Hydroelectric Power Development at Taylor Park Dam, Uncompahgre Project, Colorado, 54399-54401 [2020-19261]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 1, 2020 / Notices
MONTANA
VERMONT
Park County
Windsor County
Woodstock Village Historic District
(Additional Documentation), Along
the Ottauquechee R., Woodstock,
AD73000274
Billy Miles & Bros. Grain Elevator, Jct.
of East Park St. (US 89 Bus.) and
North G St., Livingston, SG100005604
SOUTH CAROLINA
Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part
60
Charleston County
Host of America Motel, 3245 Rivers
Ave., North Charleston, SG100005609
Richland County
Stone Manufacturing Company, 3452
North Main St., Columbia,
SG100005610
Veterans Administration Regional
Office, 1801 Assembly St., Columbia,
SG100005611
[FR Doc. 2020–19221 Filed 8–31–20; 8:45 am]
Williamsburg County
[RR04651000, 20XR0680A1,
RX003150012000000]
Epps-McGill Farmhouse, 679 Eastland
Ave., Kingstree vicinity,
SG100005612
TEXAS
Bogata Historic District, Main St.,
roughly between Mount Pleasant Rd.
and 2nd St., Bogata, SG100005602
Tarrant County
Riverside Baptist Church, 3111 Race St.,
Fort Worth, SG100005603
Wheeler County
Route 66 in Wheeler County, Texas,
(Route 66 in Texas MPS), South side
frontage road of I 40 between Gray Co.
(TX) and Beckham Co. (OK),
Shamrock vicinity, MP100005601
VERMONT
Windsor County
Woodstock Village Historic District
(Boundary Increase), Roughly along
the Ottauquechee R., Woodstock,
BC100005615
CONNECTICUT
New Haven County
Pinto, William, House, 275 Orange St.,
New Haven, MV85002316
Additional documentation has been
received for the following resources:
ARKANSAS
Pulaski County
Lake Nixon (Additional
Documentation), 18500 Cooper Orbit
Rd., Little Rock, AD100001013
19:00 Aug 31, 2020
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Hydroelectric Power Development at
Taylor Park Dam, Uncompahgre
Project, Colorado
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to accept
proposals, select lessee, and contract for
hydroelectric power development at
Taylor Park Dam.
Jkt 250001
SUMMARY: Current Federal policy allows
non-Federal development of electrical
power resource potential on Federal
water resource projects. The Bureau of
Reclamation (Reclamation) will
consider proposals for non-Federal
development of hydroelectric power at
Taylor Park Dam, a feature of the
Uncompahgre Project, located in
Colorado. Reclamation is considering
such hydroelectric power development
under a Lease of Power Privilege
(LOPP). No Federal funds will be
available for such hydroelectric power
development.
A written proposal and seven
copies must be submitted on or before
4:00 p.m. (MDT) January 29, 2021. A
proposal will be considered timely only
if it is received in the office of the Area
Manager on or before 4:00 p.m. on the
designated date. Interested entities are
cautioned that delayed delivery to this
office due to failures or
misunderstandings of the entity and/or
of mail, overnight, or courier services
will not excuse lateness and,
accordingly, are advised to provide
sufficient time for delivery. Late
proposals will not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Send written proposals to
Mr. Ed Warner, Area Manager, Western
Colorado Area Office, Bureau of
Reclamation; 445 West Gunnison
DATES:
A request to move has been received
for the following resource:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
AGENCY:
Red River County
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Dated: August 18, 2020.
Sherry A. Frear,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54399
Avenue, Suite 221, Grand Junction,
Colorado 81501–5711; telephone 970–
248–0600.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical data, including past water
release patterns, may be obtained by
contacting Mr. Ryan Christianson, Water
Management Group Chief, Western
Colorado Area Office, Bureau of
Reclamation, 445 West Gunnison
Avenue, Suite 221, Grand Junction,
Colorado 81501; telephone 970–248–
0652; email rchristianson@usbr.gov.
Reclamation will be available to meet
with interested entities only upon
written request to the Water
Management Group Chief at the
previously provided address.
