Updated Defintions, Rules, and Procedures Related to Model Versions: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) Review, 47384-47388 [2020-16992]
Download as PDF
47384
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 5, 2020 / Notices
initial HomVEE procedures and
standards.
Handbook-v4-1-508.pdf. Accessed June 19,
2020.
5.0
BILLING CODE 4184–74–P
[FR Doc. 2020–17001 Filed 8–4–20; 8:45 am]
Request for Information (RFI)
Through this Federal Register Notice,
ACF is soliciting information from a
broad array of stakeholders on the
proposed revisions to HomVEE’s
procedures. Federal, state, and local
decision makers rely on HomVEE to
know which home visiting models are
effective. New definitions, rules, and
procedures about model versions may
affect which models are deemed
effective by HomVEE. New procedures
may affect which models are eligible for
review and deemed effective by
HomVEE. New standards may affect
which studies constitute well-designed
research that serves as an evidence base
for models that meet HHS criteria for an
‘‘evidence-based early childhood home
visiting service delivery model.’’
Responses to this Federal Register
notice will inform ACF’s ongoing
discussion about HomVEE’s procedures
and standards, with the aim of
publishing a final HomVEE Version 2
Handbook by the end of 2020. This RFI
is for information and planning
purposes only and should not be
construed as a solicitation or as an
obligation on the part of ACF or HHS.
(Authority: Social Security Act Title V § 511
[42 U.S.C. 711], as extended by the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–123) through
fiscal year 2022)
John M. Sweet Jr,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
References
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
Education Sciences, National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional
Assistance, What Works Clearinghouse. What
Works Clearinghouse Version 2.1 Evidence
Standards. 2011. Available at https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/
referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v2_1_
standards_handbook.pdf. Accessed June 19,
2020.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
Education Sciences, National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional
Assistance, What Works Clearinghouse. What
Works Clearinghouse Procedures Handbook:
Version 4.1., 2020a. Available at https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/
referenceresources/WWC-ProceduresHandbook-v4-1-508.pdf. Accessed June 19,
2020.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
Education Sciences, National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional
Assistance, What Works Clearinghouse. What
Works Clearinghouse Standards Handbook:
Version 4.1., 2020b. Available at https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/
referenceresources/WWC-Standards-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Updated Defintions, Rules, and
Procedures Related to Model Versions:
Home Visiting Evidence of
Effectiveness (HomVEE) Review
Administration for Children
and Families, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), within the
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), oversees the Home
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness
(HomVEE) review, which is proposing
to revise the procedures and standards
that guide its work. The revised
procedures and standards will be
presented in two separate Federal
Register notices. The current Federal
Register notice seeks comments on
proposed updated definitions, rules,
and procedures related to handling
home visiting model versions
(commonly referred to in the home
visiting research literature as
adaptations) in the HomVEE review.
Another Federal Register notice
summarizes proposed changes and
clarifications to HomVEE’s procedures
and standards for rating the quality of
impact studies and determining which
home visiting models meet HHS criteria
for evidence of effectiveness. Readers
are referred to the full text of the
HomVEE Draft Version 2 Handbook on
the HomVEE website (https://
homvee.acf.hhs.gov/) for more details
on all proposed changes.
DATES: Send comments on or before
September 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit questions,
comments, and supplementary
documents to HomVEE@acf.hhs.gov
with ‘‘HomVEE model versions FRN
comment’’ in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: HHS invites
comments regarding this notice. To
ensure that your comments are clearly
stated, please identify the section of this
notice that your comments address.
SUMMARY:
1.0
Background
To help policymakers, program
administrators, model developers,
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
researchers, and the public identify
rigorous research and understand which
early childhood home visiting models
are effective, ACF’s Office of Planning,
Research, and Evaluation within HHS
oversees the HomVEE review.
HomVEE’s mission is to conduct a
thorough and transparent review of the
research literature on home visiting for
families with pregnant women and
children from birth to kindergarten
entry. The review team identifies welldesigned research within that pool and
extracts and summarizes the findings
from that research.
One critical use of HomVEE’s results
is to determine which home visiting
models meet the HHS criteria for an
‘‘evidence-based early childhood home
visiting service delivery model’’ (see
Exhibit II.11 in the HomVEE Draft
Version 2 Handbook), a key requirement
of eligibility for implementation with
the Maternal, Infant, and Early
Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV)
Program funding. The MIECHV Program
is administered by the Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA) in
partnership with ACF. Created in 2010,
the MIECHV Program provides funding
to states, territories, and tribal entities to
implement home visiting models.
MIECHV awardees have the flexibility
to tailor the program to serve the
specific needs of their communities.
