Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 51439-51441 [2020-18275]
Download as PDF
51439
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
of new HIV infections. In persons
without HIV infection, ARVs can be
given: (1) For 28 days following a
potential HIV exposure through sexual
or injection behaviors as nPEP, or (2)
before potential sexual HIV exposures
and taken daily for months to years as
PrEP. In persons with HIV infection,
beginning treatment with ARVs early in
their infection (e.g., with high CD4 cell
counts) can greatly lower their risk of
transmitting infection to uninfected
sexual partners; this is also called
treatment as prevention or TasP. PrEP is
99% effective at reducing the risk of
HIV through sexual contact when taken
daily. PrEP is also 74%-84% effective at
reducing the risk of HIV infection
through injection drug use when taken
daily. Persons living with HIV who are
taking ARVs as prescribed, as well as
achieving viral suppression, effectively
have no risk for transmitting the virus
to an HIV-negative partner through
sexual contact. CDC is working with
various jurisdictions with high HIV
prevalence to increase capacity of ARV
provision, build collaborative efforts
between health departments and
community-based organizations, and
engage multi-sector provider systems to
reach individuals with high risk of HIV
infection as part of the End the HIV
Epidemic Initiative. CBOs will play a
crucial role in the End the HIV
Epidemic Initiative. In a previous
survey conducted by CDC’s Division of
HIV/AIDS Prevention, CBOs reported
high awareness of nPEP, PrEP, and
TasP, but their ability to meet client
need was low. Although clinical CBOs
were more prepared to support the
expansion of biomedical HIV prevention
interventions, the likelihood that all
CBOs would incorporate these
interventions if they had additional
resources was somewhat high.
Research is needed to better
understand the capacity of CBOs to
incorporate biomedical HIV prevention
interventions into their existing
infrastructure. It is unclear whether the
provision of and capacity to provide
nPEP, PrEP, and TasP has increased
among CBOs since the original survey
was conducted. Furthermore, it is
unclear whether non-clinical CBOs have
achieved parity in linking clients to
biomedical HIV prevention
interventions with their clinical
counterparts. This new survey will
assess current capacity and provision of
nPEP, PrEP, and TasP among CBOs
providing HIV services to populations
with increased risk for HIV acquisition.
In addition, the results of this survey
will be compared to the results of the
2015 survey to assess differences in
awareness, capacity, and provision of
biomedical HIV prevention
interventions. Respondents will include
organizations engaged in HIV
prevention and outreach. Up to 330
respondents (n=330; 175 funded CBOs
and 155 CBOs that did not receive
funding) will be recruited to complete
the survey. This project will employ a
cross-sectional survey design. Executive
level staff members of all CBOs within
each of the two strata (mentioned above)
will receive phone calls, using publicly
available information, to elicit interest
in participating in the survey. If the
executive level staff member is not
interested or is unable to complete the
survey, he or she may nominate a direct
client service provider and provide this
person’s email address to study staff.
Potential respondents will be contacted
from a list of CBOs that completed the
2015 survey. Potential respondents from
CBOs that received DHAP funding
through PS15–1502 and PS17–1704 will
also be contacted to determine their
interest in participating in the data
collection effort. Each organization’s
representative will be sent an email
with a link to the survey website
(created with Survey Monkey). One link
will be used for CBOs directly funded
by CDC and a separate link will be used
for unfunded CBOs. The email will
instruct the recipient on how to
complete the survey. Three email
reminders will be sent to organizations
for those that do not complete the
survey. Email reminders will be sent
two weeks, one month, and two months
after the initial email if the potential
respondent does not compete the
survey. The survey should take
approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Where possible, data from the 2015
survey will be combined with data from
the 2020 survey. Analyses will include
completeness (non-response rates per
item) as well as frequency of item
responses for awareness, intentions, and
provision of PrEP, nPEP, and TasP will
be assessed for all respondents
combined. Frequency and differences in
item responses will be analyzed for
relationship to CBO characteristics (e.g.,
clinical CBOs vs non-clinical CBOs).
Frequency and differences in item
responses will be analyzed across
survey years. We will perform
multivariable analysis as needed (to
assess interactions between time and
type of CBO).
The total annualized burden hours is
165 hours. There are no other costs to
respondents other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Form name
.........................................................................
Community Based Organization HIV Prevention Needs Assessment Survey.
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2020–18276 Filed 8–19–20; 8:45 am]
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
[30Day–20–20HO]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
330
Number of
responses per
respondent
1
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
30/60
has submitted the information
collection request titled Heat-related
Changes in Cognitive Performance to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. CDC
previously published a ‘‘Proposed Data
Collection Submitted for Public
Comment and Recommendations’’
notice on February 25, 2020 to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. CDC did not receive comments
related to the previous notice. This
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
51440
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
notice serves to allow an additional 30
days for public and affected agency
comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this
proposed information collection project.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including, through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and
(e) Assess information collection
costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570.
Comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Direct written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice to the
Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by
fax to (202) 395–5806. Provide written
comments within 30 days of notice
publication.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Project
Heat-related Changes in Cognitive
Performance—New—National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91–173 as
amended by Public Law 95 –164
(Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977), and Public Law 109–236 (Mine
Improvement and New Emergency
Response Act of 2006) has the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
responsibility to conduct research to
improve working conditions and to
prevent accidents and occupational
diseases in U.S. mines. Heat strain is
one of these occupational diseases and
is an increasing problem among many
industries, including mining. As mines
expand into deeper and hotter
environments, and as heat waves occur
with increasing frequency and severity,
heat strain among underground and
surface miners is likely to increase. Not
only can heat strain lead to heat illness,
but studies have demonstrated
associations between heat exposure and
work injuries. Although the underlying
mechanism between heat exposure and
injury is not known, reduced cognitive
function is likely contributory.
Despite the increasing importance of
heat strain in mining, few studies have
focused on heat strain among U.S.
miners. The few studies that are
available have demonstrated that miners
often exceed a core body temperature of
38 °C during work activities, which is
above the recommended threshold, but
more information on frequency,
duration, and intensity of elevated core
body temperatures is needed in order to
focus future heat strain research to
better serve the mining industry.
In addition to determining the
patterns of duration and intensity of
heat strain among U.S. miners,
investigating the additional effects of
heat strain beyond the risk of heat
illness is an important step in
improving miner health and safety.
Studies have demonstrated associations
between heat stress and cognitive
deficits, but substantial inter- and intraindividual variability exists in the
physiologic and cognitive responses to
heat exposure. More information is
needed about the most important factors
(e.g., age, sex, chronic disease, fitness
level, hydration) contributing to
individual variability as well as
interactions between these factors,
because individual variability likely
affects the usefulness of one-size-fits-all
heat stress indices that are currently
used in mining. Additionally, it is
unclear which characteristics of core
body temperature (e.g., absolute
temperature thresholds vs. rising or
falling temperatures vs rate of
temperature change) are most associated
with cognitive dysfunction. A better
understanding of how individual
variability and core body temperature
relate to cognitive deficits would assist
in developing strategies for screening
and monitoring miners to mitigate or
prevent heat strain. Therefore, this
study aims to assess the following
objectives: (1) Whether a core body
temperature threshold exists at which
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cognitive performance begins to decline,
(2) What factors most contribute to
individual variability in cognitive and
physiologic responses to heat, and (3)
What patterns of duration and intensity
of heat strain are most common among
U.S. surface and underground miners.
To study these objectives, a dual-arm
field and laboratory study will be
conducted. The field study will be
conducted at surface and underground
mines. Data will be collected from
miners working in warm or hot areas of
participating mines. Participants will
swallow temperature pills to measure
core body temperature and will wear
bio-harnesses to measure heart rate.
Two six-minute assessments will be
taken during each shift. The
assessments include questions on
sleepiness and work tasks and a
Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) to
assess vigilant attention and reaction
time. An initial screening questionnaire
as well as post-shift questionnaires will
be used to obtain information on risk
factors for heat strain and cognitive
deficits. The purpose of collecting data
at the field sites is to evaluate the
frequency, duration, and intensity of
heat strain by monitoring core body
temperature and heart rate throughout
two complete shifts, as well as to assess
associations between core body
temperature and cognitive deficits.
The laboratory study will be
conducted in an environmental
chamber, in which environmental
conditions can be highly controlled.
Data will be collected from miners,
construction workers, and firefighters.
These three groups were chosen because
of their risk of heat exposure and their
proximity to the NIOSH laboratory
where the study will be conducted.
Participants will perform alternating
resistance and aerobic exercises
followed by brief surveys to evaluate
sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness
Scale), affect (Positive and Negative
Affect Schedule), and fatigue. Following
these surveys, two cognitive tests (PVT
and N-back, which measures vigilance,
working memory, and complex tracking)
will be administered. Testing will occur
at room temperature and in hot
conditions to compare cognitive test
results between conditions. Participants
will swallow temperature pills and wear
bio-harnesses to enable the collection of
real-time core body temperature and
heart rate data. An initial health
screening questionnaire as well as
additional questionnaires administered
prior to each test will be used to ensure
that participants are able to withstand
the physical demands of testing and to
provide information on factors that
affect individual variability to heat
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
51441
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
tolerance. Additionally, a physical
examination and fingerstick blood tests
will be used for health screening. The
purpose of collecting data in the
environmental chamber is to compare
physiologic and cognitive
measurements at different core body
temperatures to evaluate factors
contributing to individual variability in
cognitive and physiologic responses to
heat and to evaluate whether core body
temperature thresholds exist above
which cognitive deficits are observed.
