Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating Operations, 41477-41479 [2020-14444]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 133 / Friday, July 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(v) Duress, coercion, or desperation.
(vi) Family obligations or comparable
obligations to third-parties.
(vii) Age, education, cultural
background, and judgmental maturity.
(3) Whether a valid legal defense
would have precluded a conviction for
AWOL or misconduct under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. For
purposes of this paragraph, the defense
must go directly to the substantive issue
of absence or misconduct rather than to
procedures, technicalities, or
formalities.
(f) Board of corrections upgrade. An
honorable discharge or discharge under
honorable conditions issued through a
board for correction of records
established under authority of 10 U.S.C.
1552 is final and conclusive on the
Department of Veterans Affairs. The
action of the board sets aside any prior
bar to benefits imposed under paragraph
(c) or (d) of this section.
(g) Discharge review board upgrades
prior to October 8, 1977. An honorable
or general discharge issued prior to
October 8, 1977, under authority other
than that listed in paragraphs (i)(1), (2),
and (3) of this section by a discharge
review board established under 10
U.S.C. 1553, sets aside any bar to
benefits imposed under paragraph (c) or
(d) of this section except the bar
contained in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section.
(h) Discharge review board upgrades
on or after October 8, 1977. An
honorable or general discharge issued
on or after October 8, 1977, by a
discharge review board established
under 10 U.S.C. 1553, sets aside a bar
to benefits imposed under paragraph
(d), but not under paragraph (c) of this
section provided that:
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Special review board upgrades.
Unless a discharge review board
established under 10 U.S.C. 1553
determines on an individual case basis
that the discharge would be upgraded
under uniform standards meeting the
requirements set forth in paragraph (h)
of this section, an honorable or general
discharge awarded under one of the
following programs does not remove
any bar to benefits imposed under this
section:
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Overpayments after October 8,
1977, due to discharge review board
upgrades. No overpayments shall be
created as a result of payments made
after October 8, 1977, based on an
upgraded honorable or general
discharge issued under one of the
programs listed in paragraph (i) of this
section which would not be awarded
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jul 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
under the standards set forth in
paragraph (h) of this section. Accounts
in payment status on or after October 8,
1977, shall be terminated the end of the
month in which it is determined that
the original other than honorable
discharge was not issued under
conditions other than dishonorable
following notice from the appropriate
discharge review board that the
discharge would not have been
upgraded under the standards set forth
in paragraph (h) of this section, or April
7, 1978, whichever is the earliest.
Accounts in suspense (either before or
after October 8, 1977) shall be
terminated on the date of last payment
or April 7, 1978, whichever is the
earliest.
(k) Overpayments after October 8,
1977, based on application of AWOL
statutory bar.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–14559 Filed 7–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0339; FRL–10011–
79–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface
Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP) received on
March 7, 2019. The submission revises
Missouri’s regulation that restricts the
emissions of volatile organic
compounds from industrial surface
coating operations in St. Louis City and
Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, and St.
Louis Counties. Specifically, the
revisions to the rule adds a new surface
coating category for the decorative
coating of foam products, establishes an
appropriate emission limit for this type
of surface coating operation, removes
obsolete provisions that were applicable
prior to March 1, 2012, removes a
reference to a rule that is being
rescinded, removes the unnecessary use
of restrictive words, adds definitions
specific to this rule, changes rule
language to be consistent with defined
terms, and updates incorporations by
reference.
The new emission limit for decorative
coating of foam products is a SIP
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41477
strengthening and will not adversely
impact the air quality in the St. Louis
area. The remaining revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
impact the stringency of the SIP or air
quality. Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between state and
federally-approved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 10, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2020–0339 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7714;
email address: stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–
0339, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
41478
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 133 / Friday, July 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Missouri SIP received
on March 7, 2019. The revisions are to
Title 10, Division 10 of the Code of State
Regulations, 10 CSR 10–5.330 ‘‘Control
of Emissions From Industrial Surface
Coating Operations’’, which restricts the
emissions of volatile organic
compounds from industrial surface
coating operations in St. Louis City and
Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, and St.
Louis Counties. These revisions are
described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in
the docket for this action.
Missouri received three comments
from EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all three
comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for
this action. Therefore, the EPA is
proposing to approve the revisions to
this rule because it will not have a
negative impact on air quality.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The state provided
public notice of the revisions from
August 1, 2018, to October 4, 2018, and
held a public hearing on September 27,
2018. The state received and addressed
three comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this
docket, the SIP revision submission
meets the substantive requirements of
the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to amend the
Missouri SIP by approving the State’s
request to revise 10 CSR 10–5.330
‘‘Control of Emissions From Industrial
Surface Coating Operations.’’ Approval
of these revisions will ensure
consistency between state and federallyapproved rules. The EPA has
determined that these changes will not
adversely impact air quality.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jul 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
The EPA is processing this as a
proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on the action. Final
rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
a final rule that includes incorporation
by reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the Missouri Regulations described in
the proposed amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. EPA has made,
and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Particulate
matter, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 29, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart—AA Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–5.330’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
*
*
41479
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 133 / Friday, July 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5-Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.330 .........
*
Control of Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating
Operations.
