Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions from Industrial Surface Coating Operations, 57721-57723 [2020-19418]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(514) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) 2018 Updates to the California
State Implementation Plan, adopted on
October 25, 2018, chapter VII (‘‘SIP
Elements for the Coachella Valley’’),
excluding section VII.D (‘‘Contingency
Measures’’); and pages A–23 through
A–26 of appendix A (‘‘Nonattainment
Area Inventories’’).
*
*
*
*
*
(517) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) * * *
(6) Final 2016 Air Quality
Management Plan (March 2017),
Chapter 7 (‘‘Current and Future Air
Quality—Desert Nonattainment Areas’’),
adopted on March 3, 2017, excluding
the portions of pages 7–13 to 7–22
regarding particulate matter and other
criteria pollutants, and excluding the
portions of pages 7–26 to 7–30 regarding
reasonable further progress.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.244 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(11) to read as
follows:
§ 52.244
Motor vehicle emissions budgets.
(a) * * *
(11) Coachella Valley, approved
October 16, 2020.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–19162 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0339; FRL–10014–
32–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions from Industrial Surface
Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. This final action will
amend the SIP to revise a Missouri
regulation that restricts emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from industrial surface coating
operations in St. Louis City and
Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, and St.
Louis Counties in Missouri.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
Specifically, the revisions to the rule
add a new surface coating category for
the decorative coating of foam products,
establish an appropriate emission limit
for this type of surface coating
operation, remove obsolete provisions
that were applicable prior to March 1,
2012, remove a reference to a rule that
is being rescinded, remove restrictive
words, add definitions specific to this
rule, change rule language to be
consistent with defined terms, and
update incorporations by reference. The
new emission limit for decorative
coating of foam products is SIP
strengthening and will not adversely
impact the air quality in the St. Louis
area. The remaining revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
impact the stringency of the SIP or air
quality. The EPA’s approval of this rule
revision is in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0339. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7714;
email address: stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is Being Addressed in this
Document?
II. Have the Requirements for Approval of a
SIP Revision Been Met?
III. What Action is the EPA Taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving the revisions to
10 CSR 10–5.330 Control of Emissions
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57721
From Industrial Surface Coating
Operations in the Missouri SIP. The
revisions to the rule add a new surface
coating category for the decorative
coating of foam products, establish an
appropriate emission limit for this type
of surface coating operation, remove
obsolete provisions that were applicable
prior to March 1, 2012, remove a
reference to a rule that is being
rescinded, remove restrictive words,
add definitions specific to this rule,
change rule language to be consistent
with defined terms, and update
incorporations by reference. These
revisions are described in detail in the
technical support document (TSD)
included in the docket for this action.
The EPA solicited comments on the
proposed revision to Missouri’s SIP, and
received two comments unrelated to the
proposed action.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice of the revisions from
August 1, 2018, to October 4, 2018, and
held a public hearing on September 27,
2018. The state received and addressed
three comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this
docket, the SIP revision submission
meets the substantive requirements of
the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
approve Missouri’s request to amend 10
CSR 10–5.330.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the State Implementation Plan, have
been incorporated by reference by EPA
into that plan, are fully federally
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
57722
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 16, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 28, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–5.330’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA—APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.330 ........................
1 62
*
Control of Emissions
from Industrial Surface Coating Operations.
*
3/30/2019
*
*
9/16/2020, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
*
57723
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
EPA—APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued
Missouri citation
*
*
*
State effective
date
Title
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0766, FRL–10012–
38–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2015 Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Whenever the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates a
new or revised National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS), the Clean
Air Act requires each State to make a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submission to establish that its SIP
provides for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
revised NAAQS. This type of SIP
submission is commonly referred to as
an infrastructure SIP submission. The
EPA is approving the State of Idaho’s
September 27, 2018, SIP submission as
meeting applicable infrastructure
requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
DATES: The final rule is effective
October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2018–0766. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov, or
please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Jentgen at (206) 553–0340, or
jentgen.matthew@epa.gov.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
*
Explanation
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
[FR Doc. 2020–19418 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
EPA approval date
I. Background Information
On April 9, 2019, the EPA proposed
to approve Idaho’s September 27, 2018,
SIP submission as meeting certain
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS (84 FR 14067). The initial
public comment period for this
proposed action ended on May 9, 2019.
Due to an administrative error, the EPA
omitted certain documents relevant to
the proposed action from the docket
during the initial comment period, open
from April 9, 2019 to May 9, 2019. The
EPA corrected the administrative error
and on May 28, 2019, we provided an
additional 30 days for public comment
on the proposed action (84 FR 24420).
The public comment period ended on
June 27, 2019. The EPA received
adverse comments on the proposal.
II. Response to Comments
The EPA received adverse comments
during the initial comment period
related to our administrative docket
error that left out documents relevant to
the proposed action. The EPA addressed
these comments by including the
relevant documents in the docket and
providing an additional 30-day
comment period. The EPA received one
comment during the second comment
period. We have summarized and
responded to the remaining adverse
comments below. The full text of the
submitted comments may be found in
the docket for this action.
