Notice of Availability of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, 44930-44932 [2020-16076]
Download as PDF
44930
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Notices
respondent) * .20 (12 minutes or the
time taken to prepare each response).
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: July 21, 2020.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2020–16125 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1117–0021]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Extension
Without Change of a Previously
Approved Collection Dispensing
Records of Individual Practitioners
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
60-day Notice.
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
September 22, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments on the estimated
public burden or associated response
time, suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Scott A. Brinks, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (571) 362–3261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information proposed to be collected
can be enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
DATES:
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. Title of the Form/Collection:
Dispensing Records of Individual
Practitioners.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
No form number is associated with this
collection. The applicable component
within the Department of Justice is the
Drug Enforcement Administration,
Diversion Control Division.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Affected public: Business or
other for-profit.
Abstract: Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827(c),
practitioners who regularly dispense or
administer controlled substances to
patients and charge them for the
substances and those practitioners who
administer controlled substances in the
course of maintenance or detoxification
treatment shall keep records of such
activities, and accordingly must comply
with the regulations on recordkeeping.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The below table presents
information regarding the number of
respondents, responses and associated
burden hours.
Number of
annual
respondents
Activity
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Number of
annual
responses
Average
annual time
per response
(hours)
Dispensing records of individual practitioners .............................................................................
Recordkeeping requirements of collectors ..................................................................................
62,392
9,941
62,392
9,941
.5
.5
Total ......................................................................................................................................
72,333
72,333
N/A
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
proposed collection: DEA estimates that
this collection takes 36,167 annual
burden hours.
If additional information is required
please contact: Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, United
States Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, Suite 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
Dated: July 21, 2020.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (20–063)]
[FR Doc. 2020–16123 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities at
Santa Susana Field Laboratory
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
PO 00000
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
AGENCY:
Notice of Availability (NOA) of
the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) for Soil
ACTION:
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Notices
Cleanup Activities at the Santa Susana
Field Laboratory (SSFL).
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended, the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of NEPA, and
NASA’s NEPA-implementing
regulations, policy, and procedures,
NASA has prepared a Final SEIS for soil
cleanup activities at SSFL in Ventura
County, California. The purpose of this
NOA is to announce the issuance and
public availability of the Final SEIS and
inform the public of where the
document may be viewed. The Final
SEIS is intended to inform NASA
decision-makers, regulating agencies,
and the public about the environmental
impact of proposed soil cleanup in the
NASA-administered portion of SSFL.
DATES: NASA will execute a Record of
Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30
calendar days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register (FR)
of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA’s) NOA of the Final
SEIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final SEIS may be
reviewed at the following locations:
1. Simi Valley Library, 2969 Tapo
Canyon Road, Simi Valley, CA 93063,
Phone: (805) 526–1735.
2. Platt Library, 23600 Victory Blvd.,
Woodland Hills, CA 91367, Phone: (818)
340–9386.
3. California State University,
Northridge Oviatt Library, 18111
Nordhoff Street, 2nd Floor, Room 265,
Northridge, CA 91330, Phone: (818)
677–2285.
4. Department of Toxic Substances
Control, 9211 Oakdale Avenue,
Chatsworth, CA 91311, Phone: (818)
717–6521.
The Final SEIS is also available on the
internet at: https://www.nasa.gov/
feature/environmental-impactstatement-eis-for-demolition-andenvironmental-cleanup-activities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Zorba, SSFL Project Director, by
email at msfc-ssfl-information@
mail.nasa.gov, or 202–714–0496.
