Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Early Assessment Review; Commercial Clothes Washers, 44795-44798 [2020-15080]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
and the inclusion of term limits would
not only increase the likelihood of
subcommittee participation, but also
promote increased industry confidence
and trust in the subcommittee’s
composition and function. Therefore,
the alternative was rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0177, Tart
Cherries Grown in the States of
Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wisconsin. No changes in those
requirements are necessary as a result of
this action. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to
OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large tart cherry handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Board’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the tart cherry
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meetings and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the
March 19, 2020, meeting was a public
meeting, and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express their views
on this issue. Interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule, including the regulatory
and information collection impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tart
Cherries.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN
IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON,
UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND
WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[EERE–2019–BT–STD–0044]
RIN 1904–AE41
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards for Certain
Commercial and Industrial Equipment;
Early Assessment Review; Commercial
Clothes Washers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) is undertaking an early
assessment review for amended energy
conservation standards for commercial
clothes washers to determine whether to
amend applicable energy conservation
standards for this equipment.
Specifically, through this request for
information (‘‘RFI’’), DOE seeks data
and information that could enable the
agency to determine whether DOE
should propose a ‘‘no-new-standard’’
determination because a more-stringent
standard: Would not result in a
significant savings of energy; is not
technologically feasible; is not
economically justified; or any
combination of the foregoing. DOE
welcomes written comments from the
public on any subject within the scope
of this document (including those topics
not specifically raised in this RFI), as
well as the submission of data and other
relevant information concerning this
early assessment review.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before September 22,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2019–BT–STD–0044, by
any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to
CommClothesWashers2019STD0044@
ee.doe.gov. Include docket number
EERE–2019–BT–STD–0044 in the
subject line of the message.
3. Postal Mail: Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 930 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend § 930.162 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 930.162
Exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Review of applications. A Board
appointed subcommittee shall review
applications for exemption or renewal
of exemption and either approve or
deny the exemption. The subcommittee
shall consist of up to five total members,
each having no handler affiliation but
knowledge of the tart cherry industry,
one of whom shall be the public
member or the alternate public member
if available to serve. Each subcommittee
appointment shall be limited to a fiveyear term. Any denial of an application
for exemption or renewal of an existing
exemption shall be served on the
applicant by certified mail and shall
state the reasons for the denial. Within
10 days after the receipt of a denial, the
applicant may file an appeal, in writing,
with the Deputy Administrator,
Specialty Crops Program, supported by
any arguments and evidence the
applicant may wish to offer as to why
the application for exemption or
renewal of exemption should have been
approved. The Deputy Administrator,
upon consideration of such appeal, will
take such action as deemed appropriate
with respect to the application for
exemption or renewal of exemption.
*
*
*
*
*
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–15201 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44795
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
44796
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Washington, DC, 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a compact
disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza,
SW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20024.
Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in
which case it is not necessary to include
printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
III of this document.
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at https://
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2019-BT-STD0044. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section III for
information on how to submit
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mr.
Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–
0371. Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email:
Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or by email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Rulemaking History
II. Request for Information
A. Significant Savings of Energy
B. Technological Feasibility
C. Economic Justification
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
DOE has established an early
assessment review process to conduct a
more focused analysis of a specific set
of facts or circumstances that would
allow DOE to determine that, based on
one or more statutory criteria, a new or
amended energy conservation standard
is not warranted. One of the major
factors that led to the establishment of
this review is to limit the resources,
from both DOE and stakeholders,
allocated to rulemakings that will not
satisfy the requirements in Energy
Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended (‘‘EPCA’’) 1 that a new or
amended energy conservation standard
save a significant amount of energy, and
be economically justified and
technologically feasible. See 85 FR
8626, 8653–8654 (Feb. 14, 2020).
As part of the early assessment, DOE
publishes a RFI in the Federal Register,
announcing that DOE is considering
initiating a rulemaking proceeding and
soliciting comments, data, and
information on whether a new or
amended energy conservation standard
would save a significant amount of
energy and be technologically feasible
and economically justified. Based on the
information received in response to the
RFI and DOE’s own analysis, DOE will
determine whether to proceed with a
rulemaking for a new or amended
energy conservation standard.
