Provider-Based Requirements, 53173-53176 [2020-17042]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 168 / Friday, August 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
under § 89.5, before publishing the final
significant guidance document.
(e) For each significant guidance
document where the agency and the
Administrator of OIRA agree that
exigency, safety, health, or other
compelling cause warrants an
exemption from some or all
requirements under paragraph (b) of this
section, the agency must incorporate
that finding and a brief statement of
reasons for the finding into the
guidance.
(f) For all significant guidance exempt
from requirements under this section as
permitted by paragraph (b) of this
section, such significant guidance shall
be treated as temporary and will be
rescinded by operation of law 270 days
after it is published. The agency may
make the temporary significant
guidance permanent before the
automatic rescission by following the
procedures outlined for all significant
guidance not exempt under paragraph
(b).
(g) This section does not apply to preenforcement rulings, defined in
§ 89.2(g), that are guidance under this
rule.
§ 89.7 Petitions for withdrawal or
modification.
(a) Any member of the public may
petition an agency for withdrawal or
modification of a guidance document
issued by the agency.
(b) Such a petition must be submitted
in writing; include an email address and
mailing address, as well as any other
preferred means for the agency to
respond electronically to the petitioner
(where the petitioner has a means of
electronic communication); identify the
guidance document that is the subject of
the petition; and state in detail the
reason(s) for requesting withdrawal or
modification.
(c) A petition must be directed to the
relevant agency official, pursuant to
instructions provided on the website
described in § 89.5.
(d) The agency may choose to
withdraw, modify, or retain a guidance
document.
(e) Under this section an agency must
provide a response in writing to a
petition that meets the requirements of
paragraph (b) of this section promptly,
but no later than 90 days after receiving
the petition.
§ 89.8
Enforceability.
This rule is intended to improve the
internal management of the Department.
As such, it is for the use of Department
personnel only and is not intended to,
and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
law or in equity by any party against the
United States, its departments, agencies,
or entities, its officers, employees, or
agents, or any other person.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
August, 2020.
Jonathan A. Wolfson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020–18500 Filed 8–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–HL–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ68
Provider-Based Requirements
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with no
changes, a proposed rule to revise its
medical regulations concerning
collection and recovery by VA for
medical care and services provided to
an individual at a VA medical facility
for treatment of a nonservice-connected
condition. Specifically, this rulemaking
adds a regulation that establishes the
requirements VA will use to determine
whether a VA medical facility has
provider-based status.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Duran, Office of Community
Care (10D), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Ptarmigan at Cherry Creek,
Denver, CO 80209; (303) 372–4629.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA is
authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1729 to
recover or collect from a third party the
reasonable charges for medical care or
services VA furnishes to an individual
for a non-service connected disability,
to the extent that the individual, or the
provider of care or services, would be
eligible to receive payment from the
third party if the care or services had
not been furnished by VA. VA’s
collection or recovery under section
1729 is limited to care or services
furnished by VA for a nonserviceconnected disability: Incurred incident
to the individual’s employment and
covered under a worker’s compensation
law or plan that provides
reimbursement or indemnification for
such care and services; incurred as the
result of a crime of personal violence
that occurred in a State, or a political
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53173
subdivision of a State, in which a
person injured as the result of such a
crime is entitled to receive health care
and services at such State’s or
subdivision’s expense for personal
injuries suffered as the result of such
crime; incurred as a result of a motor
vehicle accident in a State that requires
automobile accident reparations (nofault) insurance; or for which the
individual is entitled to care (or the
payment of expenses of care) under a
health plan contract. VA implements its
authority under section 1729 through
regulations at title 38 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 17.101 through
17.106. More specifically, the
methodology that VA uses to determine
the amount of its collection or recovery
for is established in 38 CFR 17.101.
On November 21, 2019, VA published
a proposed rule to revise the
methodology in § 17.101 with regards to
calculating the reasonable charges for
care and services VA provides on an
outpatient basis. 84 FR 64235. That
proposed rule primarily sought to revise
38 CFR 17.101 to remove the regulatory
requirement that VA use the Centers for
Medicare and Medical Services (CMS)
provider-based criteria with regards to
VA billing of third parties, and sought
to add a new regulation at 38 CFR
17.100 to establish the criteria that VA
would use instead to determine whether
a VA facility has provider-based status.
