Schedules of Controlled Substances: Extension of Temporary Placement of N-Ethylpentylone in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, 52915-52916 [2020-19011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
other provision of this subpart, we will
not determine any overpaid individual
to be at fault in causing a qualifying
overpayment (see § 408.910(c)(1)) unless
we determine that the qualifying
overpayment made to an individual or
a representative payee during the
pandemic period (see § 408.902(b)) was
the result of fraud or similar fault or
involved misuse of benefits by a
representative payee (see § 408.641).
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Subpart E—Payment of Benefits,
Overpayments, and Underpayments
9. The authority citation for subpart E
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1147, 1601,
1602, 1611(c) and (e), and 1631(a)–(d) and (g)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1320b–17, 1381, 1381a, 1382(c)
and (e), and 1383(a)–(d) and (g)); 31 U.S.C.
3716; 31 U.S.C. 3720A.
10. Amend § 416.537 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 416.537
Overpayments—defined.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Pandemic period. As used
throughout this subpart, the term
pandemic period for the purposes of the
waiver authority in § 416.550 refers
exclusively to the period of time
beginning on March 1, 2020, and ending
on September 30, 2020.
■ 11. Amend § 416.550 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
of benefits by a representative payee
(see § 416.641).
(3) If we determine under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section that an individual
or a representative payee is without
fault in causing a qualifying
overpayment, we will also determine
that recovery of the qualifying
overpayment would be against equity
and good conscience. For purposes of
this paragraph (c)(3) only, ‘‘against
equity and good conscience’’ is not
limited to the meaning used in
§ 416.554 but means a broad concept of
fairness that takes into account all of the
facts and circumstances of the case.
(4) The provisions of this paragraph
(c)(4) will apply to a qualifying
overpayment identified by December 31,
2020.
■ 12. Amend § 416.552 by adding a
sentence following the second sentence
of the introductory text to read as
follows:
§ 416.552 Waiver of adjustment or
recovery—without fault.
* * * Notwithstanding any other
provision of this subpart, we will not
determine any overpaid individual to be
at fault in causing a qualifying
overpayment (see § 416.550(c)(1)) unless
we determine that the qualifying
overpayment made to an individual or
a representative payee during the
pandemic period (see § 416.537(c)) was
the result of fraud or similar fault or
involved misuse of benefits by a
representative payee (see § 416.641).
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–18834 Filed 8–26–20; 8:45 am]
§ 416.550 Waiver of adjustment or
recovery—when applicable.
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) We will apply the procedures in
this paragraph (c) when an individual
requests waiver of all or part of a
qualifying overpayment.
(1) For purposes of this paragraph (c),
a qualifying overpayment is one that
accrued during the pandemic period
(see § 416.537(c)) because of the actions
that we took in response to the COVID–
19 national public health emergency,
including the suspension of certain of
our manual workloads that would have
processed actions identifying and
stopping certain overpayments.
(2) Notwithstanding any other
provision of this subpart, we will
presume that an individual who
requests waiver of a qualifying
overpayment is without fault in causing
the overpayment (see § 416.552) unless
we determine that the qualifying
overpayment made to a beneficiary or a
representative payee was the result of
fraud or similar fault or involved misuse
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–482]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Extension of Temporary Placement of
N-Ethylpentylone in Schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Temporary rule; temporary
scheduling order; extension.
AGENCY:
The Acting Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this order to extend the
temporary schedule I status of a
synthetic cathinone, 1-(1,3-benzodioxol5-yl)-2-(ethylamino)pentan-1-one (Nethylpentylone, ephylone), including its
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52915
optical, positional and geometric
isomers, salts, and salts of isomers. The
schedule I status of N-ethylpentylone
currently is in effect until August 31,
2020. This order extends the temporary
scheduling of N-ethylpentylone for one
year, or until the permanent scheduling
action for this substance is completed,
whichever occurs first.
