Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters, 47925-47928 [2020-17271]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 153 / Friday, August 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller,
Safety Management Program Manager,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, General Aviation and
Rotorcraft Unit, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817–222–
5110; email 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@
faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
Federal Aviation Administration
(i) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 05.01.06, and
EASB No. 05A047, both Revision 0, and both
dated December 18, 2015, which are not
incorporated by reference, contain additional
information about the subject of this AD. For
service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
972–641–0000 or 800–232–0323; fax 972–
641–3775; or at https://
www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You
may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth,
TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD No. 2018–0090, dated April 20,
2018. You may view the EASA AD on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the
AD Docket.
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: Code: 3212, Emergency Flotation
Section.
Issued on August 3, 2020.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–17300 Filed 8–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1036; Product
Identifier 2018–SW–015–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Model AS–365N2,
AS 365 N3, SA–365N, SA–365N1
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require replacing the main gearbox
(MGB), or as an alternative, replacing
the epicyclic reduction gear module for
certain serial numbered planet gear
assemblies installed on the MGB. This
proposed AD would also require
inspecting the MGB magnetic plugs and
oil filter for particles. Depending on the
outcome of the inspections, this
proposed AD would require further
inspections, and replacing certain parts.
This proposed AD is prompted by the
failure of an MGB second stage planet
gear. The actions of this proposed AD
are intended to correct an unsafe
condition on these helicopters.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by September 21,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1036; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47925
AD, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation
Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
972–641–0000 or 800–232–0323; fax
972–641–3775; or at https://
www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/
technical-support.html. You may view
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
Rao
Edupuganti, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone 817–222–5110; email
rao.edupuganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. To ensure
the docket does not contain duplicate
comments, commenters should send
only one copy of written comments, or
if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit only one
time.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all
comments received, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this proposed rulemaking. Before acting
on this proposal, the FAA will consider
all comments received on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change
this proposal in light of the comments
received.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
47926
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 153 / Friday, August 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Rao Edupuganti,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft
Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone 817–222–5110; email
rao.edupuganti@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017–
0116, Revision 2, dated March 2, 2018,
(EASA AD 2017–01162R2) to correct an
unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters
Model AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 365
N, and SA 365 N1 helicopters. EASA
advises that after an accident on a
Model EC225 helicopter, an
investigation revealed the failure of a
second stage planet gear of the MGB.
EASA states that one of the two types
of planet gear assemblies used in the
MGB epicyclic module is subject to
higher outer race contact pressures and
therefore is more susceptible to spalling
and cracking. Airbus Helicopters
reviewed its range of helicopters with
regard to this issue and provided
instructions to improve the reliability of
the installed MGB. Therefore, EASA AD
2017–01162R2 requires repetitive
inspections of the MGB magnetic plugs
and corrective action if any particles are
detected. EASA AD 2017–01162R2 also
requires, if certain MGB planet gear
assemblies are installed, replacing the
planet gear assemblies. Finally, the
EASA AD prohibits installing an MGB
with a Type X or Type Y planet gear
assembly on any helicopter.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the
European Union, EASA has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
after evaluating all known relevant
information and determining that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type designs.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
AS365–05.00.78, Revision 3, dated
March 2, 2018, for Model SA–365N,
SA–365N1, AS–365N2, and AS 365 N3
helicopters. This service information
specifies performing periodic
inspections of the MGB magnetic plugs
for particles. This service information
also specifies identifying the type of
gear assembly installed in the MGB and
replacing any Type X assembly within
50 hours time-in-service (TIS). For Type
Y gear assemblies, the service
information requires replacing the
assembly within 50 hours TIS or within
300 hours TIS, depending on the time
since new. The service information
specifies Type Z gear assemblies should
be left as is.
The FAA also reviewed Airbus
Helicopters Service Bulletin No.
AS365–63.00.21, Revision 3, dated July
26, 2018 for Model AS365 helicopters.
This service information contains
procedures for replacing the MGB
epicyclic reduction gear as an option to
replacing the MGB.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
before further flight, for helicopters with
a Type X planet gear assembly with a
certain S/N installed, replacing the
MGB. This proposed AD would require,
for helicopters with no Type X planet
gear assembly installed but at least one
Type Y planet gear assembly with a
certain S/N installed, replacing the MGB
within 300 hours TIS or before any
planet gear assembly accumulates 1,300
hours TIS since new, whichever occurs
first. As an alternative to replacing the
MGB, this proposed AD would allow
replacing the epicyclic reduction gear
module in the affected MGB.
This proposed AD would prohibit
installing a MGB with Type Y or Type
X planet gear assembly installed on any
helicopter.
