Duke Energy Carolinas LLC; McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 44329-44330 [2020-15768]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Notices
Frequency of Response: Once per
request.
Average minutes per response: 16.
Average Expected Annual Burden
hours: 726.5.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval. All comments
will become a matter of public record.
Comments are invited on: 1. Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; 2. The accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; 3. Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; 4.
Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and 5. Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Dated: July 16, 2020.
Jillian Miller,
Director of Guidelines & Panel Operations,
National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2020–15787 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of permits issued.
AGENCY:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703–
292–8030; email: ACApermits@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 18, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Leidos Innovations Corp., Permit No.
2020–004, November 8, 2019
2. John Kennedy, Permit No. 2020–006,
November 9, 2019
3. Robin West, Permit No. 2020–009,
November 9, 2019
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
On September 18, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Grant Ballard, Permit No. 2020–005,
November 9, 2019
2. Peter West, Permit No. 2020–007,
November 9, 2019
3. Robert Sanders, Permit No. 2020–008,
November 9, 2019
On September 20, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Orla Doherty, Permit No. 2020–012,
November 4, 2019
On October 10, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Lee Welhouse, Permit No. 2020–014,
November 12, 2019
On October 22, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Ari Friedlaender, Permit No. 2020–
016, December 20, 2019
On November 12, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Heather J. Lynch, Permit No. 2020–
010, December 20, 2019
2. Joseph A. Covi, Permit No. 2020–017,
December 12, 2019
3. Zicheng Yu, Permit No. 2020–018,
January 27, 2020
On November 19, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Heather J. Lynch, Permit No. 2020–
011, December 20, 2019
2. Bob Simpson, Permit No. 2020–019,
December 20, 2019
3. Lisa Bolton, Permit No. 2020–020,
December 20, 2019
On December 3, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
1. Nicholas Teets, Permit No. 2020–013,
January 2, 2020
2. Daniel P. Zitterbart, Permit No. 2020–
021, January 2, 2020
On December 5, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on the following dates:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44329
1. Chris Eckstrom, Permit No. 2020–022,
January 8, 2020
2. David Lloyd, Permit No. 2020–024,
January 9, 2020
On December 12, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Red Rock Films, Permit No. 2020–
023, January 13, 2020
On December 27, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. William Muntean, Permit No. 2020–
025, January 27, 2020
On December 30, 2019, the National
Science Foundation published a notice
in the Federal Register of a permit
application received. The permit was
issued on the following date:
1. Brandon Savory, Permit No. 2020–
026, January 30, 2020
Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020–15883 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72–1031, 50–369, and 50–370;
NRC–2020–0044]
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC; McGuire
Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2;
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering an
exemption request from Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) which
would permit Duke Energy to maintain
MAGNASTOR® Cask 0FCTKN045 at its
McGuire Nuclear Station independent
spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) in
a storage condition where the helium
density is above the range specified in
Certificate of Compliance No. 1031,
Amendment No. 7, Technical
Specification 3.1.1. The NRC prepared
an environmental assessment (EA)
documenting its finding that the
proposed action would have no
significant environmental impact.
Accordingly, the NRC staff is issuing a
finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed
exemption.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
44330
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Notices
The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on July 14,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2020–0044 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0044. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges
Roman; telephone: 301–287–9127;
email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this
document (if that document is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: YenJu Chen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555; telephone: 301–415–1018;
email: Yen-Ju.Chen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
I. Introduction
The NRC is reviewing an exemption
request from Duke Energy, dated
September 12, 2019 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19270E395), and supplemented
by a letter dated February 3, 2020
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20052D934),
and June 15, 2020 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML20178A548). Duke Energy is
requesting an exemption from the
requirements of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) in
§ 72.212(b)(3), (b)(5)(i), and (b)(11) that
require Duke Energy and its
MAGNASTOR® Cask 0FCTKN045 to
comply with the terms, conditions, and
specifications of the Certificate of
Compliance (CoC) No. 1031,
Amendment No. 7 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML17013A481). If approved, Duke
Energy’s exemption request would
accordingly allow Duke Energy to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
maintain MAGNASTOR® Cask
0FCTKN045 in a storage condition
where the helium density is above the
range specified in CoC No. 1031,
Amendment No. 7, Technical
Specification (TS) 3.1.1.