In so doing, VA modelled a majority of
the criteria in new proposed 38 CFR
17.100 on CMS provider-based criteria
in 42 CFR 413.65, but VA’s revisions
addressed the unique structure of VA’s
health care system, versus the CMS
requirements that are more generally
applicable to private health care
systems. We reiterate from the proposed
rule that VA is an integrated, national
health care system and, therefore, some
of the CMS requirements in 42 CFR
413.65, especially as they pertain to
proximity limitations and licensure, are
not appropriate to use for VA facilities.
84 FR 64235, 64236. The CMS
requirements that were not appropriate
to use for VA facilities were further
identified and explained in more detail
in the proposed rule, as were the
alternative VA criteria in § 17.100 as
proposed. 84 FR 64235, 64236–64239.
VA received three comments in
response to the proposed rule, all of
which supported the proposed rule and
none of which suggested changes to any
provisions in the proposed rule. We
therefore adopt the proposed rule as
final with no changes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no collections
of information under the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
53174
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 168 / Friday, August 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small facilities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. We identified
that 400 out of 745 third-party payers
would qualify as small entities pursuant
to the revenue threshold established by
NAICS code 524114 (Direct Health and
Medical Insurance Carriers) to be
affected by changes in this rule. The
number of 400 was derived by assuming
potential effects on all entities that fell
below the applicable revenue threshold,
without further numeric breakout.
Although this 400 number is greater
than three percent of the 745 total
entities, the changes in this rule do not
impose any new requirements that
create a significant economic impact.
The changes made in § 17.100 related to
revising the scope and purpose, and
related to revising, adding, or removing
definitions, are technical in nature and
conform to existing statutory authorities
and existing practices in the program.
The changes in § 17.101 will allow an
additional 104 VA facilities to recognize
an additional billable charge under the
designation of a provider-based facility,
with an estimated increased revenue for
VA of $3,666,218 in FY21. This
$3,666,218 annual revenue increase
divided by the 745 firms under NAICS
code 524114 will result in $4,921
additional annual costs per firm. This
$4,921 additional cost per firm divided
by the total receipts per firm of $1,
109,867,678 does not create a significant
economic impact. Additional training
will not be required for the 400 small
entities potentially to be effected, as 97
percent of VA facilities already engage
in the provider-based practices subject
to the changes in § 17.101, which makes
these practices well known to all
potentially affected entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA’s regulatory impact analysis can
be found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm by following
the link for VA Regulations Published
from FY 2004 through FYTD.
This final rule is not subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771 because this
final rule results in no more than de
minimis costs.
64.049—VHA Community Living
Center; 64.050—VHA Diagnostic Care.
Unfunded Mandates
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Health care, Health facilities,
Health professions, Health records,
Medical devices, Medical research,
Mental health programs, Nursing
homes, Philippines, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Brooks D. Tucker, Acting Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on July 22,
2020, for publication.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as
set forth below:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
*
*
*
*
*
2. Add § 17.100 under the
undesignated center heading ‘‘Charges,
Waivers, and Collections’’ to read as
follows:
■
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
§ 17.100
status.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
as follows: 64.008—Veterans
Domiciliary Care; 64.011—Veterans
Dental Care; 64.012—Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013—Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014—
Veterans State Domiciliary Care;
64.015—Veterans State Nursing Home
Care; 64.026—Veterans State Adult Day
Health Care; 64.039—CHAMPVA;
64.040—VHA Inpatient Medicine;
64.041—VHA Outpatient Specialty
Care; 64.042—VHA Inpatient Surgery;
64.043—VHA Mental Health
Residential; 64.044—VHA Home Care;
64.045—VHA Outpatient Ancillary
Services; 64.046—VHA Inpatient
Psychiatry; 64.047—VHA Primary Care;
64.048—VHA Mental Health clinics;
(a) Scope. This section establishes the
criteria that VA uses to determine
whether a VA medical facility is
designated as provider-based for
purposes of billing for non-serviceconnected and non-special treatment
authority conditions.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
Community Based Outpatient Clinic
(CBOC). A CBOC is a VA-operated, VAfunded, or VA-reimbursed site of care
that is not located within a VA Medical
Center. A CBOC can provide primary,
specialty, subspecialty, mental health,
or any combination of health care
delivery services that can be
appropriately provided in an outpatient
setting.
Community Living Center (CLC). A
CLC is a component of the spectrum of
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
Requirements for provider-based
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 168 / Friday, August 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
long-term care that provides a skilled
nursing environment and houses a
variety of specialty programs for persons
needing short and long stay services. VA
CLCs are typically located on, or near a
VA medical facility and are VA-owned
and operated, but may be free-standing
in the community.
