Promoting Broadcast Internet Innovation Through ATSC 3.0, 43142-43145 [2020-13202]
Download as PDF
43142
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 137 / Thursday, July 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket Nos. 20–145; FCC 20–73; FRS
16852]
Promoting Broadcast Internet
Innovation Through ATSC 3.0
Federal Communications
Commission
ACTION: Declaratory Ruling.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission removes regulatory
uncertainty that could hinder the
development of the new, innovative
uses of broadcast spectrum that the
ATSC 3.0 standard enables. Specifically,
we clarify that long-standing television
station ownership restrictions do not
apply to the lease of spectrum to
provide Broadcast internet services. By
taking this step today, we help ensure
that market forces, and not television
station ownership rules that were
written for different services, are
brought to bear on and determine the
success of the nascent Broadcast
internet segment. This step will also
help ensure that broadcasters and other
innovators have the flexibility to
generate the scale—both locally and
nationally—that may be necessary to
support certain Broadcast internet
services without being subject to
regulations unrelated to the provision of
such services. A Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking relating to the broadcast
ancillary and supplementary service
rules is published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: This Declaratory Ruling took
effect June 9, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact John Cobb,
John.Cobb@fcc.gov of the Policy
Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2120.
SUMMARY:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Declaratory Ruling, MB Docket Nos. 20–
145; FCC 20–73, adopted and released
on June 9, 2020. A summary of the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted
concurrently concerning the broadcast
ancillary and supplementary service
rules is published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. The full text of this document
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jul 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) The
complete text may be purchased from
the Commission’s copy contractor, 445
12th Street SW, Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request these
documents in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an email to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
The United States is transitioning to
a new era of connectivity. From
innovative 5G offerings to high-capacity
fixed services and an entirely new
generation of low-earth orbit satellites,
providers from previously distinct
sectors are competing like never before
to offer high-speed internet services
through a mix of different technologies.
The Commission has been executing on
a plan to identify and remove the
overhang of unnecessary government
regulations that might otherwise hold
back the introduction and growth of
new competitive offerings. We want the
marketplace—not outdated rules—to
determine whether new services and
technologies will succeed. Broadcasters,
as well as a range of other entities, now
have the potential to use broadcast
spectrum to enter the converged market
for connectivity in ways not possible
only a few short years ago.
With this item, we take important
steps to further unlock the potential of
broadcast spectrum, empower
innovation, and create significant value
for broadcasters and the American
public alike by removing the
uncertainty cast by legacy regulations.
More than twenty years ago, during the
transition from analog to digital
broadcast television, the Commission
adopted rules allowing digital television
(DTV) licensees to provide ancillary or
supplementary services on their excess
spectrum capacity and authorized
licensees to enter into leases with other
entities that would provide such
services. Flash forward to today, and the
conversion of digital television from the
first-generation technologies associated
with the ATSC 1.0 standard to the nextgeneration of ancillary services that will
be enabled by ATSC 3.0 is now
underway. This new technology
promises to expand the universe of
potential uses of broadcast spectrum
capacity for new and innovative
services beyond traditional over-the-air
video in ways that will complement the
nation’s burgeoning 5G network and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
usher in a new wave of innovation and
opportunity. These new offerings over
broadcast spectrum can be referred to
collectively as ‘‘Broadcast internet’’
services to distinguish them from
traditional over-the-air video services.
Broadcasters will not only be able to
better serve the information and
entertainment needs of their
communities, but they will have the
opportunity to play a part in addressing
the digital divide and supporting the
proliferation of new, IP-based consumer
applications or voluntarily entering into
arrangements to allow others to invest
in achieving those goals. We undertake
this proceeding to ensure that our rules
help to foster the introduction of new
services and the efficient use of
spectrum.
By our Declaratory Ruling, we remove
regulatory uncertainty that could hinder
the development of the new, innovative
uses of broadcast spectrum that the
ATSC 3.0 standard enables. Specifically,
we clarify that long-standing television
station ownership restrictions do not
apply to the lease of spectrum to
provide Broadcast internet services.
This means that a broadcast television
licensee can lease spectrum to another
broadcaster (including one operating in
the same geographic market) or to a
third party for the provision of ancillary
and supplementary services without
triggering the Commission’s attribution
or ownership rules for television
stations. Those television station rules,
which identify the specific kinds of
‘‘cognizable interests’’ that allow a party
to ‘‘own, operate or control’’ a television
station or ‘‘otherwise provid[e] an
attributable interest, . . . pursuant to
[specified] criteria,’’ regulate traditional
broadcast television service and
therefore have no application to
innovative Broadcast internet services.
By taking this step today, we help
ensure that market forces, and not
television station ownership rules that
were written for different services, are
brought to bear on and determine the
success of the nascent Broadcast
internet segment. This step will also
help ensure that broadcasters and other
innovators have the flexibility to
generate the scale—both locally and
nationally—that may be necessary to
support certain Broadcast internet
services without being subject to
regulations unrelated to the provision of
such services. For instance, a single
entity could use this leasing mechanism
to acquire the rights to offer Broadcast
internet services on multiple broadcast
channels in the same market. And that
same entity could put together a
nationwide footprint for the provision of
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 137 / Thursday, July 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Broadcast internet services. Combined,
this can help create an even more
attractive market for the deployment of
competitive Broadcast internet services.
