Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 55391-55395 [2020-19582]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Within 300 hours time in service after the
effective date of this AD, visually inspect the
components of the right MLG assembly, left
MLG assembly, and NLG kit for threaded
hinge pins, part number (P/N) 92250–12281–
101, and actuator pins, P/N 92240–12287–
101 and 92240–12287–103, with serial
numbers (S/Ns) identified in Table 1 or 2
(threaded hinge pins) or in Table 1 (actuator
pins), in Section 3, the Accomplishment
Instructions, in the Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 92–
32–008, Basic Issue, dated January 21, 2020
(‘‘the ASB’’).
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: See
Figures 1 and 2 in Section 3, the
Accomplishment Instructions, in the ASB for
guidance on performing the visual
inspection.
(1) If there is any threaded hinge pin, P/
N 92250–12281–101, with an S/N listed in
Table 1 or 2 in the ASB, before further flight,
remove the threaded hinge pin from service.
(2) If there is any MLG or NLG actuator
pin, P/N 92250–12287–101 or P/N 92250–
12287–103, with an S/N listed in Table 1 in
the ASB, before further flight, remove the
actuator pin from service.
(h) Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, do not
install any threaded hinge pin, P/N 92250–
12281–101, or actuator pin, P/N 92240–
12287–101 or 92240–12287–103, with an S/
N listed in Table 1 or 2 in Section 3, the
Accomplishment Instructions, in the ASB, on
any helicopter.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Boston ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) Dorie Resnik, Aerospace Engineer,
Boston ACO Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7693; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
dorie.resnik@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft
Corporation, Commercial Systems and
Services, 124 Quarry Road, Trumbull, CT
06611; phone: (203) 416–4000; email:
product_safety.gr-sik@lmco.com. Operators
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
may also log on to the Sikorsky 360 website
at website: https://
customerportal.sikorsky.com. You may view
the related service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 817–222–5110.
Issued on August 31, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–19709 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0789; Project
Identifier AD–2020–00849–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019–22–10, which applies to all The
Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700,
–700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series
airplanes. AD 2019–22–10 requires
repetitive inspections for cracking of the
left- and right-hand side outboard
chords of frame fittings and failsafe
straps at a certain station around eight
fasteners, and repair if any cracking is
found. Since the FAA issued AD 2019–
22–10, it was determined that the initial
inspection threshold and repetitive
inspection interval are inadequate to
address the cracking in a timely manner.
For certain airplanes, this proposed AD
would reduce the compliance time for
the initial inspection, and for all
airplanes this proposed AD would
reduce the compliance time for the
repetitive inspections. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by October 23,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55391
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;
internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0789.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0789; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Rutar, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206–231–3529; email:
Greg.Rutar@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views about this
proposal. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should submit only one
copy of the comments. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
55392
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
FAA–2020–0789; Project Identifier AD–
2020–00849–T’’ at the beginning of your
comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, the FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change
this NPRM because of those comments.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Any commentary that
the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be
placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2019–22–10,
Amendment 39–19789 (84 FR 61533,
November 13, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–22–
10’’), for all The Boeing Company Model
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and
–900ER series airplanes. AD 2019–22–
10 requires inspections for cracking of
the left- and right-hand side outboard
chords of frame fittings and failsafe
straps at a certain station around eight
fasteners, and repair if any cracking is
found. AD 2019–22–10 superseded AD
2019–20–02 Amendment 39–19755 (84
FR 52754, October 3, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–
20–02’’). AD 2019–22–10 resulted from
reports of cracking discovered in the
left- and right-hand side outboard
chords of the station (STA) 663.75 frame
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
fittings and failsafe straps adjacent to
the stringer S–18A straps and a
determination that the inspection area
specified in AD 2019–20–02 needed to
be expanded. The FAA issued AD 2019–
22–10 to address cracking in the STA
663.75 frame fitting outboard chords
and failsafe straps adjacent to the
stringer S–18A straps, which could
result in failure of a Principal Structural
Element (PSE) to sustain limit load. This
condition could adversely affect the
structural integrity of the airplane and
result in loss of control of the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2019–22–10 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2019–22–
10, it was determined by an engineering
analysis of the inspection reporting
results and metallurgical evaluation of
the submitted frame fitting assemblies
that the initial inspection threshold for
Model 737–900ER series airplanes, and
the repetitive inspection interval for all
affected airplanes is inadequate to
address the cracking in a timely manner.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing MultiOperator Message MOM–MOM–20–
0443–01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020. This
service information describes
procedures for repetitive detailed
inspections for cracking of the left- and
right-hand side outboard chords of the
STA 663.75 frame fittings and failsafe
straps around eight fasteners adjacent to
the stringer S–18A straps.