Reclamation will provide an
opportunity for a site visit. In addition,
Reclamation reserves the right to
schedule a single meeting and/or visit to
address the questions of all entities that
have submitted questions or requested
site visits. Information related to the
operation and maintenance (O&M) of
Taylor Park Dam may be obtained by
contacting Mr. Steve Anderson,
Uncompahgre Valley Water Users
Association; 601 North Park Avenue,
Montrose, Colorado 81401; telephone
970–249–3813; email sanderson@
uvwua.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Uncompahgre Project is a Federal
Reclamation project. This Notice
presents background information,
proposal content guidelines, and
information concerning selection of a
non-Federal entity to develop
hydroelectric power at Taylor Park Dam,
and power purchasing and/or marketing
considerations. Interested parties will
not need to file an application with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC). To be considered for selection,
the applicant’s proposed LOPP project
must not impair the efficiency of
Reclamation project power or water
deliveries, impact the structural
integrity of the project, jeopardize
public safety, or negatively affect any
other Reclamation project purposes.
Taylor Park Dam is located near the
town of Gunnison in west-central
Colorado on the Taylor River in the
Colorado River Basin. The
Uncompahgre Project (initially
authorized as the Gunnison Project) was
authorized by the Secretary of the
Interior on March 14, 1903, under the
Reclamation Project Act of 1902 (32
Stat. 388) and approved by the President
on January 5, 1911, pursuant to the act
of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 835). The
construction of Taylor Park Dam was
approved by the President on November
6, 1935, pursuant to section 4 of the act
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
54400
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 1, 2020 / Notices
of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 836), and
subsection B of section 4 of the act of
December 5, 1924 (43 Stat. 702). The
Uncompahgre Valley Project Act of 1938
(52 Stat. 941) authorizes the Secretary of
the Interior to contract for the sale or
development of surplus power on the
Uncompahgre Project. The
Uncompahgre Valley Water Users
Association (UVWUA) under its
contracts with the United States, has
certain operation, maintenance, and
replacement responsibilities and
obligations concerning Taylor Park
Dam.
Reclamation is considering
hydroelectric power development at
Taylor Park Dam under an LOPP. An
LOPP is a contractual right given to a
non-Federal entity to use a Reclamation
facility for electric power generation
consistent with Reclamation project
purposes. LOPPs have terms not to
exceed 40 years. The general authority
for LOPPs under Reclamation law
includes, among others, the Town Sites
and Power Development Act of 1906 (43
U.S.C. Sec. 522), and the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c))
(1939 Act).
Reclamation will be the lead Federal
agency for ensuring compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA) of any LOPP considered
in response to this Notice. Reclamation
will also lead necessary consultation
with American Indian Tribal
Governments and compliance with the
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (NHPA), Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (ESA), and other related
environmental regulations for all
elements of the proposed project.
LOPPs may be issued only when
Reclamation has determined that NEPA
and any other regulatory compliance
requirements are completed. Any LOPP
at Taylor Park Dam must accommodate
existing contractual and environmental
commitments related to operation and
maintenance (O&M) of such existing
facilities. The lessee (i.e., successful
proposing entity) will be required to
enter into a contract with Reclamation.
This contract will (1) address
requirements related to coordination of
O&M with Uncompahgre Project
stakeholders (including Upper
Gunnison Water Conservancy District
(UGWCD) stakeholders), and (2)
stipulate that the LOPP lessee will be
responsible for any increase in O&M
costs that are attributable to the
hydroelectric power development.
All costs incurred by the United
States related to development and O&M
under an LOPP, including NEPA and
other environmental regulatory
compliance, engineering reviews, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Aug 31, 2020
Jkt 250001
development of the LOPP, would be the
expense of the lessee. In addition, the
lessee would be required to make
annual payments to the United States
for the use of a Federal facility at a rate
of 2–3 mills per kilowatt-hour of gross
generation, allowing the United States
to benefit proportionally.