Through a needs assessment, awardees
identify at-risk communities and select
home visiting service delivery models
that best meet state and/or local needs.
As per MIECHV’s authorizing statute,
state and territory awardees must spend
the majority of their MIECHV Program
grants to implement evidence-based
home visiting models, with up to 25
percent of funding available to
implement promising approaches that
will undergo rigorous evaluation.
For the first time since its inception
in 2009, HomVEE is proposing
substantial revisions to several
procedures and standards that guide the
systematic review. The proposed
revisions include (1) clarifying and
updating standards and procedures
(presented in a separate Federal
Register notice) for rating the quality of
impact studies that are used to
determine which home visiting models
meet HHS criteria for an ‘‘evidencebased early childhood home visiting
service delivery model’’ and (2)
clarifying definitions, rules, and
procedures for handling model versions
(commonly referred to in the home
visiting research literature as
adaptations) in the HomVEE review
process. The current Federal Register
notice focuses on the latter set of
revisions.
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 5, 2020 / Notices
HomVEE routinely encounters
research in which an individual home
visiting model has been changed or
altered for various reasons, including to
fit a new or different context (for
example, adding a new curriculum
targeted to a specific population) or to
implement a new feature (for example,
adding text messaging between visits).
In order to ensure the transparency and
accuracy of the HomVEE review, it is
important to have clear definitions,
rules, and procedures to classify
research on different versions of home
visiting models. Over the course of the
past 2 years, a HomVEE workgroup
composed of ACF and HRSA staff with
contractor support met to discuss and
develop the draft definitions, rules, and
procedures outlined in this Federal
Register notice. Their work was
informed by a close review of the
procedures of other federally sponsored
systematic evidence reviews.
Through this Federal Register notice,
ACF seeks to provide a transparent
account of how the review operates and
to collect stakeholder input on draft
definitions, rules, and procedures
related to model versions. Because these
procedural changes may affect critical
decision making, and to better
understand the implications of the
changes for various stakeholders, ACF
seeks public input on the draft changes.
After a period of public comment,
HomVEE will finalize and release the
final definitions, rules, and procedures
related to model versions.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
2.0 Definitions, Rules, and Procedures
for Reviewing Home Visiting Models
and Model Versions
First, this Federal Register notice
presents HomVEE’s definition of ‘‘early
childhood home visiting model.’’ Then,
it discusses how HomVEE proposes to
define and distinguish among various
types of model versions.
2.1 Defining an Early Childhood
Home Visiting Model
In order to identify eligible research,
HomVEE intends to apply the following
definition of an early childhood home
visiting model: HomVEE defines an
early childhood home visiting model as
an intervention that delivers a specified
set of services (through a specified set of
interactions). A model has a set of
fidelity standards that describe how the
model is to be implemented. These
voluntary programs are interventions,
either designed or adapted and tested
for delivery in the home, in which
trained home visitors meet with
expectant parents or families with
young children on a schedule that is
defined or can be tailored to meet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
family needs. During the visits, home
visitors aim to build strong, positive
relationships with families who want
and need support to improve child and
family outcomes. Models reviewed by
HomVEE must serve pregnant women or
families with children from birth to
kindergarten entry. In a model eligible
for review, the primary service delivery
strategy must be home visiting and there
must be research on the model that
examines its effects in at least one of
eight outcome domains: Child
development and school readiness,
child health, family economic selfsufficiency, linkages and referrals,
maternal health, positive parenting
practices, reductions in child
maltreatment, and reductions in
juvenile delinquency, family violence,
and crime.1 This definition of a home
visiting model is for the purpose of
sorting and classifying the research
literature as part of the HomVEE review.
It is not for the purposes of determining
eligibility for MIECHV funding.
2.1.1 Classifying Research on Early
Childhood Home Visiting Models
2.1.1.1
Defining Model Versions
To date, the HomVEE team has relied
on model developers and manuscript
authors to identify the specific version
of the model they are examining in a
research study. However, manuscripts
vary in the extent to which their authors
clearly identify the model version being
tested. Moving forward, HomVEE
intends to implement definitions, rules,
and procedures to systematically
differentiate versions of a model. This
will help ensure that HomVEE treats all
models equally and classifies research
on model effectiveness accurately.
These definitions, rules, and procedures
are for the purpose of sorting and
classifying the research literature as part
of the HomVEE review. It is not for the
purposes of determining eligibility for
MIECHV funding.
HomVEE proposes to apply the
following definitions to differentiate
models:
• Base model: The model as designed
by the developer. (This includes
implementations of the base model by
the developer and replications of the
base model by others.)
• Model version: Distinguished by a
substantial change to a core feature of
the base model (substantial change and
core feature are defined below).