If DOE makes an initial determination
based upon available evidence that a
new or amended energy conservation
standard would not meet the applicable
statutory criteria, DOE would engage in
notice and comment rulemaking before
issuing a final determination that new
or amended energy conservation
standards are not warranted.
Conversely, if DOE makes an initial
determination that a new or amended
energy conservation standard would
satisfy the applicable statutory criteria
or DOE’s analysis is inconclusive, DOE
would undertake the preliminary stages
of a rulemaking to issue a new or
amended energy conservation standard.
Beginning such a rulemaking, however,
would not preclude DOE from later
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through America’s Water
Infrastructure Act of 2018, Public Law 115–270
(Oct. 23, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
making a determination that a new or
amended energy conservation standard
cannot satisfy the requirements in the
EPCA, based upon the full suite of
DOE’s analyses. See 85 FR 8626, 8654
(Feb. 14, 2020).
A. Authority
EPCA, among other things, authorizes
DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of
a number of consumer products and
certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C.
6291–6317) Title III, Part C 2 of EPCA,
added by Public Law 95–619, Title IV,
section 441(a) (42 U.S.C. 6311–6317, as
codified), established the Energy
Conservation Program for Certain
Industrial Equipment, which sets forth a
variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency. This
equipment includes commercial clothes
washers (‘‘CCW’’), the subject of this
document. (42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(H)).
Under EPCA, DOE’s energy
conservation program consists
essentially of four parts: (1) Testing, (2)
labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and
enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA include definitions
(42 U.S.C. 6311), test procedures (42
U.S.C. 6314), labeling provisions (42
U.S.C. 6315), energy conservation
standards (42 U.S.C. 6313), and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C.
6316).
Federal energy efficiency
requirements for covered equipment
established under EPCA generally
supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing,
labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C.
6316(a) and (b); 42 U.S.C. 6297) DOE
may, however, grant waivers of Federal
preemption in limited instances for
particular State laws or regulations, in
accordance with the procedures and
other provisions set forth under 42
U.S.C. 6316(a) (applying the preemption
waiver provisions of 42 U.S.C. 6297).
EPCA also requires that, not later than
six years after the issuance of any final
rule establishing or amending a
standard, DOE evaluate the energy
conservation standards for each type of
covered equipment, including those at
issue here, and publish either a notice
of determination that the standards do
not need to be amended, or a notice of
proposed rulemaking (‘‘NOPR’’) that
includes new proposed energy
conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C.
6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)) In
making a determination that the
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part C was redesignated Part A–1.
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
standards do not need to be amended,
DOE must evaluate whether amended
standards (1) will result in significant
conservation of energy, (2) are
technologically feasible, and (3) are cost
effective as described under 42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(II). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a);
42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)(A); 42 U.S.C.
6295(n)(2)) Under 42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(II), DOE must determine
whether the benefits of a standard
exceed its burdens by, to the greatest
extent practicable, considering the
savings in operating costs throughout
the estimated average life of the covered
equipment in the type (or class)
compared to any increase in the price
of, or in the initial charges for, or
maintenance expenses of, the covered
equipment which are likely to result
from the imposition of the standard. If
DOE determines not to amend a
standard based on the statutory criteria,
not later than three years after the
issuance of a final determination not to
amend standards, DOE must publish
either a notice of determination that
standards for the equipment do not need
to be amended, or a NOPR including
new proposed energy conservation
standards (proceeding to a final rule, as
appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42
U.S.C. 6295(m)(3)(B)) DOE must make
the analysis on which a determination
is based publicly available and provide
an opportunity for written comment. (42
U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(2))
In proposing new standards, DOE
must evaluate that proposal against the
criteria of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o), as
described in the following section, and
follow the rulemaking procedures set
out in 42 U.S.C. 6295(p). (42 U.S.C.