This proposed AD also requires
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM–
MOM–19–0536–01B, dated September
30, 2019, which the Director of the
Federal Register approved for
incorporation by reference as of October
3, 2019 (84 FR 52754, October 3, 2019).
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD
because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD requires repetitive
inspections for cracking of the left- and
right-hand side outboard chords of the
STA 663.75 frame fittings and failsafe
straps around eight fasteners adjacent to
the stringer S–18A straps. This
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed AD also requires repair of all
cracking using a method approved by
the FAA or The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA). Accomplishing the initial
inspection required by paragraph (i) of
this proposed AD would terminate the
inspections originally required by
paragraph (g) of AD 2019–22–10, which
are retained in this proposed AD (the
associated reporting specified in
paragraph (h) of AD 2019–22–10 is also
retained in this proposed AD). This
proposed AD would also require
sending a report of all results of the
initial inspections specified in
paragraph (i) of this proposed AD to
Boeing.
Although this proposed AD does not
explicitly restate the requirements of
paragraphs (i), (j), and (k) of AD 2019–
22–10, this proposed AD would retain
those requirements with certain revised
compliance times. Those requirements
are referenced in Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–20–0443–01B
(R1), dated June 2, 2020, which, in turn,
is referenced in paragraphs (i) and (l) of
this proposed AD.
For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service
information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0789.
Explanation of New Compliance Times
for Certain Configurations
For Boeing Model 737–600, –700,
–700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes
having less than 22,600 total flight
cycles and on which an inspection
specified in Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–19–0623–01B,
dated November 5, 2019, has been done;
and for Boeing Model 737–900ER series
airplanes having less than 14,000 total
flight cycles and on which an inspection
specified in Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–19–0623–01B,
dated November 5, 2019, has been done,
the compliance times specified in
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM–
MOM–20–0443–01B (R1), dated June 2,
2020 (which will be required by this
proposed AD), are relieving as
compared to the compliance times in
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM–
MOM–19–0623–01B, dated November 5,
2019 (which is required by AD 2019–
22–10).
For example, for a Boeing Model 737–
600 series airplane on which the
inspection was done and the airplane
had accumulated 15,000 total flight
cycles, the next inspection required by
AD 2019–22–10 would be at 18,500 total
flight cycles (i.e., 3,500 flight cycles
after the inspection as specified in
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM–
MOM–19–0623–01B, dated November 5,
2019).
However, as specified in Boeing
Multi-Operator Message MOM–MOM–
20–0443–01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020,
the next inspection for that airplane is
prior to 22,600 total flight cycles or
within 1,500 flight cycles from the last
inspection in accordance with MOM–
MOM–19–0623–01B, or within 30 days
from the original issue date of MOM–
MOM–20–0443–01B (R1) (which would
correspond to 30 days after the effective
date of the final rule for this proposed
AD), whichever occurs latest.
In conclusion, if the inspection was
done early, operators do not have to do
the next inspection at the 3,500 interval
required by AD 2019–22–10 after this
proposed AD is a final rule; instead
operators would then do the next
inspection within the new compliance
times specified in Boeing MultiOperator Message MOM–MOM–20–
0443–01B R1), dated June 2, 2020, for
their configuration.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD
interim action. The inspection reports
that are required by this proposed AD
55393
will enable the manufacturer to obtain
better insight into the nature, cause, and
extent of the cracking, and eventually to
develop final action to address the
unsafe condition. Once final action has
been identified, the FAA might consider
further rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 1,911 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection (retained action
from AD 2019–22–10).