1 These domains are inclusive of the benchmark
domains and individual outcomes listed in the
statute that authorized the Maternal, Infant, and
Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program
(Social Security Act, Section 511 [42 U.S.C. 711]).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47385
• Model iteration: Distinguished by a
substantial change to a core feature of
the base model that the model developer
intends to represent a permanent
update to the base model. The term
model iteration is intended to capture
changes that are part of the natural
evolution of a model over time.
• Family of models: A base model
and its iterations and versions.
As indicated by the definitions,
identifying substantial changes to core
features or the addition or removal of
core features is critical for
differentiating base models and model
versions. For the purposes of HomVEE’s
review, HomVEE conceptualizes home
visiting models as being composed of a
set of core features that include both
content features (such as the topics
covered in a curriculum) and
implementation features (such as home
visitor training and staff qualifications).
Core features are integral to the model
and will be defined as the following:
• Visit format (in-person, virtual,
mixed)
• Home visit frequency
• Home visit length
• Number of home visits
• Program duration
• Required staffing structure
• Home visitor education and
experience
• Home visitor supervision
requirements
• Home visitor caseload
• Requirements for program
certification
• Training requirements for home
visitors (initial and ongoing)
• Trainer qualifications
• Curriculum
• Other features in the model’s theory
of change
HomVEE further proposes to
differentiate core features by whether
the feature has a fixed requirement or
flexible requirement. Core features with
fixed requirements have specific
guidelines that guide the
implementation of the core feature, such
as requiring a specific curriculum or
delivering home visits with a specific
frequency. Fixed requirements may also
be a specific range, such as requiring
home visits of 60–90 minutes, or
minimum thresholds, such as a staff
qualification of at least a B.A. degree.
Flexible requirements do not have
specific guidelines about
implementation, such as no requirement
for implementers to use a specific
curriculum.
2.1.1.2
Identifying Core Features
For model families that are candidates
for review in a given year, HomVEE
proposes to generate a list of core
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
47386
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 5, 2020 / Notices
features for each model and determine
whether each core feature of each model
has fixed or flexible requirements.
HomVEE will first generate the list
based on information available through
manuscripts, the developer website,
and/or the existing HomVEE
implementation profile. HomVEE will
then send the list to model developers
to invite them to verify HomVEE’s
understanding of the model’s core
features.
2.1.1.3 Using Information on Core
Features To Identify Model Versions
Using a set of predetermined decision
rules and the list of core features
verified by model developers, HomVEE
intends to identify substantial changes
to core features to distinguish research
on model versions and iterations from
research on the base model. HomVEE
welcomes feedback from the field on
these decision rules. The rules draw on
general guidance from the
implementation science literature and
current practices of other evidence
reviews.
Specifically, HomVEE will consider a
change substantial if a fixed
requirement related to a core feature is
added or removed (see Table 1). For
example, if researchers or model
implementers remove a curriculum
module or add text message check-ins
with families in between in-person
visits, those changes would be
considered substantial. In addition,
HomVEE will consider as substantial
those changes in which a fixed
requirement becomes flexible or a
flexible requirement becomes fixed. To
illustrate, a base model may allow
implementers to select their own
curriculum that best fits their context.
Researchers and model implementers
may decide to modify that feature and
require a specific curriculum. This
would be considered a substantial
change because a flexible requirement
(no required curriculum) is now fixed
(that is, a specific curriculum is now
required).
In addition, for core features that
involve a specific frequency or number
(such as number of home visits or home
visitor caseloads), changes that modify
the frequency by more than 50 percent
will, in general, be considered
substantial.2 To illustrate, a base model
may require home visitors to offer
families a minimum of 40 visits.
Researchers and model implementers
may change the home visit frequency
requirements of the base model to offer
families a minimum of 10 visits to better
serve a population where 40 visits are
not feasible. Given HomVEE’s proposed
decision rules, this would be considered
a substantial change, because the visit
frequency was changed by more than 50
percent.
TABLE 1—PROPOSED DECISION RULES FOR IDENTIFYING MODEL VERSIONS
Non-substantial change to a core
feature include:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Core feature
Curriculum ......................................
None
Home visit frequency .....................
—Intended frequency changes by
less than 25 percent
Home visitor caseloads ..................
—Intended caseload changes by
less than 25 percent
Home visitor education and experience.
None
Home visitor supervision ................
—Less than 25 percent change in
intended supervision frequency
2 If a model under study lowers a required
minimum threshold for a core feature, such as
requiring at least 10 home visits instead of 20, this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Substantial changes to a core
feature (model version or
iteration) include:
—Addition or subtraction of curriculum modules
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible
—Change in required curriculum
(from one to another)
—Intended frequency changes by
more than 50 percent
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no required
frequency to required monthly
visits)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible
—Intended
caseload
size
changes by more than 50 percent
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no caseload
guidance to requiring one visitor
per 10 families)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible
—Required degree type changes
(such as from R.N. to M.S.W.)
