Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for construction of the Proposed Delta Conveyance Project, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Contra Costa, and Alameda Counties, CA, 51420-51422 [2020-18197]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
51420
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
3. NEPA Purpose and Need. The
purpose of the study is to determine
strategies to manage the risk of impacts
from future flooding in the project area,
including public health and safety.
Coastal storm risk management
measures would seek to reduce effects
to important building, utility, and
transportation infrastructure and
resources, as well as social and
economic resources, including
recreation facilities. During certain
conditions such as storms, king tides, or
El Nin˜o events, water from the San
Francisco Bay periodically overtops
sections of the seawall along the San
Francisco Embarcadero waterfront,
resulting in flooding of low-lying areas.
Sea level rise is expected to increase
risk of flooding in the future. Flooding
could result in limited or no access to
the Embarcadero, Ferry Building and
terminals, and portions of downtown
San Francisco. Potential flooding of
these areas could adversely impact
building infrastructure, including
historic buildings; transportation and
transportation infrastructure, including
the BART, Muni, and the Embarcadero
roadway; recreation and tourism;
government resources; local businesses
and economy; and public health and
safety. Therefore, with the existing and
increasing risk as sea levels continue to
rise there is a need to manage the risk
of flooding in the study area.
4. Alternatives. Alternative
formulation is in the early stages.
USACE and the Port of San Francisco
are developing preliminary alternatives
that combine a broad suite of flood risk
management structural, non-structural,
and natural and nature-based measures
in addition to a No Action Alternative.
Structural measures include options
such as construction of new levees and
floodwalls, or improvements to the
existing seawall to address coastal
flooding along the waterfront.
Nonstructural measures include options
such as raising critical infrastructure,
floodproofing structures, recommending
land use or zoning restrictions, or
enhancing flood warning systems.
Natural and nature-based features
include measures like horizontal levees,
ecological seawalls or ‘‘ecotones’’ that
reduce flood risk while improving the
environment. USACE and the Port of
San Francisco will coordinate with
interested stakeholders to further
describe and refine the alternatives and/
or develop additional alternatives
throughout the study process. As
alternative formulation progresses, more
information will be available on the
project website: https://
www.spn.usace.army.mil/Missions/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
Projects-and-Programs/Projects-A-Z/
San-Francisco-Waterfront-StormDamage-Reduction/.
5. Scoping Process.
a. Two virtual public scoping
meetings will be held to present an
overview of the San Francisco
Waterfront Flood Resiliency Study, the
USACE alternative formulation process,
and the NEPA process. Additionally,
these meetings will afford all interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the scope of analysis and potential
alternatives. The first virtual scoping
meeting will be held on September 16,
2020, from 6:00–7:30 p.m. The second
virtual scoping meeting will be held on
September 17, 2020, from 2:00–3:30
p.m. Information on accessing the
virtual public meetings can be found at:
https://www.spn.usace.army.mil/
Missions/Projects-and-Programs/
Projects-A-Z/San-Francisco-WaterfrontStorm-Damage-Reduction/.
b. USACE will be soliciting public
comments throughout the 60-day
scoping period (See Dates and
Addresses above).
6. Availability. A minimum 30-day
public review period will be provided
for individuals, interested parties, and
agencies to review and comment on the
Draft NEPA document. All interested
parties are encouraged to respond to this
notice and provide a current address if
they wish to be notified of the Draft
NEPA Document’s public circulation.
The Draft NEPA Document is scheduled
to be available for public review and
comment in spring 2022.
USACE
believes it is important to inform the
public of the environmental review
process. To assist the USACE in
identifying and considering issues
related to the study, comments made
during formal scoping and later on the
draft NEPA document should be as
specific as possible. Reviewers should
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it alerts USACE to the reviewers’
position and concerns. It is very
important that those interested in this
study participate by the close of the
scoping period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the USACE at a time when
we can meaningfully consider them for
alternative development and
incorporate them into the study, as
appropriate.
