National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Updates to the List of Bioengineered Foods, 44791-44792 [2020-14933]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 66 [Document No. AMS–FTPP–20–0057] National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Updates to the List of Bioengineered Foods ACTION: Request for comments. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting comments and feedback on recommendations to update the List of Bioengineered Foods (List) as it pertains to the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (Standard). DATES: Comments are due by August 24, 2020. ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit written comments via the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should refer to the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. All comments submitted in response to this notice, including the identity of individuals or entities submitting comments, will be made available to the public on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trevor Findley, Deputy Director, Food Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair Trade Practices Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, telephone (202) 690–3460, email trevor.findley@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: Background On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114–216 amended the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et. seq.) (amended Act) to require USDA to establish a national, mandatory standard for disclosing any food that is or may be bioengineered. In accordance with the amended Act, USDA published final regulations to implement the Standard on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814). The regulations became effective on February 19, 2019, with a mandatory compliance date of January 1, 2022. Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered food is a food that, subject to certain factors, conditions, and limitations, contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) techniques and for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature. The regulations, at 7 CFR 66.6, include the AMS List of Bioengineered VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Jul 23, 2020 Jkt 250001 Foods (the List), which currently includes: Alfalfa, apple (ArcticTM varieties), canola, corn, cotton, eggplant (BARI Bt Begun varieties), papaya (ringspot virus-resistant varieties), pineapple (pink flesh varieties), potato, salmon (AquAdvantage®), soybean, squash (summer), and sugarbeet. As stated in the preamble to the final rule, at 83 FR 65852, the List ‘‘establishes a presumption about what foods might require disclosure under the NBFDS, but does not absolve regulated entities from the requirement to disclose the bioengineered status of food and food ingredients produced with foods not on the List when the regulated entities have actual knowledge that such foods or food ingredients are bioengineered.’’ As a result, if a regulated entity is using a food or ingredient produced from an item on the List, they must make a bioengineered food disclosure unless they have records demonstrating that the food or ingredient they are using is not bioengineered. Similarly, even if a food is not the List, a regulated entity must make a bioengineered food disclosure if they have actual knowledge a food or ingredient they are using is a bioengineered food or a bioengineered food ingredient. As stated in 7 CFR 66.7(a), AMS will review and consider updates to the List on an annual basis and will solicit recommendations regarding updates to the List through notification in the Federal Register and on the AMS website. The regulations further provide that: (1) Recommendations regarding additions to and subtractions from the List may be submitted to AMS at any time or as part of the annual review process. (2) Recommendations should be accompanied by data and other information to support the recommended action. (3) AMS will post public recommendations on its website, along with information about other revisions to the List that the agency may be considering, including input based on consultation with the government agencies responsible for oversight of the products of biotechnology: USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA–APHIS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and appropriate members of the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology or a similar successor. (4) AMS will consider whether foods proposed for inclusion on the List have been authorized for commercial PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 44791 production somewhere in the world, and whether the food is currently in legal commercial production for human food somewhere in the world. (5) If AMS determines that an update to the List is appropriate following its review of all relevant information provided, AMS will modify the List. In addition to seeking public recommendations generally regarding the entries on the List, AMS is specifically seeking public comment on the recommendations listed below. Additions to the List As required by 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4), AMS will consider two criteria when identifying food to add to the List: (1) Whether the food proposed for inclusion on the List has been authorized for commercial production somewhere in the world, and (2) whether that food is currently in legal commercial production for human food somewhere in the world. For the first criterion, AMS considers a food to have been authorized for commercial production when it has cleared all the legal requirements necessary to be produced in that country. If multiple authorizations are required before a food can be commercially produced, AMS would not consider that food to have been authorized for commercial production until it has completed all such authorizations. For the second criterion, AMS will look to see if the food that has been authorized for commercial production actually is in legal commercial production for use as human food. Based on publicly available information, AMS currently believes there is at least one crop that meets the dual criteria required by 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4). AMS believes that sugarcane is (1) Authorized for commercial production somewhere in the world and (2) currently in legal commercial production for human food somewhere in the world. 1. Sugarcane: AMS believes that Brazil approved bioengineered sugarcane for commercial release and that bioengineered sugar cane is currently in legal commercial production.1 The sugarcane was developed using recombinant DNA technology to be insect-resistant to help control sugarcane borer infestations. Brazil approved the bioengineered sugarcane for commercial production in 1 Agricultural Biotechnology Annual—2018, [Brazil—Agricultural Biotechnology Report] https:// apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/ DownloadReportByFileName?fileName= Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_ Brasilia_Brazil_12-26-2018. E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1 44792 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 143 / Friday, July 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules Other Foods Considered for Addition to the List In its research, AMS identified several bioengineered foods that are at various stages of authorization or have been authorized for commercial production but are not yet in legal commercial production for human food. Although AMS believes these bioengineered foods do not yet meet the criteria in 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4) to be added to the List, AMS is seeking public comment to determine if additional information is publicly available. 