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no education requirement to requiring
a Bachelor’s degree)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible
—More than 50 percent change in
intended supervision frequency
is a substantial change to the core feature and,
therefore, is a model version or iteration. If a model
under study exceeds a minimum requirement, this
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Changes that requires
consultation with experts
include:
Any other changes.
—Intended frequency changes by
25–50 percent.
—Intended
caseload
size
changes by 25–50 percent.
None.
—25–50 percent change in intended supervision frequency.
is not a substantial change to the core feature and
therefore is a model replication.
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 5, 2020 / Notices
47387
TABLE 1—PROPOSED DECISION RULES FOR IDENTIFYING MODEL VERSIONS—Continued
Non-substantial change to a core
feature include:
Core feature
Home visitor pre-service training ...
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Home visitor in-service training .....
—Less than 25 percent change in
required training hours
—Change in training mode (in
person to virtual) that does not
change training content
—Less than 25 percent change in
required training hours
—Change in training mode (in
person to virtual) that does not
change training content
Program certification ......................
None
Number of home visits ...................
—Intended dosage changes by
less than 25 percent
Program duration ...........................
—Intended duration changes by
less than 25 percent
Required staffing structure .............
—Less than 25 percent change in
recommended supervisor caseload
Trainer qualifications ......................
None
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Substantial changes to a core
feature (model version or
iteration) include:
Changes that requires
consultation with experts
include:
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed such as from no requirement for the frequency of supervision to requiring monthly
supervision meetings)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible
—25–50 percent change in required training hours
—Addition or subtraction of training modules
—Mode of supervision (one-onone,
reflective
supervision)
added or dropped.
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no training
requirement to specified training
requirement)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from specified
training requirement to no training requirement)
—25–50 percent change in required training hours
—Addition or subtraction of training modules
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no training
requirement to specified training
requirement)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from specified
training requirement to no training requirement)
—Program certification requirement added or dropped
—Intended dosage changes by
more than 50 percent
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from tailored
number of visits to fixed number
of visits)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from fixed
number of visits to tailored
number of visits)
—Intended duration changes by
more than 50 percent
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from duration tailored to family need to a fixed
number of months)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from a fixed
number of months to duration
tailored to family need)
—More than 50 percent change in
recommended supervisor caseload
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no required
structure to specified structure)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from specified
structure to no required structure)
—Addition or subtraction of certification requirement
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
—25–50 percent change in required training hours.
—25–50 percent change in required training hours.
Changes to certification standards
or procedures.
—Intended dosage changes 25–
50 percent.
—Intended duration changes 25–
50 percent.
—25–50 percent change in recommended supervisor caseload.
—Addition or elimination of required non-supervisory positions
—Any other changes.
05AUN1
47388
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 5, 2020 / Notices
TABLE 1—PROPOSED DECISION RULES FOR IDENTIFYING MODEL VERSIONS—Continued
Non-substantial change to a core
feature include:
Core feature
Visit format (in person, virtual,
mixed).
None
—Less than 25 percent change in
required number of in-person
visits
Visit length .....................................
None
Other features of the model’s theory of change.
None
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
HomVEE proposes that early
childhood home visiting models
(including base models, model versions,
and model iterations) continue to be
eligible for review as long as they meet
all of HomVEE’s other criteria for
inclusion as described in the HomVEE
Draft Version 2 Handbook. HomVEE
will continue to select families of
models for review by creating a
prioritization score for each family of
models using a combination of
manuscript and model characteristics
(see the HomVEE Draft Version 2
Handbook, Chapter II, Section A, for
additional details). Also, after a family
of models is selected for review,
HomVEE will continue to review all
previously unreviewed research on the
base model, model iterations, and model
versions.
Applying the HHS Criteria
HomVEE proposes to review research
on a model version and its base model
separately. Therefore, a model version
would need to independently meet HHS
criteria for ‘‘an evidence-based early
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Aug 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Changes that requires
consultation with experts
include:
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no required
qualifications to specified qualifications)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from specified
qualifications to no required
qualifications)
—Change from one fixed format
to another
—More than 50 percent change in
number of in-person visits
—Any changes involving phone
visits.
—25–50 percent change in number of in-person visits.
