Consolidated Net Operating Losses, 40927-40951 [2020-14427]
Download as PDF
40927
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 131
Wednesday, July 8, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–125716–18]
RIN 1545–BP27
Consolidated Net Operating Losses
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
partial withdrawal of a notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This notice of proposed
rulemaking contains proposed
amendments to the consolidated return
regulations under section 1502 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The
proposed regulations provide guidance
implementing recent statutory
amendments to section 172 and
withdraw and re-propose certain
sections of proposed regulations issued
in prior notices of proposed rulemaking
relating to the absorption of
consolidated net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks. In addition,
the proposed regulations update
regulations applicable to consolidated
groups that include both life insurance
companies and other companies to
reflect statutory changes. These
proposed regulations would affect
corporations that file consolidated
returns.
SUMMARY:
Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by August 31, 2020.
Requests for a public hearing must be
submitted as prescribed in the
‘‘Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing’’ section.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic
submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–125716–18) by following the
online instructions for submitting
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
comments. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The IRS
expects to have limited personnel
available to process public comments
that are submitted on paper through
mail. Until further notice, any
comments submitted on paper will be
considered to the extent practicable.
The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the IRS will
publish for public availability any
comment submitted electronically (and,
to the extent practicable, any comment
submitted on paper) to its public docket.
Send paper submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–125716–18), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Justin O. Kellar at (202) 317–6720,
Gregory J. Galvin at (202) 317–3598, or
William W. Burhop at (202) 317–5363;
concerning submission of comments or
requests for a public hearing, Regina
Johnson at (202) 317–5177 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register, the IRS is
issuing temporary regulations to permit
consolidated groups that acquire new
members that were members of another
consolidated group to elect to waive all
or part of the pre-acquisition portion of
an extended carryback period under
section 172 of the Code for certain
losses attributable to the acquired
members. The text of those temporary
regulations also serves as the text of
§ 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of these
proposed regulations. The proposed and
temporary regulations affect
corporations that file consolidated
returns.
Background
These proposed regulations revise the
Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1)
under section 1502 of the Code. Section
1502 authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury or his delegate (Secretary) to
prescribe regulations for an affiliated
group of corporations that join in filing
(or that are required to join in filing) a
consolidated return (consolidated
group) to reflect clearly the Federal
income tax liability of the consolidated
group and to prevent avoidance of such
tax liability. See § 1.1502–1(h) (defining
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the term ‘‘consolidated group’’). For
purposes of carrying out those
objectives, section 1502 also permits the
Secretary to prescribe rules that may be
different from the provisions of chapter
1 of the Code that would apply if the
corporations composing the
consolidated group filed separate
returns. Terms used in the consolidated
return regulations generally are defined
in § 1.1502–1.
These proposed revisions implement
certain statutory amendments made by
Public Law 115–97, 131 Stat. 2054
(December 22, 2017), commonly
referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(TCJA). Specifically, section 13302 of
the TCJA amended section 172 of the
Code, relating to net operating loss
(NOL) deductions, and sections 13511
through 13519 of the TCJA amended
subchapter L of chapter 1 of the Code
(subchapter L), relating to the taxation
of insurance companies. These
proposed regulations also implement
further statutory amendments to section
172 of the Code made by the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act, Public Law 116–136, 134
Stat. 281 (March 27, 2020) (CARES Act).
Additionally, these proposed
regulations update regulations under
section 1502 concerning consolidated
groups that include life insurance
companies and other companies (lifenonlife groups) to implement
amendments under prior tax legislation.
I. Net Operating Loss Deductions
Prior to amendment by the TCJA,
section 172(a) allowed a taxpayer to use
its aggregate NOL carryovers and
carrybacks to a taxable year to offset all
taxable income in the taxable year, and
section 172(b)(1) generally permitted
taxpayers to carry back NOLs two years
and carry over NOLs 20 years. The TCJA
amended section 172 to provide new
NOL deduction rules based on (i) the
type of entity generating the NOL or
using an NOL to offset income, or (ii)
the character of the loss giving rise to an
NOL. The CARES Act extended the
carryback period for NOLs arising in a
taxable year beginning after December
31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021.
See part I.A of this Background. Both
the TCJA and the CARES Act also made
other changes to section 172 that are not
pertinent to this notice of proposed
rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40928
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
A. General NOL Rules
As amended by section 13302(a)(1) of
the TCJA and section 2303(a)(1) of the
CARES Act, section 172(a)(2) of the
Code allows an NOL deduction for a
taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020, in an amount equal to the sum
of two factors. The first factor is the
aggregate amount of NOLs arising in
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (pre-2018 NOLs), that are
carried to such taxable year. The second
factor is the lesser of (i) the aggregate
amount of NOLs arising in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017
(post-2017 NOLs), that are carried to
such taxable year, or (ii) 80 percent of
the excess (if any) of (I) taxable income
computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250 of the Code, over (II) the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to the taxable year (this latter
calculation, the 80-percent limitation).
The 80-percent limitation does not
apply to taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2021. See section 172(a)(1).
For any such taxable year, section
172(a)(1) allows an NOL deduction
equal to the aggregate amount of NOL
carryovers and carrybacks to such year.
See id. Moreover, the 80-percent
limitation does not apply to limit the
use of pre-2018 NOLs. See section
172(a)(2)(A).
Section 13302(b) of the TCJA
amended section 172(b) to generally
eliminate NOL carrybacks but permit
post-2017 NOLs to be carried over
indefinitely. Section 2303(b) of the
CARES Act further amended section
172(b) to require (unless waived under
section 172(b)(3)) a five-year carryback
for NOLs arising in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017, and
before January 1, 2021. See section
172(b)(1)(D)(i).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Special NOL Rules for Nonlife
Insurance Companies
Section 13302(d) of the TCJA added
sections 172(b)(1)(C) and 172(f), which
provide special rules for insurance
companies other than life insurance
companies, as defined in section 816(a)
(nonlife insurance companies, which
commonly are referred to as property
and casualty insurance companies or
P&C companies). Under section 172(f),
the 80-percent limitation does not apply
to nonlife insurance companies.
Therefore, taxable income of nonlife
insurance companies may be fully offset
by NOL deductions. In addition, under
sections 172(b)(1)(C) and (b)(1)(D)(i),
losses of nonlife insurance companies
arising in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020, may be carried back
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
two years and carried over 20 years. (As
noted in part I.A of this Background,
losses arising in taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017, and before
January 1, 2021, are carried back five
years.) Thus, for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020, the operative
rules under section 172 effectively
apply to nonlife insurance companies in
the same manner as those rules applied
prior to enactment of the TCJA.
C. Special NOL Rules for Farming
Losses
Section 13302(c) of the TCJA
amended the special rules for farming
losses set forth in sections 172(b)(1)(F)
and 172(h), as in effect prior to
enactment of the TCJA. For purposes of
section 172, a ‘‘farming loss’’ is the
lesser of (i) the amount that would be
the NOL for the taxable year if only
income and deductions attributable to
farming businesses (as defined in
section 263A(e)(4) of the Code) were
taken into account, or (ii) the amount of
the NOL for that taxable year. See
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii). Under sections
172(b)(1)(B)(i) and (b)(1)(D)(i)(II), any
portion of an NOL for a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020, that
is characterized as a farming loss is
treated as an NOL that is carried back
two years and, as provided in section
172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II), is carried over
indefinitely. Farming losses arising in
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021, are
carried back five years. Section
172(b)(1)(D)(i).
II. Insurance Company Provisions
The TCJA also made several changes
to subchapter L (which addresses the
taxation of insurance companies) that
are relevant to this notice of proposed
rulemaking. First, sections 13511(a) and
13511(b) of the TCJA (i) struck section
805(b)(4), which generally denied life
insurance companies the NOL
deduction provided in section 172, and
(ii) made a conforming amendment by
striking section 810, which provided a
deduction for operations losses for life
insurance companies. As a result,
effective for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017, life insurance
companies are entitled to an NOL
deduction under the general rules of
section 172. Second, section
13001(b)(2)(A) of the TCJA struck
section 1201, which imposed a
minimum tax on capital gains. Third,
section 13514(a) of the TCJA struck
section 815, which provided continued
deferral of tax on policyholders surplus
accounts. Fourth, under section
13514(d) of the TCJA, stock life
insurance companies must pay the tax
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
imposed by section 801 on the balance
of any policyholders surplus accounts
(determined as of the close of such
company’s last taxable year beginning
before January 1, 2018) ratably over the
first eight taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017.
Additionally, section 2303(b) of the
CARES Act added a special rule for life
insurance companies. Section
172(b)(1)(D)(iii) provides that, in the
case of a life insurance company, if an
NOL is carried back under section
172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I) to a life insurance
company taxable year beginning before
January 1, 2018, such NOL carryback
shall be treated in the same manner as
an operations loss carryback (within the
meaning of section 810 as in effect
before its repeal) of such company to
such taxable year.
Because the repeal of section 810 is
effective for losses arising in taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2017, operations loss carryovers from
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018, continue to be allowed as
deductions in taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017, in accordance
with section 810 as in effect before its
repeal by the TCJA. See Staff of the Joint
Comm. on Tax’n, 115th Cong., General
Explanation of Public Law 115–97, at
226 (Dec. 2018).
Final regulations applicable to lifenonlife groups under § 1.1502–47 were
published in the Federal Register on
March 18, 1983. See 48 FR 11441
(March 18, 1983) (current life-nonlife
regulations). In the years that followed
that publication, other legislation also
significantly altered the taxation of
insurance companies.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
These proposed regulations provide
guidance for consolidated groups
regarding the application of the 80percent limitation, as originally enacted
as part of the TCJA and subsequently
amended by the CARES Act. These
proposed regulations also provide
guidance regarding the application of
the NOL carryback provisions following
enactment of the TCJA and the CARES
Act. In addition, the proposed
regulations withdraw and re-propose
certain sections of proposed regulations
issued under section 1502 in prior
notices of proposed rulemaking that
relate to the absorption of NOL
carrybacks and carryovers. See part II of
this Explanation of Provisions for a
further discussion.
These proposed regulations also
update § 1.1502–47 to reflect certain
changes to the insurance company rules
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
made by the CARES Act, the TCJA, and
prior tax legislation. See part III of this
Explanation of Provisions for a further
discussion. The Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to study other
issues pertinent to life-nonlife groups
for purposes of potential future
guidance.
II. Amendments to § 1.1502–21
A. In General
Under section 172, as amended by the
TCJA and the CARES Act, NOLs
generated by certain members of a
consolidated group (that is, nonlife
insurance companies), as well as NOLs
generated by certain business activity
within a consolidated group (that is,
farming losses), are subject to different
rules than other NOLs in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2020. The
proposed regulations implement these
statutory rules with regard to affiliated
groups of corporations that file
consolidated returns.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Application of the 80-Percent
Limitation
1. In General
Section 1.1502–21(a) defines the
consolidated net operating loss (CNOL)
deduction for any consolidated return
year as ‘‘the aggregate of the net
operating loss carryovers and carrybacks
to the year.’’ This section specifies that
‘‘[t]he net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks consist of (1) [a]ny CNOLs
. . . of the consolidated group; and (2)
[a]ny net operating losses of the
members arising in separate return
years.’’ NOL carryovers and carrybacks
to a consolidated return year are
determined under the principles of
section 172 and § 1.1502–21. See
§ 1.1502–21(b)(1). For example, losses
permitted to be absorbed in a
consolidated return year generally are
absorbed in the order of the taxable
years in which they arose. See id.
As discussed in part I.A of the
Background, the 80-percent limitation
on the use of post-2017 NOLs to offset
taxable income (other than taxable
income of nonlife insurance companies)
applies to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020. Consistent with
longstanding provisions in § 1.1502–
21(b)(1), these proposed regulations
generally implement the 80-percent
limitation on a consolidated group basis
by limiting a group’s deduction of post2017 NOLs for any such taxable year to
the lesser of (1) the aggregate amount of
post-2017 NOLs carried to such year, or
(2) 80 percent of the excess (if any) of
the group’s consolidated taxable income
(CTI) (computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
and 250) over the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to such year.
Thus, the amount allowed as a
deduction for a particular consolidated
return year beginning after December
31, 2020, equals the sum of (1) pre-2018
NOLs carried to that year (see section
172(a)(2)(A)), and (2) post-2017 NOLs
carried to that year after applying the
80-percent limitation (see section
172(a)(2)(B)). Additionally, the
proposed regulations provide special
rules applicable to consolidated groups
that include at least one nonlife
insurance company, as well as rules
applicable to losses arising in a separate
return limitation year (SRLY).
2. Application of the 80-Percent
Limitation to Groups Comprised of
Nonlife Insurance Companies, Members
Other Than Nonlife Insurance
Companies, or Both
Application of the 80-percent
limitation depends on the status of the
entity whose income is being offset,
rather than on the status of the entity
whose loss is being absorbed. As noted
in part I.B of the Background, section
172(f) provides that the 80-percent
limitation does not apply when the
taxable income of a nonlife insurance
company is offset by an NOL carryback
or carryover.
To implement the special rules under
section 172 regarding income of nonlife
insurance companies, these proposed
regulations clarify that application of
the 80-percent limitation within a
consolidated group to post-2017 NOLs
(post-2017 CNOL deduction limit)
depends on the status of the entity that
generated the income being offset in a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020. Therefore, if a group
is comprised solely of members other
than nonlife insurance companies
during a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for that year is determined by
applying the 80-percent limitation to all
of the group’s consolidated taxable
income for that year. In contrast, if a
group is comprised solely of nonlife
insurance companies during a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the group for that
year simply equals the group’s CTI less
the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year.
A two-factor computation is required
if a consolidated group is comprised of
both nonlife insurance companies and
other members in a consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020.
In general, under these proposed
regulations, the post-2017 CNOL
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40929
deduction limit for the group would
equal the sum of two amounts.
The first amount relates to the income
of those members that are not nonlife
insurance companies (residual income
pool). This amount equals the lesser of
(i) the aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to that year, or (ii) 80
percent of the excess of the group’s CTI
for that year (determined without regard
to income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members that are nonlife insurance
companies and without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) over the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year that
are allocated to the positive net income
of members other than nonlife insurance
companies.
The second amount relates to the
income of those members that are
nonlife insurance companies (nonlife
income pool). This amount equals 100
percent of the group’s CTI for the year
(determined without regard to any
income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members that are not nonlife insurance
companies), less the aggregate amount
of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year
that are allocated to the positive net
income of nonlife insurance company
members.
For purposes of computing the
foregoing amounts, pre-2018 NOLs are
allocated pro rata between the two types
of income pools in the group (that is, the
income pool for nonlife insurance
companies and the income pool for all
other members, respectively). This
allocation is based on the relative
amounts of positive net income in each
pool in the particular consolidated
return year.
For example, assume that P, PC1, and
PC2 are members of a calendar-year
consolidated group (P Group). PC1 and
PC2 are nonlife insurance companies,
and P is a holding company. In 2017,
the P Group has a CNOL of $10 (that is,
a pre-2018 NOL). In 2021, P has income
of $50, PC1 has income of $70, and PC2
has a loss of $20. Therefore, the P Group
has $100 of CTI in 2021. In 2022, the P
Group has a $100 CNOL (all of which
is attributable to PC1 and PC2) that is
carried back to 2021. Under sections
172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f), the P Group’s
2022 CNOL would offset P’s 2021
income subject to the 80-percent
limitation, but it would offset PC1’s
2021 income without limitation.
The total amount allowed as a CNOL
deduction in the P Group’s 2021
consolidated return year equals the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year plus the P Group’s
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for that
year. The P Group has $10 of pre-2018
NOLs carried to 2021. Under section
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40930
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
172(a)(2)(A) and § 1.1502–21(b)(1), this
loss would offset $10 of the P Group’s
2021 income.
Under these proposed regulations, the
P Group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for its 2021 consolidated return
year is equal to the sum of the following
two amounts. The first amount reflects
the application of the 80-percent
limitation to P’s income (that is, the
residual income pool). This amount is
$36, which equals the lesser of (i) the
aggregate amount of the P Group’s post2017 NOLs carried to its 2021
consolidated return year ($100), or (ii)
the product obtained by multiplying 80
percent by $45 (the excess of $50 (P’s
2021 income) over $5 (the pro rata
amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocated to
P’s income)).
The second amount reflects the
application of section 172(f) to the
income of PC1 and PC2 (that is, the
nonlife income pool). This amount is
$45, which is obtained by subtracting $5
(the pro rata amount of pre-2018 NOLs
allocated to the income of PC1 and PC2)
from $50 (PC1’s 2021 income of
$70¥PC2’s 2021 loss of $20).
Thus, the P Group has a CNOL
deduction of $91 for 2021, which
includes (1) the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 ($10),
plus (2) the P Group’s post-2017
deduction limit ($36 + $45 = $81). The
P Group has $9 of CTI in 2021 and
carries over the remaining $19 of its
2022 CNOL ($100¥$81) to future
taxable years.
If a group’s nonlife insurance
company members have net income for
a particular consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020, and
its other members have a net loss for
that year (or vice-versa), these proposed
regulations modify the foregoing
computation to ensure that the group’s
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for that
year is not overstated. If the group’s
nonlife insurance company members
have a loss for the consolidated return
year and its other members have income
for that year, the group’s post-2017
CNOL deduction limit equals the lesser
of (i) the aggregate amount of post-2017
CNOLs carried to the year, or (ii) 80
percent of the excess of the group’s CTI
(determined without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) over the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year. That
is, because none of the group’s net
income has been produced by the
group’s P&C insurance operations, the
80-percent limitation will apply to all
CTI for the year. Conversely, if the
group’s nonlife insurance company
members have income for the
consolidated return year and its other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
members have a loss for that year, the
group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit equals the group’s CTI less the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year. That is, because all
net income of the group has been
produced by the operation of members
that are nonlife insurance companies
(whose income is not subject to the 80percent limitation), all CTI for the year
may be offset by post-2017 CNOL
deductions.
In formulating these proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS considered an alternative
approach. Following the enactment of
the TCJA and the CARES Act, section
172 provides special rules applicable to
entities of different tax status, both with
regard to the use of NOLs to offset
income and with regard to the manner
in which NOLs are carried over. This
alternative approach would have
required a group to first offset income
and loss items within a pool of nonlife
insurance companies and a pool of other
members for all purposes of section 172
applicable to taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020. In other words,
the alternative approach would have
applied a pooling concept beyond
merely determining the group’s post2017 CNOL deduction limit, but would
have required a group’s CTI to be
allocated between the operations of its
nonlife insurance company members,
which can be offset fully by CNOL
deductions, and the operations of its
other members subject to the 80-percent
limitation. This alternative approach
would also have applied similar rules to
allocate CNOLs within groups including
both nonlife insurance companies and
other members to consistently identify
the portions of CNOLs allocable to
nonlife insurance company members,
which are subject to different carryover
rules than those of other members.
Specifically, this alternative approach
would have adopted a threshold
computational step under which the
principles of § 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B)
would apply to offset the income and
loss items solely among members that
are nonlife insurance companies. The
remaining members of the group would
be subject to a parallel offset. Following
this initial offsetting of pooled items,
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B) (or the
principles of § 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B), in
the case of a group with CTI) would
apply to allocate a post-2017 CNOL
among all group members with taxable
income. This approach contrasts with
the historical application of § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(B), under which a CNOL for
a year is attributed pro rata to all
members of a group that produce net
loss, without first netting among entities
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the same type. This historical
approach developed before the
enactment of the TCJA, and thus before
special carryover rules applied to
nonlife insurance companies.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments regarding the
proposed regulations’ methodology for
computing a group’s post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit. The Treasury
Department and the IRS also request
comments regarding the alternative
approach described in the preceding
two paragraphs to identify the portion of
the CNOL to which the special
carryback and carryover rules of section
172(b) (regarding nonlife insurance
company losses) would apply.
3. Losses Arising in a SRLY
Generally, an unaffiliated corporation
determines its taxable income by
offsetting its NOLs against its income. In
contrast, a consolidated group member
generally offsets its NOLs against the
income of all group members. See
§§ 1.1502–11 and 1.1502–21. However,
an exception to this general rule for
consolidated groups applies to a group’s
use of NOLs incurred by a member
(SRLY member) in a taxable year other
than a year of the current group (that is,
a separate return limitation year or
SRLY). A SRLY member may carry its
NOLs that arose in a SRLY into the
consolidated group, but those NOLs can
be absorbed by the group only to the
extent that the SRLY member generates
income on a separate-entity basis while
a member of the group (that is, to the
extent of the amount of net income
generated by the SRLY member as a
member of the group). See generally
§ 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i) (setting forth the
general SRLY limitation rule).
The SRLY rules attempt to replicate,
to the extent possible, separate-entity
usage of the SRLY attributes of the
SRLY member. In other words, the
SRLY regulations were designed to
obtain an absorption result that varies as
little as possible from the absorption
that would have occurred if the SRLY
member had not joined the consolidated
group.
To approximate a SRLY member’s
absorption of NOLs on a separate-entity
basis, the SRLY member’s net
contribution to the CTI of the group is
measured cumulatively over the period
during which the corporation is a
member of the group by using what is
commonly referred to as a ‘‘cumulative
register.’’ The cumulative register tracks
the SRLY member’s net positive (or
negative) contribution to the income of
the group. See § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i). If the
SRLY member has net positive income
in a consolidated taxable year, the
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
member’s cumulative register increases.
See § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(A) and (C). In
turn, if the losses of a SRLY member
(including SRLY-limited NOL
carryovers) are absorbed by the group,
the SRLY member’s cumulative register
decreases. See § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(B)
and (C).
These proposed regulations would
modify the cumulative register rules to
reflect the application of the 80-percent
limitation under section 172(a)(2)(B).
Under the proposed regulations, as in
current § 1.1502–21, the full amount of
the SRLY member’s current-year income
(or current-year absorbed loss) increases
(or decreases) the member’s cumulative
register. However, when the cumulative
register is reduced to account for the
group’s absorption of any SRLY
member’s NOLs that are subject to the
80-percent limitation (whether or not
those losses are subject to the SRLY
limitation), the amount of the reduction
equals the full amount of income that
would be necessary to support the
deduction by the SRLY member.
For example, after absorption of any
pre-2018 NOLs of a SRLY member, the
SRLY member (other than a nonlife
insurance company) would need to have
$100 of remaining income to enable the
group to absorb $80 of the SRLY
member’s SRLY-limited post-2017 NOLs
in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020 (that is, 80 percent
of the excess of $100 over $0).
Therefore, upon the group’s deduction
of $80 of NOL (SRLY or otherwise) of
the SRLY member, the cumulative
register would be reduced to reflect the
full $100 of income, not just the $80 of
losses absorbed by the group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that, without the
adjustment described, the SRLY
member would achieve a different result
as a member of a group than as a standalone entity. Such result would be
contrary to the objective of the SRLY
rules, which attempt to replicate the
hypothetical separate-entity treatment of
the SRLY member. Therefore, the abovedescribed adjustment would be
necessary to ensure that the SRLY
member achieves the same Federal
income tax result as if the SRLY
member continued to be a stand-alone
entity.
For example, assume that P owns 79
percent of S, and that neither P nor S
is a nonlife insurance company. In Year
1 (a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020), S incurs an $800
NOL that it carries over into Year 2. S
has no other NOL carryovers or
carrybacks. In Year 2, S has $400 of
income; accordingly, S’s 80-percent
limitation for Year 2 is $320 (that is, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
lesser of $800 or 80 percent of the
excess of $400 over $0). As a result, S
may use $320 of its $800 Year 1 NOL
to offset $320 of its $400 Year 2 income.
Under section 172(b)(2), the amount of
the $800 Year 1 NOL that is carried into
Year 3 is the excess of the entire $800
NOL over $320, or $480. S’s ability to
use any portion of its remaining Year 1
NOL in Year 3 is dependent on its
generation of additional taxable income
in Year 3.
Now assume that, instead of S filing
a separate return for Year 2, P acquires
the remaining stock of S at the end of
Year 1, and P and S file a consolidated
return for Year 2. The P group has
$1,000 of income in Year 2, of which S
has $400. Thus, S’s cumulative register
increases from $0 to $400. Because S’s
$800 Year 1 NOL arose in a SRLY, the
absorption of this NOL in Year 2 is
subject to both the SRLY limitation and
the 80-percent limitation. Under the
proposed regulations, the P group may
use only $320 (that is, the lesser of $800
or 80 percent of the excess of $400 over
$0) of S’s Year 1 SRLY NOL to offset the
P group’s Year 2 income. Upon the
absorption of $320 of S’s Year 1 SRLY
NOL, S’s cumulative register is reduced
by $400 (that is, the full amount of
income necessary to support the $320
deduction of S’s Year 1 SRLY NOL) to
$0. The remainder of S’s Year 1 SRLY
NOL is carried over.
If S’s cumulative register were not
reduced by the full amount of income
necessary to support the deduction, the
P group’s ability to use S’s loss would
exceed S’s ability to use the loss if S had
not joined the P group. As an
illustration, assume further that, in Year
3, the P group has $200 of income, with
no net amount of income or loss
attributable to S. Because S’s cumulative
register would remain at $0, the P group
would not be able to offset any of its
$200 Year 3 income with S’s Year 1
SRLY NOL. If S’s cumulative register
were reduced solely by the amount of
the SRLY NOL deducted in Year 2
($320), S would have $80 remaining in
its cumulative register ($400¥$320),
and the P group could absorb an
additional $64 (that is, the lesser of $480
or 80 percent of the excess of $80 over
$0) of S’s remaining Year 1 SRLY NOL
in Year 3. In contrast, if S had not joined
the P group and had not generated any
income in Year 3, it would not have
been able to use any of its $480
remaining Year 1 SRLY NOL in Year 3.
In other words, S would have been able
to use a total of only $320 of its Year
1 SRLY NOL in Years 2 and 3.
Therefore, absent an adjustment to S’s
cumulative register to account for the
80-percent limitation, S would achieve
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40931
a different result as a member of a
consolidated group than if S had
remained a stand-alone entity. As
explained earlier in this part II.B.3 of
this Explanation of Provisions, such a
result would be inconsistent with the
purpose of the SRLY regime. See the
preamble to TD 8823 published in the
Federal Register July 2, 1999 (64 FR
36092).
C. Recomputation of Amount of CNOL
Attributable to Each Member
Section 1.1502–21(b)(2)(i) generally
provides that, if a group has a CNOL
that is carried to another taxable year,
the CNOL is apportioned among the
group’s members. For this purpose,
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv) provides a fraction,
the numerator of which is the separate
NOL of each member for the
consolidated return year of the loss
(determined by taking into account only
the member’s items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss), and the
denominator of which is the sum of the
separate NOLs of all members for that
year.
If a member’s portion of a CNOL is
absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata
basis, the percentage of the CNOL
attributable to each member must be
recomputed to reflect the proper
allocation of the remaining CNOL. For
instance, if a portion of a CNOL
allocable to a nonlife insurance
company is carried back to and
absorbed in a prior taxable year under
the special rule for nonlife insurance
companies that applies for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2020 (see
part I.B of the Background), all or some
portion of the CNOL allocable to the
nonlife insurance company is reduced
even though the portion of the CNOL
allocable to other members remains
untouched. Therefore, the allocation of
the remaining CNOL must be
recomputed.
Accordingly, these proposed
regulations provide that, if a member’s
portion of a CNOL is absorbed or
reduced on a non-pro rata basis, the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
each member is recomputed. The
recomputed percentage of the CNOL
attributable to each member equals the
remaining CNOL attributable to the
member at the time of the
recomputation, divided by the sum of
the remaining CNOL attributable to all
of the remaining members at the time of
the recomputation. In other words, if at
the time of the recomputation a
member’s attributable portion of the
group’s remaining CNOL equals $20,
and the sum of the remaining CNOL
attributable to all of the group’s
remaining members equals $80, the
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40932
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
recomputed percentage of the CNOL
attributable to the member would equal
25 percent.
Proposed regulations (REG–101652–
10) published in the Federal Register
(80 FR 33211) on June 11, 2015 (2015
proposed regulations) contained a
similar rule (see § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of the 2015 proposed
regulations). These proposed regulations
withdraw proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of the 2015 proposed
regulations and re-propose substantially
similar language in new proposed
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2).
D. Farming Losses
For a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020, section 172(b)(1)(B)
permits the portion of a taxpayer’s NOL
for the taxable year that is a farming loss
to be carried back two years. Under that
provision, the term ‘‘farming loss’’
means the lesser of the amount that
would be the NOL if only the income
and deductions attributable to farming
businesses (as defined in section
263A(e)(4)) were taken into account, or
the amount of a taxpayer’s NOL for the
year.
Whereas the special nonlife insurance
company rules in section 172 apply
based on the status of the entity that
generated the loss, the special farming
loss carryback rules in section 172 apply
based on the character of the loss; that
is, whether the loss resulted from
farming activity. The special rule for
farming losses creates a situation similar
to that addressed in United Dominion
Industries, Inc. v. United States, 532
U.S. 822 (2001), which involved the
calculation within a consolidated group
of a product liability loss (PLL). A PLL
was a ‘‘special status loss’’ that was
subject to a 10-year carryback period
and that was equal to the aggregate of all
members’ product liability expenses
(PLEs), limited by the NOL for the year.
A consolidated group generally is
treated as having a single, unitary CNOL
for a taxable year (based on all items of
income and loss in the group) that is
allocated among members only for
specified purposes, including
carrybacks and carryovers to other
taxable years. See § 1.1502–21(e)
(defining the term ‘‘CNOL’’); § 1.1502–
11(a) (setting forth the general
computation for determining CTI).
Because the regulations under section
1502 did not allocate the CNOL for
purposes of calculating the limitation on
PLL, the Supreme Court held that the
amount of a group’s PLL was limited by
the entire amount of the group’s CNOL.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–140668–07) published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 57452) on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
September 17, 2012 (2012 proposed
regulations), the Treasury Department
and the IRS provided rules regarding the
apportionment of CNOLs that contain a
component portion of a special status
loss, such as a corporate equity
reduction interest loss or a specified
liability loss. Such losses, like farming
losses and the PLLs that were
considered in United Dominion, were
subject to special carryback rules. The
2012 proposed regulations effectuated
the holding in United Dominion that a
group’s CNOL, which is the limit on the
amount of a group’s special status
losses, may be generated anywhere in
the group. See 77 FR 57452, 57458. On
that basis, the 2012 proposed
regulations apportioned such special
status losses to each group member that
generated a loss in the year in which the
special status loss was incurred,
regardless of whether any specific
member had undertaken the activities
that generated the expenses that
effectively were granted special status.
See id.
Consistent with the 2012 proposed
regulations, these proposed regulations
re-propose, in modified form, a specific
rule regarding the apportionment of
CNOLs that include farming losses
arising in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020, or other special
status losses. See proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(D). (Due to the TCJA’s
removal of the corporate equity
reduction interest loss provisions in
former section 172(g), proposed
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(D) does not
contain explicit rules governing such
losses.) Under proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(D), the portion of the CNOL
constituting a special status loss is
apportioned to each group member
separately from the remainder of the
CNOL under the method provided in
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv). Consistent with
the 2012 proposed regulations, this
apportionment occurs without separate
inquiry into whether a particular
member actually incurred the special
status loss. See 77 FR 57452, 57458.
These proposed regulations withdraw
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(C), as proposed in
the 2012 proposed regulations. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments regarding this
approach.
E. Elections To Waive Portions of the
Five-Year Carryback Period Under
Section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)
Temporary regulations in the Rules
and Regulations section of this issue of
the Federal Register add new
paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) to the
regulations in § 1.1502–21. The
temporary regulations provide rules to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
permit consolidated groups that acquire
new members that were members of
another consolidated group to elect to
waive all or part of the pre-acquisition
portion of an extended carryback period
under section 172 for certain losses
attributable to the acquired members.
The text of those regulations also serves
as the text of § 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and
(D) of these proposed regulations. The
preamble to the temporary regulations
explains the amendments.
III. Amendments to § 1.1502–47
A. Overview
1. Legislative Background at the Time
the Current Life-Nonlife Regulations
Were Promulgated
The Life Insurance Company Income
Tax Act of 1959, Public Law 86–69, 73
Stat. 112 (June 25, 1959), established a
three-phase system of taxation for life
insurance companies (also referred to as
life companies). Under the first phase of
this three-phase system (phase 1), a life
company was taxed on the lesser of its
taxable investment income (TII) or its
gain from operations (GO). If a
company’s GO exceeded its TII, the
company was taxed on 50 percent of
such excess (phase 2). The other half of
the GO in excess of TII was added, along
with certain other items, to the
policyholders surplus account, which
was taxed when distributed to
shareholders of a stock company (phase
3). Life companies also were permitted
certain deductions that were unique to
insurance companies, such as increases
in reserves to the extent not funded out
of the policyholders’ share of
investment income.
