Appeals of SBA Loan Review Decisions Under the Paycheck Protection Program, 52883-52890 [2020-17895]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various layers of government. Therefore,
SBA has determined that this rule has
no federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35
SBA has determined that this rule
will not impose new or modify existing
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires that when an agency
issues a proposed rule, or a final rule
pursuant to Section 553(b) of the APA
or another law, the agency must prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis that
meets the requirements of the RFA and
publish such analysis in the Federal
Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Specifically,
the RFA normally requires agencies to
describe the impact of a rulemaking on
small entities by providing a regulatory
impact analysis. Such analysis must
address the consideration of regulatory
options that would lessen the economic
effect of the rule on small entities. The
RFA defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as (1) a
proprietary firm meeting the size
standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its
field; or (3) a small government
jurisdiction with a population of less
than 50,000. 5 U.S.C. 601(3)–(6). Except
for such small government jurisdictions,
neither State nor local governments are
‘‘small entities.’’ Similarly, for purposes
of the RFA, individual persons are not
small entities.
The requirement to conduct a
regulatory impact analysis does not
apply if the head of the agency ‘‘certifies
that the rule will not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.’’
5 U.S.C. 605(b). The agency must,
however, publish the certification in the
Federal Register at the time of
publication of the rule, ‘‘along with a
statement providing the factual basis for
such certification.’’ If the agency head
has not waived the requirements for a
regulatory flexibility analysis in
accordance with the RFA’s waiver
provision, and no other RFA exception
applies, the agency must prepare the
regulatory flexibility analysis and
publish it in the Federal Register at the
time of promulgation or, if the rule is
promulgated in response to an
emergency that makes timely
compliance impracticable, within 180
days of publication of the final rule. 5
U.S.C. 604(a), 608(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
Rules that are exempt from notice and
comment are also exempt from the RFA
requirements, including conducting a
regulatory flexibility analysis, when
among other things the agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. SBA Office of Advocacy guide:
How to Comply with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, Ch.1. p.9. Accordingly,
SBA is not required to conduct a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–18940 Filed 8–25–20; 1:00 pm]
BILLING CODE P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 134
[Docket Number SBA–2020–0042]
RIN 3245–AH55
Appeals of SBA Loan Review
Decisions Under the Paycheck
Protection Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
On April 2, 2020, the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA)
posted on its website an interim final
rule relating to the implementation of
sections 1102 and 1106 of the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (CARES Act or the Act)
(published in the Federal Register on
April 15, 2020). Section 1102 of the Act
temporarily adds a new product, titled
the ‘‘Paycheck Protection Program,’’ to
the U.S. Small Business
Administration’s (SBA’s) 7(a) Loan
Program. Subsequently, SBA issued a
number of interim final rules
implementing the Paycheck Protection
Program (PPP). This interim final rule
supplements the interim final rule on
Loan Review Procedures and Related
Borrower and Lender Responsibilities
posted on SBA’s website on May 22,
2020 (published on June 1, 2020, in the
Federal Register), as revised by the
interim final rule posted on SBA’s
website on June 22, 2020, in order to
inform PPP borrowers and lenders of the
process for a PPP borrower to appeal
certain SBA loan review decisions
under the PPP to the SBA Office of
Hearings and Appeals, and requests
public comment.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective
August 25, 2020.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52883
Applicability date: This interim final
rule applies to certain loan review
decisions made by SBA under the
Paycheck Protection Program.
Comment date: Comments must be
received on or before September 28,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by number SBA–2020–0042
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
send an email to ppp-ifr@sba.gov.
Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you
believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination whether it will
publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
Call Center Representative at 833–572–
0502, or the local SBA Field Office; the
list of offices can be found at https://
www.sba.gov/tools/localassistance/
districtoffices.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
On March 13, 2020, President Trump
declared the ongoing Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic of
sufficient severity and magnitude to
warrant an emergency declaration for all
States, territories, and the District of
Columbia. With the COVID–19
emergency, many small businesses
nationwide are experiencing economic
hardship as a direct result of the
Federal, State, tribal, and local public
health measures that have been taken to
minimize the public’s exposure to the
virus. These measures, some of which
are government-mandated, have been
implemented nationwide and include
the closures of restaurants, bars, and
gyms. In addition, based on the advice
of public health officials, other
measures, such as keeping a safe
distance from others or even stay-athome orders, are being implemented,
resulting in a dramatic decrease in
economic activity as the public avoids
malls, retail stores, and other
businesses.
On March 27, 2020, the President
signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (the CARES Act)
(Pub. L. 116–136) to provide emergency
assistance and health care response for
individuals, families, and businesses
affected by the coronavirus pandemic.
The Small Business Administration
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
52884
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(SBA) received funding and authority
through the CARES Act to modify
existing loan programs and establish a
new loan program to assist small
businesses nationwide adversely
impacted by the COVID–19 emergency.
Section 1102 of the CARES Act
temporarily permits SBA to guarantee
100 percent of 7(a) loans under a new
program titled the ‘‘Paycheck Protection
Program’’ (PPP). Section 1106 of the
CARES Act provides for forgiveness of
up to the full principal amount of
qualifying loans guaranteed under the
PPP.
On April 2, 2020, SBA posted its first
PPP interim final rule (85 FR 20811)
(the First Interim Final Rule).
Subsequently, SBA issued a number of
other interim final rules implementing
the PPP. On April 24, 2020, the
President signed the Paycheck
Protection Program and Health Care
Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 116–139),
which provided additional funding and
authority for the PPP.
On May 22, 2020, SBA and Treasury
posted an interim final rule on Loan
Review Procedures and Related
Borrower and Lender Responsibilities
(85 FR 33010) (Loan Review Interim
Final Rule (IFR)). The rule stated that
SBA would be issuing a separate interim
final rule addressing the process for
appealing certain SBA loan review
decisions under the PPP. On June 5,
2020, the Paycheck Protection Program
Flexibility Act of 2020 (Pub. L. 116–142)
(Flexibility Act) was signed into law,
amending the CARES Act. On June 22,
2020, SBA and Treasury posted an
interim final rule that in part revised the
Loan Review IFR to incorporate the
relevant Flexibility Act amendments,
address revisions to the Loan
Forgiveness Application (SBA Form
3508), and include a new alternative
Loan Forgiveness Application (SBA
Form 3508EZ). On July 4, 2020, Public
Law 116–147 was enacted, extending
the authority for SBA to guarantee PPP
loans to August 8, 2020.
As described below, this interim final
rule informs PPP borrowers and lenders
of the process for a PPP borrower to
appeal certain SBA loan review
decisions under the PPP to the SBA
Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)
by establishing a new subpart L for 13
CFR part 134, and requests public
comment.
II. Comments and Immediate Effective
Date
The intent of the CARES Act is that
SBA provide relief to America’s small
businesses expeditiously. This intent,
along with the dramatic decrease in
economic activity nationwide, provides
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
good cause for SBA to dispense with the
30-day delayed effective date provided
in the Administrative Procedure Act.
Specifically, it is critical to meet
lenders’ and borrowers’ need for clarity
concerning the OHA appeal process as
rapidly as possible because SBA can
review a PPP loan and make
determinations as to a borrower’s
eligibility at any time. This interim final
rule supplements the previous
regulation on the discrete issues related
to SBA’s process for reviewing a
borrower’s eligibility for a PPP loan, the
PPP loan amount received, the use of
the PPP loan proceeds and/or the PPP
loan forgiveness amount claimed by the
borrower.
This interim final rule is effective
without advance notice and public
comment because section 1114 of the
CARES Act authorizes SBA to issue
regulations to implement title I of the
CARES Act without regard to notice
requirements. In addition, SBA has
determined that there is good cause for
dispensing with advance public notice
and comment on the ground that it
would be contrary to the public interest.
Specifically, SBA has determined that
advance notice and public comment
would delay the ability of PPP
borrowers to understand with certainty
the process for appealing certain SBA
loan review decisions under the PPP.
This rule is being issued to allow for
immediate implementation of the OHA
appeal feature of this program. Although
this interim final rule is effective
immediately, comments are solicited
from interested members of the public
on all aspects of this interim final rule,
including section III below. These
comments must be submitted on or
before September 28, 2020. SBA will
consider these comments and the need
for making any revisions as a result of
these comments.
III. Subpart L—Rules of Practice for
Appeals of Certain SBA Loan Review
Decisions Under the Paycheck
Protection Program
This interim final rule establishes a
new subpart L for 13 CFR part 134,
establishing rules of practice for appeals
of certain SBA loan review decisions
under the Paycheck Protection Program
(PPP).
Section 134.1201, Scope of rules in
this subpart L, provides a process for
appeal to OHA of certain SBA loan
review decisions under the PPP and any
other PPP matter referred to OHA by the
Administrator. This subpart defines the
term SBA loan review decision as an
official written decision by SBA, after
SBA completes a review of a PPP loan,
that finds a borrower (1) was ineligible
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for a PPP loan; (2) was ineligible for the
PPP loan amount received or used the
PPP loan proceeds for unauthorized
uses; (3) is ineligible for PPP loan
forgiveness in the amount determined
by the lender in its full or partial
approval decision issued to SBA (except
for the deduction of any Economic
Injury Disaster Loan advance in
accordance with section 1110(e)(6) of
the CARES Act); and/or (4) is ineligible
for PPP loan forgiveness in any amount
when the lender has issued a full denial
decision to SBA.
For a PPP loan of any size, SBA may
undertake a loan review at any time in
SBA’s discretion, and this subpart L
applies to loan review decisions made
by SBA after SBA completes a review of
a PPP loan as set forth in Part III.1 and
Part III.2c. of the Loan Review IFR, as
amended. Only final SBA loan review
decisions (as defined in this rule) can be
appealed to OHA; a PPP borrower
cannot file an OHA appeal of any
decision made by a lender concerning a
PPP loan. A PPP borrower can request
an SBA review of a lender decision to
deny the borrower’s loan forgiveness
application in full, in accordance with
Part III.2.b. of the Loan Review IFR, as
amended, but that request is for a
review by SBA, not an OHA appeal. A
borrower may exercise any other rights
it has under applicable law against a
PPP lender regarding a lender decision.
