Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Findings on a Petition To Delist the Distinct Population Segment of the Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo and a Petition To List the U.S. Population of Northwestern Moose, 57816-57818 [2020-19149]

Download as PDF 57816 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules 19. We encourage the public to submit comments via https:// www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the docket. In the final rules section of this issue of the Federal Register, the EPA is approving ABCAQCB’s request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain NSPS and NESHAP for all sources (both Title V and non-Title V sources). ABCAQCB has adopted certain NSPS and NESHAP by reference into ABCAQCB’s regulations. In addition, the EPA is waiving certain notification requirements required by the delegated standards so that sources will only need to notify and report to ABCAQCB, thereby avoiding duplicative notification and reporting to the EPA. This waiver only extends to the submission of copies of notifications and reports; EPA does not waive the requirements in delegated standards that require notifications and reports be submitted to an electronic database. The EPA is taking direct final action without prior proposal because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no relevant adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If the EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn, and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of this issue of the Federal Register. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Yellow-billed cuckoo. Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Findings on a Petition To Delist the Distinct Population Segment of the Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo and a Petition To List the U.S. Population of Northwestern Moose AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notification of findings. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 12month findings on a petition to remove the distinct population segment (DPS) of the western yellow-billed cuckoo from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (i.e., to ‘‘delist’’ that DPS) and a petition to list a DPS of the U.S. population of northwestern moose under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After a thorough review of the best available scientific and commercial information, we find that it is not warranted at this time to delist the DPS of the western yellow-billed cuckoo. However, we ask the public to submit to us at any time any new information relevant to the status of the DPS of the western yellowbilled cuckoo or its habitat. We also find that the U.S. population of northwestern moose does not meet the criteria for discreteness as a DPS and the petitioned northwestern moose DPS is not a listable entity under the Act. SUMMARY: The findings in this document were made on September 16, 2020. DATES: Detailed descriptions of the bases for these findings are available on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov under the following docket numbers: ADDRESSES: Species Docket No. Dated: July 30, 2020. David Garcia, Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6. Yellow-billed cuckoo ....... [FR Doc. 2020–17062 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am] Please submit any new information, materials, comments, or questions concerning this finding to the appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Northwestern moose ...... FWS–R2–ES–2020– 0004 FWS–R3–ES–2016– 0061 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Sep 15, 2020 Jkt 250001 Species PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Northwestern moose. Contact information Jeff Humphrey, Field Supervisor, 602–242–0210, jeff_humphrey@fws.gov; or Shawn Sartorius, Project Leader, 505– 346–2525, shawn_sartorius@ fws.gov. Sarah Quamme, Field Supervisor, Minnesota-Wisconsin Field Office, 952–252–0092. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we are required to make a finding whether or not a petitioned action is warranted within 12 months after receiving any petition for which we have determined contained substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted (‘‘12-month finding’’). We must make a finding that the petitioned action is: (1) Not warranted; (2) warranted; or (3) warranted but precluded. We must publish these 12-month findings in the Federal Register. Summary of Information Pertaining to the Five Factors Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and the implementing regulations at part 424 of title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (50 CFR part 424) set forth procedures for adding species to, removing species from, or reclassifying species on the Lists. The Act defines ‘‘species’’ as any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature. The Act defines ‘‘endangered species’’ as any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range (16 U.S.C. 1532(6)), and ‘‘threatened species’’ as any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range (16 U.S.C. 1532(20)). Under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, a species may be determined to be an endangered species or a threatened species because of any of the following five factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM 16SEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. In considering whether a species may meet the definition of an endangered species or a threatened species because of any of the five factors, we must look beyond the mere exposure of the species to the stressor to determine whether the species responds to the stressor in a way that causes actual impacts to the species. If there is exposure to a stressor, but no response, or only a positive response, that stressor does not cause a species to meet the definition of an endangered species or a threatened species. If there is exposure and the