Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes, 52281-52284 [2020-18562]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 25, 2020 / Proposed Rules
comment period by 14 days, until
September 8, 2020.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on August 7, 2020,
by Alexander N. Fitzsimmons, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 11,
2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2020–17841 Filed 8–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Examining the AD Docket
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0781; Product
Identifier 2018–CE–045–AD]
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0781; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Turner, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Fort
Worth ACO Branch, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177;
telephone: (817) 222–4508; fax: (817)
222–5245; email: johh.r.turner@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi
Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
75–16–20, which applies to all
Mitsubishi Model MU–2B, MU–2B–10,
MU–2B–15, MU–2B–20, MU–2B–25,
MU–2B–26, MU–2B–30, MU–2B–35,
and MU–2B–36 airplanes. AD 75–16–20
requires repetitive inspections of the
propeller pitch control (PPC) lever for
security and proper rigging. Since the
FAA issued AD 75–16–20, the FAA
received additional reports of the PPC
lever linkage disconnecting at the
engine. In addition, Mitsubishi has type
certificated additional airplanes that are
subject to the unsafe condition. This
proposed AD would require
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
modification and repetitive inspections
of the PPC lever linkage. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by October 9, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries America, Inc., c/o Turbine
Aircraft Services, Inc., 4550 Jimmy
Doolittle Drive, Addison, Texas 75001;
telephone: (972) 248–3108, ext. 209; fax:
(972) 248–3321; internet: https://mu2aircraft.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Aug 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2020–0781; Product
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
52281
Identifier 2018–CE–045–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information as described in the
following paragraph and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed
AD.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to John Turner,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Fort Worth
ACO Branch, 10101 Hillwood Parkway,
Fort Worth, Texas 76177; telephone:
(817) 222–4508; fax: (817) 222–5245;
email: johh.r.turner@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 75–16–20,
Amendment 39–2294 (40 FR 31751, July
29, 1975) (‘‘AD 75–16–20’’), for all
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
(Mitsubishi) Models MU–2B, MU–2B–
10, MU–2B–15, MU–2B–20, MU–2B–25,
MU–2B–26, MU–2B–30, MU–2B–35,
and MU–2B–36 airplanes. AD 75–16–20
requires repetitively inspecting the PPC
lever for security and proper rigging. AD
75–16–20 resulted from reports of the
PPC lever linkage disconnecting from
the engine. The FAA issued AD 75–16–
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
52282
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 25, 2020 / Proposed Rules
20 to prevent separation of the PPC
lever, which could lead to the inability
to control the propeller pitch with the
power lever in the cockpit and
subsequent loss of control of the engine
power settings.
Actions Since AD 75–16–20 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 75–16–20,
the FAA received reports of the PPC
lever linkage disconnecting at the
engine, which resulted in the inability
to control the propeller pitch with the
power lever in the cockpit. This
condition, if uncorrected, could lead to
loss of control of the engine power
settings. In addition, Mitsubishi
developed a secondary retention feature
to secure the PPC. To correct this unsafe
condition, the Japan Civil Aviation
Bureau (JCAB), which is the aviation
authority for Japan, issued JCAB AD No.
TCD–8678–2016, dated February 5,
2016 (referred to after this as the
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information or ‘‘the MCAI’’) to correct
an unsafe condition for certain
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Model
MU–2B, MU–2B–15, MU–2B–20, MU–
2B–25, MU–2B–26, MU–2B–30, MU–
2B–35, and MU–2B–36 airplanes. The
MCAI requires replacing the PPC lever
bolt with the new bolt.
This proposed AD would require this
bolt replacement and would also require
installing a secondary retention feature
and repetitive inspections of the PPC
lever to prevent future reoccurrence.
Also since AD 75–16–20 was issued,
Mitsubishi has type certificated Models
MU–2B–26A, MU–2B–36A, MU–2B–40,
and MU–2B–60 airplanes. These models
have the same PPC configuration and
are subject to the same unsafe condition.
As a result, the proposed AD would add
these models to the applicability. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0781.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Mitsubishi has issued MU–2 Service
Recommendation No. 049/76–002,
dated June 29, 2018, and MU–2 Service
Recommendation No. 080, dated June
29, 2018. This service information
contains procedures for installing a PPC
lever secondary retention feature to
secure the PPC lever. These documents
are distinct since they apply to different
airplane models and configurations.