6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)(B)) If DOE
decides to amend the standard based on
the statutory criteria, DOE must publish
a final rule not later than two years after
energy conservation standards are
proposed. (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(3)(A))
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Rulemaking History
DOE completed a rulemaking in 2014
to amend the standards for CCWs
manufactured on or after January 1,
2018. 79 FR 74492 (Dec. 15, 2014;
‘‘December 2014 Final Rule’’). The
current energy conservation standards
established in this final rule are located
in title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) part 431 section
156(b). As provided in 10 CFR 431.154,
the currently applicable DOE test
procedures for CCWs appear at
appendix J2 to subpart B of part 430,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
which prescribes the test procedures for
residential clothes washers.3
II. Request for Information
DOE is publishing this RFI to collect
data and information during the early
assessment review to inform its
decision, consistent with its obligations
under EPCA, as to whether the
Department should proceed with an
energy conservation standards
rulemaking. Accordingly, in the
following sections, DOE has identified
specific issues on which it seeks input
to aid in its analysis of whether an
amended standard for CCWs would not
save a significant amount of energy or
be technologically feasible or
economically justified. In particular,
DOE is interested in any information
indicating that there has not been
sufficient technological or market
changes since DOE last conducted an
energy conservation standards
rulemaking analysis for CCWs to suggest
a more-stringent standard could satisfy
these criteria. DOE also welcomes
comments on other issues relevant to its
early assessment that may not
specifically be identified in this
document.
A. Significant Savings of Energy
On December 15, 2014, DOE
established energy conservation
standards for CCWs that are expected to
result in 0.04 quadrillion British
thermal units (‘‘quads’’) of site energy
savings 4 over a 30-year period, which
amounts to energy savings of 7 percent
relative to the energy use of CCWs
without the amended standards. 79 FR
74492, 74493. If DOE determines that
more-stringent energy conservation
standards would not result in an
additional 0.3 quads of site energy
savings or an additional 10-percent
reduction in site energy use over a 30year period, DOE would propose to
make a no-new-standards
determination. DOE seeks comment on
energy savings that could be expected
from more-stringent standards for
CCWs.
3 EPCA directs that the test procedure for CCWs
shall be the same as the test procedures established
for residential clothes washers. (42 U.S.C.
6314(a)(8))
4 This estimate of 0.04 quads reflects site energy
savings. The final rule published December 15,
2014 presented the 30-year energy savings estimate
as 0.07 quads, reflecting full-fuel-cycle (‘‘FFC’’)
energy savings. The FFC measure includes point-ofuse (site) energy; the energy losses associated with
generation, transmission, and distribution of
electricity; and the energy consumed in extracting,
processing, and transporting or distributing primary
fuels. 79 FR 77492, 74502.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44797
B. Technological Feasibility
In the December 2014 Final Rule,
DOE considered a number of technology
options that manufacturers could use to
reduce energy consumption in CCWs.
DOE seeks comment on any changes to
these technology options that could
affect whether DOE could propose a
‘‘no-new-standards’’ determination,
such as an insignificant increase in the
range of efficiencies and performance
characteristics of these technology
options. DOE also seeks comment on
whether there are any other technology
options that DOE should consider in its
analysis.
C. Economic Justification
In determining whether a proposed
energy conservation standard is
economically justified, DOE analyzes,
among other things, the potential
economic impact on consumers,
manufacturers, and the Nation. DOE
seeks comment on whether there are
economic barriers to the adoption of
more-stringent energy conservation
standards for CCWs. DOE also seeks
comment and data on any other aspects
of its economic justification analysis
from the December 2014 Final Rule that
may indicate whether more-stringent
energy conservation standards would
not be economically justified or cost
effective.
III. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit in writing by September 22,
2020, comments and information on
matters addressed in this notice and on
other matters relevant to DOE’s early
assessment of whether more-stringent
energy conservation standards are not
warranted for CCWs.
Submitting comments via https://
www.regulations.gov. The https://
www.regulations.gov web page requires
you to provide your name and contact
information. Your contact information
will be viewable to DOE Building
Technologies staff only. Your contact
information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
44798
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment. If
this instruction is followed, persons
viewing comments will see only first
and last names, organization names,
correspondence containing comments,
and any documents submitted with the
comments.
Do not submit to https://
www.regulations.gov information for
which disclosure is restricted by statute,
such as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter
referred to as Confidential Business
Information (‘‘CBI’’)). Comments
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments
will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large
volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your
comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment
tracking number that https://
www.regulations.gov provides after you
have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand
delivery/courier, or postal mail.
Comments and documents submitted
via email, hand delivery/courier, or
postal mail also will be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information in a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. If you
submit via postal mail or hand delivery/
courier, please provide all items on a
CD, if feasible, in which case it is not
necessary to submit printed copies.
