Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, 55512-55514 [2020-19752]
Download as PDF
55512
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Notices
NRC EXPORT LICENSE APPLICATION—Continued
End Use ..............................
Country of Destination ........
Storage or disposal by the original generator.
Mexico.
Dated: September 1, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David L. Skeen,
Deputy Director, Office of International
Programs.
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document.
[FR Doc. 2020–19734 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–454; 50–455; 50–456; 50–
457; NRC–2020–0206]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2;
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a September
30, 2019, request from Exelon
Generation Company, LLC (Exelon)
from regulatory requirements to allow
Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, to use
an alternative methodology for
determining reactor coolant system
pressure-temperature limits. The
methodology is described in AREVA NP
Topical Report BAW–2308, Revisions
1–A and 2–A, ‘‘Initial RTNDT of Linde
80 Weld Materials.’’
DATES: The exemption was issued on
August 31, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2020–0206 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0206. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Joel
S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–6606, email:
Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the exemption is attached.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: September 1, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joel S. Wiebe,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects
Branch III, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
Attachment—Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Docket Nos. 50–454; 50–455; 50–456;
50–457
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2;
Exemption
I. Background
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(Exelon, the licensee), holds Renewed
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–37
and NPF–66, which authorize operation
of the Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
(Byron), a pressurized-water reactor
facility, located in Ogle County, Illinois
and Renewed Facility Operating License
Nos. NPF–72 and NPF–77, which
authorize operation of the Braidwood
Station, Units 1 and 2 (Braidwood), a
pressurized-water reactor facility,
located in Will County, Illinois. The
licenses, among other things, subject the
facilities to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
By letter dated September 30, 2019
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML19275E307), Exelon
requested exemptions from specific
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50,
Section 50.61, ‘‘Fracture Toughness
Requirements for Protection Against
Pressurized Thermal Shock Events,’’
and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G,
‘‘Fracture Toughness Requirements,’’ for
Braidwood and Byron. The requested
exemptions from these requirements
would allow use of an alternative
methodology to determine reactor
coolant system pressure-temperature
limits. The new methodology that
Exelon intends to use is described in
AREVA NP Topical Report BAW–2308,
Revisions 1–A and 2–A, ‘‘Initial RTNDT
of Linde 80 Weld Materials’’ (BAW–
2308) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML032380449 and ML081270388).
BAW–2308 was approved for
referencing in plant specific license
amendments by NRC letters dated
August 4, 2005 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML052070408), and March 24, 2008
(ADAMS Accession No. ML080770349).
II. Request/Action
Pursuant to 10 CFR, Part 50, Section
50.61, ‘‘Fracture Toughness
Requirements for Protection Against
Pressurized Thermal Shock Events,’’
and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G,
‘‘Fracture Toughness Requirements,’’
the Commission’s regulations establish
specific fracture toughness requirements
for nuclear power plant reactor pressure
vessels (RPVs). In its letter dated
September 30, 2019, Exelon requested
exemptions from these requirements to
allow use of an alternative methodology
described in BAW–2308. BAW–2308
provides an alternate methodology for
evaluating the integrity of certain RPV
beltline welds, at Braidwood and Byron.
The methodology described in BAW–
2308, utilized fracture toughness test
data based on the use of the 1997 and
2002 editions of American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard
Test Method E 1921, ‘‘Standard Test
Method for Determination of Reference
Temperature T0, for Ferritic Steels in the
Transition Range,’’ and American
Society for Mechanical Engineers Boiler
and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),
Code Case N–629, ‘‘Use of Fracture
Toughness Test Data to establish
Reference Temperature for Pressure
Retaining materials of Section III,
Division 1, Class 1.’’
In order to use the BAW–2308
methodology, an exemption is required
since Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50,
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Notices
through reference to Appendix G to
Section XI of the ASME Code pursuant
to 10 CFR 50.55(a), requires the use of
a methodology based on Charpy V-notch
(Cv) and drop weight data.