DATES: This order, which extends the
temporary scheduling order that DEA
previously issued for this substance (83
FR 44474, August 31, 2018), is effective
August 31, 2020, and expires on August
31, 2021. If DEA publishes a final rule
making this scheduling action
permanent, this order will expire on the
effective date of that rule, if the effective
date is earlier than August 31, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott A. Brinks, Regulatory Drafting and
Policy Support Section, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (571) 362–8209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Legal Authority
On August 31, 2018, the former
Acting Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
published a temporary scheduling order
in the Federal Register (83 FR 44474)
placing 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2(ethylamino)-pentan-1-one (Nethylpentylone, ephylone), a synthetic
cathinone, in schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
pursuant to the temporary scheduling
provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h).1 That
order was effective on the date of
publication, and was based on findings
by the former Acting Administrator of
DEA that the temporary scheduling of
this substance was necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). The
CSA provides that the temporary control
of this substance expire two years from
the effective date of the temporary
scheduling order, or on August 31,
2020. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2). However, this
same subsection also provides that,
during the pendency of proceedings
under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1) to
permanently add the substance to a
schedule, the temporary scheduling of
that substance can be extended for up to
one year. Proceedings for the scheduling
of a substance under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)
may be initiated by the Attorney
1 Though DEA has used the term ‘‘final order’’
with respect to temporary scheduling orders in the
past, this notice adheres to the statutory language
of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a ‘‘temporary
scheduling order.’’ No substantive change is
intended.
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
52916
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
General (delegated to the Administrator
of DEA pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100) on his
own motion.
The Acting Administrator of DEA, on
his own motion pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(a), has initiated proceedings under
21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1) to permanently
schedule N-ethylpentylone. DEA is
simultaneously publishing, elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register, a
notice of proposed rulemaking for the
permanent placement of Nethylpentylone in schedule I. If that
proposed rule is finalized, scheduling of
this substance will be made permanent
by publication of a final rule in the
Federal Register.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2), the
Acting Administrator of DEA orders that
the temporary scheduling of Nethylpentylone, including its optical,
positional, and geometric isomers, salts,
and salts of isomers, be extended for one
year, or until the permanent scheduling
proceeding is completed, whichever
occurs first.
Regulatory Matters
The CSA provides for an expedited
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
Under 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the
Administrator of DEA, as delegated by
the Attorney General, may, by order,
place a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. This same subsection
provides that the temporary scheduling
of a substance shall expire at the end of
two years from the date of the issuance
of the order scheduling such substance,
except that the Administrator may,
during the pendency of proceedings to
permanently schedule the substance,
extend the temporary scheduling for up
to one year.
Given that section 811(h) directs that
temporary scheduling actions be issued
by order and sets forth the procedures
by which such orders are to be issued
and extended, DEA believes that the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do
not apply to this extension of the
temporary scheduling order. The
specific language chosen by Congress
indicates an intention for DEA to
proceed through the issuance of an
order instead of proceeding by
rulemaking. Given that Congress
specifically requires the Attorney
General to follow rulemaking
procedures for other kinds of scheduling
actions, see 21 U.S.C. 811(a), it is
noteworthy that, in subsection 811(h),
Congress authorized the issuance of
temporary scheduling actions by order
rather than by rule. In the alternative,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
even assuming that this action might be
subject to section 553 of the APA, the
Acting Administrator finds that there is
good cause to forgo the notice and
comment requirements of section 553,
as any further delays in the process for
extending the temporary scheduling
order would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest in view
of the manifest urgency to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety
that this substance would present if
scheduling expired, for the reasons
expressed in the temporary scheduling
order (83 FR 44474, August 31, 2018).
Further, DEA believes that this order
extending the temporary scheduling
action is not a ‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
requirements for the preparation of an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis in 5
U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where,
as here, DEA is not required by section
553 of the APA or any other law to
publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), section 3(f), and
the principles reaffirmed in Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this
action has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). This order is not an Executive
Order 13771 regulatory action.
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
As noted above, this action is an
order, not a rule. Accordingly, the
Congressional Review Act (CRA) is
inapplicable, as it applies only to rules.