Additional information about NASA’s
SSFL Site, the proposed soil cleanup
activities, and the associated planning
process and documentation (as
available) may be found on the internet
at https://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov or on the
California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) website at
https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/
Santa_Susana_Field_Lab/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SSFL
site is 2,850 acres located in Ventura
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
County, California, approximately 7
miles northwest of Canoga Park and
approximately 30 miles northwest of
downtown Los Angeles. SSFL is
composed of four areas known as Areas
I, II, III, and IV and two ‘‘undeveloped’’
areas. The NASA-administered portion
is 41.7 acres within Area I and all 409.5
acres of Area II and was historically
used for developing and testing rocket
engines. The Boeing Company (Boeing)
owns the remaining 2,398.8 acres within
Areas I, III, IV, and the two undeveloped
areas. The Department of Energy (DOE)
is responsible for building demolition
and cleanup of soils and groundwater in
Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone.
Rocket engine testing has been
discontinued at SSFL and the property
has been excessed to the General
Services Administration (GSA). GSA
has conditionally accepted the Report of
Excess pending certain environmental
cleanup requirements are met.
NASA entered into an Administrative
Order on Consent (AOC) for Remedial
Action with DTSC on December 6, 2010,
‘‘to further define and make more
specific NASA’s obligations with
respect to the cleanup of soils at the
Site.’’ Based on the 2010 Order, NASA
is required to complete a federal
environmental impact analysis pursuant
to NEPA and NASA Procedural
Requirement (NPR) 8580.1.
NASA completed a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
per NEPA for demolition of site
infrastructure, soil cleanup, and
groundwater remediation within Area II
and a portion of Area I (former Liquid
Oxygen [LOX] Plant) of SSFL on March
14, 2014 (79 FR 14545). NASA
subsequently issued a ROD for building
demolition on April 25, 2014. A ROD
for groundwater cleanup was published
in the Federal Register on October 17,
2018 (83 FR 52570). On October 25,
2019, an NOA was published in the FR
(84 FR 57490) for the Draft SEIS, which
initiated a 45-day public comment
period. On December 9, 2019, NASA
published a notice in the FR that
advised the public that the comment
period would be extended by 30 days to
January 8, 2020 (84 FR 67296).
This Final SEIS has been prepared by
NASA for soil cleanup within its
administered portion of SSFL.
Alternatives: The CEQ’s
implementing regulations for NEPA
require that where significant new
information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on a proposed
action or its impacts exists, an SEIS
must be prepared for the original EIS so
that the Agency has the best possible
information to make any necessary
substantive changes in its decisions
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44931
regarding the proposed action. NASA
initiated preparation of this Final SEIS
when it determined that pursuant to
information found in the DTSC’s Draft
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Review for the SSFL cleanup, the soil
quantity which may need to be removed
from the SSFL site far exceeded the
estimate NASA used in its 2014 Final
EIS. NASA determined this constituted
significant new information relevant to
environmental concerns and bearing on
the proposed action.
NEPA requires analysis of a range of
reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action. The alternatives section is the
heart of any NEPA document, including
this Final SEIS. In determining the
scope of alternatives to be considered,
NASA considered those alternatives that
are: (1) Practical and feasible using both
the AOC framework and a risk-based
approach based on criteria provided for
in the National Contingency Plan and as
set forth in applicable California state
law, (2) protective both environmentally
and from a human health-based
perspective, and (3) feasible from a
technical implementability standpoint.
As it prepared the Final SEIS and
evaluated the alternatives set forth
below, NASA was mindful of its
responsibility to implement an
environmental cleanup of residual
contaminants in Area II and the portion
of Area I over which it has continued
oversight in a manner that is fully
protective of public health and the
environment, preserves to the maximum
extent possible the Site’s natural and
cultural resources, and is feasible (i.e.,
implementable). The Final SEIS takes
into account other responsible party
cleanup obligations for the areas of
SSFL that surround NASA’s property to
ensure a long-term, cohesive, and
uniform remedial action is
implemented. The Final SEIS considers
the following range of alternatives that
meet NASA’s objectives to clean up soil
at the portion of the SSFL site
administered by NASA.