As noted, the Commission last
addressed these issues over twenty
years ago, well before the ongoing
transition to ATSC 3.0 dramatically
increased the scope of innovative new
services that can be provided and
expanded the types of leasing
arrangements that will help facilitate
greater access to broadcast spectrum by
third parties. Therefore, questions have
been raised about the application of our
prior ancillary services regime to these
new offerings. Our decision today will
help provide the stable and predictable
regulatory environment that is critical if
parties are to invest heavily in new
Broadcast internet services and thus aid
in their proliferation.
Background. Commission Regulations
Applicable to Ancillary and
Supplementary Services. Pursuant to
section 336 of the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act), Congress
established the framework for licensing
DTV spectrum to television broadcasters
and permitted them to offer ancillary
and supplementary services consistent
with the public interest. Congress
recognized that the transition from
analog to digital broadcast technology
would enable DTV licensees to provide
new and innovative services, including
various forms of data services, over their
additional spectrum capacity and
wanted to provide licensees with the
flexibility necessary to utilize fully that
new potential. Accordingly, section 336
directed the Commission to adopt
regulations that would allow DTV
licensees to make use of excess
spectrum capacity, so long as the
ancillary or supplementary services
carried on DTV capacity do not derogate
any advanced television services (i.e.,
free over-the-air broadcast service) that
the Commission may require. Such
ancillary or supplemental services are
also subject to any Commission
regulations that are applicable to
analogous services. The statute also
directed the Commission to impose a fee
on ancillary or supplementary services
for which the DTV licensee charges a
subscription fee or receives
compensation from a third party other
than commercial advertisements used to
support non-subscription broadcasting.
The Commission adopted the initial
rules governing the provision of
ancillary or supplementary broadcast
services in 1997 as part of the DTV Fifth
Report and Order. Consistent with the
Act, the rules obligate DTV licensees to
‘‘transmit at least one over-the-air video
program signal at no direct charge to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jul 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
viewers on the DTV channel.’’ This
means that regardless of whatever other
services a broadcaster may provide over
its spectrum, it must continue to
provide one free stream of programming
to viewers. As long as DTV licensees
satisfy that obligation, the rules permit
them to ‘‘offer services of any nature,
consistent with the public interest,
convenience, and necessity, on an
ancillary or supplementary basis’’
provided the services do not derogate
the licensee’s obligation to provide one
free stream of programming to viewers
and are subject to any regulations on
services analogous to the ancillary or
supplementary service. These rules
reflect the Commission’s intent to
promote the public interest by
maximizing ‘‘broadcasters’ flexibility to
provide a digital service to meet the
audience’s needs and desires.’’
The Commission initiated a separate
proceeding to determine how best to
assess and collect the statutorily
required fee for ancillary or
supplementary services. The statute
directed the Commission to adopt a fee
structure that would ‘‘recover for the
public a portion of the value of the
public spectrum resource made
available for such commercial use, and
. . . avoid unjust enrichment through
the method employed to permit such
uses of that resources.’’ It also
specifically instructed the Commission
to set the fee at a value that, ‘‘to the
extent feasible, equals but does not
exceed (over the term of the license) the
amount that would have been recovered
had such services been licensed
pursuant to the provisions of section
309(j) of [the Act] and the Commission’s
regulations thereunder.’’ Ultimately, the
Commission determined that a fee based
on a percentage of the gross revenues
generated by feeable ancillary or
supplementary services was the best
option to satisfy the statutory directive
and achieve the goal of incentivizing
innovation to maximize spectrum
efficiency. The Commission set the fee
at five percent of gross revenues
received from any feeable ancillary or
supplementary services.
Subsequently, the Commission
clarified the ancillary or supplementary
service rules as applied to
noncommercial educational (NCE)
television licensees. The Commission
concluded that § 73.621 of the rules,
which requires public NCE stations to
provide a nonprofit and noncommercial
broadcast service, would apply to the
provision of ancillary or supplementary
services by NCE licensees. However, the
Commission also decided to allow NCE
licensees to offer subscription services
on their excess capacity and to advertise
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43143
on ancillary or supplementary services
that do not constitute broadcasting.
Finally, the Commission concluded that
section 336(e) of the Act does not
exempt NCE licensees ‘‘from the
requirement to pay fees on revenues
generated by the remunerative use of
their excess digital capacity, even when
those revenues are used to support their
mission-related activities.’’
Pursuant to section 336(e)(4) of the
Act, the Commission originally adopted
rules requiring all DTV licensees and
permittees annually to file a form
(currently Form 2100, Schedule G),
reporting information about their use of
the DTV bitstream to provide feeable
ancillary and supplementary services. In
2017, as a part of the Modernization of
Media Regulation Initiative, the
Commission revised these filing
requirements. The Commission
concluded that requiring every DTV
licensee to file the form was an
unnecessary regulatory burden, as very
few licensees offered any feeable
service, and instead changed the rules to
require only those licensees who had
provided feeable ancillary or
supplementary services during the
applicable reporting period to file the
form. As the Commission observed, at
that time only a fraction of all television
broadcast stations provided feeable
ancillary or supplementary services
despite expectations in the wake of the
digital transition.