The licensee also requested an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.61 to use an
alternate methodology to allow the use
of fracture toughness test data for
evaluating the integrity of certain
Braidwood and Byron, RPV beltline
welds based on the use of the 1997 and
2002 editions of ASTM E 1921 and
ASME Code Case N–629. An exemption
is required since the methodology for
evaluating RPV material fracture
toughness in 10 CFR 50.61 requires the
use of the CV and drop weight data for
establishing the pressurized thermal
shock (PTS) reference temperature
(RTPTS). This exemption only modifies
the methodology to be used by the
licensee for demonstrating compliance
with the requirements of 10 CFR part
50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, and
does not exempt the licensee from
meeting any other requirement of 10
CFR part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR
50.61.
Similar exemptions have been issued
for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1
and 2 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14126A594), and Three Mile Island
Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13324A086).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when:
(1) The exemptions are authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
public health or safety, and are
consistent with the common defense
and security; and (2) when special
circumstances are present, as defined in
10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). In its letter dated
September 30, 2019, Exelon stated that
the requested exemptions meet the
special circumstances of 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), since application of the
methodology in BAW–2308, in this
particular circumstance serves the
underlying purpose of the regulations.
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow the use
of an alternate methodology to make use
of fracture toughness test data for
evaluating the integrity of the
Braidwood, Units 1 and 2, and Byron,
Units 1 and 2, RPV Linde 80 beltline
materials and would not result in
changes to operation of the units. 10
CFR 50.60(b) allows the use of proposed
alternatives to the described
requirements in 10 CFR part 50,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Appendix G, or portions thereof, when
an exemption is granted by the
Commission under 10 CFR 50.12. 10
CFR 50.12(a) allows the NRC to grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 50, Appendix G, and 10 CFR
50.61. The NRC staff has determined
that granting the exemption will not
result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the NRC staff determined that the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue
Risk to Public Health and Safety
The NRC letter dated August 4, 2005,
required licensees to meet six
conditions and limitations to use the
methods of BAW–2308 Revision 1–A.
The NRC letter dated March 24, 2008,
did not add any additional conditions
and limitations to be resolved.
Condition (1): By its letter dated
September 30, 2019, the licensee
provided WCAP–18370–NP,
‘‘Braidwood Units 1 and 2 Heatup and
Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal
Operation,’’ and WCAP–18371–NP,
‘‘Byron Units 1 and 2 Heatup and
Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal
Operation.’’ Appendix G of both WCAP
reports discuss the applicability of
BAW–2308 to Braidwood and Byron
Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell welds. The
licensee compared the weld material
properties of its Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell
welds to the Linde 80 welds evaluated
in BAW–2308. The licensee determined
that the specific heats relevant to the
Braidwood and Byron Unit 1 and 2
Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell welds were not
analyzed, therefore, the generic ‘‘all
heats’’ IRTTo and s1 values were used.
The NRC staff reviewed the weld
material properties of the licensee welds
to those in BAW–2308 and confirmed
that the use of the generic values was
appropriate. Therefore, the staff
determined that the licensee meets
Condition (1).
Condition (2): Section 7 in both
WCAP reports discuss its evaluation
using RG 1.99, Revision 2 method to
determine the shift in the initial
properties. Section 5 of both WCAP
reports provide the licensee’s
calculation of the chemistry factors,
with Tables 5–4 and 5–5 of both reports
providing the summary of chemistry
factors. The NRC staff reviewed the
chemistry factors and confirmed that the
licensee used values greater than 167 °F.
The licensee provided its calculated
adjusted reference temperature (ART)
results in Tables 7–5 and 7–8 for the
extended beltline materials, including
the calculated DRTNDT. The staff
conducted confirmatory calculations
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55513
and verified the licensee’s calculated
values using RG 1.99, Revision 2 and
the chemistry factors. Therefore, the
staff determined that the licensee meets
Condition (2).
Condition (3): Tables 7–5 and 7–8 in
both WCAP reports also provides the sI
and sD values used to calculate the ART
for the extended beltline materials. The
NRC staff confirmed that the licensee
used the sI value from Table 3 of the
NRC letter dated August 4, 2005, and sD
value of 28 °F for the Linde 80 nozzleto-shell welds. Therefore, the NRC staff
determined that the licensee meets
Condition (3).
Condition (4): In its letter dated
September 30, 2019, the licensee
requested an exemption, per 10 CFR
50.12 and 10 CFR 50.60(b), from the
requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR
part 50 and 10 CFR 50.61 in Attachment
4 of the September 30, 2019, submittal.