Facility. A facility is a point of care
where individuals can seek VA health
care services, to include a VA Medical
Center, CBOC, Health Care Center, CLC,
and Other Outpatient Services site.
Health Care Center (HCC). An HCC is
a VA-owned, VA-leased, VA-contracted
or shared clinic that is operational at
least five days per week and provides
primary care, mental health care, on site
specialty services, and performs
ambulatory surgery and/or invasive
procedures that may require moderate
sedation or general anesthesia.
Main provider. A main provider (or
parent facility/hospital or providerbased hospital (PBH)) is a provider that
either creates, or acquires ownership of,
another facility to deliver additional
health care services under its name,
ownership, and financial and
administrative control. For example, VA
Medical Centers and HCCs can be main
providers.
Other Outpatient Services (OOS). A
site that provides outpatient services to
veterans, but does not meet the
definition of a CBOC or HCC per this
section.
Prospective Payment System (PPS). A
Prospective Payment System (PPS) is a
method of reimbursement in which
Medicare payment is made based on a
predetermined, fixed amount. The
payment amount for a particular service
is derived based on the classification
system of that service (for example,
Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related
Groups for inpatient hospital services
furnished by most acute care hospitals).
Provider-based outpatient facility
(PBO). A provider-based outpatient
facility is a provider of health care
services that is either created by, or
acquired by, a main provider for the
purpose of furnishing additional health
care services under the ownership,
administrative, and financial control of
the main provider, and meets the
criteria outlined in this section.
Remote location of a hospital. A
remote location of a hospital is a CBOC,
OOS Site, or HCC that is located offsite
from the main facility.
VA Medical Center (VAMC). A VAMC
is a VA facility that provides at least two
categories of care (inpatient, outpatient,
residential, or institutional extended
care).
(c) Criteria for provider-based status.
In order to be designated as a provider-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
based facility, the following criteria
must be met:
(1) Licensure. The facility seeking
provider-based status and the main
provider must operate under the same
license. VA facilities are not licensed by
States but all VA facilities are
considered licensed for the purpose of
collection and recovery by VA as part of
VA’s national organization structure and
in accordance with VA standards,
including standards established or
recognized by VA’s Offices of the
Medical Inspector and Inspector General
and major healthcare accreditation
organizations.
(2) Clinical services. The clinical
services of the facility seeking providerbased status and the main provider must
be integrated. Integration is
demonstrated by the following:
(i) The professional staff of the facility
has clinical privileges at the main
provider.
(ii) The main provider maintains the
same monitoring and oversight (i.e.
credentialing and privileging) of the
facility seeking provider-based status as
it does for any other department of the
provider.
(iii) The medical director of the
facility seeking provider-based status
maintains a reporting relationship with
the chief medical officer or other similar
official of the main provider that has the
same frequency, intensity, and level of
accountability that exists in the
relationship between the medical
director of a department of the main
provider and the chief medical officer or
other similar official of the main
provider, and is under the same type of
supervision and accountability as any
other director, medical or otherwise, of
the main provider.
(iv) The medical staff committees or
other professional committees at the
main provider are responsible for
medical activities in the facility seeking
provider-based status, including quality
assurance, utilization review, and the
coordination and integration of services,
to the extent practicable, between the
facility seeking provider-based status
and the main provider.
(v) Medical records for patients
treated in the facility seeking providerbased status are integrated into a unified
retrieval system (or cross reference) of
the main provider.
(vi) Inpatient and outpatient services
of the facility seeking provider-based
status and the main provider are
integrated, and patients treated at the
facility who require further care have
full access to all services of the main
provider and are referred where
appropriate to the corresponding
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53175
inpatient or outpatient department or
service of the main provider.
(vii) Inpatient and outpatient services
of the facility seeking provider-based
status and the main provider are
recognized under the main provider’s
accreditation.
(3) Financial integration. The
financial operations of the facility
seeking provider-based status are fully
integrated within the financial system of
the main provider, as evidenced by
shared income and expenses between
the main provider and the facility. The
costs of a facility that is a hospital
department are reported in a cost center
of the provider, costs of a facility other
than a hospital department are reported
in the appropriate cost center or cost
centers of the main provider. The main
provider’s integrated health care system
manpower and labor budget and the
financial status of any facility seeking
provider-based status is incorporated
and readily identified in the main
provider’s integrated system reports.
(4) Public awareness. The facility
seeking provider-based status must be
held out to the public (and other payers)
as part of the main provider. Patients of
the facility must be made aware that the
facility is part of a main provider and
that they will be billed accordingly. All
literature, brochures, and public
relations newsletters from the facility
seeking provider-based status must
provide the relationship between the
main provider and the facility.