Under the LOPP, provisions will be
included for the mill rate to increase
each year commensurate with inflation
based on the average of the previous 5
years of the Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) Price Deflator. If the 5-year GDP
Price Deflator average shows no change
or deflation, the LOPP rate will remain
the same as the previous year’s rate. The
rate of increase of the 5-year GDP Price
Deflator average will be capped at 5
percent. Such annual payments to the
United States would be deposited as a
credit to the Uncompahgre Project until
an eligible reimbursable project expense
is incurred against which the credit can
be applied.
Proposal Content Guidelines
Interested parties should submit
proposals explaining in as precise detail
as is practicable how the hydropower
potential would be developed.
Minimum factors by which a proposal
will be scored and criteria evaluated
include the following:
(1) Anticipated contractual
arrangements with UVWUA for the
Uncompahgre Project feature(s) that are
proposed for utilization in the
hydropower development under
consideration. Define how the
hydropower development would
operate in harmony with the multiple
purposes of the Uncompahgre Project
and existing applicable contracts related
to O&M of Uncompahgre Project
feature(s) being considered for
modification.
(2) Information regarding whether the
applicant qualifies as a preference
entity. If the proposal is made by a
group of entities or by a subdivision of
an entity, then the application must
explain whether and why the applicant
or applicants qualify as preference
entities. The term ‘‘preference entity,’’
as applied to a LOPP, means an entity
qualifying for preference under Section
9c of the 1939 Act as a municipality,
public corporation or agency, or
cooperative or other nonprofit
organization financed in whole or in
part by loans made pursuant to the
Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as
amended.
(3) Information relevant to the
qualifications of the proposing entity to
plan and implement such a project,
including but not limited to: Type of
organization; length of time in business;
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
experience in funding, design, and
construction of similar projects;
industry rating(s) that indicate financial
soundness and/or technical and
managerial capability; experience of key
management personnel; history of any
reorganizations or mergers with other
companies; and any other information
that demonstrates the interested entity’s
organizational, technical, and financial
ability to perform all aspects of the
work. Proposals will include a
discussion of past experience in
developing, operating, and maintaining
similar facilities and provide references
as appropriate.
(4) Geographical locations and
descriptions of principal structures and
other important features of the proposed
development including roads and
transmission lines. Proposals must
estimate and describe installed capacity
and the capacity of the power facilities
under dry, average, and wet
hydrological conditions. Proposals must
also describe the daily, weekly,
monthly, and annual pattern of
expected generation under average, wet,
and dry hydrological conditions; the
ability of generation to provide ancillary
services such as regulation, spinning
reserves, and voltampere reactive
support; and information on the
reliability of the generation, potential
maintenance outage schedule, and
duration. If capacity and energy can be
delivered to another location, either by
the proposing entity or by potential
third party transmission agents, the
proposal must specify where that
capacity and energy can be delivered.
The proposal must describe the
concepts and contractual arrangements
(including the involved parties) related
to transmission interconnection, power
sales, and the proposed approach to
third party transmission if required.
(5) Existing title arrangements or a
description of the ability to acquire title
to or the right to occupy and use lands
necessary for the proposed LOPP
project, including such additional lands
as may be required during construction.
(6) A description of studies necessary
to adequately define impacts of the
proposed LOPP project on the
Uncompahgre Project, historic
properties (if such are present), and the
environment. The proposal must
describe any significant environmental
issues associated with the proposed
LOPP project and the proposing entity’s
approach for gathering relevant data and
resolving such issues to protect and
enhance the quality of the environment.
The proposal will explain any proposed
use of the LOPP project for conservation
and utilization of the available water
resources in the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 1, 2020 / Notices
(7) Plans for assuming liability for
damage to the operational and structural
integrity of the Uncompahgre Project
caused by construction, operation, and/
or maintenance of the hydropower
development.
(8) Identify the organizational
structure planned for the long-term
O&M of any proposed hydropower
development.
(9) A management plan, including
schedules of these activities as
applicable, to accomplish activities such
as planning; NEPA, NHPA, and ESA
compliance; necessary studies; LOPP
project development; design,
construction, safety plan, and facility
testing; and the start of hydropower
production.
