Implementation of Governmentwide Guidance for Grants and Cooperative Agreements, 51158-51161 [2020-16416]
Download as PDF
51158
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Final Rule
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
2 CFR Parts 1103, 1104, and 1125
[DOD–2016–OS–0048]
RIN 0790–AJ45
Implementation of Governmentwide
Guidance for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule is the first of
a sequence of six rules in this issue of
the Federal Register, which were
published as Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRMs) on November 7,
2016. The six rules collectively establish
for DoD grants and cooperative
agreements an updated interim
implementation of Governmentwide
guidance on administrative
requirements, cost principles, and audit
requirements for Federal awards. This
final rule removes outdated portions of
the DoD Grant and Agreement
Regulations (DoDGARs) and replaces it
with a new DoDGARs part containing
revised implementation of the guidance,
and establishes seven subchapters
within DoD’s chapter of the Grants and
Agreements title of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 19,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Orlando, Basic Research Office,
telephone 571–372–6413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Executive Summary
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
A. Purpose of the Final Rule
The Department of Defense Grant and
Agreement Regulations (DoDGARs) are
being updated to, among other things,
implement Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) guidance to Federal
agencies on administrative
requirements, cost principles, and audit
requirements applicable to Federal
grants, cooperative agreements, and
other assistance instruments (2 CFR part
200). DoD established an interim
implementation of that guidance at 2
CFR part 1103 in December 2014 (79 FR
76047), pending comprehensive updates
to the DoDGARs.
This final rule and the five additional
rules immediately following it in this
issue of the Federal Register implement
the OMB guidance as it applies to
general terms and conditions of DoD
grants and cooperative agreements. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
six final rules establish eleven new
DoDGARs parts and make conforming
changes to existing DoDGARs parts.
They represent a major step toward
completion of the needed updating of
the DoDGARs. Additional updates to
complete the overall revision of the
DoDGARs will be published for public
comment in subsequent notices of
proposed rulemaking. Those proposals
will focus on portions of the DoDGARs
that specify pre-award, time-of-award
requirements, and post-award
requirements. All portions of the
DoDGARs remaining in chapter I,
subchapter C of title 32 of the CFR
ultimately will be relocated to chapter
XI of title 2 of the CFR, with any
updating that may be needed.
B. Revisions Implemented by This Rule
This final rule establishes 2 CFR part
1104 to serve as the central part of the
DoDGARs that specifies for DoD
Components which portions of the
DoDGARs apply to DoD grants and
cooperative agreements for various preaward, time-of-award, and post-award
purposes, pending completion of the
remaining updates to the DoDGARs that
are needed to fully implement the OMB
guidance. It also removes the interim
implementation of the guidance
published in December 2014 at 2 CFR
part 1103, as that implementation is
superseded by this 2 CFR part 1104.
2 CFR part 1104 serves as the central
hub to direct DoD Components’ use of
the other ten new parts issued as final
rules in the Federal Register in chapter
XI of 2 CFR, as well as parts of the
DoDGARs that will remain for the time
being in subchapter C, chapter I of title
32 of the CFR.
C. Legal Authorities for the Regulatory
Action
There are two statutory authorities for
this final rule:
• 10 U.S.C. 113, which establishes the
Secretary of Defense as the head of the
Department of Defense; and
• 5 U.S.C. 301, which authorizes the
head of an Executive department to
prescribe regulations for the governance
of that department and the performance
of its business.
II. Regulatory History
In December 2014 (79 FR 76047), DoD
established an interim implementation
of the final guidance, ‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards,’’ published by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) on December 26, 2013, in 2 CFR
part 200 (Uniform Guidance—available
at 78 FR 78589). DoD then published a
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(November 7, 2016 (81 FR 78356)) that
proposed changes to 2 CFR parts 1103,
1104, and 1125 in order to provide an
organizing framework for the DoDGARs
to make it easier for users of the
regulations to locate the content that
they need. This action responds to
comments received on the proposed
rule and finalizes the proposed changes.
III. Comments and Responses
DoD received one public comment on
the November 7, 2016 NPRM that
proposed to (1) remove 2 CFR part 1103,
the part of the DoDGARs that DoD
adopted on December 19, 2014, as its
interim implementation of the OMB
guidance at 2 CFR part 200; and (2)
replace that part with a new DoDGARs
part–2 CFR part 1104—containing a
revised implementation of the guidance.