(5) Obligations of hospital outpatient
departments and hospital-based
facilities. If the facility seeking providerbased status is a hospital outpatient
department or hospital-based facility,
the facility must fulfill the obligations
described in this paragraph:
(i) The hospital outpatient department
must comply with the antidumping
rules of 42 CFR 489.20(l), (m), (q), and
(r) and § 489.24.
(ii) Physician services furnished in
hospital outpatient departments or
hospital-based facilities must be billed
with the correct site-of-service so that
appropriate physician and practitioner
payment amounts can be determined
based on their geographical location.
(iii) Physicians who work in hospital
outpatient departments or hospitalbased facilities are obligated to comply
with the non-discrimination provisions
in 42 CFR 489.10(b).
(iv) Hospital outpatient departments
must treat all Medicare patients seen on
an urgent/emergent basis as hospital
outpatients.
(v) In the case of a patient admitted
to the hospital as an inpatient after
receiving treatment in the hospital
outpatient department or hospital-based
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
53176
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 168 / Friday, August 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
facility, payments for services in the
hospital outpatient department or
hospital-based facility are subject to the
payment window provisions applicable
to PPS hospitals and to hospitals and
units excluded from PPS set forth at 42
CFR 412.2(c)(5) and at 42 CFR
413.40(c)(2), respectively.
(vi) The hospital outpatient
department must meet applicable VA
policies pertaining to hospital health
and safety programs.
(vii) VA must treat any facility that is
located on the main hospital campus as
a department of the hospital.
(6) Operation under the control of the
main provider. The facility seeking
provider-based status is operated under
the control of the main provider.
Control of the main provider requires:
(i) The main provider and the facility
seeking provider-based status have the
same governing body.
(ii) The facility seeking providerbased status is operated under the same
organizational documents as the main
provider. For example, the facility
seeking provider-based status must be
subject to common bylaws and
operating decisions of the governing
body of the main provider.
(iii) The main provider has final
responsibility for administrative
decisions, final approval for contracts
with outside parties, final approval for
personnel actions, final responsibility
for personnel policies (such as code of
conduct), and final approval for medical
staff appointments in the facility
seeking provider-based status.
(7) Administration and Supervision.
The reporting relationship between the
facility seeking provider-based status
and the main provider must have the
same frequency, intensity, and level of
accountability that exists in the
relationship between the main provider
and one of its existing departments, as
evidenced by compliance with all of the
following requirements:
(i) The facility seeking provider-based
status is under the direct supervision of
the main provider.
(ii) The facility seeking providerbased status is operated under the same
monitoring and oversight by the main
provider as any other department of the
provider, and is operated just as any
other department of the provider with
regard to supervision and
accountability. The facility director or
individual responsible for daily
operations at the facility:
(A) Maintains a reporting relationship
with a manager at the main provider
that has the same frequency, intensity,
and level of accountability that exists in
the relationship between the main
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
provider and its existing departments;
and
(B) Is accountable to the governing
body of the main provider, in the same
manner as any department head of the
provider.
(iii) The following administrative
functions of the facility seeking
provider-based status are integrated
with those of the main provider where
the facility is based: Billing services,
records, human resources, payroll,
employee benefit package, salary
structure, and purchasing services.
Either the same employees or group of
employees handle these administrative
functions for the facility and the main
provider, or the administrative
functions for both the facility and the
main provider are contracted out under
the same contract agreement; or are
handled under different contract
agreements, with the contract of the
facility or organization being managed
by the main provider.
(d) Illustrations of how the criteria are
applied. (1) A VA facility that is seeking
provider-based status that exists under
contract arrangements, where only VA
patients are seen, may be designated as
provider-based if the provider-based
requirements in this section are met.
(2) A VA facility seeking providerbased status that exists under contract
arrangements, where VA patients and
non-VA patients are seen at the same
non-VA owned facility, will have the
same provider-based status as the nonVA owned facility that is hosting the VA
facility.
(3) A VA owned and operated facility
seeking provider-based status, where
some or all of the staff are contracted
employees, may be designated as
provider-based if the provider-based
requirements in this section are met.
■ 2. Amend § 17.101 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading;
■ b. In paragraph (a)(5), removing the
definitions ‘‘Non-provider-based’’ and
‘‘Provider-based’’ from; and
■ 3. Revising paragraph (a)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 17.101 Collection or recovery by VA for
medical care or services provided or
furnished to a veteran for a non-service
connected disability.