Next Generation Broadcast Standard
(ATSC 3.0). ATSC 3.0 is the ‘‘Next
Generation’’ broadcast television (Next
Gen TV) transmission standard
developed by the Advanced Television
Systems Committee as the world’s first
IP-based broadcast transmission
platform, which ‘‘merges the
capabilities of over-the-air broadcasting
with the broadband viewing and
information delivery methods of the
internet, using the same 6 MHz
channels presently allocated for DTV
service.’’ As stated in the Next Gen TV
Report and Order, the ATSC 3.0
standard will allow broadcasters to
‘‘offer exciting and innovative services,’’
including superior reception, mobile
viewing capabilities, enhanced public
safety capabilities (such as advanced
emergency alerting capable of waking
up sleeping devices to warn consumers
of imminent emergencies), enhanced
accessibility features, localized and/or
personalized content, interactive
educational children’s content, and
other enhanced features. In 2017, the
Commission authorized broadcasters to
begin the transition to ATSC 3.0
voluntarily and established standards to
minimize the impact on, and costs to,
consumers and other industry
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
43144
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 137 / Thursday, July 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
stakeholders. The Media Bureau began
accepting applications for Next Gen TV
licenses on May 28, 2019. Earlier this
year, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking seeking
comment on proposed changes to the
rules governing the use of distributed
transmission systems (DTS) by
broadcast television stations.
Proponents of the changes assert that
they will facilitate the use of new and
innovative technologies that will
improve traditional broadcast service
and mobile reception of broadcast
signals, as well as allow the more
efficient use of broadcast spectrum,
which they claim would enable
broadcasters to exploit more fully the
new capabilities resulting from ATSC
3.0.
ATSC 3.0 provides greater spectral
capacity than the current digital
broadcast television standard, allowing
broadcasters to innovate, improve
service, and use their spectrum more
efficiently. Although today many
broadcasters are focused solely on
deploying traditional broadcast
television services using the ATSC 3.0
standard, some broadcasters and thirdparty groups are looking to the future
and examining ways broadcasters can
become part of the 5G ecosystem and
provide myriad other services using the
enhanced capabilities of ATSC 3.0
technologies. Specifically, these groups
hope to utilize television spectrum to
provide non-traditional broadcast video
services such as video-on-demand or
subscription video services and new,
innovative non-broadcast services in
such areas as the automotive industry,
agriculture, distance learning,
telehealth, public safety, utility
automation, and the ‘‘Internet of
Things’’ (IoT). Providing a regulatory
environment to enable a thriving
secondary market is key to unlocking
the potential for such Broadcast internet
services via ATSC 3.0.
Declaratory Ruling. The
Communications Act and the
Commission’s rules provide clear
authority for the provision of ancillary
and supplementary services by
broadcast television stations, including
through spectrum lease agreements, yet
few such services have been offered
over the past two decades and none
appear to have been offered extensively
or systematically across the television
industry. Accordingly, the Commission
has had little occasion to opine on these
rules since their adoption over twenty
years ago. With the advent of ATSC 3.0,
however, broadcasters may be better
positioned to realize the potential long
envisioned by Congress and the
Commission when they were granted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jul 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
the flexibility to use their spectrum in
new and novel ways to benefit their
local communities and the American
people. We expect that our clarification
today will help promote increased
investment in broadcast television
stations, thereby enabling them to better
serve their local markets.
As the Commission has noted, some
licensees may find it useful to develop
partnerships with other broadcasters or
third parties to help make the most
productive and efficient use of their
spectrum, and the Commission has
stated that it would ‘‘look with favor on
such arrangements.’’ In some cases, a
broadcaster may lease a portion of its
spectrum to a separate and unrelated
entity that, instead of the broadcaster,
would provide ancillary and
supplementary services to the
consumer. Conversion of broadcast
television to the ATSC 3.0 transmission
standard has the potential to increase
the attractiveness of ancillary and
supplementary services and
correspondingly the prevalence of
spectrum leases to third parties
(including other broadcasters) that can
provide such services. As an IP-based
standard designed for compatibility
with wireless broadband networks,
ATSC 3.0 broadcast signals can connect
to 5G wireless networks to provide
enhanced consumer experiences in
ways that ATSC 1.0 cannot. Wireless
networks are becoming more dynamic,
relying on various spectrum bands for
inbound and outbound data paths.
Though ATSC 3.0 transmissions
presently lack a return path, the
technology is well positioned to support
a host of next-generation applications,
both on its own or as part of a hybrid
wireless network. For example, third
parties may wish to lease excess
broadcast spectrum for such uses as
supporting autonomous vehicle
operation through system updates; prepositioning popular content (e.g.,
movies or video games) to help reduce
network congestion; distributing
educational or job certification
materials; providing supplemental
information to telemedicine patients;
issuing advanced emergency alerts for
first responders and the public; and
providing operational support for IoT
devices and smart meters. We expect
that these types of next-generation
services will come to define Americans’
lives over the coming years and
decades, and broadcast spectrum will be
in a position to support their growth
and proliferation. Furthermore, an
ATSC 3.0 signal can offer broadbandspeed downloads, which may help
reduce consumer costs for internet
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
services, and its propagation
characteristics make it well suited for
underserved rural communities. In
addition, the nature of ATSC 3.0
transmissions, as compared to ATSC
1.0, could lead to novel and creative
leasing arrangements that could involve
multiple, short-term spectrum users,
arrangements that were not feasible
when the Commission last issued
guidance on these issues more than
twenty years ago.
