Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 43846-43848 [2020-15652]
Download as PDF
43846
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Notices
Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief
Operating Officer, CDC, pursuant to
Public Law 92–463.
Name of Committee: Safety and
Occupational Health Study Section
(SOHSS), National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH).
Date: October 20–21, 2020.
Time: 11:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m., EDT.
Place: Teleconference.
Agenda: The meeting will convene to
address matters related to the conduct of
Study Section business and for the
study section to consider safety and
occupational health-related grant
applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., Scientific
Review Officer, NIOSH, 1095
Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV
26506, (304) 285–5951; MGoldcamp@
cdc.gov.
The Director, Strategic Business
Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, has been
delegated the authority to sign Federal
Register notices pertaining to
announcements of meetings and other
committee management activities, for
both the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit,
Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020–15615 Filed 7–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–20–20IP]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
has submitted the information
collection request titled ‘‘Occupational
Driver Safety at Intersections’’ to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. CDC
previously published a ‘‘Proposed Data
Collection Submitted for Public
Comment and Recommendations’’
notice on February 25, 2020 to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. CDC did not receive comments
related to the previous notice. This
notice serves to allow an additional 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
days for public and affected agency
comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this
proposed information collection project.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including, through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and
(e) Assess information collection
costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570.
Comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Direct written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice to the
Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by
fax to (202) 395–5806. Provide written
comments within 30 days of notice
publication.
Proposed Project
Occupational Driver Safety at
Intersections—New—National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The mission of the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) is to promote safety and health
at work for all people through research
and prevention. Nearly 40% of all traffic
crashes occur at intersections.
Erroneous decision-making while
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
crossing a signalized intersection is a
significant risk factor for drivers. Such
decision-making is even more
challenging for occupational drivers
(e.g., police and fire truck drivers) due
to their job demands, special vehicle
characteristics, and frequency of crash
risk exposure. NIOSH has initiated a
laboratory simulation study on effects of
occupation, vehicle type, vehicle
approach speed, signal light logic, and
emergency response status on
emergency vehicle driver decisionmaking at intersections to advance the
safety of approximately 900,000 law
enforcement officers and 1,134,400
career and volunteer firefighters.
Study results will be used to develop
science-based safety recognition training
materials for emergency vehicle drivers
and their employers to enhance driver
safety at intersections. The information
also will be used to (1) determine the
optimal time/distance to activate a
traffic signal preemption system for
emergency vehicles to obtain the rightof-way at intersections, and (2)
conceptualize an advanced driver
assistant system (ADAS) that provides
signal light status and issues a
preemptive warning when an
emergency vehicle approaches an
intersection at an unsafe speed limit
based on the vehicle and environmental
conditions. The system will assist
occupational drivers in decision making
while crossing a signalized intersection.
Thirty-two fire truck drivers, 32 law
enforcement officers (LEOs), and 32
general passenger vehicle drivers will be
recruited for the experiment. The
driving task for fire truck drivers and
LEOs will consist of responding to an
emergency call and returning to the base
station. The general passenger vehicle
drivers serve as the baseline reference;
they will drive a sedan, simulating
normal daily driving conditions. LEOs
will perform an additional driving task
(off-duty condition) using a sedan (same
weight and size as the LEO cruiser) on
a separate visit for the experiment. The
drivers’ performance (e.g., perception
and response time, stopping accuracy,
and stress level) and safety outcomes
(e.g., deceleration at intersection,
clearance to intersection, red light
running time, and red light running
frequency) will be analyzed, based on
vehicle locations, vehicle speeds, and
drivers’ heart rates.
A follow-up study will evaluate the
effectiveness of a driver assistant tool
(derived from the first experiment) on
the drivers’ decision-making and overall
safety outcomes. The driver assistant
tool would be (1) either an algorithm to
activate a traffic signal preemption
system at optimal time/distance for
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
43847
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Notices
emergency vehicles to obtain the rightof-way at intersections or, (2) an
advanced driver assistant system that
provides signal light status and issues a
preemptive warning when an
emergency vehicle approaches an
intersection at an unsafe speed limit.
Half of the participants from the first
experiment (i.e., 16 truck drivers, 16
LEOs, and 16 general passenger vehicle
drivers) and 48 new participants (16
from each of the three groups) will be
recruited. The design of this experiment
in terms of nature of tasks and outcome
measures will be the same as those for
the first Experiment.
The two experiments will utilize 192
research participants. An additional six
participants may be recruited to replace
dropouts during the study due to
simulator sickness. The data collection
for the two experiments will take three
years in total. Informed consent and the
data collection are expected to take
three to 3.5 hours (total) to complete for
Experiment 1 and four to 4.5 hours for
Experiment 2 for each participant. The
total estimated annualized burden hours
are 341. There are no costs to the
respondents other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x3 conditions.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x3 conditions.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x3 conditions.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x3 conditions ....