(10) An estimate of development
costs. These costs will include all
investment costs such as the cost of
studies to determine feasibility; NEPA,
NHPA, and ESA compliance; other
statutory compliance; design;
construction; financing as well as the
amortized annual cost of the
investment; annual O&M expense for
the hydropower development; lease
payments to the United States; expenses
associated with the Reclamation project;
and anticipated return on investment. If
there are additional transmission
expenses associated with the
development of the LOPP project, these
expenses must also be included. The
proposal must identify proposed
methods of financing the LOPP project.
The proposal must include an economic
analysis that compares the present
worth of all benefits and costs of the
hydropower development.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Selection of Lessee
Reclamation will evaluate proposals
received in response to this published
Notice. Reclamation may request
additional information from individual
proposing entities and/or all proposing
entities after proposals are submitted,
but prior to making a selection of a
lessee.
Reclamation will give more favorable
consideration to proposals that (1)
responsibly develop hydropower; (2)
avoid, reduce, or minimize
environmental impacts; (3) clearly
demonstrate that the offeror is qualified
to develop the hydropower facility and
provide for long-term O&M; and (4) best
share the economic benefits of the
hydropower development among parties
(including the United States) to the
LOPP. A proposal will be deemed
unacceptable if it is inconsistent with
Uncompahgre Project purposes or
interferes with UGWCD’s ability to use
their water allocation in Taylor Park
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Aug 31, 2020
Jkt 250001
Reservoir, as determined by
Reclamation.
Reclamation will give preference to
those entities that qualify as preference
entities, as defined under Proposal
Content Guidelines, item (b) of this
Notice, provided that they are well
qualified to develop and provide for
long-term O&M of the hydropower
facility. If one applicant is a preference
entity and the other is not, and the
preference entity’s proposed plans are
not as well qualified as the nonpreference entity’s plans, Reclamation
will inform the preference entity of the
specific reasons why its plans are not as
well qualified and afford up to 30
calendar days for the preference entity
to render its plans at least as well
qualified as the other plans. All other
applicants will be informed of this
action. If the plans of the preference
entity are rendered at least as well
qualified within the time allowed,
Reclamation will favor the preference
entity. If the preference entity’s plans
are not rendered at least as well
qualified within the time allowed,
Reclamation will favor the other
applicant.
Notice and Time Period To Enter Into
LOPP
Reclamation will notify, in writing, all
entities submitting proposals of
Reclamation’s decision regarding
selection of the potential lessee. The
selected potential lessee will be
provided a maximum of 24 months from
the date of selection to sign the
preliminary lease, complete the
requirements set forth in the
preliminary lease, and to sign the LOPP.
The lessee will have a maximum of 1
year from the date of the execution of
the LOPP to complete final designs,
specifications, etc., and an additional 1
year to begin construction. A maximum
of 4 years is allowed, from the date of
the preliminary lease to the beginning of
construction. Maximum timeframes for
construction will be determined by the
Regional Director, Upper Colorado
Basin—Interior Region 7. The above
timeframes will only be extended for
just cause resulting from actions and/or
circumstances that are beyond the
control of Reclamation or the lessee. Just
cause and timeframe adjustments will
be determined solely by the Regional
Director, Upper Colorado Basin—
Interior Region 7.
Wayne G. Pullan,
Deputy Regional Director, Upper Colorado
Basin—Interior Region 7, Bureau of
Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2020–19261 Filed 8–31–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54401
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1132 and 1134
(Second Review)]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip from China and the
United Arab
Emirates; Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip from China and the United
Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on January 2, 2020 (85 FR 114)
and determined on April 6, 2020 that it
would conduct expedited reviews (85
FR 42916, July 15, 2020).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on August 26, 2020.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 5110
(August 2020), entitled Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from China and the United Arab
Emirates: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–
1132 and 1134 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 26, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–19194 Filed 8–31–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–464 and 731–
TA–1160 (Second Review)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand From China; Institution of FiveYear Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54399-54401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19261]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR04651000, 20XR0680A1, RX003150012000000]
Hydroelectric Power Development at Taylor Park Dam, Uncompahgre
Project, Colorado
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to accept proposals, select lessee, and
contract for hydroelectric power development at Taylor Park Dam.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Current Federal policy allows non-Federal development of
electrical power resource potential on Federal water resource projects.