Faxes will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Jul 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
secured, written in English, and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person
submitting information that he or she
believes to be confidential and exempt
by law from public disclosure should
submit via email, postal mail, or hand
delivery/courier two well-marked
copies: One copy of the document
marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email to
CommClothesWashers2019STD0044@
ee.doe.gov or on a CD, if feasible. DOE
will make its own determination about
the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures and
energy conservation standards. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period in each stage of this
process. Interactions with and between
members of the public provide a
balanced discussion of the issues and
assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing
list to receive future notices and
information about this process should
contact Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or via email at
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on July 8, 2020, by
Alexander N. Fitzsimmons, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 8, 2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2020–15080 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0729; Project
Identifier AD–2020–00620–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM
International, S.A. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain CFM International, S.A. (CFM)
LEAP–1A23, LEAP–1A24, LEAP–
1A24E1, LEAP–1A26, LEAP–1A26CJ,
LEAP–1A26E1, LEAP–1A29, LEAP–
1A29CJ, LEAP–1A30, LEAP–1A32,
LEAP–1A33, LEAP–1A33B2, LEAP–
1A35A model turbofan engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by an
investigation by CFM that showed a
subsurface anomaly in a part
manufactured using the same material
as the LEAP–1A high-pressure turbine
(HPT) stage 2 disk. This proposed AD
would require an ultrasonic inspection
(UI) of the HPT stage 2 disk and
replacement of any HPT stage 2 disk
that fails the UI with a part eligible for
installation. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by September 8,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 143 (Friday, July 24, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44795-44798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15080]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[EERE-2019-BT-STD-0044]
RIN 1904-AE41
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for
Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment; Early Assessment Review;
Commercial Clothes Washers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') is undertaking an
early assessment review for amended energy conservation standards for
commercial clothes washers to determine whether to amend applicable
energy conservation standards for this equipment. Specifically, through
this request for information (``RFI''), DOE seeks data and information
that could enable the agency to determine whether DOE should propose a
``no-new-standard'' determination because a more-stringent standard:
Would not result in a significant savings of energy; is not
technologically feasible; is not economically justified; or any
combination of the foregoing. DOE welcomes written comments from the
public on any subject within the scope of this document (including
those topics not specifically raised in this RFI), as well as the
submission of data and other relevant information concerning this early
assessment review.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before September 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested
persons may submit comments, identified by docket number EERE-2019-BT-
STD-0044, by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to [email protected]. Include
docket number EERE-2019-BT-STD-0044 in the subject line of the message.
3. Postal Mail: Appliance and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
[[Page 44796]]
Washington, DC, 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 287-1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a compact disc (``CD''), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance and Equipment Standards
Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950
L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20024. Telephone: (202)
287-1445. If possible, please submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section III of this document.
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials,
is available for review at https://www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
The docket web page can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2019-BT-STD-0044. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section III for information on how to submit
comments through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-0371. Email:
[email protected].
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-7796. Email:
[email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket, contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or by email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Rulemaking History
II. Request for Information
A. Significant Savings of Energy
B. Technological Feasibility
C. Economic Justification
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
DOE has established an early assessment review process to conduct a
more focused analysis of a specific set of facts or circumstances that
would allow DOE to determine that, based on one or more statutory
criteria, a new or amended energy conservation standard is not
warranted. One of the major factors that led to the establishment of
this review is to limit the resources, from both DOE and stakeholders,
allocated to rulemakings that will not satisfy the requirements in
Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA'') \1\ that a
new or amended energy conservation standard save a significant amount
of energy, and be economically justified and technologically feasible.
See 85 FR 8626, 8653-8654 (Feb. 14, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018,
Public Law 115-270 (Oct. 23, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of the early assessment, DOE publishes a RFI in the Federal
Register, announcing that DOE is considering initiating a rulemaking
proceeding and soliciting comments, data, and information on whether a
new or amended energy conservation standard would save a significant
amount of energy and be technologically feasible and economically
justified. Based on the information received in response to the RFI and
DOE's own analysis, DOE will determine whether to proceed with a
rulemaking for a new or amended energy conservation standard.