In issuing this declaratory ruling, we
seek to clarify the regulatory treatment
of such leasing arrangements and to
remove any uncertainty that might chill
the introduction of new and innovative
services under ATSC 3.0. Specifically,
we clarify that the lease of excess
broadcast television spectrum to a third
party, including another broadcaster, for
the provision of ancillary and
supplementary services does not result
in attribution under our broadcast
television station ownership rules or for
any other requirements related to
television station attribution (e.g., filing
ownership reports). That is, our
attribution rules do not confer a
‘‘cognizable interest’’ solely by the
existence of a lease agreement to
provide ancillary and supplementary
services over the station’s spectrum. The
Commission’s broadcast television
station attribution rules seek to identify
interests that confer influence or control
such that those interests should be
counted for purposes of the media
ownership limits. Influence or control
over programming, personnel, and
finances is considered in making an
attribution determination. The
Commission’s media ownership limits
are intended to promote viewpoint
diversity, localism, and competition in
broadcast services, yet ancillary and
supplementary services are defined to
exclude broadcast services. We thus
find no basis to deem a lease pertaining
to such non-broadcast services as
implicating our media ownership limits.
Similarly, the Commission stated in its
order authorizing the voluntary use of
the ATSC 3.0 transmission standard that
it would not apply the broadcast
ownership rules in any situation where
airing an ATSC 3.0 signal or an ATSC
1.0 simulcast on a temporary host
station’s facility would have otherwise
resulted in a potential violation of those
rules. Pursuant to that order, such
temporary simulcasting arrangements
do not constitute a cognizable interest
under our attribution rules.
This ruling applies regardless of
whether the station is broadcasting in
ATSC 1.0 or 3.0 and only in those
circumstances where the lessee uses the
spectrum for services that qualify as
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 137 / Thursday, July 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
ancillary and supplementary under
§ 73.624(c) of the Commission’s rules,
which is the limited focus of our action
today. Consistent with our rules,
licensees entering into such leases still
bear the responsibility to retain ultimate
control over their spectrum and to
ensure compliance with our broadcast
regulations. Also consistent with
existing Commission rules and policies,
the term of any spectrum lease should
be for no greater than the duration of the
station’s broadcast license, with renewal
of the leasing arrangement permitted.
Furthermore, the broadcaster must
continue to provide at least one overthe-air video program signal at no
charge to viewers in accordance with
§ 73.624(b) of the Commission’s rules
and remain in compliance with all other
applicable Commission rules. By
extension, the broadcaster is responsible
for any misuse of its spectrum by a
lessee in violation of applicable statutes
or Commission rules.
By this declaratory ruling, we seek to
provide additional clarity in order to
encourage the investment in and
deployment of potentially beneficial
Broadcast internet services and to
eliminate any possibility of unnecessary
regulatory obstructions, either real or
perceived. The Commission’s rules for
ancillary and supplementary services
were intended to afford broadcasters the
flexibility to use spectrum capacity in
entrepreneurial and innovative ways. In
recognizing ‘‘the benefit of permitting
broadcasters the opportunity to develop
additional revenue streams from
innovative digital services,’’ the
Commission has chosen ‘‘to impose few
restrictions on broadcasters and to allow
them to make decisions that will further
their ability to respond to the
marketplace.’’ As the industry
transitions to a next-generation
broadcast television standard, we seek
to ensure that our rules help facilitate
innovative arrangements that can result
in the efficient use of spectrum. In doing
so, it is our hope that the marketplace,
not rules designed for different services,
will ultimately decide which Broadcast
internet services are developed and
supported.
Congressional Review Act. The
Commission has determined, and the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
concurs that, this rule is ‘‘non-major’’
under the Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will
send a copy of the Declaratory Ruling to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Jul 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
It is ordered that, pursuant to sections
1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 336 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
303(r), and 336, and section 1.2 of the
Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR 1.2, this
Declaratory Ruling in MB Docket No.