species responds negatively, we determine whether that stressor drives or contributes to the risk of extinction of the species such that the species warrants listing as an endangered or threatened species. The mere identification of stressors that could affect a species negatively is not sufficient to compel a finding that listing is or remains warranted. For a species to be listed or remain listed, we require evidence that these stressors are operative threats to the species and its habitat, either singly or in combination, to the point that the species meets the definition of an endangered or a threatened species under the Act. In conducting our evaluation of the five factors provided in section 4(a)(1) of the Act to determine whether the DPS of the western yellow-billed cuckoo meets the definition of ‘‘endangered species’’ or ‘‘threatened species,’’ we considered and thoroughly evaluated the best scientific and commercial information available regarding the past, present, and future stressors and threats. We reviewed the petition, information available in our files, and other available published and unpublished information. Our evaluation may include information from recognized experts; Federal, State, and tribal governments; academic institutions; foreign governments; private entities; and other members of the public. The species assessment form for the western yellow-billed cuckoo contains more detailed biological information, an analysis of the listing factors, and an explanation of why we determined that this species is not warranted for delisting. Additional background information on the western yellowbilled cuckoo can be found in the proposed listing rule (78 FR 61622; October 3, 2013) and the final listing rule (79 FR 59992; October 3, 2014). This supporting information can be found on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2018–0027. The following VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Sep 15, 2020 Jkt 250001 is an informational summary for the finding. Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo DPS Previous Federal Actions On October 3, 2014, we published a final rule (79 FR 59992) listing the western DPS of the yellow-billed cuckoo (western yellow-billed cuckoo) as a threatened species. On May 4, 2017, we received a petition from the American Stewards of Liberty, Arizona Cattlemen’s Association, Arizona Mining Association, Hereford Natural Resource Conservation District, Jim Chilton, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Public Lands Council, WestLand Resources, Inc., and Winkelman Natural Resource Conservation District, requesting that the western DPS of the yellow-billed cuckoo be removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife due to an error in our DPS analysis. They also provided information in their petition indicating the species should be delisted as a result of its documented use of additional habitat. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite information for the petitioner, required at the time at 50 CFR 424.14(a). On June 27, 2018, we published a substantial 90-day finding on the petition indicating that delisting the western DPS of the yellow-billed cuckoo may be warranted due to information on additional habitat being used by the species (83 FR 30091). While we did not find that the petition provided substantial information indicating the entity may warrant delisting due to an error in our DPS analysis, because the petitioners did provide substantial information regarding additional habitat use by the species, we indicated we would review the DPS as part of our status review of the species. This notice constitutes our 12-month finding on the May 4, 2017, petition to delist the western yellow-billed cuckoo. Summary of Finding The western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) is a member of the avian family Cuculidae. It is a migratory bird species, traveling between its wintering grounds in Central and South America and its breeding grounds in North America (Continental U.S. and Mexico) each spring and fall, often using river corridors as travel routes. The western yellow-billed cuckoo’s breeding range is known from 12 States in the United States and 6 States in Mexico. Adult yellow-billed cuckoos have a fairly stout and slightly down-curved PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 57817 bill; a slender, elongated body with a long-tailed look; and a narrow yellow ring of colored, bare skin around the eye. The plumage is loose and grayishbrown above and white below, with reddish primary flight feathers. The tail feathers are boldly patterned with black and white below. They are a mediumsized bird about 12 inches (30 centimeters) in length, and about 2 ounces (60 grams) in weight. The bill is blue-black with yellow on the basal half of the lower mandible. The legs are short and bluish-gray. Males and females differ slightly and are indistinguishable in the field (Hughes 1999, pp. 2–3). We evaluated the western yellowbilled cuckoo under our ‘‘Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments Under the Endangered Species Act’’ (DPS Policy; 61 FR 4722, February 7, 1996). We reviewed our DPS analysis from the final listing rule (79 FR 59992; October 3, 2014) and based our review on the available scientific information, including genetics and morphological information. We conclude that the western population segment of the yellow-billed cuckoo is discrete from the remainder of the species because the yellow-billed cuckoo population segment that nests west of the Continental Divide (as defined in the species assessment form) and in northwestern Mexico is markedly separated geographically and behaviorally from all other populations of yellow-billed cuckoo, including those that nest in eastern North America. We conclude that the western population segment of the yellow-billed cuckoo is significant because the loss of the population segment would leave a significant gap in the