Reporting (retained action
from AD 2019–22–10).
Inspection (new action) ..........
1 work-hour × $85 per hour =
$85 per inspection cycle.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour =
$85.
1 work-hour(s) × $85 per hour
= $85 per inspection cycle.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour =
$85.
Reporting (new action) ...........
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The FAA has received no definitive
data that would enable the agency to
provide cost estimates for the oncondition actions specified in this
proposed AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this proposed AD is 2120–
0056. The paperwork cost associated
with this proposed AD has been
detailed in the Costs of Compliance
section of this document and includes
time for reviewing instructions, as well
as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all
reporting associated with this proposed
AD is mandatory. Comments concerning
the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177–1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
$85 per inspection cycle ........
0
85 ...........................................
$162,435 per inspection
cycle.
162,435.
0
85 per inspection cycle ..........
162,435 per inspection cycle.
0
85 ...........................................
162,435.
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701, General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Regulatory Findings
PO 00000
Cost on U.S.
operators
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019–22–10, Amendment 39–19789 (84
FR 61533, November 13, 2019), and
adding the following new AD:
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2020–0789; Project Identifier AD–2020–
00849–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by October 23, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
55394
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2019–22–10,
Amendment 39–19789 (84 FR 61533,
November 13, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–22–10’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking discovered in the station (STA)
663.75 frame fitting outboard chords and
failsafe straps adjacent to the stringer S–18A
straps and a determination that the initial
inspection threshold for certain airplanes and
the repetitive inspection interval specified in
AD 2019–22–10 are inadequate to address the
cracking in a timely manner. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address cracking in the
STA 663.75 frame fitting outboard chords
and failsafe straps adjacent to the stringer S–
18A straps, which could result in failure of
a Principal Structural Element (PSE) to
sustain limit load. This condition could
adversely affect the structural integrity of the
airplane and result in loss of control of the
airplane.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Inspection and Corrective
Action With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2019–22–10 with no
changes. At the earlier of the times specified
in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection for cracking of the leftand right-hand side outboard chords of the
STA 663.75 frame fittings and failsafe straps
adjacent to the stringer S–18A straps, in
accordance with Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–19–0536–01B, dated
September 30, 2019. If any crack is found,
repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 3,500 flight cycles until the initial
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this
AD is done.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 30,000
total flight cycles, or within 7 days after
October 3, 2019 (the effective date of AD
2019–20–02, Amendment 39 19755 (84 FR
52754, October 3, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–20–02’’)),
whichever occurs later.
(2) Prior to the accumulation of 22,600
total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight
cycles after October 3, 2019 (the effective
date of AD 2019–20–02), whichever occurs
later.
(h) Retained Reporting Requirement With
No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of AD 2019–22–10, with no
changes. At the applicable time specified in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
paragraph (h)(1) or (2) of this AD, submit a
report of all findings, positive and negative,
of the initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD. Submit the report
in accordance with Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–19–0536–01B, dated
September 30, 2019.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
October 3, 3019 (the effective date of AD
2019–20–02): Submit the report within 3
days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before
October 3, 2019 (the effective date of AD
2019–20–02): Submit the report within 3
days after October 3, 2019.
(i) Inspection and Corrective Action With
Reduced Compliance Times
Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD: At the applicable initial compliance time
specified in Tables 1 and 2 of ‘‘Ref I’’ of
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM–
MOM–20–0443–01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020,
do a detailed inspection of the left- and righthand side outboard chords of the STA 663.75
frame fittings and failsafe straps around eight
fasteners adjacent to the stringer S–18A
straps, in accordance with Boeing MultiOperator Message MOM–MOM–20–0443–
01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020. If any crack is
found, repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this
AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable intervals specified in Tables 1 and
2 of ‘‘Ref I’’ of Boeing Multi-Operator
Message MOM–MOM–20–0443–01B (R1),
dated June 2, 2020. Accomplishing the initial
inspection required by this paragraph or an
initial inspection specified in Boeing MultiOperator Message MOM–MOM–19–0623–
01B, dated November 5, 2019, terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
Where Boeing Multi-Operator Message
MOM–MOM–20–0443–01B (R1), dated June
2, 2020, uses the phrase ‘‘the original issue
date of MOM–MOM–20–0443–01B(R1),’’ this
AD requires using ‘‘the effective date of this
AD.’’