That comment from an anonymous
individual pertains to this rulemaking
and the other five related rulemakings
in today’s Federal Register, thus it is
addressed here.
Comment: The commenter indicated
that consistent public concerns arise
with the bureaucracy or even
government at-large centered on
perceived accountability and efficiency
and this proposed rule provides an
opportunity for accessibility and
increases overall agency efficiency. The
commenter noted that (1) the changes
impact a wide range of institutions and
will allow for improvements in
communication between government
and the institutions it interacts with at
each level, and (2) this regulatory action
has the potential to provide much
needed uniformity to the grant process.
The commenter further indicated that
this regulatory action will increase the
efficiency for individuals attempting to
access grant and agreement information
by allocating a central hub of
information. It will allow affected
parties to identify and utilize
information at a faster rate and will
eliminate the complications of sorting
through multiple sources. The
commenter also recognized that, while
some may argue that the time required
to centralize this process and
communicate changes could increase
problems in the short-term, it is his or
her belief that standardizing the overall
process will result in positive long-term
benefits.
The commenter also specified that the
additional NPRMs regarding the
DoDGARs create an increase in the
ability of the process to be
understandable by all agencies and
institutions that interact with the DoD.
Differences in definitions or how
guidelines are worded would be
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Final Rule
reduced through these regulatory
actions, and it would promote necessary
standardization for the awards process.
The commenter’s belief is that adoption
of the proposed rules will assist the
intended groups listed such as
hospitals, higher education institutions,
and alternate levels of government by
increasing accessibility across the board.
The intention to create a central hub,
providing standard definitions and
wording and utilizing plain language,
will allow for an increase in
governmental accountability and
efficiency that can heavily influence
overall public trust.
Response: We appreciate the
commenter’s insights concerning the
intent and expected outcomes of this
rulemaking.
Title 2 CFR part 1104 incorporates,
with limited changes as indicated
below, ten other new DoDGARs parts,
which are in four of the five final rules
following this one, by referencing their
applicability. Those final rules (1)
provide standard wording of general
terms and conditions governing
administrative requirements for DoD
grants and cooperative agreements
awarded to institutions of higher
education, nonprofit organizations,
States, local governments, and Indian
tribes; (2) provide standard wording for
general terms and conditions addressing
national policy requirements for DoD
grants and cooperative agreements
awarded to all types of entities; (3)
establish a standard award format for
DoD grants and cooperative agreements,
and (4) establish a central DoDGARs
part with definitions of terms used in
those regulations. The fifth final rule
provides conforming changes in existing
parts of the DoDGARs.
The changes in 2 CFR part 1104 are
as follows:
• In 2 CFR 1104.105(a)(2) and
1104.110(b), we removed the word
‘‘new’’ as a modifier since 32 CFR part
34 has been continuously in effect and
the administrative requirements
contained therein (except as modified
by the technical amendments to that
part being made today) are to be used
in all applicable awards until
superseded.
• In 2 CFR 1104.115, we added at the
end of the paragraph the words
‘‘. . .and other applicable Defense Grant
and Agreement Regulatory System
(DGARS) policies’’ to recognize that
pending overall completion of the
DoDGARs some policies that apply to
DoD Components reside in the DGARS.
• Throughout, changed usage from
‘‘grant and cooperative agreements
awards’’ to ‘‘grants and cooperative
agreements’’ or ‘‘grants and cooperative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
51159
agreements awarded to . . . ’’
depending on the context to eliminate
the redundancy of using the defined
term ‘‘award(s)’’ to modify ‘‘grants and
cooperative agreements.’’
public by standardizing multiple
approaches to the award and
administration of DoD grants and
cooperative agreements previously used
by DoD Components.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or
E.O.s.
Alternatives
1. No Action—If no action was taken,
DoD would not be in compliance with
OMB requirements to move all financial
assistance regulations to 2 CFR.
2. Next Best alternative—The next
best alternative is to subject all awards,
regardless of where they are in their
current life cycle, to the requirements of
this final rule. Since awards are
performed over a 1–5-year life cycle, it
would not be beneficial to the public to
impose the requirements of this final
rule on an award that is near the end of
its life cycle. Therefore, this is not an
acceptable alternative, as it would
impose additional requirements on
award recipients without offering an
added benefit.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated as a ‘‘not
significant’’ regulatory action, and not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the
requirements of these Executive Orders.