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no required
visit format to required in-person format)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from required
in-person format to no required
visit format)
—More than 50 percent change in
required visit length
—Flexible requirement becomes
fixed (such as from no required
length to required length of one
hour)
—Fixed requirement becomes
flexible (such as from required
length of one hour to no required length)
None
2.1.2 Prioritizing Early Childhood
Home Visiting Models
2.2
Substantial changes to a core
feature (model version or
iteration) include:
childhood home visiting service
delivery model.’’ In contrast, HomVEE
proposes that research on the base
model and research on model iterations
be reviewed together and contribute to
HomVEE’s determination of whether the
base model meets HHS criteria.
2.3 Applying the New Definitions,
Rules, and Procedures
The new definitions, rules, and
procedures about model versions will
apply to all models that HomVEE
considers for review, regardless of
whether the model already meets HHS
criteria for an ‘‘evidence-based early
childhood home visiting service
delivery model.’’ HomVEE anticipates
implementing the new definitions,
rules, and procedures to the HomVEE
review beginning with the models
prioritized for review in 2021. The new
definitions, rules, and procedures will
be implemented with other models over
time.
3.0
Request for Information
Through this Federal Register notice,
ACF is soliciting information from a
broad array of stakeholders on the
proposed revisions to HomVEE’s
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
—25–50 percent change in required visit length.
—Any change.
procedures. Federal, state, and local
decision makers rely on HomVEE to
know which home visiting models are
effective. New definitions, rules, and
procedures about model versions may
affect which models HomVEE
determines to meet HHS criteria for ‘‘an
evidence-based early childhood home
visiting service delivery model.’’
Responses to this Federal Register
notice will inform ACF’s ongoing
discussion about HomVEE’s procedures
and standards, with the aim of
publishing a final HomVEE Version 2
Handbook by the end of 2020. This
Federal Register notice is for
information and planning purposes only
and should not be construed as a
solicitation or as an obligation on the
part of ACF or HHS.
(Authority: Social Security Act Title V § 511
[42 U.S.C. 711], as extended by the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–123) through
fiscal year 2022)
John M. Sweet, Jr.,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–16992 Filed 8–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–74–P
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47384-47388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16992]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Updated Defintions, Rules, and Procedures Related to Model
Versions: Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) Review
AGENCY: Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), within the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), oversees the Home
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) review, which is proposing
to revise the procedures and standards that guide its work. The revised
procedures and standards will be presented in two separate Federal
Register notices. The current Federal Register notice seeks comments on
proposed updated definitions, rules, and procedures related to handling
home visiting model versions (commonly referred to in the home visiting
research literature as adaptations) in the HomVEE review. Another
Federal Register notice summarizes proposed changes and clarifications
to HomVEE's procedures and standards for rating the quality of impact
studies and determining which home visiting models meet HHS criteria
for evidence of effectiveness. Readers are referred to the full text of
the HomVEE Draft Version 2 Handbook on the HomVEE website (https://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/) for more details on all proposed changes.
DATES: Send comments on or before September 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit questions, comments, and supplementary documents to
[email protected] with ``HomVEE model versions FRN comment'' in the
subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: HHS invites comments regarding this notice.
To ensure that your comments are clearly stated, please identify the
section of this notice that your comments address.
1.0 Background
To help policymakers, program administrators, model developers,
researchers, and the public identify rigorous research and understand
which early childhood home visiting models are effective, ACF's Office
of Planning, Research, and Evaluation within HHS oversees the HomVEE
review. HomVEE's mission is to conduct a thorough and transparent
review of the research literature on home visiting for families with
pregnant women and children from birth to kindergarten entry. The
review team identifies well-designed research within that pool and
extracts and summarizes the findings from that research.
One critical use of HomVEE's results is to determine which home
visiting models meet the HHS criteria for an ``evidence-based early
childhood home visiting service delivery model'' (see Exhibit II.11 in
the HomVEE Draft Version 2 Handbook), a key requirement of eligibility
for implementation with the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home
Visiting (MIECHV) Program funding. The MIECHV Program is administered
by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in
partnership with ACF. Created in 2010, the MIECHV Program provides
funding to states, territories, and tribal entities to implement home
visiting models. MIECHV awardees have the flexibility to tailor the
program to serve the specific needs of their communities. Through a
needs assessment, awardees identify at-risk communities and select home
visiting service delivery models that best meet state and/or local
needs. As per MIECHV's authorizing statute, state and territory
awardees must spend the majority of their MIECHV Program grants to
implement evidence-based home visiting models, with up to 25 percent of
funding available to implement promising approaches that will undergo
rigorous evaluation.