In addition, this section sets forth
other types of decisions and
determinations that are not covered by
this subpart L, and makes clear that
subpart C of this part, Rules of Practice
for Appeals From Size Determinations
and NAICS Code Designations, is not
applicable to appeals from SBA loan
review decisions. Lastly, this section
sets forth the specific provisions from
subpart B of this part, OHA’s general
Rules of Practice, that are applicable to
this subpart L. Other provisions from
subpart B of this part do not apply to
this subpart L. Because a PPP borrower
must begin making payments of
principal and interest on the remaining
balance of its PPP loan at the end of the
loan payment deferral period or when
SBA remits the loan forgiveness amount
to the PPP lender (or notifies the lender
that no loan forgiveness is allowed), an
appeal by a PPP borrower of any SBA
loan review decision does not extend
the deferral period of the PPP loan.
Additionally, if SBA remits to the
lender the PPP loan forgiveness amount
set forth in the decision issued by the
lender to SBA (except for the deduction
of any Economic Injury Disaster Loan
advance), the borrower may not file an
appeal with OHA, and the borrower
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
must begin repayment of any remaining
balance of its PPP loan.
Section 134.1202, The appeal
petition, provides that an appeal
petition must include the following
information: (1) The basis for OHA’s
jurisdiction, including, but not limited
to, evidence that the appeal is timely
filed in accordance with § 134.1204; (2)
A copy of the SBA loan review decision
that is being appealed, or a description
of that decision if a copy is unavailable;
(3) A full and specific statement as to
why the SBA loan review decision is
alleged to be erroneous, together with
all factual information and legal
arguments supporting the allegations;
(4) The relief being sought; (5) Signed
copies of payroll tax filings actually
reported to the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), and State quarterly business and
individual employee wage reporting and
unemployment insurance tax filings
actually reported to the relevant state,
for the relevant periods of time, if not
provided with the PPP Loan Forgiveness
Application (SBA Form 3508, SBA
Form 3508EZ, or lender’s equivalent), or
an explanation as to why they are not
relevant or not available; (6) Signed
copies of applicable federal tax returns
actually filed with the IRS with
appropriate schedules (e.g., IRS Form
1040 with Schedule C/F) documenting
income for self-employed individuals or
partners in a partnership, if not
provided with the PPP Borrower
Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or
lender’s equivalent), or an explanation
as to why they are not relevant or not
available; and (7) The name, address,
telephone number, email address and
signature of the appellant or its attorney.
This provision is consistent with OHA’s
general rules of practice in subpart B,
with the addition of the requirement for
submission of certain financial
information. SBA has determined that
submission by the appellant of financial
information, or an explanation as to
why they are not relevant or not
available, is appropriate to support
SBA’s efforts to assess compliance with
the PPP requirements set forth in the
statute, rules, and guidance. The
appellant must serve a copy of the
appeal petition with attachments on the
Associate General Counsel for
Litigation, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416, OLITService@
sba.gov. The appellant must attach to
the appeal petition a signed certificate
of service meeting the requirements of
§ 134.204(d). This section further
provides that an appeal petition which
does not include the above may be
dismissed by the Judge and permits SBA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
to move for a motion for more definite
statement or otherwise comply with the
requirements of this section.
Section 134.1203, Standing, provides
that only the borrower on a loan for
which SBA has issued a final SBA loan
review decision has standing to appeal
the SBA loan review decision to OHA.
Individual owners of a borrower and
lenders do not have standing to appeal
an SBA loan review decision.
Section 134.1204, Deadline for filing
appeal petition, prescribes that an
appeal petition must be filed within 30
calendar days after (i) the appellant’s
receipt of the final SBA loan review
decision, or (ii) notification by the
lender of the final SBA loan review
decision, whichever is earlier.
Section 134.1205, Dismissal, provides
that the Judge must dismiss the appeal
if: (1) The appeal is beyond OHA’s
jurisdiction as set forth under
§ 134.1201; (2) the appellant lacks
standing to appeal under § 134.1203; or
(3) the appeal is untimely under
§ 134.1204, or is premature because SBA
has not yet made a final SBA loan
review decision. This section also
provides that the Judge may dismiss the
appeal if, among other things, the
appeal does not, on its face, allege
specific facts that if proven to be true,
warrant reversal or remand of the SBA
loan review decision.
Section 134.1206, Notice and order,
provides that upon receipt of an appeal
challenging a final SBA loan review
decision, OHA will assign the matter to
either an Administrative Law Judge or
an Administrative Judge in accordance
with § 134.218. Unless the appeal will
be dismissed under § 134.1205, the
Judge will issue a notice and order
establishing a deadline for production of
the administrative record and specifying
a date for the close of record. Typically,
the administrative record will be due 20
calendar days after issuance of the
notice and order unless additional time
is requested and granted, and the record
will close 45 calendar days from the
date of OHA’s receipt of the appeal
unless additional time is requested and
granted. With this timeframe, SBA seeks
to provide a timely and judicious
processing of the appeal petition, while
also affording additional time if, for
example, the volume of appeals or other
matters require additional time for
compilation of the administrative record
and the close of record.
Section 134.1207, The administrative
record, requires that the administrative
record shall include relevant documents
that SBA considered in making its final
decision or that were before SBA at the
time of the final decision. The
administrative record need not,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52885
however, contain all documents
pertaining to the appellant. In addition,
SBA may claim privilege as to certain
materials. The administrative record
must be certified and authenticated that
it is, to the best of the signatory’s
knowledge, complete and correct. SBA
will file the administrative record with
OHA and serve it on appellant. This
section permits the appellant to object
to the absence of any document from the
administrative record that the appellant
believes should have been included in
the administrative record. An appellant
also may object to any claim that
documents in the administrative record
are privileged. Such objections must be
filed with OHA and served on SBA no
later than 10 calendar days after
appellant’s receipt of the administrative
record. The Judge will rule upon such
objections and may direct or permit that
the administrative record be
supplemented.
Section 134.1208, Response to an
appeal petition, prescribes that only
SBA may respond to an appeal and the
response should set forth the relevant
facts and legal arguments to the issues
presented on appeal. Except for good
cause shown, a response filed after the
close of record established by the Judge
will not be considered. SBA must file its
response with OHA, and serve a copy of
the response upon the appellant and
upon each of the persons identified in
the certificate of service attached to the
appellant’s appeal petition. No reply to
a response will be permitted unless the
Judge directs otherwise.
Section 134.1209, Evidence beyond
the record, discovery and oral hearings,
provides that, generally, the Judge may
not admit evidence beyond the written
administrative record or permit any
form of discovery. Discovery will be
permitted in OHA’s appellate
proceedings only if the Judge
determines that SBA, upon written
submission, has made a showing of
good cause for discovery. An oral
hearing will not be held on an appeal of
an SBA loan review decision, unless,
following the motion of a party, or at the
Judge’s own initiative, the Judge orders
an oral hearing upon concluding that
there is a genuine dispute of material
fact that cannot be resolved except by
the taking of testimony and the
confrontation of witnesses. SBA has
determined that allowing an oral
hearing under limited circumstances,
and allowing discovery by SBA, only
upon a showing of good cause, balances
SBA’s potential need for discovery since
it may not have all relevant documents
from appellant with the efficient use of
limited resources available. If an oral
hearing is ordered, the proceeding shall
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
52886
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
be conducted in accordance with
§§ 134.214 and 134.222 in subpart B of
this part as the Judge deems
appropriate. All appeals under this
subpart L will be decided solely on a
review of the written administrative
record, the appeal petition, response(s)
filed thereto, any admitted evidence,
and an oral hearing, if held.
Section 134.1210, Interlocutory
appeals, provides that either party may
file an interlocutory appeal of a Judge’s
ruling which decides an issue of
privilege. Interlocutory appeals will be
decided by the Administrator or a
designee. An interlocutory appeal must
be filed and served no later than 20
calendar days after issuance of the
ruling to which the interlocutory appeal
applies. A response to the interlocutory
appeal must be filed 10 calendar days
after the interlocutory appeal is served.
The Judge may stay the proceedings
before OHA, in whole or in part, as he
or she deems appropriate pending
resolution of the interlocutory appeal.
Section 134.1211, Alternative dispute
resolution, provides that at any time
during the pendency of an appeal, the
parties may submit a joint motion
requesting that the Judge permit the use
of alternative dispute resolution to assist
in resolving the matter. If the motion is
granted, the Judge will also stay the
proceedings before OHA, in whole or in
part, as he or she deems appropriate,
pending the outcome of the alternative
dispute resolution. In addition, the
Assistant Administrator for Hearings
and Appeals (AA/OHA) or a Judge may
designate another Judge or attorney
assigned to OHA to serve as a neutral in
alternative dispute resolution
procedures. If OHA provides the neutral
and the mediation fails to resolve all
issues in the case, the OHA-provided
neutral will not be involved in the
adjudication.
Section 134.1212, Standard of review,
provides that the standard of review is
whether the SBA loan review decision
was based on clear error of fact or law.
The appellant has the burden of proof,
by a preponderance of the evidence.
Section 134.1213, Decision on appeal,
provides that the Judge will issue his or
her decision within 45 calendar days
after the close of record, as practicable.
The decision will contain findings of
fact and conclusions of law, the reasons
for such findings and conclusions, and
any relief ordered. The decision will be
served on each party. The Judge’s
decision on the appeal is an initial
decision. However, unless a request for
review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a),
or a request for reconsideration is filed
pursuant to paragraph (c) of § 134.1213,
an initial decision shall become the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
final decision of SBA 30 calendar days
after its service. This section allows for
a request for reconsideration pursuant to
paragraph (c) of § 134.1213 by either
party or by the Judge on his or her own
initiative. This section also provides for
the right to request review by the
Administrator pursuant to § 134.228(a),
in which case the provisions in
§ 134.228 will apply. If a request for
review pursuant to § 134.228(a) is filed,
the decision of the Administrator is a
final decision of SBA appealable to
federal district court. In order for a
borrower to exhaust its administrative
remedies and preserve its right to seek
judicial review of an SBA final decision
in a federal district court, a borrower
that disputes the initial decision or
reconsidered initial decision must file
and serve a request for review of an
initial decision or reconsidered initial
decision by the Administrator pursuant
to § 134.228(a). If the borrower does not
request review by the Administrator
pursuant to § 134.228(a), the borrower’s
right to seek review in federal court is
waived due to the borrower’s failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. This
section also provides that the final OHA
decision creates precedent only for
appeals involving the PPP. Any OHA
decision pursuant to this subpart L
applies only to the PPP and does not
apply to SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program
generally or to any interpretation or
application of the regulations in part
120 or part 121 of this title. SBA has
determined that this is appropriate
because the PPP is governed by the
CARES Act, which adds a new
temporary program to SBA’s 7(a) Loan
Program, but does not apply to SBA’s
7(a) Loan Program generally. Lastly, this
section provides that, consistent with
the general OHA rules of practice in
subpart B of part 134, OHA decisions
are normally published without
redactions on OHA’s website. A
decision may contain confidential
business and financial information or
personally identifiable information
where that information is either
decisionally-significant or otherwise
necessary for a comprehensible
decision. Where no protective order is
in place, a party may request a redacted
public decision by contacting OHA.