As part of its exemption request, the
licensee submitted information which
demonstrates the values the licensee
proposes to use for DRTNDT and the
margin term for each Linde 80 weld in
its RPV through the end of its facility’s
current operating license. The
exemption is addressed herein.
Therefore, the NRC staff determined that
the licensee meets Condition (4).
Conditions (5) and (6) were resolved
in BAW–2308, Revision 2, as
documented in the NRC letter dated
March 24, 2008.
Based on the NRC reviews
documented in its letters dated August
4, 2005, and March 24, 2008, and
conformance to the conditions and
limitations as described above, the NRC
staff concludes that the use of BAW–
2308, Revisions 1–A and 2–A, does not
increase the probability of occurrence or
the consequences of an accident at
Braidwood or Byron and will not create
the possibility for a new or different
type of accident that could pose a risk
to public health and safety.
Based on the above, the NRC finds
that the action does not cause undue
risk to public health and safety.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the
Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption is
specifically concerned with RPV
material properties and is consistent
with guidance specified in the approved
Topical Report BAW–2308. The
exemption does not change any site
security conditions or requirements.
Therefore, the NRC finds that the action
is consistent with the common defense
and security.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
55514
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Notices
D. Special Circumstances
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix G, and 10 CFR 50.61,
is to protect the integrity of the reactor
coolant pressure boundary by ensuring
that each RPV material has adequate
fracture toughness. Application of
ASME Code, Section Ill, paragraph NB–
2331, in the determination of initial
material properties was conservatively
developed based on the level of
knowledge existing in the early 1970’s
concerning RPV materials and the
estimated effects of operation.
Since the early 1970’s, the level of
knowledge concerning these topics has
greatly expanded. This increased
knowledge level permits relaxation of
the ASME Code, Section Ill, paragraph
NB–2331, requirements via application
of BAW–2308, while maintaining the
underlying purpose of the NRC
regulations to ensure that an acceptable
margin of safety is maintained.
Based on the above, the NRC finds
that use of BAW–2308 serves the
underlying purpose of the regulation in
protecting the integrity of the reactor
coolant pressure boundary by ensuring
that the RPV materials have adequate
fracture toughness. The NRC staff has
determined that BAW–2308 applies to
the RPV materials at Braidwood and
Byron, and that its use at these facilities
is acceptable. The NRC therefore
determines that the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii) are present at Braidwood
and Byron.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC’s approval of the exemption
to 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, and 10
CFR 50.61 belongs to a category of
actions that the NRC, by rule or
regulation, has declared to be a
categorical exclusion, after first finding
that the category of actions does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Specifically, the
exemption is categorically excluded
from further environmental analysis
under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9), the
granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of
chapter 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) is a categorical
exclusion provided that: (i) The
exemption involves no significant
hazards consideration; (ii) there is no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite; and (iii) there is no significant
increase in individual or cumulative
occupational radiation exposure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
In its letter dated August 4, 2005, the
NRC concluded that BAW–2308,
Revision 1, represents an acceptable
methodology for establishing weld wire
heat specific and generic IRTT0 values
for Linde 80 welds. In its letter dated
March 24, 2008, the NRC concluded that
that the slightly modified PressurizedWater Reactor Owner’s Group initial
RTNDT methodology and the revised
IRTT0 and s1 values in BAW–2308,
Revision 2, are acceptable for estimating
the IRT0 and s1 values for various heats
of the Linde 80 welds in future RPV
integrity evaluations in license
applications. Based on the above, the
NRC staff has determined that the
granting of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards
consideration because it does not: (1)
Involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. Further, the NRC staff
has determined that issuance of the
exemptions will not result in a
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite, or a significant increase in
individual or cumulative occupational
radiation exposure.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b) and (c)(9), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in
connection with the approval of this
exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
exemption is authorized by law, will not
present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and is consistent with
the common defense and security. Also,
special circumstances are present (see
Special Circumstances above).
Therefore, the NRC hereby grants
Exelon Generation Company, LLC,
exemptions for Byron and Braidwood,
from 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, and
10 CFR 50.61 to allow the use of AREVA
NP Topical Report BAW–2308,
Revisions 1–A and 2–A, ‘‘Initial RTNDT
of Linde 80 Weld Materials.’’