The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) will consider proposals for
non-Federal development of hydroelectric power at Taylor Park Dam, a
feature of the Uncompahgre Project, located in Colorado. Reclamation is
considering such hydroelectric power development under a Lease of Power
Privilege (LOPP). No Federal funds will be available for such
hydroelectric power development.
DATES: A written proposal and seven copies must be submitted on or
before 4:00 p.m. (MDT) January 29, 2021. A proposal will be considered
timely only if it is received in the office of the Area Manager on or
before 4:00 p.m. on the designated date. Interested entities are
cautioned that delayed delivery to this office due to failures or
misunderstandings of the entity and/or of mail, overnight, or courier
services will not excuse lateness and, accordingly, are advised to
provide sufficient time for delivery. Late proposals will not be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Send written proposals to Mr. Ed Warner, Area Manager,
Western Colorado Area Office, Bureau of Reclamation; 445 West Gunnison
Avenue, Suite 221, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-5711; telephone 970-
248-0600.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical data, including past water
release patterns, may be obtained by contacting Mr. Ryan Christianson,
Water Management Group Chief, Western Colorado Area Office, Bureau of
Reclamation, 445 West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 221, Grand Junction,
Colorado 81501; telephone 970-248-0652; email [email protected].
Reclamation will be available to meet with interested entities only
upon written request to the Water Management Group Chief at the
previously provided address. Reclamation will provide an opportunity
for a site visit. In addition, Reclamation reserves the right to
schedule a single meeting and/or visit to address the questions of all
entities that have submitted questions or requested site visits.
Information related to the operation and maintenance (O&M) of Taylor
Park Dam may be obtained by contacting Mr. Steve Anderson, Uncompahgre
Valley Water Users Association; 601 North Park Avenue, Montrose,
Colorado 81401; telephone 970-249-3813; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Uncompahgre Project is a Federal
Reclamation project. This Notice presents background information,
proposal content guidelines, and information concerning selection of a
non-Federal entity to develop hydroelectric power at Taylor Park Dam,
and power purchasing and/or marketing considerations. Interested
parties will not need to file an application with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). To be considered for selection, the
applicant's proposed LOPP project must not impair the efficiency of
Reclamation project power or water deliveries, impact the structural
integrity of the project, jeopardize public safety, or negatively
affect any other Reclamation project purposes.
Taylor Park Dam is located near the town of Gunnison in west-
central Colorado on the Taylor River in the Colorado River Basin. The
Uncompahgre Project (initially authorized as the Gunnison Project) was
authorized by the Secretary of the Interior on March 14, 1903, under
the Reclamation Project Act of 1902 (32 Stat. 388) and approved by the
President on January 5, 1911, pursuant to the act of June 25, 1910 (36
Stat. 835). The construction of Taylor Park Dam was approved by the
President on November 6, 1935, pursuant to section 4 of the act
[[Page 54400]]
of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 836), and subsection B of section 4 of the
act of December 5, 1924 (43 Stat. 702). The Uncompahgre Valley Project
Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 941) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to
contract for the sale or development of surplus power on the
Uncompahgre Project. The Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association
(UVWUA) under its contracts with the United States, has certain
operation, maintenance, and replacement responsibilities and
obligations concerning Taylor Park Dam.
Reclamation is considering hydroelectric power development at
Taylor Park Dam under an LOPP. An LOPP is a contractual right given to
a non-Federal entity to use a Reclamation facility for electric power
generation consistent with Reclamation project purposes. LOPPs have
terms not to exceed 40 years. The general authority for LOPPs under
Reclamation law includes, among others, the Town Sites and Power
Development Act of 1906 (43 U.S.C. Sec. 522), and the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)) (1939 Act).
Reclamation will be the lead Federal agency for ensuring compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) of any LOPP
considered in response to this Notice. Reclamation will also lead
necessary consultation with American Indian Tribal Governments and
compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA),
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), and other related environmental
regulations for all elements of the proposed project.