This proposed AD also would require
within 10 hours TIS and thereafter
before the first flight of the day or at
intervals not to exceed 10 hours TIS,
whichever occurs first, inspecting the
lower MGB magnetic plugs for particles.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If there are particles, the proposed AD
would require replacing the MGB,
depending on the type and the size of
particles.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires a 50-hour or
300-hour TIS compliance time or by
June 30, 2019, whichever occurs first, to
determine the type of planet gear
installed in the MGB, and depending on
the outcome, to replace the MGB. This
proposed AD would set compliance
deadlines based only on hours TIS or
before further flight. The EASA AD
allows a pilot to inspect the MGB
magnetic plugs for particles, while this
proposed AD would not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 34 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. The FAA estimates that
operators may incur the following costs
in order to comply with this proposed
AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per
work-hour.
Inspecting the magnetic plugs and oil
filter for particle deposits would take
about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost
of $85 per inspection cycle.
Replacing an MGB would take about
42 work-hours for cost of $3,570 and
parts would cost about $295,000
(overhauled) for a total cost of $298,570
per helicopter.
Replacing the epicyclic reduction gear
would take about 56 work-hours for an
estimated cost of $4,760 and parts
would cost about $11,404 for a total cost
of $16,164 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 153 / Friday, August 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska, and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2017–
1036; Product Identifier 2018–SW–015–
AD.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Model AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, SA–365N, and
SA–365N1 helicopters, certified in any
category, with at least one Type X or Y planet
gear assembly with a serial number (S/N)
listed in Appendices 4.A. through 4.B of
Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin
(ASB) No. AS365–05.00.78, Revision 3, dated
March 2, 2018 (ASB AS–365–05.00.78)
installed on the main gearbox (MGB).
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
failure of an MGB planet gear assembly. This
condition could result in failure of the MGB
and subsequent loss of helicopter control.
(c) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
September 21, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Aug 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) For helicopters with at least one Type
X planet gear assembly with an S/N listed in
Appendix 4.A. of ASB AS–365–05.00.78
installed, before further flight, replace the
MGB or as an alternative to replacing an
affected MGB, replace the epicyclic reduction
gear module Post Modification (MOD)
0763C52 in the affected MGB in accordance
with paragraph 3.B.2 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Helicopters Service
Bulletin SB No. AS365–63.00.21, Revision 3,
dated July 26, 2018 (SB AS365–63.00.21),
except you are not required to contact Airbus
Helicopters.
(2) For helicopters without any Type X
planet gear assembly installed but with at
least one Type Y planet gear assembly with
an S/N listed in Appendix 4.B. of ASB AS–
365–05.0078 installed, within 300 hours
time-in-service (TIS), or before any gear
accumulates 1,300 hours TIS since new,
whichever occurs first, replace the MGB or as
an alternative to replacing the MGB, replace
the epicyclic reduction gear module MOD
0763C52 in the affected MGB in accordance
with paragraphs 3.B.2. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of SB AS365–
63.00.21, except you are not required to
contact Airbus Helicopters.
(3) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install an MGB with a Type X or Type
Y gear assembly with an S/N listed in
Appendix 4.A. or 4.B. of ASB AS–365–
05.0078 installed, on any helicopter.
(4) For all helicopters, within 10 hours TIS
and thereafter before the first flight of the day
or at intervals not to exceed 10 hours TIS,
whichever occurs first, inspect the lower
MGB magnetic plugs for particles.
(i) If there are particles that consist of any
scale, flake, or splinter, or particles other
than cotter pin fragments, pieces of lock wire,
swarf, abrasion, or miscellaneous nonmetallic waste and the planet gear assembly
has logged less than 50 hours TIS since new,
inspect the MGB plugs for particles before
further flight and inspect the oil filter for
particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for
25 hours TIS, continue to inspect the MGB
plugs for particles before each flight, inspect
the oil filter for particles at intervals not to
exceed 5 hours TIS, and perform the actions
required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through
(B) of this AD.
(ii) If there are particles that consist of any
scale, flake, or splinter, or particles other
than cotter pin fragments, pieces of lock wire,
swarf, abrasion, or miscellaneous nonmetallic waste and the planet gear assembly
has logged more than 50 hours TIS since
new, inspect the cumulative surface area of
the particles collected from both the
magnetic plug and the oil filter, since last
MGB overhaul or since new if no overhaul
has been performed.