For the first time since its inception in 2009, HomVEE is proposing
substantial revisions to several procedures and standards that guide
the systematic review. The proposed revisions include (1) clarifying
and updating standards and procedures (presented in a separate Federal
Register notice) for rating the quality of impact studies that are used
to determine which home visiting models meet HHS criteria for an
``evidence-based early childhood home visiting service delivery model''
and (2) clarifying definitions, rules, and procedures for handling
model versions (commonly referred to in the home visiting research
literature as adaptations) in the HomVEE review process. The current
Federal Register notice focuses on the latter set of revisions.
[[Page 47385]]
HomVEE routinely encounters research in which an individual home
visiting model has been changed or altered for various reasons,
including to fit a new or different context (for example, adding a new
curriculum targeted to a specific population) or to implement a new
feature (for example, adding text messaging between visits). In order
to ensure the transparency and accuracy of the HomVEE review, it is
important to have clear definitions, rules, and procedures to classify
research on different versions of home visiting models. Over the course
of the past 2 years, a HomVEE workgroup composed of ACF and HRSA staff
with contractor support met to discuss and develop the draft
definitions, rules, and procedures outlined in this Federal Register
notice. Their work was informed by a close review of the procedures of
other federally sponsored systematic evidence reviews.
Through this Federal Register notice, ACF seeks to provide a
transparent account of how the review operates and to collect
stakeholder input on draft definitions, rules, and procedures related
to model versions. Because these procedural changes may affect critical
decision making, and to better understand the implications of the
changes for various stakeholders, ACF seeks public input on the draft
changes. After a period of public comment, HomVEE will finalize and
release the final definitions, rules, and procedures related to model
versions.
2.0 Definitions, Rules, and Procedures for Reviewing Home Visiting
Models and Model Versions
First, this Federal Register notice presents HomVEE's definition of
``early childhood home visiting model.'' Then, it discusses how HomVEE
proposes to define and distinguish among various types of model
versions.
2.1 Defining an Early Childhood Home Visiting Model
In order to identify eligible research, HomVEE intends to apply the
following definition of an early childhood home visiting model: HomVEE
defines an early childhood home visiting model as an intervention that
delivers a specified set of services (through a specified set of
interactions). A model has a set of fidelity standards that describe
how the model is to be implemented. These voluntary programs are
interventions, either designed or adapted and tested for delivery in
the home, in which trained home visitors meet with expectant parents or
families with young children on a schedule that is defined or can be
tailored to meet family needs. During the visits, home visitors aim to
build strong, positive relationships with families who want and need
support to improve child and family outcomes. Models reviewed by HomVEE
must serve pregnant women or families with children from birth to
kindergarten entry. In a model eligible for review, the primary service
delivery strategy must be home visiting and there must be research on
the model that examines its effects in at least one of eight outcome
domains: Child development and school readiness, child health, family
economic self-sufficiency, linkages and referrals, maternal health,
positive parenting practices, reductions in child maltreatment, and
reductions in juvenile delinquency, family violence, and crime.\1\ This
definition of a home visiting model is for the purpose of sorting and
classifying the research literature as part of the HomVEE review. It is
not for the purposes of determining eligibility for MIECHV funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These domains are inclusive of the benchmark domains and
individual outcomes listed in the statute that authorized the
Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Program
(Social Security Act, Section 511 [42 U.S.C. 711]).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1.1 Classifying Research on Early Childhood Home Visiting Models
2.1.1.1 Defining Model Versions
To date, the HomVEE team has relied on model developers and
manuscript authors to identify the specific version of the model they
are examining in a research study. However, manuscripts vary in the
extent to which their authors clearly identify the model version being
tested. Moving forward, HomVEE intends to implement definitions, rules,
and procedures to systematically differentiate versions of a model.
This will help ensure that HomVEE treats all models equally and
classifies research on model effectiveness accurately. These
definitions, rules, and procedures are for the purpose of sorting and
classifying the research literature as part of the HomVEE review. It is
not for the purposes of determining eligibility for MIECHV funding.
HomVEE proposes to apply the following definitions to differentiate
models:
Base model: The model as designed by the developer. (This
includes implementations of the base model by the developer and
replications of the base model by others.)
Model version: Distinguished by a substantial change to a
core feature of the base model (substantial change and core feature are
defined below).
Model iteration: Distinguished by a substantial change to
a core feature of the base model that the model developer intends to
represent a permanent update to the base model. The term model
iteration is intended to capture changes that are part of the natural
evolution of a model over time.
Family of models: A base model and its iterations and
versions.