Mitsubishi has also issued MU–2
Service Bulletin No. 106/76–004, dated
February 24, 2016, and MU–2 Service
Bulletin No. 244, dated December 25,
2015. This service information contains
procedures for replacing the PPC lever
clamping bolt. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different
airplane models and configurations.
Honeywell International Inc. has
issued Service Bulletin TPE331–72–
2190, Revision 0, dated December 21,
2011. The procedures in this service
information include instructions for
incorporating a threaded hole in the
splined end of the shouldered shaft of
the PPC assembly and re-identifying the
shouldered shaft part number. The
threaded hole is used to accommodate
a secondary retention method to secure
the PPC lever.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. The FAA
is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the
repetitive inspection requirements of
AD 75–16–20 and would also require
installing a secondary retention feature
and reporting certain inspection results
to the FAA. In addition, this proposed
AD would add models to the
applicability that were not type
certificated when AD 75–16–20 was
issued.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI
This proposed AD would require an
installation of a secondary retention
feature in the threaded end of the PPC
input shaft, repetitive inspections of the
security of the PPC lever, and reporting
certain inspection results to the FAA.
The MCAI does not include these
requirements.
The applicability of the MCAI is
limited to certain Mitsubishi airplane
models and serial numbers. However,
this proposed AD would apply to all
Mitsubishi Models MU–2B, MU–2B–10,
MU–2B–15, MU–2B–20, MU–2B–25,
MU–2B–26, MU–2B–26A, MU–2B–30,
MU–2B–35, MU–2B–36, MU–2B–36A,
MU–2B–40, and MU–2B–60 airplanes
because the type design allows
installation of the affected PCC lever
linkage on other models.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 260 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per work
hour.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Modification ....................
Repetitive inspections ....
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85
per inspection cycle.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions for the incorporation of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Aug 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Parts cost
$2
0
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
$172 ......................................
$85 per inspection cycle .......
$44,720.
$22,100 per inspection cycle.
threaded hole and reporting
requirement. The FAA has no way of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these on-condition actions:
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 25, 2020 / Proposed Rules
52283
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Incorporation of threaded hole ....................
Reporting .....................................................
4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 ............................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour ...........................................................
If the PPC lever detaches, the
necessary corrective actions could vary
significantly from airplane to airplane.
The FAA has received no definitive data
that would enable estimating the cost to
install the PPC lever on each airplane or
the number of airplanes that may
require this action.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The OMB Control
Number for this information collection
is 2120–0056. Public reporting for this
collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 1 hour per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, completing and reviewing
the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of
information are mandatory as required
by this AD; the nature and extent of
confidentiality to be provided, if any.
Send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden to:
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Federal Aviation
Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177–1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Aug 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Parts cost
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 75–16–20, Amendment 39–2294
(40 FR 31751, July 29, 1975); and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
■
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.: Docket
No. FAA–2020–0781; Product Identifier
2018–CE–045–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
October 9, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
$1,000
0
$1,340
85
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 75–16–20,
Amendment 39–2294 (40 FR 31751, July 29,
1975) (‘‘AD 75–16–20’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries, Ltd. (Mitsubishi) Models MU–2B,
MU–2B–10, MU–2B–15, MU–2B–20, MU–
2B–25, MU–2B–26, MU–2B–26A, MU–2B–
30, MU–2B–35, MU–2B–36, MU–2B–36A,
MU–2B–40, and MU–2B–60 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 61: Propellers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by propeller pitch
control (PPC) lever linkages disconnecting at
the engine. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the PPC lever linkage from
disconnecting at the engine, which could
lead to the inability to control the propeller
pitch with the power lever in the cockpit and
consequent loss of control of the engine
power settings.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Modification
(1) For all airplanes except Model MU–2B
and MU–2B–10 airplanes: Within 100 hours
time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date
of this AD or within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first, modify the PPC lever linkage as
specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iii)
of this AD, as applicable.
(i) Replace the PPC lever clamping bolt in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, section 2, of Mitsubishi MU–2
Service Bulletin No. 106/76–004, dated
February 24, 2016, or Mitsubishi MU–2
Service Bulletin No. 244, dated December 25,
2015, as applicable to your model airplane.