Comment—Ozone NAAQS Violations
Summary – The Idaho Conservation
League (ICL) asserted that monitoring
data indicates Idaho’s efforts to prevent
a violation of the 2015 ozone NAAQS
are ineffective. ICL further asserted that
the EPA’s approval of the 2015 ozone
infrastructure SIP submission should be
contingent upon the State’s ‘‘creation
and implementation of new
management strategies to address ozone
in Idaho.’’
Specifically, ICL pointed to Idaho’s
infrastructure SIP submission, at
appendix B, Table B–1, indicating the
2015–2017 design value for ozone
measured at the Boise—White Pine air
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
monitoring station was 0.070 parts per
million (ppm), equal to the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. Moreover, ICL stated that in
more recent years the monitor has
shown exceedances and that the 2016–
2018 design value is likely to violate the
2015 ozone NAAQS. ICL concluded that
the laws, rules, and regulations
referenced by Idaho in its 2015 ozone
infrastructure SIP submission do not
appear adequate. Thus, the commenter
advocated that the EPA’s approval of
this SIP submission should be
contingent upon Idaho’s creation and
implementation of new emissions
management strategies to address ozone
in Idaho.
Response—The EPA agrees that that
the monitor data identified by the
commenter indicates that there may be
violations of the 2015 ozone NAAQS at
this monitor, but disagrees that this is
an issue that the State should address in
the context of an infrastructure SIP
submission. We have reviewed
monitoring data at the Boise—White
Pine Elementary monitor (Site ID:
160010017) and the design value for the
most recent three-year period (2016–
2018) is 0.072 ppm, which is over the
2015 ozone NAAQS of 0.070 ppm. At
this point in time, all areas of Idaho are
designated attainment for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. The EPA designated the
entire State of Idaho as attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS, based on 2013–2015 design
value data (82 FR 54232, at page 54243).
Each of the three monitors in Idaho that
rely on Federal Reference Method
(FRM) ozone monitoring data (BoiseWhite Pine, Meridian-St Luke’s, and
Craters of the Moon) had 2013–2015
design values below the 0.070 ppm
ozone NAAQS. If there are now
violations of the 2015 ozone NAAQS at
any monitors, then either Idaho or the
EPA may need to consider the need for
a redesignation under section 107(d)(3),
or other proactive actions to address the
ambient ozone concentrations in the
area.
The existence of possible violations of
the NAAQS does not, however, directly
affect Idaho’s September 27, 2018,
infrastructure SIP submission. As stated
in the proposal, the EPA’s longstanding
position is that infrastructure SIP
submissions are intended to address
basic SIP requirements to implement,
maintain, and enforce a NAAQS in
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57721-57723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19418]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0339; FRL-10014-32-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions from Industrial
Surface Coating Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Missouri. This final action will amend the SIP to revise a
Missouri regulation that restricts emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from industrial surface coating operations in St.
Louis City and Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, and St. Louis Counties
in Missouri.
Specifically, the revisions to the rule add a new surface coating
category for the decorative coating of foam products, establish an
appropriate emission limit for this type of surface coating operation,
remove obsolete provisions that were applicable prior to March 1, 2012,
remove a reference to a rule that is being rescinded, remove
restrictive words, add definitions specific to this rule, change rule
language to be consistent with defined terms, and update incorporations
by reference. The new emission limit for decorative coating of foam
products is SIP strengthening and will not adversely impact the air
quality in the St. Louis area. The remaining revisions are
administrative in nature and do not impact the stringency of the SIP or
air quality. The EPA's approval of this rule revision is in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0339. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7714; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is Being Addressed in this Document?
II. Have the Requirements for Approval of a SIP Revision Been Met?
III. What Action is the EPA Taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is approving the revisions to 10 CSR 10-5.330 Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating Operations in the Missouri
SIP. The revisions to the rule add a new surface coating category for
the decorative coating of foam products, establish an appropriate
emission limit for this type of surface coating operation, remove
obsolete provisions that were applicable prior to March 1, 2012, remove
a reference to a rule that is being rescinded, remove restrictive
words, add definitions specific to this rule, change rule language to
be consistent with defined terms, and update incorporations by
reference. These revisions are described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in the docket for this action. The EPA
solicited comments on the proposed revision to Missouri's SIP, and
received two comments unrelated to the proposed action.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice of the revisions from August 1, 2018, to
October 4, 2018, and held a public hearing on September 27, 2018. The
state received and addressed three comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this docket, the SIP revision
submission meets the substantive requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to approve Missouri's request to
amend 10 CSR 10-5.330.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally
[[Page 57722]]
enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective
date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 16, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 28, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-5.330'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA--Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-5.330....................... Control of 3/30/2019 9/16/2020, [insert .......................
Emissions from Federal Register
Industrial citation].
Surface Coating
Operations.
[[Page 57723]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-19418 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