(a) * * *
(6) Provider-based status and charges.
Facilities that have provider-based
status by meeting the criteria in § 17.100
are entitled to bill outpatient facility
charges and professional charges. The
professional charges for these facilities
are produced by the methodologies set
forth in this section based on facility
expense RVUs. Facilities that do not
have provider-based status because they
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
do not meet the criteria in § 17.100 are
not permitted to bill outpatient facility
charges and can only bill a professional
charge. The professional charges for
these facilities are produced by the
methodologies set forth in this section
based on non-facility practice expense
RVUs.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 17.106 by adding
paragraph (f)(2)(viii) to read as follows:
§ 17.106
payers.
VA collection rules; third-party
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) A third party may not reduce or
refuse payment if the facility where the
medical treatment was furnished is
designated by VA as provider-based, but
the facility does not meet the providerbased status requirements under 42 CFR
413.65.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–17042 Filed 8–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 258
[EPA–R09–RCRA–2018–0568; FRL–10011–
63–Region 9]
Final Determination To Approve Site
Specific Flexibility for the Cocopah
Landfill
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making a final
determination to approve two Site
Specific Flexibility Requests (SSFRs)
from Cocopah Landfill, Inc. (CLI), a
subsidiary of Republic Services, Inc.
(Republic), to close and monitor the
Cocopah Landfill. The Cocopah Landfill
is located within Indian Country on the
Cocopah Indian Reservation near
Somerton, Arizona and was operated by
Republic and its predecessors from the
1960’s to the present. EPA is
promulgating a site-specific rule
proposed on May 6, 2020, that approves
an alternative final cover and an
alternative location for the storage of
facility records.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–RCRA–2018–0568 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Publicly
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 168 (Friday, August 28, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53173-53176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17042]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AQ68
Provider-Based Requirements
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with
no changes, a proposed rule to revise its medical regulations
concerning collection and recovery by VA for medical care and services
provided to an individual at a VA medical facility for treatment of a
nonservice-connected condition. Specifically, this rulemaking adds a
regulation that establishes the requirements VA will use to determine
whether a VA medical facility has provider-based status.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Duran, Office of Community Care
(10D), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Ptarmigan at Cherry Creek, Denver, CO 80209; (303) 372-4629. (This is
not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA is authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1729 to
recover or collect from a third party the reasonable charges for
medical care or services VA furnishes to an individual for a non-
service connected disability, to the extent that the individual, or the
provider of care or services, would be eligible to receive payment from
the third party if the care or services had not been furnished by VA.
VA's collection or recovery under section 1729 is limited to care or
services furnished by VA for a nonservice-connected disability:
Incurred incident to the individual's employment and covered under a
worker's compensation law or plan that provides reimbursement or
indemnification for such care and services; incurred as the result of a
crime of personal violence that occurred in a State, or a political
subdivision of a State, in which a person injured as the result of such
a crime is entitled to receive health care and services at such State's
or subdivision's expense for personal injuries suffered as the result
of such crime; incurred as a result of a motor vehicle accident in a
State that requires automobile accident reparations (no-fault)
insurance; or for which the individual is entitled to care (or the
payment of expenses of care) under a health plan contract. VA
implements its authority under section 1729 through regulations at
title 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 17.101 through 17.106. More
specifically, the methodology that VA uses to determine the amount of
its collection or recovery for is established in 38 CFR 17.101.
On November 21, 2019, VA published a proposed rule to revise the
methodology in Sec. 17.101 with regards to calculating the reasonable
charges for care and services VA provides on an outpatient basis. 84 FR
64235. That proposed rule primarily sought to revise 38 CFR 17.101 to
remove the regulatory requirement that VA use the Centers for Medicare
and Medical Services (CMS) provider-based criteria with regards to VA
billing of third parties, and sought to add a new regulation at 38 CFR
17.100 to establish the criteria that VA would use instead to determine
whether a VA facility has provider-based status. In so doing, VA
modelled a majority of the criteria in new proposed 38 CFR 17.100 on
CMS provider-based criteria in 42 CFR 413.65, but VA's revisions
addressed the unique structure of VA's health care system, versus the
CMS requirements that are more generally applicable to private health
care systems. We reiterate from the proposed rule that VA is an
integrated, national health care system and, therefore, some of the CMS
requirements in 42 CFR 413.65, especially as they pertain to proximity
limitations and licensure, are not appropriate to use for VA
facilities. 84 FR 64235, 64236. The CMS requirements that were not
appropriate to use for VA facilities were further identified and
explained in more detail in the proposed rule, as were the alternative
VA criteria in Sec. 17.100 as proposed. 84 FR 64235, 64236-64239.