1. Cowpea: Nigeria recently authorized the commercial release of pod-borer resistant cowpea (Event— AAT709A), bioengineered for lepidopteran insect pest (Maruca vitrata) resistance.6 AMS seeks comment on whether cowpea is in legal commercial production for human food, or would be in legal commercial production for human food when AMS initiates the rulemaking process.7 If cowpea is added to the List, AMS also seeks comment on whether the addition should include any modifiers that would more accurately describe the type of cowpea that is bioengineered, such as pod-borer resistant cowpea or insect resistant cowpea. 2. Rice: AMS is aware that the Philippine Department of Agriculture approved the safety of bioengineered rice (Event—GR2E, Production of provitamin A carotenoids), also known as golden rice, for use as human food.8 While this approval has to do with the safety of the rice as human food, the rice is not yet authorized for commercial production. Because this rice has not yet been authorized for commercial release and is not in legal commercial production, it does not meet the criteria identified in 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4) and AMS is not recommending it be added to the List. AMS seeks comment on its understanding of the current status of this rice. After completing its research, AMS has not identified any other foods that it believes would meet the criteria to be included on the List. AMS requests public comment on any other foods not mentioned above that it should consider for addition to the List. Any comments not directly related to the addition, deletion or modification of the potential items for the List will not be considered nor will recommendations that are not accompanied by data and other information to support the recommended action. After reviewing the comments on this notice, AMS will 2 Agricultural Biotechnology Annual—2019, [Brazil—Agricultural Biotechnology Report] https:// apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/ DownloadReportByFileName?fileName= Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_ Brasilia_Brazil_10-20-2019. 3 Consultations on Food from New Plant Varieties, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/ fdcc/?set=Biocon&id=CTC175-A. 4 83 FR 65819. 5 Consultations on Food from New Plant Varieties, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/ fdcc/index.cfm?set=Biocon& id=SEM%2D0CZW3%2D2, Consultations on Food from New Plant Varieties, https://www.access data.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=Biocon& id=SEM%2D0ZW20%2D7. 6 Agricultural Biotechnology Annual—2019, Nigeria Approves the Commercial Release of Bt. Pod-Borer Resistant Cowpea https://apps.fas. usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/Download ReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural %20Biotechnology%20Annual_Lagos_Nigeria_521-2019 7 Pod-borer Resistant Cowpea Project, https:// www.aatf-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ Cowpea-Project.pdf, Event Name AAT709A, https:// www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/ default.asp?EventID=543&Event=AAT709A. 8 Philippines approves Golden Rice for direct use as food and feed, or for processing, https:// www.irri.org/news-and-events/news/philippinesapproves-golden-rice-direct-use-food-and-feed-orprocessing. 2018 and planted approximately 4,000 hectares for commercial production in the 2018/2019 crop year.2 As a result, AMS believes that sugarcane should be added to the List. Consistent with other items on the List, AMS would initially propose that sugarcane include ‘‘(insectresistant 3)’’ because there is currently only one bioengineered trait used in sugarcane production. As stated in the preamble to the final rule,4 if other BE versions of listed foods are authorized and become legally available, AMS would revise the listing during the annual update process to be more generic. Therefore, AMS seeks comment on whether it should undertake rulemaking to add ‘‘Sugarcane (insectresistant)’’ to the List. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Amendments to the List 1. Squash (summer): Squash (summer) is currently included on the List but AMS proposes to add an additional modifier to reflect that the only trait for bioengineered summer squash that is currently available is virus-resistance.5 Therefore, AMS would add ‘‘virus-resistant’’ to the existing modifier ‘‘summer,’’ so that squash on the list would read ‘‘Squash (summer, virus-resistant).’’ This change would be consistent with the treatment of other items on the list, where modifiers are included when only one bioengineered trait is available, as is the case with eggplant, papaya, and pineapple. Therefore, AMS seeks comment on whether it should add ‘‘virus-resistant’’ as a modifier to the existing entry of ‘‘Squash (summer).’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Jul 23, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 determine whether it should initiate rulemaking to update the List. Any changes to the regulations would be reflected in an amendment to the regulations found at 7 CFR part 66. As stated at 7 CFR 66.7(b), regulated entities would have 18 months following the effective date of the updated List of Bioengineered Foods to revise food labels to reflect changes to the List in accordance with the disclosure requirements of 7 CFR part 66. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq. Bruce Summers, Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2020–14933 Filed 7–23–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 930 [Doc. No. AMS–SC–20–0036; SC20–930–3 PR] Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin; Changes to Subcommittee Size and Addition of Term Limits Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: This proposed rule invites comments on a recommendation from the Cherry Industry Administrative Board (Board) to change subcommittee size and add term limits under the marketing order for tart cherries grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. DATES: Comments must be received by August 24, 2020. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours or can be viewed at: https:// www.regulations.gov. All comments SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM 24JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 143 (Friday, July 24, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44791-44792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14933]