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day
of August 2020
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Gregory F. Suber,
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Deputy Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2020–19752 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2020–0181]
Applications and Amendments to
Facility Operating Licenses and
Combined Licenses Involving
Proposed No Significant Hazards
Considerations and Containing
Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information and Order Imposing
Procedures for Access to Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment request;
notice of opportunity to comment,
request a hearing, and petition for leave
to intervene; order imposing
procedures.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) received and is
considering approval of two amendment
requests. The amendment requests are
for Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2,
and 3 and Beaver Valley Power Station,
Unit 2. For each amendment request,
the NRC proposes to determine that they
involve no significant hazards
consideration. Because each amendment
request contains sensitive unclassified
non-safeguards information (SUNSI) an
order imposes procedures to obtain
access to SUNSI for contention
preparation.
DATES: Comments must be filed by
October 8, 2020. A request for a hearing
or petitions for leave to intervene must
be filed by November 9, 2020. Any
potential party as defined in section 2.4
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) who believes
access to SUNSI is necessary to respond
to this notice must request document
access by September 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0181. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55512-55514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19752]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455; 50-456; 50-457; NRC-2020-0206]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2;
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a September 30, 2019, request from Exelon
Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) from regulatory requirements to allow
Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2,
to use an alternative methodology for determining reactor coolant
system pressure-temperature limits. The methodology is described in
AREVA NP Topical Report BAW-2308, Revisions 1-A and 2-A, ``Initial
RTNDT of Linde 80 Weld Materials.''
DATES: The exemption was issued on August 31, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0206 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0206. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by
email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6606, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.
Dated: September 1, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joel S. Wiebe,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Projects Branch III, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Attachment--Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455; 50-456; 50-457
Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Exemption
I. Background
Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee), holds
Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66, which
authorize operation of the Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Byron), a
pressurized-water reactor facility, located in Ogle County, Illinois
and Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77, which
authorize operation of the Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2
(Braidwood), a pressurized-water reactor facility, located in Will
County, Illinois. The licenses, among other things, subject the
facilities to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
By letter dated September 30, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML19275E307), Exelon requested
exemptions from specific requirements of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Section 50.61, ``Fracture
Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock
Events,'' and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, ``Fracture Toughness
Requirements,'' for Braidwood and Byron. The requested exemptions from
these requirements would allow use of an alternative methodology to
determine reactor coolant system pressure-temperature limits. The new
methodology that Exelon intends to use is described in AREVA NP Topical
Report BAW-2308, Revisions 1-A and 2-A, ``Initial RTNDT of
Linde 80 Weld Materials'' (BAW-2308) (ADAMS Accession No. ML032380449
and ML081270388). BAW-2308 was approved for referencing in plant
specific license amendments by NRC letters dated August 4, 2005 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML052070408), and March 24, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML080770349).
II. Request/Action
Pursuant to 10 CFR, Part 50, Section 50.61, ``Fracture Toughness
Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events,''
and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, ``Fracture Toughness Requirements,''
the Commission's regulations establish specific fracture toughness
requirements for nuclear power plant reactor pressure vessels (RPVs).
In its letter dated September 30, 2019, Exelon requested exemptions
from these requirements to allow use of an alternative methodology
described in BAW-2308. BAW-2308 provides an alternate methodology for
evaluating the integrity of certain RPV beltline welds, at Braidwood
and Byron. The methodology described in BAW-2308, utilized fracture
toughness test data based on the use of the 1997 and 2002 editions of
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Method
E 1921, ``Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference
Temperature T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition
Range,'' and American Society for Mechanical Engineers Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Code Case N-629, ``Use of Fracture
Toughness Test Data to establish Reference Temperature for Pressure
Retaining materials of Section III, Division 1, Class 1.''
In order to use the BAW-2308 methodology, an exemption is required
since Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50,
[[Page 55513]]
through reference to Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code pursuant
to 10 CFR 50.55(a), requires the use of a methodology based on Charpy
V-notch (Cv) and drop weight data.
