Air Plan Approval; OR; 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Interstate Transport Requirements, 43463-43465 [2020-14139]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43463
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 138 / Friday, July 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
entries for ‘‘Section .0101’’, ‘‘Section
.0103’’, ‘‘Section .0104’’, ‘‘Section
.0105’’, ‘‘Section .0106’’, ‘‘Section
.0107’’, ‘‘Section .0108’’, ‘‘Section
.0109’’, ‘‘Section .0110’’, ‘‘Section
.0111’’, and ‘‘Section .0304’’.
a. Under ‘‘Subchapter 2D Air
Pollution Control Requirements’’
revising the entry for ‘‘Section .0101’’;
and
■ b. Under Subchapter 2Q Air Quality
Permit Procedures by revising the
■
The revisions read as follows.
§ 52.1770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
(1) EPA APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval
date
Explanation
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements
Section .0100 Definitions and References
Section .0101 .......
Definitions ....................................................
*
*
*
1/1/2018
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
*
*
*
*
Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Permits
Section .0100 General Provisions
Section .0101 .......
Required Air Quality Permits .......................
*
Section .0103 .......
Section .0104 .......
*
Section .0110 .......
Section .0111 .......
*
*
Definitions ....................................................
Where to Obtain and File Permit Applications.
Copies of Referenced Documents ..............
Incorporation by Reference .........................
Confidential Information ..............................
Delegation of Authority ................................
Compliance Schedule for Previously Exempted Activities.
Retention of Permit at Permitted Facility ....
Applicability Determinations ........................
*
Section .0304 .......
*
*
Applications .................................................
*
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
.0105
.0106
.0107
.0108
.0109
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–14092 Filed 7–16–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0057; FRL–10011–
28–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; OR; 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide NAAQS Interstate Transport
Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) approves the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from Oregon as meeting certain Clean
Air Act (CAA) interstate transport
requirements for the 2010 1-hour Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA has
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
4/1/2018
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
*
*
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
7/17/2020,
7/17/2020,
7/17/2020,
7/17/2020,
7/17/2020,
4/1/2018
4/1/2018
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
1/1/2009
*
*
7/17/2020, [Insert citation of publication].
*
[Insert
[Insert
[Insert
[Insert
[Insert
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
of
of
of
of
of
*
determined that emissions from Oregon
sources will not contribute significantly
to nonattainment or interfere with the
maintenance of the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0057. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
PO 00000
citation
citation
citation
citation
citation
Sfmt 4700
*
publication].
publication].
publication].
publication].
publication].
*
*
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
at (206) 553–6357, or hall.kristin@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ is used, it means
the EPA.
I. Background
On May 15, 2020, we proposed to
approve the October 20, 2015, SIP
submission from Oregon as meeting
certain Clean Air Act (CAA) interstate
transport requirements for the 2010 1hour SO2 NAAQS (85 FR 29369). The
reasons for our proposed approval were
stated in the proposed rulemaking and
will not be re-stated here. The public
comment period for the proposed
rulemaking ended on June 15, 2020. We
received no comments. Therefore, we
are finalizing our rulemaking as
proposed.
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
43464
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 138 / Friday, July 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
II. Final Action
In this final action, EPA approves the
October 20, 2015, SIP submission from
Oregon as meeting the interstate
transport requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
it does not address technical standards;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in Oregon
and is also not approved to apply in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 15, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2020.
Christopher Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM—Oregon
2. In § 52.1970, amend Table 5 in
paragraph (e) by adding, under the
heading ‘‘110(a)(2) Infrastructure and
Interstate Transport’’ an entry for
‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2010 sulfur
dioxide NAAQS’’ immediately after the
entry for ‘‘Infrastructure for the 2015
ozone NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1970
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
TABLE 5—STATE OF OREGON AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM APPROVED BUT NOT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
State
submittal
date
*
EPA approval date
*
Explanations
*
*
110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
*
*
Interstate Transport for the 2010 sulfur
dioxide NAAQS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
*
Statewide ..........................
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
*
10/20/2015
Sfmt 4700
*
*
7/17/2020, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
*
This action addresses
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
43465
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 138 / Friday, July 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 5—STATE OF OREGON AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM APPROVED BUT NOT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE—
Continued
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–14139 Filed 7–16–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
40 CFR Part 1700
[EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0351; FRL–10009–46–
OW]
RIN 2040–AF53
Uniform National Discharge Standards
for Vessels of the Armed Forces—
Phase II Batch Two
Environmental Protection
Agency and Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S.
