Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 46422-46530 [2020-15525]
Download as PDF
46422
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 44
[Docket No. OCC–2020–0002]
RIN 1557–AE67
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 248
[Docket No. R–1694]
RIN 7100–AF70
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 351
RIN 3064–AF17
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 75
RIN 3038–AE93
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 255
[Release No. BHCA–9; File No. S7–02–20]
RIN 3235–AM70
Prohibitions and Restrictions on
Proprietary Trading and Certain
Interests in, and Relationships With,
Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury (OCC); Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board); Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC); and
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The OCC, Board, FDIC, SEC,
and CFTC (together, the agencies) are
adopting amendments to the regulations
implementing section 13 of the Bank
Holding Company Act (BHC Act).
Section 13 contains certain restrictions
on the ability of a banking entity or
nonbank financial company supervised
by the Board to engage in proprietary
trading and have certain interests in, or
relationships with, a hedge fund or
private equity fund (covered funds).
These final amendments are intended to
improve and streamline the regulations
implementing section 13 of the BHC Act
by modifying and clarifying
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements related to the covered
fund provisions of the rules.
DATES: Effective date: The final rule is
effective October 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Roman Goldstein, Risk
Specialist, Treasury and Market Risk
Policy, (202) 649–6360; Tabitha Edgens,
Counsel; Mark O’Horo, Senior Attorney,
Chief Counsel’s Office, (202) 649–5490;
for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400
7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
Board: Flora Ahn, Special Counsel,
(202) 452–2317, Gregory Frischmann,
Senior Counsel, (202) 452–2803, Kirin
Walsh, Attorney, (202) 452–3058, or
Sarah Podrygula, Attorney, (202) 912–
4658, Legal Division, Elizabeth
MacDonald, Manager, (202) 475–6316,
Cecily Boggs, Senior Financial
Institution Policy Analyst, (202) 530–
6209, Brendan Rowan, Senior Financial
Institution Policy Analyst, (202) 475–
6685, Christopher Powell, Senior
Financial Institution Policy Analyst,
(202) 452–3442, Nathaniel Grant, Lead
Financial Institution Policy Analyst,
(202) 452–3105, David McArthur,
Senior Economist, (202) 452–2985,
Division of Supervision and Regulation;
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW,
Washington, DC 20551.
FDIC: Bobby R. Bean, Associate
Director, bbean@fdic.gov, Andrew D.
Carayiannis, Senior Policy Analyst,
acarayiannis@fdic.gov, or Brian Cox,
Senior Policy Analyst, brcox@fdic.gov,
Capital Markets Branch, (202) 898–6888;
Michael B. Phillips, Counsel,
mphillips@fdic.gov, Benjamin J. Klein,
Counsel, bklein@fdic.gov, or Annmarie
H. Boyd, Counsel, aboyd@fdic.gov,
Legal Division, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street
NW, Washington, DC 20429.
CFTC: Cantrell Dumas, Special
Counsel, (202) 418–5043, cdumas@
cftc.gov, Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight; Mark Fajfar,
Assistant General Counsel, (202) 418–
6636, mfajfar@cftc.gov, Office of the
General Counsel; Stephen Kane,
Research Economist, (202) 418–5911,
skane@cftc.gov, Office of the Chief
Economist; Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC
20581.
SEC: Juliet M. Han, Senior Counsel,
William Miller, Senior Counsel,
Benjamin A. Tecmire, Senior Counsel,
or Jennifer Songer, Branch Chief at (202)
551–6787 or IArules@sec.gov,
Investment Adviser Regulation Office,
Division of Investment Management,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and Katherine Hsu, Office Chief, or
Benjamin Meeks, Special Counsel at
(202) 551–3850, Office of Structured
Finance, Division of Corporation
Finance, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Overview of the Final Rule
IV. Summary of the Final Rule
A. Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds
B. Modifications to Existing Covered Fund
Exclusions
1. Foreign Public Funds
2. Loan Securitizations
3. Public Welfare and Small Business
Funds
C. Additional Covered Fund Exclusions
1. Credit Funds
2. Venture Capital Funds
3. Family Wealth Management Vehicles
4. Customer Facilitation Vehicles
D. Limitations on Relationships With a
Covered Fund
E. Ownership Interest
F. Parallel Investments
G. Technical Amendments
V. Administrative Law Matters
A. Use of Plain Language
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
D. Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act
E. OCC Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
F. SEC Economic Analysis
G. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
Section 13 of the BHC Act,1 also
known as the Volcker Rule, generally
prohibits any banking entity from
engaging in proprietary trading or from
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with a hedge fund or
private equity fund (covered fund).2 The
statute expressly exempts from these
prohibitions various activities,
including, among other things:
• Underwriting and market makingrelated activities;
• Risk-mitigating hedging activities;
• Activities on behalf of customers;
• Activities for the general account of
insurance companies; and
• Trading and covered fund activities
and investments by non-U.S. banking
entities solely outside the United
States.3
In addition, section 13 of the BHC Act
contains an exemption that permits
banking entities to organize and offer,
including sponsor, covered funds,
subject to certain restrictions, including
1 12
U.S.C. 1851.
2 Id.
3 12
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1).
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
that banking entities do not rescue
investors in those funds from loss, and
are not themselves exposed to
significant losses due to investments in
or other relationships with these funds.4
Authority under section 13 of the
BHC Act for developing and adopting
regulations to implement the
prohibitions, restrictions, and
exemptions of section 13 is shared
among the Board, the FDIC, the OCC,
the SEC, and the CFTC (individually, an
agency, and collectively, the agencies).5
The agencies originally issued a final
rule implementing section 13 in
December 2013 (the 2013 rule), and
those provisions became effective on
April 1, 2014.6
The agencies published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in July 2018 (the
2018 proposal) that proposed several
amendments to the 2013 rule.7 These
proposed revisions sought to provide
greater clarity and certainty about what
activities are prohibited under the 2013
rule—in particular, under the
prohibition on proprietary trading—and
to better tailor the compliance
requirements based on the risk of a
banking entity’s trading activities. The
agencies issued a final rule
implementing amendments to the 2013
rule in November 2019 (the 2019
amendments), and those provisions
became effective in January 2020.8
As part of the 2018 proposal, the
agencies proposed targeted changes to
the provisions of the 2013 rule relating
to acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with a fund and sought
comments on other aspects of the
4 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G). Other restrictions and
requirements include: (1) The banking entity
provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, or investment
advisory services; (2) the fund is organized and
offered only to customers in connection with the
provision of such services; (3) the banking entity
does not have an ownership interest in the fund,
except for a de minimis investment; (4) the banking
entity complies with certain marketing restrictions
related to the fund; (5) no director or employee of
the banking entity has an ownership interest in the
fund, with certain exceptions; and (6) the banking
entity discloses to investors that it does not
guarantee the performance of the fund. Id.
5 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2).
6 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds; Final
Rule, 79 FR 5535 (Jan. 31, 2014).
7 Proposed Revisions to Prohibitions and
Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain
Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds
and Private Equity Funds, 83 FR 33432 (July 17,
2018).
8 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 84
FR 61974 (Nov. 14, 2019). The regulations
implementing section 13 of the BHC Act, as
amended through June 1, 2020, are referred
throughout as the ‘‘implementing regulations.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
covered fund provisions beyond those
changes for which specific rule text was
proposed.9 The 2019 amendments
finalized those changes to the covered
fund provisions for which specific rule
text was proposed in the 2018
proposal.10 The agencies indicated they
would issue a separate proposal
addressing and requesting comment on
the covered fund provisions of the rule
and other fund-related issues, and, in
February 2020, the agencies issued a
separate notice of proposed rulemaking
that specifically addressed those areas
(the 2020 proposal).11
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
proposed revisions to a number of the
provisions regarding covered fund
investments and activities as well as to
other provisions of the implementing
regulations related to the treatment of
funds. The proposed changes, which
were based on comments received in
response to the agencies’ questions in
the 2018 proposal and the agencies’
experience with the implementing
regulations, were intended to reduce the
extraterritorial impact of the
implementing regulations, improve and
streamline the covered fund provisions,
and provide clarity to banking entities
regarding the provision of financial
services and the conduct of permissible
activities in a manner that is consistent
with the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act.
To better limit the extraterritorial
impact of the implementing regulations,
the 2020 proposal would have exempted
the activities of certain funds that are
organized outside of the United States
and offered to foreign investors
(qualifying foreign excluded funds) from
the restrictions of the implementing
regulations. Under the 2013 rule, in
certain circumstances, some foreign
funds that are not ‘‘covered funds’’ may
be subject to the implementing
regulations as ‘‘banking entities,’’ if they
are controlled by a foreign banking
entity, and thus could be subject to
more onerous compliance obligations
than are imposed on similarly-situated
U.S. covered funds, even though the
foreign funds have limited nexus to the
United States. Accordingly, the 2020
FR 33471–87.
response to the 2018 proposal, the agencies
received numerous comments related to covered
fund issues for which no specific rule text was
proposed. However, in the preamble to the 2019
amendments, the agencies generally deferred public
consideration of such comments to a future
proposed rulemaking. 84 FR 62016.
11 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 85
FR 12120 (Feb. 28, 2020).
PO 00000
9 83
10 In
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46423
proposal would have codified an
existing policy statement by the Federal
banking agencies (the OCC, Board, and
FDIC) that addresses the potential issues
related to a foreign banking entity
controlling qualifying foreign excluded
funds.
The 2020 proposal also would have
made modifications to several existing
exclusions from the covered fund
provisions to provide clarity and
simplify compliance with the
requirements of the implementing
regulations. First, the 2020 proposal
would have revised certain restrictions
in the foreign public funds exclusion to
more closely align the provision with
the exclusion for similarly-situated U.S.
registered investment companies.
Second, the 2020 proposal would have
permitted loan securitizations excluded
from the definition of covered fund to
hold a small amount of non-loan assets,
consistent with past industry practice,
and would have codified existing stafflevel guidance regarding this exclusion.
In addition, the 2020 proposal would
have revised the exclusion for small
business investment companies to
account for the life cycle of those
companies and requested comment on
whether to clarify the scope of the
exclusion for public welfare and other
investments to include rural business
investment companies and qualified
opportunity funds. Finally, the 2020
proposal would have addressed
concerns about certain components of
the preamble to the 2013 rule related to
calculating a banking entity’s ownership
interests in covered funds.
The agencies also included in the
2020 proposal several new exclusions
from the covered fund definition in
order to more directly align the
regulation with the purpose of the
statute. For example, the agencies
recognized that the implementing
regulations have inhibited banking
entities’ ability to extend credit by
restricting their relationships with
credit funds, and the 2020 proposal
would have created a new exclusion for
such funds. Under the 2020 proposal,
banking entities would have been able
to invest in and have certain
relationships with credit funds that
extend the type of credit that a banking
entity may provide directly, subject to
certain safeguards. Relatedly, the 2020
proposal would have established an
exclusion from the definition of covered
fund for venture capital funds. This
provision was intended to facilitate
banking entities’ abilities to engage in
this important type of development and
investment activity, which may
facilitate capital formation and provide
important financing for small
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46424
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
businesses, particularly in areas where
such financing may not be readily
available. In addition, the agencies
believed that excluding such activities
would be consistent with the purpose of
the statute, as it would exclude fund
activities that do not present the risks
that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address.
The 2020 proposal also would have
allowed a banking entity to provide
certain traditional financial services to
its customers via a fund structure,
subject to certain safeguards and
limitations. First, the 2020 proposal
would have excluded from the
definition of covered fund an entity
created and used to facilitate customer
exposures to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service. Second, the
2020 proposal would have excluded
from the covered fund definition wealth
management vehicles that manage the
investment portfolio of a family and
certain other closely related persons.
Both of these provisions were intended
to allow a banking entity to provide
such services in the manner best suited
to its customers.
In addition, the 2020 proposal would
have permitted a banking entity to
engage in a limited set of covered
transactions with a covered fund that
the banking entity sponsors or advises
or with which the banking entity has
certain other relationships. The
implementing regulations generally
prohibit all covered transactions
between a covered fund and its banking
entity sponsor or investment adviser.
The agencies, in the 2020 proposal,
recognized that the existing restrictions
have prevented banking entities from
providing certain traditional banking
services to covered funds, such as
standard payment, clearing, and
settlement services.
Lastly, the 2020 proposal would have
clarified certain aspects of the definition
of ownership interest. Currently, due to
the broad definition of ownership
interest, some loans by banking entities
to covered funds could be deemed
ownership interests. The 2020 proposal
included a safe harbor for bona fide
senior loans or senior debt instruments
to make clear that an ‘‘ownership
interest’’ in a fund would not include
such credit interests in the fund. In
addition, the 2020 proposal would have
clarified the types of creditor rights that
may attach to an interest without
necessarily causing such an interest to
fall within the scope of the definition of
ownership interest. Finally, the 2020
proposal would have simplified
compliance efforts by tailoring the
calculation of a banking entity’s
compliance with the implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
regulations’ aggregate fund limit and
covered fund deduction and provided
clarity to banking entities regarding
their permissible investments made
alongside covered funds.12
The agencies invited comment on all
aspects of the 2020 proposal, including
specific proposed revisions and
questions posed by the agencies. The
agencies received approximately 40
unique comments from banking entities
and industry groups, public interest
groups, and other organizations and
individuals. In addition, the agencies
received six letters related to the subject
matter considered in the 2020 proposal
prior to the formal comment period. The
agencies are now finalizing the 2020
proposal, with certain changes based on
public comments, as described in detail
below.13
III. Overview of the Final Rule
Similar to the 2020 proposal, the final
rule clarifies and simplifies compliance
with the implementing regulations,
refines the extraterritorial application of
section 13 of the BHC Act, and permits
additional fund activities that do not
present the risks that section 13 was
intended to address. The agencies
received comments from a diverse set of
commenters: Comments from banking
entities and financial services industry
trade groups were generally supportive
of the 2020 proposal and recommended
additional modifications, while several
organizations and individuals were
generally opposed to the 2020 proposal.
12 Separately, the agencies proposed various
technical edits to the implementing regulations. See
infra Section IV.G (Technical Amendments).
13 Comments are generally discussed in the
relevant sections, infra. The agencies also received
several miscellaneous comments. One commenter
suggested revising § ll.21 (Termination of
activities or investments; penalties for violations) of
the implementing regulations to provide for
mandatory prison time for violations of the
implementing regulations. Anonymous. The
agencies believe that this comment is beyond the
scope of the current rulemaking. Another
commenter encouraged the agencies to exempt from
the implementing regulations international banks
with a small presence in the United States. Institute
of International Bankers (IIB). The agencies believe
that this comment is beyond the scope of the
current rulemaking. A third commenter claimed
that the 2020 proposal improperly assumed that the
implementing regulations have certain burdens and
that it did not adequately assess the costs and
benefits of the proposed revisions to the
implementing regulations. Occupy the SEC
(Occupy). Contrary to the commenter’s suggestions,
the Federal Register notice for the 2020 proposal
contained extensive discussion of the costs and
benefits of the 2020 proposal. See 85 FR 12151–76.
This final rule contains similar analyses. See infra,
Section IV (Administrative Law Matters). Several
commenters expressed support for the comment
letters submitted by other organizations. E.g., IIB;
European Banking Federation (EBF); Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. (Goldman Sachs); and Canadian
Bankers Association (CBA). Finally, one comment
was not relevant. See Charity Colleen Crouse.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
As described further below, the agencies
have adopted many of the proposed
changes to the implementing
regulations, with certain targeted
adjustments.
To reduce the extraterritorial impact
of the implementing regulations, the
final rule, similar to the 2020 proposal,
exempts the activities of certain funds
that are organized outside of the United
States and offered to foreign investors
(qualifying foreign excluded funds) from
certain restrictions of the implementing
regulations. Specifically, the final rule
codifies an existing policy statement by
the Federal banking agencies that
addresses the potential issues related to
a foreign banking entity controlling a
qualifying foreign excluded fund. The
final rule contains some modifications
to the proposed exemption—the antievasion provision and compliance
program requirements—to address
comments that the proposed exemption
would have unintentionally continued
to subject qualifying foreign excluded
funds to these requirements.
The final rule also revises, as
proposed, but with some modifications,
several existing exclusions from the
covered fund provisions, to provide
clarity and simplify compliance with
the requirements of the implementing
regulations. First, the final rule revises
certain restrictions in the foreign public
funds exclusion to more closely align
the provision with the exclusion for
similarly situated U.S. registered
investment companies. Second, the final
rule permits loan securitizations
excluded from the definition of covered
fund to hold a small amount of debt
securities, consistent with past industry
practice, and codifies existing staff-level
guidance regarding this exclusion. In
addition, the final rule revises the
exclusion for small business investment
companies to account for the life cycle
of those companies and clarifies the
scope of the exclusion for public welfare
and other investments to include rural
business investment companies and
qualified opportunity funds. Finally, the
final rule clarifies the calculation of
ownership interests in covered funds
that are attributed to a banking entity.
The final rule adopts—as proposed,
with some modifications—several new
exclusions from the covered fund
definition to more closely align the
regulation with the purpose of the
statute. First, the final rule establishes a
new exclusion for funds that extend
credit to permit the same credit-related
activities that banking entities can
engage in directly. In addition, the final
rule creates an exclusion for venture
capital funds to help ensure that
banking entities can indirectly facilitate
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
this important type of development and
investment activity to the same degree
that banking entities can do so directly.
Finally, the final rule adopts two
exclusions for family wealth
management and customer facilitation
vehicles to provide banking entities
flexibility to provide advisory and other
traditional banking services to
customers through a fund structure.
In an effort to clarify and simplify
compliance with the implementing
regulations, the final rule adopts
revisions to the provisions that govern
the relationship between a banking
entity and a fund and the definition of
ownership interest. Specifically, the
final rule permits established, codified
categories of limited low-risk
transactions between a banking entity
and a related fund, including riskless
principal transactions, and allows a
banking entity to engage in certain
transactions with a related fund in
connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement activities. In addition, the
final rule would provide an express safe
harbor for senior loans and senior debt
and provide clarity about the types of
creditor rights that would be considered
within the scope of the definition of
ownership interest. Finally, the agencies
are adopting revisions, as proposed, to
provide clarity regarding a banking
entity’s permissible investments in the
same investments as a covered fund
organized or offered by such banking
entity.
Frequently Asked Questions
The staffs of the agencies have
addressed several questions concerning
the implementing regulations through a
series of staff Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs).14 In the 2020
proposal, the agencies indicated that the
proposed rule would not modify or
revoke any previously issued staff
FAQs, unless otherwise specified.15
Several commenters recommended
codifying specific FAQs and making
explicit that other FAQs would continue
to be in effect, unmodified.16 Consistent
with the 2020 proposal and
commenters’ suggestions, the final rule
does not modify or revoke any
14 See https://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/
capitalmarkets/financial-markets/tradingvolckerrule/volcker-rule-implementation-faqs.html
(OCC); https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/
volcker-rule/faq.htm (Board); https://www.fdic.gov/
regulations/reform/volcker/faq.html (FDIC); https://
www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/faq-volcker-rulesection13.htm (SEC); https://www.cftc.gov/
LawRegulation/DoddFrankAct/Rulemakings/DF_
28_VolckerRule/index.htm (CFTC).
15 85 FR 12122–23.
16 E.g., Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (SIFMA); Financial Services Forum
(FSF); and IIB.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
previously issued staff FAQs, unless
otherwise specified.17
Comment Period
Since the issuance of the 2020
proposal, the COVID–19 global
pandemic has substantially disrupted
activity in the United States and in
other countries. The effects of the
COVID–19 disruptions have created
many challenges for households and
businesses, and the agencies received
comments requesting that the agencies
extend the comment period for the 2020
proposal or delay the rulemaking more
generally.18 In contrast, one commenter
expressed support for the rapid
approval of the 2020 proposal, to
provide banking entities regulatory
relief during a period of financial
stress.19 The agencies announced on
April 2, 2020, that they would consider
comments submitted before May 1,
2020.20 The agencies, however, do not
believe that further delay of the rule is
warranted, given the volume, depth, and
diversity of comments submitted. The
agencies believe, as well, that the final
rule may provide clarity to banking
entities that will enable banking entities
to engage in financial services and other
permissible activities in a manner that
both is consistent with the requirements
of section 13 of the BHC Act and will
facilitate capital formation and
economic activity.
Effective and Compliance Dates
The Federal Register notice
accompanying the finalization of the
2019 amendments provided for a rolling
compliance system.21 The effective date
of the amendments was January 1, 2020,
and firms are required to comply with
the revisions by January 1, 2021. Until
the mandatory compliance date,
banking entities are required to comply
with the 2013 rule, or alternatively, a
banking entity may voluntarily comply,
in whole or in part, with the 2019
amendments prior to the compliance
date.
Several commenters on the 2020
proposal suggested that the agencies
provide for voluntary early compliance
with the final rule.22 One commenter
also suggested establishing a transition
period of at least one year.23
FR 12122–23.
Better Markets, Inc. (Better Markets) and
Kathy Bowman.
19 American Bankers Association (ABA).
20 https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/
pressreleases/bcreg20200402a.htm.
21 84 FR 61974.
22 E.g., SIFMA; FSF; Japanese Bankers
Association (JBA); and ABA.
23 JBA.
PO 00000
17 85
18 E.g.,
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46425
The effective date for the final rule
will be October 1, 2020, to
accommodate the requirements of the
Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act.24 The
agencies do not believe an extended
compliance or transition period is
necessary because the final rule largely
tailors the regulations implementing
section 13 of the BHC Act rather than
increases compliance burdens.
IV. Summary of the Final Rule
A. Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds
Since the adoption of the 2013 rule,
a number of foreign banking entities,
foreign government officials, and other
market participants have expressed
concerns regarding instances in which
certain funds offered and sold outside of
the United States are excluded from the
covered fund definition but still could
be considered banking entities in certain
circumstances (foreign excluded
funds).25 This situation may occur if a
foreign banking entity controls the
foreign fund. A foreign banking entity
could be considered to control the fund
based on common corporate governance
structures abroad, such as where the
fund’s sponsor selects the majority of
the fund’s directors or trustees, or the
foreign banking entity otherwise
controls the fund for purposes of section
13 of the BHC Act. As a result, such a
fund would be subject to the
requirements of section 13 and the
implementing regulations, including
restrictions on proprietary trading,
restrictions on investing in or
sponsoring covered funds, and
compliance obligations.
The Federal banking agencies released
a policy statement on July 21, 2017 (the
policy statement), to address concerns
about the possible unintended
consequences and extraterritorial
impact of section 13 and the
implementing regulations for foreign
excluded funds.26 The policy statement
noted that the Federal banking agencies
would not take action against a foreign
banking entity 27 based on attribution of
24 See infra, Section V.D (Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory Improvement Act).
25 The implementing regulations generally
exclude covered funds from the definition of
‘‘banking entity.’’ 2013 rule § ll.2(c)(2)(i).
However, because foreign excluded funds are not
covered funds, they can become banking entities
through affiliation with other banking entities.
26 Statement regarding Treatment of Certain
Foreign Funds under the Rules Implementing
Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act (July
21, 2017), available at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/
files/bcreg20170721a1.pdf.
27 ‘‘Foreign banking entity’’ was defined for
purposes of the policy statement to mean a banking
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
Continued
31JYR4
46426
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the activities and investments of a
qualifying foreign excluded fund to a
foreign banking entity, or against a
qualifying foreign excluded fund as a
banking entity, for a period of one year
while staffs of the agencies considered
alternative ways in which the
implementing regulations could be
amended, or other appropriate action
could be taken, to address the issue. The
policy statement has since been
extended and is currently scheduled to
expire on July 21, 2021.28
For purposes of the policy statement,
a ‘‘qualifying foreign excluded fund’’
means, with respect to a foreign banking
entity, an entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2) Would be a covered fund were the
entity organized or established in the
United States, or is, or holds itself out
as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in financial
instruments for resale or other
disposition or otherwise trading in
financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the foreign
banking entity’s acquisition or retention
of an ownership interest in, or
sponsorship of, the entity;
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the foreign banking entity to
evade the requirements of section 13 or
implementing regulations.
To be eligible for this relief, the
foreign banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of any ownership interest in,
or sponsorship of, the qualifying foreign
excluded fund must meet the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in section 13(d)(1)(I) of the BHC Act and
§ ll.13(b) of the implementing
regulations, as if the qualifying foreign
excluded fund were a covered fund. To
provide greater clarity and certainty to
banking entities and qualifying foreign
excluded funds, and to limit the
extraterritoriality of the rule, the 2020
proposal included a permanent
entity that is not, and is not controlled directly or
indirectly by, a banking entity that is located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or
any State. Id.
28 Statement regarding Treatment of Certain
Foreign Funds under the Rules Implementing
Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act (July
17, 2019), available at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/
files/bcreg20190717a1.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
exemption from the section 13
restrictions on proprietary trading and
investing in or sponsoring covered
funds for the activities of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. The proposed
exemption generally included the same
eligibility criteria from the policy
statement, although it included a
modified version of the anti-evasion
provision such that, in order to qualify,
a fund could not be operated in a
manner that enables ‘‘any other banking
entity’’ (rather than ‘‘the foreign banking
entity’’) to evade the requirements of
section 13 or the implementing
regulations.
The agencies requested comment on
all aspects of this exemption.
Commenters were generally supportive
of the 2020 proposal to exempt
qualifying foreign excluded funds from
certain requirements of the
implementing regulations.29 Two
commenters expressed opposition to the
proposed exemption.30
Some commenters requested that
qualifying foreign excluded funds be
excluded from the definition of banking
entity.31 One commenter expressed
concern that the 2020 proposal would
require qualifying foreign excluded
funds to establish section 13 of the BHC
Act compliance programs, imposing
costs on qualifying foreign excluded
funds.32 This commenter noted that
there may be situations under section 13
of the BHC Act where a foreign banking
entity controls a qualifying foreign
excluded fund, but under foreign law
does not have the necessary authority to
require it to adopt a section 13
compliance program. As such, this
commenter advocated for either
excluding this type of fund from the
definition of banking entity or
exempting this type of fund from the
compliance program requirements
under the rule.33 One commenter
expressed concern that a qualifying
foreign excluded fund would still need
to comply with various restrictions
under section 13, including the
provisions of § ll.14 of the
implementing regulations (i.e., Super
23A) and the compliance program
requirements.34
Some commenters requested that the
agencies change the anti-evasion
29 SIFMA; Bank Policy Institute (BPI);
Bundesverband Investment und Asset Management
e.V. (BVI); American Investment Council (AIC);
ABA; European Fund and Asset Management
Association (EFAMA); Shareholder Advocacy
Forum (SAF); IIB; JBA; CBA; and Credit Suisse.
30 Occupy and Data Boiler Technologies LLC
(Data Boiler).
31 IIB; JBA; CBA; Credit Suisse; and EBF.
32 JBA.
33 JBA.
34 Credit Suisse.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
provision of the qualifying foreign
excluded funds definition so that it
would only apply to the specific foreign
banking entity, in a manner consistent
with the policy statement.35 One of
these commenters suggested, as an
alternative, revising the provision so
that it would only apply to ‘‘any
affiliated banking entities.’’ 36
One commenter requested an antievasion safe harbor and changes to
allow a fund to be a qualifying foreign
excluded fund when a non-U.S. banking
entity serves as a management company
to the fund and is approved to provide
fund management in accordance with
local law.37 This commenter also
requested that the agencies limit the
requirements in the proposed qualifying
foreign excluded funds definition to
only those set forth in § ll.13(b) of the
rule for covered fund activities
conducted by foreign banking entities
solely outside the United States, and
treat as qualifying foreign excluded
funds those funds for which the foreign
banking entity cannot exercise voting
rights.
Pursuant to their authority under
section 13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC Act, the
agencies are adopting the exemption for
the activities of qualifying foreign
excluded funds substantially as
proposed, but with modifications to the
anti-evasion provision and compliance
program requirements. Specifically, the
agencies are exempting the activities of
qualified foreign excluded funds from
the restrictions on proprietary trading
and investing in or sponsoring covered
funds, if the acquisition or retention of
the ownership interest in, or
sponsorship of, the qualifying foreign
excluded fund by the foreign banking
entity meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and
investments conducted solely outside
the United States, as provided in
§ ll.13(b) of the rule.38 Under the
final rule, a qualifying foreign excluded
fund has the same meaning as in the
policy statement as described above and
in the 2020 proposal, except for the
modification to the anti-evasion
provision, as described below.
Section 13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC Act
gives the agencies rulemaking authority
to exempt activities from the
prohibitions of section 13, provided the
agencies determine that the activity in
question would promote and protect the
safety and soundness of the banking
entity and the financial stability of the
35 IIB;
JBA; Credit Suisse; and EBF.
Suisse.
37 JBA.
38 See final rule § ll.13(b).
36 Credit
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
United States.39 For the reasons
described below, the agencies have
determined that exempting the activities
of qualifying foreign excluded funds
promotes and protects the safety and
soundness of banking entities and U.S.
financial stability.
This relief is expected to promote and
protect the safety and soundness of such
funds and their foreign banking entity
sponsors by putting them on a level
playing field with their foreign
competitors that are not subject to the
implementing regulations. If the
activities of these foreign funds were
subject to the restrictions applicable to
banking entities, their asset management
activities could be significantly
disrupted, and their foreign banking
entity sponsors may be at a competitive
disadvantage to other foreign bank and
non-bank market participants
conducting asset management business
outside of the United States. Exempting
the activities of these foreign funds
allows their foreign banking entity
sponsors to continue to conduct their
asset management business outside the
United States as long as the foreign
banking entity’s acquisition of an
ownership interest in or sponsorship of
the fund meets the requirements in
§ ll.13(b) of the implementing
regulations. Thus, the exemption is
expected to have the effect of promoting
the safety and soundness of these
foreign funds and their sponsors, while
at the same time limiting the
extraterritorial impact of the
implementing regulations, consistent
with the purposes of sections
13(d)(1)(H) and (I) of the BHC Act.
The exemption is also expected to
promote and protect U.S. financial
stability. While qualifying foreign
excluded funds have a very limited
nexus to the U.S. financial system, the
exemption would promote U.S.
financial stability by providing
additional capital and liquidity to U.S.
capital markets without a concomitant
increase in risk borne by U.S. entities.
Because the exemption requires that the
foreign banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund meets the requirements in
§ ll.13(b) of the final rule, the
exemption will help ensure that the
risks of investments made by these
foreign funds will be booked at foreign
entities in foreign jurisdictions, thus
promoting and protecting U.S. financial
stability. Additionally, subjecting such
funds to the requirements of the
implementing regulations could
precipitate disruptions in foreign capital
39 12
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(J).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
markets, which could generate spillover
effects in the U.S. financial system.
In response to comments regarding
the anti-evasion provision, the final rule
specifies that the qualifying foreign
excluded fund must not be operated in
a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying
foreign excluded fund, or any other
affiliated banking entity (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund), to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or the final rule. This
change is meant to clarify the scope of
the anti-evasion provision and provide
certainty for banking entities that
sponsor or control the qualifying foreign
excluded fund.
Consistent with feedback from several
commenters, the agencies also have
modified compliance requirements with
respect to qualifying foreign excluded
funds. While, under the final rule, the
activities of a qualifying foreign
excluded fund are exempted from the
proprietary trading restrictions of
§ ll.3(a) and the covered fund
restrictions of § ll.10(a) of the final
rule, the qualifying foreign excluded
fund is still a banking entity. Absent any
additional changes, the qualifying
foreign excluded fund could become
subject to the compliance requirements
of § ll.20. However, since these
qualifying foreign excluded funds are
exempted from the proprietary trading
requirements of § ll.3(a) and covered
fund restrictions of § ll.10(a) of the
final rule, the agencies believe that
requiring a compliance program for the
fund itself is overly burdensome and
unnecessary. The requirements in
§ ll.20 are intended to ensure and
monitor compliance with the
proprietary trading and covered fund
provisions, and there would be no
benefit to applying these requirements
to an entity that is exempt from those
provisions. Therefore, under the final
rule, qualifying foreign excluded funds
are not required to have compliance
programs or comply with the reporting
and additional documentation
requirements under § ll.20. However,
any banking entity that owns or
sponsors a qualifying foreign excluded
fund will still be required to have in
place appropriate compliance programs
for itself and its other subsidiaries and
provide reports and additional
documentation as required by § ll.20.
The final rule does not amend the
definition of ‘‘banking entity’’ as
requested by several commenters.
Because ‘‘banking entity’’ is specifically
defined in section 13 of the BHC Act,
the agencies find it appropriate to
address concerns related to foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46427
excluded funds through their exemptive
rulemaking authority.
The agencies are not making any
change regarding the applicability of
§ ll.14 of the implementing
regulations, which imposes limitations
on relationships with covered funds,
with respect to qualifying foreign
excluded funds. The agencies believe it
is appropriate to retain the application
of § ll.14 to qualifying foreign
excluded funds to limit risks that may
be borne by banking entities located in
the United States through transactions
with such funds.40 Further, given the
limited set of circumstances in which
§ ll.14 would apply (i.e., a transaction
between a foreign excluded fund and a
covered fund that is sponsored or
advised by the same banking entity), the
agencies do not believe that it is overly
burdensome for a banking entity that
sponsors or controls a qualifying foreign
excluded fund to ensure that it is not in
violation of § ll.14.
B. Modifications To Existing Covered
Fund Exclusions
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies acknowledged that the covered
fund definition was expansive.41 To
effectively tailor the covered fund
provisions to the types of entities that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended
to cover, the 2013 rule excluded various
types of entities from the covered fund
definition.42 In response to comments
received on the 2020 proposal, and
based on experience implementing the
rule, the agencies are modifying certain
of the existing exclusions, as described
below, to make them more appropriately
structured to effectuate the intent of the
statute and its implementing
regulations.
1. Foreign Public Funds
2013 Rule
To provide consistent treatment for
U.S. registered investment companies
and their foreign equivalents, the
implementing regulations exclude
foreign public funds from the definition
of covered fund.43 A foreign public fund
40 A U.S. banking entity’s exposure to a fund that
would be a qualifying foreign excluded fund with
respect to a foreign banking entity may still be a
covered fund with respect to a U.S. banking entity
under § ll.10(b)(1)(iii) of the implementing
regulations. A U.S. banking entity’s investment in
and relationship with such a fund could therefore
be subject to the entirety of the applicable
prohibitions and restrictions of Subpart C of the
implementing regulations.
41 See 79 FR 5677.
42 See id.
43 In adopting the foreign public fund exclusion,
the agencies’ view was that it was appropriate to
exclude these funds from the ‘‘covered fund’’
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
Continued
31JYR4
46428
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
is generally defined under the 2013 rule
as any issuer that is organized or
established outside of the United States
and the ownership interests of which
are (1) authorized to be offered and sold
to retail investors in the issuer’s home
jurisdiction and (2) sold predominantly
through one or more public offerings
outside of the United States.44 The
agencies stated in the preamble to the
2013 rule that they generally expect that
an offering is made predominantly
outside of the United States if 85
percent or more of the fund’s interests
are sold to investors that are not
residents of the United States.45 The
2013 rule defines ‘‘public offering’’ for
purposes of this exclusion to mean a
‘‘distribution,’’ as defined in
§ ll.4(a)(3) of subpart B, of securities
in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that the distribution
complies with all applicable
requirements in the jurisdiction in
which such distribution is being made;
the distribution does not restrict
availability to only investors with a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and the issuer has
filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such
jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.46
The 2013 rule places an additional
condition on a U.S. banking entity’s
ability to rely on the foreign public fund
exclusion with respect to any foreign
fund it sponsors.47 The foreign public
fund exclusion is only available to a
U.S. banking entity with respect to a
foreign fund sponsored by the U.S.
banking entity if, in addition to the
requirements discussed above, the
fund’s ownership interests are sold
predominantly to persons other than the
sponsoring banking entity, the issuer (or
affiliates of the sponsoring banking
entity or issuer), and employees and
directors of such entities.48 The agencies
stated in the preamble to the 2013 rule
that, consistent with the agencies’ view
concerning whether a foreign public
fund has been sold predominantly
definition because they are sufficiently similar to
U.S. registered investment companies. 79 FR 5678.
44 2013 rule § ll.10(c)(1); see also 79 FR 5678.
45 79 FR 5678.
46 2013 rule § ll.10(c)(1)(iii).
47 Although the discussion of this condition
generally refers to U.S. banking entities for ease of
reading, the condition also applies to foreign
subsidiaries of a U.S. banking entity. See 2013 rule
§ ll.10(c)(1)(ii) (applying this limitation ‘‘[w]ith
respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws of the United
States or of any State and any issuer for which such
banking entity acts as sponsor’’).
48 See 2013 rule § ll.10(c)(1)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
outside of the United States, the
agencies generally expect that a foreign
public fund would satisfy this
additional condition if 85 percent or
more of the fund’s interests are sold to
persons other than the sponsoring U.S.
banking entity and the specified persons
connected to that banking entity.49
2020 Proposal
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
acknowledged that some of the
conditions of the 2013 rule’s foreign
public fund exclusion may not be
necessary to ensure consistent treatment
of foreign public funds and U.S.
registered investment companies.
Moreover, some conditions may make it
difficult for a non-U.S. fund to qualify
for the exclusion or for a banking entity
to validate whether a non-U.S. fund
qualifies for the exclusion, resulting in
certain non-U.S. funds that are similar
to U.S. registered investment companies
being treated as covered funds.
To address these concerns, the 2020
proposal would have made certain
modifications to the foreign public fund
exclusion. First, the agencies proposed
to replace the requirement that the fund
be authorized to be offered and sold to
retail investors in the issuer’s home
jurisdiction (the home jurisdiction
requirement) and the requirement that
the fund interests be sold
predominantly through one or more
public offerings outside of the United
States, with a requirement that the fund
is authorized to offer and sell ownership
interests, and such interests are offered
and sold, through one or more public
offerings outside of the United States.
This change would have permitted
foreign funds to qualify for the
exclusion if they are organized in one
jurisdiction but only authorized to be
sold to retail investors in another
jurisdiction, as this is a fairly common
way for foreign retail funds to be
organized. Also, no longer requiring a
fund to be sold predominantly through
one or more public offerings was
intended to reduce the difficulty that
banking entities have described in
determining and monitoring the
distribution history and patterns of a
third-party sponsored fund or a
sponsored fund whose interests are sold
through third-party distributors.
The agencies also proposed modifying
the definition of ‘‘public offering’’ from
the implementing regulations to add a
new requirement that the distribution be
subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or
regulations, to help ensure that foreign
funds qualifying for this exclusion are
PO 00000
49 79
FR 5678.
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sufficiently similar to U.S. registered
investment companies. Additionally,
the 2020 proposal would have only
applied the condition that the
distribution comply with all applicable
requirements in the jurisdiction where it
is made to instances in which the
banking entity acts as the investment
manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, commodity
pool operator, or sponsor. This
proposed change was intended to
address the potential difficulty that a
banking entity investing in a third-party
sponsored fund may have in
determining whether the distribution of
such fund complied with all the
requirements in the jurisdiction where it
was made.
To simplify the requirements of the
exclusion and address concerns
described by banking entities with the
difficulty in tracking the sale of
ownership interests to employees and
their immediate family members, the
2020 proposal would have eliminated
the limitation on selling ownership
interests of the issuer to employees
(other than senior executive officers) of
the sponsoring banking entity or the
issuer (or affiliates of the banking entity
or issuer). This change was intended to
help align the treatment of foreign
public funds with that of U.S. registered
investment companies, as the exclusion
for U.S. registered investment
companies has no such limitation. The
2020 proposal would have continued to
limit the sale of ownership interests to
directors or senior executive officers of
the sponsoring banking entity or the
issuer (or their affiliates), as the agencies
believed that such a requirement would
be simpler for a banking entity to track.
Finally, the 2020 proposal requested
comment on the appropriateness of the
expectation stated in the preamble to
the 2013 rule that, for a U.S. banking
entity-sponsored foreign fund to satisfy
the condition that it be
‘‘predominantly’’ sold to persons other
than the sponsoring U.S. banking entity
and certain persons connected to that
banking entity, at least 85 percent of the
ownership interests in the fund should
be sold to such other persons.
Discussion of Comments and the Final
Rule
The agencies are adopting all of the
proposed changes and are making
certain adjustments in response to
comments received, as discussed below.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
generally supported the proposed
changes to the foreign public funds
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
exclusion.50 Specifically, commenters
supported the elimination of the home
jurisdiction requirement and the
requirement that the fund be sold
predominantly through one or more
public offerings.51 Commenters
supported the proposed change to the
‘‘public offering’’ definition to include a
requirement that a distribution be
subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or
regulations,52 but did not recommend
further specifying what substantive
disclosure and investor protection
requirements should apply because they
generally viewed it as unnecessary and
overly prescriptive.53 Commenters also
supported eliminating the restriction on
share ownership by employees (other
than senior executives and directors) of
the U.S. banking entity that sponsors the
foreign public fund.54 In response to a
specific question in the 2020 proposal,
one commenter indicated that the
proposed changes to the foreign public
funds exclusion would not increase the
risk of evasion of the requirements of
section 13 and the implementing
regulations, and thus no additional antievasion measures were necessary.55
Another commenter stated that the
proposed changes were less than ideal
but were acceptable after balancing
compliance costs and benefits.56
Commenters also recommended
additional changes to further align the
treatment of foreign public funds with
that of U.S. registered investment
companies or to prevent evasion of the
rule.57 Specifically, some commenters
recommended eliminating the
requirement that a fund actually be sold
through a public offering and, instead,
only require that a fund be authorized
50 IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF;
Investment Company Institute (ICI); BVI; CBA;
Committee on Capital Markets Regulation (CCMR);
Data Boiler; Goldman Sachs; Investment Adviser
Association (IAA); JBA; SAF; and U.S. Chamber of
Commerce Center for Capital Markets
Competitiveness (CCMC).
51 IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI;
BVI; and CBA.
52 IIB; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; and BVI.
53 IIB; ICI; and CBA. One commenter supported
this assertion by stating that 95 percent of the
world’s securities markets, including all major
emerging markets, have substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection rules that are guided by
the International Organization of Securities
Commissions’ common principles for retail funds
and the detailed policy work that informs those
principles. ICI.
54 FSF.
55 SIFMA.
56 Data Boiler.
57 One commenter recommended that the
agencies create an exclusion from the ‘‘proprietary
trading’’ definition for the activities of regulated
funds, including foreign public funds, under certain
circumstances. ICI. The agencies note that such a
change is not within the scope of this rulemaking.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
to be sold through a public offering.58
These commenters generally viewed
this requirement as burdensome and
difficult to administer and noted that
U.S. registered investment companies
are not required to be sold in public
distributions. The agencies do not
consider the fact that there is no
requirement for U.S. registered
investment companies to be actually
sold through public offerings as a
sufficient rationale for removing this
requirement from the foreign public
fund exclusion. Requiring foreign public
funds to be sold through one or more
public offerings is intended to ensure
that such funds are in fact public funds
and thus sufficiently similar to U.S.
registered investment companies. While
there may be certain limited scenarios
where a U.S. registered investment
company is not sold to retail investors,
the agencies believe that the vast
majority of U.S. registered investment
companies are sold to retail investors.
Furthermore, U.S. registered investment
companies are subject to robust
registration, reporting, and other
requirements that are familiar to the
agencies, whereas foreign public funds
are subject to a differing array of
requirements depending on the
jurisdiction where they are authorized
to be sold. These other jurisdictions may
have less developed requirements for
retail funds, which may increase the
likelihood of a fund seeking
authorization for public distribution in
certain foreign jurisdictions solely as a
means of avoiding the covered fund
prohibition. The agencies believe that
eliminating this requirement would
increase the risk of evasion by
permitting foreign funds that may be
authorized for sale to retail investors in
a foreign jurisdiction—but are only sold
through private offerings where no
substantive disclosure or retail investor
protections exist—to qualify for the
exclusion. Such funds would not be
comparable to U.S. registered
investment companies and would not be
the type of fund that foreign public fund
exclusion was intended to address.
Accordingly, the agencies are not
adopting this suggested modification.
One trade association commenter
suggested eliminating a provision in the
‘‘public offering’’ requirement that
prohibits a distribution from being
limited to investors with a minimum net
worth or net investment assets because
some of its members distribute funds,
including mutual funds, in offerings
that do not meet this requirement but
that are nonetheless subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
PO 00000
58 IIB;
SIFMA; and EBF.
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46429
investor protection requirements.
Similar to the reasons for retaining the
requirement that a foreign public fund
actually be sold through one or more
public offerings, the agencies believe
that retaining this requirement is
necessary to ensure that funds
qualifying for this exclusion are
sufficiently similar to U.S. registered
investment companies. In fact, one of
the identifying characteristics of a
covered fund is that its offerings are
limited to investors with minimum net
worth or net investment assets.59 The
agencies therefore believe that foreign
funds that limit their offerings to
investors with a minimum net worth or
net investment assets are generally not
sufficiently similar to U.S. registered
investment companies, and thus the
agencies are not adopting this suggested
change to the ‘‘public offering’’
definition.
One commenter opposed the
proposed elimination of the requirement
in the ‘‘public offering’’ definition that
a distribution comply with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made for a banking entity that
does not serve as the fund’s investment
manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, commodity
pool operator, or sponsor.60 The final
rule adopts this modification as
proposed, because the agencies believe
the other eligibility criteria for a fund to
qualify under the foreign public fund
exclusion are sufficient to appropriately
identify these funds. In addition, the
agencies recognize that it may be
difficult or impossible for a banking
entity that invests in a third-party fund
to know whether the fund’s distribution
complied with all applicable
requirements in the jurisdiction where it
was distributed.
One commenter recommended that
the agencies require 85 percent of a
foreign public fund’s ownership
interests be sold to and owned by ‘‘bona
fide’’ retail investors in the fund’s home
jurisdiction.61 However, for the same
reasons that the agencies are eliminating
the home jurisdiction requirement and
the requirement that a fund be sold
predominantly through public offerings,
59 Under the Investment Company Act, certain
funds whose offerings are limited to investors with
minimum net worth or net investment assets are
exempt from registration as investment companies.
See 15 U.S.C. 80a–3(c)(7). These funds are generally
treated as covered funds under section 13 of the
BHC Act and the implementing regulations. See 12
U.S.C. 1851(h)(2); implementing regulations
§ ll.10(b)(1)(i).
60 Data Boiler.
61 Oleh Zadorestskyy. This commenter also
suggested that the agencies require proof that the
investors were non-U.S. persons.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46430
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the agencies are not adopting this
requirement.
Some commenters suggested that the
agencies identify common foreign fund
types that are presumed to qualify for
the exclusion for foreign public funds
for the purpose of improving efficiency
and simplifying compliance with the
rule.62 Other commenters recommended
that issuers listed on an internationallyrecognized exchange and available in
retail-level denominations should
automatically qualify for the exclusion
for similar reasons.63 Although the
agencies expect many such funds will
qualify for the exclusion, the agencies
decline to adopt either of these
suggested changes, as both would
require the agencies’ review and ongoing monitoring of foreign laws and
regulations to ensure that the types of
funds that would qualify under these
provisions are sufficiently similar to
U.S. registered investment companies
and that their exclusion as foreign
public funds would continue to be
appropriate.
Some commenters recommended that
the agencies entirely eliminate the
restrictions on share ownership by
parties affiliated with a U.S. banking
entity sponsor of a foreign public
fund.64 Other commenters suggested
that, if the restrictions on share
ownership by banking entities affiliated
with the sponsor were retained, the
restrictions on share ownership by
senior executives and directors should
be removed.65 The commenters
generally viewed these requirements as
unnecessary and burdensome to track
and monitor. As discussed in the
preamble to the 2013 rule, these
requirements are intended to prevent
evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act.66
Additionally, the agencies note that U.S.
banking entity sponsors of foreign
public funds would need to track the
ownership of such funds by their
affiliates and management officials even
if the requirements were eliminated in
order to determine whether they control
such funds for BHC Act purposes.67
Thus, for a U.S. banking entity relying
on this exclusion with respect to a fund
that it sponsors, the agencies are
retaining the requirement that the fund
be sold predominantly to persons other
62 IIB
and EBF.
SIFMA; BPI; ABA; FSF; and CBA.
64 SIFMA and FSF.
65 SIFMA; BPI; ICI; and CCMC.
66 79 FR 5678–79.
67 See 12 CFR 225.2(e); 12 CFR 225.31(d)(2)(ii). If
a foreign public fund is controlled by a banking
entity for BHC Act purposes, such fund could also
be being treated as a banking entity under section
13. See implementing regulations § ll.2(c); FAQ
14.
63 IIB;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
than the U.S. banking entity sponsor,
the fund, affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or fund, and the directors
and senior executive officers of such
entities (collectively, ‘‘U.S. banking
entity sponsor and associated parties’’).
Relatedly, some commenters
recommended that the agencies modify
their expectation of the level of
ownership of a foreign public fund that
would satisfy the requirement that a
fund be ‘‘predominantly’’ sold to
persons other than its U.S. banking
entity sponsor and associated parties,68
which, in the preamble to the 2013 rule,
the agencies stated was 85 percent or
more (which would permit the U.S.
banking entity sponsor and associated
parties to own the remaining 15
percent). These commenters asserted
that the relevant ownership threshold
for U.S. registered investment
companies is 25 percent, and that, for
foreign public funds, the threshold
should be the same. The agencies agree
that the permitted ownership level of a
foreign public fund by a U.S. banking
entity sponsor and associated parties
should be aligned with the functionally
equivalent threshold for banking entity
investments in U.S. registered
investment companies, which is 24.9
percent.69 Accordingly, the agencies
have amended this provision in the final
rule to require that more than 75 percent
of the fund’s interests be sold to persons
other than the U.S. banking entity
sponsor and associated parties.70
One commenter recommended that,
with respect to foreign public funds
FSF; ICI; and CCMC.
the implementing regulations do not
explicitly prohibit a banking entity from acquiring
25 percent or more of a U.S. registered investment
company, a U.S. registered investment company
would become a banking entity if it is affiliated
with another banking entity (other than as
described in § ll.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing
regulations). See 79 FR 5732 (‘‘[F]or purposes of
section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule, a
registered investment company . . . will not be
considered to be an affiliate of the banking entity
if the banking entity owns, controls, or holds with
the power to vote less than 25 percent of the voting
shares of the company or fund, and provides
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company
or fund only in a manner that complies with other
limitations under applicable regulation, order, or
other authority.’’).
70 For a U.S. banking entity that sponsors a
foreign public fund, crossing the 24.9 percent
ownership threshold (other than during a permitted
seeding period) would cause the fund to be a
covered fund (if no other exclusion applied), in
which case the banking entity would be in violation
of the 3 percent per-fund investment limit. See
implementing regulations § ll.12(a)(2)(ii)(A). The
agencies believe that such a strict prohibition
against a U.S. banking entity acquiring 25 percent
or more of a foreign public fund that it sponsors is
appropriate because of the elevated risk of evasion
by the sponsoring banking entity, which may be
able to control the investments made by the fund.
PO 00000
68 BPI;
69 Although
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sponsored by U.S. affiliates of foreign
banking entities, the agencies exclude
the sponsoring U.S. banking entity’s
non-U.S. affiliates and their directors
and employees from the restrictions on
share ownership, provided that such
non-U.S. affiliates are not controlled by
a U.S. banking entity.71 This commenter
asserted that there is no U.S. financial
stability or safety and soundness benefit
to applying this restriction to such nonU.S. affiliates and their directors and
employees, as the risks of any such
investments are borne solely outside the
United States. However, with the
change described above, which permits
a U.S. banking entity sponsor and
associated parties to hold less than 25
percent of a foreign public fund, the
agencies do not believe that this change
is necessary. Even if the requirement
were modified as the commenter
suggested, the banking entity and its
affiliates would still be limited to
owning less than 25 percent of the fund
without the fund becoming a banking
entity.
One commenter requested that the
agencies modify § ll.12(b)(1) of the
implementing regulations, which
governs attribution of ownership
interests in covered funds to banking
entities, to clarify that the banking
entity ‘‘or an affiliate’’ can provide the
advisory, administrative, or other
services required in § ll.12(b)(1)(ii)(B)
for the non-attribution rule to apply.
The commenter requested this
clarification because
§ ll.12(b)(1)(ii)(B) is cross-referenced
by FAQ 14, which, as discussed above,
states that a foreign public fund will not
be treated as a banking entity if it
complies with the test in
§ ll.12(b)(1)(ii) (i.e., the banking
entity holds less than 25 percent of the
voting shares in the foreign public fund
and provides advisory, administrative,
or other services to the fund). The
agencies confirm that the requested
interpretation is correct and,
accordingly, have amended
§ ll.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing
regulations to clarify that the ownership
limit applies to the banking entity and
its affiliates, in the aggregate, and the
requirement that the banking entity
provide advisory or other services can
be satisfied by the banking entity or its
affiliates.
One commenter noted that FAQ 16,
which relates to the seeding period for
foreign public funds, uses 3 years as an
example of the duration of such a
seeding period, and requested that the
agencies confirm that a foreign public
fund’s seeding period can be longer than
71 IIB.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
3 years.72 Another commenter requested
that the agencies codify the 3-year
seeding period in the implementing
regulations.73 The agencies believe that,
depending on the facts and
circumstances of a particular foreign
public fund, the appropriate duration of
its seeding period may vary and, under
certain facts and circumstances, may
exceed three years. The agencies believe
that this flexibility is appropriate and
thus decline to further specify such a
limit. Another commenter requested
that the agencies codify the foreign
public fund seeding FAQ,74 FAQ 14,
and FAQ 16, both described above, in
the implementing regulations.75 The
agencies decline to codify these FAQs at
this time but note that the final rule
does not modify or revoke any
previously issued staff FAQs, unless
otherwise specified.
In the final rule, the agencies are
adopting the amendments to the foreign
public funds exclusion as proposed,
with the additional modifications
described above. The agencies believe
the revised requirements will make the
foreign public fund exclusion more
effective by expanding its availability,
providing clarity, and simplifying
compliance with its requirements, while
continuing to ensure that the funds that
qualify are sufficiently similar to U.S.
registered investment companies.
2. Loan Securitizations
Section 13 of the BHC Act provides
that ‘‘[n]othing in this section shall be
construed to limit or restrict the ability
of a banking entity . . . to sell or
securitize loans in a manner otherwise
permitted by law.’’ 76 To effectuate this
statutory mandate, the 2013 rule
excluded from the definition of covered
fund loan securitizations that issue
asset-backed securities and hold only
loans, certain rights and assets that arise
from the structure of the loan
securitization or from the loans
supporting a loan securitization, and a
small set of other financial instruments
(permissible assets).77
Since the adoption of the 2013 rule,
several banking entities and other
72 IAA.
73 CCMC.
74 The foreign public fund seeding FAQ states
that staffs of the agencies would not advise that a
seeding vehicle that is operated pursuant to a
written plan to become a foreign public fund and
that meets certain conditions be treated as a covered
fund during such seeding period.
75 IIB.
76 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2).
77 See 2013 rule § ll.10(c)(8). Loan is further
defined as any loan, lease, extension of credit, or
secured or unsecured receivable that is not a
security or derivative. Implementing regulations
§ ll.2(t).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
participants in the loan securitization
industry have commented that the
limited set of permissible assets has
inappropriately restricted their ability to
use the loan securitization exclusion. In
the 2018 proposal, the agencies asked
several questions regarding the efficacy
and scope of the exclusion and the Loan
Securitization Servicing FAQ.78
Comments focused on permitting small
amounts of non-loan assets and
clarifying the treatment of leases and
related assets.
In response to these concerns, the
2020 proposal would have codified the
Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ and
permitted loan securitizations to hold a
small amount of non-loan assets. The
agencies requested comment on all
aspects of the proposed changes to the
loan securitization exclusion, and
comments were generally supportive of
the proposed revisions.79 Several
commenters also suggested revisions to
the 2020 proposal.80 Comments are
discussed in detail below.81
Servicing Assets
The implementing regulations permit
loan securitizations to hold rights or
other assets (servicing assets) that arise
from the structure of the loan
securitization or from the loans
supporting a loan securitization.82
Rights or other servicing assets are
assets designed to facilitate the servicing
of the underlying loans or the
distribution of proceeds from those
loans to holders of the asset-backed
securities.83 In response to confusion
regarding the scope of the provisions
permitting servicing assets and a
separate provision limiting the types of
FR 33480–81.
SIFMA; BPI; Managed Funds Association
(MFA); PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC);
Goldman Sachs; Loan Syndications and Trading
Association (LSTA); and Structured Finance
Association (SFA).
80 E.g., SIFMA; CCMC; BPI; and IIB.
81 One commenter suggested that some
jurisdictions’ risk retention rules may vary from the
regulations implementing section 15G of the
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o–11), which requires a
banking entity to retain and maintain a certain
minimum interest in certain asset-backed securities.
See IIB. This commenter recommended allowing
banking entities to hold certain investments in
compliance with certain foreign laws (e.g.,
European risk retention rules). The agencies
understand that rules for risk retention vary across
jurisdictions. However, the agencies believe that the
requested action is outside the scope of the current
rulemaking. In addition, another commenter
requested that the agencies clarify the definition of
asset-backed securities as used in the loan
securitization exclusions. See Arnold & Porter Kaye
Scholer LLP (Arnold & Porter). The agencies discuss
the definition of asset-backed securities in Section
IV.C.1.iii (Credit Funds), infra.
82 §§ ll.2(t); ll.10(c)(8)(i)(D); ll.10(c)(8)(v).
83 See, e.g., FASB Statement No. 156: Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets, ¶ 61 (FAS 156).
PO 00000
78 83
79 E.g.,
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46431
permitted securities, the staffs of the
agencies released the Loan
Securitization Servicing FAQ. The FAQ
clarified that a servicing asset may or
may not be a security, but if the
servicing asset is a security, it must be
a permitted security under the rule.
The 2020 proposal would have
codified the Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ in the implementing
regulations to clarify the scope of the
servicing asset provision.84 Commenters
generally supported the codification of
the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ,
indicating that such a codification
would promote transparency and ensure
continued use of the loan securitization
exclusion.85 For the above reasons, the
final rule adopts the codification of the
Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ as
proposed.
Cash Equivalents
The loan securitization exclusion
permits issuers relying on the exclusion
to hold certain types of contractual
rights or assets related to the loans
underlying the securitization, including
cash equivalents. In response to
questions about the scope of the cash
equivalents provision, the Loan
Securitization Servicing FAQ stated that
‘‘cash equivalents’’ means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities.86
To promote transparency and clarity,
the 2020 proposal would have codified
this additional language in the Loan
Securitization Servicing FAQ regarding
the meaning of ‘‘cash equivalents.’’ 87
The agencies did not propose requiring
‘‘cash equivalents’’ to be ‘‘short term,’’
because the agencies recognized that a
loan securitization may need greater
flexibility to match the maturity of high
quality, highly liquid investments to its
expected or potential need for funds.
Commenters generally supported the
codification of the definition of ‘‘cash
equivalents’’ in the loan securitization
84 The 2020 proposal also clarified that special
units of beneficial interest and collateral certificates
meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
the exclusion that are securities need not meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of the
exclusion. See 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(B).
The agencies are adopting this revision, as
proposed.
85 E.g., SIFMA; PNC; and SFA. One commenter
indicated that the current Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ was sufficient and that codifying the
FAQ was not necessary; however, the commenter
did not elaborate on or justify this position. Data
Boiler.
86 See supra, n.14.
87 2020 proposed rule § ll.10(c)(8)(iii)(A).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46432
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
exclusion.88 The final rule adopts the
codification of ‘‘cash equivalents’’ as
proposed.
Limited Holdings of Certain Debt
Securities
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies declined to permit loan
securitizations to hold a certain amount
of non-loan assets.89 The agencies
supported a narrow scope of permissible
assets in loan securitizations, suggesting
that such an approach would be
consistent with the purpose of section
13 of the BHC Act.90
Several commenters on the 2018
proposal disagreed with the agencies’
views and supported expanding the
range of permissible assets in an
excluded loan securitization. After
considering the comments received on
the 2018 proposal, the 2020 proposal
would have allowed a loan
securitization vehicle to hold up to five
percent of the fund’s total assets in nonloan assets. The agencies indicated that
authorizing loan securitizations to hold
small amounts of non-loan assets could,
consistent with section 13 of the BHC
Act, permit loan securitizations to
respond to investor demand and reduce
compliance costs associated with the
securitization process without
significantly increasing risk to banking
entities and the financial system.91 The
agencies requested comment on, among
other things, the maximum amount of
permitted non-loan assets, the
methodology for calculating the cap on
non-loan assets, and whether the
agencies should limit the type of assets
that could be held under the non-loan
asset provision. Specifically, the
agencies requested comment on whether
the non-loan asset provision should be
limited to debt securities or should
exclude certain financial instruments
such as derivatives and collateralized
debt obligations.
Commenters were generally
supportive of allowing loan
securitizations to hold a limited amount
of non-loan assets.92 These commenters
indicated that the requirements for the
current loan securitization exclusion are
too restrictive and excessively limit use
of the exclusion and prevent issuers
from responding to investor demand,
and suggested that a limited bucket of
non-loan assets would not
88 E.g.,
LSTA; PNC; and SIFMA. One commenter
expressed opposition to this codification but did
not elaborate or justify this position. See Data
Boiler.
89 79 FR 5687–88.
90 79 FR 5687.
91 85 FR 12128–29.
92 E.g., SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse; MFA;
Goldman Sachs; LSTA; BPI; and SFA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
fundamentally alter the characteristics
and risks of securitizations or otherwise
increase risks in banking entities or the
financial system.93
Several commenters recommended
against limiting the type of assets that
could be held per the non-loan asset
provision.94 For example, one
commenter stated that allowing
excluded loan securitizations to invest
in any class of asset would allow those
vehicles to achieve investment goals
during periods of constrained loan
supply, while another commenter
indicated that such a restriction would
be unnecessary given that the low limit
on non-loan assets would constrain
risks.95 In contrast, one commenter
suggested limiting the type of
permissible assets to securities with risk
characteristics similar to loans.96
Numerous commenters suggested
raising the cap on non-loan assets from
five percent of assets to ten percent of
assets,97 while one commenter
indicated that a five percent cap would
be sufficient.98 Commenters that
supported an elevated limit on non-loan
assets generally argued that a ten
percent limit would further reduce
compliance burdens while not
materially increasing risk.99
Several commenters also suggested a
method for calculating the cap on nonloan assets: The par value of assets on
the day they are acquired.100 These
commenters suggested that relying on
par value is accepted practice in the
loan securitization industry and would
obviate concerns related to tracking
amortization or prepayment of loans in
a securitization portfolio.101 One of
these commenters further specified that
the limit should be calculated (1)
according to the par value of the
acquired assets on the date of
investment over the securitization’s
total collateral pool and (2) only at the
time of investment.102 Another
commenter indicated that the cap
should be calculated as the lower of the
purchase price and par value of the nonLSTA and Goldman Sachs.
MFA; LSTA; and SFA. One commenter
also requested that the agencies make clear that the
non-loan assets would not be subject to the other
provisions of the loan securitization exclusion.
LSTA.
95 SFA and LSTA.
96 JBA.
97 SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse; MFA;
Goldman Sachs; LSTA; and SFA.
98 PNC. Another commenter who generally
supported the proposed modifications to the loan
securitization exclusion did not urge the agencies
to raise the cap on non-loan assets. See BPI.
99 E.g., LSTA; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
100 SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and LSTA.
101 SIFMA and BPI.
102 BPI.
PO 00000
93 E.g.,
94 E.g.,
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
qualifying assets over the issuer’s
aggregate capital commitments plus its
subscription based credit facility.103 A
third commenter suggested having a
separate valuation mechanism for equity
securities, which the commenter
suggested should be market value upon
acquisition.104
Finally, two commenters opposed
allowing excluded loan securitizations
to hold non-loan assets and suggested
that such a change would be contrary to
the purpose of section 13 of the BHC
Act or would result in loan
securitizations with differing risk
characteristics, potentially increasing
monitoring costs on investors.105 In
addition, a commenter claimed that the
2020 proposal to allow excluded loan
securitizations to hold non-loan assets
would be contrary to section 13 of the
BHC Act.106 Specifically, this
commenter suggested that the rule of
construction in 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2)
only permits the securitization or sale of
loans and that legislative history
supports this reading of the statute.
The agencies previously concluded
and continue to believe they have legal
authority to adopt the proposed
allowance for a limited amount of nonloan assets.107 Section 13(g)(2) of the
BHC Act states, ‘‘[n]othing in this
section shall be construed to limit or
restrict the ability of a banking entity or
nonbank financial company supervised
by the Board to sell or securitize loans
in a manner otherwise permitted by
law.’’ 108 This rule of construction is
permissive—it allows the agencies to
design the regulations implementing
section 13 in a way that accommodates
and does not unduly ‘‘limit or restrict’’
the ability of banking entities to sell or
securitize loans. Contrary to the
commenter’s argument, this provision
does not mandate that any loan
securitization exclusion only relate to
loans. As discussed in this section and
the preamble to the 2020 proposal,109
the agencies believe that allowing
excluded loan securitizations to hold
limited amounts of non-loan assets
would, in fact, promote the ability of
103 Goldman
Sachs.
104 SFA.
105 JBA
and Data Boiler.
106 Occupy.
107 See 79 FR 5688–92 (stating, for example, that
‘‘[t]he [a]gencies also do not believe that they lack
the statutory authority to permit a loan
securitization relying on the loan securitization
exclusion to use derivative[s,] as suggested by
[Occupy]’’ and that, more broadly, the agencies
have the authority to allow excluded loan
securitizations to hold non-loan assets).
108 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2).
109 85 FR 12128–29.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
banking entities to sell or securitize
loans.
After considering the foregoing
comments, the agencies are revising the
loan securitization exclusion to permit a
loan securitization to hold a limited
amount of debt securities. Loan
securitizations provide an important
mechanism for banking entities to fund
lending programs. Allowing loan
securitizations to hold a small amount
of debt securities in response to
customer and market demand may
increase a banking entity’s capacity to
provide financing and lending. To
minimize the potential for banking
entities to use this exclusion to engage
in impermissible activities or take on
excessive risk, the final rule permits a
loan securitization to hold debt
securities (excluding asset-backed
securities and convertible securities), as
opposed to any non-loan assets, as the
2020 proposal would have allowed.110
Although several commenters
supported allowing a loan securitization
to hold any non-loan asset to provide
flexibility and allow the issuer’s
investment manager to respond to
changing market demands, the agencies
believe that limiting the assets to debt
securities is more consistent with the
activities of an issuer focused on
securitizing loans, rather than engaging
in other activities. The agencies have
determined, consistent with the views
of another commenter, that non-loan
assets with materially different risk
characteristics from loans could change
the character and complexity of an
issuer and raise the type of concerns
that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address. Moreover, as
described further below, limiting the
assets to those with risk characteristics
that are similar to loans will allow for
a simpler and more transparent
calculation of the five percent limit,
which will facilitate banking entities’
compliance with the exclusion. For the
same reasons, the final rule does not
permit a loan securitization to hold
asset-backed securities or convertible
securities as part of its five percent
allowance for debt securities. This helps
to ensure that a loan securitization will
not be exposed to complex financial
instruments and will retain the general
characteristic of a loan securitization
issuer.
Similarly, to reduce potential risktaking and to ensure that the fund is
composed almost entirely of loans with
minimal non-loan assets, the final rule
retains the 2020 proposal’s five percent
limit on non-loan assets. Commenters
differed on whether raising the limit on
110 Final
rule § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
non-loan assets was appropriate or
necessary to ensure flexibility, and it is
not clear what benefit would accrue to
issuers who could hold debt securities
of, for example, seven or ten percent
versus five percent. The amount of nonloan assets held by a fund should not be
so significant that it fundamentally
changes the character of the fund from
one that is engaged in securitizing loans
to one that is engaged in investing in
other types of assets.
The agencies are also clarifying the
methodology for calculating the five
percent limit on non-convertible debt
securities.111 The 2020 proposal only
provided that ‘‘the aggregate value of
any such other assets must not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of the
issuing entity’s assets’’ and requested
comment about how the agencies
should calculate this limit.112 As
suggested by several commenters, the
final rule specifies that the limit on nonconvertible debt securities must be
calculated at the most recent time of
acquisition of such assets. Specifically,
the aggregate value of debt securities
held under § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E) of the
final rule may not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(A), cash and
cash equivalents held under
§ ll.10(c)(8)(iii)(A), and debt
securities held under
§ ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E), where the value of
the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities is calculated at par
value at the time any such debt security
is purchased.113
The agencies have chosen the most
recent time of acquisition of nonconvertible debt securities as the
moment of calculation to simplify the
manner in which the 5 percent cap
applies. This would permit an issuer
that, at some point in its life, held debt
securities in excess of five percent of its
assets to qualify for the exclusion if it
came into compliance with the five
percent limit prior to a banking entity
relying on the exclusion with respect to
such issuer. The agencies believe that a
continuous monitoring obligation could
impose significant burdens on excluded
issuers and could cause an issuer to be
disqualified from the loan securitization
exclusion based on market events not
under its control. It is also unnecessary
to require this calculation at other
intervals because limiting permissible
assets to those that have similar
characteristics as loans addresses the
potential for evasion of the five percent
rule § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E)(1)–(2).
112 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E); 85 FR
12129.
113 Final rule § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E)(1)–(2).
PO 00000
111 Final
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46433
limit that could arise if the issuer held
more volatile assets.114
In the final rule, this measurement is
based only on the value of the loans and
debt securities held under
§§ ll.10(c)(8)(i)(A) and (E) and the
cash and cash equivalents held under
§ ll.10(c)(8)(iii)(A) rather than the
aggregate value of all of the issuing
entity’s assets. The purpose of the five
percent limit is to ensure the investment
pool of a loan securitization is
composed of loans. Therefore, the
calculation takes into account the assets
that should make up the issuing entity’s
investment pool and excludes the value
of other rights or incidental assets, as
well as derivatives held for risk
management. This further simplifies the
calculation methodology by excluding
assets that may be more complex to
value and that are ancillary to the loan
securitization’s investment activities.
This straightforward calculation
methodology will ensure that the loan
securitization exclusion remains easy to
use and will facilitate banking entities’
compliance with the exclusion.
The agencies recognize that a loan
securitization’s transaction agreements
may require that some categories of
loans, cash equivalents, or debt
securities be valued at fair market value
for certain purposes. To accommodate
such situations, the exclusion provides
that the value of any loan, cash
equivalent, or permissible debt security
may be based on its fair market value if
(1) the issuing entity is required to use
the fair market value of such loan or
debt security for purposes of calculating
compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations
under its transaction agreements and (2)
the issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets, for example non-performing
loans, consistently. This provision is
intended to provide issuers with the
flexibility to leverage existing
calculation methodologies while
preventing issuers from using
inconsistent methodologies in a manner
to evade the requirements of the
exclusion.
Leases
A commenter on the 2018 proposal
suggested that the loan securitization
exclusion be expanded to cover leases
and related assets, including operating
or capital leases.115 In response, in the
2020 proposal the agencies stated that
they were ‘‘not proposing to separately
114 The agencies also have authority to address
acts that function as an evasion of the requirements
of the exclusion. See implementing regulations
§ ll.21.
115 See 85 FR 12128.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46434
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
list leases within the loan securitization
exclusion because leases are included in
the definition of loan and thus are
permitted assets for loan securitizations
under the current exclusion.’’ 116 That
same commenter made a comment on
the 2020 proposal urging the agencies to
reconsider explicitly including
operating leases and leased properties in
the loan securitization exclusion.117
This commenter asserted that unless the
agencies specifically revise the
definition of ‘‘rights or other assets’’ to
explicitly include leased property, then
securitization vehicles with operating
leases that rely on the residual property
value after expiration of the lease to
support their asset-backed securities
would not be able to qualify under the
loan securitization exemption, despite
the 2013 rule’s provisions for special
units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates.
Consistent with the 2020 proposal,
the agencies are not separately listing
leases within the loan securitization
exclusion because leases are included in
the definition of loan and thus are
permitted assets for loan securitizations
under the current exclusion. The
agencies are also not modifying the
definition of ‘‘rights or other assets’’ to
explicitly include leased property, as
any residual value of such leased
property upon expiration of an
operating lease should meet the
requirements to constitute an asset that
is related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding loans.
3. Public Welfare and Small Business
Funds
i. Public Welfare Funds
Section 13(d)(1)(E) of the BHC Act
permits, among other things, a banking
entity to make and retain investments
that are designed primarily to promote
the public welfare of the type permitted
under 12 U.S.C. 24(Eleventh).118
Consistent with the statute, the
implementing regulations exclude from
the definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ issuers
that make investments that are designed
primarily to promote the public welfare,
of the type permitted under paragraph
11 of section 5136 of the Revised
Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C.
24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or
families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) (the public welfare
investment exclusion).119
116 Id.
117 SFA.
118 See
12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E).
regulations
§ ll.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
119 Implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
The 2020 proposal noted that the
OCC’s regulations implementing 12
U.S.C. 24(Eleventh) provide that
investments that receive consideration
as qualified investments under the
regulations implementing the
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) are
public welfare investments for national
banks.120 The 2020 proposal requested
comment on whether any change should
be made to clarify that all permissible
public welfare investments, under any
agency’s regulation, are excluded from
the covered fund restrictions.121 The
2020 proposal specifically asked
whether investments that would receive
consideration as qualified investments
under the CRA should be excluded from
the definition of covered fund, either by
incorporating these investments into the
public welfare investment exclusion or
by establishing a new exclusion for
CRA-qualifying investments.122
In addition, the 2020 proposal
requested comment on whether Rural
Business Investment Companies (RBICs)
are typically excluded from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ because of
the public welfare investment exclusion
or another exclusion and on whether the
agencies should expressly exclude
RBICs from the definition of covered
fund.123 RBICs are licensed under a
program designed to promote economic
development and job creation in rural
communities by investing in companies
involved in the production, processing,
and supply of food and agriculturerelated products.124
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act established
the ‘‘opportunity zone’’ program to
provide tax incentives for long-term
investing in designated economically
distressed communities.125 The program
allows taxpayers to defer and reduce
taxes on capital gains by reinvesting
gains in ‘‘qualified opportunity funds’’
(QOF) that are required to have at least
90 percent of their assets in designated
low-income zones.126 The 2020
proposal requested comment on
whether many or all QOFs would meet
the terms of the public welfare
investment exclusion and on whether
the agencies should expressly exclude
QOFs from the definition of covered
fund.127
85 FR 12130; 12 CFR 24.3.
85 FR 12130 (noting that such a change
could provide additional certainty regarding
community development investments made
through fund structures).
122 See id.
123 See id.
124 See id.
125 See id.
126 See id.
127 See id.
PO 00000
120 See
121 See
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Commenters generally supported
clarifying that funds that make
investments that qualify for
consideration under the CRA qualify for
the public welfare investment
exclusion.128 Commenters noted that
this clarification would be consistent
with the OCC’s regulations concerning
public welfare investments and the
CRA, provide greater certainty, and
avoid unnecessarily chilling public
welfare investment activities.129 One
commenter stated that some banking
entities have been reluctant to invest in
certain community development funds
due to uncertainty as to whether these
funds were covered funds.130 This
commenter stated that explicitly
excluding funds that qualify for
consideration under the CRA from the
definition of covered fund would
eliminate this uncertainty and would
help support the type of community
development efforts that the public
welfare investment exclusion was
designed to promote.131 In addition,
some commenters recommended
excluding funds that qualify for the
public welfare investment exclusion
from the definition of ‘‘banking
entity.’’ 132
Commenters also generally favored
explicitly excluding RBICs and QOFs
from the definition of ‘‘covered fund,’’
either by adopting new exclusions, or by
clarifying the scope of the public
welfare investment exclusion.133
Commenters stated that explicitly
excluding these funds from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ would be
consistent with the statutory provision
permitting public welfare investments.
Commenters stated that RBICs and
QOFs must make investments that are
clearly designed primarily to promote
the public welfare because they are
required to invest primarily in ways that
promote job creation in rural
communities (which may have
significant low- and moderate-income
populations or be economically
disadvantaged and in need of
revitalization or stabilization) and in
economically distressed communities,
respectively.134 Commenters stated that
128 See SIFMA; FSF; BPI; ABA; PNC; Community
Development Venture Capital Alliance (CDVCA);
IIB; and Data Boiler (stating that incorporating the
CRA public welfare exemption may ease some
challenges faced by communities during the current
COVID pandemic, but all PWI should not be
excluded).
129 See SIFMA; FSF; and CDVCA.
130 See CDVCA.
131 See id.
132 See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and IIB.
133 See SIFMA; FSF; ABA (addressing QOFs); and
Small Business Investor Alliance (SBIA)
(addressing RBICs).
134 See SIFMA and FSF.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
certain RBICs and QOFs qualify for the
public welfare investment exclusion,
but providing an express exclusion for
these funds would reduce uncertainty
and associated compliance burdens and
would encourage banking entities to
provide capital to projects that promote
economic development in rural and
low-income communities.135 One
commenter stated that RBICs and QOFs
engage in investments that are
substantively similar or identical to
those of public welfare investment
funds that are already excluded from the
definition of covered fund and of the
type that Congress recognized that
section 13 of the BHC Act was not
designed to prohibit.136 Another
commenter stated that explicitly
excluding RBICs would result in the
provision of valuable expertise and
services to RBICs and provide funding
and assistance to small businesses and
low- and moderate-income
communities.137 One commenter
expressed skepticism about providing a
new exclusion for RBICs and QOFs but
suggested that certain of these funds
may currently qualify for the public
welfare investment exclusion.138
Another commenter stated that it is not
necessary to expressly exclude QOFs
from the definition of covered fund,
noting that these funds should be of the
type primarily intended to promote the
public welfare of low- and moderateincome areas and should therefore
qualify for the current public welfare
investment exclusion.139
After carefully considering the
comments received, the agencies are
revising the public welfare investment
exclusion to explicitly incorporate
funds, the business of which is to make
investments that qualify for
consideration under the Federal banking
agencies’ regulations implementing the
CRA.140 Explicitly excluding these types
of investments from the definition of
covered fund clarifies and gives full
effect to the statutory exemption for
public welfare investments.141 In
addition, this clarification will reduce
uncertainty and will facilitate public
welfare investments by banking entities.
The agencies are also adopting
explicit exclusions from the definition
135 See
SIFMA and FSF.
136 See SIFMA.
137 See SBIA.
138 See Data Boiler.
139 See PNC.
140 Final rule § ll.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
141 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E). A banking entity
must have independent authority to make a public
welfare investment. For example, a banking entity
that is a state member bank may make a public
welfare investment to the extent permissible under
12 U.S.C. 338a and 12 CFR 208.22.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
of covered fund for RBICs and QOFs in
§ ll.10(c)(11) of the final rule. These
types of funds were created by Congress
to promote development in rural and
low-income communities, and, due to
their similarity to SBICs and public
welfare investments, the agencies
believe that section 13 of the BHC Act
was not intended to restrict the types of
funds that engage in those activities.
RBICs are companies licensed under the
Rural Business Investment Program, a
program designed to promote economic
development and the creation of wealth
and job opportunities among
individuals living in rural areas and to
help meet the equity capital investment
needs primarily of smaller enterprises
located in such areas.142 Likewise,
QOFs were developed as part of a
program to promote long-term investing
in designated economically distressed
communities and are required to have at
least 90 percent of their assets in
designated low-income zones.143
Congress created RBICs and QOFs to
encourage investment in rural areas,
small enterprises, and low-income
areas. Providing an explicit exclusion
for these funds in the implementing
regulations gives effect to section 13 of
the BHC Act’s provision permitting
public welfare investments and avoids
chilling the activities of funds that were
not the target of section 13 of the BHC
Act.144 Although many of these funds
may already qualify for the public
welfare investment exclusion, the
agencies are explicitly excluding these
funds from the definition of covered
fund to reduce uncertainty and
compliance burden. Thus, under the
final rule, a covered fund does not
include an issuer that has elected to be
regulated or is regulated as a RBIC, as
described in 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)(A) or
(B), or that has terminated its
participation as a RBIC in accordance
with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not
make any new investments (other than
investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer’s expected or
potential need for funds and whose
currency corresponds to the issuer’s
142 See, e.g., Rural Business Investment Company
(RBIC) Program, 85 FR 16519, 16520 (Mar. 24,
2020).
143 See 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–2(d).
144 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E); 156 Cong. Rec.
S5896 (daily ed. July 15, 2010) (Statement of Sen.
Merkley) (noting that Section 13(d)(1)(E) permits
investments ‘‘of the type’’ permitted under 12
U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh), including ‘‘a range of lowincome community development and other
projects,’’ but ‘‘is flexible enough to permit the
[agencies] to include other similar low-risk
investments with a public welfare purpose’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46435
assets) after such termination.145
Likewise, under the final rule, a covered
fund does not include an issuer that is
a QOF, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).146
The final rule does not exclude funds
that qualify for the public welfare
investment exclusion from the
definition of ‘‘banking entity’’ as
requested by some commenters.147 The
term ‘‘banking entity’’ is specifically
defined in section 13 of the BHC Act.148
In addition, the agencies do not believe
that applying the definition of banking
entity places an undue burden on
banking entities’ public welfare
investments. The agencies believe that
banking entities are able to design their
permissible public welfare investments
so as not to cause the investment fund
to become a banking entity. For public
welfare investment funds that are
banking entities, the agencies believe
that the burden-reducing amendments
adopted in this final rule and the 2019
amendments should mitigate concerns
about compliance burdens.
ii. Small Business Investment
Companies
Consistent with section 13 of the BHC
Act,149 the implementing regulations
exclude from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund’’ SBICs and issuers that have
received notice from the Small Business
Administration to proceed to qualify for
a license as an SBIC, which notice or
license has not been revoked.150 The
agencies proposed revising the
exclusion for SBICs to clarify how the
exclusion would apply to SBICs that
surrender their licenses during winddown phases.151 Specifically, the
agencies proposed revising the
exclusion for SBICs to apply explicitly
to an issuer that has voluntarily
surrendered its license to operate as an
SBIC in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents) after such voluntary
145 Final rule § ll.10(c)(11)(iii). As with SBICs,
discussed below, the final rule contemplates that an
issuer that ceases to be a RBIC during wind-down
may continue to qualify for the exclusion from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ for RBICs if the issuer
satisfies certain conditions designed to prevent
abuse.
146 Final rule § ll.10(c)(11)(iv). As with other
types of issuers excluded from the covered fund
definition, a banking entity must have independent
authority to invest in a QOF.
147 See SIFMA and BPI.
148 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1).
149 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E) (permitting
investments in SBICs).
150 See implementing regulations
§ ll.10(c)(11)(i).
151 See 85 FR 12131.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46436
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
surrender.152 The agencies explained
that applying the exclusion to an issuer
that has surrendered its SBIC license is
appropriate because of the statutory
exemption for investments in SBICs and
because banking entities may otherwise
become discouraged from investing in
SBICs due to concerns that an SBIC may
become a covered fund during its winddown phase.153 The agencies further
noted that the proposed revisions
included a number of requirements
designed to ensure that the exclusion
would not be abused.154 In particular,
the exclusion would apply only to an
issuer that voluntarily surrenders its
license in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and that does not make any
new investments (other than
investments in cash equivalents).155
Most commenters that directly
addressed the 2020 proposal’s revisions
concerning SBICs supported the
proposed revisions, stating that the
proposed revisions would provide
greater certainty to banking entities
wishing to invest in SBICs and would
increase investment in small
businesses.156 One commenter stated
that revising the exclusion for SBICs
would prevent a banking entity from
being forced to sell an interest in an
SBIC that became a covered fund for
reasons outside of the banking entity’s
control.157 Commenters further noted
that the proposed revisions included
sufficient safeguards against evasion
and did not present safety or soundness
concerns.158 One commenter
recommended against revising the
exclusion from the definition of covered
fund for SBICs. This commenter
expressed concern about frequent
buying and selling of SBICs and noted
that section 13 of the BHC Act and its
implementing regulations do not
prohibit a banking entity from lending
to small businesses.159 The commenter
further expressed concern that an SBIC
that surrenders its license may be doing
so because it has failed or no longer
wishes to comply with the Small
Business Administration’s
regulations.160
After carefully considering the
comments received, the agencies are
adopting the revisions to the exclusion
from the definition of covered fund for
SBICs, as proposed.161 The revisions
152 See
id.
id.; 12 U.S.C 1851(d)(1)(E).
154 See 85 FR 12131.
155 See id.
156 See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; PNC; and SBIA.
157 See SBIA.
158 See SIFMA; BPI; and SBIA.
159 See SIFMA; BPI; and SBIA.
160 See Data Boiler.
161 See final rule § ll10(c)(11)(i).
153 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
will provide greater certainty to banking
entities, give full effect to the provision
of section 13 of the BHC Act that
permits investments in SBICs, and
support capital formation for small
businesses. In response to one
commenter’s concerns regarding the
exclusion for SBICs,162 the agencies
note that a banking entity’s investment
in an SBIC must comply with all
applicable laws and regulations,
including the prohibition against
proprietary trading under section 13 of
the BHC Act and its implementing
regulations. Furthermore, as noted
above, the revised exclusion for SBICs
includes safeguards designed to prevent
abuse or evasion. In particular, the
exclusion would only apply to an issuer
that has voluntarily surrendered its
license to operate as an SBIC in
accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and
that does not make new investments
(other than investments in cash
equivalents) after such voluntary
surrender.
C. Additional Covered Fund Exclusions
In addition to modifying certain
existing exclusions, the agencies are
creating four new exclusions from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ to better
tailor the provision to the types of
entities that section 13 was intended to
cover. These exclusions are for credit
funds, venture capital funds, family
wealth management vehicles, and
customer facilitation vehicles.
General Comments
Many commenters were broadly
supportive of the proposed new
exclusions from the definition of
‘‘covered fund.’’ 163 Some commenters
recommended adopting additional
exclusions for an array of fund types
and situations, including for tender
bond vehicles,164 ownership interests
erroneously acquired or retained,165
certain real estate funds,166 and funds in
their seeding period.167 The agencies are
declining to adopt these suggested
exclusions because the requested
actions are outside the scope of the
current rulemaking. In addition, one
commenter urged the agencies to
redefine the definition of ‘‘covered
fund,’’ to rely on a characteristics-based
approach.168 The agencies decline to
revise the definition of ‘‘covered fund’’
Data Boiler.
SIFMA; JBA; Credit Suisse; and SAF.
164 SIFMA.
165 SIFMA and BPI.
166 IAA.
167 ABA.
168 JBA.
for the reasons articulated in the
preamble to the 2013 rule.169
1. Credit Funds
i. Background and 2020 Proposal
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies declined to establish an
exclusion from the definition of covered
fund for funds that make loans, invest
in debt, or otherwise extend the type of
credit that banking entities may provide
directly under applicable banking law
(credit funds).170 The agencies cited
concerns about whether credit funds
could be distinguished from private
equity funds and hedge funds and the
possible evasion of the requirements of
section 13 of the BHC Act through the
availability of such an exclusion. In
addition, the agencies suggested that
some credit funds would be able to
operate using other exclusions from the
definition of covered fund in the 2013
rule, such as the exclusion for joint
ventures or the exclusion for loan
securitizations.171
However, commenters on the 2018
proposal noted that many credit funds
have not been able to utilize the joint
venture and loan securitization
exclusions. In response, the agencies
included in the 2020 proposal a specific
exclusion for credit funds. Under the
2020 proposal, a credit fund would have
been an issuer whose assets consist
solely of:
• Loans;
• Debt instruments;
• Related rights and other assets that
are related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling loans, or
debt instruments; and
• Certain interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives.172
The proposed exclusion would have
been subject to certain additional
requirements to reduce evasion
concerns and help ensure that banking
entities invest in, sponsor, or advise
credit funds in a safe and sound
manner. For example, the proposed
exclusion would have imposed (1)
certain activity requirements on the
credit fund, including a prohibition on
proprietary trading; 173 (2) disclosure
and safety and soundness requirements
on banking entities that sponsor or serve
as an advisor for a credit fund; 174 (3)
safety and soundness requirements on
all banking entities that invest in or
have certain relationships with a credit
162 See
163 E.g.,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
169 See
170 See
79 FR 5671.
79 FR 5705.
171 Id.
proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(i).
proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(ii).
174 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(iii).
172 2020
173 2020
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
fund; 175 and (4) restrictions on the
banking entity’s investment in, and
relationship with, a credit fund.176 The
proposed exclusion also would have
permitted a credit fund to receive and
hold a limited amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) that were received on
customary terms in connection with the
credit fund’s loans or debt
instruments.177
ii. Comments
The agencies requested comment on
all aspects of the proposed credit fund
exclusion. In addition, the agencies
solicited comment on specific
provisions of the proposed exclusion,
including the permissibility of certain
assets and requirements related to the
activities of the credit fund and the
relationship between a banking entity
and a credit fund.178
General
Commenters were generally
supportive of adopting an exclusion for
credit funds, and several commenters
suggested specific revisions to the
proposed exclusion.179 Several
commenters supportive of the 2020
proposal urged the agencies not to adopt
any further limitations on the proposed
exclusion and indicated that the
proposed exclusion would not increase
the risk of evasion of the requirements
of section 13 of the BHC Act.180 Two
commenters expressed general
opposition to or concern about the
proposed credit fund exclusion.181
Asset Requirements
Commenters were generally
supportive of allowing a credit fund to
invest broadly in loans and debt
instruments, certain related assets, and
certain derivatives.182 One commenter
recommended against delineating
between permissible and nonpermissible types of loans and debt
instruments, arguing that credit funds
proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(iv).
proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(v).
177 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii).
178 See 85 FR 12133.
179 E.g., CCMC; AIC; SIFMA; FSF; ABA; Arnold
& Porter; and Goldman Sachs.
180 E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; Goldman Sachs;
and Arnold & Porter.
181 Better Markets and Data Boiler. One of these
commenters suggested that banking entities should
instead rely on the exclusions for joint ventures and
loan securitizations. Data Boiler.
182 E.g., SIFMA; Arnold & Porter; and ABA. One
commenter also noted that the permissible holding
period for debt previously contracted varies
depending on applicable regulations and suggested
that the agencies specify the holding period for debt
previously contracted assets owned by a credit fund
and provide for an extension process. Arnold &
Porter.
175 2020
176 2020
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
should be able to extend credit to the
same degree as would be permitted for
the banking entity to extend directly.183
Another commenter encouraged the
agencies to clarify and expand the
definition of debt instrument and
derivatives, to include all tranches of
debt, collateralized loan and
collateralized debt obligations, and any
derivatives related to hedging credit
risk, such as credit default swaps and
total return swaps.184 In addition, a
commenter suggested clarifying that no
specific credit standard applies to loans
held by a credit fund.185 One
commenter also urged the agencies to
establish a safe harbor to the permissible
asset restrictions for banking entities
that rely, in good faith, on a
representation by the credit fund that
the credit fund only invests in
permissible assets.186
Two commenters recommended
limiting permissible assets to only loans
or debt instruments, and not equity.187
In contrast, a range of commenters
argued that allowing a credit fund to
receive certain assets, like equity,
related to an extension of credit would
promote the sale of loans and extensions
of credit.188 Some of these commenters
suggested that taking equity as partial
consideration for extending credit is
commonplace in the debt and loan
markets and that such a provision could
ensure that credit funds are able to
facilitate loan and debt workouts and
restructurings, a critical financial
intermediation function.189 Most
commenters supportive of the 2020
proposal were generally opposed to a
183 SIFMA. The same commenter also urged the
agencies to permit credit funds to hold commodity
forward contracts, which the commenter argued
may be an appropriate hedge for extensions of
credit to agricultural businesses. SIFMA.
184 Credit Suisse. See also Arnold & Porter
(recommending expanding the types of permissible
derivatives, to allow for more effective hedging and
easier disposal of portfolio assets).
185 ABA.
186 Arnold & Porter.
187 Data Boiler and Better Markets. One of these
commenters argued that the inclusion of non-loan
instruments would be contrary to the purpose of
section 13 of the BHC Act. Data Boiler. As indicated
by the agencies in the preamble to the 2020
proposal, taking limited amounts of non-loan or
debt assets as consideration for an extension of
credit is common and is a permitted practice for
insured depository institutions. Therefore, the
agencies believe it would not be inconsistent with
section 13 of the BHC Act to facilitate the sale of
loans by establishing a credit fund exclusion that
allows a credit fund to hold a limited amount of
certain equity instruments related to extensions of
credit. See also the discussion about permitting
excluded loan securitizations to hold a small
amount of non-loan assets, supra Section IV.B.2
(Loan Securitizations).
188 E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; ABA; and Arnold
& Porter.
189 E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; and Arnold &
Porter.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46437
quantitative limit on the amount of
equity securities (or rights to acquire an
equity security) received on customary
terms in connection with such loans or
debt instruments that could be held by
a credit fund, citing compliance costs
and diminished flexibility,190 but some
commenters indicated that a limitation
of 20 or 25 percent of total assets could
be acceptable if the agencies were to
impose a limit.191
Commenters supportive of allowing
credit funds to hold certain related
assets, such as equity, in connection
with an extension of credit suggested
that the provision would not raise
significant safety and soundness or
evasion concerns. For example, one
commenter claimed that such a
provision would not raise the risk of
evasion, in part, because equity options
received as consideration generally
expire unexercised.192 Other
commenters argued that the activity
requirements of the exclusion would
prevent a credit fund from becoming
actively involved in the purchase and
sale of equity instruments.193 Another
commenter suggested that the agencies
could impose a requirement that nonloan or non-debt assets be acquired on
arms-length terms and adhere to bank
safety and soundness standards.194
Separately, several commenters
recommended allowing excluded credit
funds to hold any type of asset, up to
a certain percentage of aggregate assets,
either 20 or 25 percent of a credit fund’s
total assets.195 These commenters
asserted that permitting a credit fund to
own equity securities and other assets
would help the fund more effectively
provide credit, without altering the
character of the credit fund, and would
reduce compliance burdens associated
with launching and operating a credit
fund.196 In addition, these commenters
claimed that a limited bucket for nonloan and non-debt assets would be
consistent with the ability of banking
entities and some business development
companies to invest in equity.197
Banking Entity and Issuer Requirements
Generally, commenters either agreed
that certain restrictions to ensure that a
credit fund is actually engaged in
prudently providing credit and credit
190 SIFMA; FSF; CCMC; AIC; ABA; and Goldman
Sachs.
191 SIFMA and CCMC.
192 Arnold & Porter.
193 Goldman Sachs and FSF.
194 ABA.
195 SIFMA; FSF; Credit Suisse; ABA; and
Goldman Sachs. One commenter also suggested a
formula for determining the cap. Goldman Sachs.
196 E.g., SIFMA and Goldman Sachs.
197 Id.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46438
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
intermediation and is not operated for
the purpose of evading the provisions of
section 13 of the BHC Act were
appropriate or did not object to the
inclusion of these requirements.198
Several commenters, however, offered
revisions to the activities, sponsor or
advisor, banking entity, or investment
and relationship limit requirements. For
example, several commenters requested
clarification on the prohibition on
proprietary trading by an excluded
credit fund contained in
§ ll.10(c)(15)(ii)(A) of the 2020
proposal. One commenter suggested that
the definition of proprietary trading for
a credit fund should depend on the
definition used by the banking entity.199
Another commenter encouraged the
agencies to incorporate the exclusions
and exemptions from the prohibition on
proprietary trading into the credit fund
exclusion’s prohibition on proprietary
trading.200 A third commenter
recommended making explicit that
exercising rights for certain related
assets, such as an equity warrant, is not
proprietary trading.201
Commenters also requested revisions
to and clarification about the limits on
a banking entity’s investment in, and
relationship with, a credit fund. One
commenter argued that the imposition
of § ll.14 of the implementing
regulations (which imposes limitations
on the relationship between a banking
entity and a fund it sponsors or advises)
would be duplicative of (1) the
requirement that the banking entity not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the credit
fund and (2) certain conflict of interest,
high-risk, and safety and soundness
restrictions.202 Another commenter
claimed that there was little benefit to
imposing the requirements of § ll.14
(described above) and § ll.15 (which
imposes certain material conflicts of
interest, high-risk investments, and
safety and soundness and financial
stability requirements on permitted
covered fund activities) of the
implementing regulations in the context
of credit funds and suggested that the
partial application of § ll.14, in
particular, could lead to unexpected and
198 E.g., SIFMA; Better Markets; FSF; and
Goldman Sachs. One commenter also indicated that
the disclosure requirement for banking entities that
sponsor or advise funds is appropriate. Arnold &
Porter.
199 SIFMA. For example, the commenter
suggested that a credit fund sponsored by a banking
entity subject to the market risk rule should be
permitted to use the definitions of proprietary
trading and trading account in § ll.3(b)(1)(ii).
200 FSF.
201 Arnold & Porter.
202 SIFMA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
inappropriate outcomes, such as
allowing a banking entity to invest in
the equity of a credit fund, but not the
debt instruments issued by that same
credit fund.203 That same commenter
also recommended eliminating
§ ll.10(c)(15)(v)(B) of the 2020
proposal—which would have required
that the banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the credit fund be
conducted in compliance with, and
subject to, applicable banking laws and
regulations—because applicable
banking laws and regulations apply
regardless of the banking entity’s use of
the credit fund exclusion.204
In addition, a commenter argued that
banking entities that serve as investment
advisers or commodity trading advisors
to credit funds should not be subject to
the disclosure and safety and soundness
requirements of § ll.10(c)(15)(iii) of
the 2020 proposal since investment
advisers and commodity trading
advisors who do not otherwise sponsor
or invest in a fund are generally not
subject to section 13 of the BHC Act.
The commenter argued that
§ ll.10(c)(15)(iii) of the 2020 proposal
would impose differing requirements on
a credit fund depending on whether the
investment adviser or commodity
trading advisor was an insured
depository institution or a bank holding
company. That commenter also claimed
that the portfolio requirements in
§ ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(B) of the 2020
proposal could require banking entities
to establish complex compliance
programs to assess credit fund
compliance with state and foreign laws
and that the agencies should limit the
scope of the provision to only federal
banking laws and regulations.205
Finally, one commenter contended
that the application of certain
requirements in the exclusion is
contingent on the type of banking entity
that invests in or sponsors a credit fund
and urged the agencies to make explicit
that only the identity of the sponsor of
the credit fund, and not its affiliates or
third-party investors, determines which
portfolio quality and safety and
soundness requirements apply to the
credit fund.206 More generally, this
commenter asked the agencies to make
explicit in the preamble to the final rule
that the actions of unaffiliated, thirdparty banking entities do not affect
whether a banking entity may invest in
a fund.207
PO 00000
203 Arnold
204 Arnold
& Porter.
& Porter.
205 Id.
206 Id.
207 Id.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Other Comments
Commenters also submitted several
miscellaneous comments about the
proposed exclusion for credit funds.
One commenter requested that the
agencies clarify the definition of assetbacked securities as used in the
proposed credit fund exclusion and the
current loan securitization exclusion.208
That same commenter also urged the
agencies to revise the proposed credit
fund exclusion to allow banking entities
with more stringent credit requirements,
such as insured depository institutions,
to invest in credit funds that hold
distressed debt.209
Finally, the 2020 proposal requested
comment on whether to combine the
proposed credit fund exclusion with the
loan securitization exclusion.
Commenters were generally opposed to
combining the two exclusions, citing
different classes of assets in which the
two types of issuers invest and a
fundamental difference in structure
(loan securitizations issue asset-backed
securities, while credit funds do not).210
In addition, one commenter argued that
while combining the two exclusions
would increase the simplicity of the
rule, such an amalgamated exclusion
could result in increased compliance
burdens for issuers who are accustomed
to the lack of credit requirements in the
current loan securitization exclusion.211
iii. Final Exclusion
After consideration of the comments,
the agencies are adopting the credit
fund exclusion as proposed, with
certain modifications. The agencies
believe that the credit fund exclusion in
the final rule (1) addresses the
application of the covered fund
provisions to credit-related activities
that certain banking entities are
permitted to engage in directly and (2)
is consistent with Congress’s intent that
section 13 of the BHC Act limit banking
entities’ investment in and relationships
with hedge funds and private equity
funds, but not limit or restrict banking
entities’ ability to extend credit.212 The
agencies also believe that the credit
fund exclusion in the final rule, with
the eligibility criteria described below,
will address concerns the agencies
expressed in the preamble to the 2013
208 Id.
209 Id.
210 SIFMA; FSF; CCMC; Credit Suisse; and Data
Boiler.
211 Arnold & Porter.
212 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2), (h)(2). Paragraph
(g)(2) of section 13 of the BHC Act makes clear that
the Volcker rule is not intended to impede banking
entities’ ability to extend credit by, for example,
selling loans or securitize loans. See 12 U.S.C.
1851(g)(2).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
rule about the ability to administer an
exclusion for credit funds and the
potential evasion of section 13 of the
BHC Act.213 Banking entities already
have experience using and complying
with the loan securitization exclusion.
Establishing an exclusion for credit
funds based on the framework provided
by the loan securitization exclusion
allows banking entities to provide
traditional extensions of credit
regardless of the specific form, whether
directly via a loan made by a banking
entity, or indirectly through an
investment in or relationship with a
credit fund that transacts primarily in
loans and certain debt instruments.
The credit fund exclusion limits the
universe of potential funds that can rely
on the exclusion by clearly specifying
the types of activities in which those
funds may engage. Excluded credit
funds can transact in or hold only loans;
debt instruments that would be
permissible for the banking entity
relying on the exclusion to hold
directly; certain rights or assets that are
related or incidental to the loans or debt
instruments, including equity securities
(or rights to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in
connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and certain interest rate
and foreign exchange derivatives. The
credit fund exclusion, with these
eligibility criteria, should not raise
evasion concerns. Similarly, the
agencies’ expectations regarding the
amount of permissible equity securities
(or rights to acquire an equity security)
held and the requirement that the credit
fund not engage in activities that would
constitute proprietary trading should
help to ensure that the extensions of
credit, whether directly originated or
acquired from a third party, are held by
the credit fund for the purpose of
facilitating lending and not for the
purpose of evading the requirements of
section 13. Finally, the restrictions on
guarantees and other limitations should
eliminate the ability and incentive for
either the banking entity sponsoring a
credit fund or any affiliate to provide
additional support beyond the
ownership interest retained by the
sponsor. Thus, the agencies expect that,
together, the criteria for the credit fund
exclusion will prevent a banking entity
from having any incentive to bail out
such funds in periods of financial stress
or otherwise expose the banking entity
to the types of risks that the covered
fund provisions of section 13 were
intended to address.
Consistent with commenters’
suggestions, the agencies are keeping
213 See
79 FR 5705.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
separate the credit fund exclusion and
the loan securitization exclusion
because the structures and purposes of
those two types of issuers differ
sufficiently to warrant different
requirements. For example, loan
securitizations and credit funds have
different asset composition and different
financing and legal structures.
Therefore, the agencies are finalizing a
credit fund exclusion separate from the
loan securitization exclusion.
Asset Requirements
Under the final rule, a credit fund, for
the purposes of the credit fund
exclusion, is an issuer whose assets
consist solely of:
• Loans;
• Debt instruments;
• Related rights and other assets that
are related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling loans, or
debt instruments; and
• Certain interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives.214
Several provisions of the exclusion
are similar to and modeled on
conditions in the loan securitization
exclusion to ease compliance burdens.
For example, any derivatives held by
the credit fund must relate to loans,
permissible debt instruments, or other
rights or assets held and reduce the
interest rate and/or foreign exchange
risks related to these holdings.215 In
addition, any related rights or other
assets held that are securities must be
cash equivalents, securities received in
lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to loans held or, unique to the
credit fund exclusion, equity securities
(or rights to acquire equity securities)
received on customary terms in
connection with the credit fund’s loans
or debt instruments.216
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
requested comment on whether to
impose a limit on the amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) that may be held by an
excluded credit fund.217 After a review
of the comments and further
deliberation, the agencies are not
adopting a quantitative limit on the
amount of equity securities (or rights to
acquire equity securities) that may be
held by an excluded credit fund. Any
such equity securities or rights are
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i).
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(D).
216 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C). In a minor
change from the 2020 proposal, the agencies are
making clear that rights or other assets held under
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of that section may not
include any derivative, other than a derivative that
meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(15)(i)(D) of
that section.
217 85 FR 12133.
PO 00000
214 Final
215 Final
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46439
limited by the requirements that they be
(a) received on customary terms in
connection with the fund’s loans or debt
instruments and (b) related or incidental
to acquiring, holding, servicing, or
selling those loans or debt instruments.
The agencies generally expect that the
equity securities or rights satisfying
those criteria in connection with an
investment in loans or debt instruments
of a borrower (or affiliated borrowers)
would not exceed five percent of the
value of the fund’s total investment in
the borrower (or affiliated borrowers) at
the time the investment is made. The
agencies understand that the value of
those equity securities or other rights
may change over time for a variety of
reasons, including as a result of market
conditions and business performance, as
well as more fundamental changes in
the business and the credit fund’s
corresponding management of the
investment (e.g., exchanges of debt
instruments for equity in connection
with mergers and restructurings or a
disposition of all portion of the credit
investment without a corresponding
disposition of the equity securities or
rights due to differences in market
conditions or other factors).
Accordingly, the agencies can foresee
various circumstances where the
relative value of such equity securities
or rights in a borrower (or affiliated
borrowers) would over the life of the
investment exceed five percent on a
basis consistent with the requirements.
Nonetheless, the agencies expect that
the fund’s exposure to equity securities
(or other rights), individually and
collectively and when viewed over time,
would be managed on a basis consistent
with the fund’s overall purpose.
The agencies are also not imposing
additional restrictions on the types of
equity securities (or rights to acquire an
equity security) that a credit fund may
hold. The final rule prevents a banking
entity from relying on the credit fund
exclusion unless any debt instruments
and equity securities (or rights to
acquire an equity security) held by the
credit fund and received on customary
terms in connection with the credit
fund’s loans or debt instruments are
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly and a sponsor
of a credit fund must ensure that the
credit fund complies with certain safety
and soundness standards.218 Combined
with the prohibition on proprietary
trading by a credit fund,219 these
limitations are expected to prevent
evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act
and should be sufficient to prevent
218 Final
219 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(B), (iii)(B).
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
31JYR4
46440
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
banking entities from investing in or
sponsoring credit funds that hold
excessively risky equity securities (or
rights to acquire an equity security).220
The agencies are, however, clarifying
that the provision allowing related
rights and other assets does not
separately permit the holding of
derivatives. The preamble to the 2020
proposal made clear that ‘‘any
derivatives held by the credit fund must
relate to loans, permissible debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
held, and reduce the interest rate and/
or foreign exchange risks related to
these holdings.’’ 221 The agencies
suggested then and currently believe
that allowing a credit fund issuer to
hold derivatives not related to interest
rate or foreign exchange hedging would
not be necessary to facilitate the indirect
extension of credit by banking entities
and may pose the very risks that section
13 of the BHC Act was intended to
reach. To ensure that the credit fund
exclusions does not inadvertently allow
the holding of certain derivatives
unrelated to interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks, the final rule explicitly
excludes derivatives from permissible
related right and other assets.222
The agencies are not adopting a broad
expansion of permissible assets, as
recommended by several commenters.
Contrary to commenters’ suggestions,
allowing credit funds to hold unlimited
amounts of non-debt instruments or
derivatives, such as credit default or
total return swaps, could present
evasion concerns and is not necessary
for effectuating the rule of
construction.223 The agencies believe
220 One commenter suggested requiring that
equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity
security) be acquired via arms-length market
transactions and adhere to bank safety and
soundness standards. See ABA. Under the final
rule, a banking entity may not rely on the credit
fund exclusion unless any equity securities (or
rights to acquire an equity security) held by the
credit fund are permissible for the banking entity
to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations. Final rule
§ ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(B). In addition, the final rule
requires that equity securities (or rights to acquire
an equity security) related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments must be received on customary
terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments. Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii).
Finally, a banking entity’s investment in, and
relationship with, the issuer must comply with the
limitations imposed in § ll.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund. Final rule
§ ll.10(c)(15)(v)(A).
221 85 FR 12132.
222 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(2).
223 The agencies’ rationale, in the preamble to the
2013 rule, for limiting the permissible assets for the
loan securitization exclusion is particularly
relevant. See 79 FR 5691 (‘‘Under the final rule as
adopted, an excluded loan securitization would not
be able to hold derivatives that would relate to risks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
that only those instruments that
facilitate the extension of credit and
directly-related hedging activities
should be permitted under the
exclusion. For example, allowing the
unlimited holding of credit default
swaps by a majority owned or
sponsored credit fund could raise the
risks that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address. Moreover,
permitting excluded credit funds to
invest up to 25 percent of total assets in
any type of asset could turn the
exclusion for credit funds into an
exclusion for the type of funds that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended
to address. Such a result would be
contrary to section 13 of the BHC Act.
There are several additional changes
recommended by commenters that the
agencies are not including in the final
rule. Specifically, the final rule does
not:
• Allow excluded credit funds to
hold commodity forward contracts.
Although these contracts have
legitimate value as hedging instruments,
the agencies do not believe this type of
hedging activity is consistent with the
purpose of the exclusion for credit
funds, which is to allow banking
entities to share the risks of their
permissible lending activities or to
engage in permissible lending activities
indirectly through a fund structure.
• Permit banking entities that are
insured depository institutions or their
operating subsidiaries to invest in credit
funds through a contribution to a credit
fund of troubled loans and debt
previously contracted assets from the
banking entity’s portfolio. The
conditions in the final rule are intended
to ensure that a credit fund generally
engages in activities that the banking
entity may engage in directly and that
the banking entity’s investment in and
relationship with the fund are
conducted in a safe and sound manner.
to counterparties or issuers of the underlying assets
referenced by these derivatives because the
operation of derivatives, such as these, that expand
potential exposures beyond the loans and other
assets, would not in the Agencies’ view be
consistent with the limited exclusion contained in
the rule of construction under section 13(g)(2) of the
BHC Act, and could be used to circumvent the
restrictions on proprietary trading and prohibitions
in section 13(f) of the BHC Act. The Agencies
believe that the use of derivatives by an issuing
entity for asset-backed securities that is excluded
from the definition of covered fund under the loan
securitization exclusion should be narrowly
tailored to hedging activities that reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks directly related
to the asset-backed securities or the loans
supporting the asset-backed securities because the
use of derivatives for purposes other than reducing
interest rate risk and foreign exchange risks would
introduce credit risk without necessarily relating to
or involving a reduction of interest rate risk or
foreign exchange risk.’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The agencies decline to deviate from
these standards for any particular type
of credit fund because doing so could
permit activities that raise the type of
concerns that section 13 of the BHC Act
was intended to address.
• Further specify the holding period
for securities held in lieu of debts
previously contracted held by a credit
fund. Generally, a banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion unless any
debt instruments and equity securities
(or rights to acquire equity securities)
held by the fund would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and
hold directly under applicable federal
banking laws and regulations. However,
the requirement that a banking entity be
able to hold a given asset directly does
not apply to securities held in lieu of
debts previously contracted under the
final regulations. Because a banking
entity’s ability to invest in or sponsor an
excluded credit fund is not contingent
on how long the credit fund holds
securities held in lieu of debts
previously contracted, the agencies do
not believe it is necessary to amend the
regulations to impose a specific holding
period on securities held by a credit
fund in lieu of debts previously
contracted.224
• Revise or expand on the definition
of debt instrument. The agencies believe
that the term debt instrument already
has a general meaning that is used in the
marketplace and by regulators and that
a new definition is unnecessary given
this widely understood meaning and
could cause confusion.
• Adopt a safe harbor for banking
entities that rely, in good faith, on a
representation by the credit fund that it
only invests in permissible assets. It is
the responsibility of the banking entity
to ensure that it complies with section
13 of the BHC Act and the
implementing regulations, and such
responsibility cannot be substituted
solely with a representation from a
credit fund.
Activity Requirements
The agencies are adopting the activity
requirements for issuers in the 2020
proposal without revision. Under the
final rule, a credit fund is not a covered
fund, provided that:
• The fund does not engage in
activities that would constitute
proprietary trading, as defined in
§ ll.3(b)(1)(i) of the rule, as if the fund
were a banking entity; 225 and
224 The agencies note that banking entities must
otherwise comply with applicable law. See infra,
Additional Banking Entity Requirements.
225 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
• The fund does not issue assetbacked securities.226
The agencies decline to adopt changes
recommended by commenters because
the agencies believe the activity
requirements are clear and appropriate.
The first provision explicitly references
the prohibition on proprietary trading
by a banking entity in § ll.3 of the
implementing regulations and, in
particular, the short-term intent prong
contained in § ll.3(b)(1)(i). For the
avoidance of doubt, a credit fund would
not be able to elect a different definition
of proprietary trading or trading
account. Varying the definition of
proprietary trading depending on the
type of banking entity that sponsors or
invests in the credit fund, as suggested
by a commenter, could result in
conflicting requirements for credit funds
with multiple banking entity investors
and generally increase compliance
burdens on credit funds. The agencies
also note that activities permitted under
§ ll.10(c)(15) generally would not be
considered proprietary trading,
provided that an excluded credit fund
does not purchase or sell one or more
financial instruments principally for the
purpose of short-term resale, benefit
from actual or expected short-term price
movements, realize short-term arbitrage
profits, or hedge one or more of the
positions resulting from the purchases
or sales of financial instruments.
The agencies are not expressly
incorporating the permitted activities in
§§ ll.4, ll.5, and ll.6 of the
implementing regulations into the text
of the final credit fund exclusion. The
exclusion for credit funds is intended to
allow banking entities to share the risks
of otherwise permissible lending
activities. Accordingly, the agencies
would not expect that a credit fund
would be formed for the purpose of
engaging, or in the ordinary course
would be engaged, in the activities
permitted under §§ ll.4, ll.5, and
ll.6 of the implementing regulations.
Nevertheless, to the extent that a credit
fund seeks to engage in any of those
activities as an exemption from the
prohibition on engaging in proprietary
trading, as defined in § ll.3(b)(1)(i) of
the final rule, and does so in
compliance with the requirements and
conditions of the applicable exemption,
then the final rule would not preclude
such activities.227 Similarly, with
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(ii)(B).
227 The agencies recognize, however, that
compliance with certain requirements and
conditions in §§ ll.4, ll.5, and ll.6 of the
implementing regulations may be inapt and/or
highly impractical in the context of a credit fund,
particularly given the asset and activity restrictions
contained in § ll.10(c)(15). For example, the
226 Final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
respect to the exclusions from the
definition of proprietary trading
contained in § ll.3(d) of the
implementing regulations, the agencies
note that the trading activities identified
in § ll.3(d) are by definition not
deemed to be proprietary trading, such
that the performance by an excluded
credit fund of those activities would not
be inconsistent with the final credit
fund exclusion.228
Finally, the agencies are not revising
the definition of ‘‘asset-backed security’’
in the implementing regulations. The
definition of ‘‘asset-backed security’’ in
the implementing regulations
specifically refers to the meaning
specified in section 3(a)(79) of the
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(79)).229
This definition is used elsewhere in
banking law,230 and banking entities
and others in the loan securitization
industry have adapted their operations
in reliance of the definition contained in
the Exchange Act. Moreover, the 2013
rule included the requirement that the
fund issue asset backed securities as
part of the loan securitization criteria,
and banking entities have become
familiar with this definition, as they
have implemented and utilized the
exclusion.
Requirements for a Sponsor, Investment
Adviser, or Commodity Trading Advisor
The agencies are adopting the
proposed requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor to an excluded credit
fund with one modification.
Investors in a credit fund that a
banking entity sponsors or for which the
banking entity serves as an investment
adviser or commodity trading advisor
may have expectations related to the
performance of the credit fund that raise
bailout concerns. To ensure that these
investors are adequately informed of the
banking entity’s role in the credit fund,
the final rule requires a banking entity
that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
exemptions for underwriting and market makingrelated activities in § ll.4 require that a banking
entity relying on such exemptions, among other
things, be licensed or registered to engage in the
applicable activity in accordance with applicable
law. Moreover, to the extent that a credit fund is
a banking entity with significant trading assets and
liabilities (i.e., because it, together with its affiliates
and subsidiaries, has trading assets and liabilities
that equal or exceed $20 billion over the four
previous calendar quarters), it also would be
required to maintain a separate compliance program
specific to those exemptions.
228 Similarly, trading activity that satisfies the 60day rebuttable presumption in § ll.3(b)(4) would
be presumed not to be proprietary trading for these
purposes.
229 Implementing regulations § ll.10(d)(2).
230 See 12 CFR 244 (Credit Risk Retention).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46441
to an excluded credit fund to provide
prospective and actual investors the
disclosures specified in § ll.11(a)(8)
of the implementing regulations.231
Second, a banking entity that acts as
a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor must ensure
that the activities of the credit fund are
consistent with safety and soundness
standards that are substantially similar
to those that would apply if the banking
entity engaged in the activities
directly.232 The agencies note, contrary
to the suggestion of a commenter, that
this provision does not apply to any
investment adviser or commodity
trading advisor to a credit fund who
does not also sponsor or acquire an
ownership interest in the credit fund.
Rather, the requirements in
§ ll.10(c)(15) apply only to a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading adviser that relies on the
exclusion to sponsor or acquire an
ownership interest in the credit fund.
The covered fund provisions in
§ ll.10 of the implementing
regulations only affect the operations of
banking entities that, as principal,
directly or indirectly, acquire or retain
any ownership interest in or sponsor a
covered fund.233 Thus, the safety and
soundness provision only applies to
banking entities that sponsor an
excluded credit fund or that have an
ownership interest in an excluded credit
fund and also serve as an investment
adviser or commodity trading advisor to
the fund.
More generally, to clarify an issue
raised by some commenters, the
agencies note that whether a specific
banking entity may use the credit fund
exclusion to make or have an otherwise
impermissible investment in or
relationship with a credit fund is
contingent on the permissible activities
of the banking entity. That is, the same
fund may be a covered fund with
respect to one banking entity and an
excluded credit fund with respect to a
different banking entity. A banking
entity continues to be responsible for
ensuring that its particular investment,
sponsorship, or adviser activities
comply with section 13 of the BHC Act
and its implementing regulations. This
principle applies to paragraphs (iii), (iv),
and (v) of the credit fund exclusion.
231 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iii)(A). These
disclosures include, among other things, that losses
are borne solely by investors and not the banking
entity, that investors should examine fund
documents, and that ownership interests are not
insured by the FDIC or guaranteed. Final rule
§ ll.11(a)(8).
232 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iii)(B).
233 Implementing regulations § ll.10(a)(1).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46442
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The final rule moves the requirement
that the banking entity must comply
with § ll.14 of the implementing
regulations to § ll.10(c)(15)(iii). This
organizational change is in response to
commenters that requested the agencies
confirm that that the § ll.14
limitations do not apply to a banking
entity that merely invests in a credit
fund, as opposed to a banking entity
that sponsors or advises the fund. The
agencies believe this change is
appropriate because the limitations on
banking entities’ relationships with a
covered fund in § ll.14 only apply
when a banking entity serves, directly or
indirectly, as the investment manager,
investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, or sponsor to a covered fund.234
In addition, the agencies appreciate that
mere investment by a banking entity in
a credit fund does not raise the type of
concerns Super 23A was intended to
address, and thus the agencies are
applying § ll.14 only when a banking
entity acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
to a credit fund, in each case as though
the credit fund were a covered fund.235
The limitations in § ll.15 of the
implementing regulations regarding
material conflicts of interest, high-risk
investments, and safety and soundness
and financial stability remain applicable
to banking entities’ investment in, and
relationship with, excluded credit
funds.
Additional Banking Entity Requirements
As provided in the 2020 proposal, a
banking entity may not rely on the
credit fund exclusion if it guarantees the
performance of the fund.236 In a revision
to the 2020 proposal, under the final
rule a banking entity may not rely on
the credit fund exclusion if the fund
holds any debt instruments or equities
(or rights to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in
connection with loans or debt
instruments held by the credit fund that
the banking entity is not permitted to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.237 This change is to clarify,
as suggested by a commenter, that this
requirement is specific only to federal
banking laws and regulations. Whether
a credit fund’s holdings are permissible
for a banking entity to hold under state
or foreign laws is not relevant to
compliance with section 13 of the BHC
Act. That said, the agencies note that
banking entities must comply with the
rule § ll.14(a)(1).
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iii)(C).
236 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iv).
237 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(B).
234 Final
235 Final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
laws of the jurisdiction applicable to its
activities and operations and should be
cognizant of whether a credit fund it
sponsors or in which it invests complies
with the laws of the jurisdictions in
which the credit fund operates.238
Investment and Relationship Limits
Finally, the agencies are adopting the
proposed provisions related to a
banking entity’s investment in and
relationship with a credit fund with one
revision. Under the final rule, a banking
entity’s investment in, and relationship
with, the issuer must comply with the
limitations in § ll.15 of the
implementing regulations regarding
material conflicts of interest, high-risk
investments, and safety and soundness
and financial stability, in each case as
though the credit fund were a covered
fund.239
In addition, a banking entity’s
investment in, and relationship with, a
credit fund must be conducted in
compliance with, and subject to,
applicable banking laws and
regulations, including the safety and
soundness standards applicable to the
banking entity.240 The agencies believe
it is important to highlight that the
requirements applicable to the banking
entity also govern the ability of the
banking entity to invest in a fund that
relies on the credit fund exclusion as
well as the types of transactions that a
banking entity may conduct with such
funds.241 This means, for example, that
a banking entity that invests in or has
a relationship with a credit fund is
subject to capital charges and other
requirements under applicable banking
law.242
2. Venture Capital Funds
i. Venture Capital Funds
2020 Proposal
The 2020 proposal included an
exclusion for ‘‘qualifying venture capital
funds.’’ 243 As described in the 2020
proposal, venture capital funds that
provide capital to small and start-up
238 For example, banking entities that are
organized under state or foreign laws may,
depending on the nature of the organization, need
to comply with other laws.
239 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(v)(A).
240 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
241 The agencies also note that
§ ll.10(c)(15)(v)(B) does not impose any
additional burdens and should not generate
confusion.
242 For example, a banking entity’s investment in
or relationship with a credit fund could be subject
to the regulatory capital adjustments and
deductions relating to investments in financial
subsidiaries or in the capital of unconsolidated
financial institutions, if applicable. See 12 CFR
217.22.
243 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(16).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
businesses are covered funds unless
they can rely on an exclusion other than
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) to avoid
registration under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (Investment
Company Act) or qualify for an
exclusion under the implementing
regulations.
Under the 2020 proposal, the
exclusion would have been available to
‘‘qualifying venture capital funds,’’
which the 2020 proposal defined as an
issuer that meets the definition in 17
CFR 275.203(l)–1 (Rule 203(l)–1), as
well as several additional criteria.
Specifically, the agencies proposed to
exclude from the definition of covered
fund an issuer that:
• Is a venture capital fund as defined
in Rule 203(l)–1; and
• Does not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading,
under § ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a
banking entity.
With respect to any banking entity
that acts as sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to the
issuer, and that relies on the exclusion
to sponsor or acquire an ownership
interest in the qualifying venture capital
fund, the banking entity would have
been required to:
• Provide in writing to any
prospective and actual investor the
disclosures required under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund; and
• Ensure that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with the safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly.
In addition, a banking entity that
relied on the exclusion would not have
been permitted, directly or indirectly, to
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of the
issuer. Finally, the 2020 proposal would
have required a banking entity’s
ownership interest in or relationship
with a qualifying venture capital fund
to:
• Comply with the limitations
imposed in § ll.14 (except the
banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer)
and § ll.15 of the implementing
regulations, as if the issuer were a
covered fund; and
• Be conducted in compliance with
and subject to applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Comments
Several commenters supported an
exclusion for venture capital funds.244
Some of these commenters argued the
Volcker Rule has severely impacted
investment in venture funds and
businesses and that venture capital is a
critical financing source for innovative
businesses.245 These commenters
described their view of the positive
economic impact of venture capital
investment.246 For example, these
commenters said companies funded
with venture capital promote research
and development and job creation.247
Similarly, several commenters argued
that venture capital investments by
banking entities can contribute to
economic growth, innovation, and job
creation.248 At least one commenter said
increased venture capital investment
may increase employment by small
employers.249
Several commenters said an exclusion
for venture capital funds would benefit
underserved regions where venture
capital funding is not readily available
currently.250 One commenter said
venture capital fund sizes are often too
small for institutional investors, and
banks have historically served an
important source of investment for
small and regional venture capital
funds.251 This commenter said the loss
of banking entities as limited partners in
venture capital funds has had a
disproportionate impact on cities and
regions with emerging entrepreneurial
ecosystems areas outside of Silicon
Valley and other traditional technology
centers.252 Two commenters noted that
an exclusion for venture capital funds
would promote investments in and
financing to small businesses and startups in a broad range of geographic areas,
industries, and sectors.253
Commenters said that an exclusion for
venture capital funds would promote
the safety and soundness of banking
entities.254 One commenter said the
exclusion would allow banks to
diversify and to compete with non244 Representatives Gonzalez, Steil, Stivers, Barr,
Hill, Riggleman, Zeldin, Davidson, Budd, Gooden,
Rose, Emmer, Timmons, Posey, Kustoff, and
Loudermilk (Gonzalez et al.); Crapo; FSF; SIFMA;
CCMC; IIB; Goldman Sachs; Credit Suisse; AIC;
National Venture Capital Association (NVCA);
ABA; and SAF.
245 E.g., Gonzalez et al. and NVCA.
246 Gonzalez et al.; NVCA; and CCMC.
247 Id.
248 E.g., FSF; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
249 SAF.
250 FSF; SIFMA; CCMC; and NVCA.
251 NVCA.
252 Id.
253 FSF and SIFMA.
254 FSF; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
banking entities.255 Commenters also
said that the proposed exclusion allows
banking entities to make investments
indirectly through a fund structure that
they could make directly 256 and
incorporates criteria and activity
restrictions that address any concerns
about safety and soundness or
evasion.257
Several commenters supported
defining a qualifying venture capital
fund by reference to Rule 203(l)–1 as
proposed.258 These commenters also
said the rule should not incorporate
additional criteria as discussed in the
preamble to the 2020 proposal, such as
additional limitations on revenues or
qualifying investments.259 These
commenters said additional criteria are
unnecessary to ensure that the fund is
a bona fide venture capital fund and
could unnecessarily limit the scope of
qualifying venture capital funds.260 On
the other hand, one commenter said the
rule should include additional criteria
to ensure qualifying venture capital
funds serve the public interest and do
not cause the harms at which section 13
of the Bank Holding Company Act was
directed.261 One commenter argued
defining venture capital fund by
reference to Rule 203(l)–1 would be too
narrow because it would exclude shares
of emerging growth companies (EGCs)
from being classified as qualifying
investments and would not reflect
certain companies that operate as
venture investors and are exempt from
having to register as an investment
company but may not meet the
technical definition of a venture capital
fund under Rule 203(l)–1 (e.g., startup
incubators).262
While supporting an exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds
generally, a few commenters
recommended revisions to the proposed
exclusion.263 Some commenters
proposed changes to the requirement
that the fund not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading, under § ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if it
were a banking entity.264 One of these
commenters said qualifying venture
capital funds should be permitted to
engage in permitted proprietary trading
consistent with §§ ll.4, ll.5, and
ll.6 of the implementing
PO 00000
255 SIFMA.
regulations.265 Another commenter said
the definition of proprietary trading for
funds should be the same as the
definition that applies to the banking
entity and that having two definitions is
not reasonable or cost-effective.266
Commenters also supported changes
to the requirement that the banking
entity’s investment in and relationship
with qualifying venture capital funds
must comply with § ll.14 of the
implementing regulations. One
commenter recommended eliminating
the requirement that would apply
§ ll.14 to a banking entity’s
relationship with a venture capital
fund.267 This commenter said that other
proposed conditions adequately address
bailout and safety and soundness
concerns.268 Other commenters said the
agencies should clarify that § ll.14
does not apply to a banking entity that
simply invests in a qualifying venture
capital fund (as opposed to a banking
entity that sponsors or advises the
fund).269
Other commenters did not support the
proposed exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds.270 One of these
commenters said if the agencies do
adopt an exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds, the exclusion
must include additional requirements to
ensure that excluded venture capital
funds serve the public interest and do
not cause the harms at which section
619 of the Dodd-Frank Act was directed.