Prior to the enactment of the Tax
Reform Act of 1976, Public Law 94–455,
90 Stat. 1520 (October 4, 1976) (1976
Act), life companies were prohibited
from filing consolidated returns with
nonlife companies, including both
nonlife insurance companies and other
types of corporations. This prohibition
resulted in part from historical
differences between the taxation of life
companies and nonlife companies.
Section 1507 of the 1976 Act (90 Stat.
1520, 1739–41) permitted life
companies to consolidate with nonlife
companies, subject to additional
restrictions that do not apply to a
regular consolidated group. Section
1503(c)(1) (as amended by the 1976 Act
and subsequent tax legislation) provides
that, if the nonlife company members of
a life-nonlife group (nonlife members)
have a loss for the taxable year, then
under regulations to be issued by the
Secretary, the amount of the loss that
cannot be carried back and absorbed by
the taxable income of the nonlife
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
members can be taken into account in
determining the CTI of the group only
to the extent of the lesser of 35 percent
of such loss or 35 percent of the taxable
income of the life company members of
the group (life members). Further,
section 1503(c)(2) (as so amended)
provides that the losses of a recent
nonlife affiliate may not be used by a
life company before the sixth taxable
year the companies have been members
of the same affiliated group.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Current Life-Nonlife Regulations
The current life-nonlife regulations
adopted a subgroup method for
computing a life-nonlife group’s CTI.
Under the subgroup method, the nonlife
members and the life members generally
are treated as if the members compose
two separate consolidated groups, with
certain exceptions (including
intercompany transactions, as defined
in § 1.1502–13(b)(1)(i)). Thus, each of
the life subgroup and the nonlife
subgroup separately calculates its
taxable income. Subgroup losses that are
eligible to be carried back must be
carried back to offset subgroup income
in prior taxable years before being used
to offset income of the other subgroup
in the current taxable year, and
subgroup losses may not be carried back
to offset income of the other subgroup
in prior taxable years.
Further, a carryback of a subgroup
loss may ‘‘bump’’ the loss of the other
subgroup used in the carryback year
(that is, the loss that is carried back may
supplant a loss of the other subgroup in
the carryback year). See § 1.1502–
47(a)(2)(ii). For example, assume that
life subgroup losses were used to offset
nonlife subgroup income in Year 1. If
the nonlife subgroup incurs losses in
Year 2 that are eligible to be carried
back to Year 1, those Year 2 nonlife
subgroup losses (rather than the Year 1
life subgroup losses) would be used to
offset the nonlife subgroup’s income in
Year 1. The ‘‘bumped’’ life subgroup
losses from Year 1 then would be
carried over to future taxable years.
3. Legislative Changes Regarding the
Taxation of Insurance Companies Since
Promulgation of the Current LifeNonlife Regulations
The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984,
Public Law 98–369, 98 Stat. 494 (July
18, 1984) (1984 Act), significantly
altered the taxation of life companies.
The 1984 Act replaced the three-phase
system with a statutory mechanism
similar to that used to calculate the
Federal income tax liability of other
corporate taxpayers. Specifically,
section 801(a) imposes an income tax on
the life insurance company taxable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
income (LICTI) of a life company, and
section 801(b) defines ‘‘life insurance
company taxable income’’ as life
insurance gross income less life
insurance deductions. The legislative
history of the 1984 Act indicates that, in
part, Congress changed the taxation of
life companies in order to simplify the
Code. See Staff of the Joint Comm. on
Tax’n, 98th Cong., General Explanation
of the Revenue Provisions of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 1984, at 577
(December 31, 1984).
In turn, the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
Public Law 99–514, 100 Stat. 2085
(October 22, 1986) (1986 Act), modified
the taxation of nonlife insurance
companies. Prior to the 1986 Act,
nonlife insurance companies were
permitted to defer unearned premium
income while currently deducting the
expenses associated with earning such
income, which created a timing
mismatch between the income and
expenses of nonlife insurance
companies. The 1986 Act addressed this
mismatch by requiring a nonlife
insurance company to reduce its
deduction for unearned premium
income by 20 percent. The 1986 Act
also repealed special rates, deductions,
and exemptions for small mutual
insurance companies and added a single
provision (section 831(b)) for both small
mutual insurance companies and small
stock insurance companies.
Lastly, the TCJA made significant
additional changes to the taxation of life
insurance companies, and the CARES
Act added a special rule for such
companies in section 172(b)(1)(D)(iii).
These changes are described in detail in
part II of the Background.
B. Summary of Proposed Changes to
§ 1.1502–47
As a result of changes in the taxation
of insurance companies under the TCJA
and prior legislation, various provisions
in § 1.1502–47 currently are outdated.
Accordingly, to the extent preempted by
statute, the current regulations have no
application. These proposed regulations
update § 1.1502–47 by: (1) Removing
paragraphs implementing statutory
provisions that have been repealed; (2)
revising paragraphs implementing
statutory provisions that have been
substantially revised; (3) updating
terminology and statutory references to
account for other statutory changes; and
(4) removing paragraphs that contain
obsolete transition rules or that are no
longer applicable because the effective
dates in the current life-nonlife
regulations have passed.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40933
1. Removal of Paragraphs Due to
Repealed Statutory Provisions
Certain paragraphs in § 1.1502–47 are
no longer relevant to the calculation of
life-nonlife CTI because of the repeal of
the three-phase system by the 1984 Act
and later amendments to the Code.
Therefore, these proposed regulations
remove numerous paragraphs including
current §§ 1.1502–47(k) and (l), which
provide rules for calculating
consolidated TII and the consolidated
GO or loss from operations (LO). These
proposed regulations also remove (i)
§ 1.1502–47(f)(7)(ii), which generally
provides that the consolidated tax
liability of a life-nonlife group includes
the tax described by section 1201, and
(ii) § 1.1502–47(o), which provides rules
for calculating the alternative tax
imposed by section 1201 on
consolidated capital gain. (As noted in
part II of the Background, section 1201
was repealed by the TCJA.)
2. Updates Reflecting Substantially
Revised Statutory Provisions
These proposed regulations also
update § 1.1502–47 to reflect changes to
certain statutory provisions since the
current life-nonlife regulations were
promulgated. For example, these
proposed regulations modify current
§ 1.1502–47(f)(5) (relating to the
dividends received deduction) to reflect
changes by the 1986 Act to sections
805(a)(4) and 818(e)(2) (for life
companies) and to reflect changes by the
1986 Act and the Technical and
Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988,
Public Law 100–647, 102 Stat. 3342
(November 10, 1988), respectively, to
sections 832(b)(5)(B) and (g) (for nonlife
insurance companies). Under modified
§ 1.1502–47(f)(5) (that is, proposed
§ 1.1502–47(d)(5)), dividends received
by an insurance company from another
includible member of the group are
treated as if the group were not filing a
consolidated return. To reflect the
repeal of section 815 by the TCJA, these
proposed regulations also remove
current § 1.1502–47(g)(3) (which
provides that life-nonlife groups must
include any amounts subtracted under
section 815 from life members’
policyholders surplus accounts).
Additionally, these proposed
regulations update the rules relating to
consolidated LICTI to reflect the repeal
of the three-phase system by the 1984
Act and other changes to the taxation of
life companies. These proposed
regulations also move certain provisions
in current § 1.1502–47(k) (consolidated
TII) and (l) (consolidated GO or LO) that
remain applicable following the repeal
of the three-phase system to revised
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40934
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (g), and they implement the
special rule for life insurance companies
in section 172(b)(1)(D)(iii) under the
CARES Act.
3. Revisions to Account for Other
Statutory Changes
These proposed regulations also
update terminology and citations to the
Code to reflect current law. For
example, these proposed regulations
remove references to section 821 and
mutual insurance companies because
the statutory provisions regarding
mutual insurance companies were
repealed by the 1986 Act. Additionally,
these proposed regulations replace
references to section 802 with references
to section 801 because section 802 was
repealed by the 1984 Act. Similarly,
these proposed regulations replace
references to the LO with references to
the NOL deduction under section 172 to
reflect the repeal of section 810 by the
TCJA.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Removal of Obsolete Transition Rules
and Other Rules That No Longer Are
Applicable
These proposed regulations propose
the removal of transition rules regarding
the implementation of the current lifenonlife regulations, since those
transition rules apply to carryovers that
either have been absorbed or have
expired. For example, the proposed
regulations propose the removal of
current § 1.1502–47(h)(3) (setting forth
transition rules for NOLs attributable to
taxable years ending before January 1,
1981), current § 1.1502–47(k)(6)
(containing a similar rule for certain
capital loss carryovers), and current
§ 1.1502–47(e)(4) (granting certain lifenonlife groups permission to
discontinue filing a consolidated return
for the group’s first taxable year for
which the current life-nonlife
regulations were effective).
These proposed regulations also
would remove cross-references to
certain prior-law regulations that are
designated with an ‘‘A’’ because those
regulations generally are applicable to
years ending in 1999 or earlier.
Additionally, these proposed
regulations would remove crossreferences to § 1.1502–18 (relating to
inventory adjustments) because that
section does not apply to taxable years
beginning after July 11, 1995.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Dates
The regulations in proposed § 1.1502–
21 generally are proposed to be
applicable to losses arising in taxable
years beginning after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of a
Treasury decision adopting these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
proposed rules as final regulations
(Publication Date). The regulations in
proposed §§ 1.1502–1 and 1.1502–47
generally are proposed to be applicable
to taxable years beginning after the
Publication Date. However, a taxpayer
deducting post-2017 NOLs on (1)
original returns, (2) amended returns, or
(3) applications for tentative carryback
adjustments, filed for taxable years
beginning on or before the Publication
Date, may rely on these proposed
regulations concerning the Federal
income tax treatment of post-2017 NOLs
with regard to those filings if the
taxpayer relies on the proposed
regulations in their entirety and in a
consistent manner.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563, 13771, and
12866 direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
These proposed regulations have been
designated as subject to review under
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax
regulations. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs has designated
the proposed regulations as significant
under section 1(b) of the Memorandum
of Agreement. Accordingly, OMB has
reviewed the proposed regulations.
A. Background and Need for
Regulations
In general, taxpayers whose
deductions exceed their income
generate a net operating loss (NOL),
calculated under the rules of section
172. Section 172 also governs the use of
NOLs generated in other years to offset
taxable income in the current year.
Regulations issued under the authority
of section 1502 may be used to govern
how section 172 applies to consolidated
groups of C corporations. In general, a
consolidated group generates a
combined NOL at an aggregate level
(CNOL), with the CNOL generally equal
to the loss generated from treating the
consolidated group as a single entity.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Under regulations promulgated prior to
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the
allowed CNOL deduction was equal to
the lesser of the CNOL carryover or the
combined taxable income of the group
(before the CNOL deduction).
The TCJA and the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security Act
(CARES Act) made several changes to
section 172. First, the TCJA and the
CARES Act disallowed the carry back of
NOLs generated in taxable years
beginning after 2020, except for farming
losses and losses incurred by
corporations that are insurance
companies other than life insurance
companies (nonlife insurance
companies). Second, the TCJA and the
CARES Act limited the NOL deduction
in taxable years beginning after 2020 for
NOLs generated in 2018 or later (post2017 NOLs) to 80 percent of taxable
income determined after the deduction
for pre-2018 NOLs but before the
deduction for post-2017 NOLs. This 80percent limitation does not apply to
nonlife insurance companies.
These proposed regulations
implement the changes to section 172 in
the context of consolidated groups. In
particular, regulations are needed to
address three issues related to
consolidated groups that were not
expressly addressed in the TCJA or the
CARES Act. First, the proposed
regulations describe how to determine
the 80-percent limitation in the case of
a ‘‘mixed’’ group—that is, a
consolidated group containing nonlife
insurance companies and other
members. Second, the proposed
regulations address the calculation and
allocation of farming losses. Third, the
proposed regulations implement the 80percent limitation into existing
regulations to determine the CNOL
deduction attributable to losses a
member arising during periods in which
that member was not part of that group.
Part I.B of this Special Analyses
describes the manner by which the
proposed regulations addresses each of
these issues.
Part I.B also describes an alternative
approach that was contemplated by the
Treasury Department and the IRS
regarding the allocation of currently
generated losses to nonlife insurance
companies and other members. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
elected not to implement this approach.
B. Overview of the Proposed
Regulations
In this part I.B the following terms are
used. The term ‘‘P group’’ means a
consolidated group of which P is the
common parent. The term ‘‘P&C
member’’ means a member of the P
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
group that is a nonlife insurance
company. The term ‘‘C member’’ means
a member of the P group that is a
corporation other than nonlife insurance
company.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Application of 80-Percent Limitation
in Mixed Groups
Under the statute, the general rule for
determining the NOL deduction (for a
taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020) effectively proceeds in two
steps. First, the taxpayer deducts pre2018 NOLs without limit. Second, the
taxpayer deducts post-2017 NOLs up to
80 percent of the taxpayer’s taxable
income (computed without regard to the
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) determined after the deduction
of pre-2018 NOLs (but, naturally, before
the deduction for post-2017 NOLs).
However, this 80-percent limitation
does not apply for corporations that are
nonlife insurance companies.
The application of the 80-percent
limitation to the P group is
straightforward if (i) there are no pre2018 NOLs and (ii) both classes of P&C
members and C members have positive
income before the CNOL deduction. In
that case, these proposed regulations
provide, quite naturally, that the CNOL
limitation is determined by adding (i)
the pre-CNOL income generated by the
class of C members (C member income
pool), determined by applying the 80percent limitation, plus (ii) 100 percent
of the pre-CNOL income generated by
the class of P&C members (P&C member
income pool). This latter treatment
reflects the rule in section 172(f) that
nonlife insurance companies are not
subject to the 80-percent limitation.
One complication arises when the
pre-CNOL C member income pool is
positive and the pre-CNOL P&C income
pool is negative, and the P group has
positive combined pre-CNOL taxable
income. In this case (where the preCNOL income is generated by C
members, rather than P&C members),
these proposed regulations provide that
the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit is
determined by applying the 80-percent
limitation to the income of the P group.
If the situation were reversed, such that
the P group had positive combined
taxable income but the pre-CNOL
income is generated by P&C members,
rather than the C members, the post2017 CNOL deduction limit is equal to
the income of the P group (that is,
determined without regard to the 80percent limitation). In essence, in these
situations, the amount of the P group’s
income able to absorb a post-2017 CNOL
carryover is defined by the member pool
(that is, the C member income pool or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
the P&C member income pool) that is
generating the income.
The other complication occurs when
there is a pre-2018 NOL. In this
situation, it matters whether the pre2018 NOL is treated as reducing the
amount of the C member income pool or
reducing the amount of P&C member
income pool. Consider the following
example (Example 1). In Example 1, the
P group carries $50 in pre-2018 NOLs
and $1000 in post-2017 NOLs to 2021.
In 2021, the P&C members and the C
members, respectively, earn (pre-CNOL)
income of $100. If the pre-2018 NOL
were treated as solely reducing the
amount of C member income pool, then
the limitation for the post-2017 CNOL
deduction would be $100 plus 80
percent of $50 ($100 minus $50), equal
to $140. If the pre-2018 NOL were
treated as solely reducing the amount of
the P&C member income pool, then the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
P group would be $50 ($100 minus $50)
plus 80 percent of $100, or $130.
These proposed regulations allocate
the pre-2018 NOL pro-rata to the C
member income pool and the P&C
member income pool in proportion to
their current-year income. In Example 1,
$25 of the pre-2018 NOL would be
allocated to the C member income pool
and $25 to the P&C member income
pool. Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the P group would
be $75 ($100 minus $25) plus 80 percent
of $75 ($100 minus $25), or $135.
2. Farming Losses
Section 172 provides NOLs arising in
a taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020, may not be carried back to
prior years, with two exceptions: (1)
Farming losses and (2) nonlife insurance
company losses. Section 172(b)(1)(B)
defines a ‘‘farming loss’’ as the smaller
of the actual loss from farming activities
in a given year (that is, the excess of the
deductions in farming activities over
income in farming activities) and the
total NOL generated in that year. This
statutory provision means that if a
taxpayer incurs a loss in farming
activities but has overall income in
other activities, the farming loss will be
smaller than the loss in farming
activities (and can possibly be zero).
Regulations were needed to clarify
two issues that arise in the context of
consolidated groups. First, these
regulations clarify that the maximum
amount of farming loss is the CNOL of
the group rather than the NOL of the
specific member generating the loss in
farming activities. This approach closely
follows regulations issued by the
Treasury Department and the IRS in
2012 in an analogous setting.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40935
Second, given the overlapping
categories of carryback-eligible NOLs
(farming losses and nonlife insurance
companies), regulations are needed to
allocate the farming loss to the various
members to determine the total amount
of CNOL that can be carried back.
Consider the following example
(Example 2). In Example 2, the P group
consists of one C member and one P&C
member. In 2021, the C member’s only
activity is farming and the C member
incurs a loss of $30, while the P&C
member incurs a loss of $10. The total
farming loss is $30, since $30 is less
than the P group CNOL of $40. If this
farming loss were allocated entirely to
the C member, then the total amount
eligible for carryback would be $40 (that
is, $30 for the farming loss and $10 for
the loss incurred by the P&C member).
By contrast, if the farming loss were
allocated entirely to the P&C member,
only $30 would be eligible to be carried
back.
Again, following a similar rule as the
2012 regulations, these proposed
regulations allocate the farming loss to
each member of the group in proportion
with their share of total losses, without
regard to whether each member actually
engaged in farming. In Example 2, this
would allocate $7.50 (that is, one-fourth
of $30) of the farming loss to the P&C
member and the remaining $22.50 (that
is, three-fourths of $30) to the C
member. Therefore, the P group would
be allowed to carry back $32.50 total
(that is, the $10 of loss generated by the
P&C member and the $22.50 of farming
losses allocated to the C member).
3. Separate Return Loss Year Limitation
To reduce ‘‘loss trafficking,’’ existing
regulations under section 1502 limit the
extent to which a consolidated group
(that is, the P group) can claim a CNOL
attributable to losses generated by some
member (M) in years in which M was
not a member. In particular, existing
rules limit this amount of loss to the
amount of the loss that would have been
deductible had M remained a separate
entity; that is, the rules are designed to
preserve neutrality in loss use between
being a separate entity or a member of
a group. Existing rules operationalize
this principle using the mechanic of a
‘‘cumulative register.’’ The cumulative
register is equal to the (cumulative)
amount of M’s income that is taken into
account in the P group’s income.
Income earned by M while a member of
the P group increases the cumulative
register, while losses (carried over or
otherwise) taken into account by the
group reduce the cumulative register. In
general, the existing rules provide that
M’s pre-group NOLs cannot offset the P
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40936
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
group’s income when the cumulative
register is less than or equal to zero.
The introduction of the 80-percent
limitation in the TCJA and CARES Act
necessitates an adjustment to this
mechanism in order to retain this
neutrality-in-loss-use property. In
particular, these proposed regulations
provide that any losses by M that are
absorbed by the P group and subject to
the 80-percent limitation cause a
reduction to the register equal to the full
amount of income needed to support
that deduction. The following example
(Example 3) demonstrates why this
adjustment is necessary. In Example 3,
P and S are each corporations other than
nonlife insurance companies (that is,
they are subject to the 80-percent
limitation). Suppose in 2021, S incurs a
loss of $800, which is the only loss
incurred by S. In 2022, S incurs income
of $400. If S were not a member of a
consolidated group, its 2022 NOL
deduction would be limited to $320 (80
percent of $400). Suppose instead that
P acquires S in 2022 and that P has
separate income of $600 in 2022, so the
consolidated group has $1000 in preCNOL income in 2022. Before claiming
any CNOLs, S’s cumulative register
would increase to $400 in 2022.
Without any additional rules, the $400
cumulative register would allow P to
claim a CNOL of $400 (bringing the
register down to zero), greater than what
would have been allowed had S
remained a separate entity. By contrast,
requiring the register to be reduced by
125 percent of the NOL (as under the
current NPRM) allows P to claim only
a $320 CNOL, replicating the result if S
were a separate entity.
4. Allocation of Current Losses to
Nonlife Insurance Companies
In general, under the TCJA and
CARES Act, taxpayers may not carry
back any losses generated in tax years
beginning after 2020, with the exception
of losses generated by nonlife insurance
companies and farming losses. Existing
regulations clarify that CNOLs are
allocated to each member in proportion
to the total loss. This allocation rule can
be illustrated by example (Example 4).
In Example 4, the C member has a
current loss of $10 (in a tax year
beginning in 2021 or later). The P&C
members are corporations PC1 and PC2.
PC1 has a gain of $40 and PC2 has a loss
of $40. Assume that the P group does
not engage in any farming activities. The
CNOL for the P group is $10. The $10
of CNOL is allocated to the C member
and PC2 in proportion to their total
losses. The C member has one-fifth of
the total loss ($10 divided by $50) and
PC2 has four-fifths. Therefore, under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
existing regulations, the C member is
allocated $2 ($10 times one-fifth) and
PC2 is allocated $8 ($10 times fourfifths). In the end, $8 of the CNOL may
be carried back in Example 4. The
proposed regulations do not alter these
existing regulations.
In formulating these proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS contemplated an alternative
approach. Under this alternative,
consolidated groups would be required
to compute gain and loss by grouping
P&C members and C members
separately prior to allocating CNOL to
members. The application of this
approach can be seen by revisiting
Example 4. Under this alternative
approach, because the P&C members as
a whole do not have a loss, no CNOL
would be allocated to any P&C member
regardless of the gain or loss of any of
the individual P&C members. Thus,
under the alternative approach, none of
the $10 CNOL would be eligible for
carryback in Example 4.
C. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
In this analysis, the Treasury
Department and the IRS assess the
benefits and costs of the proposed
regulations relative to a no-action
baseline reflecting anticipated Federal
income tax-related behavior in the
absence of these regulations.
2. Summary of Economic Effects
The proposed regulations provide
certainty and clarity to taxpayers
regarding the treatment of NOLs under
section 172 and the regulations under
section 1502. In the absence of such
guidance, the chance that different
taxpayers would interpret the statute
and the regulations differently would be
exacerbated. Similarly situated
taxpayers might interpret those rules
differently, with one taxpayer pursuing
an economic opportunity that another
taxpayer might decline to make because
of different interpretations of the ability
of losses to offset taxable income. If this
second taxpayer’s activity were more
profitable, the resulting economic
decisions are inefficient. Such situations
are more likely to arise in the absence
of guidance. While no guidance can
curtail all differential or inaccurate
interpretations of the statute, the
regulations significantly mitigate the
chance for differential or inaccurate
interpretations and thereby increase
economic efficiency.
To the extent that the specific
provisions of the proposed regulations
result in the acceleration or delay of the
tax year in which taxpayers deduct an
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NOL relative to the baseline, those
taxpayers may face a change in the
present value of the after-tax return to
new investment, particularly investment
that may result in losses. The resulting
changes in the incentives facing the
taxpayer are complex and may lead the
taxpayer either to increase, decrease, or
leave unchanged the volume and risk
level of its investment portfolio, relative
to the baseline, in ways that depend on
the taxpayer’s stock of NOLs and the
depreciation schedules and income
patterns of investments they would
typically consider, including whether
the investment is subject to bonus
depreciation. Because these elements
are complex and taxpayer-specific and
because the sign of the effect on
investment is generally ambiguous, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
not projected the specific effects on
economic activity arising from the
proposed regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that any such effects will be
small relative to the baseline. The
effects are small because the regulations
apply only to consolidated groups; in
addition, several provisions of the
proposed regulations apply only to the
extent that a consolidated group
contains a mix of member types.
Moreover, the effects are small because:
(i) For provisions of the proposed
regulations that affect the deduction for
pre-2018 NOLs, the effects are limited to
the stock of the pre-2018 NOLs; and (ii)
for provisions that affect the allowable
rate of loss usage of post-2017 NOLs, the
effect arises only from the 20 percentage
point differential in the deduction for
these NOLs. This latter effect in
particular, to which the bulk of the
provisions apply, is too small to
substantially affect taxpayers’ use of
NOLs and thus too small to lead to
meaningful changes in economic
decisions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have not provided quantitative
estimates of the effects of these
regulations relative to the baseline
because they do not have readily
available models that predict the effects
of these tax treatments of consolidated
group NOLs on the investments or other
activities that consolidated groups
might undertake. The Treasury
Department and the IRS solicit
comments on this analysis and on the
economic effects of these proposed
regulations, and particularly solicit data,
models, or other evidence that could
enhance the rigor with which the final
regulations are developed.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
4. Affected Taxpayers
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Allocation of CNOLs to Specific
Members of Consolidated Groups
The proposed regulations do not
amend existing rules for the allocation
of the CNOL within consolidated
groups. The proposed regulations follow
existing rules and allocate the CNOLs to
each member of the group in proportion
to the total loss.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
considered an alternative approach that
would have required groups to compute
gain and loss at the subgroup level prior
to allocating CNOL to members. Recall
Example 4 in which the PC subgroup
had no gain or loss but the C subgroup
had a loss of $10. Under this alternative
approach, because the PC subgroup as a
whole does not have a loss, no CNOL
would be allocated to any member in
the PC group regardless of the gain or
loss of any of the individual members of
PC. Thus, in Example 4, none of the $10
CNOL would be eligible for carryback.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize that as a result of the TCJA
and the CARES Act the adopted
approach of allocating losses to each
member may provide groups with a
potential incentive, relative to the
alternative approach, to split their C
members into several corporations—
some with loss and some with gain. In
certain circumstances, such a strategy
would effectively enable some share of
the losses generated by the other C
members to be carried back. This change
in the business structure of consolidated
groups may entail economic costs
because, to the extent this strategy is
pursued, it would result from tax-driven
rather than market-driven
considerations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS project,
however, that the adopted approach will
have lower compliance costs for
taxpayers, relative to the alternative
approach, because it generally follows
existing regulatory practice for
allocating losses within a consolidated
group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have not attempted to estimate the
economic consequences of either of
these effects but project them to be
small. The effects are projected to be
small because (i) only a small number
of taxpayers are likely to be affected; (ii)
any reorganization that occurs due to
the proposed regulations will primarily
be ‘‘on paper’’ and entail little or no
economic loss; and (iii) the compliance
burden of loss allocation, under either
the proposed regulations or the
alternative approach, is not high.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that these regulations will
primarily affect consolidated groups
that contain at least one nonlife
insurance member and at least one
member that is not a nonlife insurance
company. Based on data from 2015, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
calculate that there were 1,130 such
consolidated groups. Approximately
460 of these groups were of ‘‘mixed
loss’’ status, meaning that at least one
nonlife insurance member had a gain
and one other member had a loss, or
vice versa.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
For information regarding the
collection of information in § 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(C) of these proposed
regulations (including where to submit
comments on this collection of
information and on the accuracy of the
estimated burden), please refer to the
preamble to the temporary regulations
under section 1502 published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
This collection of information will be
under Office of Management and Budget
control number 1545–0123, the same
control number as the collection of
information in those temporary
regulations, and the estimated burden of
this collection of information is
described in the preamble to those
temporary regulations.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that these proposed regulations
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This certification is based on
the fact that these proposed regulations
apply only to corporations that file
consolidated Federal income tax
returns, and that such corporations
almost exclusively consist of larger
businesses. Specifically, based on data
available to the IRS, corporations that
file consolidated Federal income tax
returns represent only approximately
two percent of all filers of Forms 1120
(U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return).
However, these consolidated Federal
income tax returns account for
approximately 95 percent of the
aggregate amount of receipts provided
on all Forms 1120. Therefore, these
proposed regulations would not create
additional obligations for, or impose an
economic impact on, small entities.
Accordingly, the Secretary certifies that
the proposed regulations will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40937
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this notice of
proposed rulemaking has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2020, that
threshold is approximately $156
million. This rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector in
excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
proposed rule does not have federalism
implications, does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and does
not preempt state law within the
meaning of the Executive Order.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before the proposed amendments to
the regulations are adopted as final
regulations, consideration will be given
to comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble
under the ADDRESSES heading. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed regulations. Any electronic
comments submitted, and to the extent
practicable any paper comments
submitted, will be made available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person who
timely submits electronic or written
comments. Requests for a public hearing
are also encouraged to be made
electronically. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date and time
for the public hearing will be published
in the Federal Register. Announcement
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40938
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
2020–4, 2020–17 IRB 1, provides that
until further notice, public hearings
conducted by the IRS will be held
telephonically. Any telephonic hearing
will be made accessible to people with
disabilities.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue
Rulings, and Notices cited in this
preamble are published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative
Bulletin) and are available from the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Publishing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
proposed regulations are Justin O.
Kellar, Gregory J. Galvin, and William
W. Burhop of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Corporate). However,
other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
Partial Withdrawal of Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of
26 U.S.C. 1502 and 7805, § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(C) of the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–140668–07) published
in the Federal Register (77 FR 57451) on
September 17, 2012 is withdrawn, and
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B) of the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–101652–10)
published in the Federal Register (80
FR 33211) on June 11, 2015 is
withdrawn.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income Taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAX
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.1502–1 is amended
by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read
as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 1.1502–1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Nonlife insurance company. The
term nonlife insurance company means
a member that is an insurance company
other than a life insurance company,
each as defined in section 816(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
(l) Applicability date. Paragraph (k) of
this section applies to taxable years
beginning after [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
FINAL RULE].
■ Par. 3. Section 1.1502–21 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraph
(a).Redesignating paragraph (a)
introductory text as paragraph (a)(1).
■ 2. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
■ 3. In paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(A), removing
the language ‘‘shall equal the product
of’’ with the language ‘‘equals the
product obtained by multiplying’’, and
adding in its place ‘‘such member’’ with
the language ‘‘the member’’.
■ 4. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B).
■ 5. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iv)(C)
through (E).
■ 6. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(v)
introductory text.
■ 7. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), redesignating
Examples 1 through 3 as paragraphs
(b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), respectively.
■ 8. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), redesignating
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(1) and (2),
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(1) and (2), and
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(1) and (2).
■ 9. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(D)
through (G).
■ 10. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B),
removing the language ‘‘§ 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)(2)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘§ 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(B)’’.
■ 11. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C).
■ 12. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(D).
■ 13. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(i)
introductory text.
■ 14. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C)(2),
removing the language ‘‘and’’.
■ 15. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D), removing
the language ‘‘account.’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘account; and’’.
■ 16. Adding paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E).
■ 17. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii)
introductory text, adding a new first
sentence.
■ 18. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), designating
Examples 1 through 5 as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), respectively.
■ 19. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), redesignating
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(i) through (iii)
as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through
(3), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(i) through
(vi) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(1)
through (6), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(C)(i)
through (iii) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(1) through (3), paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(D)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) through (4),
and paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(i) through
(v) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(1) through
(5).
■ 20. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(2), adding the language ‘‘, a
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
taxable year that begins on January 1,
2021’’ after the language ‘‘at the
beginning of Year 4’’.
■ 21. Revising paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(D)(2) through (4).
■ 22. Adding paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D)(5).
■ 23. Revising paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(E)(2) through (5).
■ 24. Adding paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(6)
and (c)(1)(iii)(F).
■ 25. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(v).
■ 26. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii)
introductory text, adding a new first
sentence.
■ 27. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii),
redesignating Examples 1 through 4 as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D),
respectively.
■ 28. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D), redesignating
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(i) through (vii)
as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(1) through
(7), paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(i) through
(iv) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1)
through (4), paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(C)(i)
through (iii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(C)(1) through (3), and
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(D)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(D)(1) and (2).
■ 29. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A)(3) through (7), the first
sentence of each, adding the language ‘‘,
including the limitation under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section’’
after the language ‘‘under paragraph (c)
of this section’’.
■ 30. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the first sentence,
adding the language ‘‘, none of which is
a nonlife insurance company’’ after the
language ‘‘S, T, P and M’’.
■ 31. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the fourth sentence,
adding the language ‘‘(a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020)’’
after the language ‘‘Year 3’’.
■ 32. Revising newly designated
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(3).
■ 33. Redesignating newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4) as paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
■ 34. Adding a new paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(4).