Department of Defense (DoD) are
promulgating discharge performance
standards for 11 discharges incidental to
the normal operation of a vessel of the
Armed Forces in the navigable waters of
the United States, the territorial seas,
and the contiguous zone. When
implemented, the discharge
performance standards will reduce the
adverse environmental impacts
associated with the vessel discharges,
stimulate the development of improved
vessel pollution control devices, and
advance the development of
environmentally sound vessels of the
Armed Forces. The 11 discharges
addressed by the final rule include the
following: Catapult water brake tank
and post-launch retraction exhaust,
controllable pitch propeller hydraulic
fluid, deck runoff, firemain systems,
graywater, hull coating leachate, motor
gasoline and compensating discharge,
sonar dome discharge, submarine
bilgewater, surface vessel bilgewater/oilwater separator effluent, and
underwater ship husbandry.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0351. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://regulations.gov website. The
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jul 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
State
submittal
date
*
EPA approval date
*
complete public record for this
rulemaking, including responses to
comments received during the
rulemaking, can be found under Docket
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0351.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine B. Weiler, Oceans and Coastal
Management Branch (4504T), U.S. EPA,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460; (202) 566–1280;
weiler.katherine@epa.gov, or Mike
Pletke, Chief of Naval Operations (N45),
2000 Navy Pentagon (Rm. 2D253),
Washington, DC 20350–2000; (703) 695–
5184; mike.pletke@navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
supplementary information is organized
as follows:
I. General Information
A. Legal Authority for the Final Rule
B. Purpose of the Final Rule
C. What vessels are regulated by the final
rule?
D. What is the geographic scope of the final
rule?
E. Rulemaking Process
F. Summary of Public Outreach and
Consultation With Federal Agencies,
States, Territories, and Tribes
G. Supporting Documentation
II. UNDS Performance Standards
Development
A. Nature of the Discharge
B. Environmental Effects
C. Cost, Practicability, and Operational
Impacts
D. Applicable U.S. and International Law
E. Definitions
III. UNDS Discharge Analysis and
Performance Standards
A. Catapult Water Brake Tank and PostLaunch Retraction Exhaust
B. Controllable Pitch Propeller Hydraulic
Fluid
C. Deck Runoff
D. Firemain Systems
E. Graywater
F. Hull Coating Leachate
G. Motor Gasoline and Compensating
Discharge
H. Sonar Dome Discharge
I. Submarine Bilgewater
J. Surface Vessel Bilgewater/Oil-Water
Separator Effluent
K. Underwater Ship Husbandry
IV. Additional Information in the Final Rule
V. Changes and Improvements Since the
Proposed Rule
A. Public Comment
B. Modification to Proposed Standards
VI. Related Acts of Congress and Executive
Orders
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanations
*
*
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
K. Coastal Zone Management Act
L. Endangered Species Act
M. Executive Order 13112: Invasive
Species
N. Executive Order 13089: Coral Reef
Protection
O. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
P. Congressional Review Act
I. General Information
A. Legal Authority for the Final Rule
The EPA and DoD promulgate this
rule under the authority of Clean Water
Act (CWA) Section 312(n) (33 U.S.C.
1322(n)). Section 325 of the National
Defense Authorization Act of 1996
(NDAA), titled ‘‘Discharges from Vessels
of the Armed Forces’’ (Pub. L. 104–106,
110 Stat. 254), amended CWA Section
312, to require the Administrator of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(Administrator) and the Secretary of
Defense of the U.S. Department of
Defense (Secretary) to develop uniform
national standards to control certain
discharges incidental to the normal
operation of a vessel of the Armed
Forces. The term Uniform National
Discharge Standards, or UNDS, is used
in this preamble to refer to the
provisions in CWA Section 312(a)(12)
through (14) and (n) (33 U.S.C.
1322(a)(12) through (14) & (n)).
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 138 (Friday, July 17, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43463-43465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14139]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0057; FRL-10011-28-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; OR; 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Interstate
Transport Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approves the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from Oregon as meeting certain
Clean Air Act (CAA) interstate transport requirements for the 2010 1-
hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). EPA has determined that emissions from Oregon
sources will not contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere
with the maintenance of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in any
other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0057. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-6357, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we'',
``us'', or ``our'' is used, it means the EPA.
I. Background
On May 15, 2020, we proposed to approve the October 20, 2015, SIP
submission from Oregon as meeting certain Clean Air Act (CAA)
interstate transport requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS (85 FR 29369). The reasons for our proposed approval were stated
in the proposed rulemaking and will not be re-stated here. The public
comment period for the proposed rulemaking ended on June 15, 2020. We
received no comments. Therefore, we are finalizing our rulemaking as
proposed.
[[Page 43464]]
II. Final Action
In this final action, EPA approves the October 20, 2015, SIP
submission from Oregon as meeting the interstate transport requirements
of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because it does not address technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Oregon and is also not approved to apply in any other area where EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In
those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 15, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2020.
Christopher Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM--Oregon
0
2. In Sec. 52.1970, amend Table 5 in paragraph (e) by adding, under
the heading ``110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport'' an
entry for ``Interstate Transport for the 2010 sulfur dioxide NAAQS''
immediately after the entry for ``Infrastructure for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1970 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
Table 5--State of Oregon Air Quality Control Program Approved But Not Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or State EPA approval date Explanations
nonattainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Interstate Transport for the 2010 Statewide.......... 10/20/2015 7/17/2020, [Insert This action
sulfur dioxide NAAQS. Federal Register addresses CAA
citation]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
.
[[Page 43465]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2020-14139 Filed 7-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