VA received three comments in response to the proposed rule, all of
which supported the proposed rule and none of which suggested changes
to any provisions in the proposed rule. We therefore adopt the proposed
rule as final with no changes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no collections of information under the
Paperwork
[[Page 53174]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small facilities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. We identified that 400 out of 745 third-party payers would qualify
as small entities pursuant to the revenue threshold established by
NAICS code 524114 (Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers) to be
affected by changes in this rule. The number of 400 was derived by
assuming potential effects on all entities that fell below the
applicable revenue threshold, without further numeric breakout.
Although this 400 number is greater than three percent of the 745 total
entities, the changes in this rule do not impose any new requirements
that create a significant economic impact. The changes made in Sec.
17.100 related to revising the scope and purpose, and related to
revising, adding, or removing definitions, are technical in nature and
conform to existing statutory authorities and existing practices in the
program. The changes in Sec. 17.101 will allow an additional 104 VA
facilities to recognize an additional billable charge under the
designation of a provider-based facility, with an estimated increased
revenue for VA of $3,666,218 in FY21. This $3,666,218 annual revenue
increase divided by the 745 firms under NAICS code 524114 will result
in $4,921 additional annual costs per firm. This $4,921 additional cost
per firm divided by the total receipts per firm of $1, 109,867,678 does
not create a significant economic impact. Additional training will not
be required for the 400 small entities potentially to be effected, as
97 percent of VA facilities already engage in the provider-based
practices subject to the changes in Sec. 17.101, which makes these
practices well known to all potentially affected entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
VA's regulatory impact analysis can be found as a supporting
document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after
the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm by following the link for VA Regulations
Published from FY 2004 through FYTD.
This final rule is not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13771
because this final rule results in no more than de minimis costs.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are as follows: 64.008--Veterans
Domiciliary Care; 64.011--Veterans Dental Care; 64.012--Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013--Veterans Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014--
Veterans State Domiciliary Care; 64.015--Veterans State Nursing Home
Care; 64.026--Veterans State Adult Day Health Care; 64.039--CHAMPVA;
64.040--VHA Inpatient Medicine; 64.041--VHA Outpatient Specialty Care;
64.042--VHA Inpatient Surgery; 64.043--VHA Mental Health Residential;
64.044--VHA Home Care; 64.045--VHA Outpatient Ancillary Services;
64.046--VHA Inpatient Psychiatry; 64.047--VHA Primary Care; 64.048--VHA
Mental Health clinics; 64.049--VHA Community Living Center; 64.050--VHA
Diagnostic Care.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Health care, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health records, Medical devices,
Medical research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines,
Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Brooks D.
Tucker, Acting Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved
this document on July 22, 2020, for publication.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulations Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17
as set forth below:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
* * * * *
0
2. Add Sec. 17.100 under the undesignated center heading ``Charges,
Waivers, and Collections'' to read as follows:
Sec. 17.100 Requirements for provider-based status.
(a) Scope. This section establishes the criteria that VA uses to
determine whether a VA medical facility is designated as provider-based
for purposes of billing for non-service-connected and non-special
treatment authority conditions.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC). A CBOC is a VA-operated,
VA-funded, or VA-reimbursed site of care that is not located within a
VA Medical Center. A CBOC can provide primary, specialty, subspecialty,
mental health, or any combination of health care delivery services that
can be appropriately provided in an outpatient setting.
Community Living Center (CLC). A CLC is a component of the spectrum
of
[[Page 53175]]
long-term care that provides a skilled nursing environment and houses a
variety of specialty programs for persons needing short and long stay
services. VA CLCs are typically located on, or near a VA medical
facility and are VA-owned and operated, but may be free-standing in the
community.
Facility. A facility is a point of care where individuals can seek
VA health care services, to include a VA Medical Center, CBOC, Health
Care Center, CLC, and Other Outpatient Services site.
Health Care Center (HCC). An HCC is a VA-owned, VA-leased, VA-
contracted or shared clinic that is operational at least five days per
week and provides primary care, mental health care, on site specialty
services, and performs ambulatory surgery and/or invasive procedures
that may require moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
Main provider. A main provider (or parent facility/hospital or
provider-based hospital (PBH)) is a provider that either creates, or
acquires ownership of, another facility to deliver additional health
care services under its name, ownership, and financial and
administrative control. For example, VA Medical Centers and HCCs can be
main providers.