■ 35. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
■ 36. Adding paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(6).
■ 37. In paragraph (g)(5), redesignating
Examples 1 through 9 as paragraphs
(g)(5)(i) through (ix), respectively.
■ 38. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(g)(5)(i) through (ix), redesignating
paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(i) through (iii) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(A) through (C),
paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(A) through (D),
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(i) through (vi) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(A) through (F),
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(i) through (v) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(A) through (E),
and paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(i) through (vii)
as paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(A) through (G).
■ 39. Revising paragraph (h)(9).
■ 40. Adding paragraph (h)(10).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.1502–21
Net operating losses.
(a) Consolidated net operating loss
deduction—(1) In general. Subject to
any limitations under the Internal
Revenue Code or this chapter (for
example, the limitations under section
172(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2) of this
section), the consolidated net operating
loss deduction (or CNOL deduction) for
any consolidated return year is the
aggregate of the net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to the year.
The net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks consist of—
(i) Any CNOLs (as defined in
paragraph (e) of this section) of the
consolidated group; and
(ii) Any net operating losses (or NOLs)
of the members arising in separate
return years.
(2) Application of section 172 for
computing net operating loss
deductions—(i) Overview. For purposes
of § 1.1502–11(a)(2) (regarding a CNOL
deduction), the rules of section 172
regarding the use of net operating losses
are taken into account as provided by
this paragraph (a)(2) in calculating the
consolidated taxable income of a group
for a particular consolidated return year.
More specifically, the aggregate amount
of net operating losses arising in taxable
years beginning before January 1, 2018
(pre-2018 NOLs) carried to a particular
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, is added to the
group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit (as determined under this
paragraph (a)(2)) for such year for
purposes of determining the total CNOL
deduction allowed for such year. See
section 172(a)(2)(A) and (B).
(ii) Computation of the 80-percent
limitation and special rule for nonlife
insurance companies—(A)
Determinations based on status of group
members. If a portion of a CNOL arising
in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2017 (post-2017 CNOL), is
carried back or carried over to a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, whether the
members of the group include nonlife
insurance companies, other types of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
corporations, or both determines
whether section 172(a) (including the
limitation described in section
172(a)(2)(B) (80-percent limitation)),
section 172(f), or both, apply to the
group for the consolidated return year.
(B) Determination of post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit. The amount of post2017 CNOLs that may be absorbed by
one or more members of the group in a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020 (post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit) is determined under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section by
applying section 172(a)(2)(B) (that is,
the 80-percent limitation), section 172(f)
(that is, the special rule for nonlife
insurance companies), or both, to the
group’s consolidated taxable income for
that year.
(C) Inapplicability of 80-percent
limitation. The 80-percent limitation
does not apply to CNOL deductions
taken in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2021, or to CNOLs arising in
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (that is, pre-2018 CNOLs). See
section 172(a).
(iii) Computations under sections
172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f). This paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) provides rules for applying
sections 172(f) and 172(a)(2)(B) to
consolidated return years beginning
after December 31, 2020 (that is, for
computing the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit). Section 172(f) applies
to income of nonlife insurance company
members, whereas section 172(a)(2)(B)
applies to income of members that are
not nonlife insurance companies. Thus,
this paragraph (a)(2)(iii) provides
specific rules for groups with no nonlife
insurance company members, only
nonlife insurance company members, or
a combination of nonlife insurance
company members and other members.
(A) Groups without nonlife insurance
company members. If no member of a
group is a nonlife insurance company
during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
section 172(a)(2)(B) (that is, the 80percent limitation) applies to all income
of the group for that year. Therefore, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for that year is the lesser of—
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to that year; or
(2) The amount determined by
multiplying—
(i) 80 percent, by
(ii) Consolidated taxable income for
the group for that year (determined
without regard to any deductions under
sections 172, 199A, and 250) less the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year.
(B) Groups comprised solely of nonlife
insurance companies. If a group is
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40939
comprised solely of nonlife insurance
companies during a particular
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, section 172(f)
applies to all income of the group for
that year. Therefore, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for the group for
that year equals consolidated taxable
income less the aggregate amount of pre2018 NOLs carried to that year.
(C) Groups that include both nonlife
insurance companies and other
corporations—(1) General rule. Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)
of this section, if a group has at least one
member that is a nonlife insurance
company and at least one member that
is not a nonlife insurance company
during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
the group for that year equals the sum
of the amounts determined under
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this
section.
(2) Residual income pool. The amount
determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) is the lesser of—
(i) The aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to a consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
or
(ii) Eighty percent of the consolidated
taxable income of the group for that year
(determined without regard to any
income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members that are nonlife insurance
companies and without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) (residual income pool) after
subtracting the aggregate amount of pre2018 NOLs carried to that year that are
allocated to the residual income pool
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this
section (that is, by applying the 80percent limitation). See section
172(a)(2)(B).
(3) Nonlife income pool. The amount
determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) is the consolidated
taxable income of the group for a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020 (determined without
regard to any income, gain, deduction,
or loss of members included in the
computation under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section) (nonlife
income pool) less the aggregate amount
of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year
that are allocated to the nonlife income
pool under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of
this section. See section 172(f).
(4) Pro rata allocation of pre-2018
NOLs between pools of income. For
purposes of paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2)
and (3) of this section, the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to any
particular consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020, is
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40940
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
prorated between the residual income
pool and the nonlife income pool based
on the relative amounts of positive
income of those two pools. For example,
if $30 of pre-2018 NOLs is carried over
to a year in which the residual income
pool contains $75 and the nonlife
income pool contains $150, the residual
income pool is allocated $10 of the pre2018 NOLs ($30 × $75/($75 + $150), or
$30 × 1⁄3), and the nonlife income pool
is allocated the remaining $20 of pre2018 NOLs ($30 × $150/($75 + $150), or
$30 × 2⁄3).
(5) Exception. The post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the group for a
consolidated return year is determined
under this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) if
the amounts computed under
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this
section for that year are not both
positive.
(i) Positive residual income pool and
negative nonlife income pool. This
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies if
the amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the
residual income pool is positive and the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the
nonlife income pool is negative. If this
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year
equals the lesser of the aggregate
amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year, or 80 percent of the
consolidated taxable income of the
entire group (determined without regard
to any deductions under sections 172,
199A, and 250) after subtracting the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year (that is, by applying
the 80-percent limitation). See section
172(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Positive nonlife income pool and
negative residual income pool. If the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the
nonlife income pool is positive and the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the
residual income pool is negative, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year
equals the consolidated taxable income
of the entire group less the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that
year. See section 172(f).
(b) * * *
(1) Carryovers and carrybacks
generally. The net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to a taxable
year are determined under the
principles of, and are subject to any
limitations under, section 172 and this
section. Thus, losses permitted to be
absorbed in a consolidated return year
generally are absorbed in the order of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
the taxable years in which they arose,
and losses carried from taxable years
ending on the same date, and which are
available to offset consolidated taxable
income for the year, generally are
absorbed on a pro rata basis. In addition,
except as otherwise provided in this
section, the amount of any CNOL
absorbed by the group in any year is
apportioned among members based on
the percentage of the CNOL eligible for
carryback or carryover that is
attributable to each member as of the
beginning of the year. The percentage of
the CNOL attributable to a member is
determined pursuant to paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. Additional
rules provided under the Internal
Revenue Code or regulations also apply.
See, for example, section 382(l)(2)(B) (if
losses are carried from the same taxable
year, losses subject to limitation under
section 382 are absorbed before losses
that are not subject to limitation under
section 382). See paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of
this section, Example 2, for an
illustration of pro rata absorption of
losses subject to a SRLY limitation.
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(B) Percentage of CNOL attributable to
a member—(1) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of
this section, the percentage of the CNOL
for the consolidated return year
attributable to a member equals the
separate net operating loss of the
member for the consolidated return year
divided by the sum of the separate net
operating losses for that year of all
members having such losses for that
year. For this purpose, the separate net
operating loss of a member is
determined by computing the CNOL by
reference to only the member’s items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss,
including the member’s losses and
deductions actually absorbed by the
group in the consolidated return year
(whether or not absorbed by the
member).
(2) Recomputed percentage. If, for any
reason, a member’s portion of a CNOL
is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata
basis (for example, under § 1.1502–11(b)
or (c), paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C) of this
section, § 1.1502–28, or § 1.1502–36(d),
or as the result of a carryback to a
separate return year), the percentage of
the CNOL attributable to each member
is recomputed. In addition, if a member
with a separate net operating loss ceases
to be a member, the percentage of the
CNOL attributable to each remaining
member is recomputed. The recomputed
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
each member equals the remaining
CNOL attributable to the member at the
time of the recomputation divided by
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the sum of the remaining CNOL
attributable to all of the remaining
members at the time of the
recomputation. For purposes of this
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2), a CNOL that
is permanently disallowed or eliminated
is treated as absorbed.
(C) Net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks—(1) General rules. Subject
to the rules regarding allocation of
special status losses under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) of this section—
(i) Nonlife insurance companies. The
portion of a CNOL attributable to any
members of the group that are nonlife
insurance companies is carried back or
carried over under the rules in section
172(b) applicable to nonlife insurance
companies.
(ii) Corporations other than nonlife
insurance companies. The portion of a
CNOL attributable to any other members
of the group is carried back or carried
over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to corporations other than
nonlife insurance companies.
(2) Recomputed percentage. For rules
governing the recomputation of the
percentage of a CNOL attributable to
each remaining member if any portion
of the CNOL attributable to a member is
carried back under section 172(b)(1)(B)
or (C) and absorbed on a non-pro rata
basis, see paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of
this section.
(D) Allocation of special status losses.
The amount of the group’s CNOL that is
determined to constitute a farming loss
(as defined in section 172(b)(1)(B)) or
any other net operating loss that is
subject to special carryback or carryover
rules (special status loss) is allocated to
each member separately from the
remainder of the CNOL based on the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
the member, as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section.
This allocation is made without regard
to whether a particular member actually
incurred specific expenses or engaged in
specific activities required by the
special status loss provisions. This
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) applies only with
regard to losses for which the special
carryback or carryover rules are
dependent on the type of expense
generating the loss, rather than on the
special status of the entity to which the
loss is allocable. See section 172(b)(1)(C)
and paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C)(1)(i) of this
section (applicable to losses of nonlife
insurance companies). This paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) does not apply to farming
losses incurred by a consolidated group
in any taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2017, and before January
1, 2021.
(E) Coordination with rules for lifenonlife groups under § 1.1502–47. For
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
groups that include at least one member
that is a life insurance company and for
which an election is in effect under
section 1504(c)(2), see § 1.1502–47.
(v) Examples. For purposes of the
examples in this paragraph (b)(2)(v),
unless otherwise stated, all groups file
consolidated returns, all corporations
have calendar taxable years, all losses
are farming losses within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii), all taxable years
begin after December 31, 2020, the facts
set forth the only corporate activity,
value means fair market value and the
adjusted basis of each asset equals its
value, all transactions are with
unrelated persons, and the application
of any limitation or threshold under
section 382 is disregarded. The
principles of this paragraph (b) are
illustrated by the following examples:
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Example 4: Allocation of a CNOL
arising in a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020. (1) P is
the common parent of a consolidated group
that includes S. Neither P nor S is a nonlife
insurance company. The P group also
includes nonlife insurance companies PC1,
PC2, and PC3. In the P group’s 2021
consolidated return year, all members except
S have separate net operating losses, and the
P group’s CNOL in that year is $40. No
member of the P group engages in farming
activities. See section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) of this section, for purposes of
carrying losses to other taxable years, the P
group’s $40 CNOL is allocated pro rata
among the group members that have separate
net operating losses. Under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(C) of this section, those respective
portions of the CNOL attributable to PC1,
PC2, and PC3 (that is, members that are
nonlife insurance companies) are carried
back to each of the two preceding taxable
years and then carried over to each of the 20
subsequent taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(C). The portion attributable to P
(which is not a nonlife insurance company)
may not be carried back but is carried over
to future years. See section 172(b)(1)(A).
(E) Example 5: Allocation of a CNOL
arising in a consolidated return year
beginning before January 1, 2021. The facts
are the same as in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(1) of
this section, except that the P group incurred
the CNOL during the P group’s 2020
consolidated return year. The allocation
among the P group members of the CNOL
described in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(2) of this
section would be the same. However, those
respective portions of the CNOL attributable
to PC1, PC2, and PC3 (that is, members that
are nonlife insurance companies) will be
carried back to each of the five preceding
taxable years and then carried over to each
of the 20 subsequent taxable years. See
section 172(b)(1)(C) and section
172(b)(1)(D)(i). The portion attributable to P
(which is not a nonlife insurance company)
will be carried back to each of the five
preceding taxable years and then carried over
to future years. See section 172(b)(1)(A) and
section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
(F) Example 6: CNOL deduction and
application of section 172. (1) P (a type of
corporation other than a nonlife insurance
company) is the common parent of a
consolidated group that includes PC1 (a
nonlife insurance company). P and PC1 were
both incorporated in Year 1 (a year beginning
after December 31, 2020). In Year 1, P and
PC1 have separate taxable income of $20 and
$25, respectively. As a result, the P group has
Year 1 consolidated taxable income of $45.
In Year 2, P has separate taxable income of
$24, and PC1 has a separate taxable loss of
$40. Thus, the P group has a Year 2 CNOL
of $16. No member of the P group engages
in farming activities. See section
172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this
section, the P group’s Year 2 CNOL is
entirely attributable to PC1, a nonlife
insurance company. Therefore, under section
172(b)(1)(C)(i), the P group may carry back to
Year 1 all $16 of its Year 2 CNOL.
(3) Under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this
section, the amount of the Year 2 CNOL that
may be used by the P group in Year 1 is
determined by taking into account the status
40941
(nonlife insurance company or other type of
corporation) of the member that has separate
taxable income composing in whole or in
part the P group’s consolidated taxable
income. Because the P group includes both
a nonlife insurance company member and a
member that is not a nonlife insurance
company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this
section applies to determine the computation
of the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
the group for Year 1. Therefore, the 80percent limitation is applied to the residual
income pool, which consists of the taxable
income of P, a type of corporation other than
a nonlife insurance company. Under the 80percent limitation, the amount of P’s Year 1
income that may be offset by the P group’s
Year 2 CNOL is $16, which equals the lesser
of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs
carried to Year 1 ($16), or 80 percent of the
excess of P’s taxable income for that year
($20) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs allocable to P ($0), which also is $16
(80 percent × ($20¥$0)). See paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (4) of this section. PC1 is
a nonlife insurance company to which
section 172(f), rather than the 80-percent
limitation, applies. Therefore, the amount of
PC1’s Year 1 income that may be offset by the
P group’s Year 2 CNOL is $25, which equals
the excess of PC1’s taxable income for Year
1 ($25) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs allocable to PC1 ($0). See paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) and (4) of this section.
(4) Based on the analysis set forth in
paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3) of this section, the P
group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
Year 1 is $41 ($16 + $25). Because the P
group’s Year 2 CNOL is $16, this amount
would offset the Year 1 income of the P
group.
(G) Example 7: Pre-2018 and post-2017
CNOLs. (1) P is the common parent of a
consolidated group. No member of the P
group is a nonlife insurance company or is
engaged in a farming business, and no
member of the P group has a loss that is
subject to a SRLY limitation. The P group
had the following consolidated taxable
income or CNOL for the following taxable
years:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(2)(v)(G)(1)
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
$60
$0
$0
($90)
$30
($40)
($100)
$120
(2) Under section 172(a)(1), all $30 of the
P group’s 2018 consolidated taxable income
is offset by the 2017 CNOL carryover without
limitation. The remaining $60 of the P
group’s 2017 CNOL is carried over to 2021
under section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(I).
(3) Under section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I), the P
group’s $40 2019 CNOL is carried back to the
five taxable years preceding the year of the
loss. Thus, the P group’s $40 2019 CNOL is
carried back to offset $40 of its 2014
consolidated taxable income.
(4) Under section 172(a)(2) and paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, the P group’s CNOL
deduction for 2021 equals the aggregate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021
plus the group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit. The P group has $60 of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to 2021 ($90 ¥ $30). Because no
member of the P group is a nonlife insurance
company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section applies to determine the computation
of the group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for 2021. See also section 172(a)(2)(B).
Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit of the P group for 2021 is $48, which
equals the lesser of the aggregate amount of
post-2017 NOLs carried to 2021 ($100), or 80
percent of the excess of the P group’s
consolidated taxable income for that year
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
computed without regard to any deductions
under sections 172, 199A, and 250 ($120)
over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to 2021 ($60) (that is, 80 percent ×
$60). Thus, the P group’s CNOL deduction
for 2021 equals $108 ($60 pre-2018 NOLs
carried to 2021 + $48 post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit). See section 172(a)(2) and
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section. The P
group offsets $108 of its $120 of 2021
consolidated taxable income, resulting in $12
of consolidated taxable income in 2021. The
remaining $52 of the P group’s 2020 CNOL
($100¥$48) is carried over to future taxable
years. See section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II).
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40942
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) [The text of proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(C) is the same as the text of
§ 1.1502–21T(b)(3)(ii)(C) published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.]
(D) [The text of proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(D) is the same as the text of
§ 1.1502–21T(b)(3)(ii)(D) published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.]
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. Except as provided in
paragraph (g) of this section (relating to
an overlap with section 382), the
aggregate of the net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks of a member
(SRLY member) arising (or treated as
arising) in SRLYs (SRLY NOLs) that are
included in the CNOL deductions for all
consolidated return years of the group
under paragraph (a) of this section may
not exceed the aggregate consolidated
taxable income for all consolidated
return years of the group determined by
reference to only the member’s items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss
(cumulative register). For this purpose—
*
*
*
*
*
(E) If a limitation on the amount of
taxable income that may be offset under
section 172(a) (see paragraph (a)(2) of
this section) applies in a taxable year to
a member whose carryovers or
carrybacks are subject to a SRLY
limitation (SRLY member), the amount
of net operating loss subject to a SRLY
limitation that is available for use by the
group in that year is limited to the
percentage of the balance in the
cumulative register that would be
available for offset under section 172(a)
if the SRLY member filed a separate
return and reported as taxable income in
that year the amount contained in the
cumulative register. For example,
assume that a consolidated group has a
SRLY member that is a corporation
other than a nonlife insurance company,
and that the SRLY member has a SRLY
NOL that arose in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017
(post-2017 NOL). The group’s
consolidated taxable income for a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020 is $200, but the
cumulative register has a positive
balance of only $120 (and no other net
operating loss carryovers or carrybacks
are available for the year). Because the
SRLY limitation would be $96 ($120 ×
80 percent), only $96 of SRLY loss may
be used, rather than $160 ($200 × 80
percent). In addition, to the extent that
this paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) applies, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
cumulative register is decreased by the
full amount of income required under
section 172(a) to support the amount of
SRLY NOL absorption. See, for example,
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) of this
section for examples illustrating the
application of this rule.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * * For purposes of the
examples in this paragraph (c)(1)(iii), no
corporation is a nonlife insurance
company and, unless otherwise
specified, all taxable years begin after
December 31, 2020, and all CNOLs arise
in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020. * * *
(A) * * *
(2) T’s $100 net operating loss carryover
from Year 1 arose in a SRLY. See § 1.1502–
1(f)(2)(iii). P’s acquisition of T was not an
ownership change as defined by section
382(g). Thus, the $100 net operating loss
carryover is subject to the SRLY limitation in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The positive
balance of the cumulative register of T for
Year 2 equals the consolidated taxable
income of the P group determined by
reference to only T’s items, or $70. However,
due to the 80-percent limitation and the
application of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, the SRLY limitation is $56 ($70 × 80
percent). No losses from equivalent years are
available, and the P group otherwise has
sufficient consolidated taxable income to
support the CNOL deduction ($300 × 80
percent = $240). Therefore, $56 of the SRLY
net operating loss is included under
paragraph (a) of this section in the P group’s
CNOL deduction for Year 2. Although only
$56 is absorbed, the cumulative register of T
is reduced by $70, the full amount of income
necessary to support the $56 deduction after
taking into account the 80-percent limitation
($70 × 80 percent = $56).
*
*
*
*
*
(B) * * *
(2) P’s Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 are not
SRLYs with respect to the P group. See
§ 1.1502–1(f)(2)(i). Thus, P’s $40 net
operating loss arising in Year 1 and $120 net
operating loss arising in Year 3 are not
subject to the SRLY limitation under
paragraph (c) of this section. Although the P
group has $160 of taxable income in Year 4,
the 80-percent limitation reduces the P
group’s net operating loss deduction in that
year to $128 ($160 × 80 percent). Under the
principles of section 172, paragraph (b) of
this section requires that P’s $40 loss arising
in Year 1 be the first loss absorbed by the P
group in Year 4. Absorption of this loss
leaves $88 ($128 ¥ $40) of the P group’s Year
4 consolidated taxable income available for
offset by loss carryovers.
(3) T’s Year 2 and Year 3 are SRLYs with
respect to the P group. See § 1.1502–
1(f)(2)(ii). P’s acquisition of T was not an
ownership change as defined by section
382(g). Thus, T’s $50 net operating loss
arising in Year 2 and $60 net operating loss
arising in Year 3 are subject to the SRLY
limitation. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T for Year 4 equals the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
P group’s consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s items, or
$70. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, after taking into account the 80percent limitation, T’s SRLY limitation is $56
($70 × 80 percent). Therefore, the P group can
absorb up to $56 of T’s SRLY net operating
losses in Year 4. Under the principles of
section 172, T’s $50 SRLY net operating loss
from Year 2 is included under paragraph (a)
of this section in the P group’s CNOL
deduction for Year 4. After absorption of this
loss, under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section,
$6 of SRLY limit remains in Year 4 ($56 ¥
$50). Further, the total amount of Year 4
consolidated taxable income available for
offset by other loss carryovers under section
172(a) is $38 ($88 ¥ $50).
(4) P and T each carry over net operating
losses to Year 4 from a taxable year ending
on the same date (that is, Year 3). The losses
carried over from Year 3 total $180. However,
the remaining Year 4 SRLY limit is $6.
Therefore, the total amount of loss available
for absorption is $126 ($120 allocable to P
and $6 allocable to T). Under paragraph (b)
of this section, the losses available for
absorption that are carried over from Year 3
are absorbed on a pro rata basis, even though
one loss arises in a SRLY and the other loss
does not. Thus, $36.19 of P’s Year 3 loss is
absorbed ($120/($120 + $6)) × $38 = $36.19.
In addition, $1.81 of T’s Year 3 loss is
absorbed ($6/($120 + $6)) × $38 = $1.81.
(5) After deduction of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 4, the cumulative
register of T is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. A total
of $51.81 of SRLY net operating losses were
absorbed in Year 4 ($50 + $1.81). After taking
into account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $64.76 ($64.76 × 80 percent =
$51.81). Therefore, the cumulative register of
T is decreased by $64.76, and $5.24 remains
in the cumulative register ($70 ¥ $64.76).
(6) P carries its remaining $83.81 ($120 ¥
$36.19) Year 3 net operating loss and T
carries its remaining $58.19 ($60 ¥ $1.81)
Year 3 net operating loss over to Year 5.
Assume that, in Year 5, the P group has $90
of consolidated taxable income (computed
without regard to the CNOL deduction). The
P group’s consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s items is
a CNOL of $4. Therefore, the positive balance
of the cumulative register of T in Year 5
equals $1.24 ($5.24 ¥ $4). Under paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into
account the 80-percent limitation, T’s SRLY
limitation is $0.99 ($1.24 × 80 percent). For
Year 5, the total amount of Year 5
consolidated taxable income available for
offset by loss carryovers as a result of the 80percent limitation is $72 ($90 × 80 percent).
Under paragraph (b) of this section, the losses
carried over from Year 3 are absorbed on a
pro rata basis, even though one loss arises in
a SRLY and the other loss does not.
Therefore, $71.16 of P’s Year 3 loss is
absorbed (($83.81/($83.81 + $0.99)) × $72 =
$71.16). In addition, $0.83 of T’s Year 3
losses is absorbed (($0.99/($83.81 + $0.99)) ×
$72 = $0.83).
*
*
(D) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(2) Under § 1.1502–15(a), T’s $100 of
ordinary loss in Year 3 constitutes a built-in
loss that is subject to the SRLY limitation
under paragraph (c) of this section. The
amount of the limitation is determined by
treating the deduction as a net operating loss
carryover from a SRLY. The built-in loss is
therefore subject to both a SRLY limitation
and the 80-percent limitation for Year 3. The
built-in loss is treated as a net operating loss
carryover solely for purposes of determining
the extent to which the loss is not allowed
by reason of the SRLY limitation, and for all
other purposes the loss remains a loss arising
in Year 3. See § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(D).
Consequently, under paragraph (b) of this
section, the built-in loss is absorbed by the
P group before the net operating loss
carryover from Year 1 is absorbed. The
positive balance of the cumulative register of
T for Year 3 equals the P group’s
consolidated taxable income determined by
reference to only T’s items, or $60. Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after
taking into account the 80-percent limitation,
the SRLY limitation for Year 3 is $48 ($60 ×
80 percent). Therefore, $48 of the built-in
loss is absorbed by the P group. None of T’s
$100 SRLY net operating loss carryover from
Year 1 is allowed.
(3) After deduction of T’s $48 SRLY builtin loss in Year 4, the cumulative register of
T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into
account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $60 ($60 × 80 percent = $48).
Therefore, the cumulative register of T is
decreased by $60, and zero remains in the
cumulative register ($60 ¥ $60).
(4) Under § 1.1502–15(a), the $52 balance
of the built-in loss that is not allowed in Year
3 because of the SRLY limitation and the 80percent limitation is treated as a $52 net
operating loss arising in Year 3 that is subject
to the SRLY limitation because, under
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, Year 3 is
treated as a SRLY. The built-in loss is carried
to other years in accordance with the rules
of paragraph (b) of this section. The positive
balance of the cumulative register of T for
Year 4 equals $40 (zero from Year 3 + $40).
Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year 4 is
$32 ($40 × 80 percent). Therefore, under
paragraph (c) of this section, $32 of T’s $100
net operating loss carryover from Year 1 is
included in the CNOL deduction under
paragraph (a) of this section in Year 4.
(5) After deduction of T’s $32 SRLY net
operating loss in Year 4, the cumulative
register of T is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After
taking into account the 80-percent limitation,
the amount of income necessary to support
this deduction is $40 ($40 × 80 percent =
$32). Therefore, the cumulative register is
decreased by $40, and zero remains in the
cumulative register ($40 ¥ $40).
(E) * * *
(2) For Year 2, the P group computes
separate SRLY limits for each of T’s SRLY
carryovers from Year 1. The group
determines its ability to use its capital loss
carryover before it determines its ability to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
use its ordinary loss carryover. Under section
1212, because the P group has no Year 2
capital gain, it cannot absorb any capital
losses in Year 2. T’s Year 1 net capital loss
and the P group’s Year 2 consolidated net
capital loss (all of which is attributable to T)
are carried over to Year 3.
(3) The P group’s ability to deduct net
operating losses in Year 2 is subject to the 80percent limitation, based on the P group’s
consolidated taxable income for the year.
Thus, the group’s limitation for Year 2 is $72
($90 × 80 percent). However, use of the Year
1 net operating loss also is subject to the
SRLY limitation. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T applicable to SRLY
net operating losses for Year 2 equals the P
group’s consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s items, or
$60. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, after taking into account the 80percent limitation, the SRLY limitation for
Year 2 is $48 ($60 × 80 percent). Therefore,
only $48 of T’s Year 1 SRLY net operating
loss is absorbed by the P group in Year 2. T
carries over its remaining $52 of its Year 1
loss to Year 3.
(4) After deduction of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 2, the net operating
loss cumulative register is adjusted pursuant
to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. The
P group deducted $48 of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 2. After taking into
account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of taxable income necessary to
support this deduction is $60 ($60 × 80
percent = $48). Therefore, the net operating
loss cumulative register of T is decreased by
$60, and zero remains in the net operating
loss cumulative register ($60 ¥ $60).
(5) For Year 3, the P group again computes
separate SRLY limits for each of T’s SRLY
carryovers from Year 1. The group has
consolidated net capital gain (without taking
into account a net capital loss carryover
deduction) of $30. Under § 1.1502–22(c), the
aggregate amount of T’s $50 capital loss
carryover from Year 1 that is included in
computing the P group’s consolidated net
capital gain for all years of the group (in this
case, Years 2 and 3) may not exceed $30 (the
aggregate consolidated net capital gain
computed by reference only to T’s items,
including losses and deductions actually
absorbed (that is, $30 of capital gain in Year
3)). Thus, the P group may include $30 of T’s
Year 1 capital loss carryover in its
computation of consolidated net capital gain
for Year 3, which offsets the group’s capital
gains for Year 3. T carries over its remaining
$20 of its Year 1 capital loss to Year 4.
Therefore, the capital loss cumulative register
of T is decreased by $30, and zero remains
in the capital loss cumulative register ($30 ¥
$30). Further, because the net operating loss
cumulative register includes all taxable
income of T included in the P group, as well
as all absorbed losses of T (including capital
items), a zero net increase occurs in the net
operating loss cumulative register. The P
group carries over the Year 2 consolidated
net capital loss to Year 4.
(6) The P group’s ability to deduct net
operating losses in Year 3 is subject to the 80percent limitation, based on the P group’s
consolidated taxable income for the year.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40943
Thus, the P group’s taxable income for Year
3 that can be offset, before use of net
operating losses, is $40 (80 percent × the sum
of zero capital gain, after use of the capital
loss carryover, plus $50 of ordinary income).
However, use of the Year 1 net operating loss
also is subject to the SRLY limitation. The
positive balance of the cumulative register of
T applicable to SRLY net operating losses for
Year 3 equals the P group’s consolidated
taxable income determined by reference only
to T’s items, or $40. This amount equals the
sum obtained by adding the zero carryover
from Year 2, a net inclusion of zero from
capital items implicated in Year 3 ($30 ¥
$30), and $40 of taxable income in Year 3.
Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year 3 is
$32 ($40 × 80 percent). Therefore, only $32
of the Year 1 net operating loss is absorbed
by the P group in Year 3. T carries over its
remaining $20 of its Year 1 loss to Year 4.
(F) Example 6: Pre-2018 NOLs and post2017 NOLs. (1) Individual A owns P. On
January 1, 2017, A forms T. P and T are
calendar-year taxpayers. In 2017, T sustains
a $100 net operating loss that is carried over.
During 2018, 2019, and 2020, T deducts a
total of $90 of its 2017 net operating loss
against its taxable income, and T carries over
the remaining $10 of its 2017 net operating
loss. In 2021, T sustains a net operating loss
of $50. On December 31, 2021, P acquires all
the stock of T, and T becomes a member of
the P group. The P group has $300 of
consolidated taxable income in 2022
(computed without regard to the CNOL
deduction). Such consolidated taxable
income would be $70 if determined by
reference to only T’s items. The P group has
no other SRLY net operating loss carryovers
or CNOL carryovers.
(2) T’s remaining $10 of net operating loss
carryover from 2017 and its $50 net operating
loss carryover from 2021 are both SRLY
losses in the P group. See § 1.1502–1(f)(2)(iii).
P’s acquisition of T was not an ownership
change as defined by section 382(g). Thus,
T’s net operating loss carryovers are subject
to the SRLY limitation in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section. The SRLY limitation for the P
group’s 2022 consolidated return year is
consolidated taxable income determined by
reference to only T’s items, or $70.
(3) Because T’s oldest (2017) carryover was
sustained in a year beginning before January
1, 2018, its use is not subject to limitation
under section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, all $10
of T’s 2017 SRLY net operating loss (that is,
a pre-2018 NOL) is included under paragraph
(a) of this section in the P group’s CNOL
deduction for 2022. After deduction of T’s
$10 SRLY net operating loss from 2017, the
cumulative register of T is reduced on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section. Therefore, the
cumulative register of T is decreased by $10,
and $60 remains in the cumulative register
($70 ¥ $10).
(4) The P group’s deduction of T’s 2021 net
operating loss is subject to both a SRLY
limitation and the 80-percent limitation
under section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, the
total limitation on the use of T’s 2021 net
operating loss in the P group is $48 (the
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40944
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
remaining cumulative register of $60 × 80
percent). No losses from equivalent years are
available, and the P group otherwise has
sufficient consolidated taxable income to
support the CNOL deduction ($290 × 80
percent = $232). Therefore, $48 of T’s 2021
SRLY net operating loss is included under
paragraph (a) of this section in the P group’s
CNOL deduction for 2022. The remaining $2
of T’s 2021 SRLY net operating loss ($50 ¥
$48) is carried over to the P group’s 2023
consolidated return year.
