Air Plan Conditional Approval and Disapproval; Arizona; Maricopa County; Power Plants, Fuel Burning Equipment, and Internal Combustion Engines, 43692-43695 [2020-14095]
Download as PDF
43692
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
e. Congressional Review Act. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The Corps will submit a
report containing the final rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States. A major
rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Marine safety,
Navigation (water), Restricted areas,
Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR
part 334 as follows:
normal maritime traffic and all activities
to include anchoring and loitering.
(2) When the range is in use, the
person(s) or officer(s) in charge shall
display a red flag from a conspicuous
and easily-seen location along the
nearby shore to signify that the range is
in use and will post lookouts to ensure
the safety of all vessels transiting
through the area. If the range is in use
at night, a strobe light shall be displayed
from the same conspicuous and easilyseen location in lieu of flags. The range
shall not be used when visibility is
equal to or less than the maximum range
of the weapons being used at the
facility.
(c) Enforcement. The restrictions on
public access in this section shall be
enforced by the Commander, Joint
Region Marianas, and such agencies as
the Commander may designate in
writing.
1. The authority citation for part 334
continues to read as follows:
[FR Doc. 2020–14131 Filed 7–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3073 or by
email at gong.kevin@epa.gov.
■
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and
40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3).
■
2. Add § 334.1415 to read as follows:
§ 334.1415 Pacific Ocean, adjacent to the
Finegayan Small Arms Range at Naval Base
Guam Telecommunication Site, on the
northwestern coast of Guam; danger zone.
(a) The area. Coordinates are bounded
by the following four points: Point A
(13°34′57″ N; 144°49′53″ E) following
the high tide line to Point B (13°35′49″
N; 144°47′59″ E), Point C (13°34′57″ N;
144°47′45″ E), and Point D (13°34′48″ N;
144°49′50″ E). The datum for these
coordinates is NAD–83.
(b) The regulation. (1) Vessels or
persons shall expeditiously transit
through the danger zone when the small
arms range is in use. Vessels shall not
be permitted to anchor or loiter within
the danger zone while the range is in
use. Range activities shall be halted
until all vessels are cleared from the
danger zone. When the range is not in
use, the danger zone shall be open to
This rule is effective on August
19, 2020.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0321. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
Approved:
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division
Directorate of Civil Works.
PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND
RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
plants. This action was proposed in the
Federal Register on December 30, 2019,
and concerns emissions of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) from combustion
sources.
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0321; FRL–10009–
81–Region 9]
Air Plan Conditional Approval and
Disapproval; Arizona; Maricopa
County; Power Plants, Fuel Burning
Equipment, and Internal Combustion
Engines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
AGENCY:
I. Proposed Action
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing conditional
approvals for two revisions to the
Maricopa County portion of the Arizona
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
concerning fuel burning equipment and
internal combustion engines. The EPA
is also finalizing a disapproval for one
revision to the Maricopa County portion
of the Arizona SIP concerning power
On December 30, 2019 (84 FR 71862),
the EPA proposed action on the
following rules that were submitted for
incorporation into the Arizona SIP.
Table 1 lists the rules on which the EPA
is finalizing action, with the dates they
were revised by the Maricopa County
Air Quality Department (MCAQD), the
dates they were submitted by the
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ), and the type of action
that the EPA is finalizing for each rule.
SUMMARY:
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Rule No.
Rule title
Revised
Submitted
322 .........
323 .........
Power Plant Operations .........................................
Fuel Burning Equipment from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Sources.
Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE).
November 2, 2016 .........
November 2, 2016 .........
June 22, 2017 ................
June 22, 2017 ................
November 2, 2016 .........
June 22, 2017 ................
324 .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Action
Disapproval.
Conditional
Approval.
Conditional
Approval.
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
1. Rule 322
We proposed to disapprove Rule 322
because the rule does not satisfy the
requirements of section 110 and part D
of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). The
deficient provisions include the
following:
a. Air Pollution Control Officer
discretion to approve alternative control
strategies as reasonably available control
technology (RACT) without further
approval from the EPA.
b. NOX emission limits for steam
generating units used for electricity
generation that were less stringent than
RACT.
c. Overly broad exemptions from
certain requirements during emergency
fuel use operations.
d. Air Pollution Control Officer
discretion to extend compliance
deadlines for applicable units.
e. Absence of a compliance
determination requirement, such as a
regular stack testing requirement.