[[Page 44791]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 66

[Document No. AMS-FTPP-20-0057]


National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Updates to the 
List of Bioengineered Foods

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting comments and feedback on 
recommendations to update the List of Bioengineered Foods (List) as it 
pertains to the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard 
(Standard).

DATES: Comments are due by August 24, 2020.

ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit written comments via the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should refer to the date and 
page number of this issue of the Federal Register. All comments 
submitted in response to this notice, including the identity of 
individuals or entities submitting comments, will be made available to 
the public on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trevor Findley, Deputy Director, Food 
Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair Trade Practices Program, 
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
telephone (202) 690-3460, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114-216 amended the Agricultural 
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et. seq.) (amended Act) to require 
USDA to establish a national, mandatory standard for disclosing any 
food that is or may be bioengineered. In accordance with the amended 
Act, USDA published final regulations to implement the Standard on 
December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814). The regulations became effective on 
February 19, 2019, with a mandatory compliance date of January 1, 2022. 
Under 7 CFR 66.1, a bioengineered food is a food that, subject to 
certain factors, conditions, and limitations, contains genetic material 
that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic 
acid (rDNA) techniques and for which the modification could not 
otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature.
    The regulations, at 7 CFR 66.6, include the AMS List of 
Bioengineered Foods (the List), which currently includes: Alfalfa, 
apple (Arctic^TM varieties), canola, corn, cotton, eggplant 
(BARI Bt Begun varieties), papaya (ringspot virus-resistant varieties), 
pineapple (pink flesh varieties), potato, salmon 
(AquAdvantage[supreg]), soybean, squash (summer), and sugarbeet. As 
stated in the preamble to the final rule, at 83 FR 65852, the List 
``establishes a presumption about what foods might require disclosure 
under the NBFDS, but does not absolve regulated entities from the 
requirement to disclose the bioengineered status of food and food 
ingredients produced with foods not on the List when the regulated 
entities have actual knowledge that such foods or food ingredients are 
bioengineered.'' As a result, if a regulated entity is using a food or 
ingredient produced from an item on the List, they must make a 
bioengineered food disclosure unless they have records demonstrating 
that the food or ingredient they are using is not bioengineered. 
Similarly, even if a food is not the List, a regulated entity must make 
a bioengineered food disclosure if they have actual knowledge a food or 
ingredient they are using is a bioengineered food or a bioengineered 
food ingredient.
    As stated in 7 CFR 66.7(a), AMS will review and consider updates to 
the List on an annual basis and will solicit recommendations regarding 
updates to the List through notification in the Federal Register and on 
the AMS website. The regulations further provide that:
    (1) Recommendations regarding additions to and subtractions from 
the List may be submitted to AMS at any time or as part of the annual 
review process.
    (2) Recommendations should be accompanied by data and other 
information to support the recommended action.
    (3) AMS will post public recommendations on its website, along with 
information about other revisions to the List that the agency may be 
considering, including input based on consultation with the government 