• Alternative A: AOC Cleanup using
DTSC-proposed Look-up Table (LUT)
values (similar to the Proposed Action
from the 2014 Final EIS with the
impacts of increased soil volumes
considered)
• Alternative B: Revised LUT Cleanup
(this alternative involves proposed
revisions to seven of the 139 LUT values
to reflect standard California Water
Board and California Human Health
screening values. All other DTSCproposed LUT values would remain the
same.)
• Alternative C: Suburban Residential
Cleanup (based on the DTSC-approved
Standardized Risk Assessment
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
44932
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Notices
Methodology [SRAM] Revision 2
Addendum, EPA risk assessment
guidelines for residential land use, and
California Environmental Protection
Agency [Cal EPA] risk assessment
guidance)
• Alternative D: Recreational Cleanup
(based on DTSC-approved SRAM
Revision 2 Addendum, EPA risk
assessment guidelines for recreational
land use, and Cal EPA risk assessment
guidance)
A No Action alternative, which is
required per NEPA, was also included
in the analysis, though it would not
meet the purpose and need of the
proposed action.
Public meetings on the Draft EIS were
held in the vicinity of SSFL on
November 20 and 21, 2019. During the
review period, NASA received
approximately 1,200 comments, over
800 of which were form letters. After
considering all comments received,
NASA prepared the Final SEIS. There
are no substantive changes to the range
of alternatives considered. Alternative
C, Suburban Residential Cleanup, is
identified as the Agency’s Preferred
Alternative, and, along with Alternative
D, the Agency’s Environmentally
Preferable Alternative.
Cheryl Parker,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–16076 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Contractor Budget
and, Contractor Representation and
Certification
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA), as part of a
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on the following
extension of a currently approved
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before September 22,
2020 to be assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the information collection to Mackie
Malaka, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Suite
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:45 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
6060, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; Fax
No. 703–519–8579; or email at
PRAComments@NCUA.gov. Given the
limited in-house staff because of the
COVID–19 pandemic, email comments
are preferred.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Address requests for additional
information to Mackie Malaka at the
address above or telephone 703–548–
2704.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB
Number: 3133–0189.
Title: Contractor Budget and
Contractor Representation and
Certification.
Form: NCUA 3249a and 3249b.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: Standardized information
from prospective outside counsel is
essential to the NCUA in carrying out its
responsibility as regulator, conservator,
and liquidating agent for federally
insured credit unions. The information
will enable the NCUA to further
standardize the data it uses to select
outside counsel, consider additional
criteria in making its selections, and
improve efficiency and recordkeeping
related to its selection process.
Affected Public: Private Sector:
Business or other for-profits.
Estimated No. of Respondents: 100.
Estimated No. of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
100.
Estimated Burden Hours per
Response: 2.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 200.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record. The
public is invited to submit comments
concerning: (a) Whether the collection
of information is necessary for the
proper execution of the function of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of the
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
By Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the
Board, the National Credit Union
Administration, on July 20, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 20, 2020.
Mackie I. Malaka,
NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–16027 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Sunshine Act Meetings; National
Science Board
The National Science Board (NSB),
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR
part 614), the National Science
Foundation Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C.
1862n–5), and the Government in the
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby
gives notice of the scheduling of
meetings for the transaction of NSB
business as follows:
TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 29,
2020 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:45 p.m., and
Thursday, July 30, 2020 from 11:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. EDT.
PLACE: These meetings will be held by
videoconference. There will be no inperson meetings to attend. The public
may observe the public meetings, which
will be streamed to the NSF You Tube
channel. For meetings on Wednesday,
July 29, go to: https://youtu.be/
3CXXjWbwsYE. For meetings on
Thursday, July 30, go to: https://
youtu.be/rjs0ny0zgR4.
STATUS: Some of these meetings will be
open to the public. Others will be closed
to the public. See full description
below.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Wednesday, July 29, 2020
Plenary Board Meeting
Open session: 11:00 a.m.–12:10 p.m.;
12:20 p.m.–1:35 p.m.