(ii) For airplanes without a threaded hole
in the splined end of the shouldered shaft of
the PPC assembly, incorporate a threaded
hole in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.C.(3)(d)2, of
Honeywell International Inc. Service Bulletin
TPE331–72–2190, Revision 0, dated
December 21, 2011.
(iii) Install a secondary retention feature in
the threaded end of the PPC input shaft in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, section 2, of Mitsubishi MU–2
Service Recommendation No. 049/76–002,
dated June 29, 2018, or Mitsubishi MU–2
Service Recommendation No. 080, dated June
29, 2018, as applicable to your model
airplane.
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
52284
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 25, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(2) For Model MU–2B and MU–2B–10
airplanes: Within 100 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD or within 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, replace the PPC lever clamping
bolt and install a secondary retention feature
in the threaded end of the PPC input shaft
using a method approved by the Manager of
the Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA. The
Manager’s approval letter must specifically
refer to this AD.
(h) Repetitive Inspections and Reporting
Within 100 hours TIS after replacing the
bolt and installing a secondary retention
feature as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
100 hours TIS, inspect the security of the
PPC lever by pulling the PPC lever upward
by hand to ensure it does not detach from the
PPC input shaft. If the PPC lever detaches, do
the following.
(1) Before further flight, install the PPC
lever using a method approved by the
Manager of the Fort Worth ACO Branch,
FAA. The Manager’s approval letter must
specifically refer to this AD.
(2) Within 30 days after the PPC lever
detachment or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, report the results of the inspection,
including airplane model and serial number,
to the FAA representative identified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Special Flight Permit
(1) Special flight permits may be issued for
the purpose of operating the airplane to a
location where the requirements of paragraph
(g) of this AD can be performed with the
following limitations: Flights must not carry
passengers, must operate in daytime visual
meteorological conditions only, and must not
operate in areas of known turbulence.
(2) Special flight permits may be issued for
the purpose of operating the airplane to a
location where the requirements of paragraph
(h) of this AD may be performed without
limitations.
(j) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden
Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection
of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory as
required by this AD; the nature and extent of
confidentiality to be provided, if any. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or
any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden to: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Aug 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177–1524.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Fort Worth ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Fort Worth ACO
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Japan
Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) AD No. TCD–
8678–2016, dated February 5, 2016, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0781.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact John Turner, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Fort Worth ACO Branch, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177;
telephone: (817) 222–4508; fax: (817) 222–
5245; email: johh.r.turner@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
America, Inc., c/o Turbine Aircraft Services,
Inc., 4550 Jimmy Doolittle Drive, Addison,
Texas 75001; telephone: (972) 248–3108, ext.
209; fax: (972) 248–3321; internet: https://
mu-2aircraft.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued on August 19, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–18562 Filed 8–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0780; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–103–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A350–941
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports that certain central
wing box (CWB) fasteners had rotated
inside the fastener holes due to
insufficient friction for the application.
This proposed AD would require
replacement of the affected fasteners, as
specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which will
be incorporated by reference. The FAA
is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by October 9, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For the material identified in this
proposed AD that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR), contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0780.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0780; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 25, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52281-52284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18562]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0781; Product Identifier 2018-CE-045-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 75-
16-20, which applies to all Mitsubishi Model MU-2B, MU-2B-10, MU-2B-15,
MU-2B-20, MU-2B-25, MU-2B-26, MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, and MU-2B-36
airplanes. AD 75-16-20 requires repetitive inspections of the propeller
pitch control (PPC) lever for security and proper rigging. Since the
FAA issued AD 75-16-20, the FAA received additional reports of the PPC
lever linkage disconnecting at the engine. In addition, Mitsubishi has
type certificated additional airplanes that are subject to the unsafe
condition. This proposed AD would require modification and repetitive
inspections of the PPC lever linkage. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 9,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Mitsubishi
Heavy Industries America, Inc., c/o Turbine Aircraft Services, Inc.,
4550 Jimmy Doolittle Drive, Addison, Texas 75001; telephone: (972) 248-
3108, ext. 209; fax: (972) 248-3321; internet: https://mu-2aircraft.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0781; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Turner, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Fort Worth ACO Branch, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177;
telephone: (817) 222-4508; fax: (817) 222-5245; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0781;
Product Identifier 2018-CE-045-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information as described in the
following paragraph and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35,
the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed AD.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552),
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to
this NPRM contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you
clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page
of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat
such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will
not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing
CBI should be sent to John Turner, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Fort Worth
ACO Branch, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177; telephone:
(817) 222-4508; fax: (817) 222-5245; email: [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 75-16-20, Amendment 39-2294 (40 FR 31751, July
29, 1975) (``AD 75-16-20''), for all Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
(Mitsubishi) Models MU-2B, MU-2B-10, MU-2B-15, MU-2B-20, MU-2B-25, MU-
2B-26, MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, and MU-2B-36 airplanes. AD 75-16-20 requires
repetitively inspecting the PPC lever for security and proper rigging.