Where a protective order is in place, the
Judge will usually issue the unredacted
decision under the protective order and
a redacted version for public release.
Section 134.1214, Effects of the
decision, provides that OHA may affirm,
reverse, or remand an SBA loan review
decision. If remanded, OHA no longer
has jurisdiction over the matter unless
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a new appeal is filed as a result of a new
SBA loan review decision.
Section 134.1215, Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA), provides that a
prevailing appellant is not entitled to
recover attorney’s fees. Appeals to OHA
from SBA loan review decisions under
the PPP are not proceedings that are
required to be conducted by an
Administrative Law Judge under
§ 134.603.
Section 134.1216, Exhaustion of
administrative remedies, provides that
an appeal to OHA and request for
review by the Administrator of a
disputed initial decision or
reconsidered initial decision are
administrative remedies that must be
exhausted before judicial review of an
SBA loan review decision may be
sought in a federal district court.
Section 134.1217, Confidential
information and protective order,
provides that if a filing or other
submission made pursuant to an appeal
in this subpart L contains confidential
business and financial information;
personally identifiable information;
source selection sensitive information;
income tax returns; documents and
information covered under § 120.1060 of
this title; or any other exempt
information, that information is not
available to the public pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5
U.S.C. 552. This provision is consistent
with the general rule of practice in
subpart B of this part. In addition, this
section permits SBA or appellant to seek
a protective order over any document or
information filed pursuant to an appeal
in this subpart L, including any
document or information exchanged in
discovery if permitted in accordance
with § 134.1209.
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 12988, 13132, 13563, and 13771,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Ch. 35), and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
This interim final rule is
economically significant for the
purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and
13563, and is considered a major rule
under the Congressional Review Act.
SBA, however, is proceeding under the
emergency provision at Executive Order
12866 Section 6(a)(3)(D) based on the
need to move expeditiously to mitigate
the current economic conditions arising
from the COVID–19 emergency. This
rule’s designation under Executive
Order 13771 will be informed by public
comment.
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12988
SBA has drafted this rule, to the
extent practicable, in accordance with
the standards set forth in section 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden. The rule
has no preemptive or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this rule
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various layers of government. Therefore,
SBA has determined that this rule has
no federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35
SBA has determined that this interim
final rule does not impose additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
generally requires that when an agency
issues a proposed rule, or a final rule
pursuant to section 553(b) of the APA or
another law, the agency must prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis that meets
the requirements of the RFA and
publish such analysis in the Federal
Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Specifically,
the RFA normally requires agencies to
describe the impact of a rulemaking on
small entities by providing a regulatory
impact analysis. Such analysis must
address the consideration of regulatory
options that would lessen the economic
effect of the rule on small entities. The
RFA defines a ‘‘small entity’’ as (1) a
proprietary firm meeting the size
standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its
field; or (3) a small government
jurisdiction with a population of less
than 50,000. 5 U.S.C. 601(3)–(6). Except
for such small government jurisdictions,
neither State nor local governments are
‘‘small entities.’’ Similarly, for purposes
of the RFA, individual persons are not
small entities. The requirement to
conduct a regulatory impact analysis
does not apply if the head of the agency
‘‘certifies that the rule will not, if
promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C.
605(b). The agency must, however,
publish the certification in the Federal
Register at the time of publication of the
rule, ‘‘along with a statement providing
the factual basis for such certification.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
If the agency head has not waived the
requirements for a regulatory flexibility
analysis in accordance with the RFA’s
waiver provision, and no other RFA
exception applies, the agency must
prepare the regulatory flexibility
analysis and publish it in the Federal
Register at the time of promulgation or,
if the rule is promulgated in response to
an emergency that makes timely
compliance impracticable, within 180
days of publication of the final rule. 5
U.S.C. 604(a), 608(b). Rules that are
exempt from notice and comment are
also exempt from the RFA requirements,
including conducting a regulatory
flexibility analysis, when among other
things the agency for good cause finds
that notice and public procedure are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. SBA Office of
Advocacy guide: How to Comply with
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Ch.1. p.9.
Accordingly, SBA is not required to
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 134
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Equal access to
justice, Lawyers, Organization and
function (Government agencies).
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Small Business
Administration amends 13 CFR part 134
as set forth below:
PART 134—RULES OF PROCEDURE
GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS
1. The authority citation for part 134
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632,
634(b)(6), 634(i), 637(a), 648(l), 656(i), 657t
and 687(c); 38 U.S.C. 8127(f); E.O. 12549, 51
FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189.
Subpart J issued under 38 U.S.C.
8127(f)(8)(B).
Subpart K issued under 38 U.S.C.
8127(f)(8)(A).
Subpart L issued under 15 U.S.C.
636(a)(36); Pub. L. 116–136; Pub. L. 116–139;
116–142; 116–147.
2. Amend § 134.102 by:
a. Removing the word ‘‘and’’ at the
end of paragraph (u);
■ b. Removing the period at the end of
paragraph (v) and adding ‘‘; and’’ in its
place; and
■ c. Adding paragraph (w) to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 134.102
Jurisdiction of OHA.
*
*
*
*
*
(w) Appeals of certain SBA loan
review decisions as defined in 13 CFR
134.1201.
■ 3. Add subpart L to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52887
Subpart L—Rules of Practice for
Appeals of Certain SBA Loan Review
Decisions Under the Paycheck
Protection Program
Sec.
134.1201 Scope of rules in this subpart L.
134.1202 The appeal petition.
134.1203 Standing.
134.1204 Deadline for filing appeal
petition.
134.1205 Dismissal.
134.1206 Notice and order.
134.1207 The administrative record.
134.1208 Response to an appeal petition.
134.1209 Evidence beyond the record,
discovery and oral hearings.
134.1210 Interlocutory appeals.
134.1211 Alternative dispute resolution
procedures.
134.1212 Standard of review.
134.1213 Decision on appeal.
134.1214 Effects of the decision.
134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act
(EAJA).
134.1216 Exhaustion of administrative
remedies.
134.1217 Confidential information and
protective order.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36); Pub. L.
116–136; Pub. L. 116–139; Pub. L. 116–142;
Pub. L. 116–147
§ 134.1201
subpart L.
Scope of the rules in this
(a) The rules of practice in this
subpart L apply to appeals to OHA from
certain SBA loan review decisions
under the Paycheck Protection Program
(PPP) as described in paragraph (b) of
this section, and to any other PPP matter
referred to OHA by the Administrator of
SBA. The PPP was established as a
temporary program under section 1102
of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act)
(Pub. L. 116–136).
(b) A final SBA loan review decision
that is appealable under this subpart L
is an official written decision by SBA,
after SBA completes a review of a PPP
loan, that finds a borrower:
(1) Was ineligible for a PPP loan;
(2) Was ineligible for the PPP loan
amount received or used the PPP loan
proceeds for unauthorized uses;
(3) Is ineligible for PPP loan
forgiveness in the amount determined
by the lender in its full approval or
partial approval decision issued to SBA
(except for the deduction of any
Economic Injury Disaster Loan advance
in accordance with section 1110(e)(6) of
the CARES Act); and/or
(4) Is ineligible for PPP loan
forgiveness in any amount when the
lender has issued a full denial decision
to SBA.
(c) A borrower cannot file an OHA
appeal of any decision made by a lender
concerning a PPP loan.
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
52888
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Any determination by SBA’s
Office of Inspector General concerning a
PPP loan is not appealable to OHA.
(e) This subpart L does not create any
right to appeal any SBA decision on any
7(a) loans other than PPP loans.
(f) The Rules of Practice for Appeals
From Size Determinations and NAICS
Code Designations in subpart C of this
part do not apply to appeals of SBA loan
review decisions or to the PPP.
(g) In addition to the subpart B of this
part provisions specifically referenced
in this subpart L, the following
regulations from subpart B of this part
also apply to this subpart L: 13 CFR
134.207 through 134.209, 134.211,
134.212, and 134.217 through 134.221.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 134.1202
The appeal petition.
(a) Contents. The appeal petition must
include the following information:
(1) The basis for OHA’s jurisdiction,
including, but not limited to, evidence
that the appeal is timely filed in
accordance with § 134.1204;
(2) A copy of the SBA loan review
decision that is being appealed, or a
description of that decision if a copy is
unavailable;
(3) A full and specific statement as to
why the SBA loan review decision is
alleged to be erroneous, together with
all factual information and legal
arguments supporting the allegations;
(4) The relief being sought;
(5) Signed copies of payroll tax filings
actually filed with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), and State quarterly
business and individual employee wage
reporting and unemployment insurance
tax filings actually reported to the
relevant state, for the relevant periods of
time, if not provided with the PPP Loan
Forgiveness Application (SBA Form
3508, SBA Form 3508EZ, or lender’s
equivalent), or an explanation as to why
they are not relevant or not available;
(6) Signed copies of applicable federal
tax returns actually filed with the IRS
with appropriate schedules (e.g., IRS
Form 1040 with Schedule C/F)
documenting income for self-employed
individuals or partners in a partnership,
if not provided with the PPP Borrower
Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or
lender’s equivalent), or an explanation
as to why they are not relevant or not
available; and
(7) The name, address, telephone
number, email address and signature of
the appellant or its attorney.
(b) Format. The maximum length of
an appeal petition (not including
attachments) is 20 pages, unless leave is
sought by the appellant and granted by
the Judge. A table of authorities is
required only for petitions citing more
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
than twenty cases, regulations, or
statutes.