However, if this were a rule, pursuant
to the CRA, ‘‘any rule for which an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, shall take effect at
such time as the federal agency
promulgating the rule determines.’’ 5
U.S.C. 808(2). It is in the public interest
to maintain the temporary placement of
N-ethylpentylone in schedule I because
it poses a public health risk, for the
reasons expressed in the temporary
scheduling order (83 FR 44474, August
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31, 2018). The temporary scheduling
action was taken pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(h), which is specifically designed to
enable DEA to act in an expeditious
manner to avoid an imminent hazard to
the public safety. Under 21 U.S.C.
811(h), temporary scheduling orders are
not subject to notice and comment
rulemaking procedures. DEA
understands that the CSA frames
temporary scheduling actions as orders
rather than rules to ensure that the
process moves swiftly, and this
extension of the temporary scheduling
order continues to serve that purpose.
For the same reasons that underlie 21
U.S.C. 811(h), that is, the need to place
this substance in schedule I because it
poses an imminent hazard to public
safety, it would be contrary to the public
interest to delay implementation of this
extension of the temporary scheduling
order. Therefore, in accordance with
section 808(2) of the CRA, this order
extending the temporary scheduling
order shall take effect immediately upon
its publication. DEA has submitted a
copy of this extension of the temporary
scheduling order to both Houses of
Congress and to the Comptroller
General, although such filing is not
required under the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801–
808 because, as noted above, this action
is an order, not a rule.
Dated: August 25, 2020.
Timothy J. Shea,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–19011 Filed 8–26–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0469]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Boat Parade;
San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary special local
regulation (SLR) on the waters of San
Diego Bay, California on September 6,
2020. This temporary SLR is necessary
to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and general users of the
waterway. This SLR temporarily
establishes a designated section of the
commercial anchorage area as a First
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 167 (Thursday, August 27, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52915-52916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19011]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-482]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Extension of Temporary
Placement of N-Ethylpentylone in Schedule I of the Controlled
Substances Act
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Temporary rule; temporary scheduling order; extension.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration is issuing this order to extend the temporary schedule I
status of a synthetic cathinone, 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-
(ethylamino)pentan-1-one (N-ethylpentylone, ephylone), including its
optical, positional and geometric isomers, salts, and salts of isomers.
The schedule I status of N-ethylpentylone currently is in effect until
August 31, 2020. This order extends the temporary scheduling of N-
ethylpentylone for one year, or until the permanent scheduling action
for this substance is completed, whichever occurs first.
DATES: This order, which extends the temporary scheduling order that
DEA previously issued for this substance (83 FR 44474, August 31,
2018), is effective August 31, 2020, and expires on August 31, 2021. If
DEA publishes a final rule making this scheduling action permanent,
this order will expire on the effective date of that rule, if the
effective date is earlier than August 31, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott A. Brinks, Regulatory Drafting
and Policy Support Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug
Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (571) 362-8209.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Legal Authority
On August 31, 2018, the former Acting Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) published a temporary scheduling order
in the Federal Register (83 FR 44474) placing 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-
2-(ethylamino)-pentan-1-one (N-ethylpentylone, ephylone), a synthetic
cathinone, in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
pursuant to the temporary scheduling provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h).\1\
That order was effective on the date of publication, and was based on
findings by the former Acting Administrator of DEA that the temporary
scheduling of this substance was necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). The CSA provides
that the temporary control of this substance expire two years from the
effective date of the temporary scheduling order, or on August 31,
2020. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2). However, this same subsection also provides
that, during the pendency of proceedings under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1) to
permanently add the substance to a schedule, the temporary scheduling
of that substance can be extended for up to one year. Proceedings for
the scheduling of a substance under 21 U.S.C. 811(a) may be initiated
by the Attorney
[[Page 52916]]
General (delegated to the Administrator of DEA pursuant to 28 CFR
0.100) on his own motion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Though DEA has used the term ``final order'' with respect to
temporary scheduling orders in the past, this notice adheres to the
statutory language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a
``temporary scheduling order.'' No substantive change is intended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Acting Administrator of DEA, on his own motion pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 811(a), has initiated proceedings under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1) to
permanently schedule N-ethylpentylone. DEA is simultaneously
publishing, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, a notice
of proposed rulemaking for the permanent placement of N-ethylpentylone
in schedule I. If that proposed rule is finalized, scheduling of this
substance will be made permanent by publication of a final rule in the
Federal Register.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2), the Acting Administrator of DEA
orders that the temporary scheduling of N-ethylpentylone, including its
optical, positional, and geometric isomers, salts, and salts of
isomers, be extended for one year, or until the permanent scheduling
proceeding is completed, whichever occurs first.