Specifically, this commenter said the
rule should: (1) Restrict all fund
investments to ‘‘qualifying investments’’
or at least very significantly restrict
investments in non-qualifying
investments (e.g., limit them to no more
than five percent of the fund’s aggregate
capital), (2) impose a minimum
securities holding period and portfolio
company revenue limitation of $35
million (or a similarly appropriate and
low figure) to ensure the fund is truly
focused on medium-to-long term
venture (as opposed to growth stage)
investments, and (3) quantitatively limit
the use of leverage as a key means for
distinguishing excluded venture capital
funds from statutorily prohibited
activities involving private equity
funds.271
265 FSF.
256 NVCA.
257 FSF
and SIFMA.
NVCA; FSF; and ABA.
259 SIFMA; NVCA; FSF; and ABA.
260 Id.
261 Better Markets.
262 CCMC.
263 FSF and SIFMA.
264 FSF and SIFMA.
258 SIFMA;
Frm 00023
46443
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
266 SIFMA.
267 SIFMA.
268 Id.
269 NVCA
and ABA.
Markets and Data Boiler. Another
commenter said an exemption for venture capital
funds was not supported by the 2020 proposal and
not permitted under the law. Occupy.
271 Better Markets.
270 Better
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46444
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Final Exclusion
The final rule adopts the proposed
exclusion for qualifying venture capital
funds with one clarifying change. The
exclusion for qualifying venture capital
funds will be available to an issuer that:
• Is a venture capital fund as defined
in Rule 203(l)–1; and
• Does not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading,
under § ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a
banking entity. 272
With respect to any banking entity
that acts as sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to the
issuer, and that relies on the exclusion
to sponsor or acquire an ownership
interest in the qualifying venture capital
fund, the banking entity will be required
to:
• Provide in writing to any
prospective and actual investor the
disclosures required under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
• Ensure that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with the safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
• Comply with the restrictions
imposed in § ll.14 (except the
banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer), as
if the issuer were a covered fund.273
Like the 2020 proposal, a banking
entity that relies on the exclusion may
not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the
issuer.274
Finally, like the 2020 proposal, the
final rule requires a banking entity’s
ownership interest in or relationship
with a qualifying venture capital fund
to:
• Comply with the limitations
imposed in § ll.15 of the
implementing regulations, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
• Be conducted in compliance with
and subject to applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.275
The agencies believe the exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds will
support capital formation, job creation,
and economic growth, particularly with
respect to small businesses and start-up
companies. These banking entity
investments in qualifying venture
capital funds can benefit the broader
financial system by improving the flow
of financing to small businesses and
start-ups. The agencies expect that the
new exclusion for qualifying venture
capital funds will provide banking
entities with an additional avenue for
providing funding to smaller businesses,
which can help to support job creation
and economic growth.
As described further below, the
requirements of the exclusion, including
the SEC’s definition of venture capital
fund in Rule 203(l)–1, address the
concerns the agencies expressed in the
preamble to the 2013 rule that the
activities and risk profiles of venture
capital funds are not readily
distinguishable from those of funds that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended
to capture. Accordingly, the agencies
determined these requirements will give
effect to the language and purpose of
section 13 of the BHC Act without
allowing banking entities to evade the
requirements of section 13.
An exclusion for qualifying venture
capital funds is permitted by the
statutory language of section 13 of the
BHC Act. As the agencies discussed in
the preamble to the 2013 final rule, the
language, structure, and purpose of
section 13 of the BHC Act authorize the
agencies to adopt a tailored definition of
‘‘covered fund’’ that focuses on vehicles
used for purposes that were the target of
the funds prohibition.276 The agencies
do not believe the fact that Congress
expressly distinguished venture capital
funds from other types of private funds
in other contexts is dispositive. In this
context, the agencies do not believe that
the differences in how the terms private
equity fund and venture capital fund are
used in the Dodd-Frank Act prohibit
this exclusion. Rather, the text of
section 619 and the Dodd-Frank Act as
a whole indicate that venture capital
funds were not the intended target of
the funds prohibition. The plain
language of the statutory prohibition
applies to hedge funds and private
equity funds.277 This language is silent
with respect to venture capital funds. In
Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act,
Congress mandated specific treatment
for venture capital funds for purposes of
the registration requirements under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’).278 This provision
suggests that Congress knew how to
accord specific treatment for venture
capital funds. Yet, Congress did not list
venture capital funds among the types
of funds that were restricted under
rule § ll.10(c)(16)(i).
rule § ll.10(c)(16)(ii).
274 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iii).
275 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iv).
272 Final
273 Final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
276 79
FR 5671.
U.S.C. 1851(a)(1)(B).
278 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(l).
277 12
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
section 13.279 That Congress did not
intend to prohibit venture capital fund
investments is further supported by the
legislative history of section 13, in
which several Members of Congress
specifically addressed venture capital
funds in the context of the funds
prohibition.280
Like the 2020 proposal, the final rule
incorporates the definition of venture
capital fund from Rule 203(l)–1. Most
commenters accepted or supported the
proposed approach to incorporate the
definition of venture capital fund in
Rule 203(l)–1.281 For the reasons
discussed in the 2020 proposal,282 the
agencies believe this definition
279 In the preamble to the 2013 final rule, the
agencies cited to Congressional reports related to
Title IV that characterized venture capital funds as
‘‘a subset of private investment funds specializing
in long-term equity investment in small or start-up
businesses.’’ 79 FR 5704 (quoting S. Rep. No. 111–
176 (2010)). However, there is no indication in the
statutory text itself that Congress intended to treat
venture capital funds identically to private equity
funds. Moreover, the agencies did not address the
difference in terminology that Congress used in
section 402 of the Dodd-Frank Act (‘‘private funds’’)
and section 619 (‘‘hedge funds’’ and ‘‘private equity
funds’’). The difference between these two terms—
specifically, the broader term ‘‘private funds’’ used
in Title IV—may indicate why Congress found it
necessary to exclude venture capital explicitly in
section 407 but not in section 619.
280 See 156 Cong. Rec. E1295 (daily ed. July 13,
2010) (statement of Rep. Eshoo) (‘‘the purpose of the
Volcker Rule is to eliminate risk-taking activities by
banks and their affiliates while at the same time
preserving safe, sound investment activities that
serve the public interest . . . Venture capital funds
do not pose the same risk to the health of the
financial system. They promote the public interest
by funding growing companies critical to spurring
innovation, job creation, and economic
competitiveness. I expect the regulators to use the
broad authority in the Volcker Rule wisely and
clarify that funds . . . such as venture capital
funds, are not captured under the Volcker Rule and
fall outside the definition of ‘private equity.’ ’’); 156
Cong. Rec. S5905 (daily ed. July 15, 2010)
(statement of Sen. Dodd) (confirming ‘‘the purpose
of the Volcker rule is to eliminate excessive risk
taking activities by banks and their affiliates while
at the same time preserving safe, sound investment
activities that serve the public interest’’ and stating
‘‘properly conducted venture capital investment
will not cause the harms at which the Volcker rule
is directed. In the event that properly conducted
venture capital investment is excessively restricted
by the provisions of section 619, I would expect the
appropriate Federal regulators to exempt it using
their authority under section 619[d][1](J) . . .’’);
and 156 Cong. Rec. S6242 (daily ed. July 26, 2010)
(statement of Sen. Scott Brown) (‘‘One other area of
remaining uncertainty that has been left to the
regulators is the treatment of bank investments in
venture capital funds. Regulators should carefully
consider whether banks that focus overwhelmingly
on lending to and investing in start-up technology
companies should be captured by one-size-fits-all
restrictions under the Volcker rule. I believe they
should not be. Venture capital investments help
entrepreneurs get the financing they need to create
new jobs. Unfairly restricting this type of capital
formation is the last thing we should be doing in
this economy.’’).
281 SIFMA; NVCA; FSF; ABA; and Goldman
Sachs.
282 85 FR 12135–12136.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
accurately identifies venture capital
funds and addresses the concerns the
agencies identified in declining to adopt
an exclusion for venture capital funds in
the 2013 rule.
The SEC has defined ‘‘venture capital
fund’’ as any private fund 283 that:
• Represents to investors and
potential investors that it pursues a
venture capital strategy;
• Immediately after the acquisition of
any asset, other than qualifying
investments or short-term holdings,
holds no more than 20 percent of the
amount of the fund’s aggregate capital
contributions and uncalled committed
capital in assets (other than short-term
holdings) that are not qualifying
investments, valued at cost or fair value,
consistently applied by the fund;
• Does not borrow, issue debt
obligations, provide guarantees or
otherwise incur leverage, in excess of 15
percent of the private fund’s aggregate
capital contributions and uncalled
committed capital, and any such
borrowing, indebtedness, guarantee or
leverage is for a non-renewable term of
no longer than 120 calendar days,
except that any guarantee by the private
fund of a qualifying portfolio company’s
obligations up to the amount of the
value of the private fund’s investment in
the qualifying portfolio company is not
subject to the 120 calendar day limit;
• Only issues securities the terms of
which do not provide a holder with any
right, except in extraordinary
circumstances, to withdraw, redeem or
require the repurchase of such securities
but may entitle holders to receive
distributions made to all holders pro
rata; and
• Is not registered under section 8 of
the Investment Company Act, and has
not elected to be treated as a business
development company pursuant to
section 54 of that Act.284
‘‘Qualifying investment’’ is defined in
the SEC’s regulation to be: (1) An equity
security issued by a qualifying portfolio
company that has been acquired directly
by the private fund from the qualifying
portfolio company; (2) any equity
security issued by a qualifying portfolio
company in exchange for an equity
security issued by the qualifying
portfolio company described in (1); or
(3) any equity security issued by a
company of which a qualifying portfolio
company is a majority-owned
subsidiary, as defined in section 2(a)(24)
of the Investment Company Act, or a
283 For purposes of 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1, ‘‘private
fund’’ is defined as ‘‘an issuer that would be an
investment company, as defined in section 3 of the
Investment Company Act, but for section 3(c)(1) or
3(c)(7) of that Act.’’ 15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)(29).
284 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
predecessor, and is acquired by the
private fund in exchange for an equity
security described in (1) or (2).285
‘‘Qualifying portfolio company,’’ in
turn, is defined in the SEC’s regulation
to be a company that: (1) At the time of
any investment by the private fund, is
not reporting or foreign traded and does
not control, is not controlled by or
under common control with another
company, directly or indirectly, that is
reporting or foreign traded; (2) does not
borrow or issue debt obligations in
connection with the private fund’s
investment in such company and
distribute to the private fund the
proceeds of such borrowing or issuance
in exchange for the private fund’s
investment; and (3) is not an investment
company, a private fund, an issuer that
would be an investment company but
for the exemption provided by 17 CFR
270.3a–7, or a commodity pool.286 The
SEC explained that the definitions of
‘‘qualifying investment’’ and ‘‘qualifying
portfolio company’’ reflect the typical
characteristics of investments made by
venture capital funds and that these
definitions work together to cabin the
definition of venture capital fund to
only the funds that Congress understood
to be venture capital funds during the
passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.287
In the preamble to the regulation
adopting this definition of venture
capital fund, the SEC explained that the
definition’s criteria distinguish venture
capital funds from other types of funds,
including private equity funds and
hedge funds. For example, the SEC
explained that it understood the criteria
for ‘‘qualifying portfolio companies’’ to
be characteristic of issuers of portfolio
securities held by venture capital funds
and, taken together, would operate to
exclude most private equity funds and
hedge funds from the venture capital
fund definition.288 The SEC also
explained that the criteria for
‘‘qualifying investments’’ under the
SEC’s regulation would help to
differentiate venture capital funds from
other types of private funds, such as
leveraged buyout funds.289 The SEC
further explained that its regulation’s
restriction on the amount of borrowing,
CFR 275.203(l)–1(c)(3).
CFR 275.203(l)–1(c)(4).
287 See Exemptions for Advisers to Venture
Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less
Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management,
and Foreign Private Advisers, 76 FR 39646, 39657
(Jul. 6, 2011).
288 76 FR 39656.
289 See, e.g., 76 FR 39653 (explaining that a
limitation on secondary market purchases of a
qualifying portfolio company’s shares would
recognize ‘‘the critical role this condition played in
differentiating venture capital funds from other
types of private funds’’).
PO 00000
285 17
286 17
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46445
debt obligations, guarantees or other
incurrence of leverage was appropriate
to differentiate venture capital funds
from other types of private funds that
may engage in trading strategies that use
financial leverage and may contribute to
systemic risk.290
This definition of venture capital fund
helps to distinguish the investment
activities of venture capital funds from
those of hedge funds and private equity
funds, which was one of the agencies’
primary concerns in declining to adopt
an exclusion for venture capital funds in
the 2013 rule. Further, this definition
includes criteria reflecting the
characteristics of venture capital funds
that the agencies believe may pose less
potential risk to a banking entity
sponsoring or investing in venture
capital funds and to the financial
system—specifically, the smaller role of
leverage financing and a lesser degree of
interconnectedness with the public
markets.291 These characteristics help to
address the concern expressed in the
preamble to the 2013 rule that the
activities and risk profiles for banking
entities regarding sponsorship of, and
investment in, venture capital fund
activities are not readily distinguishable
from those funds that section 13 of the
BHC Act was intended to capture.
One commenter said requiring that a
fund satisfy the requirements of Rule
203(l)–1 would have the effect of
making the exclusion too narrow. This
commenter said the exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds should
permit investments in EGCs and, more
generally, should ‘‘reflect the evolving
nature of the venture capital industry
and not rely solely on the existing SEC
definition.’’ 292 The final rule does not
modify the requirement that a qualifying
venture capital fund must satisfy the
requirements of Rule 203(l)–1. These
requirements focus the exclusion on the
types of less mature and start-up
portfolio companies that characterize
traditional venture capital activities. At
the same time, the definition of
qualifying venture capital fund does not
preclude investments in EGCs because a
qualifying venture capital fund could
make investments in EGCs within the 20
percent limit for non-qualifying
investments. Because the requirement
that a qualifying venture capital fund
290 76 FR 39662. See also 76 FR 39657 (‘‘We
proposed these elements of the qualifying portfolio
company definition because of the focus on
leverage in the Dodd-Frank Act as a potential
contributor to systemic risk as discussed by the
Senate Committee report, and the testimony before
Congress that stressed the lack of leverage in
venture capital investing.’’).
291 76 FR 39662.
292 CCMC.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46446
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
must satisfy the requirements of Rule
203(l)–1 does not preclude investments
in EGCs and helps to distinguish
qualifying venture capital funds from
the type of funds that section 13 of the
BHC Act was intended to restrict, the
agencies have determined to adopt the
requirement that a qualifying venture
capital fund must be a venture capital
fund as defined in Rule 203(l)–1.
The final rule adopts the requirement
that a qualifying venture capital fund
may not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer
were a banking entity.293 As described
in the 2020 proposal, this requirement
helps to promote the specific purposes
of section 13 of the BHC Act.294 The
agencies are not adopting any changes
to this requirement, as recommended by
some commenters. The agencies are not
expressly incorporating the permitted
activities in §§ ll.4, ll.5, and ll.6
of the implementing regulations into the
text of the qualifying venture capital
fund exclusion. The exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds is
intended to allow banking entities to
share the risks of otherwise permissible
long-term venture capital activities.
Accordingly, the agencies would not
expect that a qualifying venture capital
fund would be formed for the purpose
of engaging, or in the ordinary course
would be engaged, in the activities
permitted under §§ ll.4, ll.5, and
ll.6 of the implementing regulations.
Moreover, such activities could reflect a
purpose other than making long-term
venture capital investments.
Nevertheless, to the extent that a
qualifying venture capital fund seeks to
engage in any of those activities as an
exemption from the prohibition on
engaging in proprietary trading, as
defined in § ll.3(b)(1)(i) of the final
rule, and does so in compliance with
the requirements and conditions of
those permitted activities, then the final
rule would not preclude such
activities.295 Similarly, with respect to
rule § ll.10(c)(16)(i)(B).
FR 12136.
295 As the agencies noted in the discussion of the
final credit fund exclusion, compliance with certain
requirements and conditions in ll.4, ll.5, and
ll.6 of the implementing regulations may be
inapt and/or highly impractical in the context of a
qualifying venture capital fund, particularly given
the activity restrictions contained in
§ ll.10(c)(16). For example, the exemptions for
underwriting and market making-related activities
in ll.4 require that a banking entity relying on
such exemptions, among other things, be licensed
or registered to engage in the applicable activity in
accordance with applicable law. Moreover, to the
extent that a qualifying venture capital fund is a
banking entity with significant trading assets and
liabilities (i.e., because it, together with its affiliates
and subsidiaries, has trading assets and liabilities
293 Final
294 85
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
the exclusions from the definition of
proprietary trading in § ll.3(d) of the
implementing regulations, the agencies
note that that the trading activities
identified in § ll.3(d) are by
definition not deemed to be proprietary
trading, such that the performance by an
qualifying fund of those activities would
not be inconsistent with the final
qualifying venture capital fund
exclusion.296
The final rule does not define
proprietary trading by reference to the
prong of paragraph ll.3(b)(1) that
would apply to the banking entity, as
recommended by some commenters,
because the agencies do not believe this
change would be effective or simplify
the exclusion. Unlike some banking
entities, venture capital funds (that are
not themselves banking entities) are not
subject to the market risk capital rule,
and thus there is generally no need to
evaluate a venture capital fund’s
investments under the market risk
capital framework. Moreover, applying
the prong that would apply to the
relevant banking entity could result in
one venture capital fund becoming
subject to both prongs. The agencies
believe this would complicate
evaluation of a qualifying venture
capital fund’s eligibility for the
exclusion, both for banking entities and
the agencies. The agencies do not agree
with one commenter’s argument that
requiring funds sponsored by banking
entities that are subject to the market
risk capital rule test to apply the shortterm intent test for purposes of the
covered funds provisions would
introduce unnecessary complexity and
compliance costs for these banking
entities. As the agencies described in
the preamble to the 2019 final rule, the
Federal banking agencies’ market risk
capital rule 297 incorporates the same
short-term intent standard as the shortterm intent test in § ll.3(b)(1)(i).298
Therefore, market risk capital rule
covered banking entities continue to
apply the short-term intent standard as
part of their compliance with the market
risk capital rule. Similar processes may
be employed to apply the short-term
intent standard to qualifying venture
capital funds.
that equal or exceeds $20 billion over the four
previous calendar quarters), it also would be
required to maintain a separate compliance program
specific to those exemptions.
296 Similarly, and consistent with the discussion
of the final credit fund exclusion, trading activity
that satisfies the 60-day rebuttable presumption in
§ ll.3(b)(4) would be presumed not to be
proprietary trading for these purposes.
297 See 12 CFR part 3, subpart F; part 217, subpart
F; part 324, subpart F.
298 84 FR 61986.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The final rule adopts the requirement
that a banking entity that serves as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to a
qualifying venture capital fund may not
rely on the exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds unless it provides
the disclosures required under
§ ll.11(a)(8) to prospective and actual
investors in the fund. This requirement
promotes one of the purposes of section
13 of the BHC Act, which is to prevent
banking entities from bailing out funds
that they sponsor or advise. The final
rule also adopts the requirement that a
banking entity that serves as a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor to a qualifying venture
capital fund must ensure the activities
of the qualifying venture capital fund
are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activity directly. Therefore, a
banking entity may not rely on this
exclusion to sponsor or invest in an
investment fund that exposes the
banking entity to the type of high-risk
trading and investment activities that
the covered fund provisions of section
13 of the BHC Act were intended to
restrict.
In the final rule, the requirement that
the banking entity must comply with
§ ll.14 of the implementing
regulations is moved to
§ ll.10(c)(16)(ii). This change clarifies
that this requirement applies to a
banking entity that acts as sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading adviser to the qualifying venture
capital fund and does not apply to a
banking entity that merely invests in a
qualifying venture capital fund.
The final rule does not eliminate the
requirement that a banking entity’s
investment in or relationship with a
qualifying venture capital fund must
comply with § ll.14 of the
implementing regulations, as
recommended by one commenter. The
agencies do not agree that applying the
requirements of § ll.14 is duplicative
of the requirement that the banking
entity not directly or indirectly
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of the
issuer. In addition to prohibiting
guarantees, § ll.14 also prohibits
other types of transactions that function
as extensions of credit or that could
raise the type of bail-out concerns that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended
to address. The agencies also do not
agree that applying the requirements of
§ ll.14 is duplicative of the
requirement that the banking entity’s
investment in and relationships with
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the qualifying venture capital fund must
comply with the backstop provisions in
§ ll.15. The backstop provisions in
§ ll.15 address high-risk assets and
high-risk trading strategies, and material
conflicts of interest, but do not address
extensions of credit that may not entail
a ‘‘substantial financial loss’’ to the
banking entity. The agencies do not
expect that applying § ll.14 to a
banking entity that sponsors or advises
a qualifying venture capital fund will
unduly interfere with the effectiveness
of the exclusion. The final rule
incorporates revisions to § ll.14 that
will improve banking entities’ ability to
enter into certain ordinary course
transactions with sponsored and
advised funds.299 The agencies expect
these changes will mitigate concerns
that applying the requirements of
§ ll.14 to qualifying venture capital
funds will limit the exclusion’s
utility.300
The final rule adopts the requirement
that the banking entity must not
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of a
qualifying venture capital fund.301 The
final rule also adopts the requirements
that a banking entity’s ownership in or
relationship with a qualifying venture
capital fund must comply with the
limitations in § ll.15 of the
implementing regulations, as if the
issuer were a covered fund, and be
conducted in compliance with, and
subject to, applicable banking laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.302 These
requirements promote several of the
purposes of section 13 of the BHC Act.
The requirement that the banking entity
not guarantee, assume, or otherwise
ensure the obligations or performance of
a qualifying venture capital fund
promotes the purpose of preventing
banking entities from bailing out the
fund. The requirements that a banking
entity’s ownership in or relationship
with a qualifying venture capital fund
must comply with the limitations in
§ ll.15 of the implementing
regulations, as if the issuer were a
covered fund, and be conducted in
compliance with, and subject to,
299 See infra, Section IV.D (Limitations on
Relationships with a Covered Fund).
300 The commenter that recommended
eliminating the requirement that the banking
entity’s investment in or relationship with a
qualifying venture capital fund said that doing so
would ‘‘limit the utility and related benefits of the
qualifying venture capital fund exclusion,
regardless of the proposed new exceptions to Super
23A.’’ SIFMA. However, the commenter did not
provide any examples or further explain how the
utility of the exclusion would be impacted.
301 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iii).
302 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iv).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
applicable banking laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards, prevent a
qualifying venture capital fund from
being used to expose a banking entity to
the type of high-risk trading and
investment activities that the covered
fund provisions of section 13 of the BHC
Act were intended to restrict. To the
extent a fund would expose a banking
entity to a high-risk assets or a high-risk
trading strategy, the fund would not be
a qualifying venture capital fund.
Therefore, prior to making an
investment in a qualifying venture
capital fund, a banking entity would
need to ensure that the fund’s
investment mandate and strategy would
satisfy the requirements of § ll.15. In
addition, a banking entity would need
to monitor the activities of a qualifying
venture capital fund to ensure it
satisfies these requirements on an
ongoing basis.
The agencies do not believe that any
additional conditions to the exclusion
for qualifying venture capital funds are
necessary. One commenter said that the
exclusion should (1) restrict all fund
investments to ‘‘qualifying investments’’
or at least very significantly restrict
investments in non-qualifying
investments (e.g., limit them to no more
than five percent of the fund’s aggregate
capital), (2) impose a minimum
securities holding period and portfolio
company revenue limitation of $35
million (or a similarly appropriate and
low figure) to ensure the fund is truly
focused on medium-to-long term
venture (as opposed to growth stage)
investments, and (3) quantitatively limit
the use of leverage as a key means for
distinguishing excluded venture capital
funds from statutorily prohibited
activities involving private equity
funds.303 The agencies have determined
not to impose any additional criteria for
the reasons discussed below.
First, the agencies decline to limit a
qualifying venture capital fund’s nonqualifying investments to five percent or
less of total assets. The agencies agree
with commenters that it is necessary to
provide some amount of flexibility for a
venture capital fund to make
investments that deviate from the
typical form of venture capital
investment activity. For example, the
agencies understand that certain
common venture capital fund activities,
such as secondary acquisition of
portfolio company shares from
founders, are not qualifying investments
under Rule 203(l)–1. The agencies agree
with commenters, as well as with the
rationale the SEC provided in the 2011
PO 00000
303 Better
Markets.
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46447
adopting release, that said providing
flexibility for this type of non-qualifying
investment is consistent with the overall
goal of identifying funds engaged in a
venture capital strategy. In making this
determination, the agencies find it
significant that the SEC considered this
issue as part of its 2011 rulemaking and
concluded that a 20 percent bucket for
non-qualifying investments was
appropriate.304 Moreover, all activities
of a qualifying venture capital fund,
including any investments that would
be non-qualifying investments under
Rule 203(l)–1, will be subject to the
other requirements in § ll.10(c)(16),
including the requirement that the fund
not engage in proprietary trading and
not result in a material exposure by the
banking entity to a high-risk asset or
high-risk trading strategy.
The agencies also decline to impose
additional requirements, such as a
minimum securities holding period or a
portfolio company revenue limitation.
The agencies believe a minimum
securities holding period is unnecessary
in light of the requirements that the
fund (1) represent to investors and
potential investors that it pursues a
venture capital strategy 305 and (2) not
engage in any activity that would
constitute proprietary trading under
§ ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity.306
The agencies also considered whether
to include a portfolio company revenue
limitation, as discussed in the preamble
to the 2020 proposal. Most commenters
did not support imposing a revenue
limitation, while one commenter
supported imposing a limitation of $35
million. After considering all comments
received, the agencies determined that a
revenue limit could unnecessarily
disadvantage certain companies because
the revenues of startups can vary greatly
based on industry and geography. The
agencies determined it would be
unnecessarily restrictive to create a
revenue limit that could limit funding to
otherwise eligible portfolio companies.
Again, the agencies found it significant
that the SEC expressly considered this
issue as part of the 2011 rulemaking and
determined that any ‘‘single factor test
could ignore the complexities of doing
business in different industries or
regions’’ and ‘‘could inadvertently
restrict venture capital funds from
funding otherwise promising young
small companies.’’ 307 In addition, the
definition of ‘‘qualifying portfolio
company’’ in the SEC’s rule
304 76
FR 39683.
CFR 275.203(l)–(1)(a)(1).
306 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(i)(B).
307 76 FR 39649.
305 17
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46448
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
incorporates appropriate standards that
distinguish newer ventures from more
established companies. In particular, a
‘‘qualifying portfolio company’’ may not
be ‘‘reporting or foreign traded’’ and
may not control, be controlled by or
under common control with another
company that is reporting or foreign
traded.308 A ‘‘reporting or foreign
traded’’ company for these purposes
means a company that is subject to the
reporting requirements under section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or having a security listed or
traded on any exchange or organized
market operating in a foreign
jurisdiction.309 In addition to publicly
offered companies, this definition
excludes issuers if they have more than
$10 million in total assets and a class of
equity securities, such as common
stock, that is held of record by either
2,000 or more persons or 500 or more
persons who are not accredited
investors.310 In adopting the ‘‘reporting
or foreign traded’’ requirement of Rule
203(l)–1, the SEC explained that it
found ‘‘a key consideration by
Congress’’ was that venture capital
funds ‘‘are less connected with the
public markets and may involve less
potential systemic risk.’’ 311 This
condition that qualifying portfolio
companies not be capitalized by the
public markets serves to limit the type
of companies in which a qualifying
venture capital fund may invest.
Finally, the agencies determined it is
unnecessary to include an additional
quantitative limit on the use of leverage
because the exclusion incorporates a
leverage limit. Specifically, Rule 203(l)–
1 provides that a venture capital fund
may not borrow or otherwise incur
leverage in excess of 15 percent of the
fund’s aggregate capital contributions
and uncalled capital commitments, and
then only on a short-term basis. Because
the exclusion already incorporates a
limit on leverage for a qualifying
venture capital fund, it is not necessary
for the final rule to incorporate an
additional limit on leverage.
ii. Long-Term Investment Funds
In the preamble to the 2020 proposal,
the agencies asked whether the final
rule should include an exclusion for
long-term investment funds. In the
preamble, the agencies asked if an
exclusion should be provided for issuers
(1) that make long-term investments that
a banking entity could make directly, (2)
that hold themselves out as entities or
308 17
CFR 275.203(l)–1(c)(4).
CFR 275.203(l)–1(c)(5).
310 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).
311 76 FR 39656.
309 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
arrangements that make investments
that they intend to hold for a set
minimum time period, such as two
years, (3) whose relevant offering and
governing documents reflect a long-term
investment strategy, and (4) that meet
all other requirements of the proposed
qualifying venture capital fund
exclusion (other than that the issuers
would be venture capital funds as
defined in Rule 203(l)–1.
Several commenters supported an
exclusion for long-term investment
funds.312 Many of these commenters
said an exclusion for qualifying longterm investment funds would help to
close gaps in the availability of
financing that exist under the
implementing regulations while
promoting and protecting the safety and
soundness of the banking entity and the
financial stability of the U.S.313 These
commenters said the exclusion would
allow banking entities to diversify their
assets and income streams, thereby
reducing the overall risk of their assets
and operations and increasing their
resiliency against failure.314 Several of
these commenters supported an
exclusion for long-term investment
funds because they said it would allow
banking entities to do indirectly through
a fund structure the same activities they
may conduct directly.315 Some
312 Gonzalez et al.; Crapo; FSF; SIFMA; CCMC;
CCMR; IIB; Goldman Sachs; AIC; and ABA. One
commenter said the final rule should exclude an
issuer with the following characteristics: (1) Its
investment strategy or business purpose is to invest
in assets in which a financial holding company
would be permitted to invest directly; (2) it holds
itself out to investors as acquiring and holding longterm assets for at least two years; (3) it does not
engage in activities that would constitute
impermissible proprietary trading (as defined in the
implementing regulations) if conducted directly by
a banking entity; and (4) if it is sponsored by a
banking entity, (A) the sponsoring banking entity
and its affiliates cannot, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume or otherwise insure its
obligations, (B) it must comply with the disclosure
obligations under § ll.11(a)(8) of the rule and (C)
the sponsoring banking entity must comply with
the limitations imposed by § ll.14 (except that
the banking entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer) and § ll.15, as
if the vehicle were a covered fund. The commenter
said these conditions would adequately address
concerns regarding evasion, promote long-term
capital formation, and exclude certain entities that
are inadvertently captured by the definition of
‘‘covered fund’’ such as certain incubators.
Goldman Sachs.
313 SIFMA; AIC; and CCMR. One commenter said
an exclusion for long-term investment funds is
necessary because the proposed exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds would not address
incubators and other issuers that do not hold
themselves out as pursuing a venture capital
strategy. Goldman Sachs. Two commenters said
excluding long-term investment funds would
provide certainty for banking entities that hold
interests in ‘‘inadvertent’’ or ‘‘accidental’’
investment companies. SIFMA and Goldman Sachs.
314 Id.
315 FSF; CCMR; AIC; CCMC; and SIFMA.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
commenters said long-term investment
vehicles do not engage in short-term
proprietary trading or the high-risk
activities that section 619’s backstop
provisions are intended to address.316
One commenter said the rule should
not establish an exclusion for long-term
investment vehicles because section 619
of the Dodd-Frank Act was put in place
to reorient banks away from risky
speculative activities and toward
responsible lending to businesses and
households.317
The final rule does not include an
exclusion for long-term investment
funds. After reviewing all comments
received, the agencies determined that it
remains difficult to distinguish
effectively such funds from the type of
funds that section 13 of the BHC Act
was designed to restrict. A general
exclusion for long-term investment
funds would be too broad of an
approach for addressing specific types
of issuers, such as inadvertent
investment companies and incubators
that do not hold themselves out as
engaging in a venture capital strategy, as
described by some commenters. An
exclusion based primarily on the length
of time that an issuer holds its
investments could be overbroad because
it could also permit funds that are
engaged in the type of investment
activity that section 13 of the BHC Act
was designed to restrict. Moreover, the
agencies believe the exclusions for
credit funds and qualifying venture
capital funds will improve banking
entities’ ability to provide long-term
financing through certain fund
structures in a manner that is consistent
with the statute.
3. Family Wealth Management Vehicles
The agencies are adopting an
exclusion from the definition of
‘‘covered fund’’ under § ll.10(b) of the
rule for any entity that acts as a ‘‘family
wealth management vehicle.’’ This
exclusion is available to an entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities. For
family wealth management vehicles that
are trusts, the grantor(s) must be family
customers.318 For non-trust family
316 ABA
and CCMC.
Rutowski.
318 Under § ll.10(c)(17)(iii)(B) of the final rule,
a ‘‘family customer’’ is a ‘‘family client,’’ as defined
in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Advisers Act
(17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or any natural
person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a spouse or
317 Robert
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
wealth management vehicles, family
customers must own a majority of the
voting interests (directly or indirectly)
as well as a majority of interests in the
entity. Ownership of non-trust family
wealth management vehicles is
generally limited to family customers
and up to five closely related persons of
the family customers.319 However, there
is a de minimis ownership allowance
that permits one or more entities,
including a banking entity, that are not
family customers or closely related
persons, to acquire or retain, as
principal, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent
of the family wealth management
vehicle’s outstanding ownership
interests for the purpose of and to the
extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.320
In addition, a banking entity may rely
on the exclusion only if the banking
entity: (1) Provides bona fide trust,
fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to
the entity; (2) does not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of such entity; (3) complies
with the disclosure obligations under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a
covered fund, provided that the content
may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and
the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity; (4) does not
acquire or retain, as principal, an
ownership interest in the entity, other
than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the family wealth management vehicle’s
outstanding ownership interests for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary
for establishing corporate separateness
or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency,
or similar concerns; (5) complies with
the requirements of §§ ll.14(b) and
ll.15, as if such entity were a covered
fund; and (6) except for riskless
principal transactions as defined in
§ ll.10(d)(11),321 complies with the
spousal equivalent of any of the foregoing. All terms
defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1 of the Advisers Act
(17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)–1) have the same
meaning in the family wealth management vehicle
exclusion.
319 Under § ll.10(c)(17)(iii)(A) of the final rule,
‘‘closely related person’’ means ‘‘a natural person
(including the estate and estate planning vehicles
of such person) who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family customer.’’
320 This 0.5 percent ownership interest represents
the aggregate amount of a family wealth
management vehicle’s ownership interests that may
be acquired or retained by all entities that are
neither a family customer nor a closely related
person.
321 ‘‘Riskless principal transaction’’ means a
transaction in which a banking entity, after
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.322
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
requested comment on whether to
exclude family wealth management
vehicles from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund.’’ 323 Several commenters
supported this exclusion stating,
generally, that it would reduce
uncertainty for banking entities about
the permissibility of providing
traditional banking, investment
management, and trust and estate
planning services to family wealth
management vehicle clients.324 As
discussed below, other commenters
opposed the exclusion or recommended
revisions to it.325
The agencies believe that the
exclusion for family wealth
management vehicles will appropriately
allow banking entities to structure
services or transactions for customers,
or to otherwise provide traditional
customer-facing banking and asset
management services, through a vehicle,
even though such a vehicle may rely on
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
Investment Company Act or would
otherwise be a covered fund under the
implementing regulations.326 The
agencies believe the exclusion for family
wealth management vehicles will
effectively tailor the definition of
covered fund by permitting banking
entities to continue to provide
traditional banking and asset
management services that do not
involve the types of risks section 13 of
the BHC Act was designed to address.
As the agencies noted in the preamble
to the 2013 rule, section 13 and the
implementing regulations were
designed in part to permit banking
entities to continue to provide clientreceiving an order to buy (or sell) a security from
a customer, purchases (or sells) the security in the
secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the
customer. Final rule § ll.10(d)(11). The allowance
for riskless principal transactions in the final rule
does not affect the independent application of the
Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR part 223).
322 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii).
323 85 FR 12120.
324 See, e.g., Goldman Sachs; FSF; CCMR; IAA;
ABA; BPI; PNC; and SIFMA.
325 See, e.g., Better Markets, Data Boiler; SIFMA;
BPI; ABA.
326 Several commenters supported the exclusion,
with two stating that many family wealth
management vehicles do not rely on the exclusions
in 3(c)(1) and (c)(7) of the Investment Company Act
and are not covered funds under the implementing
regulations. See ABA and PNC. Banking entities
that sponsor or invest in family wealth management
vehicles that are not subject to the covered funds
provisions under section 13 of the BHC Act or the
implementing regulations would not need to rely on
this exclusion.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46449
oriented financial services, including
asset management services.327
Furthermore, the agencies believe that
the provisions of the exclusion will
work together to sufficiently reduce the
likelihood that these vehicles could be
used to evade the requirements of
section 13 or the implementing
regulations.
One of the commenters that opposed
the exclusion expressed concern with
the agencies adding an exclusion from
the definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ that
they believed would only benefit a few
wealthy families.328 Banking entities
may provide asset management services
to families through a trust structure. The
agencies believe that banking entities
should have flexibility to offer such
asset management services to families
through a fund structure subject to
appropriate limits. As noted above, the
agencies believe the exclusion for family
wealth management vehicles will
effectively tailor the definition of
covered fund by permitting banking
entities to continue to provide
traditional banking and asset
management services that do not
involve the types of risks section 13 was
designed to address.
The agencies continue to believe that
the exclusion for family wealth
management vehicles is consistent with
section 13(d)(1)(D), which permits
banking entities to engage in
transactions on behalf of customers,
when those transactions would
otherwise be prohibited under section
13.329 The exclusion will similarly
allow banking entities to provide
traditional services to customers
through vehicles used to manage the
wealth and other assets of those
customers and their families.
Another commenter suggested that,
rather than providing an exclusion for
family wealth management vehicles
through a rulemaking, the agencies
should instead provide no-action relief
on a case-by-case basis.330 The agencies
do not believe that a case-by case
approach would further the aims of
section 13 or the implementing
regulations. The agencies believe that a
case-by-case approach would be
327 See 79 FR 5541 (describing the 2013 rule as
‘‘permitting banking entities to continue to provide,
and to manage and limit the risks associated with
providing, client-oriented financial services that are
critical to capital generation for businesses of all
sizes, households and individuals, and that
facilitate liquid markets. These client-oriented
financial services, which include underwriting,
market making, and asset management services, are
important to the U.S. financial markets and the
participants in those markets.’’).
328 See Better Markets.
329 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(D).
330 Data Boiler.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46450
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
unnecessarily burdensome and difficult
to administer. This approach would also
unnecessarily deviate from the agencies’
treatment of other excluded entities
under the implementing regulations and
hinder transparency and consistency.
The agencies believe that the adopted
exclusion for a family wealth
management vehicle will appropriately
distinguish it from the type of entity
that the covered funds provisions of
section 13 of the BHC Act were
intended to capture. The exclusion
requires that a family wealth
management vehicle not raise money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in securities for resale or
other disposition or otherwise trading in
securities. This aspect of the exclusion
will help to differentiate family wealth
management vehicles from covered
funds, which raise money from
investors for this purpose.
In addition, the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion contains
ownership limits designed to ensure
that the vehicle is used to manage the
wealth and other assets of customers
and their families. One such limit is the
definition of ‘‘family customer.’’ As
proposed, the definition of ‘‘family
customer’’ is based on the definition of
‘‘family client’’ in rule 202(a)(11)(G)–
1(d)(4) under the Advisers Act (the
family office rule), and also incorporates
certain in-laws and their spouses and
spousal equivalents. Several
commenters supported this approach,331
however, one commenter suggested that
the agencies exclude in-laws, their
spouses and their spousal equivalents
from the definition of ‘‘family
customer.’’ 332 The agencies believe that
in-laws, their spouses and spousal
equivalents share the same close
familial relations as others included in
the definition of ‘‘family client.’’
Furthermore, the agencies believe that
the final rule’s definition of ‘‘family
customer’’ reflects the types of
relationships typically present in family
wealth management vehicles.333
Reflecting those relationships prevents
unnecessary constraints on the utility of
the exclusion and will allow banking
entities to provide traditional banking
services to these clients.
Another ownership limit designed to
ensure that a family wealth management
vehicle is used to manage the wealth
and other assets of customers and their
families is the requirement that a
majority of the interests in the entity are
owned by family customers.334 The
inclusion of this limit in the final rule
is a modification from the 2020 proposal
which only required family customers
to own a majority of the voting interests
(directly or indirectly) in the entity. One
commenter suggested this modification
to ensure that the exclusion is not used
to evade the intent of section 13 and the
implementing regulations.335 The
agencies believe this modification is an
appropriate means of ensuring that the
exclusion is used by banking entities
that are providing services to family
wealth management vehicles, rather
than to hedge funds or private equity
funds.
Another commenter suggested
additional ownership limits for family
wealth management vehicles, including
limits on the vehicle’s ability to
restructure, to prevent evasion of the
prohibitions of section 13 and the
implementing regulations.336 However,
as discussed above, the agencies believe
that the requirements of the exclusion,
along with the conditions a banking
entity must meet in order to rely on it,
will help to ensure that banking entities
will not be able to use family wealth
management vehicles as a means to
evade section 13 and the implementing
regulations.
Another ownership limit designed to
ensure that a family wealth management
vehicle is used to manage the wealth
and other assets of customers and their
families is the requirement that only up
to five closely related persons of family
customers may hold ownership interests
in the vehicle.337 The agencies proposed
to permit three closely related persons
to hold ownership interests. Several
commenters supported allowing a finite
number of closely related persons of
family customers to hold ownership
interests.338 However, some commenters
suggested that the proposed limit of
three closely related persons did not
reflect the typical manner in which
family wealth management vehicles are
constituted and would unnecessarily
constrain the availability of the
exclusion.339 These commenters
recommended that the agencies modify
the proposed rule to allow for up to ten
closely related persons to invest in
family wealth management vehicles.340
One of these commenters stated that
increasing the number of closely related
persons would allow banking entities to
provide traditional wealth management
and estate planning services to family
ABA.
Data Boiler.
337 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(i)(B)(3).
338 See, e.g., BPI; SIFMA; PNC; and ABA.
339 See, e.g., BPI; SIFMA; ABA; and PNC.
340 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and PNC.
335 See
336 See
331 See,
e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and ABA.
332 See Better Markets.
333 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and ABA.
334 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(i)(B)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
wealth management vehicles and that
the other conditions imposed by the
proposed rule would keep such vehicles
from evading the covered fund
provisions of the implementing
regulations.341 The commenter further
noted that a limit of ten closely related
persons would align the exclusion with
the numerical limitation of unaffiliated
owners provided for in the joint venture
exclusion.342
The final rule will allow up to five
closely related persons to hold
ownership interests in a family wealth
management vehicle. Commenters
indicated that many family wealth
management vehicles currently include
more than three closely related
persons.343 The agencies believe that the
final rule will more closely align the
exclusion with the current composition
of family wealth management vehicles,
thereby increasing the utility of the
exclusion without allowing such a large
number of non-family customer owners
to suggest the entity is in reality a hedge
fund or private equity fund.
Additionally, the agencies believe that
requiring family customers to own a
majority of the interests in the family
wealth management vehicle will serve
as an additional safeguard against
evasion of the provisions of section 13
of the BHC Act.
As proposed, the final rule’s
definition of ‘‘closely related person’’ is
‘‘a natural person (including the estate
and estate planning vehicles of such
person) who has longstanding business
or personal relationships with any
family customer.’’ 344 One commenter
suggested that the definition of ‘‘closely
related person’’ should include only
persons with personal relationships
with family customers and not also
business relationships.345 The agencies
believe that it is not practical or
worthwhile to exclude business
relationships from the definition of
‘‘closely related person’’ because it
would require banking entities to engage
in an assessment of relationships that
are likely to include elements common
in both personal and business
relationships. The agencies also believe
that requiring these relationships to be
‘‘longstanding’’ will help ensure that
they are bona fide established
relationships and not simply related to
the planned investment activities
through the family wealth management
vehicle.
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
341 See
SIFMA.
SIFMA.
343 See, e.g., BPI; ABA; and PNC.
344 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(iii)(A).
345 See, e.g., Better Markets.
342 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
In a change to the 2020 proposal, the
final rule permits any entity, or
entities—not only banking entities—to
acquire or retain, as principal, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity’s
outstanding ownership interests, for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary
for establishing corporate separateness
or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency,
or similar concerns.346 Some
commenters requested that the agencies
include this modification because often,
family wealth management vehicles use
unaffiliated third parties—such as thirdparty trustees or similar service
providers—when structuring family
wealth management vehicles.347 The
agencies believe that permitting de
minimis ownership by non-banking
entity third parties is appropriate and in
some cases necessary to reflect the
typical structure of family wealth
management vehicles. The de minimis
ownership provision recognizes that
ownership by an entity other than a
family customer or closely related
person may be necessary under certain
circumstances—such as establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
matters. Whether the entity that owns a
de minimis amount is a banking entity
or some other third party does not raise
any concerns that are not sufficiently
addressed by the aggregate ownership
limit and the narrow circumstances in
which such entities may take an
ownership interest. The agencies
recognize that without this
modification, family wealth
management vehicles may be forced to
engage in less effective and/or efficient
means of structuring and organization
because the exclusion would limit the
vehicle’s access to some customary
service providers that have traditionally
taken small ownership interests for
structuring purposes. The agencies are
therefore expanding the types of entities
that may acquire or retain the de
minimis ownership interest to include
any third party. However, the aggregate
de minimis amount and the purpose for
which it may be owned is unchanged
from the 2020 proposal.
As stated above, under the final rule,
a banking entity may only rely on the
exclusion with respect to a family
wealth management vehicle if the
banking entity meets certain
conditions.348 The agencies believe that,
collectively, the conditions of the
exclusion will help to ensure that family
wealth management vehicles are used
for client-oriented financial services
rule § ll.10(c)(17)(i)(C).
e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
348 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii).
346 Final
347 See,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
provided on arms-length, market terms,
and to prevent evasion of the
requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act and the implementing regulations.
In addition, these conditions are based
on existing conditions in other
provisions of the implementing
regulations,349 which the agencies
believe will facilitate banking entities’
compliance with the exclusion.
As proposed, the agencies are not
applying § ll.14(a), which applies
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act
to banking entities’ relationships with
covered funds, to family wealth
management vehicles because the
agencies understand that the application
of § ll.14(a) to family wealth
management vehicles could prohibit
banking entities from providing the full
range of banking and asset management
services to customers using these
vehicles.350 The agencies are, however,
applying §§ ll.14(b) and ll.15 to
family wealth management vehicles, as
proposed, because the agencies continue
to believe that it will help ensure that
banking entities and their affiliates’
exposure to risk remains appropriately
limited.
The agencies are also adopting a
prohibition, with modifications
described below, on banking entity
purchases of low-quality assets from
family wealth management vehicles that
would be prohibited under Regulation
W concerning transactions with
affiliates (12 CFR 223.15(a))—as if such
banking entity were a member bank and
the entity were an affiliate thereof—to
prevent banking entities from ‘‘bailing
out’’ family wealth management
vehicles.351 Regulation W (12 CFR
349 See implementing regulations §§ ll.11(a)(5)
(imposing, as a condition of the exemption for
organizing and offering a covered fund, that a
banking entity and its affiliates do not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of the covered fund
or of any covered fund in which such covered fund
invests); ll.11(a)(8) (imposing, as a condition of
the exemption for organizing and offering a covered
fund, that the banking entity provide certain
disclosures to any prospective and actual investor
in the covered fund); ll.10(c)(2)(ii) (allowing, as
a condition of the exclusion from the covered fund
definition for wholly-owned subsidiaries, for the
holding of up to 0.5 percent of outstanding
ownership interests by a third party for limited
purposes); and ll.14(b) (subjecting certain
transactions with covered funds to section 23B of
the Federal Reserve Act).
350 See SIFMA (stating that it agreed with the
agencies’ approach of not applying § ll.14 to
relationships between banking entities and family
wealth management vehicles because doing so
would prevent banking entities from making
ordinary extensions of credit and entering into a
number of other transactions with family wealth
management vehicles that are critical to the banking
entity providing traditional asset management and
estate planning services).
351 Final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(F).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46451
223.15(a)) provides that a member bank
may not purchase a low-quality asset
from an affiliate unless, pursuant to an
independent credit evaluation, the
member bank had committed itself to
purchase the asset before the time the
asset was acquired by the affiliate.352
Several commenters requested
clarification that the exclusion permits
banking entities to engage in riskless
principal transactions to purchase
assets—including low quality assets for
purposes of section 223.15 of the
Board’s Regulation W—from family
wealth management vehicles.353
Commenters stated that the need for
such asset purchases may arise as a
result of a family customer’s preferences
and that permitting the banking entities
to engage in such purchases may
facilitate the family customer’s sale of
the asset.354 Commenters stated that
allowing these transactions would pose
minimal market or credit risk to a
banking entity because the banking
entity would purchase and sell the same
asset contemporaneously.355
Furthermore, one commenter stated that
without clarity on the permissiveness of
riskless principal transactions, family
wealth management vehicles would be
forced to obtain the services of a thirdparty service provider to sell low quality
assets, which would increase costs and
operational complexity of the family
wealth management vehicles without
furthering the aims of section 13 of the
BHC Act or the implementing
regulations.356
The agencies believe that permitting a
banking entity to engage in riskless
principal transactions that involve the
purchase of low-quality assets from a
family wealth management vehicle is
unlikely to pose a substantive risk of
evading section 13 of the BHC Act. In
a riskless principal transaction, the
riskless principal (the banking entity)
buys and sells the same security
contemporaneously, and the asset risk
passes promptly from the customer
(family wealth management vehicle, in
this context) through the riskless
principal to a third-party.357 The
agencies are adopting the condition that
banking entities and their affiliates
comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity and
its affiliates were a member bank and
the entity were an affiliate. However, in
a change from the 2020 proposal and in
response to the concerns raised by
352 12
CFR 223.15(a).
e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
354 See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
355 See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
356 See SIFMA.
357 See 67 FR 76597.
353 See,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46452
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
commenters, the condition will
explicitly exclude from those
requirements transactions that meet the
definition of riskless principal
transactions as defined in
§ ll.10(d)(11). The definition of
riskless principal transactions adopted
in § ll.10(d)(11) is similar to the
definition adopted in the Board’s
Regulation W, as this definition is
appropriately narrow and generally
familiar to banking entities.358 The
agencies expect that, together, the
adopted criteria for the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion will
prevent a banking entity from being able
to bail out such entities in periods of
financial stress or otherwise expose the
banking entity to the types of risks that
the covered fund provisions of section
13 were intended to address.
Several commenters requested that
the agencies remove the condition that
banking entities and their affiliates
comply with the disclosure obligations
under § ll.11(a)(8) of the final rule, as
if the vehicle were a covered fund,
because such disclosures would not
apply to a vehicle that a banking entity
was not organizing and offering
pursuant to § ll.11(a) of the final rule
and therefore would be confusing.359 In
particular, these commenters stated that
the required disclosure under
§ ll.11(a)(8) concerning the banking
entity’s ‘‘ownership interests’’ in the
fund and referencing the fund’s
‘‘offering documents’’ may create
confusion in circumstances where the
banking entity does not own an interest
in the family wealth management
vehicle, or where such vehicles do not
have offering documents. Also,
commenters requested confirmation
from the agencies that banking entities
would be permitted to (i) modify the
required disclosures to reflect the
specific circumstances of their
relationship with, and the particular
structure of, their family wealth
management vehicle clients; and (ii)
satisfy the written disclosure
requirement by means other than
including such disclosures in the
governing document(s) of the family
wealth management vehicle(s).360
The agencies are adopting the
condition that banking entities and their
affiliates comply with the disclosure
obligations under § ll.11(a)(8) of the
final rule with respect to family wealth
management vehicles. However, in a
change from the 2020 proposal and in
response to the concerns raised by
commenters, the condition will
358 12
CFR 223.3(ee).
e.g., ABA and PNC.
360 See, e.g., BPI.
359 See,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
explicitly permit banking entities and
their affiliates to modify the content of
such disclosures to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and
also permit banking entities to modify
the manner of disclosure to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity.361 The
obligations under § ll.11(a)(8) of the
final rule apply in connection with the
exemption for organizing and offering
covered funds, which would typically
require the preparation and distribution
of offering documents. The agencies,
however, understand that many family
wealth management vehicles may not
have offering documents. The agencies
have an interest in providing family
wealth management vehicle customers
with the substance of the disclosure,
rather than a concern with the specific
wording of the disclosure or with the
document in which the disclosure is
provided. Accordingly, the agencies
have provided that the content of the
disclosure may be modified to prevent
the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the family wealth
management vehicle.
For example, § ll.11(a)(8) requires
disclosure that an investor ‘‘should read
the fund offering documents before
investing in the covered fund.’’ In order
to accurately reflect the specific
circumstances of a family wealth
management vehicle for which there are
no offering documents, the modified
provision will allow the banking entity
to revise this disclosure to reference the
appropriate disclosure documents, if
any, provided in connection with the
vehicle. Similarly, the agencies
understand the specific wording of the
disclosures in § ll.11(a)(8) of the rule
may need to be modified to accurately
reflect the specific circumstances of the
banking entity’s relationship with the
family wealth management vehicle. For
example, a banking entity that holds no
ownership interest in the family wealth
management vehicle may modify the
disclosure required in
§ ll.11(a)(8)(i)(A) to reflect its lack of
ownership. Moreover, § ll.11(a)(8)
requires that the banking entity provide
these disclosures, ‘‘such as through
disclosure in the . . . offering
documents.’’ The agencies expect that a
banking entity could satisfy these
361 In the 2020 proposal, the agencies had
indicated that for purposes of the proposed
exclusion, a banking entity could satisfy these
written disclosure obligations in a number of ways
and could modify the specific wording of the
disclosures in § ll.11(a)(8) to accurately reflect
the specific circumstances of the family wealth
management vehicle.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
disclosure delivery obligations in a
number of ways, such as by including
them in the family wealth management
vehicle’s governing documents, in
account opening materials or in
supplementary materials (e.g., a separate
disclosure document provided by the
banking entity solely for purposes of
complying with this exclusion and
providing the required disclosures).
4. Customer Facilitation Vehicles
The agencies are adopting an
exclusion from the definition of
‘‘covered fund’’ under § ll.10(b) of the
rule for any issuer that acts as a
‘‘customer facilitation vehicle.’’ The
customer facilitation vehicle exclusion
will, as proposed, be available for any
issuer that is formed by or at the request
of a customer of the banking entity for
the purpose of providing such customer
(which may include one or more
affiliates of such customer) with
exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service provided by
the banking entity.362
A banking entity may only rely on the
exclusion with respect to an issuer
provided that: (1) All of the ownership
interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or
more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created; 363 and (2) the
banking entity and its affiliates: (i)
Maintain documentation outlining how
the banking entity intends to facilitate
the customer’s exposure to such
transaction, investment strategy, or
service; (ii) do not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of such issuer; (iii) comply
with the disclosure obligations under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a
covered fund, provided that the content
may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and
the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer; (iv) do not
acquire or retain, as principal, an
ownership interest in the issuer, other
than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the issuer’s outstanding ownership
interests for the purpose of and to the
extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; (v) comply with the
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(i).
this condition, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by
one or more entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns. Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
362 Final
363 Notwithstanding
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of §§ ll.14(b) and
ll.15, as if such issuer were a covered
fund; and (vi) except for riskless
principal transactions as defined in
§ ll.10(d)(11), comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.364
The agencies continue to believe that
this exclusion will appropriately allow
banking entities to structure certain
types of services or transactions for
customers, or to otherwise provide
traditional customer-facing banking and
asset management services, through a
vehicle, even though such a vehicle may
rely on section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
Investment Company Act or would
otherwise be a covered fund under the
final rule. Most commenters that
addressed this exclusion were
supportive,365 stating that it would
provide banking entities with greater
flexibility to meet client needs and
objectives.366 Some commenters found
the exclusion’s conditions to be
reasonable and sufficient.367 However,
two commenters recommended that the
agencies impose additional limitations
on the exclusion.368 One of these
commenters argued that the exclusion
would permit, and possibly encourage,
banking entities to increase their risk
exposures through the use of customer
facilitation vehicles, and the agencies
should minimize such risk exposures
and promote risk monitoring and
management.369
The agencies continue to believe that
these vehicles do not expose banking
entities to the types of risks that section
13 of the BHC Act was intended to
restrict, and that this exclusion is
consistent with section 13(d)(1)(D),
which permits banking entities to
engage in transactions on behalf of
customers, when such transactions
would otherwise be prohibited under
section 13. The agencies have elsewhere
tailored the 2013 rule to allow banking
entities to meet their customers’
needs.370 This exclusion will similarly
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii).
e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; Credit Suisse;
FSF; Goldman Sachs; and IAA.
366 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and Goldman
Sachs.
367 See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
368 See Better Markets and Data Boiler.
369 See Better Markets.
370 For example, the agencies in 2019 amended
the exemption for risk-mitigating hedging activities
to allow banking entities to acquire or retain an
ownership interest in a covered fund as a riskmitigating hedge when acting as an intermediary on
behalf of a customer that is not itself a banking
entity to facilitate the exposure by the customer to
the profits and losses of the covered fund. See 2019
amendments § ll.13(a)(1)(ii). See also 2019
364 Final
365 See,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
allow banking entities to provide
customer-oriented financial services
through a vehicle when that vehicle’s
purpose is to facilitate a customer’s
exposure to those services.371 As stated
in the 2020 proposal, the agencies do
not believe that section 13 of the BHC
Act was intended to interfere
unnecessarily with the ability of
banking entities to provide services to
their customers simply because the
customer may prefer to receive those
services through a vehicle or through a
transaction with a vehicle instead of
directly with the banking entity.372
Some commenters agreed, stating that
customer facilitation vehicles would not
expose banking entities to the types of
risks that section 13 was intended to
prohibit or limit, particularly given that
such vehicles will be subject to a
number of conditions, as discussed
below.373
The exclusion will, as proposed,
require that the vehicle be formed by or
at the request of the customer.374 One
commenter suggested that the agencies
remove this requirement, arguing that it
would inhibit a banking entity’s ability
to provide customers with services in a
timely manner.375 However, the
agencies continue to believe that this
requirement is an important component
of the exclusion because it helps
differentiate customer facilitation
vehicles from covered funds that are
organized and offered by the banking
entity. As stated in the 2020 proposal,
the requirement will not preclude a
banking entity from marketing its
customer facilitation vehicle services or
discussing with its customers prior to
the formation of such vehicles the
amendments § ll.3(d)(11) (excluding from the
definition of ‘‘proprietary trading’’ the entering into
of customer-driven swaps or customer-driven
security-based swaps and matched swaps or
security-based swaps under certain conditions).
371 This exclusion does not require that the
customer relationship be pre-existing. In other
words, the exclusion will be available for an issuer
that is formed for the purpose of facilitating the
exposure of a customer of the banking entity where
the customer relationship begins only in connection
with the formation of that issuer. The agencies took
a similar approach to this question in describing the
exemption for activities related to organizing and
offering a covered fund under § ll.11(a) of the
2013 rule. See 79 FR 5716. The agencies indicated
that section 13(d)(1)(G), under which the exemption
under § ll.11(a) was adopted, did not explicitly
require that the customer relationship be preexisting. Similarly, section 13(d)(1)(D) does not
explicitly require a pre-existing customer
relationship.
372 85 FR 12120.
373 See SIFMA and ABA.
374 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(i).
375 SIFMA (stating that requiring a banking entity
to wait for a customer to request formation would
delay the banking entity’s ability to provide services
to the customer without any corresponding
regulatory benefit).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46453
potential benefits of structuring such
services through a vehicle.376
As in the 2020 proposal, the agencies
are not specifying the types of
transaction, investment strategy or other
service that a customer facilitation
vehicle may be formed to facilitate.377
One commenter recommended
specifying that the exclusion only allow
vehicles to be formed for extensions of
intraday credit, and payment, clearing,
and settlement services, and only for
purposes of operational efficiency.378
Another commenter argued that
attempting to specify may prevent
banking entities from being able to
appropriately respond to a customer’s
requests.379 The agencies continue to
believe that providing flexibility
enhances the utility of this exclusion.
Specifically, the agencies note that the
purpose of this exclusion is to allow
banking entities to provide customeroriented financial services through
vehicles, providing customers with
exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service that the
banking entity may provide to such
customers directly. Limiting the type of
transaction, investment strategy, or
service for which the customer
facilitation vehicle may be formed
would interfere with this purpose.
Accordingly, the agencies are adopting
this requirement as proposed.
Under the final rule, similar to the
2020 proposal, a banking entity will be
able to rely on the customer facilitation
vehicle exclusion only under certain
conditions, as stated above.380
Commenters supported most of the
conditions, stating that the exclusion
imposes reasonable conditions that
provide safeguards.381 Commenters also
suggested modifications to certain
conditions, as discussed below.382 The
agencies are adopting the conditions,
largely as proposed. However, the
agencies are modifying the conditions
that relate to de minimis ownership of
the vehicle, the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), and the disclosure obligations
under § ll.11(a)(8), as discussed
below.
As proposed, the exclusion would
have permitted banking entities and
their affiliates to acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer up to 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests, for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary
376 85
FR 12120.
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(i).
378 See Data Boiler.
379 See SIFMA.
380 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii).
381 See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
382 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
377 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46454
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
for establishing corporate separateness
or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency,
or similar concerns.383 Similar to their
request for family wealth management
vehicles, commenters suggested that the
agencies specifically allow any party
that is unaffiliated with the customer,
rather than only the banking entities
and their affiliates, to own this de
minimis interest.384 For the same
reasons as discussed above with respect
to family wealth management vehicles,
the agencies are modifying the de
minimis ownership provision such that
up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
issuer’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not customers if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.385
The agencies are adopting, with
modifications, the condition for a
banking entity to comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity were a member
bank and the issuer were an affiliate
thereof.386 As discussed above, several
commenters recommended that the
agencies clarify that the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion permits
banking entities to engage in riskless
principal transactions to purchase
assets—including low quality assets for
purposes of section 223.15 of the
Board’s Regulation W—from family
wealth management vehicles.387 One
such commenter also suggested that, for
purposes of consistency, the agencies
should similarly clarify that banking
entities are permitted to engage in such
riskless principal transactions with
customer facilitation vehicles.388
The purpose of the proposed
requirement that a customer facilitation
vehicle must comply with 12 CFR
223.15(a) was the same for both the
family wealth management vehicle and
the customer facilitation vehicle
exclusions—to help ensure that the
exclusions do not allow banking entities
to ‘‘bail out’’ either vehicle.389 For the
383 See 2020 proposed rule
§ ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(4).
384 See SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
385 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
386 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6). 12 CFR
223.15(a) provides that a member bank may not
purchase a low-quality asset from an affiliate
unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself
to purchase the asset before the time the asset was
acquired by the affiliate. 12 CFR 223.15(a).
387 See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA. See supra, Section
IV.C.3 (Family Wealth Management Vehicles).
388 See BPI.
389 See 85 FR 12120.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
same reasons discussed above with
respect to family wealth management
vehicles, the agencies have modified the
requirement to exclude from the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a)
transactions that meet the definition of
riskless principal transactions as
defined in § ll.10(d)(11).390 Similar to
the agencies’ approach with respect to
family wealth management vehicles, the
agencies expect that, together, the
adopted criteria for this exclusion will
prevent a banking entity from being able
to bail out customer facilitation vehicles
in periods of financial stress or
otherwise expose the banking entity to
the types of risks that the covered fund
provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act
were intended to address.
The agencies are modifying the
condition that the banking entity and its
affiliates comply with the disclosure
obligations under § ll.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund, to
provide clarification that the content of
the disclosure may be modified to
prevent the disclosure from being
misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer.391
Commenters requested that the agencies
provide such clarification in the context
of family wealth management
vehicles.392 Although the agencies did
not receive any comments with respect
to this condition in the context of this
exclusion, the agencies are similarly
modifying this condition under this
exclusion. The agencies believe that
these disclosures will provide important
information to the customers for whom
these vehicles will be used to provide
services—whether they are family
customers under the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion or other
customers under this exclusion. The
agencies’ treatment of this condition for
family wealth management vehicles, as
described above, will similarly apply to
this condition for customer facilitation
vehicles.393
The agencies are adopting, as
proposed, the condition that all of the
ownership interests of the issuer are
owned by the customer (which may
include one or more of the customer’s
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created (other than a de minimis interest
that may be held by others, as discussed
above).394 The agencies continue to
believe that this condition is
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6).
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(3).
392 See supra, Section IV.C.3 (Family Wealth
Management Vehicles).
393 Id.
394 Final rule §§ ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(A)–(B).
PO 00000
390 Final
391 Final
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
appropriate to prevent banking entities
from using this exclusion for customer
facilitation vehicles to evade the
restrictions of section 13 of the BHC
Act. To help track compliance, a
banking entity and its affiliates will, as
proposed, have to maintain
documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the
customer’s exposure to a transaction,
investment strategy, or service.395
The agencies are also adopting, as
proposed, the condition that the
banking entity and its affiliates do not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of such
issuer.396 The agencies continue to
believe that this condition is
appropriate and consistent with the goal
of preventing banking entities from
bailing out their customer facilitation
vehicles. Commenters generally agreed,
supporting the condition as one that is
reasonable and appropriate in
addressing the agencies’ potential
evasion concerns.397
Finally, the agencies are adopting, as
proposed, the condition that the
banking entity and its affiliates comply
with the requirements of §§ ll.14(b)
and ll.15, as if such issuer were a
covered fund.398 The agencies requested
comment in the 2020 proposal whether
this exclusion should also require that
the banking entity and its affiliates
comply with the requirements of all of
§ ll.14. One commenter argued that
requiring compliance with the
requirements of all of § ll.14 would
eliminate the utility of this exclusion.399
The same commenter supported the
condition, as proposed, stating that
requiring compliance with only
§ ll.14(b), which would apply the
requirements in section 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act, and the application
of the prudential backstops under
§ ll.15 would serve as adequate
safeguards to avoid the risk of bailout or
other evasion concerns.400 The agencies
continue to believe that this condition
will help ensure that banking entities
and their affiliates’ exposure to risk
remains appropriately limited.
The agencies continue to believe that,
collectively, the conditions on the
exclusion will help to ensure that
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1).
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(2).
397 See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and Data Boiler.
398 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(5).
399 See FSF (stating that if banking entities were
required to comply with all of § ll.14, they would
not be able to enter into swaps and other covered
transactions with the customer facilitation vehicle
for their clients, many of whom seek such
transactions through the use of such vehicles).
400 See FSF.
395 Final
396 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
customer facilitation vehicles are used
for customer-oriented financial services
provided on arms-length, market terms,
and to prevent evasion of the
requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act and the final rule. The agencies also
continue to believe that the adopted
conditions will be consistent with the
purposes of section 13.
As in the 2020 proposal, the agencies
will not apply § ll.14(a) to customer
facilitation vehicles because the
agencies understand that this would
prohibit banking entities from providing
the full range of banking and asset
management services to customers using
these vehicles. Commenters generally
supported this approach,401 and one
noted that applying § ll.14(a) to these
vehicles would undo any practical
utility of the exclusion.402
D. Limitations on Relationships With a
Covered Fund
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
proposed to amend the regulations
implementing section 13(f)(1) of the
BHC Act to permit banking entities to
engage in a limited set of covered
transactions with covered funds for
which the banking entity directly or
indirectly serves as investment manager,
investment adviser, or sponsor, or that
the banking entity organizes and offers
pursuant to section 13(d)(1)(G) of the
BHC Act (such funds, related covered
funds).403
Section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act
generally prohibits a banking entity
from entering into a transaction with a
related covered fund that would be a
covered transaction as defined in
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act
as if the banking entity was a member
bank and the covered fund was an
affiliate.404 The 2020 proposal would
have amended the application of section
13(f)(1) of the BHC Act in limited
circumstances, by allowing a banking
entity to enter into certain covered
transactions with a related covered fund
that would be permissible without limit
for a state member bank to enter into
with an affiliate under section 23A of
401 See,
e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
SIFMA.
403 See 2020 proposal § ll.14(a)(2), (3); 85 FR
12143–12146.
404 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1); see also 12 U.S.C. 371c.
Section 13(f)(3) of the BHC Act also provides an
exemption for prime brokerage transactions
between a banking entity and a covered fund in
which a covered fund managed, sponsored, or
advised by that banking entity has taken an
ownership interest. 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(3). In
addition, section 13(f)(2) subjects any transaction
permitted under section 13(f) (including a
permitted prime brokerage transaction) between a
banking entity and covered fund to section 23B of
the Federal Reserve Act. 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(2); see 12
U.S.C. 371c–1.
402 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
the Federal Reserve Act. In addition, the
2020 proposal would have allowed a
banking entity to enter into short-term
extensions of credit with, and purchase
assets from, a related covered fund in
connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement activities. The agencies
invited comment on the past
interpretation of section 13(f)(1) of the
BHC Act,405 and the proposed
amendments to the regulations
implementing section 13(f)(1).406
As described in the 2020 proposal, the
agencies believe the statutory
rulemaking authority under paragraph
(d)(1)(J) of section 13 of the BHC Act
permits the agencies to determine that
banking entities may enter into covered
transactions with related covered funds
that would otherwise be prohibited by
section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act,
provided that the rulemaking complies
with applicable statutory
requirements.407 This interpretation of
the agencies’ rulemaking authority is
supported both by the inclusion of other
covered transactions within the
permitted activities listed in paragraph
(d)(1) of section 13 and by the manner
in which section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act
is incorporated in the list of permitted
activities in paragraph (d)(1), as
described below.
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act limits the aggregate amount of
covered transactions between a member
bank and its affiliates, while section
13(f)(1) of the BHC Act generally
prohibits covered transactions between
a banking entity and a related covered
fund, with no minimum amount of
permissible covered transactions.408
405 In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies
noted that ‘‘[s]ection 13(f) of the BHC Act does not
incorporate or reference the exemptions contained
in section 23A of the FR Act or the Board’s
Regulation W.’’ 79 FR 5746.
406 85 FR 12145–46.
407 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), (d)(1)(J), (d)(2).
408 12 U.S.C. 371c, 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1). The term
‘‘covered transaction’’ is defined in section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act to mean, with respect to an
affiliate of a member bank, (1) a loan or extension
of credit to the affiliate, including a purchase of
assets subject to an agreement to repurchase; (2) a
purchase of or an investment in securities issued by
the affiliate; (3) a purchase of assets from the
affiliate, except such purchase of real and personal
property as may be specifically exempted by the
Board by order or regulation; (4) the acceptance of
securities or other debt obligations issued by the
affiliate as collateral security for a loan or extension
of credit to any person or company; (5) the issuance
of a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit,
including an endorsement or standby letter of
credit, on behalf of an affiliate; (6) a transaction
with an affiliate that involves the borrowing or
lending of securities, to the extent that the
transaction causes a member bank or a subsidiary
to have credit exposure to the affiliate; or (7) a
derivative transaction, as defined in paragraph (3)
of section 5200(b) of the Revised Statutes of the
United States (12 U.S.C. 84(b)), with an affiliate, to
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46455
Despite the general prohibition on
certain covered transactions in section
13(f)(1), section 13 also authorizes a
banking entity to own an interest in a
related covered fund, which would be a
‘‘covered transaction’’ for purposes of
section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act.409 In addition to this apparent
conflict between paragraphs 13(d) and
(f) with respect to covered fund
ownership, there are other elements of
these paragraphs that introduce
ambiguity about the interpretation of the
term ‘‘covered transaction’’ as used in
section 13(f) of the BHC Act. For
example, despite the general prohibition
on covered funds, another part of
section 13 permits a bank entity ‘‘to
acquire or retain an ownership interest
in a covered fund in accordance with
the requirements of section 13.’’ 410 In
the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies specifically interpreted section
13 to allow such investments noting that
a contrary interpretation would make
the specific language that permits
covered transactions between a banking
entity and a related covered fund ‘‘mere
surplusage.’’ 411 The statute also
prohibits a banking entity that organizes
or offers a hedge fund or private equity
fund from directly or indirectly
guaranteeing, assuming, or otherwise
insuring the obligations or performance
of the fund (or of any hedge fund or
private equity fund in which such hedge
fund or private equity fund invests).412
To the extent that section 13(f) prohibits
all covered transactions between a
banking entity and a related covered
fund, however, the independent
prohibition on guarantees in section
13(d)(1)(G)(v) would seem to be
unnecessary and redundant.413
Although the agencies previously
expressed doubt about their ability to
permit banking entities to enter into
covered transactions with related
covered funds pursuant to their
authority under section 13(d)(1)(J) of the
BHC Act,414 the activities permitted
pursuant to paragraph (d) specifically
contemplate allowing a banking entity
to enter into certain covered
the extent that the transaction causes a member
bank or a subsidiary to have credit exposure to the
affiliate. See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(7), as amended by
Pub. L. 111.203, section 608 (July 21, 2010). Section
13(f) of the BHC Act does not alter the applicability
of section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and the
Board’s Regulation W to covered transactions
between insured depository institutions and their
affiliates.
409 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G); (d)(4).
410 79 FR 5746.
411 Id.
412 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(v).
413 See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(7)(E); 12 CFR
223.3(h)(4).
414 See 76 FR 68912 n.313.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46456
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
transactions with related funds.415 The
exceptions in section 13(f)(1) are also
expressly incorporated into the statutory
list of permitted activities, specifically
in section 13(d)(1)(G)(iv).416 By virtue of
the conflict between paragraphs (d) and
(f) of section 13, and the inclusion of
specific covered transactions within the
permitted activities in paragraph (d) of
section 13, the agencies continue to
believe that the authority granted
pursuant to paragraph (d)(1)(J) to
determine that other activities are not
prohibited by the statute authorizes the
agencies to exercise rulemaking
authority to determine that banking
entities may enter into covered
transactions with related covered funds
that would otherwise be prohibited by
section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act,
provided that the rulemaking complies
with applicable statutory
requirements.417
Several commenters expressed
support for the proposed amendments
to the regulations implementing section
13(f)(1) of the BHC Act that would have
permitted a banking entity to engage in
a limited set of covered transactions
with a related covered fund.418 Some
commenters recommended that the
agencies clarify whether a banking
entity may enter into exempt
transactions with a related covered fund
in the circumstance where such
transactions would be exempt from
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act
only if a bank entered into such
transactions with a securities
affiliate.419 A few commenters also
recommended that the agencies adopt a
new exclusion allowing a banking entity
to offer other types of extensions of
credit to a related covered fund,
including extensions of credit in the
ordinary course of business.420 Other
commenters recommended that the
agencies clarify that section 13(f)(1)
does not apply outside of the United
States.421 The commenters noted that
such an approach would limit the
extraterritorial effect of section 13(f)(1),
and would better align section 13(f)(1)
with the manner in which section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act applies
outside of the United States.
As discussed below, the final rule
adopts the proposed amendments from
the 2020 proposal with minor
modifications. The agencies believe
that, under certain circumstances, it is
415 12
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G); (d)(4).
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(iv).
417 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), (d)(1)(J), (d)(2).
418 See, e.g., ABA; BPI; CBA; Data Boiler; EBF;
FSF; IIB; PNC; and SIFMA.
419 ABA; BPI; FSF; and SIFMA.
420 BPI and PNC.
421 CBA; EBF; and IIB.
appropriate to permit banking entities to
enter into certain covered transactions
with related covered funds, in the
manner described in the amendments to
§ ll.14 of the implementing
regulations. Consistent with the 2020
proposal, these amendments do not
modify the definition of ‘‘covered
transaction’’ but instead authorize
banking entities to engage in limited
transactions with related covered funds.
Any transactions permitted by these
revisions must still meet the eligibility
requirements for the particular
transaction, and the banking entity must
also comply with certain conflict of
interest, high-risk, and safety and
soundness restrictions with respect to
such transactions. The agencies are also
expressly providing that a banking
entity may enter into certain riskless
principal transactions with a related
covered fund, as described below.
Exempt Transactions Under Section
23A and the Board’s Regulation W;
Riskless Principal Transactions
The final rule adopts the amendments
to the regulations implementing section
13(f)(1) of the BHC Act to permit
banking entities to enter into exempt
transactions permitted under section
23A and the Board’s Regulation W.
Specifically, the final rule permits a
banking entity to engage in certain
covered transactions with a related
covered fund that would be exempt
from the quantitative limits, collateral
requirements, and low-quality asset
prohibition under section 23A of the
Federal Reserve Act, including certain
transactions that would be exempt
pursuant to section 223.42 of the
Board’s Regulation W.422
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act is designed to protect against a
depository institution suffering losses in
transactions with affiliates, and to limit
the ability of a depository institution to
transfer to its affiliates the ‘‘subsidy’’
arising from the depository institution’s
access to the Federal safety net.423
Nevertheless, a member bank may enter
into certain ‘‘exempt’’ covered
transactions set forth in section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act and the Board’s
Regulation W, without regard to the
quantitative limits, collateral
requirements, and low-quality asset
prohibition of section 23A and the
Board’s Regulation W, provided such
transactions meet the criteria specified
in Regulation W.424
416 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
12 U.S.C. 371c(d); 12 CFR 223.42.
a brief background on section 23A of the
Federal Reserve Act, see Transactions Between
Member Banks and Their Affiliates, 67 FR 76560–
765561 (December 12, 2002).
424 See 12 U.S.C. 371c(d); 12 CFR 223.42.
PO 00000
422 See
423 For
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Under the Board’s Regulation W, a
member bank may enter into certain
exempt covered transactions only with
a securities affiliate. Specifically, under
these exempt covered transactions, a
member bank may enter into
transactions to purchase marketable
securities, to purchase municipal
securities, and to enter into riskless
principal transactions only with a
securities affiliate.425 In permitting such
transactions under Regulation W, the
Board previously concluded that the
condition that such transactions were
permissible only with a securities
affiliate was an important consideration
that helped justify the exemption,
noting that securities affiliates generally
must be registered as broker-dealers,
and are therefore subject to SEC
supervision and examination, and are
required to keep detailed records
concerning each securities
transaction.426
The exempt transactions specified in
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act
and Regulation W are structured in a
manner so as not to present the same
concerns about a depository institution
suffering losses or transferring the
subsidy arising from the depository
institution’s access to the Federal safety
net. The agencies believe that the same
rationale that supports the exemptions
in section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act and the Board’s Regulation W also
supports exempting such transactions
from the prohibition on covered
transactions between a banking entity
and related covered funds under section
13(f)(1) of the BHC Act, provided that
such transactions are subject to the same
requirements and conditions specified
in Regulation W. In particular, the
agencies note that these exemptions
generally do not present significant risks
of loss and serve important public
policy objectives.427
Several commenters recommended
that the agencies clarify whether a
banking entity may enter into certain
transactions with a related covered fund
that would be permissible under the
Board’s Regulation W if entered into
between a bank and a securities affiliate,
425 12
CFR 223.42(f), (g), (m).
FR 76591 (December 12, 2002); see 67 FR
76593, 76597.
427 For example, intraday extensions of credit are
exempt covered transactions under section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act. The Board previously has
noted that ‘‘[i]ntraday overdrafts and other forms of
intraday credit generally are not used as a means
of funding or otherwise providing financial support
for an affiliate. Rather, these credit extensions
typically facilitate the settlement of transactions
between an affiliate and its customers when there
are mismatches between the timing of funds sent
and received during the business day.’’ 67 FR
76596.
426 67
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
even if the covered fund would not meet
the eligibility criteria to be a ‘‘securities
affiliate’’ under the Board’s Regulation
W.428 As noted above, Regulation W
imposes various conditions and
requirements on transactions that a bank
enters into with its affiliates, and
permits a bank to enter into transactions
involving the purchase of marketable
securities, the purchase of municipal
securities, and riskless principal
transactions only with an affiliate that is
a ‘‘securities affiliate’’ as defined in
Regulation W. With respect to purchases
of marketable securities and municipal
securities, the final rule follows the
approach adopted in Regulation W, and
permits a banking entity to enter into
such covered transactions with a related
covered fund only if those transactions
would meet all of the eligibility criteria
to qualify as exempt transactions under
Regulation W, including the
requirement that the related covered
fund meets the requirements to be a
securities affiliate.429 As noted above,
the exempt transactions specified in
Regulation W include various limits and
conditions that both limit the risks of
such transactions and allow the Federal
banking agencies to monitor
compliance. Generally, the final rule
retains the eligibility criteria for exempt
covered transactions defined in
Regulation W. The agencies believe that
these conditions serve important
policies, and appropriately limit the
scope of the exempt transactions
permissible under the implementing
regulations.
The final rule permits banking entities
to enter into riskless principal
transactions with a related covered
fund, including in circumstances where
the covered fund is not a ‘‘securities
affiliate.’’ 430 In a riskless principal
transaction, the riskless principal (the
banking entity) buys and sells the same
security contemporaneously, and the
asset risk passes promptly from the
affiliate (the related covered fund)
through the riskless principal to a third
party.431 In permitting such transactions
under Regulation W, the Board
428 ABA; BPI; FSF; and SIFMA. Under the Board’s
Regulation W, a ‘‘securities affiliate’’ is defined as
‘‘[a]n affiliate of the member bank that is registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a
broker or dealer; or . . . [a]ny other securities
broker or dealer affiliate of a member bank that is
approved by the Board.’’ 12 CFR 223.3(gg).
429 In addition to requiring that an affiliate be a
securities affiliate, the exemptions under Regulation
W permitting a bank to purchase marketable
securities or municipal securities in certain
circumstances require the bank to retain records
about the underlying transaction. See 12 CFR
223.42(f)(6), (g)(3)(iii)(B).
430 Cf. 12 CFR 223.42(m).
431 See 67 FR 76597.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
previously found that there was no
regulatory benefit to subjecting riskless
principal transactions to section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act, because such
transactions closely resemble securities
brokerage transactions, and these
transactions do not allow the affiliate to
transfer risk to the affiliate acting as a
riskless principal.432
Although the 2020 proposal would
have permitted a banking entity to enter
into a riskless principal transaction with
a covered fund provided it met the
criteria in Regulation W, the final rule
adopts a standalone exception to
differentiate riskless principal
transactions specifically from other
transactions that would be exempt
transactions under the Board’s
Regulation W.433 In connection with
permitting banking entities to enter into
riskless principal transactions with
related covered funds in a separate
exception from Super 23A, the agencies
are defining riskless principal
transactions in § ll.10 of the
regulations. The definition of riskless
principal transactions adopted in the
final rule is similar to the definition
adopted in the Board’s Regulation W, as
this definition is appropriately narrow
and generally familiar to banking
entities.434
In addition, and as discussed in more
detail below, banking entities may
separately rely on the independent
exception for acquisitions of assets in
connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement services. The agencies expect
that in many instances, subject to other
applicable laws and regulations, a
banking entity may be able to engage in
acquisitions of assets in connection with
payment, clearing, and settlement
services, without relying on the
exception permitting banking entities to
enter into covered transactions with
their related covered funds that would
be exempt under Regulation W.
Short-Term Extensions of Credit and
Acquisitions of Assets in Connection
With Payment, Clearing, and Settlement
Services
The final rule adopts the proposed
amendments in the 2020 proposal that
would have permitted a banking entity
to provide short-term extensions of
credit to, and purchase assets from, a
related covered fund, subject to
appropriate limits. Under the final rule,
each short-term extension of credit or
purchase of assets must be made in the
ordinary course of business in
connection with payment transactions;
PO 00000
432 Id.
433 12
CFR 223.42.
12 CFR 223.3(ee).
securities, derivatives, or futures
clearing; or settlement services. In
addition, each extension of credit must
be required to be repaid, sold, or
terminated no later than five business
days after it was originated.
Additionally, the proposed five business
day criterion is consistent with the
Federal banking agencies’ capital rules
and would generally limit banking
entities to transactions with normal
settlement periods, which have lower
risk of delayed settlement or failure,
when providing short-term extensions
of credit.435 Each short-term extension
of credit must also meet the same
requirements applicable to intraday
extensions of credit under section
223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board’s
Regulation W (as if the extension of
credit was an intraday extension of
credit, regardless of the duration of the
extension of credit). Under these
requirements, the banking entity making
a short-term extension would have to
meet the same requirements as it would
to engage in an intraday extension of
credit under Regulation W (and as
incorporated in the implementing
regulations). Specifically, the banking
entity would need to have policies and
procedures to manage the credit
exposure and must have no reason to
believe that the related covered fund
will have difficulty repaying the
extension of credit in accordance with
its terms. Finally, each extension of
credit or purchase of assets permitted by
these revisions must also comply with
certain conflict of interest, high-risk,
and safety and soundness restrictions,
and must otherwise be permissible for
the banking entity to enter into with the
fund.436
435 See 78 FR 62110 (October 11, 2013). While the
Federal banking agencies require firms to track and
monitor the credit risk exposure for transactions
involving securities, foreign exchange instruments,
and commodities that have a risk of delayed
settlement, this requirement does not apply to other
types of transactions which may be used in
providing a short-term extension of credit (e.g.,
repo-style transactions). Additionally, banking
entities typically monitor credit extensions by
counterparty, and not by transaction type. Thus, the
final rule is consistent with the approach taken in
the Federal banking agencies’ capital rule, without
imposing an additional compliance burden without
a corresponding benefit. See, e.g., 12 CFR 3.2; 217.2;
324.2 (defining derivative contract to include
unsettled securities with a contractual settlement or
delivery lag that is longer than the lesser of the
market standard for the particular instrument or
five business days); 12 CFR 3.38(d); 217.38(d);
324.38(d) (noting that an institution must hold riskbased capital against any delivery-versus-payment
or payment-versus-payment transaction with a
normal settlement period if the counterparty has
not made delivery within five business days after
settlement).
436 For example, an investment fund with respect
to which a member bank or its affiliate is an
434 See
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46457
Continued
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46458
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The agencies do not believe it would
be appropriate to permit banking
entities to enter into other covered
transactions with a related covered
fund, outside of the exceptions noted
above. Although some commenters
recommended expanding this exception
to allow banking entities to enter into
limited amounts of covered transactions
with related covered funds, the agencies
believe that permitting banking entities
to engage in other covered transactions
with related covered funds would
potentially raise the concerns that
paragraph 13(f)(1) was intended to
address.
The agencies also do not believe that
it would be appropriate to limit the
application of section 13(f)(1) to the
United States as some commenters
recommended, at this time. The
agencies note that other amendments in
the final rule (for example, amendments
to the treatment of foreign excluded
funds and foreign public funds) may
help address some of the commenters’
concerns about the extraterritorial
application of section 13(f)(1).
Impact of the Amendments on Safety
and Soundness and U.S. Financial
Stability
The agencies expect that the
amendments in the final rule described
above would generally promote and
protect the safety and soundness of
banking entities and U.S. financial
stability. In comments previously
submitted to the agencies, banking
entities that sponsor or serve as the
investment adviser to covered funds
have argued that the inability to engage
in any covered transactions with such
funds, particularly those types of
transactions that are expressly exempted
under section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act and the Board’s Regulation
W, has limited the services that they or
their affiliates can provide. The
commenters said that amending the
regulations to permit limited covered
transactions with related covered funds
would not create any new incentives for
the banking entity to financially support
the related covered fund in times of
stress and would not otherwise permit
the banking entity to indirectly engage
in proprietary trading through the
related covered fund.437 For example,
when a banking entity sponsors or
advises a covered fund, the prohibition
on covered transactions between the
banking entity (and its affiliates) and the
covered fund may limit the ability of the
investment adviser may be subject to additional
restrictions under Section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act. See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(1)(D).
437 See 85 FR 12144.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
banking entity and its affiliates to
provide other services, such as trade
settlement services, to the covered fund.
As discussed below, the agencies
believe that the exceptions in the final
rule would generally promote and
protect the safety and soundness of
banking entities and U.S. financial
stability by allowing banking entities to
reduce operational risk.
Currently, the restrictions under
section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act
substantially limit the ability of a
banking entity to both (1) organize and
offer a covered fund, or act as an
investment adviser to the covered fund,
and (2) provide custody or other
services to the fund. As a result, a third
party is required to provide other
necessary services for the fund’s
operation, including payment, clearing,
and settlement services that are
generally provided by the fund’s
custodian, even when the banking entity
sponsor of the fund typically provides
those services to other funds it sponsors.
This is the case even when the third
party may not offer the same quality of
services available through an affiliate, or
where the third party may charge more
for the same services that could be
provided by an affiliate. This increases
the potential for problems at the thirdparty service provider (e.g., an
operational failure or a disruption to
normal functioning) to affect the
banking entity or the fund, which were
required to use the third-party service
provider as a result of the restrictions
under section 13(f)(1). Those problems
may then spread among financial
institutions or markets and thereby
threaten the stability of the U.S.
financial system. By amending
§ ll.14(a), therefore, the final rule
allows a banking entity to reduce both
operational risk and interconnectedness
to other financial institutions by directly
providing a broader array of services to
a fund it organizes and offers, or
advises. The agencies believe that
reducing these risks will promote and
protect the safety and soundness of
banking entities.438
The final rule also would promote
and protect U.S. financial stability by
reducing interconnectedness among
firms. The provision of custodial
services among depository institutions
in the United States is highly
concentrated, with the four largest
438 The agencies believe that the same rationales
that supported exempting certain covered
transactions in section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act and the Board’s Regulation W also support
permitting a banking entity to engage in those
exempt covered transactions with a related covered
fund, subject to the same terms and conditions as
applicable under section 23A and Regulation W.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
providers, all of which remain subject to
the Volcker Rule, holding more than 85
percent of custodial assets. Requiring a
banking entity that organizes and offers
a covered fund to use a third party to
provide these services could increase
the interconnections between these
firms and the risk that distress at one
banking entity would be spread to the
others. The authorized covered
transactions would permit banking
entities to provide a more
comprehensive suite of services to
related covered funds, reducing
interconnectedness by reducing the
need to rely on third parties to provide
such services.
The final rule also retains important
limits on the transactions that a banking
entity may enter into with a related
covered fund, including limitations that
apply to transactions within the new
exceptions in the regulations
implementing § ll.14(a). As specified
in the statute, such activities are
permissible only ‘‘to the extent
permitted by any other provision of
Federal or state law, and subject to the
limitations under section 13(d)(2) of the
BHC Act and any restrictions or
limitations that the appropriate Federal
banking agencies, the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, may determine . . .’’ 439
Section 13(d)(2) of the BHC Act also
imposes additional restrictions on any
activities authorized pursuant to section
(d)(1), including those activities
authorized by rulemaking pursuant to
section (d)(1)(J).440
Sections ll.14(b) and ll.14(c) of
the regulations implementing section 13
of the BHC Act both generally require
that a banking entity may enter into
certain transactions specified in section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act
(including ‘‘covered transactions’’ as
defined in section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act) with related covered funds
only on terms and under circumstances
that are substantially the same (or at
least as favorable) as to the banking
entity as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with or
involving other nonaffiliated
companies, or in the absence of
comparable transactions, on terms and
under circumstances that the banking
entity in good faith would offer to, or
would apply to, nonaffiliated
companies.441
439 12
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1).
U.S.C. 1851(d)(2); see also 2013 rule
§§ ll.7 and ll.15.
441 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(2); see 12 U.S.C. 371c–
1(a)(1).
440 12
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The agencies therefore have
determined that the amendments to
§ ll.14(a) of the final rule, in the
manner described above, would
promote and protect both the safety and
soundness of banking entities, and U.S.
financial stability.
E. Ownership Interest
1. Definition of ‘‘Ownership Interest’’
The 2013 rule defines an ‘‘ownership
interest’’ in a covered fund to mean any
equity, partnership, or other similar
interest. Some banking entities have
expressed concern about the inclusion
of the term ‘‘other similar interest’’ in
the definition of ‘‘ownership interest,’’
and have indicated that the definition of
this term could lead to the inclusion of
debt instruments that have standard
covenants within the definition of
ownership interest. Under the 2013 rule,
‘‘other similar interest’’ is defined as an
interest that:
• Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund (excluding the
rights of a creditor to exercise remedies
upon the occurrence of an event of
default or an acceleration event);
• Has the right under the terms of the
interest to receive a share of the income,
gains or profits of the covered fund;
• Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
• Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
• Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
• Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Any synthetic right to have, receive,
or be allocated any of the rights
above.442
This definition focuses on the
attributes of the interest and whether it
provides a banking entity with
economic exposure to the profits and
losses of the covered fund, rather than
its form. Under the 2013 rule, a debt
interest in a covered fund can be an
ownership interest if it has the same
characteristics as an equity or other
ownership interest (e.g., provides the
holder with certain voting rights; the
right or ability to share in the covered
fund’s profits or losses; or the ability,
directly or pursuant to a contract or
synthetic interest, to earn a return based
on the performance of the fund’s
underlying holdings or investments).
In the 2018 proposal, the agencies
requested comment on all aspects of the
2013 rule’s application to securitization
transactions, including the definition of
ownership interest. Specifically, the
agencies asked whether there were any
modifications that should be made to
the 2013 rule’s definition of ownership
interest.443 Among other things, the
agencies requested comments on
whether they should modify
§ ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A) to provide that the
‘‘rights of a creditor to exercise remedies
upon the occurrence of an event of
default or an acceleration event’’
include the right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
cause, or to nominate or vote on a
nominated replacement manager upon
an investment manager’s resignation or
removal.444
A number of comments received on
the 2018 proposal supported the
agencies’ suggestion to modify
§ ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A) and to expressly
permit creditors to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
cause, or to nominate or vote on a
nominated replacement manager upon
an investment manager’s resignation or
removal without causing an interest to
become an ownership interest.445
However, a few of these commenters on
the 2018 proposal noted that this
modification would not address all
issues with the condition as banks
sometimes have contractual rights to
participate in the selection or removal of
a general partner, managing member or
member of the board of directors or
trustees of a borrower that are not
limited to the exercise of a remedy upon
an event of default or other default
PO 00000
rule § ll.10(d)(6)(i).
FR 33481.
442 2013
443 83
444 Id.
445 See,
e.g., SFIG; JBA; LSTA; and IAA.
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46459
event.446 Therefore, these commenters
proposed eliminating the ‘‘other similar
interest’’ clause from the definition
altogether or, alternatively, replacing the
definition of ownership interest with
the definition of ‘‘voting securities’’
from the Board’s Regulation Y.
A number of commenters on the 2018
proposal argued that debt interests
issued by covered funds and loans to
third-party covered funds not advised or
managed by a banking entity should be
excluded from the definition of
ownership interest.447 Other
commenters suggested reducing the
scope of the definition of ownership
interest to apply only to equity and
equity-like interests that are commonly
understood to indicate a bona fide
ownership interest in a covered fund.448
One other commenter asked the
agencies to clarify conditions under the
‘‘other similar interest’’ clause.449
Specifically, the commenter asked the
agencies to clarify whether the right to
receive all or a portion of the spread
extends to using the excess spread or
any debt repaid from collections on
underlying assets of a special purpose
entity to pay principal or interest that is
otherwise owed is not an ownership
interest. Another commenter asked the
agencies not to modify the definition of
ownership interest as, the commenter
argued, there is nothing under section
13 of the BHC Act that limits or restricts
the ability of a banking entity or
nonbank financial company to sell or
securitize loans in a manner permitted
by law.450
In response to comments received on
the 2018 proposal and in order to
provide clarity about the types of
interests that would be considered
within the scope of the definition of
ownership interest, the 2020 proposal
would have amended the parenthetical
in § ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A) to specify that
creditors’ remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event, which include, for example, the
right to participate in the removal of an
investment manager for cause or to
nominate or vote on a nominated
replacement manager upon an
occurrence of an event of default, would
not be considered an ownership interest
for this reason alone.451 The 2020
proposal also sought comment on
whether it would be appropriate to
446 See
SFIG.
e.g., Capital One et al. and BPI.
448 See, e.g., ABA and CAE.
449 See SFIG.
450 See Data Boiler.
451 The definition of ‘‘ownership interest’’ in the
implementing regulations is independent from the
definition of ‘‘voting securities’’ in the Board’s
Regulation Y.
447 See,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46460
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
further allow for an interest to confer
the right to participate in any removal
of an investment manager for cause, or
to nominate or vote on a nominated
replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal, whether or not an event of
default or an acceleration event has
occurred, without that interest being
deemed an ownership interest. Such
additional ‘‘for cause’’ termination
events may include the insolvency of
the investment manager, the breach by
the investment manager of certain
representations or warranties, or the
occurrence of a ‘‘key person’’ event or
a change in control with respect to the
investment manager.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
generally supported the proposed
amendment to the definition of
ownership interest to specify that
creditors’ remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event include the right to participate in
the removal of an investment manager
for cause or to nominate or vote on a
nominated replacement manager upon
an occurrence of an event of default. In
the view of these commenters, the
proposed clarification would
appropriately recognize that the ability
of a holder to vote on removal or
appointment of managers for cause is
not a right limited to equity holders.
However, many of these commenters
asserted that creditors’ rights are also
provided to debt holders in
circumstances other than an event of
default or acceleration. These
commenters therefore recommended the
proposed amendments be expanded to
include additional for cause events that
are independent of an event of default
or acceleration, such as the insolvency
of the investment manager or breach of
the investment management or
collateral management agreement.452
In light of comments received on the
2020 proposal, the agencies recognize
that it is customary for debt holders to
hold certain rights to participate in the
removal or replacement of an
investment manager for cause that may
be triggered by events other than default
or acceleration events. The agencies
believe that debt interests that include
the rights of a creditor to participate in
the for-cause removal or replacement of
an investment manager under certain
circumstances do not necessarily
constitute the type of interest Section 13
of the BHC Act is intended to capture
as an ownership interest. The agencies
are therefore finalizing, with certain
modifications, the amendments to
§ ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A) in order to provide
452 See,
clarity about the types of creditor rights
that may attach to an interest without
that interest being deemed an
ownership interest. The agencies have
modified the scope of the definition of
ownership interest in the final rule to
allow for certain additional rights of
creditors that are not triggered
exclusively by an event of default or
acceleration to attach to a debt interest
without such interests being deemed
ownership interests. In addition to such
rights arising under events of default or
acceleration, under the final rule, the
definition of ownership interest does
not include rights of a creditor to
participate in the removal or
replacement of an investment manager
for cause in connection with:
(1) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(2) the breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(3) the breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(4) the occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(5) the indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(6) a change in control with respect to
the investment manager;
(7) the loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(8) other similar events that constitute
‘‘cause’’ for removal of an investment
manager, provided that such events are
not solely related to the performance of
the covered fund or to the investment
manager’s exercise of investment
discretion under the covered fund’s
transaction agreements.
The 2020 proposal also would have
provided a safe harbor from the
definition of ownership interest, as
suggested by some commenters to the
2018 proposal.453 The safe harbor was
intended to address concerns of
commenters to the 2018 proposal that
some ordinary debt interests could be
construed as an ownership interest. The
2020 proposal, therefore, would have
e.g., SIFMA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
453 See
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
SFIG.
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
provided that any senior loan or other
senior debt interest that meets all of the
following characteristics would not be
considered to be an ownership interest:
(1) The holders of such interest do not
receive any profits of the covered fund
but may only receive: (i) Interest
payments which are not dependent on
the performance of the covered fund;
and (ii) fixed principal payments on or
before a maturity date (which may
include prepayment premiums intended
solely to reflect, and compensate
holders of the interest for, foregone
income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments on
the interest is absolute and may not be
reduced because of the losses arising
from the covered fund, such as
allocation of losses, write-downs or
charge-offs of the outstanding principal
balance, or reductions in the principal
and interest payable; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed and/or
paid in full (excluding the rights of a
creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
generally supported the proposed safe
harbor from the definition of ownership
interest for certain senior loans or senior
debt interests that do not have
equity-like characteristics.454 However,
certain commenters also requested that
the agencies clarify that the safe harbor
is available to senior loans and senior
debt interests where repayment of
principal may vary as a result of
acceleration or amortization
provisions.455 Additionally, certain
commenters also requested that the
agencies clarify that the reference to
senior loans or senior debt interests in
the proposed safe harbor includes all
exposures that would meet the
definition of ‘‘investment grade’’ found
in 12 CFR part 1 and implementing
guidelines, as long as such exposures
comply with the proposed
conditions.456
The agencies intended for the
proposed conditions of the safe harbor
to provide clarity and predictability to
banking entities by enabling them to
determine more readily whether an
interest would be an ownership interest
under the regulations implementing
section 13 of the BHC Act. After
considering comments received, the
454 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; LSTA; Mortgage
Bankers Association; and PNC.
455 See SIFMA.
456 See, e.g., LSTA and SFA.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
agencies have included the conditions
from the 2020 proposal for the safe
harbor with a modification to
§ ll.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1)(ii). The
modification requires that the senior
loan or senior debt interest involves,
among other things, repayment of a
fixed principal amount, on or before a
maturity date, in a contractuallydetermined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely
to reflect, and compensate holders of the
interest for, forgone income resulting
from an early prepayment). The
agencies believe this modification will
provide additional clarity that the safe
harbor is available to senior loan and
senior debt interests where contractual
principal payments vary over the life of
a senior loan or senior debt interest for
reasons such as amortization and
acceleration provided that the total
amount of principal required to be
repaid over the life of the instrument
does not change. The agencies believe
this modification to the safe harbor
under the final rule will ensure that
debt interests that do not have equitylike characteristics are not considered
ownership interests. Additionally, the
agencies believe that the conditions are
rigorous enough to prevent banking
entities from evading the prohibition on
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in a covered fund.
Further, in response to certain
commenters’ request that the agencies
clarify that the reference to senior loans
or senior debt interests in the proposed
safe harbor includes all exposures that
would meet the definition of
‘‘investment grade’’ found in 12 CFR
part 1 and implementing guidelines, the
agencies have determined that such a
provision would be inappropriate for
purposes of the safe harbor conditions
in the final rule. Unlike the safe harbor
provisions in the final rule regarding
ownership interests, such a provision
would not ensure that debt interests that
have equity-like characteristics are
treated as ownership interests for
purposes of subpart C of the final rule.
In response to the 2020 proposal, one
commenter requested that the agencies
modify the condition in
§ ll.10(d)(6)(i)(B) of the implementing
regulations and § ll.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1)
of the 2020 proposal, which states that
an interest that has the right to receive
a share of the income, gains or profits
of the covered fund is considered an
ownership interest, to clarify that the
condition would not include amounts
payable to securitization noteholders in
accordance with a contractual priority
of payments, commonly referred to as a
‘‘waterfall,’’ so long as such amounts are
limited to fixed principal and interest
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
determined on a fixed or typical index
floating rate basis.457 Specifically, the
commenter suggested a modification to
this condition to clarify that the term
‘‘profit’’ is intended to mean ‘‘net
profits’’ out of concern for the potential
ambiguity of how the condition would
apply to amounts received by
securitization noteholders in accordance
with the securitization’s waterfall of
payment. Another commenter disagreed
with any revision to the 2020 proposed
rule that would only cover as an
ownership interest an interest which
has the right to receive a share of the
‘‘net’’ income, gains or profits of the
covered fund.458 The final rule does not
modify § ll.10(d)(6)(i)(B) of the
implementing regulations or
§ ll.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) of the 2020
proposal. However, the agencies clarify
that a debt interest in a covered fund
would not be considered an ownership
interest solely because the interest is
entitled to receive an allocation of
collections from the covered fund’s
underlying financial assets in
accordance with a contractual priority
of payments.
2. Fund Limits and Covered Fund
Deduction
The 2020 proposal included
amendments to the implementing
regulations to better align the manner in
which a banking entity calculates the
aggregate fund limit and covered fund
deduction with the manner in which it
calculates the per fund limit, as it
relates to investments by employees of
the banking entity. Specifically,
consistent with how investments by
employees and directors are treated
generally under the existing rule of
construction in § ll.12(b)(1)(iv), the
2020 proposal would have modified
§§ ll.12(c) and ll.12(d) to require
attribution of amounts paid by an
employee or director to acquire a
restricted profit interest only when the
banking entity has financed the
acquisition.
The 2013 rule excludes from the
definition of ownership interest certain
restricted profit interests.459 To be
SFA.
Data Boiler.
459 2013 rule § ll.10(d)(6)(ii). Under the 2013
rule, the exclusion from the definition of ownership
interest is limited to restricted profit interests held
by an entity, employee, or former employee in a
covered fund for which the entity or employee
serves as investment manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, or other service
provider. As noted in the preamble to the 2013 rule,
the term ‘‘restricted profit interest’’ was used to
avoid any confusion from using the term ‘‘carried
interest,’’ which is used in other contexts. The
proposed rule would focus on the treatment of
restricted profit interests for purposes of calculating
PO 00000
457 See
458 See
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46461
excluded from the definition of
ownership interest, the restricted profit
interest must also meet various other
conditions, including that any amounts
invested in the covered fund—including
amounts paid by the entity, an
employee of the entity, or former
employee of the entity—are within the
applicable limits under § ll.12 of the
2013 rule.460
Under § ll.12 of the 2013 rule,
different calculation methodologies
apply for purposes of calculating
compliance with the per fund limit, the
aggregate fund limit, and the covered
fund deduction.461 For purposes of
calculating a banking entity’s
compliance with the aggregate fund
limit and the covered fund deduction,
the banking entity must include any
amounts paid by the banking entity or
an employee in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest in
the covered fund.462
The agencies did not receive
comments on the proposed change in
the treatment of restricted profit
interests. Several commenters
recommended that the agencies
eliminate the per fund limit, the
aggregate fund limit, and the covered
fund deduction with respect to any
ownership interest held by a banking
entity in any covered fund, if that
interest is held pursuant to
underwriting and market making
activities.463
With respect to the proposed change
in the treatment of restricted profit
interests, the agencies continue to
believe that it is appropriate for a
banking entity to count amounts
invested by the banking entity (or its
affiliates) to acquire restricted profit
interests in a fund organized and offered
by the banking entity for purposes of the
aggregate fund limit and covered fund
deduction. However, the agencies
believe attribution of employee and
director ownership of restricted profit
interests to a banking entity may not be
necessary in the circumstance when a
banking entity does not finance, directly
compliance with the aggregate fund limit and
covered fund deduction but would not address in
any way the treatment of such profit interests under
other laws, including under Federal income tax
law. See 79 FR 5706, n.2091.
460 2013 rule § ll.10(d)(6)(ii)(C).
461 2013 rule § ll.12(b)(1)(iv). As noted in the
preamble to the 2013 rule, the attribution to a
banking entity of ownership interests acquired by
an employee or director using financing provided
by the banking entity ensures that funding provided
by the banking entity to acquire ownership interests
in the fund, whether provided directly or indirectly,
is counted against the per fund limit and aggregate
fund limit. See 79 FR 5733.
462 2013 rule § ll.10(d)(6)(C); §§ ll.12(c)(1),
(d). See also 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G).
463 BPI; FSF; IIB; and SIFMA.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46462
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
or indirectly, the employee’s or
director’s acquisition of a restricted
profit interest in a covered fund
organized or offered by the banking
entity. The final rule amends the
implementing regulations to limit the
attribution of an employee’s or
director’s restricted profit interest in a
covered fund organized or offered by the
banking entity to only those
circumstances in which the banking
entity has directly or indirectly financed
the acquisition of the restricted profit
interest. The agencies expect that this
amendment will simplify a banking
entity’s compliance with the aggregate
fund limit and covered fund deduction
provisions of the rule, and more fully
recognize that employees and directors
may use their own resources, not
provided by the banking entity, to invest
in ownership interests or restricted
profit interests in a covered fund they
advise (for example, to align their
personal financial interests with those
of other investors in the covered fund).
The final rule does not adopt the
recommendation from commenters that
the agencies should eliminate the per
fund limit, aggregate fund limit, or
covered fund deduction requirements.
The 2019 amendments adopted several
changes to simplify the covered fund
compliance requirements for banking
entities that engage in market making or
underwriting with respect to a thirdparty covered fund. Specifically, the
2019 amendments eliminated the
aggregate fund limit and capital
deduction requirements for the value of
ownership interests in third-party funds
acquired or retained in connection with
permissible market making or
underwriting activities (i.e., covered
funds that the banking entity does not
advise or organize and offer pursuant to
§ ll.11(a) or (b) of the implementing
regulations). In discussing this change
in the preamble to the 2019
amendments, the agencies noted that
the amendments to the treatment of
ownership interests in third-party funds
were intended to better align the
compliance requirements for
underwriting and market making
involving covered funds with the risks
that those activities entail.464 The
compliance challenges associated with
underwriting and market making in
ownership interests in covered funds is
particularly acute with respect to thirdparty covered funds. As discussed in the
preamble to the 2019 amendments, ‘‘a
banking entity can more readily
determine whether a fund is a covered
fund if the banking entity advises or
464 See
84 FR 62017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
organizes and offers the fund.’’ 465 While
section 13 of the BHC Act provides the
agencies greater flexibility to adopt
changes in the treatment of ownership
interests in third-party funds, it
prescribes specific requirements that
apply to funds that the banking entity
advises, or organizes and offers.
Specifically, section 13 provides that a
banking entity must not acquire or
retain an ownership interest in a fund
organized and offered by the banking
entity except for a de minimis
investment subject to and in compliance
with paragraph (d)(4) of section 13 of
the BHC Act.466 Therefore, the final rule
does not adopt the change
recommended by commenters to modify
the treatment of ownership interests in
related covered funds that are held by
a banking entity in connection with
market making and underwriting
activities.
F. Parallel Investments
The 2020 proposal included a new
rule of construction in § ll.12(b)
clarifying that banking entities are not
required to treat investments alongside
covered funds as investments in covered
funds if certain conditions are met.467
As explained in the 2020 proposal, this
rule of construction was meant to
provide clarity in light of a discrepancy
between the preamble to the 2013 rule
and the text of the implementing
regulations.
The implementing regulations require
that a banking entity hold no more than
three percent of the total ownership
interests of a covered fund that the
banking entity organizes and offers
pursuant to § ll.11.468 Section
ll.12(b)(1)(i) of the implementing
regulations requires that, for purposes of
this ownership limitation, ‘‘the amount
and value of a banking entity’s
permitted investment in any single
covered fund shall include any
ownership interest held under § ll.12
directly by the banking entity, including
any affiliate of the banking entity.’’ 469
Section ll.12(b) also includes several
other rules of construction that address
circumstances under which an
investment in a covered fund would be
attributed to a banking entity.
The 2011 notice of proposed
rulemaking included a proposed
provision that would have required
attribution of certain direct investments
by a banking entity alongside, or
465 Id.
U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(iii).
85 FR 12149.
468 See id. at 12148; implementing regulations
§ ll.12.
469 See implementing regulations
§ ll.12(b)(1)(i).
PO 00000
466 12
467 See
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
otherwise in parallel with, a covered
fund.470 The agencies declined to adopt
this provision in the 2013 rule after
considering the language of the statute
as well as commenters’ views on that
provision.471
The 2013 rule restricts a banking
entity’s investment in a covered fund
organized and offered pursuant to
§ ll.11 to three percent of the total
number or value of the outstanding
ownership interests of the fund. That
regulatory requirement is consistent
with section 13(d)(4) of the BHC Act,
which limits the size of investments by
a banking entity in a hedge fund or
private equity fund.472 Neither section
13(d)(4) of the BHC Act nor the text of
the implementing regulations requires a
banking entity to treat an otherwise
permissible investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as an investment in the covered fund.
The text of the 2013 rule does not
impose any quantitative limits on any
investments by banking entities made
alongside, or otherwise in parallel with,
covered funds.473 However, in the
preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies
discussed the potential for evasion of
the per fund limit and aggregate fund
limit and stated that ‘‘if a banking entity
makes investments side by side in
substantially the same positions as the
covered fund, then the value of such
investments shall be included for
purposes of determining the value of the
banking entity’s investment in the
covered fund.’’ 474 The agencies also
stated that ‘‘a banking entity that
sponsors the covered fund should not
itself make any additional side by side
co-investment with the covered fund in
a privately negotiated investment unless
the value of such co-investment is less
than 3% of the value of the total amount
co-invested by other investors in such
investment.’’ 475
The 2020 proposal included a new
rule of construction to address
investments made by banking entities
alongside covered funds. This proposed
rule of construction was intended to
clarify in the rule text that banking
470 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 76
FR 68846, 68951–52 (Nov. 7, 2011).
471 In declining to adopt this parallel investment
provision, the agencies noted that banking entities
rely on a number of investment authorities and
structures to make investments and meet the needs
of their clients. 79 FR 5734.
472 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(4).
473 Any investment by the banking entity would
need to comply with the proprietary trading
restrictions in Subpart B of the implementing
regulations.
474 79 FR 5734.
475 See id.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
entities are not required to treat a direct
investment by a banking entity
alongside a covered fund as an
investment in the covered fund if
certain conditions are met. Specifically,
proposed § ll.12(b)(5) provided that:
(1) A banking entity shall not be
required to include in the calculation of
the investment limits under
§ ll.12(a)(2) any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(2) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under § ll.12 in the amount
of any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.476
In the preamble to the 2020 proposal,
the agencies recognized that banking
entities rely on a number of investment
authorities and structures to make
investments and meet the needs of their
clients and shareholders.477 The
agencies indicated that the proposed
rule of construction would provide
clarity to banking entities so that they
may make such investments for the
benefit of their clients and shareholders,
provided that those investments comply
with applicable laws and regulations.478
The preamble to the 2020 proposal went
on to note several restrictions that may
apply to a banking entity’s investment
alongside a covered fund. For example,
a banking entity may not engage in
prohibited proprietary trading alongside
a covered fund. Likewise, a banking
entity must have authority to make any
investment alongside a covered fund
under applicable banking and other
laws and regulations and must ensure
that the investment complies with
applicable safety and soundness
standards. For example, national banks
are restricted in their ability to make
direct equity investments under 12
U.S.C. 24 (Seventh) and 12 CFR part 1.
In addition, a banking entity that invests
alongside a covered fund that the
banking entity organizes and offers
under the asset management exemption
in § ll.11 would need to comply with
all the conditions of that exemption,
which, among other things, prohibits
the banking entity from guaranteeing,
assuming, or otherwise insuring the
obligations or performance of the
covered fund. Thus, a banking entity
476 See
85 FR 12149.
See also 79 FR 5734.
478 85 FR 12149.
477 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
would not be permitted to make a direct
investment alongside a covered fund
that the banking entity organizes and
offers for the purpose of artificially
maintaining or increasing the value of
the fund’s positions. Likewise, the
banking entity would also need to
ensure that any direct investment
alongside an organized and offered
covered fund does not cause the
sponsoring banking entity’s permitted
organizing and offering activities to
violate the prudential backstops under
§ ll.15.479
Most commenters that addressed the
proposed rule of construction supported
adopting the proposed revision.480
Commenters stated that the rule of
construction was consistent with
section 13 of the BHC Act, would not
increase the types of risks that section
13 of the BHC Act was meant to address,
and would not raise concerns about
evading section 13 of the BHC Act.481
Commenters noted that banking entities
would need to hold their investments in
a manner consistent with relevant
authorities and the associated risk
management and other prudential and
regulatory limits and controls, including
stringent capital requirements, for these
types of investments.482 Some
commenters also requested that the
agencies permit employees and
directors of a banking entity that
sponsors a covered fund to invest
directly in that covered fund, regardless
of whether the employees or directors
provide services to the covered fund on
behalf of their banking entity
employer.483 The agencies received one
comment opposing the proposed rule of
construction.484 This commenter
characterized the proposed rule of
construction as permitting proprietary
trading at arm’s length but without a
limit on the ownership interest that a
banking entity may hold and stated that
parallel investments should be subject
to the limitations that would apply to
direct investments in covered funds.485
After carefully considering the
comments received, the agencies are
adopting the rule of construction in
479 See id. In particular, to the extent the
investment would result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and its clients,
for example because the banking entity may exit the
position at a different time or on different terms
than the covered fund, the banking entity would be
required to provide timely and effective disclosure
in accordance with § ll.15(b) prior to making the
investments. Id.
480 See FSF; SIFMA; BPI; IIB; Goldman Sachs;
PNC; and ABA.
481 See FSF; SIFMA; and BPI.
482 See FSF; SIFMA; and BPI.
483 See ABA and PNC.
484 See Data Boiler.
485 See id.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46463
§ ll.12(b)(5), as proposed.486 As
described above and in the 2020
proposal, this rule of construction is
consistent with the text of section 13 of
the BHC Act, which does not prohibit a
banking entity from making otherwise
permissible investments directly when
doing so alongside a covered fund. This
rule of construction will also reduce
compliance burden by clarifying that a
banking entity is not required under
§ ll.12 of the final rule to attribute to
the banking entity direct investments
made alongside a covered fund for
purposes of the de minimis investment
limitation. In response to the
commenter who opposed the rule of
construction,487 the agencies note that
the rule of construction is consistent
with section 13 of the BHC Act and each
investment by a banking entity must
comply with laws and regulations,
including any applicable safety and
soundness standards.
As discussed in the preamble to the
2020 proposal, the rule of construction
will not prohibit a banking entity from
having investment policies,
arrangements or agreements to invest
alongside a covered fund in all or
substantially all of the investments
made by the covered fund or to fund all
or any portion of the investment
opportunities made available by the
covered fund to other investors.
Accordingly, a banking entity could
market a covered fund it organizes and
offers pursuant to § ll.11 on the basis
of the banking entity’s expectation that
it would invest in parallel with the
covered fund in some or all of the same
investments, or the expectation that the
banking entity would fund one or more
co-investment opportunities made
available by the covered fund. However,
as discussed in the preamble to the 2020
proposal, the agencies would expect
that any such investment policies,
arrangements or agreements would
ensure that the banking entity has the
ability to evaluate each investment on a
case-by-case basis to confirm that the
banking entity does not make any
investment unless the investment
complies with applicable laws and
486 Final rule § ll.12(b)(5). These kinds of
investments could be, for example, parallel
investments or co-investments. For these purposes,
‘‘parallel investments’’ generally refers to a series of
investments that are made side-by-side with a
covered fund, and ‘‘co-investments’’ generally refers
to a specific investment opportunity that is made
available to third-parties when the general partner
or investment manager for the covered fund
determines that the covered fund does not have
sufficient capital available to make the entire
investment in the target portfolio company or
determines that it would not be suitable for the
covered fund to take the entire available
investment.
487 See Data Boiler.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46464
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
regulations, including any applicable
safety and soundness standards. The
agencies believe that this would further
ensure that the banking entity is not
exposed to the types of risks that section
13 of the BHC Act was intended to
address.
As discussed earlier and in the
preamble to the 2020 proposal, the
agencies recognize that the 2011
proposed rule would have required a
banking entity to apply the per fund
limit and aggregate fund limit to a direct
investment alongside a covered fund
when, among other things, a banking
entity is contractually obligated to make
such investment alongside a covered
fund. The agencies continue to believe
that such a prohibition is not necessary
given the agencies’ expectation that a
banking entity would retain the ability
to evaluate each investment on a caseby-case basis to confirm that the
banking entity does not make any
investment unless the investment
complies with applicable laws and
regulations, including any applicable
safety and soundness standards.
The 2013 rule imposes certain
attribution rules and eligibility
requirements for investments by
directors and employees of a banking
entity in covered funds organized and
offered by the banking entity.
Specifically, § ll.12(b)(1)(iv) of the
2013 rule requires attribution of an
investment by a director or employee of
a banking entity who acquires an
ownership interest in his or her
personal capacity in a covered fund
sponsored by the banking entity if the
banking entity, directly or indirectly,
extends financing for the purpose of
enabling the director or employee to
acquire the ownership interest in the
fund and the financing is used to
acquire such ownership interest in the
covered fund. Section ll.11(a)(7)
prohibits investments by any director or
employee of the banking entity (or an
affiliate thereof) in the covered fund,
other than any director or employee
who is directly engaged in providing
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, or other services to the
covered fund at the time the director or
employee makes the investment.
As discussed in the preamble to the
2020 proposal, the agencies recognize
that directors and employees of banking
entities may participate in investments
alongside a covered fund, for example
on an ad hoc basis or as part of a
compensation arrangement. Consistent
with the agencies’ rule of construction
regarding direct investments by banking
entities alongside a covered fund, the
agencies would expect that any direct
investments (whether a series of parallel
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
investments or a co-investment) by a
director or employee of a banking entity
(or an affiliate thereof) made alongside
a covered fund in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations would
not be treated as an investment by the
director or employee in the covered
fund. Accordingly, such a direct
investment would not be attributed to
the banking entity as an investment in
the covered fund, regardless of whether
the banking entity arranged the
transaction on behalf of the director or
employee or provided financing for the
investment.488 Similarly, the
requirements under § ll.11(a)(7)
limiting the directors and employees
that are eligible to invest in a covered
fund organized and offered by the
banking entity to those that are directly
engaged in providing specified services
to the covered fund would not apply to
any such direct investment.489
With respect to investments in a
covered fund, the agencies decline to
permit an employee or director of a
banking entity that organizes and offers
a covered fund to make investments in
that covered fund if the director or
employee does not provide services to
the covered fund on behalf of the
banking entity, as requested by some
commenters.490 The restriction on these
types of director and employee
investments is required by the
statute.491
G. Technical Amendments
The agencies proposed five sets of
clarifying technical edits to the
implementing regulations. Specifically,
the agencies proposed to (1) amend
§ ll.12(b)(1)(ii) to add a comma after
the words ‘‘SEC-regulated business
development companies’’ in both places
where that phrase is used; (2) amend
§ ll.12(b)(4)(i) to replace the phrase
‘‘ownership interest of the master fund’’
with the phrase ‘‘ownership interest in
the master fund’’; (3) amend
§ ll.12(b)(4)(ii) to replace the phrase
488 See 2013 rule § ll.12(b)(1)(iv) (requiring
attribution of an investment by a director or
employee in a covered fund organized and offered
by the banking entity, where the banking entity,
directly or indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or employee to
acquire the ownership interest in the covered fund
and the financing is used to acquire such ownership
interest in the covered fund) (emphasis added).
489 See 2013 rule § ll.11(a)(7) (prohibiting
investments by any director or employee of the
banking entity (or an affiliate thereof) in a covered
fund organized and offered by the banking entity,
other than any director or employee who is directly
engaged in providing investment advisory,
commodity trading advisory, or other services to the
covered fund at the time the director or employee
makes the investment) (emphasis added).
490 See ABA and PNC.
491 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(vii).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
‘‘ownership interest of the fund’’ with
the phrase ‘‘ownership interest in the
fund;’’ (4) amend §§ ll.10(c)(3)(i) and
ll.10(c)(10)(i) to replace the word
‘‘comprised’’ with the word
‘‘composed;’’ and (5) amend
§ ll.10(c)(8)(iv)(A) to replace the word
‘‘of’’ in the phrase ‘‘contractual rights of
other assets’’ with the word ‘‘or.’’
The agencies did not receive comment
on these provisions and are adopting the
technical amendments as proposed.
V. Administrative Law Matters
A. Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act 492 requires the Federal
banking agencies to use plain language
in all proposed and final rules
published after January 1, 2000. The
Federal banking agencies sought to
present the proposed rule in a simple
and straightforward manner and did not
receive any comments on plain
language.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Certain provisions of the final rule
contain ‘‘collection of information’’
requirements within the meaning of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). In accordance
with the requirements of the PRA, the
agencies may not conduct or sponsor,
and a respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The agencies
reviewed the final rule and determined
that the final rule creates new
recordkeeping requirements and revises
certain disclosure requirements that
have been previously cleared under
various OMB control numbers. The
agencies did not receive any specific
comments on the PRA. The agencies are
extending for three years, with revision,
these information collections. The
information collection requirements
contained in this final rule have been
submitted by the OCC and FDIC to OMB
for review and approval under section
3507(d) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(d))
and section 1320.11 of the OMB’s
implementing regulations (5 CFR 1320).
The Board reviewed the final rule under
the authority delegated to the Board by
OMB. The Board will submit
information collection burden estimates
to OMB, and the submission will
include burden for Federal Reservesupervised institutions, as well as
burden for OCC-, FDIC-, SEC-, and
CFTC-supervised institutions under a
holding company. The OCC and the
492 Public Law 106–102, section 722, 113 Stat.
1338, 1471 (1999).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Reporting
FDIC will take burden for banking
entities that are not under a holding
company.
Abstract
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally
prohibits any banking entity from
engaging in proprietary trading or from
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with a covered fund,
subject to certain exemptions. The
exemptions allow certain types of
permissible trading and asset
management activities.
Current Actions
The final rule contains requirements
subject to the PRA, and the changes
relative to the implementing regulations
are discussed herein. The new
recordkeeping requirements are found
in section ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1) and
the modified disclosure requirements
are found in section ll.11(a)(8)(i). The
modified information collection
requirements would implement section
13 of the BHC Act. The respondents are
for-profit financial institutions,
including small businesses. A covered
entity must retain these records for a
period that is no less than 5 years in a
form that allows it to promptly produce
such records to the relevant agency on
request.
Recordkeeping Requirements
Section ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1)
requires a banking entity relying on the
exclusion from the covered fund
definition for customer facilitation
vehicles to maintain documentation
outlining how the banking entity
intends to facilitate the customer’s
exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or service. The agencies
estimate that the new recordkeeping
requirement will be incurred once a
year with an average hour per response
of 10 hours.
Disclosure Requirements
Section ll.11(a)(8)(i), which
requires banking entities that organize
and offer covered funds to make certain
disclosures to investors in such funds,
is being expanded to also apply to
banking entities relying on exclusions
for credit funds, venture capital funds,
family wealth management vehicles, or
customer facilitation vehicles. The
agencies estimate that the current
average hours per response of 0.1 will
increase to 0.5.
Revision, With Extension, of the
Following Information Collections
Estimated average hours per response:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
Section ll.4(c)(3)(i)—0.25 hours for
an average of 20 times per year.
Section ll.12(e)—20 hours (Initial
set-up 50 hours) for an average of 10
times per year.
Section ll.20(d)—41 hours (Initial
set-up 125 hours) quarterly.
Section ll.20(i)—20 hours.
Recordkeeping
Section ll.3(d)(3)—1 hour (Initial
set-up 3 hours).
Section ll.4(b)(3)(i)(A)—2 hours
quarterly.
Section ll.4(c)(3)(i)—0.25 hours for
an average of 40 times per year.
Section ll.5(c)—40 hours (Initial
setup 80 hours).
Section ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1)—10
hours.
Section ll.11(a)(2)—10 hours.
Section ll.20(b)—265 hours (Initial
set-up 795 hours).
Section ll.20(c)—100 hours (Initial
set-up 300 hours).
Section ll.20(d)—10 hours.
Section ll.20(e)—200 hours.
Section ll.20(f)(1)—8 hours.
Section ll.20(f)(2)—40 hours
(Initial set-up 100 hours).
Disclosure
Section ll.11(a)(8)(i)—0.5 hours for
an average of 26 times per year.
OCC
Title of Information Collection:
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and
Disclosure Requirements Associated
with Restrictions on Proprietary Trading
and Certain Relationships with Hedge
Funds and Private Equity Funds.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and
event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Respondents: National banks, state
member banks, state nonmember banks,
and state and federal savings
associations.
OMB control number: 1557–0309.
Estimated number of respondents: 39.
Revisions estimated annual burden:
302 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours:
20,410 hours (3,681 hour for initial setup and 16,729 hours for ongoing).
Board
Title of Information Collection:
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and
Disclosure Requirements Associated
with Regulation VV.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and
event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Respondents: State member banks,
bank holding companies, savings and
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46465
loan holding companies, foreign
banking organizations, U.S. State
branches or agencies of foreign banks,
and other holding companies that
control an insured depository
institution and any subsidiary of the
foregoing other than a subsidiary for
which the OCC, FDIC, CFTC, or SEC is
the primary financial regulatory agency.
The Board will take burden for all
institutions under a holding company
including:
• OCC-supervised institutions,
• FDIC-supervised institutions,
• Banking entities for which the
CFTC is the primary financial regulatory
agency, as defined in section 2(12)(C) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, and
• Banking entities for which the SEC
is the primary financial regulatory
agency, as defined in section 2(12)(B) of
the Dodd-Frank Act.
Legal authorization and
confidentiality: This information
collection is authorized by section 13 of
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2) and
12 U.S.C. 1851(e)(1)). The information
collection is required in order for
covered entities to obtain the benefit of
engaging in certain types of proprietary
trading or investing in, sponsoring, or
having certain relationships with a
hedge fund or private equity fund,
under the restrictions set forth in
section 13 and the final rule. If a
respondent considers the information to
be trade secrets and/or privileged, such
information could be withheld from the
public under the authority of the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4)). Additionally, to the extent
that such information may be contained
in an examination report, such
information could also be withheld from
the public (5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(8)).
Agency form number: FR VV.
OMB control number: 7100–0360.
Estimated number of respondents:
255.
Revisions estimated annual burden:
7,880 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours:
36,112 hours (4,381 hour for initial setup and 31,731 hours for ongoing).
FDIC
Title of Information Collection:
Volcker Rule Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Relationships with Hedge
Funds and Private Equity Funds.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and
event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Respondents: State nonmember
banks, state savings associations, and
certain subsidiaries of those entities.