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs) directs agencies to reduce
regulation and control regulatory costs
and provides that ‘‘for every one new
regulation issued, at least two prior
regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations
be prudently managed and controlled
through a budgeting process.’’ This rule
is not subject to the requirements of this
Executive Order because it is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
Cost
DOD has found that this rule will not
impose costs to the public because this
consolidation standardizes multiple
approaches to the award and
administration of DoD grants and
cooperative agreements.
Benefits
DoD determined that issuing a
revision of the implementation of OMB
guidance in 2 CFR part 200 and creating
a central hub in the DoD Grant and
Agreement Regulations will help
maximize long-term benefits to the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
B. Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
801, et seq.)
Under the Congressional Review Act,
a major rule may not take effect until at
least 60 days after submission to
Congress of a report regarding the rule.
A major rule is one that would have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or have certain other
impacts. This rule is not a major rule
under the Congressional Review Act.
C. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule will not impose any impacts
on any entities. This means that there
will be no economic impacts on any
entities. Therefore, the Department of
Defense under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 1 certifies that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
121, we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
15
U.S.C. 601 et seq (1980).
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
51160
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Final Rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this rule.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any 1 year. Although this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Collection of Information
G. Federalism
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications that warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment
in accordance with Executive Order
13132.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Parts 1103,
1104, and 1125
1. Part 1103 is removed.
2. Subchapter A to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1100 through 1109, is
added to read as follows:
■
■
Subchapter A —General Matters and
Definitions
PARTS 1100–1103—[RESERVED]
PART 1104—IMPLEMENTATION OF
GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR
GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENTS
Sec.
1104.1 Purpose of this part.
1104.100 Award format for DoD
Components’ grants and cooperative
agreements.
1104.105 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ general terms and
conditions.
1104.110 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ award-specific terms and
conditions.
1104.115 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ internal procedures.
1104.120 Definitions.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 10 U.S.C. 113.
Jkt 250001
Purpose of this part.
This part provides an update to the
DoD interim implementation of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
guidance in 2 CFR part 200. It
supersedes the initial interim
implementation of that guidance that
DoD adopted in 2 CFR part 1103 on
December 19, 2014.
§ 1104.100 Award format for DoD
Components’ grants and cooperative
agreements.
DoD Components must conform the
format of new grants and cooperative
agreements to the standard award
format specified in part 1120 of the DoD
Grant and Agreement Regulations
(DoDGARS) (2 CFR part 1120). The
standard format provides locations
within the award for:
(a) General terms and conditions,
including the administrative and
national policy requirements discussed
in § 1104.105(a) and (b), respectively.
(b) Any award-specific terms and
conditions discussed in § 1104.110.
§ 1104.105 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ general terms and conditions.
Business and Industry, Colleges and
universities, Cooperative agreements,
Grants administration, Hospitals,
Indians, Nonprofit organizations, Small
business, State and local governments.
17:19 Aug 18, 2020
PART 1103—[REMOVED]
§ 1104.1
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) applies to
collections of information using
identical questions posed to, or
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
imposed on, ten or more members of the
public. This rule does not call for a new
collection of information under the
PRA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Accordingly, under the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301 and 10 U.S.C. 113, 2 CFR
chapter XI is amended as follows:
(a) Administrative requirements. On
an interim basis pending completion of
the update of the DoDGARs to
implement OMB guidance published in
2 CFR part 200, the following regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
provisions govern the administrative
requirements to be included in general
terms and conditions of DoD
Components’ new grants and
cooperative agreements:
(1) The provisions of parts 1126
through 1138 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR
parts 1126 through 1138, which
comprise subchapter D of this chapter)
govern the administrative requirements
to be included in the general terms and
conditions of DoD Components’ new
grants and cooperative agreements
awarded to institutions of higher
education, nonprofit organizations,
States, local governments, and Indian
tribes.
(2) Part 34 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR
part 34) governs the administrative
requirements to be included in general
terms and conditions of DoD
Components’ grants and cooperative
agreements awarded to for-profit
entities.