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE STATEMENT:
Paul E. Owen,
Brigadier General, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2020–18226 Filed 8–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
construction of the Proposed Delta
Conveyance Project, Sacramento, San
Joaquin, Contra Costa, and Alameda
Counties, CA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Sacramento District (USACE),
as the lead agency under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for construction of the
Delta Conveyance Project. The
California Department of Water
Resources (DWR) is the project
proponent and will be referred to
hereafter as the Applicant. The EIS will
analyze the Applicant’s proposed action
to construct new conveyance facilities
in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
(Delta) which includes intake facilities
on the Sacramento River, tunnel reaches
and tunnel shafts, a southern forebay
and pumping plant, and south Delta
Conveyance facilities that would
connect to the existing State Water
Project (SWP) infrastructure.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento Regulatory
Division, Attn: Mr. Zachary Simmons,
1325 J Street, Room 1350, Sacramento,
CA 95814–2922.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and EIS can be answered by Mr.
Zachary Simmons, at (916) 557–6746,
by email at Zachary.M.Simmons@
usace.army.mil; or mail at U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Sacramento
Regulatory Division, Attn: Mr. Zachary
Simmons, 1325 J Street, Room 1350,
Sacramento, CA 95814–2922. Requests
to be placed on the electronic or surface
mail notification lists should also be
sent to this address. For further
information or media inquiries, contact
Mr. Paul Bruton at (916) 557–5166, or
by email at spk-pao@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed action requires permission
from USACE is required under Section
14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA).
In addition, the proposed work in
navigable waters and discharge of
dredge or fill material into waters of the
U.S. requires authorization from USACE
under Section 10 of the RHA of 1899
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
1. Proposed Action. The project
requiring an EIS involves construction
of new conveyance facilities in the Delta
that would connect to the existing SWP
infrastructure. USACE’s jurisdiction is
limited to construction activities
resulting in the discharge of dredge or
fill material within waters of the U.S.,
work or structures within navigable
waters, and modifications to the federal
levees and navigation projects. The
scope of the USACE NEPA review for
operations of the new facilities is
limited to potential effects to navigation
and long-term operations and
maintenance of the modifications to
federal levees. The scope does not
extend to the potential downstream
effects from the diversion of water
through new intakes or to the overall
SWP and water deliveries.
The proposed action includes the
construction of new intake facilities, a
tunnel, and a forebay. Two new intake
facilities would be located in the north
Delta along the east bank of the
Sacramento River between the
communities of Clarksburg and
Courtland. The new conveyance
facilities would include a tunnel to
convey water from the new intakes to a
pumping plant and new southern
forebay on Byron Tract, immediately
west of the existing Clifton Court
Forebay. A dual tunnel would connect
the new facilities to the existing State
Water Project (SWP) Banks Intake Canal
in the south Delta. The new facilities
would provide the SWP with an
alternate location for diversion of water
from the Delta and would be operated
in coordination with the existing SWP
south Delta pumping facilities, resulting
in a system also known as ‘‘dual
conveyance’’ because there would be
two complementary methods to divert
and convey water. Under the proposed
project, the new north Delta facilities
would be sized to convey up to 6,000
cubic feet per second (cfs) of water from
the Sacramento River to the SWP
facilities in the south Delta.
Because the proposed action would
alter Federal levees and cross under a
federal navigation project, permission
from USACE is required under Section
14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA)
(33 U.S.C. 408) (Section 408). In
addition, the proposed work in
navigable waters and discharge of
dredge or fill material into waters of the
U.S. requires authorization from USACE
under Section 10 of the RHA (33 U.S.C.
403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Proposed project
elements requiring a permit under
Section 404 and/or Section 10 include
the construction of the intakes within
the Sacramento River and associated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
intake facilities which include setback
levees, two tunnel shafts, and temporary
construction work areas. Project
elements along the tunnel corridor
include 13 crossings of navigable
waterways, eight tunnel shafts, access
roads and access road improvements,
staging areas, tunnel material storage
areas, and a barge landing within the
Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel
(SDWSC) at Lower Roberts Island.
Project elements at the southern forebay
facilities include construction of the
new Southern Forebay, three tunnel
shafts, one crossing of a navigable
waterway, a pumping plant, outlet and
control structure, tunnel material
storage area, and temporary
construction work areas. Proposed
project elements requiring authorization
under Section 408 include the crossing
under the SDWSC, the barge landing
within the SDWSC, and alterations to
the Sacramento River Flood Control
Project (SRFCP) to construct the intakes
within the Sacramento River, associated
intake facilities, and construction and
maintenance of the setback levees along
the Sacramento River. Compensatory
mitigation would be required for
unavoidable impacts to waters of the
U.S. and would be developed during the
EIS process.