OMB control number: 3064–0184.
Estimated number of respondents: 10.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46466
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Revisions estimated annual burden:
175 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours: 3,288
hours (1,759 hours for initial set-up and
1,529 hours for ongoing).
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) 493 requires an agency to either
provide a regulatory flexibility analysis
with a final rule or certify that the final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The U.S. Small
Business Administration (SBA)
establishes size standards that define
which entities are small businesses for
purposes of the RFA.494 Except as
otherwise specified below, the size
standard to be considered a small
business for banking entities subject to
the final rule is $600 million or less in
consolidated assets.495
Board
The Board has considered the
potential impact of the final rule on
small entities in accordance with
section 603 of the RFA. Based on the
Board’s analysis, and for the reasons
stated below, the Board certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial of
number of small entities.
The Board invited comment on all
aspects of its analysis related to the
requirements of the RFA in connection
with the 2020 proposal. In particular,
the Board requested that commenters
describe the nature of any impact on
small entities and provide empirical
data to illustrate and support the extent
of the impact. The Board did not receive
any comments related to this issue.
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, the agencies are adopting
revisions to the regulations
implementing section 13 of the BHC Act
in order to improve and streamline the
regulations by modifying and clarifying
requirements related to the covered
fund provisions.496 Certain of the
exclusions from the covered fund
definition included in the final rule
contain recordkeeping and disclosure
requirements that would apply to
banking entities relying on the
493 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
SBA, Table of Small Business Size
Standards Matched to North American Industry
Classification System Codes, available at https://
www.sba.gov/document/support--table-sizestandards.
495 See id. Pursuant to SBA regulations, the asset
size of a concern includes the assets of the concern
whose size is at issue and all of its domestic and
foreign affiliates. 13 CFR 121.103(6).
496 The agencies are explicitly authorized under
section 13(b)(2) of the BHC Act to adopt rules
implementing section 13. 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2).
494 U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
exclusion. For example, the exclusion
for customer facilitation vehicles
requires a banking entity relying on the
exclusion to maintain documentation
outlining how the banking entity
intends to facilitate the customer’s
exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or service. The final rule is
expected to reduce regulatory burden on
banking entities, and the Board does not
expect these recordkeeping
requirements to result in a significant
economic impact.
The Board’s rule generally applies to
state-chartered banks that are members
of the Federal Reserve System, bank
holding companies, and foreign banking
organizations and nonbank financial
companies supervised by the Board
(collectively, ‘‘Board-regulated
entities’’). However, section 203 of the
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act
(EGRRCPA),497 which was enacted on
May 24, 2018, amended section 13 of
the BHC Act by narrowing the definition
of banking entity to exclude certain
community banks.498 The Board is not
aware of any Board-regulated entities
that meet the SBA’s definition of ‘‘small
entity’’ that are subject to section 13 of
the BHC Act and its implementing
regulations following the enactment of
EGRRCPA. Furthermore, to the extent
that any Board-regulated entities that
meet the definition of ‘‘small entity’’ are
or become subject to section 13 of the
BHC Act and its implementing
regulations, the Board does not expect
the total number of such entities to be
substantial. Accordingly, the Board’s
final rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
OCC
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires an agency,
in connection with a final rule, to
prepare a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis describing the impact of the
rule on small entities (defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
for purposes of the RFA to include
commercial banks and savings
institutions with total assets of $600
million or less and trust companies with
total assets of $41.5 million or less) or
to certify that the final rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
Law 115–174 (May 24, 2018).
EGRRCPA, a community bank and its
affiliates are generally excluded from the definition
of banking entity, and thus section 13 of the BHC
Act, if the bank and all companies that control the
bank have total consolidated assets equal to $10
billion or less and trading assets and liabilities
equal to five percent or less of total consolidated
assets.
PO 00000
497 Public
498 Under
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a substantial number of small entities.
The OCC currently supervises
approximately 745 small entities.499
Under the EGRRCPA, banking entities
with total consolidated assets of $10
billion or less generally are not
‘‘banking entities’’ within the scope of
section 13 of the BHC Act if their
trading assets and trading liabilities do
not exceed five percent of their total
consolidated assets. In addition, section
13 of the BHC Act generally excludes
certain institutions that function only in
a trust or fiduciary capacity from the
definition of ‘‘banking entity. As a
result, no OCC-supervised small entities
are subject to section 13 of the BHC Act.
Thus, the final rule will not impact any
OCC-supervised small entities.
Therefore, the OCC certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of OCCsupervised small entities.
FDIC
The RFA generally requires that, in
connection with a final rulemaking, an
agency prepare and make available for
public comment a final regulatory
flexibility analysis describing the
impact of the final rule on small
entities.500 However, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required if the
agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The SBA has defined ‘‘small
entities’’ to include banking
organizations with total assets of less
than or equal to $600 million that are
independently owned and operated or
owned by a holding company with less
than or equal to $600 million in total
assets.501 Generally, the FDIC considers
499 The OCC bases its estimate of the number of
small entities on the SBA’s size thresholds for
commercial banks and savings institutions, and
trust companies, which are $600 million and $41.5
million, respectively. Consistent with the General
Principles of Affiliation, 13 CFR 121.103(a), the
OCC counts the assets of affiliated financial
institutions when determining if the OCC should
classify an OCC-supervised institution as a small
entity. The OCC uses December 31, 2019, to
determine size because a ‘‘financial institution’s
assets are determined by averaging the assets
reported on its four quarterly financial statements
for the preceding year.’’ See footnote 8 of the SBA’s
Table of Size Standards.
500 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
501 The SBA defines a small banking organization
as having $600 million or less in assets, where an
organization’s ‘‘assets are determined by averaging
the assets reported on its four quarterly financial
statements for the preceding year.’’ See 13 CFR
121.201 (as amended by 84 FR 34261, effective
August 19, 2019). In its determination, the ‘‘SBA
counts the receipts, employees, or other measure of
size of the concern whose size is at issue and all
of its domestic and foreign affiliates.’’ See 13 CFR
121.103. Following these regulations, the FDIC uses
a covered entity’s affiliated and acquired assets,
averaged over the preceding four quarters, to
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
a significant effect to be a quantified
effect in excess of five percent of total
annual salaries and benefits per
institution, or 2.5 percent of total
noninterest expenses. The FDIC believes
that effects in excess of these thresholds
typically represent significant effects for
FDIC-supervised institutions. For the
reasons described below and under
section 605(b) of the RFA, the FDIC
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
As of December 31, 2019, the FDIC
supervised 3,344 depository
institutions,502 of which 2,581 were
considered small entities for the
purposes of RFA.503 The Economic
Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act excluded
entities from the requirements of section
13 of the BHC Act that do not have and
are not controlled by a company that
has total assets of more than $10 billion
or trading assets and liabilities
comprising more than five percent of
total consolidated assets.504 Only one
small, FDIC-supervised institution is
subject to section 13 of the BHC Act,
because its trading assets and liabilities
exceed five percent of total consolidated
assets.505
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally
prohibits any banking entity from
engaging in proprietary trading or from
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with a covered fund. As
previously discussed, the final rule
modifies existing definitions and
exclusions and introduces new
exclusions to the implementing
regulations. The final rule permits
covered entities to engage in additional
activities with respect to covered funds,
including acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, or
having certain relationships with
covered funds, subject to certain
restrictions.
This final rule excludes certain types
of investment funds from the definition
of a ‘‘covered fund’’ for the purposes of
section 13 of the BHC Act. Investments
in funds that are affected by this final
rule could be reported as deductions
from capital on Call Report schedule
RC–R Part 1 Lines 11 or 13 if the
investments qualify as ‘‘investments in
the capital of an unconsolidated
determine whether the covered entity is ‘‘small’’ for
the purposes of RFA.
502 FDIC-supervised institutions are set forth in 12
U.S.C. 1813(q)(2).
503 FDIC Call Report data, December 31, 2019.
504 Public Law 115–174, May 24, 2018. https://
www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/
2155.
505 FDIC Call Report data, December 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
financial institution’’ or as additional
deductions on Lines 17 or 24 of
schedule RC–R otherwise.506 The one
affected small, FDIC-supervised
institution did not report any such
deductions over the past five years.507
Based on this supporting information,
the FDIC certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
SEC
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC
certified that, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the 2020 proposal would not, if
adopted, have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Although the SEC solicited
written comments regarding this
certification, no commenters responded
to this request.
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, the amendments clarify
and simplify compliance with the
implementing regulations, refine the
extraterritorial application of the section
13 of the BHC Act, and permit
additional fund activities that do not
present the risks that section 13 was
intended to address.
The amendments will generally apply
to banking entities, including certain
SEC-registered entities. These entities
include bank-affiliated SEC-registered
investment advisers, broker-dealers, and
security-based swap dealers. Based on
information in filings submitted by
these entities, the SEC believes that
there are no banking entity registered
investment advisers or broker-dealers
that are small entities for purposes of
the RFA. For this reason, the SEC
certifies that the amendments will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
CFTC
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the CFTC
hereby certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for which the CFTC is the primary
financial regulatory agency.
As discussed in this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, the final rule clarifies and
simplifies compliance with the
implementing regulations, refines the
extraterritorial application of section 13
of the BHC Act, and permits additional
fund activities that do not present the
risks that section 13 was intended to
506 See ‘‘Supervisory Guidance on the Capital
Treatment of Certain Investments in Covered
Funds.’’ FDIC FIL–50–2015: November 6, 2015.
https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2015/
fil15050a.pdf.
507 FDIC Call Report data, March 2015–December
2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46467
address. To reduce the extraterritorial
impact of the implementing regulations,
the final rule exempts the activities of
certain funds that are organized outside
of the United States and offered to
foreign investors from certain
restrictions of the implementing
regulations. The final rule also revises
several existing exclusions from the
covered fund provisions, to provide
clarity and simplify compliance with
the requirements of the implementing
regulations. The final rule adopts
several new exclusions from the covered
fund definition in order to more closely
align the regulation with the purpose of
the statute. Last, the final rule adopts
revisions to the provisions that govern
the relationship between a banking
entity and a fund and the definition of
ownership interest.
The final rule will generally apply to
banking entities, including certain
CFTC-registered entities. These entities
include bank-affiliated CFTC-registered
swap dealers, futures commission
merchants, commodity trading advisors
and commodity pool operators.508 The
CFTC has previously determined that
swap dealers, futures commission
merchants and commodity pool
operators are not small entities for
purposes of the RFA and, therefore, the
requirements of the RFA do not apply
to those entities.509 As for commodity
trading advisors, the CFTC has found it
appropriate to consider whether such
registrants should be deemed small
entities for purposes of the RFA on a
case-by-case basis, in the context of the
particular regulation at issue.510
In the context of the final rule, the
CFTC believes it is unlikely that a
substantial number of the commodity
trading advisors that are potentially
affected are small entities for purposes
of the RFA. In this regard, the CFTC
notes that only commodity trading
advisors that are registered with the
CFTC are covered by the implementing
regulations, and generally those that are
registered have larger businesses.
508 The final rule may also apply to other types
of CFTC registrants that are banking entities, such
as introducing brokers, but the CFTC believes it is
unlikely that such other registrants will have
significant activities that would implicate the final
rule. See 79 FR 5808, 5813 (Jan. 31, 2014) (CFTC
version of 2013 final rule).
509 See Policy Statement and Establishment of
Definitions of ‘‘Small Entities’’ for Purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 47 FR 18618 (Apr. 30,
1982) (futures commission merchants and
commodity pool operators); Registration of Swap
Dealers and Major Swap Participants, 77 FR 2613,
2620 (Jan. 19, 2012) (swap dealers and major swap
participants).
510 See Policy Statement and Establishment of
Definitions of ‘‘Small Entities’’ for Purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 47 FR 18618, 18620
(Apr. 30, 1982).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46468
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Similarly, the final rule applies to only
those commodity trading advisors that
are affiliated with banks, which the
CFTC expects are larger businesses.
The CFTC requested that commenters
address in particular whether any of
these commodity trading advisors, or
other CFTC registrants covered by the
proposed revisions, are small entities for
purposes of the RFA. The CFTC did not
receive any public comments on this or
any other aspect of the RFA as it relates
to the rule.
Because the CFTC believes that there
are not a substantial number of
registered, banking entity-affiliated
commodity trading advisors that are
small entities for purposes of the RFA,
and the other CFTC registrants that may
be affected by the proposed revisions
have been determined not to be small
entities, the CFTC believes that the final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for which the
CFTC is the primary financial regulatory
agency.
D. Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act
Section 302(a) of the Riegle
Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
(RCDRIA) 511 requires that each Federal
banking agency, in determining the
effective date and administrative
compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other
requirements on insured depository
institutions, consider, consistent with
principles of safety and soundness and
the public interest, any administrative
burdens that such regulations would
place on depository institutions,
including small depository institutions,
and customers of depository
institutions, as well as the benefits of
such regulations. The agencies have
considered comment on these matters in
other parts of this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
In addition, under section 302(b) of
the RCDRIA, new regulations that
impose additional reporting,
disclosures, or other new requirements
on insured depository institutions
generally must take effect on the first
day of a calendar quarter that begins on
or after the date on which the
regulations are published in final
form.512 Therefore, the effective date for
the Federal banking agencies is October
511 12
512 12
U.S.C. 4802(a).
U.S.C. 4802(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
1, 2020, the first day of the calendar
quarter.513
E. OCC Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The OCC has analyzed the final rule
under the factors in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA).
Under this analysis, the OCC considered
whether the final rule includes a
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation). The UMRA does not apply to
regulations that incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law.
The final rule does not impose new
mandates. Therefore, the OCC finds that
the final rule does not trigger the UMRA
cost threshold. Accordingly, the OCC
has not prepared the written statement
described in section 202 of the UMRA.
F. SEC Economic Analysis
1. Broad Economic Considerations
i. Background
As discussed above, section 13 of the
Bank Holding Company (BHC) Act
generally prohibits banking entities
from acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, or
having certain relationships with, a
hedge fund or private equity fund
(covered funds), subject to certain
exemptions. Section 13(h)(1) of the BHC
Act defines the term ‘‘banking entity’’ to
include (1) any insured depository
institution (as defined by statute), (2)
any company that controls an insured
depository institution, (3) any company
that is treated as a bank holding
company for purposes of section 8 of the
International Banking Act of 1978, and
(4) any affiliate or subsidiary of such an
entity.514 In addition, the Economic
Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act
(EGRRCPA),515 enacted on May 24,
2018, amended section 13 of the BHC
Act to exclude from the definition of
‘‘insured depository institution’’ any
institution that does not have and is not
controlled by a company that has (1)
more than $10 billion in total
consolidated assets; and (2) total trading
assets and trading liabilities, as reported
on the most recent applicable regulatory
filing filed by the institution, that are
513 Additionally, the Administrative Procedure
Act generally requires that the effective date of a
rule be no less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). The effective
date, October 1, 2020, will be more than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register.
514 See 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1).
515 See supra note 504.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
more than 5% of total consolidated
assets.516
Certain SEC-regulated entities, such
as broker-dealers, security-based swap
dealers (SBSDs), and registered
investment advisers (RIAs) affiliated
with an insured depository institution,
fall under the definition of ‘‘banking
entity’’ and are subject to the
prohibitions of section 13 of the BHC
Act.517 The SEC’s economic analysis is
limited to areas within the scope of the
SEC’s function as the primary securities
markets regulator in the United States.
In particular, the SEC’s economic
analysis focuses primarily on the
potential effects of the rule amendments
being adopted here (the ‘‘final rule’’) on
(1) SEC registrants, in their capacity as
such, (2) the functioning and efficiency
of the securities markets, (3) investor
protection, and (4) capital formation.
SEC registrants that may be affected by
the final rule include SEC-registered
broker-dealers, SBSDs, and RIAs. Thus,
the analysis below does not consider the
direct effects of the final rule on brokerdealers, SBSDs, and registered
investment advisers that are not banking
entities, or banking entities that are not
SEC registrants. In addition, potential
spillover effects on these and other
entities are reflected in the SEC’s
analysis of effects on efficiency,
516 These and other aspects of the regulatory
baseline against which the SEC is assessing the
economic effects of the final rule being adopted
here on SEC-regulated entities are discussed in the
economic baseline. On July 22, 2019, the agencies
adopted a final rule amending the definition of
‘‘insured depository institution’’ in a manner
consistent with EGRRCPA. See Revisions to
Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 84 FR
35008 (July 22, 2019). In November 2019, the
agencies adopted the 2019 amendments, which
tailored certain proprietary trading and covered
fund restrictions of the 2013 rule. See supra note
8.
517 Throughout this economic analysis, the terms
‘‘banking entity’’ and ‘‘entity’’ generally refer only
to banking entities for which the SEC is the primary
financial regulatory agency. While section 13 of the
BHC Act and its associated rules apply to a broader
set of banking entities, this economic analysis is
limited to those banking entities for which the SEC
is the primary financial regulatory agency as
defined in section 2(12)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
See 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), 5301(12)(B).
Compliance with SBSD registration requirements
is not yet required and there are currently no
registered SBSDs. However, the SEC has previously
estimated that as many as 50 entities may
potentially register as SBSDs and that as many as
16 of these entities may already be SEC-registered
broker-dealers. See Capital, Margin, and Segregation
Requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers and
Major Security-Based Swap Participants and Capital
and Segregation Requirements for Broker-Dealers,
84 FR 43872 (Aug. 22, 2019) (‘‘Capital, Margin, and
Segregation Adopting Release’’).
For the purposes of this economic analysis, the
term ‘‘dealer’’ generally refers to SEC-registered
broker-dealers and SBSDs.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
competition, investor protection, and
capital formation in securities markets.
This economic analysis also discusses
the impact of the final rule on private
funds,518 to the degree that it may flow
through to SEC registrants, such as
RIAs, SEC-registered broker-dealers and
SBSDs, and securities markets and
investors.
In implementing section 13 of the
BHC Act, the agencies sought to
increase the safety and soundness of
banking entities, promote financial
stability, and reduce conflicts of interest
between banking entities and their
customers.519 The regulatory regime
created by the 2013 rule may have
enhanced regulatory oversight and
compliance with the substantive
prohibitions of section 13 of the BHC
Act, but could also have impacted
capital formation and liquidity, as well
as the provision by banking entities of
a variety of financial services for
customers.
Section 13 of the BHC Act also
provides a number of statutory
exemptions to the general prohibitions
on proprietary trading and covered
funds activities. For example, the statute
exempts certain covered funds
518 There is significant overlap between the
definitions of ‘‘private fund’’ and ‘‘covered fund.’’
For purposes of this economic analysis, ‘‘private
fund’’ means an issuer that would be an investment
company, as defined in section 3 of the Investment
Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3(a)), but for section
3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80–
3(c)(1) or (7)). See also 15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)(29).
Section 13(h)(2) of the BHC Act defines ‘‘hedge
fund’’ and ‘‘private equity fund’’ to mean an issuer
that would be an investment company, but for
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company
Act, or ‘‘such similar funds’’ as the agencies
determine by rule (see 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(2)). In the
2013 rule, the agencies combined the definitions of
‘‘hedge fund’’ and ‘‘private equity fund’’ into a
single term ‘‘covered fund’’ and defined this term
to include any issuer that would be an investment
company as defined in the Investment Company
Act but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of that Act with
a number of express exclusions and additions as
determined by the agencies. Implementing
regulations § ll.10(b) and (c).
519 See, e.g., 79 FR 5536, 5541, 5574, 5659, 5666.
An extensive body of research has examined moral
hazard arising out of federal deposit insurance,
implicit bailout guarantees, and systemic risk
issues. See, e.g., Andrew G. Atkeson et al.,
Government Guarantees and the Valuation of
American Banks, 33 NBER Macroeconomics Ann.
81 (2018). See also Javier Bianchi, Efficient
Bailouts? 106 Amer. Econ. Rev. 3607 (2016); Bryan
Kelly, Hanno Lustig, & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh,
Too-Systematic-to-Fail: What Option Markets Imply
about Sector-Wide Government Guarantees, 106
Amer. Econ. Rev. 1278 (2016); Deniz Anginer, Asli
Demirguc-Kunt, & Min Zhu, How Does Deposit
Insurance Affect Bank Risk? Evidence from the
Recent Crisis, 48 J. Banking & Fin. 312 (2014);
Andrea Beltratti & Rene M. Stulz, The Credit Crisis
Around the Globe: Why Did Some Banks Perform
Better?, 105 J. Fin. Econ. 1 (2012); Pietro Veronesi
& Luigi Zingales, Paulson’s Gift, 97 J. Fin. Econ. 339
(2010). For a literature review, see, e.g., Sylvain
Benoit et al., Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on
Systemic Risk, 21 Rev. Fin. 109 (2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
activities, such as organizing and
offering covered funds.520 The 2013 rule
implemented these exemptions.521
Banking entities engaged in activities
and investments covered by section 13
of the BHC Act and the implementing
regulations are required to establish a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the implementing
regulations.522
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC
solicited comment on all aspects of the
costs and benefits associated with the
proposed amendments for SEC
registrants, including spillover effects
the proposed amendments may have on
efficiency, competition, and capital
formation in securities markets. The
SEC has considered these comments, as
discussed in greater detail in the
sections that follow.
ii. Broad Economic Effects
Certain aspects of the implementing
regulations may have resulted in a
complex and costly compliance regime
that is unduly restrictive and
burdensome on some affected banking
entities. Distinguishing between
permissible and prohibited activities
may be complex and costly, resulting in
uncertain determinations for some
entities. Moreover, the implementing
regulations may include in their scope
some groups of market participants that
do not necessarily engage in the
activities or pose the risks that section
13 of the BHC Act intended to address.
For example, definition of the term
‘‘covered fund’’ may include entities
that do not engage in the activities
contemplated by section 13 of the BHC
Act or may include entities that do not
pose the risks that section 13 is
intended to mitigate.
The final rule includes amendments
that (1) reduce the scope of entities that
may be treated as covered funds (e.g.,
credit funds, venture capital funds,
family wealth management vehicles,
and customer facilitation vehicles), (2)
modify existing covered fund exclusions
under the implementing regulations
(e.g., foreign public funds, public
welfare funds, and small business
investment companies), and (3) affect
the types of permitted activities between
12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G).
2013 rule §§ ll.4, ll.5, ll.6,
ll.11, and ll.13.
522 See 2013 rule § ll.20. See also 2019
amendments, 84 FR 62021–25, which, among other
things, modified these requirements for banking
entities with limited trading assets and liabilities.
This SEC Economic Analysis follows earlier
sections by referring to the regulations
implementing section 13 of the BHC Act, as
amended through June 1, 2020 as the
‘‘implementing regulations.’’ See supra note 8.
PO 00000
520 See
521 See
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46469
certain banking entities and certain
covered funds (e.g., restrictions on
relationships between banking entities
and covered funds, definition of
‘‘ownership interest,’’ and treatment of
loan securitizations). The final rule also
reduces the burden on affected banking
entities by codifying an existing policy
statement by the Federal banking
agencies that addresses the potential
issues related to a foreign banking entity
controlling a qualifying foreign
excluded fund and adopting a rule of
construction to provide clarity regarding
a banking entity’s permissible
investments alongside a covered fund.
Broadly, to the extent that the final
rule directly changes the scope of
permissible covered fund activities, and
indirectly reduces costs to banking
entities and covered funds by reducing
uncertainty regarding the scope of
permissible activities, the final rule may
enhance the beneficial economic effects
of the implementing regulations.523 The
SEC’s economic analysis continues to
recognize that the overall risk exposure
of banking entities generally reflects a
combination of activities, including
proprietary trading, market making,
traditional banking, asset management,
investment activities, and the extent to
which banking entities engage in
hedging and other risk-mitigating
activities. The overall risk exposure is
also a function of the magnitude,
structure, and manner in which banking
entities engage in such activities, both
within such activities individually and
across all of these activities collectively.
As discussed elsewhere,524 the SEC
recognizes the complex baseline effects
of section 13 of the BHC Act, as
amended by sections 203 and 204 of
EGRRCPA, and the implementing
regulations (including those made with
respect to sections 203 and 204 of
EGRRCPA) on overall levels and
structure of banking entity risk
exposures.
The final rule may promote the ability
of the capital markets to intermediate
between suppliers and users of capital
through, for example, increased ability
and willingness of banking entities and
investors in ‘‘covered funds’’ to
facilitate capital formation through
sponsorship and participation in certain
types of funds and to transact with
certain groups of counterparties.525 For
523 See,
e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037–92.
id.
525 See, e.g., U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, A
Financial System That Creates Economic
Opportunities: Banks and Credit Unions (June
2017), at 77, available at https://www.treasury.gov/
press-center/press-releases/Documents/
A%20Financial%20System.pdf.
524 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46470
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
example, exclusions from the ‘‘covered
fund’’ definition of specific types of
entities may benefit banking entities by
providing clarity and removing certain
constraints around potentially profitable
business opportunities and by reducing
compliance costs, and may benefit
excluded funds and their banking entity
sponsors and advisers by increasing the
spectrum of available counterparties
and improving the quality or cost of
financial services available to
customers.
The final rule, however, may also
facilitate risk mitigation as well as risktaking activities of banking entities. The
final rule also may change aspects of the
relationships among banking entities
and certain other groups of market
participants, including potentially
introducing new conflicts of interest,
and increasing or reducing the potential
effects of conflicts of interest. To the
degree that some banking entities react
to the final rule by restructuring
activities involving covered funds to
take advantage of the exclusions
contained in the final rule, there may be
shifts in the structure and levels of
activities of banking entities that would,
in turn, decrease or increase risk
exposure. Recognizing these various
potential effects, each of the exclusions
includes a number of conditions aimed
at facilitating banking entity compliance
while also allowing for customer
oriented financial services provided on
arms-length, market terms, and
preventing evasion of the requirements
of section 13.
In evaluating these various potential
effects, it is important to acknowledge
that the exclusions made available by
the final rule, such as for credit funds
and qualifying venture capital funds,
allow banking entities to engage
indirectly through fund structures in the
same activities in which they are
currently permitted to engage directly
(e.g., extensions of credit or direct
ownership stakes). Thus, the type of
exposure permitted by engaging in those
activities directly, and indirectly
through covered funds, is the same and
the banking entities may use fund
structures to diversify or otherwise
mitigate their risk exposure. Other
exclusions permit banking entities to
provide traditional banking and asset
management services to customers
through a legal entity structure, with
conditions (e.g., limitation on
ownership by the banking entity and
prohibition on ‘‘bail outs’’) intended to
ensure that the risks that section 13 of
the BHC Act was intended to address
are mitigated. Finally, nothing in the
final rule removes or modifies
prudential capital, margin, and liquidity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements that are applicable to
banking entities and that facilitate the
safety and soundness of banking entities
and the financial stability of the United
States.
The final rule may also impact
competition, allocative efficiency, and
capital formation. To the extent that the
implementing regulations have
constrained banking entities in their
covered fund activities, including
providing traditional banking and asset
management services to customers
through a legal entity structure, the
exclusions from the definition of
‘‘covered fund’’ made available by the
final rule may increase competition
between banking entities and other
entities providing services to and
otherwise transacting with those types
of funds and other entities. Such
competition may reduce costs or
increase the quality of certain financial
services provided to such funds and
their counterparties.
Finally, the final rule’s costs, benefits,
and effects on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation will be influenced
by a variety of factors, including the
prevailing macroeconomic conditions,
the financial condition of firms seeking
to raise capital and of funds seeking to
transact with banking entities,
competition between bank and nonbank providers of capital, and many
others. Moreover, these effects are likely
to vary widely among banking entities
and funds. The SEC recognizes that the
economic effects of the final rule may be
dampened or magnified in different
phases of the macroeconomic cycle,
depend on monetary and fiscal policy
developments and other government
actions, and may vary across different
types of banking entities.
The SEC also considered the
implications of the final rule for
investors. Broadly, the final rule should
increase the number of funds and other
entities that will be excluded from the
covered fund definition. This is likely to
result in an increase in offerings of such
funds or an increase in the number of
banking entities providing services to
customers through entities such as
customer facilitation vehicles and
family wealth management vehicles. If
the final rule increases the ability of
investors to access public and private
markets through funds and other
entities, the final rule may result in the
relaxing of constraints on investors’
portfolio optimization and, thus,
enhance the efficiency of portfolio
allocations. The ability of additional
investors to access these markets
through funds and other entities may, in
addition to providing those investors
with greater choice, benefit the issuers
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of the securities held by those funds and
other entities by potentially increasing
demand for those securities. Increased
demand typically results in increased
liquidity which can benefit investors
because it may enable them to enter or
exit their positions in fund instruments,
products, and portfolios in a more
timely manner and at a more attractive
price.
Moreover, investors who seek access
to public capital markets investments or
other investments through foreign
public funds may benefit to the extent
the final rule results in banking entities
offering more foreign public funds or
offering these funds at a lower cost.
Further, investors that prefer to
implement a trading or investing
strategy through a legal entity structure
may benefit from the final rule, which
allows banking entities to implement or
facilitate such a trading or investing
strategy while providing other banking
and asset management services to the
investor.526 At the same time, it is
possible that, as a result of banking
entities sponsoring or investing in more
funds that are excluded from the
definition of covered fund by the final
rule, general market risk could increase
and that risk could adversely affect
markets generally, including through
the impact on financial stability.
However, due to the mitigation effects of
the various conditions of the exclusions
from the definition of covered fund
contained in the final rule as well as
expectations regarding the relative size
and mix of the investments in the
aggregate, the SEC believes this risk to
be small. For example, the final rule
permits a banking entity to act as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to certain
excluded funds (e.g., credit funds and
qualifying venture capital funds) only to
the extent the banking entity ensures
that the activities of the funds are
consistent with safety and soundness
standards that are substantially similar
to those that would apply if the banking
entity engaged in the activities directly.
iii. Analytical Approach
The SEC’s economic analysis is
informed by research 527 on the effects
of section 13 of the BHC Act and the
2013 rule, comments received by the
agencies from a variety of interested
parties, and experience administering
the implementing regulations.
Throughout this economic analysis, the
SEC discusses how different market
526 See supra Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public
Funds).
527 See 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62044–54.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
participants 528 may respond to various
aspects of the final rule. This analysis
also considers the potential effects of
the final rule on activities by banking
entities that involve risk, their
willingness and ability to engage in
client-facilitation activities, and
competition, market quality, and capital
formation.
The final rule tailors, removes, or
alters the scope of various covered fund
requirements in the implementing
regulations. Since section 13 of the BHC
Act and the implementing regulations
impose a number of different
requirements, and, as discussed above,
the type and level of risk exposure of a
banking entity is the result of a
combination of activities,529 it is
difficult to attribute the observed effects
to a specific provision or subset of
requirements. In addition, analysis of
the effects of the implementation of the
2013 rule is confounded by
macroeconomic factors, other policy
interventions, and post-crisis changes to
market participants’ risk aversion and
return expectations.530 Because of the
extended timeline of implementation of
section 13 of the BHC Act and the
overlap of the period during which the
2013 rule was in effect with other postcrisis changes affecting the same group
or certain sub-groups of SEC registrants,
the SEC cannot rely on quantitative
methods that might otherwise provide
insight into causal attribution and
quantification of the effects of section 13
of the BHC Act and the 2013 rule on
measures of capital formation, liquidity,
competition, and informational or
allocative efficiency. Moreover,
empirical measures of capital formation
or liquidity are substantially limited by
the fact that they do not provide insight
into security issuance and transaction
activity that does not occur (or occurs in
a sector of the market for which data is
not readily available) as a result of the
implementing regulations. Accordingly,
it is difficult to quantify the primary
528 As
discussed above, supra Section V.F.1.i.
(Background), the SEC’s economic analysis is
focused on the potential effects of the final rule on
(1) SEC registrants, (2) the functioning and
efficiency of the securities markets, (3) investor
protection, and (4) capital formation. Thus, the
below analysis does not consider the direct effects
of the final rule on broker-dealers, SBSDs, or
investment advisers that are not banking entities, or
banking entities that are not SEC registrants, in
either case for purposes of section 13 of the BHC
Act, beyond the potential spillover effects on these
entities and effects on efficiency, competition,
investor protection, and capital formation in
securities markets. See infra Section V.F.2.i.
(Affected Participants).
529 See, e.g., 2013 rule at 5541.
530 With respect to the 2019 amendments, supra
note 8, analysis of the effects is difficult because of
the relatively short time that has passed since they
became effective.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
security issuance and secondary market
liquidity that would have been observed
since the financial crisis absent various
provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act
and the implementing regulations.
Importantly, the existing securities
markets—including market participants,
their business models, market structure,
etc.—differ in significant ways from the
securities markets that existed prior to
enactment of section 13 of the BHC Act
and the implementation of the 2013
rule. For example, the role of dealers in
intermediating trading activity has
changed in important ways, including
the following: (1) In recent years, on
both an absolute and relative basis, bank
dealers generally committed less capital
to intermediation activities while nonbank dealers generally committed more,
although not always in the same manner
or on the same terms as bank dealers; (2)
the volume and profitability of certain
trading activities after the financial
crisis may have decreased for bank
dealers while it may have increased for
other intermediaries, including nonbank entities that provide intraday
liquidity, but generally not overnight
liquidity, including in some sectors of
the market through the use of electronic
trading algorithms and high speed
access to data and trading venues; and
(3) the introduction of alternative credit
markets, including non-bank direct
lending markets, may have contributed
to liquidity fragmentation across
markets while potentially increasing
access to capital.531
Where possible, the SEC has
attempted to quantify the costs and
benefits it expects to result from the
final rule. In many cases, however, the
SEC is unable to quantify these potential
economic effects. Some of the primary
economic effects, such as the effect on
incentives that may give rise to conflicts
of interest in various regulated entities
and the degree to which the
implementing regulations may be
impeding activity of banking entities
with respect to certain investment
vehicles, are inherently difficult to
quantify. Moreover, some of the
intended benefits of the implementing
regulations’ definitions and prohibitions
that the agencies are amending include
the potential for more resilient markets
during a financial crisis or during
periods of severe market stress. These
intended benefits are less readily
observable under periods of strong
economic conditions, periods of
significant government credit
531 See U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, Access to
Capital and Market Liquidity (Aug. 2017), available
at https://www.sec.gov/files/access-to-capital-andmarket-liquidity-study-dera-2017.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46471
accommodation, and when markets
have significant liquidity and are less
volatile. Even following an economic
shock, identification of these intended
benefits requires a sufficient amount of
data covering a relevant sample period.
Moreover, identifying these benefits
following an economic shock could
prove difficult if the effects of past
regulation are confounded by other
interventions aimed at mitigating the
impact of the shock on financial
markets, including regulation, credit
accommodation, and fiscal stimulus.
Finally, it is difficult to quantify the net
economic effects of any individual
amendment because of overlapping
implementation periods of various postcrisis regulations. Further, it is difficult
to quantify the net economic effects of
any individual amendment because of
the fact that many market participants
changed their behavior in anticipation
of future changes in regulation.
In some instances, the SEC lacks the
information or data necessary to provide
reasonable estimates for the economic
effects of the final rule. For example, the
SEC lacks information and data on how
market participants may choose to
restructure their relationships with
various types of entities in response to
the final rule; the amount of capital
formation in covered funds that does
not occur because of current covered
fund provisions, including those
concerning the definition of covered
fund, restrictions on relationships with
covered funds, the definition of
ownership interest, and the exclusion
for loan securitizations; the volume of
loans, guarantees, securities lending,
and derivatives activity dealers may
wish to engage in with related covered
funds; as well as the extent of risk
reduction associated with the covered
fund provision of the 2013 rule. Where
the SEC cannot quantify the relevant
economic effects, they are discussed in
qualitative terms.
2. Economic Baseline
In the context of this economic
analysis, the economic costs and
benefits, and the impact of the final rule
on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation, are considered relative to a
baseline that includes the implementing
regulations (including the 2013 rule and
the 2019 amendments), legislative
amendments in EGRRCPA, and current
practices aimed at compliance with
these regulations.
i. Regulation
The SEC is assessing the economic
impact of the final rule against a
baseline that includes the legal and
regulatory framework as it exists at the
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46472
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
time of this release. Thus, the regulatory
baseline for the SEC’s economic analysis
includes section 13 of the BHC Act as
amended by EGRRCPA, and the 2013
rule. Further, the baseline accounts for
the fact that since the adoption of the
2013 rule, the agencies have adopted the
2019 amendments, which, among other
things, relate to the ability of banking
entities to engage in certain activities,
including underwriting, market-making,
and risk-mitigating hedging, with
respect to ownership interests in
covered funds, as well as amendments
conforming the 2013 rule to sections
203 and 204 of EGRRCPA. In addition,
the agencies’ staffs have provided FAQ
responses related to the regulatory
obligations of banking entities,
including SEC-regulated entities that are
also banking entities under the 2013
rule, which likely influenced these
entities’ decisions about how to comply
with the 2013 rule and may influence
these entities’ decisions about how to
comply with the 2019 amendments.532
The Federal banking agencies also
issued the policy statement in 2017 with
respect to foreign excluded funds, and
has since extended the policy statement
to 2021.533
Although the 2013 rule also included
restrictions on proprietary trading and
compliance requirements (as modified
by the 2019 amendments), the most
relevant portion of the 2013 rule for
establishing an economic baseline is
that involving covered fund
restrictions.534 The features of the
regulatory framework under the 2013
rule most relevant to the baseline
include the definition of the term
‘‘covered fund’’; restrictions on a
banking entity’s relationships with
covered funds; and restrictions on
parallel investment, co-investment, and
investments in the fund by banking
entity employees.
Scope of the Covered Fund Definition
The definition of ‘‘covered fund’’
impacts the scope of the substantive
prohibitions on banking entities
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, and having
certain relationships with, covered
funds. The implementing regulations
define covered funds, in part, as issuers
that would be investment companies
but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
Investment Company Act and then
excludes specific types of entities from
the definition. The definition also
532 See
supra note 14.
533 See supra Section VI.A. (Qualifying Foreign
Excluded Funds) and notes 26 and 28 (discussion
of ‘‘the policy statement’’).
534 See 84 FR 61974.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
includes certain commodity pools as
well as certain foreign funds. Funds that
rely on the exclusions in sections 3(c)(1)
or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company
Act are covered funds unless an
exclusion from the covered fund
definition is available. Funds that rely
on any exclusion or exemption from the
definition of ‘‘investment company’’
under the Investment Company Act,
other than the exclusion contained in
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7), such as real
estate and mortgage funds that rely on
the exclusion in section 3(c)(5)(C), are
not covered funds under the
implementing regulations. The covered
fund provisions of the implementing
regulations may reduce the ability and
incentives of banking entities to bail out
affiliated funds to mitigate reputational
risk, limit conflicts of interest with
clients, customers, and counterparties,
and reduce the ability of banking
entities to engage in proprietary trading
indirectly through funds.
The broad definition of covered funds
encompasses many different types of
vehicles, and the implementing
regulations exclude some of them from
the definition of a covered fund.535 The
excluded fund types relevant to the
baseline are funds that are regulated by
the SEC under the Investment Company
Act: Registered investment companies
(RICs) and business development
companies (BDCs). Seeding vehicles for
these funds are also excluded from the
covered fund definition during their
seeding period.536
Restrictions on Relationships Between
Banking Entities and Covered Funds
Under the baseline, banking entities
are limited in the types of transactions
in which they are able to engage with
covered funds with which they have
certain relationships. Banking entities
that serve, directly or indirectly, as the
investment manager, adviser, or sponsor
to a covered fund are prohibited from
engaging in a ‘‘covered transaction,’’ as
defined in section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act, with the covered fund or
with any other covered fund that is
controlled by such covered fund.537
Similarly, a banking entity that
organizes and offers a covered fund
pursuant to § ll.11 or that continues
to hold an ownership interest in a
covered fund in accordance with
§ ll.11(b) is prohibited from engaging
in such a ‘‘covered transaction.’’ This
prohibits all ‘‘covered transactions’’ that
535 The exclusions from the covered fund
definition are set forth in § ll.10(c) of the
implementing regulations.
536 See implementing regulations
§§ ll.10(c)(12)(i) and ll.10(c)(12)(iii).
537 See implementing regulations § ll.14(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
cause the banking entity to have credit
exposure to the affiliated covered fund,
including short-term extensions of
credit and various other transactions
required for a banking entity to provide
an affiliated covered fund payment,
clearing, and settlement services.
Definition of ‘‘Banking Entity’’
For foreign banking entities,538 certain
funds organized under foreign law and
offered to foreign investors (‘‘foreign
excluded funds’’) are not ‘‘covered
funds’’ under the implementing
regulations, but may be subject to the
implementing regulations as ‘‘banking
entities’’ under certain circumstances.
Through the policy statement, the
Federal banking agencies (in
consultation with the staffs of the SEC
and the CFTC) have provided temporary
relief, that is currently scheduled to
expire on July 21, 2021, for qualifying
foreign excluded funds that may
otherwise be subject to the
implementing regulations as banking
entities.539
Definition of ‘‘Ownership Interest’’
The implementing regulations
prohibit a banking entity, as principal,
from directly or indirectly acquiring or
retaining an ‘‘ownership interest’’ in a
covered fund.540 The implementing
regulations define an ‘‘ownership
interest’’ in a covered fund to mean any
equity, partnership, or other similar
interest. Under the implementing
regulations, ‘‘other similar interest’’ is
defined as an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
538 For purposes of this analysis, ‘‘foreign banking
entity’’ has the same meaning as used in the policy
statement, supra note 27, i.e., a banking entity that
is not, and is not controlled directly or indirectly
by, a banking entity that is located in or organized
under the laws of the United States or any state.
539 See supra note 26 and 28. For purposes of the
policy statement, a ‘‘qualifying foreign excluded
fund’’ means, with respect to a foreign banking
entity, an entity that (1) is organized or established
outside the United States and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold solely
outside the United States; (2) would be a covered
fund were the entity organized or established in the
United States, or is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition
or otherwise trading in financial instruments; (3)
would not otherwise be a banking entity except by
virtue of the foreign banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in, or
sponsorship of, the entity; (4) is established and
operated as part of a bona fide asset management
business; and (5) is not operated in a manner that
enables the foreign banking entity to evade the
requirements of section 13 or implementing
regulations.
540 Implementing regulations § ll.10(a).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund (excluding the
rights of a creditor to exercise remedies
upon the occurrence of an event of
default or an acceleration event);
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
above.541
The implementing regulations permit
a banking entity to acquire and retain an
ownership interest in a covered fund
that the banking entity organizes and
offers pursuant to § ll.11, but limits
such ownership interests to three
percent of the total number or value of
the outstanding ownership interests of
such fund (the per-fund limit).542
Loan Securitizations
As discussed above, section 13 of the
BHC Act provides a rule of construction
that explicitly allows the sale and
securitization of loans as otherwise
regulations § ll.10(d)(6)(i).
regulations §§ ll.12(a)(1)(ii)
and ll.12(a)(2)(ii)(A). The implementing
regulations also require that the aggregate value of
all ownership interests of a banking entity and its
affiliates in all covered funds acquired or retained
under § ll.12 may not exceed three percent of the
tier 1 capital of the banking entity. Implementing
regulations § ll.12(a)(2)(iii) (the aggregate funds
limit).
541 Implementing
542 Implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
permitted by law.543 Accordingly, the
implementing regulations exclude from
the covered fund definition entities that
issue asset-backed securities if they
meet specified conditions, including
that they hold only loans, certain rights
and assets, and a small set of other
financial instruments (permissible
assets).544 In addition, the baseline
includes the FAQs issued by agencies’
staff in June 2014 regarding the
servicing asset provision of the loan
securitization exclusion.545
Public Welfare and SBIC Exclusions
Under the implementing regulations,
issuers in the business of making
investments that are designed primarily
to promote the public welfare, of the
type permitted under paragraph (11) of
section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of
the United States (12 U.S.C. 24),546 are
excluded from the covered fund
definition. Similarly, the implementing
regulations exclude from the covered
fund definition small business
investment companies (SBICs) and
issuers that have received notice from
the Small Business Administration to
proceed to qualify for a license as a
SBIC and for which the notice or license
has not been revoked.547
Attribution of Certain Investments to a
Banking Entity
As discussed above, the implementing
regulations include a per-fund limit and
aggregate fund limit on a banking
entity’s ownership of covered funds that
the banking entity organizes and
offers.548 The preamble to the 2013 rule
stated, ‘‘if a banking entity makes
investments side by side in substantially
the same positions as a covered fund,
then the value of such investments shall
be included for purposes of determining
the value of the banking entity’s
investment in the covered fund.’’ 549
The agencies also stated that a banking
entity that sponsors a covered fund
should not make any additional side-byside co-investment with the covered
fund in a privately negotiated
investment unless the value of such co543 13 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2). See also supra Section
IV.B.2 (Loan Securitizations).
544 See implementing regulations § ll.10(c)(8).
Loan is further defined as any loan, lease, extension
of credit, or secured or unsecured receivable that is
not a security or derivative. Implementing
regulations rule § ll.2(t).
545 See supra Section IV.B.2 (Loan
Securitizations, discussion of servicing assets).
546 See implementing regulations
§ ll.10(c)(11)(ii).
547 See implementing regulations
§ ll.10(c)(11)(i).
548 See implementing regulations § ll.12(a). See
also supra Section IV.E.2. (Ownership Interest—
Fund Limits and Covered Fund Deduction).
549 79 FR 5734.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46473
investment is less than 3% of the value
of the total amount co-invested by other
investors in such investment.550 The
2019 amendments eliminated the
aggregate fund limit and capital
deduction requirement under
§ ll.12(d) for the value of ownership
interests held by banking entities in
third-party covered funds (e.g., covered
funds that those banking entities do not
organize or offer), acquired or retained
as a result of certain underwriting or
market-making activities. However, the
2019 amendments did not change or
amend the application of the per-fund
limit or aggregate funds limit to coinvestments alongside a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating the
aggregate fund limit and the capital
deduction requirement, the
implementing regulations require
attribution to a banking entity of
restricted profit interests in a covered
fund as ownership interests in the
covered fund for which the banking
entity serves as investment manager,
investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, or other service provider.551
Under the implementing regulations, for
purposes of calculating a banking
entity’s compliance with the aggregate
fund limit and the capital deduction
requirement, a banking entity must
include any amounts paid by the
banking entity or an employee in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest in the covered fund.552
ii. Affected Participants
The SEC-regulated entities directly
affected by the final rule include brokerdealers, security-based swap dealers,
and investment advisers. The
implementing regulations impose a
range of restrictions and compliance
obligations on banking entities with
respect to their covered fund activities
and investments. To the degree that the
final rule reduces or otherwise alters the
scope of private funds subject to
covered fund restrictions, SECregistered banking entities, including
broker-dealers, security-based swap
dealers, and investment advisers may be
affected.
Broker-Dealers 553
Under the implementing regulations,
some of the largest SEC-regulated
550 See
id.
regulations §§ ll.10(d)(6)(ii)
and ll.12(c)(1), (d). See also 12 U.S.C.
1851(d)(1)(G).
552 Implementing regulations §§ ll.12(c)(1), (d).
553 This analysis is based on data from Reporting
Form FR Y–9C for domestic holding companies on
a consolidated basis and Report of Condition and
Income for banks regulated by the Board, FDIC, and
551 Implementing
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
Continued
31JYR4
46474
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
broker-dealers are banking entities.
Table 1 reports the number, total assets,
and holdings of broker-dealers affiliated
with banks and broker-dealers that are
not.
While the 3,487 domestic brokerdealers that are not affiliated with banks
greatly outnumber the 202 banking
entity broker-dealers subject to the
implementing regulations, banking
entity broker-dealers dominate nonbanking entity broker-dealers in terms of
total assets (72% of total broker-dealer
assets) and aggregate holdings (66% of
total broker-dealer holdings).
TABLE 1—BROKER-DEALER COUNT, ASSETS, AND HOLDINGS BY AFFILIATION
Broker-dealer affiliation
Number
Total assets,
$mln 554
Holdings,
$mln 555
Holdings
(alternative),
$mln 556
Affected bank broker-dealers 557 .....................................................................
Non-bank broker-dealers 558 ............................................................................
202
3,487
3,240,045
1,258,510
777,192
404,754
607,086
255,380
Total ..........................................................................................................
3,689
4,498,556
1,181,946
862,466
Security-Based Swap Dealers
The final rule may also affect bankaffiliated SBSDs. As compliance with
SBSD registration requirements is not
yet required, there are currently no
registered SBSDs. However, the SEC has
previously estimated that as many as 50
entities may potentially register with the
SEC as security-based swap dealers and
that as many as 16 may already be SECregistered broker-dealers.559 Given the
analysis of DTCC Derivatives Repository
Limited Trade Information Warehouse
(TIW) transaction and positions data on
single-name credit-default swaps and
consistent with other recent SEC
rulemakings, the SEC preliminarily
believes that 41 entities that may
register with the SEC as SBSDs are
bank-affiliated firms, including those
that are SEC-registered broker-dealers.
Therefore, the SEC preliminarily
estimates that, in addition to the bankaffiliated SBSDs that are already
OCC for the most recent available four-quarter
average, as well as data from S&P Market
Intelligence LLC on the estimated amount of global
trading activity of U.S. and non-U.S. bank holding
companies. Broker-dealer bank affiliations were
obtained from the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council’s National Information Center.
Broker-dealer assets and holdings were obtained
from FOCUS Report data for Q4 2019.
554 Broker-dealer total assets are based on FOCUS
report data for ‘‘Total Assets.’’
555 Broker-dealer holdings are based on FOCUS
report data for securities and spot commodities
owned at market value, including bankers’
acceptances, certificates of deposit and commercial
paper, state and municipal government obligations,
corporate obligations, stocks and warrants, options,
arbitrage, other securities, U.S. and Canadian
government obligations, and spot commodities.
556 This alternative measure excludes U.S. and
Canadian government obligations and spot
commodities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
registered as broker-dealers and
included in the discussion above, as
many as 25 other bank-affiliated SBSDs
may be affected by the final rule.560
Similarly, the SEC’s analysis of TIW
data suggests that none of the entities
that may register with the SEC as Major
Security-Based Swap Participants are
affected by the final rule.
October 6, 2021 is the compliance
date for the SEC’s registration rules for
SBSDs, as well as several rules
applicable to those entities, including
segregation requirements and non-bank
capital and margin requirements,
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, business conduct
standards, and risk mitigation
techniques.561 Accordingly, the SEC
recognizes that in anticipation of the
compliance date for registration, firms
may choose to restructure their securitybased swap trading activity into (or out
of) an affiliated bank or an affiliated
This section describes RIAs advising
private funds that may be affected by
the final rule. Using Form ADV data,
Table 2 reports the number of RIAs
advising private funds by fund type as
defined in Form ADV.563 Private funds
rely on either section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7)
of the Investment Company Act and so
meet the implementing regulations’
definition of ‘‘covered fund.’’ Table 3
557 This category includes all bank-affiliated
broker-dealers except those exempted by section
203 of EGRRCPA.
558 This category includes both bank affiliated
broker-dealers subject to section 203 of EGRRCPA
and broker-dealers that are not affiliated with banks
or holding companies.
559 See Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers,
Major Security-Based Swap Participants, and
Broker-Dealers, 84 FR 68550, 68607 (Dec. 16, 2019).
560 See id.
561 See Capital, Margin, and Segregation Adopting
Release, supra note 517, at 43954. See also Rule
Amendments and Guidance Addressing CrossBorder Application of Certain Security-Based Swap
Requirements, 85 FR 6270, 6345–49 (Feb. 4, 2020).
562 These estimates are calculated from Form
ADV data as of December 31, 2019. An investment
adviser is defined as a ‘‘private fund adviser’’ for
the purposes of this economic analysis if it
indicates that it is an adviser to any private fund
on Form ADV Item 7.B. An investment adviser is
defined as a ‘‘banking entity RIA’’ if it indicates on
Form ADV Item 6.A.(7) that it is actively engaged
in business as a bank, or it indicates on Form ADV
Item 7.A.(8) that it has a ‘‘related person’’ that is
a banking or thrift institution. For purposes of Form
ADV, a ‘‘related person’’ is any advisory affiliate
and any person that is under common control with
the adviser. The definition of ‘‘control’’ for
purposes of Form ADV, which is used in
identifying related persons on the form, differs from
the definition of ‘‘control’’ under the BHC Act. In
addition, this analysis does not exclude SECregistered investment advisers affiliated with banks
that have consolidated total assets less than or equal
to $10 billion and trading assets and liabilities less
than or equal to 5% of total assets. Those banks are
no longer subject to the requirements of the 2013
rule following enactment of the EGRRCPA. Thus,
these figures may overestimate or underestimate the
number of banking entity RIAs.
563 RIAs may also advise foreign public funds that
are excluded from the covered fund definition in
the implementing regulations, are the subject of the
final rule discussed below, and are not reported on
Form ADV.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
broker-dealer instead of registering as a
standalone SBSD if bank or brokerdealer capital and other regulatory
requirements are less (or more) costly
than those that may be imposed on
SBSDs under Title VII. As a result, the
above figures may overestimate or
underestimate the number of SBSDs that
are not broker-dealers and that may
become SEC-registered entities affected
by the final rule.
Private Funds and Private Fund
Advisers 562
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46475
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
reports the number and gross assets of
private funds advised by RIAs and
separately reports these statistics for
banking entity RIAs. As can be seen
from Table 2, the two largest categories
of private funds advised by RIAs are
hedge funds and private equity
funds.564
Banking entity RIAs advise a total of
4,387 private funds with approximately
$2.089 trillion in gross assets. From
Form ADV data, banking entity RIAs’
gross private fund assets under
management are concentrated in hedge
funds and private equity funds. The SEC
estimates on the basis of this data that
banking entity RIAs advise 890 hedge
funds with approximately $606 billion
in gross assets and 1,518 private equity
funds with approximately $466 billion
in assets.
TABLE 2—SEC-REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISERS ADVISING PRIVATE FUNDS BY FUND TYPE 565
Fund type
Banking entity
RIA
All RIA
Hedge Funds ...........................................................................................................................................................
Private Equity Funds ...............................................................................................................................................
Real Estate Funds ...................................................................................................................................................
Securitized Asset Funds ..........................................................................................................................................
Venture Capital Funds .............................................................................................................................................
Liquidity Funds .........................................................................................................................................................
Other Private Funds ................................................................................................................................................
2,620
1,738
551
233
223
44
1,060
151
96
51
44
8
16
140
Total Private Fund Advisers .............................................................................................................................
4,781
282
TABLE 3—THE NUMBER AND GROSS ASSETS OF PRIVATE FUNDS ADVISED BY SEC-REGISTERED INVESTMENT
ADVISERS 566
Number of private funds
Fund type
Banking entity
RIA
All RIA
Gross assets, $bln
All RIA
Banking entity
RIA
Hedge Funds .....................................................................................................................................
Private Equity Funds .........................................................................................................................
Real Estate Funds ............................................................................................................................
Securitized Asset Funds ...................................................................................................................
Venture Capital Funds ......................................................................................................................
Liquidity Funds ..................................................................................................................................
Other Private Funds ..........................................................................................................................
10,445
16,217
3,699
2,000
1,387
76
4,757
890
1,518
320
380
44
30
1,206
8,048
4,119
732
767
174
304
1,543
606
466
94
145
3
231
542
Total Private Funds ....................................................................................................................
38,581
4,387
15,685
2,089
In addition, the SEC’s economic
analysis is informed by private fund
564 For purposes of Form ADV, ‘‘private equity
fund’’ is defined as ‘‘any private fund that is not
a hedge fund, liquidity fund, real estate fund,
securitized asset fund, or venture capital fund and
does not provide investors with redemption rights
in the ordinary course.’’ See Form ADV:
Instructions for Part 1A, Instruction 6. For purposes
of Form ADV, ‘‘hedge fund’’ is defined as ‘‘any
private fund (other than a securitized asset fund):
(a) With respect to which one or more investment
advisers (or related persons of investment advisers)
may be paid a performance fee or allocation
calculated by taking into account unrealized gains
(other than a fee or allocation the calculation of
which may take into account unrealized gains
solely for the purpose of reducing such fee or
allocation to reflect net unrealized losses); (b) that
may borrow an amount in excess of one-half of its
net asset value (including any committed capital) or
may have gross notional exposure in excess of twice
its net asset value (including any committed
capital); or (c) that may sell securities or other
assets short or enter into similar transactions (other
than for the purpose of hedging currency exposure
or managing duration).
565 This table includes only the advisers that list
private funds on section 7.B.(1) of Form ADV. The
number of advisers in the ‘‘Total Private Fund
Advisers’’ row is not the sum of the rows that
precede it since an adviser may advise multiple
types of private funds. Each listed private fund type
(e.g., real estate funds and liquidity funds) is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
statistics submitted by certain RIAs of
private funds through Form PF as
summarized in quarterly ‘‘Private Fund
Statistics.’’ 567
Registered Investment Companies and
Business Development Companies
The baseline also reflects the potential
that a RIC or a BDC would be treated as
a banking entity where the RIC or BDC’s
sponsor is a banking entity that holds
25% or more of the RIC or BDC’s voting
securities after a seeding period.568 On
the basis of SEC filings and public data,
defined in Form ADV, and those definitions are the
same for purposes of the SEC’s Form PF.
566 Gross assets include uncalled capital
commitments on Form ADV. The large decrease in
Gross assets for Liquidity Funds from that reported
in the proposing release is due, in part, to the
removal of certain Form ADV data from one filer
that contained an erroneous value for gross assets.
567 See U.S. Sec. and Exchange Comm’n, Div. of
Inv. Mgmt. Analytics Office, Private Fund Statistics,
Third Calendar Quarter 2019 (May 14, 2020),
available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/
investment/private-funds-statistics/private-fundsstatistics-2019-q3-accessible.pdf. Statistics for
preceding quarters are available at https://
www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/private-fundsstatistics.shtml.
568 See, e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 61979.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the SEC estimates that, as of December
2019, there were approximately 15,300
RICs 569 and 101 BDCs. Although RICs
and BDCs are generally not themselves
banking entities subject to the
implementing regulations, they may be
indirectly affected by the implementing
regulations and the final rule, for
example, if their sponsors or advisers
are banking entities. For instance, bankaffiliated RIAs or their affiliates may
reduce their level of investment in the
RICs or BDCs they advise, or potentially
close those funds, to eliminate the risk
of those funds becoming banking
entities themselves.
Small Business Investment Companies
Small business investment companies
are generally ‘‘privately owned and
managed investment funds, licensed
and regulated by the Small Business
Administration (SBA), that use their
own capital plus funds borrowed with
569 This estimate includes open-end companies,
exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and noninsurance unit investment trusts and does not
include fund of funds. The inclusion of fund of
funds increases this estimate to approximately
16,800.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46476
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
an SBA guarantee to make equity and
debt investments in qualifying small
businesses.’’ 570 The final rule provides
relief with respect to banking entity
investments in SBICs during the winddown process by excluding from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ those
SBICs.571 While the SEC does not have
data to quantify the number of SBICs
undergoing wind-down, trends in the
number of SBIC licenses can be
indicative of the turnover in the total
number of SBIC licensees. For example,
according to SBA data, there were 295
SBIC licensees as of March 31, 2020 572
and 299 SBIC licensees as of December
31, 2019.573 By contrast, as of
September 30, 2017, there were 315
SBICs licensed by the SBA.574
The final rule includes an exclusion
for rural business investment companies
(RBICs) from the implementing
regulations similar to that provided to
SBICs.575 As the SEC has discussed
elsewhere,576 an RBIC is defined in
section 384A of the Consolidated Farm
and Rural Development Act as a
company that is approved by the
Secretary of Agriculture and that has
entered into a participation agreement
570 See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program
Overview, available at https://www.sba.gov/
content/sbic-program-overview.
For purposes of the Advisers Act, an SBIC is
(other than an entity that has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a business development company
pursuant to section 54 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940): (A) A small business investment
company that is licensed under the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, (B) an entity that has
received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small
business investment company under the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or (C) an applicant
that is affiliated with 1 or more licensed small
business investment companies described in
subparagraph (A) and that has applied for another
license under the Small Business Investment Act of
1958, which application remains pending. 15 U.S.C.
80b–3(b)(7).
571 Specifically, the final rule excludes from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ any SBIC that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as an
SBIC in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (with some
exceptions) after such voluntary surrender. See
§ ll.10(c)(11)(i).
572 See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program
Overview as of March 31, 2020, available at:
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/
SBIC%20Quarterly%20Report%20as%20of%
20March_31_2020%20Amended%205.14.2020.pdf.
573 See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program
Overview as of December 31, 2019, available at
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/
SBIC%20Quarterly%20Report%20as%20of%20
December_31_2019.pdf.
574 See id.
575 Under the implementing regulations, an SBIC
is excluded from the ‘‘covered fund’’ definition. See
implementing regulations § ll.10(c)(11)(i).
576 See Exemptions from Investment Adviser
Registration for Advisers to Certain Rural Business
Investment Companies, 85 FR 13734 (Mar. 10, 2020)
(‘‘RBIC Investment Adviser Adopting Release’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
with the Secretary.577 Because SBICs
and RBICs share the common purpose of
promoting capital formation in their
respective sectors, advisers to SBICs and
RBICs are treated similarly under the
Advisers Act in that they have the
opportunity to take advantage of
expanded exemptions from investment
adviser registration.578 As of August
2019, there were 5 RBICs who were
licensed by the USDA managing
approximately $352 million in assets.579
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act established
the ‘‘opportunity zone’’ program to
provide tax incentives for long-term
investing in designated economically
distressed communities.580 The program
allows taxpayers to defer and reduce
taxes on capital gains by reinvesting
gains in ‘‘qualified opportunity funds’’
(QOFs) that are required to have at least
90 percent of their assets in designated
low-income zones.581 In this regard,
QOFs are similar to SBICs and public
welfare companies. The final rule
provides relief to QOFs from the
implementing regulations that is similar
to the relief provided to SBICs.582 SEC
staff is not aware of an official source for
data regarding QOFs that are available
for investment, but some private firms
collect and report such data. One such
firm reports that, as of April 2020, there
were 406 QOFs that report raising
577 See the RBIC Advisers Relief Act of 2018,
Public Law 115–417, 132 Stat. 5438 (2019) (the
‘‘RBIC Advisers Relief Act’’). To be eligible to
participate as an RBIC, the company must be a
newly formed for-profit entity or a newly formed
for-profit subsidiary of such an entity, have a
management team with experience in community
development financing or relevant venture capital
financing, and invest in enterprises that will create
wealth and job opportunities in rural areas, with an
emphasis on smaller enterprises. See 7 U.S.C.
2009cc–3(a).
578 Following enactment of the RBIC Advisers
Relief Act, supra note 577, advisers to solely RBICs
and advisers to solely SBICs are exempt from
investment adviser registration pursuant to
Advisers Act sections 203(b)(8) and 203(b)(7),
respectively. The venture capital fund adviser
exemption deems RBICs and SBICs to be venture
capital funds for purposes of the registration
exemption 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(l). Accordingly, the
exclusion for certain venture capital funds
discussed below (see infra text accompanying notes
672 and 673) which require that a fund be a venture
capital fund as defined in the SEC regulations
implementing the registration exemption, could
include RBICs and SBICs to the extent that they
satisfy the other elements of the exclusion.
579 See RBIC Investment Adviser Adopting
Release, supra note 576.
580 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Public Law
115–97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017).
581 See U.S. Sec. and Exchange Comm’n &
NASAA, Staff Statement on Opportunity Zones:
Federal and State Securities Laws Considerations,
available at https://www.sec.gov/2019_OpportunityZones_FINAL_508v2.pdf (‘‘Opportunity Zone
Statement’’).
582 See supra note 575.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
$10.09 billion in equity, and have a
fundraising goal of $31.89 billion.583
3. Costs and Benefits
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally
prohibits banking entities from
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with covered funds,
subject to certain exemptions.584 The
SEC’s economic analysis concerns the
potential costs, benefits, and effects on
efficiency, competition, and capital
formation of the final rule for five
groups of market participants. First, the
final rule may impact SEC-registered
investment advisers that are banking
entities, including those that sponsor or
advise covered funds and those that do
not, as well as SEC-registered
investment advisers that are not banking
entities that sponsor or advise covered
funds and compete with banking entity
RIAs. Second, the final rule permits
dealers greater flexibility in providing
services to more types of funds since
dealers can provide a broader array of
services to funds that would be
excluded from the covered fund
definition. Third, banking entities that
are broker-dealers or RIAs may enjoy
reduced uncertainty and greater
flexibility in making direct investments
alongside covered funds. Fourth, the
final rule may impact private funds and
other vehicles, including those entities
scoped in or out of the covered fund
provisions of the implementing
regulations, as well as private funds
competing with such funds. One such
impact may be seen to the extent that
the final rule permits banking entities to
provide a full range of traditional
customer-facing banking and asset
management services to certain entities,
such as customer facilitation vehicles
and family wealth management
vehicles. Fifth, to the extent that the
final rule impacts efficiency,
competition, and capital formation in
covered funds or underlying securities,
investors in, and sponsors of, covered
funds and underlying securities and
issuers may be affected as well.
As discussed below, the agencies
carefully considered the competing
effects that could potentially result from
the final rule and alternatives. For
example, the final rule could result in
enhanced competition among, and
capital formation driven by, entities that
would be treated as covered funds
under the implementing regulations.
583 As reported by Novogradac, a national
professional services organization that collects and
reports information on QOFs. See https://
www.novoco.com/resource-centers/opportunityzone-resource-center/opportunity-funds-listing.
584 See 12 U.S.C. 1851.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The final rule could also potentially
increase (or decrease) financial and
other risks posed by the ability to make
investments in covered funds in
addition to or in lieu of direct
investments; however, the agencies have
sought to mitigate the potential for
increased risk and other concerns by
imposing various conditions on the
exclusions designed to address such
risks.
In addition, to the extent that the
covered fund provisions of the
implementing regulations limit fund
formation, the final rule could provide
a greater ability for banking entities to
organize funds and attract capital from
third party investors. This could
increase revenues for banking entities
while reducing long-term compliance
costs; increase the availability of
venture, credit, and other financing,
including for small businesses and startups; and, as a result, increase capital
formation. The SEC is not currently
aware of any information or data that
would allow a quantification of the
extent to which the covered fund
provisions of the implementing
regulations are inhibiting capital
formation via funds. Therefore, the bulk
of the analysis below is necessarily
qualitative. To the extent that the
covered fund provisions of the
implementing regulations limit
alignment of interests between banking
entities and their clients, customers, or
counterparties, and to the extent the
final rule alters the alignment of
interests, the final rule could have a
positive or negative effect on conflict of
interest concerns.
The final rule creates new
recordkeeping requirements and revise
certain disclosure requirements.
Specifically, a banking entity may only
rely on the exclusion for customer
facilitation vehicles if the banking entity
and its affiliates maintain
documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the
customer’s exposure to a transaction,
investment strategy or service provided
by the banking entity. As discussed
above in Section V.B. (Paperwork
Reduction Act) 585 and discussed further
below, these new recordkeeping
burdens may impose an initial burden
585 For the purposes of the burden estimates in
this release, we are assuming the cost of $423 per
hour for an attorney, from SIFMA’s Management
and Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry
2013 (available at https://www.sifma.org/resources/
research/management-and-professional-earningsin-the-securities-industry-2013/), modified to
account for an 1800-hour work year and multiplied
by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee
benefits, and overhead, and adjusted for inflation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
of $1,078,650 586 and an ongoing annual
burden of $1,078,650.587 In addition,
under certain circumstances, a banking
entity must make certain disclosures
with respect to an excluded credit fund,
venture capital fund, family wealth
vehicle, or customer facilitation vehicle,
as if the entity were a covered fund. As
discussed above in Section V.B, these
disclosure requirements may impose an
initial burden of $53,933 588 and an
ongoing burden of $1,402,245.589
The sections that follow discuss how
each of the amendments in the final rule
change the implementing regulations,
and the anticipated costs and benefits of
the amendments, subject to the caveat
that not all anticipated costs and
benefits can be meaningfully
quantified.590
i. Amendments Related to Specific
Types of Funds
As discussed above, the final rule
modifies a number of the provisions of
the implementing regulations related to
the treatment of certain types of funds
(e.g., credit funds, family wealth
management vehicles, small business
investment companies, qualifying
venture capital funds, customer
facilitation vehicles, foreign excluded
funds, foreign public funds, and loan
securitizations).591
Broadly, such modifications reduce
the number and types of funds that are
within the scope of the implementing
586 In the 2019 amendments, amendments that
sought, among other things, to provide greater
clarity and certainty about what activities were
prohibited by the 2013 rule—in particular, under
the prohibition on proprietary trading—and to
better tailor the compliance requirements to the risk
of a banking entity’s activities, banking entity PRArelated burdens were apportioned to SEC-regulated
entities on the basis of the average weight of brokerdealer assets in holding company assets. See 2019
amendments, 84 FR 62074. The SEC believes that
such an approach would be inappropriate for the
PRA-related burdens associated with the final rule
because we do not have a comparable proxy for an
investment adviser’s significance within the
holding company. Since we do not have sufficient
information to determine the extent to which the
costs associated with any of the new recordkeeping
and disclosure requirements would be borne by
SEC registrants specifically, we report the entire
burden estimated based on information in supra
Section V.B (Paperwork Reduction Act).
Initial recordkeeping burdens: (10 hours) × (255
entities) × (Attorney at $423 per hour) = $1,078,650.
587 Annual recordkeeping burdens: (10 hours) ×
(255 entities) × (Attorney at $423 per hour) =
$1,078,650.
588 Initial recordkeeping burdens: (0.5 hours) ×
(255 entities) × (Attorney at $423 per hour) =
$53,933.
589 Annual recordkeeping burdens: (0.5 hours) ×
(255 entities) × (26 disclosures per year) × (Attorney
at $423 per hour) = $1,402,245.
590 See supra Section V.F.1.iii. (SEC Economic
Analysis—Analytical Approach).
591 See supra Section IV. (Summary of the Final
Rule).
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46477
regulations, impacting the economic
effects of section 13 of the BHC Act and
the implementing regulations.592
Form ADV data is not sufficiently
granular to allow the SEC to estimate
the number of funds and fund advisers
affected by the exclusions from the
covered fund definition added or
modified by the final rule and other
relief addressed by the final rule.
However, Table 2 and Table 3 in the
economic baseline quantify the number
and asset size of private funds advised
by banking entity RIAs by the type of
private fund they advise, as those fund
types are defined in Form ADV.593
Using Form ADV data, the SEC
estimates that approximately 151
banking entity RIAs advise hedge funds
and 96 banking entity RIAs advise
private equity funds (as those terms are
defined in Form ADV).594 As can be
seen from Table 2 in the economic
baseline, 44 banking entity RIAs advise
securitized asset funds. Table 3 shows
that banking entity RIAs advise 380
securitized asset funds with $145 billion
in gross assets. Another 51 banking
entity RIAs advise real estate funds, and
banking entity RIAs advise 320 real
estate funds with $94 billion in gross
assets. Venture capital funds are advised
by only 8 banking entity RIAs, and all
44 venture capital funds advised by
banking entity RIAs have in aggregate
approximately $3 billion in gross assets.
As noted elsewhere, the covered fund
provisions of the implementing
regulations may limit the ability of
banking entities to use covered funds to
circumvent the proprietary trading
prohibition, reduce bank incentives to
bail out their covered funds, and
mitigate conflicts of interest between
banking entities and their clients,
customers, or counterparties. As
discussed in the 2020 proposal, the
implementing regulations may limit the
ability of banking entities to conduct
traditional asset management activities
and reduce the availability of capital by
imposing significant costs on some
banking entities without providing
commensurate benefits.595 Moreover,
the 2013 rule’s limitations on banking
entities’ investment in covered funds
may be more significant for certain
covered funds that are typically small in
size such as many venture capital funds,
with potentially more negative spillover
592 See,
e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037–92.
fund types include hedge funds, private
equity funds, real estate funds, securitized asset
funds, venture capital funds, liquidity, and other
private funds. See supra note 564.
594 As noted in the economic baseline, a single
RIA may advise multiple types of funds. See supra
note 565.
595 See 85 FR 12164.
593 These
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46478
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
effects on capital formation in the types
of underlying securities in which these
types of funds invest.596
The final rule could reduce the scope
of funds that need to be analyzed for
covered fund status or could simplify
this analysis and enable banking entities
to own, sponsor, and have relationships
with the types of entities that the final
rule excludes from the covered fund
definition. Accordingly, the final rule
may reduce costs of banking entity
ownership in, sponsorship of, and
transactions with certain funds; may
promote greater capital formation in,
and competition among such funds; and
may improve access to capital for
issuers of the underlying debt or equity
that those funds may purchase.
The final rule may also benefit
banking entity dealers through higher
profits or greater demand for
derivatives, margin, payment, clearing,
and settlement services. Reducing
restrictions on banking entities by
further tailoring the covered fund
definition may encourage more
launches of funds that are excluded
from the definition, capital formation
and, possibly, competition in those
types of funds. If competition increases
the quality of funds available to
investors or reduces the fees funds
charge, investors in funds may benefit.
Moreover, to the degree that the final
rule may increase the spectrum of funds
available to investors, the final rule may
relax constraints around investor
portfolio optimization and increase the
efficiency of capital allocation.
The SEC received comments from a
diverse set of commenters. Comments
from banking entities and financial
services industry trade groups were
generally supportive of the proposal,
although many recommended
additional modifications.597 There were
also several organizations and
individuals that were generally opposed
to the 2020 proposal.598 The sections
that follow further discuss the economic
costs, benefits, and effects on
competition, efficiency, and capital
formation with respect to specific types
of funds and specific amendments in
the final rule.
Foreign Excluded Funds
Under the baseline, foreign excluded
funds are excluded from the covered
fund definition, but could be considered
banking entities if a foreign banking
entity controls the foreign fund in
596 See
id.
supra Section IV. (Summary of the Final
Rule) for discussion of comments and
recommendations for each of the proposed
amendments.
598 See id.
597 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
certain circumstances.599 As discussed
above, the policy statement released by
Federal banking agencies provides that
the Federal banking agencies would not
propose to take action (1) against a
foreign banking entity based on
attribution of the activities and
investments of a qualifying foreign
excluded fund to the foreign banking
entity 600 or (2) against a qualifying
foreign excluded fund as a banking
entity, in each case where the foreign
banking entity’s acquisition or retention
of any ownership interest in, or
sponsorship of, the qualifying foreign
excluded fund would meet the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in section 13(d)(1)(I) of the BHC Act and
§ ll.13(b) of the implementing
regulations, as if the qualifying foreign
excluded fund were a covered fund.601
As in the 2020 proposal, the final rule
provides a permanent exemption from
the proprietary trading and covered
fund prohibitions for certain foreign
excluded funds that is substantively
similar to the relief currently provided
to qualifying foreign excluded funds by
the policy statement.602
Commenters were generally
supportive of the proposal to exempt
qualifying foreign excluded funds from
certain requirements of the rule.603 Two
commenters expressed opposition to the
proposed exemption.604
The SEC recognizes that failing to
exclude such funds from the definition
of ‘‘banking entity’’ in the implementing
regulations imposed proprietary trading
restrictions, covered fund prohibitions,
and compliance obligations on
qualifying foreign excluded funds that
may be more burdensome than the
requirements that would apply under
the implementing regulations to covered
funds.
The SEC believes that, absent the
qualifying foreign excluded fund
exemption and upon expiry of the
policy statement, the implementing
regulations may have significant adverse
599 See supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign
Excluded Funds).
600 Foreign banking entity was defined for
purposes of the policy statement to mean a banking
entity that is not, and is not controlled directly or
indirectly by, a banking entity that is located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or
any State.
601 See supra note 26. The policy statement was
subsequently extended for a two-year period ending
on July 21, 2021. See also supra Section IV.A.
(Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds) and note 28.
602 See final rule §§ ll.6(f) and ll.13(d).
603 SIFMA; BPI; BVI; AIC; ABA; EFAMA; SAF;
IIB; JBA; CBA; and Credit Suisse. See also supra
Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds)
for a discussion of individual comments.
604 See Occupy and Data Boiler.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
effects on foreign banking entities’
ability to organize and offer certain
private funds for foreign investments,
disrupting foreign asset management
activities. The SEC recognizes that the
exemption of qualifying foreign
excluded funds from the proprietary
trading and covered fund prohibitions
that apply to ‘‘banking entities’’ may
result in increased activity by foreign
banking entities in organizing and
offering such funds, and that such
activity may involve risk for those
banking entities. At the same time, the
SEC recognizes a statutory purpose of
certain portions of section 13 of the BHC
Act is to limit the extraterritorial impact
on foreign banking entities.605
Accordingly, the final rule may benefit
foreign banking entities and their
foreign counterparties seeking to
transact with and through such funds.
The agencies received comments on
the 2020 proposal that expressed
concern that although qualifying foreign
excluded funds would be exempted
from the proprietary trading and
covered funds restrictions of the
implementing regulations, these funds
would still be required to put in place
compliance programs.606 However,
since these qualifying foreign excluded
funds are exempted from the proprietary
trading requirements of § ll.3(a) and
covered fund restrictions of § ll.10(a),
the agencies believe that requiring
compliance programs to be established
for the qualifying foreign excluded fund
itself would be overly burdensome and
unnecessary. Therefore, under the final
rule, in addition to the proposed
exemptions from the proprietary trading
and covered fund prohibitions,
qualifying foreign excluded funds will
also not be required to have compliance
programs under § ll.20. However, any
banking entity that owns or sponsors a
qualifying foreign excluded fund will
still be required to have in place the
appropriate compliance programs as
required by § ll.20.
The exemption is also expected to
promote capital formation in the United
States. While qualifying foreign
excluded funds have a limited nexus to
the United States, such funds are
permitted to invest in U.S. companies.
Therefore, to the extent that these funds
have any direct impact on capital
formation and U.S. financial stability,
the exemption would promote U.S.
financial stability by providing
additional capital and liquidity to U.S.
capital markets without a concomitant
increase in risk borne by U.S. banking
entities.
605 See
606 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
85 FR 12123–26.
IIB; JBA; CBA; EBF; and Credit Suisse.
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The final rule may increase the
incentive for some foreign banking
entities seeking to organize and offer
qualifying foreign excluded funds to
reorganize their activities so that these
funds’ activities qualify for the
exemptions. The costs and feasibility of
such reorganization will depend on the
complexity and existing compliance
structures for banking entities, the
degree to which there is unmet demand
for investment funds that may be
organized as qualifying foreign excluded
funds, and the profitability of such
banking activities. Importantly, the
principal risk of foreign banking
entities’ activities related to foreign
excluded funds generally resides
outside the United States. As discussed
above,607 because the exemption
requires that the foreign banking entity’s
acquisition of an ownership interest in
or sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements in § ll.13(b) of the final
rule, the exemption will help to ensure
that the risks of the investments made
by these foreign funds would be booked
to foreign entities in foreign
jurisdictions. The agencies believe that
exempting the activities of qualifying
foreign excluded funds promotes and
protects the safety and soundness of
banking entities and U.S. financial
stability,608 and relatedly the SEC
believes the exemption is unlikely to
impact negatively SEC registrants.
Foreign Public Funds
The implementing regulations
exclude from the covered fund
definition any foreign public fund that
satisfies three sets of conditions. First,
the issuer must be organized or
established outside of the United States,
be authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests to retail investors in
the issuer’s home jurisdiction (the
‘‘home jurisdiction’’ requirement), and
sell ownership interests predominantly
through one or more public offerings
outside of the United States. The
agencies stated in the preamble to the
2013 rule that they generally expect that
an offering is made predominantly
outside of the United States if 85
percent or more of the fund’s interests
are sold to investors that are not
residents of the United States.609
Second, for funds that are sponsored by
a U.S. banking entity, or by a banking
entity controlled by a U.S. banking
entity, the ownership interests in the
issuer must be sold ‘‘predominantly’’ to
persons other than the sponsoring
banking entity, the issuer, their
affiliates, directors of such entities, or
employees of such entities (the sales
limitation). The agencies stated in the
preamble to the 2013 rule that,
consistent with the agencies’ view
concerning whether a foreign public
fund has been sold predominantly
outside of the United States, the
agencies generally expect that a foreign
public fund would satisfy this
additional condition if 85 percent or
more of the fund’s interests are sold to
persons other than the sponsoring U.S.
banking entity and the specified persons
connected to that banking entity.610
Third, such public offerings must occur
outside the United States, must comply
with applicable jurisdictional
requirements (the compliance
obligation), may not restrict availability
to investors having a minimum level of
net worth or net investment assets, and
must have publicly available offering
disclosure documents filed or submitted
with the relevant jurisdiction.
The final rule makes several changes
to the foreign public fund exclusion.
First, the final rule removes the home
jurisdiction requirement.611 Second, the
final rule makes the exclusion available
with respect to issuers authorized to
offer and sell ownership interests
through one or more public offerings,
removing the requirement that the
issuer sells ownership interests
‘‘predominantly’’ through such public
offerings.612 Third, the agencies are also
modifying the definition of ‘‘public
offering’’ from the implementing
regulations to add a new requirement
that the distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations
in one or more jurisdictions where
ownership interests are sold.613 Fourth,
the final rule applies the compliance
obligation only in instances in which
the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor.614
Finally, the final rule narrows the sales
limitation to the sponsoring banking
entity, the issuer, affiliates, and
directors and senior executive officers of
such entities, and requires more than 75
percent of the fund’s interest to be sold
to such entities and persons.615
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comments
indicating that the foreign public fund
610 Id.
final rule § ll.10(c)(1)(i)(B).
final rule § ll.10(c)(1)(i)(B).
613 See final rule § ll.10(c)(1)(iii)(A).
614 See final rule § ll.10(c)(1)(iii)(B).
615 See final rule § ll.10(c)(1)(ii).
611 See
607 See
supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign
Excluded Funds).
608 See id.
609 79 FR 5678.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
612 See
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46479
exclusion under the implementing
regulations is impractical, overly
narrow, and prescriptive, and results in
competitive disparities between foreign
public funds and RICs.616 The SEC also
received comment that the home
jurisdiction requirement under the
implementing regulations is narrow and
fails to recognize the prevalence of nonU.S. retail funds organized in one
jurisdiction and authorized to sell
interests in other jurisdictions.617
As adopted in the final rule, the
elimination of the home jurisdiction
requirement may benefit such foreign
public funds and may facilitate greater
capital formation through such funds,
with the potential to create more capital
allocation choices for investors. To the
degree that the implementing
regulations have disadvantaged foreign
public funds relative to otherwise
comparable RICs, the elimination of the
home jurisdiction requirement may
dampen such competitive disparities.
As also discussed in the 2020
proposal, the SEC has received
comment that the requirement that
ownership interests be sold
‘‘predominantly’’ through one or more
public offerings outside of the United
States has been burdensome and poses
significant compliance burdens.618 For
example, banking entities may not fully
observe and predict both historical and
potential future distributions of funds
that are sponsored by third parties,
listed on exchanges, or sold through
third-party intermediaries or
distributors.619 In response to the 2020
proposal, commenters supported the
elimination of the home jurisdiction
requirement and the requirement that
the fund be sold predominantly through
one or more public offerings.620
To the degree that some banking
entities restrict their activities because
they are unable to quantify the volumes
of distributions through foreign public
offerings relative to, for instance, foreign
private placements, the final rule may
enable greater activity by banking
entities relating to foreign public funds.
Similar to the above discussion, this
aspect of the final rule also treats foreign
public funds in a manner more similar
to RICs (which are not required to
616 See
85 FR 12166.
funds could be organized in a particular
jurisdiction for reasons including tax treatment,
investment strategy, or flexibility to distribute into
multiple markets (for instance, in the European
Union), even though such funds are authorized to
sell interests in other jurisdictions. See also id.
618 See 85 FR 12166.
619 See id.
620 IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI;
BVI; and CBA. See also supra Section IV.B.1.
(Foreign Public Funds).
617 Such
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46480
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
monitor or assess distributions), with
corresponding competitive effects.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
also supported the proposed change to
the ‘‘public offering’’ definition to
include a requirement that the
distribution be subject to substantive
disclosure and retail investor protection
laws or regulations.621 The final rule
adopts that change, as proposed.
Accordingly, the final rule tailors the
scope of disclosure and compliance
obligations for those jurisdictions where
ownership interests are sold in
recognition of the prevalence of foreign
retail fund sales across jurisdictions.
Similarly, the final rule limits the
compliance obligation to settings in
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor—
settings that may involve greater
conflicts of interest between banking
entities and fund investors than when
the banking entity is only an investor in
the fund.
The final rule also replaces the
employee sales limitation with a
limitation on sales to senior executive
officers.622 As discussed in the 2020
proposal, the SEC has received
comment that banking entities may face
significant costs and logistical and
interpretive challenges monitoring
investments by their employees,
including those who transact in fund
shares through unaffiliated brokers or
through independent exchange
trading.623 The SEC has also received
comment that the employee sales
limitation serves no discernible antievasion purpose.624 In addition,
commenters noted that employee
ownership interest can be a meaningful
mechanism of promoting incentive
alignment.625 The final rule replaces the
employee sales limitation with a
corresponding sales limitation with
respect only to senior executive officers.
This change may reduce these reported
compliance challenges and burdens
while preserving, in part, the original
anti-evasion purpose of the limitations
on employee ownership.
The SEC received comments to the
2020 proposal that recommended the
agencies modify their expectation of the
level of ownership of a foreign public
fund that would satisfy the requirement
that a fund be ‘‘predominantly’’ sold to
persons other than its U.S. banking
621 IIB;
EFAMA; FSF; ICI; and BVI.
rule § ll.10(c)(1)(ii)(D).
623 See 85 FR 12166.
624 See id.
625 See id.
622 Final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
entity sponsor and associated parties,626
which the preamble to the 2013 rule
stated was 85 percent or more (which
would permit the U.S. banking entity
sponsor and associated parties to own
the remaining 15 percent). These
commenters asserted that the relevant
ownership threshold for U.S. registered
investment companies is 25 percent,
and that, for foreign public funds, the
threshold should be the same. The
agencies agree that the permitted
ownership level of a foreign public fund
by a U.S. banking entity sponsor and
associated parties should be aligned
with the functionally equivalent
threshold for banking entity investments
in U.S. registered investment
companies, which is 24.9 percent.627
Accordingly, the agencies have
amended this provision in the final rule
to require that more than 75 percent of
a foreign public fund’s interests must be
sold to persons other than the U.S.
banking entity sponsor and associated
parties.628
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
generally supported the proposed
changes to the foreign public funds
exclusion; 629 however, as discussed in
this section and above, the agencies are
making certain targeted adjustments in
response to comments received.630 One
commenter stated that the proposed
changes were less than ideal for
maximum control but acceptable from a
practical implementation standpoint to
balance compliance costs and
benefits.631
As discussed above, the SEC believes
that the foreign public fund provisions
of the final rule may facilitate greater
capital formation through such funds,
with the potential to create more capital
allocation choices for investors. In
626 BPI; FSF; ICI; and CCMC. See also supra
Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public Funds).
627 Although the implementing regulations do not
explicitly prohibit a banking entity from acquiring
25 percent or more of a U.S. registered investment
company, a U.S. registered investment company
would become a banking entity if it is affiliated
with another banking entity (other than as
described in § ll.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing
regulations). See 79 FR 5732 (‘‘[F]or purposes of
section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule, a
registered investment company . . . will not be
considered to be an affiliate of the banking entity
if the banking entity owns, controls, or holds with
the power to vote less than 25 percent of the voting
shares of the company or fund, and provides
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company
or fund only in a manner that complies with other
limitations under applicable regulation, order, or
other authority.’’).
628 See supra note 69.
629 IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI;
BVI; CBA; CCMR; Data Boiler; GS; IAA; JBA; SAF;
and CCMC.
630 See supra Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public
Funds).
631 See Data Boiler.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
particular, to the degree that some
banking entities restrict their activities
relating to foreign public funds because
they are unable to quantify the
distributions through public offerings or
determine the holdings of their
employees, the final rule may enable
greater activity by banking entities
relating to foreign public funds. The
final rule also limits the compliance
obligation to settings in which the
banking entity serves as the investment
manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, commodity
pool operator, or sponsor—settings that
may involve greater conflicts of interest
between banking entities and fund
investors than when the banking entity
is only an investor in the fund.
The agencies could have adopted a
variety of alternatives offering more or
less relief with respect to foreign public
funds. For example, the agencies could
have eliminated altogether the limit on
sales to affiliated entities, directors and
employees, which would have provided
an even greater alignment of treatment
between foreign public funds and
RICs.632 Alternatives providing greater
relief with respect to foreign public
funds may have facilitated greater
banking entity activity and
intermediation of such funds on the one
hand, but they may also have
strengthened the competitive
positioning of foreign public funds
relative to U.S. registered funds.
Moreover, providing greater relief with
respect to foreign public funds may
have allowed banking entities greater
flexibility in the formation and
operation of foreign public funds, but
may also have increased the risk that
banking entities would be able to use
foreign public funds to engage in
activities that the restrictions on
covered funds were intended to
prohibit, thereby reducing the
magnitude of the expected economic
benefits of section 13 of the BHC Act
and the implementing regulations.
Similarly, relative to the final rule,
alternatives providing less relief with
respect to foreign public funds may
have strengthened the competitive
positioning of U.S. RICs relative to
foreign public funds and posed lower
compliance or evasion risks, but may
also have reduced the benefits of the
relief for capital formation in foreign
public funds and their investors.
Loan Securitizations
The 2013 rule excludes from the
definition of covered fund any loan
securitization that issues asset-backed
securities, holds only loans, certain
632 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
2020 proposal at 12166.
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
rights and assets that arise from the
structure of the loan securitization or
from the loans supporting a loan
securitization, and a small set of other
financial instruments (permissible
assets), and meets other criteria.633 As
discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC
received comment that, as a result of the
2013 rule, some banking entities may
have divested or restructured their
interests in loan securitizations due to
the narrowly-drawn conditions of the
exclusion, and that a limited holding of
non-loan assets may enable banking
entities to provide traditional
securitization products and services
demanded by customers, clients, and
counterparties.634
The implementing regulations permit
loan securitizations to hold rights or
other assets (servicing assets) that arise
from the structure of the loan
securitization or from the loans
supporting a loan securitization.635 In
response to questions regarding the
scope of the provisions permitting
servicing assets and a separate provision
limiting the types of permitted
securities, the staffs of the agencies
released the Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ.636 The final rule
codifies the staff-level approach to the
loan securitization exclusion in the
Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ.637
To the degree that market participants
may have restructured their activities
consistent with the Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ, an effect of the final rule
may be to reduce uncertainty. However,
the economic effects of the codification
of the Loan Securitization Servicing
FAQ with respect to enabling greater
capital formation through loan
securitizations on the one hand, and
increasing potential risks related to such
activities on the other, may be limited.
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies declined to permit loan
securitizations to hold a certain amount
of non-loan assets.638 Several
commenters on the 2018 proposal
disagreed with the agencies’ views and
supported expanding the range of
permissible assets in an excluded loan
securitization.639 The 2020 proposal
would have allowed a loan
securitization vehicle to hold up to five
633 See 2013 rule § ll.10(c)(8). Loan is further
defined as any loan, lease, extension of credit, or
secured or unsecured receivable that is not a
security or derivative. See also 2013 rule § ll.2(t).
634 See 85 FR 12173.
635 Implementing regulations §§ ll.2(s);
ll.10(c)(8)(i)(D), (v).
636 See supra note 14 (links to the staff-level
FAQs) and 78 and referencing paragraph
(discussion of Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ).
637 § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(B).
638 2013 rule at 5687–88.
639 See 85 FR 12129.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
percent of the fund’s total assets in any
non-loan assets.
Commenters were generally
supportive of allowing loan
securitizations to hold a limited amount
of non-loan assets.640 These commenters
indicated that the requirements under
the implementing regulations for the
loan securitization exclusion have been
too restrictive, excessively limited use
of the exclusion, and prevented issuers
from responding to investor demand.
Further, commenters suggested that a
limited bucket of non-loan assets would
not fundamentally alter the
characteristics and risks of
securitizations or otherwise increase
risks in banking entities or the financial
system.641
In the final rule, the agencies are
revising the loan securitization
exclusion to permit a loan securitization
to hold a limited amount of debt
securities.642 To minimize the potential
for banking entities to use this exclusion
to engage in impermissible activities or
take on excessive risk, the final rule
permits a loan securitization to hold
debt securities (excluding asset-backed
securities and convertible securities), as
opposed to any non-loan asset, as the
2020 proposal would have allowed.643
The SEC believes that non-loan assets
with materially different risk
characteristics from loans could change
the character and complexity of an
issuer and raise the type of concerns
that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address. Moreover, as
described further below, limiting the
assets to those with risk characteristics
that are similar to loans may allow for
a simpler and more transparent
calculation of the five percent limit than
would have been necessary if loan
securitizations could invest in any nonloan asset, which will facilitate banking
entities’ compliance with the exclusion.
Alternatively, the agencies could have
expanded the range of permissible
assets in an excluded loan securitization
to include any non-loan asset with or
without limitations (e.g., the holding of
asset-backed securities could have been
permitted). Permitting loan
securitizations to hold small amounts of
non-loan assets may have enabled loan
securitizations to respond to investor
demand and may have reduced
compliance costs associated with
640 See, e.g., SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse;
MFA; Goldman Sachs; LSTA; BPI; and SFA.
641 See, e.g., LSTA and Goldman Sachs.
642 Final rule § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
643 The implementing regulations also allow an
excluded loan securitization to hold certain interest
rate and foreign exchange derivatives for risk
management purposes. The final rule makes no
change to this provision.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46481
ensuring that a loan securitization holds
only assets permitted under the
exclusion. However, permitting
excluded loan securitizations to hold a
broader range of non-loan assets could
have increased the risk that the
character and complexity of excluded
loan securitizations would have
changed in a manner that raised the
type of concerns that section 13 of the
BHC Act was intended to address.
However, the SEC recognizes that the
loan securitization industry may have
evolved since the issuance of the 2013
rule. As a result, the SEC believes that,
even if the scope of non-loan assets
permitted to be held were expanded
beyond debt securities, loan
securitizations may continue to have
excluded non-loan assets. Further,
permitting loan securitizations to hold a
small amount of debt securities will not
affect the applicable prudential
requirements aimed at the safety and
soundness of banking entities. Banking
entities currently take on a variety of
risks arising out of a broad range of
permissible activities, including the
core traditional banking activity related
to the extension of credit and direct and
indirect extension of credit by banking
entities flows through to the real
economy in the form of greater access to
capital.
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
also requested comment on the
methodology for calculating the limit on
non-loan assets. Several commenters
suggested using as a method for
calculating the limit on non-loan assets:
The par value of assets on the day they
are acquired.644 These commenters
suggested that relying on par value is
accepted practice in the loan
securitization industry and would
obviate concerns related to tracking
amortization or prepayment of loans in
a securitization portfolio.645 Another
commenter indicated that the limit
should be calculated as the lower of the
purchase price and par value of the nonqualifying assets over the issuer’s
aggregate capital commitments plus its
subscription based credit facility.646
In response to these comments, the
agencies are clarifying the methodology
for calculating the five percent limit on
non-loan assets.647 As suggested by
several commenters, the final rule
specifies that the limit on debt securities
must be calculated at the most recent
644 SIFMA;
BPI; ABA; and LSTA.
and BPI.
646 Goldman Sachs.
647 Final rule § ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
645 SIFMA
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46482
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
time of acquisition of such assets.648
Specifically, the aggregate value of debt
securities may not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans, cash and
cash equivalents, and debt securities,
where the value of the loans, cash and
cash equivalents, and debt securities is
calculated using par value at the most
recent time any such debt security is
purchased.649
The agencies have determined a
calculation methodology that is
intended to reduce compliance costs
while ensuring that the investment pool
of a loan securitization is composed of
loans. The agencies have chosen the
most recent time any such debt security
is acquired as the moment of calculation
to simplify the manner in which the five
percent limit applies. This would
permit an issuer that, at some point in
its life, held debt securities in excess of
five percent of its assets to continue to
qualify for the exclusion if it came into
compliance with the five percent limit
prior to the next acquisition of a debt
security that is subject to the five
percent limit. The SEC believes that this
approach balances the cost of
calculation with the benefits of
addressing the potential for evasion.
The SEC believes that the alternative of
a continuous monitoring obligation (i.e.,
requiring an excluded loan
securitization to ensure that it held debt
securities below or at the five percent
limit at all times, regardless of any
change in value of the securitization’s
assets) would have imposed significant
burdens on banking entities and could
have caused an issuer to be disqualified
from the loan securitization exclusion
based on market events not under its
control.
In the final rule, this calculation is
based only on the value of the loans and
debt securities held under
§§ ll.10(c)(8)(i)(A) and (E) and the
cash and cash equivalents held under
§ ll.10(c)(8)(iii)(A) rather than the
aggregate value of all of the issuing
entity’s assets. The purpose of the five
percent limit is to ensure the investment
pool of a loan securitization is
composed of loans. Therefore, the
calculation takes into account the assets
that should make up the issuing entity’s
investment pool and excludes the value
of other rights or incidental assets, as
well as derivatives held for risk
management. This further simplifies the
calculation methodology by excluding
assets that may be more complex to
value and that are ancillary to the loan
648 This limit applies to the debt securities that
a loan securitization may hold pursuant to final rule
§ ll.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
649 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
securitization’s investment activities.
This straightforward calculation
methodology will ensure that the loan
securitization exclusion remains easy to
use and will facilitate banking entities’
compliance with the exclusion.
The agencies recognize that a loan
securitization’s transaction agreements
may require that some categories of
loans, cash equivalents, or debt
securities be valued at fair market value
for certain purposes. To accommodate
such situations, the exclusion provides
that the value of any loan, cash
equivalent, or permissible debt security
may be based on its fair market value if
(1) the issuing entity is required to use
the fair market value of such loan or
debt security for purposes of calculating
compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations
under its transaction agreements and (2)
the issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets, for example non-performing
loans, consistently. This provision is
intended to provide issuers with the
flexibility to leverage existing
calculation methodologies while
preventing issuers from using
inconsistent methodologies in a manner
to evade the requirements of the
exclusion.
Credit Funds
Under the baseline, funds that raise
capital to engage in loan originations or
extensions of credit or purchase and
hold debt instruments that a banking
entity would be permitted to acquire
directly may be ‘‘covered funds’’ under
the implementing regulations. As a
result, prior to the final rule, banking
entities faced limitations on sponsoring
or investing in credit funds that engage
in traditional banking activities—
activities that banking entities are able
to engage in directly outside of the fund
structure. The SEC received several
comments to the 2018 proposal
supporting an exclusion for credit
funds. For example, some commenters
suggested that a fund or partnership
structure enables banking entities to
engage in permissible activities more
efficiently.650 Specifically, one
commenter indicated that credit funds
facilitate investments by third parties,
leading to the creation of a broader and
deeper pool of capital, which may allow
for more diversification in banking
entities’ lending portfolios, the pooling
of expertise of groups of market
participants, and otherwise reduce the
risk for banking entities and the
financial system.651 In addition, some
PO 00000
650 See
651 See
85 FR 12167.
id.
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
commenters stated that to the degree
that credit funds require precommitments of capital, they may
dampen cyclical fluctuations in loan
originations and may facilitate ongoing
extensions of credit during times of
market stress.652
The agencies included in the 2020
proposal a specific exclusion for credit
funds. Under the 2020 proposal, a credit
fund would have been an issuer whose
assets consist solely of: Loans, debt
instruments, related rights and other
assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling
loans, or debt instruments; and certain
interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives.653 The proposed exclusion
would have been subject to certain
additional requirements to reduce
evasion concerns and ensure that
banking entities invest in, sponsor, or
advise credit funds in a safe and sound
manner. For example, the proposed
exclusion would have imposed (1)
certain activity requirements on the
credit fund, including a prohibition on
proprietary trading; 654 (2) disclosure
and safety and soundness requirements
on banking entities that sponsor or serve
as an advisor for a credit fund; 655 (3)
safety and soundness requirements on
all banking entities that invest in or
have certain relationships with a credit
fund; 656 and (4) restrictions on the
banking entity’s investment in, and
relationship with, a credit fund.657 The
proposed exclusion also would have
permitted a credit fund to receive and
hold a limited amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) that were received on
customary terms in connection with the
credit fund’s loans or debt
instruments.658
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
were generally supportive of adopting
an exclusion for credit funds.659 After
consideration of the comments, the
agencies are adopting the credit fund
exclusion largely as proposed. The final
rule creates a separate exclusion from
the covered fund definition for credit
funds that meet certain conditions,
including several conditions that are
similar to certain conditions of the loan
securitization exclusion, but that reflect
652 See
id.
proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(i).
654 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(ii).
655 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(iii).
656 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(iv).
657 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(v).
658 2020 proposal § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii).
659 See, e.g., CCMC; AIC; SIFMA; FSF; ABA;
Arnold & Porter; and Goldman Sachs. See also
supra Section IV.C.1.ii. (Credit Funds—Comments)
for a more detailed discussion of comments
received.
653 2020
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the structure and operation of credit
funds.
The final rule permits banking entities
to extend credit through a fund
structure but also contains provisions to
prevent a banking entity from taking the
types of risks that the covered fund
provisions of section 13 were meant to
address. First, the credit fund exclusion
specifies the types of activities in which
these funds may engage. Excluded
credit funds can transact in or hold only
loans, debt instruments that would be
permissible for the banking entity
relying on the exception to hold
directly, certain rights or assets that are
related or incidental to the loans or debt
instruments, and certain interest rate
and foreign exchange derivatives. The
final rule requires that the credit fund
not engage in activities that would
constitute proprietary trading. Finally,
the restrictions on guarantees and other
limitations should eliminate the ability
and incentive for either the banking
entity sponsoring a credit fund or any
affiliate to provide additional support
beyond the ownership interest retained
by the sponsor.
Credit funds are likely to carry similar
returns and risks as direct extensions of
credit and loan origination outside of
the fund structure, including the
possibility of losses or gains related to
changes in interest rates, borrower
default or delinquent payments,
fluctuations in foreign currencies, and
overall market conditions. While the
presence of a fund structure may
introduce certain common risks
associated with pooled investments,
e.g., those related to governance of the
fund and those related to relying on
third-party investors providing capital
to the fund, the SEC believes those risks
to banking entities to be limited.
Moreover, fund structures also entail
certain common risk mitigating features
(such as diversification across a larger
number of borrowers) as well as
significant cost efficiencies for banking
entities.
The SEC believes that the credit fund
exclusion may allow banking entities to
engage, indirectly, in more loan
origination and traditional extension of
credit relative to the current baseline.
To the degree that banking entities are
currently constrained in their ability to
engage in extensions of credit through
credit funds because of the
implementing regulations, the exclusion
may increase the volume of
intermediation of credit by banking
entities and make intermediation more
efficient and less costly. In addition,
permitting banking entities to extend
financing to businesses through credit
funds could allow banking entities to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
compete more effectively with nonbanking entities that are not subject to
the same prudential regulation or
supervision as banking entities subject
to section 13 of the BHC Act and
thereby likely result in an increase in
lending activity in banking entitysponsored credit funds without
negatively affecting capital formation or
the availability of financing. In this
respect, the final rule could result in
greater competition between bank and
non-bank provision of credit with both
expected lower costs that typically
result from increased competition and a
larger volume of permissible banking
and financial activities to occur in the
regulated banking system. In addition,
since cost reductions and increased
efficiencies are commonly passed along
to customers, the exclusion may also
benefit banking entities’ borrowers and
facilitate the extension of credit in the
real economy.
The SEC continues to recognize that
banking entities already engage in a
variety of permissible activities
involving risk, including extensions of
credit, underwriting, and marketmaking. To the degree that credit funds
may enable greater formation of capital
by banking entities through various debt
instruments, this may influence the
risks and returns of banking entities
individually and of banking entities as
a whole. However, the SEC recognizes
that the activities of credit funds largely
replicate permissible and traditional
activities of banking entities and
undertaking similar activities largely
results in the same risk exposures.
Moreover, banking entities subject to the
implementing regulations may also be
subject to multiple prudential, capital,
margin, and liquidity requirements that
facilitate the safety and soundness of
banking entities and promote the
financial stability of the United States.
These requirements would necessarily
limit the risk that banks could take on
by lending through a credit fund
structure in a similar manner that would
apply if the banking entity were to
undertake similar lending activities
directly. In addition, the final rule
includes a set of conditions on the
credit fund exclusion, including
limitations on banking entities’
guarantees, assumption or other
insurance of the obligations or
performance of the fund,660 and
compliance with applicable safety and
soundness standards.661
Several provisions of the exclusion
are similar to and modeled on
conditions in the existing loan
PO 00000
securitization exclusion to ease
compliance burdens. For example, any
derivatives held by the credit fund must
relate to loans, permissible debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
held and reduce the interest rate and/or
foreign exchange risks related to these
holdings.662 In addition, any related
rights or other assets held that are
securities must be cash equivalents,
securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
loans or debt instruments held or,
unique to the credit fund exclusion,
equity securities (or rights to acquire
equity securities) received on customary
terms in connection with the credit
fund’s loans or debt instruments.663
Establishing an exclusion for credit
funds based on the framework provided
by the loan securitization exclusion will
allow banking entities to provide
traditional extensions of credit
regardless of the specific form, whether
directly via a loan made by a banking
entity, or indirectly through an
investment in or relationship with a
credit fund that transacts primarily in
loans and certain debt instruments.
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
requested comment on whether to
impose a limit on the amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) that may be held by an
excluded credit fund.664 After a review
of the comments and further
deliberation, the agencies are not
adopting a quantitative limit on the
amount of equity securities (or rights to
acquire equity securities) that may be
held by an excluded credit fund. Any
such equity securities or rights are
limited by the requirements that they be
(1) received on customary terms in
connection with the fund’s loans or debt
instruments and (2) related or incidental
to acquiring, holding, servicing, or
selling those loans or debt instruments.
The agencies generally expect that the
equity securities or rights satisfying
those criteria in connection with an
investment in loans or debt instruments
of a borrower (or affiliated borrowers)
would not exceed five percent of the
value of the fund’s total investment in
the borrower (or affiliated borrowers) at
the time the investment is made.
The agencies could have imposed a
quantitative limit on the amount of
equity securities (or rights to acquire
equity securities) held by the fund.
However, the value of those equity
securities or other rights may change
over time for a variety of reasons,
including as a result of market
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(D).
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C).
664 85 FR 12133.
662 Final
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(A).
661 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
660 Final
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46483
663 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46484
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
conditions and business performance, as
well as more fundamental changes in
the business and the credit fund’s
corresponding management of the
investment (e.g., exchanges of debt
instruments for equity in connection
with mergers and restructurings or a
disposition of all portion of the credit
investment without a corresponding
disposition of the equity securities or
rights due to differences in market
conditions or other factors).
Accordingly, the agencies can foresee
various circumstances where the
relative value of such equity securities
or rights in a borrower (or affiliated
borrowers) would over the life of the
investment exceed five percent on a
basis consistent with the requirements.
Therefore, a quantitative limit on the
amount of equity securities held by the
fund could have imposed compliance,
opportunity, and performance costs on
a fund without a substantial reduction
in risk to the fund. Nonetheless, the
agencies expect that the fund’s exposure
to equity securities (or other rights),
individually and collectively and when
viewed over time, would be managed on
a basis consistent with the fund’s
overall purpose.
The credit fund exclusion prevents a
banking entity from relying on the
exclusion unless any debt instruments
and equity securities (or rights to
acquire an equity security) held by the
credit fund and received on customary
terms in connection with the credit
fund’s loans or debt instruments are
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly. A banking
entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser or commodity trading advisor of
a credit fund must ensure that the
activities of the credit fund are
consistent with certain safety and
soundness standards.665 In addition, a
banking entity’s investment in, and
relationship with, a credit fund must be
conducted in compliance with, and
subject to, applicable banking laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.666 Combined
with the prohibition on proprietary
trading by a credit fund,667 these
limitations are expected to prevent
evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act.
The final rule does not separately
permit credit funds to hold derivatives
under the provision allowing related
rights and other assets. The preamble to
the 2020 proposal made clear that ‘‘any
derivatives held by the credit fund must
relate to loans, permissible debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
held, and reduce the interest rate and/
or foreign exchange risks related to
these holdings.’’ 668 The agencies
suggested then and currently believe
that allowing a credit fund to hold
derivatives not related to interest rate or
foreign exchange hedging would not be
necessary to facilitate the indirect
extensions of credit by banking entities
that are the goal of the exclusion and
may pose the very risks that section 13
of the BHC Act was intended to reach.
To help ensure that the credit fund
exclusion does not inadvertently allow
the holding of certain derivatives
unrelated to hedging interest rate and/
or foreign exchange risks, the final rule
explicitly excludes derivatives from
permissible related rights and other
assets.669
Importantly, extensions of credit and
loan origination by banking entities,
whether directly or indirectly, are
influenced by a wide variety of factors,
including the prevailing macroeconomic
conditions, the creditworthiness of
borrowers and potential borrowers,
competition between bank and nonbank credit providers, and many others.
Moreover, the efficiencies of credit
funds relative to direct extensions of
credit described above are likely to vary
considerably among banking entities
and funds. The SEC recognizes that the
potential effects described above of the
credit fund exclusion may be dampened
or magnified in different phases of the
macroeconomic cycle and across
various types of banking entities.
Investors in a credit fund that a
banking entity sponsors or for which the
banking entity serves as an investment
adviser or commodity trading advisor
may have expectations related to the
performance of the credit fund that raise
bailout concerns. To ensure that these
investors are adequately informed of the
banking entity’s role in the credit fund,
the final rule requires a banking entity
that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
to an excluded credit fund to provide
prospective and actual investors the
disclosures specified in § ll.11(a)(8)
of the implementing regulations as if the
credit fund were a covered fund.670 In
addition, a banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor must ensure
that the activities of the credit fund are
consistent with safety and soundness
standards that are substantially similar
to those that would apply if the banking
rule §§ ll.10(c)(15)(iv)(B), (iii)(B).
rule §§ ll.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
667 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
665 Final
668 See
666 Final
669 Final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
85 FR 12132.
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(2).
670 Final rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iii)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
entity engaged in the activities
directly.671
As an alternative, the agencies could
have adopted a credit fund exclusion
that restricted permissible assets to only
loans or debt instruments and not
equity. The SEC recognizes that many
banking entities are permitted to take as
consideration for a loan to a borrower a
warrant or option issued by the
borrower that may result in an equity
holding. The SEC recognizes that if
banking entities are to be allowed to
provide credit through a fund structure
that they would otherwise be allowed to
provide outside of a fund structure, an
allowance for equity holdings is
necessary. However, allowing a credit
fund to hold an unlimited amount of
equity in connection with an extension
of credit could turn the exclusion for
credit funds into an exclusion for the
type of funds that section 13 of the BHC
Act was intended to address.
Accordingly, the agencies indicate
above that they generally expect that the
equity securities or other rights acquired
by a credit fund would not exceed five
percent of the value of the fund’s total
investment in a borrower at the time the
investment is made.
Venture Capital Funds
As discussed above, the agencies are
adopting amendments in the final rule
to exclude certain venture capital funds
from the definition of ‘‘covered fund,’’
which allow banking entities to acquire
or retain an ownership interest in, or
sponsor, those venture capital funds to
the extent the banking entity is
otherwise permitted to engage in such
activities under applicable law.672 The
exclusion is available with respect to
qualifying venture capital funds, which
includes an issuer that meets the
definition of ‘‘venture capital fund’’ in
17 CFR 275.203(l)–1 and that meets
several additional criteria.673
A qualifying venture capital fund is
an issuer that, among other criteria, is a
venture capital fund as defined in 17
CFR 275.203(l)–1.674 In the preamble to
the regulations adopting this definition
of venture capital fund, the SEC
explained that the definition’s criteria
distinguish venture capital funds from
other types of funds, including private
rule § ll.10(c)(15)(iii)(B).
rule § ll.10(c)(16).
673 See supra Section IV.C.2. (Venture Capital
Funds).
674 See id. for a discussion of the SEC’s definition
of ‘‘venture capital fund’’ in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1.
Following enactment of the RBIC Advisers Relief
Act, supra note 577, the SEC’s definition of
‘‘venture capital fund’’ includes any RBIC and any
SBIC. See 15 U.S.C. 80b–3(l).
671 Final
672 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
equity funds and hedge funds.675
Moreover, the SEC explained that these
criteria reflect the Congressional
understanding that venture capital
funds are less connected with the public
markets and therefore may have less
potential for systemic risk.676 The SEC
further explained that the restriction on
the amount of borrowing, debt
obligations, guarantees or other
incurrence of leverage are appropriate to
differentiate venture capital funds from
other types of private funds that may
engage in trading strategies that use
financial leverage and may contribute to
systemic risk.677 The SEC believes that
its definition includes criteria reflecting
the characteristics of venture capital
funds that may pose less potential risk
to a banking entity sponsoring or
investing in venture capital funds and to
the financial system—specifically, the
smaller role of leverage financing and a
lesser degree of interconnectedness with
public markets.
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comments
supporting an exclusion for venture
capital funds and stating that venture
capital funds do not commonly engage
in short-term, high-risk activities, and
that, by their nature, venture capital
funds make long-term investments in
private firms.678 Moreover, the SEC
received comment that venture capital
funds promote economic growth and
competitiveness of the United States
more effectively than investments in
expressly permissible vehicles, such as
small business investment
companies.679 The SEC has also
received comment that, by virtue of
their investment strategy, long-term
675 See, e.g., Exemptions for Advisers to Venture
Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less
Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management,
and Foreign Private Advisers, 76 FR 39645, 39652
(July 6, 2011).
676 See id. at 39648 (‘‘[T]he proposed definition
of venture capital fund was designed to . . .
address concerns expressed by Congress regarding
the potential for systemic risk.’’); and at 39656
(‘‘Congressional testimony asserted that these funds
may be less connected with the public markets and
may involve less potential for systemic risk. This
appears to be a key consideration by Congress that
led to the enactment of the venture capital
exemption. As we discussed in the Proposing
Release, the rule we proposed sought to incorporate
this Congressional understanding of the nature of
investments of a venture capital fund, and these
principles guided our consideration of the proposed
venture capital fund definition.’’).
677 See id. at 39661–62. See also id. at 39657 (‘‘We
proposed these elements of the qualifying portfolio
company definition because of the focus on
leverage in the Dodd-Frank Act as a potential
contributor to systemic risk as discussed by the
Senate Committee report, and the testimony before
Congress that stressed the lack of leverage in
venture capital investing.’’).
678 See 85 FR 12168.
679 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
investment horizon, and intermediation
between companies in need of capital
and institutional investors seeking to
deploy capital in efficient ways, venture
capital funds may play a significant role
in capital formation, economic growth,
and efficient market function.680
In response to the 2020 proposal, the
agencies received comments supporting
the proposed definition of ‘‘qualifying
venture capital fund.’’ 681 At the same
time, two commenters expressed
opposition to the 2020 proposal.682
The final rule largely adopts the
exclusion as proposed.683 As adopted,
the exclusion for qualifying venture
capital funds is available to an issuer
that is a venture capital fund as defined
in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1 and does not
engage in any activity that would
constitute proprietary trading, under
§ ll.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity.684 With respect to any banking
entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
to the issuer, the banking entity is
required (1) to provide in writing to any
prospective and actual investor the
disclosures required under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund, (2) to ensure that the
activities of the issuer are consistent
with the safety and soundness standards
that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity
engaged in the activities directly, and
(3) to comply with the restrictions in
§ ll.14 (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer), as if the issuer
were a covered fund.685
As in the 2020 proposal, a banking
entity that relies on the exclusion may
not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the
issuer.686 Finally, the banking entity’s
ownership interest in or relationship
with a qualifying venture capital fund
must comply with the limitations
imposed in § ll.15 of the
implementing regulations (regarding,
among other subjects, material conflicts
of interest and high-risk investments), as
if the issuer were a covered fund; and
id.
supra note 244.
682 See supra note 270.
683 The one change from the proposal is moving
the requirement that the banking entity must
comply with §§ ll.14 to ll.10(c)(16)(ii). This
change clarifies that this requirement applies to a
banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to the
qualifying venture capital fund and does not apply
to a banking entity that merely invests in a
qualifying venture capital fund.
684 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(i).
685 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(ii).
686 Final rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iii).
PO 00000
680 See
681 See
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46485
must be conducted in compliance with
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.687
The qualifying venture capital fund
exclusion being adopted may provide
banking entities with greater flexibility
in their investments in private firms
generally and in private firms with a
broader range of financing sources, in
each case to the extent that those
investments are made through a fund
structure. In addition, it is widely noted
that the availability of venture capital
and other financing from funds is not
uniform throughout the United States
and is generally available on a
competitive basis for companies with a
significant presence in certain
geographic regions (e.g., the New York
metropolitan area, the Boston
metropolitan area, and ‘‘Silicon Valley’’
and surrounding areas).688 This view
was shared by several commenters on
the 2020 proposal, who indicated that
an exclusion for venture capital funds
would benefit underserved regions
where venture capital funding is not
readily available currently.689 In this
respect, the qualifying venture capital
fund exclusion could allow banking
entities with a presence in and
knowledge of the areas where venture
capital and other types of financing are
less readily available to businesses to
provide this type of financing in those
areas, further promoting capital
formation.
The SEC remains cognizant of the fact
that the overall level and structure of
activities of banking entities that
involve risk stems from a variety of
permissible sources, including
traditional capital provision,
underwriting, and market-making. To
the degree that qualifying venture
capital funds may enable greater
formation of capital by banking entities,
this may influence the risks and returns
of such funds individually and of
banking entities as a whole. However,
the exclusion has a number of
conditions, including a prohibition on
direct or indirect guarantees by the
banking entity, disclosures to investors,
and compliance with applicable safety
and soundness standards.
The SEC recognizes that venture
capital funds commonly invest in
rule § ll.10(c)(16)(iv).
e.g., Richard Florida, Venture Capital
Remains Highly Concentrated in Just a Few Cities,
CITYLAB (Oct. 3, 2017), available at https://
www.citylab.com/life/2017/10/venture-capitalconcentration/539775/;
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS & CB INSIGHTS,
MoneyTree Report (Q3 2019), available at https://
www.pwc.com/us/en/moneytree-report/assets/
moneytree-report-q3-2019.pdf.
689 See FSF; SIFMA; CCMC; and NVCA.
687 Final
688 See,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46486
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
illiquid private firms with few sources
of market price information, with
corresponding risks and returns. To the
degree that the exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds facilitates banking
entity activities related to venture
capital funds, this exclusion could
increase the volume and alter the
structure of banking entities’ activities,
affecting the risks associated with those
activities. At the same time, as
discussed elsewhere,690 many other
traditional and permissible activities of
banking entities involve risk, and the
provision of capital to private firms is
an important function of banking
entities within the financial system and
securities markets that benefits the real
economy.
As an alternative, the agencies
considered an additional restriction for
which they are requested specific
comment as part of the 2020 proposal.
Under this additional restriction, and
notwithstanding 17 CFR 275.203(1)–
1(a)(2), the venture capital fund
exclusion would be limited to funds
that do not invest in companies that, at
the time of the investment, have more
than a limited dollar amount of total
annual revenue. The agencies
considered several alternative
thresholds that could have been
appropriate in this regard to further
differentiate qualifying venture capital
funds from other types of private funds.
The potential benefit of including a
revenue or other similar test is that it
could have been more difficult for
banking entities to use the exclusion to
make investments through the fund that
the agencies may not have intended to
be permissible. However, any such antievasion benefits of this alternative could
have been offset by the extent to which
anti-evasion concerns are already
addressed by the other conditions of the
exclusion. In addition, such a revenue
test or other similar test could have
facilitated the indirect investment by
banking entities in smaller companies
that may have been particularly risky or
would have required qualifying venture
capital funds to pass up investment
opportunities that would otherwise be
considered typical venture capital-type
investments.
Such an additional restriction as
contemplated in the alternative would
have made it more difficult for banking
entities to sponsor and invest in
qualifying venture capital funds by
limiting the pool of possible
investments in which those funds could
invest. This difficulty may have been
particularly pronounced for banking
entities that would use the qualifying
690 See
venture capital fund exclusion to make
investments in third-party funds, which
may not have been willing to restrict—
and could have been prohibited from
restricting under other applicable
laws—the fund’s investments in
companies that met any such revenue or
other similar test. As a result, such an
additional condition could have
diminished the benefits discussed
above, both by limiting the utility of the
exclusion for banking entities to make
permissible investments and potentially
reducing the availability of financing for
businesses, including small businesses
and start-ups in areas outside of certain
major metropolitan areas.
Small Business Investment Companies
The implementing regulations
exclude from the covered fund
definition small business investment
companies. The implementing
regulations include within the scope of
the exclusion SBICs and issuers that
have received notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as an SBIC and
which have not received a revocation of
the notice or license. The final rule
expands the exclusion to incorporate
SBICs that have voluntarily surrendered
their licenses to operate and do not
make new investments (other than
investments in cash equivalents) after
such voluntary surrender.691
Clarifying that SBICs that have
voluntarily surrendered their licenses
and are winding-down remain excluded
from the covered fund definition
reduces regulatory uncertainty for
banking entities. Under the
implementing regulations, because it is
unclear whether an SBIC that has
voluntarily surrendered its license is
still excluded from the definition of
‘‘covered fund,’’ banking entities must
make a determination whether or not
the SBIC that is winding-down is a
covered fund. If the banking entity
determines that when the SBIC that is
winding-down and has voluntarily
surrendered its license no longer
qualifies for the exclusion from the
covered fund definition, then the
implementing regulations apply and the
banking entity’s existing investment in,
and relationship with, the SBIC is
prohibited. This potential result may
discourage banking entities from making
investments in SBICs.
The 2020 proposal discussed
comments the SEC had received
indicating that the 2013 rule had limited
banking entity activities in SBICs that
may spur economic growth, and that
banking entities faced significant
regulatory burdens that are not
2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037–92.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
691 Final
PO 00000
rule § ll.10(c)(11)(i).
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
commensurate with the risk of the
underlying activities.692 Another
commenter indicated that, in the
ordinary course of business, SBIC fund
managers often relinquish or voluntarily
surrender a license during the winddown of the fund while liquidating
assets in the dissolution process (since
the license is no longer necessary or an
efficient use of partnership funds).693
The agencies proposed revising the
exclusion for SBICs to clarify how the
exclusion would apply to SBICs that
voluntarily surrender their licenses
during wind-down phases.694
Specifically, the agencies proposed
revising the exclusion for SBICs to
apply explicitly to an issuer that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as an SBIC and does not make
new investments (other than
investments in cash equivalents) after
such voluntary surrender.695
Most commenters that directly
addressed the 2020 proposal’s revisions
concerning SBICs supported the
proposed revisions, stating that the
proposed revisions would provide
greater certainty to banking entities
wishing to invest in SBICs and would
increase investment in small
businesses.696 The final rule adopts the
2020 proposal’s revisions concerning
SBICs without modification.
SBICs are an important mechanism
for capital allocation by banking entities
and one important channel of capital
raising for issuers. The final rule
clarifies that banking entities are able to
continue to participate in SBIC-related
activities during the dissolution of such
funds, as long as certain conditions are
met. To the degree that banking entities
have been reluctant to invest in SBICs
to avoid the risk of an SBIC being
treated as a covered fund during SBIC
dissolution, the final rule may increase
the willingness of some banking entities
to participate in SBICs. The final rule
requires that SBICs that have voluntarily
surrendered their license may not make
new investments during the wind-down
process. This aspect of the final rule
seeks to address the possibility of
banking entities becoming exposed to
greater risk as part of their participation
in SBICs during their wind-down
process, even though such exposure
may not be common in an SBIC’s
ordinary course of business. In any case,
both the risks and the returns arising out
of a banking entity’s investment in a
SBIC at all stages of its lifecycle are
692 See
85 FR 12169.
id.
694 See 85 FR 12131.
695 See id.
696 See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; PNC; and SBIA.
693 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
likely to flow through to the banking
entity’s shareholders. Moreover,
banking entities participating in SBICs
remain subject to applicable safety and
soundness regulations and
requirements.
Public Welfare Funds
The implementing regulations
exclude from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund’’ issuers that make investments
that are designed primarily to promote
the public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph 11 of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) (public welfare
investment exclusion).697
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comment that the
implementing regulations’ exclusion for
public welfare funds may not capture
community development investments
made through investment vehicles and
comment supporting an exclusion of
investments that qualify for Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) credit,
including direct and indirect
investments in a community
development fund, SBIC, or similar
fund.698
The 2020 proposal posed a number of
questions related to the scope of the
public welfare investment exclusion.
For example, the 2020 proposal asked
whether investments that would receive
consideration as qualified investments
under the regulations implementing the
CRA should be excluded from the
definition of covered fund, either by
incorporating these investments into the
public welfare investment exclusion or
by establishing a new exclusion for
CRA-qualifying investments.699 In
addition, the 2020 proposal requested
comment on whether RBICs are
typically excluded from the definition
of ‘‘covered fund’’ because of the public
welfare investment exclusion or another
exclusion and on whether the agencies
should expressly exclude RBICs from
the definition of covered fund.700
Finally, the 2020 proposal requested
comment on whether many or all QOFs
would meet the terms of the public
welfare investment exclusion and on
whether the agencies should expressly
exclude QOFs from the definition of
covered fund.701
The final rule revises the public
welfare investment exclusion of the
697 Implementing regulations
§ ll.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
698 See 85 FR 12169.
699 See id.
700 See id.
701 See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
implementing regulations to incorporate
issuers explicitly, the business of which
is to make investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the CRA.702
To the degree that some banking
entities have faced uncertainty about
their ability to make CRA-qualified
investments and qualify for the
exclusion, the explicit exclusion for
such funds may increase the willingness
of banking entities to intermediate such
community development investments.
At the same time, to the degree that
banking entities have financed
community development projects
eligible for the CRA through other fund
structures and have relied on
corresponding exemptions, the
economic effects of the explicit
exclusion for CRA-qualified investments
may be limited to the difference in
compliance burdens between the new
explicit exclusion and any existing
covered fund exclusions.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
generally favored explicitly excluding
RBICs from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund,’’ either by adopting a new
exclusion, or by further clarifying the
scope of the public welfare investment
exclusion.703 The final rule provides a
separate specific exclusion for RBICs,
similar to the separate, specific
exclusion for SBICs.704 As discussed
elsewhere,705 RBICs are intended to
promote economic development and the
creation of wealth and job opportunities
in rural areas and among individuals
living in such areas,706 and their
purpose is similar to the purpose of
SBICs and public welfare companies.707
Because SBICs and RBICs share the
common purpose of promoting capital
formation in their respective sectors,
advisers to SBICs and RBICs are treated
similarly under the Advisers Act (in that
they have the opportunity to take
advantage of exemptions from
investment adviser registration).708 The
final rule’s specific exclusion for RBICs
should expand the economic effects of
the SBIC exclusion discussed above and
may facilitate capital formation by
Final rule § ll.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
SIFMA; FSF; and SBIA.
704 See supra note 575.
705 See supra note 576.
706 See U.S. Dep’t of Agriculture, Rural Business
Investment Program Overview, available at https://
www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/rural-businessinvestment-program.
707 SBICs are intended to increase access to
capital for growth stage businesses. See U.S. Small
Bus. Admin., SBIC Program Overview, available at
https://www.sba.gov/partners/sbics.
708 See supra note 578. The private fund adviser
exemption excludes the assets of RBICs and SBICs
from counting towards the $150 million threshold.
15 U.S.C. 80b–3(m).
PO 00000
702 See
703 See
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46487
banking entities in growth stage
businesses.
The SEC understands that RBICs may
already have been excluded from the
definition of covered fund under the
implementing regulations.709 For
example, RBICs may qualify for the
public welfare exclusion under the
implementing regulations or may not be
a covered fund by virtue of relying on
an exclusion from the definition of
‘‘investment company’’ under the
Investment Company Act other than
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7). An express
exclusion for RBICs nevertheless should
reduce compliance costs for banking
entities, which may otherwise have
been required to conduct a case-by-case
analysis of each RBIC to determine
whether it qualifies for an exclusion or
exemption under the implementing
regulations.
In response to a request for comment
in the 2020 proposal, commenters
generally favored explicitly excluding
QOFs from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund.’’ 710 The final rule provides a
specific exclusion for QOFs similar to
that provided to RBICs.711 As discussed
above, the QOF program allows
taxpayers to defer and reduce taxes on
capital gains by reinvesting gains in
QOFs that are required to have at least
90 percent of their assets in designated
low-income zones. In this regard, QOFs
are similar to SBICs and public welfare
companies. The QOF exclusion should
expand the economic effects of the SBIC
exclusion and public welfare exclusion
discussed above, and may facilitate
capital formation by banking entities.
