60-Day Notice for the “Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery”, 44328-44329 [2020-15787]
Download as PDF
44328
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Notices
Type of Review: Extension to a
currently approved collection.
Title of Collection: Rehabilitation Plan
and Award.
Agency Form Number: OWCP–16.
OMB Control Number: 1240–0045.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3176.
Frequency: On occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
3176.
Estimated Average Time per
Response: 30 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1588.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)
Anjanette Suggs,
Agency Clearance Officer, Office if Workers’
Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2020–15833 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CH–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts
60-Day Notice for the ‘‘Generic
Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency
Service Delivery’’
AGENCY:
National Endowment for the
Arts.
Notice of proposed collection;
comment request.
ACTION:
The National Endowment for
the Arts (NEA), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. Currently, the
NEA is soliciting comments concerning
the proposed information collection for
Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service
Delivery.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section below within 60
days from the date of this publication in
the Federal Register.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
Email comments to: Sunil
Iyengar, National Endowment for the
Arts, at research@arts.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.
OMB Number: 3135–0130.
Abstract: The proposed information
collection activity provides a means to
garner qualitative customer and
stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
The solicitation of feedback will target
areas such as: timeliness,
appropriateness, accuracy of
information, courtesy, efficiency of
service delivery, and resolution of
issues with service delivery. Responses
will be assessed to plan and inform
efforts to improve or maintain the
quality of service offered to the public.
If this information is not collected, vital
feedback from customers and
stakeholders on the Agency’s services
will be unavailable.
The Agency will only submit a
collection for approval under this
generic clearance if it meets the
following conditions:
• The collections are voluntary;
• The collections are low-burden for
respondents (based on considerations of
total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per
respondent) and are low-cost for both
the respondents and the Federal
Government;
• The collections are noncontroversial and do not raise issues of
concern to other Federal agencies;
• Any collection is targeted to the
solicitation of opinions from
respondents who have experience with
the program or may have experience
with the program in the near future;
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Personally identifiable information
(PII) is collected only to the extent
necessary and is not retained;
• Information gathered is used only
internally for general service
improvement and program management
purposes and is not intended for release
outside of the agency;
• Information gathered is not used for
the purpose of substantially informing
influential policy decisions; and
• Information gathered yields
qualitative information; the collections
are not designed or expected to yield
statistically reliable results or used as
though the results are generalizable to
the population of study.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance provides useful information,
but it does not yield data that can be
generalized to the overall population.
This type of generic clearance for
qualitative information will not be used
for quantitative information collections
that are designed to yield reliably
actionable results, such as monitoring
trends over time or documenting
program performance. Such data uses
require more rigorous designs that
address: The target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior to
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
As a general matter, information
collections will not result in any new
system of records containing privacy
information and will not ask questions
of a sensitive nature, such as sexual
behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs,
and other matters that are commonly
considered private.
Current Actions: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households; Businesses and
Organizations; State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
7,950.
Average Expected Annual Number of
Activities: 4.
Average Number of Respondents per
Activity: 883.
Annual Responses: 2,650.
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Notices
Frequency of Response: Once per
request.
Average minutes per response: 16.
Average Expected Annual Burden
hours: 726.5.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record.
Comments are invited on: 1. Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; 2. The accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; 3. Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; 4.
Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and 5. Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Dated: July 16, 2020.
Jillian Miller,
Director of Guidelines & Panel Operations,
National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2020–15787 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of permits issued.
AGENCY:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703–
292–8030; email: ACApermits@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 18, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Leidos Innovations Corp., Permit No.