(k) New Reporting Requirement
At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (2) of this AD, submit a
report of all findings, positive and negative,
of the initial inspection required by
paragraph (i) of this AD. Submit the report
in accordance with MOM–MOM–20–0443–
01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 3 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 3 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(l) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199
to operate the airplane to a location where
the airplane can be repaired if any crack is
found, provided the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, FAA, concurs with issuance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
special flight permit. Send requests for
concurrence by email to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACOAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(m) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden
Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection
of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory as
required by this AD. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Federal Aviation Administration,
10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177–1524.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (o)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2019–20–02 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(5) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2019–22–10 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Greg Rutar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3529; email:
Greg.Rutar@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
Issued on August 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–19582 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0803; Airspace
Docket No. 20–AGL–30]
Authority for This Rulemaking
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Charlevoix, MI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Charlevoix Municipal Airport,
Charlevoix, MI. The FAA is proposing
this action as the result of an airspace
review caused by the decommissioning
of the Charlevoix non-directional
beacon (NDB). The geographic
coordinates of the airport would also be
updated to coincide with the FAA’s
aeronautical database.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 23, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must
identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2020–
0803/Airspace Docket No. 20–AGL–30,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Sep 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Charlevoix Municipal Airport,
Charlevoix, MI, to support instrument
flight rule operations at this airport.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55395
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2020–0803/Airspace
Docket No. 20–AGL–30.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for the address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document proposes to amend
FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order
7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by amending the Class
E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface to within a 6.5mile (reduced from a 7-mile) radius of
Charlevoix Municipal Airport,
Charlevoix, MI; and updating the
geographic coordinates of the airport to
coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical
database.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM
08SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55391-55395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19582]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0789; Project Identifier AD-2020-00849-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019-22-10, which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD 2019-22-10
requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the left- and right-
hand side outboard chords of frame fittings and failsafe straps at a
certain station around eight fasteners, and repair if any cracking is
found. Since the FAA issued AD 2019-22-10, it was determined that the
initial inspection threshold and repetitive inspection interval are
inadequate to address the cracking in a timely manner. For certain
airplanes, this proposed AD would reduce the compliance time for the
initial inspection, and for all airplanes this proposed AD would reduce
the compliance time for the repetitive inspections. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 23,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is
also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0789.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0789; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Rutar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3529; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views about this proposal. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one copy of the comments. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No.
[[Page 55392]]
FAA-2020-0789; Project Identifier AD-2020-00849-T'' at the beginning of
your comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments received by the closing
date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change this NPRM because of those
comments.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2019-22-10, Amendment 39-19789 (84 FR 61533,
November 13, 2019) (``AD 2019-22-10''), for all The Boeing Company
Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD
2019-22-10 requires inspections for cracking of the left- and right-
hand side outboard chords of frame fittings and failsafe straps at a
certain station around eight fasteners, and repair if any cracking is
found. AD 2019-22-10 superseded AD 2019-20-02 Amendment 39-19755 (84 FR
52754, October 3, 2019) (``AD 2019-20-02''). AD 2019-22-10 resulted
from reports of cracking discovered in the left- and right-hand side
outboard chords of the station (STA) 663.75 frame fittings and failsafe
straps adjacent to the stringer S-18A straps and a determination that
the inspection area specified in AD 2019-20-02 needed to be expanded.
