is available in Appendix
E of the RPII/EA.
Authority
Administrative Record
The DWH Trustees opened a publicly
available Administrative Record for the
NRDA for the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill, including restoration planning
activities, concurrently with publication
of the 2011 Notice of Intent to Begin
Restoration Scoping and Prepare a Gulf
Spill Restoration Planning PEIS
(pursuant to 15 CFR 990.45). The
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The authority for this action is the
OPA (33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), its
implementing NRDA regulations in 15
CFR part 990, and the NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations in 40 CFR parts 1500–1508.
Kevin Norton,
Acting Chief, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–20354 Filed 9–14–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Rated Orders Under the
Defense Priories and Allocations
System (DPAS)
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Information
Collection, request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before November 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments by email to
Mark Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of
Industry and Security, at mark.crace@
bis.doc.gov or to PRAcomments@
doc.gov. Please reference OMB Control
Number 0694–0092 in the subject line of
your comments. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Notices
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection
activities should be directed to Mark
Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of Industry
and Security by email at mark.crace@
bis.doc.gov or by phone at 202–482–
8093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This information collection is
necessary to support the execution of
the President’s priorities and allocations
authority under the Defense Production
Act of 1950 (DPA), as amended (50
U.S.C. 4501, et seq.), and the priorities
authorities under the Selective Service
Act of 1948 (50 U.S.C. 3801, et seq.), as
implemented by the Defense Priorities
and Allocations System (DPAS)
regulation (15 CFR part 700). The
purpose of this authority is to ensure
preferential acceptance and
performance of contracts and orders
supporting national defense and
emergency preparedness program
requirements.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2020–20206 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
II. Method of Collection
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submitted electronically or in paper
form.
International Trade Administration
III. Data
[A–588–874]
OMB Control Number: 0694–0092.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission,
extension of a current information
collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
14,434,650.
Estimated Time per Response: 2
minute to 16 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 45,290.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $1,585,150.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Defense Production
Act of 1950 (DPA).
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From Japan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2017–2018
IV. Request for Comments
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Minimize the
reporting burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department/Bureau to: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of our estimate of the time and
cost burden for this proposed collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Evaluate ways to enhance the quality,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that mandatory
respondents, Nippon Steel Corporation
(NSC) and Tokyo Steel Manufacturing
Co., Ltd. (Tokyo Steel), producers and
exporters of hot-rolled steel flat
products (hot-rolled steel) from Japan,
did not sell subject merchandise in the
United States at prices below normal
value during the period of review (POR)
October 1, 2017 through September 30,
2018. In addition, Commerce
determines that Honda Trading Canada,
Inc. (Honda) had no shipments during
the POR.
DATES: Applicable September 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun
Jack Zhao or Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57821
(202) 482–1396 or (202) 482–2371,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 16, 2019, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this review in the Federal Register.1 We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. Between
January 15 and January 24, 2020,
Commerce received timely filed briefs
and rebuttal briefs from the petitioners,2
NSC, and Tokyo Steel.3 On January 15,
2020, Commerce received hearing
requests from the petitioners and NSC.4
In lieu of a hearing, Commerce held a
phone meeting with the petitioners on
July 17, 2020; NSC did not request a
phone meeting in lieu of a hearing.5
On March 20, 2020, we extended the
deadline for the final results.6 On April
24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines
in administrative reviews by 50 days.7
On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all
deadlines in administrative reviews by
1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR
68402 (December 16, 2019) (Preliminary Results),
and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
2 The petitioners are AK Steel Corporation;
ArcelorMittal USA LLC; Nucor Corporation; SSAB
Enterprises, LLC; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; and United
States Steel Corporation.
3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Flat Products from Japan: Case Brief,’’ dated January
15, 2020; see also NSC’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from Japan: NSC’s Case Brief,’’
dated January 15, 2020; Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan:
Petitioner’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 24, 2020;
NSC’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from Japan: NSC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated
January 24, 2020; and Tokyo Steel’s Letter,
‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Tokyo Steel: Certain Hot-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from Japan,’’ dated January 24,
2020.
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Flat Products from Japan: Hearing Request,’’ dated
January 15, 2020; see also NSC’s Letter, ‘‘Certain
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: NSC’s
Hearing Request,’’ dated January 15, 2020.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Products from Japan: Phone Meeting with the
Petitioners,’’ dated July 17, 2020. The petitioners
withdrew their hearing request on July 16, 2020; see
Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products From Japan: Withdrawal of Hearing
Request,’’ dated July 16, 2020. NSC did not request
a phone meeting with Commerce, in lieu of a
hearing; see Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review
of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Japan: Contact with NSC Counsel,’’ dated August
27, 2020.
6 See Memoranda, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
Products from Japan: Extension of Deadline for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017–2018,’’ dated March 20, 2020.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57820-57821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20206]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Rated Orders Under the Defense Priories and Allocations System
(DPAS)
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Information Collection, request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment
preceding submission of the collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received on or before November 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments by email
to Mark Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of Industry and Security, at
[email protected] or to [email protected]. Please reference OMB
Control Number 0694-0092 in the subject line of your comments. Do not
submit Confidential Business Information or
[[Page 57821]]
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection activities should be directed
to Mark Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of Industry and Security by email at
[email protected] or by phone at 202-482-8093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This information collection is necessary to support the execution
of the President's priorities and allocations authority under the
Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA), as amended (50 U.S.C. 4501, et
seq.), and the priorities authorities under the Selective Service Act
of 1948 (50 U.S.C. 3801, et seq.), as implemented by the Defense
Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) regulation (15 CFR part 700).
The purpose of this authority is to ensure preferential acceptance and
performance of contracts and orders supporting national defense and
emergency preparedness program requirements.
II. Method of Collection
Submitted electronically or in paper form.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694-0092.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission, extension of a current
information collection.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 14,434,650.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 minute to 16 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 45,290.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $1,585,150.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA).
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau
to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy
of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed
collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the reporting burden
on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in
your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2020-20206 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