Other Outpatient Services (OOS). A site that provides outpatient
services to veterans, but does not meet the definition of a CBOC or HCC
per this section.
Prospective Payment System (PPS). A Prospective Payment System
(PPS) is a method of reimbursement in which Medicare payment is made
based on a predetermined, fixed amount. The payment amount for a
particular service is derived based on the classification system of
that service (for example, Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups
for inpatient hospital services furnished by most acute care
hospitals).
Provider-based outpatient facility (PBO). A provider-based
outpatient facility is a provider of health care services that is
either created by, or acquired by, a main provider for the purpose of
furnishing additional health care services under the ownership,
administrative, and financial control of the main provider, and meets
the criteria outlined in this section.
Remote location of a hospital. A remote location of a hospital is a
CBOC, OOS Site, or HCC that is located offsite from the main facility.
VA Medical Center (VAMC). A VAMC is a VA facility that provides at
least two categories of care (inpatient, outpatient, residential, or
institutional extended care).
(c) Criteria for provider-based status. In order to be designated
as a provider-based facility, the following criteria must be met:
(1) Licensure. The facility seeking provider-based status and the
main provider must operate under the same license. VA facilities are
not licensed by States but all VA facilities are considered licensed
for the purpose of collection and recovery by VA as part of VA's
national organization structure and in accordance with VA standards,
including standards established or recognized by VA's Offices of the
Medical Inspector and Inspector General and major healthcare
accreditation organizations.
(2) Clinical services. The clinical services of the facility
seeking provider-based status and the main provider must be integrated.
Integration is demonstrated by the following:
(i) The professional staff of the facility has clinical privileges
at the main provider.
(ii) The main provider maintains the same monitoring and oversight
(i.e. credentialing and privileging) of the facility seeking provider-
based status as it does for any other department of the provider.
(iii) The medical director of the facility seeking provider-based
status maintains a reporting relationship with the chief medical
officer or other similar official of the main provider that has the
same frequency, intensity, and level of accountability that exists in
the relationship between the medical director of a department of the
main provider and the chief medical officer or other similar official
of the main provider, and is under the same type of supervision and
accountability as any other director, medical or otherwise, of the main
provider.
(iv) The medical staff committees or other professional committees
at the main provider are responsible for medical activities in the
facility seeking provider-based status, including quality assurance,
utilization review, and the coordination and integration of services,
to the extent practicable, between the facility seeking provider-based
status and the main provider.
(v) Medical records for patients treated in the facility seeking
provider-based status are integrated into a unified retrieval system
(or cross reference) of the main provider.
(vi) Inpatient and outpatient services of the facility seeking
provider-based status and the main provider are integrated, and
patients treated at the facility who require further care have full
access to all services of the main provider and are referred where
appropriate to the corresponding inpatient or outpatient department or
service of the main provider.
(vii) Inpatient and outpatient services of the facility seeking
provider-based status and the main provider are recognized under the
main provider's accreditation.
(3) Financial integration. The financial operations of the facility
seeking provider-based status are fully integrated within the financial
system of the main provider, as evidenced by shared income and expenses
between the main provider and the facility. The costs of a facility
that is a hospital department are reported in a cost center of the
provider, costs of a facility other than a hospital department are
reported in the appropriate cost center or cost centers of the main
provider. The main provider's integrated health care system manpower
and labor budget and the financial status of any facility seeking
provider-based status is incorporated and readily identified in the
main provider's integrated system reports.
(4) Public awareness. The facility seeking provider-based status
must be held out to the public (and other payers) as part of the main
provider. Patients of the facility must be made aware that the facility
is part of a main provider and that they will be billed accordingly.
All literature, brochures, and public relations newsletters from the
facility seeking provider-based status must provide the relationship
between the main provider and the facility.
(5) Obligations of hospital outpatient departments and hospital-
based facilities. If the facility seeking provider-based status is a
hospital outpatient department or hospital-based facility, the facility
must fulfill the obligations described in this paragraph:
(i) The hospital outpatient department must comply with the
antidumping rules of 42 CFR 489.20(l), (m), (q), and (r) and Sec.
489.24.
(ii) Physician services furnished in hospital outpatient
departments or hospital-based facilities must be billed with the
correct site-of-service so that appropriate physician and practitioner
payment amounts can be determined based on their geographical location.