The total estimated burden hours are
103. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondent
Number
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Miners.
Ingestion of temperature pill ...................................................
Fitting of chest strap ...............................................................
Consent form (field) ................................................................
Health screening questionnaire (field) ...................................
Heat stress app—shift questionnaire (field) ...........................
PVT cognitive test (field) ........................................................
Heat stress app—post—shift questionnaire (field) ................
Ingestion of temperature pill ...................................................
Fitting of chest strap ...............................................................
Consent form (chamber) ........................................................
Physical ..................................................................................
examination ............................................................................
Health screening questionnaire (chamber) ............................
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
15
15
15
15
2
2
1
1
4
5
2
3
3
1
1
1/60
1/60
30/60
30/60
1/60
5/60
10/60
1/60
1/60
30/60
10/60
15
1
30/60
Fingerstick blood sample for point-of-care testing .................
Release of ..............................................................................
Information (HIPPA) ...............................................................
Borg and thermal scale ..........................................................
PANAS KSS fatigue ...............................................................
Cognitive test: PVT (chamber) ...............................................
Cognitive test: N-back ............................................................
Pre-test screening questionnaire (chamber) ..........................
8
3
1
1
1/60
1/60
15
15
15
15
15
5
5
5
5
2
1/60
2/60
10/60
1/60
5/60
Miners/ ....................................
firefighters/ ..............................
construction workers.
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020–18275 Filed 8–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Administration for Native Americans
(ANA) Ongoing Progress Report (OPR)
and Objective Work Plan (OWP)
Administration for Native
Americans, Administration for Children
and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Administration for
Children and Families’ (ACF)
Administration for Native Americans
(ANA) is requesting a revision to the
information collection: Ongoing
Progress Report (OPR) and the Objective
Work Plan (OWP) (OMB #0970–0452).
Changes are proposed to reduce the
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
burden on the public by combining
ANA’s Annual Data Report (OMB
#0970–0475) with the OPR.
DATES: Comments due within 30 days of
publication. OMB must make a decision
about the collection of information
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: Content changes are being
made to the currently approved OPR.
ANA will continue to use the currently
approved OPR with minimal changes to
the instructions for the remainder of
fiscal year (FY) 2020 and will use the
modified OPR beginning FY 2021. The
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
modified OPR combines ANA’s Annual
Data Report (OMB #0970–0475) with the
OPR.
The information in the OPR is
collected on a semi-annual basis to
monitor the performance of grantees and
better gauge grantee progress. The semiannual data collection replaces the
previous quarterly filing requirement of
the OPR.
The OPR information collection is
conducted in accordance with Sec. 811
[42 U.S.C. 2992] of the Native American
Programs Act and will allow ANA to
report quantifiable results across all
program areas. It also provides grantees
with parameters for reporting their
progress and helps ANA better monitor
and determine the effectiveness of their
projects.
There are no changes proposed to the
OWP. The OWP information collection
is conducted in accordance with 42
U.S.C. of the Native American Programs
Act of 1972, as amended. This
collection is necessary to evaluate
applications for financial assistance and
determine the relative merits of the
projects for which such assistance is
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 162 (Thursday, August 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51439-51441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18275]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-20-20HO]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the information
collection request titled Heat-related Changes in Cognitive Performance
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
CDC previously published a ``Proposed Data Collection Submitted for
Public Comment and Recommendations'' notice on February 25, 2020 to
obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. CDC did not
receive comments related to the previous notice. This
[[Page 51440]]
notice serves to allow an additional 30 days for public and affected
agency comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this proposed information
collection project. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly
interested in comments that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including, through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570. Comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. Direct
written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in
this notice to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202)
395-5806. Provide written comments within 30 days of notice
publication.
Proposed Project
Heat-related Changes in Cognitive Performance--New--National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
NIOSH, under Public Law 91-173 as amended by Public Law 95 -164
(Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977), and Public Law 109-236
(Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006) has the
responsibility to conduct research to improve working conditions and to
prevent accidents and occupational diseases in U.S. mines. Heat strain
is one of these occupational diseases and is an increasing problem
among many industries, including mining. As mines expand into deeper
and hotter environments, and as heat waves occur with increasing
frequency and severity, heat strain among underground and surface
miners is likely to increase. Not only can heat strain lead to heat
illness, but studies have demonstrated associations between heat
exposure and work injuries. Although the underlying mechanism between
heat exposure and injury is not known, reduced cognitive function is
likely contributory.
Despite the increasing importance of heat strain in mining, few
studies have focused on heat strain among U.S. miners. The few studies
that are available have demonstrated that miners often exceed a core
body temperature of 38 [deg]C during work activities, which is above
the recommended threshold, but more information on frequency, duration,
and intensity of elevated core body temperatures is needed in order to
focus future heat strain research to better serve the mining industry.