agencies responsible for oversight of the products of biotechnology: 
USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS), the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Department of 
Health and Human Services' Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and 
appropriate members of the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of 
Biotechnology or a similar successor.
    (4) AMS will consider whether foods proposed for inclusion on the 
List have been authorized for commercial production somewhere in the 
world, and whether the food is currently in legal commercial production 
for human food somewhere in the world.
    (5) If AMS determines that an update to the List is appropriate 
following its review of all relevant information provided, AMS will 
modify the List.
    In addition to seeking public recommendations generally regarding 
the entries on the List, AMS is specifically seeking public comment on 
the recommendations listed below.

Additions to the List

    As required by 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4), AMS will consider two criteria 
when identifying food to add to the List: (1) Whether the food proposed 
for inclusion on the List has been authorized for commercial production 
somewhere in the world, and (2) whether that food is currently in legal 
commercial production for human food somewhere in the world.
    For the first criterion, AMS considers a food to have been 
authorized for commercial production when it has cleared all the legal 
requirements necessary to be produced in that country. If multiple 
authorizations are required before a food can be commercially produced, 
AMS would not consider that food to have been authorized for commercial 
production until it has completed all such authorizations. For the 
second criterion, AMS will look to see if the food that has been 
authorized for commercial production actually is in legal commercial 
production for use as human food.
    Based on publicly available information, AMS currently believes 
there is at least one crop that meets the dual criteria required by 7 
CFR 66.7(a)(4). AMS believes that sugarcane is (1) Authorized for 
commercial production somewhere in the world and (2) currently in legal 
commercial production for human food somewhere in the world.
    1. Sugarcane: AMS believes that Brazil approved bioengineered 
sugarcane for commercial release and that bioengineered sugar cane is 
currently in legal commercial production.\1\ The sugarcane was 
developed using recombinant DNA technology to be insect-resistant to 
help control sugarcane borer infestations. Brazil approved the 
bioengineered sugarcane for commercial production in

[[Page 44792]]

2018 and planted approximately 4,000 hectares for commercial production 
in the 2018/2019 crop year.\2\ As a result, AMS believes that sugarcane 
should be added to the List. Consistent with other items on the List, 
AMS would initially propose that sugarcane include ``(insect-resistant 
\3\)'' because there is currently only one bioengineered trait used in 
sugarcane production. As stated in the preamble to the final rule,\4\ 
if other BE versions of listed foods are authorized and become legally 
available, AMS would revise the listing during the annual update 
process to be more generic. Therefore, AMS seeks comment on whether it 
should undertake rulemaking to add ``Sugarcane (insect-resistant)'' to 
the List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Agricultural Biotechnology Annual--2018, [Brazil--
Agricultural Biotechnology Report] https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_12-26-2018.
    \2\ Agricultural Biotechnology Annual--2019, [Brazil--
Agricultural Biotechnology Report] https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_10-20-2019.
    \3\ Consultations on Food from New Plant Varieties, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon&id=CTC175-A.
    \4\ 83 FR 65819.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendments to the List

