Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Control of Emissions From Manufacture of Polystyrene Resin, 57700-57701 [2020-20013]
Download as PDF
57700
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.1320
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
EPA—APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
10–6.120 ........................
*
*
Restriction of Emissions
of Lead from Specific
Lead Smelter-Refinery Installations.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–19415 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0331; FRL–10014–
46–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal
of Control of Emissions From
Manufacture of Polystyrene Resin
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Missouri on January 15,
2019, and supplemented by letter on
July 11, 2019. In the proposal, EPA
proposed removal of a rule related to the
control of emissions from the
manufacture of polystyrene resin in the
St. Louis, Missouri area from its SIP.
This removal does not have an adverse
effect on air quality. The EPA’s approval
of this rule revision is in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0331. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
10/25/18
Jkt 250001
*
*
9/16/20, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
*
*
*
*
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
further progress 1 or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA
because the single source subject to the
rule ceased manufacturing polystyrene
resin in 2009 and the removal of the
rule will not cause VOC emissions to
increase. (85 FR 43526, July 17, 2020).
The EPA solicited but did not receive
any comments on this proposed rule.
Therefore, the EPA is finalizing its
proposal to remove 10 CSR 10–5.410
from the SIP.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
May 15, 2018, to August 2, 2018, and
received twelve comments from the EPA
that related to Missouri’s lack of an
adequate demonstration that the rule
could be removed from the SIP in
accordance with section 110(l) of the
CAA, whether the rule applied to new
sources and other implications related
to rescinding the rule. Missouri’s July
11, 2019 letter and December 3, 2018
response to comments on the state
rescission rulemaking addressed the
EPA’s comments. In addition, the
David Peter, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Permitting
and Standards Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7397;
email address: peter.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving the removal of
10 Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10–
5.410, Control of Emissions from
Manufacture of Polystyrene Resin, from
the Missouri SIP.
As explained in detail in EPA’s
proposed rule, Missouri has
demonstrated that removal of 10 CSR
10–5.410 will not interfere with
attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1 RFP is not applicable to the St. Louis Area
because for marginal ozone nonattainment areas,
such as the St. Louis Area, the specific
requirements of section 182(a) apply in lieu of the
attainment planning requirements that would
otherwise apply under section 172(c), including the
attainment demonstration and reasonably available
control measures (RACM) under section 172(c)(1),
reasonable further progress (RFP) under section
172(c)(2), and contingency measures under section
172(c)(9).
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
approve Missouri’s request to remove 10
CSR 10–5.410 from the SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
amending regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. As described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below, the EPA is removing
provisions of the EPA-Approved
Missouri Regulation from the Missouri
State Implementation Plan, which is
incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 24, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57701
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 3, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
§ 52.1320
[Amended]
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by removing the entry
‘‘10–5.410’’ under the heading ‘‘Chapter
5—Air Quality Standards and Air
Pollution Control Regulations for the St.
Louis Metropolitan Area’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2020–20013 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0289; FRL–10013–
51–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface
Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. This final action will
amend the SIP to revise a Missouri
regulation that restricts emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from industrial surface coating
operations in Clay, Jackson, and Platte
Counties in Missouri. Specifically, the
revisions to the rule remove restrictive
words, adds exemptions, includes
definitions specific to the rule, corrects
test method references, removes
obsolete requirements specific to
sources that have closed, changes
sections to the standard rule format, and
makes minor clarifications and
grammatical changes. The exemptions
were added to make this rule consistent
with the St. Louis version of this rule,
10 Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57700-57701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20013]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0331; FRL-10014-46-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Control of Emissions From
Manufacture of Polystyrene Resin
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Missouri on January 15, 2019, and
supplemented by letter on July 11, 2019. In the proposal, EPA proposed
removal of a rule related to the control of emissions from the
manufacture of polystyrene resin in the St. Louis, Missouri area from
its SIP. This removal does not have an adverse effect on air quality.
The EPA's approval of this rule revision is in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0331. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Peter, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Permitting and Standards Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7397; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is approving the removal of 10 Code of State Regulation
(CSR) 10-5.410, Control of Emissions from Manufacture of Polystyrene
Resin, from the Missouri SIP.
As explained in detail in EPA's proposed rule, Missouri has
demonstrated that removal of 10 CSR 10-5.410 will not interfere with
attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable further progress \1\ or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA because the single source subject to
the rule ceased manufacturing polystyrene resin in 2009 and the removal
of the rule will not cause VOC emissions to increase. (85 FR 43526,
July 17, 2020). The EPA solicited but did not receive any comments on
this proposed rule. Therefore, the EPA is finalizing its proposal to
remove 10 CSR 10-5.410 from the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ RFP is not applicable to the St. Louis Area because for
marginal ozone nonattainment areas, such as the St. Louis Area, the
specific requirements of section 182(a) apply in lieu of the
attainment planning requirements that would otherwise apply under
section 172(c), including the attainment demonstration and
reasonably available control measures (RACM) under section
172(c)(1), reasonable further progress (RFP) under section
172(c)(2), and contingency measures under section 172(c)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from May 15, 2018, to
August 2, 2018, and received twelve comments from the EPA that related
to Missouri's lack of an adequate demonstration that the rule could be
removed from the SIP in accordance with section 110(l) of the CAA,
whether the rule applied to new sources and other implications related
to rescinding the rule. Missouri's July 11, 2019 letter and December 3,
2018 response to comments on the state rescission rulemaking addressed
the EPA's comments. In addition, the
[[Page 57701]]
revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to approve Missouri's request to
remove 10 CSR 10-5.410 from the SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is amending regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. As described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below, the EPA is removing provisions of the EPA-
Approved Missouri Regulation from the Missouri State Implementation
Plan, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 24, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 3, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
Sec. 52.1320 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by removing
the entry ``10-5.410'' under the heading ``Chapter 5--Air Quality
Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis
Metropolitan Area''.
[FR Doc. 2020-20013 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P