Special Conditions: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Model 777-9 Airplanes; Structure-Mounted Airbags, 44244-44246 [2020-15506]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
44244
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
announced its most recent delineation
of urban areas, a property is located in
an area that qualifies as ‘‘rural’’
according to the definitions in
§ 1026.35(b)(2)(iv) if the search results
provided for the property by any such
automated address search tool available
on the Census Bureau’s public website
do not identify the property as being in
an urban area.
B. For example, if a creditor extended
during 2017 a first-lien covered
transaction that is secured by a property
that is located in an area that meets the
definition of rural or underserved under
§ 1026.35(b)(2)(iv), the creditor meets
this element of the exception for any
transaction consummated during 2018.
C. Alternatively, if the creditor did
not extend in 2017 a transaction that
meets the definition of rural or
underserved test under
§ 1026.35(b)(2)(iv), the creditor satisfies
this criterion for any transaction
consummated during 2018 for which it
received the application before April 1,
2018, if it extended during 2016 a firstlien covered transaction that is secured
by a property that is located in an area
that meets the definition of rural or
underserved under § 1026.35(b)(2)(iv).
ii. During the preceding calendar year,
or, if the application for the transaction
was received before April 1 of the
current calendar year, during either of
the two preceding calendar years, the
creditor together with its affiliates
extended no more than 2,000 covered
transactions, as defined by
§ 1026.43(b)(1), secured by first liens,
that were sold, assigned, or otherwise
transferred to another person, or that
were subject at the time of
consummation to a commitment to be
acquired by another person, to satisfy
the requirement of
§ 1026.35(b)(2)(iii)(B).
iii. As of the preceding December
31st, or, if the application for the
transaction was received before April 1
of the current calendar year, as of either
of the two preceding December 31sts,
the creditor and its affiliates that
regularly extended covered transactions
secured by first liens, together, had total
assets that do not exceed the applicable
asset threshold established by the
Bureau, to satisfy the requirement of
§ 1026.35(b)(2)(iii)(C). The Bureau
publishes notice of the asset threshold
each year by amending comment
35(b)(2)(iii)–1.iii.
Dated: June 29, 2020.
Laura Galban,
Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2020–14692 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2019–1102; Notice No. 25–
20–03–SC]
14 CFR 25.1301(a)—Function and
Installation
14 CFR 25.1541—Markings and Placards
In addition, the FAA has approved
several other PED-retention designs
using the
Special Conditions: Qantas Airways
Limited, Boeing Model 737–800
Airplane; Personal Electronic-Device
Straps Installed on Seat Backs
Conclusion
The Notice of Proposed Special
Conditions No. 25–20–03–SC, Docket
No. FAA–2019–1102, published at 85
FR 17786, is therefore withdrawn.
AGENCY:
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Special conditions; withdrawal.
James E Wilborn,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
The FAA is withdrawing the
Notice of Proposed Special Conditions,
which published in the Federal Register
on March 31, 2020. The FAA is
withdrawing the notice because the
special conditions are not necessary.
DATES: The special conditions published
on March 31, 2020, at 85 FR 17786, are
withdrawn as of July 22, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Shelden, Airframe and Cabin Safety
Section, AIR–675, Transport Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, Washington
98198; telephone and fax 206–231–
3214; email john.shelden@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2020–15034 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
Background
SUMMARY:
SUMMARY:
On March 31, 2020, the FAA
published in the Federal Register
Notice of Proposed Special Conditions
No. 25–20–03–SC, Docket No. FAA–
2019–1102 (85 FR 17786). The
published special conditions pertain to
the Qantas Airways Limited installation
of personal electronic-device (PED)
retention straps on passenger seat backs,
on Boeing Model 737–800 airplanes.
Reason for Withdrawal
Upon further review, the FAA has
determined that the current
airworthiness standards are sufficient,
and special conditions are not necessary
to address PED retention straps installed
on the backs of passenger seats in
Boeing Model 737–800 airplanes, as
modified by Qantas Airways Limited.