(5) After deduction of T’s $48 SRLY NOL
in 2022, the cumulative register of T is
adjusted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of
this section. After taking into account the 80percent limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is $60
($60 × 80 percent = $48). Therefore, the
cumulative register of T is decreased by $60,
and zero remains in the cumulative register
($60 ¥ $60).
(2) * * *
(v) Coordination with other limitations.
This paragraph (c)(2) does not allow a net
operating loss to offset income to the extent
inconsistent with other limitations or
restrictions on the use of losses, such as a
limitation based on the nature or activities of
members. For example, a net operating loss
may not offset income in excess of any
limitations under section 172(a) and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Additionally,
any dual consolidated loss may not reduce
the taxable income to an extent greater than
that allowed under section 1503(d) and
§§ 1.1503(d)–1 through 1.1503(d)–8. See also
§ 1.1502–47(k) (relating to preemption of
rules for life-nonlife groups).
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) * * * For purposes of the examples
in this paragraph (c)(2)(viii), no corporation
is a nonlife insurance company or has any
farming losses. * * *
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(B) * * *
(3) In Year 4, the M group has $10 of
consolidated taxable income (computed
without regard to the CNOL deduction for
Year 4). That consolidated taxable income
would be $45 if determined by reference only
to the items of P, S, and T, the members
included in the SRLY subgroup with respect
to P’s loss carryover. Therefore, the positive
balance of the cumulative register of the P
SRLY subgroup for Year 4 equals $45 and,
due to the application of the 80-percent
limitation under paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this
section, the SRLY subgroup limitation under
this paragraph (c)(2) is $36 ($45 × 80
percent). However, the M group has only $10
of consolidated taxable income in Year 4.
Thus, due to the 80-percent limitation and
the application of paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the M group’s deduction of all net
operating losses in Year 4 is limited to $8
($10 × 80 percent). As a result, the M group
deducts $8 of P’s SRLY net operating loss
carryover, and the remaining $37 is carried
over to Year 5.
(4) After deduction of $8 of P’s SRLY net
operating loss in Year 4, the cumulative
register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. After taking into account the 80percent limitation, the amount of income
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
necessary to support this deduction is $10
($10 × 80 percent = $8). Therefore, the
cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup
is decreased by $10, and $35 remains in the
cumulative register ($45 ¥ $10).
(5) In Year 5, the M group has $100 of
consolidated taxable income (computed
without regard to the CNOL deduction for
Year 5). None of P, S, or T has any items of
income, gain, deduction, or loss in Year 5.
Although the members of the P SRLY
subgroup do not contribute to the $100 of
consolidated taxable income in Year 5, the
positive balance of the cumulative register of
the P SRLY subgroup for Year 5 is $35 and,
due to the application of the 80-percent
limitation under paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this
section, the SRLY subgroup limitation under
this paragraph (c)(2) is $28 ($35 × 80
percent). Because of the 80-percent limitation
and the application of paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the M group’s deduction of net
operating losses in Year 5 is limited to $80
($100 × 80 percent). Because the $28 of net
operating loss available to be absorbed is less
than 80 percent of the M group’s
consolidated taxable income, $28 of P’s SRLY
net operating loss is absorbed in Year 5, and
the remaining $9 ($37 ¥ $28) is carried over
to Year 6.
(6) After deduction of $28 of P’s SRLY net
operating loss in Year 5, the cumulative
register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. After taking into account the 80percent limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is $35
($35 × 80 percent = $28). Therefore, the
cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup
is decreased by $35, and zero remains in the
cumulative register ($35 ¥ $35).
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(9) [The text of proposed § 1.1502–21(h)(9)
is the same as the text of § 1.1502–21T(h)(9)
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.]
(10) The rules of paragraphs (a), (b)(1),
(b)(2)(iv), and (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section apply
to losses arising in taxable years beginning
after [the date the Treasury decision adopting
these rules as final regulations is published
in the Federal Register].
Par. 4. Section 1.1502–47 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and
(ii).
■ 2. Removing paragraph (a)(3).
■ 3. Redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as
paragraph (a)(3).
■ 4. Removing paragraph (j).
■ 5. Redesignating paragraph (n) as
paragraph (j).
■ 6. Redesignating paragraph (b) as
paragraph (n).
■ 7. Redesignating paragraph (t) as
paragraph (n)(3).
■ 8. Removing paragraph (c).
■ 9. Redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (b).
■ 10. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(1).
■ 11. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(2).
■
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12. Redesignating newly redesignated
paragraphs (b)(3) through (14) as
paragraphs (b)(2) through (13),
respectively.
■ 13. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (b)(2), (3), (4), (9), (10), and
(12).
■ 14. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(13), designating Examples 1 through
14 as paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xiv),
respectively.
■ 15. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(13)(i), adding a new last sentence.
■ 16. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(13)(ii).
■ 17. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(13)(xiv).
■ 18. Redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (c).
■ 19. Removing newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
■ 20. Redesignating paragraph (c)(6) as
paragraph (c)(4).
■ 21. Redesignating paragraph (f) as
paragraph (d).
■ 22. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(5).
■ 23. Removing the last sentence of
newly redesignated paragraph (d)(6).
■ 24. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
■ 25. Redesignating paragraph (d)(7)(iii)
as paragraph (d)(7)(ii) and revising it.
■ 26. Redesignating paragraph (g) as
paragraph (e).
■ 27. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(2), removing the language ‘‘partial’’
each place it appears.
■ 28. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (e)(3).
■ 29. Redesignating paragraph (h) as
paragraph (f).
■ 30. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(2)(iii).
■ 31. In newly designated paragraph
(f)(2)(v), removing the language
‘‘partial’’ each place it appears.
■ 32. In newly designated paragraph
(f)(2)(v), adding a new last sentence.
■ 33. Revising newly designated
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) and (vii).
■ 34. Removing newly designated
paragraph (f)(3).
■ 35. Redesignating newly designated
paragraph (f)(4) as paragraph (f)(3).
■ 36. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(3)(ii).
■ 37. Adding a new paragraph (g).
■ 38. Redesignating paragraph (k)(5)
introductory text as paragraph (g)(3)(ii),
and redesignating paragraphs (k)(5)(i)
through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(A)
through (D), respectively.
■ 39. Removing newly redesignated
paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(C) and (D).
■ 40. Removing paragraphs (k) and (l).
■ 41. Redesignating paragraph (m) as
paragraph (h).
■ 42. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h), removing the language ‘‘partial’’
each place it appears.
■
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40945
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
43. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(2)(ii), adding a new last sentence.
■ 44. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(3)(iv), adding a new last sentence.
■ 45. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(3)(ix), removing the last two
sentences.
■ 46. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(4).
■ 47. Redesignating newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(5) as paragraph (h)(4).
■ 48. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(4) introductory text.
■ 49. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(4), redesignating Examples 1
through 6 as paragraphs (h)(4)(i) through
(vi).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
50. Revising newly designated
paragraphs (h)(4)(ii) and (iii).
■ 51. Removing newly designated
paragraphs (h)(4)(v) and (vi).
■ 52. In newly redesignated paragraph
(j)(2)(iii), removing the language ‘‘, and
‘‘section 812(b)(3)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘section 172(b)(3)(C)’’.
■ 53. Removing newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(2)(v).
■ 54. Redesignating newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(2)(vi) as paragraph (j)(2)(v).
■ 55. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(3).
■ 56. In newly redesignated paragraph
(n)(3), removing the language ‘‘Effective/
applicability date’’ and adding the
■
language ‘‘Filing requirements effective
dates’’ in its place.
■ 57. Adding paragraph (n)(4).
■ 58. Removing paragraphs (o) and (p).
■ 59. Redesignating paragraphs (q), (r),
and (s) as paragraphs (k), (l), and (m),
respectively.
■ 59. In the following table, for each
section designated or redesignated
under these proposed regulations (as
indicated in the second column),
removing the language in the third
column and adding the language in the
fourth column with the frequency
indicated in the fifth column:
Paragraph
Redesignation
Remove
Add
1.1502–47(a)(1) .....................
N/A .........................................
section 801 (relating to life insurance companies).
Once.
1.1502–47(a)(1) .....................
N/A .........................................
life insurance companies may
Once.
1.1502–47(a)(1) .....................
N/A .........................................
section 802 or 821 (relating
respectively to life insurance companies and to certain mutual insurance companies).
life insurance companies and
mutual insurance companies may.
composition and its consolidated tax.
Once.
1.1502–47(a)(4) .....................
1.1502–47(a)(3) .....................
1.1502–47(a)(4) .....................
1.1502–47(b) ..........................
1.1502–47(b)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(b)(2)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(d)(12)(i)(A),
(d)(12)(i)(C), (d)(12)(i)(D),
(d)(12)(iii), (d)(12)(iv),
(d)(12)(v), (d)(12)(v)(B),
(d)(12)(v)(C), (d)(12)(v)(D),
(d)(12)(vi), (d)(12)(vii), and
(d)(12)(viii)(F).
1.1502–47(d)(12)(iii) ..............
1.1502–47(d)(12)(iv) ..............
1.1502–47(d)(12)(v)(B) ..........
1.1502–47(a)(3) .....................
1.1502–47(n) ..........................
1.1502–47(n)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(n)(2)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(b)(11)(i)(A),
(b)(11)(i)(C), (b)(11)(i)(D),
(b)(11)(iii), (b)(11)(iv),
(b)(11)(v), (b)(11)(v)(B),
(b)(11)(v)(C), (b)(11)(v)(D),
(b)(11)(vi), (b)(11)(vii), and
(b)(11)(viii)(F), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(11)(iii) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(11)(iv) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(11)(v)(B) ..........
composition, its consolidated
taxable income (or loss),
and its consolidated tax.
§§ 1.1502–0 through 1.1502–
100.
848 .........................................
Effective/applicability dates ....
paragraph (n)(2) and (3) ........
Paragraph (b)(11)(v) ..............
(b)(11) ....................................
1.1502–47(d)(12)(vi) ..............
1.1502–47(d)(12)(vii) .............
1.1502–47(d)(12)(viii)(A) ........
1.1502–47(b)(11)(vi) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(11)(vii) .............
1.1502–47(b)(11)(viii)(A) ........
1.1502–47(d)(12)(viii)(D) and
(F).
1.1502–47(d)(14) ...................
1.1502–47(d)(14) ...................
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 1
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
2 through 4, 8, 10, and 12.
1.1502–47(b)(11)(viii)(D) and
(F), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13) ...................
1.1502–47(b)(13) ...................
1.1502–47(b)(13)(i) ................
1.1502–47(b)(13)(ii) through
(iv), (viii), (x), and (xii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13)(i) through
(iii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13)(i) through
(v) and (viii) through (xiii),
respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13)(v) through
(vii) and (ix), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13)(ii) through
(v) and (viii) through (xii),
respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(13)(ii), (iii), and
(xii), respectively.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
1 through 3.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
1 through 5 and 8 through
13.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
5 through 7 and 9.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
2 through 5 and 8 through
12.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples
2, 3, and 12.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
§§ 1.1502–1 through 1.1502–
80.
844 .........................................
Effective dates .......................
paragraph (b)(2) .....................
Paragraph (d)(12)(v) ..............
(d)(12) ....................................
subdivision (iii) .......................
subdivision (iv) .......................
(i.e., sections 11, 802, 821, or
831).
subdivision (vi) .......................
return year and even .............
(i.e., total reserves in section
801(c)).
Frequency
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it
appears.
Once.
Once.
Once.
subdivision (viii) .....................
paragraph (b)(11)(iii) ..............
paragraph (b)(11)(iv) ..............
(for example, section 11, section 801, or section 831).
paragraph (b)(11)(vi) ..............
return year even ....................
(that is, total reserves in section 816(c), as modified by
section 816(h)).
paragraph (b)(11)(viii) ............
Illustrations .............................
paragraph (d) .........................
1913 .......................................
1974 .......................................
Examples ...............................
paragraph (b) .........................
2012 .......................................
2012 .......................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it
appears.
1980 .......................................
2018 .......................................
1982 .......................................
2020 .......................................
Each place it
appears.
Each place it
appears.
1983 .......................................
2021 .......................................
(d)(12) ....................................
(b)(11) ....................................
stock casualty ........................
nonlife insurance ....................
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it
appears.
Each place it
appears.
Each place it
appears.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40946
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph
Redesignation
Remove
Add
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 3
1.1502–47(b)(13)(iii) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(13)(iii) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(13)(v) ...............
1.1502–47(b)(13)(xii) .............
paragraph (b)(11)(v)(B) and
(D).
for example ............................
in other words ........................
nonlife insurance ....................
Once.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 3
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 5
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example
12.
1.1502–47(e)(1) .....................
subparagraph (d)(12)(v)(B)
and (E).
e.g. .........................................
i.e. ..........................................
casualty ..................................
life company ...........................
Once.
1.1502–47(e)(3) .....................
1.1502–47(c)(3) .....................
§ 1.1502–75(c), ......................
Once.
1.1502–47(f)(3) ......................
1.1502–47(d)(3) .....................
life company or an ineligible
mutual company.
§ 1.1502–75(c) and paragraph
(e)(4) of this section,.
1981 .......................................
2019 .......................................
1.1502–47(f)(3) ......................
1.1502–47(d)(3) .....................
1982 .......................................
2020 .......................................
1.1502–47(f)(3) ......................
1.1502–47(d)(3) .....................
1.1502–47(f)(7)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(f)(7)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(d)(7)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(d)(7)(i) ..................
applying §§ 1.1502–13 and
1.1502–19.
paragraph (e) .........................
sections 801(a) and 831(a) ...
1.1502–47(g) ..........................
1.1502–47(g)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(h)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(h)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(e) ..........................
1.1502–47(e)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(e)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(e)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(e)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(e)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(e)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(f)(1) ......................
1.1502–47(f)(1) ......................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(f)(2)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(f)(2)(ii) ..................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(f)(2)(iv) .................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(v) .................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(f)(2)(iv) .................
1.1502–47(f)(2)(v) ..................
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ...................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iii) ................
1.1502–47(f)(3)(iii) .................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iii)(A) ............
1.1502–47(f)(3)(iii)(A) .............
1.1502–47(k)(5) .....................
1.1502–47(g)(3)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(k)(5) .....................
1.1502–47(k)(5)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(m) .........................
1.1502–47(g)(3)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(g)(3)(ii)(B) ............
1.1502–47(h) ..........................
applying §§ 1.1502–13,
1.1502–18, and 1.1502–19.
paragraph (g) .........................
sections 802(a), 821(a), and
831(a).
three .......................................
paragraph (h) .........................
paragraph (n) .........................
paragraph (g)(1) .....................
paragraph (j) ..........................
paragraph (m) ........................
paragraph (g)(2) .....................
paragraph (h) .........................
includes separate mutual insurance company taxable
income (as defined in section 821(b)) and insurance
company taxable income.
§§ 1.1502–21 or 1.1502–21A
(as appropriate), the rules
in this subparagraph (2).
§§ 1.1502–21(A)(f) or 1.1502–
21(e) (as appropriate).
year beginning after December 31, 1981, §§ 1.1502–
21A or 1.1502–21 (as appropriate).
nonlife loss .............................
subparagraph (2) ...................
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A
(as appropriate).
subparagraph (4) ...................
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–
22A(a) (as appropriate).
§§ 1.1502–22A(b)(1) or
1.1502–22(b).
allowed under section
822(c)(6) or section
832(c)(5),.
§ § 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A
(as appropriate).
this subparagraph (5) ............
paragraph (k)(5) .....................
paragraph (g) .........................
Each place it
appears.
Each place it
appears.
Once.
1.1502–47(m) .........................
1.1502–47(h) ..........................
paragraph (h) .........................
paragraph (f) ..........................
1.1502–47(m) .........................
1.1502–47(h) ..........................
paragraph (l) ..........................
paragraph (g) .........................
1.1502–47(m) .........................
1.1502–47(h) ..........................
paragraph (m) ........................
paragraph (h) .........................
1.1502–47(m)(2)(ii) ................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(m)(2)(ii) ................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) .................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) .................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) ..................
§§ 1502–21 or 1.1502–21A
(as appropriate).
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A
(as appropriate).
But see subdivision (ix) of this
paragraph (m)(3).
arising in separate return
years ending after December 31, 1980,.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
1.1502–47(c)(1) .....................
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Frequency
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
two .........................................
paragraph (f) ..........................
paragraph (j) ..........................
paragraph (e)(1) .....................
paragraph (g)(1) .....................
paragraph (h) .........................
paragraph (e)(2) .....................
paragraph (f) ..........................
includes insurance company
taxable income.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
§ 1.1502–21, the rules in this
paragraph (f)(2).
Once.
§ 1.1502–21(e) .......................
Once.
year, § 1.1502–21 ..................
Once.
nonlife subgroup loss .............
paragraph (f)(2) ......................
§ 1.1502–22 ...........................
Once.
Once.
Once.
paragraph (f)(3) ......................
§ 1.1502–22 ...........................
Once.
Once.
§ 1.1502–22(b), ......................
Once.
allowed under section
832(c)(5),.
Once.
§ 1.1502–22 ...........................
Once.
this paragraph (g)(3)(ii) ..........
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) .................
paragraph (e) .........................
§ 1.1502–21 ...........................
Once.
Once.
Each place
appears.
Each place
appears.
Each place
appears.
Each place
appears.
Once.
§ 1.1502–22 ...........................
Once.
But see paragraph (h)(3)(ix)
of this section.
arising in separate return
years.
Once.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Once.
it
it
it
it
40947
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph
Redesignation
Remove
Add
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) .................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) ..................
and 1.1502–22. ......................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(iii) ................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(iii) ................
and 1.1502–22 (or §§ 1.1502–
21A and 1.1502–22A, as
appropriate)..
consolidated LO .....................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(v) ................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(v) ................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(v) .................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(v) .................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vi)(A) ...........
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(A) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vi)(A) ...........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(A) ...........
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(A) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(A) ...........
GO or TII ................................
LICTI (as determined under
paragraph (j) of this section) for any.
subparagraph (3) ...................
notwithstanding § 1.1502–
21A(b)(3)(ii) or 1.1502–
21(b),.
taxable income for that year.
life consolidated net operating
loss.
taxable income .......................
LICTI for any ..........................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(B) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(B) ...........
(A) of this subdivision (vii) .....
1.1502–47(m)(3)(viii) ..............
1.1502–47(m)(3)(ix) ...............
1.1502–47(m)(3)(ix) ...............
1.1502–47(h)(3)(viii) ...............
1.1502–47(h)(3)(ix) ................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(ix) ................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(x) ................
1.1502–47(h)(3)(x) .................
1.1502–47(m)(3)(xii) ...............
1.1502–47(h)(3)(xii) ...............
1.1502–47(m)(3)(xii) ...............
1.1502–47(m)(5), Examples 1
through 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Examples 1
through 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1
1.1502–47(h)(3)(xii) ...............
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) through
(iv), respectively.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) through
(iv), respectively.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
section 172(b)(3)(C) ...............
243(b)(2) ................................
return year ending after December 31, 1980,.
LICTI (as defined in paragraph (j) of this section) in
the particular.
carryback of a consolidated
LO.
(2) or (4) .................................
1982 .......................................
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ..................
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4
1.1502–47(n) ..........................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(j) ...........................
1.1502–47(n)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(n)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(j)(1) ......................
1.1502–47(j)(1) ......................
paragraph (g)(1) .....................
paragraph (n)(2) of this section.
1.1502–47(n)(1) .....................
1.1502–47(j)(1) ......................
1.1502–47(n)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(n)(2) .....................
1.1502–47(n)(2)(ii) .................
1.1502–47(n)(2)(iii) ................
1.1502–47(j)(2) ......................
1.1502–47(j)(2) ......................
1.1502–47(j)(2)(ii) ..................
1.1502–47(j)(2)(iii) ..................
1.1502–47(n)(2)(iii) ................
1.1502–47(n)(2)(iv) ................
1.1502–47(j)(2)(iii) ..................
1.1502–47(j)(2)(iv) .................
1.1502–47(q) ..........................
1.1502–47(q) ..........................
1.1502–47(q) ..........................
1.1502–47(k) ..........................
1.1502–47(k) ..........................
1.1502–47(k) ..........................
1.1502–47(r) ..........................
1.1502–47(l) ...........................
consolidated net capital loss
(as determined under paragraph (l)(4) of this section)..
paragraph (h) .........................
paragraphs (m)(2) and (3) .....
consolidated partial LICTI ......
‘‘paragraph (l)’’ or ‘‘paragraph
(j)’’.
paragraph (h) .........................
Paragraphs (m)(3)(vi), (vii),
(x), and (xi).
1.1502–80 ..............................
paragraph (m)(3)(vi) ...............
§§ 1.1502–21A(b)(3) and
1.1502–79A(a)(3) (or
§ 1.1502–21, as appropriate).
partial LICTI (or LO) ..............
1.1502–47(r) ..........................
1.1502–47(l) ...........................
§§ 1.1502–0—1.1502–80 .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Frequency
Once.
Once.
paragraph (h)(3) .....................
notwithstanding § 1.1502–
21(b),.
Once.
Once.
taxable income for that year,
subject to the limitation in
section 172(a)..
paragraph (h)(3)(vii)(A) of this
section.
section 172(b)(3) ....................
243(b)(3) ................................
return year, ............................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
LICTI in the particular ............
Once.
carryback of a life consolidated net operating loss.
(2) or (3) .................................
2021 .......................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it
appears.
Each place it
appears.
Once.
Once.
i.e. ..........................................
that is .....................................
paragraph (d)(13) ...................
attributable to I (an ineligible
member).
paragraph (b)(12) ...................
attributable to I (an ineligible
member that is not a
nonlife insurance company).
of this section and section
Once.
172(a). The result would be.
of this section. ........................ Once.
of this section. The result
would be.
of this section or under
§ 1.1502–15A..
taxable income is $35 ............
30% ........................................
(15) .........................................
(65) .........................................
(85) .........................................
consolidated LO .....................
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
taxable income is $32.5 .........
35% ........................................
(17.5) ......................................
(67.5) ......................................
(82.5) ......................................
life consolidated net operating
loss and consolidated operations loss carryovers.
paragraph (e)(1) .....................
paragraph (j)(2) of this section, subject to the rules
and limitations in paragraph
(j)(3) of this section.
consolidated net capital loss.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it
appears.
paragraph (f) ..........................
paragraphs (h)(2) and (3) ......
consolidated LICTI .................
‘‘paragraph (g)’’ ......................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
paragraph (f) ..........................
Paragraphs (h)(3)(vi), (vii),
(x), and (xi).
1.1502–100 ............................
paragraph (h)(3)(vi) ................
§ 1.1502–21 ...........................
Once.
Once.
LICTI (or life consolidated net
operating loss).
§§ 1.1502–0 through 1.1502–
100.
Once.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
40948
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph
Redesignation
Remove
Add
.................
................
.................
.................
1.1502–47(m)(1)(iii) ...............
1.1502–47(m)(1)(iv) ...............
1.1502–47(m)(1)(v) ................
1.1502–47(m)(1)(v) ................
paragraphs (e), (h), and (j) ....
paragraph (f) ..........................
consolidated Life ....................
or life consolidated net operating loss.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(t) ...........................
1.1502–47(t) ...........................
1.1502–47(n)(3) .....................
1.1502–47(n)(3) .....................
paragraphs (g), (m), and (n) ..
paragraph (h) .........................
consolidated partial Life .........
(as defined by paragraph
(d)(3) of this section), determined under paragraph (j)
of this section,.
Paragraph (s) .........................
paragraph (s) .........................
Paragraph (m) ........................
paragraph (m) ........................
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(s)(1)(iii)
1.1502–47(s)(1)(iv)
1.1502–47(s)(1)(v)
1.1502–47(s)(1)(v)
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.1502–47 Consolidated returns by lifenonlife groups.
(a) * * *
(2) General method of consolidation—
(i) Subgroup method. The regulations
adopt a subgroup method to determine
consolidated taxable income. One
subgroup is the group’s nonlife
companies. The other subgroup is the
group’s life insurance companies.
Initially, the nonlife subgroup computes
nonlife consolidated taxable income and
the life subgroup computes consolidated
LICTI. A subgroup’s income may in
effect be reduced by a loss of the other
subgroup, subject to the limitations in
sections 172 and 1503(c). The life
subgroup losses consist of life
consolidated net operating loss,
consolidated operations loss carryovers
from taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2018 (consolidated
operations loss carryovers), and life
consolidated net capital loss. The
nonlife subgroup losses consist of
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
and nonlife consolidated net capital
loss. Consolidated taxable income is
therefore defined in pertinent part as the
sum of nonlife consolidated taxable
income and consolidated LICTI,
reduced by life subgroup losses and/or
nonlife subgroup losses.
(ii) Subgroup loss. A subgroup loss
does not actually affect the computation
of nonlife consolidated taxable income
or consolidated LICTI. It merely
constitutes a bottom-line adjustment in
reaching consolidated taxable income.
Furthermore, the amount of a
subgroup’s loss, if any, that is eligible to
be carried back to a prior taxable year
first must be carried back against
income of the same subgroup before it
may be used as a setoff against the other
subgroup’s income in the taxable year
the loss arose. (See sections 172(b)(1)
and 1503(c)(1); see also § 1.1502–21(b)).
The carryback of losses from one
subgroup may not be used to offset
income of the other subgroup in the year
to which the loss is to be carried. This
carryback of one subgroup’s loss may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
‘‘bump’’ the other subgroup’s loss that,
in effect, previously reduced the income
of the first subgroup. The subgroup’s
loss that is bumped in appropriate cases
may, in effect, reduce a succeeding
year’s income of either subgroup. This
approach gives the group the tax savings
of the use of losses, but the bumping
rule assures that, insofar as possible, life
deductions will be matched against life
income and nonlife deductions against
nonlife income.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Life company. The term life
company means a life insurance
company as defined in section 816 and
subject to tax under section 801. Section
816 applies to each company separately.
(2) Life insurance company taxable
income. The term life insurance
company taxable income or LICTI has
the meaning provided in section 801(b).
(3) Group. The term group has the
meaning provided in § 1.1502–1(a).
Unless otherwise indicated in this
section, a group’s composition is
determined without regard to section
1504(b)(2).
(4) Member. The term member has the
meaning provided in § 1.1502–1(b). A
life company is tentatively treated as a
member for any taxable year for
purposes of determining if it is an
eligible corporation under paragraph
(b)(10) of this section and, therefore, if
it is an includible corporation under
section 1504(c)(2). If such a company is
eligible and includible (under section
1504(c)(2)), it will actually be treated as
a member of the group.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) Separate return year. The term
separate return year has the meaning
provided in § 1.1502–1(e). For purposes
of this paragraph (b)(9), the term group
is defined with regard to section
1504(b)(2) for years in which an election
under section 1504(c)(2) is not in effect.
Thus, a separate return year includes a
taxable year for which that election is
not in effect.
(10) Separate return limitation year.
Section 1.1502–1(f)(2) provides
exceptions to the definition of the term
separate return limitation year. For
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Frequency
purposes of applying those exceptions
to this section, the term group is defined
without regard to section 1504(b)(2),
and the definition in this paragraph
(b)(10) applies separately to the nonlife
subgroup in determining nonlife
consolidated taxable income under
paragraph (f) of this section and to the
life subgroup in determining
consolidated LICTI under paragraph (g)
of this section. Paragraph (h)(3)(ix) of
this section defines the term separate
return limitation year for purposes of
determining whether the losses of one
subgroup may be used against the
income of the other subgroup.
*
*
*
*
*
(12) Ineligible corporation. A
corporation that is not an eligible
corporation is ineligible. If a life
company is ineligible, it is not treated
under section 1504(c)(2) as an
includible corporation. Losses of a
nonlife member arising in years when it
is ineligible may not be used under
section 1503(c)(2) and paragraph (g) of
this section to set off the income of a life
member. If a life company is ineligible
and is the common parent of the group
(without regard to section 1504(b)(2)),
the election under section 1504(c)(2)
may not be made.
(13) * * *
(i) * * * S2 must file its own separate
return for 2020.
(ii) Example 2. Since 2012, L1 has
been a life company owning all the
stock of L2. In 2018, L1 transfers assets
to S1, a new nonlife insurance company
subject to taxation under section 831(a).
For 2020, only L1 and L2 are eligible
corporations. The tacking rule in
paragraph (b)(11)(v) of this section does
not apply in 2020 because the old
corporation (L1) and the new
corporation (S1) do not have the same
tax character.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Dividends received deduction—(i)
Dividends received by insurance
company. Dividends received by an
eligible member insurance company,
taxed under either section 801 or
section 831, from another eligible
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
member of the group are treated for
Federal income tax purposes as if the
group did not file a consolidated return.
See sections 818(e)(2) and 805(a)(4) for
rules regarding a member taxed under
section 801, and see sections 832(g) and
832(b)(5)(B) through (E) for rules
regarding a member taxed under section
831.
(ii) Other dividends. Dividends
received from a life company member of
the group that are not subject to
paragraph (d)(5)(i) of this section are not
included in gross income of the
distributee member. See section
1504(c)(2)(B)(i). If the distributee
corporation is a nonlife insurance
company subject to tax under section
831, the rules of section 832(b)(5)(E)
apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(ii) Any taxes described in § 1.1502–
2 (other than in § 1.1502–2(a)(1), (a)(6),
and (a)(7)).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Carrybacks. The portion of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
for the nonlife subgroup described in
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section, if
any, that is eligible to be carried back to
prior taxable years under § 1.1502–21 is
carried back to the appropriate years
(whether consolidated or separate)
before the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss may be used as a nonlife
subgroup loss under paragraphs (e)(2)
and (h) of this section to set off
consolidated LICTI in the year the loss
arose. The election under section
172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire
carryback period for the net operating
loss of the nonlife subgroup may be
made by the agent for the group within
the meaning of § 1.1502–77.
(v) * * * For limitations on the use
of nonlife carryovers to offset nonlife
consolidated taxable income or
consolidated LICTI, see § 1.1502–21(a).
(vi) Portion of nonlife consolidated
net operating loss that is carried back to
prior taxable years. The portion of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
that (absent an election to waive
carrybacks) is carried back to the two
preceding taxable years is the sum of the
nonlife subgroup’s farming loss (within
the meaning of section 172(B)(1)(b)(ii))
and the amount of the subgroup’s net
operating loss that is attributable to
nonlife insurance companies (as
determined under § 1.1502–21). For
rules governing the absorption of net
operating loss carrybacks, including
limitations on the amount of net
operating loss carrybacks that may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
absorbed in prior taxable years, see
§ 1.1502–21(b).
(vii) Example. P, a holding company
that is not an insurance company, owns
all of the stock of S, a nonlife insurance
company, and L1, a life insurance
company. L1 owns all of the stock of L2,
a life insurance company. Both L1 and
L2 satisfy the eligibility requirements of
§ 1.1502–47(b)(11). Each corporation
uses the calendar year as its taxable year
and none of P, S, L1 or L2 are engaged
in a farming business (within the
meaning of section 263A(e)(4)). For
2021, the group first files a consolidated
return for which the election under
section 1504(c)(2) is effective. P and S
filed consolidated returns for 2019 and
2020. In 2021, the P–S group sustains a
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
that is attributable entirely to S (see
§ 1.1502–21(b)). The election in 2020
under section 1502(c)(2) does not result
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section in
the creation of a new group or the
termination of the P–S group. The loss
is carried back to the consolidated
return years 2019 and 2020 of P and S.
Pursuant to § 1.1502–21(b), the loss may
be used to offset S’s income in 2019 and
2020 without limitation, and the loss
may be used to offset P’s income in
those years, subject to the limitation in
section 172(a) (see § 1.1502–21(b)). The
portion of the loss not absorbed in 2019
and 2020 may serve as a nonlife
subgroup loss in 2021 that may set off
the consolidated LICTI of L1 and L2
under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this
section.
(3) * * *
(ii) Additional principles. In applying
§ 1.1502–22 to nonlife consolidated net
capital loss carryovers and carrybacks,
the principles set forth in paragraph
(f)(2)(iii) through (v) of this section for
applying § 1.1502–21 to nonlife
consolidated net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks also apply,
without regard to the limitation in
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Consolidated LICTI—(1) General
rule. Consolidated LICTI is the
consolidated taxable income of the life
subgroup, computed under § 1.1502–11
as modified by this paragraph (g).