20–145 is adopted. It is further ordered
that, pursuant to § 1.103 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.103, this
Declaratory Ruling shall be effective
upon release. It is further ordered that
the Commission shall send a copy of the
Declaratory Ruling in a report to be sent
to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–13202 Filed 7–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 200707–0183]
RIN 0648–BJ67
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region; Abbreviated Framework
Amendment 3
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements
management measures described in
Abbreviated Framework Amendment 3
(Abbreviated Framework 3) to the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region (FMP), as prepared and
submitted by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (South Atlantic
Council). This final rule increases the
commercial and recreational annual
catch limits (ACLs) and Abbreviated
Framework 3 increases the recreational
annual catch target (ACT) for blueline
tilefish in the South Atlantic exclusive
economic zone (EEZ). The purpose of
this final rule is to ensure that these
measures for South Atlantic blueline
tilefish are based on the best scientific
information available, to achieve and
maintain optimum yield (OY), and to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43145
prevent overfishing while minimizing to
the extent practicable, adverse social
and economic effects.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of
Abbreviated Framework 3 may be
obtained from www.regulations.gov or
the Southeast Regional Office website at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
abbreviated-framework-amendment-3blueline-tilefish. Abbreviated
Framework 3 includes a Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis and
regulatory impact review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Vara, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, email:
mary.vara@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
snapper-grouper fishery in the South
Atlantic region is managed under the
FMP and includes blueline tilefish,
along with other snapper-grouper
species. The FMP was prepared by the
South Atlantic Council and is
implemented by NMFS through
regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On April 15, 2020, NMFS published
a proposed rule for Abbreviated
Framework 3 in the Federal Register
and requested public comment (85 FR
20970, April 15, 2020). Abbreviated
Framework 3 and the proposed rule
outline the rationale for the actions
contained in this final rule. A summary
of the management measures described
in Abbreviated Framework 3 and
implemented by this final rule is
provided below. All weights described
in this final rule are in round weight.
Management Measure Contained in
This Final Rule
This final rule revises the commercial
and recreational ACLs for South
Atlantic blueline tilefish based on
updated information from a Southeast
Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR)
benchmark assessment that was
completed for the Atlantic stock of
blueline tilefish, using data through
2015 (SEDAR 50).
Prior to this final rule, the blueline
tilefish commercial ACL was 87,521 lb
(39,699 kg) and the recreational ACL
was 87,277 lb (39,588 kg).
Consistent with the results of SEDAR
50 and the acceptable biological catch
(ABC) recommendation from the South
Atlantic Council’s Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) that was
accepted by the South Atlantic Council,
this final rule increases the commercial
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 137 (Thursday, July 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43142-43145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13202]
[[Page 43142]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket Nos. 20-145; FCC 20-73; FRS 16852]
Promoting Broadcast Internet Innovation Through ATSC 3.0
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission
ACTION: Declaratory Ruling.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission removes regulatory
uncertainty that could hinder the development of the new, innovative
uses of broadcast spectrum that the ATSC 3.0 standard enables.
Specifically, we clarify that long-standing television station
ownership restrictions do not apply to the lease of spectrum to provide
Broadcast internet services. By taking this step today, we help ensure
that market forces, and not television station ownership rules that
were written for different services, are brought to bear on and
determine the success of the nascent Broadcast internet segment. This
step will also help ensure that broadcasters and other innovators have
the flexibility to generate the scale--both locally and nationally--
that may be necessary to support certain Broadcast internet services
without being subject to regulations unrelated to the provision of such
services. A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking relating to the broadcast
ancillary and supplementary service rules is published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: This Declaratory Ruling took effect June 9, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this
proceeding, contact John Cobb, [email protected] of the Policy
Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Declaratory Ruling, MB Docket Nos. 20-145; FCC 20-73, adopted and
released on June 9, 2020. A summary of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking adopted concurrently concerning the broadcast ancillary and
supplementary service rules is published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. The full text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street
SW, CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The full text of this document will
also be available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII, Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.)
The complete text may be purchased from the Commission's copy
contractor, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. To
request these documents in accessible formats (computer diskettes,
large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an email to
[email protected] or call the Commission's Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
The United States is transitioning to a new era of connectivity.
From innovative 5G offerings to high-capacity fixed services and an
entirely new generation of low-earth orbit satellites, providers from
previously distinct sectors are competing like never before to offer
high-speed internet services through a mix of different technologies.
The Commission has been executing on a plan to identify and remove the
overhang of unnecessary government regulations that might otherwise
hold back the introduction and growth of new competitive offerings. We
want the marketplace--not outdated rules--to determine whether new
services and technologies will succeed. Broadcasters, as well as a
range of other entities, now have the potential to use broadcast
spectrum to enter the converged market for connectivity in ways not
possible only a few short years ago.
With this item, we take important steps to further unlock the
potential of broadcast spectrum, empower innovation, and create
significant value for broadcasters and the American public alike by
removing the uncertainty cast by legacy regulations. More than twenty
years ago, during the transition from analog to digital broadcast
television, the Commission adopted rules allowing digital television
(DTV) licensees to provide ancillary or supplementary services on their
excess spectrum capacity and authorized licensees to enter into leases
with other entities that would provide such services. Flash forward to
today, and the conversion of digital television from the first-
generation technologies associated with the ATSC 1.0 standard to the
next-generation of ancillary services that will be enabled by ATSC 3.0
is now underway. This new technology promises to expand the universe of
potential uses of broadcast spectrum capacity for new and innovative
services beyond traditional over-the-air video in ways that will
complement the nation's burgeoning 5G network and usher in a new wave
of innovation and opportunity. These new offerings over broadcast
spectrum can be referred to collectively as ``Broadcast internet''
services to distinguish them from traditional over-the-air video
services. Broadcasters will not only be able to better serve the
information and entertainment needs of their communities, but they will
have the opportunity to play a part in addressing the digital divide
and supporting the proliferation of new, IP-based consumer applications
or voluntarily entering into arrangements to allow others to invest in
achieving those goals. We undertake this proceeding to ensure that our
rules help to foster the introduction of new services and the efficient
use of spectrum.