AD 75-16-20 resulted from reports of the PPC lever linkage
disconnecting from the engine. The FAA issued AD 75-16-
[[Page 52282]]
20 to prevent separation of the PPC lever, which could lead to the
inability to control the propeller pitch with the power lever in the
cockpit and subsequent loss of control of the engine power settings.
Actions Since AD 75-16-20 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 75-16-20, the FAA received reports of the
PPC lever linkage disconnecting at the engine, which resulted in the
inability to control the propeller pitch with the power lever in the
cockpit. This condition, if uncorrected, could lead to loss of control
of the engine power settings. In addition, Mitsubishi developed a
secondary retention feature to secure the PPC. To correct this unsafe
condition, the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB), which is the
aviation authority for Japan, issued JCAB AD No. TCD-8678-2016, dated
February 5, 2016 (referred to after this as the mandatory continuing
airworthiness information or ``the MCAI'') to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Model MU-2B,
MU-2B-15, MU-2B-20, MU-2B-25, MU-2B-26, MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, and MU-2B-
36 airplanes. The MCAI requires replacing the PPC lever bolt with the
new bolt.
This proposed AD would require this bolt replacement and would also
require installing a secondary retention feature and repetitive
inspections of the PPC lever to prevent future reoccurrence.
Also since AD 75-16-20 was issued, Mitsubishi has type certificated
Models MU-2B-26A, MU-2B-36A, MU-2B-40, and MU-2B-60 airplanes. These
models have the same PPC configuration and are subject to the same
unsafe condition. As a result, the proposed AD would add these models
to the applicability. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-0781.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Mitsubishi has issued MU-2 Service Recommendation No. 049/76-002,
dated June 29, 2018, and MU-2 Service Recommendation No. 080, dated
June 29, 2018. This service information contains procedures for
installing a PPC lever secondary retention feature to secure the PPC
lever. These documents are distinct since they apply to different
airplane models and configurations.
Mitsubishi has also issued MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 106/76-004,
dated February 24, 2016, and MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 244, dated
December 25, 2015. This service information contains procedures for
replacing the PPC lever clamping bolt. These documents are distinct
since they apply to different airplane models and configurations.
Honeywell International Inc. has issued Service Bulletin TPE331-72-
2190, Revision 0, dated December 21, 2011. The procedures in this
service information include instructions for incorporating a threaded
hole in the splined end of the shouldered shaft of the PPC assembly and
re-identifying the shouldered shaft part number. The threaded hole is
used to accommodate a secondary retention method to secure the PPC
lever.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the repetitive inspection
requirements of AD 75-16-20 and would also require installing a
secondary retention feature and reporting certain inspection results to
the FAA. In addition, this proposed AD would add models to the
applicability that were not type certificated when AD 75-16-20 was
issued.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI
This proposed AD would require an installation of a secondary
retention feature in the threaded end of the PPC input shaft,
repetitive inspections of the security of the PPC lever, and reporting
certain inspection results to the FAA. The MCAI does not include these
requirements.
The applicability of the MCAI is limited to certain Mitsubishi
airplane models and serial numbers. However, this proposed AD would
apply to all Mitsubishi Models MU-2B, MU-2B-10, MU-2B-15, MU-2B-20, MU-
2B-25, MU-2B-26, MU-2B-26A, MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, MU-2B-36, MU-2B-36A,
MU-2B-40, and MU-2B-60 airplanes because the type design allows
installation of the affected PCC lever linkage on other models.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 260 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work hour.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification..................... 2 work-hours x $85 $2 $172............... $44,720.
per hour = $170.
Repetitive inspections........... 1 work-hour x $85 0 $85 per inspection $22,100 per
per hour = $85 per cycle. inspection cycle.