2. Rules 323 and 324
We proposed to conditionally approve
these rules pursuant to CAA section
110(k)(4) because, although rule
deficiencies preclude full SIP approval
pursuant to section 110(k)(3), the rules
largely comply with the relevant CAA
requirements, and the MCAQD and the
ADEQ have committed to provide the
EPA with a SIP submission within one
year of this final action that will include
specific rule revisions that would
adequately address the deficiencies.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rules, their
deficiencies, the MCAQD and ADEQ
commitments, and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received a request to
clarify certain aspects of the proposed
rulemaking from the MCAQD including
the scope of the rulemaking, the context
of our stringency analysis for NOX
emission limits, and the necessary
testing requirements. The MCAQD’s
questions on our proposed rulemaking
and our clarifications are included in a
memorandum to the rulemaking docket.
These comments did not change our
assessment of the rules. No adverse
comments were received, and no
comments were submitted through
www.regulations.gov.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action. As
authorized in section 110(k)(3) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
301(a) of the Act, the EPA disapproves
Rule 322 for inclusion into the Arizona
SIP. As a result, offset sanctions will be
imposed unless the EPA approves a
subsequent SIP revision that corrects the
rule deficiencies within 18 months of
the effective date of this action.
Highway sanctions will be imposed
unless the EPA approves a subsequent
SIP revision that corrects the rule
deficiencies within 24 months of the
effective date of this action. These
sanctions will be imposed under section
179 of the CAA and 40 CFR 52.31.
Additionally, section 110(c) requires the
EPA to promulgate a federal
implementation plan (FIP) within 24
months unless we approve subsequent
SIP revisions that correct the rule
deficiencies.
Secondly, as authorized in sections
110(k)(4) and 301(a) of the CAA, the
EPA conditionally approves Rules 323
and 324 into the Arizona SIP. If the
MCAQD and the ADEQ submit the
necessary rule revisions by the specified
deadline, and the EPA approves the
submission, then the identified
deficiencies will be cured. However, if
the MCAQD, through the ADEQ, fails to
submit these revisions within the
required timeframe, the conditional
approval will be treated as a disapproval
for those rules for which the revisions
are not submitted. This action
incorporates the conditionally approved
submitted rules into the Arizona SIP,
including those provisions identified as
deficient.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
MCAQD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. Therefore, these materials have
been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of this final
rulemaking, and will be incorporated by
reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43693
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
action is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA, because this SIP disapproval and
conditional approval does not in-and-of
itself create any new information
collection burdens, but simply
disapproves and conditionally approves
certain State requirements for inclusion
in the SIP.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This SIP disapproval and
conditional approval does not in-and-of
itself create any new requirements but
simply disapproves and conditionally
approves certain pre-existing State
requirements for inclusion in the SIP.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action disapproves
and conditionally approves pre-existing
requirements under State or local law
and imposes no new requirements.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
state, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector, result from this
action.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have Federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
43694
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP revision
that the EPA is disapproving would not
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction, and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because this SIP disapproval and
conditional approval does not in-and-of
itself create any new regulations, but
simply disapproves and conditionally
approves certain pre-existing State
requirements for inclusion in the SIP.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Dated: June 24, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending Part 52,
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
The EPA lacks the discretionary
authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Subpart D—Arizona
M. Petitions for Judicial Review
*
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 18,
2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
2. Amend § 52.119 by adding
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.119 Identification of plan—conditional
approvals.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The EPA is conditionally
approving portions of the Arizona SIP
revisions submitted on June 22, 2017.
The conditional approval is based upon
the February 25, 2019 commitment from
the State to submit a SIP revision
consisting of rule revisions that will
cure the identified deficiencies within
twelve (12) months after the EPA’s
conditional approval. If the State fails to
meet its commitment, the conditional
approval will be treated as a disapproval
with respect to the rules for which the
corrections are not made. The following
MCAQD rules are conditionally
approved:
(i) Rule 323, Fuel Burning Equipment
from Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional (ICI) Sources and;
(ii) Rule 324, Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines (RICE);
■ 3. In § 52.120 amend Table 4 in
paragraph (c) by revising the entries for
‘‘Rule 323’’ and ‘‘Rule 324’’ to read as
follows:
§ 52.120
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 4—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS
County
citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Additional explanation
*
*
Regulation III—Control of Air Contaminants
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
*
43695
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 139 / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS—Continued
State
effective
date
County
citation
Title/subject
*
Rule 323 ............
*
*
Fuel Burning Equipment from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional
(ICI) Sources.
Stationary Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines (RICE).
Rule 324 ............
*
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 52.133 by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.133
Rules and regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Maricopa County Air Quality
Department Rule 322 ‘‘Power Plant
Operations’’, submitted on June 22,
2017, contains: An option for the Air
Pollution Control Officer to apply
alternative emission limits to applicable
equipment, and alternative compliance
deadlines, without Agency approval of
those limits and deadlines into the
Arizona State Implementation Plan;
limits that have not been demonstrated
to meet RACT; overly broad exemptions
from certain requirements during
emergency fuel use operations; and a
lack of sufficient compliance
determination requirements. Therefore,
this rule is disapproved.
