Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating Operations, 57701-57703 [2020-17653]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
approve Missouri’s request to remove 10
CSR 10–5.410 from the SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
amending regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. As described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below, the EPA is removing
provisions of the EPA-Approved
Missouri Regulation from the Missouri
State Implementation Plan, which is
incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 24, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57701
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 3, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
§ 52.1320
[Amended]
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by removing the entry
‘‘10–5.410’’ under the heading ‘‘Chapter
5—Air Quality Standards and Air
Pollution Control Regulations for the St.
Louis Metropolitan Area’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2020–20013 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0289; FRL–10013–
51–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface
Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. This final action will
amend the SIP to revise a Missouri
regulation that restricts emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from industrial surface coating
operations in Clay, Jackson, and Platte
Counties in Missouri. Specifically, the
revisions to the rule remove restrictive
words, adds exemptions, includes
definitions specific to the rule, corrects
test method references, removes
obsolete requirements specific to
sources that have closed, changes
sections to the standard rule format, and
makes minor clarifications and
grammatical changes. The exemptions
were added to make this rule consistent
with the St. Louis version of this rule,
10 Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
57702
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
5.330 Industrial Surface Coating
Operations. These exemptions are not
expected to result in an emission
increase. The other revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
impact the stringency of the SIP or air
quality. The EPA’s approval of this rule
revision is in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
This final rule is effective on
October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0289. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7714;
email address: stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving the revisions to
10 CSR 10–2.230 Control of Emissions
from Industrial Surface Coating
Operations in the Missouri SIP. The
revisions to the rule remove restrictive
words, adds exemptions, add
definitions to the rule rather than
referring to definitions in a separate
rule, corrects test method references,
removes obsolete requirements specific
to sources that have closed, changes
sections to the standard rule format, and
makes minor clarifications and
grammatical changes. These revisions
are described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
the docket for this action. The EPA
solicited comments on the proposed
revision to Missouri’s SIP, and received
one comment in support of the action.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice of the revisions from
August 1, 2018, to October 4, 2018, and
held a public hearing on September 27,
2018. The state received and addressed
eight comments. In addition, as
explained above and in more detail in
the technical support document (TSD)
which is part of this document, the
revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
approve Missouri’s request to amend 10
CSR 10–2.230.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the State Implementation Plan, have
been incorporated by reference by EPA
into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
1 62
PO 00000
FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
57703
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 16, 2020. Filing a
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–2.230’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Dated: August 6, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
EPA—APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
10–2.230 ........................
*
Control of Emissions
from Industrial Surface Coating Operations.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3/30/2019
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0213; FRL–10013–
66–Region 9]
DATES:
Air Plan Approval; California;
Consumer Products Regulations
2020.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the California Air
Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Consumer
Products portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
16:31 Sep 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
This rule is effective October 16,
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0213. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
consumer products and a supporting
test method. The EPA is also approving
revisions to California’s Tables of
Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR)
Values to support its Aerosol Coating
Products regulation. We are approving
state rules to regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
*
[FR Doc. 2020–17653 Filed 9–15–20; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
*
9/16/2020, [insert Federal Register citation].
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57701-57703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17653]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0289; FRL-10013-51-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial
Surface Coating Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Missouri. This final action will amend the SIP to revise a
Missouri regulation that restricts emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from industrial surface coating operations in Clay,
Jackson, and Platte Counties in Missouri. Specifically, the revisions
to the rule remove restrictive words, adds exemptions, includes
definitions specific to the rule, corrects test method references,
removes obsolete requirements specific to sources that have closed,
changes sections to the standard rule format, and makes minor
clarifications and grammatical changes. The exemptions were added to
make this rule consistent with the St. Louis version of this rule, 10
Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10-
[[Page 57702]]
5.330 Industrial Surface Coating Operations. These exemptions are not
expected to result in an emission increase. The other revisions are
administrative in nature and do not impact the stringency of the SIP or
air quality. The EPA's approval of this rule revision is in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0289. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7714; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is approving the revisions to 10 CSR 10-2.230 Control of
Emissions from Industrial Surface Coating Operations in the Missouri
SIP. The revisions to the rule remove restrictive words, adds
exemptions, add definitions to the rule rather than referring to
definitions in a separate rule, corrects test method references,
removes obsolete requirements specific to sources that have closed,
changes sections to the standard rule format, and makes minor
clarifications and grammatical changes. These revisions are described
in detail in the technical support document (TSD) included in the
docket for this action. The EPA solicited comments on the proposed
revision to Missouri's SIP, and received one comment in support of the
action.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice of the revisions from August 1, 2018, to
October 4, 2018, and held a public hearing on September 27, 2018. The
state received and addressed eight comments. In addition, as explained
above and in more detail in the technical support document (TSD) which
is part of this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to approve Missouri's request to
amend 10 CSR 10-2.230.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference
in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
[[Page 57703]]
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take
effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report,
which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this action and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 16, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 6, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-2.230'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA--Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-2.230....................... Control of 3/30/2019 9/16/2020, [insert .......................
Emissions from Federal Register
Industrial citation].
Surface Coating
Operations.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-17653 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