• NSB Chair’s Welcome
• Swearing-In New Members of the
Class 2020–2026
• NSF Director’s Remarks
• NSB Chair Activity Summary
• Vision 2030 Implementation Working
Group Update
• NSF HBCU Programs Overview
• Framing Black Experiences in Science
and Engineering Panel Discussion
Committee on External Engagement (EE)
Open session: 1:35 p.m.–2:15 p.m.
• Committee Chair’s Opening Remarks
• Approval of Prior Minutes
• NSB Messages on the ‘‘Missing
Millions’’ and Engaging Partners on
Vision 2030 Roadmap Actions
• Update on NSB Resources for External
Engagement
• Honorary Awards 2021 Call for
Nominations
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 143 (Friday, July 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44930-44932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16076]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (20-063)]
Notice of Availability of the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities at Santa Susana Field
Laboratory
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for Soil
[[Page 44931]]
Cleanup Activities at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, and
NASA's NEPA-implementing regulations, policy, and procedures, NASA has
prepared a Final SEIS for soil cleanup activities at SSFL in Ventura
County, California. The purpose of this NOA is to announce the issuance
and public availability of the Final SEIS and inform the public of
where the document may be viewed. The Final SEIS is intended to inform
NASA decision-makers, regulating agencies, and the public about the
environmental impact of proposed soil cleanup in the NASA-administered
portion of SSFL.
DATES: NASA will execute a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30
calendar days from the date of publication in the Federal Register (FR)
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) NOA of the Final
SEIS.
ADDRESSES: The Final SEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
1. Simi Valley Library, 2969 Tapo Canyon Road, Simi Valley, CA
93063, Phone: (805) 526-1735.
2. Platt Library, 23600 Victory Blvd., Woodland Hills, CA 91367,
Phone: (818) 340-9386.
3. California State University, Northridge Oviatt Library, 18111
Nordhoff Street, 2nd Floor, Room 265, Northridge, CA 91330, Phone:
(818) 677-2285.
4. Department of Toxic Substances Control, 9211 Oakdale Avenue,
Chatsworth, CA 91311, Phone: (818) 717-6521.
The Final SEIS is also available on the internet at: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/environmental-impact-statement-eis-for-demolition-and-environmental-cleanup-activities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Zorba, SSFL Project Director, by
email at [email protected], or 202-714-0496.
Additional information about NASA's SSFL Site, the proposed soil
cleanup activities, and the associated planning process and
documentation (as available) may be found on the internet at https://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov or on the California Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) website at https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Santa_Susana_Field_Lab/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SSFL site is 2,850 acres located in
Ventura County, California, approximately 7 miles northwest of Canoga
Park and approximately 30 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. SSFL
is composed of four areas known as Areas I, II, III, and IV and two
``undeveloped'' areas. The NASA-administered portion is 41.7 acres
within Area I and all 409.5 acres of Area II and was historically used
for developing and testing rocket engines. The Boeing Company (Boeing)
owns the remaining 2,398.8 acres within Areas I, III, IV, and the two
undeveloped areas. The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for
building demolition and cleanup of soils and groundwater in Area IV and
the Northern Buffer Zone.
Rocket engine testing has been discontinued at SSFL and the
property has been excessed to the General Services Administration
(GSA). GSA has conditionally accepted the Report of Excess pending
certain environmental cleanup requirements are met.
NASA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) for
Remedial Action with DTSC on December 6, 2010, ``to further define and
make more specific NASA's obligations with respect to the cleanup of
soils at the Site.'' Based on the 2010 Order, NASA is required to
complete a federal environmental impact analysis pursuant to NEPA and
NASA Procedural Requirement (NPR) 8580.1.
NASA completed a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) per
NEPA for demolition of site infrastructure, soil cleanup, and
groundwater remediation within Area II and a portion of Area I (former
Liquid Oxygen [LOX] Plant) of SSFL on March 14, 2014 (79 FR 14545).