[FR Doc. 2020–14095 Filed 7–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0400; FRL–10011–
87–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal
of Control of Emissions From Bakery
Ovens
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Missouri on
December 3, 2018 and supplemented by
letter on May 22, 2019. Missouri
requests that the EPA remove a rule
related to control of emissions from
bakery ovens in the Kansas City,
Missouri area from its SIP. This removal
does not have an adverse effect on air
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jul 17, 2020
*
11/02/2016
11/02/2016
*
*
Jkt 250001
EPA approval date
*
7/20/2020, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
Submitted on June 22, 2017.
7/20/2020, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
Submitted on June 22, 2017.
*
*
quality. The EPA’s approval of this rule
revision is in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0400. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7714;
email address stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. The EPA’s Response to Comments
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving the removal of
10 Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10–
2.360, Control of Emissions from Bakery
Ovens, from the Missouri SIP.
As explained in detail in the EPA’s
proposed rule, Missouri has
demonstrated that removal of 10 CSR
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Additional explanation
Sfmt 4700
*
*
10–2.360 will not interfere with
attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable
further progress 1 or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA
because the single source subject to the
rule has permanently ceased operations
and removal of the rule will not cause
VOC emissions to increase. 85 FR
22378, April 22, 2020. Therefore, the
EPA is finalizing its proposal to remove
10 CSR 10–2.360 from the SIP.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
February 28, 2018, to April 5, 2018 and
received five comments from the EPA
that related to Missouri’s lack of an
adequate demonstration that the rule
could be removed from the SIP in
accordance with section 110(l) of the
CAA. Missouri’s May 22, 2019 letter
addressed the EPA’s comments. In
addition, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. The EPA’s Response to Comments
The public comment period on the
EPA’s proposed rule opened April 22,
2020, the date of its publication in the
Federal Register and closed on May 22,
2020. During this period, the EPA
received four comments. Three of the
comments were not adverse and do not
require a response from the EPA. The
remaining comment is addressed in this
document.
Comment: The commenter stated that
they did not support this action because
industrial cooking produces significant
amounts of black carbon or soot and
indoor air pollution, referring to cooking
1 Reasonable further progress is not applicable to
the Kansas City Area because the area is in
attainment of all applicable ozone standards.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 139 (Monday, July 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43692-43695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14095]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0321; FRL-10009-81-Region 9]
Air Plan Conditional Approval and Disapproval; Arizona; Maricopa
County; Power Plants, Fuel Burning Equipment, and Internal Combustion
Engines
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
conditional approvals for two revisions to the Maricopa County portion
of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning fuel burning
equipment and internal combustion engines. The EPA is also finalizing a
disapproval for one revision to the Maricopa County portion of the
Arizona SIP concerning power plants. This action was proposed in the
Federal Register on December 30, 2019, and concerns emissions of oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) from combustion sources.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0321. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3073 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 30, 2019 (84 FR 71862), the EPA proposed action on the
following rules that were submitted for incorporation into the Arizona
SIP. Table 1 lists the rules on which the EPA is finalizing action,
with the dates they were revised by the Maricopa County Air Quality
Department (MCAQD), the dates they were submitted by the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), and the type of action that
the EPA is finalizing for each rule.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted Action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
322............... Power Plant Operations.... November 2, 2016.... June 22, 2017....... Disapproval.
323............... Fuel Burning Equipment November 2, 2016.... June 22, 2017....... Conditional
from Industrial/ Approval.
Commercial/Institutional
(ICI) Sources.
324............... Stationary Reciprocating November 2, 2016.... June 22, 2017....... Conditional
Internal Combustion Approval.
Engines (RICE).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 43693]]
1. Rule 322
We proposed to disapprove Rule 322 because the rule does not
satisfy the requirements of section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act). The deficient provisions include the following:
a. Air Pollution Control Officer discretion to approve alternative
control strategies as reasonably available control technology (RACT)
without further approval from the EPA.
b. NOX emission limits for steam generating units used
for electricity generation that were less stringent than RACT.
c. Overly broad exemptions from certain requirements during
emergency fuel use operations.
d. Air Pollution Control Officer discretion to extend compliance
deadlines for applicable units.
e. Absence of a compliance determination requirement, such as a
regular stack testing requirement.
2. Rules 323 and 324
We proposed to conditionally approve these rules pursuant to CAA
section 110(k)(4) because, although rule deficiencies preclude full SIP
approval pursuant to section 110(k)(3), the rules largely comply with
the relevant CAA requirements, and the MCAQD and the ADEQ have
committed to provide the EPA with a SIP submission within one year of
this final action that will include specific rule revisions that would
adequately address the deficiencies.