    1. Squash (summer): Squash (summer) is currently included on the 
List but AMS proposes to add an additional modifier to reflect that the 
only trait for bioengineered summer squash that is currently available 
is virus-resistance.\5\ Therefore, AMS would add ``virus-resistant'' to 
the existing modifier ``summer,'' so that squash on the list would read 
``Squash (summer, virus-resistant).'' This change would be consistent 
with the treatment of other items on the list, where modifiers are 
included when only one bioengineered trait is available, as is the case 
with eggplant, papaya, and pineapple. Therefore, AMS seeks comment on 
whether it should add ``virus-resistant'' as a modifier to the existing 
entry of ``Squash (summer).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Consultations on Food from New Plant Varieties, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=Biocon&id=SEM%2D0CZW3%2D2, Consultations on Food from 
New Plant Varieties, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/index.cfm?set=Biocon&id=SEM%2D0ZW20%2D7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Foods Considered for Addition to the List

    In its research, AMS identified several bioengineered foods that 
are at various stages of authorization or have been authorized for 
commercial production but are not yet in legal commercial production 
for human food. Although AMS believes these bioengineered foods do not 
yet meet the criteria in 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4) to be added to the List, AMS 
is seeking public comment to determine if additional information is 
publicly available.
    1. Cowpea: Nigeria recently authorized the commercial release of 
pod-borer resistant cowpea (Event--AAT709A), bioengineered for 
lepidopteran insect pest (Maruca vitrata) resistance.\6\ AMS seeks 
comment on whether cowpea is in legal commercial production for human 
food, or would be in legal commercial production for human food when 
AMS initiates the rulemaking process.\7\ If cowpea is added to the 
List, AMS also seeks comment on whether the addition should include any 
modifiers that would more accurately describe the type of cowpea that 
is bioengineered, such as pod-borer resistant cowpea or insect 
resistant cowpea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Agricultural Biotechnology Annual--2019, Nigeria Approves 
the Commercial Release of Bt. Pod-Borer Resistant Cowpea https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Lagos_Nigeria_5-21-2019
    \7\ Pod-borer Resistant Cowpea Project, https://www.aatf-africa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Cowpea-Project.pdf, Event Name 
AAT709A, https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=543&Event=AAT709A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Rice: AMS is aware that the Philippine Department of Agriculture 
approved the safety of bioengineered rice (Event--GR2E, Production of 
provitamin A carotenoids), also known as golden rice, for use as human 
food.\8\ While this approval has to do with the safety of the rice as 
human food, the rice is not yet authorized for commercial production. 
Because this rice has not yet been authorized for commercial release 
and is not in legal commercial production, it does not meet the 
criteria identified in 7 CFR 66.7(a)(4) and AMS is not recommending it 
be added to the List. AMS seeks comment on its understanding of the 
current status of this rice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Philippines approves Golden Rice for direct use as food and 
feed, or for processing, https://www.irri.org/news-and-events/news/philippines-approves-golden-rice-direct-use-food-and-feed-or-processing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After completing its research, AMS has not identified any other 
foods that it believes would meet the criteria to be included on the 
List. AMS requests public comment on any other foods not mentioned 
above that it should consider for addition to the List.
    Any comments not directly related to the addition, deletion or 
modification of the potential items for the List will not be considered 
nor will recommendations that are not accompanied by data and other 
information to support the recommended action. After reviewing the 
comments on this notice, AMS will determine whether it should initiate 
rulemaking to update the List. Any changes to the regulations would be 
reflected in an amendment to the regulations found at 7 CFR part 66. As 
stated at 7 CFR 66.7(b), regulated entities would have 18 months 
following the effective date of the updated List of Bioengineered Foods 
to revise food labels to reflect changes to the List in accordance with 
the disclosure requirements of 7 CFR part 66.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.

Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-14933 Filed 7-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.