If DOE makes an initial determination based upon available evidence
that a new or amended energy conservation standard would not meet the
applicable statutory criteria, DOE would engage in notice and comment
rulemaking before issuing a final determination that new or amended
energy conservation standards are not warranted. Conversely, if DOE
makes an initial determination that a new or amended energy
conservation standard would satisfy the applicable statutory criteria
or DOE's analysis is inconclusive, DOE would undertake the preliminary
stages of a rulemaking to issue a new or amended energy conservation
standard. Beginning such a rulemaking, however, would not preclude DOE
from later making a determination that a new or amended energy
conservation standard cannot satisfy the requirements in the EPCA,
based upon the full suite of DOE's analyses. See 85 FR 8626, 8654 (Feb.
14, 2020).
A. Authority
EPCA, among other things, authorizes DOE to regulate the energy
efficiency of a number of consumer products and certain industrial
equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part C \2\ of EPCA, added
by Public Law 95-619, Title IV, section 441(a) (42 U.S.C. 6311-6317, as
codified), established the Energy Conservation Program for Certain
Industrial Equipment, which sets forth a variety of provisions designed
to improve energy efficiency. This equipment includes commercial
clothes washers (``CCW''), the subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6311(1)(H)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part C was redesignated Part A-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under EPCA, DOE's energy conservation program consists essentially
of four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy
conservation standards, and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C.
6311), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6314), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C.
6315), energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6313), and the
authority to require information and reports from manufacturers (42
U.S.C. 6316).
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered equipment
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6316(a) and (b); 42 U.S.C. 6297) DOE may, however, grant waivers
of Federal preemption in limited instances for particular State laws or
regulations, in accordance with the procedures and other provisions set
forth under 42 U.S.C. 6316(a) (applying the preemption waiver
provisions of 42 U.S.C. 6297).
EPCA also requires that, not later than six years after the
issuance of any final rule establishing or amending a standard, DOE
evaluate the energy conservation standards for each type of covered
equipment, including those at issue here, and publish either a notice
of determination that the standards do not need to be amended, or a
notice of proposed rulemaking (``NOPR'') that includes new proposed
energy conservation standards (proceeding to a final rule, as
appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)) In making a
determination that the
[[Page 44797]]
standards do not need to be amended, DOE must evaluate whether amended
standards (1) will result in significant conservation of energy, (2)
are technologically feasible, and (3) are cost effective as described
under 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(II). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(1)(A); 42 U.S.C. 6295(n)(2)) Under 42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(II), DOE must determine whether the benefits of a
standard exceed its burdens by, to the greatest extent practicable,
considering the savings in operating costs throughout the estimated
average life of the covered equipment in the type (or class) compared
to any increase in the price of, or in the initial charges for, or
maintenance expenses of, the covered equipment which are likely to
result from the imposition of the standard. If DOE determines not to
amend a standard based on the statutory criteria, not later than three
years after the issuance of a final determination not to amend
standards, DOE must publish either a notice of determination that
standards for the equipment do not need to be amended, or a NOPR
including new proposed energy conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(3)(B)) DOE must make the analysis on which a determination is
based publicly available and provide an opportunity for written
comment. (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(2))
In proposing new standards, DOE must evaluate that proposal against
the criteria of 42 U.S.C. 6295(o), as described in the following
section, and follow the rulemaking procedures set out in 42 U.S.C.
6295(p). (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)(B)) If DOE decides to
amend the standard based on the statutory criteria, DOE must publish a
final rule not later than two years after energy conservation standards
are proposed. (42 U.S.C. 6316(a); 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(3)(A))
B. Rulemaking History
DOE completed a rulemaking in 2014 to amend the standards for CCWs
manufactured on or after January 1, 2018. 79 FR 74492 (Dec. 15, 2014;
``December 2014 Final Rule''). The current energy conservation
standards established in this final rule are located in title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (``CFR'') part 431 section 156(b). As
provided in 10 CFR 431.154, the currently applicable DOE test
procedures for CCWs appear at appendix J2 to subpart B of part 430,
which prescribes the test procedures for residential clothes
washers.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPCA directs that the test procedure for CCWs shall be the
same as the test procedures established for residential clothes
washers. (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(8))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Request for Information
DOE is publishing this RFI to collect data and information during
the early assessment review to inform its decision, consistent with its
obligations under EPCA, as to whether the Department should proceed
with an energy conservation standards rulemaking. Accordingly, in the
following sections, DOE has identified specific issues on which it
seeks input to aid in its analysis of whether an amended standard for
CCWs would not save a significant amount of energy or be
technologically feasible or economically justified. In particular, DOE
is interested in any information indicating that there has not been
sufficient technological or market changes since DOE last conducted an
energy conservation standards rulemaking analysis for CCWs to suggest a
more-stringent standard could satisfy these criteria. DOE also welcomes
comments on other issues relevant to its early assessment that may not
specifically be identified in this document.