(b) National policy requirements. Part
1122 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR part 1122)
governs the national policy
requirements to be included in DoD
Components’ new grants and
cooperative agreements awarded to all
types of entities.
§ 1104.110 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ award-specific terms and
conditions.
On an interim basis pending
completion of the update of the
DoDGARs to implement OMB guidance
published in 2 CFR part 200:
(a) The guidance in 2 CFR part 200
governs administrative requirements to
be included in any award-specific terms
and conditions used to supplement the
general terms and conditions of a new
grant or cooperative agreement awarded
to an institution of higher education,
nonprofit organization, State, local
government, or Indian tribe.
(b) Part 34 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR
part 34) governs the administrative
requirements to be included in any
award-specific terms and conditions of
DoD Components’ grants and
cooperative agreements awarded to forprofit entities.
§ 1104.115 Regulations governing DoD
Components’ internal procedures.
On an interim basis pending
completion of the update of the
DoDGARs to implement OMB guidance
published in 2 CFR part 200, DoD
Components’ internal pre-award, timeof-award, and post-award procedures
will continue to comply with
requirements in parts 21 and 22 of the
DoDGARs (32 CFR parts 21 and 22) and
other applicable Defense Grant and
Agreement Regulatory System (DGARS)
policies.
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Final Rule
§ 1104.120
Definitions.
Subchapter G—[RESERVED]
(a) DoD Grant and Agreement
Regulations or DoDGARs means the
regulations in chapter I, subchapter C of
title 32, Code of Federal Regulations,
and chapter XI of title 2, Code of Federal
Regulations.
(b) Other terms. See part 1108 of the
DoDGARs for definitions of other terms
used in this part.
PART 1171–1199—[RESERVED]
PARTS 1105–1109—[RESERVED]
DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE
3. Subchapter B to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1110 through 1119, is
added and reserved to read as follows:
Office of the Secretary
■
Dated: July 24, 2020.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2020–16416 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
2 CFR Part 1120
[DOD–2016–OS–0052]
Subchapter B—[RESERVED]
RIN 0790–AJ47
PARTS 1110–1119—[RESERVED]
4. Subchapter C to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1120 through 1125, is
added to read as follows:
■
Subchapter C—Award Format and National
Policy Terms and Conditions for All Grants
and Cooperative Agreements
PARTS 1120—1124—[RESERVED]
PART 1125—[TRANSFERRED TO
SUBCHAPTER C]
5. Part 1125 is transferred to
subchapter C.
■
6. Subchapter D to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1126 through 1140, is
added to read as follows:
■
Subchapter D—Administrative
Requirements Terms and Conditions for
Cost-Type Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to Nonprofit and Governmental
Entities
PART 1126–1140—[RESERVED]
7. Subchapter E to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1141 through 1155, is
added and reserved to read as follows:
■
Subchapter E—[Reserved]
PARTS 1141–1155—[RESERVED]
8. Subchapter F to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1156 through 1170, is
added and reserved to read as follows:
■
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Subchapter F—[RESERVED]
PART 1156–1170—[RESERVED]
9. Subchapter G to chapter XI,
consisting of parts 1171 through 1199, is
added and reserved to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
Award Format for DoD Grants and
Cooperative Agreements
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule is the second
of a sequence of six final rules in this
issue of the Federal Register that
collectively establish for DoD grants and
cooperative agreements an updated
interim implementation of Government
wide guidance on administrative
requirements, cost principles, and audit
requirements for Federal awards and
make other needed updates to the DoD
Grant and Agreement Regulations
(DoDGARs). This rule adds a new
DoDGARs part to establish a standard
format for organizing the content of DoD
Components’ awards of grants and
cooperative agreements and
modifications to them.
DATES: This rule is effective October 19,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Orlando, Basic Research Office,
telephone 571–372–6413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
51161
requirements, cost principles, and audit
requirements applicable to Federal
grants, cooperative agreements, and
other assistance instruments (2 CFR part
200).
This final rule does that by
implementing provisions of the OMB
guidance on the minimum content that
Federal agencies’ awards must include.
Another purpose of this rule is to
provide greater uniformity in the
content and organization of DoD grants
and cooperative agreements. It does so
by:
• Establishing requirements for
uniform content, beyond the minimum
identified in the OMB guidance; and
• Specifying a standard format for
organizing the content of DoD
Component grants and cooperative
agreements to all types of entities,
including entities other than those
addressed in the OMB guidance.