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x2 conditions.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x2 conditions.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x2 conditions.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x2 conditions ....
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x1 condition.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x1 condition .....
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x1 condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance
System (I)x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x1 condition.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x1 condition .....
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x1 condition.
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
1:
1:
1:
1:
Law Enforcement Officers .......
Firefighter ................................
Firefighter ................................
Firefighter ................................
Experiment 1: Firefighter ................................
Experiment 1: Firefighter ................................
Experiment 1: Firefighter ................................
Experiment 1: Firefighter ................................
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
1:
1:
1:
1:
Firefighter ................................
General civilian ........................
General civilian ........................
General civilian ........................
Experiment 1: General civilian ........................
Experiment 1: General civilian ........................
Experiment 1: General civilian ........................
Experiment 1: General civilian ........................
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
1:
2:
2:
2:
General civilian ........................
Law Enforcement Officers .......
Law Enforcement Officers .......
Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers .......
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
2:
2:
2:
2:
Law Enforcement Officers .......
Firefighter ................................
Firefighter ................................
Firefighter ................................
Experiment 2: Firefighter ................................
Experiment 2: Firefighter ................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
Number of
responses per
respondent
Avg. burden
per response
(in hrs.)
11
11
11
1
1
1
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
1
11
1
30/60
11
1
48/60
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
6
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
40/60
11
1
20/60
11
1
36/60
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
4
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
20/60
11
1
10/60
11
1
16/60
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
2
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
20/60
11
1
10/60
11
1
40/60
11
1
16/60
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
2
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
20/60
20JYN1
43848
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Experiment 2: Firefighter ................................
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x1 condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance
System (I)x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x1 condition.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x1 condition .....
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email (A) ..........
Participation Data Collection Form (B) ..........
Informed Consent form—including participant
orientation (C).
Motion Sickness Screen Form (D) .................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment (E)x5 scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test
(F)x2 states x1 condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance
System (I)x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator (G)x1 condition.
Actual test—120 minutes (H)x1 condition .....
Experiment 2: Firefighter ................................
Experiment 2: Firefighter ................................
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
2:
2:
2:
2:
Firefighter ................................
General civilian ........................
General civilian ........................
General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ........................
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020–15652 Filed 7–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
nutrition status of the general
population.
CDC must receive written
comments on or before September 18,
2020.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2020–
0078 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulation.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
Regulations.gov.
ADDRESSES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–20–0950; Docket No. CDC–2020–
0078]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice with comment period.
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing efforts to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice
invites comment on a proposed
information collection project titled
National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES).
NHANES programs produce descriptive
statistics, which measure the health and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
Please note: Submit all Federal comments
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
(regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Ph.D., Lead, Information Collection
Review Office, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia
30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email:
omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
Avg. burden
per response
(in hrs.)
11
1
10/60
11
1
40/60
11
1
16/60
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
2
1/60
1/60
20/60
11
11
1
1
2/60
20/60
11
1
10/60
11
1
40/60
11
1
16/60
11
1
2
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs.
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 139 (Monday, July 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43846-43848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15652]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-20-20IP]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the information
collection request titled ``Occupational Driver Safety at
Intersections'' to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval. CDC previously published a ``Proposed Data Collection
Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations'' notice on February
25, 2020 to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. CDC
did not receive comments related to the previous notice. This notice
serves to allow an additional 30 days for public and affected agency
comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this proposed information
collection project. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly
interested in comments that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including, through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570. Comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. Direct
written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in
this notice to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202)
395-5806. Provide written comments within 30 days of notice
publication.
Proposed Project
Occupational Driver Safety at Intersections--New--National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The mission of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) is to promote safety and health at work for all people
through research and prevention. Nearly 40% of all traffic crashes
occur at intersections. Erroneous decision-making while crossing a
signalized intersection is a significant risk factor for drivers. Such
decision-making is even more challenging for occupational drivers
(e.g., police and fire truck drivers) due to their job demands, special
vehicle characteristics, and frequency of crash risk exposure. NIOSH
has initiated a laboratory simulation study on effects of occupation,
vehicle type, vehicle approach speed, signal light logic, and emergency
response status on emergency vehicle driver decision-making at
intersections to advance the safety of approximately 900,000 law
enforcement officers and 1,134,400 career and volunteer firefighters.