II. Environmental Assessment
Summary
Under the requirements of §§ 51.21
and 51.30(a), the NRC staff developed
an EA (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20192A329) to evaluate the proposed
action, which is for the NRC to grant
Duke Energy an exemption from the
requirements of § 72.212(b)(3), (b)(5)(i),
and (b)(11), only as these requirements
pertain to MAGNASTOR® Cask
0FCTKN045. The exemption would
allow Duke Energy to maintain its
MAGNASTOR® Cask 0FCTKN045 at
McGuire Nuclear Station ISFSI in its
current storage condition. The
exemption would therefore not require
Duke Energy to restore its
MAGNASTOR® Cask 0FCTKN045 to
full compliance with the helium density
range specified in TS 3.1.1.
The EA defines the NRC’s proposed
action (i.e., to grant Duke Energy’s
exemption request per 10 CFR 72.7) and
the purpose and need for the proposed
action. Evaluations of the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives to the proposed
action are presented, followed by the
NRC’s conclusion.
The EA evaluates the potential
environmental impacts of granting the
exemption. The potential environmental
impact of using NRC-approved storage
casks was initially analyzed in the EA
for the rulemaking to provide for the
storage of spent fuel under a general
license on July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181).
The EA for using the MAGNASTOR®
System, Amendment No. 7 (81 FR
13265) tiers off of the EA for the 1990
final rule.
The NRC staff finds that the higher
helium density would not adversely
affect thermal performance and the
structural integrity of the cask system is
maintained, and thus, there would be no
release from the canister. Therefore, the
proposed action does not change the
types or quantities of effluents that may
be released offsite, it does not increase
occupational or public radiation
exposure, and there will be no
significant radiological impact to the
environment. The proposed action will
take place within the site boundary and
does not have other environmental
impacts. Accordingly, the
environmental impacts are bounded by
the previous NRC EA for the rulemaking
to add the MAGNASTOR® System,
Amendment No. 7, to 10 CFR 72.214.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Thus, the proposed action will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared an EA and
associated FONSI in support of the
proposed action. The NRC staff has
concluded that the proposed action will
not significantly impact the quality of
the human environment, and that the
proposed action is the preferred
alternative.
The NRC provided the North Carolina
Department of Health and Human
Services with a draft copy of the EA for
a 30-day review on June 18, 2020
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20171A452)
and received its response on June 23,
2020 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20177A379). The NRC also informed
the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) of its no
effects determination on January 7, 2020
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20008D559)
and received the SHPO’s concurrence
on January 14, 2020 (ADAMS Package
Accession No. ML20015A314).
The NRC staff has determined that
this exemption would have no impact
on ecological resources, and therefore
no consultations are necessary under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (16 U.S.C.A. 1536).
Therefore, the NRC finds that there
are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that a FONSI is appropriate.
Dated: July 16, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John B. McKirgan,
Chief, Storage and Transportation Branch,
Division of Fuel Management, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2020–15768 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 72–1050; NRC–2016–0231]
Interim Storage Partners Consolidated
Interim Storage Facility Project
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft environmental impact
statement; extension of comment
period.
AGENCY:
On May 8, 2020, the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
issued for public comment a draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44329-44330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15768]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72-1031, 50-369, and 50-370; NRC-2020-0044]
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC; McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2;
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering an
exemption request from Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) which
would permit Duke Energy to maintain MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask 0FCTKN045
at its McGuire Nuclear Station independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) in a storage condition where the helium density is
above the range specified in Certificate of Compliance No. 1031,
Amendment No. 7, Technical Specification 3.1.1. The NRC prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) documenting its finding that the proposed
action would have no significant environmental impact. Accordingly, the
NRC staff is issuing a finding of no significant impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed exemption.