LOPPs may be issued only when Reclamation has determined that NEPA
and any other regulatory compliance requirements are completed. Any
LOPP at Taylor Park Dam must accommodate existing contractual and
environmental commitments related to operation and maintenance (O&M) of
such existing facilities. The lessee (i.e., successful proposing
entity) will be required to enter into a contract with Reclamation.
This contract will (1) address requirements related to coordination of
O&M with Uncompahgre Project stakeholders (including Upper Gunnison
Water Conservancy District (UGWCD) stakeholders), and (2) stipulate
that the LOPP lessee will be responsible for any increase in O&M costs
that are attributable to the hydroelectric power development.
All costs incurred by the United States related to development and
O&M under an LOPP, including NEPA and other environmental regulatory
compliance, engineering reviews, and development of the LOPP, would be
the expense of the lessee. In addition, the lessee would be required to
make annual payments to the United States for the use of a Federal
facility at a rate of 2-3 mills per kilowatt-hour of gross generation,
allowing the United States to benefit proportionally.
Under the LOPP, provisions will be included for the mill rate to
increase each year commensurate with inflation based on the average of
the previous 5 years of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Price
Deflator. If the 5-year GDP Price Deflator average shows no change or
deflation, the LOPP rate will remain the same as the previous year's
rate. The rate of increase of the 5-year GDP Price Deflator average
will be capped at 5 percent. Such annual payments to the United States
would be deposited as a credit to the Uncompahgre Project until an
eligible reimbursable project expense is incurred against which the
credit can be applied.
Proposal Content Guidelines
Interested parties should submit proposals explaining in as precise
detail as is practicable how the hydropower potential would be
developed. Minimum factors by which a proposal will be scored and
criteria evaluated include the following:
(1) Anticipated contractual arrangements with UVWUA for the
Uncompahgre Project feature(s) that are proposed for utilization in the
hydropower development under consideration. Define how the hydropower
development would operate in harmony with the multiple purposes of the
Uncompahgre Project and existing applicable contracts related to O&M of
Uncompahgre Project feature(s) being considered for modification.
(2) Information regarding whether the applicant qualifies as a
preference entity. If the proposal is made by a group of entities or by
a subdivision of an entity, then the application must explain whether
and why the applicant or applicants qualify as preference entities. The
term ``preference entity,'' as applied to a LOPP, means an entity
qualifying for preference under Section 9c of the 1939 Act as a
municipality, public corporation or agency, or cooperative or other
nonprofit organization financed in whole or in part by loans made
pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended.
(3) Information relevant to the qualifications of the proposing
entity to plan and implement such a project, including but not limited
to: Type of organization; length of time in business; experience in
funding, design, and construction of similar projects; industry
rating(s) that indicate financial soundness and/or technical and
managerial capability; experience of key management personnel; history
of any reorganizations or mergers with other companies; and any other
information that demonstrates the interested entity's organizational,
technical, and financial ability to perform all aspects of the work.
Proposals will include a discussion of past experience in developing,
operating, and maintaining similar facilities and provide references as
appropriate.
(4) Geographical locations and descriptions of principal structures
and other important features of the proposed development including
roads and transmission lines. Proposals must estimate and describe
installed capacity and the capacity of the power facilities under dry,
average, and wet hydrological conditions. Proposals must also describe
the daily, weekly, monthly, and annual pattern of expected generation
under average, wet, and dry hydrological conditions; the ability of
generation to provide ancillary services such as regulation, spinning
reserves, and voltampere reactive support; and information on the
reliability of the generation, potential maintenance outage schedule,
and duration. If capacity and energy can be delivered to another
location, either by the proposing entity or by potential third party
transmission agents, the proposal must specify where that capacity and
energy can be delivered. The proposal must describe the concepts and
contractual arrangements (including the involved parties) related to
transmission interconnection, power sales, and the proposed approach to
third party transmission if required.
(5) Existing title arrangements or a description of the ability to
acquire title to or the right to occupy and use lands necessary for the
proposed LOPP project, including such additional lands as may be
required during construction.