The applicable title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) airworthiness
standards include:
14 CFR 25.562(c)(5) and (c)(8)—Emergency
Landing Dynamic Conditions
14 CFR 25.601—Hazardous Features
14 CFR 25.785(b), (d), and (k)—Occupant
Injury and Projecting Objects
14 CFR 25.787(a) and (b)—Stowage
Compartments
14 CFR 25.813(c)—Emergency Exit Access
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2019–1055; Notice No. 25–
20–05–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Model 777–9
Airplanes; Structure-Mounted Airbags
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes (Boeing) Model 777–9
airplane. This airplane will have a novel
or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport-category
airplanes. This design feature is
structure-mounted airbags designed to
limit occupant forward excursion in the
event of an emergency landing. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
September 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2019–1055 using
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket website, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478).
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shannon Lennon, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Section, AIR–675, Transport
Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 South 216th
Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3209; email
shannon.lennon@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these
special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On December 6, 2013, Boeing applied
for a change to Type Certificate No.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
T00001SE for structure-mounted airbags
installed in the Boeing Model 777–9
airplane. The application date was
extended to March 30, 2016 based on
Boeing’s request. The Boeing Model
777–9 airplane, which is a derivative of
the Boeing Model 777 airplane currently
approved under Type Certificate No.
T00001SE, is a twin-engine, transportcategory airplane with seating for 495
passengers and a maximum takeoff
weight of 775,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.101,
Boeing must show that the Model 777–
9 airplane, as changed, continues to
meet the applicable provisions of the
regulations listed in Type Certificate No.
T00001SE, or the applicable regulations
in effect on the date of application for
the change, except for earlier
amendments as agreed upon by the
FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Boeing Model 777–9 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 777–9
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777–9 airplane will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features:
Airbags mounted to structure to
prevent head injury.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44245
Discussion
Boeing proposes to install structuremounted airbags instead of inflatable
lap belts as a means to protect each
occupant from serious injury in the
event of an emergency landing, as
required by § 25.562(c)(5), on 777–9
airplanes.
Such use of airbags to provide injury
protection for the occupant is a novel or
unusual feature for this airplane model,
and the applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate airworthiness standards for
these design features. Therefore, special
conditions are needed to address
requirements particular to installation of
airbags in this manner.
Special conditions exist for airbags
installed on seat belts, known as
inflatable lap belts, which have been
installed on Boeing passenger seats.
Structure-mounted airbags, although a
novel design, were first introduced on
Jetstream Aircraft Limited Model 4100
series airplanes, which resulted in
issuance of Special Conditions 25–
ANM–127 on May 14, 1997. These
special conditions supplemented 14
CFR part 25 and, more specifically,
§§ 25.562 and 25.785.
The structure-mounted airbag, similar
to the inflatable lap belt, is designed to
limit occupant forward excursion in the
event of an emergency landing. These
airbags will reduce the potential for
serious injury, including reducing the
head-injury criterion measurement
defined in part 25. However, structuremounted airbags function similarly as
automotive airbags, where the airbag
deploys from furniture located in front
of the passenger, relative to the
airplane’s direction of flight, forming a
barrier between the structure and
occupant. Also, unlike the inflatable lap
belt, the structure-mounted airbag does
not move with the occupant. To account
for out-of-position and brace-position
occupants, the airbag is designed to
conform to the curvature of the exposed
structure in the head-strike zone.
Because the airbag system is
essentially a single-use device, it could
deploy under crash conditions that are
not sufficiently so severe as to require
the injury protection the airbag system
provides. Because an actual crash is
frequently composed of a series of
impacts before the airplane comes to
rest, a larger impact following the initial
impact could render the airbag system
unavailable. This potential situation
does not exist with standard upper-torso
restraints, which tend to provide
continuous protection regardless of
impact severity, or number of impacts,
in a crash event. Therefore, the airbag-
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
44246
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
system installation should be such that
it provides protection, when it is
required, by not expending its
protection when it is not required. If the
airbag deployment threshold is
unnecessarily low, the airbag would
need to continue to provide protection
when an impact requiring protection
occurs.