By our Declaratory Ruling, we remove regulatory uncertainty that
could hinder the development of the new, innovative uses of broadcast
spectrum that the ATSC 3.0 standard enables. Specifically, we clarify
that long-standing television station ownership restrictions do not
apply to the lease of spectrum to provide Broadcast internet services.
This means that a broadcast television licensee can lease spectrum to
another broadcaster (including one operating in the same geographic
market) or to a third party for the provision of ancillary and
supplementary services without triggering the Commission's attribution
or ownership rules for television stations. Those television station
rules, which identify the specific kinds of ``cognizable interests''
that allow a party to ``own, operate or control'' a television station
or ``otherwise provid[e] an attributable interest, . . . pursuant to
[specified] criteria,'' regulate traditional broadcast television
service and therefore have no application to innovative Broadcast
internet services. By taking this step today, we help ensure that
market forces, and not television station ownership rules that were
written for different services, are brought to bear on and determine
the success of the nascent Broadcast internet segment. This step will
also help ensure that broadcasters and other innovators have the
flexibility to generate the scale--both locally and nationally--that
may be necessary to support certain Broadcast internet services without
being subject to regulations unrelated to the provision of such
services. For instance, a single entity could use this leasing
mechanism to acquire the rights to offer Broadcast internet services on
multiple broadcast channels in the same market. And that same entity
could put together a nationwide footprint for the provision of
[[Page 43143]]
Broadcast internet services. Combined, this can help create an even
more attractive market for the deployment of competitive Broadcast
internet services.
As noted, the Commission last addressed these issues over twenty
years ago, well before the ongoing transition to ATSC 3.0 dramatically
increased the scope of innovative new services that can be provided and
expanded the types of leasing arrangements that will help facilitate
greater access to broadcast spectrum by third parties. Therefore,
questions have been raised about the application of our prior ancillary
services regime to these new offerings. Our decision today will help
provide the stable and predictable regulatory environment that is
critical if parties are to invest heavily in new Broadcast internet
services and thus aid in their proliferation.
Background. Commission Regulations Applicable to Ancillary and
Supplementary Services. Pursuant to section 336 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act), Congress established the
framework for licensing DTV spectrum to television broadcasters and
permitted them to offer ancillary and supplementary services consistent
with the public interest. Congress recognized that the transition from
analog to digital broadcast technology would enable DTV licensees to
provide new and innovative services, including various forms of data
services, over their additional spectrum capacity and wanted to provide
licensees with the flexibility necessary to utilize fully that new
potential. Accordingly, section 336 directed the Commission to adopt
regulations that would allow DTV licensees to make use of excess
spectrum capacity, so long as the ancillary or supplementary services
carried on DTV capacity do not derogate any advanced television
services (i.e., free over-the-air broadcast service) that the
Commission may require. Such ancillary or supplemental services are
also subject to any Commission regulations that are applicable to
analogous services. The statute also directed the Commission to impose
a fee on ancillary or supplementary services for which the DTV licensee
charges a subscription fee or receives compensation from a third party
other than commercial advertisements used to support non-subscription
broadcasting.
The Commission adopted the initial rules governing the provision of
ancillary or supplementary broadcast services in 1997 as part of the
DTV Fifth Report and Order. Consistent with the Act, the rules obligate
DTV licensees to ``transmit at least one over-the-air video program
signal at no direct charge to viewers on the DTV channel.'' This means
that regardless of whatever other services a broadcaster may provide
over its spectrum, it must continue to provide one free stream of
programming to viewers. As long as DTV licensees satisfy that
obligation, the rules permit them to ``offer services of any nature,
consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, on an
ancillary or supplementary basis'' provided the services do not
derogate the licensee's obligation to provide one free stream of
programming to viewers and are subject to any regulations on services
analogous to the ancillary or supplementary service. These rules
reflect the Commission's intent to promote the public interest by
maximizing ``broadcasters' flexibility to provide a digital service to
meet the audience's needs and desires.''
The Commission initiated a separate proceeding to determine how
best to assess and collect the statutorily required fee for ancillary
or supplementary services. The statute directed the Commission to adopt
a fee structure that would ``recover for the public a portion of the
value of the public spectrum resource made available for such
commercial use, and . . . avoid unjust enrichment through the method
employed to permit such uses of that resources.'' It also specifically
instructed the Commission to set the fee at a value that, ``to the
extent feasible, equals but does not exceed (over the term of the
license) the amount that would have been recovered had such services
been licensed pursuant to the provisions of section 309(j) of [the Act]
and the Commission's regulations thereunder.'' Ultimately, the
Commission determined that a fee based on a percentage of the gross
revenues generated by feeable ancillary or supplementary services was
the best option to satisfy the statutory directive and achieve the goal
of incentivizing innovation to maximize spectrum efficiency. The
Commission set the fee at five percent of gross revenues received from
any feeable ancillary or supplementary services.