2020–004, November 8, 2019
2. John Kennedy, Permit No. 2020–006,
November 9, 2019
3. Robin West, Permit No. 2020–009,
November 9, 2019
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
On September 18, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Grant Ballard, Permit No. 2020–005,
November 9, 2019
2. Peter West, Permit No. 2020–007,
November 9, 2019
3. Robert Sanders, Permit No. 2020–008,
November 9, 2019
On September 20, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Orla Doherty, Permit No. 2020–012,
November 4, 2019
On October 10, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Lee Welhouse, Permit No. 2020–014,
November 12, 2019
On October 22, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Ari Friedlaender, Permit No. 2020–
016, December 20, 2019
On November 12, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Heather J. Lynch, Permit No. 2020–
010, December 20, 2019
2. Joseph A. Covi, Permit No. 2020–017,
December 12, 2019
3. Zicheng Yu, Permit No. 2020–018,
January 27, 2020
On November 19, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Heather J. Lynch, Permit No. 2020–
011, December 20, 2019
2. Bob Simpson, Permit No. 2020–019,
December 20, 2019
3. Lisa Bolton, Permit No. 2020–020,
December 20, 2019
On December 3, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Nicholas Teets, Permit No. 2020–013,
January 2, 2020
2. Daniel P. Zitterbart, Permit No. 2020–
021, January 2, 2020
On December 5, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44329
1. Chris Eckstrom, Permit No. 2020–022,
January 8, 2020
2. David Lloyd, Permit No. 2020–024,
January 9, 2020
On December 12, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Red Rock Films, Permit No. 2020–
023, January 13, 2020
On December 27, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. William Muntean, Permit No. 2020–
025, January 27, 2020
On December 30, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Brandon Savory, Permit No. 2020–
026, January 30, 2020
Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020–15883 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72–1031, 50–369, and 50–370;
NRC–2020–0044]
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC; McGuire
Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2;
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering an
exemption request from Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) which
would permit Duke Energy to maintain
MAGNASTOR® Cask 0FCTKN045 at its
McGuire Nuclear Station independent
spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) in
a storage condition where the helium
density is above the range specified in
Certificate of Compliance No. 1031,
Amendment No. 7, Technical
Specification 3.1.1. The NRC prepared
an environmental assessment (EA)
documenting its finding that the
proposed action would have no
significant environmental impact.
Accordingly, the NRC staff is issuing a
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed
exemption.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44328-44329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15787]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts
60-Day Notice for the ``Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery''
AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.
ACTION: Notice of proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed information collection for Generic Clearance
for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section below within 60 days from the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Email comments to: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the
Arts, at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback
on Agency Service Delivery.
OMB Number: 3135-0130.
Abstract: The proposed information collection activity provides a
means to garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an
efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration's
commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we
mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and
opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative
results that can be generalized to the population of study. This
feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder
perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of
issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication,
training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or
services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
The solicitation of feedback will target areas such as: timeliness,
appropriateness, accuracy of information, courtesy, efficiency of
service delivery, and resolution of issues with service delivery.
Responses will be assessed to plan and inform efforts to improve or
maintain the quality of service offered to the public. If this
information is not collected, vital feedback from customers and
stakeholders on the Agency's services will be unavailable.
The Agency will only submit a collection for approval under this
generic clearance if it meets the following conditions:
The collections are voluntary;
The collections are low-burden for respondents (based on
considerations of total burden hours, total number of respondents, or
burden-hours per respondent) and are low-cost for both the respondents
and the Federal Government;
The collections are non-controversial and do not raise
issues of concern to other Federal agencies;
Any collection is targeted to the solicitation of opinions
from respondents who have experience with the program or may have
experience with the program in the near future;
Personally identifiable information (PII) is collected
only to the extent necessary and is not retained;
Information gathered is used only internally for general
service improvement and program management purposes and is not intended
for release outside of the agency;
Information gathered is not used for the purpose of
substantially informing influential policy decisions; and
Information gathered yields qualitative information; the
collections are not designed or expected to yield statistically
reliable results or used as though the results are generalizable to the
population of study.
Feedback collected under this generic clearance provides useful
information, but it does not yield data that can be generalized to the
overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative
information will not be used for quantitative information collections
that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as
monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Such
data uses require more rigorous designs that address: The target
population to which generalizations will be made, the sampling frame,
the sample design (including stratification and clustering), the
precision requirements or power calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate, methods for assessing
potential non-response bias, the protocols for data collection, and any
testing procedures that were or will be undertaken prior to fielding
the study. Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be eligible for submission for
other generic mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative
results.
As a general matter, information collections will not result in any
new system of records containing privacy information and will not ask
questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes,
religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered
private.
Current Actions: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals and Households; Businesses and
Organizations; State, Local or Tribal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,950.
Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: 4.
Average Number of Respondents per Activity: 883.
Annual Responses: 2,650.
[[Page 44329]]
Frequency of Response: Once per request.
Average minutes per response: 16.
Average Expected Annual Burden hours: 726.5.
Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this notice
will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will become a matter
of public record. Comments are invited on: 1. Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; 2. The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; 3. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; 4. Ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and 5. Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to
provide information.
Dated: July 16, 2020.
Jillian Miller,
Director of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the
Arts.
[FR Doc. 2020-15787 Filed 7-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P