*
*
*
3/30/2019
*
*
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0309; FRL–10011–
43–Region 9]
Finding of Failure To Attain the 2006
24-Hour Fine Particulate Matter
Standards; California; Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine
that the Los Angeles-South Coast Air
Basin nonattainment area failed to attain
the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter
(‘‘PM2.5’’) national ambient air quality
standards by the December 31, 2019
‘‘Serious’’ area attainment date. This
proposed determination is based on
ambient air quality monitoring data
from 2017 through 2019. If the EPA
finalizes this determination as
proposed, the State of California will be
required to submit a revision to the
California State Implementation Plan
that, among other elements, provides for
expeditious attainment within the time
limits prescribed by regulation and
provides for a five percent annual
reduction in the emissions of direct
PM2.5 or a PM2.5 plan precursor
pollutant. We are also proposing to
correct an error in the table of California
area designations for the 2006 PM2.5
national ambient air quality standards.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 10, 2020.
SUMMARY:
17:00 Jul 09, 2020
*
*
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2020–0309 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule].
*
[FR Doc. 2020–14444 Filed 7–9–20; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
Jkt 250001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ginger Vagenas, Air Planning Office
(AIR–2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3964, vagenas.ginger@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
B. South Coast Designations,
Classifications, and Attainment Dates for
the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
II. Proposed Determination and
Consequences
A. Applicable Statutory and Regulatory
Provisions
B. Monitoring Network Considerations
C. Data Considerations and Proposed
Determination
D. Consequences for a Serious PM2.5
Nonattainment Area Failing To Attain
the Standards by the Attainment Date
III. Proposed Error Correction
IV. Proposed Actions and Request for Public
Comment
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Under section 109 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’), the EPA has
established national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’) for
certain pervasive air pollutants (referred
to as ‘‘criteria pollutants’’) and conducts
periodic reviews of the NAAQS to
determine whether they should be
revised or whether new NAAQS should
be established.
In October 2006, the EPA revised the
24-hour NAAQS for fine particulate
matter (particles with a diameter of 2.5
microns or less or PM2.5) 1 (‘‘2006 PM2.5
NAAQS’’) to provide increased
protection of public health by lowering
1 The EPA established both primary and
secondary standards for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS. Primary standards provide public health
protection, including protecting the health of
‘‘sensitive’’ populations such as asthmatics,
children, and the elderly. Secondary standards
provide public welfare protection, including
protection against decreased visibility and damage
to animals, crops, vegetation, and buildings. Since
the primary and secondary standards for 24-hour
PM2.5 are set at the same level, we refer to them
herein using the singular ‘‘2006 PM2.5 NAAQS’’ or
‘‘2006 PM2.5 standard.’’
E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM
10JYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 133 (Friday, July 10, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41477-41479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14444]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0339; FRL-10011-79-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial
Surface Coating Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP)
received on March 7, 2019. The submission revises Missouri's regulation
that restricts the emissions of volatile organic compounds from
industrial surface coating operations in St. Louis City and Jefferson,
St. Charles, Franklin, and St. Louis Counties. Specifically, the
revisions to the rule adds a new surface coating category for the
decorative coating of foam products, establishes an appropriate
emission limit for this type of surface coating operation, removes
obsolete provisions that were applicable prior to March 1, 2012,
removes a reference to a rule that is being rescinded, removes the
unnecessary use of restrictive words, adds definitions specific to this
rule, changes rule language to be consistent with defined terms, and
updates incorporations by reference.
The new emission limit for decorative coating of foam products is a
SIP strengthening and will not adversely impact the air quality in the
St. Louis area. The remaining revisions are administrative in nature
and do not impact the stringency of the SIP or air quality. Approval of
these revisions will ensure consistency between state and federally-
approved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 10, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0339 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7714; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0339, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
[[Page 41478]]
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri SIP
received on March 7, 2019. The revisions are to Title 10, Division 10
of the Code of State Regulations, 10 CSR 10-5.330 ``Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating Operations'', which restricts
the emissions of volatile organic compounds from industrial surface
coating operations in St. Louis City and Jefferson, St. Charles,
Franklin, and St. Louis Counties. These revisions are described in
detail in the technical support document (TSD) included in the docket
for this action.
Missouri received three comments from EPA during the comment
period. Missouri responded to all three comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for this action. Therefore, the EPA
is proposing to approve the revisions to this rule because it will not
have a negative impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
state provided public notice of the revisions from August 1, 2018, to
October 4, 2018, and held a public hearing on September 27, 2018. The
state received and addressed three comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this docket, the SIP revision
submission meets the substantive requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to amend the Missouri SIP by approving the
State's request to revise 10 CSR 10-5.330 ``Control of Emissions From
Industrial Surface Coating Operations.'' Approval of these revisions
will ensure consistency between state and federally-approved rules. The
EPA has determined that these changes will not adversely impact air
quality.
The EPA is processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on the action. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in a final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the Missouri Regulations described in the proposed amendments
to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Particulate matter, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: June 29, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart--AA Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-5.330'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 41479]]
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Missouri citation Title date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5-Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-5.330........................ Control of 3/30/2019 [Date of publication of
Emissions From the final rule in the
Industrial Surface Federal Register],
Coating Operations. [Federal Register
citation of the final
rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-14444 Filed 7-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