Subsequently, the Commission clarified the ancillary or
supplementary service rules as applied to noncommercial educational
(NCE) television licensees. The Commission concluded that Sec. 73.621
of the rules, which requires public NCE stations to provide a nonprofit
and noncommercial broadcast service, would apply to the provision of
ancillary or supplementary services by NCE licensees. However, the
Commission also decided to allow NCE licensees to offer subscription
services on their excess capacity and to advertise on ancillary or
supplementary services that do not constitute broadcasting. Finally,
the Commission concluded that section 336(e) of the Act does not exempt
NCE licensees ``from the requirement to pay fees on revenues generated
by the remunerative use of their excess digital capacity, even when
those revenues are used to support their mission-related activities.''
Pursuant to section 336(e)(4) of the Act, the Commission originally
adopted rules requiring all DTV licensees and permittees annually to
file a form (currently Form 2100, Schedule G), reporting information
about their use of the DTV bitstream to provide feeable ancillary and
supplementary services. In 2017, as a part of the Modernization of
Media Regulation Initiative, the Commission revised these filing
requirements. The Commission concluded that requiring every DTV
licensee to file the form was an unnecessary regulatory burden, as very
few licensees offered any feeable service, and instead changed the
rules to require only those licensees who had provided feeable
ancillary or supplementary services during the applicable reporting
period to file the form. As the Commission observed, at that time only
a fraction of all television broadcast stations provided feeable
ancillary or supplementary services despite expectations in the wake of
the digital transition.
Next Generation Broadcast Standard (ATSC 3.0). ATSC 3.0 is the
``Next Generation'' broadcast television (Next Gen TV) transmission
standard developed by the Advanced Television Systems Committee as the
world's first IP-based broadcast transmission platform, which ``merges
the capabilities of over-the-air broadcasting with the broadband
viewing and information delivery methods of the internet, using the
same 6 MHz channels presently allocated for DTV service.'' As stated in
the Next Gen TV Report and Order, the ATSC 3.0 standard will allow
broadcasters to ``offer exciting and innovative services,'' including
superior reception, mobile viewing capabilities, enhanced public safety
capabilities (such as advanced emergency alerting capable of waking up
sleeping devices to warn consumers of imminent emergencies), enhanced
accessibility features, localized and/or personalized content,
interactive educational children's content, and other enhanced
features. In 2017, the Commission authorized broadcasters to begin the
transition to ATSC 3.0 voluntarily and established standards to
minimize the impact on, and costs to, consumers and other industry
[[Page 43144]]
stakeholders. The Media Bureau began accepting applications for Next
Gen TV licenses on May 28, 2019. Earlier this year, the Commission
adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on proposed
changes to the rules governing the use of distributed transmission
systems (DTS) by broadcast television stations. Proponents of the
changes assert that they will facilitate the use of new and innovative
technologies that will improve traditional broadcast service and mobile
reception of broadcast signals, as well as allow the more efficient use
of broadcast spectrum, which they claim would enable broadcasters to
exploit more fully the new capabilities resulting from ATSC 3.0.
ATSC 3.0 provides greater spectral capacity than the current
digital broadcast television standard, allowing broadcasters to
innovate, improve service, and use their spectrum more efficiently.
Although today many broadcasters are focused solely on deploying
traditional broadcast television services using the ATSC 3.0 standard,
some broadcasters and third-party groups are looking to the future and
examining ways broadcasters can become part of the 5G ecosystem and
provide myriad other services using the enhanced capabilities of ATSC
3.0 technologies. Specifically, these groups hope to utilize television
spectrum to provide non-traditional broadcast video services such as
video-on-demand or subscription video services and new, innovative non-
broadcast services in such areas as the automotive industry,
agriculture, distance learning, telehealth, public safety, utility
automation, and the ``Internet of Things'' (IoT). Providing a
regulatory environment to enable a thriving secondary market is key to
unlocking the potential for such Broadcast internet services via ATSC
3.0.
Declaratory Ruling. The Communications Act and the Commission's
rules provide clear authority for the provision of ancillary and
supplementary services by broadcast television stations, including
through spectrum lease agreements, yet few such services have been
offered over the past two decades and none appear to have been offered
extensively or systematically across the television industry.
Accordingly, the Commission has had little occasion to opine on these
rules since their adoption over twenty years ago. With the advent of
ATSC 3.0, however, broadcasters may be better positioned to realize the
potential long envisioned by Congress and the Commission when they were
granted the flexibility to use their spectrum in new and novel ways to
benefit their local communities and the American people. We expect that
our clarification today will help promote increased investment in
broadcast television stations, thereby enabling them to better serve
their local markets.