The licensee also requested an exemption from 10 CFR 50.61 to use
an alternate methodology to allow the use of fracture toughness test
data for evaluating the integrity of certain Braidwood and Byron, RPV
beltline welds based on the use of the 1997 and 2002 editions of ASTM E
1921 and ASME Code Case N-629. An exemption is required since the
methodology for evaluating RPV material fracture toughness in 10 CFR
50.61 requires the use of the CV and drop weight data for
establishing the pressurized thermal shock (PTS) reference temperature
(RTPTS). This exemption only modifies the methodology to be
used by the licensee for demonstrating compliance with the requirements
of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, and does not exempt the
licensee from meeting any other requirement of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
G and 10 CFR 50.61.
Similar exemptions have been issued for Point Beach Nuclear Plant,
Units 1 and 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14126A594), and Three Mile Island
Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13324A086).
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when: (1) The exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present, as defined in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2). In its letter dated September 30, 2019, Exelon stated that
the requested exemptions meet the special circumstances of 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), since application of the methodology in BAW-2308, in
this particular circumstance serves the underlying purpose of the
regulations.
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow the use of an alternate methodology to
make use of fracture toughness test data for evaluating the integrity
of the Braidwood, Units 1 and 2, and Byron, Units 1 and 2, RPV Linde 80
beltline materials and would not result in changes to operation of the
units. 10 CFR 50.60(b) allows the use of proposed alternatives to the
described requirements in 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, or portions
thereof, when an exemption is granted by the Commission under 10 CFR
50.12. 10 CFR 50.12(a) allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, and 10 CFR 50.61. The NRC
staff has determined that granting the exemption will not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission's regulations. Therefore, the NRC staff determined that the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The NRC letter dated August 4, 2005, required licensees to meet six
conditions and limitations to use the methods of BAW-2308 Revision 1-A.
The NRC letter dated March 24, 2008, did not add any additional
conditions and limitations to be resolved.
Condition (1): By its letter dated September 30, 2019, the licensee
provided WCAP-18370-NP, ``Braidwood Units 1 and 2 Heatup and Cooldown
Limit Curves for Normal Operation,'' and WCAP-18371-NP, ``Byron Units 1
and 2 Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal Operation.'' Appendix
G of both WCAP reports discuss the applicability of BAW-2308 to
Braidwood and Byron Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell welds. The licensee
compared the weld material properties of its Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell
welds to the Linde 80 welds evaluated in BAW-2308. The licensee
determined that the specific heats relevant to the Braidwood and Byron
Unit 1 and 2 Linde 80 nozzle-to-shell welds were not analyzed,
therefore, the generic ``all heats'' IRTTo and
[sigma]1 values were used. The NRC staff reviewed the weld
material properties of the licensee welds to those in BAW-2308 and
confirmed that the use of the generic values was appropriate.
Therefore, the staff determined that the licensee meets Condition (1).
Condition (2): Section 7 in both WCAP reports discuss its
evaluation using RG 1.99, Revision 2 method to determine the shift in
the initial properties. Section 5 of both WCAP reports provide the
licensee's calculation of the chemistry factors, with Tables 5-4 and 5-
5 of both reports providing the summary of chemistry factors. The NRC
staff reviewed the chemistry factors and confirmed that the licensee
used values greater than 167 [deg]F. The licensee provided its
calculated adjusted reference temperature (ART) results in Tables 7-5
and 7-8 for the extended beltline materials, including the calculated
[Delta]RTNDT. The staff conducted confirmatory calculations
and verified the licensee's calculated values using RG 1.99, Revision 2
and the chemistry factors. Therefore, the staff determined that the
licensee meets Condition (2).
Condition (3): Tables 7-5 and 7-8 in both WCAP reports also
provides the [sigma]I and [sigma][Delta] values
used to calculate the ART for the extended beltline materials. The NRC
staff confirmed that the licensee used the [sigma]I value
from Table 3 of the NRC letter dated August 4, 2005, and
[sigma][Delta] value of 28 [deg]F for the Linde 80 nozzle-
to-shell welds. Therefore, the NRC staff determined that the licensee
meets Condition (3).
Condition (4): In its letter dated September 30, 2019, the licensee
requested an exemption, per 10 CFR 50.12 and 10 CFR 50.60(b), from the
requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR 50.61 in
Attachment 4 of the September 30, 2019, submittal. As part of its
exemption request, the licensee submitted information which
demonstrates the values the licensee proposes to use for
[Delta]RTNDT and the margin term for each Linde 80 weld in
its RPV through the end of its facility's current operating license.