B. Revisions Implemented by This Rule
This final rule implements provisions
of the OMB guidance on the minimum
content that Federal agencies’ awards
must include on the notice of award.
This rule revises current practices by:
• Establishing requirements for
uniform content, beyond the minimum
identified in the OMB guidance; and
• Specifying a standard format for
organizing the content of DoD
Component grants and cooperative
agreements to all types of entities,
including entities other than those
addressed in the OMB guidance.
I. Executive Summary
C. Legal Authorities for the Regulatory
Action
There are two statutory authorities for
this final rulemaking:
• 10 U.S.C. 113, which establishes the
Secretary of Defense as the head of the
Department of Defense; and
• 5 U.S.C. 301, which authorizes the
head of an Executive department to
prescribe regulations for the governance
of that department and the performance
of its business.
A. Purpose of the Final Rule
As explained in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of the final
rulemaking immediately preceding this
one in this issue of the Federal Register,
this is one of six rules that collectively
make needed updates to the Department
of Defense Grant and Agreement
Regulations (DoDGARs). These rules
were published as Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) on November 7,
2016 (81 FR 78356).
One purpose of the overall updating
is to implement Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) guidance to Federal
agencies on administrative
II. Regulatory History
In December 2014 (79 FR 76047), DoD
established an interim implementation
of the final guidance, ‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards,’’ published by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) on December 26, 2013, in 2 CFR
part 200 (Uniform Guidance—available
at 78 FR 78589). DoD then published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(November 7, 2016 (81 FR 78369)) that
proposed to add 2 CFR part 1120 to
establish a standard format for
organizing the content of DoD
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19AUR2.SGM
19AUR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 19, 2020)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 51158-51161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16416]
[[Page 51157]]
Vol. 85
Wednesday,
No. 161
August 19, 2020
Part II
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of the Secretary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 CFR Parts 1103, 1104, et al.
32 CFR Parts 21, 22, et al.
Implementation of Governmentwide Guidance for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements, Award Format for DoD Grants and Cooperative Agreements,
Administrative Requirements Terms and Conditions for Cost-Type Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to Nonprofit and Governmental Entities,
National Policy Requirements: General Award Terms and Conditions,
Definitions for DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations, and DoD Grant and
Agreement Regulations; Final Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 /
Final Rule
[[Page 51158]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
2 CFR Parts 1103, 1104, and 1125
[DOD-2016-OS-0048]
RIN 0790-AJ45
Implementation of Governmentwide Guidance for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule is the first of a sequence of six rules in
this issue of the Federal Register, which were published as Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRMs) on November 7, 2016. The six rules
collectively establish for DoD grants and cooperative agreements an
updated interim implementation of Governmentwide guidance on
administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements
for Federal awards. This final rule removes outdated portions of the
DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGARs) and replaces it with a
new DoDGARs part containing revised implementation of the guidance, and
establishes seven subchapters within DoD's chapter of the Grants and
Agreements title of the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective October 19, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Orlando, Basic Research
Office, telephone 571-372-6413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Final Rule
The Department of Defense Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGARs)
are being updated to, among other things, implement Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) guidance to Federal agencies on
administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements
applicable to Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and other
assistance instruments (2 CFR part 200). DoD established an interim
implementation of that guidance at 2 CFR part 1103 in December 2014 (79
FR 76047), pending comprehensive updates to the DoDGARs.
This final rule and the five additional rules immediately following
it in this issue of the Federal Register implement the OMB guidance as
it applies to general terms and conditions of DoD grants and
cooperative agreements. The six final rules establish eleven new
DoDGARs parts and make conforming changes to existing DoDGARs parts.
They represent a major step toward completion of the needed updating of
the DoDGARs. Additional updates to complete the overall revision of the
DoDGARs will be published for public comment in subsequent notices of
proposed rulemaking. Those proposals will focus on portions of the
DoDGARs that specify pre-award, time-of-award requirements, and post-
award requirements. All portions of the DoDGARs remaining in chapter I,
subchapter C of title 32 of the CFR ultimately will be relocated to
chapter XI of title 2 of the CFR, with any updating that may be needed.