QOFs already may have been
excluded from the definition of covered
fund under the implementing
regulations. For example, QOFs may
qualify for the public welfare exclusion
under the implementing regulations or
may not be covered funds by virtue of
relying on an exclusion from the
definition of ‘‘investment company’’
under the Investment Company Act
other than section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7), such
as section 3(c)(5)(C).712 In addition,
depending on the facts and
circumstances, an issuer that holds
securities issued by a QOF may not
meet the definition of ‘‘investment
company’’ under section 3(a)(1) of the
Investment Company Act, may be
excluded under Rule 3a–1 thereunder,
or may qualify for the exclusion under
709 In addition, RBICs may be excluded from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ under the qualifying
venture capital fund exclusion in the final rule. See
supra note 578.
710 See SIFMA; FSF; and ABA.
711 Final rule § ll.10(c)(11)(iv).
712 See Opportunity Zone Statement, supra note
581.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46488
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
section 3(c)(6) of the Investment
Company Act.713 The express exclusion
for QOFs, similar to the express
exclusion for RBICs, should reduce
compliance costs for banking entities,
which may otherwise be required to
conduct a case-by-case analysis of each
QOF to determine whether it qualifies
for an exclusion or exemption under the
implementing regulations.
Family Wealth Management Vehicles
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
family wealth management vehicles
commonly engage in asset management
activities, as well as estate planning and
other related activities.714 The SEC
understands that some banking entities
may have been constrained in providing
traditional banking and asset
management services, including, for
example, investment advice, brokerage
execution, financing, clearing, and
settlement services, to family wealth
management vehicles due to the
implementing regulations.715 In
addition, the SEC understands that
certain family wealth management
vehicles that are structured as trusts
may prefer to appoint banking entities
as trustees acting in a fiduciary
capacity.716
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
requested comment on whether to
exclude family wealth management
vehicles from the definition of ‘‘covered
fund.’’ 717 Several commenters
supported this exclusion, stating
generally that it would reduce
uncertainty for banking entities about
the permissibility of providing
traditional banking, investment
management, and trust and estate
planning services to family wealth
management vehicle clients.718
As discussed above, the agencies are
adopting an exclusion from the
definition of ‘‘covered fund’’ for any
entity that acts as a ‘‘family wealth
management vehicle.’’ By specifically
excluding family wealth management
vehicles, the final rule may benefit such
banking entities and their family
customers by permitting the banking
entities to offer services to and engage
in transactions with family wealth
management vehicle customers.
Importantly, the final rule may benefit
family wealth management vehicles and
their investment advisers by increasing
the number of banking entity
counterparties willing to provide
713 See
id.
85 FR 12170.
715 See id.
716 See id.
717 See 85 FR 12170.
718 See, e.g., Goldman Sachs; FSF; CCMR; IAA;
ABA; BPI; PNC; and SIFMA.
714 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
traditional client-oriented financial and
asset management services. Thus, the
final rule may enhance competition
among banking and non-banking
entities providing financial services to
family wealth management vehicles and
may lead to more efficient capital
allocation of family wealth management
vehicles’ funds. To the degree banking
entities pass compliance costs on to
customers, family wealth vehicles may
experience costs savings from the final
rule as well.
Some commenters on the 2020
proposal opposed the exclusion for
family wealth management vehicles.
One commenter stated that rather than
providing an exclusion for family
wealth management vehicles through an
agency rulemaking, the agencies should
instead provide no-action relief to such
vehicles on a case-by-case basis.719 The
SEC believes that such an approach
would be unnecessarily burdensome
and difficult to administer. The
compliance costs of such an approach
could impact the willingness of banking
entities to provide traditional clientoriented financial and asset
management services to their family
customers. This approach would also
unnecessarily deviate from the agencies’
treatment of other excluded entities
under the implementing regulations and
hinder transparency and consistency.
The SEC recognizes that some
banking entities may respond to the
exclusion by seeking to structure other
entities as family wealth management
vehicles. However, as discussed in
detail above, the exclusion is only
available under a number of
conditions.720 Specifically, if the entity
is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity
must all be family customers; if the
entity is not a trust, a majority of the
voting interests in the entity must be
owned (directly or indirectly) by family
customers, a majority of the interests in
the entity must be owned by family
customers, and the entity must be
owned only by family customers and up
to five closely related persons of the
family customers.721 Moreover, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the family
wealth management vehicle’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not family customers or
closely related persons for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
Data Boiler.
supra Section IV.C.3. (Family Wealth
Management Vehicles).
721 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(i).
PO 00000
719 See
720 See
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
similar concerns.722 In addition,
banking entities may rely on this
exclusion only if they: (1) Provide bona
fide trust, fiduciary, investment
advisory, or commodity trading
advisory services to the entity; 723 (2) do
not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of such
entity; 724 (3) comply with the
disclosure obligations under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a
covered fund, provided that the content
may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and
the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity; 725 (4)
comply with the requirements of
§§ ll.14(b) and ll.15, as if such
entity were a covered fund; 726 and (5)
except for riskless principal transactions
as defined in § ll.10(d)(11), comply
with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity and
its affiliates were a member bank and
the entity were an affiliate thereof.727
The definition of ‘‘family customer’’
includes any ‘‘family client’’ as defined
in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and
any natural person who is a father-inlaw, mother-in-law, brother-in-law,
sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-inlaw of a family client, or a spouse or a
spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.728 The SEC believes that the
conditions for the exclusion and the
definition of ‘‘family customer’’ will
result in family wealth management
vehicles being used as vehicles for
providing customer-oriented financial
services on arms-length, market terms,
which the SEC believes will reduce the
risk that banking entities’ involvement
in these vehicles will give rise to the
types of risks that the covered funds
provisions are meant to mitigate.
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies
proposed to permit up to three closely
related persons to hold ownership
interests in a family wealth management
vehicle. Several commenters supported
allowing a finite number of closely
related persons to hold ownership
interests, but suggested that the
proposed limit of three did not reflect
the typical manner in which family
final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(i)(C).
final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(A).
724 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(B).
725 The disclosure content may be modified to
prevent the disclosure from being misleading, and
the manner of disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific circumstances of the
entity. See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(C).
726 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(E).
727 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(F).
728 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(iii)(B).
722 See
723 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
wealth management vehicles are
constituted and would unnecessarily
constrain the availability of the
exclusion.729
The final rule allows for five closely
related persons to hold ownership
interests in a family wealth management
vehicle. The agencies understand that
many family wealth management
vehicles currently include more than
three closely related persons.730 The
agencies believe that the final rule will
more closely align the exclusion with
the current composition of family
wealth management vehicles, thereby
increasing the utility of the exclusion
without allowing such a large number of
non-family customer owners to suggest
the entity is in reality a hedge fund or
private equity fund.
In the 2020 proposal, a banking entity
could rely on the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion only if
the banking entity and its affiliates did
not acquire or retain, as principal, an
ownership interest in the entity, other
than up to 0.5 percent of the entity’s
outstanding ownership interests. In
addition, such de minimis interest could
be held only for the purpose of and to
the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.731 Some commenters
requested that unaffiliated third
parties—such as third-party trustees or
similar service providers—be permitted
to hold the de minimis interest.732
As adopted, the final rule allows up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
vehicle’s outstanding ownership
interests to be acquired or retained by
third parties (that is, entities other than
family customers or closely related
persons). The SEC believes that
permitting de minimis ownership by
these third parties reflects a common
structure of family wealth management
vehicles. The SEC recognizes that
without this modification, family wealth
management vehicles may be forced to
engage in less effective and/or efficient
means of structuring and organization
because the exclusion could limit the
vehicle’s access to some customary
service providers that have traditionally
taken small ownership interests for
structuring purposes. To the extent that
a family customer prefers a particular
person or entity to act as a service
provider, allowing third-party service
providers to acquire the de minimis
ownership interest may enable the
family customer to choose to establish a
729 See,
e.g., BPI; SIFMA; ABA; and PNC.
e.g., BPI; ABA; and PNC.
731 See 85 FR 12139.
732 See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
730 See,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
family wealth management vehicle.
Whether the de minimis amount is held
by a banking entity or some other third
party is not likely to raise any concerns
that are not sufficiently addressed by
the aggregate ownership limit and the
narrow circumstances in which such de
minimis ownership interest may be
held. At the same time, when
circumstances require that a de minimis
ownership interest be held (e.g., for
establishing corporate separateness), if
the de minimis ownership interest is
held by a third party and not a banking
entity, then no banking entity will be
exposed to any risk associated with
holding the interest, however minimal
that risk may be.
In the 2020 proposal, banking entities
could rely on the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion only if
the banking entity complied with the
disclosure obligations under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if such vehicle were a
covered fund. Commenters on the 2020
proposal requested that the agencies
clarify that the disclosures could be
modified (1) to reflect the specific
circumstances of the banking entity’s
relationship with, and the particular
structure of, its family wealth
management vehicle clients; and (2) to
allow the banking entity to satisfy the
written disclosure requirement by
means other than including such
disclosures in the governing
document(s) of the family wealth
management vehicle(s).
The final rule provides such clarity
and change the disclosure requirement
to permit banking entities and their
affiliates (1) to modify the content of
such disclosures to prevent them from
being misleading and (2) to modify the
manner of disclosure to accommodate
the specific circumstances of the
vehicle. The SEC believes that these
disclosures will provide important
information to the customers for whom
these vehicles will be established.
Because the final rule permits
modification of the disclosures for
certain reasons, the SEC expects that the
disclosures provided to any particular
family customer will be more accurate
and better tailored to the particular
circumstances of the family wealth
management vehicle than the
disclosures might have been under the
2020 proposal. These disclosures may
result in the family customers being
better able to understand the
information included in these
disclosures and being better able to
weigh that information in determining
whether to establish a family wealth
management vehicle. To the extent that
these tailored disclosures assist family
customers in determining whether or
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46489
how to structure a family wealth
management vehicle, they may assist
family customers in deciding how best
to receive services from or otherwise
interact with banking entities. The SEC
expects that these benefits will justify
any costs incurred by banking entities in
tailoring the disclosures of
§ ll.11(a)(8) or in providing them to
customers (either by including them in
existing documents or preparing a new
disclosure document).
The agencies are adopting, with
modifications, the condition requiring a
banking entity relying on the exclusion
for family wealth management vehicles
to comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity
were a member bank and the vehicle
were an affiliate thereof.733 This
condition prohibits banking entity
purchases of low-quality assets from
these vehicles and is intended to
prevent banking entities from ‘‘bailing
out’’ family wealth management
vehicles. Several commenters on the
2020 proposal stated that the agencies
should clarify that the exclusion permits
banking entities to engage in riskless
principal transactions to purchase
assets—including low quality assets for
purposes of section 223.15 of Regulation
W—from family wealth management
vehicles.734 According to these
commenters, allowing a banking entity
to engage in such riskless principal
transactions would facilitate the family
customer’s sale of assets,735 while
posing minimal market or credit risk to
the banking entity because the banking
entity would purchase and sell the same
asset contemporaneously.736
Furthermore, commenters stated that
absent clarity on the permissiveness of
riskless principal transactions, a family
wealth management vehicle would be
forced to obtain the services of a third
party service provider to sell low quality
assets, which in turn would increase the
vehicle’s costs and operational
complexity without providing a
meaningful benefit to furthering the
aims of section 13 of the BHC or the
implementing regulations.737
The SEC believes that permitting a
banking entity to engage in riskless
principal transactions that involve the
purchase of low-quality assets from a
733 See final rule § ll.10(c)(17)(ii)(F). 12 CFR
223.15(a) provides that a member bank may not
purchase a low-quality asset from an affiliate
unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself
to purchase the asset before the time the asset was
acquired by the affiliate. 12 CFR 223.15(a).
734 See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
735 See, e.g., SIFMA.
736 See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
737 See, e.g., SIFMA.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46490
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
family wealth management vehicle is
unlikely to pose a substantive risk of
evading section 13 of the BHC Act.
Accordingly, in a change from the 2020
proposal and in response to the
concerns raised by commenters, the
condition will explicitly exclude from
the requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a)
transactions that meet the definition of
riskless principal transactions as
defined in § ll.10(d)(11). The SEC
expects that, together, the adopted
criteria for the family wealth
management vehicle exclusion will
prevent a banking entity from being able
to bail out such vehicles in periods of
financial stress or otherwise expose the
banking entity to the types of risks that
the covered fund provisions of section
13 were intended to address.
Alternative forms of relief with
respect to family wealth management
vehicles—for example, alternatives that
define ‘‘family customers’’ more broadly
or narrowly, or that remove some of the
conditions for the exclusion—would
have increased or reduced the
availability of the exclusion relative to
the final rule. Alternatively, the
agencies could have amended the
limitations on relationships with a
covered fund to permit banking entity
transactions with family wealth
management vehicles that would
otherwise be considered covered
transactions (e.g., ordinary extensions of
credit) without subjecting them to 12
CFR 223.15(a) or section 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act, as if such banking
entity were a member bank and such
family wealth management vehicle were
an affiliate thereof.
Broader (narrower) alternative forms
of relief may have increased (decreased)
the magnitude of the economic benefits
for capital formation, allocative
efficiency, and the ability of banking
entities to provide traditional customer
oriented services to family wealth
management vehicles. At the same time,
such broader relief may have increased
the risk that some banking entities
would have responded to such relief by
attempting to evade the intent of the
rule, increasing the volume of their
activities with family wealth
management vehicles. Such risks of the
alternatives, as compared to the
exclusion contained in the final rule,
may have been mitigated by the fact that
banking entities would have remained
subject to the full scope of broker-dealer
and prudential capital, margin, and
other rules aimed at facilitating safety
and soundness. Nonetheless, by
providing relief that is narrower than
the broader alternative, the final rule
should reduce those possible risks even
further. Moreover, as discussed above,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
the SEC believes that traditional
banking and asset management services
involving family wealth management
vehicles in general do not involve the
types of risks that section 13 of the BHC
Act was designed to address.738
Accordingly, any narrower relief than
that provided by the final rule with
respect to family wealth management
vehicles may have constrained the
economic benefits of the final rule
(including with respect to capital
formation and allocative efficiency)
unnecessarily.
Customer Facilitation Vehicles
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comments that,
because of the implementing
regulations’ covered fund restrictions,
some banking entities have been unable
to engage in traditional banking and
asset management services with respect
to vehicles provided for customers, even
though banking entities are otherwise
able to provide such exposures and
services to customers directly (outside
of the fund structure).739 The SEC has
also received comment that some
clients, particularly clients in markets
such as Brazil, Germany, Hong Kong,
and Japan, prefer to transact with or
through such vehicles rather than
banking entities directly because of a
variety of legal, counterparty risk
management, and accounting factors.740
Moreover, the SEC is aware that
limitations of the implementing
regulations on the activities of such
vehicles may have disrupted client
relationships, reducing the efficiency of
customer-facing financial services, and
raising compliance costs of banking
entities.741
The final rule establishes an exclusion
from the definition of ‘‘covered fund’’
for any issuer that acts as a ‘‘customer
facilitation vehicle.’’ The customer
facilitation vehicle exclusion will, as
proposed, be available for any issuer
that is formed by or at the request of a
customer of the banking entity for the
purpose of providing such customer
(which may include one or more
affiliates of such customer) with
exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service provided by
the banking entity.742
A banking entity may only rely on the
exclusion with respect to an issuer
provided that: (1) All of the ownership
interests of the issuer are owned by the
738 See supra Section IV.C.3. (Customer
Facilitation Vehicles).
739 See 85 FR 12171.
740 See id.
741 See id.
742 See final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(i).
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
customer (which may include one or
more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created; 743 and (2) the
banking entity and its affiliates: (i)
Maintain documentation outlining how
the banking entity intends to facilitate
the customer’s exposure to such
transaction, investment strategy, or
service; (ii) do not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of such issuer; (iii) comply
with the disclosure obligations under
§ ll.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a
covered fund, provided that the content
may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and
the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer; (iv) do not
acquire or retain, as principal, an
ownership interest in the issuer, other
than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the issuer’s outstanding ownership
interests for the purpose of and to the
extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; (v) comply with the
requirements of §§ ll.14(b) and
ll.15, as if such issuer were a covered
fund; and (vi) except for riskless
principal transactions as defined in
§ ll.10(d)(11), comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
The exclusion in the final rule should
reduce or eliminate the costs imposed
by the implementing regulations that
limit the services that banking entities
can provide to customer facilitation
vehicles, which in turn may limit the
activities of these vehicles. These costs
include those associated with the
disruption of client relationships and
the reduction in the efficiency of
customer-facing financial services. The
final rule should reduce these baseline
costs and inefficiencies by allowing
banking entities to provide customeroriented financial services through
vehicles, the purpose of which is to
provide such customers with exposure
to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service. As a result, banking
entities may become better able to
engage in the full range of customer
facilitation activities through special
743 Notwithstanding this condition, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by
one or more entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns. See § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
purpose vehicles and fund structures,
which could benefit banking entities,
their customers, and securities markets
more broadly.
Most commenters on the 2020
proposal that addressed this exclusion
were supportive,744 stating that it would
provide banking entities with greater
flexibility to meet client needs and
objectives.745 Some commenters found
the exclusion’s conditions to be
reasonable and sufficient.746 However,
two commenters recommended that the
agencies impose additional limitations
on the exclusion.747 One of these
commenters argued that the exclusion
would permit, and possibly encourage,
banking entities to increase their risk
exposures through the use of customer
facilitation vehicles, and the agencies
should minimize such risk exposures
and promote risk monitoring and
management.748
In the 2020 proposal, banking entities
could rely on the customer facilitation
vehicle exclusion only if the banking
entity complied with the disclosure
obligations under § ll.11(a)(8), as if
such vehicle were a covered fund.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
requested that the agencies provide
clarification in the context of family
wealth management vehicles that the
content of the disclosure may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer.
As with family wealth management
vehicles, the final rule includes a
modification to the proposed exclusion
clarifying that the content of the
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer.749 The SEC
believes that these disclosures will
provide important information to the
customers for whom these vehicles will
be used to provide services—whether
they are family customers under the
family wealth management vehicle
exclusion or other customers under this
exclusion. As discussed above with
respect to family wealth management
vehicles, the SEC believes that the
clarification in the final rule regarding
permissible modifications of the
disclosures required by § ll.11(a)(8)
will provide benefits that will justify
744 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; Credit Suisse;
FSF; Goldman Sachs; and IAA.
745 See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and Goldman
Sachs.
746 See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
747 See Better Markets and Data Boiler.
748 See Better Markets.
749 See final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
any costs from tailoring and providing
the disclosures.
In the 2020 proposal, as with family
wealth management vehicles, a banking
entity could rely on the customer
facilitation vehicle exclusion only if the
banking entity and its affiliates did not
acquire or retain, as principal, an
ownership interest in the entity, other
than up to 0.5 percent of the entity’s
outstanding ownership interests. In
addition, such de minimis interest could
be held only for the purpose of and to
the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.750 As with family wealth
management vehicles, commenters
suggested that the agencies specifically
allow any party that is unaffiliated with
the customer, rather than only the
banking entity and its affiliates, to own
this de minimis interest.751
As adopted, the final rule allows up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
vehicle’s outstanding ownership
interests to be acquired or retained by
third parties (that is, entities other than
the customer) if the ownership interest
is acquired or retained by such parties
for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy,
insolvency, or similar concerns.752 The
SEC recognize that without this
modification, customer facilitation
vehicles may be forced to engage in less
effective and/or efficient means of
structuring and organization because the
exclusion could limit the vehicle’s
access to some customary service
providers that have traditionally taken
or may otherwise take small ownership
interests for structuring purposes. To
the extent that a customer prefers a
particular person or entity to act as a
service provider, allowing third-party
service providers to acquire the de
minimis ownership interest may make
the customer more willing to establish
a customer facilitation vehicle. Whether
the de minimis amount is held by a
banking entity or some other third party
is not likely to raise any concerns that
are not sufficiently addressed by the
aggregate ownership limit and the
narrow circumstances in which the de
minimis ownership interest may be
held.
The SEC recognizes that the provision
of financial services related to customer
facilitation vehicles may involve market
risk, and the exclusion in the final rule
may enable banking entities to provide
a greater array of financial services to,
750 See
85 FR 12139.
SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
752 See final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
751 See
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46491
and otherwise transact with, such
vehicles. The SEC believes that such
risks may be mitigated by at least two
of the conditions of the exclusion. First,
similar to the family wealth
management vehicle discussed above,
other than the de minimis ownership
interest, a banking entity and its
affiliates may not acquire or retain, as
principal, any ownership in interest in
the issuer.753 Second, a banking entity
and its affiliates may not directly or
indirectly guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of the vehicle.754 These
conditions, among the other conditions
of the exclusion, may mitigate risks that
may be borne by individual banking
entities and by banking entities as a
whole as a result of the exclusion, and
may facilitate banking entities’ ongoing
compliance with section 13 of the BHC
Act and the final rule. Moreover, the
SEC continues to believe that the
provision of customer-oriented financial
services by banking entities may benefit
customers, counterparties, and
securities markets.
The final rule creates new
recordkeeping requirements for a
banking entity that relies on the
exclusion for customer facilitation
vehicles.755 Specifically, the banking
entity and its affiliates must maintain
documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the
customer’s exposure to a transaction,
investment strategy or service offered by
the banking entity. As discussed in
Section V.B 756 and above, these
recordkeeping burdens may impose a
total initial burden of $1,078,650 757 and
a total ongoing annual burden of
1,0798,650.758
The agencies are adopting, with
modifications, the condition requiring a
banking entity relying on the exclusion
for customer facilitation vehicles to
comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity were
a member bank and the vehicle were an
affiliate thereof.759 The purpose of the
proposed requirement that a customer
facilitation vehicle must comply with 12
CFR 223.15(a) was the same for both the
family wealth management vehicle and
the customer facilitation vehicle
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(4).
rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(2).
755 Final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(1).
756 See supra note 585.
757 See supra note 586.
758 See supra note 587.
759 See final rule § ll.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6). 12 CFR
223.15(a) provides that a member bank may not
purchase a low-quality asset from an affiliate
unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself
to purchase the asset before the time the asset was
acquired by the affiliate. 12 CFR 223.15(a).
753 Final
754 Final
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46492
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
exclusions—to help ensure that the
exclusions do not allow banking entities
to ‘‘bail out’’ either vehicle.760 For the
same reasons discussed above with
respect to family wealth management
vehicles, the agencies have modified the
requirement to exclude from the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a) any
transactions that meet the definition of
riskless principal transactions as
defined in § ll.10(d)(11).
As with the discussion of family
wealth management vehicles above, the
SEC believes that the ability of a
banking entity to engage in riskless
principal transactions with a customer
facilitation vehicle will lower costs for
the vehicle by allowing it to avoid
finding a third party to intermediate
trades for low quality assets. At the
same time, allowing these riskless
principal transactions should not pose
the type of risk to the banking entity
that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to prevent. The SEC expects
that the conditions for the customer
facilitation vehicle exclusion will
prevent a banking entity from being able
to bail out such vehicles in periods of
financial stress or otherwise expose the
banking entity to the types of risks that
the covered fund provisions of section
13 were intended to address.
The agencies considered alternative
forms of relief with respect to customer
facilitation vehicles. For example, the
agencies could have adopted a higher
third party ownership limit (of, for
example, 5% or 10%). Alternatively, the
agencies could have adopted a 0.5%
ownership interest limit, but without
specifying a list of purposes for which
such interest may be held, leading to
banking entities accumulating greater
ownership interests in such vehicles. As
another example, the agencies could
have adopted an exclusion for customer
facilitation vehicles without subjecting
the banking entity relying on the
exclusion to 12 CFR 223.15(a) or section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act, as if
such banking entity were a member
bank and such customer facilitation
vehicles were an affiliate thereof. Such
alternatives would have removed or
loosened the conditions of the
exclusion, which may have increased
the risk that customer facilitation
vehicles could be used for evasion
purposes or could have exposed
banking entities to additional risk, but
could also have further reduced
compliance burdens and provided
greater flexibility to banking entities and
their customers.
760 See
ii. Limitations on Relationships
Between Banking Entities and Covered
Funds
As discussed above, under the
implementing regulations, banking
entities that either: (1) Serve, directly or
indirectly, as a sponsor, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
investment manager to a covered fund;
(2) organize and offer a covered fund
under § ll.11; or (3) hold an
ownership interest under § ll.11(b)
have been unable to engage in any
covered transactions with such
funds.761 This prohibition may have
limited the services that such banking
entities and their affiliates have been
able to provide to certain entities that
are covered funds under the
implementing regulations. For example,
as noted above, banking entities have
been significantly limited in their ability
to both organize and offer a covered
fund, as well as to provide custody or
other services to the fund.
The final rule permits a banking
entity to engage in certain covered
transactions with a related covered fund
that would be exempt from the
quantitative limits, collateral
requirements, and low-quality asset
prohibition under section 23A of the
Federal Reserve Act, including certain
transactions that would be exempt
pursuant to section 223.42 of the
Board’s Regulation W.762 In addition,
the final rule authorizes banking entities
to engage in certain transactions, such
as extensions of intraday credit for
purchases of assets from covered funds
in connection with payment, clearing,
and settlement services.763 Finally, in a
modification from the 2020 proposal,
the final rule expressly permits banking
entities to enter into certain riskless
principal transactions with a related
covered fund, including in
circumstances where the covered fund
is not a ‘‘securities affiliate.’’ 764
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC received comment suggesting
that section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act
should be interpreted to include the
exemptions provided under section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act, and that
banking entities should be permitted to
engage in a limited amount of covered
transactions with related covered
funds.765 The SEC recognizes that
outsourcing such activities to third
parties may have adversely affected
customer relationships, increasing costs
and decreasing operational efficiency
85 FR 12140.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
761 See
12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1).
final rule § ll.14(a)(2)(iii).
763 See final rule § ll.14(a)(2)(v).
764 See final rule § ll.14(a)(2)(iv).
765 See 85 FR 12144.
762 See
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
for banking entities and covered funds.
The final rule provides banking entities
greater flexibility to provide these and
other services directly to covered funds.
If being able to provide custody,
clearing, and other services to related
covered funds reduces the costs of these
services and risks of operational failure
of fund custodians, then fund advisers
and, indirectly, fund investors, may
benefit from the final rule. Many direct
benefits are likely to accrue to banking
entity advisers to covered funds that
have been relying on third-party service
providers as a result of the requirements
of the implementing regulations.
The final rule includes a standalone
provision that permits banking entities
to enter into riskless principal
transactions with a related covered
fund, including in circumstances where
the covered fund is not a ‘‘securities
affiliate.’’ The 2020 proposal would
have permitted a banking entity to enter
into a riskless principal transaction with
a covered fund provided it met the
criteria in Regulation W. The SEC
believes that providing a standalone
exception will provide clarity and
certainty to banking entities about the
extent to which they are able to enter
into riskless principal transactions with
related covered funds. In addition, by
permitting more riskless principal
transactions than would have been the
case under the 2020 proposal (i.e., those
that do not or may not meet the criteria
of Regulation W), the final rule may
facilitate banking entities entering into
more of these transactions than they
would have, reducing the likelihood
that the covered fund would incur
additional costs in buying or selling
securities.766 As described above, in a
riskless principal transaction, the
riskless principal (the banking entity)
buys and sells the same security
contemporaneously, and the asset risk
passes promptly from the affiliate (the
related covered fund) through the
riskless principal to a third party.
Accordingly, the SEC does not believe
that an increase in riskless principal
transactions overall will increase the
risks borne by any particular banking
entity or banking entities in general.
The final rule increases banking
entities’ ability to engage in custody,
clearing, and other transactions with
related covered funds and will benefit
banking entities that have been unable
766 As discussed above, the final rule includes a
definition of riskless principal transaction that is
similar to the definition adopted in Regulation W.
To the extent these definitions are sufficiently
similar, the SEC expects that compliance costs will
be low for banking entities seeking to enter into
riskless principal transactions with related covered
funds.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
to engage in otherwise profitable or
efficient activities with related covered
funds. Moreover, this may enhance
operational efficiency and reduce
operational risks and costs incurred by
covered funds, which have been unable
to rely on banking entities with which
they have certain relationships for
custody, clearing, and other
transactions. As discussed above,
reducing operational risk as well as the
interconnectedness between financial
firms that would result from such
services being provided by the banking
entities and their affiliates, would
promote the financial stability of the
U.S. financial system.767
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC
discussed a prior comment that opposed
incorporating the Federal Reserve Act
section 23A exemptions or quantitative
limits.768 To the extent that the final
rule may increase transactions between
banking entities and related covered
funds, banking entities could incur risks
associated with these transactions.
However, as discussed above, the final
rule imposes a number of conditions
aimed at reducing overall risks to
banking entities, the ability of banking
entities to lever up related covered
funds, and the incentive of banking
entities to bail out related covered
funds, while enhancing their ability to
provide ordinary-course banking,
custody, and asset management
services, and to facilitate capital
formation in covered funds.
The agencies could have adopted
broader or narrower forms of relief. For
example, in addition to the relief under
the final rule, the agencies could have
permitted banking entities to engage in
additional covered transactions in
connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement services beyond extensions
of credit and purchases of assets.
Further, under the final rule, each
extension of credit must be repaid, sold,
or terminated by the end of five
business days.769 As another alternative,
the agencies could have allowed
extensions of credit in connection with
payment transactions, clearing, or
settlement services for periods that are
longer than five business days.
However, the five business day criteria
is consistent with the federal banking
agencies’ capital rule and generally
requires banking entities to rely on
transactions with normal settlement
periods, which have lower risk of
delayed settlement or failure, when
providing short-term extensions of
credit.770 In addition, the agencies could
have imposed quantitative limits on the
newly permitted covered transactions
tied to bank capital or fund size.
Relative to the final rule, alternatives
providing greater relief with respect to
covered transactions with covered funds
could have magnified the cost savings
and operational risk benefits described
above, but may also have increased risk
to banking entities or the incentives for
banking entities to bail out related
covered funds. Similarly, narrower
alternative forms of relief may have
dampened the economic effects of the
final rule discussed above.
iii. Definition of Ownership Interest
As discussed above, the implementing
regulations define ‘‘ownership interest’’
in a covered fund to mean any equity,
partnership, or ‘‘other similar interest.’’
This definition focuses on the attributes
of the interest and whether it provides
a banking entity with voting rights or
economic exposure to the profits and
losses of the covered fund, rather than
its form. ‘‘Other similar interest’’ is
defined, in part, as an interest that:
‘‘Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general partner,
managing member, member of the board of
directors or trustees, investment manager,
investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund (excluding the
rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon
the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).’’ 771
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comment that the
implementing regulations’ definition of
ownership interest has captured
instruments that do not have equity-like
features and constrained banking entity
investments in debt securitizations and
client facilitation services.772 For
example, one commenter indicated that
analyzing the ownership interest
definition in the context of
securitizations had resulted in added
time and costs of executing transactions,
as well as impeded securitization
transactions.773 Moreover, the
commenter indicated that the ‘‘other
similar interest’’ prong of the definition
precluded some banking entities from
investing in collateralized loan
obligation (CLO) senior debt
instruments, which affects lending to
CLOs, and that banking entities with
pre-existing CLO exposures have had to
waive credit-enhancing remedies to
avoid triggering the ownership interest
supra note 435.
implementing regulations
§ ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A). See also supra Section IV.E.1.
(Ownership Interest).
772 See 85 FR 12173.
773 See id.
767 See
supra Section IV.D. (Limitations on
Relationships with a Covered Fund).
768 See 85 FR 12172.
769 See final rule § ll.14(a)(2)(iv)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
restrictions.774 In addition, the SEC
received comment that the ownership
interest definition in the implementing
regulations may have required an
extensive legal analysis and
documentation review and that, as a
result, some banking entities may have
defaulted to treating interests without
controlling positions or equity-like
features as ownership interests.775
The final rule modifies the definition
of ownership interest in several ways.
First, the final rule moves the existing
exclusion from the definition of ‘‘other
similar interest’’ in § ll.10(d)(6)(A)
(‘‘for the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event’’) from the parenthetical to its
own provision.776 The final rule also
creates a new exclusion, for ‘‘the right
to participate in the removal of an
investment manager for ’’cause’’ or
participate in the selection of a
replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal.’’ 777
Commenters on the 2020 proposal
asserted that creditors’ rights are also
provided to debt holders in
circumstances other than an event of
default or acceleration. These
commenters therefore recommended the
proposed exclusion be expanded to
include additional for cause events that
are independent of an event of default
or acceleration, such as the insolvency
of the investment manager or breach of
the investment management or
collateral management agreement.778
The final rule reflects those comments
and provide clarity about the types of
creditor rights that may attach to an
interest without that interest being
deemed an ownership interest. In
particular, under § ll.10(d)(6)(A)(2),
the definition of ownership interest
does not include rights of an interest
that allows a creditor to participate in
the removal of an investment manager
for ‘‘cause.’’ The final rule defines
‘‘cause’’ for removal to mean one or
more of the following events:
(1) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(2) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(3) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
770 See
771 See
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46493
774 See
id.
id.
776 See final rule § ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A)(1).
777 See final rule § ll.10(d)(6)(i)(A)(2).
778 See SIFMA.
775 See
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46494
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(4) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(5) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(6) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(7) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(8) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or to
the investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements.
The final rule also modifies the
definition of ownership interest to add
to the list of interests that are excluded
from the definition of ownership
interest. Specifically, the final rule
provides a safe harbor excluding any
senior loan or senior debt interest that
has specific characteristics.779 Those
characteristics are: (1) Under the terms
of the interest, the holders do not have
the right to receive a share of the
income, gains, or profits of the covered
fund, but are entitled to receive only
certain interest and fees, and repayment
of a fixed principal amount on or before
a maturity date in a contractuallydetermined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely
to reflect, and compensate holders of the
interest for, forgone income resulting
from an early prepayment); (2) the
entitlement to payments is absolute and
cannot be reduced because of the losses
arising from the covered fund’s
underlying assets; and (3) the holders of
the interest are not entitled to receive
the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been
redeemed or paid in full (excluding the
rights of a creditor to exercise remedies
upon the occurrence of an event of
default or an acceleration event).780
The final rule should simplify the
analysis banking entities must perform
to determine whether they have an
ownership interest under section 13 of
the BHC Act and the final rule.
final rule § ll.10(d)(6)(ii)(B).
id. See also, supra Section IV.E.1.
(Ownership Interest).
779 See
Moreover, to the degree that banking
entities may have responded to the
ownership interest definition in the
implementing regulations by reducing
their investments in certain debt
instruments, the final rule may result in
greater banking entity investments in
covered funds and a greater ability of
covered funds to allocate capital to the
underlying assets.
The SEC recognizes that such debt
instrument investments carry risk,781
and that the risks and returns of such
investments flow through to banking
entities’ shareholders. While the final
rule’s ownership interest definition may
permit banking entities to increase
exposures to certain debt instruments,
three key considerations may mitigate
the risks associated with such activities.
First, the final rule does not change any
of the applicable prudential capital,
margin, or liquidity requirements
intended to ensure safety and soundness
of banking entities. Second, to the
degree that the ownership interest
definition has actually discouraged
banking entities from obtaining credit
enhancements to avoid triggering the
ownership interest restrictions, the final
rule may result in banking entities
receiving credit enhancements that
reduce the risk of the debt instrument or
loan and are therefore stronger than
what banking entities may have
received in the absence of the final rule.
Finally, the final rule includes a number
of conditions and restrictions aimed at
reducing the risk to banking entities
while facilitating traditional lending
activity.
The agencies could have adopted
broader relief by limiting the particular
forms of a banking entity’s interest (e.g.,
equity or partnership shares) that would
qualify as an ownership interest or by
limiting the definition of ownership
interest to ‘‘voting securities’’ as defined
by the Board’s Regulation Y. By
providing broader relief relative to the
final rule, such an alternative may have
produced greater reductions in
uncertainty and compliance burdens,
and a greater willingness of banking
entities to become involved in certain
debt transactions. However, such greater
involvement in certain debt transactions
may also have given rise to greater risks
being borne by banking entities. The
final rule is intended to provide
sufficient safeguards and limitations to
prevent banking entities from acquiring
interests in covered funds that run
counter to the intentions of the
implementing regulations and limit a
banking entity’s exposure to the
economic risks of covered funds and
780 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
781 See
PO 00000
Occupy.
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
their underlying assets, while reducing
compliance uncertainty and increasing
the willingness of banking entities to
participate in covered funds.
iv. Parallel Investments
As discussed above, the preamble to
the 2013 rule stated that if a banking
entity makes investments side by side in
substantially the same positions as a
covered fund, then the value of such
investments would be included for the
purposes of determining the value of the
banking entity’s investment in the
covered fund.782 The agencies also
stated that a banking entity that
sponsors a covered fund should not
make any additional side-by-side coinvestment with the covered fund in a
privately negotiated investment unless
the value of such co-investment is less
than three percent of the value of the
total amount co-invested by other
investors in such investment.783
As discussed in the 2020 proposal,
the SEC has received comment that
argued the implementing regulations
should not impose a limit on parallel
investments and noted that such a
restriction is not reflected in the text of
the 2013 rule.784 The final rule includes
a rule of construction that (1) a banking
entity will not be required to include in
the calculation of the investment limits
under § ll.12(a)(2) any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund, as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations, and (2) a banking
entity shall not be restricted in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.785
The SEC recognizes that this rule of
construction may increase the incentive
for banking entities to make parallel
investments alongside a covered fund
that is organized and offered by the
banking entity for the purposes of
artificially maintaining or increasing the
value of the fund’s positions.
Supporting a fund with a direct
investment in such a manner would
increase these banking entities’
exposures to the covered fund’s assets
and, as discussed above, could be
inconsistent with the final rule’s
restriction on a banking entity
guaranteeing, assuming, or otherwise
782 See supra Section IV.F. (Parallel Investments)
and references therein.
783 See id.
784 See 85 FR 12174.
785 See final rule § ll.12(b)(5)(i).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
insuring the obligations or performance
of such covered fund.786
Further, as stated above, the agencies
would expect that any investments
made alongside a covered fund by a
director or employee of a banking entity
or its affiliate, if made in compliance
with applicable laws and regulations,
would not be treated as an investment
by the director or employee in the
covered fund. Accordingly, such an
investment would not be attributed to
the banking entity as an investment in
the covered fund, regardless of whether
the banking entity arranged the
transaction on behalf of the director or
employee or provided financing for the
investment.
The SEC recognizes that the rule of
construction may remove a restriction
on investments made alongside a
covered fund that may have interfered
with banking entities’ ability to make
otherwise permissible investments
directly on their balance sheets.787 In
particular, the rule of construction may
allow banking entities to make parallel
investments alongside their covered
funds without including the value of
those parallel investments within the
ownership limits imposed on a banking
entity. Similarly, the rule of
construction may provide clarity to
banking entities such that they will not
be prevented from making investments
alongside their covered funds, as long as
those investments are otherwise
permissible under applicable laws and
regulations.788 In addition to removing
impediments for banking entities’
otherwise permissible investments, the
rule of construction in the final rule
may enable banking entities to make
investments alongside a covered fund
that will credibly signal the banking
entity’s view of the quality of the
investment(s) to investors in the fund,
and may also help align the incentives
of banking entities, and their directors
and employees, with those of the
covered funds and their investors.
4. Efficiency, Competition, and Capital
Formation
As discussed above, the final rule
excludes certain groups of private funds
and other entities from the scope of the
covered fund definition and modifies
other covered fund restrictions
applicable to banking entities subject to
the final rule. Moreover, the final rule
reduces compliance obligations of
banking entities subject to the final rule.
The SEC believes that the final rule may
789 For example, the final rule could result in
additional venture capital being available in
geographic areas where it has been relatively less
available. See supra Section V.F.3.i. (Venture
Capital Funds).
786 Id.
787 See
788 See
supra note 784.
id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
impact competition, capital formation,
and allocative efficiency.
The final rule may have three groups
of competitive effects. First, the final
rule may make it easier for bank
affiliated broker-dealers, SBSDs, and
RIAs to compete with bank unaffiliated
broker-dealers, SBSDs, and RIAs in their
activities with certain groups of private
funds and other entities. Second, the
final rule may reduce competitive
disparities between banking entities
subject to the final rule and affected by
the final rule, and banking entities that
are not. Third, certain aspects of the
final rule (such as those related to
foreign excluded funds and foreign
public funds) may reduce competitive
disparities between U.S. banking
entities and foreign banking entities in
their covered fund activities. Because
competition may reduce costs or
increase quality, and because some
affected banking entities may face
economies of scale or scope in the
provision of services to certain private
funds, these competitive effects may
flow through to customers, clients, and
investors in the form of reduced
transaction costs and greater quality of
private fund and other offerings and
related financial services.
The final rule may also impact capital
formation. For example, by reducing the
scope of application of covered fund
restrictions in the final rule, the final
rule relaxes restrictions related to
banking entity underwriting and
market-making of certain private funds.
Moreover, the final rule modifies certain
restrictions related to banking entity
relationships with certain covered
funds. Further, as discussed above, the
final rule enables banking entities to
engage indirectly (through a fund
structure) in certain of the same
activities that they are currently able to
engage in directly (extending credit or
direct ownership stakes). To the degree
that the implementing regulations
impede or otherwise constrain banking
entity activities in such funds, the final
rule may result in a greater number of
such private funds being launched by
banking entities, increasing capital
formation via private funds. The effects
of the final rule on capital formation are
likely to flow through to investors (in
the form of greater availability or variety
or private funds available for investors)
as well as an increase in the supply of
capital available to firms seeking to raise
capital or obtain financing from private
funds.789
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46495
The possible effects of the final rule
on allocative efficiency are related to the
final rule’s likely impact on capital
formation. Specifically, as discussed
above, the SEC believes that the final
rule may result in a greater number and
variety of private funds launched by
banking entities. To the degree that
banking entities may be able to provide
superior private funds due to their
expertise or economies of scale or scope,
and to the degree that fund structures
may be more efficient than direct
investments (due to, e.g., superior risk
sharing and pooling of expertise across
fund investors), the final rule may
enhance the ability of market
participants, investors, and issuers to
allocate their capital efficiently.
The SEC recognizes that the final rule
may increase the ability of banking
entities to engage in certain types of
activities involving risk, and that
increases in risk exposures of large
groups of banking entities may
negatively impact capital formation,
securities markets, and the real
economy, particularly during times of
adverse economic conditions. Moreover,
losses on investment portfolios may
discourage capital market participation
by various groups of investors. Three
important considerations may mitigate
these potential risks. First, as discussed
throughout this economic analysis,
banking entities already engage in a
variety of permissible activities
involving risk, including extensions of
credit, underwriting, and marketmaking, and the activities of many types
of private funds that are excluded under
the final rule largely replicate
permissible and traditional activities of
banking entities. Second, banking
entities subject to the final rule may also
be subject to multiple prudential
capital, margin, and liquidity
requirements that facilitate the safety
and soundness of banking entities and
promote financial stability. Third, the
additional exclusions from the
definition of covered fund each include
a number of conditions aimed at
preventing evasion of section 13 of the
BHC Act and the final rule, promoting
safety and soundness, and/or allowing
for customer oriented financial services
provided on arms-length, market terms.
Under the final rule, a banking entity
is not prohibited from acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in, or
acting as sponsor to, a covered fund if
the banking entity organizes or offers
the covered fund and satisfies other
requirements. One such requirement is
that the banking entity provide specified
disclosures to prospective and actual
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46496
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
investors in the covered fund.790 Under
the final rule, banking entities must
provide the disclosures specified by
§ ll.11(a)(8) to satisfy the exclusions
for family wealth management vehicles
and customer facilitation vehicles and
to satisfy the exclusions for credit funds
and venture capital funds if the banking
entity is a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor of the
fund. To the extent that the final rule
leads banking entities to establish or
provide services to more of these
vehicles, the volume of information
available to market participants could
increase. Specifically, if banking entities
respond to the final rule by establishing
or providing services to more of these
vehicles because they are excluded from
the definition of ‘‘covered fund,’’ then
the amount of such disclosures would
increase accordingly.
Importantly, the magnitude of all of
the above effects on competition, capital
formation, and allocative efficiency will
be influenced by a large number of
factors, such as prevailing
macroeconomic conditions, the
financial condition of firms seeking to
raise capital, and of funds seeking to
transact with banking entities, market
saturation, and search for higher yields
by investors during low interest rate
environments. Moreover, the relative
efficiency between fund structures and
the direct provision of capital is likely
to vary widely among banking entities
and funds. The SEC recognizes that
such economic effects may be
dampened or magnified in different
phases of the macroeconomic cycle and
across various types of banking entities.
G. Congressional Review Act
For the OCC, Board, FDIC, SEC, and
CFTC, the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, has
designated this rule as a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
companies, Investments, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Securities, State
nonmember banks, State savings
associations, Trusts and trustees.
12 CFR Part 351
Banks, Banking, Capital,
Compensation, Conflicts of interest,
Credit, Derivatives, Government
securities, Insurance, Insurance
companies, Investments, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Risk, Risk retention,
Securities, Trusts and trustees.
17 CFR Part 75
Banks, Banking, Compensation,
Credit, Derivatives, Federal branches
and agencies, Federal savings
associations, Government securities,
Hedge funds, Insurance, Investments,
National banks, Penalties, Proprietary
trading, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Risk, Risk retention,
Securities, Swap dealers, Trusts and
trustees, Volcker rule.
17 CFR Part 255
Banks, Brokers, Dealers, Investment
advisers, Recordkeeping, Reporting,
Securities.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the Common
Preamble, the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency amends chapter I of title
12, Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 44—PROPRIETARY TRADING
AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED
FUNDS
1. The authority citation for part 44
continues to read as follows:
■
12 CFR Part 44
Banks, Banking, Compensation,
Credit, Derivatives, Government
securities, Insurance, Investments,
National banks, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Risk, Risk
retention, Securities, Trusts and
trustees.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 27 et seq., 12 U.S.C. 1,
24, 92a, 93a, 161, 1461, 1462a, 1463, 1464,
1467a, 1813(q), 1818, 1851, 3101, 3102, 3108,
5412.
12 CFR Part 248
Administrative practice and
procedure, Banks, banking, Conflict of
interests, Credit, Foreign banking,
Government securities, Holding
companies, Insurance, Insurance
§ 44.6 Other permitted proprietary trading
activities.
790 Implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
regulations § ll.11(a)(8).
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
Subpart B—Proprietary Trading
2. Amend § 44.6 by adding paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Permitted trading activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The
prohibition contained in § 44.3(a) does
not apply to the purchase or sale of a
financial instrument by a qualifying
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
foreign excluded fund. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity
that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(i) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in § 44.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
Subpart C—Covered Funds Activities
and Investments
3. Amend § 44.10 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
d. Revising the heading of paragraph
(c)(10) and revising paragraph (c)(10)(i);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
■ f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16),
(17), and (18);
■ g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
■ h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 44.10 Prohibition on acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in and
having certain relationships with a covered
fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, an issuer that:
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(A) Is organized or established outside
of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests, and such interests
are offered and sold, through one or
more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity
that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws
of the United States or of any State and
any issuer for which such banking
entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the
exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section for such issuer unless more than
75 percent of the ownership interests in
the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or such issuer; and
(D) Directors and senior executive
officers as defined in § 225.71(c) of the
Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c))
of such entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
‘‘public offering’’ means a distribution
(as defined in § 44.4(a)(3)) of securities
in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor,
the distribution complies with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict
availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted,
with the appropriate regulatory
authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly
available.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10
unaffiliated co-venturers;
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An
issuing entity for asset-backed securities
that satisfies all the conditions of this
paragraph (c)(8) and the assets or
holdings of which are composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 44.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to
assure the servicing or timely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
distribution of proceeds to holders of
such securities and rights or other assets
that are related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and
holding the loans, provided that each
asset that is a security (other than
special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section) meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives that meet the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than assetbacked securities and convertible
securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt
securities does not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(A) of this
section, cash and cash equivalents held
under paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this
section, and debt securities held under
this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans,
cash and cash equivalents, and debt
securities for purposes of this paragraph
is calculated at par value at the most
recent time any such debt security is
acquired, except that the issuing entity
may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt
security based on its fair market value
if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to
use the fair market value of such assets
for purposes of calculating compliance
with concentration limitations or other
similar calculations under its
transaction agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes
of this paragraph (c)(8), except as
permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of
this section, the assets or holdings of the
issuing entity shall not include any of
the following:
(A) A security, including an assetbacked security, or an interest in an
equity or debt security other than as
permitted in paragraphs (c)(8)(iii), (iv),
or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a
derivative that meets the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities.
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may
hold securities, other than debt
securities permitted under paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46497
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, if those
securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents—which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities—for
purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
the loans supporting the asset-backed
securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of
derivatives by the issuing entity shall be
limited to interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives that satisfy all of
the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the
derivatives directly relate to the loans,
the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of
this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, the asset-backed
securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates. The assets or
holdings of the issuing entity may
include collateral certificates and
special units of beneficial interest
issued by a special purpose vehicle,
provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate meets
the requirements in this paragraph
(c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is used
for the sole purpose of transferring to
the issuing entity for the loan
securitization the economic risks and
benefits of the assets that are
permissible for loan securitizations
under this paragraph (c)(8) and does not
directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or
financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is
created solely to satisfy legal
requirements or otherwise facilitate the
structuring of the loan securitization;
and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate and the
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46498
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
issuing entity are established under the
direction of the same entity that
initiated the loan securitization.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i)
Scope. An entity owning or holding a
dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other
assets as provided in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section for the benefit of the holders
of covered bonds, provided that the
assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) SBICs and public welfare
investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment
company, as defined in section 103(3) of
the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or that has
received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as a small business investment
company in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make any new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents, which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to the issuer’s assets) after such
voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make
investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the
public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including
investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation
expenditures with respect to a qualified
rehabilitated building or certified
historic structure, as such terms are
defined in section 47 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar State
historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a rural business
investment company, as described in 15
U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has
terminated its participation as a rural
business investment company in
accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and
does not make any new investments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of
this paragraph, means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the issuer’s
expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to the
issuer’s assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity
fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Credit funds. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and (v) of
this section, an issuer that satisfies the
asset and activity requirements of
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer’s
assets must be composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 44.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to
paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are
related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) that is a security
is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to either the underlying loans or the
debt instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to
acquire an equity security) received on
customary terms in connection with
such loans or debt instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under
this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this
section may not include commodity
forward contracts or any derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative
directly relate to the loans, debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of
this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, debt instruments, or
other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be
eligible for the exclusion of paragraph
(c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § 44.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were
a banking entity; and
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that
acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraphs
(c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the
banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 44.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations
imposed in § 44.14, as if the issuer were
a covered fund, except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity
Requirements. A banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion with respect to an
issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer
or of any entity to which such issuer
extends credit or in which such issuer
invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds
pursuant to paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B) or
(i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship
Limits. A banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 44.15, as if the issuer were
a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds.
(i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(16)(ii)
through (iv) of this section, an issuer
that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as
defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1; and
(B) Does not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading under § 44.3(b)(1)(i), as if the
issuer were a banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
that meets the conditions in paragraph
(c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on
this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 44.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in
§ 44.14 as if the issuer were a covered
fund (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity’s ownership
interest in or relationship with the
issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 44.15, as if the issuer were
a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(17) Family wealth management
vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the
grantor(s) of the entity are all family
customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests
in the entity are owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the
entity are owned (directly or indirectly)
by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family
customers and up to 5 closely related
persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
entity’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(17)(i) of this
section with respect to an entity
provided that the banking entity (or an
affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
investment advisory, or commodity
trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure
obligations under § 44.11(a)(8), as if
such entity were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
entity, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of
§§ 44.14(b) and 44.15, as if such entity
were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, complies with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17)
of this section, the following definitions
apply:
(A) Closely related person means a
natural person (including the estate and
estate planning vehicles of such person)
who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR
275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or
(2) Any natural person who is a
father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-inlaw, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a
spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of
the foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i)
Subject to paragraph (c)(18)(ii) of this
section, an issuer that is formed by or
at the request of a customer of the
banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may
include one or more affiliates of such
customer) with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking
entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(18)(i) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46499
section with respect to an issuer
provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of
the issuer are owned by the customer
(which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its
affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining
how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer’s exposure to
such transaction, investment strategy, or
service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure
obligations under § 44.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of
§§ 44.14(b) and 44.15, as if such issuer
were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the issuer
were an affiliate thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership
interest means any equity, partnership,
or other similar interest. An ‘‘other
similar interest’’ means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46500
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
event of default or an acceleration event;
and
(2) The right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
‘‘cause’’ or participate in the selection of
a replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal. For purposes of this paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager means one or more
of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or the
investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of
this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not
include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is
an interest held by an entity (or an
employee or former employee thereof)
in a covered fund for which the entity
(or employee thereof) serves as
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
other service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the
interest is to allow the entity (or
employee or former employee thereof)
to share in the profits of the covered
fund as performance compensation for
the investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services provided to the
covered fund by the entity (or employee
or former employee thereof), provided
that the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) may be obligated
under the terms of such interest to
return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is
distributed to the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) promptly after
being earned or, if not so distributed, is
retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve
amount to satisfy contractual obligations
with respect to subsequent losses of the
covered fund and such undistributed
profit of the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) does not share
in the subsequent investment gains of
the covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the
covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining the restricted profit interest,
are within the limits of § 44.12 of this
subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by
the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) except to an affiliate
thereof (or an employee of the banking
entity or affiliate), to immediate family
members, or through the intestacy, of
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business
that gave rise to the restricted profit
interest by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) to an
unaffiliated party that provides
investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services to the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt
interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the
holders of such interest do not have the
right to receive a share of the income,
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but
are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as
well as commitment fees or other fees,
which are not determined by reference
to the performance of the underlying
assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal
amount, on or before a maturity date, in
a contractually-determined manner
(which may include prepayment
premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for,
forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments
under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced
based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, writedowns or charge-offs of the outstanding
principal balance, or reductions in the
amount of interest due and payable on
the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed or paid in
full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event).
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Riskless principal transaction.
Riskless principal transaction means a
transaction in which a banking entity,
after receiving an order from a customer
to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or
sells) the security in the secondary
market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase
from) the customer.
■ 4. Amend § 44.12 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
■ c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
■ d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
■ e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
§ 44.12
fund.
Permitted investment in a covered
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment
companies, SEC-regulated business
development companies, and foreign
public funds. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered
investment company, SEC-regulated
business development companies, or
foreign public fund as described in
§ 44.10(c)(1) will not be considered to be
an affiliate of the banking entity so long
as:
(A) The banking entity, together with
its affiliates, does not own, control, or
hold with the power to vote 25 percent
or more of the voting shares of the
company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate
of the banking entity, provides
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund in
compliance with the limitations under
applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i)
Master-feeder fund investments. If the
principal investment strategy of a
covered fund (the ‘‘feeder fund’’) is to
invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the
‘‘master fund’’), then for purposes of the
investment limitations in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
the banking entity’s permitted
investment in such funds shall be
measured only by reference to the value
of the master fund. The banking entity’s
permitted investment in the master fund
shall include any investment by the
banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
master fund that is held through the
feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a
banking entity organizes and offers a
covered fund pursuant to § 44.11 for the
purpose of investing in other covered
funds (a ‘‘fund of funds’’) and that fund
of funds itself invests in another
covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking
entity’s permitted investment in that
other fund shall include any investment
by the banking entity in that other fund,
as well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
fund that is held through the fund of
funds. The investment of the banking
entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any
single covered fund.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(5) Parallel Investments and CoInvestments. (i) A banking entity shall
not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under this section in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, the aggregate
value of all ownership interests held by
a banking entity shall be the sum of all
amounts paid or contributed by the
banking entity in connection with
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in covered funds (together with
any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 44.10(d)(6)(ii)), on
a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted
investment in a covered fund. For
purposes of calculating compliance with
the applicable regulatory capital
requirements, a banking entity shall
deduct from the banking entity’s tier 1
capital (as determined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or
contributed by the banking entity in
connection with acquiring or retaining
an ownership interest (together with any
amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 44.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical
cost basis, plus any earnings received;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46501
(ii) The fair market value of the
banking entity’s ownership interests in
the covered fund as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) or (b)(3) of this
section (together with any amounts paid
by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest
under § 44.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of
this part), if the banking entity accounts
for the profits (or losses) of the fund
investment in its financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an
ownership interest. (1) Extension period.
Upon application by a banking entity,
the Board may extend the period under
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up
to 2 additional years if the Board finds
that an extension would be consistent
with safety and soundness and not
detrimental to the public interest.
(2) Application requirements. An
application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least
90 days prior to the expiration of the
applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for
application, including information that
addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity’s plan
for reducing the permitted investment
in a covered fund through redemption,
sale, dilution or other methods as
required in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(3) Factors governing the Board
determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, the Board may consider all
the facts and circumstances related to
the permitted investment in a covered
fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would
result, directly or indirectly, in a
material exposure by the banking entity
to high-risk assets or high-risk trading
strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing
the banking entity’s interest in the
covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered
fund is expected to have attracted
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46502
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
sufficient investments from investors
unaffiliated with the banking entity to
enable the banking entity to comply
with the limitations in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered
banking entity to the investment and the
risks that disposing of, or maintaining,
the investment in the covered fund may
pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of
divesting or disposing of the investment
within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the
divestiture or conformance of the
investment would involve or result in a
material conflict of interest between the
banking entity and unaffiliated parties,
including clients, customers, or
counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity’s prior efforts
to reduce through redemption, sale,
dilution, or other methods its ownership
interests in the covered fund, including
activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board
believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on
activities or investment during any
extension period. The Board may
impose such conditions on any
extension approved under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section as the Board
determines are necessary or appropriate
to protect the safety and soundness of
the banking entity or the financial
stability of the United States, address
material conflicts of interest or other
unsound banking practices, or otherwise
further the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a
banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking
agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the Board
will consult with such agency prior to
acting on an application by the banking
entity for an extension under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
■ 5. Amend § 44.13 by adding paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
§ 44.13 Other permitted covered fund
activities and investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Permitted covered fund activities
and investments of qualifying foreign
excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
contained in § 44.10(a) does not apply to
a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d),
a qualifying foreign excluded fund
means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund by the foreign banking entity
meets the requirements for permitted
covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as
provided in § 44.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
■ 6. Amend § 44.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv),
(v), and (3); and
■ d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 44.14 Limitations on relationships with a
covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership
interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of §§ 44.11,
44.12, or 44.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that
such transaction is inconsistent with the
safe and sound operation and condition
of the banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a
covered fund that would be an exempt
covered transaction under 12 U.S.C.
371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to
the limitations specified under 12
U.S.C. 371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as
applicable,
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal
transaction with a covered fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets
from a covered fund, provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or
purchase of assets is in the ordinary
course of business in connection with
payment transactions; settlement
services; or futures, derivatives, and
securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid,
sold, or terminated by the end of five
business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each
extension of credit meets the
requirements of § 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii)
of the Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the
extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the
duration of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii),
(iv) or (v) of this section must comply
with the limitations in § 44.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Restrictions on other permitted
transactions. Any transaction permitted
under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv)
of this section shall be subject to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 371c–1) as if the counterparty
were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D—Compliance Program
Requirements; Violations
7. Amend § 44.20 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
b. Revising the heading of paragraph
(d) and revising paragraph (d)(1); and
■ c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 44.20
Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each
banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and
liabilities or a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 44.6(f) or
44.13(d)) shall develop and provide for
the continued administration of a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the prohibitions and
restrictions on proprietary trading and
covered fund activities and investments
set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act
and this part. The terms, scope, and
detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope,
and complexity of activities and
business structure of the banking entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reporting requirements under
appendix A to this part. (1) A banking
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
entity (other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 44.6(f) or
44.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading
activity permitted under subpart B shall
comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Additional documentation for
covered funds. A banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities
(other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 44.6(f) or
44.13(d)) shall maintain records that
include:
*
*
*
*
*
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE
12 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the Common
Preamble, the Board amends chapter II
of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations
as follows:
PART 248—PROPRIETARY TRADING
AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED
FUNDS (Regulation VV)
8. The authority citation for part 248
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851, 12 U.S.C. 221 et
seq., 12 U.S.C. 1818, 12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.,
and 12 U.S.C. 3103 et seq.
Subpart B—Proprietary Trading
9. Amend § 248.6 by adding paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
■
§ 248.6 Other permitted proprietary trading
activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Permitted trading activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The
prohibition contained in § 248.3(a) does
not apply to the purchase or sale of a
financial instrument by a qualifying
foreign excluded fund. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity
that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(i) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in § 248.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
Subpart C—Covered Funds Activities
and Investments
10. Amend § 248.10 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
d. Revising the heading of paragraph
(c)(10) and revising paragraph (c)(10)(i);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
■ f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16),
(17), and (18);
■ g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
■ h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 248.10 Prohibition on acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in and
having certain relationships with a covered
fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside
of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests, and such interests
are offered and sold, through one or
more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity
that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws
of the United States or of any State and
any issuer for which such banking
entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the
exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section for such issuer unless more than
75 percent of the ownership interests in
the issuer are sold to persons other than:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46503
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or such issuer; and
(D) Directors and senior executive
officers as defined in § 225.71(c) of the
Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c))
of such entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
‘‘public offering’’ means a distribution
(as defined in § 248.4(a)(3)) of securities
in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor,
the distribution complies with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict
availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted,
with the appropriate regulatory
authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly
available.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10
unaffiliated co-venturers;
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An
issuing entity for asset-backed securities
that satisfies all the conditions of this
paragraph (c)(8) and the assets or
holdings of which are composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 248.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to
assure the servicing or timely
distribution of proceeds to holders of
such securities and rights or other assets
that are related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and
holding the loans, provided that each
asset that is a security (other than
special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section) meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives that meet the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section; and
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46504
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(E) Debt securities, other than assetbacked securities and convertible
securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt
securities does not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(A) of this
section, cash and cash equivalents held
under paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this
section, and debt securities held under
this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans,
cash and cash equivalents, and debt
securities for purposes of this paragraph
is calculated at par value at the most
recent time any such debt security is
acquired, except that the issuing entity
may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt
security based on its fair market value
if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to
use the fair market value of such assets
for purposes of calculating compliance
with concentration limitations or other
similar calculations under its
transaction agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes
of this paragraph (c)(8), except as
permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of
this section, the assets or holdings of the
issuing entity shall not include any of
the following:
(A) A security, including an assetbacked security, or an interest in an
equity or debt security other than as
permitted in paragraphs (c)(8)(iii), (iv),
or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a
derivative that meets the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities.
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may
hold securities, other than debt
securities permitted under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, if those
securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents—which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities—for
purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
the loans supporting the asset-backed
securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of
derivatives by the issuing entity shall be
limited to interest rate or foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
exchange derivatives that satisfy all of
the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the
derivatives directly relate to the loans,
the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of
this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, the asset-backed
securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates. The assets or
holdings of the issuing entity may
include collateral certificates and
special units of beneficial interest
issued by a special purpose vehicle,
provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate meets
the requirements in this paragraph
(c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is used
for the sole purpose of transferring to
the issuing entity for the loan
securitization the economic risks and
benefits of the assets that are
permissible for loan securitizations
under this paragraph (c)(8) and does not
directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or
financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is
created solely to satisfy legal
requirements or otherwise facilitate the
structuring of the loan securitization;
and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate and the
issuing entity are established under the
direction of the same entity that
initiated the loan securitization.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i)
Scope. An entity owning or holding a
dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other
assets as provided in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section for the benefit of the holders
of covered bonds, provided that the
assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) SBICs and public welfare
investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment
company, as defined in section 103(3) of
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or that has
received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as a small business investment
company in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make any new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents, which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to the issuer’s assets) after such
voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make
investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the
public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including
investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation
expenditures with respect to a qualified
rehabilitated building or certified
historic structure, as such terms are
defined in section 47 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar State
historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a rural business
investment company, as described in 15
U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has
terminated its participation as a rural
business investment company in
accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and
does not make any new investments
(other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of
this paragraph, means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the issuer’s
expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to the
issuer’s assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity
fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Credit funds. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and (v) of
this section, an issuer that satisfies the
asset and activity requirements of
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer’s
assets must be composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 248.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to
paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are
related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) that is a security
is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to either the underlying loans or the
debt instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to
acquire an equity security) received on
customary terms in connection with
such loans or debt instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under
this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this
section may not include commodity
forward contracts or any derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative
directly relate to the loans, debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of
this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, debt instruments, or
other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be
eligible for the exclusion of paragraph
(c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § 248.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer
were a banking entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that
acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraphs
(c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the
banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 248.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations
imposed in § 248.14, as if the issuer
were a covered fund, except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity
Requirements. A banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion with respect to an
issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer
or of any entity to which such issuer
extends credit or in which such issuer
invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds
pursuant to paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B) or
(i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship
Limits. A banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 248.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds.
(i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(16)(ii)
through (iv) of this section, an issuer
that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as
defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1; and
(B) Does not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading under § 248.3(b)(1)(i), as if the
issuer were a banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraph
(c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on
this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 248.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in
§ 248.14 as if the issuer were a covered
fund (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer).
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46505
(iii) The banking entity must not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity’s ownership
interest in or relationship with the
issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 248.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(17) Family wealth management
vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the
grantor(s) of the entity are all family
customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests
in the entity are owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the
entity are owned (directly or indirectly)
by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family
customers and up to 5 closely related
persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
entity’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(17)(i) of this
section with respect to an entity
provided that the banking entity (or an
affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
investment advisory, or commodity
trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure
obligations under § 248.11(a)(8), as if
such entity were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46506
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
entity, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of
§§ 248.14(b) and 248.15, as if such
entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, complies with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17)
of this section, the following definitions
apply:
(A) Closely related person means a
natural person (including the estate and
estate planning vehicles of such person)
who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR
275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or
(2) Any natural person who is a
father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-inlaw, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a
spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of
the foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i)
Subject to paragraph (c)(18)(ii) of this
section, an issuer that is formed by or
at the request of a customer of the
banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may
include one or more affiliates of such
customer) with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking
entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(18)(i) of this
section with respect to an issuer
provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of
the issuer are owned by the customer
(which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(C) The banking entity and its
affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining
how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer’s exposure to
such transaction, investment strategy, or
service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure
obligations under § 248.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of
§§ 248.14(b) and 248.15, as if such
issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the issuer
were an affiliate thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership
interest means any equity, partnership,
or other similar interest. An ‘‘other
similar interest’’ means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration event;
and
(2) The right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
‘‘cause’’ or participate in the selection of
a replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal. For purposes of this paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager means one or more
of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(iii) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or the
investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of
this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not
include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is
an interest held by an entity (or an
employee or former employee thereof)
in a covered fund for which the entity
(or employee thereof) serves as
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
other service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the
interest is to allow the entity (or
employee or former employee thereof)
to share in the profits of the covered
fund as performance compensation for
the investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services provided to the
covered fund by the entity (or employee
or former employee thereof), provided
that the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) may be obligated
under the terms of such interest to
return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is
distributed to the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) promptly after
being earned or, if not so distributed, is
retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve
amount to satisfy contractual obligations
with respect to subsequent losses of the
covered fund and such undistributed
profit of the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) does not share
in the subsequent investment gains of
the covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the
covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining the restricted profit interest,
are within the limits of § 248.12 of this
subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by
the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) except to an affiliate
thereof (or an employee of the banking
entity or affiliate), to immediate family
members, or through the intestacy, of
the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business
that gave rise to the restricted profit
interest by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) to an
unaffiliated party that provides
investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services to the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt
interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the
holders of such interest do not have the
right to receive a share of the income,
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but
are entitled to receive only:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as
well as commitment fees or other fees,
which are not determined by reference
to the performance of the underlying
assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal
amount, on or before a maturity date, in
a contractually-determined manner
(which may include prepayment
premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for,
forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments
under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced
based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, writedowns or charge-offs of the outstanding
principal balance, or reductions in the
amount of interest due and payable on
the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed or paid in
full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event).
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Riskless principal transaction.
Riskless principal transaction means a
transaction in which a banking entity,
after receiving an order from a customer
to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or
sells) the security in the secondary
market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase
from) the customer.
■ 11. Amend § 248.12 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
■ c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
■ d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
■ e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 248.12 Permitted investment in a
covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment
companies, SEC-regulated business
development companies, and foreign
public funds. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered
investment company, SEC-regulated
business development companies, or
foreign public fund as described in
§ 248.10(c)(1) will not be considered to
be an affiliate of the banking entity so
long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with
its affiliates, does not own, control, or
hold with the power to vote 25 percent
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46507
or more of the voting shares of the
company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate
of the banking entity, provides
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund in
compliance with the limitations under
applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i)
Master-feeder fund investments. If the
principal investment strategy of a
covered fund (the ‘‘feeder fund’’) is to
invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the
‘‘master fund’’), then for purposes of the
investment limitations in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
the banking entity’s permitted
investment in such funds shall be
measured only by reference to the value
of the master fund. The banking entity’s
permitted investment in the master fund
shall include any investment by the
banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
master fund that is held through the
feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a
banking entity organizes and offers a
covered fund pursuant to § 248.11 for
the purpose of investing in other
covered funds (a ‘‘fund of funds’’) and
that fund of funds itself invests in
another covered fund that the banking
entity is permitted to own, then the
banking entity’s permitted investment
in that other fund shall include any
investment by the banking entity in that
other fund, as well as the banking
entity’s pro-rata share of any ownership
interest in the fund that is held through
the fund of funds. The investment of the
banking entity may not represent more
than 3 percent of the amount or value
of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and CoInvestments. (i) A banking entity shall
not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under this section in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46508
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, the aggregate
value of all ownership interests held by
a banking entity shall be the sum of all
amounts paid or contributed by the
banking entity in connection with
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in covered funds (together with
any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 248.10(d)(6)(ii)),
on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted
investment in a covered fund. For
purposes of calculating compliance with
the applicable regulatory capital
requirements, a banking entity shall
deduct from the banking entity’s tier 1
capital (as determined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or
contributed by the banking entity in
connection with acquiring or retaining
an ownership interest (together with any
amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 248.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical
cost basis, plus any earnings received;
and
(ii) The fair market value of the
banking entity’s ownership interests in
the covered fund as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) or (b)(3) of this
section (together with any amounts paid
by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest
under § 248.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of
this part), if the banking entity accounts
for the profits (or losses) of the fund
investment in its financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an
ownership interest. (1) Extension period.
Upon application by a banking entity,
the Board may extend the period under
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up
to 2 additional years if the Board finds
that an extension would be consistent
with safety and soundness and not
detrimental to the public interest.
(2) Application requirements. An
application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least
90 days prior to the expiration of the
applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for
application, including information that
addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity’s plan
for reducing the permitted investment
in a covered fund through redemption,
sale, dilution or other methods as
required in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(3) Factors governing the Board
determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, the Board may consider all
the facts and circumstances related to
the permitted investment in a covered
fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would
result, directly or indirectly, in a
material exposure by the banking entity
to high-risk assets or high-risk trading
strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing
the banking entity’s interest in the
covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered
fund is expected to have attracted
sufficient investments from investors
unaffiliated with the banking entity to
enable the banking entity to comply
with the limitations in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered
banking entity to the investment and the
risks that disposing of, or maintaining,
the investment in the covered fund may
pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of
divesting or disposing of the investment
within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the
divestiture or conformance of the
investment would involve or result in a
material conflict of interest between the
banking entity and unaffiliated parties,
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
including clients, customers, or
counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity’s prior efforts
to reduce through redemption, sale,
dilution, or other methods its ownership
interests in the covered fund, including
activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board
believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on
activities or investment during any
extension period. The Board may
impose such conditions on any
extension approved under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section as the Board
determines are necessary or appropriate
to protect the safety and soundness of
the banking entity or the financial
stability of the United States, address
material conflicts of interest or other
unsound banking practices, or otherwise
further the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a
banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking
agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the Board
will consult with such agency prior to
acting on an application by the banking
entity for an extension under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
■ 12. Amend § 248.13 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 248.13 Other permitted covered fund
activities and investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Permitted covered fund activities
and investments of qualifying foreign
excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
contained in § 248.10(a) does not apply
to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d),
a qualifying foreign excluded fund
means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund by the foreign banking entity
meets the requirements for permitted
covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as
provided in § 248.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
■ 13. Amend § 248.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv),
(v), and (3); and
■ d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 248.14 Limitations on relationships with
a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership
interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of §§ 248.11,
248.12, or 248.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that
such transaction is inconsistent with the
safe and sound operation and condition
of the banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a
covered fund that would be an exempt
covered transaction under 12 U.S.C.
371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to
the limitations specified under 12
U.S.C. 371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as
applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal
transaction with a covered fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets
from a covered fund, provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or
purchase of assets is in the ordinary
course of business in connection with
payment transactions; settlement
services; or futures, derivatives, and
securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid,
sold, or terminated by the end of five
business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each
extension of credit meets the
requirements of § 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii)
of the Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the
extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the
duration of the extension of credit.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(3) Any transaction or activity
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii),
(iv) or (v) must comply with the
limitations in § 248.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Restrictions on other permitted
transactions. Any transaction permitted
under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv)
of this section shall be subject to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 371c–1) as if the counterparty
were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D—Compliance Program
Requirements; Violations
14. Amend § 248.20 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
■ b. Revising the heading of paragraph
(d) and revising paragraph (d)(1) ; and
■ c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 248.20 Program for compliance;
reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each
banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and
liabilities or a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under §§ 248.6(f) or
248.13(d)) shall develop and provide for
the continued administration of a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the prohibitions and
restrictions on proprietary trading and
covered fund activities and investments
set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act
and this part. The terms, scope, and
detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope,
and complexity of activities and
business structure of the banking entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reporting requirements under
appendix A to this part. (1) A banking
entity (other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 248.6(f) or
248.13(d)) engaged in proprietary
trading activity permitted under subpart
B shall comply with the reporting
requirements described in appendix A
to this part, if:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Additional documentation for
covered funds. A banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities
(other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 248.6(f) or
248.13(d)) shall maintain records that
include:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46509
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Chapter III
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
Common Preamble, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation amends chapter
III of title 12, Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 351—PROPRIETARY TRADING
AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED
FUNDS
15. The authority citation for part 351
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851; 1811 et seq.;
3101 et seq.; and 5412.
Subpart B—Proprietary Trading
16. Amend § 351.6 by adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 351.6 Other permitted proprietary trading
activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Permitted trading activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The
prohibition contained in § 351.3(a) does
not apply to the purchase or sale of a
financial instrument by a qualifying
foreign excluded fund. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity
that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(i) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in § 351.13(b);
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46510
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
Subpart C—Covered Funds Activities
and Investments
17. Amend § 351.10 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
d. Revising the heading of paragraph
(c)(10) and revising paragraph (c)(10)(i);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
■ f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16),
(17), and (18);
■ g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
■ h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 351.10 Prohibition on acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in and
having certain relationships with a covered
fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside
of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests, and such interests
are offered and sold, through one or
more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity
that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws
of the United States or of any State and
any issuer for which such banking
entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the
exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section for such issuer unless more than
75 percent of the ownership interests in
the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or such issuer; and
(D) Directors and senior executive
officers as defined in § 225.71(c) of the
Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c))
of such entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
public offering means a distribution (as
defined in § 351.4(a)(3)) of securities in
any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(A) The distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor,
the distribution complies with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict
availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted,
with the appropriate regulatory
authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly
available.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10
unaffiliated co-venturers;
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An
issuing entity for asset-backed securities
that satisfies all the conditions of this
paragraph (c)(8) and the assets or
holdings of which are composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 351.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to
assure the servicing or timely
distribution of proceeds to holders of
such securities and rights or other assets
that are related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and
holding the loans, provided that each
asset that is a security (other than
special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section) meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives that meet the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than assetbacked securities and convertible
securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt
securities does not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(A) of this
section, cash and cash equivalents held
under paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this
section, and debt securities held under
this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans,
cash and cash equivalents, and debt
securities for purposes of this paragraph
is calculated at par value at the most
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
recent time any such debt security is
acquired, except that the issuing entity
may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt
security based on its fair market value
if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to
use the fair market value of such assets
for purposes of calculating compliance
with concentration limitations or other
similar calculations under its
transaction agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes
of this paragraph (c)(8), except as
permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of
this section, the assets or holdings of the
issuing entity shall not include any of
the following:
(A) A security, including an assetbacked security, or an interest in an
equity or debt security other than as
permitted in paragraphs (c)(8)(iii), (iv),
or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a
derivative that meets the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities.
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may
hold securities, other than debt
securities permitted under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, if those
securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents—which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities—for
purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
the loans supporting the asset-backed
securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of
derivatives by the issuing entity shall be
limited to interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives that satisfy all of
the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the
derivatives directly relate to the loans,
the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of
this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, the asset-backed
securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
of this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates. The assets or
holdings of the issuing entity may
include collateral certificates and
special units of beneficial interest
issued by a special purpose vehicle,
provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate meets
the requirements in this paragraph
(c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is used
for the sole purpose of transferring to
the issuing entity for the loan
securitization the economic risks and
benefits of the assets that are
permissible for loan securitizations
under this paragraph (c)(8) and does not
directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or
financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is
created solely to satisfy legal
requirements or otherwise facilitate the
structuring of the loan securitization;
and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate and the
issuing entity are established under the
direction of the same entity that
initiated the loan securitization.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i)
Scope. An entity owning or holding a
dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other
assets as provided in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section for the benefit of the holders
of covered bonds, provided that the
assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) SBICs and public welfare
investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment
company, as defined in section 103(3) of
the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or that has
received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as a small business investment
company in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make any new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents, which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to the issuer’s assets) after such
voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make
investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the
public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including
investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation
expenditures with respect to a qualified
rehabilitated building or certified
historic structure, as such terms are
defined in section 47 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar State
historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a rural business
investment company, as described in 15
U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has
terminated its participation as a rural
business investment company in
accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and
does not make any new investments
(other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of
this paragraph, means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the issuer’s
expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to the
issuer’s assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity
fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Credit funds. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and (v) of
this section, an issuer that satisfies the
asset and activity requirements of
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer’s
assets must be composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 351.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to
paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are
related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) that is a security
is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46511
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to either the underlying loans or the
debt instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to
acquire an equity security) received on
customary terms in connection with
such loans or debt instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under
this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this
section may not include commodity
forward contracts or any derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative
directly relate to the loans, debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of
this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, debt instruments, or
other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be
eligible for the exclusion of paragraph
(c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § 351.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer
were a banking entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that
acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraphs
(c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the
banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 351.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations
imposed in § 351.14, as if the issuer
were a covered fund, except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity
Requirements. A banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion with respect to an
issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46512
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer
or of any entity to which such issuer
extends credit or in which such issuer
invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds
pursuant to paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B) or
(i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship
Limits. A banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 351.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds.
(i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(16)(ii)
through (iv) of this section, an issuer
that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as
defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1; and
(B) Does not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading under § 351.3(b)(1)(i), as if the
issuer were a banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraph
(c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on
this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 351.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in
§ 351.14 as if the issuer were a covered
fund (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity’s ownership
interest in or relationship with the
issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 351.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(17) Family wealth management
vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the
grantor(s) of the entity are all family
customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests
in the entity are owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the
entity are owned (directly or indirectly)
by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family
customers and up to 5 closely related
persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
entity’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(17)(i) of this
section with respect to an entity
provided that the banking entity (or an
affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
investment advisory, or commodity
trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure
obligations under § 351.11(a)(8), as if
such entity were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
entity, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of
§§ 351.14(b) and 351.15, as if such
entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, complies with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17)
of this section, the following definitions
apply:
(A) Closely related person means a
natural person (including the estate and
estate planning vehicles of such person)
who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR
275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or
(2) Any natural person who is a
father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-inlaw, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a
spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of
the foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i)
Subject to paragraph (c)(18)(ii) of this
section, an issuer that is formed by or
at the request of a customer of the
banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may
include one or more affiliates of such
customer) with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking
entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(18)(i) of this
section with respect to an issuer
provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of
the issuer are owned by the customer
(which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its
affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining
how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer’s exposure to
such transaction, investment strategy, or
service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure
obligations under § 351.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of
§§ 351.14(b) and 351.15, as if such
issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the issuer
were an affiliate thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership
interest means any equity, partnership,
or other similar interest. An other
similar interest means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration event;
and
(2) The right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
‘‘cause’’ or participate in the selection of
a replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal. For purposes of this paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager means one or more
of the following events: (i) The
bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship
or receivership of the investment
manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or the
investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of
this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not
include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is
an interest held by an entity (or an
employee or former employee thereof)
in a covered fund for which the entity
(or employee thereof) serves as
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
other service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the
interest is to allow the entity (or
employee or former employee thereof)
to share in the profits of the covered
fund as performance compensation for
the investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services provided to the
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46513
covered fund by the entity (or employee
or former employee thereof), provided
that the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) may be obligated
under the terms of such interest to
return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is
distributed to the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) promptly after
being earned or, if not so distributed, is
retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve
amount to satisfy contractual obligations
with respect to subsequent losses of the
covered fund and such undistributed
profit of the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) does not share
in the subsequent investment gains of
the covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the
covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining the restricted profit interest,
are within the limits of § 351.12 of this
subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by
the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) except to an affiliate
thereof (or an employee of the banking
entity or affiliate), to immediate family
members, or through the intestacy, of
the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business
that gave rise to the restricted profit
interest by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) to an
unaffiliated party that provides
investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services to the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt
interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the
holders of such interest do not have the
right to receive a share of the income,
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but
are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as
well as commitment fees or other fees,
which are not determined by reference
to the performance of the underlying
assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal
amount, on or before a maturity date, in
a contractually-determined manner
(which may include prepayment
premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for,
forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments
under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced
based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, writedowns or charge-offs of the outstanding
principal balance, or reductions in the
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46514
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
amount of interest due and payable on
the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed or paid in
full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event).
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Riskless principal transaction.
Riskless principal transaction means a
transaction in which a banking entity,
after receiving an order from a customer
to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or
sells) the security in the secondary
market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase
from) the customer.
■ 18. Amend § 351.12 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
■ c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
■ d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
■ e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 351.12 Permitted investment in a
covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment
companies, SEC-regulated business
development companies, and foreign
public funds. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered
investment company, SEC-regulated
business development companies, or
foreign public fund as described in
§ 351.10(c)(1) will not be considered to
be an affiliate of the banking entity so
long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with
its affiliates, does not own, control, or
hold with the power to vote 25 percent
or more of the voting shares of the
company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate
of the banking entity, provides
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund in
compliance with the limitations under
applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i)
Master-feeder fund investments. If the
principal investment strategy of a
covered fund (the ‘‘feeder fund’’) is to
invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the
‘‘master fund’’), then for purposes of the
investment limitations in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
the banking entity’s permitted
investment in such funds shall be
measured only by reference to the value
of the master fund. The banking entity’s
permitted investment in the master fund
shall include any investment by the
banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
master fund that is held through the
feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a
banking entity organizes and offers a
covered fund pursuant to § 351.11 for
the purpose of investing in other
covered funds (a ‘‘fund of funds’’) and
that fund of funds itself invests in
another covered fund that the banking
entity is permitted to own, then the
banking entity’s permitted investment
in that other fund shall include any
investment by the banking entity in that
other fund, as well as the banking
entity’s pro-rata share of any ownership
interest in the fund that is held through
the fund of funds. The investment of the
banking entity may not represent more
than 3 percent of the amount or value
of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and CoInvestments. (i) A banking entity shall
not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under this section in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, the aggregate
value of all ownership interests held by
a banking entity shall be the sum of all
amounts paid or contributed by the
banking entity in connection with
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in covered funds (together with
any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 351.10(d)(6)(ii)),
on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted
investment in a covered fund. For
purposes of calculating compliance with
the applicable regulatory capital
requirements, a banking entity shall
deduct from the banking entity’s tier 1
capital (as determined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or
contributed by the banking entity in
connection with acquiring or retaining
an ownership interest (together with any
amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 351.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical
cost basis, plus any earnings received;
and
(ii) The fair market value of the
banking entity’s ownership interests in
the covered fund as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) or (b)(3) of this
section (together with any amounts paid
by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest
under § 351.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of
this part), if the banking entity accounts
for the profits (or losses) of the fund
investment in its financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an
ownership interest. (1) Extension period.
Upon application by a banking entity,
the Board may extend the period under
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up
to 2 additional years if the Board finds
that an extension would be consistent
with safety and soundness and not
detrimental to the public interest.
(2) Application requirements. An
application for extension must:
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least
90 days prior to the expiration of the
applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for
application, including information that
addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity’s plan
for reducing the permitted investment
in a covered fund through redemption,
sale, dilution or other methods as
required in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(3) Factors governing the Board
determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, the Board may consider all
the facts and circumstances related to
the permitted investment in a covered
fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would
result, directly or indirectly, in a
material exposure by the banking entity
to high-risk assets or high-risk trading
strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing
the banking entity’s interest in the
covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered
fund is expected to have attracted
sufficient investments from investors
unaffiliated with the banking entity to
enable the banking entity to comply
with the limitations in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered
banking entity to the investment and the
risks that disposing of, or maintaining,
the investment in the covered fund may
pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of
divesting or disposing of the investment
within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the
divestiture or conformance of the
investment would involve or result in a
material conflict of interest between the
banking entity and unaffiliated parties,
including clients, customers, or
counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity’s prior efforts
to reduce through redemption, sale,
dilution, or other methods its ownership
interests in the covered fund, including
activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board
believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on
activities or investment during any
extension period. The Board may
impose such conditions on any
extension approved under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section as the Board
determines are necessary or appropriate
to protect the safety and soundness of
the banking entity or the financial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
stability of the United States, address
material conflicts of interest or other
unsound banking practices, or otherwise
further the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a
banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking
agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the Board
will consult with such agency prior to
acting on an application by the banking
entity for an extension under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
■ 19. Amend § 351.13 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 351.13 Other permitted covered fund
activities and investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Permitted covered fund activities
and investments of qualifying foreign
excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
contained in § 351.10(a) does not apply
to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d),
a qualifying foreign excluded fund
means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund by the foreign banking entity
meets the requirements for permitted
covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as
provided in § 351.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
■ 20. Amend § 351.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46515
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv),
(v), and (3); and
■ d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 351.14 Limitations on relationships with
a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership
interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of §§ 351.11,
351.12, or 351.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that
such transaction is inconsistent with the
safe and sound operation and condition
of the banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a
covered fund that would be an exempt
covered transaction under 12 U.S.C.
371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to
the limitations specified under 12
U.S.C. 371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as
applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal
transaction with a covered fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets
from a covered fund, provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or
purchase of assets is in the ordinary
course of business in connection with
payment transactions; settlement
services; or futures, derivatives, and
securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid,
sold, or terminated by the end of five
business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each
extension of credit meets the
requirements of § 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii)
of the Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the
extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the
duration of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii),
(iv) or (v) must comply with the
limitations in § 351.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Restrictions on other permitted
transactions. Any transaction permitted
under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv)
of this section shall be subject to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 371c–1) as if the counterparty
were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D—Compliance Program
Requirements; Violations
■
■
21. Amend § 351.20 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46516
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
b. Revising the heading of paragraph
(d) and revising paragraph (d)(1); and
■ c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
(a) Program requirement. Each
banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and
liabilities or a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 351.6(f) or
351.13(d)) shall develop and provide for
the continued administration of a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the prohibitions and
restrictions on proprietary trading and
covered fund activities and investments
set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act
and this part. The terms, scope, and
detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope,
and complexity of activities and
business structure of the banking entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reporting requirements under
appendix A to this part. (1) A banking
entity (other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 351.6(f) or
351.13(d)) engaged in proprietary
trading activity permitted under subpart
B shall comply with the reporting
requirements described in appendix A
to this part, if:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Additional documentation for
covered funds. A banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities
(other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 351.6(f) or
351.13(d)) shall maintain records that
include:
*
*
*
*
*
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
Common Preamble, the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission amends
part 75 to chapter I of title 17 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
22. The authority citation for part 75
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
§ 75.6 Other permitted proprietary trading
activities.
*
*
*
*
(f) Permitted trading activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The
prohibition contained in § 75.3(a) does
not apply to the purchase or sale of a
financial instrument by a qualifying
foreign excluded fund. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity
that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(i) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in § 75.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
Subpart C—Covered Funds Activities
and Investments
24. Amend § 75.10 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
d. Revising the heading of paragraph
(c)(10) and revising paragraph (c)(10)(i);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
■ f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16),
(17), and (18);
■
■
■
■
■
PART 75—PROPRIETARY TRADING
AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED
FUNDS
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851.
23. Amend § 75.6 by adding paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
■
*
§ 351.20 Program for compliance;
reporting.
■
Subpart B—Proprietary Trading
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 75.10 Prohibition on acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in and
having certain relationships with a covered
fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside
of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests, and such interests
are offered and sold, through one or
more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity
that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws
of the United States or of any State and
any issuer for which such banking
entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the
exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section for such issuer unless more than
75 percent of the ownership interests in
the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or such issuer; and
(D) Directors and senior executive
officers as defined in § 225.71(c) of the
Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c))
of such entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
‘‘public offering’’ means a distribution
(as defined in § 75.4(a)(3)) of securities
in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor,
the distribution complies with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict
availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted,
with the appropriate regulatory
authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly
available.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10
unaffiliated co-venturers;
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An
issuing entity for asset-backed securities
that satisfies all the conditions of this
paragraph (c)(8) and the assets or
holdings of which are composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 75.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to
assure the servicing or timely
distribution of proceeds to holders of
such securities and rights or other assets
that are related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and
holding the loans, provided that each
asset that is a security (other than
special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section) meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives that meet the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than assetbacked securities and convertible
securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt
securities does not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(A) of this
section, cash and cash equivalents held
under paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this
section, and debt securities held under
this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans,
cash and cash equivalents, and debt
securities for purposes of this paragraph
is calculated at par value at the most
recent time any such debt security is
acquired, except that the issuing entity
may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt
security based on its fair market value
if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to
use the fair market value of such assets
for purposes of calculating compliance
with concentration limitations or other
similar calculations under its
transaction agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes
of this paragraph (c)(8), except as
permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of
this section, the assets or holdings of the
issuing entity shall not include any of
the following:
(A) A security, including an assetbacked security, or an interest in an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
equity or debt security other than as
permitted in paragraphs (c)(8)(iii), (iv),
or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a
derivative that meets the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities.
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may
hold securities, other than debt
securities permitted under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, if those
securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents—which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities—for
purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
the loans supporting the asset-backed
securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of
derivatives by the issuing entity shall be
limited to interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives that satisfy all of
the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the
derivatives directly relate to the loans,
the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of
this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, the asset-backed
securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates. The assets or
holdings of the issuing entity may
include collateral certificates and
special units of beneficial interest
issued by a special purpose vehicle,
provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate meets
the requirements in this paragraph
(c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is used
for the sole purpose of transferring to
the issuing entity for the loan
securitization the economic risks and
benefits of the assets that are
permissible for loan securitizations
under this paragraph (c)(8) and does not
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46517
directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or
financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is
created solely to satisfy legal
requirements or otherwise facilitate the
structuring of the loan securitization;
and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate and the
issuing entity are established under the
direction of the same entity that
initiated the loan securitization.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i)
Scope. An entity owning or holding a
dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other
assets as provided in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section for the benefit of the holders
of covered bonds, provided that the
assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) * * *
(i) That is a small business investment
company, as defined in section 103(3) of
the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or that has
received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as a small business investment
company in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make any new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents, which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to the issuer’s assets) after such
voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make
investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the
public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including
investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation
expenditures with respect to a qualified
rehabilitated building or certified
historic structure, as such terms are
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46518
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
defined in section 47 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar State
historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a rural business
investment company, as described in 15
U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has
terminated its participation as a rural
business investment company in
accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and
does not make any new investments
(other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of
this paragraph, means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the issuer’s
expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to the
issuer’s assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity
fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Credit funds. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and (v) of
this section, an issuer that satisfies the
asset and activity requirements of
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer’s
assets must be composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 75.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to
paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are
related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) that is a security
is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to either the underlying loans or the
debt instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to
acquire an equity security) received on
customary terms in connection with
such loans or debt instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under
this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this
section may not include commodity
forward contracts or any derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative
directly relate to the loans, debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of
this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
related to the loans, debt instruments, or
other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be
eligible for the exclusion of paragraph
(c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § 75.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were
a banking entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that
acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraphs
(c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the
banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 75.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations
imposed in § 75.14, as if the issuer were
a covered fund, except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity
Requirements. A banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion with respect to an
issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer
or of any entity to which such issuer
extends credit or in which such issuer
invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds
pursuant to paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B) or
(i)(C)(l)(iii) of this section would be
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship
Limits. A banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 75.15, as if the issuer were
a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds.
(i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(16)(ii)
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
through (iv) of this section, an issuer
that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as
defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1; and
(B) Does not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading under § 75.3(b)(1)(i), as if the
issuer were a banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraph
(c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on
this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 75.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in
§ 75.14 as if the issuer were a covered
fund (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity’s ownership
interest in or relationship with the
issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 75.15, as if the issuer were
a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(17) Family wealth management
vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the
grantor(s) of the entity are all family
customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests
in the entity are owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the
entity are owned (directly or indirectly)
by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family
customers and up to 5 closely related
persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
entity’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(17)(i) of this
section with respect to an entity
provided that the banking entity (or an
affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
investment advisory, or commodity
trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure
obligations under § 75.11(a)(8), as if
such entity were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
entity, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of
§§ 75.14(b) and 75.15, as if such entity
were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, complies with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17)
of this section, the following definitions
apply:
(A) Closely related person means a
natural person (including the estate and
estate planning vehicles of such person)
who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR
275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or
(2) Any natural person who is a
father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-inlaw, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a
spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of
the foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i)
Subject to paragraph (c)(18)(ii) of this
section, an issuer that is formed by or
at the request of a customer of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may
include one or more affiliates of such
customer) with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking
entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(18)(i) of this
section with respect to an issuer
provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of
the issuer are owned by the customer
(which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its
affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining
how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer’s exposure to
such transaction, investment strategy, or
service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure
obligations under § 75.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of
§§ 75.14(b) and 75.15, as if such issuer
were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the issuer
were an affiliate thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership
interest means any equity, partnership,
or other similar interest. An ‘‘other
similar interest’’ means an interest that:
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46519
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration event;
and
(2) The right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
‘‘cause’’ or participate in the selection of
a replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal. For purposes of this paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager means one or more
of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or the
investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46520
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of
this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not
include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is
an interest held by an entity (or an
employee or former employee thereof)
in a covered fund for which the entity
(or employee thereof) serves as
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
other service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the
interest is to allow the entity (or
employee or former employee thereof)
to share in the profits of the covered
fund as performance compensation for
the investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services provided to the
covered fund by the entity (or employee
or former employee thereof), provided
that the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) may be obligated
under the terms of such interest to
return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is
distributed to the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) promptly after
being earned or, if not so distributed, is
retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve
amount to satisfy contractual obligations
with respect to subsequent losses of the
covered fund and such undistributed
profit of the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) does not share
in the subsequent investment gains of
the covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the
covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
obtaining the restricted profit interest,
are within the limits of § 75.12 of this
subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by
the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) except to an affiliate
thereof (or an employee of the banking
entity or affiliate), to immediate family
members, or through the intestacy, of
the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business
that gave rise to the restricted profit
interest by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) to an
unaffiliated party that provides
investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services to the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt
interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the
holders of such interest do not have the
right to receive a share of the income,
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but
are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as
well as commitment fees or other fees,
which are not determined by reference
to the performance of the underlying
assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal
amount, on or before a maturity date, in
a contractually-determined manner
(which may include prepayment
premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for,
forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments
under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced
based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, writedowns or charge-offs of the outstanding
principal balance, or reductions in the
amount of interest due and payable on
the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed or paid in
full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event).
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Riskless principal transaction.
Riskless principal transaction means a
transaction in which a banking entity,
after receiving an order from a customer
to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or
sells) the security in the secondary
market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase
from) the customer.
■ 26. Amend § 75.12 by:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 75.12
fund.
Permitted investment in a covered
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment
companies, SEC-regulated business
development companies, and foreign
public funds. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered
investment company, SEC-regulated
business development companies, or
foreign public fund as described in
§ 75.10(c)(1) will not be considered to be
an affiliate of the banking entity so long
as:
(A) The banking entity, together with
its affiliates, does not own, control, or
hold with the power to vote 25 percent
or more of the voting shares of the
company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate
of the banking entity, provides
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund in
compliance with the limitations under
applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i)
Master-feeder fund investments. If the
principal investment strategy of a
covered fund (the ‘‘feeder fund’’) is to
invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the
‘‘master fund’’), then for purposes of the
investment limitations in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
the banking entity’s permitted
investment in such funds shall be
measured only by reference to the value
of the master fund. The banking entity’s
permitted investment in the master fund
shall include any investment by the
banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
master fund that is held through the
feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a
banking entity organizes and offers a
covered fund pursuant to § 75.11 for the
purpose of investing in other covered
funds (a ‘‘fund of funds’’) and that fund
of funds itself invests in another
covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking
entity’s permitted investment in that
other fund shall include any investment
by the banking entity in that other fund,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
as well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
fund that is held through the fund of
funds. The investment of the banking
entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any
single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and CoInvestments. (i) A banking entity shall
not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under this section in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, the aggregate
value of all ownership interests held by
a banking entity shall be the sum of all
amounts paid or contributed by the
banking entity in connection with
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in covered funds (together with
any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 75.10(d)(6)(ii)), on
a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted
investment in a covered fund. For
purposes of calculating compliance with
the applicable regulatory capital
requirements, a banking entity shall
deduct from the banking entity’s tier 1
capital (as determined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or
contributed by the banking entity in
connection with acquiring or retaining
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
an ownership interest (together with any
amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 75.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical
cost basis, plus any earnings received;
and
(ii) The fair market value of the
banking entity’s ownership interests in
the covered fund as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) or (b)(3) of this
section (together with any amounts paid
by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest
under § 75.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of
this part), if the banking entity accounts
for the profits (or losses) of the fund
investment in its financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an
ownership interest. (1) Extension period.
Upon application by a banking entity,
the Board may extend the period under
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up
to 2 additional years if the Board finds
that an extension would be consistent
with safety and soundness and not
detrimental to the public interest.
(2) Application requirements. An
application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least
90 days prior to the expiration of the
applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for
application, including information that
addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity’s plan
for reducing the permitted investment
in a covered fund through redemption,
sale, dilution or other methods as
required in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(3) Factors governing the Board
determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, the Board may consider all
the facts and circumstances related to
the permitted investment in a covered
fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would
result, directly or indirectly, in a
material exposure by the banking entity
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46521
to high-risk assets or high-risk trading
strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing
the banking entity’s interest in the
covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered
fund is expected to have attracted
sufficient investments from investors
unaffiliated with the banking entity to
enable the banking entity to comply
with the limitations in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered
banking entity to the investment and the
risks that disposing of, or maintaining,
the investment in the covered fund may
pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of
divesting or disposing of the investment
within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the
divestiture or conformance of the
investment would involve or result in a
material conflict of interest between the
banking entity and unaffiliated parties,
including clients, customers, or
counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity’s prior efforts
to reduce through redemption, sale,
dilution, or other methods its ownership
interests in the covered fund, including
activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board
believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on
activities or investment during any
extension period. The Board may
impose such conditions on any
extension approved under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section as the Board
determines are necessary or appropriate
to protect the safety and soundness of
the banking entity or the financial
stability of the United States, address
material conflicts of interest or other
unsound banking practices, or otherwise
further the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a
banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking
agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the Board
will consult with such agency prior to
acting on an application by the banking
entity for an extension under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
■ 26. Amend § 75.13 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 75.13 Other permitted covered fund
activities and investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Permitted covered fund activities
and investments of qualifying foreign
excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46522
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
contained in § 75.10(a) does not apply to
a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d),
a qualifying foreign excluded fund
means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund by the foreign banking entity
meets the requirements for permitted
covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as
provided in § 75.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
■ 27. Amend § 75.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv),
(v), and (3); and
■ d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 75.14 Limitations on relationships with a
covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership
interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of §§ 75.11,
75.12, or 75.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that
such transaction is inconsistent with the
safe and sound operation and condition
of the banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a
covered fund that would be an exempt
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
covered transaction under 12 U.S.C.
371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to
the limitations specified under 12
U.S.C. 371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as
applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal
transaction with a covered fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets
from a covered fund, provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or
purchase of assets is in the ordinary
course of business in connection with
payment transactions; settlement
services; or futures, derivatives, and
securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid,
sold, or terminated by the end of five
business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each
extension of credit meets the
requirements of § 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii)
of the Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the
extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the
duration of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii),
(iv) or (v) must comply with the
limitations in § 75.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Restrictions on other permitted
transactions. Any transaction permitted
under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv)
of this section shall be subject to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 371c–1) as if the counterparty
were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D—Compliance Program
Requirements; Violations
28. Amend § 75.20 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
b. Revising the heading of paragraph
(d) and revising paragraph (d)(1); and
■ c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 75.20
Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each
banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and
liabilities or a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 75.6(f) or
75.13(d)) shall develop and provide for
the continued administration of a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the prohibitions and
restrictions on proprietary trading and
covered fund activities and investments
set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act
and this part. The terms, scope, and
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope,
and complexity of activities and
business structure of the banking entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reporting requirements under
appendix A to this part. (1) A banking
entity (other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 75.6(f) or
75.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading
activity permitted under subpart B shall
comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Additional documentation for
covered funds. A banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities
(other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 75.6(f) or
75.13(d)) shall maintain records that
include:
*
*
*
*
*
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
Common Preamble, the Securities and
Exchange Commission amends part 255
to chapter II of title 17 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 255—PROPRIETARY TRADING
AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED
FUNDS
29. The authority citation for part 255
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851.
Subpart B—Proprietary Trading
30. Amend § 255.6 by adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 255.6 Other permitted proprietary trading
activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Permitted trading activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The
prohibition contained in § 255.3(a) does
not apply to the purchase or sale of a
financial instrument by a qualifying
foreign excluded fund. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity
that:
(1) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(i) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity’s acquisition or
retention of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the
requirements for permitted covered
fund activities and investments solely
outside the United States, as provided
in § 255.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
Subpart C—Covered Funds Activities
and Investments
31. Amend § 255.10 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
d. Revising the heading of paragraph
(c)(10) and revising paragraph (c)(10)(i);
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
■ f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16),
(17), and (18);
■ g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
■ h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
■
§ 255.10 Prohibition on acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in and
having certain relationships with a covered
fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this
section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside
of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell
ownership interests, and such interests
are offered and sold, through one or
more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity
that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is,
located in or organized under the laws
of the United States or of any State and
any issuer for which such banking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the
exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section for such issuer unless more than
75 percent of the ownership interests in
the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring
banking entity or such issuer; and
(D) Directors and senior executive
officers as defined in § 225.71(c) of the
Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c))
of such entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
‘‘public offering’’ means a distribution
(as defined in § 255.4(a)(3)) of securities
in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail
investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to
substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for
which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor,
the distribution complies with all
applicable requirements in the
jurisdiction in which such distribution
is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict
availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted,
with the appropriate regulatory
authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly
available.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10
unaffiliated co-venturers;
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An
issuing entity for asset-backed securities
that satisfies all the conditions of this
paragraph (c)(8) and the assets or
holdings of which are composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 255.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to
assure the servicing or timely
distribution of proceeds to holders of
such securities and rights or other assets
that are related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and
holding the loans, provided that each
asset that is a security (other than
special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section) meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of this section;
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46523
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives that meet the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of
this section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than assetbacked securities and convertible
securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt
securities does not exceed five percent
of the aggregate value of loans held
under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(A) of this
section, cash and cash equivalents held
under paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this
section, and debt securities held under
this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans,
cash and cash equivalents, and debt
securities for purposes of this paragraph
is calculated at par value at the most
recent time any such debt security is
acquired, except that the issuing entity
may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt
security based on its fair market value
if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to
use the fair market value of such assets
for purposes of calculating compliance
with concentration limitations or other
similar calculations under its
transaction agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity’s valuation
methodology values similarly situated
assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes
of this paragraph (c)(8), except as
permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of
this section, the assets or holdings of the
issuing entity shall not include any of
the following:
(A) A security, including an assetbacked security, or an interest in an
equity or debt security other than as
permitted in paragraphs (c)(8)(iii), (iv),
or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a
derivative that meets the requirements
of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities.
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may
hold securities, other than debt
securities permitted under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, if those
securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents—which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
securitization’s expected or potential
need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to either the underlying
loans or the asset-backed securities—for
purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46524
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
the loans supporting the asset-backed
securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of
derivatives by the issuing entity shall be
limited to interest rate or foreign
exchange derivatives that satisfy all of
the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the
derivatives directly relate to the loans,
the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of
this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, the asset-backed
securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities
described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this
section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest
and collateral certificates. The assets or
holdings of the issuing entity may
include collateral certificates and
special units of beneficial interest
issued by a special purpose vehicle,
provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate meets
the requirements in this paragraph
(c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is used
for the sole purpose of transferring to
the issuing entity for the loan
securitization the economic risks and
benefits of the assets that are
permissible for loan securitizations
under this paragraph (c)(8) and does not
directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or
financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate is
created solely to satisfy legal
requirements or otherwise facilitate the
structuring of the loan securitization;
and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that
issues the special unit of beneficial
interest or collateral certificate and the
issuing entity are established under the
direction of the same entity that
initiated the loan securitization.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i)
Scope. An entity owning or holding a
dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other
assets as provided in paragraph (c)(8) of
this section for the benefit of the holders
of covered bonds, provided that the
assets in the pool are composed solely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
of assets that meet the conditions in
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) * * *
(i) That is a small business investment
company, as defined in section 103(3) of
the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 662), or that has
received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to
qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or
license has not been revoked, or that has
voluntarily surrendered its license to
operate as a small business investment
company in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make any new
investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents, which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to the issuer’s assets) after such
voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make
investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the
public welfare, of the type permitted
under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States
(12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of
low- and moderate-income communities
or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including
investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations
implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et
seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation
expenditures with respect to a qualified
rehabilitated building or certified
historic structure, as such terms are
defined in section 47 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar State
historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a rural business
investment company, as described in 15
U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has
terminated its participation as a rural
business investment company in
accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and
does not make any new investments
(other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of
this paragraph, means high quality,
highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the issuer’s
expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to the
issuer’s assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity
fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z–
2(d).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(15) Credit funds. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and (v) of
this section, an issuer that satisfies the
asset and activity requirements of
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer’s
assets must be composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in § 255.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to
paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are
related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling such loans
or debt instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) that is a security
is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the
purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments
whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer’s expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds
to either the underlying loans or the
debt instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts
previously contracted with respect to
such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to
acquire an equity security) received on
customary terms in connection with
such loans or debt instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under
this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this
section may not include commodity
forward contracts or any derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative
directly relate to the loans, debt
instruments, or other rights or assets
described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of
this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest
rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to the loans, debt instruments, or
other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be
eligible for the exclusion of paragraph
(c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that
would constitute proprietary trading
under § 255.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer
were a banking entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that
acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraphs
(c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the
banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
§ 255.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations
imposed in § 255.14, as if the issuer
were a covered fund, except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any
ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity
Requirements. A banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion with respect to an
issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this
section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer
or of any entity to which such issuer
extends credit or in which such issuer
invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds
pursuant to paragraphs (c)(15)(i)(B) or
(i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be
permissible for the banking entity to
acquire and hold directly under
applicable federal banking laws and
regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship
Limits. A banking entity’s investment in,
and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 255.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds.
(i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(16)(ii)
through (iv) of this section, an issuer
that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as
defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)–1; and
(B) Does not engage in any activity
that would constitute proprietary
trading under § 255.3(b)(1)(i), as if the
issuer were a banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a
sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to an issuer
that meets the conditions in paragraph
(c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on
this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any
prospective and actual investor in the
issuer the disclosures required under
§ 255.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a
covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the
issuer are consistent with safety and
soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
apply if the banking entity engaged in
the activities directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in
§ 255.14 as if the issuer were a covered
fund (except the banking entity may
acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not,
directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity’s ownership
interest in or relationship with the
issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations
imposed in § 255.15, as if the issuer
were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable
safety and soundness standards.
(17) Family wealth management
vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that
is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily
for the purpose of investing in securities
for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the
grantor(s) of the entity are all family
customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests
in the entity are owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the
entity are owned (directly or indirectly)
by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family
customers and up to 5 closely related
persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this section, up
to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
entity’s outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or
more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons if
the ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(17)(i) of this
section with respect to an entity
provided that the banking entity (or an
affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
investment advisory, or commodity
trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure
obligations under § 255.11(a)(8), as if
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46525
such entity were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
entity, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of
§§ 255.14(b) and 255.15, as if such
entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, complies with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the entity were
an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17)
of this section, the following definitions
apply:
(A) Closely related person means a
natural person (including the estate and
estate planning vehicles of such person)
who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR
275.202(a)(11)(G)–1(d)(4)); or
(2) Any natural person who is a
father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-inlaw, sister-in-law, son-in-law or
daughter-in-law of a family client, or a
spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of
the foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i)
Subject to paragraph (c)(18)(ii) of this
section, an issuer that is formed by or
at the request of a customer of the
banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may
include one or more affiliates of such
customer) with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking
entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the
exclusion in paragraph (c)(18)(i) of this
section with respect to an issuer
provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of
the issuer are owned by the customer
(which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was
created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph
(c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer’s
outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more
entities that are not customers if the
ownership interest is acquired or
retained by such parties for the purpose
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46526
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its
affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining
how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer’s exposure to
such transaction, investment strategy, or
service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of such
issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure
obligations under § 255.11(a)(8), as if
such issuer were a covered fund,
provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from
being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to
accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as
principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than as described in
paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of
§§ 255.14(b) and 255.15, as if such
issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal
transactions as defined in paragraph
(d)(11) of this section, comply with the
requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if
such banking entity and its affiliates
were a member bank and the issuer
were an affiliate thereof.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership
interest means any equity, partnership,
or other similar interest. An ‘‘other
similar interest’’ means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the
selection or removal of a general
partner, managing member, member of
the board of directors or trustees,
investment manager, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor
of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration event;
and
(2) The right to participate in the
removal of an investment manager for
‘‘cause’’ or participate in the selection of
a replacement manager upon an
investment manager’s resignation or
removal. For purposes of this paragraph
(d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager means one or more
of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency,
conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment
manager of any material provision of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
covered fund’s transaction agreements
applicable to the investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment
manager of material representations or
warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that
constitutes fraud or criminal activity in
the performance of the investment
manager’s obligations under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment
manager for a criminal offense, or the
indictment of any officer, member,
partner or other principal of the
investment manager for a criminal
offense materially related to his or her
investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect
to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or
incapacitation of an individual critical
to the operation of the investment
manager or primarily responsible for the
management of the covered fund’s
assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that
constitute ‘‘cause’’ for removal of an
investment manager, provided that such
events are not solely related to the
performance of the covered fund or the
investment manager’s exercise of
investment discretion under the covered
fund’s transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of
the interest to receive a share of the
income, gains or profits of the covered
fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund
after all other interests have been
redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding
the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an
event of default or an acceleration
event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a
portion of excess spread (the positive
difference, if any, between the aggregate
interest payments received from the
underlying assets of the covered fund
and the aggregate interest paid to the
holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the
interest that the amounts payable by the
covered fund with respect to the interest
could be reduced based on losses arising
from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of
losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due
and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through
basis from the covered fund, or has a
rate of return that is determined by
reference to the performance of the
underlying assets of the covered fund;
or
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(G) Any synthetic right to have,
receive, or be allocated any of the rights
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of
this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not
include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is
an interest held by an entity (or an
employee or former employee thereof)
in a covered fund for which the entity
(or employee thereof) serves as
investment manager, investment
adviser, commodity trading advisor, or
other service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the
interest is to allow the entity (or
employee or former employee thereof)
to share in the profits of the covered
fund as performance compensation for
the investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services provided to the
covered fund by the entity (or employee
or former employee thereof), provided
that the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) may be obligated
under the terms of such interest to
return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is
distributed to the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) promptly after
being earned or, if not so distributed, is
retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve
amount to satisfy contractual obligations
with respect to subsequent losses of the
covered fund and such undistributed
profit of the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) does not share
in the subsequent investment gains of
the covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the
covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining the restricted profit interest,
are within the limits of § 255.12 of this
subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by
the entity (or employee or former
employee thereof) except to an affiliate
thereof (or an employee of the banking
entity or affiliate), to immediate family
members, or through the intestacy, of
the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business
that gave rise to the restricted profit
interest by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) to an
unaffiliated party that provides
investment management, investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory,
or other services to the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt
interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the
holders of such interest do not have the
right to receive a share of the income,
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but
are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as
well as commitment fees or other fees,
which are not determined by reference
to the performance of the underlying
assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal
amount, on or before a maturity date, in
a contractually-determined manner
(which may include prepayment
premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for,
forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments
under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced
based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, writedowns or charge-offs of the outstanding
principal balance, or reductions in the
amount of interest due and payable on
the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not
entitled to receive the underlying assets
of the covered fund after all other
interests have been redeemed or paid in
full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence
of an event of default or an acceleration
event).
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Riskless principal transaction.
Riskless principal transaction means a
transaction in which a banking entity,
after receiving an order from a customer
to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or
sells) the security in the secondary
market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase
from) the customer.
■ 32. Amend § 255.12 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
■ c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
■ d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
■ e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 255.12 Permitted investment in a
covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment
companies, SEC-regulated business
development companies, and foreign
public funds. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered
investment company, SEC-regulated
business development companies, or
foreign public fund as described in
§ 255.10(c)(1) will not be considered to
be an affiliate of the banking entity so
long as:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(A) The banking entity, together with
its affiliates, does not own, control, or
hold with the power to vote 25 percent
or more of the voting shares of the
company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate
of the banking entity, provides
investment advisory, commodity trading
advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund in
compliance with the limitations under
applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i)
Master-feeder fund investments. If the
principal investment strategy of a
covered fund (the ‘‘feeder fund’’) is to
invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the
‘‘master fund’’), then for purposes of the
investment limitations in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section,
the banking entity’s permitted
investment in such funds shall be
measured only by reference to the value
of the master fund. The banking entity’s
permitted investment in the master fund
shall include any investment by the
banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity’s pro-rata
share of any ownership interest in the
master fund that is held through the
feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a
banking entity organizes and offers a
covered fund pursuant to § 255.11 for
the purpose of investing in other
covered funds (a ‘‘fund of funds’’) and
that fund of funds itself invests in
another covered fund that the banking
entity is permitted to own, then the
banking entity’s permitted investment
in that other fund shall include any
investment by the banking entity in that
other fund, as well as the banking
entity’s pro-rata share of any ownership
interest in the fund that is held through
the fund of funds. The investment of the
banking entity may not represent more
than 3 percent of the amount or value
of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and CoInvestments. (i) A banking entity shall
not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section
any investment the banking entity
makes alongside a covered fund as long
as the investment is made in
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be
restricted under this section in the
amount of any investment the banking
entity makes alongside a covered fund
as long as the investment is made in
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46527
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety
and soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, the aggregate
value of all ownership interests held by
a banking entity shall be the sum of all
amounts paid or contributed by the
banking entity in connection with
acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in covered funds (together with
any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 255.10(d)(6)(ii)),
on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section, an investment by a director or
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted
investment in a covered fund. For
purposes of calculating compliance with
the applicable regulatory capital
requirements, a banking entity shall
deduct from the banking entity’s tier 1
capital (as determined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or
contributed by the banking entity in
connection with acquiring or retaining
an ownership interest (together with any
amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest under § 255.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical
cost basis, plus any earnings received;
and
(ii) The fair market value of the
banking entity’s ownership interests in
the covered fund as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) or (b)(3) of this
section (together with any amounts paid
by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest
under § 255.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of
this part), if the banking entity accounts
for the profits (or losses) of the fund
investment in its financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and
director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For
purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, an investment by a director or
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46528
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
employee of a banking entity who
acquires a restricted profit interest in his
or her personal capacity in a covered
fund sponsored by the banking entity
will be attributed to the banking entity
if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or
employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is
used to acquire such ownership interest
in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an
ownership interest. (1) Extension period.
Upon application by a banking entity,
the Board may extend the period under
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up
to 2 additional years if the Board finds
that an extension would be consistent
with safety and soundness and not
detrimental to the public interest.
(2) Application requirements. An
application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least
90 days prior to the expiration of the
applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for
application, including information that
addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3)
of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity’s plan
for reducing the permitted investment
in a covered fund through redemption,
sale, dilution or other methods as
required in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
(3) Factors governing the Board
determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, the Board may consider all
the facts and circumstances related to
the permitted investment in a covered
fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would
result, directly or indirectly, in a
material exposure by the banking entity
to high-risk assets or high-risk trading
strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing
the banking entity’s interest in the
covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered
fund is expected to have attracted
sufficient investments from investors
unaffiliated with the banking entity to
enable the banking entity to comply
with the limitations in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered
banking entity to the investment and the
risks that disposing of, or maintaining,
the investment in the covered fund may
pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of
divesting or disposing of the investment
within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the
divestiture or conformance of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
investment would involve or result in a
material conflict of interest between the
banking entity and unaffiliated parties,
including clients, customers, or
counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity’s prior efforts
to reduce through redemption, sale,
dilution, or other methods its ownership
interests in the covered fund, including
activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board
believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on
activities or investment during any
extension period. The Board may
impose such conditions on any
extension approved under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section as the Board
determines are necessary or appropriate
to protect the safety and soundness of
the banking entity or the financial
stability of the United States, address
material conflicts of interest or other
unsound banking practices, or otherwise
further the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a
banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking
agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the Board
will consult with such agency prior to
acting on an application by the banking
entity for an extension under paragraph
(e)(1) of this section.
■ 33. Amend § 255.13 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 255.13 Other permitted covered fund
activities and investments.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Permitted covered fund activities
and investments of qualifying foreign
excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
contained in § 255.10(a) does not apply
to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d),
a qualifying foreign excluded fund
means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside
the United States, and the ownership
interests of which are offered and sold
solely outside the United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the
entity were organized or established in
the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an
entity or arrangement that raises money
from investors primarily for the purpose
of investing in financial instruments for
resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking
entity except by virtue of the acquisition
or retention of an ownership interest in,
sponsorship of, or relationship with the
entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(A) The banking entity is not
organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
organized, under the laws of the United
States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity’s acquisition of
an ownership interest in or sponsorship
of the fund by the foreign banking entity
meets the requirements for permitted
covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as
provided in § 255.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part
of a bona fide asset management
business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that
enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign
excluded fund, or any of its affiliates, to
evade the requirements of section 13 of
the BHC Act or this part.
■ 34. Amend § 255.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
■ c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv),
(v), and (3); and
■ d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 255.14 Limitations on relationships with
a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership
interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of §§ 255.11,
255.12, or 255.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that
such transaction is inconsistent with the
safe and sound operation and condition
of the banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a
covered fund that would be an exempt
covered transaction under 12 U.S.C.
371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to
the limitations specified under 12
U.S.C. 371c(d) or § 223.42 of the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as
applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal
transaction with a covered fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets
from a covered fund, provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or
purchase of assets is in the ordinary
course of business in connection with
payment transactions; settlement
services; or futures, derivatives, and
securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid,
sold, or terminated by the end of five
business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each
extension of credit meets the
requirements of § 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii)
of the Board’s Regulation W (12 CFR
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the
extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the
duration of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii),
(iv) or (v) must comply with the
limitations in § 255.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Restrictions on other permitted
transactions. Any transaction permitted
under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv)
of this section shall be subject to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12
U.S.C. 371c–1) as if the counterparty
were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D—Compliance Program
Requirements; Violations
35. Amend § 255.20 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a);
■ b. Revising the heading of paragraph
(d) and revising paragraph (d)(1); and
■ c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 255.20 Program for compliance;
reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each
banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and
liabilities or a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 255.6(f) or
255.13(d)) shall develop and provide for
the continued administration of a
compliance program reasonably
designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the prohibitions and
restrictions on proprietary trading and
covered fund activities and investments
set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act
and this part. The terms, scope, and
detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope,
and complexity of activities and
business structure of the banking entity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Reporting requirements under
appendix A to this part. (1) A banking
entity (other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 255.6(f) or
255.13(d)) engaged in proprietary
trading activity permitted under subpart
B shall comply with the reporting
requirements described in appendix A
to this part, if:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Additional documentation for
covered funds. A banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities
(other than a qualifying foreign
excluded fund under section 255.6(f) or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
255.13(d)) shall maintain records that
include:
*
*
*
*
*
Brian P. Brooks,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on or about June
25, 2020.
James P. Sheesley,
Acting Assistant Executive Secretary.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 25,
2020 by the Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
By the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
Note: The following appendices will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendices to Prohibitions and
Restrictions on Proprietary Trading
and Certain Interests in, and
Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds—CFTC Voting
Summary and CFTC Commissioners’
Statements
Appendix 1—CFTC Voting Summary
On this matter, CFTC Chairman Tarbert
and Commissioners Quintenz and Stump
voted in the affirmative. CFTC
Commissioners Behnam and Berkovitz voted
in the negative. The document submitted to
the CFTC Commissioners for a vote did not
include Section V.F. SEC Economic Analysis.
Appendix 2—Supporting Statement of
CFTC Chairman Heath P. Tarbert
As I have previously remarked, the Volcker
Rule is ‘‘among the most well-intentioned but
poorly designed regulations in the history of
American finance.’’ 1 While today’s final rule
does not fix the fundamental flaws of the
Volcker Rule 2—only congressional action
can do that—it at least represents a more
accurate reading of the law Congress actually
passed and brings us a step closer to a
reasonable implementation of the rule.3
1 See Statement of Chairman Heath P. Tarbert in
Support of Revisions to the Volcker Rule (Sept. 16,
2019), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/
SpeechesTestimony/tarbertstatement091619.
2 See, e.g., Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law No: 115–
174 (May 24, 2018) (amending section 13 of the
Bank Holding Company Act by narrowing the
definition of ‘‘banking entity’’ in the Volcker Rule
to exclude certain community banks).
3 See Statement of Chairman Heath P. Tarbert in
Support of Further Revisions to the Volcker Rule
(Jan. 30, 2020), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/
SpeechesTestimony/tarbertstatement013020b.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46529
Specifically, the Volcker Rule will now no
longer be applied to investments Congress
never intended to be included in the first
place, such as credit funds, venture capital
funds, customer facilitation vehicles, and
family wealth management vehicles. The
final rule also contains important
modifications to several existing exclusions
from the prohibition on activities related to
private equity and hedge funds (the ‘‘covered
funds’’ provisions)—for foreign public funds,
loan securitizations, and small business
investment companies. In these ways, the
final rule begins to address the over-breadth
of the covered funds definition and related
requirements.
I am therefore pleased to support adoption
of the proposed revisions to the Volcker
Rule’s covered funds provisions. While only
a modest step forward, these refinements will
nonetheless enhance the regulatory
experience and provide clarity for market
participants who have struggled to comply
with the Volcker Rule.
Appendix 3—Dissenting Statement of
CFTC Commissioner Rostin Behnam
I respectfully dissent as to the
Commission’s decision to finalize additional
revisions to the Volcker Rule. As we
approach the ten year anniversary of the
Dodd-Frank Act,1 and cautiously begin
mapping a path out of the current pandemic,
I believe it is a good time to reflect on the
lessons learned from the 2008 financial
crisis, the efficacy of our responses, and
whether our objectives have changed, or just
our perspective. One of the many critically
important provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act
is the Volcker Rule. The Volcker Rule, in
simple terms, contains two basic
prohibitions: (1) Banking entities may not
engage in proprietary trading; and (2)
banking entities cannot have an ownership
interest in, sponsor, or have certain
relationships with a covered fund.
Last September, the Commission, along
with other Federal agencies (the
‘‘Agencies’’),2 approved changes that
significantly weakened the prohibition on
propriety trading by narrowing the scope of
financial instruments subject to the Volcker
Rule.3 I did not support those changes.4
Today, the Commission, again in tandem
with the Agencies, completes the dismantling
that began in 2018,5 and votes to significantly
weaken the prohibition on ownership of
1 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376
(2010).
2 The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
Treasury; the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System; the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation; and the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
3 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 84
FR 61974 (Nov. 14, 2019).
4 Id. at 62275.
5 See Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 83
FR 33432 (proposed July 17, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
46530
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
covered funds. Again, I cannot support these
changes.
I voted against the 2018 proposal, and
earlier this year, voted against the proposal
that strikes the final blow today.6 In voting
against the 2020 proposal, I quoted the late
Paul Volcker’s letter to the Chairman of the
Federal Reserve, which he penned last
September, when the Agencies approved the
changes breaking down the proprietary
trading prohibition.7 Mr. Volcker warned that
the amended rule ‘‘amplifies risk in the
financial system, increases moral hazard and
erodes protections against conflicts of
interest that were so glaringly on display
during the last crisis.’’ 8 Mr. Volcker’s words
apply equally well to the changes that the
Commission finalizes today regarding
covered funds—particularly the erosion of
the existing protections regarding conflicts of
interest.
As the tenth anniversary of the Dodd-Frank
Act sadly coincides with a different kind of
crisis, I think it is critical to take a hard look
at how far we have come in ten years, and
how well markets have adapted to carefully
crafted policy intended to create a more
resilient financial system. Chipping away,
particularly at a time of great uncertainty,
risks a reversion to the past, when in fact, we
should only be looking forward.
Appendix 4—Dissenting Statement of
CFTC Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz
The Volcker covered funds final release
(‘‘Covered Funds Rule’’) adopts with only
minor changes the rule amendments as
proposed by the agencies in January of this
year (‘‘the Proposal’’). I voted against 1 the
Proposal because the agencies had only
superficially considered the additional risks
that banks would incur under the loosened
regulations. Nothing in the Covered Funds
Rule final release dispels this concern.
Therefore I dissent from the final release.
Congress enacted the original Volcker rule
after the 2008 financial crisis to protect
American taxpayers from again having to
bailout banks that are insured by the FDIC or
6 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 85
FR 12120, 12204 (proposed Feb. 28, 2020).
7 Id.
8 Jesse Hamilton and Yalman Onaran, ‘‘Volcker
the Man Blasts Volcker the Rule in Letter to Fed
Chair,’’ Bloomberg (Sep. 10, 2019), https://
www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-10/
volcker-the-man-blasts-volcker-the-rule-in-letter-tofed-chair.
1 Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Dan M.
Berkovitz Regarding Volcker Covered Funds
Proposal (Jan. 30, 2020), available at: https://
www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/
berkovitzstatement013020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:59 Jul 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
have access to Federal Reserve Bank financial
support. This goal was to be achieved by
preventing the government-supported banks
from undertaking risky proprietary trading
activities and from owning hedge funds or
private equity funds. The new Covered
Funds Rule, together with the rollbacks in
the Volcker proprietary trading regulations
adopted in 2019,2 will undermine many of
the risk-reducing benefits of the original
Volcker rule.