As the Commission has noted, some licensees may find it useful to
develop partnerships with other broadcasters or third parties to help
make the most productive and efficient use of their spectrum, and the
Commission has stated that it would ``look with favor on such
arrangements.'' In some cases, a broadcaster may lease a portion of its
spectrum to a separate and unrelated entity that, instead of the
broadcaster, would provide ancillary and supplementary services to the
consumer. Conversion of broadcast television to the ATSC 3.0
transmission standard has the potential to increase the attractiveness
of ancillary and supplementary services and correspondingly the
prevalence of spectrum leases to third parties (including other
broadcasters) that can provide such services. As an IP-based standard
designed for compatibility with wireless broadband networks, ATSC 3.0
broadcast signals can connect to 5G wireless networks to provide
enhanced consumer experiences in ways that ATSC 1.0 cannot. Wireless
networks are becoming more dynamic, relying on various spectrum bands
for inbound and outbound data paths. Though ATSC 3.0 transmissions
presently lack a return path, the technology is well positioned to
support a host of next-generation applications, both on its own or as
part of a hybrid wireless network. For example, third parties may wish
to lease excess broadcast spectrum for such uses as supporting
autonomous vehicle operation through system updates; pre-positioning
popular content (e.g., movies or video games) to help reduce network
congestion; distributing educational or job certification materials;
providing supplemental information to telemedicine patients; issuing
advanced emergency alerts for first responders and the public; and
providing operational support for IoT devices and smart meters. We
expect that these types of next-generation services will come to define
Americans' lives over the coming years and decades, and broadcast
spectrum will be in a position to support their growth and
proliferation. Furthermore, an ATSC 3.0 signal can offer broadband-
speed downloads, which may help reduce consumer costs for internet
services, and its propagation characteristics make it well suited for
underserved rural communities. In addition, the nature of ATSC 3.0
transmissions, as compared to ATSC 1.0, could lead to novel and
creative leasing arrangements that could involve multiple, short-term
spectrum users, arrangements that were not feasible when the Commission
last issued guidance on these issues more than twenty years ago.
In issuing this declaratory ruling, we seek to clarify the
regulatory treatment of such leasing arrangements and to remove any
uncertainty that might chill the introduction of new and innovative
services under ATSC 3.0. Specifically, we clarify that the lease of
excess broadcast television spectrum to a third party, including
another broadcaster, for the provision of ancillary and supplementary
services does not result in attribution under our broadcast television
station ownership rules or for any other requirements related to
television station attribution (e.g., filing ownership reports). That
is, our attribution rules do not confer a ``cognizable interest''
solely by the existence of a lease agreement to provide ancillary and
supplementary services over the station's spectrum. The Commission's
broadcast television station attribution rules seek to identify
interests that confer influence or control such that those interests
should be counted for purposes of the media ownership limits. Influence
or control over programming, personnel, and finances is considered in
making an attribution determination. The Commission's media ownership
limits are intended to promote viewpoint diversity, localism, and
competition in broadcast services, yet ancillary and supplementary
services are defined to exclude broadcast services. We thus find no
basis to deem a lease pertaining to such non-broadcast services as
implicating our media ownership limits. Similarly, the Commission
stated in its order authorizing the voluntary use of the ATSC 3.0
transmission standard that it would not apply the broadcast ownership
rules in any situation where airing an ATSC 3.0 signal or an ATSC 1.0
simulcast on a temporary host station's facility would have otherwise
resulted in a potential violation of those rules. Pursuant to that
order, such temporary simulcasting arrangements do not constitute a
cognizable interest under our attribution rules.
This ruling applies regardless of whether the station is
broadcasting in ATSC 1.0 or 3.0 and only in those circumstances where
the lessee uses the spectrum for services that qualify as
[[Page 43145]]
ancillary and supplementary under Sec. 73.624(c) of the Commission's
rules, which is the limited focus of our action today. Consistent with
our rules, licensees entering into such leases still bear the
responsibility to retain ultimate control over their spectrum and to
ensure compliance with our broadcast regulations. Also consistent with
existing Commission rules and policies, the term of any spectrum lease
should be for no greater than the duration of the station's broadcast
license, with renewal of the leasing arrangement permitted.
Furthermore, the broadcaster must continue to provide at least one
over-the-air video program signal at no charge to viewers in accordance
with Sec. 73.624(b) of the Commission's rules and remain in compliance
with all other applicable Commission rules. By extension, the
broadcaster is responsible for any misuse of its spectrum by a lessee
in violation of applicable statutes or Commission rules.
By this declaratory ruling, we seek to provide additional clarity
in order to encourage the investment in and deployment of potentially
beneficial Broadcast internet services and to eliminate any possibility
of unnecessary regulatory obstructions, either real or perceived. The
Commission's rules for ancillary and supplementary services were
intended to afford broadcasters the flexibility to use spectrum
capacity in entrepreneurial and innovative ways. In recognizing ``the
benefit of permitting broadcasters the opportunity to develop
additional revenue streams from innovative digital services,'' the
Commission has chosen ``to impose few restrictions on broadcasters and
to allow them to make decisions that will further their ability to
respond to the marketplace.'' As the industry transitions to a next-
generation broadcast television standard, we seek to ensure that our
rules help facilitate innovative arrangements that can result in the
efficient use of spectrum. In doing so, it is our hope that the
marketplace, not rules designed for different services, will ultimately
decide which Broadcast internet services are developed and supported.
Congressional Review Act. The Commission has determined, and the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, concurs that, this rule is ``non-
major'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The
Commission will send a copy of the Declaratory Ruling to Congress and
the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
It is ordered that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and
336 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151,
154(i), 154(j), 303(r), and 336, and section 1.2 of the Commission's
Rules, 47 CFR 1.2, this Declaratory Ruling in MB Docket No. 20-145 is
adopted. It is further ordered that, pursuant to Sec. 1.103 of the
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.103, this Declaratory Ruling shall be
effective upon release. It is further ordered that the Commission shall
send a copy of the Declaratory Ruling in a report to be sent to
Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13202 Filed 7-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P