B. Revisions Implemented by This Rule
This final rule establishes 2 CFR part 1104 to serve as the central
part of the DoDGARs that specifies for DoD Components which portions of
the DoDGARs apply to DoD grants and cooperative agreements for various
pre-award, time-of-award, and post-award purposes, pending completion
of the remaining updates to the DoDGARs that are needed to fully
implement the OMB guidance. It also removes the interim implementation
of the guidance published in December 2014 at 2 CFR part 1103, as that
implementation is superseded by this 2 CFR part 1104.
2 CFR part 1104 serves as the central hub to direct DoD Components'
use of the other ten new parts issued as final rules in the Federal
Register in chapter XI of 2 CFR, as well as parts of the DoDGARs that
will remain for the time being in subchapter C, chapter I of title 32
of the CFR.
C. Legal Authorities for the Regulatory Action
There are two statutory authorities for this final rule:
10 U.S.C. 113, which establishes the Secretary of Defense
as the head of the Department of Defense; and
5 U.S.C. 301, which authorizes the head of an Executive
department to prescribe regulations for the governance of that
department and the performance of its business.
II. Regulatory History
In December 2014 (79 FR 76047), DoD established an interim
implementation of the final guidance, ``Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards,'' published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on
December 26, 2013, in 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Guidance--available at 78
FR 78589). DoD then published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (November
7, 2016 (81 FR 78356)) that proposed changes to 2 CFR parts 1103, 1104,
and 1125 in order to provide an organizing framework for the DoDGARs to
make it easier for users of the regulations to locate the content that
they need. This action responds to comments received on the proposed
rule and finalizes the proposed changes.
III. Comments and Responses
DoD received one public comment on the November 7, 2016 NPRM that
proposed to (1) remove 2 CFR part 1103, the part of the DoDGARs that
DoD adopted on December 19, 2014, as its interim implementation of the
OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 200; and (2) replace that part with a new
DoDGARs part-2 CFR part 1104--containing a revised implementation of
the guidance. That comment from an anonymous individual pertains to
this rulemaking and the other five related rulemakings in today's
Federal Register, thus it is addressed here.
Comment: The commenter indicated that consistent public concerns
arise with the bureaucracy or even government at-large centered on
perceived accountability and efficiency and this proposed rule provides
an opportunity for accessibility and increases overall agency
efficiency. The commenter noted that (1) the changes impact a wide
range of institutions and will allow for improvements in communication
between government and the institutions it interacts with at each
level, and (2) this regulatory action has the potential to provide much
needed uniformity to the grant process. The commenter further indicated
that this regulatory action will increase the efficiency for
individuals attempting to access grant and agreement information by
allocating a central hub of information. It will allow affected parties
to identify and utilize information at a faster rate and will eliminate
the complications of sorting through multiple sources. The commenter
also recognized that, while some may argue that the time required to
centralize this process and communicate changes could increase problems
in the short-term, it is his or her belief that standardizing the
overall process will result in positive long-term benefits.
The commenter also specified that the additional NPRMs regarding
the DoDGARs create an increase in the ability of the process to be
understandable by all agencies and institutions that interact with the
DoD. Differences in definitions or how guidelines are worded would be
[[Page 51159]]
reduced through these regulatory actions, and it would promote
necessary standardization for the awards process. The commenter's
belief is that adoption of the proposed rules will assist the intended
groups listed such as hospitals, higher education institutions, and
alternate levels of government by increasing accessibility across the
board. The intention to create a central hub, providing standard
definitions and wording and utilizing plain language, will allow for an
increase in governmental accountability and efficiency that can heavily
influence overall public trust.
Response: We appreciate the commenter's insights concerning the
intent and expected outcomes of this rulemaking.
Title 2 CFR part 1104 incorporates, with limited changes as
indicated below, ten other new DoDGARs parts, which are in four of the
five final rules following this one, by referencing their
applicability. Those final rules (1) provide standard wording of
general terms and conditions governing administrative requirements for
DoD grants and cooperative agreements awarded to institutions of higher
education, nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and
Indian tribes; (2) provide standard wording for general terms and
conditions addressing national policy requirements for DoD grants and
cooperative agreements awarded to all types of entities; (3) establish
a standard award format for DoD grants and cooperative agreements, and
(4) establish a central DoDGARs part with definitions of terms used in
those regulations. The fifth final rule provides conforming changes in
existing parts of the DoDGARs.