Our proposed action contains more information on the rules, their
deficiencies, the MCAQD and ADEQ commitments, and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received a request to clarify certain aspects of
the proposed rulemaking from the MCAQD including the scope of the
rulemaking, the context of our stringency analysis for NOX
emission limits, and the necessary testing requirements. The MCAQD's
questions on our proposed rulemaking and our clarifications are
included in a memorandum to the rulemaking docket. These comments did
not change our assessment of the rules. No adverse comments were
received, and no comments were submitted through www.regulations.gov.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. As authorized in section 110(k)(3)
and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA disapproves Rule 322 for inclusion into
the Arizona SIP. As a result, offset sanctions will be imposed unless
the EPA approves a subsequent SIP revision that corrects the rule
deficiencies within 18 months of the effective date of this action.
Highway sanctions will be imposed unless the EPA approves a subsequent
SIP revision that corrects the rule deficiencies within 24 months of
the effective date of this action. These sanctions will be imposed
under section 179 of the CAA and 40 CFR 52.31. Additionally, section
110(c) requires the EPA to promulgate a federal implementation plan
(FIP) within 24 months unless we approve subsequent SIP revisions that
correct the rule deficiencies.
Secondly, as authorized in sections 110(k)(4) and 301(a) of the
CAA, the EPA conditionally approves Rules 323 and 324 into the Arizona
SIP. If the MCAQD and the ADEQ submit the necessary rule revisions by
the specified deadline, and the EPA approves the submission, then the
identified deficiencies will be cured. However, if the MCAQD, through
the ADEQ, fails to submit these revisions within the required
timeframe, the conditional approval will be treated as a disapproval
for those rules for which the revisions are not submitted. This action
incorporates the conditionally approved submitted rules into the
Arizona SIP, including those provisions identified as deficient.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MCAQD
rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below.
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that
plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the
CAA as of the effective date of this final rulemaking, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA, because this SIP disapproval and conditional approval does not
in-and-of itself create any new information collection burdens, but
simply disapproves and conditionally approves certain State
requirements for inclusion in the SIP.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This SIP
disapproval and conditional approval does not in-and-of itself create
any new requirements but simply disapproves and conditionally approves
certain pre-existing State requirements for inclusion in the SIP.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action disapproves and conditionally approves
pre-existing requirements under State or local law and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have Federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the
[[Page 43694]]
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP revision that the EPA is
disapproving would not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because this SIP disapproval and conditional
approval does not in-and-of itself create any new regulations, but
simply disapproves and conditionally approves certain pre-existing
State requirements for inclusion in the SIP.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
M. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 18, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 24, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending Part 52,
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.119 by adding paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.119 Identification of plan--conditional approvals.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The EPA is conditionally approving portions of the Arizona SIP
revisions submitted on June 22, 2017. The conditional approval is based
upon the February 25, 2019 commitment from the State to submit a SIP
revision consisting of rule revisions that will cure the identified
deficiencies within twelve (12) months after the EPA's conditional
approval. If the State fails to meet its commitment, the conditional
approval will be treated as a disapproval with respect to the rules for
which the corrections are not made. The following MCAQD rules are
conditionally approved:
(i) Rule 323, Fuel Burning Equipment from Industrial/Commercial/
Institutional (ICI) Sources and;
(ii) Rule 324, Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
(RICE);
0
3. In Sec. 52.120 amend Table 4 in paragraph (c) by revising the
entries for ``Rule 323'' and ``Rule 324'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 4--EPA-Approved Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
County citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation III--Control of Air Contaminants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 43695]]
* * * * * * *
Rule 323................... Fuel Burning 11/02/2016 7/20/2020, [INSERT Submitted on June 22,
Equipment from Federal Register 2017.
Industrial/ CITATION].
Commercial/
Institutional (ICI)
Sources.
Rule 324................... Stationary 11/02/2016 7/20/2020, [INSERT Submitted on June 22,
Reciprocating Federal Register 2017.
Internal Combustion CITATION].
Engines (RICE).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 52.133 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.133 Rules and regulations.
* * * * *
(h) Maricopa County Air Quality Department Rule 322 ``Power Plant
Operations'', submitted on June 22, 2017, contains: An option for the
Air Pollution Control Officer to apply alternative emission limits to
applicable equipment, and alternative compliance deadlines, without
Agency approval of those limits and deadlines into the Arizona State
Implementation Plan; limits that have not been demonstrated to meet
RACT; overly broad exemptions from certain requirements during
emergency fuel use operations; and a lack of sufficient compliance
determination requirements. Therefore, this rule is disapproved.
[FR Doc. 2020-14095 Filed 7-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P