(c) Service of the appeal petition. In
addition to filing an appeal with OHA
in accordance with § 134.204(b), the
appellant must serve a copy of the
appeal petition with attachments on the
Associate General Counsel for
Litigation, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416, OLITService@
sba.gov.
(d) Certificate of service. The
appellant must attach to the appeal
petition a signed certificate of service
meeting the requirements of
§ 134.204(d).
(e) Dismissal. An appeal petition
which does not contain all of the
information required by paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section may be
dismissed, with or without prejudice, at
the Judge’s own initiative, or upon
motion of SBA.
(f) Motion for more definite statement.
SBA may, not later than five days after
receiving an appeal petition, move for
an order to the appellant to provide a
more definite appeal petition or
otherwise comply with this section. A
Judge may order a more definite appeal
petition on his or her own initiative.
(1) A motion for a more definite
appeal petition stays SBA’s time for
filing a response. The Judge will
establish the time for filing and serving
a response and will extend the close of
the record as appropriate.
(2) If the appellant does not comply
with the Judge’s order to provide a more
definite appeal petition or otherwise
fails to comply with applicable
regulations, the Judge may dismiss the
petition with prejudice.
(g) Calculation of a deadline when the
time period is given in days. Do not
count the day the time period begins,
but do count the last day of the time
period. If the last day is Saturday,
Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the time
period ends on the next business day.
§ 134.1203
Standing.
Only the borrower on a loan for which
SBA has issued a final SBA loan review
decision has standing to appeal the SBA
loan review decision to OHA.
§ 134.1204
petition.
Deadline for filing appeal
An appeal petition must be filed with
OHA within 30 calendar days after the
appellant’s receipt of the final SBA loan
review decision, or notification by the
lender of the final SBA loan review
decision, whichever is earlier.
§ 134.1205
Dismissal.
(a) The Judge must dismiss the appeal
if:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) The appeal is beyond OHA’s
jurisdiction as set forth under
§ 134.1201;
(2) The appellant lacks standing to
appeal under § 134.1203; or
(3) The appeal is untimely under
§ 134.1204, or is premature because SBA
has not yet made a final SBA loan
review decision.
(b) The Judge may dismiss the appeal
in accordance with § 134.1202(e) or
(f)(2), or if the appeal does not, on its
face, allege specific facts that if proven
to be true, warrant reversal or remand of
the SBA loan review decision.
§ 134.1206
Notice and order.
Upon receipt of an appeal challenging
a final SBA loan review decision, OHA
will assign the matter to either an
Administrative Law Judge or an
Administrative Judge in accordance
with § 134.218. Unless the appeal is
dismissed under § 134.1205, the Judge
will issue a notice and order
establishing a deadline for production of
the administrative record and specifying
a date for the close of record. The notice
and order will be served upon all
known parties (or their attorneys).
Typically, the administrative record will
be due 20 calendar days after issuance
of the notice and order unless additional
time is requested and granted, and the
record will close 45 calendar days from
the date of OHA’s receipt of the appeal
unless additional time is requested and
granted.
§ 134.1207
The administrative record.
(a) Contents. The administrative
record shall include relevant documents
that SBA considered in making its final
decision or that were before SBA at the
time of the final decision. The
administrative record need not,
however, contain all documents
pertaining to the appellant. In addition,
SBA may claim privilege as to certain
materials. The administrative record
must be certified and authenticated that
it is, to the best of the signatory’s
knowledge, complete and correct.
(b) Filing. SBA will file the
administrative record with OHA and
serve it on appellant.
(c) Objection. The appellant may
object to the absence of any document
from the administrative record that the
appellant believes should have been
included in the administrative record.
An appellant also may object to any
claim that documents in the
administrative record are privileged.
Such objections must be filed with OHA
and served on SBA no later than 10
calendar days after the appellant’s
receipt of the administrative record. The
Judge will rule upon such objections
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
and may direct or permit that the
administrative record be supplemented.
§ 134.1208
Response to an appeal petition.
(a) Who may respond. Only SBA may
respond to an appeal. The response
should set forth the relevant facts and
legal arguments to the issues presented
on appeal.
(b) Time limit. Except for good cause
shown, a response filed after the close
of record established by the Judge will
not be considered.
(c) Service. The SBA must file its
response with OHA, and serve a copy of
the response upon the appellant and
upon each of the persons identified in
the certificate of service attached to the
appeal petition pursuant to
§ 134.1202(d).
(d) Reply to a response. No reply to
a response will be permitted unless the
Judge directs otherwise.
§ 134.1209 Evidence beyond the record,
discovery and oral hearings.
(a) General Rule. Generally, the Judge
may not admit evidence beyond the
written administrative record or permit
any form of discovery.
(b) Discovery. Discovery will be
permitted only if the Judge determines
that SBA, upon written submission, has
made a showing of good cause for
discovery.
(c) Oral hearings. Oral hearings will
not be held on an appeal of an SBA loan
review decision, unless, following the
motion of a party, or at the Judge’s own
initiative, the Judge orders an oral
hearing upon concluding that there is a
genuine dispute of material fact that
cannot be resolved except by the taking
of testimony and the confrontation of
witnesses. If an oral hearing is ordered,
the proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with §§ 134.214 and 134.222
in subpart B of this part as the Judge
deems appropriate.
(d) The record. All appeals under this
subpart L will be decided solely on a
review of the written administrative
record, the appeal petition, and
response(s) filed thereto, any admitted
evidence, and an oral hearing, if held.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 134.1210
Interlocutory appeals.
(a) General. Either party may file an
interlocutory appeal of a Judge’s ruling
which decides an issue of privilege.
Interlocutory appeals will be decided by
the Administrator of SBA or a designee.
(b) Procedures. An interlocutory
appeal must be filed and served no later
than 20 calendar days after issuance of
the ruling to which the interlocutory
appeal applies. A response to the
interlocutory appeal must be filed 10
calendar days after the interlocutory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
appeal is served. The Judge may stay the
proceedings before OHA, in whole or in
part, as he or she deems appropriate
pending resolution of the interlocutory
appeal.
§ 134.1211
Alternative dispute resolution.
(a) Joint Motion. At any time during
the pendency of an appeal, the parties
may submit a joint motion requesting
that the Judge permit the use of
alternative dispute resolution to assist
in resolving the matter.
(b) Procedures. If the motion is
granted, the Judge will also stay the
proceedings before OHA, in whole or in
part, as he or she deems appropriate,
pending the outcome of the alternative
dispute resolution. In addition, the AA/
OHA or a Judge may designate another
Judge or attorney assigned to OHA to
serve as a neutral in alternative dispute
resolution procedures. If OHA provides
the neutral and the mediation fails to
resolve all issues in the case, the OHAprovided neutral will not be involved in
the adjudication.
§ 134.1212
Standard of review.
The standard of review is whether the
SBA loan review decision was based on
clear error of fact or law. The appellant
has the burden of proof, by a
preponderance of the evidence.
§ 134.1213
Decision on appeal.
(a) Time limits and contents. The
Judge will issue his or her decision
within 45 calendar days after the close
of record, as practicable. The decision
will contain findings of fact and
conclusions of law, the reasons for such
findings and conclusions, and any relief
ordered. The decision will be served on
each party.
(b) Initial decision. The Judge’s
decision on the appeal is an initial
decision. However, unless a request for
review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a),
or a request for reconsideration is filed
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section,
an initial decision shall become the
final decision of SBA 30 calendar days
after its service. The final OHA decision
creates precedent only for appeals
involving the PPP. Any OHA decision
pursuant to this subpart L applies only
to the PPP and does not apply to SBA’s
7(a) Loan Program generally or to any
interpretation or application of the
regulations in part 120 or part 121 of
this title.
(c) Reconsideration. An initial
decision of the Judge may be
reconsidered. Either SBA or the
appellant may request reconsideration
by filing with the Judge and serving a
petition for reconsideration within 10
calendar days after service of the written
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52889
decision. The request for
reconsideration must clearly show an
error of fact or law material to the
decision. The Judge may also reconsider
a decision on his or her own initiative
within 20 calendar days after service of
the written decision.
(d) Request for review. Within 30
calendar days after the service of an
initial decision or a reconsidered initial
decision of a Judge, any party, or SBA’s
Office of General Counsel, may file and
serve a request for review by the
Administrator pursuant to § 134.228(a).
In order for a borrower to exhaust its
administrative remedies and preserve its
right to seek judicial review of an SBA
final decision in a federal district court,
a borrower that disputes an initial
decision or reconsidered initial decision
must file and serve a request for review
of the initial decision or reconsidered
initial decision by the Administrator
pursuant to § 134.228(a). If a request for
review is filed pursuant to § 134.228(a),
the provisions in § 134.228 will apply.
(e) Publication. OHA decisions are
normally published without redactions
on OHA’s website. A decision may
contain confidential business and
financial information or personally
identifiable information where that
information is either decisionallysignificant or otherwise necessary for a
comprehensible decision. Where no
protective order is in place, a party may
request a redacted public decision by
contacting OHA. Where a protective
order is in place, the Judge will usually
issue the unredacted decision under the
protective order and a redacted version
for public release.
§ 134.1214
Effects of the decision.
OHA may affirm, reverse, or remand
an SBA loan review decision. If
remanded, OHA no longer has
jurisdiction over the matter unless a
new appeal is filed as a result of a new
SBA loan review decision.
§ 134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act
(EAJA), 5 U.S.C. 504.
A prevailing appellant is not entitled
to recover attorney’s fees. Appeals to
OHA from SBA loan review decisions
under the PPP are not proceedings that
are required to be conducted by an
Administrative Law Judge under
§ 134.603.
§ 134.1216
remedies.
Exhaustion of administrative
An appeal to OHA and request for
review by the Administrator of a
disputed initial decision or
reconsidered initial decision are
administrative remedies that must be
exhausted before judicial review of an
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
52890
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
SBA loan review decision may be
sought in a federal district court.
§ 134.1217 Confidential Information and
Protective Order.
(a) If a filing or other submission
made pursuant to an appeal in this
subpart L contains confidential business
and financial information; personally
identifiable information; source
selection sensitive information; income
tax returns; documents and information
covered under § 120.1060 of this title; or
any other exempt information, that
information is not available to the
public pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552.