The exemption is addressed herein. Therefore, the NRC staff determined
that the licensee meets Condition (4).
Conditions (5) and (6) were resolved in BAW-2308, Revision 2, as
documented in the NRC letter dated March 24, 2008.
Based on the NRC reviews documented in its letters dated August 4,
2005, and March 24, 2008, and conformance to the conditions and
limitations as described above, the NRC staff concludes that the use of
BAW-2308, Revisions 1-A and 2-A, does not increase the probability of
occurrence or the consequences of an accident at Braidwood or Byron and
will not create the possibility for a new or different type of accident
that could pose a risk to public health and safety.
Based on the above, the NRC finds that the action does not cause
undue risk to public health and safety.
C. The Exemption Is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption is specifically concerned with RPV material
properties and is consistent with guidance specified in the approved
Topical Report BAW-2308. The exemption does not change any site
security conditions or requirements. Therefore, the NRC finds that the
action is consistent with the common defense and security.
[[Page 55514]]
D. Special Circumstances
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, and 10 CFR
50.61, is to protect the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure
boundary by ensuring that each RPV material has adequate fracture
toughness. Application of ASME Code, Section Ill, paragraph NB-2331, in
the determination of initial material properties was conservatively
developed based on the level of knowledge existing in the early 1970's
concerning RPV materials and the estimated effects of operation.
Since the early 1970's, the level of knowledge concerning these
topics has greatly expanded. This increased knowledge level permits
relaxation of the ASME Code, Section Ill, paragraph NB-2331,
requirements via application of BAW-2308, while maintaining the
underlying purpose of the NRC regulations to ensure that an acceptable
margin of safety is maintained.
Based on the above, the NRC finds that use of BAW-2308 serves the
underlying purpose of the regulation in protecting the integrity of the
reactor coolant pressure boundary by ensuring that the RPV materials
have adequate fracture toughness. The NRC staff has determined that
BAW-2308 applies to the RPV materials at Braidwood and Byron, and that
its use at these facilities is acceptable. The NRC therefore determines
that the special circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) are
present at Braidwood and Byron.
E. Environmental Considerations
The NRC's approval of the exemption to 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G,
and 10 CFR 50.61 belongs to a category of actions that the NRC, by rule
or regulation, has declared to be a categorical exclusion, after first
finding that the category of actions does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
Specifically, the exemption is categorically excluded from further
environmental analysis under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9), the granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of chapter 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) is a categorical exclusion provided that: (i) The
exemption involves no significant hazards consideration; (ii) there is
no significant change in the types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite; and (iii) there
is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational
radiation exposure.
In its letter dated August 4, 2005, the NRC concluded that BAW-
2308, Revision 1, represents an acceptable methodology for establishing
weld wire heat specific and generic IRTT0 values for Linde
80 welds. In its letter dated March 24, 2008, the NRC concluded that
that the slightly modified Pressurized-Water Reactor Owner's Group
initial RTNDT methodology and the revised IRTT0
and [sigma]1 values in BAW-2308, Revision 2, are acceptable
for estimating the IRT0 and [sigma]1 values for
various heats of the Linde 80 welds in future RPV integrity evaluations
in license applications. Based on the above, the NRC staff has
determined that the granting of the exemption request involves no
significant hazards consideration because it does not: (1) Involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. Further, the
NRC staff has determined that issuance of the exemptions will not
result in a significant change in the types or significant increase in
the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite, or a
significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation
exposure.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and (c)(9), no environmental
impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in
connection with the approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12,
the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special circumstances are present (see Special
Circumstances above). Therefore, the NRC hereby grants Exelon
Generation Company, LLC, exemptions for Byron and Braidwood, from 10
CFR part 50, Appendix G, and 10 CFR 50.61 to allow the use of AREVA NP
Topical Report BAW-2308, Revisions 1-A and 2-A, ``Initial
RTNDT of Linde 80 Weld Materials.''
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of August 2020
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Gregory F. Suber,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2020-19752 Filed 9-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P