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions for the incorporation of the threaded hole and
reporting requirement. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:
[[Page 52283]]
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorporation of threaded hole................ 4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,000 $1,340
$340.
Reporting..................................... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour...... 0 85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the PPC lever detaches, the necessary corrective actions could
vary significantly from airplane to airplane. The FAA has received no
definitive data that would enable estimating the cost to install the
PPC lever on each airplane or the number of airplanes that may require
this action.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection of information are
mandatory as required by this AD; the nature and extent of
confidentiality to be provided, if any. Send comments regarding this
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 75-16-20, Amendment 39-2294
(40 FR 31751, July 29, 1975); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2020-0781; Product
Identifier 2018-CE-045-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by October 9, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 75-16-20, Amendment 39-2294 (40 FR 31751,
July 29, 1975) (``AD 75-16-20'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
(Mitsubishi) Models MU-2B, MU-2B-10, MU-2B-15, MU-2B-20, MU-2B-25,
MU-2B-26, MU-2B-26A, MU-2B-30, MU-2B-35, MU-2B-36, MU-2B-36A, MU-2B-
40, and MU-2B-60 airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 61: Propellers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by propeller pitch control (PPC) lever
linkages disconnecting at the engine. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the PPC lever linkage from disconnecting at the engine,
which could lead to the inability to control the propeller pitch
with the power lever in the cockpit and consequent loss of control
of the engine power settings.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Modification
(1) For all airplanes except Model MU-2B and MU-2B-10 airplanes:
Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of
this AD or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, modify the PPC lever linkage as specified in
paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) Replace the PPC lever clamping bolt in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, section 2, of Mitsubishi MU-2 Service
Bulletin No. 106/76-004, dated February 24, 2016, or Mitsubishi MU-2
Service Bulletin No. 244, dated December 25, 2015, as applicable to
your model airplane.
(ii) For airplanes without a threaded hole in the splined end of
the shouldered shaft of the PPC assembly, incorporate a threaded
hole in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.C.(3)(d)2, of Honeywell International Inc. Service Bulletin
TPE331-72-2190, Revision 0, dated December 21, 2011.
(iii) Install a secondary retention feature in the threaded end
of the PPC input shaft in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, section 2, of Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Recommendation
No. 049/76-002, dated June 29, 2018, or Mitsubishi MU-2 Service
Recommendation No. 080, dated June 29, 2018, as applicable to your
model airplane.
[[Page 52284]]
(2) For Model MU-2B and MU-2B-10 airplanes: Within 100 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD or within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace the PPC
lever clamping bolt and install a secondary retention feature in the
threaded end of the PPC input shaft using a method approved by the
Manager of the Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA. The Manager's approval
letter must specifically refer to this AD.
(h) Repetitive Inspections and Reporting
Within 100 hours TIS after replacing the bolt and installing a
secondary retention feature as required by paragraph (g) of this AD
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, inspect the
security of the PPC lever by pulling the PPC lever upward by hand to
ensure it does not detach from the PPC input shaft. If the PPC lever
detaches, do the following.
(1) Before further flight, install the PPC lever using a method
approved by the Manager of the Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA. The
Manager's approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
(2) Within 30 days after the PPC lever detachment or within 30
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
report the results of the inspection, including airplane model and
serial number, to the FAA representative identified in paragraph
(l)(2) of this AD.
(i) Special Flight Permit
(1) Special flight permits may be issued for the purpose of
operating the airplane to a location where the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD can be performed with the following
limitations: Flights must not carry passengers, must operate in
daytime visual meteorological conditions only, and must not operate
in areas of known turbulence.
(2) Special flight permits may be issued for the purpose of
operating the airplane to a location where the requirements of
paragraph (h) of this AD may be performed without limitations.
(j) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory as required by this AD; the
nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177-1524.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Fort Worth ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Fort Worth ACO Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) AD No. TCD-8678-2016,
dated February 5, 2016, for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2020-0781.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact John Turner,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Fort Worth ACO Branch, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177; telephone: (817) 222-4508; fax:
(817) 222-5245; email: [email protected].
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc., c/o Turbine Aircraft
Services, Inc., 4550 Jimmy Doolittle Drive, Addison, Texas 75001;
telephone: (972) 248-3108, ext. 209; fax: (972) 248-3321; internet:
https://mu-2aircraft.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Issued on August 19, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-18562 Filed 8-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P