The original Volcker covered funds
regulations were not perfect. The foreign
public funds exception and the so called
‘‘super 23A’’ provisions governing activities
banks can undertake with covered funds
needed careful adjustments. However, the
Covered Funds Rule goes much, much
further. It creates broad new exclusions from
the covered funds definition with inadequate
analysis as to whether these activities were
intended to be permitted under the statute or
pose serious risk to the banks and the United
States financial system.
I addressed some of these new exclusions
in more detail in my dissenting statement on
the Proposal.3 Of these, the new ‘‘venture
capital funds’’ exclusion perhaps best
illustrates the extent to which the Covered
Funds Rule undermines the very purpose of
the Volcker rule. Venture capital serves an
important function in our financial markets
by providing needed capital to startup
companies. But venture capital investing is
very risky. One study found that about 75%
of venture capital-backed firms in the United
States did not return capital to investors.4
Another article on venture capital noted that
‘‘VC funds haven’t significantly
outperformed the public markets since the
late 1990s, and since 1997 less cash has been
returned to VC investors than they have
invested.’’ 5 This is exactly the type of risky
private equity fund 6 investing by
2 Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 84 FR
61974 (Nov. 14, 2019).
3 Supra footnote 1.
4 Deborah Gage, The Venture Capital Secret: 3 out
of 4 Start-Ups Fail, Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20,
2012) (citing research by Shikhar Ghosh, a senior
lecturer at Harvard Business School), available at
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100008723963904
43720204578004980476429190.
5 Diane Mulcahy, Six Myths About Venture
Capitalists, Harvard Business Review (May 2013),
available at https://hbr.org/2013/05/six-mythsabout-venture-capitalists.
6 Interestingly, while the Proposal acknowledged
that venture capital funds are a subset of private
equity funds for purposes of Volcker, in the
preamble to the Covered Funds Rule, the agencies
provide a tortured, speculative analysis of statutory
construction trying to explain that Congress ‘‘may’’
have meant to exclude venture capital funds,
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
government-supported banks that Congress
intended the Volcker rule to curtail.
In adopting the Covered Funds Rule, the
agencies failed to analyze any data or other
information that lays out the risks of venture
capital investing. The agencies simply
exclude venture capital funds from Volcker
regulation. The Covered Funds Rule makes,
at best, a weak case that venture capital
investments promote and protect the safety
and soundness of banking entities and the
United States financial system by allowing
banks to diversify investments. The weakness
of that assertion is clear when one considers
that allowing any investments in hedge funds
and private equity funds would do the same,
and yet that risk taking activity is precisely
what Congress prohibited.
The banking industry does not need to take
on the additional risks permitted by the
Covered Funds Rule to be successful. U.S.
banks have performed well in recent years.
Recent Global League Tables ranking global
banks by amount of banking business activity
shows that three or four U.S. banks are
ranked among the top five banks in the world
in almost every table, including the tables for
foreign markets banking.7 While many factors
impact banking success, the relative strength
of U.S. banks internationally belies
suggestions that the new laws and
regulations adopted in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis are hurting the
competitiveness of U.S. banks. We should
recognize, rather than undermine, the
success of U.S. banks since the 2008 financial
crisis and adoption of the Dodd-Frank Act in
2010.
To date, U.S. banks also have performed
well during the Covid-19 pandemic. But our
financial system continues to face many
extraordinary risks from the effects of the
pandemic. In the middle of this latest shock
to our financial system, we should not be
rushing out a final rule that permits greater
risk taking by banks. Rather, we should take
stock of the data available to us, and make
carefully reasoned, incremental changes that
are consistent with the Congressional intent
for the Volcker rule.
[FR Doc. 2020–15525 Filed 7–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
despite no real evidence to that effect. To the
contrary, three of the four statements from members
of Congress in the legislative record cited in the
Covered Funds Rule clearly show that they
assumed that venture capital funds are private
equity funds under the Volcker rule. See Covered
Funds Rule, section IV.C.2.i.
7 See GlobalCapital.com, Global League Tables,
available at https://www.globalcapital.com/data/allleague-tables.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR4.SGM
31JYR4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 148 (Friday, July 31, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46422-46530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15525]
[[Page 46421]]
Vol. 85
Friday,
No. 148
July 31, 2020
Part IV
Department of the Treasury
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Reserve System
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities and Exchange Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
12 CFR Parts 44, 248 and 351
17 CFR Parts 75 and 255
Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain
Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity
Funds; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 46422]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Part 44
[Docket No. OCC-2020-0002]
RIN 1557-AE67
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 248
[Docket No. R-1694]
RIN 7100-AF70
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 351
RIN 3064-AF17
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 75
RIN 3038-AE93
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 255
[Release No. BHCA-9; File No. S7-02-20]
RIN 3235-AM70
Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain
Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity
Funds
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury (OCC);
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC); and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The OCC, Board, FDIC, SEC, and CFTC (together, the agencies)
are adopting amendments to the regulations implementing section 13 of
the Bank Holding Company Act (BHC Act). Section 13 contains certain
restrictions on the ability of a banking entity or nonbank financial
company supervised by the Board to engage in proprietary trading and
have certain interests in, or relationships with, a hedge fund or
private equity fund (covered funds). These final amendments are
intended to improve and streamline the regulations implementing section
13 of the BHC Act by modifying and clarifying requirements related to
the covered fund provisions of the rules.
DATES: Effective date: The final rule is effective October 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Roman Goldstein, Risk Specialist, Treasury and Market Risk
Policy, (202) 649-6360; Tabitha Edgens, Counsel; Mark O'Horo, Senior
Attorney, Chief Counsel's Office, (202) 649-5490; for persons who are
deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
Board: Flora Ahn, Special Counsel, (202) 452-2317, Gregory
Frischmann, Senior Counsel, (202) 452-2803, Kirin Walsh, Attorney,
(202) 452-3058, or Sarah Podrygula, Attorney, (202) 912-4658, Legal
Division, Elizabeth MacDonald, Manager, (202) 475-6316, Cecily Boggs,
Senior Financial Institution Policy Analyst, (202) 530-6209, Brendan
Rowan, Senior Financial Institution Policy Analyst, (202) 475-6685,
Christopher Powell, Senior Financial Institution Policy Analyst, (202)
452-3442, Nathaniel Grant, Lead Financial Institution Policy Analyst,
(202) 452-3105, David McArthur, Senior Economist, (202) 452-2985,
Division of Supervision and Regulation; Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW, Washington, DC 20551.
FDIC: Bobby R. Bean, Associate Director, [email protected], Andrew D.
Carayiannis, Senior Policy Analyst, [email protected], or Brian
Cox, Senior Policy Analyst, [email protected], Capital Markets Branch,
(202) 898-6888; Michael B. Phillips, Counsel, [email protected],
Benjamin J. Klein, Counsel, [email protected], or Annmarie H. Boyd,
Counsel, [email protected], Legal Division, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
CFTC: Cantrell Dumas, Special Counsel, (202) 418-5043,
[email protected], Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight;
Mark Fajfar, Assistant General Counsel, (202) 418-6636,
[email protected], Office of the General Counsel; Stephen Kane, Research
Economist, (202) 418-5911, [email protected], Office of the Chief
Economist; Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
SEC: Juliet M. Han, Senior Counsel, William Miller, Senior Counsel,
Benjamin A. Tecmire, Senior Counsel, or Jennifer Songer, Branch Chief
at (202) 551-6787 or [email protected], Investment Adviser Regulation
Office, Division of Investment Management, and Katherine Hsu, Office
Chief, or Benjamin Meeks, Special Counsel at (202) 551-3850, Office of
Structured Finance, Division of Corporation Finance, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Overview of the Final Rule
IV. Summary of the Final Rule
A. Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds
B. Modifications to Existing Covered Fund Exclusions
1. Foreign Public Funds
2. Loan Securitizations
3. Public Welfare and Small Business Funds
C. Additional Covered Fund Exclusions
1. Credit Funds
2. Venture Capital Funds
3. Family Wealth Management Vehicles
4. Customer Facilitation Vehicles
D. Limitations on Relationships With a Covered Fund
E. Ownership Interest
F. Parallel Investments
G. Technical Amendments
V. Administrative Law Matters
A. Use of Plain Language
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
D. Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act
E. OCC Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
F. SEC Economic Analysis
G. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
Section 13 of the BHC Act,\1\ also known as the Volcker Rule,
generally prohibits any banking entity from engaging in proprietary
trading or from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in,
sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or
private equity fund (covered fund).\2\ The statute expressly exempts
from these prohibitions various activities, including, among other
things:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 1851.
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underwriting and market making-related activities;
Risk-mitigating hedging activities;
Activities on behalf of customers;
Activities for the general account of insurance companies;
and
Trading and covered fund activities and investments by
non-U.S. banking entities solely outside the United States.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, section 13 of the BHC Act contains an exemption that
permits banking entities to organize and offer, including sponsor,
covered funds, subject to certain restrictions, including
[[Page 46423]]
that banking entities do not rescue investors in those funds from loss,
and are not themselves exposed to significant losses due to investments
in or other relationships with these funds.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G). Other restrictions and requirements
include: (1) The banking entity provides bona fide trust, fiduciary,
or investment advisory services; (2) the fund is organized and
offered only to customers in connection with the provision of such
services; (3) the banking entity does not have an ownership interest
in the fund, except for a de minimis investment; (4) the banking
entity complies with certain marketing restrictions related to the
fund; (5) no director or employee of the banking entity has an
ownership interest in the fund, with certain exceptions; and (6) the
banking entity discloses to investors that it does not guarantee the
performance of the fund. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority under section 13 of the BHC Act for developing and
adopting regulations to implement the prohibitions, restrictions, and
exemptions of section 13 is shared among the Board, the FDIC, the OCC,
the SEC, and the CFTC (individually, an agency, and collectively, the
agencies).\5\ The agencies originally issued a final rule implementing
section 13 in December 2013 (the 2013 rule), and those provisions
became effective on April 1, 2014.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2).
\6\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds; Final Rule, 79 FR 5535 (Jan. 31, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies published a notice of proposed rulemaking in July 2018
(the 2018 proposal) that proposed several amendments to the 2013
rule.\7\ These proposed revisions sought to provide greater clarity and
certainty about what activities are prohibited under the 2013 rule--in
particular, under the prohibition on proprietary trading--and to better
tailor the compliance requirements based on the risk of a banking
entity's trading activities. The agencies issued a final rule
implementing amendments to the 2013 rule in November 2019 (the 2019
amendments), and those provisions became effective in January 2020.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Proposed Revisions to Prohibitions and Restrictions on
Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships
With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 83 FR 33432 (July 17,
2018).
\8\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 84 FR 61974 (Nov. 14, 2019). The regulations
implementing section 13 of the BHC Act, as amended through June 1,
2020, are referred throughout as the ``implementing regulations.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of the 2018 proposal, the agencies proposed targeted
changes to the provisions of the 2013 rule relating to acquiring or
retaining an ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain
relationships with a fund and sought comments on other aspects of the
covered fund provisions beyond those changes for which specific rule
text was proposed.\9\ The 2019 amendments finalized those changes to
the covered fund provisions for which specific rule text was proposed
in the 2018 proposal.\10\ The agencies indicated they would issue a
separate proposal addressing and requesting comment on the covered fund
provisions of the rule and other fund-related issues, and, in February
2020, the agencies issued a separate notice of proposed rulemaking that
specifically addressed those areas (the 2020 proposal).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 83 FR 33471-87.
\10\ In response to the 2018 proposal, the agencies received
numerous comments related to covered fund issues for which no
specific rule text was proposed. However, in the preamble to the
2019 amendments, the agencies generally deferred public
consideration of such comments to a future proposed rulemaking. 84
FR 62016.
\11\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 85 FR 12120 (Feb. 28, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies proposed revisions to a number
of the provisions regarding covered fund investments and activities as
well as to other provisions of the implementing regulations related to
the treatment of funds. The proposed changes, which were based on
comments received in response to the agencies' questions in the 2018
proposal and the agencies' experience with the implementing
regulations, were intended to reduce the extraterritorial impact of the
implementing regulations, improve and streamline the covered fund
provisions, and provide clarity to banking entities regarding the
provision of financial services and the conduct of permissible
activities in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of
section 13 of the BHC Act.
To better limit the extraterritorial impact of the implementing
regulations, the 2020 proposal would have exempted the activities of
certain funds that are organized outside of the United States and
offered to foreign investors (qualifying foreign excluded funds) from
the restrictions of the implementing regulations. Under the 2013 rule,
in certain circumstances, some foreign funds that are not ``covered
funds'' may be subject to the implementing regulations as ``banking
entities,'' if they are controlled by a foreign banking entity, and
thus could be subject to more onerous compliance obligations than are
imposed on similarly-situated U.S. covered funds, even though the
foreign funds have limited nexus to the United States. Accordingly, the
2020 proposal would have codified an existing policy statement by the
Federal banking agencies (the OCC, Board, and FDIC) that addresses the
potential issues related to a foreign banking entity controlling
qualifying foreign excluded funds.
The 2020 proposal also would have made modifications to several
existing exclusions from the covered fund provisions to provide clarity
and simplify compliance with the requirements of the implementing
regulations. First, the 2020 proposal would have revised certain
restrictions in the foreign public funds exclusion to more closely
align the provision with the exclusion for similarly-situated U.S.
registered investment companies. Second, the 2020 proposal would have
permitted loan securitizations excluded from the definition of covered
fund to hold a small amount of non-loan assets, consistent with past
industry practice, and would have codified existing staff-level
guidance regarding this exclusion. In addition, the 2020 proposal would
have revised the exclusion for small business investment companies to
account for the life cycle of those companies and requested comment on
whether to clarify the scope of the exclusion for public welfare and
other investments to include rural business investment companies and
qualified opportunity funds. Finally, the 2020 proposal would have
addressed concerns about certain components of the preamble to the 2013
rule related to calculating a banking entity's ownership interests in
covered funds.
The agencies also included in the 2020 proposal several new
exclusions from the covered fund definition in order to more directly
align the regulation with the purpose of the statute. For example, the
agencies recognized that the implementing regulations have inhibited
banking entities' ability to extend credit by restricting their
relationships with credit funds, and the 2020 proposal would have
created a new exclusion for such funds. Under the 2020 proposal,
banking entities would have been able to invest in and have certain
relationships with credit funds that extend the type of credit that a
banking entity may provide directly, subject to certain safeguards.
Relatedly, the 2020 proposal would have established an exclusion from
the definition of covered fund for venture capital funds. This
provision was intended to facilitate banking entities' abilities to
engage in this important type of development and investment activity,
which may facilitate capital formation and provide important financing
for small
[[Page 46424]]
businesses, particularly in areas where such financing may not be
readily available. In addition, the agencies believed that excluding
such activities would be consistent with the purpose of the statute, as
it would exclude fund activities that do not present the risks that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to address.
The 2020 proposal also would have allowed a banking entity to
provide certain traditional financial services to its customers via a
fund structure, subject to certain safeguards and limitations. First,
the 2020 proposal would have excluded from the definition of covered
fund an entity created and used to facilitate customer exposures to a
transaction, investment strategy, or other service. Second, the 2020
proposal would have excluded from the covered fund definition wealth
management vehicles that manage the investment portfolio of a family
and certain other closely related persons. Both of these provisions
were intended to allow a banking entity to provide such services in the
manner best suited to its customers.
In addition, the 2020 proposal would have permitted a banking
entity to engage in a limited set of covered transactions with a
covered fund that the banking entity sponsors or advises or with which
the banking entity has certain other relationships. The implementing
regulations generally prohibit all covered transactions between a
covered fund and its banking entity sponsor or investment adviser. The
agencies, in the 2020 proposal, recognized that the existing
restrictions have prevented banking entities from providing certain
traditional banking services to covered funds, such as standard
payment, clearing, and settlement services.
Lastly, the 2020 proposal would have clarified certain aspects of
the definition of ownership interest. Currently, due to the broad
definition of ownership interest, some loans by banking entities to
covered funds could be deemed ownership interests. The 2020 proposal
included a safe harbor for bona fide senior loans or senior debt
instruments to make clear that an ``ownership interest'' in a fund
would not include such credit interests in the fund. In addition, the
2020 proposal would have clarified the types of creditor rights that
may attach to an interest without necessarily causing such an interest
to fall within the scope of the definition of ownership interest.
Finally, the 2020 proposal would have simplified compliance efforts by
tailoring the calculation of a banking entity's compliance with the
implementing regulations' aggregate fund limit and covered fund
deduction and provided clarity to banking entities regarding their
permissible investments made alongside covered funds.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Separately, the agencies proposed various technical edits
to the implementing regulations. See infra Section IV.G (Technical
Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies invited comment on all aspects of the 2020 proposal,
including specific proposed revisions and questions posed by the
agencies. The agencies received approximately 40 unique comments from
banking entities and industry groups, public interest groups, and other
organizations and individuals. In addition, the agencies received six
letters related to the subject matter considered in the 2020 proposal
prior to the formal comment period. The agencies are now finalizing the
2020 proposal, with certain changes based on public comments, as
described in detail below.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Comments are generally discussed in the relevant sections,
infra. The agencies also received several miscellaneous comments.
One commenter suggested revising Sec. __.21 (Termination of
activities or investments; penalties for violations) of the
implementing regulations to provide for mandatory prison time for
violations of the implementing regulations. Anonymous. The agencies
believe that this comment is beyond the scope of the current
rulemaking. Another commenter encouraged the agencies to exempt from
the implementing regulations international banks with a small
presence in the United States. Institute of International Bankers
(IIB). The agencies believe that this comment is beyond the scope of
the current rulemaking. A third commenter claimed that the 2020
proposal improperly assumed that the implementing regulations have
certain burdens and that it did not adequately assess the costs and
benefits of the proposed revisions to the implementing regulations.
Occupy the SEC (Occupy). Contrary to the commenter's suggestions,
the Federal Register notice for the 2020 proposal contained
extensive discussion of the costs and benefits of the 2020 proposal.
See 85 FR 12151-76. This final rule contains similar analyses. See
infra, Section IV (Administrative Law Matters). Several commenters
expressed support for the comment letters submitted by other
organizations. E.g., IIB; European Banking Federation (EBF); Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. (Goldman Sachs); and Canadian Bankers Association
(CBA). Finally, one comment was not relevant. See Charity Colleen
Crouse.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Overview of the Final Rule
Similar to the 2020 proposal, the final rule clarifies and
simplifies compliance with the implementing regulations, refines the
extraterritorial application of section 13 of the BHC Act, and permits
additional fund activities that do not present the risks that section
13 was intended to address. The agencies received comments from a
diverse set of commenters: Comments from banking entities and financial
services industry trade groups were generally supportive of the 2020
proposal and recommended additional modifications, while several
organizations and individuals were generally opposed to the 2020
proposal. As described further below, the agencies have adopted many of
the proposed changes to the implementing regulations, with certain
targeted adjustments.
To reduce the extraterritorial impact of the implementing
regulations, the final rule, similar to the 2020 proposal, exempts the
activities of certain funds that are organized outside of the United
States and offered to foreign investors (qualifying foreign excluded
funds) from certain restrictions of the implementing regulations.
Specifically, the final rule codifies an existing policy statement by
the Federal banking agencies that addresses the potential issues
related to a foreign banking entity controlling a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. The final rule contains some modifications to the
proposed exemption--the anti-evasion provision and compliance program
requirements--to address comments that the proposed exemption would
have unintentionally continued to subject qualifying foreign excluded
funds to these requirements.
The final rule also revises, as proposed, but with some
modifications, several existing exclusions from the covered fund
provisions, to provide clarity and simplify compliance with the
requirements of the implementing regulations. First, the final rule
revises certain restrictions in the foreign public funds exclusion to
more closely align the provision with the exclusion for similarly
situated U.S. registered investment companies. Second, the final rule
permits loan securitizations excluded from the definition of covered
fund to hold a small amount of debt securities, consistent with past
industry practice, and codifies existing staff-level guidance regarding
this exclusion. In addition, the final rule revises the exclusion for
small business investment companies to account for the life cycle of
those companies and clarifies the scope of the exclusion for public
welfare and other investments to include rural business investment
companies and qualified opportunity funds. Finally, the final rule
clarifies the calculation of ownership interests in covered funds that
are attributed to a banking entity.
The final rule adopts--as proposed, with some modifications--
several new exclusions from the covered fund definition to more closely
align the regulation with the purpose of the statute. First, the final
rule establishes a new exclusion for funds that extend credit to permit
the same credit-related activities that banking entities can engage in
directly. In addition, the final rule creates an exclusion for venture
capital funds to help ensure that banking entities can indirectly
facilitate
[[Page 46425]]
this important type of development and investment activity to the same
degree that banking entities can do so directly. Finally, the final
rule adopts two exclusions for family wealth management and customer
facilitation vehicles to provide banking entities flexibility to
provide advisory and other traditional banking services to customers
through a fund structure.
In an effort to clarify and simplify compliance with the
implementing regulations, the final rule adopts revisions to the
provisions that govern the relationship between a banking entity and a
fund and the definition of ownership interest. Specifically, the final
rule permits established, codified categories of limited low-risk
transactions between a banking entity and a related fund, including
riskless principal transactions, and allows a banking entity to engage
in certain transactions with a related fund in connection with payment,
clearing, and settlement activities. In addition, the final rule would
provide an express safe harbor for senior loans and senior debt and
provide clarity about the types of creditor rights that would be
considered within the scope of the definition of ownership interest.
Finally, the agencies are adopting revisions, as proposed, to provide
clarity regarding a banking entity's permissible investments in the
same investments as a covered fund organized or offered by such banking
entity.
Frequently Asked Questions
The staffs of the agencies have addressed several questions
concerning the implementing regulations through a series of staff
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).\14\ In the 2020 proposal, the
agencies indicated that the proposed rule would not modify or revoke
any previously issued staff FAQs, unless otherwise specified.\15\
Several commenters recommended codifying specific FAQs and making
explicit that other FAQs would continue to be in effect,
unmodified.\16\ Consistent with the 2020 proposal and commenters'
suggestions, the final rule does not modify or revoke any previously
issued staff FAQs, unless otherwise specified.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See https://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/capitalmarkets/financial-markets/trading-volckerrule/volcker-rule-implementation-faqs.html (OCC); https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/volcker-rule/faq.htm (Board); https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/reform/volcker/faq.html (FDIC); https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/faq-volcker-rule-section13.htm (SEC); https://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/DoddFrankAct/Rulemakings/DF_28_VolckerRule/index.htm
(CFTC).
\15\ 85 FR 12122-23.
\16\ E.g., Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
(SIFMA); Financial Services Forum (FSF); and IIB.
\17\ 85 FR 12122-23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment Period
Since the issuance of the 2020 proposal, the COVID-19 global
pandemic has substantially disrupted activity in the United States and
in other countries. The effects of the COVID-19 disruptions have
created many challenges for households and businesses, and the agencies
received comments requesting that the agencies extend the comment
period for the 2020 proposal or delay the rulemaking more
generally.\18\ In contrast, one commenter expressed support for the
rapid approval of the 2020 proposal, to provide banking entities
regulatory relief during a period of financial stress.\19\ The agencies
announced on April 2, 2020, that they would consider comments submitted
before May 1, 2020.\20\ The agencies, however, do not believe that
further delay of the rule is warranted, given the volume, depth, and
diversity of comments submitted. The agencies believe, as well, that
the final rule may provide clarity to banking entities that will enable
banking entities to engage in financial services and other permissible
activities in a manner that both is consistent with the requirements of
section 13 of the BHC Act and will facilitate capital formation and
economic activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ E.g., Better Markets, Inc. (Better Markets) and Kathy
Bowman.
\19\ American Bankers Association (ABA).
\20\ https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20200402a.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective and Compliance Dates
The Federal Register notice accompanying the finalization of the
2019 amendments provided for a rolling compliance system.\21\ The
effective date of the amendments was January 1, 2020, and firms are
required to comply with the revisions by January 1, 2021. Until the
mandatory compliance date, banking entities are required to comply with
the 2013 rule, or alternatively, a banking entity may voluntarily
comply, in whole or in part, with the 2019 amendments prior to the
compliance date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 84 FR 61974.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters on the 2020 proposal suggested that the agencies
provide for voluntary early compliance with the final rule.\22\ One
commenter also suggested establishing a transition period of at least
one year.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ E.g., SIFMA; FSF; Japanese Bankers Association (JBA); and
ABA.
\23\ JBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The effective date for the final rule will be October 1, 2020, to
accommodate the requirements of the Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act.\24\ The agencies do not believe an extended
compliance or transition period is necessary because the final rule
largely tailors the regulations implementing section 13 of the BHC Act
rather than increases compliance burdens.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See infra, Section V.D (Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Summary of the Final Rule
A. Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds
Since the adoption of the 2013 rule, a number of foreign banking
entities, foreign government officials, and other market participants
have expressed concerns regarding instances in which certain funds
offered and sold outside of the United States are excluded from the
covered fund definition but still could be considered banking entities
in certain circumstances (foreign excluded funds).\25\ This situation
may occur if a foreign banking entity controls the foreign fund. A
foreign banking entity could be considered to control the fund based on
common corporate governance structures abroad, such as where the fund's
sponsor selects the majority of the fund's directors or trustees, or
the foreign banking entity otherwise controls the fund for purposes of
section 13 of the BHC Act. As a result, such a fund would be subject to
the requirements of section 13 and the implementing regulations,
including restrictions on proprietary trading, restrictions on
investing in or sponsoring covered funds, and compliance obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ The implementing regulations generally exclude covered
funds from the definition of ``banking entity.'' 2013 rule Sec.
__.2(c)(2)(i). However, because foreign excluded funds are not
covered funds, they can become banking entities through affiliation
with other banking entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Federal banking agencies released a policy statement on July
21, 2017 (the policy statement), to address concerns about the possible
unintended consequences and extraterritorial impact of section 13 and
the implementing regulations for foreign excluded funds.\26\ The policy
statement noted that the Federal banking agencies would not take action
against a foreign banking entity \27\ based on attribution of
[[Page 46426]]
the activities and investments of a qualifying foreign excluded fund to
a foreign banking entity, or against a qualifying foreign excluded fund
as a banking entity, for a period of one year while staffs of the
agencies considered alternative ways in which the implementing
regulations could be amended, or other appropriate action could be
taken, to address the issue. The policy statement has since been
extended and is currently scheduled to expire on July 21, 2021.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Statement regarding Treatment of Certain Foreign Funds
under the Rules Implementing Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company
Act (July 21, 2017), available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/files/bcreg20170721a1.pdf.
\27\ ``Foreign banking entity'' was defined for purposes of the
policy statement to mean a banking entity that is not, and is not
controlled directly or indirectly by, a banking entity that is
located in or organized under the laws of the United States or any
State. Id.
\28\ Statement regarding Treatment of Certain Foreign Funds
under the Rules Implementing Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company
Act (July 17, 2019), available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/files/bcreg20190717a1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of the policy statement, a ``qualifying foreign
excluded fund'' means, with respect to a foreign banking entity, an
entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2) Would be a covered fund were the entity organized or
established in the United States, or is, or holds itself out as being,
an entity or arrangement that raises money from investors primarily for
the purpose of investing in financial instruments for resale or other
disposition or otherwise trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
foreign banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in, or sponsorship of, the entity;
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the foreign banking
entity to evade the requirements of section 13 or implementing
regulations.
To be eligible for this relief, the foreign banking entity's
acquisition or retention of any ownership interest in, or sponsorship
of, the qualifying foreign excluded fund must meet the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in section 13(d)(1)(I) of the BHC Act and
Sec. __.13(b) of the implementing regulations, as if the qualifying
foreign excluded fund were a covered fund. To provide greater clarity
and certainty to banking entities and qualifying foreign excluded
funds, and to limit the extraterritoriality of the rule, the 2020
proposal included a permanent exemption from the section 13
restrictions on proprietary trading and investing in or sponsoring
covered funds for the activities of qualifying foreign excluded funds.
The proposed exemption generally included the same eligibility criteria
from the policy statement, although it included a modified version of
the anti-evasion provision such that, in order to qualify, a fund could
not be operated in a manner that enables ``any other banking entity''
(rather than ``the foreign banking entity'') to evade the requirements
of section 13 or the implementing regulations.
The agencies requested comment on all aspects of this exemption.
Commenters were generally supportive of the 2020 proposal to exempt
qualifying foreign excluded funds from certain requirements of the
implementing regulations.\29\ Two commenters expressed opposition to
the proposed exemption.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ SIFMA; Bank Policy Institute (BPI); Bundesverband
Investment und Asset Management e.V. (BVI); American Investment
Council (AIC); ABA; European Fund and Asset Management Association
(EFAMA); Shareholder Advocacy Forum (SAF); IIB; JBA; CBA; and Credit
Suisse.
\30\ Occupy and Data Boiler Technologies LLC (Data Boiler).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some commenters requested that qualifying foreign excluded funds be
excluded from the definition of banking entity.\31\ One commenter
expressed concern that the 2020 proposal would require qualifying
foreign excluded funds to establish section 13 of the BHC Act
compliance programs, imposing costs on qualifying foreign excluded
funds.\32\ This commenter noted that there may be situations under
section 13 of the BHC Act where a foreign banking entity controls a
qualifying foreign excluded fund, but under foreign law does not have
the necessary authority to require it to adopt a section 13 compliance
program. As such, this commenter advocated for either excluding this
type of fund from the definition of banking entity or exempting this
type of fund from the compliance program requirements under the
rule.\33\ One commenter expressed concern that a qualifying foreign
excluded fund would still need to comply with various restrictions
under section 13, including the provisions of Sec. __.14 of the
implementing regulations (i.e., Super 23A) and the compliance program
requirements.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ IIB; JBA; CBA; Credit Suisse; and EBF.
\32\ JBA.
\33\ JBA.
\34\ Credit Suisse.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some commenters requested that the agencies change the anti-evasion
provision of the qualifying foreign excluded funds definition so that
it would only apply to the specific foreign banking entity, in a manner
consistent with the policy statement.\35\ One of these commenters
suggested, as an alternative, revising the provision so that it would
only apply to ``any affiliated banking entities.'' \36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ IIB; JBA; Credit Suisse; and EBF.
\36\ Credit Suisse.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter requested an anti-evasion safe harbor and changes to
allow a fund to be a qualifying foreign excluded fund when a non-U.S.
banking entity serves as a management company to the fund and is
approved to provide fund management in accordance with local law.\37\
This commenter also requested that the agencies limit the requirements
in the proposed qualifying foreign excluded funds definition to only
those set forth in Sec. __.13(b) of the rule for covered fund
activities conducted by foreign banking entities solely outside the
United States, and treat as qualifying foreign excluded funds those
funds for which the foreign banking entity cannot exercise voting
rights.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ JBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to their authority under section 13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC
Act, the agencies are adopting the exemption for the activities of
qualifying foreign excluded funds substantially as proposed, but with
modifications to the anti-evasion provision and compliance program
requirements. Specifically, the agencies are exempting the activities
of qualified foreign excluded funds from the restrictions on
proprietary trading and investing in or sponsoring covered funds, if
the acquisition or retention of the ownership interest in, or
sponsorship of, the qualifying foreign excluded fund by the foreign
banking entity meets the requirements for permitted covered fund
activities and investments conducted solely outside the United States,
as provided in Sec. __.13(b) of the rule.\38\ Under the final rule, a
qualifying foreign excluded fund has the same meaning as in the policy
statement as described above and in the 2020 proposal, except for the
modification to the anti-evasion provision, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See final rule Sec. __.13(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC Act gives the agencies rulemaking
authority to exempt activities from the prohibitions of section 13,
provided the agencies determine that the activity in question would
promote and protect the safety and soundness of the banking entity and
the financial stability of the
[[Page 46427]]
United States.\39\ For the reasons described below, the agencies have
determined that exempting the activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds promotes and protects the safety and soundness of banking
entities and U.S. financial stability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(J).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This relief is expected to promote and protect the safety and
soundness of such funds and their foreign banking entity sponsors by
putting them on a level playing field with their foreign competitors
that are not subject to the implementing regulations. If the activities
of these foreign funds were subject to the restrictions applicable to
banking entities, their asset management activities could be
significantly disrupted, and their foreign banking entity sponsors may
be at a competitive disadvantage to other foreign bank and non-bank
market participants conducting asset management business outside of the
United States. Exempting the activities of these foreign funds allows
their foreign banking entity sponsors to continue to conduct their
asset management business outside the United States as long as the
foreign banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements in Sec. __.13(b) of the
implementing regulations. Thus, the exemption is expected to have the
effect of promoting the safety and soundness of these foreign funds and
their sponsors, while at the same time limiting the extraterritorial
impact of the implementing regulations, consistent with the purposes of
sections 13(d)(1)(H) and (I) of the BHC Act.
The exemption is also expected to promote and protect U.S.
financial stability. While qualifying foreign excluded funds have a
very limited nexus to the U.S. financial system, the exemption would
promote U.S. financial stability by providing additional capital and
liquidity to U.S. capital markets without a concomitant increase in
risk borne by U.S. entities. Because the exemption requires that the
foreign banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements in Sec. __.13(b) of the
final rule, the exemption will help ensure that the risks of
investments made by these foreign funds will be booked at foreign
entities in foreign jurisdictions, thus promoting and protecting U.S.
financial stability. Additionally, subjecting such funds to the
requirements of the implementing regulations could precipitate
disruptions in foreign capital markets, which could generate spillover
effects in the U.S. financial system.
In response to comments regarding the anti-evasion provision, the
final rule specifies that the qualifying foreign excluded fund must not
be operated in a manner that enables the banking entity that sponsors
or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any other
affiliated banking entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded
fund), to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act or the
final rule. This change is meant to clarify the scope of the anti-
evasion provision and provide certainty for banking entities that
sponsor or control the qualifying foreign excluded fund.
Consistent with feedback from several commenters, the agencies also
have modified compliance requirements with respect to qualifying
foreign excluded funds. While, under the final rule, the activities of
a qualifying foreign excluded fund are exempted from the proprietary
trading restrictions of Sec. __.3(a) and the covered fund restrictions
of Sec. __.10(a) of the final rule, the qualifying foreign excluded
fund is still a banking entity. Absent any additional changes, the
qualifying foreign excluded fund could become subject to the compliance
requirements of Sec. __.20. However, since these qualifying foreign
excluded funds are exempted from the proprietary trading requirements
of Sec. __.3(a) and covered fund restrictions of Sec. __.10(a) of the
final rule, the agencies believe that requiring a compliance program
for the fund itself is overly burdensome and unnecessary. The
requirements in Sec. __.20 are intended to ensure and monitor
compliance with the proprietary trading and covered fund provisions,
and there would be no benefit to applying these requirements to an
entity that is exempt from those provisions. Therefore, under the final
rule, qualifying foreign excluded funds are not required to have
compliance programs or comply with the reporting and additional
documentation requirements under Sec. __.20. However, any banking
entity that owns or sponsors a qualifying foreign excluded fund will
still be required to have in place appropriate compliance programs for
itself and its other subsidiaries and provide reports and additional
documentation as required by Sec. __.20.
The final rule does not amend the definition of ``banking entity''
as requested by several commenters. Because ``banking entity'' is
specifically defined in section 13 of the BHC Act, the agencies find it
appropriate to address concerns related to foreign excluded funds
through their exemptive rulemaking authority.
The agencies are not making any change regarding the applicability
of Sec. __.14 of the implementing regulations, which imposes
limitations on relationships with covered funds, with respect to
qualifying foreign excluded funds. The agencies believe it is
appropriate to retain the application of Sec. __.14 to qualifying
foreign excluded funds to limit risks that may be borne by banking
entities located in the United States through transactions with such
funds.\40\ Further, given the limited set of circumstances in which
Sec. __.14 would apply (i.e., a transaction between a foreign excluded
fund and a covered fund that is sponsored or advised by the same
banking entity), the agencies do not believe that it is overly
burdensome for a banking entity that sponsors or controls a qualifying
foreign excluded fund to ensure that it is not in violation of Sec.
__.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ A U.S. banking entity's exposure to a fund that would be a
qualifying foreign excluded fund with respect to a foreign banking
entity may still be a covered fund with respect to a U.S. banking
entity under Sec. __.10(b)(1)(iii) of the implementing regulations.
A U.S. banking entity's investment in and relationship with such a
fund could therefore be subject to the entirety of the applicable
prohibitions and restrictions of Subpart C of the implementing
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Modifications To Existing Covered Fund Exclusions
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies acknowledged that
the covered fund definition was expansive.\41\ To effectively tailor
the covered fund provisions to the types of entities that section 13 of
the BHC Act was intended to cover, the 2013 rule excluded various types
of entities from the covered fund definition.\42\ In response to
comments received on the 2020 proposal, and based on experience
implementing the rule, the agencies are modifying certain of the
existing exclusions, as described below, to make them more
appropriately structured to effectuate the intent of the statute and
its implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ See 79 FR 5677.
\42\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Foreign Public Funds
2013 Rule
To provide consistent treatment for U.S. registered investment
companies and their foreign equivalents, the implementing regulations
exclude foreign public funds from the definition of covered fund.\43\ A
foreign public fund
[[Page 46428]]
is generally defined under the 2013 rule as any issuer that is
organized or established outside of the United States and the ownership
interests of which are (1) authorized to be offered and sold to retail
investors in the issuer's home jurisdiction and (2) sold predominantly
through one or more public offerings outside of the United States.\44\
The agencies stated in the preamble to the 2013 rule that they
generally expect that an offering is made predominantly outside of the
United States if 85 percent or more of the fund's interests are sold to
investors that are not residents of the United States.\45\ The 2013
rule defines ``public offering'' for purposes of this exclusion to mean
a ``distribution,'' as defined in Sec. __.4(a)(3) of subpart B, of
securities in any jurisdiction outside the United States to investors,
including retail investors, provided that the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made; the distribution does not restrict
availability to only investors with a minimum level of net worth or net
investment assets; and the issuer has filed or submitted, with the
appropriate regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering
disclosure documents that are publicly available.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ In adopting the foreign public fund exclusion, the
agencies' view was that it was appropriate to exclude these funds
from the ``covered fund'' definition because they are sufficiently
similar to U.S. registered investment companies. 79 FR 5678.
\44\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(c)(1); see also 79 FR 5678.
\45\ 79 FR 5678.
\46\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2013 rule places an additional condition on a U.S. banking
entity's ability to rely on the foreign public fund exclusion with
respect to any foreign fund it sponsors.\47\ The foreign public fund
exclusion is only available to a U.S. banking entity with respect to a
foreign fund sponsored by the U.S. banking entity if, in addition to
the requirements discussed above, the fund's ownership interests are
sold predominantly to persons other than the sponsoring banking entity,
the issuer (or affiliates of the sponsoring banking entity or issuer),
and employees and directors of such entities.\48\ The agencies stated
in the preamble to the 2013 rule that, consistent with the agencies'
view concerning whether a foreign public fund has been sold
predominantly outside of the United States, the agencies generally
expect that a foreign public fund would satisfy this additional
condition if 85 percent or more of the fund's interests are sold to
persons other than the sponsoring U.S. banking entity and the specified
persons connected to that banking entity.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ Although the discussion of this condition generally refers
to U.S. banking entities for ease of reading, the condition also
applies to foreign subsidiaries of a U.S. banking entity. See 2013
rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(ii) (applying this limitation ``[w]ith
respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled directly or
indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or organized
under the laws of the United States or of any State and any issuer
for which such banking entity acts as sponsor'').
\48\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(ii).
\49\ 79 FR 5678.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 Proposal
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies acknowledged that some of the
conditions of the 2013 rule's foreign public fund exclusion may not be
necessary to ensure consistent treatment of foreign public funds and
U.S. registered investment companies. Moreover, some conditions may
make it difficult for a non-U.S. fund to qualify for the exclusion or
for a banking entity to validate whether a non-U.S. fund qualifies for
the exclusion, resulting in certain non-U.S. funds that are similar to
U.S. registered investment companies being treated as covered funds.
To address these concerns, the 2020 proposal would have made
certain modifications to the foreign public fund exclusion. First, the
agencies proposed to replace the requirement that the fund be
authorized to be offered and sold to retail investors in the issuer's
home jurisdiction (the home jurisdiction requirement) and the
requirement that the fund interests be sold predominantly through one
or more public offerings outside of the United States, with a
requirement that the fund is authorized to offer and sell ownership
interests, and such interests are offered and sold, through one or more
public offerings outside of the United States. This change would have
permitted foreign funds to qualify for the exclusion if they are
organized in one jurisdiction but only authorized to be sold to retail
investors in another jurisdiction, as this is a fairly common way for
foreign retail funds to be organized. Also, no longer requiring a fund
to be sold predominantly through one or more public offerings was
intended to reduce the difficulty that banking entities have described
in determining and monitoring the distribution history and patterns of
a third-party sponsored fund or a sponsored fund whose interests are
sold through third-party distributors.
The agencies also proposed modifying the definition of ``public
offering'' from the implementing regulations to add a new requirement
that the distribution be subject to substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection laws or regulations, to help ensure that foreign
funds qualifying for this exclusion are sufficiently similar to U.S.
registered investment companies. Additionally, the 2020 proposal would
have only applied the condition that the distribution comply with all
applicable requirements in the jurisdiction where it is made to
instances in which the banking entity acts as the investment manager,
investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator,
or sponsor. This proposed change was intended to address the potential
difficulty that a banking entity investing in a third-party sponsored
fund may have in determining whether the distribution of such fund
complied with all the requirements in the jurisdiction where it was
made.
To simplify the requirements of the exclusion and address concerns
described by banking entities with the difficulty in tracking the sale
of ownership interests to employees and their immediate family members,
the 2020 proposal would have eliminated the limitation on selling
ownership interests of the issuer to employees (other than senior
executive officers) of the sponsoring banking entity or the issuer (or
affiliates of the banking entity or issuer). This change was intended
to help align the treatment of foreign public funds with that of U.S.
registered investment companies, as the exclusion for U.S. registered
investment companies has no such limitation. The 2020 proposal would
have continued to limit the sale of ownership interests to directors or
senior executive officers of the sponsoring banking entity or the
issuer (or their affiliates), as the agencies believed that such a
requirement would be simpler for a banking entity to track.
Finally, the 2020 proposal requested comment on the appropriateness
of the expectation stated in the preamble to the 2013 rule that, for a
U.S. banking entity-sponsored foreign fund to satisfy the condition
that it be ``predominantly'' sold to persons other than the sponsoring
U.S. banking entity and certain persons connected to that banking
entity, at least 85 percent of the ownership interests in the fund
should be sold to such other persons.
Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule
The agencies are adopting all of the proposed changes and are
making certain adjustments in response to comments received, as
discussed below.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal generally supported the proposed
changes to the foreign public funds
[[Page 46429]]
exclusion.\50\ Specifically, commenters supported the elimination of
the home jurisdiction requirement and the requirement that the fund be
sold predominantly through one or more public offerings.\51\ Commenters
supported the proposed change to the ``public offering'' definition to
include a requirement that a distribution be subject to substantive
disclosure and retail investor protection laws or regulations,\52\ but
did not recommend further specifying what substantive disclosure and
investor protection requirements should apply because they generally
viewed it as unnecessary and overly prescriptive.\53\ Commenters also
supported eliminating the restriction on share ownership by employees
(other than senior executives and directors) of the U.S. banking entity
that sponsors the foreign public fund.\54\ In response to a specific
question in the 2020 proposal, one commenter indicated that the
proposed changes to the foreign public funds exclusion would not
increase the risk of evasion of the requirements of section 13 and the
implementing regulations, and thus no additional anti-evasion measures
were necessary.\55\ Another commenter stated that the proposed changes
were less than ideal but were acceptable after balancing compliance
costs and benefits.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; Investment Company
Institute (ICI); BVI; CBA; Committee on Capital Markets Regulation
(CCMR); Data Boiler; Goldman Sachs; Investment Adviser Association
(IAA); JBA; SAF; and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Capital
Markets Competitiveness (CCMC).
\51\ IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; BVI; and CBA.
\52\ IIB; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; and BVI.
\53\ IIB; ICI; and CBA. One commenter supported this assertion
by stating that 95 percent of the world's securities markets,
including all major emerging markets, have substantive disclosure
and retail investor protection rules that are guided by the
International Organization of Securities Commissions' common
principles for retail funds and the detailed policy work that
informs those principles. ICI.
\54\ FSF.
\55\ SIFMA.
\56\ Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also recommended additional changes to further align the
treatment of foreign public funds with that of U.S. registered
investment companies or to prevent evasion of the rule.\57\
Specifically, some commenters recommended eliminating the requirement
that a fund actually be sold through a public offering and, instead,
only require that a fund be authorized to be sold through a public
offering.\58\ These commenters generally viewed this requirement as
burdensome and difficult to administer and noted that U.S. registered
investment companies are not required to be sold in public
distributions. The agencies do not consider the fact that there is no
requirement for U.S. registered investment companies to be actually
sold through public offerings as a sufficient rationale for removing
this requirement from the foreign public fund exclusion. Requiring
foreign public funds to be sold through one or more public offerings is
intended to ensure that such funds are in fact public funds and thus
sufficiently similar to U.S. registered investment companies. While
there may be certain limited scenarios where a U.S. registered
investment company is not sold to retail investors, the agencies
believe that the vast majority of U.S. registered investment companies
are sold to retail investors. Furthermore, U.S. registered investment
companies are subject to robust registration, reporting, and other
requirements that are familiar to the agencies, whereas foreign public
funds are subject to a differing array of requirements depending on the
jurisdiction where they are authorized to be sold. These other
jurisdictions may have less developed requirements for retail funds,
which may increase the likelihood of a fund seeking authorization for
public distribution in certain foreign jurisdictions solely as a means
of avoiding the covered fund prohibition. The agencies believe that
eliminating this requirement would increase the risk of evasion by
permitting foreign funds that may be authorized for sale to retail
investors in a foreign jurisdiction--but are only sold through private
offerings where no substantive disclosure or retail investor
protections exist--to qualify for the exclusion. Such funds would not
be comparable to U.S. registered investment companies and would not be
the type of fund that foreign public fund exclusion was intended to
address. Accordingly, the agencies are not adopting this suggested
modification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ One commenter recommended that the agencies create an
exclusion from the ``proprietary trading'' definition for the
activities of regulated funds, including foreign public funds, under
certain circumstances. ICI. The agencies note that such a change is
not within the scope of this rulemaking.
\58\ IIB; SIFMA; and EBF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One trade association commenter suggested eliminating a provision
in the ``public offering'' requirement that prohibits a distribution
from being limited to investors with a minimum net worth or net
investment assets because some of its members distribute funds,
including mutual funds, in offerings that do not meet this requirement
but that are nonetheless subject to substantive disclosure and retail
investor protection requirements. Similar to the reasons for retaining
the requirement that a foreign public fund actually be sold through one
or more public offerings, the agencies believe that retaining this
requirement is necessary to ensure that funds qualifying for this
exclusion are sufficiently similar to U.S. registered investment
companies. In fact, one of the identifying characteristics of a covered
fund is that its offerings are limited to investors with minimum net
worth or net investment assets.\59\ The agencies therefore believe that
foreign funds that limit their offerings to investors with a minimum
net worth or net investment assets are generally not sufficiently
similar to U.S. registered investment companies, and thus the agencies
are not adopting this suggested change to the ``public offering''
definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ Under the Investment Company Act, certain funds whose
offerings are limited to investors with minimum net worth or net
investment assets are exempt from registration as investment
companies. See 15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(7). These funds are generally
treated as covered funds under section 13 of the BHC Act and the
implementing regulations. See 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(2); implementing
regulations Sec. __.10(b)(1)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter opposed the proposed elimination of the requirement
in the ``public offering'' definition that a distribution comply with
all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made for a banking entity that does not serve as
the fund's investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor.\60\ The final rule adopts
this modification as proposed, because the agencies believe the other
eligibility criteria for a fund to qualify under the foreign public
fund exclusion are sufficient to appropriately identify these funds. In
addition, the agencies recognize that it may be difficult or impossible
for a banking entity that invests in a third-party fund to know whether
the fund's distribution complied with all applicable requirements in
the jurisdiction where it was distributed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter recommended that the agencies require 85 percent of a
foreign public fund's ownership interests be sold to and owned by
``bona fide'' retail investors in the fund's home jurisdiction.\61\
However, for the same reasons that the agencies are eliminating the
home jurisdiction requirement and the requirement that a fund be sold
predominantly through public offerings,
[[Page 46430]]
the agencies are not adopting this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ Oleh Zadorestskyy. This commenter also suggested that the
agencies require proof that the investors were non-U.S. persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some commenters suggested that the agencies identify common foreign
fund types that are presumed to qualify for the exclusion for foreign
public funds for the purpose of improving efficiency and simplifying
compliance with the rule.\62\ Other commenters recommended that issuers
listed on an internationally-recognized exchange and available in
retail-level denominations should automatically qualify for the
exclusion for similar reasons.\63\ Although the agencies expect many
such funds will qualify for the exclusion, the agencies decline to
adopt either of these suggested changes, as both would require the
agencies' review and on-going monitoring of foreign laws and
regulations to ensure that the types of funds that would qualify under
these provisions are sufficiently similar to U.S. registered investment
companies and that their exclusion as foreign public funds would
continue to be appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ IIB and EBF.
\63\ IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; FSF; and CBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some commenters recommended that the agencies entirely eliminate
the restrictions on share ownership by parties affiliated with a U.S.
banking entity sponsor of a foreign public fund.\64\ Other commenters
suggested that, if the restrictions on share ownership by banking
entities affiliated with the sponsor were retained, the restrictions on
share ownership by senior executives and directors should be
removed.\65\ The commenters generally viewed these requirements as
unnecessary and burdensome to track and monitor. As discussed in the
preamble to the 2013 rule, these requirements are intended to prevent
evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act.\66\ Additionally, the agencies
note that U.S. banking entity sponsors of foreign public funds would
need to track the ownership of such funds by their affiliates and
management officials even if the requirements were eliminated in order
to determine whether they control such funds for BHC Act purposes.\67\
Thus, for a U.S. banking entity relying on this exclusion with respect
to a fund that it sponsors, the agencies are retaining the requirement
that the fund be sold predominantly to persons other than the U.S.
banking entity sponsor, the fund, affiliates of such sponsoring banking
entity or fund, and the directors and senior executive officers of such
entities (collectively, ``U.S. banking entity sponsor and associated
parties'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ SIFMA and FSF.
\65\ SIFMA; BPI; ICI; and CCMC.
\66\ 79 FR 5678-79.
\67\ See 12 CFR 225.2(e); 12 CFR 225.31(d)(2)(ii). If a foreign
public fund is controlled by a banking entity for BHC Act purposes,
such fund could also be being treated as a banking entity under
section 13. See implementing regulations Sec. __.2(c); FAQ 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relatedly, some commenters recommended that the agencies modify
their expectation of the level of ownership of a foreign public fund
that would satisfy the requirement that a fund be ``predominantly''
sold to persons other than its U.S. banking entity sponsor and
associated parties,\68\ which, in the preamble to the 2013 rule, the
agencies stated was 85 percent or more (which would permit the U.S.
banking entity sponsor and associated parties to own the remaining 15
percent). These commenters asserted that the relevant ownership
threshold for U.S. registered investment companies is 25 percent, and
that, for foreign public funds, the threshold should be the same. The
agencies agree that the permitted ownership level of a foreign public
fund by a U.S. banking entity sponsor and associated parties should be
aligned with the functionally equivalent threshold for banking entity
investments in U.S. registered investment companies, which is 24.9
percent.\69\ Accordingly, the agencies have amended this provision in
the final rule to require that more than 75 percent of the fund's
interests be sold to persons other than the U.S. banking entity sponsor
and associated parties.\70\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ BPI; FSF; ICI; and CCMC.
\69\ Although the implementing regulations do not explicitly
prohibit a banking entity from acquiring 25 percent or more of a
U.S. registered investment company, a U.S. registered investment
company would become a banking entity if it is affiliated with
another banking entity (other than as described in Sec.
__.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing regulations). See 79 FR 5732
(``[F]or purposes of section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule, a
registered investment company . . . will not be considered to be an
affiliate of the banking entity if the banking entity owns,
controls, or holds with the power to vote less than 25 percent of
the voting shares of the company or fund, and provides investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund only in a manner that complies with
other limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.'').
\70\ For a U.S. banking entity that sponsors a foreign public
fund, crossing the 24.9 percent ownership threshold (other than
during a permitted seeding period) would cause the fund to be a
covered fund (if no other exclusion applied), in which case the
banking entity would be in violation of the 3 percent per-fund
investment limit. See implementing regulations Sec.
__.12(a)(2)(ii)(A). The agencies believe that such a strict
prohibition against a U.S. banking entity acquiring 25 percent or
more of a foreign public fund that it sponsors is appropriate
because of the elevated risk of evasion by the sponsoring banking
entity, which may be able to control the investments made by the
fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter recommended that, with respect to foreign public
funds sponsored by U.S. affiliates of foreign banking entities, the
agencies exclude the sponsoring U.S. banking entity's non-U.S.
affiliates and their directors and employees from the restrictions on
share ownership, provided that such non-U.S. affiliates are not
controlled by a U.S. banking entity.\71\ This commenter asserted that
there is no U.S. financial stability or safety and soundness benefit to
applying this restriction to such non-U.S. affiliates and their
directors and employees, as the risks of any such investments are borne
solely outside the United States. However, with the change described
above, which permits a U.S. banking entity sponsor and associated
parties to hold less than 25 percent of a foreign public fund, the
agencies do not believe that this change is necessary. Even if the
requirement were modified as the commenter suggested, the banking
entity and its affiliates would still be limited to owning less than 25
percent of the fund without the fund becoming a banking entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\71\ IIB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter requested that the agencies modify Sec. __.12(b)(1)
of the implementing regulations, which governs attribution of ownership
interests in covered funds to banking entities, to clarify that the
banking entity ``or an affiliate'' can provide the advisory,
administrative, or other services required in Sec. __.12(b)(1)(ii)(B)
for the non-attribution rule to apply. The commenter requested this
clarification because Sec. __.12(b)(1)(ii)(B) is cross-referenced by
FAQ 14, which, as discussed above, states that a foreign public fund
will not be treated as a banking entity if it complies with the test in
Sec. __.12(b)(1)(ii) (i.e., the banking entity holds less than 25
percent of the voting shares in the foreign public fund and provides
advisory, administrative, or other services to the fund). The agencies
confirm that the requested interpretation is correct and, accordingly,
have amended Sec. __.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing regulations to
clarify that the ownership limit applies to the banking entity and its
affiliates, in the aggregate, and the requirement that the banking
entity provide advisory or other services can be satisfied by the
banking entity or its affiliates.
One commenter noted that FAQ 16, which relates to the seeding
period for foreign public funds, uses 3 years as an example of the
duration of such a seeding period, and requested that the agencies
confirm that a foreign public fund's seeding period can be longer than
[[Page 46431]]
3 years.\72\ Another commenter requested that the agencies codify the
3-year seeding period in the implementing regulations.\73\ The agencies
believe that, depending on the facts and circumstances of a particular
foreign public fund, the appropriate duration of its seeding period may
vary and, under certain facts and circumstances, may exceed three
years. The agencies believe that this flexibility is appropriate and
thus decline to further specify such a limit. Another commenter
requested that the agencies codify the foreign public fund seeding
FAQ,\74\ FAQ 14, and FAQ 16, both described above, in the implementing
regulations.\75\ The agencies decline to codify these FAQs at this time
but note that the final rule does not modify or revoke any previously
issued staff FAQs, unless otherwise specified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\72\ IAA.
\73\ CCMC.
\74\ The foreign public fund seeding FAQ states that staffs of
the agencies would not advise that a seeding vehicle that is
operated pursuant to a written plan to become a foreign public fund
and that meets certain conditions be treated as a covered fund
during such seeding period.
\75\ IIB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the final rule, the agencies are adopting the amendments to the
foreign public funds exclusion as proposed, with the additional
modifications described above. The agencies believe the revised
requirements will make the foreign public fund exclusion more effective
by expanding its availability, providing clarity, and simplifying
compliance with its requirements, while continuing to ensure that the
funds that qualify are sufficiently similar to U.S. registered
investment companies.
2. Loan Securitizations
Section 13 of the BHC Act provides that ``[n]othing in this section
shall be construed to limit or restrict the ability of a banking entity
. . . to sell or securitize loans in a manner otherwise permitted by
law.'' \76\ To effectuate this statutory mandate, the 2013 rule
excluded from the definition of covered fund loan securitizations that
issue asset-backed securities and hold only loans, certain rights and
assets that arise from the structure of the loan securitization or from
the loans supporting a loan securitization, and a small set of other
financial instruments (permissible assets).\77\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\76\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2).
\77\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.10(c)(8). Loan is further defined as
any loan, lease, extension of credit, or secured or unsecured
receivable that is not a security or derivative. Implementing
regulations Sec. __.2(t).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the adoption of the 2013 rule, several banking entities and
other participants in the loan securitization industry have commented
that the limited set of permissible assets has inappropriately
restricted their ability to use the loan securitization exclusion. In
the 2018 proposal, the agencies asked several questions regarding the
efficacy and scope of the exclusion and the Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ.\78\ Comments focused on permitting small amounts of non-
loan assets and clarifying the treatment of leases and related assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\78\ 83 FR 33480-81.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to these concerns, the 2020 proposal would have
codified the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ and permitted loan
securitizations to hold a small amount of non-loan assets. The agencies
requested comment on all aspects of the proposed changes to the loan
securitization exclusion, and comments were generally supportive of the
proposed revisions.\79\ Several commenters also suggested revisions to
the 2020 proposal.\80\ Comments are discussed in detail below.\81\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\79\ E.g., SIFMA; BPI; Managed Funds Association (MFA); PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC); Goldman Sachs; Loan
Syndications and Trading Association (LSTA); and Structured Finance
Association (SFA).
\80\ E.g., SIFMA; CCMC; BPI; and IIB.
\81\ One commenter suggested that some jurisdictions' risk
retention rules may vary from the regulations implementing section
15G of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78o-11), which requires a banking
entity to retain and maintain a certain minimum interest in certain
asset-backed securities. See IIB. This commenter recommended
allowing banking entities to hold certain investments in compliance
with certain foreign laws (e.g., European risk retention rules). The
agencies understand that rules for risk retention vary across
jurisdictions. However, the agencies believe that the requested
action is outside the scope of the current rulemaking. In addition,
another commenter requested that the agencies clarify the definition
of asset-backed securities as used in the loan securitization
exclusions. See Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (Arnold & Porter).
The agencies discuss the definition of asset-backed securities in
Section IV.C.1.iii (Credit Funds), infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Servicing Assets
The implementing regulations permit loan securitizations to hold
rights or other assets (servicing assets) that arise from the structure
of the loan securitization or from the loans supporting a loan
securitization.\82\ Rights or other servicing assets are assets
designed to facilitate the servicing of the underlying loans or the
distribution of proceeds from those loans to holders of the asset-
backed securities.\83\ In response to confusion regarding the scope of
the provisions permitting servicing assets and a separate provision
limiting the types of permitted securities, the staffs of the agencies
released the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ. The FAQ clarified that
a servicing asset may or may not be a security, but if the servicing
asset is a security, it must be a permitted security under the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\82\ Sec. Sec. __.2(t); __.10(c)(8)(i)(D); __.10(c)(8)(v).
\83\ See, e.g., FASB Statement No. 156: Accounting for Servicing
of Financial Assets, ] 61 (FAS 156).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2020 proposal would have codified the Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ in the implementing regulations to clarify the scope of
the servicing asset provision.\84\ Commenters generally supported the
codification of the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ, indicating that
such a codification would promote transparency and ensure continued use
of the loan securitization exclusion.\85\ For the above reasons, the
final rule adopts the codification of the Loan Securitization Servicing
FAQ as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\84\ The 2020 proposal also clarified that special units of
beneficial interest and collateral certificates meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of the exclusion that are
securities need not meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii)
of the exclusion. See 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(B). The
agencies are adopting this revision, as proposed.
\85\ E.g., SIFMA; PNC; and SFA. One commenter indicated that the
current Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ was sufficient and that
codifying the FAQ was not necessary; however, the commenter did not
elaborate on or justify this position. Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Equivalents
The loan securitization exclusion permits issuers relying on the
exclusion to hold certain types of contractual rights or assets related
to the loans underlying the securitization, including cash equivalents.
In response to questions about the scope of the cash equivalents
provision, the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ stated that ``cash
equivalents'' means high quality, highly liquid investments whose
maturity corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need
for funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans
or the asset-backed securities.\86\ To promote transparency and
clarity, the 2020 proposal would have codified this additional language
in the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ regarding the meaning of
``cash equivalents.'' \87\ The agencies did not propose requiring
``cash equivalents'' to be ``short term,'' because the agencies
recognized that a loan securitization may need greater flexibility to
match the maturity of high quality, highly liquid investments to its
expected or potential need for funds. Commenters generally supported
the codification of the definition of ``cash equivalents'' in the loan
securitization
[[Page 46432]]
exclusion.\88\ The final rule adopts the codification of ``cash
equivalents'' as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\86\ See supra, n.14.
\87\ 2020 proposed rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(iii)(A).
\88\ E.g., LSTA; PNC; and SIFMA. One commenter expressed
opposition to this codification but did not elaborate or justify
this position. See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limited Holdings of Certain Debt Securities
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies declined to permit
loan securitizations to hold a certain amount of non-loan assets.\89\
The agencies supported a narrow scope of permissible assets in loan
securitizations, suggesting that such an approach would be consistent
with the purpose of section 13 of the BHC Act.\90\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\89\ 79 FR 5687-88.
\90\ 79 FR 5687.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters on the 2018 proposal disagreed with the
agencies' views and supported expanding the range of permissible assets
in an excluded loan securitization. After considering the comments
received on the 2018 proposal, the 2020 proposal would have allowed a
loan securitization vehicle to hold up to five percent of the fund's
total assets in non-loan assets. The agencies indicated that
authorizing loan securitizations to hold small amounts of non-loan
assets could, consistent with section 13 of the BHC Act, permit loan
securitizations to respond to investor demand and reduce compliance
costs associated with the securitization process without significantly
increasing risk to banking entities and the financial system.\91\ The
agencies requested comment on, among other things, the maximum amount
of permitted non-loan assets, the methodology for calculating the cap
on non-loan assets, and whether the agencies should limit the type of
assets that could be held under the non-loan asset provision.
Specifically, the agencies requested comment on whether the non-loan
asset provision should be limited to debt securities or should exclude
certain financial instruments such as derivatives and collateralized
debt obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\91\ 85 FR 12128-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters were generally supportive of allowing loan
securitizations to hold a limited amount of non-loan assets.\92\ These
commenters indicated that the requirements for the current loan
securitization exclusion are too restrictive and excessively limit use
of the exclusion and prevent issuers from responding to investor
demand, and suggested that a limited bucket of non-loan assets would
not fundamentally alter the characteristics and risks of
securitizations or otherwise increase risks in banking entities or the
financial system.\93\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\92\ E.g., SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse; MFA; Goldman Sachs;
LSTA; BPI; and SFA.
\93\ E.g., LSTA and Goldman Sachs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters recommended against limiting the type of assets
that could be held per the non-loan asset provision.\94\ For example,
one commenter stated that allowing excluded loan securitizations to
invest in any class of asset would allow those vehicles to achieve
investment goals during periods of constrained loan supply, while
another commenter indicated that such a restriction would be
unnecessary given that the low limit on non-loan assets would constrain
risks.\95\ In contrast, one commenter suggested limiting the type of
permissible assets to securities with risk characteristics similar to
loans.\96\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\94\ E.g., MFA; LSTA; and SFA. One commenter also requested that
the agencies make clear that the non-loan assets would not be
subject to the other provisions of the loan securitization
exclusion. LSTA.
\95\ SFA and LSTA.
\96\ JBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous commenters suggested raising the cap on non-loan assets
from five percent of assets to ten percent of assets,\97\ while one
commenter indicated that a five percent cap would be sufficient.\98\
Commenters that supported an elevated limit on non-loan assets
generally argued that a ten percent limit would further reduce
compliance burdens while not materially increasing risk.\99\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\97\ SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse; MFA; Goldman Sachs; LSTA;
and SFA.
\98\ PNC. Another commenter who generally supported the proposed
modifications to the loan securitization exclusion did not urge the
agencies to raise the cap on non-loan assets. See BPI.
\99\ E.g., LSTA; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters also suggested a method for calculating the cap
on non-loan assets: The par value of assets on the day they are
acquired.\100\ These commenters suggested that relying on par value is
accepted practice in the loan securitization industry and would obviate
concerns related to tracking amortization or prepayment of loans in a
securitization portfolio.\101\ One of these commenters further
specified that the limit should be calculated (1) according to the par
value of the acquired assets on the date of investment over the
securitization's total collateral pool and (2) only at the time of
investment.\102\ Another commenter indicated that the cap should be
calculated as the lower of the purchase price and par value of the non-
qualifying assets over the issuer's aggregate capital commitments plus
its subscription based credit facility.\103\ A third commenter
suggested having a separate valuation mechanism for equity securities,
which the commenter suggested should be market value upon
acquisition.\104\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\100\ SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and LSTA.
\101\ SIFMA and BPI.
\102\ BPI.
\103\ Goldman Sachs.
\104\ SFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, two commenters opposed allowing excluded loan
securitizations to hold non-loan assets and suggested that such a
change would be contrary to the purpose of section 13 of the BHC Act or
would result in loan securitizations with differing risk
characteristics, potentially increasing monitoring costs on
investors.\105\ In addition, a commenter claimed that the 2020 proposal
to allow excluded loan securitizations to hold non-loan assets would be
contrary to section 13 of the BHC Act.\106\ Specifically, this
commenter suggested that the rule of construction in 12 U.S.C.
1851(g)(2) only permits the securitization or sale of loans and that
legislative history supports this reading of the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\105\ JBA and Data Boiler.
\106\ Occupy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies previously concluded and continue to believe they have
legal authority to adopt the proposed allowance for a limited amount of
non-loan assets.\107\ Section 13(g)(2) of the BHC Act states,
``[n]othing in this section shall be construed to limit or restrict the
ability of a banking entity or nonbank financial company supervised by
the Board to sell or securitize loans in a manner otherwise permitted
by law.'' \108\ This rule of construction is permissive--it allows the
agencies to design the regulations implementing section 13 in a way
that accommodates and does not unduly ``limit or restrict'' the ability
of banking entities to sell or securitize loans. Contrary to the
commenter's argument, this provision does not mandate that any loan
securitization exclusion only relate to loans. As discussed in this
section and the preamble to the 2020 proposal,\109\ the agencies
believe that allowing excluded loan securitizations to hold limited
amounts of non-loan assets would, in fact, promote the ability of
[[Page 46433]]
banking entities to sell or securitize loans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\107\ See 79 FR 5688-92 (stating, for example, that ``[t]he
[a]gencies also do not believe that they lack the statutory
authority to permit a loan securitization relying on the loan
securitization exclusion to use derivative[s,] as suggested by
[Occupy]'' and that, more broadly, the agencies have the authority
to allow excluded loan securitizations to hold non-loan assets).
\108\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2).
\109\ 85 FR 12128-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After considering the foregoing comments, the agencies are revising
the loan securitization exclusion to permit a loan securitization to
hold a limited amount of debt securities. Loan securitizations provide
an important mechanism for banking entities to fund lending programs.
Allowing loan securitizations to hold a small amount of debt securities
in response to customer and market demand may increase a banking
entity's capacity to provide financing and lending. To minimize the
potential for banking entities to use this exclusion to engage in
impermissible activities or take on excessive risk, the final rule
permits a loan securitization to hold debt securities (excluding asset-
backed securities and convertible securities), as opposed to any non-
loan assets, as the 2020 proposal would have allowed.\110\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\110\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although several commenters supported allowing a loan
securitization to hold any non-loan asset to provide flexibility and
allow the issuer's investment manager to respond to changing market
demands, the agencies believe that limiting the assets to debt
securities is more consistent with the activities of an issuer focused
on securitizing loans, rather than engaging in other activities. The
agencies have determined, consistent with the views of another
commenter, that non-loan assets with materially different risk
characteristics from loans could change the character and complexity of
an issuer and raise the type of concerns that section 13 of the BHC Act
was intended to address. Moreover, as described further below, limiting
the assets to those with risk characteristics that are similar to loans
will allow for a simpler and more transparent calculation of the five
percent limit, which will facilitate banking entities' compliance with
the exclusion. For the same reasons, the final rule does not permit a
loan securitization to hold asset-backed securities or convertible
securities as part of its five percent allowance for debt securities.
This helps to ensure that a loan securitization will not be exposed to
complex financial instruments and will retain the general
characteristic of a loan securitization issuer.
Similarly, to reduce potential risk-taking and to ensure that the
fund is composed almost entirely of loans with minimal non-loan assets,
the final rule retains the 2020 proposal's five percent limit on non-
loan assets. Commenters differed on whether raising the limit on non-
loan assets was appropriate or necessary to ensure flexibility, and it
is not clear what benefit would accrue to issuers who could hold debt
securities of, for example, seven or ten percent versus five percent.
The amount of non-loan assets held by a fund should not be so
significant that it fundamentally changes the character of the fund
from one that is engaged in securitizing loans to one that is engaged
in investing in other types of assets.
The agencies are also clarifying the methodology for calculating
the five percent limit on non-convertible debt securities.\111\ The
2020 proposal only provided that ``the aggregate value of any such
other assets must not exceed five percent of the aggregate value of the
issuing entity's assets'' and requested comment about how the agencies
should calculate this limit.\112\ As suggested by several commenters,
the final rule specifies that the limit on non-convertible debt
securities must be calculated at the most recent time of acquisition of
such assets. Specifically, the aggregate value of debt securities held
under Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E) of the final rule may not exceed five
percent of the aggregate value of loans held under Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(i)(A), cash and cash equivalents held under Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(iii)(A), and debt securities held under Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(i)(E), where the value of the loans, cash and cash
equivalents, and debt securities is calculated at par value at the time
any such debt security is purchased.\113\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\111\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E)(1)-(2).
\112\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E); 85 FR 12129.
\113\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E)(1)-(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies have chosen the most recent time of acquisition of
non-convertible debt securities as the moment of calculation to
simplify the manner in which the 5 percent cap applies. This would
permit an issuer that, at some point in its life, held debt securities
in excess of five percent of its assets to qualify for the exclusion if
it came into compliance with the five percent limit prior to a banking
entity relying on the exclusion with respect to such issuer. The
agencies believe that a continuous monitoring obligation could impose
significant burdens on excluded issuers and could cause an issuer to be
disqualified from the loan securitization exclusion based on market
events not under its control. It is also unnecessary to require this
calculation at other intervals because limiting permissible assets to
those that have similar characteristics as loans addresses the
potential for evasion of the five percent limit that could arise if the
issuer held more volatile assets.\114\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\114\ The agencies also have authority to address acts that
function as an evasion of the requirements of the exclusion. See
implementing regulations Sec. __.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the final rule, this measurement is based only on the value of
the loans and debt securities held under Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(A)
and (E) and the cash and cash equivalents held under Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(iii)(A) rather than the aggregate value of all of the
issuing entity's assets. The purpose of the five percent limit is to
ensure the investment pool of a loan securitization is composed of
loans. Therefore, the calculation takes into account the assets that
should make up the issuing entity's investment pool and excludes the
value of other rights or incidental assets, as well as derivatives held
for risk management. This further simplifies the calculation
methodology by excluding assets that may be more complex to value and
that are ancillary to the loan securitization's investment activities.
This straightforward calculation methodology will ensure that the loan
securitization exclusion remains easy to use and will facilitate
banking entities' compliance with the exclusion.
The agencies recognize that a loan securitization's transaction
agreements may require that some categories of loans, cash equivalents,
or debt securities be valued at fair market value for certain purposes.
To accommodate such situations, the exclusion provides that the value
of any loan, cash equivalent, or permissible debt security may be based
on its fair market value if (1) the issuing entity is required to use
the fair market value of such loan or debt security for purposes of
calculating compliance with concentration limitations or other similar
calculations under its transaction agreements and (2) the issuing
entity's valuation methodology values similarly situated assets, for
example non-performing loans, consistently. This provision is intended
to provide issuers with the flexibility to leverage existing
calculation methodologies while preventing issuers from using
inconsistent methodologies in a manner to evade the requirements of the
exclusion.
Leases
A commenter on the 2018 proposal suggested that the loan
securitization exclusion be expanded to cover leases and related
assets, including operating or capital leases.\115\ In response, in the
2020 proposal the agencies stated that they were ``not proposing to
separately
[[Page 46434]]
list leases within the loan securitization exclusion because leases are
included in the definition of loan and thus are permitted assets for
loan securitizations under the current exclusion.'' \116\ That same
commenter made a comment on the 2020 proposal urging the agencies to
reconsider explicitly including operating leases and leased properties
in the loan securitization exclusion.\117\ This commenter asserted that
unless the agencies specifically revise the definition of ``rights or
other assets'' to explicitly include leased property, then
securitization vehicles with operating leases that rely on the residual
property value after expiration of the lease to support their asset-
backed securities would not be able to qualify under the loan
securitization exemption, despite the 2013 rule's provisions for
special units of beneficial interest and collateral certificates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\115\ See 85 FR 12128.
\116\ Id.
\117\ SFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the 2020 proposal, the agencies are not separately
listing leases within the loan securitization exclusion because leases
are included in the definition of loan and thus are permitted assets
for loan securitizations under the current exclusion. The agencies are
also not modifying the definition of ``rights or other assets'' to
explicitly include leased property, as any residual value of such
leased property upon expiration of an operating lease should meet the
requirements to constitute an asset that is related or incidental to
purchasing or otherwise acquiring and holding loans.
3. Public Welfare and Small Business Funds
i. Public Welfare Funds
Section 13(d)(1)(E) of the BHC Act permits, among other things, a
banking entity to make and retain investments that are designed
primarily to promote the public welfare of the type permitted under 12
U.S.C. 24(Eleventh).\118\ Consistent with the statute, the implementing
regulations exclude from the definition of ``covered fund'' issuers
that make investments that are designed primarily to promote the public
welfare, of the type permitted under paragraph 11 of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the
welfare of low- and moderate-income communities or families (such as
providing housing, services, or jobs) (the public welfare investment
exclusion).\119\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\118\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E).
\119\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2020 proposal noted that the OCC's regulations implementing 12
U.S.C. 24(Eleventh) provide that investments that receive consideration
as qualified investments under the regulations implementing the
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) are public welfare investments for
national banks.\120\ The 2020 proposal requested comment on whether any
change should be made to clarify that all permissible public welfare
investments, under any agency's regulation, are excluded from the
covered fund restrictions.\121\ The 2020 proposal specifically asked
whether investments that would receive consideration as qualified
investments under the CRA should be excluded from the definition of
covered fund, either by incorporating these investments into the public
welfare investment exclusion or by establishing a new exclusion for
CRA-qualifying investments.\122\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\120\ See 85 FR 12130; 12 CFR 24.3.
\121\ See 85 FR 12130 (noting that such a change could provide
additional certainty regarding community development investments
made through fund structures).
\122\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the 2020 proposal requested comment on whether Rural
Business Investment Companies (RBICs) are typically excluded from the
definition of ``covered fund'' because of the public welfare investment
exclusion or another exclusion and on whether the agencies should
expressly exclude RBICs from the definition of covered fund.\123\ RBICs
are licensed under a program designed to promote economic development
and job creation in rural communities by investing in companies
involved in the production, processing, and supply of food and
agriculture-related products.\124\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\123\ See id.
\124\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act established the ``opportunity zone''
program to provide tax incentives for long-term investing in designated
economically distressed communities.\125\ The program allows taxpayers
to defer and reduce taxes on capital gains by reinvesting gains in
``qualified opportunity funds'' (QOF) that are required to have at
least 90 percent of their assets in designated low-income zones.\126\
The 2020 proposal requested comment on whether many or all QOFs would
meet the terms of the public welfare investment exclusion and on
whether the agencies should expressly exclude QOFs from the definition
of covered fund.\127\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\125\ See id.
\126\ See id.
\127\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters generally supported clarifying that funds that make
investments that qualify for consideration under the CRA qualify for
the public welfare investment exclusion.\128\ Commenters noted that
this clarification would be consistent with the OCC's regulations
concerning public welfare investments and the CRA, provide greater
certainty, and avoid unnecessarily chilling public welfare investment
activities.\129\ One commenter stated that some banking entities have
been reluctant to invest in certain community development funds due to
uncertainty as to whether these funds were covered funds.\130\ This
commenter stated that explicitly excluding funds that qualify for
consideration under the CRA from the definition of covered fund would
eliminate this uncertainty and would help support the type of community
development efforts that the public welfare investment exclusion was
designed to promote.\131\ In addition, some commenters recommended
excluding funds that qualify for the public welfare investment
exclusion from the definition of ``banking entity.'' \132\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\128\ See SIFMA; FSF; BPI; ABA; PNC; Community Development
Venture Capital Alliance (CDVCA); IIB; and Data Boiler (stating that
incorporating the CRA public welfare exemption may ease some
challenges faced by communities during the current COVID pandemic,
but all PWI should not be excluded).
\129\ See SIFMA; FSF; and CDVCA.
\130\ See CDVCA.
\131\ See id.
\132\ See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and IIB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also generally favored explicitly excluding RBICs and
QOFs from the definition of ``covered fund,'' either by adopting new
exclusions, or by clarifying the scope of the public welfare investment
exclusion.\133\ Commenters stated that explicitly excluding these funds
from the definition of ``covered fund'' would be consistent with the
statutory provision permitting public welfare investments. Commenters
stated that RBICs and QOFs must make investments that are clearly
designed primarily to promote the public welfare because they are
required to invest primarily in ways that promote job creation in rural
communities (which may have significant low- and moderate-income
populations or be economically disadvantaged and in need of
revitalization or stabilization) and in economically distressed
communities, respectively.\134\ Commenters stated that
[[Page 46435]]
certain RBICs and QOFs qualify for the public welfare investment
exclusion, but providing an express exclusion for these funds would
reduce uncertainty and associated compliance burdens and would
encourage banking entities to provide capital to projects that promote
economic development in rural and low-income communities.\135\ One
commenter stated that RBICs and QOFs engage in investments that are
substantively similar or identical to those of public welfare
investment funds that are already excluded from the definition of
covered fund and of the type that Congress recognized that section 13
of the BHC Act was not designed to prohibit.\136\ Another commenter
stated that explicitly excluding RBICs would result in the provision of
valuable expertise and services to RBICs and provide funding and
assistance to small businesses and low- and moderate-income
communities.\137\ One commenter expressed skepticism about providing a
new exclusion for RBICs and QOFs but suggested that certain of these
funds may currently qualify for the public welfare investment
exclusion.\138\ Another commenter stated that it is not necessary to
expressly exclude QOFs from the definition of covered fund, noting that
these funds should be of the type primarily intended to promote the
public welfare of low- and moderate-income areas and should therefore
qualify for the current public welfare investment exclusion.\139\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\133\ See SIFMA; FSF; ABA (addressing QOFs); and Small Business
Investor Alliance (SBIA) (addressing RBICs).
\134\ See SIFMA and FSF.
\135\ See SIFMA and FSF.
\136\ See SIFMA.
\137\ See SBIA.
\138\ See Data Boiler.
\139\ See PNC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After carefully considering the comments received, the agencies are
revising the public welfare investment exclusion to explicitly
incorporate funds, the business of which is to make investments that
qualify for consideration under the Federal banking agencies'
regulations implementing the CRA.\140\ Explicitly excluding these types
of investments from the definition of covered fund clarifies and gives
full effect to the statutory exemption for public welfare
investments.\141\ In addition, this clarification will reduce
uncertainty and will facilitate public welfare investments by banking
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\140\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
\141\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E). A banking entity must have
independent authority to make a public welfare investment. For
example, a banking entity that is a state member bank may make a
public welfare investment to the extent permissible under 12 U.S.C.
338a and 12 CFR 208.22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are also adopting explicit exclusions from the
definition of covered fund for RBICs and QOFs in Sec. __.10(c)(11) of
the final rule. These types of funds were created by Congress to
promote development in rural and low-income communities, and, due to
their similarity to SBICs and public welfare investments, the agencies
believe that section 13 of the BHC Act was not intended to restrict the
types of funds that engage in those activities. RBICs are companies
licensed under the Rural Business Investment Program, a program
designed to promote economic development and the creation of wealth and
job opportunities among individuals living in rural areas and to help
meet the equity capital investment needs primarily of smaller
enterprises located in such areas.\142\ Likewise, QOFs were developed
as part of a program to promote long-term investing in designated
economically distressed communities and are required to have at least
90 percent of their assets in designated low-income zones.\143\
Congress created RBICs and QOFs to encourage investment in rural areas,
small enterprises, and low-income areas. Providing an explicit
exclusion for these funds in the implementing regulations gives effect
to section 13 of the BHC Act's provision permitting public welfare
investments and avoids chilling the activities of funds that were not
the target of section 13 of the BHC Act.\144\ Although many of these
funds may already qualify for the public welfare investment exclusion,
the agencies are explicitly excluding these funds from the definition
of covered fund to reduce uncertainty and compliance burden. Thus,
under the final rule, a covered fund does not include an issuer that
has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a RBIC, as described in
15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A) or (B), or that has terminated its
participation as a RBIC in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not
make any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents,
which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly
liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected
or potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the
issuer's assets) after such termination.\145\ Likewise, under the final
rule, a covered fund does not include an issuer that is a QOF, as
defined in 26 U.S.C. 1400Z-2(d).\146\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\142\ See, e.g., Rural Business Investment Company (RBIC)
Program, 85 FR 16519, 16520 (Mar. 24, 2020).
\143\ See 26 U.S.C. 1400Z-2(d).
\144\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E); 156 Cong. Rec. S5896 (daily
ed. July 15, 2010) (Statement of Sen. Merkley) (noting that Section
13(d)(1)(E) permits investments ``of the type'' permitted under 12
U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh), including ``a range of low-income community
development and other projects,'' but ``is flexible enough to permit
the [agencies] to include other similar low-risk investments with a
public welfare purpose'').
\145\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(iii). As with SBICs,
discussed below, the final rule contemplates that an issuer that
ceases to be a RBIC during wind-down may continue to qualify for the
exclusion from the definition of ``covered fund'' for RBICs if the
issuer satisfies certain conditions designed to prevent abuse.
\146\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(iv). As with other types of
issuers excluded from the covered fund definition, a banking entity
must have independent authority to invest in a QOF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule does not exclude funds that qualify for the public
welfare investment exclusion from the definition of ``banking entity''
as requested by some commenters.\147\ The term ``banking entity'' is
specifically defined in section 13 of the BHC Act.\148\ In addition,
the agencies do not believe that applying the definition of banking
entity places an undue burden on banking entities' public welfare
investments. The agencies believe that banking entities are able to
design their permissible public welfare investments so as not to cause
the investment fund to become a banking entity. For public welfare
investment funds that are banking entities, the agencies believe that
the burden-reducing amendments adopted in this final rule and the 2019
amendments should mitigate concerns about compliance burdens.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\147\ See SIFMA and BPI.
\148\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Small Business Investment Companies
Consistent with section 13 of the BHC Act,\149\ the implementing
regulations exclude from the definition of ``covered fund'' SBICs and
issuers that have received notice from the Small Business
Administration to proceed to qualify for a license as an SBIC, which
notice or license has not been revoked.\150\ The agencies proposed
revising the exclusion for SBICs to clarify how the exclusion would
apply to SBICs that surrender their licenses during wind-down
phases.\151\ Specifically, the agencies proposed revising the exclusion
for SBICs to apply explicitly to an issuer that has voluntarily
surrendered its license to operate as an SBIC in accordance with 13 CFR
107.1900 and does not make new investments (other than investments in
cash equivalents) after such voluntary
[[Page 46436]]
surrender.\152\ The agencies explained that applying the exclusion to
an issuer that has surrendered its SBIC license is appropriate because
of the statutory exemption for investments in SBICs and because banking
entities may otherwise become discouraged from investing in SBICs due
to concerns that an SBIC may become a covered fund during its wind-down
phase.\153\ The agencies further noted that the proposed revisions
included a number of requirements designed to ensure that the exclusion
would not be abused.\154\ In particular, the exclusion would apply only
to an issuer that voluntarily surrenders its license in accordance with
13 CFR 107.1900 and that does not make any new investments (other than
investments in cash equivalents).\155\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\149\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(E) (permitting investments in
SBICs).
\150\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(11)(i).
\151\ See 85 FR 12131.
\152\ See id.
\153\ See id.; 12 U.S.C 1851(d)(1)(E).
\154\ See 85 FR 12131.
\155\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most commenters that directly addressed the 2020 proposal's
revisions concerning SBICs supported the proposed revisions, stating
that the proposed revisions would provide greater certainty to banking
entities wishing to invest in SBICs and would increase investment in
small businesses.\156\ One commenter stated that revising the exclusion
for SBICs would prevent a banking entity from being forced to sell an
interest in an SBIC that became a covered fund for reasons outside of
the banking entity's control.\157\ Commenters further noted that the
proposed revisions included sufficient safeguards against evasion and
did not present safety or soundness concerns.\158\ One commenter
recommended against revising the exclusion from the definition of
covered fund for SBICs. This commenter expressed concern about frequent
buying and selling of SBICs and noted that section 13 of the BHC Act
and its implementing regulations do not prohibit a banking entity from
lending to small businesses.\159\ The commenter further expressed
concern that an SBIC that surrenders its license may be doing so
because it has failed or no longer wishes to comply with the Small
Business Administration's regulations.\160\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\156\ See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; PNC; and SBIA.
\157\ See SBIA.
\158\ See SIFMA; BPI; and SBIA.
\159\ See SIFMA; BPI; and SBIA.
\160\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After carefully considering the comments received, the agencies are
adopting the revisions to the exclusion from the definition of covered
fund for SBICs, as proposed.\161\ The revisions will provide greater
certainty to banking entities, give full effect to the provision of
section 13 of the BHC Act that permits investments in SBICs, and
support capital formation for small businesses. In response to one
commenter's concerns regarding the exclusion for SBICs,\162\ the
agencies note that a banking entity's investment in an SBIC must comply
with all applicable laws and regulations, including the prohibition
against proprietary trading under section 13 of the BHC Act and its
implementing regulations. Furthermore, as noted above, the revised
exclusion for SBICs includes safeguards designed to prevent abuse or
evasion. In particular, the exclusion would only apply to an issuer
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as an SBIC in
accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and that does not make new investments
(other than investments in cash equivalents) after such voluntary
surrender.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\161\ See final rule Sec. __10(c)(11)(i).
\162\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Additional Covered Fund Exclusions
In addition to modifying certain existing exclusions, the agencies
are creating four new exclusions from the definition of ``covered
fund'' to better tailor the provision to the types of entities that
section 13 was intended to cover. These exclusions are for credit
funds, venture capital funds, family wealth management vehicles, and
customer facilitation vehicles.
General Comments
Many commenters were broadly supportive of the proposed new
exclusions from the definition of ``covered fund.'' \163\ Some
commenters recommended adopting additional exclusions for an array of
fund types and situations, including for tender bond vehicles,\164\
ownership interests erroneously acquired or retained,\165\ certain real
estate funds,\166\ and funds in their seeding period.\167\ The agencies
are declining to adopt these suggested exclusions because the requested
actions are outside the scope of the current rulemaking. In addition,
one commenter urged the agencies to redefine the definition of
``covered fund,'' to rely on a characteristics-based approach.\168\ The
agencies decline to revise the definition of ``covered fund'' for the
reasons articulated in the preamble to the 2013 rule.\169\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\163\ E.g., SIFMA; JBA; Credit Suisse; and SAF.
\164\ SIFMA.
\165\ SIFMA and BPI.
\166\ IAA.
\167\ ABA.
\168\ JBA.
\169\ See 79 FR 5671.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Credit Funds
i. Background and 2020 Proposal
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies declined to
establish an exclusion from the definition of covered fund for funds
that make loans, invest in debt, or otherwise extend the type of credit
that banking entities may provide directly under applicable banking law
(credit funds).\170\ The agencies cited concerns about whether credit
funds could be distinguished from private equity funds and hedge funds
and the possible evasion of the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act through the availability of such an exclusion. In addition, the
agencies suggested that some credit funds would be able to operate
using other exclusions from the definition of covered fund in the 2013
rule, such as the exclusion for joint ventures or the exclusion for
loan securitizations.\171\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\170\ See 79 FR 5705.
\171\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, commenters on the 2018 proposal noted that many credit
funds have not been able to utilize the joint venture and loan
securitization exclusions. In response, the agencies included in the
2020 proposal a specific exclusion for credit funds. Under the 2020
proposal, a credit fund would have been an issuer whose assets consist
solely of:
Loans;
Debt instruments;
Related rights and other assets that are related or
incidental to acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling loans, or debt
instruments; and
Certain interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives.\172\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\172\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed exclusion would have been subject to certain
additional requirements to reduce evasion concerns and help ensure that
banking entities invest in, sponsor, or advise credit funds in a safe
and sound manner. For example, the proposed exclusion would have
imposed (1) certain activity requirements on the credit fund, including
a prohibition on proprietary trading; \173\ (2) disclosure and safety
and soundness requirements on banking entities that sponsor or serve as
an advisor for a credit fund; \174\ (3) safety and soundness
requirements on all banking entities that invest in or have certain
relationships with a credit
[[Page 46437]]
fund; \175\ and (4) restrictions on the banking entity's investment in,
and relationship with, a credit fund.\176\ The proposed exclusion also
would have permitted a credit fund to receive and hold a limited amount
of equity securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) that were
received on customary terms in connection with the credit fund's loans
or debt instruments.\177\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\173\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii).
\174\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii).
\175\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv).
\176\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v).
\177\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Comments
The agencies requested comment on all aspects of the proposed
credit fund exclusion. In addition, the agencies solicited comment on
specific provisions of the proposed exclusion, including the
permissibility of certain assets and requirements related to the
activities of the credit fund and the relationship between a banking
entity and a credit fund.\178\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\178\ See 85 FR 12133.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General
Commenters were generally supportive of adopting an exclusion for
credit funds, and several commenters suggested specific revisions to
the proposed exclusion.\179\ Several commenters supportive of the 2020
proposal urged the agencies not to adopt any further limitations on the
proposed exclusion and indicated that the proposed exclusion would not
increase the risk of evasion of the requirements of section 13 of the
BHC Act.\180\ Two commenters expressed general opposition to or concern
about the proposed credit fund exclusion.\181\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\179\ E.g., CCMC; AIC; SIFMA; FSF; ABA; Arnold & Porter; and
Goldman Sachs.
\180\ E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; Goldman Sachs; and Arnold &
Porter.
\181\ Better Markets and Data Boiler. One of these commenters
suggested that banking entities should instead rely on the
exclusions for joint ventures and loan securitizations. Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset Requirements
Commenters were generally supportive of allowing a credit fund to
invest broadly in loans and debt instruments, certain related assets,
and certain derivatives.\182\ One commenter recommended against
delineating between permissible and non-permissible types of loans and
debt instruments, arguing that credit funds should be able to extend
credit to the same degree as would be permitted for the banking entity
to extend directly.\183\ Another commenter encouraged the agencies to
clarify and expand the definition of debt instrument and derivatives,
to include all tranches of debt, collateralized loan and collateralized
debt obligations, and any derivatives related to hedging credit risk,
such as credit default swaps and total return swaps.\184\ In addition,
a commenter suggested clarifying that no specific credit standard
applies to loans held by a credit fund.\185\ One commenter also urged
the agencies to establish a safe harbor to the permissible asset
restrictions for banking entities that rely, in good faith, on a
representation by the credit fund that the credit fund only invests in
permissible assets.\186\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\182\ E.g., SIFMA; Arnold & Porter; and ABA. One commenter also
noted that the permissible holding period for debt previously
contracted varies depending on applicable regulations and suggested
that the agencies specify the holding period for debt previously
contracted assets owned by a credit fund and provide for an
extension process. Arnold & Porter.
\183\ SIFMA. The same commenter also urged the agencies to
permit credit funds to hold commodity forward contracts, which the
commenter argued may be an appropriate hedge for extensions of
credit to agricultural businesses. SIFMA.
\184\ Credit Suisse. See also Arnold & Porter (recommending
expanding the types of permissible derivatives, to allow for more
effective hedging and easier disposal of portfolio assets).
\185\ ABA.
\186\ Arnold & Porter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two commenters recommended limiting permissible assets to only
loans or debt instruments, and not equity.\187\ In contrast, a range of
commenters argued that allowing a credit fund to receive certain
assets, like equity, related to an extension of credit would promote
the sale of loans and extensions of credit.\188\ Some of these
commenters suggested that taking equity as partial consideration for
extending credit is commonplace in the debt and loan markets and that
such a provision could ensure that credit funds are able to facilitate
loan and debt workouts and restructurings, a critical financial
intermediation function.\189\ Most commenters supportive of the 2020
proposal were generally opposed to a quantitative limit on the amount
of equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity security) received
on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt instruments
that could be held by a credit fund, citing compliance costs and
diminished flexibility,\190\ but some commenters indicated that a
limitation of 20 or 25 percent of total assets could be acceptable if
the agencies were to impose a limit.\191\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\187\ Data Boiler and Better Markets. One of these commenters
argued that the inclusion of non-loan instruments would be contrary
to the purpose of section 13 of the BHC Act. Data Boiler. As
indicated by the agencies in the preamble to the 2020 proposal,
taking limited amounts of non-loan or debt assets as consideration
for an extension of credit is common and is a permitted practice for
insured depository institutions. Therefore, the agencies believe it
would not be inconsistent with section 13 of the BHC Act to
facilitate the sale of loans by establishing a credit fund exclusion
that allows a credit fund to hold a limited amount of certain equity
instruments related to extensions of credit. See also the discussion
about permitting excluded loan securitizations to hold a small
amount of non-loan assets, supra Section IV.B.2 (Loan
Securitizations).
\188\ E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; ABA; and Arnold & Porter.
\189\ E.g., SIFMA; Credit Suisse; and Arnold & Porter.
\190\ SIFMA; FSF; CCMC; AIC; ABA; and Goldman Sachs.
\191\ SIFMA and CCMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters supportive of allowing credit funds to hold certain
related assets, such as equity, in connection with an extension of
credit suggested that the provision would not raise significant safety
and soundness or evasion concerns. For example, one commenter claimed
that such a provision would not raise the risk of evasion, in part,
because equity options received as consideration generally expire
unexercised.\192\ Other commenters argued that the activity
requirements of the exclusion would prevent a credit fund from becoming
actively involved in the purchase and sale of equity instruments.\193\
Another commenter suggested that the agencies could impose a
requirement that non-loan or non-debt assets be acquired on arms-length
terms and adhere to bank safety and soundness standards.\194\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\192\ Arnold & Porter.
\193\ Goldman Sachs and FSF.
\194\ ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separately, several commenters recommended allowing excluded credit
funds to hold any type of asset, up to a certain percentage of
aggregate assets, either 20 or 25 percent of a credit fund's total
assets.\195\ These commenters asserted that permitting a credit fund to
own equity securities and other assets would help the fund more
effectively provide credit, without altering the character of the
credit fund, and would reduce compliance burdens associated with
launching and operating a credit fund.\196\ In addition, these
commenters claimed that a limited bucket for non-loan and non-debt
assets would be consistent with the ability of banking entities and
some business development companies to invest in equity.\197\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\195\ SIFMA; FSF; Credit Suisse; ABA; and Goldman Sachs. One
commenter also suggested a formula for determining the cap. Goldman
Sachs.
\196\ E.g., SIFMA and Goldman Sachs.
\197\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking Entity and Issuer Requirements
Generally, commenters either agreed that certain restrictions to
ensure that a credit fund is actually engaged in prudently providing
credit and credit
[[Page 46438]]
intermediation and is not operated for the purpose of evading the
provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act were appropriate or did not
object to the inclusion of these requirements.\198\ Several commenters,
however, offered revisions to the activities, sponsor or advisor,
banking entity, or investment and relationship limit requirements. For
example, several commenters requested clarification on the prohibition
on proprietary trading by an excluded credit fund contained in Sec.
__.10(c)(15)(ii)(A) of the 2020 proposal. One commenter suggested that
the definition of proprietary trading for a credit fund should depend
on the definition used by the banking entity.\199\ Another commenter
encouraged the agencies to incorporate the exclusions and exemptions
from the prohibition on proprietary trading into the credit fund
exclusion's prohibition on proprietary trading.\200\ A third commenter
recommended making explicit that exercising rights for certain related
assets, such as an equity warrant, is not proprietary trading.\201\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\198\ E.g., SIFMA; Better Markets; FSF; and Goldman Sachs. One
commenter also indicated that the disclosure requirement for banking
entities that sponsor or advise funds is appropriate. Arnold &
Porter.
\199\ SIFMA. For example, the commenter suggested that a credit
fund sponsored by a banking entity subject to the market risk rule
should be permitted to use the definitions of proprietary trading
and trading account in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(ii).
\200\ FSF.
\201\ Arnold & Porter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also requested revisions to and clarification about the
limits on a banking entity's investment in, and relationship with, a
credit fund. One commenter argued that the imposition of Sec. __.14 of
the implementing regulations (which imposes limitations on the
relationship between a banking entity and a fund it sponsors or
advises) would be duplicative of (1) the requirement that the banking
entity not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of the credit fund and (2)
certain conflict of interest, high-risk, and safety and soundness
restrictions.\202\ Another commenter claimed that there was little
benefit to imposing the requirements of Sec. __.14 (described above)
and Sec. __.15 (which imposes certain material conflicts of interest,
high-risk investments, and safety and soundness and financial stability
requirements on permitted covered fund activities) of the implementing
regulations in the context of credit funds and suggested that the
partial application of Sec. __.14, in particular, could lead to
unexpected and inappropriate outcomes, such as allowing a banking
entity to invest in the equity of a credit fund, but not the debt
instruments issued by that same credit fund.\203\ That same commenter
also recommended eliminating Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(B) of the 2020
proposal--which would have required that the banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the credit fund be conducted in
compliance with, and subject to, applicable banking laws and
regulations--because applicable banking laws and regulations apply
regardless of the banking entity's use of the credit fund
exclusion.\204\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\202\ SIFMA.
\203\ Arnold & Porter.
\204\ Arnold & Porter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, a commenter argued that banking entities that serve as
investment advisers or commodity trading advisors to credit funds
should not be subject to the disclosure and safety and soundness
requirements of Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii) of the 2020 proposal since
investment advisers and commodity trading advisors who do not otherwise
sponsor or invest in a fund are generally not subject to section 13 of
the BHC Act. The commenter argued that Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii) of the
2020 proposal would impose differing requirements on a credit fund
depending on whether the investment adviser or commodity trading
advisor was an insured depository institution or a bank holding
company. That commenter also claimed that the portfolio requirements in
Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(B) of the 2020 proposal could require banking
entities to establish complex compliance programs to assess credit fund
compliance with state and foreign laws and that the agencies should
limit the scope of the provision to only federal banking laws and
regulations.\205\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\205\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, one commenter contended that the application of certain
requirements in the exclusion is contingent on the type of banking
entity that invests in or sponsors a credit fund and urged the agencies
to make explicit that only the identity of the sponsor of the credit
fund, and not its affiliates or third-party investors, determines which
portfolio quality and safety and soundness requirements apply to the
credit fund.\206\ More generally, this commenter asked the agencies to
make explicit in the preamble to the final rule that the actions of
unaffiliated, third-party banking entities do not affect whether a
banking entity may invest in a fund.\207\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\206\ Id.
\207\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Comments
Commenters also submitted several miscellaneous comments about the
proposed exclusion for credit funds. One commenter requested that the
agencies clarify the definition of asset-backed securities as used in
the proposed credit fund exclusion and the current loan securitization
exclusion.\208\ That same commenter also urged the agencies to revise
the proposed credit fund exclusion to allow banking entities with more
stringent credit requirements, such as insured depository institutions,
to invest in credit funds that hold distressed debt.\209\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\208\ Id.
\209\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the 2020 proposal requested comment on whether to combine
the proposed credit fund exclusion with the loan securitization
exclusion. Commenters were generally opposed to combining the two
exclusions, citing different classes of assets in which the two types
of issuers invest and a fundamental difference in structure (loan
securitizations issue asset-backed securities, while credit funds do
not).\210\ In addition, one commenter argued that while combining the
two exclusions would increase the simplicity of the rule, such an
amalgamated exclusion could result in increased compliance burdens for
issuers who are accustomed to the lack of credit requirements in the
current loan securitization exclusion.\211\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\210\ SIFMA; FSF; CCMC; Credit Suisse; and Data Boiler.
\211\ Arnold & Porter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Final Exclusion
After consideration of the comments, the agencies are adopting the
credit fund exclusion as proposed, with certain modifications. The
agencies believe that the credit fund exclusion in the final rule (1)
addresses the application of the covered fund provisions to credit-
related activities that certain banking entities are permitted to
engage in directly and (2) is consistent with Congress's intent that
section 13 of the BHC Act limit banking entities' investment in and
relationships with hedge funds and private equity funds, but not limit
or restrict banking entities' ability to extend credit.\212\ The
agencies also believe that the credit fund exclusion in the final rule,
with the eligibility criteria described below, will address concerns
the agencies expressed in the preamble to the 2013
[[Page 46439]]
rule about the ability to administer an exclusion for credit funds and
the potential evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act.\213\ Banking
entities already have experience using and complying with the loan
securitization exclusion. Establishing an exclusion for credit funds
based on the framework provided by the loan securitization exclusion
allows banking entities to provide traditional extensions of credit
regardless of the specific form, whether directly via a loan made by a
banking entity, or indirectly through an investment in or relationship
with a credit fund that transacts primarily in loans and certain debt
instruments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\212\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2), (h)(2). Paragraph (g)(2) of
section 13 of the BHC Act makes clear that the Volcker rule is not
intended to impede banking entities' ability to extend credit by,
for example, selling loans or securitize loans. See 12 U.S.C.
1851(g)(2).
\213\ See 79 FR 5705.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The credit fund exclusion limits the universe of potential funds
that can rely on the exclusion by clearly specifying the types of
activities in which those funds may engage. Excluded credit funds can
transact in or hold only loans; debt instruments that would be
permissible for the banking entity relying on the exclusion to hold
directly; certain rights or assets that are related or incidental to
the loans or debt instruments, including equity securities (or rights
to acquire an equity security) received on customary terms in
connection with such loans or debt instruments; and certain interest
rate and foreign exchange derivatives. The credit fund exclusion, with
these eligibility criteria, should not raise evasion concerns.
Similarly, the agencies' expectations regarding the amount of
permissible equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity security)
held and the requirement that the credit fund not engage in activities
that would constitute proprietary trading should help to ensure that
the extensions of credit, whether directly originated or acquired from
a third party, are held by the credit fund for the purpose of
facilitating lending and not for the purpose of evading the
requirements of section 13. Finally, the restrictions on guarantees and
other limitations should eliminate the ability and incentive for either
the banking entity sponsoring a credit fund or any affiliate to provide
additional support beyond the ownership interest retained by the
sponsor. Thus, the agencies expect that, together, the criteria for the
credit fund exclusion will prevent a banking entity from having any
incentive to bail out such funds in periods of financial stress or
otherwise expose the banking entity to the types of risks that the
covered fund provisions of section 13 were intended to address.
Consistent with commenters' suggestions, the agencies are keeping
separate the credit fund exclusion and the loan securitization
exclusion because the structures and purposes of those two types of
issuers differ sufficiently to warrant different requirements. For
example, loan securitizations and credit funds have different asset
composition and different financing and legal structures. Therefore,
the agencies are finalizing a credit fund exclusion separate from the
loan securitization exclusion.
Asset Requirements
Under the final rule, a credit fund, for the purposes of the credit
fund exclusion, is an issuer whose assets consist solely of:
Loans;
Debt instruments;
Related rights and other assets that are related or
incidental to acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling loans, or debt
instruments; and
Certain interest rate or foreign exchange
derivatives.\214\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\214\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several provisions of the exclusion are similar to and modeled on
conditions in the loan securitization exclusion to ease compliance
burdens. For example, any derivatives held by the credit fund must
relate to loans, permissible debt instruments, or other rights or
assets held and reduce the interest rate and/or foreign exchange risks
related to these holdings.\215\ In addition, any related rights or
other assets held that are securities must be cash equivalents,
securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with respect
to loans held or, unique to the credit fund exclusion, equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) received on
customary terms in connection with the credit fund's loans or debt
instruments.\216\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\215\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(D).
\216\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C). In a minor change
from the 2020 proposal, the agencies are making clear that rights or
other assets held under paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of that section may
not include any derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(15)(i)(D) of that section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies requested comment on whether to
impose a limit on the amount of equity securities (or rights to acquire
equity securities) that may be held by an excluded credit fund.\217\
After a review of the comments and further deliberation, the agencies
are not adopting a quantitative limit on the amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) that may be held by
an excluded credit fund. Any such equity securities or rights are
limited by the requirements that they be (a) received on customary
terms in connection with the fund's loans or debt instruments and (b)
related or incidental to acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling
those loans or debt instruments. The agencies generally expect that the
equity securities or rights satisfying those criteria in connection
with an investment in loans or debt instruments of a borrower (or
affiliated borrowers) would not exceed five percent of the value of the
fund's total investment in the borrower (or affiliated borrowers) at
the time the investment is made. The agencies understand that the value
of those equity securities or other rights may change over time for a
variety of reasons, including as a result of market conditions and
business performance, as well as more fundamental changes in the
business and the credit fund's corresponding management of the
investment (e.g., exchanges of debt instruments for equity in
connection with mergers and restructurings or a disposition of all
portion of the credit investment without a corresponding disposition of
the equity securities or rights due to differences in market conditions
or other factors). Accordingly, the agencies can foresee various
circumstances where the relative value of such equity securities or
rights in a borrower (or affiliated borrowers) would over the life of
the investment exceed five percent on a basis consistent with the
requirements. Nonetheless, the agencies expect that the fund's exposure
to equity securities (or other rights), individually and collectively
and when viewed over time, would be managed on a basis consistent with
the fund's overall purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\217\ 85 FR 12133.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are also not imposing additional restrictions on the
types of equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity security)
that a credit fund may hold. The final rule prevents a banking entity
from relying on the credit fund exclusion unless any debt instruments
and equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity security) held by
the credit fund and received on customary terms in connection with the
credit fund's loans or debt instruments are permissible for the banking
entity to acquire and hold directly and a sponsor of a credit fund must
ensure that the credit fund complies with certain safety and soundness
standards.\218\ Combined with the prohibition on proprietary trading by
a credit fund,\219\ these limitations are expected to prevent evasion
of section 13 of the BHC Act and should be sufficient to prevent
[[Page 46440]]
banking entities from investing in or sponsoring credit funds that hold
excessively risky equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity
security).\220\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\218\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(B), (iii)(B).
\219\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
\220\ One commenter suggested requiring that equity securities
(or rights to acquire an equity security) be acquired via arms-
length market transactions and adhere to bank safety and soundness
standards. See ABA. Under the final rule, a banking entity may not
rely on the credit fund exclusion unless any equity securities (or
rights to acquire an equity security) held by the credit fund are
permissible for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly
under applicable federal banking laws and regulations. Final rule
Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(B). In addition, the final rule requires that
equity securities (or rights to acquire an equity security) related
or incidental to acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such
loans or debt instruments must be received on customary terms in
connection with such loans or debt instruments. Final rule Sec.
__.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii). Finally, a banking entity's investment
in, and relationship with, the issuer must comply with the
limitations imposed in Sec. __.15, as if the issuer were a covered
fund. Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are, however, clarifying that the provision allowing
related rights and other assets does not separately permit the holding
of derivatives. The preamble to the 2020 proposal made clear that ``any
derivatives held by the credit fund must relate to loans, permissible
debt instruments, or other rights or assets held, and reduce the
interest rate and/or foreign exchange risks related to these
holdings.'' \221\ The agencies suggested then and currently believe
that allowing a credit fund issuer to hold derivatives not related to
interest rate or foreign exchange hedging would not be necessary to
facilitate the indirect extension of credit by banking entities and may
pose the very risks that section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to
reach. To ensure that the credit fund exclusions does not inadvertently
allow the holding of certain derivatives unrelated to interest rate
and/or foreign exchange risks, the final rule explicitly excludes
derivatives from permissible related right and other assets.\222\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\221\ 85 FR 12132.
\222\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are not adopting a broad expansion of permissible
assets, as recommended by several commenters. Contrary to commenters'
suggestions, allowing credit funds to hold unlimited amounts of non-
debt instruments or derivatives, such as credit default or total return
swaps, could present evasion concerns and is not necessary for
effectuating the rule of construction.\223\ The agencies believe that
only those instruments that facilitate the extension of credit and
directly-related hedging activities should be permitted under the
exclusion. For example, allowing the unlimited holding of credit
default swaps by a majority owned or sponsored credit fund could raise
the risks that section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to address.
Moreover, permitting excluded credit funds to invest up to 25 percent
of total assets in any type of asset could turn the exclusion for
credit funds into an exclusion for the type of funds that section 13 of
the BHC Act was intended to address. Such a result would be contrary to
section 13 of the BHC Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\223\ The agencies' rationale, in the preamble to the 2013 rule,
for limiting the permissible assets for the loan securitization
exclusion is particularly relevant. See 79 FR 5691 (``Under the
final rule as adopted, an excluded loan securitization would not be
able to hold derivatives that would relate to risks to
counterparties or issuers of the underlying assets referenced by
these derivatives because the operation of derivatives, such as
these, that expand potential exposures beyond the loans and other
assets, would not in the Agencies' view be consistent with the
limited exclusion contained in the rule of construction under
section 13(g)(2) of the BHC Act, and could be used to circumvent the
restrictions on proprietary trading and prohibitions in section
13(f) of the BHC Act. The Agencies believe that the use of
derivatives by an issuing entity for asset-backed securities that is
excluded from the definition of covered fund under the loan
securitization exclusion should be narrowly tailored to hedging
activities that reduce the interest rate and/or foreign exchange
risks directly related to the asset-backed securities or the loans
supporting the asset-backed securities because the use of
derivatives for purposes other than reducing interest rate risk and
foreign exchange risks would introduce credit risk without
necessarily relating to or involving a reduction of interest rate
risk or foreign exchange risk.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are several additional changes recommended by commenters that
the agencies are not including in the final rule. Specifically, the
final rule does not:
Allow excluded credit funds to hold commodity forward
contracts. Although these contracts have legitimate value as hedging
instruments, the agencies do not believe this type of hedging activity
is consistent with the purpose of the exclusion for credit funds, which
is to allow banking entities to share the risks of their permissible
lending activities or to engage in permissible lending activities
indirectly through a fund structure.
Permit banking entities that are insured depository
institutions or their operating subsidiaries to invest in credit funds
through a contribution to a credit fund of troubled loans and debt
previously contracted assets from the banking entity's portfolio. The
conditions in the final rule are intended to ensure that a credit fund
generally engages in activities that the banking entity may engage in
directly and that the banking entity's investment in and relationship
with the fund are conducted in a safe and sound manner. The agencies
decline to deviate from these standards for any particular type of
credit fund because doing so could permit activities that raise the
type of concerns that section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to
address.
Further specify the holding period for securities held in
lieu of debts previously contracted held by a credit fund. Generally, a
banking entity may not rely on this exclusion unless any debt
instruments and equity securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) held by the fund would be permissible for the banking
entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable federal banking
laws and regulations. However, the requirement that a banking entity be
able to hold a given asset directly does not apply to securities held
in lieu of debts previously contracted under the final regulations.
Because a banking entity's ability to invest in or sponsor an excluded
credit fund is not contingent on how long the credit fund holds
securities held in lieu of debts previously contracted, the agencies do
not believe it is necessary to amend the regulations to impose a
specific holding period on securities held by a credit fund in lieu of
debts previously contracted.\224\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\224\ The agencies note that banking entities must otherwise
comply with applicable law. See infra, Additional Banking Entity
Requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revise or expand on the definition of debt instrument. The
agencies believe that the term debt instrument already has a general
meaning that is used in the marketplace and by regulators and that a
new definition is unnecessary given this widely understood meaning and
could cause confusion.
Adopt a safe harbor for banking entities that rely, in
good faith, on a representation by the credit fund that it only invests
in permissible assets. It is the responsibility of the banking entity
to ensure that it complies with section 13 of the BHC Act and the
implementing regulations, and such responsibility cannot be substituted
solely with a representation from a credit fund.
Activity Requirements
The agencies are adopting the activity requirements for issuers in
the 2020 proposal without revision. Under the final rule, a credit fund
is not a covered fund, provided that:
The fund does not engage in activities that would
constitute proprietary trading, as defined in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i) of
the rule, as if the fund were a banking entity; \225\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\225\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46441]]
The fund does not issue asset-backed securities.\226\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\226\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies decline to adopt changes recommended by commenters
because the agencies believe the activity requirements are clear and
appropriate. The first provision explicitly references the prohibition
on proprietary trading by a banking entity in Sec. __.3 of the
implementing regulations and, in particular, the short-term intent
prong contained in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i). For the avoidance of doubt, a
credit fund would not be able to elect a different definition of
proprietary trading or trading account. Varying the definition of
proprietary trading depending on the type of banking entity that
sponsors or invests in the credit fund, as suggested by a commenter,
could result in conflicting requirements for credit funds with multiple
banking entity investors and generally increase compliance burdens on
credit funds. The agencies also note that activities permitted under
Sec. __.10(c)(15) generally would not be considered proprietary
trading, provided that an excluded credit fund does not purchase or
sell one or more financial instruments principally for the purpose of
short-term resale, benefit from actual or expected short-term price
movements, realize short-term arbitrage profits, or hedge one or more
of the positions resulting from the purchases or sales of financial
instruments.
The agencies are not expressly incorporating the permitted
activities in Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, and __.6 of the implementing
regulations into the text of the final credit fund exclusion. The
exclusion for credit funds is intended to allow banking entities to
share the risks of otherwise permissible lending activities.
Accordingly, the agencies would not expect that a credit fund would be
formed for the purpose of engaging, or in the ordinary course would be
engaged, in the activities permitted under Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, and
__.6 of the implementing regulations. Nevertheless, to the extent that
a credit fund seeks to engage in any of those activities as an
exemption from the prohibition on engaging in proprietary trading, as
defined in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i) of the final rule, and does so in
compliance with the requirements and conditions of the applicable
exemption, then the final rule would not preclude such activities.\227\
Similarly, with respect to the exclusions from the definition of
proprietary trading contained in Sec. __.3(d) of the implementing
regulations, the agencies note that the trading activities identified
in Sec. __.3(d) are by definition not deemed to be proprietary
trading, such that the performance by an excluded credit fund of those
activities would not be inconsistent with the final credit fund
exclusion.\228\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\227\ The agencies recognize, however, that compliance with
certain requirements and conditions in Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, and
__.6 of the implementing regulations may be inapt and/or highly
impractical in the context of a credit fund, particularly given the
asset and activity restrictions contained in Sec. __.10(c)(15). For
example, the exemptions for underwriting and market making-related
activities in Sec. __.4 require that a banking entity relying on
such exemptions, among other things, be licensed or registered to
engage in the applicable activity in accordance with applicable law.
Moreover, to the extent that a credit fund is a banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities (i.e., because it,
together with its affiliates and subsidiaries, has trading assets
and liabilities that equal or exceed $20 billion over the four
previous calendar quarters), it also would be required to maintain a
separate compliance program specific to those exemptions.
\228\ Similarly, trading activity that satisfies the 60-day
rebuttable presumption in Sec. __.3(b)(4) would be presumed not to
be proprietary trading for these purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the agencies are not revising the definition of ``asset-
backed security'' in the implementing regulations. The definition of
``asset-backed security'' in the implementing regulations specifically
refers to the meaning specified in section 3(a)(79) of the Exchange Act
(15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(79)).\229\ This definition is used elsewhere in
banking law,\230\ and banking entities and others in the loan
securitization industry have adapted their operations in reliance of
the definition contained in the Exchange Act. Moreover, the 2013 rule
included the requirement that the fund issue asset backed securities as
part of the loan securitization criteria, and banking entities have
become familiar with this definition, as they have implemented and
utilized the exclusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\229\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(d)(2).
\230\ See 12 CFR 244 (Credit Risk Retention).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirements for a Sponsor, Investment Adviser, or Commodity Trading
Advisor
The agencies are adopting the proposed requirements for a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an excluded credit
fund with one modification.
Investors in a credit fund that a banking entity sponsors or for
which the banking entity serves as an investment adviser or commodity
trading advisor may have expectations related to the performance of the
credit fund that raise bailout concerns. To ensure that these investors
are adequately informed of the banking entity's role in the credit
fund, the final rule requires a banking entity that acts as a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an excluded credit
fund to provide prospective and actual investors the disclosures
specified in Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the implementing regulations.\231\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\231\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii)(A). These disclosures
include, among other things, that losses are borne solely by
investors and not the banking entity, that investors should examine
fund documents, and that ownership interests are not insured by the
FDIC or guaranteed. Final rule Sec. __.11(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, a banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor must ensure that the activities
of the credit fund are consistent with safety and soundness standards
that are substantially similar to those that would apply if the banking
entity engaged in the activities directly.\232\ The agencies note,
contrary to the suggestion of a commenter, that this provision does not
apply to any investment adviser or commodity trading advisor to a
credit fund who does not also sponsor or acquire an ownership interest
in the credit fund. Rather, the requirements in Sec. __.10(c)(15)
apply only to a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity trading
adviser that relies on the exclusion to sponsor or acquire an ownership
interest in the credit fund. The covered fund provisions in Sec. __.10
of the implementing regulations only affect the operations of banking
entities that, as principal, directly or indirectly, acquire or retain
any ownership interest in or sponsor a covered fund.\233\ Thus, the
safety and soundness provision only applies to banking entities that
sponsor an excluded credit fund or that have an ownership interest in
an excluded credit fund and also serve as an investment adviser or
commodity trading advisor to the fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\232\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii)(B).
\233\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More generally, to clarify an issue raised by some commenters, the
agencies note that whether a specific banking entity may use the credit
fund exclusion to make or have an otherwise impermissible investment in
or relationship with a credit fund is contingent on the permissible
activities of the banking entity. That is, the same fund may be a
covered fund with respect to one banking entity and an excluded credit
fund with respect to a different banking entity. A banking entity
continues to be responsible for ensuring that its particular
investment, sponsorship, or adviser activities comply with section 13
of the BHC Act and its implementing regulations. This principle applies
to paragraphs (iii), (iv), and (v) of the credit fund exclusion.
[[Page 46442]]
The final rule moves the requirement that the banking entity must
comply with Sec. __.14 of the implementing regulations to Sec.
__.10(c)(15)(iii). This organizational change is in response to
commenters that requested the agencies confirm that that the Sec.
__.14 limitations do not apply to a banking entity that merely invests
in a credit fund, as opposed to a banking entity that sponsors or
advises the fund. The agencies believe this change is appropriate
because the limitations on banking entities' relationships with a
covered fund in Sec. __.14 only apply when a banking entity serves,
directly or indirectly, as the investment manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, or sponsor to a covered fund.\234\ In
addition, the agencies appreciate that mere investment by a banking
entity in a credit fund does not raise the type of concerns Super 23A
was intended to address, and thus the agencies are applying Sec. __.14
only when a banking entity acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or
commodity trading advisor to a credit fund, in each case as though the
credit fund were a covered fund.\235\ The limitations in Sec. __.15 of
the implementing regulations regarding material conflicts of interest,
high-risk investments, and safety and soundness and financial stability
remain applicable to banking entities' investment in, and relationship
with, excluded credit funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\234\ Final rule Sec. __.14(a)(1).
\235\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Banking Entity Requirements
As provided in the 2020 proposal, a banking entity may not rely on
the credit fund exclusion if it guarantees the performance of the
fund.\236\ In a revision to the 2020 proposal, under the final rule a
banking entity may not rely on the credit fund exclusion if the fund
holds any debt instruments or equities (or rights to acquire an equity
security) received on customary terms in connection with loans or debt
instruments held by the credit fund that the banking entity is not
permitted to acquire and hold directly under applicable federal banking
laws and regulations.\237\ This change is to clarify, as suggested by a
commenter, that this requirement is specific only to federal banking
laws and regulations. Whether a credit fund's holdings are permissible
for a banking entity to hold under state or foreign laws is not
relevant to compliance with section 13 of the BHC Act. That said, the
agencies note that banking entities must comply with the laws of the
jurisdiction applicable to its activities and operations and should be
cognizant of whether a credit fund it sponsors or in which it invests
complies with the laws of the jurisdictions in which the credit fund
operates.\238\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\236\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv).
\237\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(B).
\238\ For example, banking entities that are organized under
state or foreign laws may, depending on the nature of the
organization, need to comply with other laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment and Relationship Limits
Finally, the agencies are adopting the proposed provisions related
to a banking entity's investment in and relationship with a credit fund
with one revision. Under the final rule, a banking entity's investment
in, and relationship with, the issuer must comply with the limitations
in Sec. __.15 of the implementing regulations regarding material
conflicts of interest, high-risk investments, and safety and soundness
and financial stability, in each case as though the credit fund were a
covered fund.\239\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\239\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, a banking entity's investment in, and relationship
with, a credit fund must be conducted in compliance with, and subject
to, applicable banking laws and regulations, including the safety and
soundness standards applicable to the banking entity.\240\ The agencies
believe it is important to highlight that the requirements applicable
to the banking entity also govern the ability of the banking entity to
invest in a fund that relies on the credit fund exclusion as well as
the types of transactions that a banking entity may conduct with such
funds.\241\ This means, for example, that a banking entity that invests
in or has a relationship with a credit fund is subject to capital
charges and other requirements under applicable banking law.\242\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\240\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
\241\ The agencies also note that Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(B) does
not impose any additional burdens and should not generate confusion.
\242\ For example, a banking entity's investment in or
relationship with a credit fund could be subject to the regulatory
capital adjustments and deductions relating to investments in
financial subsidiaries or in the capital of unconsolidated financial
institutions, if applicable. See 12 CFR 217.22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Venture Capital Funds
i. Venture Capital Funds
2020 Proposal
The 2020 proposal included an exclusion for ``qualifying venture
capital funds.'' \243\ As described in the 2020 proposal, venture
capital funds that provide capital to small and start-up businesses are
covered funds unless they can rely on an exclusion other than section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) to avoid registration under the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (Investment Company Act) or qualify for an exclusion under
the implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\243\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the 2020 proposal, the exclusion would have been available to
``qualifying venture capital funds,'' which the 2020 proposal defined
as an issuer that meets the definition in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1 (Rule
203(l)-1), as well as several additional criteria. Specifically, the
agencies proposed to exclude from the definition of covered fund an
issuer that:
Is a venture capital fund as defined in Rule 203(l)-1; and
Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading, under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity.
With respect to any banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to the issuer, and that relies on
the exclusion to sponsor or acquire an ownership interest in the
qualifying venture capital fund, the banking entity would have been
required to:
Provide in writing to any prospective and actual investor
the disclosures required under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were
a covered fund; and
Ensure that the activities of the issuer are consistent
with the safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar
to those that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the
activities directly.
In addition, a banking entity that relied on the exclusion would
not have been permitted, directly or indirectly, to guarantee, assume,
or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the issuer.
Finally, the 2020 proposal would have required a banking entity's
ownership interest in or relationship with a qualifying venture capital
fund to:
Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. __.14 (except
the banking entity may acquire and retain any ownership interest in the
issuer) and Sec. __.15 of the implementing regulations, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
Be conducted in compliance with and subject to applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
[[Page 46443]]
Comments
Several commenters supported an exclusion for venture capital
funds.\244\ Some of these commenters argued the Volcker Rule has
severely impacted investment in venture funds and businesses and that
venture capital is a critical financing source for innovative
businesses.\245\ These commenters described their view of the positive
economic impact of venture capital investment.\246\ For example, these
commenters said companies funded with venture capital promote research
and development and job creation.\247\ Similarly, several commenters
argued that venture capital investments by banking entities can
contribute to economic growth, innovation, and job creation.\248\ At
least one commenter said increased venture capital investment may
increase employment by small employers.\249\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\244\ Representatives Gonzalez, Steil, Stivers, Barr, Hill,
Riggleman, Zeldin, Davidson, Budd, Gooden, Rose, Emmer, Timmons,
Posey, Kustoff, and Loudermilk (Gonzalez et al.); Crapo; FSF; SIFMA;
CCMC; IIB; Goldman Sachs; Credit Suisse; AIC; National Venture
Capital Association (NVCA); ABA; and SAF.
\245\ E.g., Gonzalez et al. and NVCA.
\246\ Gonzalez et al.; NVCA; and CCMC.
\247\ Id.
\248\ E.g., FSF; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
\249\ SAF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters said an exclusion for venture capital funds
would benefit underserved regions where venture capital funding is not
readily available currently.\250\ One commenter said venture capital
fund sizes are often too small for institutional investors, and banks
have historically served an important source of investment for small
and regional venture capital funds.\251\ This commenter said the loss
of banking entities as limited partners in venture capital funds has
had a disproportionate impact on cities and regions with emerging
entrepreneurial ecosystems areas outside of Silicon Valley and other
traditional technology centers.\252\ Two commenters noted that an
exclusion for venture capital funds would promote investments in and
financing to small businesses and start-ups in a broad range of
geographic areas, industries, and sectors.\253\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\250\ FSF; SIFMA; CCMC; and NVCA.
\251\ NVCA.
\252\ Id.
\253\ FSF and SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters said that an exclusion for venture capital funds would
promote the safety and soundness of banking entities.\254\ One
commenter said the exclusion would allow banks to diversify and to
compete with non-banking entities.\255\ Commenters also said that the
proposed exclusion allows banking entities to make investments
indirectly through a fund structure that they could make directly \256\
and incorporates criteria and activity restrictions that address any
concerns about safety and soundness or evasion.\257\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\254\ FSF; SIFMA; and Goldman Sachs.
\255\ SIFMA.
\256\ NVCA.
\257\ FSF and SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters supported defining a qualifying venture capital
fund by reference to Rule 203(l)-1 as proposed.\258\ These commenters
also said the rule should not incorporate additional criteria as
discussed in the preamble to the 2020 proposal, such as additional
limitations on revenues or qualifying investments.\259\ These
commenters said additional criteria are unnecessary to ensure that the
fund is a bona fide venture capital fund and could unnecessarily limit
the scope of qualifying venture capital funds.\260\ On the other hand,
one commenter said the rule should include additional criteria to
ensure qualifying venture capital funds serve the public interest and
do not cause the harms at which section 13 of the Bank Holding Company
Act was directed.\261\ One commenter argued defining venture capital
fund by reference to Rule 203(l)-1 would be too narrow because it would
exclude shares of emerging growth companies (EGCs) from being
classified as qualifying investments and would not reflect certain
companies that operate as venture investors and are exempt from having
to register as an investment company but may not meet the technical
definition of a venture capital fund under Rule 203(l)-1 (e.g., startup
incubators).\262\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\258\ SIFMA; NVCA; FSF; and ABA.
\259\ SIFMA; NVCA; FSF; and ABA.
\260\ Id.
\261\ Better Markets.
\262\ CCMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While supporting an exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds
generally, a few commenters recommended revisions to the proposed
exclusion.\263\ Some commenters proposed changes to the requirement
that the fund not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading, under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity.\264\ One of these commenters said qualifying venture capital
funds should be permitted to engage in permitted proprietary trading
consistent with Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, and __.6 of the implementing
regulations.\265\ Another commenter said the definition of proprietary
trading for funds should be the same as the definition that applies to
the banking entity and that having two definitions is not reasonable or
cost-effective.\266\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\263\ FSF and SIFMA.
\264\ FSF and SIFMA.
\265\ FSF.
\266\ SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also supported changes to the requirement that the
banking entity's investment in and relationship with qualifying venture
capital funds must comply with Sec. __.14 of the implementing
regulations. One commenter recommended eliminating the requirement that
would apply Sec. __.14 to a banking entity's relationship with a
venture capital fund.\267\ This commenter said that other proposed
conditions adequately address bailout and safety and soundness
concerns.\268\ Other commenters said the agencies should clarify that
Sec. __.14 does not apply to a banking entity that simply invests in a
qualifying venture capital fund (as opposed to a banking entity that
sponsors or advises the fund).\269\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\267\ SIFMA.
\268\ Id.