(b) SBA or appellant may seek a
protective order over any document or
information exchanged in discovery if
permitted in accordance with
§ 134.1209 and any document or
information filed pursuant to an appeal
in this subpart L.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–17895 Filed 8–25–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0786; Project
Identifier AD–2020–00914–R; Amendment
39–21229; AD 2020–18–08]
Examining the AD Docket
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Robinson
Helicopter Company
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019–12–
18 for Robinson Helicopter Company
(Robinson) Model R44 II helicopters. AD
2019–12–18 required inspecting certain
engine air induction hoses (hoses) and
replacing any hose that was not
airworthy. AD 2019–12–18 also
prohibited the installation of certain
hoses. This AD continues to require
inspecting those previously affected
hoses and amends the applicability,
clarifies an inspection requirement,
adds a requirement to repeat the
inspection, and expands the installation
prohibition. This AD was prompted by
an additional report of separation
between the outer and inner hose layers.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
This AD is effective August 27,
2020.
The FAA must receive any comments
on this AD by October 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Robinson
Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport
Drive, Torrance, CA 90505; telephone
310–539–0508; fax 310–539–5198; or at
https://robinsonheli.com/. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 817–222–5110.
DATES:
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0786; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Gretler, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712;
phone 562–627–5251; email
roger.gretler@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2019–12–18,
Amendment 39–19673 (84 FR 32028,
July 5, 2019) (‘‘AD 2019–12–18’’), for
Robinson Model R44 II helicopters. AD
2019–12–18 required, for helicopter
serial numbers (S/Ns) 14248 through
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14268 and 14270 through 14286 and
helicopters with a hose part number (P/
N) A785–31 installed after April 30,
2018, inspecting the inside of the hose
for separation between the outer and
inner layers and flexing the hose in all
directions while listening for a crinkling
sound, which is an indication of
separation. If there was any separation
or a crinkling sound, AD 2019–12–18
required replacing the hose before
further flight. If there was no separation
and no crinkling sound, AD 2019–12–18
required replacing the hose within 50
hours time-in-service (TIS). Finally, AD
2019–12–18 prohibited installing hose
P/N A785–31 marked with code 1Q18
on any helicopter.
AD 2019–12–18 resulted from 12
reports, including an accident on April
4, 2019, of separation between the outer
and inner layers of the orange silicone
hose out of a suspected population of
100 hoses traced to a specific
manufacturing batch marked by code
1Q18 (1st quarter of 2018). The
separation of the silicone layers, if not
addressed, could result in blockage of
air flow to the engine, engine stoppage,
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter. Accordingly, the FAA issued
AD 2019–12–18 to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
Actions Since AD 2019–12–18 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2019–12–
18, an NTSB report of October 2019
concluded from the accident aircraft’s
orange silicone hose marked by code
1Q18, that contamination was
introduced during the manufacturing
process between the silicone layers that
prevented a satisfactory bond.
In addition, a helicopter accident
occurred on April 6, 2020, and
preliminary investigation indicated that
separation between the outer and inner
layers of the orange silicone hose P/N
A785–31 occurred. This hose was traced
to the manufacturing batch marked by
code 3Q17 (3rd quarter of 2017).
Subsequently, the FAA determined
that any helicopter with an improved
black neoprene hose P/N A785–31
installed should not be affected by this
AD. The FAA has also determined that,
for helicopters with an orange silicone
hose, repeating the inspection is
necessary. Accordingly, the FAA is
superseding AD 2019–12–18 to amend
the applicability from all Robinson
Model R44 II helicopters to Model R44
II helicopters with an orange silicone
hose P/N A785–31 installed. This AD
also clarifies that the hose must be
removed to perform the inspection, adds
a requirement to repeat the inspection,
and expands the installation prohibition
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 167 (Thursday, August 27, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52883-52890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 134
[Docket Number SBA-2020-0042]
RIN 3245-AH55
Appeals of SBA Loan Review Decisions Under the Paycheck
Protection Program
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 2, 2020, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)
posted on its website an interim final rule relating to the
implementation of sections 1102 and 1106 of the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act or the Act) (published in
the Federal Register on April 15, 2020). Section 1102 of the Act
temporarily adds a new product, titled the ``Paycheck Protection
Program,'' to the U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA's) 7(a)
Loan Program. Subsequently, SBA issued a number of interim final rules
implementing the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). This interim final
rule supplements the interim final rule on Loan Review Procedures and
Related Borrower and Lender Responsibilities posted on SBA's website on
May 22, 2020 (published on June 1, 2020, in the Federal Register), as
revised by the interim final rule posted on SBA's website on June 22,
2020, in order to inform PPP borrowers and lenders of the process for a
PPP borrower to appeal certain SBA loan review decisions under the PPP
to the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals, and requests public comment.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective August 25, 2020.
Applicability date: This interim final rule applies to certain loan
review decisions made by SBA under the Paycheck Protection Program.
Comment date: Comments must be received on or before September 28,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by number SBA-2020-0042
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. SBA will post all
comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to submit confidential
business information (CBI) as defined in the User Notice at
www.regulations.gov, please send an email to ppp-[email protected]. Highlight
the information that you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe
SBA should hold this information as confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final determination whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Call Center Representative at 833-
572-0502, or the local SBA Field Office; the list of offices can be
found at https://www.sba.gov/tools/localassistance/districtoffices.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
On March 13, 2020, President Trump declared the ongoing Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic of sufficient severity and magnitude
to warrant an emergency declaration for all States, territories, and
the District of Columbia. With the COVID-19 emergency, many small
businesses nationwide are experiencing economic hardship as a direct
result of the Federal, State, tribal, and local public health measures
that have been taken to minimize the public's exposure to the virus.
These measures, some of which are government-mandated, have been
implemented nationwide and include the closures of restaurants, bars,
and gyms. In addition, based on the advice of public health officials,
other measures, such as keeping a safe distance from others or even
stay-at-home orders, are being implemented, resulting in a dramatic
decrease in economic activity as the public avoids malls, retail
stores, and other businesses.
On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) (Pub. L. 116-136) to
provide emergency assistance and health care response for individuals,
families, and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. The
Small Business Administration
[[Page 52884]]
(SBA) received funding and authority through the CARES Act to modify
existing loan programs and establish a new loan program to assist small
businesses nationwide adversely impacted by the COVID-19 emergency.
Section 1102 of the CARES Act temporarily permits SBA to guarantee 100
percent of 7(a) loans under a new program titled the ``Paycheck
Protection Program'' (PPP). Section 1106 of the CARES Act provides for
forgiveness of up to the full principal amount of qualifying loans
guaranteed under the PPP.
On April 2, 2020, SBA posted its first PPP interim final rule (85
FR 20811) (the First Interim Final Rule). Subsequently, SBA issued a
number of other interim final rules implementing the PPP. On April 24,
2020, the President signed the Paycheck Protection Program and Health
Care Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 116-139), which provided additional
funding and authority for the PPP.
On May 22, 2020, SBA and Treasury posted an interim final rule on
Loan Review Procedures and Related Borrower and Lender Responsibilities
(85 FR 33010) (Loan Review Interim Final Rule (IFR)). The rule stated
that SBA would be issuing a separate interim final rule addressing the
process for appealing certain SBA loan review decisions under the PPP.
On June 5, 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act of
2020 (Pub. L. 116-142) (Flexibility Act) was signed into law, amending
the CARES Act. On June 22, 2020, SBA and Treasury posted an interim
final rule that in part revised the Loan Review IFR to incorporate the
relevant Flexibility Act amendments, address revisions to the Loan
Forgiveness Application (SBA Form 3508), and include a new alternative
Loan Forgiveness Application (SBA Form 3508EZ). On July 4, 2020, Public
Law 116-147 was enacted, extending the authority for SBA to guarantee
PPP loans to August 8, 2020.
As described below, this interim final rule informs PPP borrowers
and lenders of the process for a PPP borrower to appeal certain SBA
loan review decisions under the PPP to the SBA Office of Hearings and
Appeals (OHA) by establishing a new subpart L for 13 CFR part 134, and
requests public comment.
II. Comments and Immediate Effective Date
The intent of the CARES Act is that SBA provide relief to America's
small businesses expeditiously. This intent, along with the dramatic
decrease in economic activity nationwide, provides good cause for SBA
to dispense with the 30-day delayed effective date provided in the
Administrative Procedure Act. Specifically, it is critical to meet
lenders' and borrowers' need for clarity concerning the OHA appeal
process as rapidly as possible because SBA can review a PPP loan and
make determinations as to a borrower's eligibility at any time. This
interim final rule supplements the previous regulation on the discrete
issues related to SBA's process for reviewing a borrower's eligibility
for a PPP loan, the PPP loan amount received, the use of the PPP loan
proceeds and/or the PPP loan forgiveness amount claimed by the
borrower.
This interim final rule is effective without advance notice and
public comment because section 1114 of the CARES Act authorizes SBA to
issue regulations to implement title I of the CARES Act without regard
to notice requirements. In addition, SBA has determined that there is
good cause for dispensing with advance public notice and comment on the
ground that it would be contrary to the public interest. Specifically,
SBA has determined that advance notice and public comment would delay
the ability of PPP borrowers to understand with certainty the process
for appealing certain SBA loan review decisions under the PPP. This
rule is being issued to allow for immediate implementation of the OHA
appeal feature of this program. Although this interim final rule is
effective immediately, comments are solicited from interested members
of the public on all aspects of this interim final rule, including
section III below. These comments must be submitted on or before
September 28, 2020. SBA will consider these comments and the need for
making any revisions as a result of these comments.
III. Subpart L--Rules of Practice for Appeals of Certain SBA Loan
Review Decisions Under the Paycheck Protection Program
This interim final rule establishes a new subpart L for 13 CFR part
134, establishing rules of practice for appeals of certain SBA loan
review decisions under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).
Section 134.1201, Scope of rules in this subpart L, provides a
process for appeal to OHA of certain SBA loan review decisions under
the PPP and any other PPP matter referred to OHA by the Administrator.
This subpart defines the term SBA loan review decision as an official
written decision by SBA, after SBA completes a review of a PPP loan,
that finds a borrower (1) was ineligible for a PPP loan; (2) was
ineligible for the PPP loan amount received or used the PPP loan
proceeds for unauthorized uses; (3) is ineligible for PPP loan
forgiveness in the amount determined by the lender in its full or
partial approval decision issued to SBA (except for the deduction of
any Economic Injury Disaster Loan advance in accordance with section
1110(e)(6) of the CARES Act); and/or (4) is ineligible for PPP loan
forgiveness in any amount when the lender has issued a full denial
decision to SBA.