NASA subsequently issued a ROD for building demolition on April 25,
2014. A ROD for groundwater cleanup was published in the Federal
Register on October 17, 2018 (83 FR 52570). On October 25, 2019, an NOA
was published in the FR (84 FR 57490) for the Draft SEIS, which
initiated a 45-day public comment period. On December 9, 2019, NASA
published a notice in the FR that advised the public that the comment
period would be extended by 30 days to January 8, 2020 (84 FR 67296).
This Final SEIS has been prepared by NASA for soil cleanup within
its administered portion of SSFL.
Alternatives: The CEQ's implementing regulations for NEPA require
that where significant new information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on a proposed action or its impacts exists, an
SEIS must be prepared for the original EIS so that the Agency has the
best possible information to make any necessary substantive changes in
its decisions regarding the proposed action. NASA initiated preparation
of this Final SEIS when it determined that pursuant to information
found in the DTSC's Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Review for
the SSFL cleanup, the soil quantity which may need to be removed from
the SSFL site far exceeded the estimate NASA used in its 2014 Final
EIS. NASA determined this constituted significant new information
relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action.
NEPA requires analysis of a range of reasonable alternatives to the
proposed action. The alternatives section is the heart of any NEPA
document, including this Final SEIS. In determining the scope of
alternatives to be considered, NASA considered those alternatives that
are: (1) Practical and feasible using both the AOC framework and a
risk-based approach based on criteria provided for in the National
Contingency Plan and as set forth in applicable California state law,
(2) protective both environmentally and from a human health-based
perspective, and (3) feasible from a technical implementability
standpoint.
As it prepared the Final SEIS and evaluated the alternatives set
forth below, NASA was mindful of its responsibility to implement an
environmental cleanup of residual contaminants in Area II and the
portion of Area I over which it has continued oversight in a manner
that is fully protective of public health and the environment,
preserves to the maximum extent possible the Site's natural and
cultural resources, and is feasible (i.e., implementable). The Final
SEIS takes into account other responsible party cleanup obligations for
the areas of SSFL that surround NASA's property to ensure a long-term,
cohesive, and uniform remedial action is implemented. The Final SEIS
considers the following range of alternatives that meet NASA's
objectives to clean up soil at the portion of the SSFL site
administered by NASA.
Alternative A: AOC Cleanup using DTSC-proposed Look-up
Table (LUT) values (similar to the Proposed Action from the 2014 Final
EIS with the impacts of increased soil volumes considered)
Alternative B: Revised LUT Cleanup (this alternative
involves proposed revisions to seven of the 139 LUT values to reflect
standard California Water Board and California Human Health screening
values. All other DTSC-proposed LUT values would remain the same.)
Alternative C: Suburban Residential Cleanup (based on the
DTSC-approved Standardized Risk Assessment
[[Page 44932]]
Methodology [SRAM] Revision 2 Addendum, EPA risk assessment guidelines
for residential land use, and California Environmental Protection
Agency [Cal EPA] risk assessment guidance)
Alternative D: Recreational Cleanup (based on DTSC-
approved SRAM Revision 2 Addendum, EPA risk assessment guidelines for
recreational land use, and Cal EPA risk assessment guidance)
A No Action alternative, which is required per NEPA, was also
included in the analysis, though it would not meet the purpose and need
of the proposed action.
Public meetings on the Draft EIS were held in the vicinity of SSFL
on November 20 and 21, 2019. During the review period, NASA received
approximately 1,200 comments, over 800 of which were form letters.
After considering all comments received, NASA prepared the Final SEIS.
There are no substantive changes to the range of alternatives
considered. Alternative C, Suburban Residential Cleanup, is identified
as the Agency's Preferred Alternative, and, along with Alternative D,
the Agency's Environmentally Preferable Alternative.
Cheryl Parker,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-16076 Filed 7-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P