species’ range that would span seven entire States and substantial portions of five additional States in the United States, and six States in Mexico. We have carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial information available regarding the past, present, and future threats to the western yellowbilled cuckoo, and we evaluated all relevant factors under the five listing factors, including any regulatory mechanisms and conservation measures addressing these stressors. In the final listing rule (79 FR 59992; October 3, 2014), we identified the primary stressors affecting the western yellowbilled cuckoo’s biological status to include habitat loss and degradation from altered watercourse hydrology and natural stream processes, livestock overgrazing, encroachment from agriculture, conversion of native habitat to predominantly nonnative vegetation, E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM 16SEP1 57818 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules and sedimentation of riparian habitat; poor water quality; and, to a lesser extent, effects of invasive species and the effects of climate change. The cumulative impact from various threats is also a factor that will exacerbate multiple existing threats to the western yellow-billed cuckoo and its habitat. We found that the threats identified in the final listing rule are still acting on the species and continue to affect the cuckoo’s viability. In addition, minerals mining projects negatively impact recently identified occupied habitat in central and southern Arizona. Current yellow-billed cuckoo breeding populations are fragmented and geographically isolated. The western yellow-billed cuckoo continues to meet the definition of a threatened species. Therefore, we find that delisting the western yellow-billed cuckoo is not warranted. A detailed discussion of the basis for this finding can be found in the western yellow-billed cuckoo species assessment and other supporting documents (see ADDRESSES, above). Northwestern Moose U.S. DPS Previous Federal Actions On July 9, 2015, we received a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity and Honor the Earth, requesting that we list the U.S. population of northwestern moose (Alces alces andersoni) as an endangered or threatened DPS. On June 3, 2016, we published a 90-day finding that the petition presented substantial scientific or commercial information, indicating that listing the northwestern moose DPS may be warranted (81 FR 35698). jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Summary of Finding The moose is the largest member of the deer family. Currently, four subspecies of moose are recognized VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Sep 15, 2020 Jkt 250001 from North America. The petitioned entity is the U.S. population of the northwestern subspecies of moose (Alces alces andersoni), which historically occurred in Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Moose were likely extirpated from the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and the State of Wisconsin. Recent reintroductions in Michigan were of the eastern subspecies (Alces alces americana), which likely spread into Wisconsin. The current range of the northwestern moose includes Minnesota, North Dakota, and Isle Royale National Park in Michigan. We have carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial information available regarding the northwestern moose and evaluated the petition’s claims that the U.S. population of northwestern moose qualifies as a DPS for listing under the Act. We considered differences in antler size and reproductive behavior, as well as control of moose harvest, management of moose habitat, and the moose’s conservation status within the range of the northwestern moose in the United States and Canada. We do not have information that shows a difference, based on physical, physiological, ecological, or behavioral factors, between the populations in the United States and Canada. Further, we find that the U.S. population of northwestern moose is not delimited by international governmental boundaries within which differences in control of exploitation, management of habitat, conservation status, or regulatory mechanisms exist that are significant in light of section 4(a)(1)(D) of the Act. Therefore, we find that the U.S. population of northwestern moose does not meet the criteria for discreteness as a DPS and the petitioned northwestern moose DPS is not a listable entity under PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 the Act. A detailed discussion of the basis for this finding can be found in the northwestern moose species assessment and other supporting documents (see ADDRESSES, above). New Information We request that you submit any new information concerning the taxonomy of, biology of, ecology of, status of, or stressors to the western yellow-billed cuckoo or the northwestern moose to the appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, whenever it becomes available. New information will help us monitor this species and make appropriate decisions about its conservation and status. We encourage local agencies and stakeholders to continue cooperative monitoring and conservation efforts. References Cited A list of the references cited in the petition finding are available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the docket provided above in ADDRESSES and upon request from the appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Authors The primary authors of this document are the staff members of the Species Assessment Team, Ecological Services Program. Authority The authority for this action is section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Aurelia Skipwith, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2020–19149 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM 16SEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57816-57818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 201]