The changes in 2 CFR part 1104 are as follows:
In 2 CFR 1104.105(a)(2) and 1104.110(b), we removed the
word ``new'' as a modifier since 32 CFR part 34 has been continuously
in effect and the administrative requirements contained therein (except
as modified by the technical amendments to that part being made today)
are to be used in all applicable awards until superseded.
In 2 CFR 1104.115, we added at the end of the paragraph
the words ``. . .and other applicable Defense Grant and Agreement
Regulatory System (DGARS) policies'' to recognize that pending overall
completion of the DoDGARs some policies that apply to DoD Components
reside in the DGARS.
Throughout, changed usage from ``grant and cooperative
agreements awards'' to ``grants and cooperative agreements'' or
``grants and cooperative agreements awarded to . . . '' depending on
the context to eliminate the redundancy of using the defined term
``award(s)'' to modify ``grants and cooperative agreements.''
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or E.O.s.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated as a ``not significant''
regulatory action, and not economically significant, under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the requirements of
these Executive Orders.
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs) directs agencies to reduce regulation and control
regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination,
and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and
controlled through a budgeting process.'' This rule is not subject to
the requirements of this Executive Order because it is not significant
under Executive Order 12866.
Cost
DOD has found that this rule will not impose costs to the public
because this consolidation standardizes multiple approaches to the
award and administration of DoD grants and cooperative agreements.
Benefits
DoD determined that issuing a revision of the implementation of OMB
guidance in 2 CFR part 200 and creating a central hub in the DoD Grant
and Agreement Regulations will help maximize long-term benefits to the
public by standardizing multiple approaches to the award and
administration of DoD grants and cooperative agreements previously used
by DoD Components.
Alternatives
1. No Action--If no action was taken, DoD would not be in
compliance with OMB requirements to move all financial assistance
regulations to 2 CFR.
2. Next Best alternative--The next best alternative is to subject
all awards, regardless of where they are in their current life cycle,
to the requirements of this final rule. Since awards are performed over
a 1-5-year life cycle, it would not be beneficial to the public to
impose the requirements of this final rule on an award that is near the
end of its life cycle. Therefore, this is not an acceptable
alternative, as it would impose additional requirements on award
recipients without offering an added benefit.
B. Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.)
Under the Congressional Review Act, a major rule may not take
effect until at least 60 days after submission to Congress of a report
regarding the rule. A major rule is one that would have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or have certain other
impacts. This rule is not a major rule under the Congressional Review
Act.
C. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. This rule will not impose any impacts on any entities. This
means that there will be no economic impacts on any entities.
Therefore, the Department of Defense under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act \1\ certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq (1980).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
[[Page 51160]]
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this rule.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any 1 year. Although this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Collection of Information
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) applies to
collections of information using identical questions posed to, or
reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more members
of the public. This rule does not call for a new collection of
information under the PRA.
G. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This proposed rule does not have federalism implications
that warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment in accordance
with Executive Order 13132.
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Parts 1103, 1104, and 1125
Business and Industry, Colleges and universities, Cooperative
agreements, Grants administration, Hospitals, Indians, Nonprofit
organizations, Small business, State and local governments.
Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and 10 U.S.C. 113,
2 CFR chapter XI is amended as follows:
PART 1103--[REMOVED]
0
1. Part 1103 is removed.
0
2. Subchapter A to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1100 through 1109,
is added to read as follows:
Subchapter A --General Matters and Definitions
PARTS 1100-1103--[RESERVED]
PART 1104--IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
Sec.
1104.1 Purpose of this part.
1104.100 Award format for DoD Components' grants and cooperative
agreements.
1104.105 Regulations governing DoD Components' general terms and
conditions.
1104.110 Regulations governing DoD Components' award-specific terms
and conditions.
1104.115 Regulations governing DoD Components' internal procedures.
1104.120 Definitions.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 10 U.S.C. 113.
Sec. 1104.1 Purpose of this part.
This part provides an update to the DoD interim implementation of
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in 2 CFR part 200. It
supersedes the initial interim implementation of that guidance that DoD
adopted in 2 CFR part 1103 on December 19, 2014.