As indicated by the definitions, identifying substantial changes to
core features or the addition or removal of core features is critical
for differentiating base models and model versions. For the purposes of
HomVEE's review, HomVEE conceptualizes home visiting models as being
composed of a set of core features that include both content features
(such as the topics covered in a curriculum) and implementation
features (such as home visitor training and staff qualifications). Core
features are integral to the model and will be defined as the
following:
Visit format (in-person, virtual, mixed)
Home visit frequency
Home visit length
Number of home visits
Program duration
Required staffing structure
Home visitor education and experience
Home visitor supervision requirements
Home visitor caseload
Requirements for program certification
Training requirements for home visitors (initial and ongoing)
Trainer qualifications
Curriculum
Other features in the model's theory of change
HomVEE further proposes to differentiate core features by whether
the feature has a fixed requirement or flexible requirement. Core
features with fixed requirements have specific guidelines that guide
the implementation of the core feature, such as requiring a specific
curriculum or delivering home visits with a specific frequency. Fixed
requirements may also be a specific range, such as requiring home
visits of 60-90 minutes, or minimum thresholds, such as a staff
qualification of at least a B.A. degree. Flexible requirements do not
have specific guidelines about implementation, such as no requirement
for implementers to use a specific curriculum.
2.1.1.2 Identifying Core Features
For model families that are candidates for review in a given year,
HomVEE proposes to generate a list of core
[[Page 47386]]
features for each model and determine whether each core feature of each
model has fixed or flexible requirements. HomVEE will first generate
the list based on information available through manuscripts, the
developer website, and/or the existing HomVEE implementation profile.
HomVEE will then send the list to model developers to invite them to
verify HomVEE's understanding of the model's core features.
2.1.1.3 Using Information on Core Features To Identify Model Versions
Using a set of predetermined decision rules and the list of core
features verified by model developers, HomVEE intends to identify
substantial changes to core features to distinguish research on model
versions and iterations from research on the base model. HomVEE
welcomes feedback from the field on these decision rules. The rules
draw on general guidance from the implementation science literature and
current practices of other evidence reviews.
Specifically, HomVEE will consider a change substantial if a fixed
requirement related to a core feature is added or removed (see Table
1). For example, if researchers or model implementers remove a
curriculum module or add text message check-ins with families in
between in-person visits, those changes would be considered
substantial. In addition, HomVEE will consider as substantial those
changes in which a fixed requirement becomes flexible or a flexible
requirement becomes fixed. To illustrate, a base model may allow
implementers to select their own curriculum that best fits their
context. Researchers and model implementers may decide to modify that
feature and require a specific curriculum. This would be considered a
substantial change because a flexible requirement (no required
curriculum) is now fixed (that is, a specific curriculum is now
required).
In addition, for core features that involve a specific frequency or
number (such as number of home visits or home visitor caseloads),
changes that modify the frequency by more than 50 percent will, in
general, be considered substantial.\2\ To illustrate, a base model may
require home visitors to offer families a minimum of 40 visits.
Researchers and model implementers may change the home visit frequency
requirements of the base model to offer families a minimum of 10 visits
to better serve a population where 40 visits are not feasible. Given
HomVEE's proposed decision rules, this would be considered a
substantial change, because the visit frequency was changed by more
than 50 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If a model under study lowers a required minimum threshold
for a core feature, such as requiring at least 10 home visits
instead of 20, this is a substantial change to the core feature and,
therefore, is a model version or iteration. If a model under study
exceeds a minimum requirement, this is not a substantial change to
the core feature and therefore is a model replication.
Table 1--Proposed Decision Rules for Identifying Model Versions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Substantial changes to a
Non-substantial change to core feature (model Changes that requires
Core feature a core feature include: version or iteration) consultation with experts
include: include:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curriculum................... None --Addition or subtraction Any other changes.
of curriculum modules
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible
--Change in required
curriculum (from one to
another)
Home visit frequency......... --Intended frequency --Intended frequency --Intended frequency
changes by less than 25 changes by more than 50 changes by 25-50
percent percent percent.
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no required
frequency to required
monthly visits)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible
Home visitor caseloads....... --Intended caseload --Intended caseload size --Intended caseload size
changes by less than 25 changes by more than 50 changes by 25-50
percent percent percent.
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no caseload guidance
to requiring one visitor
per 10 families)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible
Home visitor education and None --Required degree type None.
experience. changes (such as from
R.N. to M.S.W.)
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no education
requirement to requiring
a Bachelor's degree)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible
Home visitor supervision..... --Less than 25 percent --More than 50 percent --25-50 percent change in
change in intended change in intended intended supervision
supervision frequency supervision frequency frequency.