(2) Life consolidated net operating
loss deduction—(i) In general. In
applying § 1.1502–21, the rules in this
paragraph (g)(2) apply in determining
for the life subgroup the life net
operating loss and the portion of the life
net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks to the taxable year.
(ii) Life CNOL. The life consolidated
net operating loss is determined under
§ 1.1502–21(e) by treating the life
subgroup as the group.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40949
(iii) Carrybacks—(A) General rule.
The portion of the life consolidated net
operating loss for the life subgroup, if
any, that is eligible to be carried back
under § 1.1502–21 is carried back to the
appropriate years (whether consolidated
or separate) before the life consolidated
net operating loss may be used as a life
subgroup loss under paragraphs (e)(1)
and (j) of this section to set off nonlife
consolidated taxable income in the year
the loss arose. The election under
section 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire
carryback period for the consolidated
net operating loss of the life subgroup
may be made by the common parent of
the group.
(B) Special rule for life consolidated
net operating losses arising in 2018,
2019, or 2020. If a life consolidated net
operating loss arising in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017, and
before January 1, 2021, is carried back
to a life insurance company taxable year
beginning before January 1, 2018, then
such life consolidated net operating loss
is treated as an operations loss
carryback (within the meaning of
section 810, as in effect prior to its
repeal) of such company to such taxable
year.
(iv) Subgroup rule. In determining the
portion of the life consolidated net
operating loss that is absorbed when the
loss is carried back to a consolidated
return year, § 1.1502–21 is applied by
treating the life subgroup as the group.
Therefore, the absorption is determined
without taking into account any nonlife
subgroup losses that were previously
reported on a consolidated return as
setting off life consolidated taxable
income for the year to which the life
subgroup loss is carried back.
(v) Carryovers. The portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss that is
not absorbed in a prior year as a
carryback, or as a life subgroup loss that
set off nonlife consolidated taxable
income for the year the loss arose,
constitutes a life carryover under this
paragraph (g)(2) to reduce consolidated
LICTI before that portion may constitute
a life subgroup loss that sets off nonlife
consolidated taxable income for that
particular year. For limitations on the
use of nonlife carryovers to offset
nonlife consolidated taxable income or
consolidated LICTI, see § 1.1502–21(b).
(3) Life consolidated capital gain net
income or loss—(i) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Additionally, the amount of
consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40950
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
carryovers may be subject to limitation
(see section 172 and § 1.1502–21(a)).
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The amount of
consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
carryovers may be subject to limitation
(see section 172 and § 1.1502–21(a)).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (h). In the examples, L
indicates a life company, S is a nonlife
insurance company, another letter
indicates a nonlife company that is not
an insurance company, no company has
farming losses (within the meaning of
be set off against consolidated LICTI in
2021 is $35 (35 percent of the lesser of
the offsettable $100 or consolidated
LICTI of $200). See section 1503(c)(1)
and paragraph (h)(3)(x) of this section.
S carries over a loss of $65, and I carries
over a loss of $100, to 2022 under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section to be
used against nonlife consolidated
taxable income (consolidated net
operating loss ($200) less amount used
in 2020 ($35). Under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)
of this section, the offsettable nonlife
consolidated net operating loss that may
be carried to 2022 is $65 ($100 minus
$35). The facts and results are
summarized in the following table.
section 172(b)(1)(B)), and each
corporation uses the calendar year as its
taxable year.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Example 2. (A) The facts are the
same as in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this
section, except that, for 2021, S’s
separate net operating loss is $200.
Assume further that L’s consolidated
LICTI is $200. Under paragraph
(h)(3)(vi) of this section, the offsettable
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
is $100 (the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss computed under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section ($200),
reduced by the separate net operating
loss of I ($100)). The offsettable nonlife
consolidated net operating loss that may
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (h)(4)(ii)(A)
[Dollars omitted]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
P ..................................................................................................................
S ..................................................................................................................
I ....................................................................................................................
Nonlife Subgroup .........................................................................................
L ...................................................................................................................
35% of lower of line 4(c) or 5(c) ..................................................................
Unused offsettable loss ...............................................................................
(B) Accordingly, under paragraph (e)
of this section, consolidated taxable
income is $165 (line 5(a) minus line
6(c)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (h)(4)(ii) of this section,
with the following additions for 2022.
The nonlife subgroup has nonlife
consolidated taxable income of $50 (all
of which is attributable to I) before the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
deduction under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section. Consolidated LICTI is $100.
Under paragraph (f)(2) of this section,
$50 of the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss carryover ($165) is used
in 2022 and, under paragraph (h)(3)(vi)
and (vii) of this section, the portion
used in 2021 is attributable to I, the
ineligible nonlife member. Accordingly,
the offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss from 2021 under
paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of this section is
$65, the unused loss from 2020. The
offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss in 2022 is $22.75 (35
percent of the lesser of the offsettable
loss of $65 or consolidated LICTI of
$100). Accordingly, under paragraph (e)
of this section, consolidated taxable
income is $77.25 (consolidated LICTI of
$100 minus the offsettable loss of
$22.75).
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
Facts
Offsettable
Limit
Unused loss
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
100
(200)
(100)
(200)
200
........................
........................
........................
(100)
........................
(100)
200
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(100)
........................
35
........................
........................
(65)
(100)
(165)
........................
........................
(65)
(j) * * *
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (j). In the examples, L
indicates a life company, S is a nonlife
insurance company, another letter
indicates a nonlife company that is not
an insurance company, no company has
farming losses (within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)), and each
corporation uses the calendar year as its
taxable year.
(i) Example 1. P, S, L1 and L2
constitute a group that elects under
section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated
return for 2021. In 2021, the nonlife
subgroup consolidated taxable income
is $100 and there is $20 of nonlife
consolidated net capital loss that cannot
be carried back under paragraph (f) of
this section to taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) preceding
2021. The nonlife subgroup has no
carryover from years prior to 2021. The
life consolidated net operating loss is
$150, which under paragraph (g) of this
section includes life consolidated
capital gain net income of $25. Since
life consolidated capital gain net income
is zero for 2021, the nonlife capital loss
offset is zero. However, $100 of life
consolidated net operating loss sets off
the $100 nonlife consolidated taxable
income in 2021. The life subgroup
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
carries under paragraph (g)(2) of this
section to 2022 $50 of the life
consolidated net operating loss ($150
minus $100). The $50 carryover will be
used in 2022 (subject to the limitation
in section 172(a)) against life subgroup
income before it may be used in 2022
to setoff nonlife consolidated taxable
income.
(ii) Example 2. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this section,
except that, for 2021, the nonlife
consolidated taxable income is $150
(this amount is entirely attributable to S
and includes nonlife consolidated
capital gain net income of $50),
consolidated LICTI is $200, and a life
consolidated net capital loss is $50.
Assume that the $50 life consolidated
net capital loss sets off the $50 nonlife
consolidated capital gain net income.
Consolidated taxable income under
paragraph (e) of this section is $300
(nonlife consolidated taxable income
($150) minus the setoff of the life
consolidated net capital loss ($50), plus
consolidated LICTI ($200)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section,
except that, for 2022, the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss is $150.
This entire amount is attributable to S;
thus, it is eligible to be carried back to
2021 against nonlife consolidated
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
taxable income under paragraph (f)(2) of
this section and § 1.1502–21(b). If P, the
common parent, does not elect to
relinquish the carryback under section
172(b)(3), the entire $150 will be carried
back, reducing 2021 nonlife
consolidated taxable income to zero and
nonlife consolidated capital gain net
income to zero. Under paragraph
(h)(3)(xii) of this section, the setoff in
2021 of the nonlife consolidated capital
gain net income ($50) by the life
consolidated net capital loss ($50) is
restored. Accordingly, the 2021 life
consolidated net capital loss may be
carried over by the life subgroup to
2022. Under paragraph (e) of this
section, after the carryback,
consolidated taxable income for 2021 is
$200 (nonlife consolidated taxable
income ($0) plus consolidated LICTI
($200)).
(iv) Example 4. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section,
except that P elects under section
172(b)(3)to relinquish the carryback of
$150 arising in 2022. The setoff in
Example 2 is not restored. However, the
offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for 2022 (or that may be
carried over from 2022) is zero. See
paragraph (h)(3)(viii) of this section.
Nevertheless, the $150 nonlife
consolidated net operating loss may be
carried over to be used by the nonlife
group.
(v) Example 5. P owns all of the stock
of S1 and of L1. On January 1, 2017, L1
purchases all of the stock of L2. For
2021, the group elects under section
1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return.
For 2021, L1 is an eligible corporation
under paragraph (c)(11) of this section
but L2 is ineligible. Thus, L1 but not L2
is a member for 2021. For 2021, L2
sustains a net operating loss, which
cannot be carried back (see section
172(b)). For 2021, L2 is treated under
paragraph (d)(6) of this section as a
member of a controlled group of
corporations under section 1563 with P,
S, and L1. For 2022, L2 is eligible and
is included on the group’s consolidated
return. L2’s net operating loss for 2021
that may be carried to 2022 is not
treated under paragraph (b)(10) of this
section as having been sustained in a
separate return limitation year for
purposes of computing consolidated
LICTI of the L1–L2 life subgroup for
2022. Furthermore, the portion of L2’s
net operating loss not used under
paragraph (g)(2) of this section against
life subgroup income in 2022 may be
included in offsettable life consolidated
net operating loss under paragraph (j)(2)
and (h)(3)(i) of this section that reduces
in 2022 nonlife consolidated taxable
income (subject to the limitation in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
section 172(a)) because L2’s loss in 2021
was not sustained in a separate return
limitation year under paragraph (j)(2)
and (h)(3)(ix)(A) of this section or in a
separate return year (2021) when an
election was not in effect under section
1504(c)(2) or section 243(b)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(4) The rules of paragraphs (a)(2)(i),
(a)(2)(ii), (b)(1) through (b)(4), (b)(9),
(b)(10), (b)(12), (b)(13)(ii), (d)(5)(i),
(d)(5)(ii), (d)(7)(ii), (f)(2)(iii), (f)(2)(vi),
(f)(2)(vii), (f)(3)(ii), (g), (h)(4)(ii),
(h)(4)(iii), and (j)(3) of this section apply
to taxable years beginning after
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2020–14427 Filed 7–2–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2018–0856; FRL–10011–
09–Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Repeal
of State Regulations for Particulate
Matter for Lime Manufacturing Plants
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve a New Mexico
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision for the repeal of State
regulations titled 20.2.20 NMAC (Title
20: Environmental Protection, Chapter
2: Air Quality (Statewide), Part 20: Lime
Manufacturing Plants—Particulate
Matter of the New Mexico
Administrative Code) that cover
particulate matter emission standards
for lime manufacturing plants and lime
hydrators in the State of New Mexico.
EPA is proposing to approve the repeal
of the regulations based on the CAA
section 110(l) demonstration contained
in the New Mexico submittal, which
provides that the SIP revision will not
interfere with attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS or any other
CAA requirement.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 7, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2018–0856, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40951
ruan-lei.karolina@epa.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Ms. Karolina Ruan Lei, (214)
665–7346, ruan-lei.karolina@epa.gov.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may not be
publicly available due to docket file size
restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).
Ms.
Karolina Ruan Lei, (214) 665–7346,
ruan-lei.karolina@epa.gov. Out of an
abundance of caution for members of
the public and our staff, the EPA Region
6 office will be closed to the public to
reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–
19. We encourage the public to submit
comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, as there will be a
delay in processing mail and no courier
or hand deliveries will be accepted.
Please call or email the contact listed
above if you need alternative access to
material indexed but not provided in
the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Clean Air Act Section 110(l)
B. State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
C. The National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS)
D. History of Reviews of the NAAQS for
Particulate Matter
II. New Mexico’s Submittal
A. The Regulation Proposed for Repeal
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 131 (Wednesday, July 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40927-40951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14427]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 40927]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-125716-18]
RIN 1545-BP27
Consolidated Net Operating Losses
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; partial withdrawal of a notice
of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of proposed rulemaking contains proposed
amendments to the consolidated return regulations under section 1502 of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The proposed regulations provide
guidance implementing recent statutory amendments to section 172 and
withdraw and re-propose certain sections of proposed regulations issued
in prior notices of proposed rulemaking relating to the absorption of
consolidated net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks. In addition,
the proposed regulations update regulations applicable to consolidated
groups that include both life insurance companies and other companies
to reflect statutory changes. These proposed regulations would affect
corporations that file consolidated returns.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by August 31, 2020. Requests for a public hearing must
be submitted as prescribed in the ``Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing'' section.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-125716-
18) by following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited
or withdrawn. The IRS expects to have limited personnel available to
process public comments that are submitted on paper through mail. Until
further notice, any comments submitted on paper will be considered to
the extent practicable. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS will publish for public availability any
comment submitted electronically (and, to the extent practicable, any
comment submitted on paper) to its public docket.
Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-125716-18), Room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Justin O. Kellar at (202) 317-6720, Gregory J. Galvin at (202) 317-
3598, or William W. Burhop at (202) 317-5363; concerning submission of
comments or requests for a public hearing, Regina Johnson at (202) 317-
5177 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register, the IRS is issuing temporary regulations
to permit consolidated groups that acquire new members that were
members of another consolidated group to elect to waive all or part of
the pre-acquisition portion of an extended carryback period under
section 172 of the Code for certain losses attributable to the acquired
members. The text of those temporary regulations also serves as the
text of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of these proposed
regulations. The proposed and temporary regulations affect corporations
that file consolidated returns.
Background
These proposed regulations revise the Income Tax Regulations (26
CFR part 1) under section 1502 of the Code. Section 1502 authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate (Secretary) to prescribe
regulations for an affiliated group of corporations that join in filing
(or that are required to join in filing) a consolidated return
(consolidated group) to reflect clearly the Federal income tax
liability of the consolidated group and to prevent avoidance of such
tax liability. See Sec. 1.1502-1(h) (defining the term ``consolidated
group''). For purposes of carrying out those objectives, section 1502
also permits the Secretary to prescribe rules that may be different
from the provisions of chapter 1 of the Code that would apply if the
corporations composing the consolidated group filed separate returns.
Terms used in the consolidated return regulations generally are defined
in Sec. 1.1502-1.
These proposed revisions implement certain statutory amendments
made by Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (December 22, 2017), commonly
referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Specifically, section
13302 of the TCJA amended section 172 of the Code, relating to net
operating loss (NOL) deductions, and sections 13511 through 13519 of
the TCJA amended subchapter L of chapter 1 of the Code (subchapter L),
relating to the taxation of insurance companies. These proposed
regulations also implement further statutory amendments to section 172
of the Code made by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
Act, Public Law 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (March 27, 2020) (CARES Act).
Additionally, these proposed regulations update regulations under
section 1502 concerning consolidated groups that include life insurance
companies and other companies (life-nonlife groups) to implement
amendments under prior tax legislation.
I. Net Operating Loss Deductions
Prior to amendment by the TCJA, section 172(a) allowed a taxpayer
to use its aggregate NOL carryovers and carrybacks to a taxable year to
offset all taxable income in the taxable year, and section 172(b)(1)
generally permitted taxpayers to carry back NOLs two years and carry
over NOLs 20 years. The TCJA amended section 172 to provide new NOL
deduction rules based on (i) the type of entity generating the NOL or
using an NOL to offset income, or (ii) the character of the loss giving
rise to an NOL. The CARES Act extended the carryback period for NOLs
arising in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before
January 1, 2021. See part I.A of this Background. Both the TCJA and the
CARES Act also made other changes to section 172 that are not pertinent
to this notice of proposed rulemaking.
[[Page 40928]]
A. General NOL Rules
As amended by section 13302(a)(1) of the TCJA and section
2303(a)(1) of the CARES Act, section 172(a)(2) of the Code allows an
NOL deduction for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2020, in
an amount equal to the sum of two factors. The first factor is the
aggregate amount of NOLs arising in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2018 (pre-2018 NOLs), that are carried to such taxable year.
The second factor is the lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of NOLs
arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 (post-2017
NOLs), that are carried to such taxable year, or (ii) 80 percent of the
excess (if any) of (I) taxable income computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250 of the Code, over (II) the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to the taxable year (this
latter calculation, the 80-percent limitation). The 80-percent
limitation does not apply to taxable years beginning before January 1,
2021. See section 172(a)(1). For any such taxable year, section
172(a)(1) allows an NOL deduction equal to the aggregate amount of NOL
carryovers and carrybacks to such year. See id. Moreover, the 80-
percent limitation does not apply to limit the use of pre-2018 NOLs.
See section 172(a)(2)(A).
Section 13302(b) of the TCJA amended section 172(b) to generally
eliminate NOL carrybacks but permit post-2017 NOLs to be carried over
indefinitely. Section 2303(b) of the CARES Act further amended section
172(b) to require (unless waived under section 172(b)(3)) a five-year
carryback for NOLs arising in taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021. See section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
B. Special NOL Rules for Nonlife Insurance Companies
Section 13302(d) of the TCJA added sections 172(b)(1)(C) and
172(f), which provide special rules for insurance companies other than
life insurance companies, as defined in section 816(a) (nonlife
insurance companies, which commonly are referred to as property and
casualty insurance companies or P&C companies). Under section 172(f),
the 80-percent limitation does not apply to nonlife insurance
companies. Therefore, taxable income of nonlife insurance companies may
be fully offset by NOL deductions. In addition, under sections
172(b)(1)(C) and (b)(1)(D)(i), losses of nonlife insurance companies
arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020, may be
carried back two years and carried over 20 years. (As noted in part I.A
of this Background, losses arising in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021, are carried back five
years.) Thus, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020, the
operative rules under section 172 effectively apply to nonlife
insurance companies in the same manner as those rules applied prior to
enactment of the TCJA.
C. Special NOL Rules for Farming Losses
Section 13302(c) of the TCJA amended the special rules for farming
losses set forth in sections 172(b)(1)(F) and 172(h), as in effect
prior to enactment of the TCJA. For purposes of section 172, a
``farming loss'' is the lesser of (i) the amount that would be the NOL
for the taxable year if only income and deductions attributable to
farming businesses (as defined in section 263A(e)(4) of the Code) were
taken into account, or (ii) the amount of the NOL for that taxable
year. See section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii). Under sections 172(b)(1)(B)(i) and
(b)(1)(D)(i)(II), any portion of an NOL for a taxable year beginning
after December 31, 2020, that is characterized as a farming loss is
treated as an NOL that is carried back two years and, as provided in
section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II), is carried over indefinitely. Farming
losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and
before January 1, 2021, are carried back five years. Section
172(b)(1)(D)(i).
II. Insurance Company Provisions
The TCJA also made several changes to subchapter L (which addresses
the taxation of insurance companies) that are relevant to this notice
of proposed rulemaking. First, sections 13511(a) and 13511(b) of the
TCJA (i) struck section 805(b)(4), which generally denied life
insurance companies the NOL deduction provided in section 172, and (ii)
made a conforming amendment by striking section 810, which provided a
deduction for operations losses for life insurance companies. As a
result, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017,
life insurance companies are entitled to an NOL deduction under the
general rules of section 172. Second, section 13001(b)(2)(A) of the
TCJA struck section 1201, which imposed a minimum tax on capital gains.
Third, section 13514(a) of the TCJA struck section 815, which provided
continued deferral of tax on policyholders surplus accounts. Fourth,
under section 13514(d) of the TCJA, stock life insurance companies must
pay the tax imposed by section 801 on the balance of any policyholders
surplus accounts (determined as of the close of such company's last
taxable year beginning before January 1, 2018) ratably over the first
eight taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
Additionally, section 2303(b) of the CARES Act added a special rule
for life insurance companies. Section 172(b)(1)(D)(iii) provides that,
in the case of a life insurance company, if an NOL is carried back
under section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I) to a life insurance company taxable
year beginning before January 1, 2018, such NOL carryback shall be
treated in the same manner as an operations loss carryback (within the
meaning of section 810 as in effect before its repeal) of such company
to such taxable year.
Because the repeal of section 810 is effective for losses arising
in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, operations loss
carryovers from taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018,
continue to be allowed as deductions in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017, in accordance with section 810 as in effect before
its repeal by the TCJA. See Staff of the Joint Comm. on Tax'n, 115th
Cong., General Explanation of Public Law 115-97, at 226 (Dec. 2018).
Final regulations applicable to life-nonlife groups under Sec.
1.1502-47 were published in the Federal Register on March 18, 1983. See
48 FR 11441 (March 18, 1983) (current life-nonlife regulations). In the
years that followed that publication, other legislation also
significantly altered the taxation of insurance companies.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Overview
These proposed regulations provide guidance for consolidated groups
regarding the application of the 80-percent limitation, as originally
enacted as part of the TCJA and subsequently amended by the CARES Act.
These proposed regulations also provide guidance regarding the
application of the NOL carryback provisions following enactment of the
TCJA and the CARES Act. In addition, the proposed regulations withdraw
and re-propose certain sections of proposed regulations issued under
section 1502 in prior notices of proposed rulemaking that relate to the
absorption of NOL carrybacks and carryovers. See part II of this
Explanation of Provisions for a further discussion.
These proposed regulations also update Sec. 1.1502-47 to reflect
certain changes to the insurance company rules
[[Page 40929]]
made by the CARES Act, the TCJA, and prior tax legislation. See part
III of this Explanation of Provisions for a further discussion. The
Treasury Department and the IRS continue to study other issues
pertinent to life-nonlife groups for purposes of potential future
guidance.
II. Amendments to Sec. 1.1502-21
A. In General
Under section 172, as amended by the TCJA and the CARES Act, NOLs
generated by certain members of a consolidated group (that is, nonlife
insurance companies), as well as NOLs generated by certain business
activity within a consolidated group (that is, farming losses), are
subject to different rules than other NOLs in taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020. The proposed regulations implement these
statutory rules with regard to affiliated groups of corporations that
file consolidated returns.
B. Application of the 80-Percent Limitation
1. In General
Section 1.1502-21(a) defines the consolidated net operating loss
(CNOL) deduction for any consolidated return year as ``the aggregate of
the net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to the year.'' This
section specifies that ``[t]he net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks consist of (1) [a]ny CNOLs . . . of the consolidated group;
and (2) [a]ny net operating losses of the members arising in separate
return years.'' NOL carryovers and carrybacks to a consolidated return
year are determined under the principles of section 172 and Sec.
1.1502-21. See Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(1). For example, losses permitted to
be absorbed in a consolidated return year generally are absorbed in the
order of the taxable years in which they arose. See id.
As discussed in part I.A of the Background, the 80-percent
limitation on the use of post-2017 NOLs to offset taxable income (other
than taxable income of nonlife insurance companies) applies to taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2020. Consistent with longstanding
provisions in Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(1), these proposed regulations
generally implement the 80-percent limitation on a consolidated group
basis by limiting a group's deduction of post-2017 NOLs for any such
taxable year to the lesser of (1) the aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to such year, or (2) 80 percent of the excess (if any) of
the group's consolidated taxable income (CTI) (computed without regard
to any deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250) over the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to such year. Thus, the amount allowed
as a deduction for a particular consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020, equals the sum of (1) pre-2018 NOLs carried to
that year (see section 172(a)(2)(A)), and (2) post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year after applying the 80-percent limitation (see section
172(a)(2)(B)). Additionally, the proposed regulations provide special
rules applicable to consolidated groups that include at least one
nonlife insurance company, as well as rules applicable to losses
arising in a separate return limitation year (SRLY).
2. Application of the 80-Percent Limitation to Groups Comprised of
Nonlife Insurance Companies, Members Other Than Nonlife Insurance
Companies, or Both
Application of the 80-percent limitation depends on the status of
the entity whose income is being offset, rather than on the status of
the entity whose loss is being absorbed. As noted in part I.B of the
Background, section 172(f) provides that the 80-percent limitation does
not apply when the taxable income of a nonlife insurance company is
offset by an NOL carryback or carryover.
To implement the special rules under section 172 regarding income
of nonlife insurance companies, these proposed regulations clarify that
application of the 80-percent limitation within a consolidated group to
post-2017 NOLs (post-2017 CNOL deduction limit) depends on the status
of the entity that generated the income being offset in a consolidated
return year beginning after December 31, 2020. Therefore, if a group is
comprised solely of members other than nonlife insurance companies
during a consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020,
the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the group for that year is
determined by applying the 80-percent limitation to all of the group's
consolidated taxable income for that year. In contrast, if a group is
comprised solely of nonlife insurance companies during a consolidated
return year beginning after December 31, 2020, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the group for that year simply equals the group's
CTI less the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year.
A two-factor computation is required if a consolidated group is
comprised of both nonlife insurance companies and other members in a
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020. In general,
under these proposed regulations, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit
for the group would equal the sum of two amounts.
The first amount relates to the income of those members that are
not nonlife insurance companies (residual income pool). This amount
equals the lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried
to that year, or (ii) 80 percent of the excess of the group's CTI for
that year (determined without regard to income, gain, deduction, or
loss of members that are nonlife insurance companies and without regard
to any deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250) over the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year that are allocated to the
positive net income of members other than nonlife insurance companies.
The second amount relates to the income of those members that are
nonlife insurance companies (nonlife income pool). This amount equals
100 percent of the group's CTI for the year (determined without regard
to any income, gain, deduction, or loss of members that are not nonlife
insurance companies), less the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year that are allocated to the positive net income of
nonlife insurance company members.
For purposes of computing the foregoing amounts, pre-2018 NOLs are
allocated pro rata between the two types of income pools in the group
(that is, the income pool for nonlife insurance companies and the
income pool for all other members, respectively). This allocation is
based on the relative amounts of positive net income in each pool in
the particular consolidated return year.
For example, assume that P, PC1, and PC2 are members of a calendar-
year consolidated group (P Group). PC1 and PC2 are nonlife insurance
companies, and P is a holding company. In 2017, the P Group has a CNOL
of $10 (that is, a pre-2018 NOL). In 2021, P has income of $50, PC1 has
income of $70, and PC2 has a loss of $20. Therefore, the P Group has
$100 of CTI in 2021. In 2022, the P Group has a $100 CNOL (all of which
is attributable to PC1 and PC2) that is carried back to 2021. Under
sections 172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f), the P Group's 2022 CNOL would offset
P's 2021 income subject to the 80-percent limitation, but it would
offset PC1's 2021 income without limitation.
The total amount allowed as a CNOL deduction in the P Group's 2021
consolidated return year equals the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year plus the P Group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit
for that year. The P Group has $10 of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021.
Under section
[[Page 40930]]
172(a)(2)(A) and Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(1), this loss would offset $10 of
the P Group's 2021 income.
Under these proposed regulations, the P Group's post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for its 2021 consolidated return year is equal to the
sum of the following two amounts. The first amount reflects the
application of the 80-percent limitation to P's income (that is, the
residual income pool). This amount is $36, which equals the lesser of
(i) the aggregate amount of the P Group's post-2017 NOLs carried to its
2021 consolidated return year ($100), or (ii) the product obtained by
multiplying 80 percent by $45 (the excess of $50 (P's 2021 income) over
$5 (the pro rata amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocated to P's income)).
The second amount reflects the application of section 172(f) to the
income of PC1 and PC2 (that is, the nonlife income pool). This amount
is $45, which is obtained by subtracting $5 (the pro rata amount of
pre-2018 NOLs allocated to the income of PC1 and PC2) from $50 (PC1's
2021 income of $70-PC2's 2021 loss of $20).
Thus, the P Group has a CNOL deduction of $91 for 2021, which
includes (1) the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021
($10), plus (2) the P Group's post-2017 deduction limit ($36 + $45 =
$81). The P Group has $9 of CTI in 2021 and carries over the remaining
$19 of its 2022 CNOL ($100-$81) to future taxable years.
If a group's nonlife insurance company members have net income for
a particular consolidated return year beginning after December 31,
2020, and its other members have a net loss for that year (or vice-
versa), these proposed regulations modify the foregoing computation to
ensure that the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for that year is
not overstated. If the group's nonlife insurance company members have a
loss for the consolidated return year and its other members have income
for that year, the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit equals the
lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of post-2017 CNOLs carried to the
year, or (ii) 80 percent of the excess of the group's CTI (determined
without regard to any deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250)
over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year. That
is, because none of the group's net income has been produced by the
group's P&C insurance operations, the 80-percent limitation will apply
to all CTI for the year. Conversely, if the group's nonlife insurance
company members have income for the consolidated return year and its
other members have a loss for that year, the group's post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit equals the group's CTI less the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year. That is, because all net income of
the group has been produced by the operation of members that are
nonlife insurance companies (whose income is not subject to the 80-
percent limitation), all CTI for the year may be offset by post-2017
CNOL deductions.
In formulating these proposed regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS considered an alternative approach. Following the enactment
of the TCJA and the CARES Act, section 172 provides special rules
applicable to entities of different tax status, both with regard to the
use of NOLs to offset income and with regard to the manner in which
NOLs are carried over. This alternative approach would have required a
group to first offset income and loss items within a pool of nonlife
insurance companies and a pool of other members for all purposes of
section 172 applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31,
2020. In other words, the alternative approach would have applied a
pooling concept beyond merely determining the group's post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit, but would have required a group's CTI to be allocated
between the operations of its nonlife insurance company members, which
can be offset fully by CNOL deductions, and the operations of its other
members subject to the 80-percent limitation. This alternative approach
would also have applied similar rules to allocate CNOLs within groups
including both nonlife insurance companies and other members to
consistently identify the portions of CNOLs allocable to nonlife
insurance company members, which are subject to different carryover
rules than those of other members.
Specifically, this alternative approach would have adopted a
threshold computational step under which the principles of Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B) would apply to offset the income and loss items
solely among members that are nonlife insurance companies. The
remaining members of the group would be subject to a parallel offset.
Following this initial offsetting of pooled items, Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(2)(iv)(B) (or the principles of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B), in
the case of a group with CTI) would apply to allocate a post-2017 CNOL
among all group members with taxable income. This approach contrasts
with the historical application of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B), under
which a CNOL for a year is attributed pro rata to all members of a
group that produce net loss, without first netting among entities of
the same type. This historical approach developed before the enactment
of the TCJA, and thus before special carryover rules applied to nonlife
insurance companies.
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding the
proposed regulations' methodology for computing a group's post-2017
CNOL deduction limit. The Treasury Department and the IRS also request
comments regarding the alternative approach described in the preceding
two paragraphs to identify the portion of the CNOL to which the special
carryback and carryover rules of section 172(b) (regarding nonlife
insurance company losses) would apply.
3. Losses Arising in a SRLY
Generally, an unaffiliated corporation determines its taxable
income by offsetting its NOLs against its income. In contrast, a
consolidated group member generally offsets its NOLs against the income
of all group members. See Sec. Sec. 1.1502-11 and 1.1502-21. However,
an exception to this general rule for consolidated groups applies to a
group's use of NOLs incurred by a member (SRLY member) in a taxable
year other than a year of the current group (that is, a separate return
limitation year or SRLY). A SRLY member may carry its NOLs that arose
in a SRLY into the consolidated group, but those NOLs can be absorbed
by the group only to the extent that the SRLY member generates income
on a separate-entity basis while a member of the group (that is, to the
extent of the amount of net income generated by the SRLY member as a
member of the group). See generally Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i) (setting
forth the general SRLY limitation rule).
The SRLY rules attempt to replicate, to the extent possible,
separate-entity usage of the SRLY attributes of the SRLY member. In
other words, the SRLY regulations were designed to obtain an absorption
result that varies as little as possible from the absorption that would
have occurred if the SRLY member had not joined the consolidated group.
To approximate a SRLY member's absorption of NOLs on a separate-
entity basis, the SRLY member's net contribution to the CTI of the
group is measured cumulatively over the period during which the
corporation is a member of the group by using what is commonly referred
to as a ``cumulative register.'' The cumulative register tracks the
SRLY member's net positive (or negative) contribution to the income of
the group. See Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i). If the SRLY member has net
positive income in a consolidated taxable year, the
[[Page 40931]]
member's cumulative register increases. See Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(A)
and (C). In turn, if the losses of a SRLY member (including SRLY-
limited NOL carryovers) are absorbed by the group, the SRLY member's
cumulative register decreases. See Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(B) and (C).