(iii) Physicians who work in hospital outpatient departments or
hospital-based facilities are obligated to comply with the non-
discrimination provisions in 42 CFR 489.10(b).
(iv) Hospital outpatient departments must treat all Medicare
patients seen on an urgent/emergent basis as hospital outpatients.
(v) In the case of a patient admitted to the hospital as an
inpatient after receiving treatment in the hospital outpatient
department or hospital-based
[[Page 53176]]
facility, payments for services in the hospital outpatient department
or hospital-based facility are subject to the payment window provisions
applicable to PPS hospitals and to hospitals and units excluded from
PPS set forth at 42 CFR 412.2(c)(5) and at 42 CFR 413.40(c)(2),
respectively.
(vi) The hospital outpatient department must meet applicable VA
policies pertaining to hospital health and safety programs.
(vii) VA must treat any facility that is located on the main
hospital campus as a department of the hospital.
(6) Operation under the control of the main provider. The facility
seeking provider-based status is operated under the control of the main
provider. Control of the main provider requires:
(i) The main provider and the facility seeking provider-based
status have the same governing body.
(ii) The facility seeking provider-based status is operated under
the same organizational documents as the main provider. For example,
the facility seeking provider-based status must be subject to common
bylaws and operating decisions of the governing body of the main
provider.
(iii) The main provider has final responsibility for administrative
decisions, final approval for contracts with outside parties, final
approval for personnel actions, final responsibility for personnel
policies (such as code of conduct), and final approval for medical
staff appointments in the facility seeking provider-based status.
(7) Administration and Supervision. The reporting relationship
between the facility seeking provider-based status and the main
provider must have the same frequency, intensity, and level of
accountability that exists in the relationship between the main
provider and one of its existing departments, as evidenced by
compliance with all of the following requirements:
(i) The facility seeking provider-based status is under the direct
supervision of the main provider.
(ii) The facility seeking provider-based status is operated under
the same monitoring and oversight by the main provider as any other
department of the provider, and is operated just as any other
department of the provider with regard to supervision and
accountability. The facility director or individual responsible for
daily operations at the facility:
(A) Maintains a reporting relationship with a manager at the main
provider that has the same frequency, intensity, and level of
accountability that exists in the relationship between the main
provider and its existing departments; and
(B) Is accountable to the governing body of the main provider, in
the same manner as any department head of the provider.
(iii) The following administrative functions of the facility
seeking provider-based status are integrated with those of the main
provider where the facility is based: Billing services, records, human
resources, payroll, employee benefit package, salary structure, and
purchasing services. Either the same employees or group of employees
handle these administrative functions for the facility and the main
provider, or the administrative functions for both the facility and the
main provider are contracted out under the same contract agreement; or
are handled under different contract agreements, with the contract of
the facility or organization being managed by the main provider.
(d) Illustrations of how the criteria are applied. (1) A VA
facility that is seeking provider-based status that exists under
contract arrangements, where only VA patients are seen, may be
designated as provider-based if the provider-based requirements in this
section are met.
(2) A VA facility seeking provider-based status that exists under
contract arrangements, where VA patients and non-VA patients are seen
at the same non-VA owned facility, will have the same provider-based
status as the non-VA owned facility that is hosting the VA facility.
(3) A VA owned and operated facility seeking provider-based status,
where some or all of the staff are contracted employees, may be
designated as provider-based if the provider-based requirements in this
section are met.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.101 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading;
0
b. In paragraph (a)(5), removing the definitions ``Non-provider-based''
and ``Provider-based'' from; and
0
3. Revising paragraph (a)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 17.101 Collection or recovery by VA for medical care or services
provided or furnished to a veteran for a non-service connected
disability.
(a) * * *
(6) Provider-based status and charges. Facilities that have
provider-based status by meeting the criteria in Sec. 17.100 are
entitled to bill outpatient facility charges and professional charges.
The professional charges for these facilities are produced by the
methodologies set forth in this section based on facility expense RVUs.
Facilities that do not have provider-based status because they do not
meet the criteria in Sec. 17.100 are not permitted to bill outpatient
facility charges and can only bill a professional charge. The
professional charges for these facilities are produced by the
methodologies set forth in this section based on non-facility practice
expense RVUs.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.106 by adding paragraph (f)(2)(viii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 17.106 VA collection rules; third-party payers.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) A third party may not reduce or refuse payment if the
facility where the medical treatment was furnished is designated by VA
as provider-based, but the facility does not meet the provider-based
status requirements under 42 CFR 413.65.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-17042 Filed 8-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P