\269\ NVCA and ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other commenters did not support the proposed exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds.\270\ One of these commenters said if
the agencies do adopt an exclusion for qualifying venture capital
funds, the exclusion must include additional requirements to ensure
that excluded venture capital funds serve the public interest and do
not cause the harms at which section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act was
directed. Specifically, this commenter said the rule should: (1)
Restrict all fund investments to ``qualifying investments'' or at least
very significantly restrict investments in non-qualifying investments
(e.g., limit them to no more than five percent of the fund's aggregate
capital), (2) impose a minimum securities holding period and portfolio
company revenue limitation of $35 million (or a similarly appropriate
and low figure) to ensure the fund is truly focused on medium-to-long
term venture (as opposed to growth stage) investments, and (3)
quantitatively limit the use of leverage as a key means for
distinguishing excluded venture capital funds from statutorily
prohibited activities involving private equity funds.\271\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\270\ Better Markets and Data Boiler. Another commenter said an
exemption for venture capital funds was not supported by the 2020
proposal and not permitted under the law. Occupy.
\271\ Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46444]]
Final Exclusion
The final rule adopts the proposed exclusion for qualifying venture
capital funds with one clarifying change. The exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds will be available to an issuer that:
Is a venture capital fund as defined in Rule 203(l)-1; and
Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading, under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity. \272\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\272\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to any banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to the issuer, and that relies on
the exclusion to sponsor or acquire an ownership interest in the
qualifying venture capital fund, the banking entity will be required
to:
Provide in writing to any prospective and actual investor
the disclosures required under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were
a covered fund;
Ensure that the activities of the issuer are consistent
with the safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar
to those that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the
activities directly; and
Comply with the restrictions imposed in Sec. __.14
(except the banking entity may acquire and retain any ownership
interest in the issuer), as if the issuer were a covered fund.\273\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\273\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like the 2020 proposal, a banking entity that relies on the
exclusion may not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the issuer.\274\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\274\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, like the 2020 proposal, the final rule requires a banking
entity's ownership interest in or relationship with a qualifying
venture capital fund to:
Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. __.15 of the
implementing regulations, as if the issuer were a covered fund; and
Be conducted in compliance with and subject to applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.\275\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\275\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies believe the exclusion for qualifying venture capital
funds will support capital formation, job creation, and economic
growth, particularly with respect to small businesses and start-up
companies. These banking entity investments in qualifying venture
capital funds can benefit the broader financial system by improving the
flow of financing to small businesses and start-ups. The agencies
expect that the new exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds will
provide banking entities with an additional avenue for providing
funding to smaller businesses, which can help to support job creation
and economic growth.
As described further below, the requirements of the exclusion,
including the SEC's definition of venture capital fund in Rule 203(l)-
1, address the concerns the agencies expressed in the preamble to the
2013 rule that the activities and risk profiles of venture capital
funds are not readily distinguishable from those of funds that section
13 of the BHC Act was intended to capture. Accordingly, the agencies
determined these requirements will give effect to the language and
purpose of section 13 of the BHC Act without allowing banking entities
to evade the requirements of section 13.
An exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds is permitted by
the statutory language of section 13 of the BHC Act. As the agencies
discussed in the preamble to the 2013 final rule, the language,
structure, and purpose of section 13 of the BHC Act authorize the
agencies to adopt a tailored definition of ``covered fund'' that
focuses on vehicles used for purposes that were the target of the funds
prohibition.\276\ The agencies do not believe the fact that Congress
expressly distinguished venture capital funds from other types of
private funds in other contexts is dispositive. In this context, the
agencies do not believe that the differences in how the terms private
equity fund and venture capital fund are used in the Dodd-Frank Act
prohibit this exclusion. Rather, the text of section 619 and the Dodd-
Frank Act as a whole indicate that venture capital funds were not the
intended target of the funds prohibition. The plain language of the
statutory prohibition applies to hedge funds and private equity
funds.\277\ This language is silent with respect to venture capital
funds. In Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act, Congress mandated specific
treatment for venture capital funds for purposes of the registration
requirements under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers
Act'').\278\ This provision suggests that Congress knew how to accord
specific treatment for venture capital funds. Yet, Congress did not
list venture capital funds among the types of funds that were
restricted under section 13.\279\ That Congress did not intend to
prohibit venture capital fund investments is further supported by the
legislative history of section 13, in which several Members of Congress
specifically addressed venture capital funds in the context of the
funds prohibition.\280\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\276\ 79 FR 5671.
\277\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(a)(1)(B).
\278\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l).
\279\ In the preamble to the 2013 final rule, the agencies cited
to Congressional reports related to Title IV that characterized
venture capital funds as ``a subset of private investment funds
specializing in long-term equity investment in small or start-up
businesses.'' 79 FR 5704 (quoting S. Rep. No. 111-176 (2010)).
However, there is no indication in the statutory text itself that
Congress intended to treat venture capital funds identically to
private equity funds. Moreover, the agencies did not address the
difference in terminology that Congress used in section 402 of the
Dodd-Frank Act (``private funds'') and section 619 (``hedge funds''
and ``private equity funds''). The difference between these two
terms--specifically, the broader term ``private funds'' used in
Title IV--may indicate why Congress found it necessary to exclude
venture capital explicitly in section 407 but not in section 619.
\280\ See 156 Cong. Rec. E1295 (daily ed. July 13, 2010)
(statement of Rep. Eshoo) (``the purpose of the Volcker Rule is to
eliminate risk-taking activities by banks and their affiliates while
at the same time preserving safe, sound investment activities that
serve the public interest . . . Venture capital funds do not pose
the same risk to the health of the financial system. They promote
the public interest by funding growing companies critical to
spurring innovation, job creation, and economic competitiveness. I
expect the regulators to use the broad authority in the Volcker Rule
wisely and clarify that funds . . . such as venture capital funds,
are not captured under the Volcker Rule and fall outside the
definition of `private equity.' ''); 156 Cong. Rec. S5905 (daily ed.
July 15, 2010) (statement of Sen. Dodd) (confirming ``the purpose of
the Volcker rule is to eliminate excessive risk taking activities by
banks and their affiliates while at the same time preserving safe,
sound investment activities that serve the public interest'' and
stating ``properly conducted venture capital investment will not
cause the harms at which the Volcker rule is directed. In the event
that properly conducted venture capital investment is excessively
restricted by the provisions of section 619, I would expect the
appropriate Federal regulators to exempt it using their authority
under section 619[d][1](J) . . .''); and 156 Cong. Rec. S6242 (daily
ed. July 26, 2010) (statement of Sen. Scott Brown) (``One other area
of remaining uncertainty that has been left to the regulators is the
treatment of bank investments in venture capital funds. Regulators
should carefully consider whether banks that focus overwhelmingly on
lending to and investing in start-up technology companies should be
captured by one-size-fits-all restrictions under the Volcker rule. I
believe they should not be. Venture capital investments help
entrepreneurs get the financing they need to create new jobs.
Unfairly restricting this type of capital formation is the last
thing we should be doing in this economy.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like the 2020 proposal, the final rule incorporates the definition
of venture capital fund from Rule 203(l)-1. Most commenters accepted or
supported the proposed approach to incorporate the definition of
venture capital fund in Rule 203(l)-1.\281\ For the reasons discussed
in the 2020 proposal,\282\ the agencies believe this definition
[[Page 46445]]
accurately identifies venture capital funds and addresses the concerns
the agencies identified in declining to adopt an exclusion for venture
capital funds in the 2013 rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\281\ SIFMA; NVCA; FSF; ABA; and Goldman Sachs.
\282\ 85 FR 12135-12136.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC has defined ``venture capital fund'' as any private fund
\283\ that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\283\ For purposes of 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1, ``private fund'' is
defined as ``an issuer that would be an investment company, as
defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act, but for section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of that Act.'' 15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Represents to investors and potential investors that it
pursues a venture capital strategy;
Immediately after the acquisition of any asset, other than
qualifying investments or short-term holdings, holds no more than 20
percent of the amount of the fund's aggregate capital contributions and
uncalled committed capital in assets (other than short-term holdings)
that are not qualifying investments, valued at cost or fair value,
consistently applied by the fund;
Does not borrow, issue debt obligations, provide
guarantees or otherwise incur leverage, in excess of 15 percent of the
private fund's aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed
capital, and any such borrowing, indebtedness, guarantee or leverage is
for a non-renewable term of no longer than 120 calendar days, except
that any guarantee by the private fund of a qualifying portfolio
company's obligations up to the amount of the value of the private
fund's investment in the qualifying portfolio company is not subject to
the 120 calendar day limit;
Only issues securities the terms of which do not provide a
holder with any right, except in extraordinary circumstances, to
withdraw, redeem or require the repurchase of such securities but may
entitle holders to receive distributions made to all holders pro rata;
and
Is not registered under section 8 of the Investment
Company Act, and has not elected to be treated as a business
development company pursuant to section 54 of that Act.\284\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\284\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Qualifying investment'' is defined in the SEC's regulation to be:
(1) An equity security issued by a qualifying portfolio company that
has been acquired directly by the private fund from the qualifying
portfolio company; (2) any equity security issued by a qualifying
portfolio company in exchange for an equity security issued by the
qualifying portfolio company described in (1); or (3) any equity
security issued by a company of which a qualifying portfolio company is
a majority-owned subsidiary, as defined in section 2(a)(24) of the
Investment Company Act, or a predecessor, and is acquired by the
private fund in exchange for an equity security described in (1) or
(2).\285\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\285\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Qualifying portfolio company,'' in turn, is defined in the SEC's
regulation to be a company that: (1) At the time of any investment by
the private fund, is not reporting or foreign traded and does not
control, is not controlled by or under common control with another
company, directly or indirectly, that is reporting or foreign traded;
(2) does not borrow or issue debt obligations in connection with the
private fund's investment in such company and distribute to the private
fund the proceeds of such borrowing or issuance in exchange for the
private fund's investment; and (3) is not an investment company, a
private fund, an issuer that would be an investment company but for the
exemption provided by 17 CFR 270.3a-7, or a commodity pool.\286\ The
SEC explained that the definitions of ``qualifying investment'' and
``qualifying portfolio company'' reflect the typical characteristics of
investments made by venture capital funds and that these definitions
work together to cabin the definition of venture capital fund to only
the funds that Congress understood to be venture capital funds during
the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.\287\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\286\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1(c)(4).
\287\ See Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds,
Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under
Management, and Foreign Private Advisers, 76 FR 39646, 39657 (Jul.
6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the preamble to the regulation adopting this definition of
venture capital fund, the SEC explained that the definition's criteria
distinguish venture capital funds from other types of funds, including
private equity funds and hedge funds. For example, the SEC explained
that it understood the criteria for ``qualifying portfolio companies''
to be characteristic of issuers of portfolio securities held by venture
capital funds and, taken together, would operate to exclude most
private equity funds and hedge funds from the venture capital fund
definition.\288\ The SEC also explained that the criteria for
``qualifying investments'' under the SEC's regulation would help to
differentiate venture capital funds from other types of private funds,
such as leveraged buyout funds.\289\ The SEC further explained that its
regulation's restriction on the amount of borrowing, debt obligations,
guarantees or other incurrence of leverage was appropriate to
differentiate venture capital funds from other types of private funds
that may engage in trading strategies that use financial leverage and
may contribute to systemic risk.\290\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\288\ 76 FR 39656.
\289\ See, e.g., 76 FR 39653 (explaining that a limitation on
secondary market purchases of a qualifying portfolio company's
shares would recognize ``the critical role this condition played in
differentiating venture capital funds from other types of private
funds'').
\290\ 76 FR 39662. See also 76 FR 39657 (``We proposed these
elements of the qualifying portfolio company definition because of
the focus on leverage in the Dodd-Frank Act as a potential
contributor to systemic risk as discussed by the Senate Committee
report, and the testimony before Congress that stressed the lack of
leverage in venture capital investing.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This definition of venture capital fund helps to distinguish the
investment activities of venture capital funds from those of hedge
funds and private equity funds, which was one of the agencies' primary
concerns in declining to adopt an exclusion for venture capital funds
in the 2013 rule. Further, this definition includes criteria reflecting
the characteristics of venture capital funds that the agencies believe
may pose less potential risk to a banking entity sponsoring or
investing in venture capital funds and to the financial system--
specifically, the smaller role of leverage financing and a lesser
degree of interconnectedness with the public markets.\291\ These
characteristics help to address the concern expressed in the preamble
to the 2013 rule that the activities and risk profiles for banking
entities regarding sponsorship of, and investment in, venture capital
fund activities are not readily distinguishable from those funds that
section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to capture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\291\ 76 FR 39662.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter said requiring that a fund satisfy the requirements
of Rule 203(l)-1 would have the effect of making the exclusion too
narrow. This commenter said the exclusion for qualifying venture
capital funds should permit investments in EGCs and, more generally,
should ``reflect the evolving nature of the venture capital industry
and not rely solely on the existing SEC definition.'' \292\ The final
rule does not modify the requirement that a qualifying venture capital
fund must satisfy the requirements of Rule 203(l)-1. These requirements
focus the exclusion on the types of less mature and start-up portfolio
companies that characterize traditional venture capital activities. At
the same time, the definition of qualifying venture capital fund does
not preclude investments in EGCs because a qualifying venture capital
fund could make investments in EGCs within the 20 percent limit for
non-qualifying investments. Because the requirement that a qualifying
venture capital fund
[[Page 46446]]
must satisfy the requirements of Rule 203(l)-1 does not preclude
investments in EGCs and helps to distinguish qualifying venture capital
funds from the type of funds that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to restrict, the agencies have determined to adopt the
requirement that a qualifying venture capital fund must be a venture
capital fund as defined in Rule 203(l)-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\292\ CCMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule adopts the requirement that a qualifying venture
capital fund may not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.\293\ As described in the 2020 proposal, this
requirement helps to promote the specific purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act.\294\ The agencies are not adopting any changes to this
requirement, as recommended by some commenters. The agencies are not
expressly incorporating the permitted activities in Sec. Sec. __.4,
__.5, and __.6 of the implementing regulations into the text of the
qualifying venture capital fund exclusion. The exclusion for qualifying
venture capital funds is intended to allow banking entities to share
the risks of otherwise permissible long-term venture capital
activities. Accordingly, the agencies would not expect that a
qualifying venture capital fund would be formed for the purpose of
engaging, or in the ordinary course would be engaged, in the activities
permitted under Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, and __.6 of the implementing
regulations. Moreover, such activities could reflect a purpose other
than making long-term venture capital investments. Nevertheless, to the
extent that a qualifying venture capital fund seeks to engage in any of
those activities as an exemption from the prohibition on engaging in
proprietary trading, as defined in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i) of the final
rule, and does so in compliance with the requirements and conditions of
those permitted activities, then the final rule would not preclude such
activities.\295\ Similarly, with respect to the exclusions from the
definition of proprietary trading in Sec. __.3(d) of the implementing
regulations, the agencies note that that the trading activities
identified in Sec. __.3(d) are by definition not deemed to be
proprietary trading, such that the performance by an qualifying fund of
those activities would not be inconsistent with the final qualifying
venture capital fund exclusion.\296\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\293\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(i)(B).
\294\ 85 FR 12136.
\295\ As the agencies noted in the discussion of the final
credit fund exclusion, compliance with certain requirements and
conditions in __.4, __.5, and __.6 of the implementing regulations
may be inapt and/or highly impractical in the context of a
qualifying venture capital fund, particularly given the activity
restrictions contained in Sec. __.10(c)(16). For example, the
exemptions for underwriting and market making-related activities in
__.4 require that a banking entity relying on such exemptions, among
other things, be licensed or registered to engage in the applicable
activity in accordance with applicable law. Moreover, to the extent
that a qualifying venture capital fund is a banking entity with
significant trading assets and liabilities (i.e., because it,
together with its affiliates and subsidiaries, has trading assets
and liabilities that equal or exceeds $20 billion over the four
previous calendar quarters), it also would be required to maintain a
separate compliance program specific to those exemptions.
\296\ Similarly, and consistent with the discussion of the final
credit fund exclusion, trading activity that satisfies the 60-day
rebuttable presumption in Sec. __.3(b)(4) would be presumed not to
be proprietary trading for these purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule does not define proprietary trading by reference to
the prong of paragraph __.3(b)(1) that would apply to the banking
entity, as recommended by some commenters, because the agencies do not
believe this change would be effective or simplify the exclusion.
Unlike some banking entities, venture capital funds (that are not
themselves banking entities) are not subject to the market risk capital
rule, and thus there is generally no need to evaluate a venture capital
fund's investments under the market risk capital framework. Moreover,
applying the prong that would apply to the relevant banking entity
could result in one venture capital fund becoming subject to both
prongs. The agencies believe this would complicate evaluation of a
qualifying venture capital fund's eligibility for the exclusion, both
for banking entities and the agencies. The agencies do not agree with
one commenter's argument that requiring funds sponsored by banking
entities that are subject to the market risk capital rule test to apply
the short-term intent test for purposes of the covered funds provisions
would introduce unnecessary complexity and compliance costs for these
banking entities. As the agencies described in the preamble to the 2019
final rule, the Federal banking agencies' market risk capital rule
\297\ incorporates the same short-term intent standard as the short-
term intent test in Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i).\298\ Therefore, market risk
capital rule covered banking entities continue to apply the short-term
intent standard as part of their compliance with the market risk
capital rule. Similar processes may be employed to apply the short-term
intent standard to qualifying venture capital funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\297\ See 12 CFR part 3, subpart F; part 217, subpart F; part
324, subpart F.
\298\ 84 FR 61986.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule adopts the requirement that a banking entity that
serves as a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor
to a qualifying venture capital fund may not rely on the exclusion for
qualifying venture capital funds unless it provides the disclosures
required under Sec. __.11(a)(8) to prospective and actual investors in
the fund. This requirement promotes one of the purposes of section 13
of the BHC Act, which is to prevent banking entities from bailing out
funds that they sponsor or advise. The final rule also adopts the
requirement that a banking entity that serves as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to a qualifying venture capital
fund must ensure the activities of the qualifying venture capital fund
are consistent with safety and soundness standards that are
substantially similar to those that would apply if the banking entity
engaged in the activity directly. Therefore, a banking entity may not
rely on this exclusion to sponsor or invest in an investment fund that
exposes the banking entity to the type of high-risk trading and
investment activities that the covered fund provisions of section 13 of
the BHC Act were intended to restrict.
In the final rule, the requirement that the banking entity must
comply with Sec. __.14 of the implementing regulations is moved to
Sec. __.10(c)(16)(ii). This change clarifies that this requirement
applies to a banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading adviser to the qualifying venture capital fund and
does not apply to a banking entity that merely invests in a qualifying
venture capital fund.
The final rule does not eliminate the requirement that a banking
entity's investment in or relationship with a qualifying venture
capital fund must comply with Sec. __.14 of the implementing
regulations, as recommended by one commenter. The agencies do not agree
that applying the requirements of Sec. __.14 is duplicative of the
requirement that the banking entity not directly or indirectly
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer. In addition to prohibiting guarantees, Sec. __.14 also
prohibits other types of transactions that function as extensions of
credit or that could raise the type of bail-out concerns that section
13 of the BHC Act was intended to address. The agencies also do not
agree that applying the requirements of Sec. __.14 is duplicative of
the requirement that the banking entity's investment in and
relationships with
[[Page 46447]]
the qualifying venture capital fund must comply with the backstop
provisions in Sec. __.15. The backstop provisions in Sec. __.15
address high-risk assets and high-risk trading strategies, and material
conflicts of interest, but do not address extensions of credit that may
not entail a ``substantial financial loss'' to the banking entity. The
agencies do not expect that applying Sec. __.14 to a banking entity
that sponsors or advises a qualifying venture capital fund will unduly
interfere with the effectiveness of the exclusion. The final rule
incorporates revisions to Sec. __.14 that will improve banking
entities' ability to enter into certain ordinary course transactions
with sponsored and advised funds.\299\ The agencies expect these
changes will mitigate concerns that applying the requirements of Sec.
__.14 to qualifying venture capital funds will limit the exclusion's
utility.\300\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\299\ See infra, Section IV.D (Limitations on Relationships with
a Covered Fund).
\300\ The commenter that recommended eliminating the requirement
that the banking entity's investment in or relationship with a
qualifying venture capital fund said that doing so would ``limit the
utility and related benefits of the qualifying venture capital fund
exclusion, regardless of the proposed new exceptions to Super 23A.''
SIFMA. However, the commenter did not provide any examples or
further explain how the utility of the exclusion would be impacted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule adopts the requirement that the banking entity must
not guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of a qualifying venture capital fund.\301\ The final rule
also adopts the requirements that a banking entity's ownership in or
relationship with a qualifying venture capital fund must comply with
the limitations in Sec. __.15 of the implementing regulations, as if
the issuer were a covered fund, and be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.\302\ These requirements
promote several of the purposes of section 13 of the BHC Act. The
requirement that the banking entity not guarantee, assume, or otherwise
ensure the obligations or performance of a qualifying venture capital
fund promotes the purpose of preventing banking entities from bailing
out the fund. The requirements that a banking entity's ownership in or
relationship with a qualifying venture capital fund must comply with
the limitations in Sec. __.15 of the implementing regulations, as if
the issuer were a covered fund, and be conducted in compliance with,
and subject to, applicable banking laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards, prevent a qualifying venture
capital fund from being used to expose a banking entity to the type of
high-risk trading and investment activities that the covered fund
provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act were intended to restrict. To
the extent a fund would expose a banking entity to a high-risk assets
or a high-risk trading strategy, the fund would not be a qualifying
venture capital fund. Therefore, prior to making an investment in a
qualifying venture capital fund, a banking entity would need to ensure
that the fund's investment mandate and strategy would satisfy the
requirements of Sec. __.15. In addition, a banking entity would need
to monitor the activities of a qualifying venture capital fund to
ensure it satisfies these requirements on an ongoing basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\301\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iii).
\302\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies do not believe that any additional conditions to the
exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds are necessary. One
commenter said that the exclusion should (1) restrict all fund
investments to ``qualifying investments'' or at least very
significantly restrict investments in non-qualifying investments (e.g.,
limit them to no more than five percent of the fund's aggregate
capital), (2) impose a minimum securities holding period and portfolio
company revenue limitation of $35 million (or a similarly appropriate
and low figure) to ensure the fund is truly focused on medium-to-long
term venture (as opposed to growth stage) investments, and (3)
quantitatively limit the use of leverage as a key means for
distinguishing excluded venture capital funds from statutorily
prohibited activities involving private equity funds.\303\ The agencies
have determined not to impose any additional criteria for the reasons
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\303\ Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the agencies decline to limit a qualifying venture capital
fund's non-qualifying investments to five percent or less of total
assets. The agencies agree with commenters that it is necessary to
provide some amount of flexibility for a venture capital fund to make
investments that deviate from the typical form of venture capital
investment activity. For example, the agencies understand that certain
common venture capital fund activities, such as secondary acquisition
of portfolio company shares from founders, are not qualifying
investments under Rule 203(l)-1. The agencies agree with commenters, as
well as with the rationale the SEC provided in the 2011 adopting
release, that said providing flexibility for this type of non-
qualifying investment is consistent with the overall goal of
identifying funds engaged in a venture capital strategy. In making this
determination, the agencies find it significant that the SEC considered
this issue as part of its 2011 rulemaking and concluded that a 20
percent bucket for non-qualifying investments was appropriate.\304\
Moreover, all activities of a qualifying venture capital fund,
including any investments that would be non-qualifying investments
under Rule 203(l)-1, will be subject to the other requirements in Sec.
__.10(c)(16), including the requirement that the fund not engage in
proprietary trading and not result in a material exposure by the
banking entity to a high-risk asset or high-risk trading strategy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\304\ 76 FR 39683.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies also decline to impose additional requirements, such
as a minimum securities holding period or a portfolio company revenue
limitation. The agencies believe a minimum securities holding period is
unnecessary in light of the requirements that the fund (1) represent to
investors and potential investors that it pursues a venture capital
strategy \305\ and (2) not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if it were a banking
entity.\306\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\305\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-(1)(a)(1).
\306\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(i)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies also considered whether to include a portfolio company
revenue limitation, as discussed in the preamble to the 2020 proposal.
Most commenters did not support imposing a revenue limitation, while
one commenter supported imposing a limitation of $35 million. After
considering all comments received, the agencies determined that a
revenue limit could unnecessarily disadvantage certain companies
because the revenues of startups can vary greatly based on industry and
geography. The agencies determined it would be unnecessarily
restrictive to create a revenue limit that could limit funding to
otherwise eligible portfolio companies. Again, the agencies found it
significant that the SEC expressly considered this issue as part of the
2011 rulemaking and determined that any ``single factor test could
ignore the complexities of doing business in different industries or
regions'' and ``could inadvertently restrict venture capital funds from
funding otherwise promising young small companies.'' \307\ In addition,
the definition of ``qualifying portfolio company'' in the SEC's rule
[[Page 46448]]
incorporates appropriate standards that distinguish newer ventures from
more established companies. In particular, a ``qualifying portfolio
company'' may not be ``reporting or foreign traded'' and may not
control, be controlled by or under common control with another company
that is reporting or foreign traded.\308\ A ``reporting or foreign
traded'' company for these purposes means a company that is subject to
the reporting requirements under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or having a security listed or traded on any
exchange or organized market operating in a foreign jurisdiction.\309\
In addition to publicly offered companies, this definition excludes
issuers if they have more than $10 million in total assets and a class
of equity securities, such as common stock, that is held of record by
either 2,000 or more persons or 500 or more persons who are not
accredited investors.\310\ In adopting the ``reporting or foreign
traded'' requirement of Rule 203(l)-1, the SEC explained that it found
``a key consideration by Congress'' was that venture capital funds
``are less connected with the public markets and may involve less
potential systemic risk.'' \311\ This condition that qualifying
portfolio companies not be capitalized by the public markets serves to
limit the type of companies in which a qualifying venture capital fund
may invest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\307\ 76 FR 39649.
\308\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1(c)(4).
\309\ 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1(c)(5).
\310\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).
\311\ 76 FR 39656.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the agencies determined it is unnecessary to include an
additional quantitative limit on the use of leverage because the
exclusion incorporates a leverage limit. Specifically, Rule 203(l)-1
provides that a venture capital fund may not borrow or otherwise incur
leverage in excess of 15 percent of the fund's aggregate capital
contributions and uncalled capital commitments, and then only on a
short-term basis. Because the exclusion already incorporates a limit on
leverage for a qualifying venture capital fund, it is not necessary for
the final rule to incorporate an additional limit on leverage.
ii. Long-Term Investment Funds
In the preamble to the 2020 proposal, the agencies asked whether
the final rule should include an exclusion for long-term investment
funds. In the preamble, the agencies asked if an exclusion should be
provided for issuers (1) that make long-term investments that a banking
entity could make directly, (2) that hold themselves out as entities or
arrangements that make investments that they intend to hold for a set
minimum time period, such as two years, (3) whose relevant offering and
governing documents reflect a long-term investment strategy, and (4)
that meet all other requirements of the proposed qualifying venture
capital fund exclusion (other than that the issuers would be venture
capital funds as defined in Rule 203(l)-1.
Several commenters supported an exclusion for long-term investment
funds.\312\ Many of these commenters said an exclusion for qualifying
long-term investment funds would help to close gaps in the availability
of financing that exist under the implementing regulations while
promoting and protecting the safety and soundness of the banking entity
and the financial stability of the U.S.\313\ These commenters said the
exclusion would allow banking entities to diversify their assets and
income streams, thereby reducing the overall risk of their assets and
operations and increasing their resiliency against failure.\314\
Several of these commenters supported an exclusion for long-term
investment funds because they said it would allow banking entities to
do indirectly through a fund structure the same activities they may
conduct directly.\315\ Some commenters said long-term investment
vehicles do not engage in short-term proprietary trading or the high-
risk activities that section 619's backstop provisions are intended to
address.\316\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\312\ Gonzalez et al.; Crapo; FSF; SIFMA; CCMC; CCMR; IIB;
Goldman Sachs; AIC; and ABA. One commenter said the final rule
should exclude an issuer with the following characteristics: (1) Its
investment strategy or business purpose is to invest in assets in
which a financial holding company would be permitted to invest
directly; (2) it holds itself out to investors as acquiring and
holding long-term assets for at least two years; (3) it does not
engage in activities that would constitute impermissible proprietary
trading (as defined in the implementing regulations) if conducted
directly by a banking entity; and (4) if it is sponsored by a
banking entity, (A) the sponsoring banking entity and its affiliates
cannot, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume or otherwise
insure its obligations, (B) it must comply with the disclosure
obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the rule and (C) the
sponsoring banking entity must comply with the limitations imposed
by Sec. __.14 (except that the banking entity may acquire and
retain any ownership interest in the issuer) and Sec. __.15, as if
the vehicle were a covered fund. The commenter said these conditions
would adequately address concerns regarding evasion, promote long-
term capital formation, and exclude certain entities that are
inadvertently captured by the definition of ``covered fund'' such as
certain incubators. Goldman Sachs.
\313\ SIFMA; AIC; and CCMR. One commenter said an exclusion for
long-term investment funds is necessary because the proposed
exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds would not address
incubators and other issuers that do not hold themselves out as
pursuing a venture capital strategy. Goldman Sachs. Two commenters
said excluding long-term investment funds would provide certainty
for banking entities that hold interests in ``inadvertent'' or
``accidental'' investment companies. SIFMA and Goldman Sachs.
\314\ Id.
\315\ FSF; CCMR; AIC; CCMC; and SIFMA.
\316\ ABA and CCMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter said the rule should not establish an exclusion for
long-term investment vehicles because section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act
was put in place to reorient banks away from risky speculative
activities and toward responsible lending to businesses and
households.\317\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\317\ Robert Rutowski.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule does not include an exclusion for long-term
investment funds. After reviewing all comments received, the agencies
determined that it remains difficult to distinguish effectively such
funds from the type of funds that section 13 of the BHC Act was
designed to restrict. A general exclusion for long-term investment
funds would be too broad of an approach for addressing specific types
of issuers, such as inadvertent investment companies and incubators
that do not hold themselves out as engaging in a venture capital
strategy, as described by some commenters. An exclusion based primarily
on the length of time that an issuer holds its investments could be
overbroad because it could also permit funds that are engaged in the
type of investment activity that section 13 of the BHC Act was designed
to restrict. Moreover, the agencies believe the exclusions for credit
funds and qualifying venture capital funds will improve banking
entities' ability to provide long-term financing through certain fund
structures in a manner that is consistent with the statute.
3. Family Wealth Management Vehicles
The agencies are adopting an exclusion from the definition of
``covered fund'' under Sec. __.10(b) of the rule for any entity that
acts as a ``family wealth management vehicle.'' This exclusion is
available to an entity that is not, and does not hold itself out as
being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from investors
primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for resale or
other disposition or otherwise trading in securities. For family wealth
management vehicles that are trusts, the grantor(s) must be family
customers.\318\ For non-trust family
[[Page 46449]]
wealth management vehicles, family customers must own a majority of the
voting interests (directly or indirectly) as well as a majority of
interests in the entity. Ownership of non-trust family wealth
management vehicles is generally limited to family customers and up to
five closely related persons of the family customers.\319\ However,
there is a de minimis ownership allowance that permits one or more
entities, including a banking entity, that are not family customers or
closely related persons, to acquire or retain, as principal, up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the family wealth management vehicle's
outstanding ownership interests for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.\320\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\318\ Under Sec. __.10(c)(17)(iii)(B) of the final rule, a
``family customer'' is a ``family client,'' as defined in Rule
202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of the Advisers Act (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-
1(d)(4)); or any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-
law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of
a family client, or a spouse or spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing. All terms defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 of the Advisers
Act (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1) have the same meaning in the family
wealth management vehicle exclusion.
\319\ Under Sec. __.10(c)(17)(iii)(A) of the final rule,
``closely related person'' means ``a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.''
\320\ This 0.5 percent ownership interest represents the
aggregate amount of a family wealth management vehicle's ownership
interests that may be acquired or retained by all entities that are
neither a family customer nor a closely related person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, a banking entity may rely on the exclusion only if the
banking entity: (1) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment
advisory, or commodity trading advisory services to the entity; (2)
does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such entity; (3) complies with
the disclosure obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such entity
were a covered fund, provided that the content may be modified to
prevent the disclosure from being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of
the entity; (4) does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership
interest in the entity, other than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the family wealth management vehicle's outstanding ownership interests
for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; (5) complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and
__.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and (6) except for
riskless principal transactions as defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11),\321\
complies with the requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking
entity and its affiliates were a member bank and the entity were an
affiliate thereof.\322\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\321\ ``Riskless principal transaction'' means a transaction in
which a banking entity, after receiving an order to buy (or sell) a
security from a customer, purchases (or sells) the security in the
secondary market for its own account to offset a contemporaneous
sale to (or purchase from) the customer. Final rule Sec.
__.10(d)(11). The allowance for riskless principal transactions in
the final rule does not affect the independent application of the
Board's Regulation W (12 CFR part 223).
\322\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies requested comment on whether to
exclude family wealth management vehicles from the definition of
``covered fund.'' \323\ Several commenters supported this exclusion
stating, generally, that it would reduce uncertainty for banking
entities about the permissibility of providing traditional banking,
investment management, and trust and estate planning services to family
wealth management vehicle clients.\324\ As discussed below, other
commenters opposed the exclusion or recommended revisions to it.\325\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\323\ 85 FR 12120.
\324\ See, e.g., Goldman Sachs; FSF; CCMR; IAA; ABA; BPI; PNC;
and SIFMA.
\325\ See, e.g., Better Markets, Data Boiler; SIFMA; BPI; ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies believe that the exclusion for family wealth
management vehicles will appropriately allow banking entities to
structure services or transactions for customers, or to otherwise
provide traditional customer-facing banking and asset management
services, through a vehicle, even though such a vehicle may rely on
section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act or would
otherwise be a covered fund under the implementing regulations.\326\
The agencies believe the exclusion for family wealth management
vehicles will effectively tailor the definition of covered fund by
permitting banking entities to continue to provide traditional banking
and asset management services that do not involve the types of risks
section 13 of the BHC Act was designed to address. As the agencies
noted in the preamble to the 2013 rule, section 13 and the implementing
regulations were designed in part to permit banking entities to
continue to provide client-oriented financial services, including asset
management services.\327\ Furthermore, the agencies believe that the
provisions of the exclusion will work together to sufficiently reduce
the likelihood that these vehicles could be used to evade the
requirements of section 13 or the implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\326\ Several commenters supported the exclusion, with two
stating that many family wealth management vehicles do not rely on
the exclusions in 3(c)(1) and (c)(7) of the Investment Company Act
and are not covered funds under the implementing regulations. See
ABA and PNC. Banking entities that sponsor or invest in family
wealth management vehicles that are not subject to the covered funds
provisions under section 13 of the BHC Act or the implementing
regulations would not need to rely on this exclusion.
\327\ See 79 FR 5541 (describing the 2013 rule as ``permitting
banking entities to continue to provide, and to manage and limit the
risks associated with providing, client-oriented financial services
that are critical to capital generation for businesses of all sizes,
households and individuals, and that facilitate liquid markets.
These client-oriented financial services, which include
underwriting, market making, and asset management services, are
important to the U.S. financial markets and the participants in
those markets.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the commenters that opposed the exclusion expressed concern
with the agencies adding an exclusion from the definition of ``covered
fund'' that they believed would only benefit a few wealthy
families.\328\ Banking entities may provide asset management services
to families through a trust structure. The agencies believe that
banking entities should have flexibility to offer such asset management
services to families through a fund structure subject to appropriate
limits. As noted above, the agencies believe the exclusion for family
wealth management vehicles will effectively tailor the definition of
covered fund by permitting banking entities to continue to provide
traditional banking and asset management services that do not involve
the types of risks section 13 was designed to address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\328\ See Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies continue to believe that the exclusion for family
wealth management vehicles is consistent with section 13(d)(1)(D),
which permits banking entities to engage in transactions on behalf of
customers, when those transactions would otherwise be prohibited under
section 13.\329\ The exclusion will similarly allow banking entities to
provide traditional services to customers through vehicles used to
manage the wealth and other assets of those customers and their
families.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\329\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another commenter suggested that, rather than providing an
exclusion for family wealth management vehicles through a rulemaking,
the agencies should instead provide no-action relief on a case-by-case
basis.\330\ The agencies do not believe that a case-by case approach
would further the aims of section 13 or the implementing regulations.
The agencies believe that a case-by-case approach would be
[[Page 46450]]
unnecessarily burdensome and difficult to administer. This approach
would also unnecessarily deviate from the agencies' treatment of other
excluded entities under the implementing regulations and hinder
transparency and consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\330\ Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies believe that the adopted exclusion for a family wealth
management vehicle will appropriately distinguish it from the type of
entity that the covered funds provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act
were intended to capture. The exclusion requires that a family wealth
management vehicle not raise money from investors primarily for the
purpose of investing in securities for resale or other disposition or
otherwise trading in securities. This aspect of the exclusion will help
to differentiate family wealth management vehicles from covered funds,
which raise money from investors for this purpose.
In addition, the family wealth management vehicle exclusion
contains ownership limits designed to ensure that the vehicle is used
to manage the wealth and other assets of customers and their families.
One such limit is the definition of ``family customer.'' As proposed,
the definition of ``family customer'' is based on the definition of
``family client'' in rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) under the Advisers Act
(the family office rule), and also incorporates certain in-laws and
their spouses and spousal equivalents. Several commenters supported
this approach,\331\ however, one commenter suggested that the agencies
exclude in-laws, their spouses and their spousal equivalents from the
definition of ``family customer.'' \332\ The agencies believe that in-
laws, their spouses and spousal equivalents share the same close
familial relations as others included in the definition of ``family
client.'' Furthermore, the agencies believe that the final rule's
definition of ``family customer'' reflects the types of relationships
typically present in family wealth management vehicles.\333\ Reflecting
those relationships prevents unnecessary constraints on the utility of
the exclusion and will allow banking entities to provide traditional
banking services to these clients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\331\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and ABA.
\332\ See Better Markets.
\333\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another ownership limit designed to ensure that a family wealth
management vehicle is used to manage the wealth and other assets of
customers and their families is the requirement that a majority of the
interests in the entity are owned by family customers.\334\ The
inclusion of this limit in the final rule is a modification from the
2020 proposal which only required family customers to own a majority of
the voting interests (directly or indirectly) in the entity. One
commenter suggested this modification to ensure that the exclusion is
not used to evade the intent of section 13 and the implementing
regulations.\335\ The agencies believe this modification is an
appropriate means of ensuring that the exclusion is used by banking
entities that are providing services to family wealth management
vehicles, rather than to hedge funds or private equity funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\334\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(i)(B)(2).
\335\ See ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another commenter suggested additional ownership limits for family
wealth management vehicles, including limits on the vehicle's ability
to restructure, to prevent evasion of the prohibitions of section 13
and the implementing regulations.\336\ However, as discussed above, the
agencies believe that the requirements of the exclusion, along with the
conditions a banking entity must meet in order to rely on it, will help
to ensure that banking entities will not be able to use family wealth
management vehicles as a means to evade section 13 and the implementing
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\336\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another ownership limit designed to ensure that a family wealth
management vehicle is used to manage the wealth and other assets of
customers and their families is the requirement that only up to five
closely related persons of family customers may hold ownership
interests in the vehicle.\337\ The agencies proposed to permit three
closely related persons to hold ownership interests. Several commenters
supported allowing a finite number of closely related persons of family
customers to hold ownership interests.\338\ However, some commenters
suggested that the proposed limit of three closely related persons did
not reflect the typical manner in which family wealth management
vehicles are constituted and would unnecessarily constrain the
availability of the exclusion.\339\ These commenters recommended that
the agencies modify the proposed rule to allow for up to ten closely
related persons to invest in family wealth management vehicles.\340\
One of these commenters stated that increasing the number of closely
related persons would allow banking entities to provide traditional
wealth management and estate planning services to family wealth
management vehicles and that the other conditions imposed by the
proposed rule would keep such vehicles from evading the covered fund
provisions of the implementing regulations.\341\ The commenter further
noted that a limit of ten closely related persons would align the
exclusion with the numerical limitation of unaffiliated owners provided
for in the joint venture exclusion.\342\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\337\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(i)(B)(3).
\338\ See, e.g., BPI; SIFMA; PNC; and ABA.
\339\ See, e.g., BPI; SIFMA; ABA; and PNC.
\340\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and PNC.
\341\ See SIFMA.
\342\ See SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule will allow up to five closely related persons to
hold ownership interests in a family wealth management vehicle.
Commenters indicated that many family wealth management vehicles
currently include more than three closely related persons.\343\ The
agencies believe that the final rule will more closely align the
exclusion with the current composition of family wealth management
vehicles, thereby increasing the utility of the exclusion without
allowing such a large number of non-family customer owners to suggest
the entity is in reality a hedge fund or private equity fund.
Additionally, the agencies believe that requiring family customers to
own a majority of the interests in the family wealth management vehicle
will serve as an additional safeguard against evasion of the provisions
of section 13 of the BHC Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\343\ See, e.g., BPI; ABA; and PNC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, the final rule's definition of ``closely related
person'' is ``a natural person (including the estate and estate
planning vehicles of such person) who has longstanding business or
personal relationships with any family customer.'' \344\ One commenter
suggested that the definition of ``closely related person'' should
include only persons with personal relationships with family customers
and not also business relationships.\345\ The agencies believe that it
is not practical or worthwhile to exclude business relationships from
the definition of ``closely related person'' because it would require
banking entities to engage in an assessment of relationships that are
likely to include elements common in both personal and business
relationships. The agencies also believe that requiring these
relationships to be ``longstanding'' will help ensure that they are
bona fide established relationships and not simply related to the
planned investment activities through the family wealth management
vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\344\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(iii)(A).
\345\ See, e.g., Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46451]]
In a change to the 2020 proposal, the final rule permits any
entity, or entities--not only banking entities--to acquire or retain,
as principal, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity's
outstanding ownership interests, for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.\346\ Some commenters
requested that the agencies include this modification because often,
family wealth management vehicles use unaffiliated third parties--such
as third-party trustees or similar service providers--when structuring
family wealth management vehicles.\347\ The agencies believe that
permitting de minimis ownership by non-banking entity third parties is
appropriate and in some cases necessary to reflect the typical
structure of family wealth management vehicles. The de minimis
ownership provision recognizes that ownership by an entity other than a
family customer or closely related person may be necessary under
certain circumstances--such as establishing corporate separateness or
addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar matters. Whether the
entity that owns a de minimis amount is a banking entity or some other
third party does not raise any concerns that are not sufficiently
addressed by the aggregate ownership limit and the narrow circumstances
in which such entities may take an ownership interest. The agencies
recognize that without this modification, family wealth management
vehicles may be forced to engage in less effective and/or efficient
means of structuring and organization because the exclusion would limit
the vehicle's access to some customary service providers that have
traditionally taken small ownership interests for structuring purposes.
The agencies are therefore expanding the types of entities that may
acquire or retain the de minimis ownership interest to include any
third party. However, the aggregate de minimis amount and the purpose
for which it may be owned is unchanged from the 2020 proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\346\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(i)(C).
\347\ See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As stated above, under the final rule, a banking entity may only
rely on the exclusion with respect to a family wealth management
vehicle if the banking entity meets certain conditions.\348\ The
agencies believe that, collectively, the conditions of the exclusion
will help to ensure that family wealth management vehicles are used for
client-oriented financial services provided on arms-length, market
terms, and to prevent evasion of the requirements of section 13 of the
BHC Act and the implementing regulations. In addition, these conditions
are based on existing conditions in other provisions of the
implementing regulations,\349\ which the agencies believe will
facilitate banking entities' compliance with the exclusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\348\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii).
\349\ See implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.11(a)(5)
(imposing, as a condition of the exemption for organizing and
offering a covered fund, that a banking entity and its affiliates do
not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure
the obligations or performance of the covered fund or of any covered
fund in which such covered fund invests); __.11(a)(8) (imposing, as
a condition of the exemption for organizing and offering a covered
fund, that the banking entity provide certain disclosures to any
prospective and actual investor in the covered fund);
__.10(c)(2)(ii) (allowing, as a condition of the exclusion from the
covered fund definition for wholly-owned subsidiaries, for the
holding of up to 0.5 percent of outstanding ownership interests by a
third party for limited purposes); and __.14(b) (subjecting certain
transactions with covered funds to section 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, the agencies are not applying Sec. __.14(a), which
applies section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act to banking entities'
relationships with covered funds, to family wealth management vehicles
because the agencies understand that the application of Sec. __.14(a)
to family wealth management vehicles could prohibit banking entities
from providing the full range of banking and asset management services
to customers using these vehicles.\350\ The agencies are, however,
applying Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and __.15 to family wealth management
vehicles, as proposed, because the agencies continue to believe that it
will help ensure that banking entities and their affiliates' exposure
to risk remains appropriately limited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\350\ See SIFMA (stating that it agreed with the agencies'
approach of not applying Sec. __.14 to relationships between
banking entities and family wealth management vehicles because doing
so would prevent banking entities from making ordinary extensions of
credit and entering into a number of other transactions with family
wealth management vehicles that are critical to the banking entity
providing traditional asset management and estate planning
services).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are also adopting a prohibition, with modifications
described below, on banking entity purchases of low-quality assets from
family wealth management vehicles that would be prohibited under
Regulation W concerning transactions with affiliates (12 CFR
223.15(a))--as if such banking entity were a member bank and the entity
were an affiliate thereof--to prevent banking entities from ``bailing
out'' family wealth management vehicles.\351\ Regulation W (12 CFR
223.15(a)) provides that a member bank may not purchase a low-quality
asset from an affiliate unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself to purchase the asset
before the time the asset was acquired by the affiliate.\352\ Several
commenters requested clarification that the exclusion permits banking
entities to engage in riskless principal transactions to purchase
assets--including low quality assets for purposes of section 223.15 of
the Board's Regulation W--from family wealth management vehicles.\353\
Commenters stated that the need for such asset purchases may arise as a
result of a family customer's preferences and that permitting the
banking entities to engage in such purchases may facilitate the family
customer's sale of the asset.\354\ Commenters stated that allowing
these transactions would pose minimal market or credit risk to a
banking entity because the banking entity would purchase and sell the
same asset contemporaneously.\355\ Furthermore, one commenter stated
that without clarity on the permissiveness of riskless principal
transactions, family wealth management vehicles would be forced to
obtain the services of a third-party service provider to sell low
quality assets, which would increase costs and operational complexity
of the family wealth management vehicles without furthering the aims of
section 13 of the BHC Act or the implementing regulations.\356\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\351\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(F).
\352\ 12 CFR 223.15(a).
\353\ See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
\354\ See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
\355\ See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
\356\ See SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies believe that permitting a banking entity to engage in
riskless principal transactions that involve the purchase of low-
quality assets from a family wealth management vehicle is unlikely to
pose a substantive risk of evading section 13 of the BHC Act. In a
riskless principal transaction, the riskless principal (the banking
entity) buys and sells the same security contemporaneously, and the
asset risk passes promptly from the customer (family wealth management
vehicle, in this context) through the riskless principal to a third-
party.\357\ The agencies are adopting the condition that banking
entities and their affiliates comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a member
bank and the entity were an affiliate. However, in a change from the
2020 proposal and in response to the concerns raised by
[[Page 46452]]
commenters, the condition will explicitly exclude from those
requirements transactions that meet the definition of riskless
principal transactions as defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11). The definition
of riskless principal transactions adopted in Sec. __.10(d)(11) is
similar to the definition adopted in the Board's Regulation W, as this
definition is appropriately narrow and generally familiar to banking
entities.\358\ The agencies expect that, together, the adopted criteria
for the family wealth management vehicle exclusion will prevent a
banking entity from being able to bail out such entities in periods of
financial stress or otherwise expose the banking entity to the types of
risks that the covered fund provisions of section 13 were intended to
address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\357\ See 67 FR 76597.
\358\ 12 CFR 223.3(ee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters requested that the agencies remove the condition
that banking entities and their affiliates comply with the disclosure
obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the final rule, as if the
vehicle were a covered fund, because such disclosures would not apply
to a vehicle that a banking entity was not organizing and offering
pursuant to Sec. __.11(a) of the final rule and therefore would be
confusing.\359\ In particular, these commenters stated that the
required disclosure under Sec. __.11(a)(8) concerning the banking
entity's ``ownership interests'' in the fund and referencing the fund's
``offering documents'' may create confusion in circumstances where the
banking entity does not own an interest in the family wealth management
vehicle, or where such vehicles do not have offering documents. Also,
commenters requested confirmation from the agencies that banking
entities would be permitted to (i) modify the required disclosures to
reflect the specific circumstances of their relationship with, and the
particular structure of, their family wealth management vehicle
clients; and (ii) satisfy the written disclosure requirement by means
other than including such disclosures in the governing document(s) of
the family wealth management vehicle(s).\360\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\359\ See, e.g., ABA and PNC.
\360\ See, e.g., BPI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are adopting the condition that banking entities and
their affiliates comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
__.11(a)(8) of the final rule with respect to family wealth management
vehicles. However, in a change from the 2020 proposal and in response
to the concerns raised by commenters, the condition will explicitly
permit banking entities and their affiliates to modify the content of
such disclosures to prevent the disclosure from being misleading and
also permit banking entities to modify the manner of disclosure to
accommodate the specific circumstances of the entity.\361\ The
obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the final rule apply in
connection with the exemption for organizing and offering covered
funds, which would typically require the preparation and distribution
of offering documents. The agencies, however, understand that many
family wealth management vehicles may not have offering documents. The
agencies have an interest in providing family wealth management vehicle
customers with the substance of the disclosure, rather than a concern
with the specific wording of the disclosure or with the document in
which the disclosure is provided. Accordingly, the agencies have
provided that the content of the disclosure may be modified to prevent
the disclosure from being misleading and the manner of disclosure may
be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of the family
wealth management vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\361\ In the 2020 proposal, the agencies had indicated that for
purposes of the proposed exclusion, a banking entity could satisfy
these written disclosure obligations in a number of ways and could
modify the specific wording of the disclosures in Sec. __.11(a)(8)
to accurately reflect the specific circumstances of the family
wealth management vehicle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, Sec. __.11(a)(8) requires disclosure that an investor
``should read the fund offering documents before investing in the
covered fund.'' In order to accurately reflect the specific
circumstances of a family wealth management vehicle for which there are
no offering documents, the modified provision will allow the banking
entity to revise this disclosure to reference the appropriate
disclosure documents, if any, provided in connection with the vehicle.
Similarly, the agencies understand the specific wording of the
disclosures in Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the rule may need to be modified to
accurately reflect the specific circumstances of the banking entity's
relationship with the family wealth management vehicle. For example, a
banking entity that holds no ownership interest in the family wealth
management vehicle may modify the disclosure required in Sec.
__.11(a)(8)(i)(A) to reflect its lack of ownership. Moreover, Sec.
__.11(a)(8) requires that the banking entity provide these disclosures,
``such as through disclosure in the . . . offering documents.'' The
agencies expect that a banking entity could satisfy these disclosure
delivery obligations in a number of ways, such as by including them in
the family wealth management vehicle's governing documents, in account
opening materials or in supplementary materials (e.g., a separate
disclosure document provided by the banking entity solely for purposes
of complying with this exclusion and providing the required
disclosures).
4. Customer Facilitation Vehicles
The agencies are adopting an exclusion from the definition of
``covered fund'' under Sec. __.10(b) of the rule for any issuer that
acts as a ``customer facilitation vehicle.'' The customer facilitation
vehicle exclusion will, as proposed, be available for any issuer that
is formed by or at the request of a customer of the banking entity for
the purpose of providing such customer (which may include one or more
affiliates of such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service provided by the banking entity.\362\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\362\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A banking entity may only rely on the exclusion with respect to an
issuer provided that: (1) All of the ownership interests of the issuer
are owned by the customer (which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was created; \363\ and (2) the banking
entity and its affiliates: (i) Maintain documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the customer's exposure to such
transaction, investment strategy, or service; (ii) do not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of such issuer; (iii) comply with the disclosure
obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered
fund, provided that the content may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of the issuer; (iv)
do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's
outstanding ownership interests for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns; (v) comply with the
[[Page 46453]]
requirements of Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and __.15, as if such issuer were a
covered fund; and (vi) except for riskless principal transactions as
defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11), comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a member
bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.\364\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\363\ Notwithstanding this condition, up to an aggregate 0.5
percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more entities that are not customers
if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties
for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns. Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
\364\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies continue to believe that this exclusion will
appropriately allow banking entities to structure certain types of
services or transactions for customers, or to otherwise provide
traditional customer-facing banking and asset management services,
through a vehicle, even though such a vehicle may rely on section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act or would otherwise be
a covered fund under the final rule. Most commenters that addressed
this exclusion were supportive,\365\ stating that it would provide
banking entities with greater flexibility to meet client needs and
objectives.\366\ Some commenters found the exclusion's conditions to be
reasonable and sufficient.\367\ However, two commenters recommended
that the agencies impose additional limitations on the exclusion.\368\
One of these commenters argued that the exclusion would permit, and
possibly encourage, banking entities to increase their risk exposures
through the use of customer facilitation vehicles, and the agencies
should minimize such risk exposures and promote risk monitoring and
management.\369\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\365\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; Credit Suisse; FSF; Goldman
Sachs; and IAA.
\366\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and Goldman Sachs.
\367\ See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
\368\ See Better Markets and Data Boiler.
\369\ See Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies continue to believe that these vehicles do not expose
banking entities to the types of risks that section 13 of the BHC Act
was intended to restrict, and that this exclusion is consistent with
section 13(d)(1)(D), which permits banking entities to engage in
transactions on behalf of customers, when such transactions would
otherwise be prohibited under section 13. The agencies have elsewhere
tailored the 2013 rule to allow banking entities to meet their
customers' needs.\370\ This exclusion will similarly allow banking
entities to provide customer-oriented financial services through a
vehicle when that vehicle's purpose is to facilitate a customer's
exposure to those services.\371\ As stated in the 2020 proposal, the
agencies do not believe that section 13 of the BHC Act was intended to
interfere unnecessarily with the ability of banking entities to provide
services to their customers simply because the customer may prefer to
receive those services through a vehicle or through a transaction with
a vehicle instead of directly with the banking entity.\372\ Some
commenters agreed, stating that customer facilitation vehicles would
not expose banking entities to the types of risks that section 13 was
intended to prohibit or limit, particularly given that such vehicles
will be subject to a number of conditions, as discussed below.\373\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\370\ For example, the agencies in 2019 amended the exemption
for risk-mitigating hedging activities to allow banking entities to
acquire or retain an ownership interest in a covered fund as a risk-
mitigating hedge when acting as an intermediary on behalf of a
customer that is not itself a banking entity to facilitate the
exposure by the customer to the profits and losses of the covered
fund. See 2019 amendments Sec. __.13(a)(1)(ii). See also 2019
amendments Sec. __.3(d)(11) (excluding from the definition of
``proprietary trading'' the entering into of customer-driven swaps
or customer-driven security-based swaps and matched swaps or
security-based swaps under certain conditions).
\371\ This exclusion does not require that the customer
relationship be pre-existing. In other words, the exclusion will be
available for an issuer that is formed for the purpose of
facilitating the exposure of a customer of the banking entity where
the customer relationship begins only in connection with the
formation of that issuer. The agencies took a similar approach to
this question in describing the exemption for activities related to
organizing and offering a covered fund under Sec. __.11(a) of the
2013 rule. See 79 FR 5716. The agencies indicated that section
13(d)(1)(G), under which the exemption under Sec. __.11(a) was
adopted, did not explicitly require that the customer relationship
be pre-existing. Similarly, section 13(d)(1)(D) does not explicitly
require a pre-existing customer relationship.
\372\ 85 FR 12120.
\373\ See SIFMA and ABA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The exclusion will, as proposed, require that the vehicle be formed
by or at the request of the customer.\374\ One commenter suggested that
the agencies remove this requirement, arguing that it would inhibit a
banking entity's ability to provide customers with services in a timely
manner.\375\ However, the agencies continue to believe that this
requirement is an important component of the exclusion because it helps
differentiate customer facilitation vehicles from covered funds that
are organized and offered by the banking entity. As stated in the 2020
proposal, the requirement will not preclude a banking entity from
marketing its customer facilitation vehicle services or discussing with
its customers prior to the formation of such vehicles the potential
benefits of structuring such services through a vehicle.\376\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\374\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(i).
\375\ SIFMA (stating that requiring a banking entity to wait for
a customer to request formation would delay the banking entity's
ability to provide services to the customer without any
corresponding regulatory benefit).
\376\ 85 FR 12120.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As in the 2020 proposal, the agencies are not specifying the types
of transaction, investment strategy or other service that a customer
facilitation vehicle may be formed to facilitate.\377\ One commenter
recommended specifying that the exclusion only allow vehicles to be
formed for extensions of intraday credit, and payment, clearing, and
settlement services, and only for purposes of operational
efficiency.\378\ Another commenter argued that attempting to specify
may prevent banking entities from being able to appropriately respond
to a customer's requests.\379\ The agencies continue to believe that
providing flexibility enhances the utility of this exclusion.
Specifically, the agencies note that the purpose of this exclusion is
to allow banking entities to provide customer-oriented financial
services through vehicles, providing customers with exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or other service that the banking
entity may provide to such customers directly. Limiting the type of
transaction, investment strategy, or service for which the customer
facilitation vehicle may be formed would interfere with this purpose.
Accordingly, the agencies are adopting this requirement as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\377\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(i).
\378\ See Data Boiler.
\379\ See SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the final rule, similar to the 2020 proposal, a banking
entity will be able to rely on the customer facilitation vehicle
exclusion only under certain conditions, as stated above.\380\
Commenters supported most of the conditions, stating that the exclusion
imposes reasonable conditions that provide safeguards.\381\ Commenters
also suggested modifications to certain conditions, as discussed
below.\382\ The agencies are adopting the conditions, largely as
proposed. However, the agencies are modifying the conditions that
relate to de minimis ownership of the vehicle, the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), and the disclosure obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8),
as discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\380\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii).
\381\ See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
\382\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, the exclusion would have permitted banking entities
and their affiliates to acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership
interest in the issuer up to 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding
ownership interests, for the purpose of and to the extent necessary
[[Page 46454]]
for establishing corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy,
insolvency, or similar concerns.\383\ Similar to their request for
family wealth management vehicles, commenters suggested that the
agencies specifically allow any party that is unaffiliated with the
customer, rather than only the banking entities and their affiliates,
to own this de minimis interest.\384\ For the same reasons as discussed
above with respect to family wealth management vehicles, the agencies
are modifying the de minimis ownership provision such that up to an
aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership interests
may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are not
customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.\385\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\383\ See 2020 proposed rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(4).
\384\ See SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
\385\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are adopting, with modifications, the condition for a
banking entity to comply with the requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a), as
if such banking entity were a member bank and the issuer were an
affiliate thereof.\386\ As discussed above, several commenters
recommended that the agencies clarify that the family wealth management
vehicle exclusion permits banking entities to engage in riskless
principal transactions to purchase assets--including low quality assets
for purposes of section 223.15 of the Board's Regulation W--from family
wealth management vehicles.\387\ One such commenter also suggested
that, for purposes of consistency, the agencies should similarly
clarify that banking entities are permitted to engage in such riskless
principal transactions with customer facilitation vehicles.\388\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\386\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6). 12 CFR 223.15(a)
provides that a member bank may not purchase a low-quality asset
from an affiliate unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself to purchase the
asset before the time the asset was acquired by the affiliate. 12
CFR 223.15(a).
\387\ See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA. See supra, Section IV.C.3
(Family Wealth Management Vehicles).
\388\ See BPI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the proposed requirement that a customer
facilitation vehicle must comply with 12 CFR 223.15(a) was the same for
both the family wealth management vehicle and the customer facilitation
vehicle exclusions--to help ensure that the exclusions do not allow
banking entities to ``bail out'' either vehicle.\389\ For the same
reasons discussed above with respect to family wealth management
vehicles, the agencies have modified the requirement to exclude from
the requirements of 12 CFR 223.15(a) transactions that meet the
definition of riskless principal transactions as defined in Sec.
__.10(d)(11).\390\ Similar to the agencies' approach with respect to
family wealth management vehicles, the agencies expect that, together,
the adopted criteria for this exclusion will prevent a banking entity
from being able to bail out customer facilitation vehicles in periods
of financial stress or otherwise expose the banking entity to the types
of risks that the covered fund provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act
were intended to address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\389\ See 85 FR 12120.
\390\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are modifying the condition that the banking entity
and its affiliates comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
__.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered fund, to provide
clarification that the content of the disclosure may be modified to
prevent the disclosure from being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of
the issuer.\391\ Commenters requested that the agencies provide such
clarification in the context of family wealth management vehicles.\392\
Although the agencies did not receive any comments with respect to this
condition in the context of this exclusion, the agencies are similarly
modifying this condition under this exclusion. The agencies believe
that these disclosures will provide important information to the
customers for whom these vehicles will be used to provide services--
whether they are family customers under the family wealth management
vehicle exclusion or other customers under this exclusion. The
agencies' treatment of this condition for family wealth management
vehicles, as described above, will similarly apply to this condition
for customer facilitation vehicles.\393\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\391\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(3).
\392\ See supra, Section IV.C.3 (Family Wealth Management
Vehicles).
\393\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are adopting, as proposed, the condition that all of
the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the customer (which
may include one or more of the customer's affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created (other than a de minimis interest that may be held
by others, as discussed above).\394\ The agencies continue to believe
that this condition is appropriate to prevent banking entities from
using this exclusion for customer facilitation vehicles to evade the
restrictions of section 13 of the BHC Act. To help track compliance, a
banking entity and its affiliates will, as proposed, have to maintain
documentation outlining how the banking entity intends to facilitate
the customer's exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
service.\395\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\394\ Final rule Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(A)-(B).
\395\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are also adopting, as proposed, the condition that the
banking entity and its affiliates do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of such issuer.\396\ The agencies continue to believe that this
condition is appropriate and consistent with the goal of preventing
banking entities from bailing out their customer facilitation vehicles.
Commenters generally agreed, supporting the condition as one that is
reasonable and appropriate in addressing the agencies' potential
evasion concerns.\397\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\396\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(2).
\397\ See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the agencies are adopting, as proposed, the condition that
the banking entity and its affiliates comply with the requirements of
Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and __.15, as if such issuer were a covered
fund.\398\ The agencies requested comment in the 2020 proposal whether
this exclusion should also require that the banking entity and its
affiliates comply with the requirements of all of Sec. __.14. One
commenter argued that requiring compliance with the requirements of all
of Sec. __.14 would eliminate the utility of this exclusion.\399\ The
same commenter supported the condition, as proposed, stating that
requiring compliance with only Sec. __.14(b), which would apply the
requirements in section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, and the
application of the prudential backstops under Sec. __.15 would serve
as adequate safeguards to avoid the risk of bailout or other evasion
concerns.\400\ The agencies continue to believe that this condition
will help ensure that banking entities and their affiliates' exposure
to risk remains appropriately limited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\398\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(5).
\399\ See FSF (stating that if banking entities were required to
comply with all of Sec. __.14, they would not be able to enter into
swaps and other covered transactions with the customer facilitation
vehicle for their clients, many of whom seek such transactions
through the use of such vehicles).
\400\ See FSF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies continue to believe that, collectively, the conditions
on the exclusion will help to ensure that
[[Page 46455]]
customer facilitation vehicles are used for customer-oriented financial
services provided on arms-length, market terms, and to prevent evasion
of the requirements of section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule.
The agencies also continue to believe that the adopted conditions will
be consistent with the purposes of section 13.
As in the 2020 proposal, the agencies will not apply Sec. __.14(a)
to customer facilitation vehicles because the agencies understand that
this would prohibit banking entities from providing the full range of
banking and asset management services to customers using these
vehicles. Commenters generally supported this approach,\401\ and one
noted that applying Sec. __.14(a) to these vehicles would undo any
practical utility of the exclusion.\402\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\401\ See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
\402\ See SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Limitations on Relationships With a Covered Fund
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies proposed to amend the
regulations implementing section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act to permit
banking entities to engage in a limited set of covered transactions
with covered funds for which the banking entity directly or indirectly
serves as investment manager, investment adviser, or sponsor, or that
the banking entity organizes and offers pursuant to section 13(d)(1)(G)
of the BHC Act (such funds, related covered funds).\403\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\403\ See 2020 proposal Sec. __.14(a)(2), (3); 85 FR 12143-
12146.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act generally prohibits a banking
entity from entering into a transaction with a related covered fund
that would be a covered transaction as defined in section 23A of the
Federal Reserve Act as if the banking entity was a member bank and the
covered fund was an affiliate.\404\ The 2020 proposal would have
amended the application of section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act in limited
circumstances, by allowing a banking entity to enter into certain
covered transactions with a related covered fund that would be
permissible without limit for a state member bank to enter into with an
affiliate under section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. In addition,
the 2020 proposal would have allowed a banking entity to enter into
short-term extensions of credit with, and purchase assets from, a
related covered fund in connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement activities. The agencies invited comment on the past
interpretation of section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act,\405\ and the
proposed amendments to the regulations implementing section
13(f)(1).\406\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\404\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1); see also 12 U.S.C. 371c. Section
13(f)(3) of the BHC Act also provides an exemption for prime
brokerage transactions between a banking entity and a covered fund
in which a covered fund managed, sponsored, or advised by that
banking entity has taken an ownership interest. 12 U.S.C.
1851(f)(3). In addition, section 13(f)(2) subjects any transaction
permitted under section 13(f) (including a permitted prime brokerage
transaction) between a banking entity and covered fund to section
23B of the Federal Reserve Act. 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(2); see 12 U.S.C.
371c-1.
\405\ In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies noted that
``[s]ection 13(f) of the BHC Act does not incorporate or reference
the exemptions contained in section 23A of the FR Act or the Board's
Regulation W.'' 79 FR 5746.
\406\ 85 FR 12145-46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described in the 2020 proposal, the agencies believe the
statutory rulemaking authority under paragraph (d)(1)(J) of section 13
of the BHC Act permits the agencies to determine that banking entities
may enter into covered transactions with related covered funds that
would otherwise be prohibited by section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act,
provided that the rulemaking complies with applicable statutory
requirements.\407\ This interpretation of the agencies' rulemaking
authority is supported both by the inclusion of other covered
transactions within the permitted activities listed in paragraph (d)(1)
of section 13 and by the manner in which section 13(f)(1) of the BHC
Act is incorporated in the list of permitted activities in paragraph
(d)(1), as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\407\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), (d)(1)(J), (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act limits the aggregate amount
of covered transactions between a member bank and its affiliates, while
section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act generally prohibits covered
transactions between a banking entity and a related covered fund, with
no minimum amount of permissible covered transactions.\408\ Despite the
general prohibition on certain covered transactions in section
13(f)(1), section 13 also authorizes a banking entity to own an
interest in a related covered fund, which would be a ``covered
transaction'' for purposes of section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act.\409\ In addition to this apparent conflict between paragraphs
13(d) and (f) with respect to covered fund ownership, there are other
elements of these paragraphs that introduce ambiguity about the
interpretation of the term ``covered transaction'' as used in section
13(f) of the BHC Act. For example, despite the general prohibition on
covered funds, another part of section 13 permits a bank entity ``to
acquire or retain an ownership interest in a covered fund in accordance
with the requirements of section 13.'' \410\ In the preamble to the
2013 rule, the agencies specifically interpreted section 13 to allow
such investments noting that a contrary interpretation would make the
specific language that permits covered transactions between a banking
entity and a related covered fund ``mere surplusage.'' \411\ The
statute also prohibits a banking entity that organizes or offers a
hedge fund or private equity fund from directly or indirectly
guaranteeing, assuming, or otherwise insuring the obligations or
performance of the fund (or of any hedge fund or private equity fund in
which such hedge fund or private equity fund invests).\412\ To the
extent that section 13(f) prohibits all covered transactions between a
banking entity and a related covered fund, however, the independent
prohibition on guarantees in section 13(d)(1)(G)(v) would seem to be
unnecessary and redundant.\413\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\408\ 12 U.S.C. 371c, 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1). The term ``covered
transaction'' is defined in section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act
to mean, with respect to an affiliate of a member bank, (1) a loan
or extension of credit to the affiliate, including a purchase of
assets subject to an agreement to repurchase; (2) a purchase of or
an investment in securities issued by the affiliate; (3) a purchase
of assets from the affiliate, except such purchase of real and
personal property as may be specifically exempted by the Board by
order or regulation; (4) the acceptance of securities or other debt
obligations issued by the affiliate as collateral security for a
loan or extension of credit to any person or company; (5) the
issuance of a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit, including
an endorsement or standby letter of credit, on behalf of an
affiliate; (6) a transaction with an affiliate that involves the
borrowing or lending of securities, to the extent that the
transaction causes a member bank or a subsidiary to have credit
exposure to the affiliate; or (7) a derivative transaction, as
defined in paragraph (3) of section 5200(b) of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 84(b)), with an affiliate, to the
extent that the transaction causes a member bank or a subsidiary to
have credit exposure to the affiliate. See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(7), as
amended by Pub. L. 111.203, section 608 (July 21, 2010). Section
13(f) of the BHC Act does not alter the applicability of section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act and the Board's Regulation W to covered
transactions between insured depository institutions and their
affiliates.
\409\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G); (d)(4).
\410\ 79 FR 5746.
\411\ Id.
\412\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(v).
\413\ See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(7)(E); 12 CFR 223.3(h)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the agencies previously expressed doubt about their
ability to permit banking entities to enter into covered transactions
with related covered funds pursuant to their authority under section
13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC Act,\414\ the activities permitted pursuant to
paragraph (d) specifically contemplate allowing a banking entity to
enter into certain covered
[[Page 46456]]
transactions with related funds.\415\ The exceptions in section
13(f)(1) are also expressly incorporated into the statutory list of
permitted activities, specifically in section 13(d)(1)(G)(iv).\416\ By
virtue of the conflict between paragraphs (d) and (f) of section 13,
and the inclusion of specific covered transactions within the permitted
activities in paragraph (d) of section 13, the agencies continue to
believe that the authority granted pursuant to paragraph (d)(1)(J) to
determine that other activities are not prohibited by the statute
authorizes the agencies to exercise rulemaking authority to determine
that banking entities may enter into covered transactions with related
covered funds that would otherwise be prohibited by section 13(f)(1) of
the BHC Act, provided that the rulemaking complies with applicable
statutory requirements.\417\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\414\ See 76 FR 68912 n.313.
\415\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G); (d)(4).
\416\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(iv).
\417\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), (d)(1)(J), (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters expressed support for the proposed amendments to
the regulations implementing section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act that would
have permitted a banking entity to engage in a limited set of covered
transactions with a related covered fund.\418\ Some commenters
recommended that the agencies clarify whether a banking entity may
enter into exempt transactions with a related covered fund in the
circumstance where such transactions would be exempt from section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act only if a bank entered into such
transactions with a securities affiliate.\419\ A few commenters also
recommended that the agencies adopt a new exclusion allowing a banking
entity to offer other types of extensions of credit to a related
covered fund, including extensions of credit in the ordinary course of
business.\420\ Other commenters recommended that the agencies clarify
that section 13(f)(1) does not apply outside of the United States.\421\
The commenters noted that such an approach would limit the
extraterritorial effect of section 13(f)(1), and would better align
section 13(f)(1) with the manner in which section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act applies outside of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\418\ See, e.g., ABA; BPI; CBA; Data Boiler; EBF; FSF; IIB; PNC;
and SIFMA.
\419\ ABA; BPI; FSF; and SIFMA.
\420\ BPI and PNC.
\421\ CBA; EBF; and IIB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the final rule adopts the proposed amendments
from the 2020 proposal with minor modifications. The agencies believe
that, under certain circumstances, it is appropriate to permit banking
entities to enter into certain covered transactions with related
covered funds, in the manner described in the amendments to Sec. __.14
of the implementing regulations. Consistent with the 2020 proposal,
these amendments do not modify the definition of ``covered
transaction'' but instead authorize banking entities to engage in
limited transactions with related covered funds. Any transactions
permitted by these revisions must still meet the eligibility
requirements for the particular transaction, and the banking entity
must also comply with certain conflict of interest, high-risk, and
safety and soundness restrictions with respect to such transactions.
The agencies are also expressly providing that a banking entity may
enter into certain riskless principal transactions with a related
covered fund, as described below.
Exempt Transactions Under Section 23A and the Board's Regulation W;
Riskless Principal Transactions
The final rule adopts the amendments to the regulations
implementing section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act to permit banking entities
to enter into exempt transactions permitted under section 23A and the
Board's Regulation W. Specifically, the final rule permits a banking
entity to engage in certain covered transactions with a related covered
fund that would be exempt from the quantitative limits, collateral
requirements, and low-quality asset prohibition under section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act, including certain transactions that would be
exempt pursuant to section 223.42 of the Board's Regulation W.\422\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\422\ See 12 U.S.C. 371c(d); 12 CFR 223.42.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act is designed to protect
against a depository institution suffering losses in transactions with
affiliates, and to limit the ability of a depository institution to
transfer to its affiliates the ``subsidy'' arising from the depository
institution's access to the Federal safety net.\423\ Nevertheless, a
member bank may enter into certain ``exempt'' covered transactions set
forth in section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and the Board's
Regulation W, without regard to the quantitative limits, collateral
requirements, and low-quality asset prohibition of section 23A and the
Board's Regulation W, provided such transactions meet the criteria
specified in Regulation W.\424\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\423\ For a brief background on section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act, see Transactions Between Member Banks and Their
Affiliates, 67 FR 76560-765561 (December 12, 2002).
\424\ See 12 U.S.C. 371c(d); 12 CFR 223.42.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Board's Regulation W, a member bank may enter into
certain exempt covered transactions only with a securities affiliate.
Specifically, under these exempt covered transactions, a member bank
may enter into transactions to purchase marketable securities, to
purchase municipal securities, and to enter into riskless principal
transactions only with a securities affiliate.\425\ In permitting such
transactions under Regulation W, the Board previously concluded that
the condition that such transactions were permissible only with a
securities affiliate was an important consideration that helped justify
the exemption, noting that securities affiliates generally must be
registered as broker-dealers, and are therefore subject to SEC
supervision and examination, and are required to keep detailed records
concerning each securities transaction.\426\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\425\ 12 CFR 223.42(f), (g), (m).
\426\ 67 FR 76591 (December 12, 2002); see 67 FR 76593, 76597.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The exempt transactions specified in section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act and Regulation W are structured in a manner so as not to
present the same concerns about a depository institution suffering
losses or transferring the subsidy arising from the depository
institution's access to the Federal safety net. The agencies believe
that the same rationale that supports the exemptions in section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act and the Board's Regulation W also supports
exempting such transactions from the prohibition on covered
transactions between a banking entity and related covered funds under
section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act, provided that such transactions are
subject to the same requirements and conditions specified in Regulation
W. In particular, the agencies note that these exemptions generally do
not present significant risks of loss and serve important public policy
objectives.\427\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\427\ For example, intraday extensions of credit are exempt
covered transactions under section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
The Board previously has noted that ``[i]ntraday overdrafts and
other forms of intraday credit generally are not used as a means of
funding or otherwise providing financial support for an affiliate.
Rather, these credit extensions typically facilitate the settlement
of transactions between an affiliate and its customers when there
are mismatches between the timing of funds sent and received during
the business day.'' 67 FR 76596.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters recommended that the agencies clarify whether a
banking entity may enter into certain transactions with a related
covered fund that would be permissible under the Board's Regulation W
if entered into between a bank and a securities affiliate,
[[Page 46457]]
even if the covered fund would not meet the eligibility criteria to be
a ``securities affiliate'' under the Board's Regulation W.\428\ As
noted above, Regulation W imposes various conditions and requirements
on transactions that a bank enters into with its affiliates, and
permits a bank to enter into transactions involving the purchase of
marketable securities, the purchase of municipal securities, and
riskless principal transactions only with an affiliate that is a
``securities affiliate'' as defined in Regulation W. With respect to
purchases of marketable securities and municipal securities, the final
rule follows the approach adopted in Regulation W, and permits a
banking entity to enter into such covered transactions with a related
covered fund only if those transactions would meet all of the
eligibility criteria to qualify as exempt transactions under Regulation
W, including the requirement that the related covered fund meets the
requirements to be a securities affiliate.\429\ As noted above, the
exempt transactions specified in Regulation W include various limits
and conditions that both limit the risks of such transactions and allow
the Federal banking agencies to monitor compliance. Generally, the
final rule retains the eligibility criteria for exempt covered
transactions defined in Regulation W. The agencies believe that these
conditions serve important policies, and appropriately limit the scope
of the exempt transactions permissible under the implementing
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\428\ ABA; BPI; FSF; and SIFMA. Under the Board's Regulation W,
a ``securities affiliate'' is defined as ``[a]n affiliate of the
member bank that is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as a broker or dealer; or . . . [a]ny other securities
broker or dealer affiliate of a member bank that is approved by the
Board.'' 12 CFR 223.3(gg).
\429\ In addition to requiring that an affiliate be a securities
affiliate, the exemptions under Regulation W permitting a bank to
purchase marketable securities or municipal securities in certain
circumstances require the bank to retain records about the
underlying transaction. See 12 CFR 223.42(f)(6), (g)(3)(iii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule permits banking entities to enter into riskless
principal transactions with a related covered fund, including in
circumstances where the covered fund is not a ``securities affiliate.''
\430\ In a riskless principal transaction, the riskless principal (the
banking entity) buys and sells the same security contemporaneously, and
the asset risk passes promptly from the affiliate (the related covered
fund) through the riskless principal to a third party.\431\ In
permitting such transactions under Regulation W, the Board previously
found that there was no regulatory benefit to subjecting riskless
principal transactions to section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act,
because such transactions closely resemble securities brokerage
transactions, and these transactions do not allow the affiliate to
transfer risk to the affiliate acting as a riskless principal.\432\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\430\ Cf. 12 CFR 223.42(m).
\431\ See 67 FR 76597.
\432\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the 2020 proposal would have permitted a banking entity to
enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered fund
provided it met the criteria in Regulation W, the final rule adopts a
standalone exception to differentiate riskless principal transactions
specifically from other transactions that would be exempt transactions
under the Board's Regulation W.\433\ In connection with permitting
banking entities to enter into riskless principal transactions with
related covered funds in a separate exception from Super 23A, the
agencies are defining riskless principal transactions in Sec. __.10 of
the regulations. The definition of riskless principal transactions
adopted in the final rule is similar to the definition adopted in the
Board's Regulation W, as this definition is appropriately narrow and
generally familiar to banking entities.\434\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\433\ 12 CFR 223.42.
\434\ See 12 CFR 223.3(ee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, and as discussed in more detail below, banking
entities may separately rely on the independent exception for
acquisitions of assets in connection with payment, clearing, and
settlement services. The agencies expect that in many instances,
subject to other applicable laws and regulations, a banking entity may
be able to engage in acquisitions of assets in connection with payment,
clearing, and settlement services, without relying on the exception
permitting banking entities to enter into covered transactions with
their related covered funds that would be exempt under Regulation W.
Short-Term Extensions of Credit and Acquisitions of Assets in
Connection With Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Services
The final rule adopts the proposed amendments in the 2020 proposal
that would have permitted a banking entity to provide short-term
extensions of credit to, and purchase assets from, a related covered
fund, subject to appropriate limits. Under the final rule, each short-
term extension of credit or purchase of assets must be made in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
securities, derivatives, or futures clearing; or settlement services.
In addition, each extension of credit must be required to be repaid,
sold, or terminated no later than five business days after it was
originated. Additionally, the proposed five business day criterion is
consistent with the Federal banking agencies' capital rules and would
generally limit banking entities to transactions with normal settlement
periods, which have lower risk of delayed settlement or failure, when
providing short-term extensions of credit.\435\ Each short-term
extension of credit must also meet the same requirements applicable to
intraday extensions of credit under section 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of
the Board's Regulation W (as if the extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the duration of the extension of
credit). Under these requirements, the banking entity making a short-
term extension would have to meet the same requirements as it would to
engage in an intraday extension of credit under Regulation W (and as
incorporated in the implementing regulations). Specifically, the
banking entity would need to have policies and procedures to manage the
credit exposure and must have no reason to believe that the related
covered fund will have difficulty repaying the extension of credit in
accordance with its terms. Finally, each extension of credit or
purchase of assets permitted by these revisions must also comply with
certain conflict of interest, high-risk, and safety and soundness
restrictions, and must otherwise be permissible for the banking entity
to enter into with the fund.\436\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\435\ See 78 FR 62110 (October 11, 2013). While the Federal
banking agencies require firms to track and monitor the credit risk
exposure for transactions involving securities, foreign exchange
instruments, and commodities that have a risk of delayed settlement,
this requirement does not apply to other types of transactions which
may be used in providing a short-term extension of credit (e.g.,
repo-style transactions). Additionally, banking entities typically
monitor credit extensions by counterparty, and not by transaction
type. Thus, the final rule is consistent with the approach taken in
the Federal banking agencies' capital rule, without imposing an
additional compliance burden without a corresponding benefit. See,
e.g., 12 CFR 3.2; 217.2; 324.2 (defining derivative contract to
include unsettled securities with a contractual settlement or
delivery lag that is longer than the lesser of the market standard
for the particular instrument or five business days); 12 CFR
3.38(d); 217.38(d); 324.38(d) (noting that an institution must hold
risk-based capital against any delivery-versus-payment or payment-
versus-payment transaction with a normal settlement period if the
counterparty has not made delivery within five business days after
settlement).
\436\ For example, an investment fund with respect to which a
member bank or its affiliate is an investment adviser may be subject
to additional restrictions under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act. See 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(1)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46458]]
The agencies do not believe it would be appropriate to permit
banking entities to enter into other covered transactions with a
related covered fund, outside of the exceptions noted above. Although
some commenters recommended expanding this exception to allow banking
entities to enter into limited amounts of covered transactions with
related covered funds, the agencies believe that permitting banking
entities to engage in other covered transactions with related covered
funds would potentially raise the concerns that paragraph 13(f)(1) was
intended to address.
The agencies also do not believe that it would be appropriate to
limit the application of section 13(f)(1) to the United States as some
commenters recommended, at this time. The agencies note that other
amendments in the final rule (for example, amendments to the treatment
of foreign excluded funds and foreign public funds) may help address
some of the commenters' concerns about the extraterritorial application
of section 13(f)(1).
Impact of the Amendments on Safety and Soundness and U.S. Financial
Stability
The agencies expect that the amendments in the final rule described
above would generally promote and protect the safety and soundness of
banking entities and U.S. financial stability. In comments previously
submitted to the agencies, banking entities that sponsor or serve as
the investment adviser to covered funds have argued that the inability
to engage in any covered transactions with such funds, particularly
those types of transactions that are expressly exempted under section
23A of the Federal Reserve Act and the Board's Regulation W, has
limited the services that they or their affiliates can provide. The
commenters said that amending the regulations to permit limited covered
transactions with related covered funds would not create any new
incentives for the banking entity to financially support the related
covered fund in times of stress and would not otherwise permit the
banking entity to indirectly engage in proprietary trading through the
related covered fund.\437\ For example, when a banking entity sponsors
or advises a covered fund, the prohibition on covered transactions
between the banking entity (and its affiliates) and the covered fund
may limit the ability of the banking entity and its affiliates to
provide other services, such as trade settlement services, to the
covered fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\437\ See 85 FR 12144.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the agencies believe that the exceptions in the
final rule would generally promote and protect the safety and soundness
of banking entities and U.S. financial stability by allowing banking
entities to reduce operational risk.
Currently, the restrictions under section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act
substantially limit the ability of a banking entity to both (1)
organize and offer a covered fund, or act as an investment adviser to
the covered fund, and (2) provide custody or other services to the
fund. As a result, a third party is required to provide other necessary
services for the fund's operation, including payment, clearing, and
settlement services that are generally provided by the fund's
custodian, even when the banking entity sponsor of the fund typically
provides those services to other funds it sponsors. This is the case
even when the third party may not offer the same quality of services
available through an affiliate, or where the third party may charge
more for the same services that could be provided by an affiliate. This
increases the potential for problems at the third-party service
provider (e.g., an operational failure or a disruption to normal
functioning) to affect the banking entity or the fund, which were
required to use the third-party service provider as a result of the
restrictions under section 13(f)(1). Those problems may then spread
among financial institutions or markets and thereby threaten the
stability of the U.S. financial system. By amending Sec. __.14(a),
therefore, the final rule allows a banking entity to reduce both
operational risk and interconnectedness to other financial institutions
by directly providing a broader array of services to a fund it
organizes and offers, or advises. The agencies believe that reducing
these risks will promote and protect the safety and soundness of
banking entities.\438\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\438\ The agencies believe that the same rationales that
supported exempting certain covered transactions in section 23A of
the Federal Reserve Act and the Board's Regulation W also support
permitting a banking entity to engage in those exempt covered
transactions with a related covered fund, subject to the same terms
and conditions as applicable under section 23A and Regulation W.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule also would promote and protect U.S. financial
stability by reducing interconnectedness among firms. The provision of
custodial services among depository institutions in the United States
is highly concentrated, with the four largest providers, all of which
remain subject to the Volcker Rule, holding more than 85 percent of
custodial assets. Requiring a banking entity that organizes and offers
a covered fund to use a third party to provide these services could
increase the interconnections between these firms and the risk that
distress at one banking entity would be spread to the others. The
authorized covered transactions would permit banking entities to
provide a more comprehensive suite of services to related covered
funds, reducing interconnectedness by reducing the need to rely on
third parties to provide such services.
The final rule also retains important limits on the transactions
that a banking entity may enter into with a related covered fund,
including limitations that apply to transactions within the new
exceptions in the regulations implementing Sec. __.14(a). As specified
in the statute, such activities are permissible only ``to the extent
permitted by any other provision of Federal or state law, and subject
to the limitations under section 13(d)(2) of the BHC Act and any
restrictions or limitations that the appropriate Federal banking
agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, may determine . . .'' \439\ Section
13(d)(2) of the BHC Act also imposes additional restrictions on any
activities authorized pursuant to section (d)(1), including those
activities authorized by rulemaking pursuant to section (d)(1)(J).\440\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\439\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1).
\440\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(2); see also 2013 rule Sec. Sec. __.7
and __.15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections __.14(b) and __.14(c) of the regulations implementing
section 13 of the BHC Act both generally require that a banking entity
may enter into certain transactions specified in section 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act (including ``covered transactions'' as defined in
section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act) with related covered funds only
on terms and under circumstances that are substantially the same (or at
least as favorable) as to the banking entity as those prevailing at the
time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated
companies, or in the absence of comparable transactions, on terms and
under circumstances that the banking entity in good faith would offer
to, or would apply to, nonaffiliated companies.\441\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\441\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(2); see 12 U.S.C. 371c-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46459]]
The agencies therefore have determined that the amendments to Sec.
__.14(a) of the final rule, in the manner described above, would
promote and protect both the safety and soundness of banking entities,
and U.S. financial stability.
E. Ownership Interest
1. Definition of ``Ownership Interest''
The 2013 rule defines an ``ownership interest'' in a covered fund
to mean any equity, partnership, or other similar interest. Some
banking entities have expressed concern about the inclusion of the term
``other similar interest'' in the definition of ``ownership interest,''
and have indicated that the definition of this term could lead to the
inclusion of debt instruments that have standard covenants within the
definition of ownership interest. Under the 2013 rule, ``other similar
interest'' is defined as an interest that:
Has the right to participate in the selection or removal
of a general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors
or trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor of the covered fund (excluding the rights of a creditor
to exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event);
Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the
covered fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid
in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon
the occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread
(the positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest
payments received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and
the aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding
interests);
Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered
fund, or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any
of the rights above.\442\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\442\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This definition focuses on the attributes of the interest and
whether it provides a banking entity with economic exposure to the
profits and losses of the covered fund, rather than its form. Under the
2013 rule, a debt interest in a covered fund can be an ownership
interest if it has the same characteristics as an equity or other
ownership interest (e.g., provides the holder with certain voting
rights; the right or ability to share in the covered fund's profits or
losses; or the ability, directly or pursuant to a contract or synthetic
interest, to earn a return based on the performance of the fund's
underlying holdings or investments).
In the 2018 proposal, the agencies requested comment on all aspects
of the 2013 rule's application to securitization transactions,
including the definition of ownership interest. Specifically, the
agencies asked whether there were any modifications that should be made
to the 2013 rule's definition of ownership interest.\443\ Among other
things, the agencies requested comments on whether they should modify
Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A) to provide that the ``rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event'' include the right to participate in the removal of
an investment manager for cause, or to nominate or vote on a nominated
replacement manager upon an investment manager's resignation or
removal.\444\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\443\ 83 FR 33481.
\444\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of comments received on the 2018 proposal supported the
agencies' suggestion to modify Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A) and to expressly
permit creditors to participate in the removal of an investment manager
for cause, or to nominate or vote on a nominated replacement manager
upon an investment manager's resignation or removal without causing an
interest to become an ownership interest.\445\ However, a few of these
commenters on the 2018 proposal noted that this modification would not
address all issues with the condition as banks sometimes have
contractual rights to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member or member of the board of directors or
trustees of a borrower that are not limited to the exercise of a remedy
upon an event of default or other default event.\446\ Therefore, these
commenters proposed eliminating the ``other similar interest'' clause
from the definition altogether or, alternatively, replacing the
definition of ownership interest with the definition of ``voting
securities'' from the Board's Regulation Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\445\ See, e.g., SFIG; JBA; LSTA; and IAA.
\446\ See SFIG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of commenters on the 2018 proposal argued that debt
interests issued by covered funds and loans to third-party covered
funds not advised or managed by a banking entity should be excluded
from the definition of ownership interest.\447\ Other commenters
suggested reducing the scope of the definition of ownership interest to
apply only to equity and equity-like interests that are commonly
understood to indicate a bona fide ownership interest in a covered
fund.\448\ One other commenter asked the agencies to clarify conditions
under the ``other similar interest'' clause.\449\ Specifically, the
commenter asked the agencies to clarify whether the right to receive
all or a portion of the spread extends to using the excess spread or
any debt repaid from collections on underlying assets of a special
purpose entity to pay principal or interest that is otherwise owed is
not an ownership interest. Another commenter asked the agencies not to
modify the definition of ownership interest as, the commenter argued,
there is nothing under section 13 of the BHC Act that limits or
restricts the ability of a banking entity or nonbank financial company
to sell or securitize loans in a manner permitted by law.\450\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\447\ See, e.g., Capital One et al. and BPI.
\448\ See, e.g., ABA and CAE.
\449\ See SFIG.
\450\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to comments received on the 2018 proposal and in order
to provide clarity about the types of interests that would be
considered within the scope of the definition of ownership interest,
the 2020 proposal would have amended the parenthetical in Sec.
__.10(d)(6)(i)(A) to specify that creditors' remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event, which
include, for example, the right to participate in the removal of an
investment manager for cause or to nominate or vote on a nominated
replacement manager upon an occurrence of an event of default, would
not be considered an ownership interest for this reason alone.\451\ The
2020 proposal also sought comment on whether it would be appropriate to
[[Page 46460]]
further allow for an interest to confer the right to participate in any
removal of an investment manager for cause, or to nominate or vote on a
nominated replacement manager upon an investment manager's resignation
or removal, whether or not an event of default or an acceleration event
has occurred, without that interest being deemed an ownership interest.
Such additional ``for cause'' termination events may include the
insolvency of the investment manager, the breach by the investment
manager of certain representations or warranties, or the occurrence of
a ``key person'' event or a change in control with respect to the
investment manager.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\451\ The definition of ``ownership interest'' in the
implementing regulations is independent from the definition of
``voting securities'' in the Board's Regulation Y.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters on the 2020 proposal generally supported the proposed
amendment to the definition of ownership interest to specify that
creditors' remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event include the right to participate in the removal of
an investment manager for cause or to nominate or vote on a nominated
replacement manager upon an occurrence of an event of default. In the
view of these commenters, the proposed clarification would
appropriately recognize that the ability of a holder to vote on removal
or appointment of managers for cause is not a right limited to equity
holders. However, many of these commenters asserted that creditors'
rights are also provided to debt holders in circumstances other than an
event of default or acceleration. These commenters therefore
recommended the proposed amendments be expanded to include additional
for cause events that are independent of an event of default or
acceleration, such as the insolvency of the investment manager or
breach of the investment management or collateral management
agreement.\452\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\452\ See, e.g., SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of comments received on the 2020 proposal, the agencies
recognize that it is customary for debt holders to hold certain rights
to participate in the removal or replacement of an investment manager
for cause that may be triggered by events other than default or
acceleration events. The agencies believe that debt interests that
include the rights of a creditor to participate in the for-cause
removal or replacement of an investment manager under certain
circumstances do not necessarily constitute the type of interest
Section 13 of the BHC Act is intended to capture as an ownership
interest. The agencies are therefore finalizing, with certain
modifications, the amendments to Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A) in order to
provide clarity about the types of creditor rights that may attach to
an interest without that interest being deemed an ownership interest.
The agencies have modified the scope of the definition of ownership
interest in the final rule to allow for certain additional rights of
creditors that are not triggered exclusively by an event of default or
acceleration to attach to a debt interest without such interests being
deemed ownership interests. In addition to such rights arising under
events of default or acceleration, under the final rule, the definition
of ownership interest does not include rights of a creditor to
participate in the removal or replacement of an investment manager for
cause in connection with:
(1) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(2) the breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(3) the breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(4) the occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(5) the indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(6) a change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(7) the loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(8) other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal of
an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely related
to the performance of the covered fund or to the investment manager's
exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's transaction
agreements.
The 2020 proposal also would have provided a safe harbor from the
definition of ownership interest, as suggested by some commenters to
the 2018 proposal.\453\ The safe harbor was intended to address
concerns of commenters to the 2018 proposal that some ordinary debt
interests could be construed as an ownership interest. The 2020
proposal, therefore, would have provided that any senior loan or other
senior debt interest that meets all of the following characteristics
would not be considered to be an ownership interest:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\453\ See SFIG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The holders of such interest do not receive any profits of the
covered fund but may only receive: (i) Interest payments which are not
dependent on the performance of the covered fund; and (ii) fixed
principal payments on or before a maturity date (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, foregone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments on the interest is absolute and may
not be reduced because of the losses arising from the covered fund,
such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs of the
outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the principal and
interest payable; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed and/or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor
to exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
Commenters on the 2020 proposal generally supported the proposed
safe harbor from the definition of ownership interest for certain
senior loans or senior debt interests that do not have
equity[hyphen]like characteristics.\454\ However, certain commenters
also requested that the agencies clarify that the safe harbor is
available to senior loans and senior debt interests where repayment of
principal may vary as a result of acceleration or amortization
provisions.\455\ Additionally, certain commenters also requested that
the agencies clarify that the reference to senior loans or senior debt
interests in the proposed safe harbor includes all exposures that would
meet the definition of ``investment grade'' found in 12 CFR part 1 and
implementing guidelines, as long as such exposures comply with the
proposed conditions.\456\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\454\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; LSTA; Mortgage Bankers Association;
and PNC.
\455\ See SIFMA.
\456\ See, e.g., LSTA and SFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies intended for the proposed conditions of the safe
harbor to provide clarity and predictability to banking entities by
enabling them to determine more readily whether an interest would be an
ownership interest under the regulations implementing section 13 of the
BHC Act. After considering comments received, the
[[Page 46461]]
agencies have included the conditions from the 2020 proposal for the
safe harbor with a modification to Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1)(ii). The
modification requires that the senior loan or senior debt interest
involves, among other things, repayment of a fixed principal amount, on
or before a maturity date, in a contractually-determined manner (which
may include prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and
compensate holders of the interest for, forgone income resulting from
an early prepayment). The agencies believe this modification will
provide additional clarity that the safe harbor is available to senior
loan and senior debt interests where contractual principal payments
vary over the life of a senior loan or senior debt interest for reasons
such as amortization and acceleration provided that the total amount of
principal required to be repaid over the life of the instrument does
not change. The agencies believe this modification to the safe harbor
under the final rule will ensure that debt interests that do not have
equity-like characteristics are not considered ownership interests.
Additionally, the agencies believe that the conditions are rigorous
enough to prevent banking entities from evading the prohibition on
acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in a covered fund.
Further, in response to certain commenters' request that the
agencies clarify that the reference to senior loans or senior debt
interests in the proposed safe harbor includes all exposures that would
meet the definition of ``investment grade'' found in 12 CFR part 1 and
implementing guidelines, the agencies have determined that such a
provision would be inappropriate for purposes of the safe harbor
conditions in the final rule. Unlike the safe harbor provisions in the
final rule regarding ownership interests, such a provision would not
ensure that debt interests that have equity-like characteristics are
treated as ownership interests for purposes of subpart C of the final
rule.
In response to the 2020 proposal, one commenter requested that the
agencies modify the condition in Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(B) of the
implementing regulations and Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) of the 2020
proposal, which states that an interest that has the right to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund is considered
an ownership interest, to clarify that the condition would not include
amounts payable to securitization noteholders in accordance with a
contractual priority of payments, commonly referred to as a
``waterfall,'' so long as such amounts are limited to fixed principal
and interest determined on a fixed or typical index floating rate
basis.\457\ Specifically, the commenter suggested a modification to
this condition to clarify that the term ``profit'' is intended to mean
``net profits'' out of concern for the potential ambiguity of how the
condition would apply to amounts received by securitization noteholders
in accordance with the securitization's waterfall of payment. Another
commenter disagreed with any revision to the 2020 proposed rule that
would only cover as an ownership interest an interest which has the
right to receive a share of the ``net'' income, gains or profits of the
covered fund.\458\ The final rule does not modify Sec.
__.10(d)(6)(i)(B) of the implementing regulations or Sec.
__.10(d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) of the 2020 proposal. However, the agencies
clarify that a debt interest in a covered fund would not be considered
an ownership interest solely because the interest is entitled to
receive an allocation of collections from the covered fund's underlying
financial assets in accordance with a contractual priority of payments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\457\ See SFA.
\458\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Fund Limits and Covered Fund Deduction
The 2020 proposal included amendments to the implementing
regulations to better align the manner in which a banking entity
calculates the aggregate fund limit and covered fund deduction with the
manner in which it calculates the per fund limit, as it relates to
investments by employees of the banking entity. Specifically,
consistent with how investments by employees and directors are treated
generally under the existing rule of construction in Sec.
__.12(b)(1)(iv), the 2020 proposal would have modified Sec. Sec.
__.12(c) and __.12(d) to require attribution of amounts paid by an
employee or director to acquire a restricted profit interest only when
the banking entity has financed the acquisition.
The 2013 rule excludes from the definition of ownership interest
certain restricted profit interests.\459\ To be excluded from the
definition of ownership interest, the restricted profit interest must
also meet various other conditions, including that any amounts invested
in the covered fund--including amounts paid by the entity, an employee
of the entity, or former employee of the entity--are within the
applicable limits under Sec. __.12 of the 2013 rule.\460\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\459\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii). Under the 2013 rule, the
exclusion from the definition of ownership interest is limited to
restricted profit interests held by an entity, employee, or former
employee in a covered fund for which the entity or employee serves
as investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, or other service provider. As noted in the preamble to the
2013 rule, the term ``restricted profit interest'' was used to avoid
any confusion from using the term ``carried interest,'' which is
used in other contexts. The proposed rule would focus on the
treatment of restricted profit interests for purposes of calculating
compliance with the aggregate fund limit and covered fund deduction
but would not address in any way the treatment of such profit
interests under other laws, including under Federal income tax law.
See 79 FR 5706, n.2091.
\460\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Sec. __.12 of the 2013 rule, different calculation
methodologies apply for purposes of calculating compliance with the per
fund limit, the aggregate fund limit, and the covered fund
deduction.\461\ For purposes of calculating a banking entity's
compliance with the aggregate fund limit and the covered fund
deduction, the banking entity must include any amounts paid by the
banking entity or an employee in connection with obtaining a restricted
profit interest in the covered fund.\462\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\461\ 2013 rule Sec. __.12(b)(1)(iv). As noted in the preamble
to the 2013 rule, the attribution to a banking entity of ownership
interests acquired by an employee or director using financing
provided by the banking entity ensures that funding provided by the
banking entity to acquire ownership interests in the fund, whether
provided directly or indirectly, is counted against the per fund
limit and aggregate fund limit. See 79 FR 5733.
\462\ 2013 rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(C); Sec. Sec. __.12(c)(1),
(d). See also 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies did not receive comments on the proposed change in the
treatment of restricted profit interests. Several commenters
recommended that the agencies eliminate the per fund limit, the
aggregate fund limit, and the covered fund deduction with respect to
any ownership interest held by a banking entity in any covered fund, if
that interest is held pursuant to underwriting and market making
activities.\463\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\463\ BPI; FSF; IIB; and SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the proposed change in the treatment of restricted
profit interests, the agencies continue to believe that it is
appropriate for a banking entity to count amounts invested by the
banking entity (or its affiliates) to acquire restricted profit
interests in a fund organized and offered by the banking entity for
purposes of the aggregate fund limit and covered fund deduction.
However, the agencies believe attribution of employee and director
ownership of restricted profit interests to a banking entity may not be
necessary in the circumstance when a banking entity does not finance,
directly
[[Page 46462]]
or indirectly, the employee's or director's acquisition of a restricted
profit interest in a covered fund organized or offered by the banking
entity. The final rule amends the implementing regulations to limit the
attribution of an employee's or director's restricted profit interest
in a covered fund organized or offered by the banking entity to only
those circumstances in which the banking entity has directly or
indirectly financed the acquisition of the restricted profit interest.
The agencies expect that this amendment will simplify a banking
entity's compliance with the aggregate fund limit and covered fund
deduction provisions of the rule, and more fully recognize that
employees and directors may use their own resources, not provided by
the banking entity, to invest in ownership interests or restricted
profit interests in a covered fund they advise (for example, to align
their personal financial interests with those of other investors in the
covered fund).
The final rule does not adopt the recommendation from commenters
that the agencies should eliminate the per fund limit, aggregate fund
limit, or covered fund deduction requirements. The 2019 amendments
adopted several changes to simplify the covered fund compliance
requirements for banking entities that engage in market making or
underwriting with respect to a third-party covered fund. Specifically,
the 2019 amendments eliminated the aggregate fund limit and capital
deduction requirements for the value of ownership interests in third-
party funds acquired or retained in connection with permissible market
making or underwriting activities (i.e., covered funds that the banking
entity does not advise or organize and offer pursuant to Sec. __.11(a)
or (b) of the implementing regulations). In discussing this change in
the preamble to the 2019 amendments, the agencies noted that the
amendments to the treatment of ownership interests in third-party funds
were intended to better align the compliance requirements for
underwriting and market making involving covered funds with the risks
that those activities entail.\464\ The compliance challenges associated
with underwriting and market making in ownership interests in covered
funds is particularly acute with respect to third-party covered funds.
As discussed in the preamble to the 2019 amendments, ``a banking entity
can more readily determine whether a fund is a covered fund if the
banking entity advises or organizes and offers the fund.'' \465\ While
section 13 of the BHC Act provides the agencies greater flexibility to
adopt changes in the treatment of ownership interests in third-party
funds, it prescribes specific requirements that apply to funds that the
banking entity advises, or organizes and offers. Specifically, section
13 provides that a banking entity must not acquire or retain an
ownership interest in a fund organized and offered by the banking
entity except for a de minimis investment subject to and in compliance
with paragraph (d)(4) of section 13 of the BHC Act.\466\ Therefore, the
final rule does not adopt the change recommended by commenters to
modify the treatment of ownership interests in related covered funds
that are held by a banking entity in connection with market making and
underwriting activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\464\ See 84 FR 62017.
\465\ Id.
\466\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Parallel Investments
The 2020 proposal included a new rule of construction in Sec.
__.12(b) clarifying that banking entities are not required to treat
investments alongside covered funds as investments in covered funds if
certain conditions are met.\467\ As explained in the 2020 proposal,
this rule of construction was meant to provide clarity in light of a
discrepancy between the preamble to the 2013 rule and the text of the
implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\467\ See 85 FR 12149.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The implementing regulations require that a banking entity hold no
more than three percent of the total ownership interests of a covered
fund that the banking entity organizes and offers pursuant to Sec.
__.11.\468\ Section __.12(b)(1)(i) of the implementing regulations
requires that, for purposes of this ownership limitation, ``the amount
and value of a banking entity's permitted investment in any single
covered fund shall include any ownership interest held under Sec.
__.12 directly by the banking entity, including any affiliate of the
banking entity.'' \469\ Section __.12(b) also includes several other
rules of construction that address circumstances under which an
investment in a covered fund would be attributed to a banking entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\468\ See id. at 12148; implementing regulations Sec. __.12.
\469\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.12(b)(1)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2011 notice of proposed rulemaking included a proposed
provision that would have required attribution of certain direct
investments by a banking entity alongside, or otherwise in parallel
with, a covered fund.\470\ The agencies declined to adopt this
provision in the 2013 rule after considering the language of the
statute as well as commenters' views on that provision.\471\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\470\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 76 FR 68846, 68951-52 (Nov. 7, 2011).
\471\ In declining to adopt this parallel investment provision,
the agencies noted that banking entities rely on a number of
investment authorities and structures to make investments and meet
the needs of their clients. 79 FR 5734.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2013 rule restricts a banking entity's investment in a covered
fund organized and offered pursuant to Sec. __.11 to three percent of
the total number or value of the outstanding ownership interests of the
fund. That regulatory requirement is consistent with section 13(d)(4)
of the BHC Act, which limits the size of investments by a banking
entity in a hedge fund or private equity fund.\472\ Neither section
13(d)(4) of the BHC Act nor the text of the implementing regulations
requires a banking entity to treat an otherwise permissible investment
the banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as an investment in
the covered fund. The text of the 2013 rule does not impose any
quantitative limits on any investments by banking entities made
alongside, or otherwise in parallel with, covered funds.\473\ However,
in the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies discussed the potential
for evasion of the per fund limit and aggregate fund limit and stated
that ``if a banking entity makes investments side by side in
substantially the same positions as the covered fund, then the value of
such investments shall be included for purposes of determining the
value of the banking entity's investment in the covered fund.'' \474\
The agencies also stated that ``a banking entity that sponsors the
covered fund should not itself make any additional side by side co-
investment with the covered fund in a privately negotiated investment
unless the value of such co-investment is less than 3% of the value of
the total amount co-invested by other investors in such investment.''
\475\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\472\ 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(4).
\473\ Any investment by the banking entity would need to comply
with the proprietary trading restrictions in Subpart B of the
implementing regulations.
\474\ 79 FR 5734.
\475\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2020 proposal included a new rule of construction to address
investments made by banking entities alongside covered funds. This
proposed rule of construction was intended to clarify in the rule text
that banking
[[Page 46463]]
entities are not required to treat a direct investment by a banking
entity alongside a covered fund as an investment in the covered fund if
certain conditions are met. Specifically, proposed Sec. __.12(b)(5)
provided that:
(1) A banking entity shall not be required to include in the
calculation of the investment limits under Sec. __.12(a)(2) any
investment the banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as
the investment is made in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, including applicable safety and soundness standards.
(2) A banking entity shall not be restricted under Sec. __.12 in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.\476\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\476\ See 85 FR 12149.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the preamble to the 2020 proposal, the agencies recognized that
banking entities rely on a number of investment authorities and
structures to make investments and meet the needs of their clients and
shareholders.\477\ The agencies indicated that the proposed rule of
construction would provide clarity to banking entities so that they may
make such investments for the benefit of their clients and
shareholders, provided that those investments comply with applicable
laws and regulations.\478\ The preamble to the 2020 proposal went on to
note several restrictions that may apply to a banking entity's
investment alongside a covered fund. For example, a banking entity may
not engage in prohibited proprietary trading alongside a covered fund.
Likewise, a banking entity must have authority to make any investment
alongside a covered fund under applicable banking and other laws and
regulations and must ensure that the investment complies with
applicable safety and soundness standards. For example, national banks
are restricted in their ability to make direct equity investments under
12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh) and 12 CFR part 1. In addition, a banking entity
that invests alongside a covered fund that the banking entity organizes
and offers under the asset management exemption in Sec. __.11 would
need to comply with all the conditions of that exemption, which, among
other things, prohibits the banking entity from guaranteeing, assuming,
or otherwise insuring the obligations or performance of the covered
fund. Thus, a banking entity would not be permitted to make a direct
investment alongside a covered fund that the banking entity organizes
and offers for the purpose of artificially maintaining or increasing
the value of the fund's positions. Likewise, the banking entity would
also need to ensure that any direct investment alongside an organized
and offered covered fund does not cause the sponsoring banking entity's
permitted organizing and offering activities to violate the prudential
backstops under Sec. __.15.\479\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\477\ Id. See also 79 FR 5734.
\478\ 85 FR 12149.
\479\ See id. In particular, to the extent the investment would
result in a material conflict of interest between the banking entity
and its clients, for example because the banking entity may exit the
position at a different time or on different terms than the covered
fund, the banking entity would be required to provide timely and
effective disclosure in accordance with Sec. __.15(b) prior to
making the investments. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most commenters that addressed the proposed rule of construction
supported adopting the proposed revision.\480\ Commenters stated that
the rule of construction was consistent with section 13 of the BHC Act,
would not increase the types of risks that section 13 of the BHC Act
was meant to address, and would not raise concerns about evading
section 13 of the BHC Act.\481\ Commenters noted that banking entities
would need to hold their investments in a manner consistent with
relevant authorities and the associated risk management and other
prudential and regulatory limits and controls, including stringent
capital requirements, for these types of investments.\482\ Some
commenters also requested that the agencies permit employees and
directors of a banking entity that sponsors a covered fund to invest
directly in that covered fund, regardless of whether the employees or
directors provide services to the covered fund on behalf of their
banking entity employer.\483\ The agencies received one comment
opposing the proposed rule of construction.\484\ This commenter
characterized the proposed rule of construction as permitting
proprietary trading at arm's length but without a limit on the
ownership interest that a banking entity may hold and stated that
parallel investments should be subject to the limitations that would
apply to direct investments in covered funds.\485\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\480\ See FSF; SIFMA; BPI; IIB; Goldman Sachs; PNC; and ABA.
\481\ See FSF; SIFMA; and BPI.
\482\ See FSF; SIFMA; and BPI.
\483\ See ABA and PNC.
\484\ See Data Boiler.
\485\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After carefully considering the comments received, the agencies are
adopting the rule of construction in Sec. __.12(b)(5), as
proposed.\486\ As described above and in the 2020 proposal, this rule
of construction is consistent with the text of section 13 of the BHC
Act, which does not prohibit a banking entity from making otherwise
permissible investments directly when doing so alongside a covered
fund. This rule of construction will also reduce compliance burden by
clarifying that a banking entity is not required under Sec. __.12 of
the final rule to attribute to the banking entity direct investments
made alongside a covered fund for purposes of the de minimis investment
limitation. In response to the commenter who opposed the rule of
construction,\487\ the agencies note that the rule of construction is
consistent with section 13 of the BHC Act and each investment by a
banking entity must comply with laws and regulations, including any
applicable safety and soundness standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\486\ Final rule Sec. __.12(b)(5). These kinds of investments
could be, for example, parallel investments or co-investments. For
these purposes, ``parallel investments'' generally refers to a
series of investments that are made side-by-side with a covered
fund, and ``co-investments'' generally refers to a specific
investment opportunity that is made available to third-parties when
the general partner or investment manager for the covered fund
determines that the covered fund does not have sufficient capital
available to make the entire investment in the target portfolio
company or determines that it would not be suitable for the covered
fund to take the entire available investment.
\487\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the preamble to the 2020 proposal, the rule of
construction will not prohibit a banking entity from having investment
policies, arrangements or agreements to invest alongside a covered fund
in all or substantially all of the investments made by the covered fund
or to fund all or any portion of the investment opportunities made
available by the covered fund to other investors. Accordingly, a
banking entity could market a covered fund it organizes and offers
pursuant to Sec. __.11 on the basis of the banking entity's
expectation that it would invest in parallel with the covered fund in
some or all of the same investments, or the expectation that the
banking entity would fund one or more co-investment opportunities made
available by the covered fund. However, as discussed in the preamble to
the 2020 proposal, the agencies would expect that any such investment
policies, arrangements or agreements would ensure that the banking
entity has the ability to evaluate each investment on a case-by-case
basis to confirm that the banking entity does not make any investment
unless the investment complies with applicable laws and
[[Page 46464]]
regulations, including any applicable safety and soundness standards.
The agencies believe that this would further ensure that the banking
entity is not exposed to the types of risks that section 13 of the BHC
Act was intended to address.
As discussed earlier and in the preamble to the 2020 proposal, the
agencies recognize that the 2011 proposed rule would have required a
banking entity to apply the per fund limit and aggregate fund limit to
a direct investment alongside a covered fund when, among other things,
a banking entity is contractually obligated to make such investment
alongside a covered fund. The agencies continue to believe that such a
prohibition is not necessary given the agencies' expectation that a
banking entity would retain the ability to evaluate each investment on
a case-by-case basis to confirm that the banking entity does not make
any investment unless the investment complies with applicable laws and
regulations, including any applicable safety and soundness standards.
The 2013 rule imposes certain attribution rules and eligibility
requirements for investments by directors and employees of a banking
entity in covered funds organized and offered by the banking entity.
Specifically, Sec. __.12(b)(1)(iv) of the 2013 rule requires
attribution of an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires an ownership interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity if the
banking entity, directly or indirectly, extends financing for the
purpose of enabling the director or employee to acquire the ownership
interest in the fund and the financing is used to acquire such
ownership interest in the covered fund. Section __.11(a)(7) prohibits
investments by any director or employee of the banking entity (or an
affiliate thereof) in the covered fund, other than any director or
employee who is directly engaged in providing investment advisory,
commodity trading advisory, or other services to the covered fund at
the time the director or employee makes the investment.
As discussed in the preamble to the 2020 proposal, the agencies
recognize that directors and employees of banking entities may
participate in investments alongside a covered fund, for example on an
ad hoc basis or as part of a compensation arrangement. Consistent with
the agencies' rule of construction regarding direct investments by
banking entities alongside a covered fund, the agencies would expect
that any direct investments (whether a series of parallel investments
or a co-investment) by a director or employee of a banking entity (or
an affiliate thereof) made alongside a covered fund in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations would not be treated as an investment
by the director or employee in the covered fund. Accordingly, such a
direct investment would not be attributed to the banking entity as an
investment in the covered fund, regardless of whether the banking
entity arranged the transaction on behalf of the director or employee
or provided financing for the investment.\488\ Similarly, the
requirements under Sec. __.11(a)(7) limiting the directors and
employees that are eligible to invest in a covered fund organized and
offered by the banking entity to those that are directly engaged in
providing specified services to the covered fund would not apply to any
such direct investment.\489\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\488\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.12(b)(1)(iv) (requiring attribution
of an investment by a director or employee in a covered fund
organized and offered by the banking entity, where the banking
entity, directly or indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of
enabling the director or employee to acquire the ownership interest
in the covered fund and the financing is used to acquire such
ownership interest in the covered fund) (emphasis added).
\489\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.11(a)(7) (prohibiting investments
by any director or employee of the banking entity (or an affiliate
thereof) in a covered fund organized and offered by the banking
entity, other than any director or employee who is directly engaged
in providing investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or
other services to the covered fund at the time the director or
employee makes the investment) (emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to investments in a covered fund, the agencies decline
to permit an employee or director of a banking entity that organizes
and offers a covered fund to make investments in that covered fund if
the director or employee does not provide services to the covered fund
on behalf of the banking entity, as requested by some commenters.\490\
The restriction on these types of director and employee investments is
required by the statute.\491\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\490\ See ABA and PNC.
\491\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G)(vii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Technical Amendments
The agencies proposed five sets of clarifying technical edits to
the implementing regulations. Specifically, the agencies proposed to
(1) amend Sec. __.12(b)(1)(ii) to add a comma after the words ``SEC-
regulated business development companies'' in both places where that
phrase is used; (2) amend Sec. __.12(b)(4)(i) to replace the phrase
``ownership interest of the master fund'' with the phrase ``ownership
interest in the master fund''; (3) amend Sec. __.12(b)(4)(ii) to
replace the phrase ``ownership interest of the fund'' with the phrase
``ownership interest in the fund;'' (4) amend Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(3)(i)
and __.10(c)(10)(i) to replace the word ``comprised'' with the word
``composed;'' and (5) amend Sec. __.10(c)(8)(iv)(A) to replace the
word ``of'' in the phrase ``contractual rights of other assets'' with
the word ``or.''
The agencies did not receive comment on these provisions and are
adopting the technical amendments as proposed.
V. Administrative Law Matters
A. Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act \492\ requires the
Federal banking agencies to use plain language in all proposed and
final rules published after January 1, 2000. The Federal banking
agencies sought to present the proposed rule in a simple and
straightforward manner and did not receive any comments on plain
language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\492\ Public Law 106-102, section 722, 113 Stat. 1338, 1471
(1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Certain provisions of the final rule contain ``collection of
information'' requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). In accordance with
the requirements of the PRA, the agencies may not conduct or sponsor,
and a respondent is not required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. The agencies reviewed the final rule
and determined that the final rule creates new recordkeeping
requirements and revises certain disclosure requirements that have been
previously cleared under various OMB control numbers. The agencies did
not receive any specific comments on the PRA. The agencies are
extending for three years, with revision, these information
collections. The information collection requirements contained in this
final rule have been submitted by the OCC and FDIC to OMB for review
and approval under section 3507(d) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) and
section 1320.11 of the OMB's implementing regulations (5 CFR 1320). The
Board reviewed the final rule under the authority delegated to the
Board by OMB. The Board will submit information collection burden
estimates to OMB, and the submission will include burden for Federal
Reserve-supervised institutions, as well as burden for OCC-, FDIC-,
SEC-, and CFTC-supervised institutions under a holding company. The OCC
and the
[[Page 46465]]
FDIC will take burden for banking entities that are not under a holding
company.
Abstract
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally prohibits any banking entity
from engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with
a covered fund, subject to certain exemptions. The exemptions allow
certain types of permissible trading and asset management activities.
Current Actions
The final rule contains requirements subject to the PRA, and the
changes relative to the implementing regulations are discussed herein.
The new recordkeeping requirements are found in section
__.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1) and the modified disclosure requirements are
found in section __.11(a)(8)(i). The modified information collection
requirements would implement section 13 of the BHC Act. The respondents
are for-profit financial institutions, including small businesses. A
covered entity must retain these records for a period that is no less
than 5 years in a form that allows it to promptly produce such records
to the relevant agency on request.
Recordkeeping Requirements
Section __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1) requires a banking entity relying on
the exclusion from the covered fund definition for customer
facilitation vehicles to maintain documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the customer's exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy, or service. The agencies estimate
that the new recordkeeping requirement will be incurred once a year
with an average hour per response of 10 hours.
Disclosure Requirements
Section __.11(a)(8)(i), which requires banking entities that
organize and offer covered funds to make certain disclosures to
investors in such funds, is being expanded to also apply to banking
entities relying on exclusions for credit funds, venture capital funds,
family wealth management vehicles, or customer facilitation vehicles.
The agencies estimate that the current average hours per response of
0.1 will increase to 0.5.
Revision, With Extension, of the Following Information Collections
Estimated average hours per response:
Reporting
Section __.4(c)(3)(i)--0.25 hours for an average of 20 times per
year.
Section __.12(e)--20 hours (Initial set-up 50 hours) for an average
of 10 times per year.
Section __.20(d)--41 hours (Initial set-up 125 hours) quarterly.
Section __.20(i)--20 hours.
Recordkeeping
Section __.3(d)(3)--1 hour (Initial set-up 3 hours).
Section __.4(b)(3)(i)(A)--2 hours quarterly.
Section __.4(c)(3)(i)--0.25 hours for an average of 40 times per
year.
Section __.5(c)--40 hours (Initial setup 80 hours).
Section __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(1)--10 hours.
Section __.11(a)(2)--10 hours.
Section __.20(b)--265 hours (Initial set-up 795 hours).
Section __.20(c)--100 hours (Initial set-up 300 hours).
Section __.20(d)--10 hours.
Section __.20(e)--200 hours.
Section __.20(f)(1)--8 hours.
Section __.20(f)(2)--40 hours (Initial set-up 100 hours).
Disclosure
Section __.11(a)(8)(i)--0.5 hours for an average of 26 times per
year.
OCC
Title of Information Collection: Reporting, Recordkeeping, and
Disclosure Requirements Associated with Restrictions on Proprietary
Trading and Certain Relationships with Hedge Funds and Private Equity
Funds.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
Respondents: National banks, state member banks, state nonmember
banks, and state and federal savings associations.
OMB control number: 1557-0309.
Estimated number of respondents: 39.
Revisions estimated annual burden: 302 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours: 20,410 hours (3,681 hour for initial
set-up and 16,729 hours for ongoing).
Board
Title of Information Collection: Reporting, Recordkeeping, and
Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation VV.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
Respondents: State member banks, bank holding companies, savings
and loan holding companies, foreign banking organizations, U.S. State
branches or agencies of foreign banks, and other holding companies that
control an insured depository institution and any subsidiary of the
foregoing other than a subsidiary for which the OCC, FDIC, CFTC, or SEC
is the primary financial regulatory agency. The Board will take burden
for all institutions under a holding company including:
OCC-supervised institutions,
FDIC-supervised institutions,
Banking entities for which the CFTC is the primary
financial regulatory agency, as defined in section 2(12)(C) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, and
Banking entities for which the SEC is the primary
financial regulatory agency, as defined in section 2(12)(B) of the
Dodd-Frank Act.
Legal authorization and confidentiality: This information
collection is authorized by section 13 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C.
1851(b)(2) and 12 U.S.C. 1851(e)(1)). The information collection is
required in order for covered entities to obtain the benefit of
engaging in certain types of proprietary trading or investing in,
sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or
private equity fund, under the restrictions set forth in section 13 and
the final rule. If a respondent considers the information to be trade
secrets and/or privileged, such information could be withheld from the
public under the authority of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4)). Additionally, to the extent that such information may be
contained in an examination report, such information could also be
withheld from the public (5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(8)).
Agency form number: FR VV.
OMB control number: 7100-0360.
Estimated number of respondents: 255.
Revisions estimated annual burden: 7,880 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours: 36,112 hours (4,381 hour for initial
set-up and 31,731 hours for ongoing).
FDIC
Title of Information Collection: Volcker Rule Restrictions on
Proprietary Trading and Relationships with Hedge Funds and Private
Equity Funds.
Frequency: Annual, quarterly, and event driven.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
Respondents: State nonmember banks, state savings associations, and
certain subsidiaries of those entities.
OMB control number: 3064-0184.
Estimated number of respondents: 10.
[[Page 46466]]
Revisions estimated annual burden: 175 hours.
Estimated annual burden hours: 3,288 hours (1,759 hours for initial
set-up and 1,529 hours for ongoing).
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) \493\ requires an agency to
either provide a regulatory flexibility analysis with a final rule or
certify that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) establishes size standards that define which
entities are small businesses for purposes of the RFA.\494\ Except as
otherwise specified below, the size standard to be considered a small
business for banking entities subject to the final rule is $600 million
or less in consolidated assets.\495\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\493\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\494\ U.S. SBA, Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched
to North American Industry Classification System Codes, available at
https://www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards.
\495\ See id. Pursuant to SBA regulations, the asset size of a
concern includes the assets of the concern whose size is at issue
and all of its domestic and foreign affiliates. 13 CFR 121.103(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board
The Board has considered the potential impact of the final rule on
small entities in accordance with section 603 of the RFA. Based on the
Board's analysis, and for the reasons stated below, the Board certifies
that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial of number of small entities.
The Board invited comment on all aspects of its analysis related to
the requirements of the RFA in connection with the 2020 proposal. In
particular, the Board requested that commenters describe the nature of
any impact on small entities and provide empirical data to illustrate
and support the extent of the impact. The Board did not receive any
comments related to this issue.
As discussed in the Supplementary Information, the agencies are
adopting revisions to the regulations implementing section 13 of the
BHC Act in order to improve and streamline the regulations by modifying
and clarifying requirements related to the covered fund
provisions.\496\ Certain of the exclusions from the covered fund
definition included in the final rule contain recordkeeping and
disclosure requirements that would apply to banking entities relying on
the exclusion. For example, the exclusion for customer facilitation
vehicles requires a banking entity relying on the exclusion to maintain
documentation outlining how the banking entity intends to facilitate
the customer's exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
service. The final rule is expected to reduce regulatory burden on
banking entities, and the Board does not expect these recordkeeping
requirements to result in a significant economic impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\496\ The agencies are explicitly authorized under section
13(b)(2) of the BHC Act to adopt rules implementing section 13. 12
U.S.C. 1851(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board's rule generally applies to state-chartered banks that
are members of the Federal Reserve System, bank holding companies, and
foreign banking organizations and nonbank financial companies
supervised by the Board (collectively, ``Board-regulated entities'').
However, section 203 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA),\497\ which was enacted on May 24,
2018, amended section 13 of the BHC Act by narrowing the definition of
banking entity to exclude certain community banks.\498\ The Board is
not aware of any Board-regulated entities that meet the SBA's
definition of ``small entity'' that are subject to section 13 of the
BHC Act and its implementing regulations following the enactment of
EGRRCPA. Furthermore, to the extent that any Board-regulated entities
that meet the definition of ``small entity'' are or become subject to
section 13 of the BHC Act and its implementing regulations, the Board
does not expect the total number of such entities to be substantial.
Accordingly, the Board's final rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\497\ Public Law 115-174 (May 24, 2018).
\498\ Under EGRRCPA, a community bank and its affiliates are
generally excluded from the definition of banking entity, and thus
section 13 of the BHC Act, if the bank and all companies that
control the bank have total consolidated assets equal to $10 billion
or less and trading assets and liabilities equal to five percent or
less of total consolidated assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires an agency, in connection with a final rule, to prepare a Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis describing the impact of the rule on
small entities (defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for
purposes of the RFA to include commercial banks and savings
institutions with total assets of $600 million or less and trust
companies with total assets of $41.5 million or less) or to certify
that the final rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The OCC currently supervises
approximately 745 small entities.\499\ Under the EGRRCPA, banking
entities with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or less
generally are not ``banking entities'' within the scope of section 13
of the BHC Act if their trading assets and trading liabilities do not
exceed five percent of their total consolidated assets. In addition,
section 13 of the BHC Act generally excludes certain institutions that
function only in a trust or fiduciary capacity from the definition of
``banking entity. As a result, no OCC-supervised small entities are
subject to section 13 of the BHC Act. Thus, the final rule will not
impact any OCC-supervised small entities. Therefore, the OCC certifies
that the final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of OCC-supervised small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\499\ The OCC bases its estimate of the number of small entities
on the SBA's size thresholds for commercial banks and savings
institutions, and trust companies, which are $600 million and $41.5
million, respectively. Consistent with the General Principles of
Affiliation, 13 CFR 121.103(a), the OCC counts the assets of
affiliated financial institutions when determining if the OCC should
classify an OCC-supervised institution as a small entity. The OCC
uses December 31, 2019, to determine size because a ``financial
institution's assets are determined by averaging the assets reported
on its four quarterly financial statements for the preceding year.''
See footnote 8 of the SBA's Table of Size Standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDIC
The RFA generally requires that, in connection with a final
rulemaking, an agency prepare and make available for public comment a
final regulatory flexibility analysis describing the impact of the
final rule on small entities.\500\ However, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required if the agency certifies that the final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The SBA has defined ``small entities'' to include
banking organizations with total assets of less than or equal to $600
million that are independently owned and operated or owned by a holding
company with less than or equal to $600 million in total assets.\501\
Generally, the FDIC considers
[[Page 46467]]
a significant effect to be a quantified effect in excess of five
percent of total annual salaries and benefits per institution, or 2.5
percent of total noninterest expenses. The FDIC believes that effects
in excess of these thresholds typically represent significant effects
for FDIC-supervised institutions. For the reasons described below and
under section 605(b) of the RFA, the FDIC certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\500\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\501\ The SBA defines a small banking organization as having
$600 million or less in assets, where an organization's ``assets are
determined by averaging the assets reported on its four quarterly
financial statements for the preceding year.'' See 13 CFR 121.201
(as amended by 84 FR 34261, effective August 19, 2019). In its
determination, the ``SBA counts the receipts, employees, or other
measure of size of the concern whose size is at issue and all of its
domestic and foreign affiliates.'' See 13 CFR 121.103. Following
these regulations, the FDIC uses a covered entity's affiliated and
acquired assets, averaged over the preceding four quarters, to
determine whether the covered entity is ``small'' for the purposes
of RFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of December 31, 2019, the FDIC supervised 3,344 depository
institutions,\502\ of which 2,581 were considered small entities for
the purposes of RFA.\503\ The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act excluded entities from the requirements of
section 13 of the BHC Act that do not have and are not controlled by a
company that has total assets of more than $10 billion or trading
assets and liabilities comprising more than five percent of total
consolidated assets.\504\ Only one small, FDIC-supervised institution
is subject to section 13 of the BHC Act, because its trading assets and
liabilities exceed five percent of total consolidated assets.\505\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\502\ FDIC-supervised institutions are set forth in 12 U.S.C.