Study results will be used to develop science-based safety
recognition training materials for emergency vehicle drivers and their
employers to enhance driver safety at intersections. The information
also will be used to (1) determine the optimal time/distance to
activate a traffic signal preemption system for emergency vehicles to
obtain the right-of-way at intersections, and (2) conceptualize an
advanced driver assistant system (ADAS) that provides signal light
status and issues a preemptive warning when an emergency vehicle
approaches an intersection at an unsafe speed limit based on the
vehicle and environmental conditions. The system will assist
occupational drivers in decision making while crossing a signalized
intersection.
Thirty-two fire truck drivers, 32 law enforcement officers (LEOs),
and 32 general passenger vehicle drivers will be recruited for the
experiment. The driving task for fire truck drivers and LEOs will
consist of responding to an emergency call and returning to the base
station. The general passenger vehicle drivers serve as the baseline
reference; they will drive a sedan, simulating normal daily driving
conditions. LEOs will perform an additional driving task (off-duty
condition) using a sedan (same weight and size as the LEO cruiser) on a
separate visit for the experiment. The drivers' performance (e.g.,
perception and response time, stopping accuracy, and stress level) and
safety outcomes (e.g., deceleration at intersection, clearance to
intersection, red light running time, and red light running frequency)
will be analyzed, based on vehicle locations, vehicle speeds, and
drivers' heart rates.
A follow-up study will evaluate the effectiveness of a driver
assistant tool (derived from the first experiment) on the drivers'
decision-making and overall safety outcomes. The driver assistant tool
would be (1) either an algorithm to activate a traffic signal
preemption system at optimal time/distance for
[[Page 43847]]
emergency vehicles to obtain the right-of-way at intersections or, (2)
an advanced driver assistant system that provides signal light status
and issues a preemptive warning when an emergency vehicle approaches an
intersection at an unsafe speed limit. Half of the participants from
the first experiment (i.e., 16 truck drivers, 16 LEOs, and 16 general
passenger vehicle drivers) and 48 new participants (16 from each of the
three groups) will be recruited. The design of this experiment in terms
of nature of tasks and outcome measures will be the same as those for
the first Experiment.
The two experiments will utilize 192 research participants. An
additional six participants may be recruited to replace dropouts during
the study due to simulator sickness. The data collection for the two
experiments will take three years in total. Informed consent and the
data collection are expected to take three to 3.5 hours (total) to
complete for Experiment 1 and four to 4.5 hours for Experiment 2 for
each participant. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 341.
There are no costs to the respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Avg. burden
Type of respondents Form name Number of responses per per response
respondents respondent (in hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Officers. Email (A).
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Officers. Collection Form (B).
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
Officers. including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
Officers. (D).
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Pre and post drive 11 1 1
Officers. simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x3 conditions.
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 30/60
Officers. Stability Test (F)x2
states x3 conditions.
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 48/60
Officers. practice in simulator
(G)x3 conditions.
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 6
Officers. (H)x3 conditions.
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Email (A).
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Collection Form (B).
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
(D).
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Pre and post drive 11 1 40/60
simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x2 conditions.
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 20/60
Stability Test (F)x2
states x2 conditions.
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 36/60
practice in simulator
(G)x2 conditions.
Experiment 1: Firefighter.......... Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 4
(H)x2 conditions.
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Email (A).
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Collection Form (B).
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
(D).
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60
simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x1 condition.
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 10/60
Stability Test (F)x2
states x1 condition.
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 16/60
practice in simulator
(G)x1 condition.
Experiment 1: General civilian..... Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 2
(H)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Officers. Email (A).
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Officers. Collection Form (B).
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
Officers. including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
Officers. (D).
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60
Officers. simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 10/60
Officers. Stability Test (F)x2
states x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Acceptance of Advanced 11 1 40/60
Officers. Driver Assistance System
(I)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 16/60
Officers. practice in simulator
(G)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 2
Officers. (H)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Email (A).
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Collection Form (B).
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
(D).
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60
simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x1 condition.
[[Page 43848]]
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 10/60
Stability Test (F)x2
states x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Acceptance of Advanced 11 1 40/60
Driver Assistance System
(I)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 16/60
practice in simulator
(G)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: Firefighter.......... Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 2
(H)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Pre-Enrollment Confirmation 11 1 1/60
Email (A).
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Participation Data 11 1 1/60
Collection Form (B).
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Informed Consent form-- 11 1 20/60
including participant
orientation (C).
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Motion Sickness Screen Form 11 1 2/60
(D).
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60
simulator sickness
assessment (E)x5 scenarios
x1 condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Sharpened Romberg Postural 11 1 10/60
Stability Test (F)x2
states x1 condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Acceptance of Advanced 11 1 40/60
Driver Assistance System
(I)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Practice Roadmap--Driving 11 1 16/60
practice in simulator
(G)x1 condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian..... Actual test--120 minutes 11 1 2
(H)x1 condition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-15652 Filed 7-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P