For a PPP loan of any size, SBA may undertake a loan review at any
time in SBA's discretion, and this subpart L applies to loan review
decisions made by SBA after SBA completes a review of a PPP loan as set
forth in Part III.1 and Part III.2c. of the Loan Review IFR, as
amended. Only final SBA loan review decisions (as defined in this rule)
can be appealed to OHA; a PPP borrower cannot file an OHA appeal of any
decision made by a lender concerning a PPP loan. A PPP borrower can
request an SBA review of a lender decision to deny the borrower's loan
forgiveness application in full, in accordance with Part III.2.b. of
the Loan Review IFR, as amended, but that request is for a review by
SBA, not an OHA appeal. A borrower may exercise any other rights it has
under applicable law against a PPP lender regarding a lender decision.
In addition, this section sets forth other types of decisions and
determinations that are not covered by this subpart L, and makes clear
that subpart C of this part, Rules of Practice for Appeals From Size
Determinations and NAICS Code Designations, is not applicable to
appeals from SBA loan review decisions. Lastly, this section sets forth
the specific provisions from subpart B of this part, OHA's general
Rules of Practice, that are applicable to this subpart L. Other
provisions from subpart B of this part do not apply to this subpart L.
Because a PPP borrower must begin making payments of principal and
interest on the remaining balance of its PPP loan at the end of the
loan payment deferral period or when SBA remits the loan forgiveness
amount to the PPP lender (or notifies the lender that no loan
forgiveness is allowed), an appeal by a PPP borrower of any SBA loan
review decision does not extend the deferral period of the PPP loan.
Additionally, if SBA remits to the lender the PPP loan forgiveness
amount set forth in the decision issued by the lender to SBA (except
for the deduction of any Economic Injury Disaster Loan advance), the
borrower may not file an appeal with OHA, and the borrower
[[Page 52885]]
must begin repayment of any remaining balance of its PPP loan.
Section 134.1202, The appeal petition, provides that an appeal
petition must include the following information: (1) The basis for
OHA's jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, evidence that the
appeal is timely filed in accordance with Sec. 134.1204; (2) A copy of
the SBA loan review decision that is being appealed, or a description
of that decision if a copy is unavailable; (3) A full and specific
statement as to why the SBA loan review decision is alleged to be
erroneous, together with all factual information and legal arguments
supporting the allegations; (4) The relief being sought; (5) Signed
copies of payroll tax filings actually reported to the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), and State quarterly business and individual employee
wage reporting and unemployment insurance tax filings actually reported
to the relevant state, for the relevant periods of time, if not
provided with the PPP Loan Forgiveness Application (SBA Form 3508, SBA
Form 3508EZ, or lender's equivalent), or an explanation as to why they
are not relevant or not available; (6) Signed copies of applicable
federal tax returns actually filed with the IRS with appropriate
schedules (e.g., IRS Form 1040 with Schedule C/F) documenting income
for self-employed individuals or partners in a partnership, if not
provided with the PPP Borrower Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or
lender's equivalent), or an explanation as to why they are not relevant
or not available; and (7) The name, address, telephone number, email
address and signature of the appellant or its attorney. This provision
is consistent with OHA's general rules of practice in subpart B, with
the addition of the requirement for submission of certain financial
information. SBA has determined that submission by the appellant of
financial information, or an explanation as to why they are not
relevant or not available, is appropriate to support SBA's efforts to
assess compliance with the PPP requirements set forth in the statute,
rules, and guidance. The appellant must serve a copy of the appeal
petition with attachments on the Associate General Counsel for
Litigation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416, [email protected]. The appellant must attach to
the appeal petition a signed certificate of service meeting the
requirements of Sec. 134.204(d). This section further provides that an
appeal petition which does not include the above may be dismissed by
the Judge and permits SBA to move for a motion for more definite
statement or otherwise comply with the requirements of this section.
Section 134.1203, Standing, provides that only the borrower on a
loan for which SBA has issued a final SBA loan review decision has
standing to appeal the SBA loan review decision to OHA. Individual
owners of a borrower and lenders do not have standing to appeal an SBA
loan review decision.
Section 134.1204, Deadline for filing appeal petition, prescribes
that an appeal petition must be filed within 30 calendar days after (i)
the appellant's receipt of the final SBA loan review decision, or (ii)
notification by the lender of the final SBA loan review decision,
whichever is earlier.
Section 134.1205, Dismissal, provides that the Judge must dismiss
the appeal if: (1) The appeal is beyond OHA's jurisdiction as set forth
under Sec. 134.1201; (2) the appellant lacks standing to appeal under
Sec. 134.1203; or (3) the appeal is untimely under Sec. 134.1204, or
is premature because SBA has not yet made a final SBA loan review
decision. This section also provides that the Judge may dismiss the
appeal if, among other things, the appeal does not, on its face, allege
specific facts that if proven to be true, warrant reversal or remand of
the SBA loan review decision.
Section 134.1206, Notice and order, provides that upon receipt of
an appeal challenging a final SBA loan review decision, OHA will assign
the matter to either an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative
Judge in accordance with Sec. 134.218. Unless the appeal will be
dismissed under Sec. 134.1205, the Judge will issue a notice and order
establishing a deadline for production of the administrative record and
specifying a date for the close of record. Typically, the
administrative record will be due 20 calendar days after issuance of
the notice and order unless additional time is requested and granted,
and the record will close 45 calendar days from the date of OHA's
receipt of the appeal unless additional time is requested and granted.
With this timeframe, SBA seeks to provide a timely and judicious
processing of the appeal petition, while also affording additional time
if, for example, the volume of appeals or other matters require
additional time for compilation of the administrative record and the
close of record.
Section 134.1207, The administrative record, requires that the
administrative record shall include relevant documents that SBA
considered in making its final decision or that were before SBA at the
time of the final decision. The administrative record need not,
however, contain all documents pertaining to the appellant. In
addition, SBA may claim privilege as to certain materials. The
administrative record must be certified and authenticated that it is,
to the best of the signatory's knowledge, complete and correct. SBA
will file the administrative record with OHA and serve it on appellant.
This section permits the appellant to object to the absence of any
document from the administrative record that the appellant believes
should have been included in the administrative record. An appellant
also may object to any claim that documents in the administrative
record are privileged. Such objections must be filed with OHA and
served on SBA no later than 10 calendar days after appellant's receipt
of the administrative record. The Judge will rule upon such objections
and may direct or permit that the administrative record be
supplemented.
Section 134.1208, Response to an appeal petition, prescribes that
only SBA may respond to an appeal and the response should set forth the
relevant facts and legal arguments to the issues presented on appeal.
Except for good cause shown, a response filed after the close of record
established by the Judge will not be considered. SBA must file its
response with OHA, and serve a copy of the response upon the appellant
and upon each of the persons identified in the certificate of service
attached to the appellant's appeal petition. No reply to a response
will be permitted unless the Judge directs otherwise.
Section 134.1209, Evidence beyond the record, discovery and oral
hearings, provides that, generally, the Judge may not admit evidence
beyond the written administrative record or permit any form of
discovery. Discovery will be permitted in OHA's appellate proceedings
only if the Judge determines that SBA, upon written submission, has
made a showing of good cause for discovery. An oral hearing will not be
held on an appeal of an SBA loan review decision, unless, following the
motion of a party, or at the Judge's own initiative, the Judge orders
an oral hearing upon concluding that there is a genuine dispute of
material fact that cannot be resolved except by the taking of testimony
and the confrontation of witnesses. SBA has determined that allowing an
oral hearing under limited circumstances, and allowing discovery by
SBA, only upon a showing of good cause, balances SBA's potential need
for discovery since it may not have all relevant documents from
appellant with the efficient use of limited resources available. If an
oral hearing is ordered, the proceeding shall
[[Page 52886]]
be conducted in accordance with Sec. Sec. 134.214 and 134.222 in
subpart B of this part as the Judge deems appropriate. All appeals
under this subpart L will be decided solely on a review of the written
administrative record, the appeal petition, response(s) filed thereto,
any admitted evidence, and an oral hearing, if held.
Section 134.1210, Interlocutory appeals, provides that either party
may file an interlocutory appeal of a Judge's ruling which decides an
issue of privilege. Interlocutory appeals will be decided by the
Administrator or a designee. An interlocutory appeal must be filed and
served no later than 20 calendar days after issuance of the ruling to
which the interlocutory appeal applies. A response to the interlocutory
appeal must be filed 10 calendar days after the interlocutory appeal is
served. The Judge may stay the proceedings before OHA, in whole or in
part, as he or she deems appropriate pending resolution of the
interlocutory appeal.
Section 134.1211, Alternative dispute resolution, provides that at
any time during the pendency of an appeal, the parties may submit a
joint motion requesting that the Judge permit the use of alternative
dispute resolution to assist in resolving the matter. If the motion is
granted, the Judge will also stay the proceedings before OHA, in whole
or in part, as he or she deems appropriate, pending the outcome of the
alternative dispute resolution. In addition, the Assistant
Administrator for Hearings and Appeals (AA/OHA) or a Judge may
designate another Judge or attorney assigned to OHA to serve as a
neutral in alternative dispute resolution procedures. If OHA provides
the neutral and the mediation fails to resolve all issues in the case,
the OHA-provided neutral will not be involved in the adjudication.
Section 134.1212, Standard of review, provides that the standard of
review is whether the SBA loan review decision was based on clear error
of fact or law. The appellant has the burden of proof, by a
preponderance of the evidence.
Section 134.1213, Decision on appeal, provides that the Judge will
issue his or her decision within 45 calendar days after the close of
record, as practicable. The decision will contain findings of fact and
conclusions of law, the reasons for such findings and conclusions, and
any relief ordered. The decision will be served on each party. The
Judge's decision on the appeal is an initial decision. However, unless
a request for review is filed pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a), or a
request for reconsideration is filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of Sec.