[[Page 47387]]
--Flexible requirement --Mode of supervision
becomes fixed such as (one-on-one, reflective
from no requirement for supervision) added or
the frequency of dropped.
supervision to requiring
monthly supervision
meetings)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible
Home visitor pre-service --Less than 25 percent --25-50 percent change in --25-50 percent change in
training. change in required required training hours required training hours.
training hours
--Change in training mode --Addition or subtraction
(in person to virtual) of training modules
that does not change
training content
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no training
requirement to specified
training requirement)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from specified training
requirement to no
training requirement)
Home visitor in-service --Less than 25 percent --25-50 percent change in --25-50 percent change in
training. change in required required training hours required training hours.
training hours
--Change in training mode --Addition or subtraction
(in person to virtual) of training modules
that does not change
training content
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no training
requirement to specified
training requirement)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from specified training
requirement to no
training requirement)
Program certification........ None --Program certification Changes to certification
requirement added or standards or procedures.
dropped
Number of home visits........ --Intended dosage changes --Intended dosage changes --Intended dosage changes
by less than 25 percent by more than 50 percent 25-50 percent.
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from tailored number of
visits to fixed number of
visits)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from fixed number of
visits to tailored number
of visits)
Program duration............. --Intended duration --Intended duration --Intended duration
changes by less than 25 changes by more than 50 changes 25-50 percent.
percent percent
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from duration tailored to
family need to a fixed
number of months)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from a fixed number of
months to duration
tailored to family need)
Required staffing structure.. --Less than 25 percent --More than 50 percent --25-50 percent change in
change in recommended change in recommended recommended supervisor
supervisor caseload supervisor caseload caseload.
--Flexible requirement --Addition or elimination
becomes fixed (such as of required non-
from no required supervisory positions
structure to specified
structure)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from specified structure
to no required structure)
Trainer qualifications....... None --Addition or subtraction --Any other changes.
of certification
requirement
[[Page 47388]]
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no required
qualifications to
specified qualifications)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from specified
qualifications to no
required qualifications)
Visit format (in person, None --Change from one fixed --Any changes involving
virtual, mixed). format to another phone visits.
--Less than 25 percent --More than 50 percent --25-50 percent change in
change in required number change in number of in- number of in-person
of in-person visits person visits visits.
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no required visit
format to required in-
person format)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from required in-person
format to no required
visit format)
Visit length................. None --More than 50 percent --25-50 percent change in
change in required visit required visit length.
length
--Flexible requirement
becomes fixed (such as
from no required length
to required length of one
hour)
--Fixed requirement
becomes flexible (such as
from required length of
one hour to no required
length)
Other features of the model's None None --Any change.
theory of change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1.2 Prioritizing Early Childhood Home Visiting Models
HomVEE proposes that early childhood home visiting models
(including base models, model versions, and model iterations) continue
to be eligible for review as long as they meet all of HomVEE's other
criteria for inclusion as described in the HomVEE Draft Version 2
Handbook. HomVEE will continue to select families of models for review
by creating a prioritization score for each family of models using a
combination of manuscript and model characteristics (see the HomVEE
Draft Version 2 Handbook, Chapter II, Section A, for additional
details). Also, after a family of models is selected for review, HomVEE
will continue to review all previously unreviewed research on the base
model, model iterations, and model versions.
2.2 Applying the HHS Criteria
HomVEE proposes to review research on a model version and its base
model separately. Therefore, a model version would need to
independently meet HHS criteria for ``an evidence-based early childhood
home visiting service delivery model.'' In contrast, HomVEE proposes
that research on the base model and research on model iterations be
reviewed together and contribute to HomVEE's determination of whether
the base model meets HHS criteria.
2.3 Applying the New Definitions, Rules, and Procedures
The new definitions, rules, and procedures about model versions
will apply to all models that HomVEE considers for review, regardless
of whether the model already meets HHS criteria for an ``evidence-based
early childhood home visiting service delivery model.'' HomVEE
anticipates implementing the new definitions, rules, and procedures to
the HomVEE review beginning with the models prioritized for review in
2021. The new definitions, rules, and procedures will be implemented
with other models over time.
3.0 Request for Information
Through this Federal Register notice, ACF is soliciting information
from a broad array of stakeholders on the proposed revisions to
HomVEE's procedures. Federal, state, and local decision makers rely on
HomVEE to know which home visiting models are effective. New
definitions, rules, and procedures about model versions may affect
which models HomVEE determines to meet HHS criteria for ``an evidence-
based early childhood home visiting service delivery model.''
Responses to this Federal Register notice will inform ACF's ongoing
discussion about HomVEE's procedures and standards, with the aim of
publishing a final HomVEE Version 2 Handbook by the end of 2020. This
Federal Register notice is for information and planning purposes only
and should not be construed as a solicitation or as an obligation on
the part of ACF or HHS.
(Authority: Social Security Act Title V Sec. 511 [42 U.S.C. 711],
as extended by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-123)
through fiscal year 2022)
John M. Sweet, Jr.,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-16992 Filed 8-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-74-P