Quinclorac; Pesticide Tolerances, 43700-43702 [2020-14395]
Download as PDF
43700
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0523; FRL–10010–91]
Quinclorac; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
This regulation amends the
tolerance for residues of quinclorac in or
on rice, grain. BASF Corporation
requested this tolerance amendment
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective July
20, 2020. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 18, 2020, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0523, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Please note that due to the public
health emergency the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room
was closed to public visitors on March
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will
continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For
further information on EPA/DC services,
docket contact information and the
current status of the EPA/DC and
Reading Room, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0523 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 18, 2020. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2019–0523, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 28,
2019 (84 FR 57685) (FRL–10001–11),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 9F8770) by BASF
Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
The petition requested that 40 CFR part
180.463 be amended by raising the
existing tolerance for residues of the
herbicide quinclorac, in or on rice, grain
to 10.0 parts per million (ppm). That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by BASF Corporation,
the registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing tolerances that vary from
what was requested, by amending the
tolerance of quinclorac in or on rice,
bran to 30 ppm. The reason for this
change is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish or amend a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide
chemical residue in or on a food) only
if EPA determines that the tolerance is
‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of
FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that
‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue, including all anticipated
dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable
information.’’ This includes exposure
through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing or
amending a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for quinclorac
including exposure resulting from the
tolerance amended by this action. EPA’s
assessment of exposures and risks
associated with quinclorac follows.
On December 4, 2017, EPA published
in the Federal Register a final rule
establishing tolerances for residues of
quinclorac in or on several commodities
based on the Agency’s conclusion that
aggregate exposure to quinclorac is safe
for the general population, including
infants and children. See 82 FR 57144
(FRL–9970–05). Because certain
elements of EPA’s safety assessment
have not changed since that rulemaking,
EPA is incorporating by reference
portions of that rulemaking into this
document—in particular, the
toxicological profile and points of
departure, cumulative risk statement,
and the Agency’s determination
regarding the children’s safety factor. In
addition, because the residential
exposures and drinking water exposures
have not changed, those sections are
also incorporated by reference, but the
Agency did conduct updated dietary
and aggregate risk assessments in order
to incorporate the higher residues of
quinclorac on rice.
The dietary exposure assessment was
updated, assuming 100% crop treated
(PCT), tolerance-level residues, an
empirical processing factor (rapeseed
oil, 1.5x) and HED’s 2018 default
processing factors, and the highest
estimated drinking water concentrations
(EDWCs) from acute/chronic ground
water exposure. EPA’s aggregate
exposure assessment incorporated this
revised dietary exposure, as well as
exposure in drinking water and from
residential sources, although those latter
exposures are not impacted by the
amended tolerance on rice, grain and
thus have not changed since the last
assessment.
Acute dietary risks are below the
Agency’s level of concern: 2.6% of the
acute population adjusted dose (aPAD)
for females age 13 to 49, the only
population subgroup for which an acute
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
endpoint was selected. Chronic dietary
risks are below the Agency’s level of
concern: 11% of the chronic population
adjusted dose (cPAD) for infants <1 year
of age, the population subgroup with the
highest exposure. Residential handler
inhalation exposures for adults as well
as post-application incidental oral
exposures for children from registered
uses of quinclorac in residential areas
were assessed previously and no risks of
concern were identified. Using the
exposure assumptions described for
short-term exposures, EPA has
concluded the combined short-term
food, water, and residential exposures
result in aggregate margins of exposures
above the level of concern of 100 for all
scenarios assessed and are not of
concern. There are no uses resulting in
intermediate-term residential exposures.
Therefore, based on the risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to quinclorac residues. Further
information about EPA’s risk assessment
and safety analysis for residues of
quinclorac can be found in the
document entitled, ‘‘Quinclorac: Human
Health Risk Assessment for Rice
Commodity Tolerance Increases’’ by
going to https://www.regulations.gov.
The referenced document is available in
the docket established by this action,
which is described under ADDRESSES.
Locate and click on the hyperlink for
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–
0523.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate analytical methods (gas
chromatography/electron capture
detector (GC/ECD) and liquid
chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)) are available
for enforcing quinclorac tolerances on
plant and livestock commodities.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43701
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level. Codex has
established an MRL for quinclorac in or
on rice at 10 ppm. This MRL is the same
as the tolerance amended for quinclorac
in the United States. Codex has not
established an MRL for quinclorac in or
on rice bran. Therefore, harmonization
is not an issue for this commodity.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
As a result of the tolerance increase
on rice grain, the tolerance of the
processed commodity rice, bran also
needs to be increased. EPA used the
highest average field trial value for rice
reflecting the proposed foliar broadcast
use, and the rice, bran processing factor
to determine the needed tolerance of 30
ppm in or on rice, bran.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are modified for
residues of quinclorac in or on rice,
grain to 10 ppm; and rice, bran to 30
ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action modifies tolerances under
FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a
petition submitted to the Agency. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
43702
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
Dated: June 12, 2020.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.463 amend paragraph (a)(1)
by designating the table and revising in
newly designated Table 1 to paragraph
(a)(1) the entries for ‘‘Rice, bran’’ and
‘‘Rice, grain’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 180.463180.463
for residues.
Quinclorac; tolerances
(a)(1) * * *
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1)
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
Rice, bran .............................