1813(q)(2).
\503\ FDIC Call Report data, December 31, 2019.
\504\ Public Law 115-174, May 24, 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/ 2155.
\505\ FDIC Call Report data, December 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally prohibits any banking entity
from engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with
a covered fund. As previously discussed, the final rule modifies
existing definitions and exclusions and introduces new exclusions to
the implementing regulations. The final rule permits covered entities
to engage in additional activities with respect to covered funds,
including acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, sponsoring,
or having certain relationships with covered funds, subject to certain
restrictions.
This final rule excludes certain types of investment funds from the
definition of a ``covered fund'' for the purposes of section 13 of the
BHC Act. Investments in funds that are affected by this final rule
could be reported as deductions from capital on Call Report schedule
RC-R Part 1 Lines 11 or 13 if the investments qualify as ``investments
in the capital of an unconsolidated financial institution'' or as
additional deductions on Lines 17 or 24 of schedule RC-R
otherwise.\506\ The one affected small, FDIC-supervised institution did
not report any such deductions over the past five years.\507\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\506\ See ``Supervisory Guidance on the Capital Treatment of
Certain Investments in Covered Funds.'' FDIC FIL-50-2015: November
6, 2015. https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2015/fil15050a.pdf.
\507\ FDIC Call Report data, March 2015-December 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on this supporting information, the FDIC certifies that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
SEC
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC certified that, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the 2020 proposal would not, if adopted, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Although the
SEC solicited written comments regarding this certification, no
commenters responded to this request.
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, the amendments
clarify and simplify compliance with the implementing regulations,
refine the extraterritorial application of the section 13 of the BHC
Act, and permit additional fund activities that do not present the
risks that section 13 was intended to address.
The amendments will generally apply to banking entities, including
certain SEC-registered entities. These entities include bank-affiliated
SEC-registered investment advisers, broker-dealers, and security-based
swap dealers. Based on information in filings submitted by these
entities, the SEC believes that there are no banking entity registered
investment advisers or broker-dealers that are small entities for
purposes of the RFA. For this reason, the SEC certifies that the
amendments will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
CFTC
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the CFTC hereby certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for which the CFTC is the primary financial
regulatory agency.
As discussed in this Supplementary Information, the final rule
clarifies and simplifies compliance with the implementing regulations,
refines the extraterritorial application of section 13 of the BHC Act,
and permits additional fund activities that do not present the risks
that section 13 was intended to address. To reduce the extraterritorial
impact of the implementing regulations, the final rule exempts the
activities of certain funds that are organized outside of the United
States and offered to foreign investors from certain restrictions of
the implementing regulations. The final rule also revises several
existing exclusions from the covered fund provisions, to provide
clarity and simplify compliance with the requirements of the
implementing regulations. The final rule adopts several new exclusions
from the covered fund definition in order to more closely align the
regulation with the purpose of the statute. Last, the final rule adopts
revisions to the provisions that govern the relationship between a
banking entity and a fund and the definition of ownership interest.
The final rule will generally apply to banking entities, including
certain CFTC-registered entities. These entities include bank-
affiliated CFTC-registered swap dealers, futures commission merchants,
commodity trading advisors and commodity pool operators.\508\ The CFTC
has previously determined that swap dealers, futures commission
merchants and commodity pool operators are not small entities for
purposes of the RFA and, therefore, the requirements of the RFA do not
apply to those entities.\509\ As for commodity trading advisors, the
CFTC has found it appropriate to consider whether such registrants
should be deemed small entities for purposes of the RFA on a case-by-
case basis, in the context of the particular regulation at issue.\510\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\508\ The final rule may also apply to other types of CFTC
registrants that are banking entities, such as introducing brokers,
but the CFTC believes it is unlikely that such other registrants
will have significant activities that would implicate the final
rule. See 79 FR 5808, 5813 (Jan. 31, 2014) (CFTC version of 2013
final rule).
\509\ See Policy Statement and Establishment of Definitions of
``Small Entities'' for Purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
47 FR 18618 (Apr. 30, 1982) (futures commission merchants and
commodity pool operators); Registration of Swap Dealers and Major
Swap Participants, 77 FR 2613, 2620 (Jan. 19, 2012) (swap dealers
and major swap participants).
\510\ See Policy Statement and Establishment of Definitions of
``Small Entities'' for Purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
47 FR 18618, 18620 (Apr. 30, 1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the context of the final rule, the CFTC believes it is unlikely
that a substantial number of the commodity trading advisors that are
potentially affected are small entities for purposes of the RFA. In
this regard, the CFTC notes that only commodity trading advisors that
are registered with the CFTC are covered by the implementing
regulations, and generally those that are registered have larger
businesses.
[[Page 46468]]
Similarly, the final rule applies to only those commodity trading
advisors that are affiliated with banks, which the CFTC expects are
larger businesses.
The CFTC requested that commenters address in particular whether
any of these commodity trading advisors, or other CFTC registrants
covered by the proposed revisions, are small entities for purposes of
the RFA. The CFTC did not receive any public comments on this or any
other aspect of the RFA as it relates to the rule.
Because the CFTC believes that there are not a substantial number
of registered, banking entity-affiliated commodity trading advisors
that are small entities for purposes of the RFA, and the other CFTC
registrants that may be affected by the proposed revisions have been
determined not to be small entities, the CFTC believes that the final
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for which the CFTC is the primary financial
regulatory agency.
D. Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act
Section 302(a) of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 (RCDRIA) \511\ requires that each Federal
banking agency, in determining the effective date and administrative
compliance requirements for new regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other requirements on insured depository
institutions, consider, consistent with principles of safety and
soundness and the public interest, any administrative burdens that such
regulations would place on depository institutions, including small
depository institutions, and customers of depository institutions, as
well as the benefits of such regulations. The agencies have considered
comment on these matters in other parts of this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\511\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, under section 302(b) of the RCDRIA, new regulations
that impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other new
requirements on insured depository institutions generally must take
effect on the first day of a calendar quarter that begins on or after
the date on which the regulations are published in final form.\512\
Therefore, the effective date for the Federal banking agencies is
October 1, 2020, the first day of the calendar quarter.\513\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\512\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(b).
\513\ Additionally, the Administrative Procedure Act generally
requires that the effective date of a rule be no less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). The
effective date, October 1, 2020, will be more than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. OCC Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The OCC has analyzed the final rule under the factors in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA). Under this analysis, the
OCC considered whether the final rule includes a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in
any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). The UMRA does not apply
to regulations that incorporate requirements specifically set forth in
law.
The final rule does not impose new mandates. Therefore, the OCC
finds that the final rule does not trigger the UMRA cost threshold.
Accordingly, the OCC has not prepared the written statement described
in section 202 of the UMRA.
F. SEC Economic Analysis
1. Broad Economic Considerations
i. Background
As discussed above, section 13 of the Bank Holding Company (BHC)
Act generally prohibits banking entities from acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships
with, a hedge fund or private equity fund (covered funds), subject to
certain exemptions. Section 13(h)(1) of the BHC Act defines the term
``banking entity'' to include (1) any insured depository institution
(as defined by statute), (2) any company that controls an insured
depository institution, (3) any company that is treated as a bank
holding company for purposes of section 8 of the International Banking
Act of 1978, and (4) any affiliate or subsidiary of such an
entity.\514\ In addition, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and
Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA),\515\ enacted on May 24, 2018,
amended section 13 of the BHC Act to exclude from the definition of
``insured depository institution'' any institution that does not have
and is not controlled by a company that has (1) more than $10 billion
in total consolidated assets; and (2) total trading assets and trading
liabilities, as reported on the most recent applicable regulatory
filing filed by the institution, that are more than 5% of total
consolidated assets.\516\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\514\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1).
\515\ See supra note 504.
\516\ These and other aspects of the regulatory baseline against
which the SEC is assessing the economic effects of the final rule
being adopted here on SEC-regulated entities are discussed in the
economic baseline. On July 22, 2019, the agencies adopted a final
rule amending the definition of ``insured depository institution''
in a manner consistent with EGRRCPA. See Revisions to Prohibitions
and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in,
and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds, 84 FR
35008 (July 22, 2019). In November 2019, the agencies adopted the
2019 amendments, which tailored certain proprietary trading and
covered fund restrictions of the 2013 rule. See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain SEC-regulated entities, such as broker-dealers, security-
based swap dealers (SBSDs), and registered investment advisers (RIAs)
affiliated with an insured depository institution, fall under the
definition of ``banking entity'' and are subject to the prohibitions of
section 13 of the BHC Act.\517\ The SEC's economic analysis is limited
to areas within the scope of the SEC's function as the primary
securities markets regulator in the United States. In particular, the
SEC's economic analysis focuses primarily on the potential effects of
the rule amendments being adopted here (the ``final rule'') on (1) SEC
registrants, in their capacity as such, (2) the functioning and
efficiency of the securities markets, (3) investor protection, and (4)
capital formation. SEC registrants that may be affected by the final
rule include SEC-registered broker-dealers, SBSDs, and RIAs. Thus, the
analysis below does not consider the direct effects of the final rule
on broker-dealers, SBSDs, and registered investment advisers that are
not banking entities, or banking entities that are not SEC registrants.
In addition, potential spillover effects on these and other entities
are reflected in the SEC's analysis of effects on efficiency,
[[Page 46469]]
competition, investor protection, and capital formation in securities
markets. This economic analysis also discusses the impact of the final
rule on private funds,\518\ to the degree that it may flow through to
SEC registrants, such as RIAs, SEC-registered broker-dealers and SBSDs,
and securities markets and investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\517\ Throughout this economic analysis, the terms ``banking
entity'' and ``entity'' generally refer only to banking entities for
which the SEC is the primary financial regulatory agency. While
section 13 of the BHC Act and its associated rules apply to a
broader set of banking entities, this economic analysis is limited
to those banking entities for which the SEC is the primary financial
regulatory agency as defined in section 2(12)(B) of the Dodd-Frank
Act. See 12 U.S.C. 1851(b)(2), 5301(12)(B).
Compliance with SBSD registration requirements is not yet
required and there are currently no registered SBSDs. However, the
SEC has previously estimated that as many as 50 entities may
potentially register as SBSDs and that as many as 16 of these
entities may already be SEC-registered broker-dealers. See Capital,
Margin, and Segregation Requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers
and Major Security-Based Swap Participants and Capital and
Segregation Requirements for Broker-Dealers, 84 FR 43872 (Aug. 22,
2019) (``Capital, Margin, and Segregation Adopting Release'').
For the purposes of this economic analysis, the term ``dealer''
generally refers to SEC-registered broker-dealers and SBSDs.
\518\ There is significant overlap between the definitions of
``private fund'' and ``covered fund.'' For purposes of this economic
analysis, ``private fund'' means an issuer that would be an
investment company, as defined in section 3 of the Investment
Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(a)), but for section 3(c)(1) or section
3(c)(7) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80-3(c)(1) or (7)). See also 15
U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(29). Section 13(h)(2) of the BHC Act defines ``hedge
fund'' and ``private equity fund'' to mean an issuer that would be
an investment company, but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
Investment Company Act, or ``such similar funds'' as the agencies
determine by rule (see 12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(2)). In the 2013 rule, the
agencies combined the definitions of ``hedge fund'' and ``private
equity fund'' into a single term ``covered fund'' and defined this
term to include any issuer that would be an investment company as
defined in the Investment Company Act but for section 3(c)(1) or
3(c)(7) of that Act with a number of express exclusions and
additions as determined by the agencies. Implementing regulations
Sec. __.10(b) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In implementing section 13 of the BHC Act, the agencies sought to
increase the safety and soundness of banking entities, promote
financial stability, and reduce conflicts of interest between banking
entities and their customers.\519\ The regulatory regime created by the
2013 rule may have enhanced regulatory oversight and compliance with
the substantive prohibitions of section 13 of the BHC Act, but could
also have impacted capital formation and liquidity, as well as the
provision by banking entities of a variety of financial services for
customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\519\ See, e.g., 79 FR 5536, 5541, 5574, 5659, 5666. An
extensive body of research has examined moral hazard arising out of
federal deposit insurance, implicit bailout guarantees, and systemic
risk issues. See, e.g., Andrew G. Atkeson et al., Government
Guarantees and the Valuation of American Banks, 33 NBER
Macroeconomics Ann. 81 (2018). See also Javier Bianchi, Efficient
Bailouts? 106 Amer. Econ. Rev. 3607 (2016); Bryan Kelly, Hanno
Lustig, & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, Too-Systematic-to-Fail: What
Option Markets Imply about Sector-Wide Government Guarantees, 106
Amer. Econ. Rev. 1278 (2016); Deniz Anginer, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, &
Min Zhu, How Does Deposit Insurance Affect Bank Risk? Evidence from
the Recent Crisis, 48 J. Banking & Fin. 312 (2014); Andrea Beltratti
& Rene M. Stulz, The Credit Crisis Around the Globe: Why Did Some
Banks Perform Better?, 105 J. Fin. Econ. 1 (2012); Pietro Veronesi &
Luigi Zingales, Paulson's Gift, 97 J. Fin. Econ. 339 (2010). For a
literature review, see, e.g., Sylvain Benoit et al., Where the Risks
Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk, 21 Rev. Fin. 109 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 13 of the BHC Act also provides a number of statutory
exemptions to the general prohibitions on proprietary trading and
covered funds activities. For example, the statute exempts certain
covered funds activities, such as organizing and offering covered
funds.\520\ The 2013 rule implemented these exemptions.\521\ Banking
entities engaged in activities and investments covered by section 13 of
the BHC Act and the implementing regulations are required to establish
a compliance program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor
compliance with the implementing regulations.\522\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\520\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G).
\521\ See 2013 rule Sec. Sec. __.4, __.5, __.6, __.11, and
__.13.
\522\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.20. See also 2019 amendments, 84 FR
62021-25, which, among other things, modified these requirements for
banking entities with limited trading assets and liabilities. This
SEC Economic Analysis follows earlier sections by referring to the
regulations implementing section 13 of the BHC Act, as amended
through June 1, 2020 as the ``implementing regulations.'' See supra
note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC solicited comment on all aspects of
the costs and benefits associated with the proposed amendments for SEC
registrants, including spillover effects the proposed amendments may
have on efficiency, competition, and capital formation in securities
markets. The SEC has considered these comments, as discussed in greater
detail in the sections that follow.
ii. Broad Economic Effects
Certain aspects of the implementing regulations may have resulted
in a complex and costly compliance regime that is unduly restrictive
and burdensome on some affected banking entities. Distinguishing
between permissible and prohibited activities may be complex and
costly, resulting in uncertain determinations for some entities.
Moreover, the implementing regulations may include in their scope some
groups of market participants that do not necessarily engage in the
activities or pose the risks that section 13 of the BHC Act intended to
address. For example, definition of the term ``covered fund'' may
include entities that do not engage in the activities contemplated by
section 13 of the BHC Act or may include entities that do not pose the
risks that section 13 is intended to mitigate.
The final rule includes amendments that (1) reduce the scope of
entities that may be treated as covered funds (e.g., credit funds,
venture capital funds, family wealth management vehicles, and customer
facilitation vehicles), (2) modify existing covered fund exclusions
under the implementing regulations (e.g., foreign public funds, public
welfare funds, and small business investment companies), and (3) affect
the types of permitted activities between certain banking entities and
certain covered funds (e.g., restrictions on relationships between
banking entities and covered funds, definition of ``ownership
interest,'' and treatment of loan securitizations). The final rule also
reduces the burden on affected banking entities by codifying an
existing policy statement by the Federal banking agencies that
addresses the potential issues related to a foreign banking entity
controlling a qualifying foreign excluded fund and adopting a rule of
construction to provide clarity regarding a banking entity's
permissible investments alongside a covered fund.
Broadly, to the extent that the final rule directly changes the
scope of permissible covered fund activities, and indirectly reduces
costs to banking entities and covered funds by reducing uncertainty
regarding the scope of permissible activities, the final rule may
enhance the beneficial economic effects of the implementing
regulations.\523\ The SEC's economic analysis continues to recognize
that the overall risk exposure of banking entities generally reflects a
combination of activities, including proprietary trading, market
making, traditional banking, asset management, investment activities,
and the extent to which banking entities engage in hedging and other
risk-mitigating activities. The overall risk exposure is also a
function of the magnitude, structure, and manner in which banking
entities engage in such activities, both within such activities
individually and across all of these activities collectively. As
discussed elsewhere,\524\ the SEC recognizes the complex baseline
effects of section 13 of the BHC Act, as amended by sections 203 and
204 of EGRRCPA, and the implementing regulations (including those made
with respect to sections 203 and 204 of EGRRCPA) on overall levels and
structure of banking entity risk exposures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\523\ See, e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037-92.
\524\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule may promote the ability of the capital markets to
intermediate between suppliers and users of capital through, for
example, increased ability and willingness of banking entities and
investors in ``covered funds'' to facilitate capital formation through
sponsorship and participation in certain types of funds and to transact
with certain groups of counterparties.\525\ For
[[Page 46470]]
example, exclusions from the ``covered fund'' definition of specific
types of entities may benefit banking entities by providing clarity and
removing certain constraints around potentially profitable business
opportunities and by reducing compliance costs, and may benefit
excluded funds and their banking entity sponsors and advisers by
increasing the spectrum of available counterparties and improving the
quality or cost of financial services available to customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\525\ See, e.g., U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, A Financial System
That Creates Economic Opportunities: Banks and Credit Unions (June
2017), at 77, available at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/A%20Financial%20System.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule, however, may also facilitate risk mitigation as
well as risk-taking activities of banking entities. The final rule also
may change aspects of the relationships among banking entities and
certain other groups of market participants, including potentially
introducing new conflicts of interest, and increasing or reducing the
potential effects of conflicts of interest. To the degree that some
banking entities react to the final rule by restructuring activities
involving covered funds to take advantage of the exclusions contained
in the final rule, there may be shifts in the structure and levels of
activities of banking entities that would, in turn, decrease or
increase risk exposure. Recognizing these various potential effects,
each of the exclusions includes a number of conditions aimed at
facilitating banking entity compliance while also allowing for customer
oriented financial services provided on arms-length, market terms, and
preventing evasion of the requirements of section 13.
In evaluating these various potential effects, it is important to
acknowledge that the exclusions made available by the final rule, such
as for credit funds and qualifying venture capital funds, allow banking
entities to engage indirectly through fund structures in the same
activities in which they are currently permitted to engage directly
(e.g., extensions of credit or direct ownership stakes). Thus, the type
of exposure permitted by engaging in those activities directly, and
indirectly through covered funds, is the same and the banking entities
may use fund structures to diversify or otherwise mitigate their risk
exposure. Other exclusions permit banking entities to provide
traditional banking and asset management services to customers through
a legal entity structure, with conditions (e.g., limitation on
ownership by the banking entity and prohibition on ``bail outs'')
intended to ensure that the risks that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address are mitigated. Finally, nothing in the final rule
removes or modifies prudential capital, margin, and liquidity
requirements that are applicable to banking entities and that
facilitate the safety and soundness of banking entities and the
financial stability of the United States.
The final rule may also impact competition, allocative efficiency,
and capital formation. To the extent that the implementing regulations
have constrained banking entities in their covered fund activities,
including providing traditional banking and asset management services
to customers through a legal entity structure, the exclusions from the
definition of ``covered fund'' made available by the final rule may
increase competition between banking entities and other entities
providing services to and otherwise transacting with those types of
funds and other entities. Such competition may reduce costs or increase
the quality of certain financial services provided to such funds and
their counterparties.
Finally, the final rule's costs, benefits, and effects on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation will be influenced by a
variety of factors, including the prevailing macroeconomic conditions,
the financial condition of firms seeking to raise capital and of funds
seeking to transact with banking entities, competition between bank and
non-bank providers of capital, and many others. Moreover, these effects
are likely to vary widely among banking entities and funds. The SEC
recognizes that the economic effects of the final rule may be dampened
or magnified in different phases of the macroeconomic cycle, depend on
monetary and fiscal policy developments and other government actions,
and may vary across different types of banking entities.
The SEC also considered the implications of the final rule for
investors. Broadly, the final rule should increase the number of funds
and other entities that will be excluded from the covered fund
definition. This is likely to result in an increase in offerings of
such funds or an increase in the number of banking entities providing
services to customers through entities such as customer facilitation
vehicles and family wealth management vehicles. If the final rule
increases the ability of investors to access public and private markets
through funds and other entities, the final rule may result in the
relaxing of constraints on investors' portfolio optimization and, thus,
enhance the efficiency of portfolio allocations. The ability of
additional investors to access these markets through funds and other
entities may, in addition to providing those investors with greater
choice, benefit the issuers of the securities held by those funds and
other entities by potentially increasing demand for those securities.
Increased demand typically results in increased liquidity which can
benefit investors because it may enable them to enter or exit their
positions in fund instruments, products, and portfolios in a more
timely manner and at a more attractive price.
Moreover, investors who seek access to public capital markets
investments or other investments through foreign public funds may
benefit to the extent the final rule results in banking entities
offering more foreign public funds or offering these funds at a lower
cost. Further, investors that prefer to implement a trading or
investing strategy through a legal entity structure may benefit from
the final rule, which allows banking entities to implement or
facilitate such a trading or investing strategy while providing other
banking and asset management services to the investor.\526\ At the same
time, it is possible that, as a result of banking entities sponsoring
or investing in more funds that are excluded from the definition of
covered fund by the final rule, general market risk could increase and
that risk could adversely affect markets generally, including through
the impact on financial stability. However, due to the mitigation
effects of the various conditions of the exclusions from the definition
of covered fund contained in the final rule as well as expectations
regarding the relative size and mix of the investments in the
aggregate, the SEC believes this risk to be small. For example, the
final rule permits a banking entity to act as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to certain excluded funds (e.g.,
credit funds and qualifying venture capital funds) only to the extent
the banking entity ensures that the activities of the funds are
consistent with safety and soundness standards that are substantially
similar to those that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the
activities directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\526\ See supra Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public Funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Analytical Approach
The SEC's economic analysis is informed by research \527\ on the
effects of section 13 of the BHC Act and the 2013 rule, comments
received by the agencies from a variety of interested parties, and
experience administering the implementing regulations. Throughout this
economic analysis, the SEC discusses how different market
[[Page 46471]]
participants \528\ may respond to various aspects of the final rule.
This analysis also considers the potential effects of the final rule on
activities by banking entities that involve risk, their willingness and
ability to engage in client-facilitation activities, and competition,
market quality, and capital formation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\527\ See 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62044-54.
\528\ As discussed above, supra Section V.F.1.i. (Background),
the SEC's economic analysis is focused on the potential effects of
the final rule on (1) SEC registrants, (2) the functioning and
efficiency of the securities markets, (3) investor protection, and
(4) capital formation. Thus, the below analysis does not consider
the direct effects of the final rule on broker-dealers, SBSDs, or
investment advisers that are not banking entities, or banking
entities that are not SEC registrants, in either case for purposes
of section 13 of the BHC Act, beyond the potential spillover effects
on these entities and effects on efficiency, competition, investor
protection, and capital formation in securities markets. See infra
Section V.F.2.i. (Affected Participants).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule tailors, removes, or alters the scope of various
covered fund requirements in the implementing regulations. Since
section 13 of the BHC Act and the implementing regulations impose a
number of different requirements, and, as discussed above, the type and
level of risk exposure of a banking entity is the result of a
combination of activities,\529\ it is difficult to attribute the
observed effects to a specific provision or subset of requirements. In
addition, analysis of the effects of the implementation of the 2013
rule is confounded by macroeconomic factors, other policy
interventions, and post-crisis changes to market participants' risk
aversion and return expectations.\530\ Because of the extended timeline
of implementation of section 13 of the BHC Act and the overlap of the
period during which the 2013 rule was in effect with other post-crisis
changes affecting the same group or certain sub-groups of SEC
registrants, the SEC cannot rely on quantitative methods that might
otherwise provide insight into causal attribution and quantification of
the effects of section 13 of the BHC Act and the 2013 rule on measures
of capital formation, liquidity, competition, and informational or
allocative efficiency. Moreover, empirical measures of capital
formation or liquidity are substantially limited by the fact that they
do not provide insight into security issuance and transaction activity
that does not occur (or occurs in a sector of the market for which data
is not readily available) as a result of the implementing regulations.
Accordingly, it is difficult to quantify the primary security issuance
and secondary market liquidity that would have been observed since the
financial crisis absent various provisions of section 13 of the BHC Act
and the implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\529\ See, e.g., 2013 rule at 5541.
\530\ With respect to the 2019 amendments, supra note 8,
analysis of the effects is difficult because of the relatively short
time that has passed since they became effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, the existing securities markets--including market
participants, their business models, market structure, etc.--differ in
significant ways from the securities markets that existed prior to
enactment of section 13 of the BHC Act and the implementation of the
2013 rule. For example, the role of dealers in intermediating trading
activity has changed in important ways, including the following: (1) In
recent years, on both an absolute and relative basis, bank dealers
generally committed less capital to intermediation activities while
non-bank dealers generally committed more, although not always in the
same manner or on the same terms as bank dealers; (2) the volume and
profitability of certain trading activities after the financial crisis
may have decreased for bank dealers while it may have increased for
other intermediaries, including non-bank entities that provide intraday
liquidity, but generally not overnight liquidity, including in some
sectors of the market through the use of electronic trading algorithms
and high speed access to data and trading venues; and (3) the
introduction of alternative credit markets, including non-bank direct
lending markets, may have contributed to liquidity fragmentation across
markets while potentially increasing access to capital.\531\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\531\ See U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, Access to Capital and Market
Liquidity (Aug. 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/files/access-to-capital-and-market-liquidity-study-dera-2017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where possible, the SEC has attempted to quantify the costs and
benefits it expects to result from the final rule. In many cases,
however, the SEC is unable to quantify these potential economic
effects. Some of the primary economic effects, such as the effect on
incentives that may give rise to conflicts of interest in various
regulated entities and the degree to which the implementing regulations
may be impeding activity of banking entities with respect to certain
investment vehicles, are inherently difficult to quantify. Moreover,
some of the intended benefits of the implementing regulations'
definitions and prohibitions that the agencies are amending include the
potential for more resilient markets during a financial crisis or
during periods of severe market stress. These intended benefits are
less readily observable under periods of strong economic conditions,
periods of significant government credit accommodation, and when
markets have significant liquidity and are less volatile. Even
following an economic shock, identification of these intended benefits
requires a sufficient amount of data covering a relevant sample period.
Moreover, identifying these benefits following an economic shock could
prove difficult if the effects of past regulation are confounded by
other interventions aimed at mitigating the impact of the shock on
financial markets, including regulation, credit accommodation, and
fiscal stimulus. Finally, it is difficult to quantify the net economic
effects of any individual amendment because of overlapping
implementation periods of various post-crisis regulations. Further, it
is difficult to quantify the net economic effects of any individual
amendment because of the fact that many market participants changed
their behavior in anticipation of future changes in regulation.
In some instances, the SEC lacks the information or data necessary
to provide reasonable estimates for the economic effects of the final
rule. For example, the SEC lacks information and data on how market
participants may choose to restructure their relationships with various
types of entities in response to the final rule; the amount of capital
formation in covered funds that does not occur because of current
covered fund provisions, including those concerning the definition of
covered fund, restrictions on relationships with covered funds, the
definition of ownership interest, and the exclusion for loan
securitizations; the volume of loans, guarantees, securities lending,
and derivatives activity dealers may wish to engage in with related
covered funds; as well as the extent of risk reduction associated with
the covered fund provision of the 2013 rule. Where the SEC cannot
quantify the relevant economic effects, they are discussed in
qualitative terms.
2. Economic Baseline
In the context of this economic analysis, the economic costs and
benefits, and the impact of the final rule on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation, are considered relative to a baseline that
includes the implementing regulations (including the 2013 rule and the
2019 amendments), legislative amendments in EGRRCPA, and current
practices aimed at compliance with these regulations.
i. Regulation
The SEC is assessing the economic impact of the final rule against
a baseline that includes the legal and regulatory framework as it
exists at the
[[Page 46472]]
time of this release. Thus, the regulatory baseline for the SEC's
economic analysis includes section 13 of the BHC Act as amended by
EGRRCPA, and the 2013 rule. Further, the baseline accounts for the fact
that since the adoption of the 2013 rule, the agencies have adopted the
2019 amendments, which, among other things, relate to the ability of
banking entities to engage in certain activities, including
underwriting, market-making, and risk-mitigating hedging, with respect
to ownership interests in covered funds, as well as amendments
conforming the 2013 rule to sections 203 and 204 of EGRRCPA. In
addition, the agencies' staffs have provided FAQ responses related to
the regulatory obligations of banking entities, including SEC-regulated
entities that are also banking entities under the 2013 rule, which
likely influenced these entities' decisions about how to comply with
the 2013 rule and may influence these entities' decisions about how to
comply with the 2019 amendments.\532\ The Federal banking agencies also
issued the policy statement in 2017 with respect to foreign excluded
funds, and has since extended the policy statement to 2021.\533\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\532\ See supra note 14.
\533\ See supra Section VI.A. (Qualifying Foreign Excluded
Funds) and notes 26 and 28 (discussion of ``the policy statement'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the 2013 rule also included restrictions on proprietary
trading and compliance requirements (as modified by the 2019
amendments), the most relevant portion of the 2013 rule for
establishing an economic baseline is that involving covered fund
restrictions.\534\ The features of the regulatory framework under the
2013 rule most relevant to the baseline include the definition of the
term ``covered fund''; restrictions on a banking entity's relationships
with covered funds; and restrictions on parallel investment, co-
investment, and investments in the fund by banking entity employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\534\ See 84 FR 61974.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Covered Fund Definition
The definition of ``covered fund'' impacts the scope of the
substantive prohibitions on banking entities acquiring or retaining an
ownership interest in, sponsoring, and having certain relationships
with, covered funds. The implementing regulations define covered funds,
in part, as issuers that would be investment companies but for section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act and then excludes
specific types of entities from the definition. The definition also
includes certain commodity pools as well as certain foreign funds.
Funds that rely on the exclusions in sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
Investment Company Act are covered funds unless an exclusion from the
covered fund definition is available. Funds that rely on any exclusion
or exemption from the definition of ``investment company'' under the
Investment Company Act, other than the exclusion contained in section
3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7), such as real estate and mortgage funds that rely on
the exclusion in section 3(c)(5)(C), are not covered funds under the
implementing regulations. The covered fund provisions of the
implementing regulations may reduce the ability and incentives of
banking entities to bail out affiliated funds to mitigate reputational
risk, limit conflicts of interest with clients, customers, and
counterparties, and reduce the ability of banking entities to engage in
proprietary trading indirectly through funds.
The broad definition of covered funds encompasses many different
types of vehicles, and the implementing regulations exclude some of
them from the definition of a covered fund.\535\ The excluded fund
types relevant to the baseline are funds that are regulated by the SEC
under the Investment Company Act: Registered investment companies
(RICs) and business development companies (BDCs). Seeding vehicles for
these funds are also excluded from the covered fund definition during
their seeding period.\536\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\535\ The exclusions from the covered fund definition are set
forth in Sec. __.10(c) of the implementing regulations.
\536\ See implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(12)(i)
and __.10(c)(12)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restrictions on Relationships Between Banking Entities and Covered
Funds
Under the baseline, banking entities are limited in the types of
transactions in which they are able to engage with covered funds with
which they have certain relationships. Banking entities that serve,
directly or indirectly, as the investment manager, adviser, or sponsor
to a covered fund are prohibited from engaging in a ``covered
transaction,'' as defined in section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act,
with the covered fund or with any other covered fund that is controlled
by such covered fund.\537\ Similarly, a banking entity that organizes
and offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. __.11 or that continues to
hold an ownership interest in a covered fund in accordance with Sec.
__.11(b) is prohibited from engaging in such a ``covered transaction.''
This prohibits all ``covered transactions'' that cause the banking
entity to have credit exposure to the affiliated covered fund,
including short-term extensions of credit and various other
transactions required for a banking entity to provide an affiliated
covered fund payment, clearing, and settlement services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\537\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.14(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of ``Banking Entity''
For foreign banking entities,\538\ certain funds organized under
foreign law and offered to foreign investors (``foreign excluded
funds'') are not ``covered funds'' under the implementing regulations,
but may be subject to the implementing regulations as ``banking
entities'' under certain circumstances. Through the policy statement,
the Federal banking agencies (in consultation with the staffs of the
SEC and the CFTC) have provided temporary relief, that is currently
scheduled to expire on July 21, 2021, for qualifying foreign excluded
funds that may otherwise be subject to the implementing regulations as
banking entities.\539\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\538\ For purposes of this analysis, ``foreign banking entity''
has the same meaning as used in the policy statement, supra note 27,
i.e., a banking entity that is not, and is not controlled directly
or indirectly by, a banking entity that is located in or organized
under the laws of the United States or any state.
\539\ See supra note 26 and 28. For purposes of the policy
statement, a ``qualifying foreign excluded fund'' means, with
respect to a foreign banking entity, an entity that (1) is organized
or established outside the United States and the ownership interests
of which are offered and sold solely outside the United States; (2)
would be a covered fund were the entity organized or established in
the United States, or is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or
arrangement that raises money from investors primarily for the
purpose of investing in financial instruments for resale or other
disposition or otherwise trading in financial instruments; (3) would
not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the foreign
banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership interest
in, or sponsorship of, the entity; (4) is established and operated
as part of a bona fide asset management business; and (5) is not
operated in a manner that enables the foreign banking entity to
evade the requirements of section 13 or implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of ``Ownership Interest''
The implementing regulations prohibit a banking entity, as
principal, from directly or indirectly acquiring or retaining an
``ownership interest'' in a covered fund.\540\ The implementing
regulations define an ``ownership interest'' in a covered fund to mean
any equity, partnership, or other similar interest. Under the
implementing regulations, ``other similar interest'' is defined as an
interest that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\540\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees,
[[Page 46473]]
investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor of
the covered fund (excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise
remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration
event);
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights above.\541\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\541\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The implementing regulations permit a banking entity to acquire and
retain an ownership interest in a covered fund that the banking entity
organizes and offers pursuant to Sec. __.11, but limits such ownership
interests to three percent of the total number or value of the
outstanding ownership interests of such fund (the per-fund limit).\542\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\542\ Implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.12(a)(1)(ii) and
__.12(a)(2)(ii)(A). The implementing regulations also require that
the aggregate value of all ownership interests of a banking entity
and its affiliates in all covered funds acquired or retained under
Sec. __.12 may not exceed three percent of the tier 1 capital of
the banking entity. Implementing regulations Sec. __.12(a)(2)(iii)
(the aggregate funds limit).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loan Securitizations
As discussed above, section 13 of the BHC Act provides a rule of
construction that explicitly allows the sale and securitization of
loans as otherwise permitted by law.\543\ Accordingly, the implementing
regulations exclude from the covered fund definition entities that
issue asset-backed securities if they meet specified conditions,
including that they hold only loans, certain rights and assets, and a
small set of other financial instruments (permissible assets).\544\ In
addition, the baseline includes the FAQs issued by agencies' staff in
June 2014 regarding the servicing asset provision of the loan
securitization exclusion.\545\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\543\ 13 U.S.C. 1851(g)(2). See also supra Section IV.B.2 (Loan
Securitizations).
\544\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(8). Loan is
further defined as any loan, lease, extension of credit, or secured
or unsecured receivable that is not a security or derivative.
Implementing regulations rule Sec. __.2(t).
\545\ See supra Section IV.B.2 (Loan Securitizations, discussion
of servicing assets).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Welfare and SBIC Exclusions
Under the implementing regulations, issuers in the business of
making investments that are designed primarily to promote the public
welfare, of the type permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of
the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24),\546\ are
excluded from the covered fund definition. Similarly, the implementing
regulations exclude from the covered fund definition small business
investment companies (SBICs) and issuers that have received notice from
the Small Business Administration to proceed to qualify for a license
as a SBIC and for which the notice or license has not been
revoked.\547\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\546\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(11)(ii).
\547\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(11)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attribution of Certain Investments to a Banking Entity
As discussed above, the implementing regulations include a per-fund
limit and aggregate fund limit on a banking entity's ownership of
covered funds that the banking entity organizes and offers.\548\ The
preamble to the 2013 rule stated, ``if a banking entity makes
investments side by side in substantially the same positions as a
covered fund, then the value of such investments shall be included for
purposes of determining the value of the banking entity's investment in
the covered fund.'' \549\ The agencies also stated that a banking
entity that sponsors a covered fund should not make any additional
side-by-side co-investment with the covered fund in a privately
negotiated investment unless the value of such co-investment is less
than 3% of the value of the total amount co-invested by other investors
in such investment.\550\ The 2019 amendments eliminated the aggregate
fund limit and capital deduction requirement under Sec. __.12(d) for
the value of ownership interests held by banking entities in third-
party covered funds (e.g., covered funds that those banking entities do
not organize or offer), acquired or retained as a result of certain
underwriting or market-making activities. However, the 2019 amendments
did not change or amend the application of the per-fund limit or
aggregate funds limit to co-investments alongside a covered fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\548\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.12(a). See also
supra Section IV.E.2. (Ownership Interest--Fund Limits and Covered
Fund Deduction).
\549\ 79 FR 5734.
\550\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of calculating the aggregate fund limit and the
capital deduction requirement, the implementing regulations require
attribution to a banking entity of restricted profit interests in a
covered fund as ownership interests in the covered fund for which the
banking entity serves as investment manager, investment adviser,
commodity trading advisor, or other service provider.\551\ Under the
implementing regulations, for purposes of calculating a banking
entity's compliance with the aggregate fund limit and the capital
deduction requirement, a banking entity must include any amounts paid
by the banking entity or an employee in connection with obtaining a
restricted profit interest in the covered fund.\552\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\551\ Implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii) and
__.12(c)(1), (d). See also 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(G).
\552\ Implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.12(c)(1), (d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Affected Participants
The SEC-regulated entities directly affected by the final rule
include broker-dealers, security-based swap dealers, and investment
advisers. The implementing regulations impose a range of restrictions
and compliance obligations on banking entities with respect to their
covered fund activities and investments. To the degree that the final
rule reduces or otherwise alters the scope of private funds subject to
covered fund restrictions, SEC-registered banking entities, including
broker-dealers, security-based swap dealers, and investment advisers
may be affected.
Broker-Dealers \553\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\553\ This analysis is based on data from Reporting Form FR Y-9C
for domestic holding companies on a consolidated basis and Report of
Condition and Income for banks regulated by the Board, FDIC, and OCC
for the most recent available four-quarter average, as well as data
from S&P Market Intelligence LLC on the estimated amount of global
trading activity of U.S. and non-U.S. bank holding companies.
Broker-dealer bank affiliations were obtained from the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council's National Information
Center. Broker-dealer assets and holdings were obtained from FOCUS
Report data for Q4 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the implementing regulations, some of the largest SEC-
regulated
[[Page 46474]]
broker-dealers are banking entities. Table 1 reports the number, total
assets, and holdings of broker-dealers affiliated with banks and
broker-dealers that are not.
While the 3,487 domestic broker-dealers that are not affiliated
with banks greatly outnumber the 202 banking entity broker-dealers
subject to the implementing regulations, banking entity broker-dealers
dominate non-banking entity broker-dealers in terms of total assets
(72% of total broker-dealer assets) and aggregate holdings (66% of
total broker-dealer holdings).
Table 1--Broker-Dealer Count, Assets, and Holdings by Affiliation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Holdings
Broker-dealer affiliation Number Total assets, Holdings, $mln (alternative),
$mln \554\ \555\ $mln \556\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected bank broker-dealers \557\.............. 202 3,240,045 777,192 607,086
Non-bank broker-dealers \558\................... 3,487 1,258,510 404,754 255,380
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 3,689 4,498,556 1,181,946 862,466
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Security-Based Swap Dealers
The final rule may also affect bank-affiliated SBSDs. As compliance
with SBSD registration requirements is not yet required, there are
currently no registered SBSDs. However, the SEC has previously
estimated that as many as 50 entities may potentially register with the
SEC as security-based swap dealers and that as many as 16 may already
be SEC-registered broker-dealers.\559\ Given the analysis of DTCC
Derivatives Repository Limited Trade Information Warehouse (TIW)
transaction and positions data on single-name credit-default swaps and
consistent with other recent SEC rulemakings, the SEC preliminarily
believes that 41 entities that may register with the SEC as SBSDs are
bank-affiliated firms, including those that are SEC-registered broker-
dealers. Therefore, the SEC preliminarily estimates that, in addition
to the bank-affiliated SBSDs that are already registered as broker-
dealers and included in the discussion above, as many as 25 other bank-
affiliated SBSDs may be affected by the final rule.\560\ Similarly, the
SEC's analysis of TIW data suggests that none of the entities that may
register with the SEC as Major Security-Based Swap Participants are
affected by the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\554\ Broker-dealer total assets are based on FOCUS report data
for ``Total Assets.''
\555\ Broker-dealer holdings are based on FOCUS report data for
securities and spot commodities owned at market value, including
bankers' acceptances, certificates of deposit and commercial paper,
state and municipal government obligations, corporate obligations,
stocks and warrants, options, arbitrage, other securities, U.S. and
Canadian government obligations, and spot commodities.
\556\ This alternative measure excludes U.S. and Canadian
government obligations and spot commodities.
\557\ This category includes all bank-affiliated broker-dealers
except those exempted by section 203 of EGRRCPA.
\558\ This category includes both bank affiliated broker-dealers
subject to section 203 of EGRRCPA and broker-dealers that are not
affiliated with banks or holding companies.
\559\ See Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Security-
Based Swap Dealers, Major Security-Based Swap Participants, and
Broker-Dealers, 84 FR 68550, 68607 (Dec. 16, 2019).
\560\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 6, 2021 is the compliance date for the SEC's registration
rules for SBSDs, as well as several rules applicable to those entities,
including segregation requirements and non-bank capital and margin
requirements, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, business
conduct standards, and risk mitigation techniques.\561\ Accordingly,
the SEC recognizes that in anticipation of the compliance date for
registration, firms may choose to restructure their security-based swap
trading activity into (or out of) an affiliated bank or an affiliated
broker-dealer instead of registering as a standalone SBSD if bank or
broker-dealer capital and other regulatory requirements are less (or
more) costly than those that may be imposed on SBSDs under Title VII.
As a result, the above figures may overestimate or underestimate the
number of SBSDs that are not broker-dealers and that may become SEC-
registered entities affected by the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\561\ See Capital, Margin, and Segregation Adopting Release,
supra note 517, at 43954. See also Rule Amendments and Guidance
Addressing Cross-Border Application of Certain Security-Based Swap
Requirements, 85 FR 6270, 6345-49 (Feb. 4, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Funds and Private Fund Advisers \562\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\562\ These estimates are calculated from Form ADV data as of
December 31, 2019. An investment adviser is defined as a ``private
fund adviser'' for the purposes of this economic analysis if it
indicates that it is an adviser to any private fund on Form ADV Item
7.B. An investment adviser is defined as a ``banking entity RIA'' if
it indicates on Form ADV Item 6.A.(7) that it is actively engaged in
business as a bank, or it indicates on Form ADV Item 7.A.(8) that it
has a ``related person'' that is a banking or thrift institution.
For purposes of Form ADV, a ``related person'' is any advisory
affiliate and any person that is under common control with the
adviser. The definition of ``control'' for purposes of Form ADV,
which is used in identifying related persons on the form, differs
from the definition of ``control'' under the BHC Act. In addition,
this analysis does not exclude SEC-registered investment advisers
affiliated with banks that have consolidated total assets less than
or equal to $10 billion and trading assets and liabilities less than
or equal to 5% of total assets. Those banks are no longer subject to
the requirements of the 2013 rule following enactment of the
EGRRCPA. Thus, these figures may overestimate or underestimate the
number of banking entity RIAs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This section describes RIAs advising private funds that may be
affected by the final rule. Using Form ADV data, Table 2 reports the
number of RIAs advising private funds by fund type as defined in Form
ADV.\563\ Private funds rely on either section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of
the Investment Company Act and so meet the implementing regulations'
definition of ``covered fund.'' Table 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\563\ RIAs may also advise foreign public funds that are
excluded from the covered fund definition in the implementing
regulations, are the subject of the final rule discussed below, and
are not reported on Form ADV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46475]]
reports the number and gross assets of private funds advised by RIAs
and separately reports these statistics for banking entity RIAs. As can
be seen from Table 2, the two largest categories of private funds
advised by RIAs are hedge funds and private equity funds.\564\
Banking entity RIAs advise a total of 4,387 private funds with
approximately $2.089 trillion in gross assets. From Form ADV data,
banking entity RIAs' gross private fund assets under management are
concentrated in hedge funds and private equity funds. The SEC estimates
on the basis of this data that banking entity RIAs advise 890 hedge
funds with approximately $606 billion in gross assets and 1,518 private
equity funds with approximately $466 billion in assets.
Table 2--SEC-Registered Investment Advisers Advising Private Funds by
Fund Type \565\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking entity
Fund type All RIA RIA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hedge Funds............................. 2,620 151
Private Equity Funds.................... 1,738 96
Real Estate Funds....................... 551 51
Securitized Asset Funds................. 233 44
Venture Capital Funds................... 223 8
Liquidity Funds......................... 44 16
Other Private Funds..................... 1,060 140
-------------------------------
Total Private Fund Advisers......... 4,781 282
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--The Number and Gross Assets of Private Funds Advised by SEC-Registered Investment Advisers \566\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of private funds Gross assets, $bln
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fund type Banking entity Banking entity
All RIA RIA All RIA RIA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hedge Funds..................................... 10,445 890 8,048 606
Private Equity Funds............................ 16,217 1,518 4,119 466
Real Estate Funds............................... 3,699 320 732 94
Securitized Asset Funds......................... 2,000 380 767 145
Venture Capital Funds........................... 1,387 44 174 3
Liquidity Funds................................. 76 30 304 231
Other Private Funds............................. 4,757 1,206 1,543 542
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Private Funds......................... 38,581 4,387 15,685 2,089
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the SEC's economic analysis is informed by private
fund statistics submitted by certain RIAs of private funds through Form
PF as summarized in quarterly ``Private Fund Statistics.'' \567\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\564\ For purposes of Form ADV, ``private equity fund'' is
defined as ``any private fund that is not a hedge fund, liquidity
fund, real estate fund, securitized asset fund, or venture capital
fund and does not provide investors with redemption rights in the
ordinary course.'' See Form ADV: Instructions for Part 1A,
Instruction 6. For purposes of Form ADV, ``hedge fund'' is defined
as ``any private fund (other than a securitized asset fund): (a)
With respect to which one or more investment advisers (or related
persons of investment advisers) may be paid a performance fee or
allocation calculated by taking into account unrealized gains (other
than a fee or allocation the calculation of which may take into
account unrealized gains solely for the purpose of reducing such fee
or allocation to reflect net unrealized losses); (b) that may borrow
an amount in excess of one-half of its net asset value (including
any committed capital) or may have gross notional exposure in excess
of twice its net asset value (including any committed capital); or
(c) that may sell securities or other assets short or enter into
similar transactions (other than for the purpose of hedging currency
exposure or managing duration).
\565\ This table includes only the advisers that list private
funds on section 7.B.(1) of Form ADV. The number of advisers in the
``Total Private Fund Advisers'' row is not the sum of the rows that
precede it since an adviser may advise multiple types of private
funds. Each listed private fund type (e.g., real estate funds and
liquidity funds) is defined in Form ADV, and those definitions are
the same for purposes of the SEC's Form PF.
\566\ Gross assets include uncalled capital commitments on Form
ADV. The large decrease in Gross assets for Liquidity Funds from
that reported in the proposing release is due, in part, to the
removal of certain Form ADV data from one filer that contained an
erroneous value for gross assets.
\567\ See U.S. Sec. and Exchange Comm'n, Div. of Inv. Mgmt.
Analytics Office, Private Fund Statistics, Third Calendar Quarter
2019 (May 14, 2020), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/private-funds-statistics/private-funds-statistics-2019-q3-accessible.pdf. Statistics for preceding quarters are available
at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/private-funds-statistics.shtml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Investment Companies and Business Development Companies
The baseline also reflects the potential that a RIC or a BDC would
be treated as a banking entity where the RIC or BDC's sponsor is a
banking entity that holds 25% or more of the RIC or BDC's voting
securities after a seeding period.\568\ On the basis of SEC filings and
public data, the SEC estimates that, as of December 2019, there were
approximately 15,300 RICs \569\ and 101 BDCs. Although RICs and BDCs
are generally not themselves banking entities subject to the
implementing regulations, they may be indirectly affected by the
implementing regulations and the final rule, for example, if their
sponsors or advisers are banking entities. For instance, bank-
affiliated RIAs or their affiliates may reduce their level of
investment in the RICs or BDCs they advise, or potentially close those
funds, to eliminate the risk of those funds becoming banking entities
themselves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\568\ See, e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 61979.
\569\ This estimate includes open-end companies, exchange-traded
funds, closed-end funds, and non-insurance unit investment trusts
and does not include fund of funds. The inclusion of fund of funds
increases this estimate to approximately 16,800.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Business Investment Companies
Small business investment companies are generally ``privately owned
and managed investment funds, licensed and regulated by the Small
Business Administration (SBA), that use their own capital plus funds
borrowed with
[[Page 46476]]
an SBA guarantee to make equity and debt investments in qualifying
small businesses.'' \570\ The final rule provides relief with respect
to banking entity investments in SBICs during the wind-down process by
excluding from the definition of ``covered fund'' those SBICs.\571\
While the SEC does not have data to quantify the number of SBICs
undergoing wind-down, trends in the number of SBIC licenses can be
indicative of the turnover in the total number of SBIC licensees. For
example, according to SBA data, there were 295 SBIC licensees as of
March 31, 2020 \572\ and 299 SBIC licensees as of December 31,
2019.\573\ By contrast, as of September 30, 2017, there were 315 SBICs
licensed by the SBA.\574\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\570\ See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program Overview,
available at https://www.sba.gov/content/sbic-program-overview.
For purposes of the Advisers Act, an SBIC is (other than an
entity that has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a
business development company pursuant to section 54 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940): (A) A small business investment
company that is licensed under the Small Business Investment Act of
1958, (B) an entity that has received from the Small Business
Administration notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small
business investment company under the Small Business Investment Act
of 1958, which notice or license has not been revoked, or (C) an
applicant that is affiliated with 1 or more licensed small business
investment companies described in subparagraph (A) and that has
applied for another license under the Small Business Investment Act
of 1958, which application remains pending. 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(7).
\571\ Specifically, the final rule excludes from the definition
of ``covered fund'' any SBIC that has voluntarily surrendered its
license to operate as an SBIC in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and
does not make any new investments (with some exceptions) after such
voluntary surrender. See Sec. __.10(c)(11)(i).
\572\ See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program Overview as of
March 31, 2020, available at: https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/SBIC%20Quarterly%20Report%20as%20of%
20March_31_2020%20Amended%205.14.2020.pdf.
\573\ See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program Overview as of
December 31, 2019, available at https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/SBIC%20Quarterly%20Report%20as%20of%20December_31_2019.pdf.
\574\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule includes an exclusion for rural business investment
companies (RBICs) from the implementing regulations similar to that
provided to SBICs.\575\ As the SEC has discussed elsewhere,\576\ an
RBIC is defined in section 384A of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act as a company that is approved by the Secretary of
Agriculture and that has entered into a participation agreement with
the Secretary.\577\ Because SBICs and RBICs share the common purpose of
promoting capital formation in their respective sectors, advisers to
SBICs and RBICs are treated similarly under the Advisers Act in that
they have the opportunity to take advantage of expanded exemptions from
investment adviser registration.\578\ As of August 2019, there were 5
RBICs who were licensed by the USDA managing approximately $352 million
in assets.\579\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\575\ Under the implementing regulations, an SBIC is excluded
from the ``covered fund'' definition. See implementing regulations
Sec. __.10(c)(11)(i).
\576\ See Exemptions from Investment Adviser Registration for
Advisers to Certain Rural Business Investment Companies, 85 FR 13734
(Mar. 10, 2020) (``RBIC Investment Adviser Adopting Release'').
\577\ See the RBIC Advisers Relief Act of 2018, Public Law 115-
417, 132 Stat. 5438 (2019) (the ``RBIC Advisers Relief Act''). To be
eligible to participate as an RBIC, the company must be a newly
formed for-profit entity or a newly formed for-profit subsidiary of
such an entity, have a management team with experience in community
development financing or relevant venture capital financing, and
invest in enterprises that will create wealth and job opportunities
in rural areas, with an emphasis on smaller enterprises. See 7
U.S.C. 2009cc-3(a).
\578\ Following enactment of the RBIC Advisers Relief Act, supra
note 577, advisers to solely RBICs and advisers to solely SBICs are
exempt from investment adviser registration pursuant to Advisers Act
sections 203(b)(8) and 203(b)(7), respectively. The venture capital
fund adviser exemption deems RBICs and SBICs to be venture capital
funds for purposes of the registration exemption 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l).
Accordingly, the exclusion for certain venture capital funds
discussed below (see infra text accompanying notes 672 and 673)
which require that a fund be a venture capital fund as defined in
the SEC regulations implementing the registration exemption, could
include RBICs and SBICs to the extent that they satisfy the other
elements of the exclusion.
\579\ See RBIC Investment Adviser Adopting Release, supra note
576.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act established the ``opportunity zone''
program to provide tax incentives for long-term investing in designated
economically distressed communities.\580\ The program allows taxpayers
to defer and reduce taxes on capital gains by reinvesting gains in
``qualified opportunity funds'' (QOFs) that are required to have at
least 90 percent of their assets in designated low-income zones.\581\
In this regard, QOFs are similar to SBICs and public welfare companies.
The final rule provides relief to QOFs from the implementing
regulations that is similar to the relief provided to SBICs.\582\ SEC
staff is not aware of an official source for data regarding QOFs that
are available for investment, but some private firms collect and report
such data. One such firm reports that, as of April 2020, there were 406
QOFs that report raising $10.09 billion in equity, and have a
fundraising goal of $31.89 billion.\583\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\580\ Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Public Law 115-97, 131
Stat. 2054 (2017).
\581\ See U.S. Sec. and Exchange Comm'n & NASAA, Staff Statement
on Opportunity Zones: Federal and State Securities Laws
Considerations, available at https://www.sec.gov/2019_Opportunity-Zones_FINAL_508v2.pdf (``Opportunity Zone Statement'').
\582\ See supra note 575.
\583\ As reported by Novogradac, a national professional
services organization that collects and reports information on QOFs.
See https://www.novoco.com/resource-centers/opportunity-zone-resource-center/opportunity-funds-listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Costs and Benefits
Section 13 of the BHC Act generally prohibits banking entities from
acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having
certain relationships with covered funds, subject to certain
exemptions.\584\ The SEC's economic analysis concerns the potential
costs, benefits, and effects on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation of the final rule for five groups of market participants.
First, the final rule may impact SEC-registered investment advisers
that are banking entities, including those that sponsor or advise
covered funds and those that do not, as well as SEC-registered
investment advisers that are not banking entities that sponsor or
advise covered funds and compete with banking entity RIAs. Second, the
final rule permits dealers greater flexibility in providing services to
more types of funds since dealers can provide a broader array of
services to funds that would be excluded from the covered fund
definition. Third, banking entities that are broker-dealers or RIAs may
enjoy reduced uncertainty and greater flexibility in making direct
investments alongside covered funds. Fourth, the final rule may impact
private funds and other vehicles, including those entities scoped in or
out of the covered fund provisions of the implementing regulations, as
well as private funds competing with such funds. One such impact may be
seen to the extent that the final rule permits banking entities to
provide a full range of traditional customer-facing banking and asset
management services to certain entities, such as customer facilitation
vehicles and family wealth management vehicles. Fifth, to the extent
that the final rule impacts efficiency, competition, and capital
formation in covered funds or underlying securities, investors in, and
sponsors of, covered funds and underlying securities and issuers may be
affected as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\584\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the agencies carefully considered the competing
effects that could potentially result from the final rule and
alternatives. For example, the final rule could result in enhanced
competition among, and capital formation driven by, entities that would
be treated as covered funds under the implementing regulations.
[[Page 46477]]
The final rule could also potentially increase (or decrease) financial
and other risks posed by the ability to make investments in covered
funds in addition to or in lieu of direct investments; however, the
agencies have sought to mitigate the potential for increased risk and
other concerns by imposing various conditions on the exclusions
designed to address such risks.
In addition, to the extent that the covered fund provisions of the
implementing regulations limit fund formation, the final rule could
provide a greater ability for banking entities to organize funds and
attract capital from third party investors. This could increase
revenues for banking entities while reducing long-term compliance
costs; increase the availability of venture, credit, and other
financing, including for small businesses and start-ups; and, as a
result, increase capital formation. The SEC is not currently aware of
any information or data that would allow a quantification of the extent
to which the covered fund provisions of the implementing regulations
are inhibiting capital formation via funds. Therefore, the bulk of the
analysis below is necessarily qualitative. To the extent that the
covered fund provisions of the implementing regulations limit alignment
of interests between banking entities and their clients, customers, or
counterparties, and to the extent the final rule alters the alignment
of interests, the final rule could have a positive or negative effect
on conflict of interest concerns.
The final rule creates new recordkeeping requirements and revise
certain disclosure requirements. Specifically, a banking entity may
only rely on the exclusion for customer facilitation vehicles if the
banking entity and its affiliates maintain documentation outlining how
the banking entity intends to facilitate the customer's exposure to a
transaction, investment strategy or service provided by the banking
entity. As discussed above in Section V.B. (Paperwork Reduction Act)
\585\ and discussed further below, these new recordkeeping burdens may
impose an initial burden of $1,078,650 \586\ and an ongoing annual
burden of $1,078,650.\587\ In addition, under certain circumstances, a
banking entity must make certain disclosures with respect to an
excluded credit fund, venture capital fund, family wealth vehicle, or
customer facilitation vehicle, as if the entity were a covered fund. As
discussed above in Section V.B, these disclosure requirements may
impose an initial burden of $53,933 \588\ and an ongoing burden of
$1,402,245.\589\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\585\ For the purposes of the burden estimates in this release,
we are assuming the cost of $423 per hour for an attorney, from
SIFMA's Management and Professional Earnings in the Securities
Industry 2013 (available at https://www.sifma.org/resources/research/management-and-professional-earnings-in-the-securities-industry-2013/), modified to account for an 1800-hour work year and
multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee
benefits, and overhead, and adjusted for inflation.
\586\ In the 2019 amendments, amendments that sought, among
other things, to provide greater clarity and certainty about what
activities were prohibited by the 2013 rule--in particular, under
the prohibition on proprietary trading--and to better tailor the
compliance requirements to the risk of a banking entity's
activities, banking entity PRA-related burdens were apportioned to
SEC-regulated entities on the basis of the average weight of broker-
dealer assets in holding company assets. See 2019 amendments, 84 FR
62074. The SEC believes that such an approach would be inappropriate
for the PRA-related burdens associated with the final rule because
we do not have a comparable proxy for an investment adviser's
significance within the holding company. Since we do not have
sufficient information to determine the extent to which the costs
associated with any of the new recordkeeping and disclosure
requirements would be borne by SEC registrants specifically, we
report the entire burden estimated based on information in supra
Section V.B (Paperwork Reduction Act).
Initial recordkeeping burdens: (10 hours) x (255 entities) x
(Attorney at $423 per hour) = $1,078,650.
\587\ Annual recordkeeping burdens: (10 hours) x (255 entities)
x (Attorney at $423 per hour) = $1,078,650.
\588\ Initial recordkeeping burdens: (0.5 hours) x (255
entities) x (Attorney at $423 per hour) = $53,933.
\589\ Annual recordkeeping burdens: (0.5 hours) x (255 entities)
x (26 disclosures per year) x (Attorney at $423 per hour) =
$1,402,245.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The sections that follow discuss how each of the amendments in the
final rule change the implementing regulations, and the anticipated
costs and benefits of the amendments, subject to the caveat that not
all anticipated costs and benefits can be meaningfully quantified.\590\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\590\ See supra Section V.F.1.iii. (SEC Economic Analysis--
Analytical Approach).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
i. Amendments Related to Specific Types of Funds
As discussed above, the final rule modifies a number of the
provisions of the implementing regulations related to the treatment of
certain types of funds (e.g., credit funds, family wealth management
vehicles, small business investment companies, qualifying venture
capital funds, customer facilitation vehicles, foreign excluded funds,
foreign public funds, and loan securitizations).\591\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\591\ See supra Section IV. (Summary of the Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Broadly, such modifications reduce the number and types of funds
that are within the scope of the implementing regulations, impacting
the economic effects of section 13 of the BHC Act and the implementing
regulations.\592\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\592\ See, e.g., 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037-92.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form ADV data is not sufficiently granular to allow the SEC to
estimate the number of funds and fund advisers affected by the
exclusions from the covered fund definition added or modified by the
final rule and other relief addressed by the final rule. However, Table
2 and Table 3 in the economic baseline quantify the number and asset
size of private funds advised by banking entity RIAs by the type of
private fund they advise, as those fund types are defined in Form
ADV.\593\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\593\ These fund types include hedge funds, private equity
funds, real estate funds, securitized asset funds, venture capital
funds, liquidity, and other private funds. See supra note 564.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Form ADV data, the SEC estimates that approximately 151
banking entity RIAs advise hedge funds and 96 banking entity RIAs
advise private equity funds (as those terms are defined in Form
ADV).\594\ As can be seen from Table 2 in the economic baseline, 44
banking entity RIAs advise securitized asset funds. Table 3 shows that
banking entity RIAs advise 380 securitized asset funds with $145
billion in gross assets. Another 51 banking entity RIAs advise real
estate funds, and banking entity RIAs advise 320 real estate funds with
$94 billion in gross assets. Venture capital funds are advised by only
8 banking entity RIAs, and all 44 venture capital funds advised by
banking entity RIAs have in aggregate approximately $3 billion in gross
assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\594\ As noted in the economic baseline, a single RIA may advise
multiple types of funds. See supra note 565.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted elsewhere, the covered fund provisions of the implementing
regulations may limit the ability of banking entities to use covered
funds to circumvent the proprietary trading prohibition, reduce bank
incentives to bail out their covered funds, and mitigate conflicts of
interest between banking entities and their clients, customers, or
counterparties. As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the implementing
regulations may limit the ability of banking entities to conduct
traditional asset management activities and reduce the availability of
capital by imposing significant costs on some banking entities without
providing commensurate benefits.\595\ Moreover, the 2013 rule's
limitations on banking entities' investment in covered funds may be
more significant for certain covered funds that are typically small in
size such as many venture capital funds, with potentially more negative
spillover
[[Page 46478]]
effects on capital formation in the types of underlying securities in
which these types of funds invest.\596\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\595\ See 85 FR 12164.
\596\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule could reduce the scope of funds that need to be
analyzed for covered fund status or could simplify this analysis and
enable banking entities to own, sponsor, and have relationships with
the types of entities that the final rule excludes from the covered
fund definition. Accordingly, the final rule may reduce costs of
banking entity ownership in, sponsorship of, and transactions with
certain funds; may promote greater capital formation in, and
competition among such funds; and may improve access to capital for
issuers of the underlying debt or equity that those funds may purchase.
The final rule may also benefit banking entity dealers through
higher profits or greater demand for derivatives, margin, payment,
clearing, and settlement services. Reducing restrictions on banking
entities by further tailoring the covered fund definition may encourage
more launches of funds that are excluded from the definition, capital
formation and, possibly, competition in those types of funds. If
competition increases the quality of funds available to investors or
reduces the fees funds charge, investors in funds may benefit.
Moreover, to the degree that the final rule may increase the spectrum
of funds available to investors, the final rule may relax constraints
around investor portfolio optimization and increase the efficiency of
capital allocation.
The SEC received comments from a diverse set of commenters.
Comments from banking entities and financial services industry trade
groups were generally supportive of the proposal, although many
recommended additional modifications.\597\ There were also several
organizations and individuals that were generally opposed to the 2020
proposal.\598\ The sections that follow further discuss the economic
costs, benefits, and effects on competition, efficiency, and capital
formation with respect to specific types of funds and specific
amendments in the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\597\ See supra Section IV. (Summary of the Final Rule) for
discussion of comments and recommendations for each of the proposed
amendments.
\598\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Excluded Funds
Under the baseline, foreign excluded funds are excluded from the
covered fund definition, but could be considered banking entities if a
foreign banking entity controls the foreign fund in certain
circumstances.\599\ As discussed above, the policy statement released
by Federal banking agencies provides that the Federal banking agencies
would not propose to take action (1) against a foreign banking entity
based on attribution of the activities and investments of a qualifying
foreign excluded fund to the foreign banking entity \600\ or (2)
against a qualifying foreign excluded fund as a banking entity, in each
case where the foreign banking entity's acquisition or retention of any
ownership interest in, or sponsorship of, the qualifying foreign
excluded fund would meet the requirements for permitted covered fund
activities and investments solely outside the United States, as
provided in section 13(d)(1)(I) of the BHC Act and Sec. __.13(b) of
the implementing regulations, as if the qualifying foreign excluded
fund were a covered fund.\601\ As in the 2020 proposal, the final rule
provides a permanent exemption from the proprietary trading and covered
fund prohibitions for certain foreign excluded funds that is
substantively similar to the relief currently provided to qualifying
foreign excluded funds by the policy statement.\602\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\599\ See supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign Excluded
Funds).
\600\ Foreign banking entity was defined for purposes of the
policy statement to mean a banking entity that is not, and is not
controlled directly or indirectly by, a banking entity that is
located in or organized under the laws of the United States or any
State.
\601\ See supra note 26. The policy statement was subsequently
extended for a two-year period ending on July 21, 2021. See also
supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign Excluded Funds) and note 28.
\602\ See final rule Sec. Sec. __.6(f) and __.13(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters were generally supportive of the proposal to exempt
qualifying foreign excluded funds from certain requirements of the
rule.\603\ Two commenters expressed opposition to the proposed
exemption.\604\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\603\ SIFMA; BPI; BVI; AIC; ABA; EFAMA; SAF; IIB; JBA; CBA; and
Credit Suisse. See also supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign
Excluded Funds) for a discussion of individual comments.
\604\ See Occupy and Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC recognizes that failing to exclude such funds from the
definition of ``banking entity'' in the implementing regulations
imposed proprietary trading restrictions, covered fund prohibitions,
and compliance obligations on qualifying foreign excluded funds that
may be more burdensome than the requirements that would apply under the
implementing regulations to covered funds.
The SEC believes that, absent the qualifying foreign excluded fund
exemption and upon expiry of the policy statement, the implementing
regulations may have significant adverse effects on foreign banking
entities' ability to organize and offer certain private funds for
foreign investments, disrupting foreign asset management activities.
The SEC recognizes that the exemption of qualifying foreign excluded
funds from the proprietary trading and covered fund prohibitions that
apply to ``banking entities'' may result in increased activity by
foreign banking entities in organizing and offering such funds, and
that such activity may involve risk for those banking entities. At the
same time, the SEC recognizes a statutory purpose of certain portions
of section 13 of the BHC Act is to limit the extraterritorial impact on
foreign banking entities.\605\ Accordingly, the final rule may benefit
foreign banking entities and their foreign counterparties seeking to
transact with and through such funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\605\ See 85 FR 12123-26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies received comments on the 2020 proposal that expressed
concern that although qualifying foreign excluded funds would be
exempted from the proprietary trading and covered funds restrictions of
the implementing regulations, these funds would still be required to
put in place compliance programs.\606\ However, since these qualifying
foreign excluded funds are exempted from the proprietary trading
requirements of Sec. __.3(a) and covered fund restrictions of Sec.
__.10(a), the agencies believe that requiring compliance programs to be
established for the qualifying foreign excluded fund itself would be
overly burdensome and unnecessary. Therefore, under the final rule, in
addition to the proposed exemptions from the proprietary trading and
covered fund prohibitions, qualifying foreign excluded funds will also
not be required to have compliance programs under Sec. __.20. However,
any banking entity that owns or sponsors a qualifying foreign excluded
fund will still be required to have in place the appropriate compliance
programs as required by Sec. __.20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\606\ See IIB; JBA; CBA; EBF; and Credit Suisse.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The exemption is also expected to promote capital formation in the
United States. While qualifying foreign excluded funds have a limited
nexus to the United States, such funds are permitted to invest in U.S.
companies. Therefore, to the extent that these funds have any direct
impact on capital formation and U.S. financial stability, the exemption
would promote U.S. financial stability by providing additional capital
and liquidity to U.S. capital markets without a concomitant increase in
risk borne by U.S. banking entities.
[[Page 46479]]
The final rule may increase the incentive for some foreign banking
entities seeking to organize and offer qualifying foreign excluded
funds to reorganize their activities so that these funds' activities
qualify for the exemptions. The costs and feasibility of such
reorganization will depend on the complexity and existing compliance
structures for banking entities, the degree to which there is unmet
demand for investment funds that may be organized as qualifying foreign
excluded funds, and the profitability of such banking activities.
Importantly, the principal risk of foreign banking entities' activities
related to foreign excluded funds generally resides outside the United
States. As discussed above,\607\ because the exemption requires that
the foreign banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements in Sec. __.13(b) of the
final rule, the exemption will help to ensure that the risks of the
investments made by these foreign funds would be booked to foreign
entities in foreign jurisdictions. The agencies believe that exempting
the activities of qualifying foreign excluded funds promotes and
protects the safety and soundness of banking entities and U.S.
financial stability,\608\ and relatedly the SEC believes the exemption
is unlikely to impact negatively SEC registrants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\607\ See supra Section IV.A. (Qualifying Foreign Excluded
Funds).
\608\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Public Funds
The implementing regulations exclude from the covered fund
definition any foreign public fund that satisfies three sets of
conditions. First, the issuer must be organized or established outside
of the United States, be authorized to offer and sell ownership
interests to retail investors in the issuer's home jurisdiction (the
``home jurisdiction'' requirement), and sell ownership interests
predominantly through one or more public offerings outside of the
United States. The agencies stated in the preamble to the 2013 rule
that they generally expect that an offering is made predominantly
outside of the United States if 85 percent or more of the fund's
interests are sold to investors that are not residents of the United
States.\609\ Second, for funds that are sponsored by a U.S. banking
entity, or by a banking entity controlled by a U.S. banking entity, the
ownership interests in the issuer must be sold ``predominantly'' to
persons other than the sponsoring banking entity, the issuer, their
affiliates, directors of such entities, or employees of such entities
(the sales limitation). The agencies stated in the preamble to the 2013
rule that, consistent with the agencies' view concerning whether a
foreign public fund has been sold predominantly outside of the United
States, the agencies generally expect that a foreign public fund would
satisfy this additional condition if 85 percent or more of the fund's
interests are sold to persons other than the sponsoring U.S. banking
entity and the specified persons connected to that banking entity.\610\
Third, such public offerings must occur outside the United States, must
comply with applicable jurisdictional requirements (the compliance
obligation), may not restrict availability to investors having a
minimum level of net worth or net investment assets, and must have
publicly available offering disclosure documents filed or submitted
with the relevant jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\609\ 79 FR 5678.
\610\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule makes several changes to the foreign public fund
exclusion. First, the final rule removes the home jurisdiction
requirement.\611\ Second, the final rule makes the exclusion available
with respect to issuers authorized to offer and sell ownership
interests through one or more public offerings, removing the
requirement that the issuer sells ownership interests ``predominantly''
through such public offerings.\612\ Third, the agencies are also
modifying the definition of ``public offering'' from the implementing
regulations to add a new requirement that the distribution is subject
to substantive disclosure and retail investor protection laws or
regulations in one or more jurisdictions where ownership interests are
sold.\613\ Fourth, the final rule applies the compliance obligation
only in instances in which the banking entity serves as the investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool
operator, or sponsor.\614\ Finally, the final rule narrows the sales
limitation to the sponsoring banking entity, the issuer, affiliates,
and directors and senior executive officers of such entities, and
requires more than 75 percent of the fund's interest to be sold to such
entities and persons.\615\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\611\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(i)(B).
\612\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(i)(B).
\613\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(iii)(A).
\614\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(iii)(B).
\615\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comments
indicating that the foreign public fund exclusion under the
implementing regulations is impractical, overly narrow, and
prescriptive, and results in competitive disparities between foreign
public funds and RICs.\616\ The SEC also received comment that the home
jurisdiction requirement under the implementing regulations is narrow
and fails to recognize the prevalence of non-U.S. retail funds
organized in one jurisdiction and authorized to sell interests in other
jurisdictions.\617\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\616\ See 85 FR 12166.
\617\ Such funds could be organized in a particular jurisdiction
for reasons including tax treatment, investment strategy, or
flexibility to distribute into multiple markets (for instance, in
the European Union), even though such funds are authorized to sell
interests in other jurisdictions. See also id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As adopted in the final rule, the elimination of the home
jurisdiction requirement may benefit such foreign public funds and may
facilitate greater capital formation through such funds, with the
potential to create more capital allocation choices for investors. To
the degree that the implementing regulations have disadvantaged foreign
public funds relative to otherwise comparable RICs, the elimination of
the home jurisdiction requirement may dampen such competitive
disparities.
As also discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received
comment that the requirement that ownership interests be sold
``predominantly'' through one or more public offerings outside of the
United States has been burdensome and poses significant compliance
burdens.\618\ For example, banking entities may not fully observe and
predict both historical and potential future distributions of funds
that are sponsored by third parties, listed on exchanges, or sold
through third-party intermediaries or distributors.\619\ In response to
the 2020 proposal, commenters supported the elimination of the home
jurisdiction requirement and the requirement that the fund be sold
predominantly through one or more public offerings.\620\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\618\ See 85 FR 12166.
\619\ See id.
\620\ IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; BVI; and CBA.
See also supra Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public Funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the degree that some banking entities restrict their activities
because they are unable to quantify the volumes of distributions
through foreign public offerings relative to, for instance, foreign
private placements, the final rule may enable greater activity by
banking entities relating to foreign public funds. Similar to the above
discussion, this aspect of the final rule also treats foreign public
funds in a manner more similar to RICs (which are not required to
[[Page 46480]]
monitor or assess distributions), with corresponding competitive
effects.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal also supported the proposed change
to the ``public offering'' definition to include a requirement that the
distribution be subject to substantive disclosure and retail investor
protection laws or regulations.\621\ The final rule adopts that change,
as proposed. Accordingly, the final rule tailors the scope of
disclosure and compliance obligations for those jurisdictions where
ownership interests are sold in recognition of the prevalence of
foreign retail fund sales across jurisdictions. Similarly, the final
rule limits the compliance obligation to settings in which the banking
entity serves as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity
trading advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor--settings that may
involve greater conflicts of interest between banking entities and fund
investors than when the banking entity is only an investor in the fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\621\ IIB; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; and BVI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule also replaces the employee sales limitation with a
limitation on sales to senior executive officers.\622\ As discussed in
the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comment that banking entities
may face significant costs and logistical and interpretive challenges
monitoring investments by their employees, including those who transact
in fund shares through unaffiliated brokers or through independent
exchange trading.\623\ The SEC has also received comment that the
employee sales limitation serves no discernible anti-evasion
purpose.\624\ In addition, commenters noted that employee ownership
interest can be a meaningful mechanism of promoting incentive
alignment.\625\ The final rule replaces the employee sales limitation
with a corresponding sales limitation with respect only to senior
executive officers. This change may reduce these reported compliance
challenges and burdens while preserving, in part, the original anti-
evasion purpose of the limitations on employee ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\622\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(1)(ii)(D).
\623\ See 85 FR 12166.
\624\ See id.
\625\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC received comments to the 2020 proposal that recommended the
agencies modify their expectation of the level of ownership of a
foreign public fund that would satisfy the requirement that a fund be
``predominantly'' sold to persons other than its U.S. banking entity
sponsor and associated parties,\626\ which the preamble to the 2013
rule stated was 85 percent or more (which would permit the U.S. banking
entity sponsor and associated parties to own the remaining 15 percent).
These commenters asserted that the relevant ownership threshold for
U.S. registered investment companies is 25 percent, and that, for
foreign public funds, the threshold should be the same. The agencies
agree that the permitted ownership level of a foreign public fund by a
U.S. banking entity sponsor and associated parties should be aligned
with the functionally equivalent threshold for banking entity
investments in U.S. registered investment companies, which is 24.9
percent.\627\ Accordingly, the agencies have amended this provision in
the final rule to require that more than 75 percent of a foreign public
fund's interests must be sold to persons other than the U.S. banking
entity sponsor and associated parties.\628\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\626\ BPI; FSF; ICI; and CCMC. See also supra Section IV.B.1.
(Foreign Public Funds).
\627\ Although the implementing regulations do not explicitly
prohibit a banking entity from acquiring 25 percent or more of a
U.S. registered investment company, a U.S. registered investment
company would become a banking entity if it is affiliated with
another banking entity (other than as described in Sec.
__.12(b)(1)(ii) of the implementing regulations). See 79 FR 5732
(``[F]or purposes of section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule, a
registered investment company . . . will not be considered to be an
affiliate of the banking entity if the banking entity owns,
controls, or holds with the power to vote less than 25 percent of
the voting shares of the company or fund, and provides investment
advisory, commodity trading advisory, administrative, and other
services to the company or fund only in a manner that complies with
other limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.'').
\628\ See supra note 69.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters on the 2020 proposal generally supported the proposed
changes to the foreign public funds exclusion; \629\ however, as
discussed in this section and above, the agencies are making certain
targeted adjustments in response to comments received.\630\ One
commenter stated that the proposed changes were less than ideal for
maximum control but acceptable from a practical implementation
standpoint to balance compliance costs and benefits.\631\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\629\ IIB; SIFMA; BPI; ABA; EBF; EFAMA; FSF; ICI; BVI; CBA;
CCMR; Data Boiler; GS; IAA; JBA; SAF; and CCMC.
\630\ See supra Section IV.B.1. (Foreign Public Funds).
\631\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, the SEC believes that the foreign public fund
provisions of the final rule may facilitate greater capital formation
through such funds, with the potential to create more capital
allocation choices for investors. In particular, to the degree that
some banking entities restrict their activities relating to foreign
public funds because they are unable to quantify the distributions
through public offerings or determine the holdings of their employees,
the final rule may enable greater activity by banking entities relating
to foreign public funds. The final rule also limits the compliance
obligation to settings in which the banking entity serves as the
investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor,
commodity pool operator, or sponsor--settings that may involve greater
conflicts of interest between banking entities and fund investors than
when the banking entity is only an investor in the fund.
The agencies could have adopted a variety of alternatives offering
more or less relief with respect to foreign public funds. For example,
the agencies could have eliminated altogether the limit on sales to
affiliated entities, directors and employees, which would have provided
an even greater alignment of treatment between foreign public funds and
RICs.\632\ Alternatives providing greater relief with respect to
foreign public funds may have facilitated greater banking entity
activity and intermediation of such funds on the one hand, but they may
also have strengthened the competitive positioning of foreign public
funds relative to U.S. registered funds. Moreover, providing greater
relief with respect to foreign public funds may have allowed banking
entities greater flexibility in the formation and operation of foreign
public funds, but may also have increased the risk that banking
entities would be able to use foreign public funds to engage in
activities that the restrictions on covered funds were intended to
prohibit, thereby reducing the magnitude of the expected economic
benefits of section 13 of the BHC Act and the implementing regulations.
Similarly, relative to the final rule, alternatives providing less
relief with respect to foreign public funds may have strengthened the
competitive positioning of U.S. RICs relative to foreign public funds
and posed lower compliance or evasion risks, but may also have reduced
the benefits of the relief for capital formation in foreign public
funds and their investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\632\ See 2020 proposal at 12166.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loan Securitizations
The 2013 rule excludes from the definition of covered fund any loan
securitization that issues asset-backed securities, holds only loans,
certain
[[Page 46481]]
rights and assets that arise from the structure of the loan
securitization or from the loans supporting a loan securitization, and
a small set of other financial instruments (permissible assets), and
meets other criteria.\633\ As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC
received comment that, as a result of the 2013 rule, some banking
entities may have divested or restructured their interests in loan
securitizations due to the narrowly-drawn conditions of the exclusion,
and that a limited holding of non-loan assets may enable banking
entities to provide traditional securitization products and services
demanded by customers, clients, and counterparties.\634\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\633\ See 2013 rule Sec. __.10(c)(8). Loan is further defined
as any loan, lease, extension of credit, or secured or unsecured
receivable that is not a security or derivative. See also 2013 rule
Sec. __.2(t).
\634\ See 85 FR 12173.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The implementing regulations permit loan securitizations to hold
rights or other assets (servicing assets) that arise from the structure
of the loan securitization or from the loans supporting a loan
securitization.\635\ In response to questions regarding the scope of
the provisions permitting servicing assets and a separate provision
limiting the types of permitted securities, the staffs of the agencies
released the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ.\636\ The final rule
codifies the staff-level approach to the loan securitization exclusion
in the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ.\637\ To the degree that
market participants may have restructured their activities consistent
with the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ, an effect of the final rule
may be to reduce uncertainty. However, the economic effects of the
codification of the Loan Securitization Servicing FAQ with respect to
enabling greater capital formation through loan securitizations on the
one hand, and increasing potential risks related to such activities on
the other, may be limited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\635\ Implementing regulations Sec. Sec. __.2(s);
__.10(c)(8)(i)(D), (v).
\636\ See supra note 14 (links to the staff-level FAQs) and 78
and referencing paragraph (discussion of Loan Securitization
Servicing FAQ).
\637\ Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the preamble to the 2013 rule, the agencies declined to permit
loan securitizations to hold a certain amount of non-loan assets.\638\
Several commenters on the 2018 proposal disagreed with the agencies'
views and supported expanding the range of permissible assets in an
excluded loan securitization.\639\ The 2020 proposal would have allowed
a loan securitization vehicle to hold up to five percent of the fund's
total assets in any non-loan assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\638\ 2013 rule at 5687-88.
\639\ See 85 FR 12129.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters were generally supportive of allowing loan
securitizations to hold a limited amount of non-loan assets.\640\ These
commenters indicated that the requirements under the implementing
regulations for the loan securitization exclusion have been too
restrictive, excessively limited use of the exclusion, and prevented
issuers from responding to investor demand. Further, commenters
suggested that a limited bucket of non-loan assets would not
fundamentally alter the characteristics and risks of securitizations or
otherwise increase risks in banking entities or the financial
system.\641\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\640\ See, e.g., SIFMA; CCMC; ABA; Credit Suisse; MFA; Goldman
Sachs; LSTA; BPI; and SFA.
\641\ See, e.g., LSTA and Goldman Sachs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the final rule, the agencies are revising the loan
securitization exclusion to permit a loan securitization to hold a
limited amount of debt securities.\642\ To minimize the potential for
banking entities to use this exclusion to engage in impermissible
activities or take on excessive risk, the final rule permits a loan
securitization to hold debt securities (excluding asset-backed
securities and convertible securities), as opposed to any non-loan
asset, as the 2020 proposal would have allowed.\643\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\642\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
\643\ The implementing regulations also allow an excluded loan
securitization to hold certain interest rate and foreign exchange
derivatives for risk management purposes. The final rule makes no
change to this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC believes that non-loan assets with materially different
risk characteristics from loans could change the character and
complexity of an issuer and raise the type of concerns that section 13
of the BHC Act was intended to address. Moreover, as described further
below, limiting the assets to those with risk characteristics that are
similar to loans may allow for a simpler and more transparent
calculation of the five percent limit than would have been necessary if
loan securitizations could invest in any non-loan asset, which will
facilitate banking entities' compliance with the exclusion.
Alternatively, the agencies could have expanded the range of
permissible assets in an excluded loan securitization to include any
non-loan asset with or without limitations (e.g., the holding of asset-
backed securities could have been permitted). Permitting loan
securitizations to hold small amounts of non-loan assets may have
enabled loan securitizations to respond to investor demand and may have
reduced compliance costs associated with ensuring that a loan
securitization holds only assets permitted under the exclusion.
However, permitting excluded loan securitizations to hold a broader
range of non-loan assets could have increased the risk that the
character and complexity of excluded loan securitizations would have
changed in a manner that raised the type of concerns that section 13 of
the BHC Act was intended to address.
However, the SEC recognizes that the loan securitization industry
may have evolved since the issuance of the 2013 rule. As a result, the
SEC believes that, even if the scope of non-loan assets permitted to be
held were expanded beyond debt securities, loan securitizations may
continue to have excluded non-loan assets. Further, permitting loan
securitizations to hold a small amount of debt securities will not
affect the applicable prudential requirements aimed at the safety and
soundness of banking entities. Banking entities currently take on a
variety of risks arising out of a broad range of permissible
activities, including the core traditional banking activity related to
the extension of credit and direct and indirect extension of credit by
banking entities flows through to the real economy in the form of
greater access to capital.
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies also requested comment on the
methodology for calculating the limit on non-loan assets. Several
commenters suggested using as a method for calculating the limit on
non-loan assets: The par value of assets on the day they are
acquired.\644\ These commenters suggested that relying on par value is
accepted practice in the loan securitization industry and would obviate
concerns related to tracking amortization or prepayment of loans in a
securitization portfolio.\645\ Another commenter indicated that the
limit should be calculated as the lower of the purchase price and par
value of the non-qualifying assets over the issuer's aggregate capital
commitments plus its subscription based credit facility.\646\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\644\ SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and LSTA.
\645\ SIFMA and BPI.
\646\ Goldman Sachs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to these comments, the agencies are clarifying the
methodology for calculating the five percent limit on non-loan
assets.\647\ As suggested by several commenters, the final rule
specifies that the limit on debt securities must be calculated at the
most recent
[[Page 46482]]
time of acquisition of such assets.\648\ Specifically, the aggregate
value of debt securities may not exceed five percent of the aggregate
value of loans, cash and cash equivalents, and debt securities, where
the value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents, and debt securities
is calculated using par value at the most recent time any such debt
security is purchased.\649\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\647\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
\648\ This limit applies to the debt securities that a loan
securitization may hold pursuant to final rule Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(i)(E).
\649\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies have determined a calculation methodology that is
intended to reduce compliance costs while ensuring that the investment
pool of a loan securitization is composed of loans. The agencies have
chosen the most recent time any such debt security is acquired as the
moment of calculation to simplify the manner in which the five percent
limit applies. This would permit an issuer that, at some point in its
life, held debt securities in excess of five percent of its assets to
continue to qualify for the exclusion if it came into compliance with
the five percent limit prior to the next acquisition of a debt security
that is subject to the five percent limit. The SEC believes that this
approach balances the cost of calculation with the benefits of
addressing the potential for evasion. The SEC believes that the
alternative of a continuous monitoring obligation (i.e., requiring an
excluded loan securitization to ensure that it held debt securities
below or at the five percent limit at all times, regardless of any
change in value of the securitization's assets) would have imposed
significant burdens on banking entities and could have caused an issuer
to be disqualified from the loan securitization exclusion based on
market events not under its control.
In the final rule, this calculation is based only on the value of
the loans and debt securities held under Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(8)(i)(A)
and (E) and the cash and cash equivalents held under Sec.
__.10(c)(8)(iii)(A) rather than the aggregate value of all of the
issuing entity's assets. The purpose of the five percent limit is to
ensure the investment pool of a loan securitization is composed of
loans. Therefore, the calculation takes into account the assets that
should make up the issuing entity's investment pool and excludes the
value of other rights or incidental assets, as well as derivatives held
for risk management. This further simplifies the calculation
methodology by excluding assets that may be more complex to value and
that are ancillary to the loan securitization's investment activities.
This straightforward calculation methodology will ensure that the loan
securitization exclusion remains easy to use and will facilitate
banking entities' compliance with the exclusion.
The agencies recognize that a loan securitization's transaction
agreements may require that some categories of loans, cash equivalents,
or debt securities be valued at fair market value for certain purposes.
To accommodate such situations, the exclusion provides that the value
of any loan, cash equivalent, or permissible debt security may be based
on its fair market value if (1) the issuing entity is required to use
the fair market value of such loan or debt security for purposes of
calculating compliance with concentration limitations or other similar
calculations under its transaction agreements and (2) the issuing
entity's valuation methodology values similarly situated assets, for
example non-performing loans, consistently. This provision is intended
to provide issuers with the flexibility to leverage existing
calculation methodologies while preventing issuers from using
inconsistent methodologies in a manner to evade the requirements of the
exclusion.
Credit Funds
Under the baseline, funds that raise capital to engage in loan
originations or extensions of credit or purchase and hold debt
instruments that a banking entity would be permitted to acquire
directly may be ``covered funds'' under the implementing regulations.
As a result, prior to the final rule, banking entities faced
limitations on sponsoring or investing in credit funds that engage in
traditional banking activities--activities that banking entities are
able to engage in directly outside of the fund structure. The SEC
received several comments to the 2018 proposal supporting an exclusion
for credit funds. For example, some commenters suggested that a fund or
partnership structure enables banking entities to engage in permissible
activities more efficiently.\650\ Specifically, one commenter indicated
that credit funds facilitate investments by third parties, leading to
the creation of a broader and deeper pool of capital, which may allow
for more diversification in banking entities' lending portfolios, the
pooling of expertise of groups of market participants, and otherwise
reduce the risk for banking entities and the financial system.\651\ In
addition, some commenters stated that to the degree that credit funds
require pre-commitments of capital, they may dampen cyclical
fluctuations in loan originations and may facilitate ongoing extensions
of credit during times of market stress.\652\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\650\ See 85 FR 12167.
\651\ See id.
\652\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies included in the 2020 proposal a specific exclusion for
credit funds. Under the 2020 proposal, a credit fund would have been an
issuer whose assets consist solely of: Loans, debt instruments, related
rights and other assets that are related or incidental to acquiring,
holding, servicing, or selling loans, or debt instruments; and certain
interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives.\653\ The proposed
exclusion would have been subject to certain additional requirements to
reduce evasion concerns and ensure that banking entities invest in,
sponsor, or advise credit funds in a safe and sound manner. For
example, the proposed exclusion would have imposed (1) certain activity
requirements on the credit fund, including a prohibition on proprietary
trading; \654\ (2) disclosure and safety and soundness requirements on
banking entities that sponsor or serve as an advisor for a credit fund;
\655\ (3) safety and soundness requirements on all banking entities
that invest in or have certain relationships with a credit fund; \656\
and (4) restrictions on the banking entity's investment in, and
relationship with, a credit fund.\657\ The proposed exclusion also
would have permitted a credit fund to receive and hold a limited amount
of equity securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) that were
received on customary terms in connection with the credit fund's loans
or debt instruments.\658\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\653\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i).
\654\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii).
\655\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii).
\656\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv).
\657\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v).
\658\ 2020 proposal Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(1)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters on the 2020 proposal were generally supportive of
adopting an exclusion for credit funds.\659\ After consideration of the
comments, the agencies are adopting the credit fund exclusion largely
as proposed. The final rule creates a separate exclusion from the
covered fund definition for credit funds that meet certain conditions,
including several conditions that are similar to certain conditions of
the loan securitization exclusion, but that reflect
[[Page 46483]]
the structure and operation of credit funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\659\ See, e.g., CCMC; AIC; SIFMA; FSF; ABA; Arnold & Porter;
and Goldman Sachs. See also supra Section IV.C.1.ii. (Credit Funds--
Comments) for a more detailed discussion of comments received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule permits banking entities to extend credit through a
fund structure but also contains provisions to prevent a banking entity
from taking the types of risks that the covered fund provisions of
section 13 were meant to address. First, the credit fund exclusion
specifies the types of activities in which these funds may engage.
Excluded credit funds can transact in or hold only loans, debt
instruments that would be permissible for the banking entity relying on
the exception to hold directly, certain rights or assets that are
related or incidental to the loans or debt instruments, and certain
interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives. The final rule requires
that the credit fund not engage in activities that would constitute
proprietary trading. Finally, the restrictions on guarantees and other
limitations should eliminate the ability and incentive for either the
banking entity sponsoring a credit fund or any affiliate to provide
additional support beyond the ownership interest retained by the
sponsor.
Credit funds are likely to carry similar returns and risks as
direct extensions of credit and loan origination outside of the fund
structure, including the possibility of losses or gains related to
changes in interest rates, borrower default or delinquent payments,
fluctuations in foreign currencies, and overall market conditions.
While the presence of a fund structure may introduce certain common
risks associated with pooled investments, e.g., those related to
governance of the fund and those related to relying on third-party
investors providing capital to the fund, the SEC believes those risks
to banking entities to be limited. Moreover, fund structures also
entail certain common risk mitigating features (such as diversification
across a larger number of borrowers) as well as significant cost
efficiencies for banking entities.
The SEC believes that the credit fund exclusion may allow banking
entities to engage, indirectly, in more loan origination and
traditional extension of credit relative to the current baseline. To
the degree that banking entities are currently constrained in their
ability to engage in extensions of credit through credit funds because
of the implementing regulations, the exclusion may increase the volume
of intermediation of credit by banking entities and make intermediation
more efficient and less costly. In addition, permitting banking
entities to extend financing to businesses through credit funds could
allow banking entities to compete more effectively with non-banking
entities that are not subject to the same prudential regulation or
supervision as banking entities subject to section 13 of the BHC Act
and thereby likely result in an increase in lending activity in banking
entity-sponsored credit funds without negatively affecting capital
formation or the availability of financing. In this respect, the final
rule could result in greater competition between bank and non-bank
provision of credit with both expected lower costs that typically
result from increased competition and a larger volume of permissible
banking and financial activities to occur in the regulated banking
system. In addition, since cost reductions and increased efficiencies
are commonly passed along to customers, the exclusion may also benefit
banking entities' borrowers and facilitate the extension of credit in
the real economy.
The SEC continues to recognize that banking entities already engage
in a variety of permissible activities involving risk, including
extensions of credit, underwriting, and market-making. To the degree
that credit funds may enable greater formation of capital by banking
entities through various debt instruments, this may influence the risks
and returns of banking entities individually and of banking entities as
a whole. However, the SEC recognizes that the activities of credit
funds largely replicate permissible and traditional activities of
banking entities and undertaking similar activities largely results in
the same risk exposures. Moreover, banking entities subject to the
implementing regulations may also be subject to multiple prudential,
capital, margin, and liquidity requirements that facilitate the safety
and soundness of banking entities and promote the financial stability
of the United States. These requirements would necessarily limit the
risk that banks could take on by lending through a credit fund
structure in a similar manner that would apply if the banking entity
were to undertake similar lending activities directly. In addition, the
final rule includes a set of conditions on the credit fund exclusion,
including limitations on banking entities' guarantees, assumption or
other insurance of the obligations or performance of the fund,\660\ and
compliance with applicable safety and soundness standards.\661\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\660\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(A).
\661\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several provisions of the exclusion are similar to and modeled on
conditions in the existing loan securitization exclusion to ease
compliance burdens. For example, any derivatives held by the credit
fund must relate to loans, permissible debt instruments, or other
rights or assets held and reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to these holdings.\662\ In addition, any related
rights or other assets held that are securities must be cash
equivalents, securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to loans or debt instruments held or, unique to the credit
fund exclusion, equity securities (or rights to acquire equity
securities) received on customary terms in connection with the credit
fund's loans or debt instruments.\663\ Establishing an exclusion for
credit funds based on the framework provided by the loan securitization
exclusion will allow banking entities to provide traditional extensions
of credit regardless of the specific form, whether directly via a loan
made by a banking entity, or indirectly through an investment in or
relationship with a credit fund that transacts primarily in loans and
certain debt instruments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\662\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(D).
\663\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies requested comment on whether to
impose a limit on the amount of equity securities (or rights to acquire
equity securities) that may be held by an excluded credit fund.\664\
After a review of the comments and further deliberation, the agencies
are not adopting a quantitative limit on the amount of equity
securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) that may be held by
an excluded credit fund. Any such equity securities or rights are
limited by the requirements that they be (1) received on customary
terms in connection with the fund's loans or debt instruments and (2)
related or incidental to acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling
those loans or debt instruments. The agencies generally expect that the
equity securities or rights satisfying those criteria in connection
with an investment in loans or debt instruments of a borrower (or
affiliated borrowers) would not exceed five percent of the value of the
fund's total investment in the borrower (or affiliated borrowers) at
the time the investment is made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\664\ 85 FR 12133.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies could have imposed a quantitative limit on the amount
of equity securities (or rights to acquire equity securities) held by
the fund. However, the value of those equity securities or other rights
may change over time for a variety of reasons, including as a result of
market
[[Page 46484]]
conditions and business performance, as well as more fundamental
changes in the business and the credit fund's corresponding management
of the investment (e.g., exchanges of debt instruments for equity in
connection with mergers and restructurings or a disposition of all
portion of the credit investment without a corresponding disposition of
the equity securities or rights due to differences in market conditions
or other factors). Accordingly, the agencies can foresee various
circumstances where the relative value of such equity securities or
rights in a borrower (or affiliated borrowers) would over the life of
the investment exceed five percent on a basis consistent with the
requirements. Therefore, a quantitative limit on the amount of equity
securities held by the fund could have imposed compliance, opportunity,
and performance costs on a fund without a substantial reduction in risk
to the fund. Nonetheless, the agencies expect that the fund's exposure
to equity securities (or other rights), individually and collectively
and when viewed over time, would be managed on a basis consistent with
the fund's overall purpose.
The credit fund exclusion prevents a banking entity from relying on
the exclusion unless any debt instruments and equity securities (or
rights to acquire an equity security) held by the credit fund and
received on customary terms in connection with the credit fund's loans
or debt instruments are permissible for the banking entity to acquire
and hold directly. A banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser or commodity trading advisor of a credit fund must ensure that
the activities of the credit fund are consistent with certain safety
and soundness standards.\665\ In addition, a banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, a credit fund must be conducted
in compliance with, and subject to, applicable banking laws and
regulations, including applicable safety and soundness standards.\666\
Combined with the prohibition on proprietary trading by a credit
fund,\667\ these limitations are expected to prevent evasion of section
13 of the BHC Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\665\ Final rule Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iv)(B), (iii)(B).
\666\ Final rule Sec. Sec. __.10(c)(15)(v)(B).
\667\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule does not separately permit credit funds to hold
derivatives under the provision allowing related rights and other
assets. The preamble to the 2020 proposal made clear that ``any
derivatives held by the credit fund must relate to loans, permissible
debt instruments, or other rights or assets held, and reduce the
interest rate and/or foreign exchange risks related to these
holdings.'' \668\ The agencies suggested then and currently believe
that allowing a credit fund to hold derivatives not related to interest
rate or foreign exchange hedging would not be necessary to facilitate
the indirect extensions of credit by banking entities that are the goal
of the exclusion and may pose the very risks that section 13 of the BHC
Act was intended to reach. To help ensure that the credit fund
exclusion does not inadvertently allow the holding of certain
derivatives unrelated to hedging interest rate and/or foreign exchange
risks, the final rule explicitly excludes derivatives from permissible
related rights and other assets.\669\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\668\ See 85 FR 12132.
\669\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(i)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, extensions of credit and loan origination by banking
entities, whether directly or indirectly, are influenced by a wide
variety of factors, including the prevailing macroeconomic conditions,
the creditworthiness of borrowers and potential borrowers, competition
between bank and non-bank credit providers, and many others. Moreover,
the efficiencies of credit funds relative to direct extensions of
credit described above are likely to vary considerably among banking
entities and funds. The SEC recognizes that the potential effects
described above of the credit fund exclusion may be dampened or
magnified in different phases of the macroeconomic cycle and across
various types of banking entities.
Investors in a credit fund that a banking entity sponsors or for
which the banking entity serves as an investment adviser or commodity
trading advisor may have expectations related to the performance of the
credit fund that raise bailout concerns. To ensure that these investors
are adequately informed of the banking entity's role in the credit
fund, the final rule requires a banking entity that acts as a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an excluded credit
fund to provide prospective and actual investors the disclosures
specified in Sec. __.11(a)(8) of the implementing regulations as if
the credit fund were a covered fund.\670\ In addition, a banking entity
that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor must ensure that the activities of the credit fund are
consistent with safety and soundness standards that are substantially
similar to those that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the
activities directly.\671\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\670\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii)(A).
\671\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(15)(iii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As an alternative, the agencies could have adopted a credit fund
exclusion that restricted permissible assets to only loans or debt
instruments and not equity. The SEC recognizes that many banking
entities are permitted to take as consideration for a loan to a
borrower a warrant or option issued by the borrower that may result in
an equity holding. The SEC recognizes that if banking entities are to
be allowed to provide credit through a fund structure that they would
otherwise be allowed to provide outside of a fund structure, an
allowance for equity holdings is necessary. However, allowing a credit
fund to hold an unlimited amount of equity in connection with an
extension of credit could turn the exclusion for credit funds into an
exclusion for the type of funds that section 13 of the BHC Act was
intended to address. Accordingly, the agencies indicate above that they
generally expect that the equity securities or other rights acquired by
a credit fund would not exceed five percent of the value of the fund's
total investment in a borrower at the time the investment is made.
Venture Capital Funds
As discussed above, the agencies are adopting amendments in the
final rule to exclude certain venture capital funds from the definition
of ``covered fund,'' which allow banking entities to acquire or retain
an ownership interest in, or sponsor, those venture capital funds to
the extent the banking entity is otherwise permitted to engage in such
activities under applicable law.\672\ The exclusion is available with
respect to qualifying venture capital funds, which includes an issuer
that meets the definition of ``venture capital fund'' in 17 CFR
275.203(l)-1 and that meets several additional criteria.\673\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\672\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16).
\673\ See supra Section IV.C.2. (Venture Capital Funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A qualifying venture capital fund is an issuer that, among other
criteria, is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-
1.\674\ In the preamble to the regulations adopting this definition of
venture capital fund, the SEC explained that the definition's criteria
distinguish venture capital funds from other types of funds, including
private
[[Page 46485]]
equity funds and hedge funds.\675\ Moreover, the SEC explained that
these criteria reflect the Congressional understanding that venture
capital funds are less connected with the public markets and therefore
may have less potential for systemic risk.\676\ The SEC further
explained that the restriction on the amount of borrowing, debt
obligations, guarantees or other incurrence of leverage are appropriate
to differentiate venture capital funds from other types of private
funds that may engage in trading strategies that use financial leverage
and may contribute to systemic risk.\677\ The SEC believes that its
definition includes criteria reflecting the characteristics of venture
capital funds that may pose less potential risk to a banking entity
sponsoring or investing in venture capital funds and to the financial
system--specifically, the smaller role of leverage financing and a
lesser degree of interconnectedness with public markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\674\ See id. for a discussion of the SEC's definition of
``venture capital fund'' in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1. Following enactment
of the RBIC Advisers Relief Act, supra note 577, the SEC's
definition of ``venture capital fund'' includes any RBIC and any
SBIC. See 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l).
\675\ See, e.g., Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital
Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets
Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers, 76 FR 39645, 39652
(July 6, 2011).
\676\ See id. at 39648 (``[T]he proposed definition of venture
capital fund was designed to . . . address concerns expressed by
Congress regarding the potential for systemic risk.''); and at 39656
(``Congressional testimony asserted that these funds may be less
connected with the public markets and may involve less potential for
systemic risk. This appears to be a key consideration by Congress
that led to the enactment of the venture capital exemption. As we
discussed in the Proposing Release, the rule we proposed sought to
incorporate this Congressional understanding of the nature of
investments of a venture capital fund, and these principles guided
our consideration of the proposed venture capital fund
definition.'').
\677\ See id. at 39661-62. See also id. at 39657 (``We proposed
these elements of the qualifying portfolio company definition
because of the focus on leverage in the Dodd-Frank Act as a
potential contributor to systemic risk as discussed by the Senate
Committee report, and the testimony before Congress that stressed
the lack of leverage in venture capital investing.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comments
supporting an exclusion for venture capital funds and stating that
venture capital funds do not commonly engage in short-term, high-risk
activities, and that, by their nature, venture capital funds make long-
term investments in private firms.\678\ Moreover, the SEC received
comment that venture capital funds promote economic growth and
competitiveness of the United States more effectively than investments
in expressly permissible vehicles, such as small business investment
companies.\679\ The SEC has also received comment that, by virtue of
their investment strategy, long-term investment horizon, and
intermediation between companies in need of capital and institutional
investors seeking to deploy capital in efficient ways, venture capital
funds may play a significant role in capital formation, economic
growth, and efficient market function.\680\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\678\ See 85 FR 12168.
\679\ See id.
\680\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the 2020 proposal, the agencies received comments
supporting the proposed definition of ``qualifying venture capital
fund.'' \681\ At the same time, two commenters expressed opposition to
the 2020 proposal.\682\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\681\ See supra note 244.
\682\ See supra note 270.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule largely adopts the exclusion as proposed.\683\ As
adopted, the exclusion for qualifying venture capital funds is
available to an issuer that is a venture capital fund as defined in 17
CFR 275.203(l)-1 and does not engage in any activity that would
constitute proprietary trading, under Sec. __.3(b)(1)(i), as if it
were a banking entity.\684\ With respect to any banking entity that
acts as sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor to
the issuer, the banking entity is required (1) to provide in writing to
any prospective and actual investor the disclosures required under
Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if the issuer were a covered fund, (2) to ensure
that the activities of the issuer are consistent with the safety and
soundness standards that are substantially similar to those that would
apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities directly, and (3)
to comply with the restrictions in Sec. __.14 (except the banking
entity may acquire and retain any ownership interest in the issuer), as
if the issuer were a covered fund.\685\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\683\ The one change from the proposal is moving the requirement
that the banking entity must comply with Sec. Sec. __.14 to
__.10(c)(16)(ii). This change clarifies that this requirement
applies to a banking entity that acts as sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to the qualifying venture
capital fund and does not apply to a banking entity that merely
invests in a qualifying venture capital fund.
\684\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(i).
\685\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As in the 2020 proposal, a banking entity that relies on the
exclusion may not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the issuer.\686\
Finally, the banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship
with a qualifying venture capital fund must comply with the limitations
imposed in Sec. __.15 of the implementing regulations (regarding,
among other subjects, material conflicts of interest and high-risk
investments), as if the issuer were a covered fund; and must be
conducted in compliance with and subject to, applicable banking laws
and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.\687\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\686\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iii).
\687\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(16)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The qualifying venture capital fund exclusion being adopted may
provide banking entities with greater flexibility in their investments
in private firms generally and in private firms with a broader range of
financing sources, in each case to the extent that those investments
are made through a fund structure. In addition, it is widely noted that
the availability of venture capital and other financing from funds is
not uniform throughout the United States and is generally available on
a competitive basis for companies with a significant presence in
certain geographic regions (e.g., the New York metropolitan area, the
Boston metropolitan area, and ``Silicon Valley'' and surrounding
areas).\688\ This view was shared by several commenters on the 2020
proposal, who indicated that an exclusion for venture capital funds
would benefit underserved regions where venture capital funding is not
readily available currently.\689\ In this respect, the qualifying
venture capital fund exclusion could allow banking entities with a
presence in and knowledge of the areas where venture capital and other
types of financing are less readily available to businesses to provide
this type of financing in those areas, further promoting capital
formation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\688\ See, e.g., Richard Florida, Venture Capital Remains Highly
Concentrated in Just a Few Cities, CITYLAB (Oct. 3, 2017), available
at https://www.citylab.com/life/2017/10/venture-capital-concentration/539775/; PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS & CB INSIGHTS,
MoneyTree Report (Q3 2019), available at https://www.pwc.com/us/en/moneytree-report/assets/moneytree-report-q3-2019.pdf.
\689\ See FSF; SIFMA; CCMC; and NVCA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC remains cognizant of the fact that the overall level and
structure of activities of banking entities that involve risk stems
from a variety of permissible sources, including traditional capital
provision, underwriting, and market-making. To the degree that
qualifying venture capital funds may enable greater formation of
capital by banking entities, this may influence the risks and returns
of such funds individually and of banking entities as a whole. However,
the exclusion has a number of conditions, including a prohibition on
direct or indirect guarantees by the banking entity, disclosures to
investors, and compliance with applicable safety and soundness
standards.
The SEC recognizes that venture capital funds commonly invest in
[[Page 46486]]
illiquid private firms with few sources of market price information,
with corresponding risks and returns. To the degree that the exclusion
for qualifying venture capital funds facilitates banking entity
activities related to venture capital funds, this exclusion could
increase the volume and alter the structure of banking entities'
activities, affecting the risks associated with those activities. At
the same time, as discussed elsewhere,\690\ many other traditional and
permissible activities of banking entities involve risk, and the
provision of capital to private firms is an important function of
banking entities within the financial system and securities markets
that benefits the real economy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\690\ See 2019 amendments, 84 FR 62037-92.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As an alternative, the agencies considered an additional
restriction for which they are requested specific comment as part of
the 2020 proposal. Under this additional restriction, and
notwithstanding 17 CFR 275.203(1)-1(a)(2), the venture capital fund
exclusion would be limited to funds that do not invest in companies
that, at the time of the investment, have more than a limited dollar
amount of total annual revenue. The agencies considered several
alternative thresholds that could have been appropriate in this regard
to further differentiate qualifying venture capital funds from other
types of private funds. The potential benefit of including a revenue or
other similar test is that it could have been more difficult for
banking entities to use the exclusion to make investments through the
fund that the agencies may not have intended to be permissible.
However, any such anti-evasion benefits of this alternative could have
been offset by the extent to which anti-evasion concerns are already
addressed by the other conditions of the exclusion. In addition, such a
revenue test or other similar test could have facilitated the indirect
investment by banking entities in smaller companies that may have been
particularly risky or would have required qualifying venture capital
funds to pass up investment opportunities that would otherwise be
considered typical venture capital-type investments.
Such an additional restriction as contemplated in the alternative
would have made it more difficult for banking entities to sponsor and
invest in qualifying venture capital funds by limiting the pool of
possible investments in which those funds could invest. This difficulty
may have been particularly pronounced for banking entities that would
use the qualifying venture capital fund exclusion to make investments
in third-party funds, which may not have been willing to restrict--and
could have been prohibited from restricting under other applicable
laws--the fund's investments in companies that met any such revenue or
other similar test. As a result, such an additional condition could
have diminished the benefits discussed above, both by limiting the
utility of the exclusion for banking entities to make permissible
investments and potentially reducing the availability of financing for
businesses, including small businesses and start-ups in areas outside
of certain major metropolitan areas.
Small Business Investment Companies
The implementing regulations exclude from the covered fund
definition small business investment companies. The implementing
regulations include within the scope of the exclusion SBICs and issuers
that have received notice to proceed to qualify for a license as an
SBIC and which have not received a revocation of the notice or license.
The final rule expands the exclusion to incorporate SBICs that have
voluntarily surrendered their licenses to operate and do not make new
investments (other than investments in cash equivalents) after such
voluntary surrender.\691\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\691\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clarifying that SBICs that have voluntarily surrendered their
licenses and are winding-down remain excluded from the covered fund
definition reduces regulatory uncertainty for banking entities. Under
the implementing regulations, because it is unclear whether an SBIC
that has voluntarily surrendered its license is still excluded from the
definition of ``covered fund,'' banking entities must make a
determination whether or not the SBIC that is winding-down is a covered
fund. If the banking entity determines that when the SBIC that is
winding-down and has voluntarily surrendered its license no longer
qualifies for the exclusion from the covered fund definition, then the
implementing regulations apply and the banking entity's existing
investment in, and relationship with, the SBIC is prohibited. This
potential result may discourage banking entities from making
investments in SBICs.
The 2020 proposal discussed comments the SEC had received
indicating that the 2013 rule had limited banking entity activities in
SBICs that may spur economic growth, and that banking entities faced
significant regulatory burdens that are not commensurate with the risk
of the underlying activities.\692\ Another commenter indicated that, in
the ordinary course of business, SBIC fund managers often relinquish or
voluntarily surrender a license during the wind-down of the fund while
liquidating assets in the dissolution process (since the license is no
longer necessary or an efficient use of partnership funds).\693\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\692\ See 85 FR 12169.
\693\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies proposed revising the exclusion for SBICs to clarify
how the exclusion would apply to SBICs that voluntarily surrender their
licenses during wind-down phases.\694\ Specifically, the agencies
proposed revising the exclusion for SBICs to apply explicitly to an
issuer that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as an
SBIC and does not make new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents) after such voluntary surrender.\695\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\694\ See 85 FR 12131.
\695\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most commenters that directly addressed the 2020 proposal's
revisions concerning SBICs supported the proposed revisions, stating
that the proposed revisions would provide greater certainty to banking
entities wishing to invest in SBICs and would increase investment in
small businesses.\696\ The final rule adopts the 2020 proposal's
revisions concerning SBICs without modification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\696\ See SIFMA; BPI; ABA; PNC; and SBIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBICs are an important mechanism for capital allocation by banking
entities and one important channel of capital raising for issuers. The
final rule clarifies that banking entities are able to continue to
participate in SBIC-related activities during the dissolution of such
funds, as long as certain conditions are met. To the degree that
banking entities have been reluctant to invest in SBICs to avoid the
risk of an SBIC being treated as a covered fund during SBIC
dissolution, the final rule may increase the willingness of some
banking entities to participate in SBICs. The final rule requires that
SBICs that have voluntarily surrendered their license may not make new
investments during the wind-down process. This aspect of the final rule
seeks to address the possibility of banking entities becoming exposed
to greater risk as part of their participation in SBICs during their
wind-down process, even though such exposure may not be common in an
SBIC's ordinary course of business. In any case, both the risks and the
returns arising out of a banking entity's investment in a SBIC at all
stages of its lifecycle are
[[Page 46487]]
likely to flow through to the banking entity's shareholders. Moreover,
banking entities participating in SBICs remain subject to applicable
safety and soundness regulations and requirements.
Public Welfare Funds
The implementing regulations exclude from the definition of
``covered fund'' issuers that make investments that are designed
primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type permitted under
paragraph 11 of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes of the United
States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and moderate-
income communities or families (such as providing housing, services, or
jobs) (public welfare investment exclusion).\697\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\697\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comment
that the implementing regulations' exclusion for public welfare funds
may not capture community development investments made through
investment vehicles and comment supporting an exclusion of investments
that qualify for Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) credit, including
direct and indirect investments in a community development fund, SBIC,
or similar fund.\698\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\698\ See 85 FR 12169.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2020 proposal posed a number of questions related to the scope
of the public welfare investment exclusion. For example, the 2020
proposal asked whether investments that would receive consideration as
qualified investments under the regulations implementing the CRA should
be excluded from the definition of covered fund, either by
incorporating these investments into the public welfare investment
exclusion or by establishing a new exclusion for CRA-qualifying
investments.\699\ In addition, the 2020 proposal requested comment on
whether RBICs are typically excluded from the definition of ``covered
fund'' because of the public welfare investment exclusion or another
exclusion and on whether the agencies should expressly exclude RBICs
from the definition of covered fund.\700\ Finally, the 2020 proposal
requested comment on whether many or all QOFs would meet the terms of
the public welfare investment exclusion and on whether the agencies
should expressly exclude QOFs from the definition of covered fund.\701\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\699\ See id.
\700\ See id.
\701\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule revises the public welfare investment exclusion of
the implementing regulations to incorporate issuers explicitly, the
business of which is to make investments that qualify for consideration
under the regulations implementing the CRA.\702\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\702\ See Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(ii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the degree that some banking entities have faced uncertainty
about their ability to make CRA-qualified investments and qualify for
the exclusion, the explicit exclusion for such funds may increase the
willingness of banking entities to intermediate such community
development investments. At the same time, to the degree that banking
entities have financed community development projects eligible for the
CRA through other fund structures and have relied on corresponding
exemptions, the economic effects of the explicit exclusion for CRA-
qualified investments may be limited to the difference in compliance
burdens between the new explicit exclusion and any existing covered
fund exclusions.
Commenters on the 2020 proposal generally favored explicitly
excluding RBICs from the definition of ``covered fund,'' either by
adopting a new exclusion, or by further clarifying the scope of the
public welfare investment exclusion.\703\ The final rule provides a
separate specific exclusion for RBICs, similar to the separate,
specific exclusion for SBICs.\704\ As discussed elsewhere,\705\ RBICs
are intended to promote economic development and the creation of wealth
and job opportunities in rural areas and among individuals living in
such areas,\706\ and their purpose is similar to the purpose of SBICs
and public welfare companies.\707\ Because SBICs and RBICs share the
common purpose of promoting capital formation in their respective
sectors, advisers to SBICs and RBICs are treated similarly under the
Advisers Act (in that they have the opportunity to take advantage of
exemptions from investment adviser registration).\708\ The final rule's
specific exclusion for RBICs should expand the economic effects of the
SBIC exclusion discussed above and may facilitate capital formation by
banking entities in growth stage businesses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\703\ See SIFMA; FSF; and SBIA.
\704\ See supra note 575.
\705\ See supra note 576.
\706\ See U.S. Dep't of Agriculture, Rural Business Investment
Program Overview, available at https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/rural-business-investment-program.
\707\ SBICs are intended to increase access to capital for
growth stage businesses. See U.S. Small Bus. Admin., SBIC Program
Overview, available at https://www.sba.gov/partners/sbics.
\708\ See supra note 578. The private fund adviser exemption
excludes the assets of RBICs and SBICs from counting towards the
$150 million threshold. 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(m).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC understands that RBICs may already have been excluded from
the definition of covered fund under the implementing regulations.\709\
For example, RBICs may qualify for the public welfare exclusion under
the implementing regulations or may not be a covered fund by virtue of
relying on an exclusion from the definition of ``investment company''
under the Investment Company Act other than section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7).
An express exclusion for RBICs nevertheless should reduce compliance
costs for banking entities, which may otherwise have been required to
conduct a case-by-case analysis of each RBIC to determine whether it
qualifies for an exclusion or exemption under the implementing
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\709\ In addition, RBICs may be excluded from the definition of
``covered fund'' under the qualifying venture capital fund exclusion
in the final rule. See supra note 578.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to a request for comment in the 2020 proposal,
commenters generally favored explicitly excluding QOFs from the
definition of ``covered fund.'' \710\ The final rule provides a
specific exclusion for QOFs similar to that provided to RBICs.\711\ As
discussed above, the QOF program allows taxpayers to defer and reduce
taxes on capital gains by reinvesting gains in QOFs that are required
to have at least 90 percent of their assets in designated low-income
zones. In this regard, QOFs are similar to SBICs and public welfare
companies. The QOF exclusion should expand the economic effects of the
SBIC exclusion and public welfare exclusion discussed above, and may
facilitate capital formation by banking entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\710\ See SIFMA; FSF; and ABA.
\711\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(11)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
QOFs already may have been excluded from the definition of covered
fund under the implementing regulations. For example, QOFs may qualify
for the public welfare exclusion under the implementing regulations or
may not be covered funds by virtue of relying on an exclusion from the
definition of ``investment company'' under the Investment Company Act
other than section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7), such as section 3(c)(5)(C).\712\
In addition, depending on the facts and circumstances, an issuer that
holds securities issued by a QOF may not meet the definition of
``investment company'' under section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company
Act, may be excluded under Rule 3a-1 thereunder, or may qualify for the
exclusion under
[[Page 46488]]
section 3(c)(6) of the Investment Company Act.\713\ The express
exclusion for QOFs, similar to the express exclusion for RBICs, should
reduce compliance costs for banking entities, which may otherwise be
required to conduct a case-by-case analysis of each QOF to determine
whether it qualifies for an exclusion or exemption under the
implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\712\ See Opportunity Zone Statement, supra note 581.
\713\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Wealth Management Vehicles
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, family wealth management
vehicles commonly engage in asset management activities, as well as
estate planning and other related activities.\714\ The SEC understands
that some banking entities may have been constrained in providing
traditional banking and asset management services, including, for
example, investment advice, brokerage execution, financing, clearing,
and settlement services, to family wealth management vehicles due to
the implementing regulations.\715\ In addition, the SEC understands
that certain family wealth management vehicles that are structured as
trusts may prefer to appoint banking entities as trustees acting in a
fiduciary capacity.\716\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\714\ See 85 FR 12170.
\715\ See id.
\716\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies requested comment on whether to
exclude family wealth management vehicles from the definition of
``covered fund.'' \717\ Several commenters supported this exclusion,
stating generally that it would reduce uncertainty for banking entities
about the permissibility of providing traditional banking, investment
management, and trust and estate planning services to family wealth
management vehicle clients.\718\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\717\ See 85 FR 12170.
\718\ See, e.g., Goldman Sachs; FSF; CCMR; IAA; ABA; BPI; PNC;
and SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, the agencies are adopting an exclusion from the
definition of ``covered fund'' for any entity that acts as a ``family
wealth management vehicle.'' By specifically excluding family wealth
management vehicles, the final rule may benefit such banking entities
and their family customers by permitting the banking entities to offer
services to and engage in transactions with family wealth management
vehicle customers.
Importantly, the final rule may benefit family wealth management
vehicles and their investment advisers by increasing the number of
banking entity counterparties willing to provide traditional client-
oriented financial and asset management services. Thus, the final rule
may enhance competition among banking and non-banking entities
providing financial services to family wealth management vehicles and
may lead to more efficient capital allocation of family wealth
management vehicles' funds. To the degree banking entities pass
compliance costs on to customers, family wealth vehicles may experience
costs savings from the final rule as well.
Some commenters on the 2020 proposal opposed the exclusion for
family wealth management vehicles. One commenter stated that rather
than providing an exclusion for family wealth management vehicles
through an agency rulemaking, the agencies should instead provide no-
action relief to such vehicles on a case-by-case basis.\719\ The SEC
believes that such an approach would be unnecessarily burdensome and
difficult to administer. The compliance costs of such an approach could
impact the willingness of banking entities to provide traditional
client-oriented financial and asset management services to their family
customers. This approach would also unnecessarily deviate from the
agencies' treatment of other excluded entities under the implementing
regulations and hinder transparency and consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\719\ See Data Boiler.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC recognizes that some banking entities may respond to the
exclusion by seeking to structure other entities as family wealth
management vehicles. However, as discussed in detail above, the
exclusion is only available under a number of conditions.\720\
Specifically, if the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity
must all be family customers; if the entity is not a trust, a majority
of the voting interests in the entity must be owned (directly or
indirectly) by family customers, a majority of the interests in the
entity must be owned by family customers, and the entity must be owned
only by family customers and up to five closely related persons of the
family customers.\721\ Moreover, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
family wealth management vehicle's outstanding ownership interests may
be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are not family
customers or closely related persons for the purpose of and to the
extent necessary for establishing corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.\722\ In addition, banking
entities may rely on this exclusion only if they: (1) Provide bona fide
trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or commodity trading advisory
services to the entity; \723\ (2) do not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of such entity; \724\ (3) comply with the disclosure obligations under
Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that
the content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being
misleading and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate
the specific circumstances of the entity; \725\ (4) comply with the
requirements of Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and __.15, as if such entity were a
covered fund; \726\ and (5) except for riskless principal transactions
as defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11), comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.\727\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\720\ See supra Section IV.C.3. (Family Wealth Management
Vehicles).
\721\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(i).
\722\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(i)(C).
\723\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(A).
\724\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(B).
\725\ The disclosure content may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading, and the manner of disclosure may
be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of the entity.
See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(C).
\726\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(E).
\727\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The definition of ``family customer'' includes any ``family
client'' as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, and any natural person who is a father-in-law,
mother-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-
in-law of a family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any
of the foregoing.\728\ The SEC believes that the conditions for the
exclusion and the definition of ``family customer'' will result in
family wealth management vehicles being used as vehicles for providing
customer-oriented financial services on arms-length, market terms,
which the SEC believes will reduce the risk that banking entities'
involvement in these vehicles will give rise to the types of risks that
the covered funds provisions are meant to mitigate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\728\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(iii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the agencies proposed to permit up to three
closely related persons to hold ownership interests in a family wealth
management vehicle. Several commenters supported allowing a finite
number of closely related persons to hold ownership interests, but
suggested that the proposed limit of three did not reflect the typical
manner in which family
[[Page 46489]]
wealth management vehicles are constituted and would unnecessarily
constrain the availability of the exclusion.\729\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\729\ See, e.g., BPI; SIFMA; ABA; and PNC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule allows for five closely related persons to hold
ownership interests in a family wealth management vehicle. The agencies
understand that many family wealth management vehicles currently
include more than three closely related persons.\730\ The agencies
believe that the final rule will more closely align the exclusion with
the current composition of family wealth management vehicles, thereby
increasing the utility of the exclusion without allowing such a large
number of non-family customer owners to suggest the entity is in
reality a hedge fund or private equity fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\730\ See, e.g., BPI; ABA; and PNC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, a banking entity could rely on the family
wealth management vehicle exclusion only if the banking entity and its
affiliates did not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership
interest in the entity, other than up to 0.5 percent of the entity's
outstanding ownership interests. In addition, such de minimis interest
could be held only for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for
establishing corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy,
insolvency, or similar concerns.\731\ Some commenters requested that
unaffiliated third parties--such as third-party trustees or similar
service providers--be permitted to hold the de minimis interest.\732\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\731\ See 85 FR 12139.
\732\ See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As adopted, the final rule allows up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the vehicle's outstanding ownership interests to be acquired or
retained by third parties (that is, entities other than family
customers or closely related persons). The SEC believes that permitting
de minimis ownership by these third parties reflects a common structure
of family wealth management vehicles. The SEC recognizes that without
this modification, family wealth management vehicles may be forced to
engage in less effective and/or efficient means of structuring and
organization because the exclusion could limit the vehicle's access to
some customary service providers that have traditionally taken small
ownership interests for structuring purposes. To the extent that a
family customer prefers a particular person or entity to act as a
service provider, allowing third-party service providers to acquire the
de minimis ownership interest may enable the family customer to choose
to establish a family wealth management vehicle. Whether the de minimis
amount is held by a banking entity or some other third party is not
likely to raise any concerns that are not sufficiently addressed by the
aggregate ownership limit and the narrow circumstances in which such de
minimis ownership interest may be held. At the same time, when
circumstances require that a de minimis ownership interest be held
(e.g., for establishing corporate separateness), if the de minimis
ownership interest is held by a third party and not a banking entity,
then no banking entity will be exposed to any risk associated with
holding the interest, however minimal that risk may be.
In the 2020 proposal, banking entities could rely on the family
wealth management vehicle exclusion only if the banking entity complied
with the disclosure obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such
vehicle were a covered fund. Commenters on the 2020 proposal requested
that the agencies clarify that the disclosures could be modified (1) to
reflect the specific circumstances of the banking entity's relationship
with, and the particular structure of, its family wealth management
vehicle clients; and (2) to allow the banking entity to satisfy the
written disclosure requirement by means other than including such
disclosures in the governing document(s) of the family wealth
management vehicle(s).
The final rule provides such clarity and change the disclosure
requirement to permit banking entities and their affiliates (1) to
modify the content of such disclosures to prevent them from being
misleading and (2) to modify the manner of disclosure to accommodate
the specific circumstances of the vehicle. The SEC believes that these
disclosures will provide important information to the customers for
whom these vehicles will be established. Because the final rule permits
modification of the disclosures for certain reasons, the SEC expects
that the disclosures provided to any particular family customer will be
more accurate and better tailored to the particular circumstances of
the family wealth management vehicle than the disclosures might have
been under the 2020 proposal. These disclosures may result in the
family customers being better able to understand the information
included in these disclosures and being better able to weigh that
information in determining whether to establish a family wealth
management vehicle. To the extent that these tailored disclosures
assist family customers in determining whether or how to structure a
family wealth management vehicle, they may assist family customers in
deciding how best to receive services from or otherwise interact with
banking entities. The SEC expects that these benefits will justify any
costs incurred by banking entities in tailoring the disclosures of
Sec. __.11(a)(8) or in providing them to customers (either by
including them in existing documents or preparing a new disclosure
document).