134.1213, an initial decision shall become the final decision of SBA 30
calendar days after its service. This section allows for a request for
reconsideration pursuant to paragraph (c) of Sec. 134.1213 by either
party or by the Judge on his or her own initiative. This section also
provides for the right to request review by the Administrator pursuant
to Sec. 134.228(a), in which case the provisions in Sec. 134.228 will
apply. If a request for review pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a) is filed,
the decision of the Administrator is a final decision of SBA appealable
to federal district court. In order for a borrower to exhaust its
administrative remedies and preserve its right to seek judicial review
of an SBA final decision in a federal district court, a borrower that
disputes the initial decision or reconsidered initial decision must
file and serve a request for review of an initial decision or
reconsidered initial decision by the Administrator pursuant to Sec.
134.228(a). If the borrower does not request review by the
Administrator pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a), the borrower's right to
seek review in federal court is waived due to the borrower's failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. This section also provides that the
final OHA decision creates precedent only for appeals involving the
PPP. Any OHA decision pursuant to this subpart L applies only to the
PPP and does not apply to SBA's 7(a) Loan Program generally or to any
interpretation or application of the regulations in part 120 or part
121 of this title. SBA has determined that this is appropriate because
the PPP is governed by the CARES Act, which adds a new temporary
program to SBA's 7(a) Loan Program, but does not apply to SBA's 7(a)
Loan Program generally. Lastly, this section provides that, consistent
with the general OHA rules of practice in subpart B of part 134, OHA
decisions are normally published without redactions on OHA's website. A
decision may contain confidential business and financial information or
personally identifiable information where that information is either
decisionally-significant or otherwise necessary for a comprehensible
decision. Where no protective order is in place, a party may request a
redacted public decision by contacting OHA. Where a protective order is
in place, the Judge will usually issue the unredacted decision under
the protective order and a redacted version for public release.
Section 134.1214, Effects of the decision, provides that OHA may
affirm, reverse, or remand an SBA loan review decision. If remanded,
OHA no longer has jurisdiction over the matter unless a new appeal is
filed as a result of a new SBA loan review decision.
Section 134.1215, Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), provides that
a prevailing appellant is not entitled to recover attorney's fees.
Appeals to OHA from SBA loan review decisions under the PPP are not
proceedings that are required to be conducted by an Administrative Law
Judge under Sec. 134.603.
Section 134.1216, Exhaustion of administrative remedies, provides
that an appeal to OHA and request for review by the Administrator of a
disputed initial decision or reconsidered initial decision are
administrative remedies that must be exhausted before judicial review
of an SBA loan review decision may be sought in a federal district
court.
Section 134.1217, Confidential information and protective order,
provides that if a filing or other submission made pursuant to an
appeal in this subpart L contains confidential business and financial
information; personally identifiable information; source selection
sensitive information; income tax returns; documents and information
covered under Sec. 120.1060 of this title; or any other exempt
information, that information is not available to the public pursuant
to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. This provision
is consistent with the general rule of practice in subpart B of this
part. In addition, this section permits SBA or appellant to seek a
protective order over any document or information filed pursuant to an
appeal in this subpart L, including any document or information
exchanged in discovery if permitted in accordance with Sec. 134.1209.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13132, 13563, and 13771,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
This interim final rule is economically significant for the
purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and is considered a major
rule under the Congressional Review Act. SBA, however, is proceeding
under the emergency provision at Executive Order 12866 Section
6(a)(3)(D) based on the need to move expeditiously to mitigate the
current economic conditions arising from the COVID-19 emergency. This
rule's designation under Executive Order 13771 will be informed by
public comment.
[[Page 52887]]
Executive Order 12988
SBA has drafted this rule, to the extent practicable, in accordance
with the standards set forth in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The rule has no preemptive or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this rule will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various layers of government. Therefore, SBA
has determined that this rule has no federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35
SBA has determined that this interim final rule does not impose
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires that when an
agency issues a proposed rule, or a final rule pursuant to section
553(b) of the APA or another law, the agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis that meets the requirements of the RFA and publish
such analysis in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604. Specifically,
the RFA normally requires agencies to describe the impact of a
rulemaking on small entities by providing a regulatory impact analysis.
Such analysis must address the consideration of regulatory options that
would lessen the economic effect of the rule on small entities. The RFA
defines a ``small entity'' as (1) a proprietary firm meeting the size
standards of the Small Business Administration (SBA); (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small
government jurisdiction with a population of less than 50,000. 5 U.S.C.
601(3)-(6). Except for such small government jurisdictions, neither
State nor local governments are ``small entities.'' Similarly, for
purposes of the RFA, individual persons are not small entities. The
requirement to conduct a regulatory impact analysis does not apply if
the head of the agency ``certifies that the rule will not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 605(b). The agency must, however, publish
the certification in the Federal Register at the time of publication of
the rule, ``along with a statement providing the factual basis for such
certification.'' If the agency head has not waived the requirements for
a regulatory flexibility analysis in accordance with the RFA's waiver
provision, and no other RFA exception applies, the agency must prepare
the regulatory flexibility analysis and publish it in the Federal
Register at the time of promulgation or, if the rule is promulgated in
response to an emergency that makes timely compliance impracticable,
within 180 days of publication of the final rule. 5 U.S.C. 604(a),
608(b). Rules that are exempt from notice and comment are also exempt
from the RFA requirements, including conducting a regulatory
flexibility analysis, when among other things the agency for good cause
finds that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest. SBA Office of Advocacy guide: How
to Comply with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Ch.1. p.9. Accordingly,
SBA is not required to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 134
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Equal access to
justice, Lawyers, Organization and function (Government agencies).
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Small Business
Administration amends 13 CFR part 134 as set forth below:
PART 134--RULES OF PROCEDURE GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE OFFICE OF
HEARINGS AND APPEALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 134 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 634(i),
637(a), 648(l), 656(i), 657t and 687(c); 38 U.S.C. 8127(f); E.O.
12549, 51 FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189.
Subpart J issued under 38 U.S.C. 8127(f)(8)(B).
Subpart K issued under 38 U.S.C. 8127(f)(8)(A).
Subpart L issued under 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36); Pub. L. 116-136;
Pub. L. 116-139; 116-142; 116-147.
0
2. Amend Sec. 134.102 by:
0
a. Removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (u);
0
b. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (v) and adding ``; and''
in its place; and
0
c. Adding paragraph (w) to read as follows:
Sec. 134.102 Jurisdiction of OHA.
* * * * *
(w) Appeals of certain SBA loan review decisions as defined in 13
CFR 134.1201.
0
3. Add subpart L to read as follows:
Subpart L--Rules of Practice for Appeals of Certain SBA Loan Review
Decisions Under the Paycheck Protection Program
Sec.
134.1201 Scope of rules in this subpart L.
134.1202 The appeal petition.
134.1203 Standing.
134.1204 Deadline for filing appeal petition.
134.1205 Dismissal.
134.1206 Notice and order.
134.1207 The administrative record.
134.1208 Response to an appeal petition.
134.1209 Evidence beyond the record, discovery and oral hearings.
134.1210 Interlocutory appeals.
134.1211 Alternative dispute resolution procedures.
134.1212 Standard of review.
134.1213 Decision on appeal.
134.1214 Effects of the decision.
134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).
134.1216 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.
134.1217 Confidential information and protective order.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36); Pub. L. 116-136; Pub. L. 116-
139; Pub. L. 116-142; Pub. L. 116-147
Sec. 134.1201 Scope of the rules in this subpart L.
(a) The rules of practice in this subpart L apply to appeals to OHA
from certain SBA loan review decisions under the Paycheck Protection
Program (PPP) as described in paragraph (b) of this section, and to any
other PPP matter referred to OHA by the Administrator of SBA. The PPP
was established as a temporary program under section 1102 of the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (Pub. L.
116-136).
(b) A final SBA loan review decision that is appealable under this
subpart L is an official written decision by SBA, after SBA completes a
review of a PPP loan, that finds a borrower:
(1) Was ineligible for a PPP loan;
(2) Was ineligible for the PPP loan amount received or used the PPP
loan proceeds for unauthorized uses;
(3) Is ineligible for PPP loan forgiveness in the amount determined
by the lender in its full approval or partial approval decision issued
to SBA (except for the deduction of any Economic Injury Disaster Loan
advance in accordance with section 1110(e)(6) of the CARES Act); and/or
(4) Is ineligible for PPP loan forgiveness in any amount when the
lender has issued a full denial decision to SBA.
(c) A borrower cannot file an OHA appeal of any decision made by a
lender concerning a PPP loan.
[[Page 52888]]
(d) Any determination by SBA's Office of Inspector General
concerning a PPP loan is not appealable to OHA.
(e) This subpart L does not create any right to appeal any SBA
decision on any 7(a) loans other than PPP loans.
(f) The Rules of Practice for Appeals From Size Determinations and
NAICS Code Designations in subpart C of this part do not apply to
appeals of SBA loan review decisions or to the PPP.
(g) In addition to the subpart B of this part provisions
specifically referenced in this subpart L, the following regulations
from subpart B of this part also apply to this subpart L: 13 CFR
134.207 through 134.209, 134.211, 134.212, and 134.217 through 134.221.
Sec. 134.1202 The appeal petition.
(a) Contents. The appeal petition must include the following
information:
(1) The basis for OHA's jurisdiction, including, but not limited
to, evidence that the appeal is timely filed in accordance with Sec.
134.1204;
(2) A copy of the SBA loan review decision that is being appealed,
or a description of that decision if a copy is unavailable;
(3) A full and specific statement as to why the SBA loan review
decision is alleged to be erroneous, together with all factual
information and legal arguments supporting the allegations;
(4) The relief being sought;
(5) Signed copies of payroll tax filings actually filed with the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and State quarterly business and
individual employee wage reporting and unemployment insurance tax
filings actually reported to the relevant state, for the relevant
periods of time, if not provided with the PPP Loan Forgiveness
Application (SBA Form 3508, SBA Form 3508EZ, or lender's equivalent),
or an explanation as to why they are not relevant or not available;
(6) Signed copies of applicable federal tax returns actually filed
with the IRS with appropriate schedules (e.g., IRS Form 1040 with
Schedule C/F) documenting income for self-employed individuals or
partners in a partnership, if not provided with the PPP Borrower
Application Form (SBA Form 2483 or lender's equivalent), or an
explanation as to why they are not relevant or not available; and
(7) The name, address, telephone number, email address and
signature of the appellant or its attorney.
(b) Format. The maximum length of an appeal petition (not including
attachments) is 20 pages, unless leave is sought by the appellant and
granted by the Judge. A table of authorities is required only for
petitions citing more than twenty cases, regulations, or statutes.