These proposed regulations would modify the cumulative register
rules to reflect the application of the 80-percent limitation under
section 172(a)(2)(B). Under the proposed regulations, as in current
Sec. 1.1502-21, the full amount of the SRLY member's current-year
income (or current-year absorbed loss) increases (or decreases) the
member's cumulative register. However, when the cumulative register is
reduced to account for the group's absorption of any SRLY member's NOLs
that are subject to the 80-percent limitation (whether or not those
losses are subject to the SRLY limitation), the amount of the reduction
equals the full amount of income that would be necessary to support the
deduction by the SRLY member.
For example, after absorption of any pre-2018 NOLs of a SRLY
member, the SRLY member (other than a nonlife insurance company) would
need to have $100 of remaining income to enable the group to absorb $80
of the SRLY member's SRLY-limited post-2017 NOLs in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020 (that is, 80 percent of the excess of
$100 over $0). Therefore, upon the group's deduction of $80 of NOL
(SRLY or otherwise) of the SRLY member, the cumulative register would
be reduced to reflect the full $100 of income, not just the $80 of
losses absorbed by the group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that, without
the adjustment described, the SRLY member would achieve a different
result as a member of a group than as a stand-alone entity. Such result
would be contrary to the objective of the SRLY rules, which attempt to
replicate the hypothetical separate-entity treatment of the SRLY
member. Therefore, the above-described adjustment would be necessary to
ensure that the SRLY member achieves the same Federal income tax result
as if the SRLY member continued to be a stand-alone entity.
For example, assume that P owns 79 percent of S, and that neither P
nor S is a nonlife insurance company. In Year 1 (a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020), S incurs an $800 NOL that it
carries over into Year 2. S has no other NOL carryovers or carrybacks.
In Year 2, S has $400 of income; accordingly, S's 80-percent limitation
for Year 2 is $320 (that is, the lesser of $800 or 80 percent of the
excess of $400 over $0). As a result, S may use $320 of its $800 Year 1
NOL to offset $320 of its $400 Year 2 income. Under section 172(b)(2),
the amount of the $800 Year 1 NOL that is carried into Year 3 is the
excess of the entire $800 NOL over $320, or $480. S's ability to use
any portion of its remaining Year 1 NOL in Year 3 is dependent on its
generation of additional taxable income in Year 3.
Now assume that, instead of S filing a separate return for Year 2,
P acquires the remaining stock of S at the end of Year 1, and P and S
file a consolidated return for Year 2. The P group has $1,000 of income
in Year 2, of which S has $400. Thus, S's cumulative register increases
from $0 to $400. Because S's $800 Year 1 NOL arose in a SRLY, the
absorption of this NOL in Year 2 is subject to both the SRLY limitation
and the 80-percent limitation. Under the proposed regulations, the P
group may use only $320 (that is, the lesser of $800 or 80 percent of
the excess of $400 over $0) of S's Year 1 SRLY NOL to offset the P
group's Year 2 income. Upon the absorption of $320 of S's Year 1 SRLY
NOL, S's cumulative register is reduced by $400 (that is, the full
amount of income necessary to support the $320 deduction of S's Year 1
SRLY NOL) to $0. The remainder of S's Year 1 SRLY NOL is carried over.
If S's cumulative register were not reduced by the full amount of
income necessary to support the deduction, the P group's ability to use
S's loss would exceed S's ability to use the loss if S had not joined
the P group. As an illustration, assume further that, in Year 3, the P
group has $200 of income, with no net amount of income or loss
attributable to S. Because S's cumulative register would remain at $0,
the P group would not be able to offset any of its $200 Year 3 income
with S's Year 1 SRLY NOL. If S's cumulative register were reduced
solely by the amount of the SRLY NOL deducted in Year 2 ($320), S would
have $80 remaining in its cumulative register ($400-$320), and the P
group could absorb an additional $64 (that is, the lesser of $480 or 80
percent of the excess of $80 over $0) of S's remaining Year 1 SRLY NOL
in Year 3. In contrast, if S had not joined the P group and had not
generated any income in Year 3, it would not have been able to use any
of its $480 remaining Year 1 SRLY NOL in Year 3. In other words, S
would have been able to use a total of only $320 of its Year 1 SRLY NOL
in Years 2 and 3.
Therefore, absent an adjustment to S's cumulative register to
account for the 80-percent limitation, S would achieve a different
result as a member of a consolidated group than if S had remained a
stand-alone entity. As explained earlier in this part II.B.3 of this
Explanation of Provisions, such a result would be inconsistent with the
purpose of the SRLY regime. See the preamble to TD 8823 published in
the Federal Register July 2, 1999 (64 FR 36092).
C. Recomputation of Amount of CNOL Attributable to Each Member
Section 1.1502-21(b)(2)(i) generally provides that, if a group has
a CNOL that is carried to another taxable year, the CNOL is apportioned
among the group's members. For this purpose, Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)
provides a fraction, the numerator of which is the separate NOL of each
member for the consolidated return year of the loss (determined by
taking into account only the member's items of income, gain, deduction,
and loss), and the denominator of which is the sum of the separate NOLs
of all members for that year.
If a member's portion of a CNOL is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro
rata basis, the percentage of the CNOL attributable to each member must
be recomputed to reflect the proper allocation of the remaining CNOL.
For instance, if a portion of a CNOL allocable to a nonlife insurance
company is carried back to and absorbed in a prior taxable year under
the special rule for nonlife insurance companies that applies for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020 (see part I.B of the
Background), all or some portion of the CNOL allocable to the nonlife
insurance company is reduced even though the portion of the CNOL
allocable to other members remains untouched. Therefore, the allocation
of the remaining CNOL must be recomputed.
Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that, if a member's
portion of a CNOL is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata basis, the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to each member is recomputed. The
recomputed percentage of the CNOL attributable to each member equals
the remaining CNOL attributable to the member at the time of the
recomputation, divided by the sum of the remaining CNOL attributable to
all of the remaining members at the time of the recomputation. In other
words, if at the time of the recomputation a member's attributable
portion of the group's remaining CNOL equals $20, and the sum of the
remaining CNOL attributable to all of the group's remaining members
equals $80, the
[[Page 40932]]
recomputed percentage of the CNOL attributable to the member would
equal 25 percent.
Proposed regulations (REG-101652-10) published in the Federal
Register (80 FR 33211) on June 11, 2015 (2015 proposed regulations)
contained a similar rule (see Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of the
2015 proposed regulations). These proposed regulations withdraw
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of the 2015 proposed
regulations and re-propose substantially similar language in new
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B)(2).
D. Farming Losses
For a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2020, section
172(b)(1)(B) permits the portion of a taxpayer's NOL for the taxable
year that is a farming loss to be carried back two years. Under that
provision, the term ``farming loss'' means the lesser of the amount
that would be the NOL if only the income and deductions attributable to
farming businesses (as defined in section 263A(e)(4)) were taken into
account, or the amount of a taxpayer's NOL for the year.
Whereas the special nonlife insurance company rules in section 172
apply based on the status of the entity that generated the loss, the
special farming loss carryback rules in section 172 apply based on the
character of the loss; that is, whether the loss resulted from farming
activity. The special rule for farming losses creates a situation
similar to that addressed in United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United
States, 532 U.S. 822 (2001), which involved the calculation within a
consolidated group of a product liability loss (PLL). A PLL was a
``special status loss'' that was subject to a 10-year carryback period
and that was equal to the aggregate of all members' product liability
expenses (PLEs), limited by the NOL for the year. A consolidated group
generally is treated as having a single, unitary CNOL for a taxable
year (based on all items of income and loss in the group) that is
allocated among members only for specified purposes, including
carrybacks and carryovers to other taxable years. See Sec. 1.1502-
21(e) (defining the term ``CNOL''); Sec. 1.1502-11(a) (setting forth
the general computation for determining CTI). Because the regulations
under section 1502 did not allocate the CNOL for purposes of
calculating the limitation on PLL, the Supreme Court held that the
amount of a group's PLL was limited by the entire amount of the group's
CNOL.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-140668-07) published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 57452) on September 17, 2012 (2012 proposed
regulations), the Treasury Department and the IRS provided rules
regarding the apportionment of CNOLs that contain a component portion
of a special status loss, such as a corporate equity reduction interest
loss or a specified liability loss. Such losses, like farming losses
and the PLLs that were considered in United Dominion, were subject to
special carryback rules. The 2012 proposed regulations effectuated the
holding in United Dominion that a group's CNOL, which is the limit on
the amount of a group's special status losses, may be generated
anywhere in the group. See 77 FR 57452, 57458. On that basis, the 2012
proposed regulations apportioned such special status losses to each
group member that generated a loss in the year in which the special
status loss was incurred, regardless of whether any specific member had
undertaken the activities that generated the expenses that effectively
were granted special status. See id.
Consistent with the 2012 proposed regulations, these proposed
regulations re-propose, in modified form, a specific rule regarding the
apportionment of CNOLs that include farming losses arising in taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2020, or other special status
losses. See proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(D). (Due to the TCJA's
removal of the corporate equity reduction interest loss provisions in
former section 172(g), proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(D) does not
contain explicit rules governing such losses.) Under proposed Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(D), the portion of the CNOL constituting a special
status loss is apportioned to each group member separately from the
remainder of the CNOL under the method provided in Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(2)(iv). Consistent with the 2012 proposed regulations, this
apportionment occurs without separate inquiry into whether a particular
member actually incurred the special status loss. See 77 FR 57452,
57458. These proposed regulations withdraw Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(2)(iv)(C), as proposed in the 2012 proposed regulations. The
Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding this
approach.
E. Elections To Waive Portions of the Five-Year Carryback Period Under
Section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)
Temporary regulations in the Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register add new paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D)
to the regulations in Sec. 1.1502-21. The temporary regulations
provide rules to permit consolidated groups that acquire new members
that were members of another consolidated group to elect to waive all
or part of the pre-acquisition portion of an extended carryback period
under section 172 for certain losses attributable to the acquired
members. The text of those regulations also serves as the text of Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of these proposed regulations. The
preamble to the temporary regulations explains the amendments.
III. Amendments to Sec. 1.1502-47
A. Overview
1. Legislative Background at the Time the Current Life-Nonlife
Regulations Were Promulgated
The Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959, Public Law 86-
69, 73 Stat. 112 (June 25, 1959), established a three-phase system of
taxation for life insurance companies (also referred to as life
companies). Under the first phase of this three-phase system (phase 1),
a life company was taxed on the lesser of its taxable investment income
(TII) or its gain from operations (GO). If a company's GO exceeded its
TII, the company was taxed on 50 percent of such excess (phase 2). The
other half of the GO in excess of TII was added, along with certain
other items, to the policyholders surplus account, which was taxed when
distributed to shareholders of a stock company (phase 3). Life
companies also were permitted certain deductions that were unique to
insurance companies, such as increases in reserves to the extent not
funded out of the policyholders' share of investment income.
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Public Law
94-455, 90 Stat. 1520 (October 4, 1976) (1976 Act), life companies were
prohibited from filing consolidated returns with nonlife companies,
including both nonlife insurance companies and other types of
corporations. This prohibition resulted in part from historical
differences between the taxation of life companies and nonlife
companies.
Section 1507 of the 1976 Act (90 Stat. 1520, 1739-41) permitted
life companies to consolidate with nonlife companies, subject to
additional restrictions that do not apply to a regular consolidated
group. Section 1503(c)(1) (as amended by the 1976 Act and subsequent
tax legislation) provides that, if the nonlife company members of a
life-nonlife group (nonlife members) have a loss for the taxable year,
then under regulations to be issued by the Secretary, the amount of the
loss that cannot be carried back and absorbed by the taxable income of
the nonlife
[[Page 40933]]
members can be taken into account in determining the CTI of the group
only to the extent of the lesser of 35 percent of such loss or 35
percent of the taxable income of the life company members of the group
(life members). Further, section 1503(c)(2) (as so amended) provides
that the losses of a recent nonlife affiliate may not be used by a life
company before the sixth taxable year the companies have been members
of the same affiliated group.
2. Current Life-Nonlife Regulations
The current life-nonlife regulations adopted a subgroup method for
computing a life-nonlife group's CTI. Under the subgroup method, the
nonlife members and the life members generally are treated as if the
members compose two separate consolidated groups, with certain
exceptions (including intercompany transactions, as defined in Sec.
1.1502-13(b)(1)(i)). Thus, each of the life subgroup and the nonlife
subgroup separately calculates its taxable income. Subgroup losses that
are eligible to be carried back must be carried back to offset subgroup
income in prior taxable years before being used to offset income of the
other subgroup in the current taxable year, and subgroup losses may not
be carried back to offset income of the other subgroup in prior taxable
years.
Further, a carryback of a subgroup loss may ``bump'' the loss of
the other subgroup used in the carryback year (that is, the loss that
is carried back may supplant a loss of the other subgroup in the
carryback year). See Sec. 1.1502-47(a)(2)(ii). For example, assume
that life subgroup losses were used to offset nonlife subgroup income
in Year 1. If the nonlife subgroup incurs losses in Year 2 that are
eligible to be carried back to Year 1, those Year 2 nonlife subgroup
losses (rather than the Year 1 life subgroup losses) would be used to
offset the nonlife subgroup's income in Year 1. The ``bumped'' life
subgroup losses from Year 1 then would be carried over to future
taxable years.
3. Legislative Changes Regarding the Taxation of Insurance Companies
Since Promulgation of the Current Life-Nonlife Regulations
The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Public Law 98-369, 98 Stat. 494
(July 18, 1984) (1984 Act), significantly altered the taxation of life
companies. The 1984 Act replaced the three-phase system with a
statutory mechanism similar to that used to calculate the Federal
income tax liability of other corporate taxpayers. Specifically,
section 801(a) imposes an income tax on the life insurance company
taxable income (LICTI) of a life company, and section 801(b) defines
``life insurance company taxable income'' as life insurance gross
income less life insurance deductions. The legislative history of the
1984 Act indicates that, in part, Congress changed the taxation of life
companies in order to simplify the Code. See Staff of the Joint Comm.
on Tax'n, 98th Cong., General Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of
the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, at 577 (December 31, 1984).
In turn, the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat.
2085 (October 22, 1986) (1986 Act), modified the taxation of nonlife
insurance companies. Prior to the 1986 Act, nonlife insurance companies
were permitted to defer unearned premium income while currently
deducting the expenses associated with earning such income, which
created a timing mismatch between the income and expenses of nonlife
insurance companies. The 1986 Act addressed this mismatch by requiring
a nonlife insurance company to reduce its deduction for unearned
premium income by 20 percent. The 1986 Act also repealed special rates,
deductions, and exemptions for small mutual insurance companies and
added a single provision (section 831(b)) for both small mutual
insurance companies and small stock insurance companies.
Lastly, the TCJA made significant additional changes to the
taxation of life insurance companies, and the CARES Act added a special
rule for such companies in section 172(b)(1)(D)(iii). These changes are
described in detail in part II of the Background.
B. Summary of Proposed Changes to Sec. 1.1502-47
As a result of changes in the taxation of insurance companies under
the TCJA and prior legislation, various provisions in Sec. 1.1502-47
currently are outdated. Accordingly, to the extent preempted by
statute, the current regulations have no application. These proposed
regulations update Sec. 1.1502-47 by: (1) Removing paragraphs
implementing statutory provisions that have been repealed; (2) revising
paragraphs implementing statutory provisions that have been
substantially revised; (3) updating terminology and statutory
references to account for other statutory changes; and (4) removing
paragraphs that contain obsolete transition rules or that are no longer
applicable because the effective dates in the current life-nonlife
regulations have passed.
1. Removal of Paragraphs Due to Repealed Statutory Provisions
Certain paragraphs in Sec. 1.1502-47 are no longer relevant to the
calculation of life-nonlife CTI because of the repeal of the three-
phase system by the 1984 Act and later amendments to the Code.
Therefore, these proposed regulations remove numerous paragraphs
including current Sec. Sec. 1.1502-47(k) and (l), which provide rules
for calculating consolidated TII and the consolidated GO or loss from
operations (LO). These proposed regulations also remove (i) Sec.
1.1502-47(f)(7)(ii), which generally provides that the consolidated tax
liability of a life-nonlife group includes the tax described by section
1201, and (ii) Sec. 1.1502-47(o), which provides rules for calculating
the alternative tax imposed by section 1201 on consolidated capital
gain. (As noted in part II of the Background, section 1201 was repealed
by the TCJA.)
2. Updates Reflecting Substantially Revised Statutory Provisions
These proposed regulations also update Sec. 1.1502-47 to reflect
changes to certain statutory provisions since the current life-nonlife
regulations were promulgated. For example, these proposed regulations
modify current Sec. 1.1502-47(f)(5) (relating to the dividends
received deduction) to reflect changes by the 1986 Act to sections
805(a)(4) and 818(e)(2) (for life companies) and to reflect changes by
the 1986 Act and the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988,
Public Law 100-647, 102 Stat. 3342 (November 10, 1988), respectively,
to sections 832(b)(5)(B) and (g) (for nonlife insurance companies).
Under modified Sec. 1.1502-47(f)(5) (that is, proposed Sec. 1.1502-
47(d)(5)), dividends received by an insurance company from another
includible member of the group are treated as if the group were not
filing a consolidated return. To reflect the repeal of section 815 by
the TCJA, these proposed regulations also remove current Sec. 1.1502-
47(g)(3) (which provides that life-nonlife groups must include any
amounts subtracted under section 815 from life members' policyholders
surplus accounts).
Additionally, these proposed regulations update the rules relating
to consolidated LICTI to reflect the repeal of the three-phase system
by the 1984 Act and other changes to the taxation of life companies.
These proposed regulations also move certain provisions in current
Sec. 1.1502-47(k) (consolidated TII) and (l) (consolidated GO or LO)
that remain applicable following the repeal of the three-phase system
to revised
[[Page 40934]]
paragraph (g), and they implement the special rule for life insurance
companies in section 172(b)(1)(D)(iii) under the CARES Act.
3. Revisions to Account for Other Statutory Changes
These proposed regulations also update terminology and citations to
the Code to reflect current law. For example, these proposed
regulations remove references to section 821 and mutual insurance
companies because the statutory provisions regarding mutual insurance
companies were repealed by the 1986 Act. Additionally, these proposed
regulations replace references to section 802 with references to
section 801 because section 802 was repealed by the 1984 Act.
Similarly, these proposed regulations replace references to the LO with
references to the NOL deduction under section 172 to reflect the repeal
of section 810 by the TCJA.
4. Removal of Obsolete Transition Rules and Other Rules That No Longer
Are Applicable
These proposed regulations propose the removal of transition rules
regarding the implementation of the current life-nonlife regulations,
since those transition rules apply to carryovers that either have been
absorbed or have expired. For example, the proposed regulations propose
the removal of current Sec. 1.1502-47(h)(3) (setting forth transition
rules for NOLs attributable to taxable years ending before January 1,
1981), current Sec. 1.1502-47(k)(6) (containing a similar rule for
certain capital loss carryovers), and current Sec. 1.1502-47(e)(4)
(granting certain life-nonlife groups permission to discontinue filing
a consolidated return for the group's first taxable year for which the
current life-nonlife regulations were effective).
These proposed regulations also would remove cross-references to
certain prior-law regulations that are designated with an ``A'' because
those regulations generally are applicable to years ending in 1999 or
earlier. Additionally, these proposed regulations would remove cross-
references to Sec. 1.1502-18 (relating to inventory adjustments)
because that section does not apply to taxable years beginning after
July 11, 1995.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Dates
The regulations in proposed Sec. 1.1502-21 generally are proposed
to be applicable to losses arising in taxable years beginning after the
date of publication in the Federal Register of a Treasury decision
adopting these proposed rules as final regulations (Publication Date).
The regulations in proposed Sec. Sec. 1.1502-1 and 1.1502-47 generally
are proposed to be applicable to taxable years beginning after the
Publication Date. However, a taxpayer deducting post-2017 NOLs on (1)
original returns, (2) amended returns, or (3) applications for
tentative carryback adjustments, filed for taxable years beginning on
or before the Publication Date, may rely on these proposed regulations
concerning the Federal income tax treatment of post-2017 NOLs with
regard to those filings if the taxpayer relies on the proposed
regulations in their entirety and in a consistent manner.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563, 13771, and 12866 direct agencies to assess
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
These proposed regulations have been designated as subject to
review under Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax
regulations. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
designated the proposed regulations as significant under section 1(b)
of the Memorandum of Agreement. Accordingly, OMB has reviewed the
proposed regulations.
A. Background and Need for Regulations
In general, taxpayers whose deductions exceed their income generate
a net operating loss (NOL), calculated under the rules of section 172.
Section 172 also governs the use of NOLs generated in other years to
offset taxable income in the current year. Regulations issued under the
authority of section 1502 may be used to govern how section 172 applies
to consolidated groups of C corporations. In general, a consolidated
group generates a combined NOL at an aggregate level (CNOL), with the
CNOL generally equal to the loss generated from treating the
consolidated group as a single entity. Under regulations promulgated
prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the allowed CNOL deduction
was equal to the lesser of the CNOL carryover or the combined taxable
income of the group (before the CNOL deduction).
The TCJA and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(CARES Act) made several changes to section 172. First, the TCJA and
the CARES Act disallowed the carry back of NOLs generated in taxable
years beginning after 2020, except for farming losses and losses
incurred by corporations that are insurance companies other than life
insurance companies (nonlife insurance companies). Second, the TCJA and
the CARES Act limited the NOL deduction in taxable years beginning
after 2020 for NOLs generated in 2018 or later (post-2017 NOLs) to 80
percent of taxable income determined after the deduction for pre-2018
NOLs but before the deduction for post-2017 NOLs. This 80-percent
limitation does not apply to nonlife insurance companies.
These proposed regulations implement the changes to section 172 in
the context of consolidated groups. In particular, regulations are
needed to address three issues related to consolidated groups that were
not expressly addressed in the TCJA or the CARES Act. First, the
proposed regulations describe how to determine the 80-percent
limitation in the case of a ``mixed'' group--that is, a consolidated
group containing nonlife insurance companies and other members. Second,
the proposed regulations address the calculation and allocation of
farming losses. Third, the proposed regulations implement the 80-
percent limitation into existing regulations to determine the CNOL
deduction attributable to losses a member arising during periods in
which that member was not part of that group. Part I.B of this Special
Analyses describes the manner by which the proposed regulations
addresses each of these issues.
Part I.B also describes an alternative approach that was
contemplated by the Treasury Department and the IRS regarding the
allocation of currently generated losses to nonlife insurance companies
and other members. The Treasury Department and the IRS elected not to
implement this approach.
B. Overview of the Proposed Regulations
In this part I.B the following terms are used. The term ``P group''
means a consolidated group of which P is the common parent. The term
``P&C member'' means a member of the P
[[Page 40935]]
group that is a nonlife insurance company. The term ``C member'' means
a member of the P group that is a corporation other than nonlife
insurance company.
1. Application of 80-Percent Limitation in Mixed Groups
Under the statute, the general rule for determining the NOL
deduction (for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2020)
effectively proceeds in two steps. First, the taxpayer deducts pre-2018
NOLs without limit. Second, the taxpayer deducts post-2017 NOLs up to
80 percent of the taxpayer's taxable income (computed without regard to
the deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250) determined after the
deduction of pre-2018 NOLs (but, naturally, before the deduction for
post-2017 NOLs). However, this 80-percent limitation does not apply for
corporations that are nonlife insurance companies.
The application of the 80-percent limitation to the P group is
straightforward if (i) there are no pre-2018 NOLs and (ii) both classes
of P&C members and C members have positive income before the CNOL
deduction. In that case, these proposed regulations provide, quite
naturally, that the CNOL limitation is determined by adding (i) the
pre-CNOL income generated by the class of C members (C member income
pool), determined by applying the 80-percent limitation, plus (ii) 100
percent of the pre-CNOL income generated by the class of P&C members
(P&C member income pool). This latter treatment reflects the rule in
section 172(f) that nonlife insurance companies are not subject to the
80-percent limitation.
One complication arises when the pre-CNOL C member income pool is
positive and the pre-CNOL P&C income pool is negative, and the P group
has positive combined pre-CNOL taxable income. In this case (where the
pre-CNOL income is generated by C members, rather than P&C members),
these proposed regulations provide that the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit is determined by applying the 80-percent limitation to the income
of the P group. If the situation were reversed, such that the P group
had positive combined taxable income but the pre-CNOL income is
generated by P&C members, rather than the C members, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit is equal to the income of the P group (that is,
determined without regard to the 80-percent limitation). In essence, in
these situations, the amount of the P group's income able to absorb a
post-2017 CNOL carryover is defined by the member pool (that is, the C
member income pool or the P&C member income pool) that is generating
the income.
The other complication occurs when there is a pre-2018 NOL. In this
situation, it matters whether the pre-2018 NOL is treated as reducing
the amount of the C member income pool or reducing the amount of P&C
member income pool. Consider the following example (Example 1). In
Example 1, the P group carries $50 in pre-2018 NOLs and $1000 in post-
2017 NOLs to 2021. In 2021, the P&C members and the C members,
respectively, earn (pre-CNOL) income of $100. If the pre-2018 NOL were
treated as solely reducing the amount of C member income pool, then the
limitation for the post-2017 CNOL deduction would be $100 plus 80
percent of $50 ($100 minus $50), equal to $140. If the pre-2018 NOL
were treated as solely reducing the amount of the P&C member income
pool, then the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the P group would be
$50 ($100 minus $50) plus 80 percent of $100, or $130.
These proposed regulations allocate the pre-2018 NOL pro-rata to
the C member income pool and the P&C member income pool in proportion
to their current-year income. In Example 1, $25 of the pre-2018 NOL
would be allocated to the C member income pool and $25 to the P&C
member income pool. Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
the P group would be $75 ($100 minus $25) plus 80 percent of $75 ($100
minus $25), or $135.
2. Farming Losses
Section 172 provides NOLs arising in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020, may not be carried back to prior years, with two
exceptions: (1) Farming losses and (2) nonlife insurance company
losses. Section 172(b)(1)(B) defines a ``farming loss'' as the smaller
of the actual loss from farming activities in a given year (that is,
the excess of the deductions in farming activities over income in
farming activities) and the total NOL generated in that year. This
statutory provision means that if a taxpayer incurs a loss in farming
activities but has overall income in other activities, the farming loss
will be smaller than the loss in farming activities (and can possibly
be zero).
Regulations were needed to clarify two issues that arise in the
context of consolidated groups. First, these regulations clarify that
the maximum amount of farming loss is the CNOL of the group rather than
the NOL of the specific member generating the loss in farming
activities. This approach closely follows regulations issued by the
Treasury Department and the IRS in 2012 in an analogous setting.
Second, given the overlapping categories of carryback-eligible NOLs
(farming losses and nonlife insurance companies), regulations are
needed to allocate the farming loss to the various members to determine
the total amount of CNOL that can be carried back. Consider the
following example (Example 2). In Example 2, the P group consists of
one C member and one P&C member. In 2021, the C member's only activity
is farming and the C member incurs a loss of $30, while the P&C member
incurs a loss of $10. The total farming loss is $30, since $30 is less
than the P group CNOL of $40. If this farming loss were allocated
entirely to the C member, then the total amount eligible for carryback
would be $40 (that is, $30 for the farming loss and $10 for the loss
incurred by the P&C member). By contrast, if the farming loss were
allocated entirely to the P&C member, only $30 would be eligible to be
carried back.
Again, following a similar rule as the 2012 regulations, these
proposed regulations allocate the farming loss to each member of the
group in proportion with their share of total losses, without regard to
whether each member actually engaged in farming. In Example 2, this
would allocate $7.50 (that is, one-fourth of $30) of the farming loss
to the P&C member and the remaining $22.50 (that is, three-fourths of
$30) to the C member. Therefore, the P group would be allowed to carry
back $32.50 total (that is, the $10 of loss generated by the P&C member
and the $22.50 of farming losses allocated to the C member).
3. Separate Return Loss Year Limitation
To reduce ``loss trafficking,'' existing regulations under section
1502 limit the extent to which a consolidated group (that is, the P
group) can claim a CNOL attributable to losses generated by some member
(M) in years in which M was not a member. In particular, existing rules
limit this amount of loss to the amount of the loss that would have
been deductible had M remained a separate entity; that is, the rules
are designed to preserve neutrality in loss use between being a
separate entity or a member of a group. Existing rules operationalize
this principle using the mechanic of a ``cumulative register.'' The
cumulative register is equal to the (cumulative) amount of M's income
that is taken into account in the P group's income. Income earned by M
while a member of the P group increases the cumulative register, while
losses (carried over or otherwise) taken into account by the group
reduce the cumulative register. In general, the existing rules provide
that M's pre-group NOLs cannot offset the P
[[Page 40936]]
group's income when the cumulative register is less than or equal to
zero.
The introduction of the 80-percent limitation in the TCJA and CARES
Act necessitates an adjustment to this mechanism in order to retain
this neutrality-in-loss-use property. In particular, these proposed
regulations provide that any losses by M that are absorbed by the P
group and subject to the 80-percent limitation cause a reduction to the
register equal to the full amount of income needed to support that
deduction. The following example (Example 3) demonstrates why this
adjustment is necessary. In Example 3, P and S are each corporations
other than nonlife insurance companies (that is, they are subject to
the 80-percent limitation). Suppose in 2021, S incurs a loss of $800,
which is the only loss incurred by S. In 2022, S incurs income of $400.
If S were not a member of a consolidated group, its 2022 NOL deduction
would be limited to $320 (80 percent of $400). Suppose instead that P
acquires S in 2022 and that P has separate income of $600 in 2022, so
the consolidated group has $1000 in pre-CNOL income in 2022. Before
claiming any CNOLs, S's cumulative register would increase to $400 in
2022. Without any additional rules, the $400 cumulative register would
allow P to claim a CNOL of $400 (bringing the register down to zero),
greater than what would have been allowed had S remained a separate
entity. By contrast, requiring the register to be reduced by 125
percent of the NOL (as under the current NPRM) allows P to claim only a
$320 CNOL, replicating the result if S were a separate entity.
4. Allocation of Current Losses to Nonlife Insurance Companies
In general, under the TCJA and CARES Act, taxpayers may not carry
back any losses generated in tax years beginning after 2020, with the
exception of losses generated by nonlife insurance companies and
farming losses. Existing regulations clarify that CNOLs are allocated
to each member in proportion to the total loss. This allocation rule
can be illustrated by example (Example 4). In Example 4, the C member
has a current loss of $10 (in a tax year beginning in 2021 or later).
The P&C members are corporations PC1 and PC2. PC1 has a gain of $40 and
PC2 has a loss of $40. Assume that the P group does not engage in any
farming activities. The CNOL for the P group is $10. The $10 of CNOL is
allocated to the C member and PC2 in proportion to their total losses.
The C member has one-fifth of the total loss ($10 divided by $50) and
PC2 has four-fifths. Therefore, under the existing regulations, the C
member is allocated $2 ($10 times one-fifth) and PC2 is allocated $8
($10 times four-fifths). In the end, $8 of the CNOL may be carried back
in Example 4. The proposed regulations do not alter these existing
regulations.
In formulating these proposed regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS contemplated an alternative approach. Under this
alternative, consolidated groups would be required to compute gain and
loss by grouping P&C members and C members separately prior to
allocating CNOL to members. The application of this approach can be
seen by revisiting Example 4. Under this alternative approach, because
the P&C members as a whole do not have a loss, no CNOL would be
allocated to any P&C member regardless of the gain or loss of any of
the individual P&C members. Thus, under the alternative approach, none
of the $10 CNOL would be eligible for carryback in Example 4.
C. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
In this analysis, the Treasury Department and the IRS assess the
benefits and costs of the proposed regulations relative to a no-action
baseline reflecting anticipated Federal income tax-related behavior in
the absence of these regulations.
2. Summary of Economic Effects
The proposed regulations provide certainty and clarity to taxpayers
regarding the treatment of NOLs under section 172 and the regulations
under section 1502. In the absence of such guidance, the chance that
different taxpayers would interpret the statute and the regulations
differently would be exacerbated. Similarly situated taxpayers might
interpret those rules differently, with one taxpayer pursuing an
economic opportunity that another taxpayer might decline to make
because of different interpretations of the ability of losses to offset
taxable income. If this second taxpayer's activity were more
profitable, the resulting economic decisions are inefficient. Such
situations are more likely to arise in the absence of guidance. While
no guidance can curtail all differential or inaccurate interpretations
of the statute, the regulations significantly mitigate the chance for
differential or inaccurate interpretations and thereby increase
economic efficiency.