These proposed special conditions are
based upon special conditions 25–605–
SC for the Boeing Model 787–9
airplanes equipped with B/E Aerospace
Super-Diamond model business-class
passenger seats and associated furniture.
The proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Boeing
Model 777–9 airplane. Should Boeing
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
series of airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the FAA proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Boeing
Model 777–9 airplanes.
1. The applicant must demonstrate by
test that the structure-mounted airbag
will deploy and provide protection
under crash conditions where it is
necessary to prevent serious injury to a
50th percentile occupant, as specified in
§ 25.562. The means of protection must
provide a consistent approach to energy
absorption for a range of occupants,
from a two-year-old child to a 95th
percentile male.
2. The structure-mounted airbag must
provide adequate protection for each
occupant regardless of the number of
occupants of the seat assembly.
jbell on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
3. The structure-mounted airbag
system must not be susceptible to
inadvertent deployment as a result of
wear and tear, or inertial loads resulting
from in-flight or ground maneuvers
(including gusts and hard landings)
likely to be experienced in service.
4. Deployment of the structuremounted airbag must not introduce
hazards or injury mechanisms to the
seated occupant, including occupants in
the brace position. Deployment of the
structure-mounted airbag must also not
result in injuries that could impede
rapid exit from the airplane.
5. The applicant must demonstrate
that an inadvertent deployment that
could cause injury to a standing or
sitting person is improbable. Inadvertent
deployment must not cause injury to
anyone who may be positioned close to
the structure-mounted airbag (e.g.,
seated in an adjacent seat, or standing
adjacent to the airbag installation or the
subject seat). Cases where a structuremounted airbag is inadvertently
deployed near a seated occupant or an
empty seat must be considered.
6. Effects of the deflection and
deformation of the structure to which
the airbag is attached must be taken into
account when evaluating deployment
and location of the inflated airbag. The
effect of loads imposed by airbag
deployment, or stowed components
where applicable, must also be taken
into account.
7. Inadvertent deployment of the
structure-mounted airbag during the
most critical part of flight will either not
cause a hazard to the airplane or is
extremely improbable.
8. The applicant must demonstrate
that the structure-mounted airbag, when
deployed, does not impair access to the
seatbelt- or harness-release means, and
must not hinder evacuation. This will
include consideration of adjacent seat
places and the aisle.
9. The airbag, once deployed, must
not adversely affect the emergencylighting system, and must not block
escape-path lighting to the extent that
the light(s) no longer meet their
intended function.
10. The structure-mounted airbag
must not impede occupants’ rapid exit
from the airplane 10 seconds after its
deployment.
11. Where structure-mounted airbag
systems are installed in or close to
passenger evacuation routes (other than
for the passenger seat for which the
airbag is installed), possibility of impact
on emergency evacuation (e.g., hanging
in the aisle, potential trip hazard, etc.)
must be evaluated.
12. The airbag electronic system must
be designed to be protected from
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
lightning per § 25.1316(b), and highintensity radiated fields per
§ 25.1317(c).
13. The structure-mounted airbag
system must not contain or release
hazardous quantities of gas or
particulate matter into the cabin.
14. The structure-mounted airbag
installation must be protected from the
effects of fire such that no hazard to
occupants will result.
15. The inflatable bag material must
meet the 2.5-inches-per-minute
horizontal flammability test defined in
14 CFR part 25, appendix F, part I,
paragraph (a)(1)(iv).
16. The design of the structuremounted airbag system must protect the
mechanisms and controls from external
contamination associated with that
which could occur on or around
passenger seating.
17. The structure-mounted airbag
system must have a means to verify the
integrity of the structure-mounted airbag
activation system.
18. The applicant must provide
installation limitations to ensure
installation compatibility between the
seat design and opposing monument or
structure.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July
14, 2020.