Sec. 1104.100 Award format for DoD Components' grants and cooperative
agreements.
DoD Components must conform the format of new grants and
cooperative agreements to the standard award format specified in part
1120 of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGARS) (2 CFR part
1120). The standard format provides locations within the award for:
(a) General terms and conditions, including the administrative and
national policy requirements discussed in Sec. 1104.105(a) and (b),
respectively.
(b) Any award-specific terms and conditions discussed in Sec.
1104.110.
Sec. 1104.105 Regulations governing DoD Components' general terms and
conditions.
(a) Administrative requirements. On an interim basis pending
completion of the update of the DoDGARs to implement OMB guidance
published in 2 CFR part 200, the following regulatory provisions govern
the administrative requirements to be included in general terms and
conditions of DoD Components' new grants and cooperative agreements:
(1) The provisions of parts 1126 through 1138 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR
parts 1126 through 1138, which comprise subchapter D of this chapter)
govern the administrative requirements to be included in the general
terms and conditions of DoD Components' new grants and cooperative
agreements awarded to institutions of higher education, nonprofit
organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes.
(2) Part 34 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR part 34) governs the
administrative requirements to be included in general terms and
conditions of DoD Components' grants and cooperative agreements awarded
to for-profit entities.
(b) National policy requirements. Part 1122 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR
part 1122) governs the national policy requirements to be included in
DoD Components' new grants and cooperative agreements awarded to all
types of entities.
Sec. 1104.110 Regulations governing DoD Components' award-specific
terms and conditions.
On an interim basis pending completion of the update of the DoDGARs
to implement OMB guidance published in 2 CFR part 200:
(a) The guidance in 2 CFR part 200 governs administrative
requirements to be included in any award-specific terms and conditions
used to supplement the general terms and conditions of a new grant or
cooperative agreement awarded to an institution of higher education,
nonprofit organization, State, local government, or Indian tribe.
(b) Part 34 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR part 34) governs the
administrative requirements to be included in any award-specific terms
and conditions of DoD Components' grants and cooperative agreements
awarded to for-profit entities.
Sec. 1104.115 Regulations governing DoD Components' internal
procedures.
On an interim basis pending completion of the update of the DoDGARs
to implement OMB guidance published in 2 CFR part 200, DoD Components'
internal pre-award, time-of-award, and post-award procedures will
continue to comply with requirements in parts 21 and 22 of the DoDGARs
(32 CFR parts 21 and 22) and other applicable Defense Grant and
Agreement Regulatory System (DGARS) policies.
[[Page 51161]]
Sec. 1104.120 Definitions.
(a) DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations or DoDGARs means the
regulations in chapter I, subchapter C of title 32, Code of Federal
Regulations, and chapter XI of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations.
(b) Other terms. See part 1108 of the DoDGARs for definitions of
other terms used in this part.
PARTS 1105-1109--[RESERVED]
0
3. Subchapter B to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1110 through 1119,
is added and reserved to read as follows:
Subchapter B--[RESERVED]
PARTS 1110-1119--[RESERVED]
0
4. Subchapter C to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1120 through 1125,
is added to read as follows:
Subchapter C--Award Format and National Policy Terms and Conditions for
All Grants and Cooperative Agreements
PARTS 1120--1124--[RESERVED]
PART 1125--[TRANSFERRED TO SUBCHAPTER C]
0
5. Part 1125 is transferred to subchapter C.
0
6. Subchapter D to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1126 through 1140,
is added to read as follows:
Subchapter D--Administrative Requirements Terms and Conditions for
Cost-Type Grants and Cooperative Agreements to Nonprofit and
Governmental Entities
PART 1126-1140--[RESERVED]
0
7. Subchapter E to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1141 through 1155,
is added and reserved to read as follows:
Subchapter E--[Reserved]
PARTS 1141-1155--[RESERVED]
0
8. Subchapter F to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1156 through 1170,
is added and reserved to read as follows:
Subchapter F--[RESERVED]
PART 1156-1170--[RESERVED]
0
9. Subchapter G to chapter XI, consisting of parts 1171 through 1199,
is added and reserved to read as follows:
Subchapter G--[RESERVED]
PART 1171-1199--[RESERVED]
Dated: July 24, 2020.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2020-16416 Filed 8-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P