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Findings on a 
Petition To Delist the Distinct Population Segment of the Western 
Yellow-Billed Cuckoo and a Petition To List the U.S. Population of 
Northwestern Moose

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notification of findings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 12-
month findings on a petition to remove the distinct population segment 
(DPS) of the western yellow-billed cuckoo from the List of Endangered 
and Threatened Wildlife (i.e., to ``delist'' that DPS) and a petition 
to list a DPS of the U.S. population of northwestern moose under the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After a thorough 
review of the best available scientific and commercial information, we 
find that it is not warranted at this time to delist the DPS of the 
western yellow-billed cuckoo. However, we ask the public to submit to 
us at any time any new information relevant to the status of the DPS of 
the western yellow-billed cuckoo or its habitat. We also find that the 
U.S. population of northwestern moose does not meet the criteria for 
discreteness as a DPS and the petitioned northwestern moose DPS is not 
a listable entity under the Act.

DATES: The findings in this document were made on September 16, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Detailed descriptions of the bases for these findings are 
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov under the 
following docket numbers:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Species                            Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellow-billed cuckoo......................  FWS-R2-ES-2020-0004
Northwestern moose........................  FWS-R3-ES-2016-0061
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please submit any new information, materials, comments, or 
questions concerning this finding to the appropriate person, as 
specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Species                        Contact information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellow-billed cuckoo...................  Jeff Humphrey, Field
                                          Supervisor, 602-242-0210,
                                          [email protected]; or
                                          Shawn Sartorius, Project
                                          Leader, 505-346-2525,
                                          [email protected].
Northwestern moose.....................  Sarah Quamme, Field Supervisor,
                                          Minnesota-Wisconsin Field
                                          Office, 952-252-0092.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please 
call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we 
are required to make a finding whether or not a petitioned action is 
warranted within 12 months after receiving any petition for which we 
have determined contained substantial scientific or commercial 
information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted 
(``12-month finding''). We must make a finding that the petitioned 
action is: (1) Not warranted; (2) warranted; or (3) warranted but 
precluded. We must publish these 12-month findings in the Federal 
Register.

Summary of Information Pertaining to the Five Factors

    Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and the implementing 
regulations at part 424 of title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(50 CFR part 424) set forth procedures for adding species to, removing 
species from, or reclassifying species on the Lists. The Act defines 
``species'' as any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any 
distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or 
wildlife which interbreeds when mature. The Act defines ``endangered 
species'' as any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all 
or a significant portion of its range (16 U.S.C. 1532(6)), and 
``threatened species'' as any species that is likely to become an 
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a 
significant portion of its range (16 U.S.C. 1532(20)). Under section 
4(a)(1) of the Act, a species may be determined to be an endangered 
species or a threatened species because of any of the following five 
factors:
    (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or 
curtailment of its habitat or range;
    (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or 
educational purposes;
    (C) Disease or predation;
    (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or

[[Page 57817]]

    (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued 
existence.
    In considering whether a species may meet the definition of an 
endangered species or a threatened species because of any of the five 
factors, we must look beyond the mere exposure of the species to the 
stressor to determine whether the species responds to the stressor in a 
way that causes actual impacts to the species. If there is exposure to 
a stressor, but no response, or only a positive response, that stressor 
does not cause a species to meet the definition of an endangered 
species or a threatened species. If there is exposure and the species 
responds negatively, we determine whether that stressor drives or 
contributes to the risk of extinction of the species such that the 
species warrants listing as an endangered or threatened species. The 
mere identification of stressors that could affect a species negatively 
is not sufficient to compel a finding that listing is or remains 
warranted. For a species to be listed or remain listed, we require 
evidence that these stressors are operative threats to the species and 
its habitat, either singly or in combination, to the point that the 
species meets the definition of an endangered or a threatened species 
under the Act.
    In conducting our evaluation of the five factors provided in 
section 4(a)(1) of the Act to determine whether the DPS of the western 
yellow-billed cuckoo meets the definition of ``endangered species'' or 
``threatened species,'' we considered and thoroughly evaluated the best 
scientific and commercial information available regarding the past, 
present, and future stressors and threats. We reviewed the petition, 
information available in our files, and other available published and 
unpublished information. Our evaluation may include information from 
recognized experts; Federal, State, and tribal governments; academic 
institutions; foreign governments; private entities; and other members 
of the public.
    The species assessment form for the western yellow-billed cuckoo 
contains more detailed biological information, an analysis of the 
listing factors, and an explanation of why we determined that this 
species is not warranted for delisting. Additional background 
information on the western yellow-billed cuckoo can be found in the 
proposed listing rule (78 FR 61622; October 3, 2013) and the final 
listing rule (79 FR 59992; October 3, 2014). This supporting 
information can be found on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov 
under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2018-0027. The following is an informational 
summary for the finding.

Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo DPS

Previous Federal Actions
    On October 3, 2014, we published a final rule (79 FR 59992) listing 
the western DPS of the yellow-billed cuckoo (western yellow-billed 
cuckoo) as a threatened species.
    On May 4, 2017, we received a petition from the American Stewards 
of Liberty, Arizona Cattlemen's Association, Arizona Mining 
Association, Hereford Natural Resource Conservation District, Jim 
Chilton, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, Public Lands Council, 
WestLand Resources, Inc., and Winkelman Natural Resource Conservation 
District, requesting that the western DPS of the yellow-billed cuckoo 
be removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife due to 
an error in our DPS analysis. They also provided information in their 
petition indicating the species should be delisted as a result of its 
documented use of additional habitat. The petition clearly identified 
itself as such and included the requisite information for the 
petitioner, required at the time at 50 CFR 424.14(a).
    On June 27, 2018, we published a substantial 90-day finding on the 
petition indicating that delisting the western DPS of the yellow-billed 
cuckoo may be warranted due to information on additional habitat being 
used by the species (83 FR 30091). While we did not find that the 
petition provided substantial information indicating the entity may 
warrant delisting due to an error in our DPS analysis, because the 
petitioners did provide substantial information regarding additional 
habitat use by the species, we indicated we would review the DPS as 
part of our status review of the species.
    This notice constitutes our 12-month finding on the May 4, 2017, 
petition to delist the western yellow-billed cuckoo.
Summary of Finding
    The western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) is a member 
of the avian family Cuculidae. It is a migratory bird species, 
traveling between its wintering grounds in Central and South America 
and its breeding grounds in North America (Continental U.S. and Mexico) 
each spring and fall, often using river corridors as travel routes. The 
western yellow-billed cuckoo's breeding range is known from 12 States 
in the United States and 6 States in Mexico.
    Adult yellow-billed cuckoos have a fairly stout and slightly down-
curved bill; a slender, elongated body with a long-tailed look; and a 
narrow yellow ring of colored, bare skin around the eye. The plumage is 
loose and grayish-brown above and white below, with reddish primary 
flight feathers. The tail feathers are boldly patterned with black and 
white below. They are a medium-sized bird about 12 inches (30 
centimeters) in length, and about 2 ounces (60 grams) in weight. The 
bill is blue-black with yellow on the basal half of the lower mandible. 
The legs are short and bluish-gray. Males and females differ slightly 
and are indistinguishable in the field (Hughes 1999, pp. 2-3).
    We evaluated the western yellow-billed cuckoo under our ``Policy 
Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments 
Under the Endangered Species Act'' (DPS Policy; 61 FR 4722, February 7, 
1996). We reviewed our DPS analysis from the final listing rule (79 FR 
59992; October 3, 2014) and based our review on the available 
scientific information, including genetics and morphological 
information. We conclude that the western population segment of the 
yellow-billed cuckoo is discrete from the remainder of the species 
because the yellow-billed cuckoo population segment that nests west of 
the Continental Divide (as defined in the species assessment form) and 
in northwestern Mexico is markedly separated geographically and 
behaviorally from all other populations of yellow-billed cuckoo, 
including those that nest in eastern North America. We conclude that 
the western population segment of the yellow-billed cuckoo is 
significant because the loss of the population segment would leave a 
significant gap in the species' range that would span seven entire 
States and substantial portions of five additional States in the United 
States, and six States in Mexico.
    We have carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial 
information available regarding the past, present, and future threats 
to the western yellow-billed cuckoo, and we evaluated all relevant 
factors under the five listing factors, including any regulatory 
mechanisms and conservation measures addressing these stressors. In the 
final listing rule (79 FR 59992; October 3, 2014), we identified the 
primary stressors affecting the western yellow-billed cuckoo's 
biological status to include habitat loss and degradation from altered 
watercourse hydrology and natural stream processes, livestock 
overgrazing, encroachment from agriculture, conversion of native 
habitat to predominantly nonnative vegetation,