Regulatory Matters
The CSA provides for an expedited temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. Under 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator of DEA, as delegated
by the Attorney General, may, by order, place a substance in schedule I
on a temporary basis. This same subsection provides that the temporary
scheduling of a substance shall expire at the end of two years from the
date of the issuance of the order scheduling such substance, except
that the Administrator may, during the pendency of proceedings to
permanently schedule the substance, extend the temporary scheduling for
up to one year.
Given that section 811(h) directs that temporary scheduling actions
be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by which such orders
are to be issued and extended, DEA believes that the notice and comment
requirements of section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this extension of the temporary
scheduling order. The specific language chosen by Congress indicates an
intention for DEA to proceed through the issuance of an order instead
of proceeding by rulemaking. Given that Congress specifically requires
the Attorney General to follow rulemaking procedures for other kinds of
scheduling actions, see 21 U.S.C. 811(a), it is noteworthy that, in
subsection 811(h), Congress authorized the issuance of temporary
scheduling actions by order rather than by rule. In the alternative,
even assuming that this action might be subject to section 553 of the
APA, the Acting Administrator finds that there is good cause to forgo
the notice and comment requirements of section 553, as any further
delays in the process for extending the temporary scheduling order
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest in view of
the manifest urgency to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety
that this substance would present if scheduling expired, for the
reasons expressed in the temporary scheduling order (83 FR 44474,
August 31, 2018). Further, DEA believes that this order extending the
temporary scheduling action is not a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
601(2), and, accordingly, is not subject to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The requirements for the preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are
not applicable where, as here, DEA is not required by section 553 of
the APA or any other law to publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
section 3(f), and the principles reaffirmed in Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this action
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This order is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action.
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132 (Federalism), it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
As noted above, this action is an order, not a rule. Accordingly,
the Congressional Review Act (CRA) is inapplicable, as it applies only
to rules. However, if this were a rule, pursuant to the CRA, ``any rule
for which an agency for good cause finds that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest, shall take effect at such time as the federal agency
promulgating the rule determines.'' 5 U.S.C. 808(2). It is in the
public interest to maintain the temporary placement of N-ethylpentylone
in schedule I because it poses a public health risk, for the reasons
expressed in the temporary scheduling order (83 FR 44474, August 31,
2018). The temporary scheduling action was taken pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(h), which is specifically designed to enable DEA to act in an
expeditious manner to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Under 21 U.S.C. 811(h), temporary scheduling orders are not subject to
notice and comment rulemaking procedures. DEA understands that the CSA
frames temporary scheduling actions as orders rather than rules to
ensure that the process moves swiftly, and this extension of the
temporary scheduling order continues to serve that purpose. For the
same reasons that underlie 21 U.S.C. 811(h), that is, the need to place
this substance in schedule I because it poses an imminent hazard to
public safety, it would be contrary to the public interest to delay
implementation of this extension of the temporary scheduling order.
Therefore, in accordance with section 808(2) of the CRA, this order
extending the temporary scheduling order shall take effect immediately
upon its publication. DEA has submitted a copy of this extension of the
temporary scheduling order to both Houses of Congress and to the
Comptroller General, although such filing is not required under the
CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801-808 because, as noted above, this action is an order,
not a rule.
Dated: August 25, 2020.
Timothy J. Shea,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-19011 Filed 8-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P