The FAA issued AD 2019-22-10 to address cracking in the STA 663.75
frame fitting outboard chords and failsafe straps adjacent to the
stringer S-18A straps, which could result in failure of a Principal
Structural Element (PSE) to sustain limit load. This condition could
adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane and result in
loss of control of the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2019-22-10 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2019-22-10, it was determined by an
engineering analysis of the inspection reporting results and
metallurgical evaluation of the submitted frame fitting assemblies that
the initial inspection threshold for Model 737-900ER series airplanes,
and the repetitive inspection interval for all affected airplanes is
inadequate to address the cracking in a timely manner.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B
(R1), dated June 2, 2020. This service information describes procedures
for repetitive detailed inspections for cracking of the left- and
right-hand side outboard chords of the STA 663.75 frame fittings and
failsafe straps around eight fasteners adjacent to the stringer S-18A
straps.
This proposed AD also requires Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-
MOM-19-0536-01B, dated September 30, 2019, which the Director of the
Federal Register approved for incorporation by reference as of October
3, 2019 (84 FR 52754, October 3, 2019).
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of
the left- and right-hand side outboard chords of the STA 663.75 frame
fittings and failsafe straps around eight fasteners adjacent to the
stringer S-18A straps. This proposed AD also requires repair of all
cracking using a method approved by the FAA or The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization (ODA). Accomplishing the initial
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this proposed AD would
terminate the inspections originally required by paragraph (g) of AD
2019-22-10, which are retained in this proposed AD (the associated
reporting specified in paragraph (h) of AD 2019-22-10 is also retained
in this proposed AD). This proposed AD would also require sending a
report of all results of the initial inspections specified in paragraph
(i) of this proposed AD to Boeing.
Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of paragraphs (i), (j), and (k) of AD 2019-22-10, this
proposed AD would retain those requirements with certain revised
compliance times. Those requirements are referenced in Boeing Multi-
Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020, which,
in turn, is referenced in paragraphs (i) and (l) of this proposed AD.
For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0789.
Explanation of New Compliance Times for Certain Configurations
For Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes having less than 22,600 total flight cycles and on which an
inspection specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0623-
01B, dated November 5, 2019, has been done; and for Boeing Model 737-
900ER series airplanes having less than 14,000 total flight cycles and
on which an inspection specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-
MOM-19-0623-01B, dated November 5, 2019, has been done, the compliance
times specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B
(R1), dated June 2, 2020 (which will be required by this proposed AD),
are relieving as compared to the compliance times in Boeing Multi-
Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0623-01B, dated November 5, 2019 (which is
required by AD 2019-22-10).
For example, for a Boeing Model 737-600 series airplane on which
the inspection was done and the airplane had accumulated 15,000 total
flight cycles, the next inspection required by AD 2019-22-10 would be
at 18,500 total flight cycles (i.e., 3,500 flight cycles after the
inspection as specified in
[[Page 55393]]
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0623-01B, dated November 5,
2019).
However, as specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-
0443-01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020, the next inspection for that
airplane is prior to 22,600 total flight cycles or within 1,500 flight
cycles from the last inspection in accordance with MOM-MOM-19-0623-01B,
or within 30 days from the original issue date of MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B
(R1) (which would correspond to 30 days after the effective date of the
final rule for this proposed AD), whichever occurs latest.
In conclusion, if the inspection was done early, operators do not
have to do the next inspection at the 3,500 interval required by AD
2019-22-10 after this proposed AD is a final rule; instead operators
would then do the next inspection within the new compliance times
specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B R1),
dated June 2, 2020, for their configuration.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD interim action. The inspection
reports that are required by this proposed AD will enable the
manufacturer to obtain better insight into the nature, cause, and
extent of the cracking, and eventually to develop final action to
address the unsafe condition. Once final action has been identified,
the FAA might consider further rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 1,911 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection (retained action from 1 work-hour x $85 $0 $85 per inspection $162,435 per
AD 2019-22-10). per hour = $85 per cycle. inspection cycle.
inspection cycle.
Reporting (retained action from 1 work-hour x $85 0 85................. 162,435.
AD 2019-22-10). per hour = $85.