The agencies are adopting, with modifications, the condition
requiring a banking entity relying on the exclusion for family wealth
management vehicles to comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity were a member bank and the vehicle
were an affiliate thereof.\733\ This condition prohibits banking entity
purchases of low-quality assets from these vehicles and is intended to
prevent banking entities from ``bailing out'' family wealth management
vehicles. Several commenters on the 2020 proposal stated that the
agencies should clarify that the exclusion permits banking entities to
engage in riskless principal transactions to purchase assets--including
low quality assets for purposes of section 223.15 of Regulation W--from
family wealth management vehicles.\734\ According to these commenters,
allowing a banking entity to engage in such riskless principal
transactions would facilitate the family customer's sale of
assets,\735\ while posing minimal market or credit risk to the banking
entity because the banking entity would purchase and sell the same
asset contemporaneously.\736\ Furthermore, commenters stated that
absent clarity on the permissiveness of riskless principal
transactions, a family wealth management vehicle would be forced to
obtain the services of a third party service provider to sell low
quality assets, which in turn would increase the vehicle's costs and
operational complexity without providing a meaningful benefit to
furthering the aims of section 13 of the BHC or the implementing
regulations.\737\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\733\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(17)(ii)(F). 12 CFR 223.15(a)
provides that a member bank may not purchase a low-quality asset
from an affiliate unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself to purchase the
asset before the time the asset was acquired by the affiliate. 12
CFR 223.15(a).
\734\ See, e.g., BPI and SIFMA.
\735\ See, e.g., SIFMA.
\736\ See, e.g., SIFMA and BPI.
\737\ See, e.g., SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC believes that permitting a banking entity to engage in
riskless principal transactions that involve the purchase of low-
quality assets from a
[[Page 46490]]
family wealth management vehicle is unlikely to pose a substantive risk
of evading section 13 of the BHC Act. Accordingly, in a change from the
2020 proposal and in response to the concerns raised by commenters, the
condition will explicitly exclude from the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a) transactions that meet the definition of riskless principal
transactions as defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11). The SEC expects that,
together, the adopted criteria for the family wealth management vehicle
exclusion will prevent a banking entity from being able to bail out
such vehicles in periods of financial stress or otherwise expose the
banking entity to the types of risks that the covered fund provisions
of section 13 were intended to address.
Alternative forms of relief with respect to family wealth
management vehicles--for example, alternatives that define ``family
customers'' more broadly or narrowly, or that remove some of the
conditions for the exclusion--would have increased or reduced the
availability of the exclusion relative to the final rule.
Alternatively, the agencies could have amended the limitations on
relationships with a covered fund to permit banking entity transactions
with family wealth management vehicles that would otherwise be
considered covered transactions (e.g., ordinary extensions of credit)
without subjecting them to 12 CFR 223.15(a) or section 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act, as if such banking entity were a member bank and
such family wealth management vehicle were an affiliate thereof.
Broader (narrower) alternative forms of relief may have increased
(decreased) the magnitude of the economic benefits for capital
formation, allocative efficiency, and the ability of banking entities
to provide traditional customer oriented services to family wealth
management vehicles. At the same time, such broader relief may have
increased the risk that some banking entities would have responded to
such relief by attempting to evade the intent of the rule, increasing
the volume of their activities with family wealth management vehicles.
Such risks of the alternatives, as compared to the exclusion contained
in the final rule, may have been mitigated by the fact that banking
entities would have remained subject to the full scope of broker-dealer
and prudential capital, margin, and other rules aimed at facilitating
safety and soundness. Nonetheless, by providing relief that is narrower
than the broader alternative, the final rule should reduce those
possible risks even further. Moreover, as discussed above, the SEC
believes that traditional banking and asset management services
involving family wealth management vehicles in general do not involve
the types of risks that section 13 of the BHC Act was designed to
address.\738\ Accordingly, any narrower relief than that provided by
the final rule with respect to family wealth management vehicles may
have constrained the economic benefits of the final rule (including
with respect to capital formation and allocative efficiency)
unnecessarily.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\738\ See supra Section IV.C.3. (Customer Facilitation
Vehicles).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Facilitation Vehicles
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comments
that, because of the implementing regulations' covered fund
restrictions, some banking entities have been unable to engage in
traditional banking and asset management services with respect to
vehicles provided for customers, even though banking entities are
otherwise able to provide such exposures and services to customers
directly (outside of the fund structure).\739\ The SEC has also
received comment that some clients, particularly clients in markets
such as Brazil, Germany, Hong Kong, and Japan, prefer to transact with
or through such vehicles rather than banking entities directly because
of a variety of legal, counterparty risk management, and accounting
factors.\740\ Moreover, the SEC is aware that limitations of the
implementing regulations on the activities of such vehicles may have
disrupted client relationships, reducing the efficiency of customer-
facing financial services, and raising compliance costs of banking
entities.\741\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\739\ See 85 FR 12171.
\740\ See id.
\741\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule establishes an exclusion from the definition of
``covered fund'' for any issuer that acts as a ``customer facilitation
vehicle.'' The customer facilitation vehicle exclusion will, as
proposed, be available for any issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.\742\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\742\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A banking entity may only rely on the exclusion with respect to an
issuer provided that: (1) All of the ownership interests of the issuer
are owned by the customer (which may include one or more of its
affiliates) for whom the issuer was created; \743\ and (2) the banking
entity and its affiliates: (i) Maintain documentation outlining how the
banking entity intends to facilitate the customer's exposure to such
transaction, investment strategy, or service; (ii) do not, directly or
indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or
performance of such issuer; (iii) comply with the disclosure
obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered
fund, provided that the content may be modified to prevent the
disclosure from being misleading and the manner of disclosure may be
modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of the issuer; (iv)
do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest in the
issuer, other than up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's
outstanding ownership interests for the purpose of and to the extent
necessary for establishing corporate separateness or addressing
bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns; (v) comply with the
requirements of Sec. Sec. __.14(b) and __.15, as if such issuer were a
covered fund; and (vi) except for riskless principal transactions as
defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11), comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a member
bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\743\ Notwithstanding this condition, up to an aggregate 0.5
percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership interests may be
acquired or retained by one or more entities that are not customers
if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties
for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or
similar concerns. See Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The exclusion in the final rule should reduce or eliminate the
costs imposed by the implementing regulations that limit the services
that banking entities can provide to customer facilitation vehicles,
which in turn may limit the activities of these vehicles. These costs
include those associated with the disruption of client relationships
and the reduction in the efficiency of customer-facing financial
services. The final rule should reduce these baseline costs and
inefficiencies by allowing banking entities to provide customer-
oriented financial services through vehicles, the purpose of which is
to provide such customers with exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy, or other service. As a result, banking entities may become
better able to engage in the full range of customer facilitation
activities through special
[[Page 46491]]
purpose vehicles and fund structures, which could benefit banking
entities, their customers, and securities markets more broadly.
Most commenters on the 2020 proposal that addressed this exclusion
were supportive,\744\ stating that it would provide banking entities
with greater flexibility to meet client needs and objectives.\745\ Some
commenters found the exclusion's conditions to be reasonable and
sufficient.\746\ However, two commenters recommended that the agencies
impose additional limitations on the exclusion.\747\ One of these
commenters argued that the exclusion would permit, and possibly
encourage, banking entities to increase their risk exposures through
the use of customer facilitation vehicles, and the agencies should
minimize such risk exposures and promote risk monitoring and
management.\748\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\744\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; Credit Suisse; FSF; Goldman
Sachs; and IAA.
\745\ See, e.g., SIFMA; BPI; ABA; and Goldman Sachs.
\746\ See, e.g., SIFMA; FSF; and SAF.
\747\ See Better Markets and Data Boiler.
\748\ See Better Markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, banking entities could rely on the customer
facilitation vehicle exclusion only if the banking entity complied with
the disclosure obligations under Sec. __.11(a)(8), as if such vehicle
were a covered fund. Commenters on the 2020 proposal requested that the
agencies provide clarification in the context of family wealth
management vehicles that the content of the disclosure may be modified
to prevent the disclosure from being misleading and the manner of
disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of
the issuer.
As with family wealth management vehicles, the final rule includes
a modification to the proposed exclusion clarifying that the content of
the disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific
circumstances of the issuer.\749\ The SEC believes that these
disclosures will provide important information to the customers for
whom these vehicles will be used to provide services--whether they are
family customers under the family wealth management vehicle exclusion
or other customers under this exclusion. As discussed above with
respect to family wealth management vehicles, the SEC believes that the
clarification in the final rule regarding permissible modifications of
the disclosures required by Sec. __.11(a)(8) will provide benefits
that will justify any costs from tailoring and providing the
disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\749\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, as with family wealth management vehicles, a
banking entity could rely on the customer facilitation vehicle
exclusion only if the banking entity and its affiliates did not acquire
or retain, as principal, an ownership interest in the entity, other
than up to 0.5 percent of the entity's outstanding ownership interests.
In addition, such de minimis interest could be held only for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.\750\ As with family wealth management vehicles, commenters
suggested that the agencies specifically allow any party that is
unaffiliated with the customer, rather than only the banking entity and
its affiliates, to own this de minimis interest.\751\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\750\ See 85 FR 12139.
\751\ See SIFMA; BPI; and FSF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As adopted, the final rule allows up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of
the vehicle's outstanding ownership interests to be acquired or
retained by third parties (that is, entities other than the customer)
if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties for
the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.\752\ The SEC recognize that without this modification,
customer facilitation vehicles may be forced to engage in less
effective and/or efficient means of structuring and organization
because the exclusion could limit the vehicle's access to some
customary service providers that have traditionally taken or may
otherwise take small ownership interests for structuring purposes. To
the extent that a customer prefers a particular person or entity to act
as a service provider, allowing third-party service providers to
acquire the de minimis ownership interest may make the customer more
willing to establish a customer facilitation vehicle. Whether the de
minimis amount is held by a banking entity or some other third party is
not likely to raise any concerns that are not sufficiently addressed by
the aggregate ownership limit and the narrow circumstances in which the
de minimis ownership interest may be held.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\752\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC recognizes that the provision of financial services related
to customer facilitation vehicles may involve market risk, and the
exclusion in the final rule may enable banking entities to provide a
greater array of financial services to, and otherwise transact with,
such vehicles. The SEC believes that such risks may be mitigated by at
least two of the conditions of the exclusion. First, similar to the
family wealth management vehicle discussed above, other than the de
minimis ownership interest, a banking entity and its affiliates may not
acquire or retain, as principal, any ownership in interest in the
issuer.\753\ Second, a banking entity and its affiliates may not
directly or indirectly guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the
obligations or performance of the vehicle.\754\ These conditions, among
the other conditions of the exclusion, may mitigate risks that may be
borne by individual banking entities and by banking entities as a whole
as a result of the exclusion, and may facilitate banking entities'
ongoing compliance with section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule.
Moreover, the SEC continues to believe that the provision of customer-
oriented financial services by banking entities may benefit customers,
counterparties, and securities markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\753\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(4).
\754\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule creates new recordkeeping requirements for a banking
entity that relies on the exclusion for customer facilitation
vehicles.\755\ Specifically, the banking entity and its affiliates must
maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends to
facilitate the customer's exposure to a transaction, investment
strategy or service offered by the banking entity. As discussed in
Section V.B \756\ and above, these recordkeeping burdens may impose a
total initial burden of $1,078,650 \757\ and a total ongoing annual
burden of 1,0798,650.\758\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\755\ Final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(B)(1).
\756\ See supra note 585.
\757\ See supra note 586.
\758\ See supra note 587.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are adopting, with modifications, the condition
requiring a banking entity relying on the exclusion for customer
facilitation vehicles to comply with the requirements of 12 CFR
223.15(a), as if such banking entity were a member bank and the vehicle
were an affiliate thereof.\759\ The purpose of the proposed requirement
that a customer facilitation vehicle must comply with 12 CFR 223.15(a)
was the same for both the family wealth management vehicle and the
customer facilitation vehicle
[[Page 46492]]
exclusions--to help ensure that the exclusions do not allow banking
entities to ``bail out'' either vehicle.\760\ For the same reasons
discussed above with respect to family wealth management vehicles, the
agencies have modified the requirement to exclude from the requirements
of 12 CFR 223.15(a) any transactions that meet the definition of
riskless principal transactions as defined in Sec. __.10(d)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\759\ See final rule Sec. __.10(c)(18)(ii)(C)(6). 12 CFR
223.15(a) provides that a member bank may not purchase a low-quality
asset from an affiliate unless, pursuant to an independent credit
evaluation, the member bank had committed itself to purchase the
asset before the time the asset was acquired by the affiliate. 12
CFR 223.15(a).
\760\ See 85 FR 12140.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As with the discussion of family wealth management vehicles above,
the SEC believes that the ability of a banking entity to engage in
riskless principal transactions with a customer facilitation vehicle
will lower costs for the vehicle by allowing it to avoid finding a
third party to intermediate trades for low quality assets. At the same
time, allowing these riskless principal transactions should not pose
the type of risk to the banking entity that section 13 of the BHC Act
was intended to prevent. The SEC expects that the conditions for the
customer facilitation vehicle exclusion will prevent a banking entity
from being able to bail out such vehicles in periods of financial
stress or otherwise expose the banking entity to the types of risks
that the covered fund provisions of section 13 were intended to
address.
The agencies considered alternative forms of relief with respect to
customer facilitation vehicles. For example, the agencies could have
adopted a higher third party ownership limit (of, for example, 5% or
10%). Alternatively, the agencies could have adopted a 0.5% ownership
interest limit, but without specifying a list of purposes for which
such interest may be held, leading to banking entities accumulating
greater ownership interests in such vehicles. As another example, the
agencies could have adopted an exclusion for customer facilitation
vehicles without subjecting the banking entity relying on the exclusion
to 12 CFR 223.15(a) or section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, as if
such banking entity were a member bank and such customer facilitation
vehicles were an affiliate thereof. Such alternatives would have
removed or loosened the conditions of the exclusion, which may have
increased the risk that customer facilitation vehicles could be used
for evasion purposes or could have exposed banking entities to
additional risk, but could also have further reduced compliance burdens
and provided greater flexibility to banking entities and their
customers.
ii. Limitations on Relationships Between Banking Entities and Covered
Funds
As discussed above, under the implementing regulations, banking
entities that either: (1) Serve, directly or indirectly, as a sponsor,
investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or investment manager to
a covered fund; (2) organize and offer a covered fund under Sec.
__.11; or (3) hold an ownership interest under Sec. __.11(b) have been
unable to engage in any covered transactions with such funds.\761\ This
prohibition may have limited the services that such banking entities
and their affiliates have been able to provide to certain entities that
are covered funds under the implementing regulations. For example, as
noted above, banking entities have been significantly limited in their
ability to both organize and offer a covered fund, as well as to
provide custody or other services to the fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\761\ See 12 U.S.C. 1851(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule permits a banking entity to engage in certain
covered transactions with a related covered fund that would be exempt
from the quantitative limits, collateral requirements, and low-quality
asset prohibition under section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act,
including certain transactions that would be exempt pursuant to section
223.42 of the Board's Regulation W.\762\ In addition, the final rule
authorizes banking entities to engage in certain transactions, such as
extensions of intraday credit for purchases of assets from covered
funds in connection with payment, clearing, and settlement
services.\763\ Finally, in a modification from the 2020 proposal, the
final rule expressly permits banking entities to enter into certain
riskless principal transactions with a related covered fund, including
in circumstances where the covered fund is not a ``securities
affiliate.'' \764\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\762\ See final rule Sec. __.14(a)(2)(iii).
\763\ See final rule Sec. __.14(a)(2)(v).
\764\ See final rule Sec. __.14(a)(2)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC received comment
suggesting that section 13(f)(1) of the BHC Act should be interpreted
to include the exemptions provided under section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act, and that banking entities should be permitted to engage in
a limited amount of covered transactions with related covered
funds.\765\ The SEC recognizes that outsourcing such activities to
third parties may have adversely affected customer relationships,
increasing costs and decreasing operational efficiency for banking
entities and covered funds. The final rule provides banking entities
greater flexibility to provide these and other services directly to
covered funds. If being able to provide custody, clearing, and other
services to related covered funds reduces the costs of these services
and risks of operational failure of fund custodians, then fund advisers
and, indirectly, fund investors, may benefit from the final rule. Many
direct benefits are likely to accrue to banking entity advisers to
covered funds that have been relying on third-party service providers
as a result of the requirements of the implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\765\ See 85 FR 12144.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule includes a standalone provision that permits banking
entities to enter into riskless principal transactions with a related
covered fund, including in circumstances where the covered fund is not
a ``securities affiliate.'' The 2020 proposal would have permitted a
banking entity to enter into a riskless principal transaction with a
covered fund provided it met the criteria in Regulation W. The SEC
believes that providing a standalone exception will provide clarity and
certainty to banking entities about the extent to which they are able
to enter into riskless principal transactions with related covered
funds. In addition, by permitting more riskless principal transactions
than would have been the case under the 2020 proposal (i.e., those that
do not or may not meet the criteria of Regulation W), the final rule
may facilitate banking entities entering into more of these
transactions than they would have, reducing the likelihood that the
covered fund would incur additional costs in buying or selling
securities.\766\ As described above, in a riskless principal
transaction, the riskless principal (the banking entity) buys and sells
the same security contemporaneously, and the asset risk passes promptly
from the affiliate (the related covered fund) through the riskless
principal to a third party. Accordingly, the SEC does not believe that
an increase in riskless principal transactions overall will increase
the risks borne by any particular banking entity or banking entities in
general.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\766\ As discussed above, the final rule includes a definition
of riskless principal transaction that is similar to the definition
adopted in Regulation W. To the extent these definitions are
sufficiently similar, the SEC expects that compliance costs will be
low for banking entities seeking to enter into riskless principal
transactions with related covered funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule increases banking entities' ability to engage in
custody, clearing, and other transactions with related covered funds
and will benefit banking entities that have been unable
[[Page 46493]]
to engage in otherwise profitable or efficient activities with related
covered funds. Moreover, this may enhance operational efficiency and
reduce operational risks and costs incurred by covered funds, which
have been unable to rely on banking entities with which they have
certain relationships for custody, clearing, and other transactions. As
discussed above, reducing operational risk as well as the
interconnectedness between financial firms that would result from such
services being provided by the banking entities and their affiliates,
would promote the financial stability of the U.S. financial
system.\767\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\767\ See supra Section IV.D. (Limitations on Relationships with
a Covered Fund).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 2020 proposal, the SEC discussed a prior comment that
opposed incorporating the Federal Reserve Act section 23A exemptions or
quantitative limits.\768\ To the extent that the final rule may
increase transactions between banking entities and related covered
funds, banking entities could incur risks associated with these
transactions. However, as discussed above, the final rule imposes a
number of conditions aimed at reducing overall risks to banking
entities, the ability of banking entities to lever up related covered
funds, and the incentive of banking entities to bail out related
covered funds, while enhancing their ability to provide ordinary-course
banking, custody, and asset management services, and to facilitate
capital formation in covered funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\768\ See 85 FR 12172.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies could have adopted broader or narrower forms of
relief. For example, in addition to the relief under the final rule,
the agencies could have permitted banking entities to engage in
additional covered transactions in connection with payment, clearing,
and settlement services beyond extensions of credit and purchases of
assets. Further, under the final rule, each extension of credit must be
repaid, sold, or terminated by the end of five business days.\769\ As
another alternative, the agencies could have allowed extensions of
credit in connection with payment transactions, clearing, or settlement
services for periods that are longer than five business days. However,
the five business day criteria is consistent with the federal banking
agencies' capital rule and generally requires banking entities to rely
on transactions with normal settlement periods, which have lower risk
of delayed settlement or failure, when providing short-term extensions
of credit.\770\ In addition, the agencies could have imposed
quantitative limits on the newly permitted covered transactions tied to
bank capital or fund size. Relative to the final rule, alternatives
providing greater relief with respect to covered transactions with
covered funds could have magnified the cost savings and operational
risk benefits described above, but may also have increased risk to
banking entities or the incentives for banking entities to bail out
related covered funds. Similarly, narrower alternative forms of relief
may have dampened the economic effects of the final rule discussed
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\769\ See final rule Sec. __.14(a)(2)(iv)(B).
\770\ See supra note 435.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Definition of Ownership Interest
As discussed above, the implementing regulations define ``ownership
interest'' in a covered fund to mean any equity, partnership, or
``other similar interest.'' This definition focuses on the attributes
of the interest and whether it provides a banking entity with voting
rights or economic exposure to the profits and losses of the covered
fund, rather than its form. ``Other similar interest'' is defined, in
part, as an interest that:
``Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors
or trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor of the covered fund (excluding the rights of a
creditor to exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of
default or an acceleration event).'' \771\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\771\ See implementing regulations Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A). See
also supra Section IV.E.1. (Ownership Interest).
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comment
that the implementing regulations' definition of ownership interest has
captured instruments that do not have equity-like features and
constrained banking entity investments in debt securitizations and
client facilitation services.\772\ For example, one commenter indicated
that analyzing the ownership interest definition in the context of
securitizations had resulted in added time and costs of executing
transactions, as well as impeded securitization transactions.\773\
Moreover, the commenter indicated that the ``other similar interest''
prong of the definition precluded some banking entities from investing
in collateralized loan obligation (CLO) senior debt instruments, which
affects lending to CLOs, and that banking entities with pre-existing
CLO exposures have had to waive credit-enhancing remedies to avoid
triggering the ownership interest restrictions.\774\ In addition, the
SEC received comment that the ownership interest definition in the
implementing regulations may have required an extensive legal analysis
and documentation review and that, as a result, some banking entities
may have defaulted to treating interests without controlling positions
or equity-like features as ownership interests.\775\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\772\ See 85 FR 12173.
\773\ See id.
\774\ See id.
\775\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule modifies the definition of ownership interest in
several ways. First, the final rule moves the existing exclusion from
the definition of ``other similar interest'' in Sec. __.10(d)(6)(A)
(``for the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event'') from the
parenthetical to its own provision.\776\ The final rule also creates a
new exclusion, for ``the right to participate in the removal of an
investment manager for ''cause'' or participate in the selection of a
replacement manager upon an investment manager's resignation or
removal.'' \777\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\776\ See final rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A)(1).
\777\ See final rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(i)(A)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters on the 2020 proposal asserted that creditors' rights are
also provided to debt holders in circumstances other than an event of
default or acceleration. These commenters therefore recommended the
proposed exclusion be expanded to include additional for cause events
that are independent of an event of default or acceleration, such as
the insolvency of the investment manager or breach of the investment
management or collateral management agreement.\778\ The final rule
reflects those comments and provide clarity about the types of creditor
rights that may attach to an interest without that interest being
deemed an ownership interest. In particular, under Sec.
__.10(d)(6)(A)(2), the definition of ownership interest does not
include rights of an interest that allows a creditor to participate in
the removal of an investment manager for ``cause.'' The final rule
defines ``cause'' for removal to mean one or more of the following
events:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\778\ See SIFMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(2) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(3) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
[[Page 46494]]
(4) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(5) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(6) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(7) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(8) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal of
an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely related
to the performance of the covered fund or to the investment manager's
exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's transaction
agreements.
The final rule also modifies the definition of ownership interest
to add to the list of interests that are excluded from the definition
of ownership interest. Specifically, the final rule provides a safe
harbor excluding any senior loan or senior debt interest that has
specific characteristics.\779\ Those characteristics are: (1) Under the
terms of the interest, the holders do not have the right to receive a
share of the income, gains, or profits of the covered fund, but are
entitled to receive only certain interest and fees, and repayment of a
fixed principal amount on or before a maturity date in a contractually-
determined manner (which may include prepayment premiums intended
solely to reflect, and compensate holders of the interest for, forgone
income resulting from an early prepayment); (2) the entitlement to
payments is absolute and cannot be reduced because of the losses
arising from the covered fund's underlying assets; and (3) the holders
of the interest are not entitled to receive the underlying assets of
the covered fund after all other interests have been redeemed or paid
in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon
the occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event).\780\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\779\ See final rule Sec. __.10(d)(6)(ii)(B).
\780\ See id. See also, supra Section IV.E.1. (Ownership
Interest).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule should simplify the analysis banking entities must
perform to determine whether they have an ownership interest under
section 13 of the BHC Act and the final rule. Moreover, to the degree
that banking entities may have responded to the ownership interest
definition in the implementing regulations by reducing their
investments in certain debt instruments, the final rule may result in
greater banking entity investments in covered funds and a greater
ability of covered funds to allocate capital to the underlying assets.
The SEC recognizes that such debt instrument investments carry
risk,\781\ and that the risks and returns of such investments flow
through to banking entities' shareholders. While the final rule's
ownership interest definition may permit banking entities to increase
exposures to certain debt instruments, three key considerations may
mitigate the risks associated with such activities. First, the final
rule does not change any of the applicable prudential capital, margin,
or liquidity requirements intended to ensure safety and soundness of
banking entities. Second, to the degree that the ownership interest
definition has actually discouraged banking entities from obtaining
credit enhancements to avoid triggering the ownership interest
restrictions, the final rule may result in banking entities receiving
credit enhancements that reduce the risk of the debt instrument or loan
and are therefore stronger than what banking entities may have received
in the absence of the final rule. Finally, the final rule includes a
number of conditions and restrictions aimed at reducing the risk to
banking entities while facilitating traditional lending activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\781\ See Occupy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies could have adopted broader relief by limiting the
particular forms of a banking entity's interest (e.g., equity or
partnership shares) that would qualify as an ownership interest or by
limiting the definition of ownership interest to ``voting securities''
as defined by the Board's Regulation Y. By providing broader relief
relative to the final rule, such an alternative may have produced
greater reductions in uncertainty and compliance burdens, and a greater
willingness of banking entities to become involved in certain debt
transactions. However, such greater involvement in certain debt
transactions may also have given rise to greater risks being borne by
banking entities. The final rule is intended to provide sufficient
safeguards and limitations to prevent banking entities from acquiring
interests in covered funds that run counter to the intentions of the
implementing regulations and limit a banking entity's exposure to the
economic risks of covered funds and their underlying assets, while
reducing compliance uncertainty and increasing the willingness of
banking entities to participate in covered funds.
iv. Parallel Investments
As discussed above, the preamble to the 2013 rule stated that if a
banking entity makes investments side by side in substantially the same
positions as a covered fund, then the value of such investments would
be included for the purposes of determining the value of the banking
entity's investment in the covered fund.\782\ The agencies also stated
that a banking entity that sponsors a covered fund should not make any
additional side-by-side co-investment with the covered fund in a
privately negotiated investment unless the value of such co-investment
is less than three percent of the value of the total amount co-invested
by other investors in such investment.\783\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\782\ See supra Section IV.F. (Parallel Investments) and
references therein.
\783\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the 2020 proposal, the SEC has received comment
that argued the implementing regulations should not impose a limit on
parallel investments and noted that such a restriction is not reflected
in the text of the 2013 rule.\784\ The final rule includes a rule of
construction that (1) a banking entity will not be required to include
in the calculation of the investment limits under Sec. __.12(a)(2) any
investment the banking entity makes alongside a covered fund, as long
as the investment is made in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, and (2) a banking entity shall not be restricted in the
amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a covered
fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.\785\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\784\ See 85 FR 12174.
\785\ See final rule Sec. __.12(b)(5)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC recognizes that this rule of construction may increase the
incentive for banking entities to make parallel investments alongside a
covered fund that is organized and offered by the banking entity for
the purposes of artificially maintaining or increasing the value of the
fund's positions. Supporting a fund with a direct investment in such a
manner would increase these banking entities' exposures to the covered
fund's assets and, as discussed above, could be inconsistent with the
final rule's restriction on a banking entity guaranteeing, assuming, or
otherwise
[[Page 46495]]
insuring the obligations or performance of such covered fund.\786\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\786\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, as stated above, the agencies would expect that any
investments made alongside a covered fund by a director or employee of
a banking entity or its affiliate, if made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, would not be treated as an investment
by the director or employee in the covered fund. Accordingly, such an
investment would not be attributed to the banking entity as an
investment in the covered fund, regardless of whether the banking
entity arranged the transaction on behalf of the director or employee
or provided financing for the investment.
The SEC recognizes that the rule of construction may remove a
restriction on investments made alongside a covered fund that may have
interfered with banking entities' ability to make otherwise permissible
investments directly on their balance sheets.\787\ In particular, the
rule of construction may allow banking entities to make parallel
investments alongside their covered funds without including the value
of those parallel investments within the ownership limits imposed on a
banking entity. Similarly, the rule of construction may provide clarity
to banking entities such that they will not be prevented from making
investments alongside their covered funds, as long as those investments
are otherwise permissible under applicable laws and regulations.\788\
In addition to removing impediments for banking entities' otherwise
permissible investments, the rule of construction in the final rule may
enable banking entities to make investments alongside a covered fund
that will credibly signal the banking entity's view of the quality of
the investment(s) to investors in the fund, and may also help align the
incentives of banking entities, and their directors and employees, with
those of the covered funds and their investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\787\ See supra note 784.
\788\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Efficiency, Competition, and Capital Formation
As discussed above, the final rule excludes certain groups of
private funds and other entities from the scope of the covered fund
definition and modifies other covered fund restrictions applicable to
banking entities subject to the final rule. Moreover, the final rule
reduces compliance obligations of banking entities subject to the final
rule. The SEC believes that the final rule may impact competition,
capital formation, and allocative efficiency.
The final rule may have three groups of competitive effects. First,
the final rule may make it easier for bank affiliated broker-dealers,
SBSDs, and RIAs to compete with bank unaffiliated broker-dealers,
SBSDs, and RIAs in their activities with certain groups of private
funds and other entities. Second, the final rule may reduce competitive
disparities between banking entities subject to the final rule and
affected by the final rule, and banking entities that are not. Third,
certain aspects of the final rule (such as those related to foreign
excluded funds and foreign public funds) may reduce competitive
disparities between U.S. banking entities and foreign banking entities
in their covered fund activities. Because competition may reduce costs
or increase quality, and because some affected banking entities may
face economies of scale or scope in the provision of services to
certain private funds, these competitive effects may flow through to
customers, clients, and investors in the form of reduced transaction
costs and greater quality of private fund and other offerings and
related financial services.
The final rule may also impact capital formation. For example, by
reducing the scope of application of covered fund restrictions in the
final rule, the final rule relaxes restrictions related to banking
entity underwriting and market-making of certain private funds.
Moreover, the final rule modifies certain restrictions related to
banking entity relationships with certain covered funds. Further, as
discussed above, the final rule enables banking entities to engage
indirectly (through a fund structure) in certain of the same activities
that they are currently able to engage in directly (extending credit or
direct ownership stakes). To the degree that the implementing
regulations impede or otherwise constrain banking entity activities in
such funds, the final rule may result in a greater number of such
private funds being launched by banking entities, increasing capital
formation via private funds. The effects of the final rule on capital
formation are likely to flow through to investors (in the form of
greater availability or variety or private funds available for
investors) as well as an increase in the supply of capital available to
firms seeking to raise capital or obtain financing from private
funds.\789\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\789\ For example, the final rule could result in additional
venture capital being available in geographic areas where it has
been relatively less available. See supra Section V.F.3.i. (Venture
Capital Funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The possible effects of the final rule on allocative efficiency are
related to the final rule's likely impact on capital formation.
Specifically, as discussed above, the SEC believes that the final rule
may result in a greater number and variety of private funds launched by
banking entities. To the degree that banking entities may be able to
provide superior private funds due to their expertise or economies of
scale or scope, and to the degree that fund structures may be more
efficient than direct investments (due to, e.g., superior risk sharing
and pooling of expertise across fund investors), the final rule may
enhance the ability of market participants, investors, and issuers to
allocate their capital efficiently.
The SEC recognizes that the final rule may increase the ability of
banking entities to engage in certain types of activities involving
risk, and that increases in risk exposures of large groups of banking
entities may negatively impact capital formation, securities markets,
and the real economy, particularly during times of adverse economic
conditions. Moreover, losses on investment portfolios may discourage
capital market participation by various groups of investors. Three
important considerations may mitigate these potential risks. First, as
discussed throughout this economic analysis, banking entities already
engage in a variety of permissible activities involving risk, including
extensions of credit, underwriting, and market-making, and the
activities of many types of private funds that are excluded under the
final rule largely replicate permissible and traditional activities of
banking entities. Second, banking entities subject to the final rule
may also be subject to multiple prudential capital, margin, and
liquidity requirements that facilitate the safety and soundness of
banking entities and promote financial stability. Third, the additional
exclusions from the definition of covered fund each include a number of
conditions aimed at preventing evasion of section 13 of the BHC Act and
the final rule, promoting safety and soundness, and/or allowing for
customer oriented financial services provided on arms-length, market
terms.
Under the final rule, a banking entity is not prohibited from
acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, or acting as sponsor
to, a covered fund if the banking entity organizes or offers the
covered fund and satisfies other requirements. One such requirement is
that the banking entity provide specified disclosures to prospective
and actual
[[Page 46496]]
investors in the covered fund.\790\ Under the final rule, banking
entities must provide the disclosures specified by Sec. __.11(a)(8) to
satisfy the exclusions for family wealth management vehicles and
customer facilitation vehicles and to satisfy the exclusions for credit
funds and venture capital funds if the banking entity is a sponsor,
investment adviser, or commodity trading advisor of the fund. To the
extent that the final rule leads banking entities to establish or
provide services to more of these vehicles, the volume of information
available to market participants could increase. Specifically, if
banking entities respond to the final rule by establishing or providing
services to more of these vehicles because they are excluded from the
definition of ``covered fund,'' then the amount of such disclosures
would increase accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\790\ Implementing regulations Sec. __.11(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, the magnitude of all of the above effects on
competition, capital formation, and allocative efficiency will be
influenced by a large number of factors, such as prevailing
macroeconomic conditions, the financial condition of firms seeking to
raise capital, and of funds seeking to transact with banking entities,
market saturation, and search for higher yields by investors during low
interest rate environments. Moreover, the relative efficiency between
fund structures and the direct provision of capital is likely to vary
widely among banking entities and funds. The SEC recognizes that such
economic effects may be dampened or magnified in different phases of
the macroeconomic cycle and across various types of banking entities.
G. Congressional Review Act
For the OCC, Board, FDIC, SEC, and CFTC, the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, has
designated this rule as a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 44
Banks, Banking, Compensation, Credit, Derivatives, Government
securities, Insurance, Investments, National banks, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Risk, Risk retention,
Securities, Trusts and trustees.
12 CFR Part 248
Administrative practice and procedure, Banks, banking, Conflict of
interests, Credit, Foreign banking, Government securities, Holding
companies, Insurance, Insurance companies, Investments, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities, State nonmember
banks, State savings associations, Trusts and trustees.
12 CFR Part 351
Banks, Banking, Capital, Compensation, Conflicts of interest,
Credit, Derivatives, Government securities, Insurance, Insurance
companies, Investments, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Risk, Risk retention, Securities, Trusts and trustees.
17 CFR Part 75
Banks, Banking, Compensation, Credit, Derivatives, Federal branches
and agencies, Federal savings associations, Government securities,
Hedge funds, Insurance, Investments, National banks, Penalties,
Proprietary trading, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Risk,
Risk retention, Securities, Swap dealers, Trusts and trustees, Volcker
rule.
17 CFR Part 255
Banks, Brokers, Dealers, Investment advisers, Recordkeeping,
Reporting, Securities.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the Common Preamble, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency amends chapter I of title 12, Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 44--PROPRIETARY TRADING AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED FUNDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 44 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 27 et seq., 12 U.S.C. 1, 24, 92a, 93a, 161,
1461, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1813(q), 1818, 1851, 3101, 3102,
3108, 5412.
Subpart B--Proprietary Trading
0
2. Amend Sec. 44.6 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 44.6 Other permitted proprietary trading activities.
* * * * *
(f) Permitted trading activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds. The prohibition contained in Sec. 44.3(a) does not apply to the
purchase or sale of a financial instrument by a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement
that raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing
in financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship of,
or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that meets
the following:
(i) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in or sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in Sec. 44.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
Subpart C--Covered Funds Activities and Investments
0
3. Amend Sec. 44.10 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
0
d. Revising the heading of paragraph (c)(10) and revising paragraph
(c)(10)(i);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
0
f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16), (17), and (18);
0
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 44.10 Prohibition on acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in and having certain relationships with a covered fund.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, an issuer that:
[[Page 46497]]
(A) Is organized or established outside of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell ownership interests, and such
interests are offered and sold, through one or more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or of any State and any
issuer for which such banking entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section for such issuer unless more than 75 percent of the
ownership interests in the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring banking entity or such issuer;
and
(D) Directors and senior executive officers as defined in Sec.
225.71(c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c)) of such
entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the
term ``public offering'' means a distribution (as defined in Sec.
44.4(a)(3)) of securities in any jurisdiction outside the United States
to investors, including retail investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for which the banking entity serves
as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor, the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict availability to investors
having a minimum level of net worth or net investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10 unaffiliated co-venturers;
* * * * *
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An issuing entity for asset-
backed securities that satisfies all the conditions of this paragraph
(c)(8) and the assets or holdings of which are composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 44.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or
timely distribution of proceeds to holders of such securities and
rights or other assets that are related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding the loans, provided that each asset
that is a security (other than special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v)
of this section) meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of
this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates that meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of this
section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than asset-backed securities and
convertible securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt securities does not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of loans held under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(A) of this section, cash and cash equivalents held under
paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this section, and debt securities held
under this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities for purposes of this paragraph is calculated at par
value at the most recent time any such debt security is acquired,
except that the issuing entity may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt security based on its fair market
value if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to use the fair market value of
such assets for purposes of calculating compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations under its transaction
agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity's valuation methodology values similarly
situated assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(8),
except as permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, the
assets or holdings of the issuing entity shall not include any of the
following:
(A) A security, including an asset-backed security, or an interest
in an equity or debt security other than as permitted in paragraphs
(c)(8)(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may hold securities, other than
debt securities permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section,
if those securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents--which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or
the asset-backed securities--for purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to the loans supporting the asset-backed securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of derivatives by the issuing entity
shall be limited to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that
satisfy all of the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the derivatives directly relate to the
loans, the asset-backed securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section, or the debt
securities described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities described in paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates. The assets or holdings of the issuing entity may include
collateral certificates and special units of beneficial interest issued
by a special purpose vehicle, provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate meets the requirements in
this paragraph (c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is used for the sole purpose of transferring to the issuing
entity for the loan securitization the economic risks and benefits of
the assets that are permissible for loan securitizations under this
paragraph (c)(8) and does not directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is created solely to satisfy legal requirements or
otherwise facilitate the structuring of the loan securitization; and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate and the
[[Page 46498]]
issuing entity are established under the direction of the same entity
that initiated the loan securitization.
* * * * *
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i) Scope. An entity owning or
holding a dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other assets as provided in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for the benefit of the holders of
covered bonds, provided that the assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this
section.
* * * * *
(11) SBICs and public welfare investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment company, as defined in
section 103(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.
662), or that has received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or license has not been revoked, or
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a small
business investment company in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type
permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a
qualified rehabilitated building or certified historic structure, as
such terms are defined in section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 or a similar State historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a rural
business investment company, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A)
or (B), or that has terminated its participation as a rural business
investment company in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not make
any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or
potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's
assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C.
1400Z-2(d).
* * * * *
(15) Credit funds. Subject to paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section, an issuer that satisfies the asset and activity
requirements of paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer's assets must be composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 44.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this
section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans or debt
instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
that is a security is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or the debt
instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
of this section may not include commodity forward contracts or any
derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative directly relate to the
loans, debt instruments, or other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, debt instruments, or other rights
or assets described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be eligible for the exclusion of
paragraph (c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that would constitute proprietary
trading under Sec. 44.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were a banking
entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 44.11(a)(8) of this
subpart, as if the issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations imposed in Sec. 44.14, as if the
issuer were a covered fund, except the banking entity may acquire and
retain any ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity Requirements. A banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion with respect to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the
issuer or of any entity to which such issuer extends credit or in which
such issuer invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(15)(i)(B) or (i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship Limits. A banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 44.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs
(c)(16)(ii) through (iv) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1;
and
(B) Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. 44.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to an issuer
[[Page 46499]]
that meets the conditions in paragraph (c)(16)(i) of this section may
not rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 44.11(a)(8), as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in Sec. 44.14 as if the issuer
were a covered fund (except the banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship with
the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 44.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(17) Family wealth management vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that is not, and does not hold
itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for
resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity are all
family customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests in the entity are owned
(directly or indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the entity are owned (directly
or indirectly) by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family customers and up to 5
closely related persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity's outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities
that are not family customers or closely related persons if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(17)(i) of this section with respect to an entity provided that the
banking entity (or an affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of such entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
44.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the entity, other than as described in paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of
this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 44.14(b) and
44.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, complies with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17) of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(A) Closely related person means a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4));
or
(2) Any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of a
family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(18)(ii) of this section, an issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(18)(i) of this section with respect to an issuer provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to
an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership
interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are
not customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends
to facilitate the customer's exposure to such transaction, investment
strategy, or service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec. 44.11(a)(8),
as if such issuer were a covered fund, provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading and the manner
of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances
of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the issuer, other than as described in paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of
this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 44.14(b) and 44.15,
as if such issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the issuer were an affiliate thereof.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership interest means any equity,
partnership, or other similar interest. An ``other similar interest''
means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an
[[Page 46500]]
event of default or an acceleration event; and
(2) The right to participate in the removal of an investment
manager for ``cause'' or participate in the selection of a replacement
manager upon an investment manager's resignation or removal. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ``cause'' for removal of an
investment manager means one or more of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal
of an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely
related to the performance of the covered fund or the investment
manager's exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's
transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is an interest held by an
entity (or an employee or former employee thereof) in a covered fund
for which the entity (or employee thereof) serves as investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or other
service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the interest is to allow the
entity (or employee or former employee thereof) to share in the profits
of the covered fund as performance compensation for the investment
management, investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other
services provided to the covered fund by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof), provided that the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) may be obligated under the terms of such
interest to return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is distributed to the entity
(or employee or former employee thereof) promptly after being earned
or, if not so distributed, is retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve amount to satisfy contractual
obligations with respect to subsequent losses of the covered fund and
such undistributed profit of the entity (or employee or former employee
thereof) does not share in the subsequent investment gains of the
covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with obtaining the restricted profit
interest, are within the limits of Sec. 44.12 of this subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) except to an affiliate thereof (or an employee
of the banking entity or affiliate), to immediate family members, or
through the intestacy, of the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business that gave rise to the restricted
profit interest by the entity (or employee or former employee thereof)
to an unaffiliated party that provides investment management,
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other services to
the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the holders of such interest do
not have the right to receive a share of the income, gains, or profits
of the covered fund, but are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as well as commitment fees
or other fees, which are not determined by reference to the performance
of the underlying assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal amount, on or before a maturity
date, in a contractually-determined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund, such as allocation of losses,
write-downs or charge-offs of the outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due and payable on the interest;
and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
* * * * *
(11) Riskless principal transaction. Riskless principal transaction
means a transaction in which a banking entity, after receiving an order
from a customer to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or sells) the
security in the secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the customer.
0
4. Amend Sec. 44.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
[[Page 46501]]
Sec. 44.12 Permitted investment in a covered fund.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment companies, SEC-regulated
business development companies, and foreign public funds. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered investment
company, SEC-regulated business development companies, or foreign
public fund as described in Sec. 44.10(c)(1) will not be considered to
be an affiliate of the banking entity so long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with its affiliates, does not own,
control, or hold with the power to vote 25 percent or more of the
voting shares of the company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate of the banking entity,
provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company or fund in compliance
with the limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
* * * * *
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i) Master-feeder fund
investments. If the principal investment strategy of a covered fund
(the ``feeder fund'') is to invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the ``master fund''), then for purposes of
the investment limitations in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, the banking entity's permitted investment in such funds
shall be measured only by reference to the value of the master fund.
The banking entity's permitted investment in the master fund shall
include any investment by the banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership interest
in the master fund that is held through the feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a banking entity organizes and
offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. 44.11 for the purpose of
investing in other covered funds (a ``fund of funds'') and that fund of
funds itself invests in another covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking entity's permitted investment in
that other fund shall include any investment by the banking entity in
that other fund, as well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any
ownership interest in the fund that is held through the fund of funds.
The investment of the banking entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and Co-Investments. (i) A banking entity
shall not be required to include in the calculation of the investment
limits under paragraph (a)(2) of this section any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be restricted under this section in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, the
aggregate value of all ownership interests held by a banking entity
shall be the sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
in covered funds (together with any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
44.10(d)(6)(ii)), on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
* * * * *
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted investment in a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating compliance with the applicable regulatory
capital requirements, a banking entity shall deduct from the banking
entity's tier 1 capital (as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
(together with any amounts paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec. 44.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical cost basis, plus any earnings
received; and
(ii) The fair market value of the banking entity's ownership
interests in the covered fund as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
or (b)(3) of this section (together with any amounts paid by the entity
in connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
44.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of this part), if the banking entity
accounts for the profits (or losses) of the fund investment in its
financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an ownership interest. (1)
Extension period. Upon application by a banking entity, the Board may
extend the period under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up to 2
additional years if the Board finds that an extension would be
consistent with safety and soundness and not detrimental to the public
interest.
(2) Application requirements. An application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least 90 days prior to the
expiration of the applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for application, including information
that addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3) of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity's plan for reducing the permitted
investment in a covered fund through redemption, sale, dilution or
other methods as required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Factors governing the Board determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Board may
consider all the facts and circumstances related to the permitted
investment in a covered fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would result, directly or indirectly, in
a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk assets or high-
risk trading strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing the banking entity's interest
in the covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered fund is expected to have
attracted
[[Page 46502]]
sufficient investments from investors unaffiliated with the banking
entity to enable the banking entity to comply with the limitations in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered banking entity to the
investment and the risks that disposing of, or maintaining, the
investment in the covered fund may pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of divesting or disposing of the
investment within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the divestiture or conformance of
the investment would involve or result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and unaffiliated parties, including
clients, customers, or counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity's prior efforts to reduce through
redemption, sale, dilution, or other methods its ownership interests in
the covered fund, including activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on activities or investment
during any extension period. The Board may impose such conditions on
any extension approved under paragraph (e)(1) of this section as the
Board determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the safety and
soundness of the banking entity or the financial stability of the
United States, address material conflicts of interest or other unsound
banking practices, or otherwise further the purposes of section 13 of
the BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the
Board will consult with such agency prior to acting on an application
by the banking entity for an extension under paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
0
5. Amend Sec. 44.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 44.13 Other permitted covered fund activities and investments.
* * * * *
(d) Permitted covered fund activities and investments of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. (1) The prohibition contained in Sec. 44.10(a)
does not apply to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of
the acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship
of, or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund by the foreign banking entity meets the
requirements for permitted covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as provided in Sec. 44.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
0
6. Amend Sec. 44.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv), (v), and (3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 44.14 Limitations on relationships with a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership interest in a covered fund in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 44.11, 44.12, or 44.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that such transaction is
inconsistent with the safe and sound operation and condition of the
banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a covered fund that would be an
exempt covered transaction under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of
the Board's Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to the limitations
specified under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered
fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets from a covered fund,
provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or purchase of assets is in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
settlement services; or futures, derivatives, and securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid, sold, or terminated by the
end of five business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each extension of credit meets the
requirements of Sec. 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the extension of
credit was an intraday extension of credit, regardless of the duration
of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity permitted under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii), (iv) or (v) of this section must comply with the
limitations in Sec. 44.15.
* * * * *
(c) Restrictions on other permitted transactions. Any transaction
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section
shall be subject to section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
371c-1) as if the counterparty were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D--Compliance Program Requirements; Violations
0
7. Amend Sec. 44.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the heading of paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (d)(1);
and
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 44.20 Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and liabilities or a qualifying
foreign excluded fund under section 44.6(f) or 44.13(d)) shall develop
and provide for the continued administration of a compliance program
reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the
prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and covered fund
activities and investments set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act and
this part. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope, and complexity of activities
and business structure of the banking entity.
* * * * *
(d) Reporting requirements under appendix A to this part. (1) A
banking
[[Page 46503]]
entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded fund under section
44.6(f) or 44.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading activity permitted
under subpart B shall comply with the reporting requirements described
in appendix A to this part, if:
* * * * *
(e) Additional documentation for covered funds. A banking entity
with significant trading assets and liabilities (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund under section 44.6(f) or 44.13(d))
shall maintain records that include:
* * * * *
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
12 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the Common Preamble, the Board amends
chapter II of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 248--PROPRIETARY TRADING AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED FUNDS (Regulation VV)
0
8. The authority citation for part 248 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851, 12 U.S.C. 221 et seq., 12 U.S.C.
1818, 12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq., and 12 U.S.C. 3103 et seq.
Subpart B--Proprietary Trading
0
9. Amend Sec. 248.6 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 248.6 Other permitted proprietary trading activities.
* * * * *
(f) Permitted trading activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds. The prohibition contained in Sec. 248.3(a) does not apply to
the purchase or sale of a financial instrument by a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement
that raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing
in financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship of,
or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that meets
the following:
(i) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in or sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in Sec. 248.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
Subpart C--Covered Funds Activities and Investments
0
10. Amend Sec. 248.10 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
0
d. Revising the heading of paragraph (c)(10) and revising paragraph
(c)(10)(i);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
0
f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16), (17), and (18);
0
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 248.10 Prohibition on acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in and having certain relationships with a covered fund.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell ownership interests, and such
interests are offered and sold, through one or more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or of any State and any
issuer for which such banking entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section for such issuer unless more than 75 percent of the
ownership interests in the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring banking entity or such issuer;
and
(D) Directors and senior executive officers as defined in Sec.
225.71(c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c)) of such
entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the
term ``public offering'' means a distribution (as defined in Sec.
248.4(a)(3)) of securities in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for which the banking entity serves
as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor, the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict availability to investors
having a minimum level of net worth or net investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10 unaffiliated co-venturers;
* * * * *
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An issuing entity for asset-
backed securities that satisfies all the conditions of this paragraph
(c)(8) and the assets or holdings of which are composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 248.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or
timely distribution of proceeds to holders of such securities and
rights or other assets that are related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding the loans, provided that each asset
that is a security (other than special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v)
of this section) meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of
this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates that meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of this
section; and
[[Page 46504]]
(E) Debt securities, other than asset-backed securities and
convertible securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt securities does not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of loans held under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(A) of this section, cash and cash equivalents held under
paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this section, and debt securities held
under this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities for purposes of this paragraph is calculated at par
value at the most recent time any such debt security is acquired,
except that the issuing entity may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt security based on its fair market
value if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to use the fair market value of
such assets for purposes of calculating compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations under its transaction
agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity's valuation methodology values similarly
situated assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(8),
except as permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, the
assets or holdings of the issuing entity shall not include any of the
following:
(A) A security, including an asset-backed security, or an interest
in an equity or debt security other than as permitted in paragraphs
(c)(8)(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may hold securities, other than
debt securities permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section,
if those securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents--which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or
the asset-backed securities--for purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to the loans supporting the asset-backed securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of derivatives by the issuing entity
shall be limited to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that
satisfy all of the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the derivatives directly relate to the
loans, the asset-backed securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section, or the debt
securities described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities described in paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates. The assets or holdings of the issuing entity may include
collateral certificates and special units of beneficial interest issued
by a special purpose vehicle, provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate meets the requirements in
this paragraph (c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is used for the sole purpose of transferring to the issuing
entity for the loan securitization the economic risks and benefits of
the assets that are permissible for loan securitizations under this
paragraph (c)(8) and does not directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is created solely to satisfy legal requirements or
otherwise facilitate the structuring of the loan securitization; and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate and the issuing entity
are established under the direction of the same entity that initiated
the loan securitization.
* * * * *
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i) Scope. An entity owning or
holding a dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other assets as provided in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for the benefit of the holders of
covered bonds, provided that the assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this
section.
* * * * *
(11) SBICs and public welfare investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment company, as defined in
section 103(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.
662), or that has received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or license has not been revoked, or
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a small
business investment company in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type
permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a
qualified rehabilitated building or certified historic structure, as
such terms are defined in section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 or a similar State historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a rural
business investment company, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A)
or (B), or that has terminated its participation as a rural business
investment company in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not make
any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or
potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's
assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C.
1400Z-2(d).
* * * * *
(15) Credit funds. Subject to paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section, an issuer that satisfies the asset and activity
requirements of paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section.
[[Page 46505]]
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer's assets must be composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 248.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this
section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans or debt
instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
that is a security is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or the debt
instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
of this section may not include commodity forward contracts or any
derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative directly relate to the
loans, debt instruments, or other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, debt instruments, or other rights
or assets described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be eligible for the exclusion of
paragraph (c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that would constitute proprietary
trading under Sec. 248.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were a banking
entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 248.11(a)(8) of this
subpart, as if the issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations imposed in Sec. 248.14, as if
the issuer were a covered fund, except the banking entity may acquire
and retain any ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity Requirements. A banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion with respect to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the
issuer or of any entity to which such issuer extends credit or in which
such issuer invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(15)(i)(B) or (i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship Limits. A banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 248.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs
(c)(16)(ii) through (iv) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1;
and
(B) Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. 248.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraph (c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on this exclusion
unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 248.11(a)(8), as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in Sec. 248.14 as if the issuer
were a covered fund (except the banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship with
the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 248.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(17) Family wealth management vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that is not, and does not hold
itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for
resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity are all
family customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests in the entity are owned
(directly or indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the entity are owned (directly
or indirectly) by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family customers and up to 5
closely related persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity's outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities
that are not family customers or closely related persons if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(17)(i) of this section with respect to an entity provided that the
banking entity (or an affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of such entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
248.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to
[[Page 46506]]
accommodate the specific circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the entity, other than as described in paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of
this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 248.14(b) and
248.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, complies with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17) of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(A) Closely related person means a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4));
or
(2) Any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of a
family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(18)(ii) of this section, an issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(18)(i) of this section with respect to an issuer provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to
an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership
interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are
not customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends
to facilitate the customer's exposure to such transaction, investment
strategy, or service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
248.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the issuer, other than as described in paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of
this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 248.14(b) and
248.15, as if such issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the issuer were an affiliate thereof.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership interest means any equity,
partnership, or other similar interest. An ``other similar interest''
means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event; and
(2) The right to participate in the removal of an investment
manager for ``cause'' or participate in the selection of a replacement
manager upon an investment manager's resignation or removal. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ``cause'' for removal of an
investment manager means one or more of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal
of an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely
related to the performance of the covered fund or the investment
manager's exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's
transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights
[[Page 46507]]
in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is an interest held by an
entity (or an employee or former employee thereof) in a covered fund
for which the entity (or employee thereof) serves as investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or other
service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the interest is to allow the
entity (or employee or former employee thereof) to share in the profits
of the covered fund as performance compensation for the investment
management, investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other
services provided to the covered fund by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof), provided that the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) may be obligated under the terms of such
interest to return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is distributed to the entity
(or employee or former employee thereof) promptly after being earned
or, if not so distributed, is retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve amount to satisfy contractual
obligations with respect to subsequent losses of the covered fund and
such undistributed profit of the entity (or employee or former employee
thereof) does not share in the subsequent investment gains of the
covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with obtaining the restricted profit
interest, are within the limits of Sec. 248.12 of this subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) except to an affiliate thereof (or an employee
of the banking entity or affiliate), to immediate family members, or
through the intestacy, of the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business that gave rise to the restricted
profit interest by the entity (or employee or former employee thereof)
to an unaffiliated party that provides investment management,
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other services to
the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the holders of such interest do
not have the right to receive a share of the income, gains, or profits
of the covered fund, but are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as well as commitment fees
or other fees, which are not determined by reference to the performance
of the underlying assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal amount, on or before a maturity
date, in a contractually-determined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund, such as allocation of losses,
write-downs or charge-offs of the outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due and payable on the interest;
and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
* * * * *
(11) Riskless principal transaction. Riskless principal transaction
means a transaction in which a banking entity, after receiving an order
from a customer to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or sells) the
security in the secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the customer.
0
11. Amend Sec. 248.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 248.12 Permitted investment in a covered fund.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment companies, SEC-regulated
business development companies, and foreign public funds. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered investment
company, SEC-regulated business development companies, or foreign
public fund as described in Sec. 248.10(c)(1) will not be considered
to be an affiliate of the banking entity so long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with its affiliates, does not own,
control, or hold with the power to vote 25 percent or more of the
voting shares of the company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate of the banking entity,
provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company or fund in compliance
with the limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
* * * * *
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i) Master-feeder fund
investments. If the principal investment strategy of a covered fund
(the ``feeder fund'') is to invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the ``master fund''), then for purposes of
the investment limitations in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, the banking entity's permitted investment in such funds
shall be measured only by reference to the value of the master fund.
The banking entity's permitted investment in the master fund shall
include any investment by the banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership interest
in the master fund that is held through the feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a banking entity organizes and
offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. 248.11 for the purpose of
investing in other covered funds (a ``fund of funds'') and that fund of
funds itself invests in another covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking entity's permitted investment in
that other fund shall include any investment by the banking entity in
that other fund, as well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any
ownership interest in the fund that is held through the fund of funds.
The investment of the banking entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and Co-Investments. (i) A banking entity
shall not be required to include in the calculation of the investment
limits under paragraph (a)(2) of this section any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be restricted under this section in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.
[[Page 46508]]
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, the
aggregate value of all ownership interests held by a banking entity
shall be the sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
in covered funds (together with any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
248.10(d)(6)(ii)), on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
* * * * *
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted investment in a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating compliance with the applicable regulatory
capital requirements, a banking entity shall deduct from the banking
entity's tier 1 capital (as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
(together with any amounts paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec. 248.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical cost basis, plus any earnings
received; and
(ii) The fair market value of the banking entity's ownership
interests in the covered fund as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
or (b)(3) of this section (together with any amounts paid by the entity
in connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
248.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of this part), if the banking entity
accounts for the profits (or losses) of the fund investment in its
financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an ownership interest. (1)
Extension period. Upon application by a banking entity, the Board may
extend the period under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up to 2
additional years if the Board finds that an extension would be
consistent with safety and soundness and not detrimental to the public
interest.
(2) Application requirements. An application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least 90 days prior to the
expiration of the applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for application, including information
that addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3) of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity's plan for reducing the permitted
investment in a covered fund through redemption, sale, dilution or
other methods as required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Factors governing the Board determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Board may
consider all the facts and circumstances related to the permitted
investment in a covered fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would result, directly or indirectly, in
a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk assets or high-
risk trading strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing the banking entity's interest
in the covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered fund is expected to have
attracted sufficient investments from investors unaffiliated with the
banking entity to enable the banking entity to comply with the
limitations in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered banking entity to the
investment and the risks that disposing of, or maintaining, the
investment in the covered fund may pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of divesting or disposing of the
investment within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the divestiture or conformance of
the investment would involve or result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and unaffiliated parties, including
clients, customers, or counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity's prior efforts to reduce through
redemption, sale, dilution, or other methods its ownership interests in
the covered fund, including activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on activities or investment
during any extension period. The Board may impose such conditions on
any extension approved under paragraph (e)(1) of this section as the
Board determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the safety and
soundness of the banking entity or the financial stability of the
United States, address material conflicts of interest or other unsound
banking practices, or otherwise further the purposes of section 13 of
the BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the
Board will consult with such agency prior to acting on an application
by the banking entity for an extension under paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
0
12. Amend Sec. 248.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 248.13 Other permitted covered fund activities and investments.
* * * * *
(d) Permitted covered fund activities and investments of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. (1) The prohibition contained in Sec.
248.10(a) does not apply to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of
the acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship
of, or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is
[[Page 46509]]
organized, under the laws of the United States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund by the foreign banking entity meets the
requirements for permitted covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as provided in Sec. 248.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
0
13. Amend Sec. 248.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv), (v), and (3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 248.14 Limitations on relationships with a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership interest in a covered fund in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 248.11, 248.12, or
248.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that such transaction is
inconsistent with the safe and sound operation and condition of the
banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a covered fund that would be an
exempt covered transaction under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of
the Board's Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to the limitations
specified under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered
fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets from a covered fund,
provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or purchase of assets is in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
settlement services; or futures, derivatives, and securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid, sold, or terminated by the
end of five business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each extension of credit meets the
requirements of Sec. 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the extension of
credit was an intraday extension of credit, regardless of the duration
of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity permitted under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii), (iv) or (v) must comply with the limitations in Sec.
248.15.
* * * * *
(c) Restrictions on other permitted transactions. Any transaction
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section
shall be subject to section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
371c-1) as if the counterparty were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D--Compliance Program Requirements; Violations
0
14. Amend Sec. 248.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the heading of paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (d)(1)
; and
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 248.20 Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and liabilities or a qualifying
foreign excluded fund under Sec. Sec. 248.6(f) or 248.13(d)) shall
develop and provide for the continued administration of a compliance
program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the
prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and covered fund
activities and investments set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act and
this part. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope, and complexity of activities
and business structure of the banking entity.
* * * * *
(d) Reporting requirements under appendix A to this part. (1) A
banking entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded fund under
section 248.6(f) or 248.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading activity
permitted under subpart B shall comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
* * * * *
(e) Additional documentation for covered funds. A banking entity
with significant trading assets and liabilities (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund under section 248.6(f) or 248.13(d))
shall maintain records that include:
* * * * *
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Chapter III
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the Common Preamble, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation amends chapter III of title 12, Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 351--PROPRIETARY TRADING AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED FUNDS
0
15. The authority citation for part 351 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851; 1811 et seq.; 3101 et seq.; and 5412.
Subpart B--Proprietary Trading
0
16. Amend Sec. 351.6 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 351.6 Other permitted proprietary trading activities.
* * * * *
(f) Permitted trading activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds. The prohibition contained in Sec. 351.3(a) does not apply to
the purchase or sale of a financial instrument by a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement
that raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing
in financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship of,
or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that meets
the following:
(i) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in or sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in Sec. 351.13(b);
[[Page 46510]]
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
Subpart C--Covered Funds Activities and Investments
0
17. Amend Sec. 351.10 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
0
d. Revising the heading of paragraph (c)(10) and revising paragraph
(c)(10)(i);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
0
f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16), (17), and (18);
0
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 351.10 Prohibition on acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in and having certain relationships with a covered fund.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell ownership interests, and such
interests are offered and sold, through one or more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or of any State and any
issuer for which such banking entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section for such issuer unless more than 75 percent of the
ownership interests in the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring banking entity or such issuer;
and
(D) Directors and senior executive officers as defined in Sec.
225.71(c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c)) of such
entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the
term public offering means a distribution (as defined in Sec.
351.4(a)(3)) of securities in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for which the banking entity serves
as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor, the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict availability to investors
having a minimum level of net worth or net investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10 unaffiliated co-venturers;
* * * * *
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An issuing entity for asset-
backed securities that satisfies all the conditions of this paragraph
(c)(8) and the assets or holdings of which are composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 351.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or
timely distribution of proceeds to holders of such securities and
rights or other assets that are related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding the loans, provided that each asset
that is a security (other than special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v)
of this section) meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of
this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates that meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of this
section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than asset-backed securities and
convertible securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt securities does not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of loans held under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(A) of this section, cash and cash equivalents held under
paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this section, and debt securities held
under this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities for purposes of this paragraph is calculated at par
value at the most recent time any such debt security is acquired,
except that the issuing entity may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt security based on its fair market
value if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to use the fair market value of
such assets for purposes of calculating compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations under its transaction
agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity's valuation methodology values similarly
situated assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(8),
except as permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, the
assets or holdings of the issuing entity shall not include any of the
following:
(A) A security, including an asset-backed security, or an interest
in an equity or debt security other than as permitted in paragraphs
(c)(8)(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may hold securities, other than
debt securities permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section,
if those securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents--which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or
the asset-backed securities--for purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to the loans supporting the asset-backed securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of derivatives by the issuing entity
shall be limited to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that
satisfy all of the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the derivatives directly relate to the
loans, the asset-backed securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section, or the debt
securities described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
[[Page 46511]]
of this section, or the debt securities described in paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates. The assets or holdings of the issuing entity may include
collateral certificates and special units of beneficial interest issued
by a special purpose vehicle, provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate meets the requirements in
this paragraph (c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is used for the sole purpose of transferring to the issuing
entity for the loan securitization the economic risks and benefits of
the assets that are permissible for loan securitizations under this
paragraph (c)(8) and does not directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is created solely to satisfy legal requirements or
otherwise facilitate the structuring of the loan securitization; and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate and the issuing entity
are established under the direction of the same entity that initiated
the loan securitization.
* * * * *
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i) Scope. An entity owning or
holding a dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other assets as provided in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for the benefit of the holders of
covered bonds, provided that the assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this
section.
* * * * *
(11) SBICs and public welfare investment funds. An issuer:
(i) That is a small business investment company, as defined in
section 103(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.
662), or that has received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or license has not been revoked, or
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a small
business investment company in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type
permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a
qualified rehabilitated building or certified historic structure, as
such terms are defined in section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 or a similar State historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a rural
business investment company, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A)
or (B), or that has terminated its participation as a rural business
investment company in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not make
any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or
potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's
assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C.
1400Z-2(d).
* * * * *
(15) Credit funds. Subject to paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section, an issuer that satisfies the asset and activity
requirements of paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer's assets must be composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 351.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this
section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans or debt
instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
that is a security is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or the debt
instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
of this section may not include commodity forward contracts or any
derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative directly relate to the
loans, debt instruments, or other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, debt instruments, or other rights
or assets described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be eligible for the exclusion of
paragraph (c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that would constitute proprietary
trading under Sec. 351.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were a banking
entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 351.11(a)(8) of this
subpart, as if the issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations imposed in Sec. 351.14, as if
the issuer were a covered fund, except the banking entity may acquire
and retain any ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity Requirements. A banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion with respect to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
[[Page 46512]]
assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the
issuer or of any entity to which such issuer extends credit or in which
such issuer invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(15)(i)(B) or (i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship Limits. A banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 351.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs
(c)(16)(ii) through (iv) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1;
and
(B) Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. 351.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraph (c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on this exclusion
unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 351.11(a)(8), as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in Sec. 351.14 as if the issuer
were a covered fund (except the banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship with
the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 351.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(17) Family wealth management vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that is not, and does not hold
itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for
resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity are all
family customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests in the entity are owned
(directly or indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the entity are owned (directly
or indirectly) by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family customers and up to 5
closely related persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity's outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities
that are not family customers or closely related persons if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(17)(i) of this section with respect to an entity provided that the
banking entity (or an affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of such entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
351.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the entity, other than as described in paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of
this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 351.14(b) and
351.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, complies with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17) of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(A) Closely related person means a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4));
or
(2) Any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of a
family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(18)(ii) of this section, an issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(18)(i) of this section with respect to an issuer provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to
an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership
interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are
not customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends
to facilitate the customer's exposure to such transaction, investment
strategy, or service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
351.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of
[[Page 46513]]
disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances of
the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the issuer, other than as described in paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of
this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 351.14(b) and
351.15, as if such issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the issuer were an affiliate thereof.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership interest means any equity,
partnership, or other similar interest. An other similar interest means
an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event; and
(2) The right to participate in the removal of an investment
manager for ``cause'' or participate in the selection of a replacement
manager upon an investment manager's resignation or removal. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ``cause'' for removal of an
investment manager means one or more of the following events: (i) The
bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of the
investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal
of an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely
related to the performance of the covered fund or the investment
manager's exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's
transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is an interest held by an
entity (or an employee or former employee thereof) in a covered fund
for which the entity (or employee thereof) serves as investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or other
service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the interest is to allow the
entity (or employee or former employee thereof) to share in the profits
of the covered fund as performance compensation for the investment
management, investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other
services provided to the covered fund by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof), provided that the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) may be obligated under the terms of such
interest to return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is distributed to the entity
(or employee or former employee thereof) promptly after being earned
or, if not so distributed, is retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve amount to satisfy contractual
obligations with respect to subsequent losses of the covered fund and
such undistributed profit of the entity (or employee or former employee
thereof) does not share in the subsequent investment gains of the
covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with obtaining the restricted profit
interest, are within the limits of Sec. 351.12 of this subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) except to an affiliate thereof (or an employee
of the banking entity or affiliate), to immediate family members, or
through the intestacy, of the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business that gave rise to the restricted
profit interest by the entity (or employee or former employee thereof)
to an unaffiliated party that provides investment management,
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other services to
the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the holders of such interest do
not have the right to receive a share of the income, gains, or profits
of the covered fund, but are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as well as commitment fees
or other fees, which are not determined by reference to the performance
of the underlying assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal amount, on or before a maturity
date, in a contractually-determined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund, such as allocation of losses,
write-downs or charge-offs of the outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the
[[Page 46514]]
amount of interest due and payable on the interest; and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
* * * * *
(11) Riskless principal transaction. Riskless principal transaction
means a transaction in which a banking entity, after receiving an order
from a customer to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or sells) the
security in the secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the customer.
0
18. Amend Sec. 351.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 351.12 Permitted investment in a covered fund.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment companies, SEC-regulated
business development companies, and foreign public funds. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered investment
company, SEC-regulated business development companies, or foreign
public fund as described in Sec. 351.10(c)(1) will not be considered
to be an affiliate of the banking entity so long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with its affiliates, does not own,
control, or hold with the power to vote 25 percent or more of the
voting shares of the company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate of the banking entity,
provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company or fund in compliance
with the limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
* * * * *
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i) Master-feeder fund
investments. If the principal investment strategy of a covered fund
(the ``feeder fund'') is to invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the ``master fund''), then for purposes of
the investment limitations in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, the banking entity's permitted investment in such funds
shall be measured only by reference to the value of the master fund.
The banking entity's permitted investment in the master fund shall
include any investment by the banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership interest
in the master fund that is held through the feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a banking entity organizes and
offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. 351.11 for the purpose of
investing in other covered funds (a ``fund of funds'') and that fund of
funds itself invests in another covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking entity's permitted investment in
that other fund shall include any investment by the banking entity in
that other fund, as well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any
ownership interest in the fund that is held through the fund of funds.
The investment of the banking entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and Co-Investments. (i) A banking entity
shall not be required to include in the calculation of the investment
limits under paragraph (a)(2) of this section any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be restricted under this section in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, the
aggregate value of all ownership interests held by a banking entity
shall be the sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
in covered funds (together with any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
351.10(d)(6)(ii)), on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
* * * * *
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted investment in a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating compliance with the applicable regulatory
capital requirements, a banking entity shall deduct from the banking
entity's tier 1 capital (as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
(together with any amounts paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec. 351.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical cost basis, plus any earnings
received; and
(ii) The fair market value of the banking entity's ownership
interests in the covered fund as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
or (b)(3) of this section (together with any amounts paid by the entity
in connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
351.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of this part), if the banking entity
accounts for the profits (or losses) of the fund investment in its
financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an ownership interest. (1)
Extension period. Upon application by a banking entity, the Board may
extend the period under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up to 2
additional years if the Board finds that an extension would be
consistent with safety and soundness and not detrimental to the public
interest.
(2) Application requirements. An application for extension must:
[[Page 46515]]
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least 90 days prior to the
expiration of the applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for application, including information
that addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3) of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity's plan for reducing the permitted
investment in a covered fund through redemption, sale, dilution or
other methods as required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Factors governing the Board determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Board may
consider all the facts and circumstances related to the permitted
investment in a covered fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would result, directly or indirectly, in
a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk assets or high-
risk trading strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing the banking entity's interest
in the covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered fund is expected to have
attracted sufficient investments from investors unaffiliated with the
banking entity to enable the banking entity to comply with the
limitations in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered banking entity to the
investment and the risks that disposing of, or maintaining, the
investment in the covered fund may pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of divesting or disposing of the
investment within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the divestiture or conformance of
the investment would involve or result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and unaffiliated parties, including
clients, customers, or counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity's prior efforts to reduce through
redemption, sale, dilution, or other methods its ownership interests in
the covered fund, including activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on activities or investment
during any extension period. The Board may impose such conditions on
any extension approved under paragraph (e)(1) of this section as the
Board determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the safety and
soundness of the banking entity or the financial stability of the
United States, address material conflicts of interest or other unsound
banking practices, or otherwise further the purposes of section 13 of
the BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the
Board will consult with such agency prior to acting on an application
by the banking entity for an extension under paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
0
19. Amend Sec. 351.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 351.13 Other permitted covered fund activities and investments.
* * * * *
(d) Permitted covered fund activities and investments of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. (1) The prohibition contained in Sec.
351.10(a) does not apply to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of
the acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship
of, or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund by the foreign banking entity meets the
requirements for permitted covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as provided in Sec. 351.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
0
20. Amend Sec. 351.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv), (v), and (3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 351.14 Limitations on relationships with a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership interest in a covered fund in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 351.11, 351.12, or
351.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that such transaction is
inconsistent with the safe and sound operation and condition of the
banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a covered fund that would be an
exempt covered transaction under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of
the Board's Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to the limitations
specified under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered
fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets from a covered fund,
provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or purchase of assets is in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
settlement services; or futures, derivatives, and securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid, sold, or terminated by the
end of five business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each extension of credit meets the
requirements of Sec. 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the extension of
credit was an intraday extension of credit, regardless of the duration
of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity permitted under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii), (iv) or (v) must comply with the limitations in Sec.
351.15.
* * * * *
(c) Restrictions on other permitted transactions. Any transaction
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section
shall be subject to section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
371c-1) as if the counterparty were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D--Compliance Program Requirements; Violations
0
21. Amend Sec. 351.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
[[Page 46516]]
0
b. Revising the heading of paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (d)(1);
and
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 351.20 Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and liabilities or a qualifying
foreign excluded fund under section 351.6(f) or 351.13(d)) shall
develop and provide for the continued administration of a compliance
program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the
prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and covered fund
activities and investments set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act and
this part. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope, and complexity of activities
and business structure of the banking entity.
* * * * *
(d) Reporting requirements under appendix A to this part. (1) A
banking entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded fund under
section 351.6(f) or 351.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading activity
permitted under subpart B shall comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
* * * * *
(e) Additional documentation for covered funds. A banking entity
with significant trading assets and liabilities (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund under section 351.6(f) or 351.13(d))
shall maintain records that include:
* * * * *
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the Common Preamble, the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission amends part 75 to chapter I of title 17 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 75--PROPRIETARY TRADING AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED FUNDS
0
22. The authority citation for part 75 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851.
Subpart B--Proprietary Trading
0
23. Amend Sec. 75.6 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 75.6 Other permitted proprietary trading activities.
* * * * *
(f) Permitted trading activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds. The prohibition contained in Sec. 75.3(a) does not apply to the
purchase or sale of a financial instrument by a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement
that raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing
in financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship of,
or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that meets
the following:
(i) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in or sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in Sec. 75.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
Subpart C--Covered Funds Activities and Investments
0
24. Amend Sec. 75.10 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
0
d. Revising the heading of paragraph (c)(10) and revising paragraph
(c)(10)(i);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
0
f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16), (17), and (18);
0
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 75.10 Prohibition on acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in and having certain relationships with a covered fund.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell ownership interests, and such
interests are offered and sold, through one or more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or of any State and any
issuer for which such banking entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section for such issuer unless more than 75 percent of the
ownership interests in the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring banking entity or such issuer;
and
(D) Directors and senior executive officers as defined in Sec.
225.71(c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c)) of such
entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the
term ``public offering'' means a distribution (as defined in Sec.
75.4(a)(3)) of securities in any jurisdiction outside the United States
to investors, including retail investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for which the banking entity serves
as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor, the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict availability to investors
having a minimum level of net worth or net investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.
* * * * *
[[Page 46517]]
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10 unaffiliated co-venturers;
* * * * *
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An issuing entity for asset-
backed securities that satisfies all the conditions of this paragraph
(c)(8) and the assets or holdings of which are composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 75.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or
timely distribution of proceeds to holders of such securities and
rights or other assets that are related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding the loans, provided that each asset
that is a security (other than special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v)
of this section) meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of
this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates that meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of this
section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than asset-backed securities and
convertible securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt securities does not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of loans held under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(A) of this section, cash and cash equivalents held under
paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this section, and debt securities held
under this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities for purposes of this paragraph is calculated at par
value at the most recent time any such debt security is acquired,
except that the issuing entity may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt security based on its fair market
value if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to use the fair market value of
such assets for purposes of calculating compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations under its transaction
agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity's valuation methodology values similarly
situated assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(8),
except as permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, the
assets or holdings of the issuing entity shall not include any of the
following:
(A) A security, including an asset-backed security, or an interest
in an equity or debt security other than as permitted in paragraphs
(c)(8)(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may hold securities, other than
debt securities permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section,
if those securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents--which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or
the asset-backed securities--for purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to the loans supporting the asset-backed securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of derivatives by the issuing entity
shall be limited to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that
satisfy all of the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the derivatives directly relate to the
loans, the asset-backed securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section, or the debt
securities described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities described in paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates. The assets or holdings of the issuing entity may include
collateral certificates and special units of beneficial interest issued
by a special purpose vehicle, provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate meets the requirements in
this paragraph (c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is used for the sole purpose of transferring to the issuing
entity for the loan securitization the economic risks and benefits of
the assets that are permissible for loan securitizations under this
paragraph (c)(8) and does not directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is created solely to satisfy legal requirements or
otherwise facilitate the structuring of the loan securitization; and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate and the issuing entity
are established under the direction of the same entity that initiated
the loan securitization.
* * * * *
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i) Scope. An entity owning or
holding a dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other assets as provided in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for the benefit of the holders of
covered bonds, provided that the assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this
section.
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(i) That is a small business investment company, as defined in
section 103(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.
662), or that has received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or license has not been revoked, or
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a small
business investment company in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type
permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a
qualified rehabilitated building or certified historic structure, as
such terms are
[[Page 46518]]
defined in section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or a similar
State historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a rural
business investment company, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A)
or (B), or that has terminated its participation as a rural business
investment company in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not make
any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or
potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's
assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C.
1400Z-2(d).
* * * * *
(15) Credit funds. Subject to paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section, an issuer that satisfies the asset and activity
requirements of paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer's assets must be composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 75.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this
section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans or debt
instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
that is a security is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or the debt
instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
of this section may not include commodity forward contracts or any
derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative directly relate to the
loans, debt instruments, or other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, debt instruments, or other rights
or assets described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be eligible for the exclusion of
paragraph (c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that would constitute proprietary
trading under Sec. 75.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were a banking
entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 75.11(a)(8) of this
subpart, as if the issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations imposed in Sec. 75.14, as if the
issuer were a covered fund, except the banking entity may acquire and
retain any ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity Requirements. A banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion with respect to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the
issuer or of any entity to which such issuer extends credit or in which
such issuer invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(15)(i)(B) or (i)(C)(l)(iii) of this section would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship Limits. A banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 75.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs
(c)(16)(ii) through (iv) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1;
and
(B) Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. 75.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraph (c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on this exclusion
unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 75.11(a)(8), as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in Sec. 75.14 as if the issuer
were a covered fund (except the banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship with
the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 75.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(17) Family wealth management vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that is not, and does not hold
itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for
resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity are all
family customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests in the entity are owned
(directly or indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the entity are owned (directly
or indirectly) by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family customers and up to 5
closely related persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the
[[Page 46519]]
entity's outstanding ownership interests may be acquired or retained by
one or more entities that are not family customers or closely related
persons if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(17)(i) of this section with respect to an entity provided that the
banking entity (or an affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of such entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
75.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the entity, other than as described in paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of
this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 75.14(b) and
75.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, complies with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17) of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(A) Closely related person means a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4));
or
(2) Any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of a
family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(18)(ii) of this section, an issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(18)(i) of this section with respect to an issuer provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to
an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership
interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are
not customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing
corporate separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar
concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends
to facilitate the customer's exposure to such transaction, investment
strategy, or service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec. 75.11(a)(8),
as if such issuer were a covered fund, provided that the content may be
modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading and the manner
of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the specific circumstances
of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the issuer, other than as described in paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of
this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 75.14(b) and 75.15,
as if such issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the issuer were an affiliate thereof.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership interest means any equity,
partnership, or other similar interest. An ``other similar interest''
means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event; and
(2) The right to participate in the removal of an investment
manager for ``cause'' or participate in the selection of a replacement
manager upon an investment manager's resignation or removal. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ``cause'' for removal of an
investment manager means one or more of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal
of an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely
related to the performance of the covered fund or the investment
manager's exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's
transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an
[[Page 46520]]
event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is an interest held by an
entity (or an employee or former employee thereof) in a covered fund
for which the entity (or employee thereof) serves as investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or other
service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the interest is to allow the
entity (or employee or former employee thereof) to share in the profits
of the covered fund as performance compensation for the investment
management, investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other
services provided to the covered fund by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof), provided that the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) may be obligated under the terms of such
interest to return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is distributed to the entity
(or employee or former employee thereof) promptly after being earned
or, if not so distributed, is retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve amount to satisfy contractual
obligations with respect to subsequent losses of the covered fund and
such undistributed profit of the entity (or employee or former employee
thereof) does not share in the subsequent investment gains of the
covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with obtaining the restricted profit
interest, are within the limits of Sec. 75.12 of this subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) except to an affiliate thereof (or an employee
of the banking entity or affiliate), to immediate family members, or
through the intestacy, of the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business that gave rise to the restricted
profit interest by the entity (or employee or former employee thereof)
to an unaffiliated party that provides investment management,
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other services to
the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the holders of such interest do
not have the right to receive a share of the income, gains, or profits
of the covered fund, but are entitled to receive only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as well as commitment fees
or other fees, which are not determined by reference to the performance
of the underlying assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal amount, on or before a maturity
date, in a contractually-determined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund, such as allocation of losses,
write-downs or charge-offs of the outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due and payable on the interest;
and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
* * * * *
(11) Riskless principal transaction. Riskless principal transaction
means a transaction in which a banking entity, after receiving an order
from a customer to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or sells) the
security in the secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the customer.
0
26. Amend Sec. 75.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 75.12 Permitted investment in a covered fund.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment companies, SEC-regulated
business development companies, and foreign public funds. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered investment
company, SEC-regulated business development companies, or foreign
public fund as described in Sec. 75.10(c)(1) will not be considered to
be an affiliate of the banking entity so long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with its affiliates, does not own,
control, or hold with the power to vote 25 percent or more of the
voting shares of the company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate of the banking entity,
provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company or fund in compliance
with the limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
* * * * *
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i) Master-feeder fund
investments. If the principal investment strategy of a covered fund
(the ``feeder fund'') is to invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the ``master fund''), then for purposes of
the investment limitations in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, the banking entity's permitted investment in such funds
shall be measured only by reference to the value of the master fund.
The banking entity's permitted investment in the master fund shall
include any investment by the banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership interest
in the master fund that is held through the feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a banking entity organizes and
offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. 75.11 for the purpose of
investing in other covered funds (a ``fund of funds'') and that fund of
funds itself invests in another covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking entity's permitted investment in
that other fund shall include any investment by the banking entity in
that other fund,
[[Page 46521]]
as well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership
interest in the fund that is held through the fund of funds. The
investment of the banking entity may not represent more than 3 percent
of the amount or value of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and Co-Investments. (i) A banking entity
shall not be required to include in the calculation of the investment
limits under paragraph (a)(2) of this section any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be restricted under this section in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, the
aggregate value of all ownership interests held by a banking entity
shall be the sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
in covered funds (together with any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
75.10(d)(6)(ii)), on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
* * * * *
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted investment in a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating compliance with the applicable regulatory
capital requirements, a banking entity shall deduct from the banking
entity's tier 1 capital (as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
(together with any amounts paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec. 75.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical cost basis, plus any earnings
received; and
(ii) The fair market value of the banking entity's ownership
interests in the covered fund as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
or (b)(3) of this section (together with any amounts paid by the entity
in connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
75.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of this part), if the banking entity
accounts for the profits (or losses) of the fund investment in its
financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an ownership interest. (1)
Extension period. Upon application by a banking entity, the Board may
extend the period under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up to 2
additional years if the Board finds that an extension would be
consistent with safety and soundness and not detrimental to the public
interest.
(2) Application requirements. An application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least 90 days prior to the
expiration of the applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for application, including information
that addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3) of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity's plan for reducing the permitted
investment in a covered fund through redemption, sale, dilution or
other methods as required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Factors governing the Board determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Board may
consider all the facts and circumstances related to the permitted
investment in a covered fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would result, directly or indirectly, in
a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk assets or high-
risk trading strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing the banking entity's interest
in the covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered fund is expected to have
attracted sufficient investments from investors unaffiliated with the
banking entity to enable the banking entity to comply with the
limitations in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered banking entity to the
investment and the risks that disposing of, or maintaining, the
investment in the covered fund may pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of divesting or disposing of the
investment within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the divestiture or conformance of
the investment would involve or result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and unaffiliated parties, including
clients, customers, or counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity's prior efforts to reduce through
redemption, sale, dilution, or other methods its ownership interests in
the covered fund, including activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on activities or investment
during any extension period. The Board may impose such conditions on
any extension approved under paragraph (e)(1) of this section as the
Board determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the safety and
soundness of the banking entity or the financial stability of the
United States, address material conflicts of interest or other unsound
banking practices, or otherwise further the purposes of section 13 of
the BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the
Board will consult with such agency prior to acting on an application
by the banking entity for an extension under paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
0
26. Amend Sec. 75.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 75.13 Other permitted covered fund activities and investments.
* * * * *
(d) Permitted covered fund activities and investments of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. (1) The prohibition
[[Page 46522]]
contained in Sec. 75.10(a) does not apply to a qualifying foreign
excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of
the acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship
of, or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund by the foreign banking entity meets the
requirements for permitted covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as provided in Sec. 75.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
0
27. Amend Sec. 75.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv), (v), and (3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 75.14 Limitations on relationships with a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership interest in a covered fund in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 75.11, 75.12, or 75.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that such transaction is
inconsistent with the safe and sound operation and condition of the
banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a covered fund that would be an
exempt covered transaction under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of
the Board's Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to the limitations
specified under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered
fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets from a covered fund,
provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or purchase of assets is in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
settlement services; or futures, derivatives, and securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid, sold, or terminated by the
end of five business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each extension of credit meets the
requirements of Sec. 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the extension of
credit was an intraday extension of credit, regardless of the duration
of the extension of credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity permitted under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii), (iv) or (v) must comply with the limitations in Sec.
75.15.
* * * * *
(c) Restrictions on other permitted transactions. Any transaction
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section
shall be subject to section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
371c-1) as if the counterparty were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D--Compliance Program Requirements; Violations
0
28. Amend Sec. 75.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the heading of paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (d)(1);
and
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 75.20 Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and liabilities or a qualifying
foreign excluded fund under section 75.6(f) or 75.13(d)) shall develop
and provide for the continued administration of a compliance program
reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the
prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and covered fund
activities and investments set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act and
this part. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope, and complexity of activities
and business structure of the banking entity.
* * * * *
(d) Reporting requirements under appendix A to this part. (1) A
banking entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded fund under
section 75.6(f) or 75.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading activity
permitted under subpart B shall comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
* * * * *
(e) Additional documentation for covered funds. A banking entity
with significant trading assets and liabilities (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund under section 75.6(f) or 75.13(d))
shall maintain records that include:
* * * * *
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the Common Preamble, the Securities
and Exchange Commission amends part 255 to chapter II of title 17 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 255--PROPRIETARY TRADING AND CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COVERED FUNDS
0
29. The authority citation for part 255 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1851.
Subpart B--Proprietary Trading
0
30. Amend Sec. 255.6 by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 255.6 Other permitted proprietary trading activities.
* * * * *
(f) Permitted trading activities of qualifying foreign excluded
funds. The prohibition contained in Sec. 255.3(a) does not apply to
the purchase or sale of a financial instrument by a qualifying foreign
excluded fund. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(1) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(2)(i) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(ii) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement
that raises money
[[Page 46523]]
from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in financial
instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in
financial instruments;
(3) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of the
acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship of,
or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that meets
the following:
(i) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(ii) The banking entity's acquisition or retention of an ownership
interest in or sponsorship of the fund meets the requirements for
permitted covered fund activities and investments solely outside the
United States, as provided in Sec. 255.13(b);
(4) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(5) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
Subpart C--Covered Funds Activities and Investments
0
31. Amend Sec. 255.10 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. Revising paragraph (c)(3)(i);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c)(8);
0
d. Revising the heading of paragraph (c)(10) and revising paragraph
(c)(10)(i);
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(11);
0
f. Adding paragraphs (c)(15), (16), (17), and (18);
0
g. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
h. Adding paragraph (d)(11).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 255.10 Prohibition on acquiring or retaining an ownership
interest in and having certain relationships with a covered fund.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Foreign public funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is organized or established outside of the United States; and
(B) Is authorized to offer and sell ownership interests, and such
interests are offered and sold, through one or more public offerings.
(ii) With respect to a banking entity that is, or is controlled
directly or indirectly by a banking entity that is, located in or
organized under the laws of the United States or of any State and any
issuer for which such banking entity acts as sponsor, the sponsoring
banking entity may not rely on the exemption in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section for such issuer unless more than 75 percent of the
ownership interests in the issuer are sold to persons other than:
(A) Such sponsoring banking entity;
(B) Such issuer;
(C) Affiliates of such sponsoring banking entity or such issuer;
and
(D) Directors and senior executive officers as defined in Sec.
225.71(c) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.71(c)) of such
entities.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the
term ``public offering'' means a distribution (as defined in Sec.
255.4(a)(3)) of securities in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to investors, including retail investors, provided that:
(A) The distribution is subject to substantive disclosure and
retail investor protection laws or regulations;
(B) With respect to an issuer for which the banking entity serves
as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, or sponsor, the distribution complies
with all applicable requirements in the jurisdiction in which such
distribution is being made;
(C) The distribution does not restrict availability to investors
having a minimum level of net worth or net investment assets; and
(D) The issuer has filed or submitted, with the appropriate
regulatory authority in such jurisdiction, offering disclosure
documents that are publicly available.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Is composed of no more than 10 unaffiliated co-venturers;
* * * * *
(8) Loan securitizations. (i) Scope. An issuing entity for asset-
backed securities that satisfies all the conditions of this paragraph
(c)(8) and the assets or holdings of which are composed solely of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 255.2(t);
(B) Rights or other assets designed to assure the servicing or
timely distribution of proceeds to holders of such securities and
rights or other assets that are related or incidental to purchasing or
otherwise acquiring and holding the loans, provided that each asset
that is a security (other than special units of beneficial interest and
collateral certificates meeting the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v)
of this section) meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iii) of
this section;
(C) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that meet the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section;
(D) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates that meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(v) of this
section; and
(E) Debt securities, other than asset-backed securities and
convertible securities, provided that:
(1) The aggregate value of such debt securities does not exceed
five percent of the aggregate value of loans held under paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(A) of this section, cash and cash equivalents held under
paragraph (c)(8)(iii)(A) of this section, and debt securities held
under this paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E); and
(2) The aggregate value of the loans, cash and cash equivalents,
and debt securities for purposes of this paragraph is calculated at par
value at the most recent time any such debt security is acquired,
except that the issuing entity may instead determine the value of any
such loan, cash equivalent, or debt security based on its fair market
value if:
(i) The issuing entity is required to use the fair market value of
such assets for purposes of calculating compliance with concentration
limitations or other similar calculations under its transaction
agreements, and
(ii) The issuing entity's valuation methodology values similarly
situated assets consistently.
(ii) Impermissible assets. For purposes of this paragraph (c)(8),
except as permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section, the
assets or holdings of the issuing entity shall not include any of the
following:
(A) A security, including an asset-backed security, or an interest
in an equity or debt security other than as permitted in paragraphs
(c)(8)(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section;
(B) A derivative, other than a derivative that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(8)(iv) of this section; or
(C) A commodity forward contract.
(iii) Permitted securities. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A)
of this section, the issuing entity may hold securities, other than
debt securities permitted under paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section,
if those securities are:
(A) Cash equivalents--which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the securitization's expected or potential need for
funds and whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or
the asset-backed securities--for purposes of the rights and assets in
paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section; or
[[Page 46524]]
(B) Securities received in lieu of debts previously contracted with
respect to the loans supporting the asset-backed securities.
(iv) Derivatives. The holdings of derivatives by the issuing entity
shall be limited to interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives that
satisfy all of the following conditions:
(A) The written terms of the derivatives directly relate to the
loans, the asset-backed securities, the contractual rights or other
assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B) of this section, or the debt
securities described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(E) of this section; and
(B) The derivatives reduce the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, the asset-backed securities, the
contractual rights or other assets described in paragraph (c)(8)(i)(B)
of this section, or the debt securities described in paragraph
(c)(8)(i)(E) of this section.
(v) Special units of beneficial interest and collateral
certificates. The assets or holdings of the issuing entity may include
collateral certificates and special units of beneficial interest issued
by a special purpose vehicle, provided that:
(A) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate meets the requirements in
this paragraph (c)(8);
(B) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is used for the sole purpose of transferring to the issuing
entity for the loan securitization the economic risks and benefits of
the assets that are permissible for loan securitizations under this
paragraph (c)(8) and does not directly or indirectly transfer any
interest in any other economic or financial exposure;
(C) The special unit of beneficial interest or collateral
certificate is created solely to satisfy legal requirements or
otherwise facilitate the structuring of the loan securitization; and
(D) The special purpose vehicle that issues the special unit of
beneficial interest or collateral certificate and the issuing entity
are established under the direction of the same entity that initiated
the loan securitization.
* * * * *
(10) Qualifying covered bonds. (i) Scope. An entity owning or
holding a dynamic or fixed pool of loans or other assets as provided in
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for the benefit of the holders of
covered bonds, provided that the assets in the pool are composed solely
of assets that meet the conditions in paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this
section.
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(i) That is a small business investment company, as defined in
section 103(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.
662), or that has received from the Small Business Administration
notice to proceed to qualify for a license as a small business
investment company, which notice or license has not been revoked, or
that has voluntarily surrendered its license to operate as a small
business investment company in accordance with 13 CFR 107.1900 and does
not make any new investments (other than investments in cash
equivalents, which, for the purposes of this paragraph, means high
quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity corresponds to the
issuer's expected or potential need for funds and whose currency
corresponds to the issuer's assets) after such voluntary surrender;
(ii) The business of which is to make investments that are:
(A) Designed primarily to promote the public welfare, of the type
permitted under paragraph (11) of section 5136 of the Revised Statutes
of the United States (12 U.S.C. 24), including the welfare of low- and
moderate-income communities or families (such as providing housing,
services, or jobs) and including investments that qualify for
consideration under the regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.); or
(B) Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a
qualified rehabilitated building or certified historic structure, as
such terms are defined in section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 or a similar State historic tax credit program;
(iii) That has elected to be regulated or is regulated as a rural
business investment company, as described in 15 U.S.C. 80b-3(b)(8)(A)
or (B), or that has terminated its participation as a rural business
investment company in accordance with 7 CFR 4290.1900 and does not make
any new investments (other than investments in cash equivalents, which,
for the purposes of this paragraph, means high quality, highly liquid
investments whose maturity corresponds to the issuer's expected or
potential need for funds and whose currency corresponds to the issuer's
assets) after such termination; or
(iv) That is a qualified opportunity fund, as defined in 26 U.S.C.
1400Z-2(d).
* * * * *
(15) Credit funds. Subject to paragraphs (c)(15)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section, an issuer that satisfies the asset and activity
requirements of paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Asset requirements. The issuer's assets must be composed solely
of:
(A) Loans as defined in Sec. 255.2(t);
(B) Debt instruments, subject to paragraph (c)(15)(iv) of this
section;
(C) Rights and other assets that are related or incidental to
acquiring, holding, servicing, or selling such loans or debt
instruments, provided that:
(1) Each right or asset held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
that is a security is either:
(i) A cash equivalent (which, for the purposes of this paragraph,
means high quality, highly liquid investments whose maturity
corresponds to the issuer's expected or potential need for funds and
whose currency corresponds to either the underlying loans or the debt
instruments);
(ii) A security received in lieu of debts previously contracted
with respect to such loans or debt instruments; or
(iii) An equity security (or right to acquire an equity security)
received on customary terms in connection with such loans or debt
instruments; and
(2) Rights or other assets held under this paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C)
of this section may not include commodity forward contracts or any
derivative; and
(D) Interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives, if:
(1) The written terms of the derivative directly relate to the
loans, debt instruments, or other rights or assets described in
paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section; and
(2) The derivative reduces the interest rate and/or foreign
exchange risks related to the loans, debt instruments, or other rights
or assets described in paragraph (c)(15)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) Activity requirements. To be eligible for the exclusion of
paragraph (c)(15) of this section, an issuer must:
(A) Not engage in any activity that would constitute proprietary
trading under Sec. 255.3(b)(l)(i), as if the issuer were a banking
entity; and
(B) Not issue asset-backed securities.
(iii) Requirements for a sponsor, investment adviser, or commodity
trading advisor. A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment
adviser, or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section may not
rely on this exclusion unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under
[[Page 46525]]
Sec. 255.11(a)(8) of this subpart, as if the issuer were a covered
fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the limitations imposed in Sec. 255.14, as if
the issuer were a covered fund, except the banking entity may acquire
and retain any ownership interest in the issuer.
(iv) Additional Banking Entity Requirements. A banking entity may
not rely on this exclusion with respect to an issuer that meets the
conditions in paragraphs (c)(15)(i) and (ii) of this section unless:
(A) The banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee,
assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the
issuer or of any entity to which such issuer extends credit or in which
such issuer invests; and
(B) Any assets the issuer holds pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(15)(i)(B) or (i)(C)(1)(iii) of this section would be permissible
for the banking entity to acquire and hold directly under applicable
federal banking laws and regulations.
(v) Investment and Relationship Limits. A banking entity's
investment in, and relationship with, the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 255.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(16) Qualifying venture capital funds. (i) Subject to paragraphs
(c)(16)(ii) through (iv) of this section, an issuer that:
(A) Is a venture capital fund as defined in 17 CFR 275.203(l)-1;
and
(B) Does not engage in any activity that would constitute
proprietary trading under Sec. 255.3(b)(1)(i), as if the issuer were a
banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity that acts as a sponsor, investment adviser,
or commodity trading advisor to an issuer that meets the conditions in
paragraph (c)(16)(i) of this section may not rely on this exclusion
unless the banking entity:
(A) Provides in writing to any prospective and actual investor in
the issuer the disclosures required under Sec. 255.11(a)(8), as if the
issuer were a covered fund;
(B) Ensures that the activities of the issuer are consistent with
safety and soundness standards that are substantially similar to those
that would apply if the banking entity engaged in the activities
directly; and
(C) Complies with the restrictions in Sec. 255.14 as if the issuer
were a covered fund (except the banking entity may acquire and retain
any ownership interest in the issuer).
(iii) The banking entity must not, directly or indirectly,
guarantee, assume, or otherwise insure the obligations or performance
of the issuer.
(iv) A banking entity's ownership interest in or relationship with
the issuer must:
(A) Comply with the limitations imposed in Sec. 255.15, as if the
issuer were a covered fund; and
(B) Be conducted in compliance with, and subject to, applicable
banking laws and regulations, including applicable safety and soundness
standards.
(17) Family wealth management vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(17)(ii) of this section, any entity that is not, and does not hold
itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that raises money from
investors primarily for the purpose of investing in securities for
resale or other disposition or otherwise trading in securities, and:
(A) If the entity is a trust, the grantor(s) of the entity are all
family customers; and
(B) If the entity is not a trust:
(1) A majority of the voting interests in the entity are owned
(directly or indirectly) by family customers;
(2) A majority of the interests in the entity are owned (directly
or indirectly) by family customers;
(3) The entity is owned only by family customers and up to 5
closely related persons of the family customers; and
(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(17)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section, up to an aggregate 0.5 percent of the entity's outstanding
ownership interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities
that are not family customers or closely related persons if the
ownership interest is acquired or retained by such parties for the
purpose of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate
separateness or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(17)(i) of this section with respect to an entity provided that the
banking entity (or an affiliate):
(A) Provides bona fide trust, fiduciary, investment advisory, or
commodity trading advisory services to the entity;
(B) Does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or
otherwise insure the obligations or performance of such entity;
(C) Complies with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
255.11(a)(8), as if such entity were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the entity;
(D) Does not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the entity, other than as described in paragraph (c)(17)(i)(C) of
this section;
(E) Complies with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 255.14(b) and
255.15, as if such entity were a covered fund; and
(F) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, complies with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the entity were an affiliate thereof.
(iii) For purposes of paragraph (c)(17) of this section, the
following definitions apply:
(A) Closely related person means a natural person (including the
estate and estate planning vehicles of such person) who has
longstanding business or personal relationships with any family
customer.
(B) Family customer means:
(1) A family client, as defined in Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4) of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (17 CFR 275.202(a)(11)(G)-1(d)(4));
or
(2) Any natural person who is a father-in-law, mother-in-law,
brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law or daughter-in-law of a
family client, or a spouse or a spousal equivalent of any of the
foregoing.
(18) Customer facilitation vehicles. (i) Subject to paragraph
(c)(18)(ii) of this section, an issuer that is formed by or at the
request of a customer of the banking entity for the purpose of
providing such customer (which may include one or more affiliates of
such customer) with exposure to a transaction, investment strategy, or
other service provided by the banking entity.
(ii) A banking entity may rely on the exclusion in paragraph
(c)(18)(i) of this section with respect to an issuer provided that:
(A) All of the ownership interests of the issuer are owned by the
customer (which may include one or more of its affiliates) for whom the
issuer was created;
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(A) of this section, up to
an aggregate 0.5 percent of the issuer's outstanding ownership
interests may be acquired or retained by one or more entities that are
not customers if the ownership interest is acquired or retained by such
parties for the purpose
[[Page 46526]]
of and to the extent necessary for establishing corporate separateness
or addressing bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar concerns; and
(C) The banking entity and its affiliates:
(1) Maintain documentation outlining how the banking entity intends
to facilitate the customer's exposure to such transaction, investment
strategy, or service;
(2) Do not, directly or indirectly, guarantee, assume, or otherwise
insure the obligations or performance of such issuer;
(3) Comply with the disclosure obligations under Sec.
255.11(a)(8), as if such issuer were a covered fund, provided that the
content may be modified to prevent the disclosure from being misleading
and the manner of disclosure may be modified to accommodate the
specific circumstances of the issuer;
(4) Do not acquire or retain, as principal, an ownership interest
in the issuer, other than as described in paragraph (c)(18)(ii)(B) of
this section;
(5) Comply with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 255.14(b) and
255.15, as if such issuer were a covered fund; and
(6) Except for riskless principal transactions as defined in
paragraph (d)(11) of this section, comply with the requirements of 12
CFR 223.15(a), as if such banking entity and its affiliates were a
member bank and the issuer were an affiliate thereof.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Ownership interest. (i) Ownership interest means any equity,
partnership, or other similar interest. An ``other similar interest''
means an interest that:
(A) Has the right to participate in the selection or removal of a
general partner, managing member, member of the board of directors or
trustees, investment manager, investment adviser, or commodity trading
advisor of the covered fund, excluding:
(1) The rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event; and
(2) The right to participate in the removal of an investment
manager for ``cause'' or participate in the selection of a replacement
manager upon an investment manager's resignation or removal. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(6)(i)(A)(2), ``cause'' for removal of an
investment manager means one or more of the following events:
(i) The bankruptcy, insolvency, conservatorship or receivership of
the investment manager;
(ii) The breach by the investment manager of any material provision
of the covered fund's transaction agreements applicable to the
investment manager;
(iii) The breach by the investment manager of material
representations or warranties;
(iv) The occurrence of an act that constitutes fraud or criminal
activity in the performance of the investment manager's obligations
under the covered fund's transaction agreements;
(v) The indictment of the investment manager for a criminal
offense, or the indictment of any officer, member, partner or other
principal of the investment manager for a criminal offense materially
related to his or her investment management activities;
(vi) A change in control with respect to the investment manager;
(vii) The loss, separation or incapacitation of an individual
critical to the operation of the investment manager or primarily
responsible for the management of the covered fund's assets; or
(viii) Other similar events that constitute ``cause'' for removal
of an investment manager, provided that such events are not solely
related to the performance of the covered fund or the investment
manager's exercise of investment discretion under the covered fund's
transaction agreements;
(B) Has the right under the terms of the interest to receive a
share of the income, gains or profits of the covered fund;
(C) Has the right to receive the underlying assets of the covered
fund after all other interests have been redeemed and/or paid in full
(excluding the rights of a creditor to exercise remedies upon the
occurrence of an event of default or an acceleration event);
(D) Has the right to receive all or a portion of excess spread (the
positive difference, if any, between the aggregate interest payments
received from the underlying assets of the covered fund and the
aggregate interest paid to the holders of other outstanding interests);
(E) Provides under the terms of the interest that the amounts
payable by the covered fund with respect to the interest could be
reduced based on losses arising from the underlying assets of the
covered fund, such as allocation of losses, write-downs or charge-offs
of the outstanding principal balance, or reductions in the amount of
interest due and payable on the interest;
(F) Receives income on a pass-through basis from the covered fund,
or has a rate of return that is determined by reference to the
performance of the underlying assets of the covered fund; or
(G) Any synthetic right to have, receive, or be allocated any of
the rights in paragraphs (d)(6)(i)(A) through (F) of this section.
(ii) Ownership interest does not include:
(A) Restricted profit interest, which is an interest held by an
entity (or an employee or former employee thereof) in a covered fund
for which the entity (or employee thereof) serves as investment
manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor, or other
service provider, so long as:
(1) The sole purpose and effect of the interest is to allow the
entity (or employee or former employee thereof) to share in the profits
of the covered fund as performance compensation for the investment
management, investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other
services provided to the covered fund by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof), provided that the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) may be obligated under the terms of such
interest to return profits previously received;
(2) All such profit, once allocated, is distributed to the entity
(or employee or former employee thereof) promptly after being earned
or, if not so distributed, is retained by the covered fund for the sole
purpose of establishing a reserve amount to satisfy contractual
obligations with respect to subsequent losses of the covered fund and
such undistributed profit of the entity (or employee or former employee
thereof) does not share in the subsequent investment gains of the
covered fund;
(3) Any amounts invested in the covered fund, including any amounts
paid by the entity in connection with obtaining the restricted profit
interest, are within the limits of Sec. 255.12 of this subpart; and
(4) The interest is not transferable by the entity (or employee or
former employee thereof) except to an affiliate thereof (or an employee
of the banking entity or affiliate), to immediate family members, or
through the intestacy, of the employee or former employee, or in
connection with a sale of the business that gave rise to the restricted
profit interest by the entity (or employee or former employee thereof)
to an unaffiliated party that provides investment management,
investment advisory, commodity trading advisory, or other services to
the fund.
(B) Any senior loan or senior debt interest that has the following
characteristics:
(1) Under the terms of the interest the holders of such interest do
not have the right to receive a share of the income,
[[Page 46527]]
gains, or profits of the covered fund, but are entitled to receive
only:
(i) Interest at a stated interest rate, as well as commitment fees
or other fees, which are not determined by reference to the performance
of the underlying assets of the covered fund; and
(ii) Repayment of a fixed principal amount, on or before a maturity
date, in a contractually-determined manner (which may include
prepayment premiums intended solely to reflect, and compensate holders
of the interest for, forgone income resulting from an early
prepayment);
(2) The entitlement to payments under the terms of the interest are
absolute and could not be reduced based on losses arising from the
underlying assets of the covered fund, such as allocation of losses,
write-downs or charge-offs of the outstanding principal balance, or
reductions in the amount of interest due and payable on the interest;
and
(3) The holders of the interest are not entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the covered fund after all other interests have
been redeemed or paid in full (excluding the rights of a creditor to
exercise remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default or an
acceleration event).
* * * * *
(11) Riskless principal transaction. Riskless principal transaction
means a transaction in which a banking entity, after receiving an order
from a customer to buy (or sell) a security, purchases (or sells) the
security in the secondary market for its own account to offset a
contemporaneous sale to (or purchase from) the customer.
0
32. Amend Sec. 255.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4);
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(5);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(1); and
0
e. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 255.12 Permitted investment in a covered fund.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Treatment of registered investment companies, SEC-regulated
business development companies, and foreign public funds. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, a registered investment
company, SEC-regulated business development companies, or foreign
public fund as described in Sec. 255.10(c)(1) will not be considered
to be an affiliate of the banking entity so long as:
(A) The banking entity, together with its affiliates, does not own,
control, or hold with the power to vote 25 percent or more of the
voting shares of the company or fund; and
(B) The banking entity, or an affiliate of the banking entity,
provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory,
administrative, and other services to the company or fund in compliance
with the limitations under applicable regulation, order, or other
authority.
* * * * *
(4) Multi-tier fund investments. (i) Master-feeder fund
investments. If the principal investment strategy of a covered fund
(the ``feeder fund'') is to invest substantially all of its assets in
another single covered fund (the ``master fund''), then for purposes of
the investment limitations in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, the banking entity's permitted investment in such funds
shall be measured only by reference to the value of the master fund.
The banking entity's permitted investment in the master fund shall
include any investment by the banking entity in the master fund, as
well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any ownership interest
in the master fund that is held through the feeder fund; and
(ii) Fund-of-funds investments. If a banking entity organizes and
offers a covered fund pursuant to Sec. 255.11 for the purpose of
investing in other covered funds (a ``fund of funds'') and that fund of
funds itself invests in another covered fund that the banking entity is
permitted to own, then the banking entity's permitted investment in
that other fund shall include any investment by the banking entity in
that other fund, as well as the banking entity's pro-rata share of any
ownership interest in the fund that is held through the fund of funds.
The investment of the banking entity may not represent more than 3
percent of the amount or value of any single covered fund.
(5) Parallel Investments and Co-Investments. (i) A banking entity
shall not be required to include in the calculation of the investment
limits under paragraph (a)(2) of this section any investment the
banking entity makes alongside a covered fund as long as the investment
is made in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including
applicable safety and soundness standards.
(ii) A banking entity shall not be restricted under this section in
the amount of any investment the banking entity makes alongside a
covered fund as long as the investment is made in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, including applicable safety and
soundness standards.
(c) * * *
(1)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, the
aggregate value of all ownership interests held by a banking entity
shall be the sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
in covered funds (together with any amounts paid by the entity in
connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
255.10(d)(6)(ii)), on a historical cost basis;
(ii) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, an investment by a director or employee of a banking
entity who acquires a restricted profit interest in his or her personal
capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the banking entity will be
attributed to the banking entity if the banking entity, directly or
indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of enabling the director
or employee to acquire the restricted profit interest in the fund and
the financing is used to acquire such ownership interest in the covered
fund.
* * * * *
(d) Capital treatment for a permitted investment in a covered fund.
For purposes of calculating compliance with the applicable regulatory
capital requirements, a banking entity shall deduct from the banking
entity's tier 1 capital (as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section) the greater of:
(1)(i) The sum of all amounts paid or contributed by the banking
entity in connection with acquiring or retaining an ownership interest
(together with any amounts paid by the entity in connection with
obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec. 255.10(d)(6)(ii) of
subpart C of this part), on a historical cost basis, plus any earnings
received; and
(ii) The fair market value of the banking entity's ownership
interests in the covered fund as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
or (b)(3) of this section (together with any amounts paid by the entity
in connection with obtaining a restricted profit interest under Sec.
255.10(d)(6)(ii) of subpart C of this part), if the banking entity
accounts for the profits (or losses) of the fund investment in its
financial statements.
(2) Treatment of employee and director restricted profit interests
financed by the banking entity. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section, an investment by a director or
[[Page 46528]]
employee of a banking entity who acquires a restricted profit interest
in his or her personal capacity in a covered fund sponsored by the
banking entity will be attributed to the banking entity if the banking
entity, directly or indirectly, extends financing for the purpose of
enabling the director or employee to acquire the restricted profit
interest in the fund and the financing is used to acquire such
ownership interest in the covered fund.
(e) Extension of time to divest an ownership interest. (1)
Extension period. Upon application by a banking entity, the Board may
extend the period under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section for up to 2
additional years if the Board finds that an extension would be
consistent with safety and soundness and not detrimental to the public
interest.
(2) Application requirements. An application for extension must:
(i) Be submitted to the Board at least 90 days prior to the
expiration of the applicable time period;
(ii) Provide the reasons for application, including information
that addresses the factors in paragraph (e)(3) of this section; and
(iii) Explain the banking entity's plan for reducing the permitted
investment in a covered fund through redemption, sale, dilution or
other methods as required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) Factors governing the Board determinations. In reviewing any
application under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the Board may
consider all the facts and circumstances related to the permitted
investment in a covered fund, including:
(i) Whether the investment would result, directly or indirectly, in
a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk assets or high-
risk trading strategies;
(ii) The contractual terms governing the banking entity's interest
in the covered fund;
(iii) The date on which the covered fund is expected to have
attracted sufficient investments from investors unaffiliated with the
banking entity to enable the banking entity to comply with the
limitations in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section;
(iv) The total exposure of the covered banking entity to the
investment and the risks that disposing of, or maintaining, the
investment in the covered fund may pose to the banking entity and the
financial stability of the United States;
(v) The cost to the banking entity of divesting or disposing of the
investment within the applicable period;
(vi) Whether the investment or the divestiture or conformance of
the investment would involve or result in a material conflict of
interest between the banking entity and unaffiliated parties, including
clients, customers, or counterparties to which it owes a duty;
(vii) The banking entity's prior efforts to reduce through
redemption, sale, dilution, or other methods its ownership interests in
the covered fund, including activities related to the marketing of
interests in such covered fund;
(viii) Market conditions; and
(ix) Any other factor that the Board believes appropriate.
(4) Authority to impose restrictions on activities or investment
during any extension period. The Board may impose such conditions on
any extension approved under paragraph (e)(1) of this section as the
Board determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the safety and
soundness of the banking entity or the financial stability of the
United States, address material conflicts of interest or other unsound
banking practices, or otherwise further the purposes of section 13 of
the BHC Act and this part.
(5) Consultation. In the case of a banking entity that is primarily
regulated by another Federal banking agency, the SEC, or the CFTC, the
Board will consult with such agency prior to acting on an application
by the banking entity for an extension under paragraph (e)(1) of this
section.
0
33. Amend Sec. 255.13 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 255.13 Other permitted covered fund activities and investments.
* * * * *
(d) Permitted covered fund activities and investments of qualifying
foreign excluded funds. (1) The prohibition contained in Sec.
255.10(a) does not apply to a qualifying foreign excluded fund.
(2) For purposes of this paragraph (d), a qualifying foreign
excluded fund means a banking entity that:
(i) Is organized or established outside the United States, and the
ownership interests of which are offered and sold solely outside the
United States;
(ii)(A) Would be a covered fund if the entity were organized or
established in the United States, or
(B) Is, or holds itself out as being, an entity or arrangement that
raises money from investors primarily for the purpose of investing in
financial instruments for resale or other disposition or otherwise
trading in financial instruments;
(iii) Would not otherwise be a banking entity except by virtue of
the acquisition or retention of an ownership interest in, sponsorship
of, or relationship with the entity, by another banking entity that
meets the following:
(A) The banking entity is not organized, or directly or indirectly
controlled by a banking entity that is organized, under the laws of the
United States or of any State; and
(B) The banking entity's acquisition of an ownership interest in or
sponsorship of the fund by the foreign banking entity meets the
requirements for permitted covered fund activities and investments
solely outside the United States, as provided in Sec. 255.13(b);
(iv) Is established and operated as part of a bona fide asset
management business; and
(v) Is not operated in a manner that enables the banking entity
that sponsors or controls the qualifying foreign excluded fund, or any
of its affiliates, to evade the requirements of section 13 of the BHC
Act or this part.
0
34. Amend Sec. 255.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (iv), (v), and (3); and
0
d. Revising paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 255.14 Limitations on relationships with a covered fund.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Acquire and retain any ownership interest in a covered fund in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 255.11, 255.12, or
255.13;
(ii) * * *
(C) The Board has not determined that such transaction is
inconsistent with the safe and sound operation and condition of the
banking entity; and
(iii) Enter into a transaction with a covered fund that would be an
exempt covered transaction under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of
the Board's Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42) subject to the limitations
specified under 12 U.S.C. 371c(d) or Sec. 223.42 of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR 223.42), as applicable,
(iv) Enter into a riskless principal transaction with a covered
fund; and
(v) Extend credit to or purchase assets from a covered fund,
provided:
(A) Each extension of credit or purchase of assets is in the
ordinary course of business in connection with payment transactions;
settlement services; or futures, derivatives, and securities clearing;
(B) Each extension of credit is repaid, sold, or terminated by the
end of five business days; and
(C) The banking entity making each extension of credit meets the
requirements of Sec. 223.42(l)(1)(i) and (ii) of the Board's
Regulation W (12 CFR
[[Page 46529]]
223.42(l)(1)(i) and(ii)), as if the extension of credit was an intraday
extension of credit, regardless of the duration of the extension of
credit.
(3) Any transaction or activity permitted under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii), (iv) or (v) must comply with the limitations in Sec.
255.15.
* * * * *
(c) Restrictions on other permitted transactions. Any transaction
permitted under paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (iii), or (iv) of this section
shall be subject to section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
371c-1) as if the counterparty were an affiliate of the banking entity
under section 23B.
Subpart D--Compliance Program Requirements; Violations
0
35. Amend Sec. 255.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the heading of paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (d)(1);
and
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 255.20 Program for compliance; reporting.
(a) Program requirement. Each banking entity (other than a banking
entity with limited trading assets and liabilities or a qualifying
foreign excluded fund under section 255.6(f) or 255.13(d)) shall
develop and provide for the continued administration of a compliance
program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the
prohibitions and restrictions on proprietary trading and covered fund
activities and investments set forth in section 13 of the BHC Act and
this part. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program shall
be appropriate for the types, size, scope, and complexity of activities
and business structure of the banking entity.
* * * * *
(d) Reporting requirements under appendix A to this part. (1) A
banking entity (other than a qualifying foreign excluded fund under
section 255.6(f) or 255.13(d)) engaged in proprietary trading activity
permitted under subpart B shall comply with the reporting requirements
described in appendix A to this part, if:
* * * * *
(e) Additional documentation for covered funds. A banking entity
with significant trading assets and liabilities (other than a
qualifying foreign excluded fund under section 255.6(f) or 255.13(d))
shall maintain records that include:
* * * * *
Brian P. Brooks,
Acting Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, on or about June 25, 2020.
James P. Sheesley,
Acting Assistant Executive Secretary.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 25, 2020 by the Commission.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
By the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
Note: The following appendices will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Appendices to Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private
Equity Funds--CFTC Voting Summary and CFTC Commissioners' Statements
Appendix 1--CFTC Voting Summary
On this matter, CFTC Chairman Tarbert and Commissioners Quintenz
and Stump voted in the affirmative. CFTC Commissioners Behnam and
Berkovitz voted in the negative. The document submitted to the CFTC
Commissioners for a vote did not include Section V.F. SEC Economic
Analysis.
Appendix 2--Supporting Statement of CFTC Chairman Heath P. Tarbert
As I have previously remarked, the Volcker Rule is ``among the
most well-intentioned but poorly designed regulations in the history
of American finance.'' \1\ While today's final rule does not fix the
fundamental flaws of the Volcker Rule \2\--only congressional action
can do that--it at least represents a more accurate reading of the
law Congress actually passed and brings us a step closer to a
reasonable implementation of the rule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Statement of Chairman Heath P. Tarbert in Support of
Revisions to the Volcker Rule (Sept. 16, 2019), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/tarbertstatement091619.
\2\ See, e.g., Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act, Public Law No: 115-174 (May 24, 2018) (amending
section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act by narrowing the
definition of ``banking entity'' in the Volcker Rule to exclude
certain community banks).
\3\ See Statement of Chairman Heath P. Tarbert in Support of
Further Revisions to the Volcker Rule (Jan. 30, 2020), https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/tarbertstatement013020b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Volcker Rule will now no longer be applied to
investments Congress never intended to be included in the first
place, such as credit funds, venture capital funds, customer
facilitation vehicles, and family wealth management vehicles. The
final rule also contains important modifications to several existing
exclusions from the prohibition on activities related to private
equity and hedge funds (the ``covered funds'' provisions)--for
foreign public funds, loan securitizations, and small business
investment companies. In these ways, the final rule begins to
address the over-breadth of the covered funds definition and related
requirements.
I am therefore pleased to support adoption of the proposed
revisions to the Volcker Rule's covered funds provisions. While only
a modest step forward, these refinements will nonetheless enhance
the regulatory experience and provide clarity for market
participants who have struggled to comply with the Volcker Rule.
Appendix 3--Dissenting Statement of CFTC Commissioner Rostin Behnam
I respectfully dissent as to the Commission's decision to
finalize additional revisions to the Volcker Rule. As we approach
the ten year anniversary of the Dodd-Frank Act,\1\ and cautiously
begin mapping a path out of the current pandemic, I believe it is a
good time to reflect on the lessons learned from the 2008 financial
crisis, the efficacy of our responses, and whether our objectives
have changed, or just our perspective. One of the many critically
important provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act is the Volcker Rule. The
Volcker Rule, in simple terms, contains two basic prohibitions: (1)
Banking entities may not engage in proprietary trading; and (2)
banking entities cannot have an ownership interest in, sponsor, or
have certain relationships with a covered fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last September, the Commission, along with other Federal
agencies (the ``Agencies''),\2\ approved changes that significantly
weakened the prohibition on propriety trading by narrowing the scope
of financial instruments subject to the Volcker Rule.\3\ I did not
support those changes.\4\ Today, the Commission, again in tandem
with the Agencies, completes the dismantling that began in 2018,\5\
and votes to significantly weaken the prohibition on ownership of
[[Page 46530]]
covered funds. Again, I cannot support these changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury; the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation; and the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
\3\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 84 FR 61974 (Nov. 14, 2019).
\4\ Id. at 62275.
\5\ See Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 83 FR 33432 (proposed July 17, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I voted against the 2018 proposal, and earlier this year, voted
against the proposal that strikes the final blow today.\6\ In voting
against the 2020 proposal, I quoted the late Paul Volcker's letter
to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, which he penned last
September, when the Agencies approved the changes breaking down the
proprietary trading prohibition.\7\ Mr. Volcker warned that the
amended rule ``amplifies risk in the financial system, increases
moral hazard and erodes protections against conflicts of interest
that were so glaringly on display during the last crisis.'' \8\ Mr.
Volcker's words apply equally well to the changes that the
Commission finalizes today regarding covered funds--particularly the
erosion of the existing protections regarding conflicts of interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 85 FR 12120, 12204 (proposed Feb. 28, 2020).
\7\ Id.
\8\ Jesse Hamilton and Yalman Onaran, ``Volcker the Man Blasts
Volcker the Rule in Letter to Fed Chair,'' Bloomberg (Sep. 10,
2019), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-10/volcker-the-man-blasts-volcker-the-rule-in-letter-to-fed-chair.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the tenth anniversary of the Dodd-Frank Act sadly coincides
with a different kind of crisis, I think it is critical to take a
hard look at how far we have come in ten years, and how well markets
have adapted to carefully crafted policy intended to create a more
resilient financial system. Chipping away, particularly at a time of
great uncertainty, risks a reversion to the past, when in fact, we
should only be looking forward.
Appendix 4--Dissenting Statement of CFTC Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz
The Volcker covered funds final release (``Covered Funds Rule'')
adopts with only minor changes the rule amendments as proposed by
the agencies in January of this year (``the Proposal''). I voted
against \1\ the Proposal because the agencies had only superficially
considered the additional risks that banks would incur under the
loosened regulations. Nothing in the Covered Funds Rule final
release dispels this concern. Therefore I dissent from the final
release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz
Regarding Volcker Covered Funds Proposal (Jan. 30, 2020), available
at: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/berkovitzstatement013020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congress enacted the original Volcker rule after the 2008
financial crisis to protect American taxpayers from again having to
bailout banks that are insured by the FDIC or have access to Federal
Reserve Bank financial support. This goal was to be achieved by
preventing the government-supported banks from undertaking risky
proprietary trading activities and from owning hedge funds or
private equity funds. The new Covered Funds Rule, together with the
rollbacks in the Volcker proprietary trading regulations adopted in
2019,\2\ will undermine many of the risk-reducing benefits of the
original Volcker rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and
Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and
Private Equity Funds, 84 FR 61974 (Nov. 14, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The original Volcker covered funds regulations were not perfect.
The foreign public funds exception and the so called ``super 23A''
provisions governing activities banks can undertake with covered
funds needed careful adjustments. However, the Covered Funds Rule
goes much, much further. It creates broad new exclusions from the
covered funds definition with inadequate analysis as to whether
these activities were intended to be permitted under the statute or
pose serious risk to the banks and the United States financial
system.
I addressed some of these new exclusions in more detail in my
dissenting statement on the Proposal.\3\ Of these, the new ``venture
capital funds'' exclusion perhaps best illustrates the extent to
which the Covered Funds Rule undermines the very purpose of the
Volcker rule. Venture capital serves an important function in our
financial markets by providing needed capital to startup companies.
But venture capital investing is very risky. One study found that
about 75% of venture capital-backed firms in the United States did
not return capital to investors.\4\ Another article on venture
capital noted that ``VC funds haven't significantly outperformed the
public markets since the late 1990s, and since 1997 less cash has
been returned to VC investors than they have invested.'' \5\ This is
exactly the type of risky private equity fund \6\ investing by
government-supported banks that Congress intended the Volcker rule
to curtail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Supra footnote 1.
\4\ Deborah Gage, The Venture Capital Secret: 3 out of 4 Start-
Ups Fail, Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 2012) (citing research by
Shikhar Ghosh, a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School),
available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443720204578004980476429190.
\5\ Diane Mulcahy, Six Myths About Venture Capitalists, Harvard
Business Review (May 2013), available at https://hbr.org/2013/05/six-myths-about-venture-capitalists.
\6\ Interestingly, while the Proposal acknowledged that venture
capital funds are a subset of private equity funds for purposes of
Volcker, in the preamble to the Covered Funds Rule, the agencies
provide a tortured, speculative analysis of statutory construction
trying to explain that Congress ``may'' have meant to exclude
venture capital funds, despite no real evidence to that effect. To
the contrary, three of the four statements from members of Congress
in the legislative record cited in the Covered Funds Rule clearly
show that they assumed that venture capital funds are private equity
funds under the Volcker rule. See Covered Funds Rule, section
IV.C.2.i.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting the Covered Funds Rule, the agencies failed to
analyze any data or other information that lays out the risks of
venture capital investing. The agencies simply exclude venture
capital funds from Volcker regulation. The Covered Funds Rule makes,
at best, a weak case that venture capital investments promote and
protect the safety and soundness of banking entities and the United
States financial system by allowing banks to diversify investments.
The weakness of that assertion is clear when one considers that
allowing any investments in hedge funds and private equity funds
would do the same, and yet that risk taking activity is precisely
what Congress prohibited.
The banking industry does not need to take on the additional
risks permitted by the Covered Funds Rule to be successful. U.S.
banks have performed well in recent years. Recent Global League
Tables ranking global banks by amount of banking business activity
shows that three or four U.S. banks are ranked among the top five
banks in the world in almost every table, including the tables for
foreign markets banking.\7\ While many factors impact banking
success, the relative strength of U.S. banks internationally belies
suggestions that the new laws and regulations adopted in the wake of
the 2008 financial crisis are hurting the competitiveness of U.S.
banks. We should recognize, rather than undermine, the success of
U.S. banks since the 2008 financial crisis and adoption of the Dodd-
Frank Act in 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See GlobalCapital.com, Global League Tables, available at
https://www.globalcapital.com/data/all-league-tables.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, U.S. banks also have performed well during the Covid-19
pandemic. But our financial system continues to face many
extraordinary risks from the effects of the pandemic. In the middle
of this latest shock to our financial system, we should not be
rushing out a final rule that permits greater risk taking by banks.
Rather, we should take stock of the data available to us, and make
carefully reasoned, incremental changes that are consistent with the
Congressional intent for the Volcker rule.
[FR Doc. 2020-15525 Filed 7-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P