A. Significant Savings of Energy
On December 15, 2014, DOE established energy conservation standards
for CCWs that are expected to result in 0.04 quadrillion British
thermal units (``quads'') of site energy savings \4\ over a 30-year
period, which amounts to energy savings of 7 percent relative to the
energy use of CCWs without the amended standards. 79 FR 74492, 74493.
If DOE determines that more-stringent energy conservation standards
would not result in an additional 0.3 quads of site energy savings or
an additional 10-percent reduction in site energy use over a 30-year
period, DOE would propose to make a no-new-standards determination. DOE
seeks comment on energy savings that could be expected from more-
stringent standards for CCWs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This estimate of 0.04 quads reflects site energy savings.
The final rule published December 15, 2014 presented the 30-year
energy savings estimate as 0.07 quads, reflecting full-fuel-cycle
(``FFC'') energy savings. The FFC measure includes point-of-use
(site) energy; the energy losses associated with generation,
transmission, and distribution of electricity; and the energy
consumed in extracting, processing, and transporting or distributing
primary fuels. 79 FR 77492, 74502.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Technological Feasibility
In the December 2014 Final Rule, DOE considered a number of
technology options that manufacturers could use to reduce energy
consumption in CCWs. DOE seeks comment on any changes to these
technology options that could affect whether DOE could propose a ``no-
new-standards'' determination, such as an insignificant increase in the
range of efficiencies and performance characteristics of these
technology options. DOE also seeks comment on whether there are any
other technology options that DOE should consider in its analysis.
C. Economic Justification
In determining whether a proposed energy conservation standard is
economically justified, DOE analyzes, among other things, the potential
economic impact on consumers, manufacturers, and the Nation. DOE seeks
comment on whether there are economic barriers to the adoption of more-
stringent energy conservation standards for CCWs. DOE also seeks
comment and data on any other aspects of its economic justification
analysis from the December 2014 Final Rule that may indicate whether
more-stringent energy conservation standards would not be economically
justified or cost effective.
III. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to submit in writing by
September 22, 2020, comments and information on matters addressed in
this notice and on other matters relevant to DOE's early assessment of
whether more-stringent energy conservation standards are not warranted
for CCWs.
Submitting comments via https://www.regulations.gov. The https://www.regulations.gov web page requires you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any
[[Page 44798]]
information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your comment.
If this instruction is followed, persons viewing comments will see only
first and last names, organization names, correspondence containing
comments, and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through https://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments
received through the website will waive any CBI claims for the
information submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that https://www.regulations.gov provides after you have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery/courier, or postal
mail. Comments and documents submitted via email, hand delivery/
courier, or postal mail also will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov. If you do not want your personal contact
information to be publicly viewable, do not include it in your comment
or any accompanying documents. Instead, provide your contact
information in a cover letter. Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via postal mail
or hand delivery/courier, please provide all items on a CD, if
feasible, in which case it is not necessary to submit printed copies.
Faxes will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English, and free of any defects or
viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery/courier two well-marked copies:
One copy of the document marked ``confidential'' including all the
information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document
marked ``non-confidential'' with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. Submit these documents via email to
[email protected] or on a CD, if feasible. DOE
will make its own determination about the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to be a very important part of
the process for developing test procedures and energy conservation
standards. DOE actively encourages the participation and interaction of
the public during the comment period in each stage of this process.
Interactions with and between members of the public provide a balanced
discussion of the issues and assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing list to receive future notices
and information about this process should contact Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or via email at
[email protected].
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on July 8,
2020, by Alexander N. Fitzsimmons, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with
the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 8, 2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2020-15080 Filed 7-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P