James E. Wilborn,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–15506 Filed 7–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–112339–19]
RIN 1545–BP42
Credit for Carbon Oxide Sequestration;
Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of hearing.
AGENCY:
This document provides a
notice of public hearing on proposed
regulations regarding the credit for
carbon oxide sequestration under
section 45Q of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code).
DATES: The public hearing is being held
on Wednesday, August 26, 2020, at 10
a.m. The IRS must receive speakers’
outlines of the topics to be discussed at
the public hearing by Friday, August 14,
2020. If no outlines are received by
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 141 (Wednesday, July 22, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44244-44246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15506]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2019-1055; Notice No. 25-20-05-SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Model 777-9
Airplanes; Structure-Mounted Airbags
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes (Boeing) Model 777-9 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport-
category airplanes. This design feature is structure-mounted airbags
designed to limit occupant forward excursion in the event of an
emergency landing. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before September 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2019-1055 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of
[[Page 44245]]
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478).
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Lennon, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Section, AIR-675, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198;
telephone and fax 206-231-3209; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On December 6, 2013, Boeing applied for a change to Type
Certificate No. T00001SE for structure-mounted airbags installed in the
Boeing Model 777-9 airplane. The application date was extended to March
30, 2016 based on Boeing's request. The Boeing Model 777-9 airplane,
which is a derivative of the Boeing Model 777 airplane currently
approved under Type Certificate No. T00001SE, is a twin-engine,
transport-category airplane with seating for 495 passengers and a
maximum takeoff weight of 775,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.101, Boeing must show that the Model 777-9 airplane, as
changed, continues to meet the applicable provisions of the regulations
listed in Type Certificate No. T00001SE, or the applicable regulations
in effect on the date of application for the change, except for earlier
amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777-9 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 777-9 airplane must comply with the fuel-
vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777-9 airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
Airbags mounted to structure to prevent head injury.
Discussion
Boeing proposes to install structure-mounted airbags instead of
inflatable lap belts as a means to protect each occupant from serious
injury in the event of an emergency landing, as required by Sec.
25.562(c)(5), on 777-9 airplanes.
Such use of airbags to provide injury protection for the occupant
is a novel or unusual feature for this airplane model, and the
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate airworthiness standards for these design features.
Therefore, special conditions are needed to address requirements
particular to installation of airbags in this manner.
Special conditions exist for airbags installed on seat belts, known
as inflatable lap belts, which have been installed on Boeing passenger
seats. Structure-mounted airbags, although a novel design, were first
introduced on Jetstream Aircraft Limited Model 4100 series airplanes,
which resulted in issuance of Special Conditions 25-ANM-127 on May 14,
1997. These special conditions supplemented 14 CFR part 25 and, more
specifically, Sec. Sec. 25.562 and 25.785.
The structure-mounted airbag, similar to the inflatable lap belt,
is designed to limit occupant forward excursion in the event of an
emergency landing. These airbags will reduce the potential for serious
injury, including reducing the head-injury criterion measurement
defined in part 25. However, structure-mounted airbags function
similarly as automotive airbags, where the airbag deploys from
furniture located in front of the passenger, relative to the airplane's
direction of flight, forming a barrier between the structure and
occupant. Also, unlike the inflatable lap belt, the structure-mounted
airbag does not move with the occupant. To account for out-of-position
and brace-position occupants, the airbag is designed to conform to the
curvature of the exposed structure in the head-strike zone.
Because the airbag system is essentially a single-use device, it
could deploy under crash conditions that are not sufficiently so severe
as to require the injury protection the airbag system provides. Because
an actual crash is frequently composed of a series of impacts before
the airplane comes to rest, a larger impact following the initial
impact could render the airbag system unavailable. This potential
situation does not exist with standard upper-torso restraints, which
tend to provide continuous protection regardless of impact severity, or
number of impacts, in a crash event. Therefore, the airbag-
[[Page 44246]]
system installation should be such that it provides protection, when it
is required, by not expending its protection when it is not required.