In addition to determining the patterns of duration and intensity
of heat strain among U.S. miners, investigating the additional effects
of heat strain beyond the risk of heat illness is an important step in
improving miner health and safety. Studies have demonstrated
associations between heat stress and cognitive deficits, but
substantial inter- and intra-individual variability exists in the
physiologic and cognitive responses to heat exposure. More information
is needed about the most important factors (e.g., age, sex, chronic
disease, fitness level, hydration) contributing to individual
variability as well as interactions between these factors, because
individual variability likely affects the usefulness of one-size-fits-
all heat stress indices that are currently used in mining.
Additionally, it is unclear which characteristics of core body
temperature (e.g., absolute temperature thresholds vs. rising or
falling temperatures vs rate of temperature change) are most associated
with cognitive dysfunction. A better understanding of how individual
variability and core body temperature relate to cognitive deficits
would assist in developing strategies for screening and monitoring
miners to mitigate or prevent heat strain. Therefore, this study aims
to assess the following objectives: (1) Whether a core body temperature
threshold exists at which cognitive performance begins to decline, (2)
What factors most contribute to individual variability in cognitive and
physiologic responses to heat, and (3) What patterns of duration and
intensity of heat strain are most common among U.S. surface and
underground miners.
To study these objectives, a dual-arm field and laboratory study
will be conducted. The field study will be conducted at surface and
underground mines. Data will be collected from miners working in warm
or hot areas of participating mines. Participants will swallow
temperature pills to measure core body temperature and will wear bio-
harnesses to measure heart rate. Two six-minute assessments will be
taken during each shift. The assessments include questions on
sleepiness and work tasks and a Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) to
assess vigilant attention and reaction time. An initial screening
questionnaire as well as post-shift questionnaires will be used to
obtain information on risk factors for heat strain and cognitive
deficits. The purpose of collecting data at the field sites is to
evaluate the frequency, duration, and intensity of heat strain by
monitoring core body temperature and heart rate throughout two complete
shifts, as well as to assess associations between core body temperature
and cognitive deficits.
The laboratory study will be conducted in an environmental chamber,
in which environmental conditions can be highly controlled. Data will
be collected from miners, construction workers, and firefighters. These
three groups were chosen because of their risk of heat exposure and
their proximity to the NIOSH laboratory where the study will be
conducted. Participants will perform alternating resistance and aerobic
exercises followed by brief surveys to evaluate sleepiness (Karolinska
Sleepiness Scale), affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), and
fatigue. Following these surveys, two cognitive tests (PVT and N-back,
which measures vigilance, working memory, and complex tracking) will be
administered. Testing will occur at room temperature and in hot
conditions to compare cognitive test results between conditions.
Participants will swallow temperature pills and wear bio-harnesses to
enable the collection of real-time core body temperature and heart rate
data. An initial health screening questionnaire as well as additional
questionnaires administered prior to each test will be used to ensure
that participants are able to withstand the physical demands of testing
and to provide information on factors that affect individual
variability to heat
[[Page 51441]]
tolerance. Additionally, a physical examination and fingerstick blood
tests will be used for health screening. The purpose of collecting data
in the environmental chamber is to compare physiologic and cognitive
measurements at different core body temperatures to evaluate factors
contributing to individual variability in cognitive and physiologic
responses to heat and to evaluate whether core body temperature
thresholds exist above which cognitive deficits are observed.
The total estimated burden hours are 103. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Average burden
Type of respondent Form name Number of responses per per response
respondents respondent (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miners.............................
Ingestion of temperature 30 2 1/60
pill.
Fitting of chest strap..... 30 2 1/60
Consent form (field)....... 30 1 30/60
Health screening 30 1 30/60
questionnaire (field).
Heat stress app--shift 30 4 1/60
questionnaire (field).
PVT cognitive test (field). 30 5 5/60
Heat stress app--post-- 30 2 10/60
shift questionnaire
(field).
Ingestion of temperature 15 3 1/60
pill.
Fitting of chest strap..... 15 3 1/60
Consent form (chamber)..... 15 1 30/60
Physical................... 15 1 10/60
examination................
Health screening 15 1 30/60
questionnaire (chamber).
Miners/............................
firefighters/......................
construction workers...............
Fingerstick blood sample 8 1 1/60
for point-of-care testing.
Release of................. 3 1 1/60
Information (HIPPA)........
Borg and thermal scale..... 15 5 1/60
PANAS KSS fatigue.......... 15 5 2/60
Cognitive test: PVT 15 5 10/60
(chamber).
Cognitive test: N-back..... 15 5 1/60
Pre-test screening 15 2 5/60
questionnaire (chamber).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-18275 Filed 8-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P