[[Page 57818]]

and sedimentation of riparian habitat; poor water quality; and, to a 
lesser extent, effects of invasive species and the effects of climate 
change. The cumulative impact from various threats is also a factor 
that will exacerbate multiple existing threats to the western yellow-
billed cuckoo and its habitat. We found that the threats identified in 
the final listing rule are still acting on the species and continue to 
affect the cuckoo's viability. In addition, minerals mining projects 
negatively impact recently identified occupied habitat in central and 
southern Arizona. Current yellow-billed cuckoo breeding populations are 
fragmented and geographically isolated. The western yellow-billed 
cuckoo continues to meet the definition of a threatened species.
    Therefore, we find that delisting the western yellow-billed cuckoo 
is not warranted. A detailed discussion of the basis for this finding 
can be found in the western yellow-billed cuckoo species assessment and 
other supporting documents (see ADDRESSES, above).

Northwestern Moose U.S. DPS

Previous Federal Actions
    On July 9, 2015, we received a petition from the Center for 
Biological Diversity and Honor the Earth, requesting that we list the 
U.S. population of northwestern moose (Alces alces andersoni) as an 
endangered or threatened DPS. On June 3, 2016, we published a 90-day 
finding that the petition presented substantial scientific or 
commercial information, indicating that listing the northwestern moose 
DPS may be warranted (81 FR 35698).
Summary of Finding
    The moose is the largest member of the deer family. Currently, four 
subspecies of moose are recognized from North America. The petitioned 
entity is the U.S. population of the northwestern subspecies of moose 
(Alces alces andersoni), which historically occurred in Michigan, 
Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Moose were likely extirpated 
from the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and the State of 
Wisconsin. Recent reintroductions in Michigan were of the eastern 
subspecies (Alces alces americana), which likely spread into Wisconsin. 
The current range of the northwestern moose includes Minnesota, North 
Dakota, and Isle Royale National Park in Michigan.
    We have carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial 
information available regarding the northwestern moose and evaluated 
the petition's claims that the U.S. population of northwestern moose 
qualifies as a DPS for listing under the Act. We considered differences 
in antler size and reproductive behavior, as well as control of moose 
harvest, management of moose habitat, and the moose's conservation 
status within the range of the northwestern moose in the United States 
and Canada. We do not have information that shows a difference, based 
on physical, physiological, ecological, or behavioral factors, between 
the populations in the United States and Canada. Further, we find that 
the U.S. population of northwestern moose is not delimited by 
international governmental boundaries within which differences in 
control of exploitation, management of habitat, conservation status, or 
regulatory mechanisms exist that are significant in light of section 
4(a)(1)(D) of the Act.
    Therefore, we find that the U.S. population of northwestern moose 
does not meet the criteria for discreteness as a DPS and the petitioned 
northwestern moose DPS is not a listable entity under the Act. A 
detailed discussion of the basis for this finding can be found in the 
northwestern moose species assessment and other supporting documents 
(see ADDRESSES, above).

New Information

    We request that you submit any new information concerning the 
taxonomy of, biology of, ecology of, status of, or stressors to the 
western yellow-billed cuckoo or the northwestern moose to the 
appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
whenever it becomes available. New information will help us monitor 
this species and make appropriate decisions about its conservation and 
status. We encourage local agencies and stakeholders to continue 
cooperative monitoring and conservation efforts.

References Cited

    A list of the references cited in the petition finding are 
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the docket 
provided above in ADDRESSES and upon request from the appropriate 
person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Authors

    The primary authors of this document are the staff members of the 
Species Assessment Team, Ecological Services Program.

Authority

    The authority for this action is section 4 of the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Aurelia Skipwith,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-19149 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.