Rice, grain ............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
30
10
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–14395 Filed 7–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0571; FRL–10010–64]
Magnesium Sulfate; Exemption From
the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of magnesium
sulfate anhydrous (CAS Reg. No. 7487–
88–9); magnesium sulfate monohydrate
(CAS Reg. No. 14168–73–1); magnesium
sulfate trihydrate (CAS Reg. No. 15320–
30–6); magnesium sulfate tetrahydrate
(CAS Reg. No. 24378–31–2); magnesium
sulfate pentahydrate (CAS Reg. No.
15553–21–6); magnesium sulfate
hexahydrate (CAS Reg. No. 17830–18–
1); and magnesium sulfate heptahydrate
(CAS Reg. No. 10034–99–8), collectively
referred to as magnesium sulfate, when
used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils at an end-use
concentration not to exceed 4400 parts
per million (ppm). Ecolab, Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting establishment of
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance for magnesium sulfate. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of magnesium sulfate when
used in accordance with these
exemptions.
DATES: This regulation is effective July
20, 2020. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 18, 2020, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0571, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Please note that due to the public
health emergency the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room
was closed to public visitors on March
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will
continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For
further information on EPA/DC services,
docket contact information and the
current status of the EPA/DC and
Reading Room, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 139 (Monday, July 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43700-43702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14395]
[[Page 43700]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0523; FRL-10010-91]
Quinclorac; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation amends the tolerance for residues of
quinclorac in or on rice, grain. BASF Corporation requested this
tolerance amendment under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July 20, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 18, 2020,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0523, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Please note that due to the public health emergency the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room was closed to public visitors on March
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For further information on EPA/DC
services, docket contact information and the current status of the EPA/
DC and Reading Room, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0523 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 18, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0523, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 28, 2019 (84 FR 57685) (FRL-
10001-11), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3),
21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
9F8770) by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180.463
be amended by raising the existing tolerance for residues of the
herbicide quinclorac, in or on rice, grain to 10.0 parts per million
(ppm). That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by
BASF Corporation, the registrant, which is available in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response
to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing tolerances that vary from what was requested, by amending
the tolerance of quinclorac in or on rice, bran to 30 ppm. The reason
for this change is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish or amend a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
[[Page 43701]]
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing or amending a tolerance and
to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .'' Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D),
and the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information
in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the
hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for
quinclorac including exposure resulting from the tolerance amended by
this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with
quinclorac follows.
On December 4, 2017, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues of quinclorac in or on
several commodities based on the Agency's conclusion that aggregate
exposure to quinclorac is safe for the general population, including
infants and children. See 82 FR 57144 (FRL-9970-05). Because certain
elements of EPA's safety assessment have not changed since that
rulemaking, EPA is incorporating by reference portions of that
rulemaking into this document--in particular, the toxicological profile
and points of departure, cumulative risk statement, and the Agency's
determination regarding the children's safety factor. In addition,
because the residential exposures and drinking water exposures have not
changed, those sections are also incorporated by reference, but the
Agency did conduct updated dietary and aggregate risk assessments in
order to incorporate the higher residues of quinclorac on rice.
The dietary exposure assessment was updated, assuming 100% crop
treated (PCT), tolerance-level residues, an empirical processing factor
(rapeseed oil, 1.5x) and HED's 2018 default processing factors, and the
highest estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) from acute/
chronic ground water exposure. EPA's aggregate exposure assessment
incorporated this revised dietary exposure, as well as exposure in
drinking water and from residential sources, although those latter
exposures are not impacted by the amended tolerance on rice, grain and
thus have not changed since the last assessment.
Acute dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern: 2.6%
of the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) for females age 13 to 49,
the only population subgroup for which an acute endpoint was selected.
Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern: 11% of
the chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD) for infants <1 year of age,
the population subgroup with the highest exposure. Residential handler
inhalation exposures for adults as well as post-application incidental
oral exposures for children from registered uses of quinclorac in
residential areas were assessed previously and no risks of concern were
identified. Using the exposure assumptions described for short-term
exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water, and
residential exposures result in aggregate margins of exposures above
the level of concern of 100 for all scenarios assessed and are not of
concern. There are no uses resulting in intermediate-term residential
exposures.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to quinclorac residues. Further information about
EPA's risk assessment and safety analysis for residues of quinclorac
can be found in the document entitled, ``Quinclorac: Human Health Risk
Assessment for Rice Commodity Tolerance Increases'' by going to https://www.regulations.gov. The referenced document is available in the docket
established by this action, which is described under ADDRESSES. Locate
and click on the hyperlink for docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0523.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate analytical methods (gas chromatography/electron capture
detector (GC/ECD) and liquid chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)) are available for enforcing quinclorac
tolerances on plant and livestock commodities.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level. Codex has established
an MRL for quinclorac in or on rice at 10 ppm. This MRL is the same as
the tolerance amended for quinclorac in the United States. Codex has
not established an MRL for quinclorac in or on rice bran. Therefore,
harmonization is not an issue for this commodity.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
As a result of the tolerance increase on rice grain, the tolerance
of the processed commodity rice, bran also needs to be increased. EPA
used the highest average field trial value for rice reflecting the
proposed foliar broadcast use, and the rice, bran processing factor to
determine the needed tolerance of 30 ppm in or on rice, bran.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are modified for residues of quinclorac in or
on rice, grain to 10 ppm; and rice, bran to 30 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action modifies tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
[[Page 43702]]
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 12, 2020.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.463 amend paragraph (a)(1) by designating the table and
revising in newly designated Table 1 to paragraph (a)(1) the entries
for ``Rice, bran'' and ``Rice, grain'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.463180.463 Quinclorac; tolerances for residues.
(a)(1) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Rice, bran.............................................. 30
Rice, grain............................................. 10
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-14395 Filed 7-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P