Construction of the overall
conveyance project, if approved, would
take approximately 13 years, but the
duration of construction at most
locations would vary and would not
extend for this full construction period.
The future operation of the intakes after
completion of construction would not
be within control or responsibility of the
Corps.
2. Alternatives. A number of project
alternatives, including the no action
alternative and the Applicant’s
preferred alternative will be evaluated
in the EIS in accordance with NEPA (33
CFR part 230 (USACE NEPA
Regulations) and 33 CFR part 325,
Appendix B (NEPA Implementation
Procedures for USACE Regulatory
Projects). Current alternatives to be
analyzed include variations of the
proposed project. Options include two
of three possible intake structures,
multiple intake structure designs based
on impact footprint and fish screen
designs, intake and tunnel capacity
between 3,000 to 7,500 cfs, and
optimizing a tunnel alignment to
minimize impacts within either a
central Delta or eastern Delta corridor.
3. Scoping Process.
a. Affected Federal, State, regional,
and local agencies; Native American
Tribes; other interested private
organizations; and the general public are
invited to participate in the scoping
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51421
process. Comments can be submitted to
the contacts identified above or
submitted via the website identified in
4. Scoping Meetings below.
b. The EIS will analyze the
environmental effects of construction on
the aquatic environment and all other
impacts that fall within the USACE
jurisdiction. Potentially significant
issues to be analyzed in depth include
impacts to waters of the United States
(including wetlands), the federal flood
control project, and air quality. Other
impacts include biological resources,
special status species, hydrology and
water quality, land use, navigation,
water supply, aesthetics, recreation, and
socioeconomic effects.
c. USACE has invited the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service, and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to
participate as cooperating agencies in
the preparation of the EIS. The
Applicant is lead agency for the
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) under the California
Environmental Quality Act for the
proposed project. The two
environmental reviews will be
completed as separate, but parallel
processes, and result in separate
documents.
d. USACE will consult with the State
Historic Preservation Officer and with
Native American Tribes to comply with
the National Historic Preservation Act,
and with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) to comply
with the Endangered Species Act.
USACE will also coordinate with the
USFWS to comply with the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act and with
NMFS to comply with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act.
4. Scoping Meetings. Due to the
current COVID–19 pandemic and in
compliance with Army and USACE
directives, no in-person public scoping
meetings will be held. Members of the
public are invited to view project
information and a presentation on the
USACE proposed action at https://
www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/
Regulatory/Permitting/EnvironmentalImpact-Statements/. Comments may be
submitted via the website or through
email or written comments submitted to
the contacts listed above.
5. Availability of the Draft EIS. The
draft EIS is scheduled to be available for
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
51422
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 162 / Thursday, August 20, 2020 / Notices
public review and comment in mid2021.
Paul E. Owen,
Brigadier General, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2020–18197 Filed 8–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0090]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Master Generic Plan for Customer
Surveys and Focus Groups
Department of Education (ED).
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection request (ICR).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
September 21, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2020–SCC–0090. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
LBJ, Room 6W208B, Washington, DC
20202–8240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Stephanie
Valentine, 202–453–7061.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Aug 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Master Generic
Plan for Customer Surveys and Focus
Groups.
OMB Control Number: 1800–0011.
Type of Review: An extension of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 451,325.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 115,344.
Abstract: Surveys to be considered
under this generic will only include
those surveys that improve customer
service or collect feedback about a
service provided to individuals or
entities directly served by ED. The
results of these customer surveys will
help ED managers plan and implement
program improvements and other
customer satisfaction initiatives. Focus
groups that will be considered under the
generic clearance will assess customer
satisfaction with a direct service, or will
be designed to inform a customer
satisfaction survey ED is considering.
Surveys that have the potential to
influence policy will not be considered
under this generic clearance.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 17, 2020.
Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–18241 Filed 8–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP20–481–000]
Rio Bravo Pipeline Company, LLC;
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review of the Rio Bravo Pipeline
Project Amendment
On June 16, 2020, Rio Bravo Pipeline
Company, LLC (RB Pipeline) filed an
application in Docket No. CP20–481–
000 requesting to amend the Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity
pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural
Gas Act granted by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) for the Rio Bravo Pipeline Project
in Docket No. CP16–455–000. The
proposed project is known as the Rio
Bravo Pipeline Project Amendment
(Project Amendment), and RB Pipeline
proposes to modify the pipeline
facilities that will transport natural gas
to Rio Grande LNG, LLC’s previously
approved (but not yet constructed)
liquefied natural gas (LNG) Terminal in
Cameron County, Texas.
On June 25, 2020, the Commission
issued its Notice of Application for the
Project Amendment. Among other
things, that notice alerted agencies
issuing federal authorizations of the
requirement to complete all necessary
reviews and to reach a final decision on
a request for a federal authorization
within 90 days of the date of issuance
of the Commission staff’s Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the Project
Amendment. This instant notice
identifies the FERC staff’s planned
schedule for the completion of the EA
for the Project Amendment.
Schedule for Environmental Review
Issuance of EA—November 16, 2020
90-day Federal Authorization Decision
Deadline—February 15, 2021
If a schedule change becomes
necessary, additional notice will be
provided so that the relevant agencies
are kept informed of the Project
Amendment’s progress.
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 162 (Thursday, August 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51420-51422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18197]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
construction of the Proposed Delta Conveyance Project, Sacramento, San
Joaquin, Contra Costa, and Alameda Counties, CA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District (USACE),
as the lead agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for construction
of the Delta Conveyance Project. The California Department of Water
Resources (DWR) is the project proponent and will be referred to
hereafter as the Applicant. The EIS will analyze the Applicant's
proposed action to construct new conveyance facilities in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) which includes intake facilities
on the Sacramento River, tunnel reaches and tunnel shafts, a southern
forebay and pumping plant, and south Delta Conveyance facilities that
would connect to the existing State Water Project (SWP) infrastructure.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento Regulatory
Division, Attn: Mr. Zachary Simmons, 1325 J Street, Room 1350,
Sacramento, CA 95814-2922.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and EIS can be answered by Mr. Zachary Simmons, at (916) 557-6746, by
email at [email protected]; or mail at U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, Sacramento Regulatory Division, Attn: Mr. Zachary
Simmons, 1325 J Street, Room 1350, Sacramento, CA 95814-2922. Requests
to be placed on the electronic or surface mail notification lists
should also be sent to this address. For further information or media
inquiries, contact Mr. Paul Bruton at (916) 557-5166, or by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action requires permission from
USACE is required under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA).
In addition, the proposed work in navigable waters and discharge of
dredge or fill material into waters of the U.S. requires authorization
from USACE under Section 10 of the RHA of 1899 and Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act.
[[Page 51421]]
1. Proposed Action. The project requiring an EIS involves
construction of new conveyance facilities in the Delta that would
connect to the existing SWP infrastructure. USACE's jurisdiction is
limited to construction activities resulting in the discharge of dredge
or fill material within waters of the U.S., work or structures within
navigable waters, and modifications to the federal levees and
navigation projects. The scope of the USACE NEPA review for operations
of the new facilities is limited to potential effects to navigation and
long-term operations and maintenance of the modifications to federal
levees. The scope does not extend to the potential downstream effects
from the diversion of water through new intakes or to the overall SWP
and water deliveries.
The proposed action includes the construction of new intake
facilities, a tunnel, and a forebay. Two new intake facilities would be
located in the north Delta along the east bank of the Sacramento River
between the communities of Clarksburg and Courtland. The new conveyance
facilities would include a tunnel to convey water from the new intakes
to a pumping plant and new southern forebay on Byron Tract, immediately
west of the existing Clifton Court Forebay. A dual tunnel would connect
the new facilities to the existing State Water Project (SWP) Banks
Intake Canal in the south Delta. The new facilities would provide the
SWP with an alternate location for diversion of water from the Delta
and would be operated in coordination with the existing SWP south Delta
pumping facilities, resulting in a system also known as ``dual
conveyance'' because there would be two complementary methods to divert
and convey water. Under the proposed project, the new north Delta
facilities would be sized to convey up to 6,000 cubic feet per second
(cfs) of water from the Sacramento River to the SWP facilities in the
south Delta.