(A) If the total surface area of the particles
is less than 3 mm2, examine the particles
with largest surface area (S), longest particle
length (L) and thickest particles (e).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47927
(1) If largest surface area (S) of a particle
is less than 1 mm2, the L is less than 1.5 mm,
and the e is less than 0.2 mm, inspect the
MGB plugs for particles before further flight
and inspect the oil filter for particles within
5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for 25 hours TIS,
continue to inspect the MGB plugs for
particles before each flight, inspect the oil
filter for particles at intervals not to exceed
5 hours TIS, and perform the actions required
by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through (B) of this
AD.
(2) If largest particle size (S) is greater than
1 mm2, the L is greater than 1.5 mm, or the
e is greater than 0.2 mm, perform a
metallurgical analysis for any 16NCD13
particles using a method in accordance with
FAA-approved procedures.
(3) If there are any 16NCD13 particles,
replace the MGB with an airworthy MGB.
(4) If there are no 16NCD13 particles,
inspect the MGB plugs for particles before
further flight and inspect the oil filter for
particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for
25 hours TIS, continue to inspect the MGB
plugs for particles before each flight, inspect
the oil filter for particles at intervals not to
exceed 5 hours TIS, and perform the actions
required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through
(B) of this AD.
(B) If the total surface area of collected
particles is greater than or equal to 3 mm2,
before further flight, perform a metallurgical
analysis for any 6NCD13 particles using a
method in accordance with FAA-approved
procedures.
(1) If there are any 16NCD13 particles,
before further flight, replace the MGB with an
airworthy MGB.
(2) If there are no 16NCD13 particles,
inspect the MGB plugs for particles before
further flight and inspect the oil filter for
particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for
25 hours TIS, continue to inspect the MGB
plugs for particles before each flight, inspect
the oil filter for particles at intervals not to
exceed 5 hours TIS, and perform the actions
required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through
(B) of this AD.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and
Policy Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone 817–222–5110; email 9ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD 2017–0116R2, dated March 2,
2018. You may view the EASA AD on the
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
47928
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 153 / Friday, August 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the
AD Docket.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6300, Main Rotor Drive System.
Issued on August 3, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–17271 Filed 8–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0642; Airspace
Docket No. 19–AWP–98]
Authority for This Rulemaking
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Amendment of V–25, V–27,
V–494, V–108, V–301, and T–257 in the
Vicinity of Santa Rosa, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend VHF Omnidirectional Range
(VOR) Federal airways V–25, V–27, V–
494, V–108, V–301, and United States
Area Navigation route T–257 in the
vicinity of Santa Rosa, CA. The
amendments are due to the planned
decommissioning of the Santa Rosa, CA
VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment
(DME) navigation aid (NAVAID) which
provides navigation guidance for
portions of the affected airways. The
Santa Rosa VOR/DME is being
decommissioned as part of the FAA’s
VOR Minimum Operational Network
(MON) program.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 21, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1(800) 647–5527, or (202) 366–9826.
You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA–2020–0642; Airspace Docket No.
19–AWP–98 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit
comments through the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/. For further
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Aug 06, 2020
information, you can contact the Rules
and Regulations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
The Order is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11D at NARA, email:
fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher McMullin, Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 250001
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
modify the National Airspace System as
necessary to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2020–0642; Airspace Docket No. 19–
AWP–98) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA–2020–0642; Airspace
Docket No. 19–AWP–98.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received on or
before the specified comment closing
date will be considered before taking
action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
comment closing date. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of
the Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document proposes to amend
FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019. FAA Order
7400.11D is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
Background
The FAA is planning to
decommission the Santa Rosa, CA VOR/
DME in December 2020. The Santa
Rosa, CA VOR/DME was one of the
candidate VORs identified for
discontinuance by the FAA’s VOR MON
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 153 (Friday, August 7, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47925-47928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17271]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-1036; Product Identifier 2018-SW-015-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Airbus Helicopters Model AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, SA-365N, SA-365N1
helicopters. This proposed AD would require replacing the main gearbox
(MGB), or as an alternative, replacing the epicyclic reduction gear
module for certain serial numbered planet gear assemblies installed on
the MGB. This proposed AD would also require inspecting the MGB
magnetic plugs and oil filter for particles. Depending on the outcome
of the inspections, this proposed AD would require further inspections,
and replacing certain parts. This proposed AD is prompted by the
failure of an MGB second stage planet gear. The actions of this
proposed AD are intended to correct an unsafe condition on these
helicopters.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September
21, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1036; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (now European
Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone 972-641-0000 or 800-232-0323; fax 972-641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may
view the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao Edupuganti, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one
copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit only one time.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all comments received, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments received on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light
of the comments received.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act
[[Page 47926]]
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually
treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it
is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.''
The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the
FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM.
Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Rao Edupuganti, Aviation
Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017-0116, Revision 2, dated
March 2, 2018, (EASA AD 2017-01162R2) to correct an unsafe condition
for Airbus Helicopters Model AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 365 N, and SA 365
N1 helicopters. EASA advises that after an accident on a Model EC225
helicopter, an investigation revealed the failure of a second stage
planet gear of the MGB. EASA states that one of the two types of planet
gear assemblies used in the MGB epicyclic module is subject to higher
outer race contact pressures and therefore is more susceptible to
spalling and cracking. Airbus Helicopters reviewed its range of
helicopters with regard to this issue and provided instructions to
improve the reliability of the installed MGB. Therefore, EASA AD 2017-
01162R2 requires repetitive inspections of the MGB magnetic plugs and
corrective action if any particles are detected. EASA AD 2017-01162R2
also requires, if certain MGB planet gear assemblies are installed,
replacing the planet gear assemblies. Finally, the EASA AD prohibits
installing an MGB with a Type X or Type Y planet gear assembly on any
helicopter.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA of the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all known relevant information and determining that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other products of the
same type designs.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. AS365-05.00.78, Revision 3, dated March 2, 2018, for Model SA-365N,
SA-365N1, AS-365N2, and AS 365 N3 helicopters. This service information
specifies performing periodic inspections of the MGB magnetic plugs for
particles. This service information also specifies identifying the type
of gear assembly installed in the MGB and replacing any Type X assembly
within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS). For Type Y gear assemblies, the
service information requires replacing the assembly within 50 hours TIS
or within 300 hours TIS, depending on the time since new. The service
information specifies Type Z gear assemblies should be left as is.
The FAA also reviewed Airbus Helicopters Service Bulletin No.
AS365-63.00.21, Revision 3, dated July 26, 2018 for Model AS365
helicopters. This service information contains procedures for replacing
the MGB epicyclic reduction gear as an option to replacing the MGB.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require before further flight, for
helicopters with a Type X planet gear assembly with a certain S/N
installed, replacing the MGB. This proposed AD would require, for
helicopters with no Type X planet gear assembly installed but at least
one Type Y planet gear assembly with a certain S/N installed, replacing
the MGB within 300 hours TIS or before any planet gear assembly
accumulates 1,300 hours TIS since new, whichever occurs first. As an
alternative to replacing the MGB, this proposed AD would allow
replacing the epicyclic reduction gear module in the affected MGB.
This proposed AD would prohibit installing a MGB with Type Y or
Type X planet gear assembly installed on any helicopter.
This proposed AD also would require within 10 hours TIS and
thereafter before the first flight of the day or at intervals not to
exceed 10 hours TIS, whichever occurs first, inspecting the lower MGB
magnetic plugs for particles. If there are particles, the proposed AD
would require replacing the MGB, depending on the type and the size of
particles.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires a 50-hour or 300-hour TIS compliance time or
by June 30, 2019, whichever occurs first, to determine the type of
planet gear installed in the MGB, and depending on the outcome, to
replace the MGB. This proposed AD would set compliance deadlines based
only on hours TIS or before further flight. The EASA AD allows a pilot
to inspect the MGB magnetic plugs for particles, while this proposed AD
would not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 34 helicopters of
U.S. Registry. The FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this proposed AD. Labor costs are
estimated at $85 per work-hour.
Inspecting the magnetic plugs and oil filter for particle deposits
would take about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost of $85 per
inspection cycle.
Replacing an MGB would take about 42 work-hours for cost of $3,570
and parts would cost about $295,000 (overhauled) for a total cost of
$298,570 per helicopter.
Replacing the epicyclic reduction gear would take about 56 work-
hours for an estimated cost of $4,760 and parts would cost about
$11,404 for a total cost of $16,164 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
[[Page 47927]]
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2017-1036; Product Identifier
2018-SW-015-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model AS-365N2, AS 365 N3,
SA-365N, and SA-365N1 helicopters, certified in any category, with
at least one Type X or Y planet gear assembly with a serial number
(S/N) listed in Appendices 4.A. through 4.B of Airbus Helicopters
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS365-05.00.78, Revision 3, dated
March 2, 2018 (ASB AS-365-05.00.78) installed on the main gearbox
(MGB).
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as failure of an MGB planet
gear assembly. This condition could result in failure of the MGB and
subsequent loss of helicopter control.