If the airbag deployment threshold is unnecessarily low, the airbag
would need to continue to provide protection when an impact requiring
protection occurs.
These proposed special conditions are based upon special conditions
25-605-SC for the Boeing Model 787-9 airplanes equipped with B/E
Aerospace Super-Diamond model business-class passenger seats and
associated furniture. The proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Boeing Model 777-9 airplane. Should Boeing apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, the FAA proposes the following special conditions as part
of the type certification basis for Boeing Model 777-9 airplanes.
1. The applicant must demonstrate by test that the structure-
mounted airbag will deploy and provide protection under crash
conditions where it is necessary to prevent serious injury to a 50th
percentile occupant, as specified in Sec. 25.562. The means of
protection must provide a consistent approach to energy absorption for
a range of occupants, from a two-year-old child to a 95th percentile
male.
2. The structure-mounted airbag must provide adequate protection
for each occupant regardless of the number of occupants of the seat
assembly.
3. The structure-mounted airbag system must not be susceptible to
inadvertent deployment as a result of wear and tear, or inertial loads
resulting from in-flight or ground maneuvers (including gusts and hard
landings) likely to be experienced in service.
4. Deployment of the structure-mounted airbag must not introduce
hazards or injury mechanisms to the seated occupant, including
occupants in the brace position. Deployment of the structure-mounted
airbag must also not result in injuries that could impede rapid exit
from the airplane.
5. The applicant must demonstrate that an inadvertent deployment
that could cause injury to a standing or sitting person is improbable.
Inadvertent deployment must not cause injury to anyone who may be
positioned close to the structure-mounted airbag (e.g., seated in an
adjacent seat, or standing adjacent to the airbag installation or the
subject seat). Cases where a structure-mounted airbag is inadvertently
deployed near a seated occupant or an empty seat must be considered.
6. Effects of the deflection and deformation of the structure to
which the airbag is attached must be taken into account when evaluating
deployment and location of the inflated airbag. The effect of loads
imposed by airbag deployment, or stowed components where applicable,
must also be taken into account.
7. Inadvertent deployment of the structure-mounted airbag during
the most critical part of flight will either not cause a hazard to the
airplane or is extremely improbable.
8. The applicant must demonstrate that the structure-mounted
airbag, when deployed, does not impair access to the seatbelt- or
harness-release means, and must not hinder evacuation. This will
include consideration of adjacent seat places and the aisle.
9. The airbag, once deployed, must not adversely affect the
emergency-lighting system, and must not block escape-path lighting to
the extent that the light(s) no longer meet their intended function.
10. The structure-mounted airbag must not impede occupants' rapid
exit from the airplane 10 seconds after its deployment.
11. Where structure-mounted airbag systems are installed in or
close to passenger evacuation routes (other than for the passenger seat
for which the airbag is installed), possibility of impact on emergency
evacuation (e.g., hanging in the aisle, potential trip hazard, etc.)
must be evaluated.
12. The airbag electronic system must be designed to be protected
from lightning per Sec. 25.1316(b), and high-intensity radiated fields
per Sec. 25.1317(c).
13. The structure-mounted airbag system must not contain or release
hazardous quantities of gas or particulate matter into the cabin.
14. The structure-mounted airbag installation must be protected
from the effects of fire such that no hazard to occupants will result.
15. The inflatable bag material must meet the 2.5-inches-per-minute
horizontal flammability test defined in 14 CFR part 25, appendix F,
part I, paragraph (a)(1)(iv).
16. The design of the structure-mounted airbag system must protect
the mechanisms and controls from external contamination associated with
that which could occur on or around passenger seating.
17. The structure-mounted airbag system must have a means to verify
the integrity of the structure-mounted airbag activation system.
18. The applicant must provide installation limitations to ensure
installation compatibility between the seat design and opposing
monument or structure.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July 14, 2020.
James E. Wilborn,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-15506 Filed 7-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P