To the extent that the specific provisions of the proposed
regulations result in the acceleration or delay of the tax year in
which taxpayers deduct an NOL relative to the baseline, those taxpayers
may face a change in the present value of the after-tax return to new
investment, particularly investment that may result in losses. The
resulting changes in the incentives facing the taxpayer are complex and
may lead the taxpayer either to increase, decrease, or leave unchanged
the volume and risk level of its investment portfolio, relative to the
baseline, in ways that depend on the taxpayer's stock of NOLs and the
depreciation schedules and income patterns of investments they would
typically consider, including whether the investment is subject to
bonus depreciation. Because these elements are complex and taxpayer-
specific and because the sign of the effect on investment is generally
ambiguous, the Treasury Department and the IRS have not projected the
specific effects on economic activity arising from the proposed
regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that any such effects
will be small relative to the baseline. The effects are small because
the regulations apply only to consolidated groups; in addition, several
provisions of the proposed regulations apply only to the extent that a
consolidated group contains a mix of member types. Moreover, the
effects are small because: (i) For provisions of the proposed
regulations that affect the deduction for pre-2018 NOLs, the effects
are limited to the stock of the pre-2018 NOLs; and (ii) for provisions
that affect the allowable rate of loss usage of post-2017 NOLs, the
effect arises only from the 20 percentage point differential in the
deduction for these NOLs. This latter effect in particular, to which
the bulk of the provisions apply, is too small to substantially affect
taxpayers' use of NOLs and thus too small to lead to meaningful changes
in economic decisions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have not provided quantitative
estimates of the effects of these regulations relative to the baseline
because they do not have readily available models that predict the
effects of these tax treatments of consolidated group NOLs on the
investments or other activities that consolidated groups might
undertake. The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on this
analysis and on the economic effects of these proposed regulations, and
particularly solicit data, models, or other evidence that could enhance
the rigor with which the final regulations are developed.
[[Page 40937]]
3. Allocation of CNOLs to Specific Members of Consolidated Groups
The proposed regulations do not amend existing rules for the
allocation of the CNOL within consolidated groups. The proposed
regulations follow existing rules and allocate the CNOLs to each member
of the group in proportion to the total loss.
The Treasury Department and the IRS considered an alternative
approach that would have required groups to compute gain and loss at
the subgroup level prior to allocating CNOL to members. Recall Example
4 in which the PC subgroup had no gain or loss but the C subgroup had a
loss of $10. Under this alternative approach, because the PC subgroup
as a whole does not have a loss, no CNOL would be allocated to any
member in the PC group regardless of the gain or loss of any of the
individual members of PC. Thus, in Example 4, none of the $10 CNOL
would be eligible for carryback.
The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that as a result of
the TCJA and the CARES Act the adopted approach of allocating losses to
each member may provide groups with a potential incentive, relative to
the alternative approach, to split their C members into several
corporations--some with loss and some with gain. In certain
circumstances, such a strategy would effectively enable some share of
the losses generated by the other C members to be carried back. This
change in the business structure of consolidated groups may entail
economic costs because, to the extent this strategy is pursued, it
would result from tax-driven rather than market-driven considerations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project, however, that the adopted
approach will have lower compliance costs for taxpayers, relative to
the alternative approach, because it generally follows existing
regulatory practice for allocating losses within a consolidated group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have not attempted to estimate
the economic consequences of either of these effects but project them
to be small. The effects are projected to be small because (i) only a
small number of taxpayers are likely to be affected; (ii) any
reorganization that occurs due to the proposed regulations will
primarily be ``on paper'' and entail little or no economic loss; and
(iii) the compliance burden of loss allocation, under either the
proposed regulations or the alternative approach, is not high.
4. Affected Taxpayers
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that these regulations
will primarily affect consolidated groups that contain at least one
nonlife insurance member and at least one member that is not a nonlife
insurance company. Based on data from 2015, the Treasury Department and
the IRS calculate that there were 1,130 such consolidated groups.
Approximately 460 of these groups were of ``mixed loss'' status,
meaning that at least one nonlife insurance member had a gain and one
other member had a loss, or vice versa.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
For information regarding the collection of information in Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) of these proposed regulations (including where
to submit comments on this collection of information and on the
accuracy of the estimated burden), please refer to the preamble to the
temporary regulations under section 1502 published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. This collection of information will be
under Office of Management and Budget control number 1545-0123, the
same control number as the collection of information in those temporary
regulations, and the estimated burden of this collection of information
is described in the preamble to those temporary regulations.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it
is hereby certified that these proposed regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact that these proposed regulations
apply only to corporations that file consolidated Federal income tax
returns, and that such corporations almost exclusively consist of
larger businesses. Specifically, based on data available to the IRS,
corporations that file consolidated Federal income tax returns
represent only approximately two percent of all filers of Forms 1120
(U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return). However, these consolidated
Federal income tax returns account for approximately 95 percent of the
aggregate amount of receipts provided on all Forms 1120. Therefore,
these proposed regulations would not create additional obligations for,
or impose an economic impact on, small entities. Accordingly, the
Secretary certifies that the proposed regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a state,
local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. In 2020, that threshold is approximately $156 million. This
rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on state and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order. This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications, does not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on state and local governments, and does not preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
Before the proposed amendments to the regulations are adopted as
final regulations, consideration will be given to comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the
ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments
on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Any electronic comments
submitted, and to the extent practicable any paper comments submitted,
will be made available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any
person who timely submits electronic or written comments. Requests for
a public hearing are also encouraged to be made electronically. If a
public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date and time for the public
hearing will be published in the Federal Register. Announcement
[[Page 40938]]
2020-4, 2020-17 IRB 1, provides that until further notice, public
hearings conducted by the IRS will be held telephonically. Any
telephonic hearing will be made accessible to people with disabilities.
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings, and Notices cited in this
preamble are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative
Bulletin) and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the
IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these proposed regulations are Justin O.
Kellar, Gregory J. Galvin, and William W. Burhop of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their development.
Partial Withdrawal of Notices of Proposed Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 1502 and 7805, Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(C) of the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-
140668-07) published in the Federal Register (77 FR 57451) on September
17, 2012 is withdrawn, and Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B) of the notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG-101652-10) published in the Federal
Register (80 FR 33211) on June 11, 2015 is withdrawn.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income Taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAX
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.1502-1 is amended by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(k) Nonlife insurance company. The term nonlife insurance company
means a member that is an insurance company other than a life insurance
company, each as defined in section 816(a).
(l) Applicability date. Paragraph (k) of this section applies to
taxable years beginning after [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
0
Par. 3. Section 1.1502-21 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraph (a).Redesignating paragraph (a) introductory text
as paragraph (a)(1).
0
2. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
3. In paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(A), removing the language ``shall equal the
product of'' with the language ``equals the product obtained by
multiplying'', and adding in its place ``such member'' with the
language ``the member''.
0
4. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B).
0
5. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iv)(C) through (E).
0
6. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(v) introductory text.
0
7. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), redesignating Examples 1 through 3 as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), respectively.
0
8. In newly redesignated paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A) through (C),
redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(b)(2)(v)(A)(1) and (2), paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(1) and (2), and paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(i) and
(ii) as paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(1) and (2).
0
9. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(D) through (G).
0
10. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B), removing the language ``Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)(2)'' and adding in its place ``Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)''.
0
11. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C).
0
12. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(D).
0
13. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(i) introductory text.
0
14. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C)(2), removing the language ``and''.
0
15. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D), removing the language ``account.'' and
adding in its place ``account; and''.
0
16. Adding paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E).
0
17. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii) introductory text, adding a new first
sentence.
0
18. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), designating Examples 1 through 5 as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), respectively.
0
19. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E),
redesignating paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(i) through
(vi) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(1) through (6), paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(C)(1) through
(3), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) through (4), and paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(i) through
(v) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(1) through (5).
0
20. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(C)(2), adding the
language ``, a taxable year that begins on January 1, 2021'' after the
language ``at the beginning of Year 4''.
0
21. Revising paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(2) through (4).
0
22. Adding paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D)(5).
0
23. Revising paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(2) through (5).
0
24. Adding paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(6) and (c)(1)(iii)(F).
0
25. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(v).
0
26. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii) introductory text, adding a new first
sentence.
0
27. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii), redesignating Examples 1 through 4 as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D), respectively.
0
28. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D),
redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(i) through (vii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A)(1) through (7), paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(i) through
(iv) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1) through (4), paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(C)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(C)(1)
through (3), and paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(D)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(D)(1) and (2).
0
29. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(3) through (7),
the first sentence of each, adding the language ``, including the
limitation under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section'' after the
language ``under paragraph (c) of this section''.
0
30. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the first
sentence, adding the language ``, none of which is a nonlife insurance
company'' after the language ``S, T, P and M''.
0
31. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the fourth
sentence, adding the language ``(a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020)'' after the language ``Year 3''.
0
32. Revising newly designated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(3).
0
33. Redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4) as
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
0
34. Adding a new paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4).
0
35. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
0
36. Adding paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(6).
0
37. In paragraph (g)(5), redesignating Examples 1 through 9 as
paragraphs (g)(5)(i) through (ix), respectively.
0
38. In newly redesignated paragraphs (g)(5)(i) through (ix),
redesignating paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs
(g)(5)(i)(A) through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(A) through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(i) through
(iii) as paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(A) through (C), paragraphs
(g)(5)(iv)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(A) through (D),
[[Page 40939]]
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(A) through
(D), paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(A)
through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(i) through (vi) as paragraphs
(g)(5)(vii)(A) through (F), paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(i) through (v) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(A) through (E), and paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(i)
through (vii) as paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(A) through (G).
0
39. Revising paragraph (h)(9).
0
40. Adding paragraph (h)(10).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-21 Net operating losses.
(a) Consolidated net operating loss deduction--(1) In general.
Subject to any limitations under the Internal Revenue Code or this
chapter (for example, the limitations under section 172(a)(2) and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section), the consolidated net operating loss
deduction (or CNOL deduction) for any consolidated return year is the
aggregate of the net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to the
year. The net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks consist of--
(i) Any CNOLs (as defined in paragraph (e) of this section) of the
consolidated group; and
(ii) Any net operating losses (or NOLs) of the members arising in
separate return years.
(2) Application of section 172 for computing net operating loss
deductions--(i) Overview. For purposes of Sec. 1.1502-11(a)(2)
(regarding a CNOL deduction), the rules of section 172 regarding the
use of net operating losses are taken into account as provided by this
paragraph (a)(2) in calculating the consolidated taxable income of a
group for a particular consolidated return year. More specifically, the
aggregate amount of net operating losses arising in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2018 (pre-2018 NOLs) carried to a
particular consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020,
is added to the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit (as determined
under this paragraph (a)(2)) for such year for purposes of determining
the total CNOL deduction allowed for such year. See section
172(a)(2)(A) and (B).
(ii) Computation of the 80-percent limitation and special rule for
nonlife insurance companies--(A) Determinations based on status of
group members. If a portion of a CNOL arising in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017 (post-2017 CNOL), is carried back or
carried over to a consolidated return year beginning after December 31,
2020, whether the members of the group include nonlife insurance
companies, other types of corporations, or both determines whether
section 172(a) (including the limitation described in section
172(a)(2)(B) (80-percent limitation)), section 172(f), or both, apply
to the group for the consolidated return year.
(B) Determination of post-2017 CNOL deduction limit. The amount of
post-2017 CNOLs that may be absorbed by one or more members of the
group in a consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020
(post-2017 CNOL deduction limit) is determined under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section by applying section 172(a)(2)(B) (that is,
the 80-percent limitation), section 172(f) (that is, the special rule
for nonlife insurance companies), or both, to the group's consolidated
taxable income for that year.
(C) Inapplicability of 80-percent limitation. The 80-percent
limitation does not apply to CNOL deductions taken in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2021, or to CNOLs arising in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2018 (that is, pre-2018 CNOLs). See section
172(a).
(iii) Computations under sections 172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f). This
paragraph (a)(2)(iii) provides rules for applying sections 172(f) and
172(a)(2)(B) to consolidated return years beginning after December 31,
2020 (that is, for computing the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit).
Section 172(f) applies to income of nonlife insurance company members,
whereas section 172(a)(2)(B) applies to income of members that are not
nonlife insurance companies. Thus, this paragraph (a)(2)(iii) provides
specific rules for groups with no nonlife insurance company members,
only nonlife insurance company members, or a combination of nonlife
insurance company members and other members.
(A) Groups without nonlife insurance company members. If no member
of a group is a nonlife insurance company during a particular
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020, section
172(a)(2)(B) (that is, the 80-percent limitation) applies to all income
of the group for that year. Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for the group for that year is the lesser of--
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to that year; or
(2) The amount determined by multiplying--
(i) 80 percent, by
(ii) Consolidated taxable income for the group for that year
(determined without regard to any deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) less the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that
year.
(B) Groups comprised solely of nonlife insurance companies. If a
group is comprised solely of nonlife insurance companies during a
particular consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020,
section 172(f) applies to all income of the group for that year.
Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the group for that
year equals consolidated taxable income less the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year.
(C) Groups that include both nonlife insurance companies and other
corporations--(1) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) of this section, if a group has at least one member
that is a nonlife insurance company and at least one member that is not
a nonlife insurance company during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for the group for that year equals the sum of the amounts
determined under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section.
(2) Residual income pool. The amount determined under this
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) is the lesser of--
(i) The aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to a
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020, or
(ii) Eighty percent of the consolidated taxable income of the group
for that year (determined without regard to any income, gain,
deduction, or loss of members that are nonlife insurance companies and
without regard to any deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250)
(residual income pool) after subtracting the aggregate amount of pre-
2018 NOLs carried to that year that are allocated to the residual
income pool under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section (that is,
by applying the 80-percent limitation). See section 172(a)(2)(B).
(3) Nonlife income pool. The amount determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) is the consolidated taxable income of the group for a
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020 (determined
without regard to any income, gain, deduction, or loss of members
included in the computation under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this
section) (nonlife income pool) less the aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs carried to that year that are allocated to the nonlife income pool
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section. See section 172(f).
(4) Pro rata allocation of pre-2018 NOLs between pools of income.
For purposes of paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section,
the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to any particular
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020, is
[[Page 40940]]
prorated between the residual income pool and the nonlife income pool
based on the relative amounts of positive income of those two pools.
For example, if $30 of pre-2018 NOLs is carried over to a year in which
the residual income pool contains $75 and the nonlife income pool
contains $150, the residual income pool is allocated $10 of the pre-
2018 NOLs ($30 x $75/($75 + $150), or $30 x \1/3\), and the nonlife
income pool is allocated the remaining $20 of pre-2018 NOLs ($30 x
$150/($75 + $150), or $30 x \2/3\).
(5) Exception. The post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the group for
a consolidated return year is determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) if the amounts computed under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section for that year are not both
positive.
(i) Positive residual income pool and negative nonlife income pool.
This paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies if the amount computed
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the residual
income pool is positive and the amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the nonlife income pool is
negative. If this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for the group for a consolidated return year
equals the lesser of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year, or 80 percent of the consolidated taxable income of the
entire group (determined without regard to any deductions under
sections 172, 199A, and 250) after subtracting the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year (that is, by applying the 80-percent
limitation). See section 172(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Positive nonlife income pool and negative residual income
pool. If the amount computed under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this
section for the nonlife income pool is positive and the amount computed
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the residual
income pool is negative, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year equals the consolidated taxable
income of the entire group less the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year. See section 172(f).
(b) * * *
(1) Carryovers and carrybacks generally. The net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to a taxable year are determined under the
principles of, and are subject to any limitations under, section 172
and this section. Thus, losses permitted to be absorbed in a
consolidated return year generally are absorbed in the order of the
taxable years in which they arose, and losses carried from taxable
years ending on the same date, and which are available to offset
consolidated taxable income for the year, generally are absorbed on a
pro rata basis. In addition, except as otherwise provided in this
section, the amount of any CNOL absorbed by the group in any year is
apportioned among members based on the percentage of the CNOL eligible
for carryback or carryover that is attributable to each member as of
the beginning of the year. The percentage of the CNOL attributable to a
member is determined pursuant to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this
section. Additional rules provided under the Internal Revenue Code or
regulations also apply. See, for example, section 382(l)(2)(B) (if
losses are carried from the same taxable year, losses subject to
limitation under section 382 are absorbed before losses that are not
subject to limitation under section 382). See paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of
this section, Example 2, for an illustration of pro rata absorption of
losses subject to a SRLY limitation.
(2) * * *
(iv) * * *
(B) Percentage of CNOL attributable to a member--(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of this section, the
percentage of the CNOL for the consolidated return year attributable to
a member equals the separate net operating loss of the member for the
consolidated return year divided by the sum of the separate net
operating losses for that year of all members having such losses for
that year. For this purpose, the separate net operating loss of a
member is determined by computing the CNOL by reference to only the
member's items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, including the
member's losses and deductions actually absorbed by the group in the
consolidated return year (whether or not absorbed by the member).
(2) Recomputed percentage. If, for any reason, a member's portion
of a CNOL is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata basis (for example,
under Sec. 1.1502-11(b) or (c), paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C) of this
section, Sec. 1.1502-28, or Sec. 1.1502-36(d), or as the result of a
carryback to a separate return year), the percentage of the CNOL
attributable to each member is recomputed. In addition, if a member
with a separate net operating loss ceases to be a member, the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to each remaining member is
recomputed. The recomputed percentage of the CNOL attributable to each
member equals the remaining CNOL attributable to the member at the time
of the recomputation divided by the sum of the remaining CNOL
attributable to all of the remaining members at the time of the
recomputation. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2), a CNOL
that is permanently disallowed or eliminated is treated as absorbed.
(C) Net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks--(1) General
rules. Subject to the rules regarding allocation of special status
losses under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) of this section--
(i) Nonlife insurance companies. The portion of a CNOL attributable
to any members of the group that are nonlife insurance companies is
carried back or carried over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to nonlife insurance companies.
(ii) Corporations other than nonlife insurance companies. The
portion of a CNOL attributable to any other members of the group is
carried back or carried over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to corporations other than nonlife insurance companies.
(2) Recomputed percentage. For rules governing the recomputation of
the percentage of a CNOL attributable to each remaining member if any
portion of the CNOL attributable to a member is carried back under
section 172(b)(1)(B) or (C) and absorbed on a non-pro rata basis, see
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of this section.
(D) Allocation of special status losses. The amount of the group's
CNOL that is determined to constitute a farming loss (as defined in
section 172(b)(1)(B)) or any other net operating loss that is subject
to special carryback or carryover rules (special status loss) is
allocated to each member separately from the remainder of the CNOL
based on the percentage of the CNOL attributable to the member, as
determined under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. This
allocation is made without regard to whether a particular member
actually incurred specific expenses or engaged in specific activities
required by the special status loss provisions. This paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) applies only with regard to losses for which the special
carryback or carryover rules are dependent on the type of expense
generating the loss, rather than on the special status of the entity to
which the loss is allocable. See section 172(b)(1)(C) and paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(C)(1)(i) of this section (applicable to losses of nonlife
insurance companies). This paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) does not apply to
farming losses incurred by a consolidated group in any taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021.
(E) Coordination with rules for life-nonlife groups under Sec.
1.1502-47. For
[[Page 40941]]
groups that include at least one member that is a life insurance
company and for which an election is in effect under section
1504(c)(2), see Sec. 1.1502-47.
(v) Examples. For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(b)(2)(v), unless otherwise stated, all groups file consolidated
returns, all corporations have calendar taxable years, all losses are
farming losses within the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii), all
taxable years begin after December 31, 2020, the facts set forth the
only corporate activity, value means fair market value and the adjusted
basis of each asset equals its value, all transactions are with
unrelated persons, and the application of any limitation or threshold
under section 382 is disregarded. The principles of this paragraph (b)
are illustrated by the following examples:
* * * * *
(D) Example 4: Allocation of a CNOL arising in a consolidated
return year beginning after December 31, 2020. (1) P is the common
parent of a consolidated group that includes S. Neither P nor S is a
nonlife insurance company. The P group also includes nonlife
insurance companies PC1, PC2, and PC3. In the P group's 2021
consolidated return year, all members except S have separate net
operating losses, and the P group's CNOL in that year is $40. No
member of the P group engages in farming activities. See section
172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) of this
section, for purposes of carrying losses to other taxable years, the
P group's $40 CNOL is allocated pro rata among the group members
that have separate net operating losses. Under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(C) of this section, those respective portions of the CNOL
attributable to PC1, PC2, and PC3 (that is, members that are nonlife
insurance companies) are carried back to each of the two preceding
taxable years and then carried over to each of the 20 subsequent
taxable years. See section 172(b)(1)(C). The portion attributable to
P (which is not a nonlife insurance company) may not be carried back
but is carried over to future years. See section 172(b)(1)(A).
(E) Example 5: Allocation of a CNOL arising in a consolidated
return year beginning before January 1, 2021. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(1) of this section, except that the P
group incurred the CNOL during the P group's 2020 consolidated
return year. The allocation among the P group members of the CNOL
described in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(2) of this section would be the
same. However, those respective portions of the CNOL attributable to
PC1, PC2, and PC3 (that is, members that are nonlife insurance
companies) will be carried back to each of the five preceding
taxable years and then carried over to each of the 20 subsequent
taxable years. See section 172(b)(1)(C) and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
The portion attributable to P (which is not a nonlife insurance
company) will be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable
years and then carried over to future years. See section
172(b)(1)(A) and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
(F) Example 6: CNOL deduction and application of section 172.
(1) P (a type of corporation other than a nonlife insurance company)
is the common parent of a consolidated group that includes PC1 (a
nonlife insurance company). P and PC1 were both incorporated in Year
1 (a year beginning after December 31, 2020). In Year 1, P and PC1
have separate taxable income of $20 and $25, respectively. As a
result, the P group has Year 1 consolidated taxable income of $45.
In Year 2, P has separate taxable income of $24, and PC1 has a
separate taxable loss of $40. Thus, the P group has a Year 2 CNOL of
$16. No member of the P group engages in farming activities. See
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section, the P group's
Year 2 CNOL is entirely attributable to PC1, a nonlife insurance
company. Therefore, under section 172(b)(1)(C)(i), the P group may
carry back to Year 1 all $16 of its Year 2 CNOL.
(3) Under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, the amount of
the Year 2 CNOL that may be used by the P group in Year 1 is
determined by taking into account the status (nonlife insurance
company or other type of corporation) of the member that has
separate taxable income composing in whole or in part the P group's
consolidated taxable income. Because the P group includes both a
nonlife insurance company member and a member that is not a nonlife
insurance company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section applies
to determine the computation of the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit
for the group for Year 1. Therefore, the 80-percent limitation is
applied to the residual income pool, which consists of the taxable
income of P, a type of corporation other than a nonlife insurance
company. Under the 80-percent limitation, the amount of P's Year 1
income that may be offset by the P group's Year 2 CNOL is $16, which
equals the lesser of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried
to Year 1 ($16), or 80 percent of the excess of P's taxable income
for that year ($20) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
allocable to P ($0), which also is $16 (80 percent x ($20-$0)). See
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (4) of this section. PC1 is a
nonlife insurance company to which section 172(f), rather than the
80-percent limitation, applies. Therefore, the amount of PC1's Year
1 income that may be offset by the P group's Year 2 CNOL is $25,
which equals the excess of PC1's taxable income for Year 1 ($25)
over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocable to PC1 ($0).
See paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) and (4) of this section.
(4) Based on the analysis set forth in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3)
of this section, the P group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
Year 1 is $41 ($16 + $25). Because the P group's Year 2 CNOL is $16,
this amount would offset the Year 1 income of the P group.
(G) Example 7: Pre-2018 and post-2017 CNOLs. (1) P is the common
parent of a consolidated group. No member of the P group is a
nonlife insurance company or is engaged in a farming business, and
no member of the P group has a loss that is subject to a SRLY
limitation. The P group had the following consolidated taxable
income or CNOL for the following taxable years:
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(2)(v)(G)(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$60 $0 $0 ($90) $30 ($40) ($100) $120
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Under section 172(a)(1), all $30 of the P group's 2018
consolidated taxable income is offset by the 2017 CNOL carryover
without limitation. The remaining $60 of the P group's 2017 CNOL is
carried over to 2021 under section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(I).
(3) Under section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I), the P group's $40 2019
CNOL is carried back to the five taxable years preceding the year of
the loss. Thus, the P group's $40 2019 CNOL is carried back to
offset $40 of its 2014 consolidated taxable income.
(4) Under section 172(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section, the P group's CNOL deduction for 2021 equals the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 plus the group's post-2017
CNOL deduction limit. The P group has $60 of pre-2018 NOLs carried
to 2021 ($90 - $30). Because no member of the P group is a nonlife
insurance company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section applies
to determine the computation of the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for 2021. See also section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, the post-
2017 CNOL deduction limit of the P group for 2021 is $48, which
equals the lesser of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried
to 2021 ($100), or 80 percent of the excess of the P group's
consolidated taxable income for that year computed without regard to
any deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250 ($120) over the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 ($60) (that is, 80
percent x $60). Thus, the P group's CNOL deduction for 2021 equals
$108 ($60 pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 + $48 post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit). See section 172(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section. The P group offsets $108 of its $120 of 2021
consolidated taxable income, resulting in $12 of consolidated
taxable income in 2021. The remaining $52 of the P group's 2020 CNOL
($100-$48) is carried over to future taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II).
[[Page 40942]]
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) [The text of proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) is the same
as the text of Sec. 1.1502-21T(b)(3)(ii)(C) published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.]
(D) [The text of proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(D) is the same
as the text of Sec. 1.1502-21T(b)(3)(ii)(D) published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.]
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this
section (relating to an overlap with section 382), the aggregate of the
net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks of a member (SRLY member)
arising (or treated as arising) in SRLYs (SRLY NOLs) that are included
in the CNOL deductions for all consolidated return years of the group
under paragraph (a) of this section may not exceed the aggregate
consolidated taxable income for all consolidated return years of the
group determined by reference to only the member's items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss (cumulative register). For this purpose--
* * * * *
(E) If a limitation on the amount of taxable income that may be
offset under section 172(a) (see paragraph (a)(2) of this section)
applies in a taxable year to a member whose carryovers or carrybacks
are subject to a SRLY limitation (SRLY member), the amount of net
operating loss subject to a SRLY limitation that is available for use
by the group in that year is limited to the percentage of the balance
in the cumulative register that would be available for offset under
section 172(a) if the SRLY member filed a separate return and reported
as taxable income in that year the amount contained in the cumulative
register. For example, assume that a consolidated group has a SRLY
member that is a corporation other than a nonlife insurance company,
and that the SRLY member has a SRLY NOL that arose in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017 (post-2017 NOL). The group's
consolidated taxable income for a consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020 is $200, but the cumulative register has a
positive balance of only $120 (and no other net operating loss
carryovers or carrybacks are available for the year). Because the SRLY
limitation would be $96 ($120 x 80 percent), only $96 of SRLY loss may
be used, rather than $160 ($200 x 80 percent). In addition, to the
extent that this paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) applies, the cumulative
register is decreased by the full amount of income required under
section 172(a) to support the amount of SRLY NOL absorption. See, for
example, paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) of this section for examples
illustrating the application of this rule.
* * * * *
(iii) * * * For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(c)(1)(iii), no corporation is a nonlife insurance company and, unless
otherwise specified, all taxable years begin after December 31, 2020,
and all CNOLs arise in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
* * *
(A) * * *
(2) T's $100 net operating loss carryover from Year 1 arose in a
SRLY. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(iii). P's acquisition of T was not an
ownership change as defined by section 382(g). Thus, the $100 net
operating loss carryover is subject to the SRLY limitation in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T for Year 2 equals the consolidated taxable
income of the P group determined by reference to only T's items, or
$70. However, due to the 80-percent limitation and the application
of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, the SRLY limitation is
$56 ($70 x 80 percent). No losses from equivalent years are
available, and the P group otherwise has sufficient consolidated
taxable income to support the CNOL deduction ($300 x 80 percent =
$240). Therefore, $56 of the SRLY net operating loss is included
under paragraph (a) of this section in the P group's CNOL deduction
for Year 2. Although only $56 is absorbed, the cumulative register
of T is reduced by $70, the full amount of income necessary to
support the $56 deduction after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation ($70 x 80 percent = $56).
* * * * *
(B) * * *
(2) P's Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 are not SRLYs with respect to
the P group. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(i). Thus, P's $40 net
operating loss arising in Year 1 and $120 net operating loss arising
in Year 3 are not subject to the SRLY limitation under paragraph (c)
of this section. Although the P group has $160 of taxable income in
Year 4, the 80-percent limitation reduces the P group's net
operating loss deduction in that year to $128 ($160 x 80 percent).
Under the principles of section 172, paragraph (b) of this section
requires that P's $40 loss arising in Year 1 be the first loss
absorbed by the P group in Year 4. Absorption of this loss leaves
$88 ($128 - $40) of the P group's Year 4 consolidated taxable income
available for offset by loss carryovers.
(3) T's Year 2 and Year 3 are SRLYs with respect to the P group.
See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(ii). P's acquisition of T was not an
ownership change as defined by section 382(g). Thus, T's $50 net
operating loss arising in Year 2 and $60 net operating loss arising
in Year 3 are subject to the SRLY limitation. The positive balance
of the cumulative register of T for Year 4 equals the P group's
consolidated taxable income determined by reference to only T's
items, or $70. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after
taking into account the 80-percent limitation, T's SRLY limitation
is $56 ($70 x 80 percent). Therefore, the P group can absorb up to
$56 of T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 4. Under the principles
of section 172, T's $50 SRLY net operating loss from Year 2 is
included under paragraph (a) of this section in the P group's CNOL
deduction for Year 4. After absorption of this loss, under paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section, $6 of SRLY limit remains in Year 4 ($56 -
$50). Further, the total amount of Year 4 consolidated taxable
income available for offset by other loss carryovers under section
172(a) is $38 ($88 - $50).
(4) P and T each carry over net operating losses to Year 4 from
a taxable year ending on the same date (that is, Year 3). The losses
carried over from Year 3 total $180. However, the remaining Year 4
SRLY limit is $6. Therefore, the total amount of loss available for
absorption is $126 ($120 allocable to P and $6 allocable to T).
Under paragraph (b) of this section, the losses available for
absorption that are carried over from Year 3 are absorbed on a pro
rata basis, even though one loss arises in a SRLY and the other loss
does not. Thus, $36.19 of P's Year 3 loss is absorbed ($120/($120 +
$6)) x $38 = $36.19. In addition, $1.81 of T's Year 3 loss is
absorbed ($6/($120 + $6)) x $38 = $1.81.
(5) After deduction of T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 4,
the cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. A total of $51.81 of SRLY net
operating losses were absorbed in Year 4 ($50 + $1.81). After taking
into account the 80-percent limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is $64.76 ($64.76 x 80 percent =
$51.81). Therefore, the cumulative register of T is decreased by
$64.76, and $5.24 remains in the cumulative register ($70 - $64.76).
(6) P carries its remaining $83.81 ($120 - $36.19) Year 3 net
operating loss and T carries its remaining $58.19 ($60 - $1.81) Year
3 net operating loss over to Year 5. Assume that, in Year 5, the P
group has $90 of consolidated taxable income (computed without
regard to the CNOL deduction). The P group's consolidated taxable
income determined by reference to only T's items is a CNOL of $4.
Therefore, the positive balance of the cumulative register of T in
Year 5 equals $1.24 ($5.24 - $4). Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of
this section, after taking into account the 80-percent limitation,
T's SRLY limitation is $0.99 ($1.24 x 80 percent). For Year 5, the
total amount of Year 5 consolidated taxable income available for
offset by loss carryovers as a result of the 80-percent limitation
is $72 ($90 x 80 percent). Under paragraph (b) of this section, the
losses carried over from Year 3 are absorbed on a pro rata basis,
even though one loss arises in a SRLY and the other loss does not.
Therefore, $71.16 of P's Year 3 loss is absorbed (($83.81/($83.81 +
$0.99)) x $72 = $71.16). In addition, $0.83 of T's Year 3 losses is
absorbed (($0.99/($83.81 + $0.99)) x $72 = $0.83).