Because the proposed action would alter Federal levees and cross
under a federal navigation project, permission from USACE is required
under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 U.S.C. 408)
(Section 408). In addition, the proposed work in navigable waters and
discharge of dredge or fill material into waters of the U.S. requires
authorization from USACE under Section 10 of the RHA (33 U.S.C. 403)
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Proposed
project elements requiring a permit under Section 404 and/or Section 10
include the construction of the intakes within the Sacramento River and
associated intake facilities which include setback levees, two tunnel
shafts, and temporary construction work areas. Project elements along
the tunnel corridor include 13 crossings of navigable waterways, eight
tunnel shafts, access roads and access road improvements, staging
areas, tunnel material storage areas, and a barge landing within the
Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel (SDWSC) at Lower Roberts Island.
Project elements at the southern forebay facilities include
construction of the new Southern Forebay, three tunnel shafts, one
crossing of a navigable waterway, a pumping plant, outlet and control
structure, tunnel material storage area, and temporary construction
work areas. Proposed project elements requiring authorization under
Section 408 include the crossing under the SDWSC, the barge landing
within the SDWSC, and alterations to the Sacramento River Flood Control
Project (SRFCP) to construct the intakes within the Sacramento River,
associated intake facilities, and construction and maintenance of the
setback levees along the Sacramento River. Compensatory mitigation
would be required for unavoidable impacts to waters of the U.S. and
would be developed during the EIS process.
Construction of the overall conveyance project, if approved, would
take approximately 13 years, but the duration of construction at most
locations would vary and would not extend for this full construction
period. The future operation of the intakes after completion of
construction would not be within control or responsibility of the
Corps.
2. Alternatives. A number of project alternatives, including the no
action alternative and the Applicant's preferred alternative will be
evaluated in the EIS in accordance with NEPA (33 CFR part 230 (USACE
NEPA Regulations) and 33 CFR part 325, Appendix B (NEPA Implementation
Procedures for USACE Regulatory Projects). Current alternatives to be
analyzed include variations of the proposed project. Options include
two of three possible intake structures, multiple intake structure
designs based on impact footprint and fish screen designs, intake and
tunnel capacity between 3,000 to 7,500 cfs, and optimizing a tunnel
alignment to minimize impacts within either a central Delta or eastern
Delta corridor.
3. Scoping Process.
a. Affected Federal, State, regional, and local agencies; Native
American Tribes; other interested private organizations; and the
general public are invited to participate in the scoping process.
Comments can be submitted to the contacts identified above or submitted
via the website identified in 4. Scoping Meetings below.
b. The EIS will analyze the environmental effects of construction
on the aquatic environment and all other impacts that fall within the
USACE jurisdiction. Potentially significant issues to be analyzed in
depth include impacts to waters of the United States (including
wetlands), the federal flood control project, and air quality. Other
impacts include biological resources, special status species, hydrology
and water quality, land use, navigation, water supply, aesthetics,
recreation, and socioeconomic effects.
c. USACE has invited the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
National Marine Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to participate as cooperating agencies in the
preparation of the EIS. The Applicant is lead agency for the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) under the
California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project. The two
environmental reviews will be completed as separate, but parallel
processes, and result in separate documents.
d. USACE will consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer
and with Native American Tribes to comply with the National Historic
Preservation Act, and with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to comply with the
Endangered Species Act. USACE will also coordinate with the USFWS to
comply with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act and with NMFS to
comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act.
4. Scoping Meetings. Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and in
compliance with Army and USACE directives, no in-person public scoping
meetings will be held. Members of the public are invited to view
project information and a presentation on the USACE proposed action at
https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Permitting/Environmental-Impact-Statements/. Comments may be submitted via the
website or through email or written comments submitted to the contacts
listed above.
5. Availability of the Draft EIS. The draft EIS is scheduled to be
available for
[[Page 51422]]
public review and comment in mid-2021.
Paul E. Owen,
Brigadier General, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2020-18197 Filed 8-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P