(6) A description of studies necessary to adequately define impacts
of the proposed LOPP project on the Uncompahgre Project, historic
properties (if such are present), and the environment. The proposal
must describe any significant environmental issues associated with the
proposed LOPP project and the proposing entity's approach for gathering
relevant data and resolving such issues to protect and enhance the
quality of the environment. The proposal will explain any proposed use
of the LOPP project for conservation and utilization of the available
water resources in the public interest.
[[Page 54401]]
(7) Plans for assuming liability for damage to the operational and
structural integrity of the Uncompahgre Project caused by construction,
operation, and/or maintenance of the hydropower development.
(8) Identify the organizational structure planned for the long-term
O&M of any proposed hydropower development.
(9) A management plan, including schedules of these activities as
applicable, to accomplish activities such as planning; NEPA, NHPA, and
ESA compliance; necessary studies; LOPP project development; design,
construction, safety plan, and facility testing; and the start of
hydropower production.
(10) An estimate of development costs. These costs will include all
investment costs such as the cost of studies to determine feasibility;
NEPA, NHPA, and ESA compliance; other statutory compliance; design;
construction; financing as well as the amortized annual cost of the
investment; annual O&M expense for the hydropower development; lease
payments to the United States; expenses associated with the Reclamation
project; and anticipated return on investment. If there are additional
transmission expenses associated with the development of the LOPP
project, these expenses must also be included. The proposal must
identify proposed methods of financing the LOPP project. The proposal
must include an economic analysis that compares the present worth of
all benefits and costs of the hydropower development.
Selection of Lessee
Reclamation will evaluate proposals received in response to this
published Notice. Reclamation may request additional information from
individual proposing entities and/or all proposing entities after
proposals are submitted, but prior to making a selection of a lessee.
Reclamation will give more favorable consideration to proposals
that (1) responsibly develop hydropower; (2) avoid, reduce, or minimize
environmental impacts; (3) clearly demonstrate that the offeror is
qualified to develop the hydropower facility and provide for long-term
O&M; and (4) best share the economic benefits of the hydropower
development among parties (including the United States) to the LOPP. A
proposal will be deemed unacceptable if it is inconsistent with
Uncompahgre Project purposes or interferes with UGWCD's ability to use
their water allocation in Taylor Park Reservoir, as determined by
Reclamation.
Reclamation will give preference to those entities that qualify as
preference entities, as defined under Proposal Content Guidelines, item
(b) of this Notice, provided that they are well qualified to develop
and provide for long-term O&M of the hydropower facility. If one
applicant is a preference entity and the other is not, and the
preference entity's proposed plans are not as well qualified as the
non-preference entity's plans, Reclamation will inform the preference
entity of the specific reasons why its plans are not as well qualified
and afford up to 30 calendar days for the preference entity to render
its plans at least as well qualified as the other plans. All other
applicants will be informed of this action. If the plans of the
preference entity are rendered at least as well qualified within the
time allowed, Reclamation will favor the preference entity. If the
preference entity's plans are not rendered at least as well qualified
within the time allowed, Reclamation will favor the other applicant.
Notice and Time Period To Enter Into LOPP
Reclamation will notify, in writing, all entities submitting
proposals of Reclamation's decision regarding selection of the
potential lessee. The selected potential lessee will be provided a
maximum of 24 months from the date of selection to sign the preliminary
lease, complete the requirements set forth in the preliminary lease,
and to sign the LOPP. The lessee will have a maximum of 1 year from the
date of the execution of the LOPP to complete final designs,
specifications, etc., and an additional 1 year to begin construction. A
maximum of 4 years is allowed, from the date of the preliminary lease
to the beginning of construction. Maximum timeframes for construction
will be determined by the Regional Director, Upper Colorado Basin--
Interior Region 7. The above timeframes will only be extended for just
cause resulting from actions and/or circumstances that are beyond the
control of Reclamation or the lessee. Just cause and timeframe
adjustments will be determined solely by the Regional Director, Upper
Colorado Basin--Interior Region 7.
Wayne G. Pullan,
Deputy Regional Director, Upper Colorado Basin--Interior Region 7,
Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2020-19261 Filed 8-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P