(c) Service of the appeal petition. In addition to filing an appeal
with OHA in accordance with Sec. 134.204(b), the appellant must serve
a copy of the appeal petition with attachments on the Associate General
Counsel for Litigation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, [email protected].
(d) Certificate of service. The appellant must attach to the appeal
petition a signed certificate of service meeting the requirements of
Sec. 134.204(d).
(e) Dismissal. An appeal petition which does not contain all of the
information required by paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section may
be dismissed, with or without prejudice, at the Judge's own initiative,
or upon motion of SBA.
(f) Motion for more definite statement. SBA may, not later than
five days after receiving an appeal petition, move for an order to the
appellant to provide a more definite appeal petition or otherwise
comply with this section. A Judge may order a more definite appeal
petition on his or her own initiative.
(1) A motion for a more definite appeal petition stays SBA's time
for filing a response. The Judge will establish the time for filing and
serving a response and will extend the close of the record as
appropriate.
(2) If the appellant does not comply with the Judge's order to
provide a more definite appeal petition or otherwise fails to comply
with applicable regulations, the Judge may dismiss the petition with
prejudice.
(g) Calculation of a deadline when the time period is given in
days. Do not count the day the time period begins, but do count the
last day of the time period. If the last day is Saturday, Sunday, or a
Federal holiday, the time period ends on the next business day.
Sec. 134.1203 Standing.
Only the borrower on a loan for which SBA has issued a final SBA
loan review decision has standing to appeal the SBA loan review
decision to OHA.
Sec. 134.1204 Deadline for filing appeal petition.
An appeal petition must be filed with OHA within 30 calendar days
after the appellant's receipt of the final SBA loan review decision, or
notification by the lender of the final SBA loan review decision,
whichever is earlier.
Sec. 134.1205 Dismissal.
(a) The Judge must dismiss the appeal if:
(1) The appeal is beyond OHA's jurisdiction as set forth under
Sec. 134.1201;
(2) The appellant lacks standing to appeal under Sec. 134.1203; or
(3) The appeal is untimely under Sec. 134.1204, or is premature
because SBA has not yet made a final SBA loan review decision.
(b) The Judge may dismiss the appeal in accordance with Sec.
134.1202(e) or (f)(2), or if the appeal does not, on its face, allege
specific facts that if proven to be true, warrant reversal or remand of
the SBA loan review decision.
Sec. 134.1206 Notice and order.
Upon receipt of an appeal challenging a final SBA loan review
decision, OHA will assign the matter to either an Administrative Law
Judge or an Administrative Judge in accordance with Sec. 134.218.
Unless the appeal is dismissed under Sec. 134.1205, the Judge will
issue a notice and order establishing a deadline for production of the
administrative record and specifying a date for the close of record.
The notice and order will be served upon all known parties (or their
attorneys). Typically, the administrative record will be due 20
calendar days after issuance of the notice and order unless additional
time is requested and granted, and the record will close 45 calendar
days from the date of OHA's receipt of the appeal unless additional
time is requested and granted.
Sec. 134.1207 The administrative record.
(a) Contents. The administrative record shall include relevant
documents that SBA considered in making its final decision or that were
before SBA at the time of the final decision. The administrative record
need not, however, contain all documents pertaining to the appellant.
In addition, SBA may claim privilege as to certain materials. The
administrative record must be certified and authenticated that it is,
to the best of the signatory's knowledge, complete and correct.
(b) Filing. SBA will file the administrative record with OHA and
serve it on appellant.
(c) Objection. The appellant may object to the absence of any
document from the administrative record that the appellant believes
should have been included in the administrative record. An appellant
also may object to any claim that documents in the administrative
record are privileged. Such objections must be filed with OHA and
served on SBA no later than 10 calendar days after the appellant's
receipt of the administrative record. The Judge will rule upon such
objections
[[Page 52889]]
and may direct or permit that the administrative record be
supplemented.
Sec. 134.1208 Response to an appeal petition.
(a) Who may respond. Only SBA may respond to an appeal. The
response should set forth the relevant facts and legal arguments to the
issues presented on appeal.
(b) Time limit. Except for good cause shown, a response filed after
the close of record established by the Judge will not be considered.
(c) Service. The SBA must file its response with OHA, and serve a
copy of the response upon the appellant and upon each of the persons
identified in the certificate of service attached to the appeal
petition pursuant to Sec. 134.1202(d).
(d) Reply to a response. No reply to a response will be permitted
unless the Judge directs otherwise.
Sec. 134.1209 Evidence beyond the record, discovery and oral
hearings.
(a) General Rule. Generally, the Judge may not admit evidence
beyond the written administrative record or permit any form of
discovery.
(b) Discovery. Discovery will be permitted only if the Judge
determines that SBA, upon written submission, has made a showing of
good cause for discovery.
(c) Oral hearings. Oral hearings will not be held on an appeal of
an SBA loan review decision, unless, following the motion of a party,
or at the Judge's own initiative, the Judge orders an oral hearing upon
concluding that there is a genuine dispute of material fact that cannot
be resolved except by the taking of testimony and the confrontation of
witnesses. If an oral hearing is ordered, the proceeding shall be
conducted in accordance with Sec. Sec. 134.214 and 134.222 in subpart
B of this part as the Judge deems appropriate.
(d) The record. All appeals under this subpart L will be decided
solely on a review of the written administrative record, the appeal
petition, and response(s) filed thereto, any admitted evidence, and an
oral hearing, if held.
Sec. 134.1210 Interlocutory appeals.
(a) General. Either party may file an interlocutory appeal of a
Judge's ruling which decides an issue of privilege. Interlocutory
appeals will be decided by the Administrator of SBA or a designee.
(b) Procedures. An interlocutory appeal must be filed and served no
later than 20 calendar days after issuance of the ruling to which the
interlocutory appeal applies. A response to the interlocutory appeal
must be filed 10 calendar days after the interlocutory appeal is
served. The Judge may stay the proceedings before OHA, in whole or in
part, as he or she deems appropriate pending resolution of the
interlocutory appeal.
Sec. 134.1211 Alternative dispute resolution.
(a) Joint Motion. At any time during the pendency of an appeal, the
parties may submit a joint motion requesting that the Judge permit the
use of alternative dispute resolution to assist in resolving the
matter.
(b) Procedures. If the motion is granted, the Judge will also stay
the proceedings before OHA, in whole or in part, as he or she deems
appropriate, pending the outcome of the alternative dispute resolution.
In addition, the AA/OHA or a Judge may designate another Judge or
attorney assigned to OHA to serve as a neutral in alternative dispute
resolution procedures. If OHA provides the neutral and the mediation
fails to resolve all issues in the case, the OHA-provided neutral will
not be involved in the adjudication.
Sec. 134.1212 Standard of review.
The standard of review is whether the SBA loan review decision was
based on clear error of fact or law. The appellant has the burden of
proof, by a preponderance of the evidence.
Sec. 134.1213 Decision on appeal.
(a) Time limits and contents. The Judge will issue his or her
decision within 45 calendar days after the close of record, as
practicable. The decision will contain findings of fact and conclusions
of law, the reasons for such findings and conclusions, and any relief
ordered. The decision will be served on each party.
(b) Initial decision. The Judge's decision on the appeal is an
initial decision. However, unless a request for review is filed
pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a), or a request for reconsideration is filed
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, an initial decision shall
become the final decision of SBA 30 calendar days after its service.
The final OHA decision creates precedent only for appeals involving the
PPP. Any OHA decision pursuant to this subpart L applies only to the
PPP and does not apply to SBA's 7(a) Loan Program generally or to any
interpretation or application of the regulations in part 120 or part
121 of this title.
(c) Reconsideration. An initial decision of the Judge may be
reconsidered. Either SBA or the appellant may request reconsideration
by filing with the Judge and serving a petition for reconsideration
within 10 calendar days after service of the written decision. The
request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law
material to the decision. The Judge may also reconsider a decision on
his or her own initiative within 20 calendar days after service of the
written decision.
(d) Request for review. Within 30 calendar days after the service
of an initial decision or a reconsidered initial decision of a Judge,
any party, or SBA's Office of General Counsel, may file and serve a
request for review by the Administrator pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a).
In order for a borrower to exhaust its administrative remedies and
preserve its right to seek judicial review of an SBA final decision in
a federal district court, a borrower that disputes an initial decision
or reconsidered initial decision must file and serve a request for
review of the initial decision or reconsidered initial decision by the
Administrator pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a). If a request for review is
filed pursuant to Sec. 134.228(a), the provisions in Sec. 134.228
will apply.
(e) Publication. OHA decisions are normally published without
redactions on OHA's website. A decision may contain confidential
business and financial information or personally identifiable
information where that information is either decisionally-significant
or otherwise necessary for a comprehensible decision. Where no
protective order is in place, a party may request a redacted public
decision by contacting OHA. Where a protective order is in place, the
Judge will usually issue the unredacted decision under the protective
order and a redacted version for public release.
Sec. 134.1214 Effects of the decision.
OHA may affirm, reverse, or remand an SBA loan review decision. If
remanded, OHA no longer has jurisdiction over the matter unless a new
appeal is filed as a result of a new SBA loan review decision.
Sec. 134.1215 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. 504.
A prevailing appellant is not entitled to recover attorney's fees.
Appeals to OHA from SBA loan review decisions under the PPP are not
proceedings that are required to be conducted by an Administrative Law
Judge under Sec. 134.603.
Sec. 134.1216 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.
An appeal to OHA and request for review by the Administrator of a
disputed initial decision or reconsidered initial decision are
administrative remedies that must be exhausted before judicial review
of an
[[Page 52890]]
SBA loan review decision may be sought in a federal district court.
Sec. 134.1217 Confidential Information and Protective Order.
(a) If a filing or other submission made pursuant to an appeal in
this subpart L contains confidential business and financial
information; personally identifiable information; source selection
sensitive information; income tax returns; documents and information
covered under Sec. 120.1060 of this title; or any other exempt
information, that information is not available to the public pursuant
to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552.
(b) SBA or appellant may seek a protective order over any document
or information exchanged in discovery if permitted in accordance with
Sec. 134.1209 and any document or information filed pursuant to an
appeal in this subpart L.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-17895 Filed 8-25-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P