Inspection (new action).......... 1 work-hour(s) x 0 85 per inspection 162,435 per
$85 per hour = $85 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
Reporting (new action)........... 1 work-hour x $85 0 85................. 162,435.
per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the
agency to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified
in this proposed AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-
1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2019-22-10, Amendment 39-19789 (84 FR 61533, November 13, 2019), and
adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2020-0789; Project Identifier AD-
2020-00849-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October 23,
2020.
[[Page 55394]]
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2019-22-10, Amendment 39-19789 (84 FR 61533,
November 13, 2019) (``AD 2019-22-10'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracking discovered in the
station (STA) 663.75 frame fitting outboard chords and failsafe
straps adjacent to the stringer S-18A straps and a determination
that the initial inspection threshold for certain airplanes and the
repetitive inspection interval specified in AD 2019-22-10 are
inadequate to address the cracking in a timely manner. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address cracking in the STA 663.75 frame fitting
outboard chords and failsafe straps adjacent to the stringer S-18A
straps, which could result in failure of a Principal Structural
Element (PSE) to sustain limit load. This condition could adversely
affect the structural integrity of the airplane and result in loss
of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Inspection and Corrective Action With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2019-22-10 with no changes. At the earlier of the times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection for
cracking of the left- and right-hand side outboard chords of the STA
663.75 frame fittings and failsafe straps adjacent to the stringer
S-18A straps, in accordance with Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-
MOM-19-0536-01B, dated September 30, 2019. If any crack is found,
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,500 flight
cycles until the initial inspection required by paragraph (i) of
this AD is done.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles, or
within 7 days after October 3, 2019 (the effective date of AD 2019-
20-02, Amendment 39 19755 (84 FR 52754, October 3, 2019) (``AD 2019-
20-02'')), whichever occurs later.
(2) Prior to the accumulation of 22,600 total flight cycles, or
within 1,000 flight cycles after October 3, 2019 (the effective date
of AD 2019-20-02), whichever occurs later.
(h) Retained Reporting Requirement With No Changes
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2019-22-10, with no changes. At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(1) or (2) of this AD, submit a report of all findings,
positive and negative, of the initial inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD. Submit the report in accordance with
Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0536-01B, dated September
30, 2019.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after October 3, 3019 (the
effective date of AD 2019-20-02): Submit the report within 3 days
after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before October 3, 2019 (the
effective date of AD 2019-20-02): Submit the report within 3 days
after October 3, 2019.
(i) Inspection and Corrective Action With Reduced Compliance Times
Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: At the
applicable initial compliance time specified in Tables 1 and 2 of
``Ref I'' of Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B (R1),
dated June 2, 2020, do a detailed inspection of the left- and right-
hand side outboard chords of the STA 663.75 frame fittings and
failsafe straps around eight fasteners adjacent to the stringer S-
18A straps, in accordance with Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-
MOM-20-0443-01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020. If any crack is found,
repair before further flight using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in
Tables 1 and 2 of ``Ref I'' of Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-
MOM-20-0443-01B (R1), dated June 2, 2020. Accomplishing the initial
inspection required by this paragraph or an initial inspection
specified in Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-19-0623-01B,
dated November 5, 2019, terminates the inspections required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
Where Boeing Multi-Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B (R1),
dated June 2, 2020, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of
MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B(R1),'' this AD requires using ``the effective
date of this AD.''
(k) New Reporting Requirement
At the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(1) or (2) of
this AD, submit a report of all findings, positive and negative, of
the initial inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD. Submit
the report in accordance with MOM-MOM-20-0443-01B (R1), dated June
2, 2020.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 3 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 3 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(l) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the
airplane can be repaired if any crack is found, provided the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, concurs with issuance of the
special flight permit. Send requests for concurrence by email to [email protected].
(m) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory as required by this AD. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden to Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation
Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (o)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2019-20-02 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
(5) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2019-22-10 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
(o) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Greg Rutar,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
[[Page 55395]]
98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3529; email: [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Issued on August 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-19582 Filed 9-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P