Air Plan Approval; California; Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District, 41922-41924 [2020-13863]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
41922
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 134 / Monday, July 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804,
however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of
particular applicability; rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and
rules of agency organization, procedure,
or practice that do not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because
this is a rule of particular applicability,
EPA is not required to submit a rule
report regarding this action under
section 801.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 11,
2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: June 18, 2020.
Dennis Deziel,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends Part 52 of
chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE—New Hampshire
2. In § 52.1520, amend paragraph (e)
by adding an entry in the table for
‘‘Negative declaration for the 2016
Control Techniques Guideline for the
Oil and Natural Gas Industry’’ at the end
of the table, to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1520
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
NEW HAMPSHIRE NONREGULATORY
State
submittal
date/
effective
date
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision
*
*
Negative declaration for the 2016 Control
Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
*
*
Statewide .......................
EPA approved date 3
*
12/20/2019
*
7/13/2020 [Insert Federal Register citation].
Explanations
*
Negative declaration.
3 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
[FR Doc. 2020–13635 Filed 7–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0291; FRL–10010–
73–Region 9]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Air Plan Approval; California; Mariposa
County Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Jul 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
approve a revision to the Mariposa
County Air Pollution Control District
(MCAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns reporting of emissions
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in
nonattainment areas. We are approving
a local rule to require submittal of
emissions statements under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
August 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0291. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3848 or by
email at levin.nancy@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 134 / Monday, July 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
final action with the dates that it was
41923
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted to the EPA by the California
Air Resources Board. On March 16,
2020 (85 FR 14845), the EPA proposed
to approve the rule into the California
SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule No.
MCAPCD .........................................................
We proposed to approve Rule 513
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
MCAPCD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Jul 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
513
Rule title
Emissions Statements ....................................
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Revised
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
05/15/18
Submitted
04/30/19
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 11,
2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
41924
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 134 / Monday, July 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 23, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(26)(viii)(F) and
(c)(534) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(26) * * *
(viii) * * *
(F) Previously approved on August
22, 1977 in paragraph (c)(26)(viii)(A) of
this section, and now deleted with
replacement by Rule 513, ‘‘Emission
Statements’’ in paragraph
(c)(534)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule
408, ‘‘Source Recordkeeping and
Reporting.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(534) A new regulation for the
following APCD was submitted on April
30, 2019 by the Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Mariposa County Air Pollution Control
District.
(1) Rule 513, ‘‘Emissions Statements,’’
Adopted on May 15, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2020–13863 Filed 7–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R01–OAR–2020–0132; FRL–10011–
52–Region 1]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Air Plan Approval and Air Quality
Designation; Connecticut;
Determination of Clean Data for the
2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the
Greater Connecticut Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
Jkt 250001
Elizabeth Townsend, Air Quality
Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (Mail code 05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel. (617) 918–
1614, email townsend.elizabeth@
epa.gov.
Table of Contents
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing a clean data
15:48 Jul 10, 2020
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2020–0132. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov website. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1 Regional Office, Air and
Radiation Division, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays and
facility closures due to COVID–19.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This final action is effective on
August 12, 2020.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
40 CFR Part 52
SUMMARY:
determination for the Greater
Connecticut Serious 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area, concluding that the
area has monitored attainment of the
2008 8-hour National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone,
based upon certified 2016–2018 ozone
data. This action suspends the
requirements for this area to submit an
attainment demonstration, a reasonable
further progress plan, contingency
measures, and other planning State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS on the condition that the
area continues to attain the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. This action is being
taken in accordance with the Clean Air
Act.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Background and Purpose
On March 27, 2020 (85 FR 17301),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of
Connecticut. The NPRM proposed to
determine that the Greater Connecticut
Serious 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area has attained the 2008 8-hour
NAAQS for ozone, based on 2016–2018
ozone data. Since the NPRM was
published, EPA has finalized and
published the design values for 2019,
based on 2017–2019 ozone data. These
data support the conclusion that the
Greater Connecticut area attains the
2008 8-hour NAAQS for ozone.
On April 20, 2020 (85 FR 21796), EPA
published a correction to the proposed
rule which corrected information,
displayed in Table 1, of the 2016 fourthhigh 8-hour ozone average
concentration values for the Abington,
Cornwall, and East Hartford monitors.
Although incorrect values were
displayed in the original version of the
proposed rule, the correct values were
utilized in the calculation of the design
values and in the analysis for the clean
data determination and therefore did
not change our analysis or conclusions.
EPA proposed to determine that the
obligation for Connecticut to make
submissions to meet certain CAA
requirements related to attainment of
the NAAQS for this area is not
applicable for as long as the area
continues to attain the NAAQS. The
rationale for EPA’s proposed action is
explained in the NPRM and will not be
restated here. No public comments were
received on the NPRM.
II. Final Action
For the reasons stated in the proposed
action, EPA is finalizing a clean data
determination for the Greater
Connecticut Serious 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area based on the area’s
current attainment of the 2008 8-hour
ozone standard. Pursuant to 40 CFR
51.1118, this action suspends the
requirements for this area to submit
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions related to attainment of the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on the
condition that the area continues to
attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In
particular, as discussed in the proposed
action (85 FR 17301), the obligation for
Connecticut to submit attainment
demonstrations and associated
reasonably available control measures,
reasonable further progress plans,
contingency measures for failure to
attain or make reasonable progress and
other planning SIPs related to
attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS
shall be suspended until such time as:
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 134 (Monday, July 13, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41922-41924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13863]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0291; FRL-10010-73-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Mariposa County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Mariposa County Air Pollution
Control District (MCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns reporting of
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) in nonattainment areas. We are approving a local rule
to require submittal of emissions statements under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on August 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0291. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3848 or by
email at [email protected].
[[Page 41923]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this final action with the
dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted to the
EPA by the California Air Resources Board. On March 16, 2020 (85 FR
14845), the EPA proposed to approve the rule into the California SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAPCD................................ 513 Emissions Statements.... 05/15/18 04/30/19
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve Rule 513 because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the
California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
MCAPCD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 11, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 41924]]
Dated: June 23, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(26)(viii)(F) and
(c)(534) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(26) * * *
(viii) * * *
(F) Previously approved on August 22, 1977 in paragraph
(c)(26)(viii)(A) of this section, and now deleted with replacement by
Rule 513, ``Emission Statements'' in paragraph (c)(534)(i)(A)(1) of
this section, Rule 408, ``Source Recordkeeping and Reporting.''
* * * * *
(534) A new regulation for the following APCD was submitted on
April 30, 2019 by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mariposa County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 513, ``Emissions Statements,'' Adopted on May 15, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2020-13863 Filed 7-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