(c) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by September 21, 2020.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) For helicopters with at least one Type X planet gear
assembly with an S/N listed in Appendix 4.A. of ASB AS-365-05.00.78
installed, before further flight, replace the MGB or as an
alternative to replacing an affected MGB, replace the epicyclic
reduction gear module Post Modification (MOD) 0763C52 in the
affected MGB in accordance with paragraph 3.B.2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Helicopters Service Bulletin
SB No. AS365-63.00.21, Revision 3, dated July 26, 2018 (SB AS365-
63.00.21), except you are not required to contact Airbus
Helicopters.
(2) For helicopters without any Type X planet gear assembly
installed but with at least one Type Y planet gear assembly with an
S/N listed in Appendix 4.B. of ASB AS-365-05.0078 installed, within
300 hours time-in-service (TIS), or before any gear accumulates
1,300 hours TIS since new, whichever occurs first, replace the MGB
or as an alternative to replacing the MGB, replace the epicyclic
reduction gear module MOD 0763C52 in the affected MGB in accordance
with paragraphs 3.B.2. of the Accomplishment Instructions of SB
AS365-63.00.21, except you are not required to contact Airbus
Helicopters.
(3) After the effective date of this AD, do not install an MGB
with a Type X or Type Y gear assembly with an S/N listed in Appendix
4.A. or 4.B. of ASB AS-365-05.0078 installed, on any helicopter.
(4) For all helicopters, within 10 hours TIS and thereafter
before the first flight of the day or at intervals not to exceed 10
hours TIS, whichever occurs first, inspect the lower MGB magnetic
plugs for particles.
(i) If there are particles that consist of any scale, flake, or
splinter, or particles other than cotter pin fragments, pieces of
lock wire, swarf, abrasion, or miscellaneous non-metallic waste and
the planet gear assembly has logged less than 50 hours TIS since
new, inspect the MGB plugs for particles before further flight and
inspect the oil filter for particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter,
for 25 hours TIS, continue to inspect the MGB plugs for particles
before each flight, inspect the oil filter for particles at
intervals not to exceed 5 hours TIS, and perform the actions
required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through (B) of this AD.
(ii) If there are particles that consist of any scale, flake, or
splinter, or particles other than cotter pin fragments, pieces of
lock wire, swarf, abrasion, or miscellaneous non-metallic waste and
the planet gear assembly has logged more than 50 hours TIS since
new, inspect the cumulative surface area of the particles collected
from both the magnetic plug and the oil filter, since last MGB
overhaul or since new if no overhaul has been performed.
(A) If the total surface area of the particles is less than 3
mm\2\, examine the particles with largest surface area (S), longest
particle length (L) and thickest particles (e).
(1) If largest surface area (S) of a particle is less than 1
mm\2\, the L is less than 1.5 mm, and the e is less than 0.2 mm,
inspect the MGB plugs for particles before further flight and
inspect the oil filter for particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter,
for 25 hours TIS, continue to inspect the MGB plugs for particles
before each flight, inspect the oil filter for particles at
intervals not to exceed 5 hours TIS, and perform the actions
required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through (B) of this AD.
(2) If largest particle size (S) is greater than 1 mm\2\, the L
is greater than 1.5 mm, or the e is greater than 0.2 mm, perform a
metallurgical analysis for any 16NCD13 particles using a method in
accordance with FAA-approved procedures.
(3) If there are any 16NCD13 particles, replace the MGB with an
airworthy MGB.
(4) If there are no 16NCD13 particles, inspect the MGB plugs for
particles before further flight and inspect the oil filter for
particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for 25 hours TIS, continue
to inspect the MGB plugs for particles before each flight, inspect
the oil filter for particles at intervals not to exceed 5 hours TIS,
and perform the actions required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through
(B) of this AD.
(B) If the total surface area of collected particles is greater
than or equal to 3 mm\2\, before further flight, perform a
metallurgical analysis for any 6NCD13 particles using a method in
accordance with FAA-approved procedures.
(1) If there are any 16NCD13 particles, before further flight,
replace the MGB with an airworthy MGB.
(2) If there are no 16NCD13 particles, inspect the MGB plugs for
particles before further flight and inspect the oil filter for
particles within 5 hours TIS. Thereafter, for 25 hours TIS, continue
to inspect the MGB plugs for particles before each flight, inspect
the oil filter for particles at intervals not to exceed 5 hours TIS,
and perform the actions required by paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(A) through
(B) of this AD.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, may approve
AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti, Aviation
Safety Engineer, Regulations and Policy Section, Rotorcraft
Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone 817-222-5110; email [email protected].
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD 2017-
0116R2, dated March 2, 2018. You may view the EASA AD on the
[[Page 47928]]
internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6300, Main Rotor
Drive System.
Issued on August 3, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-17271 Filed 8-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P