Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; CARTIVA, 41999-42000 [2020-15011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 134 / Monday, July 13, 2020 / Notices
InvaGen requested that FDA consider
and grant InvaGen’s request for an
extension. On October 23, 2012, FDA
issued a letter to InvaGen granting
InvaGen an extension until March 2013
to submit bioequivalence study data.
InvaGen has not submitted the
bioequivalence study data.
The additional correspondence noted
above that was not identified in the
October 28, 2019, NOOH does not alter
the underlying basis of the October 28,
2019, NOOH. In the absence of
information showing bioequivalence
between the generic drug at issue and
the reference listed drug (RLD), there is
no basis for concluding that the
Agency’s finding of safety and efficacy
supporting approval of the RLD can be
used as a basis to support approval of
the generic drug. Section 505(e) of the
FD&C Act provides FDA the authority to
withdraw approval of an ANDA in these
circumstances.
In correspondence dated November 7,
2019, InvaGen requested withdrawal of
the approval of ANDA 078320 under
§ 314.150(d). Because this application
withdrawal is effectuated through the
NOOH process (see 84 FR 57736),
InvaGen’s request to withdraw approval
under § 314.150(d) is moot. In the
November 7, 2019, correspondence,
InvaGen also waived its opportunity for
a hearing under § 314.150(a).
FDA finds that InvaGen has
repeatedly failed to submit the required
data to support a finding of
bioequivalence for ANDA 078320. In
addition, under 21 CFR 314.200, FDA
finds that InvaGen has waived any
contentions concerning the legal status
of the drug product. Therefore, under
section 505(e) of the FD&C Act,
approval of ANDA 078320, and all
amendments and supplements thereto,
is withdrawn (see DATES). Introduction
or delivery for introduction of this drug
product into interstate commerce
without an approved application is
illegal and subject to regulatory action
(see sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(a), 331(d))).
Dated: July 7, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2020–14981 Filed 7–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:25 Jul 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2018–E–4404]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CARTIVA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for CARTIVA and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that medical
device.
SUMMARY:
Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by September 11, 2020.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
January 11, 2021. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before September 11,
2020. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
at the end of September 11, 2020.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
DATES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41999
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2018–E–4404 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; CARTIVA.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will
be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
42000
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 134 / Monday, July 13, 2020 / Notices
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of USPTO may award
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:25 Jul 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
(half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as
specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
medical device CARTIVA. CARTIVA is
approved for use in the treatment of
patients with painful degenerative or
post-traumatic arthritis (hallux limitus
or hallux rigidus) in the first
metatarsophalangeal joint with or
without the presence of mild hallux
valgus. Subsequent to this approval, the
USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for CARTIVA
(U.S. Patent No. 5,981,826) from Cartiva,
Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated June 12, 2019, FDA
advised the USPTO that this medical
device had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
CARTIVA represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
CARTIVA is 2,407 days. Of this time,
1,979 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 428 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date a clinical investigation on
humans involving the device was begun:
November 30, 2009. The applicant
claims that the date of the beginning of
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period was October 27, 2009.
However, records indicate that the
period beginning on the date a clinical
investigation on humans involving the
device was begun was November 30,
2009, which represents the beginning of
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): May 1, 2015. The
applicant claims May 13, 2015, as the
date the premarket approval application
(PMA) for CARTIVA (PMA 150017) was
initially submitted. However, FDA
records indicate that PMA 150017 was
submitted on May 1, 2015.
3. The date the application was
approved: July 1, 2016. FDA has verified
the applicant’s claim that PMA 150017
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
was approved on July 1, 2016. This
determination of the regulatory review
period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,429 days of patent
term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: July 7, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020–15011 Filed 7–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 134 (Monday, July 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41999-42000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2018-E-4404]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CARTIVA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period for CARTIVA and is publishing
this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that medical
device.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a redetermination by September 11,
2020. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with
due diligence during the regulatory review period by January 11, 2021.
See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more
information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before September 11, 2020. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of September 11, 2020. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-E-4404 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; CARTIVA.'' Received comments, those filed
in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit
[[Page 42000]]
both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this information as ``confidential.''
Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except
in accordance with Sec. 10.20 (21 CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the device and continues until
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of USPTO may award (half the testing phase
must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before
the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the medical device CARTIVA. CARTIVA
is approved for use in the treatment of patients with painful
degenerative or post-traumatic arthritis (hallux limitus or hallux
rigidus) in the first metatarsophalangeal joint with or without the
presence of mild hallux valgus. Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO
received a patent term restoration application for CARTIVA (U.S. Patent
No. 5,981,826) from Cartiva, Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA's
assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated June 12, 2019, FDA advised the USPTO
that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and
that the approval of CARTIVA represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that
FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
CARTIVA is 2,407 days. Of this time, 1,979 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 428 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date a clinical investigation on humans involving the device
was begun: November 30, 2009. The applicant claims that the date of the
beginning of the testing phase of the regulatory review period was
October 27, 2009. However, records indicate that the period beginning
on the date a clinical investigation on humans involving the device was
begun was November 30, 2009, which represents the beginning of the
testing phase of the regulatory review period.
2. The date an application was initially submitted with respect to
the device under section 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): May 1,
2015. The applicant claims May 13, 2015, as the date the premarket
approval application (PMA) for CARTIVA (PMA 150017) was initially
submitted. However, FDA records indicate that PMA 150017 was submitted
on May 1, 2015.
3. The date the application was approved: July 1, 2016. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that PMA 150017 was approved on July 1,
2016. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes
the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,429 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under
21 CFR 60.24, ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as
specified in Sec. 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must comply with all the requirements
of Sec. 60.30, including but not limited to: Must be timely (see
DATES), must be filed in accordance with Sec. 10.20, must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42,
1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: July 7, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-15011 Filed 7-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P