[[Page 44330]]
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
July 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0044 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0044. Address questions about NRC docket
IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges Roman; telephone: 301-287-
9127; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document (if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yen-Ju Chen, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555; telephone: 301-415-1018; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is reviewing an exemption request from Duke Energy, dated
September 12, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19270E395), and supplemented
by a letter dated February 3, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20052D934),
and June 15, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20178A548). Duke Energy is
requesting an exemption from the requirements of title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) in Sec. 72.212(b)(3), (b)(5)(i), and
(b)(11) that require Duke Energy and its MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask
0FCTKN045 to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications of
the Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1031, Amendment No. 7 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML17013A481). If approved, Duke Energy's exemption
request would accordingly allow Duke Energy to maintain
MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask 0FCTKN045 in a storage condition where the
helium density is above the range specified in CoC No. 1031, Amendment
No. 7, Technical Specification (TS) 3.1.1.
II. Environmental Assessment Summary
Under the requirements of Sec. Sec. 51.21 and 51.30(a), the NRC
staff developed an EA (ADAMS Accession No. ML20192A329) to evaluate the
proposed action, which is for the NRC to grant Duke Energy an exemption
from the requirements of Sec. 72.212(b)(3), (b)(5)(i), and (b)(11),
only as these requirements pertain to MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask 0FCTKN045.
The exemption would allow Duke Energy to maintain its MAGNASTOR[supreg]
Cask 0FCTKN045 at McGuire Nuclear Station ISFSI in its current storage
condition. The exemption would therefore not require Duke Energy to
restore its MAGNASTOR[supreg] Cask 0FCTKN045 to full compliance with
the helium density range specified in TS 3.1.1.
The EA defines the NRC's proposed action (i.e., to grant Duke
Energy's exemption request per 10 CFR 72.7) and the purpose and need
for the proposed action. Evaluations of the potential environmental
impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action
are presented, followed by the NRC's conclusion.
The EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of granting
the exemption. The potential environmental impact of using NRC-approved
storage casks was initially analyzed in the EA for the rulemaking to
provide for the storage of spent fuel under a general license on July
18, 1990 (55 FR 29181). The EA for using the MAGNASTOR[supreg] System,
Amendment No. 7 (81 FR 13265) tiers off of the EA for the 1990 final
rule.
The NRC staff finds that the higher helium density would not
adversely affect thermal performance and the structural integrity of
the cask system is maintained, and thus, there would be no release from
the canister. Therefore, the proposed action does not change the types
or quantities of effluents that may be released offsite, it does not
increase occupational or public radiation exposure, and there will be
no significant radiological impact to the environment. The proposed
action will take place within the site boundary and does not have other
environmental impacts. Accordingly, the environmental impacts are
bounded by the previous NRC EA for the rulemaking to add the
MAGNASTOR[supreg] System, Amendment No. 7, to 10 CFR 72.214. Thus, the
proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of
the human environment.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared an EA and associated FONSI in support of
the proposed action. The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed
action will not significantly impact the quality of the human
environment, and that the proposed action is the preferred alternative.
The NRC provided the North Carolina Department of Health and Human
Services with a draft copy of the EA for a 30-day review on June 18,
2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20171A452) and received its response on
June 23, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20177A379). The NRC also informed
the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) of its no
effects determination on January 7, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20008D559) and received the SHPO's concurrence on January 14, 2020
(ADAMS Package Accession No. ML20015A314).
The NRC staff has determined that this exemption would have no
impact on ecological resources, and therefore no consultations are
necessary under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C.A. 1536).
Therefore, the NRC finds that there are no significant
environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of
an environmental impact statement is not warranted. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined that a FONSI is appropriate.
Dated: July 16, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John B. McKirgan,
Chief, Storage and Transportation Branch, Division of Fuel Management,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2020-15768 Filed 7-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P