* * * * *
(D) * * *
[[Page 40943]]
(2) Under Sec. 1.1502-15(a), T's $100 of ordinary loss in Year
3 constitutes a built-in loss that is subject to the SRLY limitation
under paragraph (c) of this section. The amount of the limitation is
determined by treating the deduction as a net operating loss
carryover from a SRLY. The built-in loss is therefore subject to
both a SRLY limitation and the 80-percent limitation for Year 3. The
built-in loss is treated as a net operating loss carryover solely
for purposes of determining the extent to which the loss is not
allowed by reason of the SRLY limitation, and for all other purposes
the loss remains a loss arising in Year 3. See Sec. 1.1502-
21(c)(1)(i)(D). Consequently, under paragraph (b) of this section,
the built-in loss is absorbed by the P group before the net
operating loss carryover from Year 1 is absorbed. The positive
balance of the cumulative register of T for Year 3 equals the P
group's consolidated taxable income determined by reference to only
T's items, or $60. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the SRLY
limitation for Year 3 is $48 ($60 x 80 percent). Therefore, $48 of
the built-in loss is absorbed by the P group. None of T's $100 SRLY
net operating loss carryover from Year 1 is allowed.
(3) After deduction of T's $48 SRLY built-in loss in Year 4, the
cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into account the 80-
percent limitation, the amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $60 ($60 x 80 percent = $48). Therefore, the cumulative
register of T is decreased by $60, and zero remains in the
cumulative register ($60 - $60).
(4) Under Sec. 1.1502-15(a), the $52 balance of the built-in
loss that is not allowed in Year 3 because of the SRLY limitation
and the 80-percent limitation is treated as a $52 net operating loss
arising in Year 3 that is subject to the SRLY limitation because,
under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, Year 3 is treated as a
SRLY. The built-in loss is carried to other years in accordance with
the rules of paragraph (b) of this section. The positive balance of
the cumulative register of T for Year 4 equals $40 (zero from Year 3
+ $40). Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking
into account the 80-percent limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year
4 is $32 ($40 x 80 percent). Therefore, under paragraph (c) of this
section, $32 of T's $100 net operating loss carryover from Year 1 is
included in the CNOL deduction under paragraph (a) of this section
in Year 4.
(5) After deduction of T's $32 SRLY net operating loss in Year
4, the cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into account the 80-
percent limitation, the amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $40 ($40 x 80 percent = $32). Therefore, the cumulative
register is decreased by $40, and zero remains in the cumulative
register ($40 - $40).
(E) * * *
(2) For Year 2, the P group computes separate SRLY limits for
each of T's SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The group determines its
ability to use its capital loss carryover before it determines its
ability to use its ordinary loss carryover. Under section 1212,
because the P group has no Year 2 capital gain, it cannot absorb any
capital losses in Year 2. T's Year 1 net capital loss and the P
group's Year 2 consolidated net capital loss (all of which is
attributable to T) are carried over to Year 3.
(3) The P group's ability to deduct net operating losses in Year
2 is subject to the 80-percent limitation, based on the P group's
consolidated taxable income for the year. Thus, the group's
limitation for Year 2 is $72 ($90 x 80 percent). However, use of the
Year 1 net operating loss also is subject to the SRLY limitation.
The positive balance of the cumulative register of T applicable to
SRLY net operating losses for Year 2 equals the P group's
consolidated taxable income determined by reference to only T's
items, or $60. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after
taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the SRLY limitation
for Year 2 is $48 ($60 x 80 percent). Therefore, only $48 of T's
Year 1 SRLY net operating loss is absorbed by the P group in Year 2.
T carries over its remaining $52 of its Year 1 loss to Year 3.
(4) After deduction of T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 2,
the net operating loss cumulative register is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. The P group deducted $48 of
T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 2. After taking into account
the 80-percent limitation, the amount of taxable income necessary to
support this deduction is $60 ($60 x 80 percent = $48). Therefore,
the net operating loss cumulative register of T is decreased by $60,
and zero remains in the net operating loss cumulative register ($60
- $60).
(5) For Year 3, the P group again computes separate SRLY limits
for each of T's SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The group has
consolidated net capital gain (without taking into account a net
capital loss carryover deduction) of $30. Under Sec. 1.1502-22(c),
the aggregate amount of T's $50 capital loss carryover from Year 1
that is included in computing the P group's consolidated net capital
gain for all years of the group (in this case, Years 2 and 3) may
not exceed $30 (the aggregate consolidated net capital gain computed
by reference only to T's items, including losses and deductions
actually absorbed (that is, $30 of capital gain in Year 3)). Thus,
the P group may include $30 of T's Year 1 capital loss carryover in
its computation of consolidated net capital gain for Year 3, which
offsets the group's capital gains for Year 3. T carries over its
remaining $20 of its Year 1 capital loss to Year 4. Therefore, the
capital loss cumulative register of T is decreased by $30, and zero
remains in the capital loss cumulative register ($30 - $30).
Further, because the net operating loss cumulative register includes
all taxable income of T included in the P group, as well as all
absorbed losses of T (including capital items), a zero net increase
occurs in the net operating loss cumulative register. The P group
carries over the Year 2 consolidated net capital loss to Year 4.
(6) The P group's ability to deduct net operating losses in Year
3 is subject to the 80-percent limitation, based on the P group's
consolidated taxable income for the year. Thus, the P group's
taxable income for Year 3 that can be offset, before use of net
operating losses, is $40 (80 percent x the sum of zero capital gain,
after use of the capital loss carryover, plus $50 of ordinary
income). However, use of the Year 1 net operating loss also is
subject to the SRLY limitation. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T applicable to SRLY net operating losses for
Year 3 equals the P group's consolidated taxable income determined
by reference only to T's items, or $40. This amount equals the sum
obtained by adding the zero carryover from Year 2, a net inclusion
of zero from capital items implicated in Year 3 ($30 - $30), and $40
of taxable income in Year 3. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, after taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the
SRLY limitation for Year 3 is $32 ($40 x 80 percent). Therefore,
only $32 of the Year 1 net operating loss is absorbed by the P group
in Year 3. T carries over its remaining $20 of its Year 1 loss to
Year 4.
(F) Example 6: Pre-2018 NOLs and post-2017 NOLs. (1) Individual
A owns P. On January 1, 2017, A forms T. P and T are calendar-year
taxpayers. In 2017, T sustains a $100 net operating loss that is
carried over. During 2018, 2019, and 2020, T deducts a total of $90
of its 2017 net operating loss against its taxable income, and T
carries over the remaining $10 of its 2017 net operating loss. In
2021, T sustains a net operating loss of $50. On December 31, 2021,
P acquires all the stock of T, and T becomes a member of the P
group. The P group has $300 of consolidated taxable income in 2022
(computed without regard to the CNOL deduction). Such consolidated
taxable income would be $70 if determined by reference to only T's
items. The P group has no other SRLY net operating loss carryovers
or CNOL carryovers.
(2) T's remaining $10 of net operating loss carryover from 2017
and its $50 net operating loss carryover from 2021 are both SRLY
losses in the P group. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(iii). P's
acquisition of T was not an ownership change as defined by section
382(g). Thus, T's net operating loss carryovers are subject to the
SRLY limitation in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The SRLY
limitation for the P group's 2022 consolidated return year is
consolidated taxable income determined by reference to only T's
items, or $70.
(3) Because T's oldest (2017) carryover was sustained in a year
beginning before January 1, 2018, its use is not subject to
limitation under section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, all $10 of T's
2017 SRLY net operating loss (that is, a pre-2018 NOL) is included
under paragraph (a) of this section in the P group's CNOL deduction
for 2022. After deduction of T's $10 SRLY net operating loss from
2017, the cumulative register of T is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar
basis, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section. Therefore,
the cumulative register of T is decreased by $10, and $60 remains in
the cumulative register ($70 - $10).
(4) The P group's deduction of T's 2021 net operating loss is
subject to both a SRLY limitation and the 80-percent limitation
under section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, the total limitation on the
use of T's 2021 net operating loss in the P group is $48 (the
[[Page 40944]]
remaining cumulative register of $60 x 80 percent). No losses from
equivalent years are available, and the P group otherwise has
sufficient consolidated taxable income to support the CNOL deduction
($290 x 80 percent = $232). Therefore, $48 of T's 2021 SRLY net
operating loss is included under paragraph (a) of this section in
the P group's CNOL deduction for 2022. The remaining $2 of T's 2021
SRLY net operating loss ($50 - $48) is carried over to the P group's
2023 consolidated return year.
(5) After deduction of T's $48 SRLY NOL in 2022, the cumulative
register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. After taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of income necessary to support this deduction is $60 ($60 x
80 percent = $48). Therefore, the cumulative register of T is
decreased by $60, and zero remains in the cumulative register ($60 -
$60).
(2) * * *
(v) Coordination with other limitations. This paragraph (c)(2)
does not allow a net operating loss to offset income to the extent
inconsistent with other limitations or restrictions on the use of
losses, such as a limitation based on the nature or activities of
members. For example, a net operating loss may not offset income in
excess of any limitations under section 172(a) and paragraph (a)(2)
of this section. Additionally, any dual consolidated loss may not
reduce the taxable income to an extent greater than that allowed
under section 1503(d) and Sec. Sec. 1.1503(d)-1 through 1.1503(d)-
8. See also Sec. 1.1502-47(k) (relating to preemption of rules for
life-nonlife groups).
* * * * *
(viii) * * * For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(c)(2)(viii), no corporation is a nonlife insurance company or has
any farming losses. * * *
* * * * *
(B) * * *
(3) In Year 4, the M group has $10 of consolidated taxable
income (computed without regard to the CNOL deduction for Year 4).
That consolidated taxable income would be $45 if determined by
reference only to the items of P, S, and T, the members included in
the SRLY subgroup with respect to P's loss carryover. Therefore, the
positive balance of the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup
for Year 4 equals $45 and, due to the application of the 80-percent
limitation under paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section, the SRLY
subgroup limitation under this paragraph (c)(2) is $36 ($45 x 80
percent). However, the M group has only $10 of consolidated taxable
income in Year 4. Thus, due to the 80-percent limitation and the
application of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the M group's
deduction of all net operating losses in Year 4 is limited to $8
($10 x 80 percent). As a result, the M group deducts $8 of P's SRLY
net operating loss carryover, and the remaining $37 is carried over
to Year 5.
(4) After deduction of $8 of P's SRLY net operating loss in Year
4, the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking
into account the 80-percent limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is $10 ($10 x 80 percent = $8).
Therefore, the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is
decreased by $10, and $35 remains in the cumulative register ($45 -
$10).
(5) In Year 5, the M group has $100 of consolidated taxable
income (computed without regard to the CNOL deduction for Year 5).
None of P, S, or T has any items of income, gain, deduction, or loss
in Year 5. Although the members of the P SRLY subgroup do not
contribute to the $100 of consolidated taxable income in Year 5, the
positive balance of the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup
for Year 5 is $35 and, due to the application of the 80-percent
limitation under paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section, the SRLY
subgroup limitation under this paragraph (c)(2) is $28 ($35 x 80
percent). Because of the 80-percent limitation and the application
of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the M group's deduction of net
operating losses in Year 5 is limited to $80 ($100 x 80 percent).
Because the $28 of net operating loss available to be absorbed is
less than 80 percent of the M group's consolidated taxable income,
$28 of P's SRLY net operating loss is absorbed in Year 5, and the
remaining $9 ($37 - $28) is carried over to Year 6.
(6) After deduction of $28 of P's SRLY net operating loss in
Year 5, the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking
into account the 80-percent limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is $35 ($35 x 80 percent = $28).
Therefore, the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is
decreased by $35, and zero remains in the cumulative register ($35 -
$35).
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(9) [The text of proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(h)(9) is the same as
the text of Sec. 1.1502-21T(h)(9) published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.]
(10) The rules of paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(iv), and
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section apply to losses arising in taxable
years beginning after [the date the Treasury decision adopting these
rules as final regulations is published in the Federal Register].
0
Par. 4. Section 1.1502-47 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii).
0
2. Removing paragraph (a)(3).
0
3. Redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as paragraph (a)(3).
0
4. Removing paragraph (j).
0
5. Redesignating paragraph (n) as paragraph (j).
0
6. Redesignating paragraph (b) as paragraph (n).
0
7. Redesignating paragraph (t) as paragraph (n)(3).
0
8. Removing paragraph (c).
0
9. Redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (b).
0
10. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(1).
0
11. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2).
0
12. Redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (b)(3) through (14) as
paragraphs (b)(2) through (13), respectively.
0
13. Revising newly redesignated paragraphs (b)(2), (3), (4), (9), (10),
and (12).
0
14. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(13), designating Examples 1
through 14 as paragraphs (b)(13)(i) through (xiv), respectively.
0
15. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(13)(i), adding a new last
sentence.
0
16. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(13)(ii).
0
17. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (b)(13)(xiv).
0
18. Redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (c).
0
19. Removing newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
0
20. Redesignating paragraph (c)(6) as paragraph (c)(4).
0
21. Redesignating paragraph (f) as paragraph (d).
0
22. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (d)(5).
0
23. Removing the last sentence of newly redesignated paragraph (d)(6).
0
24. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
0
25. Redesignating paragraph (d)(7)(iii) as paragraph (d)(7)(ii) and
revising it.
0
26. Redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (e).
0
27. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2), removing the language
``partial'' each place it appears.
0
28. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (e)(3).
0
29. Redesignating paragraph (h) as paragraph (f).
0
30. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(iii).
0
31. In newly designated paragraph (f)(2)(v), removing the language
``partial'' each place it appears.
0
32. In newly designated paragraph (f)(2)(v), adding a new last
sentence.
0
33. Revising newly designated paragraph (f)(2)(vi) and (vii).
0
34. Removing newly designated paragraph (f)(3).
0
35. Redesignating newly designated paragraph (f)(4) as paragraph
(f)(3).
0
36. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (f)(3)(ii).
0
37. Adding a new paragraph (g).
0
38. Redesignating paragraph (k)(5) introductory text as paragraph
(g)(3)(ii), and redesignating paragraphs (k)(5)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(A) through (D), respectively.
0
39. Removing newly redesignated paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(C) and (D).
0
40. Removing paragraphs (k) and (l).
0
41. Redesignating paragraph (m) as paragraph (h).
0
42. In newly redesignated paragraph (h), removing the language
``partial'' each place it appears.
[[Page 40945]]
0
43. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(2)(ii), adding a new last
sentence.
0
44. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3)(iv), adding a new last
sentence.
0
45. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3)(ix), removing the last two
sentences.
0
46. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4).
0
47. Redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (h)(5) as paragraph
(h)(4).
0
48. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4) introductory text.
0
49. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4), redesignating Examples 1
through 6 as paragraphs (h)(4)(i) through (vi).
0
50. Revising newly designated paragraphs (h)(4)(ii) and (iii).
0
51. Removing newly designated paragraphs (h)(4)(v) and (vi).
0
52. In newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(iii), removing the language
``, and ``section 812(b)(3)'' and adding in its place ``section
172(b)(3)(C)''.
0
53. Removing newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(v).
0
54. Redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(vi) as paragraph
(j)(2)(v).
0
55. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (j)(3).
0
56. In newly redesignated paragraph (n)(3), removing the language
``Effective/applicability date'' and adding the language ``Filing
requirements effective dates'' in its place.
0
57. Adding paragraph (n)(4).
0
58. Removing paragraphs (o) and (p).
0
59. Redesignating paragraphs (q), (r), and (s) as paragraphs (k), (l),
and (m), respectively.
0
59. In the following table, for each section designated or redesignated
under these proposed regulations (as indicated in the second column),
removing the language in the third column and adding the language in
the fourth column with the frequency indicated in the fifth column:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph Redesignation Remove Add Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... section 802 or 821 section 801 Once.
(relating (relating to life
respectively to insurance
life insurance companies).
companies and to
certain mutual
insurance
companies).
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... life insurance life insurance Once.
companies and companies may.
mutual insurance
companies may.
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... composition and composition, its Once.
its consolidated consolidated
tax. taxable income
(or loss), and
its consolidated
tax.
1.1502-47(a)(4)................. 1.1502-47(a)(3)... Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Once.
1.1502-1 through 1.1502-0 through
1.1502-80. 1.1502-100.
1.1502-47(a)(4)................. 1.1502-47(a)(3)... 844............... 848............... Once.
1.1502-47(b).................... 1.1502-47(n)...... Effective dates... Effective/ Once.
applicability
dates.
1.1502-47(b)(1)................. 1.1502-47(n)(1)... paragraph (b)(2).. paragraph (n)(2) Once.
and (3).
1.1502-47(b)(2)(i).............. 1.1502-47(n)(2)(i) Paragraph Paragraph Once.
(d)(12)(v). (b)(11)(v).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(i)(A), 1.1502-47(b)(11)(i (d)(12)........... (b)(11)........... Each place it
(d)(12)(i)(C), (d)(12)(i)(D), )(A), appears.
(d)(12)(iii), (d)(12)(iv), (b)(11)(i)(C),
(d)(12)(v), (d)(12)(v)(B), (b)(11)(i)(D),
(d)(12)(v)(C), (d)(12)(v)(D), (b)(11)(iii),
(d)(12)(vi), (d)(12)(vii), and (b)(11)(iv),
(d)(12)(viii)(F). (b)(11)(v),
(b)(11)(v)(B),
(b)(11)(v)(C),
(b)(11)(v)(D),
(b)(11)(vi),
(b)(11)(vii), and
(b)(11)(viii)(F),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(12)(iii)........... 1.1502-47(b)(11)(i subdivision (iii). paragraph Once.
ii). (b)(11)(iii).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(iv)............ 1.1502-47(b)(11)(i subdivision (iv).. paragraph Once.
v). (b)(11)(iv).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(v)(B).......... 1.1502-47(b)(11)(v (i.e., sections (for example, Once.
)(B). 11, 802, 821, or section 11,
831). section 801, or
section 831).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(vi)............ 1.1502-47(b)(11)(v subdivision (vi).. paragraph Once.
i). (b)(11)(vi).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(vii)........... 1.1502-47(b)(11)(v return year and return year even.. Once.
ii). even.
1.1502-47(d)(12)(viii)(A)....... 1.1502-47(b)(11)(v (i.e., total (that is, total Once.
iii)(A). reserves in reserves in
section 801(c)). section 816(c),
as modified by
section 816(h)).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(viii)(D) and 1.1502-47(b)(11)(v subdivision (viii) paragraph Once.
(F). iii)(D) and (F), (b)(11)(viii).
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14)................ 1.1502-47(b)(13).. Illustrations..... Examples.......... Once.
1.1502-47(d)(14)................ 1.1502-47(b)(13).. paragraph (d)..... paragraph (b)..... Once.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 1..... 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i 1913.............. 2012.............. Once.
).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i 1974.............. 2012.............. Each place it
through 4, 8, 10, and 12. i) through (iv), appears.
(viii), (x), and
(xii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 1 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i 1980.............. 2018.............. Each place it
through 3. ) through (iii), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 1 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i 1982.............. 2020.............. Each place it
through 5 and 8 through 13. ) through (v) and appears.
(viii) through
(xiii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 5 1.1502-47(b)(13)(v 1983.............. 2021.............. Each place it
through 7 and 9. ) through (vii) appears.
and (ix),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i (d)(12)........... (b)(11)........... Each place it
through 5 and 8 through 12. i) through (v) appears.
and (viii)
through (xii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2, 3, 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i stock casualty.... nonlife insurance. Each place it
and 12. i), (iii), and appears.
(xii),
respectively.
[[Page 40946]]
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 3..... 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i subparagraph paragraph Once.
ii). (d)(12)(v)(B) and (b)(11)(v)(B) and
(E). (D).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 3..... 1.1502-47(b)(13)(i e.g............... for example....... Once.
ii).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 5..... 1.1502-47(b)(13)(v i.e............... in other words.... Once.
).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 12.... 1.1502-47(b)(13)(x casualty.......... nonlife insurance. Once.
ii).
1.1502-47(e)(1)................. 1.1502-47(c)(1)... life company or an life company...... Once.
ineligible mutual
company.
1.1502-47(e)(3)................. 1.1502-47(c)(3)... Sec. 1.1502- Sec. 1.1502- Once.
75(c) and 75(c),.
paragraph (e)(4)
of this section,.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... 1981.............. 2019.............. Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... 1982.............. 2020.............. Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... applying Sec. applying Sec. Once.
Sec. 1.1502-13, Sec. 1.1502-13
1.1502-18, and and 1.1502-19.
1.1502-19.
1.1502-47(f)(7)(i).............. 1.1502-47(d)(7)(i) paragraph (g)..... paragraph (e)..... Once.
1.1502-47(f)(7)(i).............. 1.1502-47(d)(7)(i) sections 802(a), sections 801(a) Once.
821(a), and and 831(a).
831(a).
1.1502-47(g).................... 1.1502-47(e)...... three............. two............... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (n)..... paragraph (j)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (g)(1).. paragraph (e)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (j)..... paragraph (g)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (m)..... paragraph (h)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (g)(2).. paragraph (e)(2).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(1)................. 1.1502-47(f)(1)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(h)(1)................. 1.1502-47(f)(1)... includes separate includes insurance Once.
mutual insurance company taxable
company taxable income.
income (as
defined in
section 821(b))
and insurance
company taxable
income.
1.1502-47(h)(2)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21, Once.
1.1502-21 or the rules in this
1.1502-21A (as paragraph (f)(2).
appropriate), the
rules in this
subparagraph (2).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502- Once.
). 1.1502-21(A)(f) 21(e).
or 1.1502-21(e)
(as appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(iv year beginning year, Sec. Once.
). after December 1.1502-21.
31, 1981, Sec.
Sec. 1.1502-21A
or 1.1502-21 (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(iv nonlife loss...... nonlife subgroup Once.
). loss.
1.1502-47(h)(2)(v).............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(v) subparagraph (2).. paragraph (f)(2).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) subparagraph (4).. paragraph (f)(3).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A(a) (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(f)(3)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502- Once.
i). 1.1502-22A(b)(1) 22(b),.
or 1.1502-22(b).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(iii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(f)(3)(ii allowed under allowed under Once.
i)(A). section 822(c)(6) section
or section 832(c)(5),.
832(c)(5),.
1.1502-47(k)(5)................. 1.1502-47(g)(3)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
). 1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(k)(5)................. 1.1502-47(g)(3)(ii this subparagraph this paragraph Once.
). (5). (g)(3)(ii).
1.1502-47(k)(5)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(g)(3)(ii paragraph (k)(5).. paragraph Once.
)(B). (g)(3)(ii).
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (g)..... paragraph (e)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (l)..... paragraph (g)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (m)..... paragraph (h)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. 1502- Sec. 1.1502-21.. Once.
). 21 or 1.1502-21A
(as appropriate).
1.1502-47(m)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
). 1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) But see But see paragraph Once.
subdivision (ix) (h)(3)(ix) of
of this paragraph this section.
(m)(3).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) arising in arising in Once.
separate return separate return
years ending years.
after December
31, 1980,.
[[Page 40947]]
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) and 1.1502-22 (or and 1.1502-22..... Once.
Sec. Sec.
1.1502-21A and
1.1502-22A, as
appropriate)..
1.1502-47(m)(3)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ii consolidated LO... life consolidated Once.
i). net operating
loss.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(v).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(v) GO or TII......... taxable income.... Once.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(v).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(v) LICTI (as LICTI for any..... Once.
determined under
paragraph (j) of
this section) for
any.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vi)(A).......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi subparagraph (3).. paragraph (h)(3).. Once.
)(A).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi notwithstanding notwithstanding Once.
i)(A). Sec. 1.1502- Sec. 1.1502-
21A(b)(3)(ii) or 21(b),.
1.1502-21(b),.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi taxable income for taxable income for Once.
i)(A). that year.. that year,
subject to the
limitation in
section 172(a)..
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(B)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi (A) of this paragraph Once.
i)(B). subdivision (vii). (h)(3)(vii)(A) of
this section.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(viii)........... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi section section 172(b)(3). Once.
ii). 172(b)(3)(C).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(ix)............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ix 243(b)(2)......... 243(b)(3)......... Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(ix)............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ix return year ending return year,...... Once.
). after December
31, 1980,.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(x).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(x) LICTI (as defined LICTI in the Once.
in paragraph (j) particular.
of this section)
in the particular.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(xii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(xi carryback of a carryback of a Once.
i). consolidated LO. life consolidated
net operating
loss.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(xii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(xi (2) or (4)........ (2) or (3)........ Once.
i).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Examples 1 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) 1982.............. 2021.............. Each place it
through 4. through (iv), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Examples 1 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) i.e............... that is........... Each place it
through 4. through (iv), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) paragraph (d)(13). paragraph (b)(12). Once.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) attributable to I attributable to I Once.
(an ineligible (an ineligible
member). member that is
not a nonlife
insurance
company).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) of this section. of this section Once.
The result would and section
be. 172(a). The
result would be.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv of this section or of this section... Once.
). under Sec.
1.1502-15A..
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv taxable income is taxable income is Once.
). $35. $32.5.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv 30%............... 35%............... Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (15).............. (17.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (65).............. (67.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (85).............. (82.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(n).................... 1.1502-47(j)...... consolidated LO... life consolidated Each place it
net operating appears.
loss and
consolidated
operations loss
carryovers.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... paragraph (g)(1).. paragraph (e)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... paragraph (n)(2) paragraph (j)(2) Once.
of this section. of this section,
subject to the
rules and
limitations in
paragraph (j)(3)
of this section.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... consolidated net consolidated net Once.
capital loss (as capital loss..
determined under
paragraph (l)(4)
of this section)..
1.1502-47(n)(2)................. 1.1502-47(j)(2)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(n)(2)................. 1.1502-47(j)(2)... paragraphs (m)(2) paragraphs (h)(2) Once.
and (3). and (3).
1.1502-47(n)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(j)(2)(ii consolidated consolidated LICTI Once.
). partial LICTI.
1.1502-47(n)(2)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(j)(2)(ii ``paragraph (l)'' ``paragraph (g)''. Once.
i). or ``paragraph
(j)''.
1.1502-47(n)(2)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(j)(2)(ii paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
i).
1.1502-47(n)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(j)(2)(iv Paragraphs Paragraphs Once.
). (m)(3)(vi), (h)(3)(vi),
(vii), (x), and (vii), (x), and
(xi). (xi).
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... 1.1502-80......... 1.1502-100........ Once.
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... paragraph paragraph Once.
(m)(3)(vi). (h)(3)(vi).
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21.. Once.
1.1502-21A(b)(3)
and 1.1502-
79A(a)(3) (or
Sec. 1.1502-21,
as appropriate).
1.1502-47(r).................... 1.1502-47(l)...... partial LICTI (or LICTI (or life Once.
LO). consolidated net
operating loss).
1.1502-47(r).................... 1.1502-47(l)...... Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Once.
1.1502-0--1.1502- 1.1502-0 through
80. 1.1502-100.
[[Page 40948]]
1.1502-47(s)(1)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(m)(1)(ii paragraphs (g), paragraphs (e), Once.
i). (m), and (n). (h), and (j).
1.1502-47(s)(1)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(iv paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
).
1.1502-47(s)(1)(v).............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(v) consolidated consolidated Life. Once.
partial Life.
1.1502-47(s)(1)(v).............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(v) (as defined by or life Once.
paragraph (d)(3) consolidated net
of this section), operating loss.
determined under
paragraph (j) of
this section,.
1.1502-47(t).................... 1.1502-47(n)(3)... Paragraph (s)..... Paragraph (m)..... Once.
1.1502-47(t).................... 1.1502-47(n)(3)... paragraph (s)..... paragraph (m)..... Once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-47 Consolidated returns by life-nonlife groups.
(a) * * *
(2) General method of consolidation--(i) Subgroup method. The
regulations adopt a subgroup method to determine consolidated taxable
income. One subgroup is the group's nonlife companies. The other
subgroup is the group's life insurance companies. Initially, the
nonlife subgroup computes nonlife consolidated taxable income and the
life subgroup computes consolidated LICTI. A subgroup's income may in
effect be reduced by a loss of the other subgroup, subject to the
limitations in sections 172 and 1503(c). The life subgroup losses
consist of life consolidated net operating loss, consolidated
operations loss carryovers from taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (consolidated operations loss carryovers), and life
consolidated net capital loss. The nonlife subgroup losses consist of
nonlife consolidated net operating loss and nonlife consolidated net
capital loss. Consolidated taxable income is therefore defined in
pertinent part as the sum of nonlife consolidated taxable income and
consolidated LICTI, reduced by life subgroup losses and/or nonlife
subgroup losses.
(ii) Subgroup loss. A subgroup loss does not actually affect the
computation of nonlife consolidated taxable income or consolidated
LICTI. It merely constitutes a bottom-line adjustment in reaching
consolidated taxable income. Furthermore, the amount of a subgroup's
loss, if any, that is eligible to be carried back to a prior taxable
year first must be carried back against income of the same subgroup
before it may be used as a setoff against the other subgroup's income
in the taxable year the loss arose. (See sections 172(b)(1) and
1503(c)(1); see also Sec. 1.1502-21(b)). The carryback of losses from
one subgroup may not be used to offset income of the other subgroup in
the year to which the loss is to be carried. This carryback of one
subgroup's loss may ``bump'' the other subgroup's loss that, in effect,
previously reduced the income of the first subgroup. The subgroup's
loss that is bumped in appropriate cases may, in effect, reduce a
succeeding year's income of either subgroup. This approach gives the
group the tax savings of the use of losses, but the bumping rule
assures that, insofar as possible, life deductions will be matched
against life income and nonlife deductions against nonlife income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Life company. The term life company means a life insurance
company as defined in section 816 and subject to tax under section 801.
Section 816 applies to each company separately.
(2) Life insurance company taxable income. The term life insurance
company taxable income or LICTI has the meaning provided in section
801(b).
(3) Group. The term group has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.1502-
1(a). Unless otherwise indicated in this section, a group's composition
is determined without regard to section 1504(b)(2).
(4) Member. The term member has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.1502-1(b). A life company is tentatively treated as a member for any
taxable year for purposes of determining if it is an eligible
corporation under paragraph (b)(10) of this section and, therefore, if
it is an includible corporation under section 1504(c)(2). If such a
company is eligible and includible (under section 1504(c)(2)), it will
actually be treated as a member of the group.
* * * * *
(9) Separate return year. The term separate return year has the
meaning provided in Sec. 1.1502-1(e). For purposes of this paragraph
(b)(9), the term group is defined with regard to section 1504(b)(2) for
years in which an election under section 1504(c)(2) is not in effect.
Thus, a separate return year includes a taxable year for which that
election is not in effect.
(10) Separate return limitation year. Section 1.1502-1(f)(2)
provides exceptions to the definition of the term separate return
limitation year. For purposes of applying those exceptions to this
section, the term group is defined without regard to section
1504(b)(2), and the definition in this paragraph (b)(10) applies
separately to the nonlife subgroup in determining nonlife consolidated
taxable income under paragraph (f) of this section and to the life
subgroup in determining consolidated LICTI under paragraph (g) of this
section. Paragraph (h)(3)(ix) of this section defines the term separate
return limitation year for purposes of determining whether the losses
of one subgroup may be used against the income of the other subgroup.
* * * * *
(12) Ineligible corporation. A corporation that is not an eligible
corporation is ineligible. If a life company is ineligible, it is not
treated under section 1504(c)(2) as an includible corporation. Losses
of a nonlife member arising in years when it is ineligible may not be
used under section 1503(c)(2) and paragraph (g) of this section to set
off the income of a life member. If a life company is ineligible and is
the common parent of the group (without regard to section 1504(b)(2)),
the election under section 1504(c)(2) may not be made.
(13) * * *
(i) * * * S2 must file its own separate return for 2020.
(ii) Example 2. Since 2012, L1 has been a life company owning all
the stock of L2. In 2018, L1 transfers assets to S1, a new nonlife
insurance company subject to taxation under section 831(a). For 2020,
only L1 and L2 are eligible corporations. The tacking rule in paragraph
(b)(11)(v) of this section does not apply in 2020 because the old
corporation (L1) and the new corporation (S1) do not have the same tax
character.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
* * * * *
(5) Dividends received deduction--(i) Dividends received by
insurance company. Dividends received by an eligible member insurance
company, taxed under either section 801 or section 831, from another
eligible
[[Page 40949]]
member of the group are treated for Federal income tax purposes as if
the group did not file a consolidated return. See sections 818(e)(2)
and 805(a)(4) for rules regarding a member taxed under section 801, and
see sections 832(g) and 832(b)(5)(B) through (E) for rules regarding a
member taxed under section 831.
(ii) Other dividends. Dividends received from a life company member
of the group that are not subject to paragraph (d)(5)(i) of this
section are not included in gross income of the distributee member. See
section 1504(c)(2)(B)(i). If the distributee corporation is a nonlife
insurance company subject to tax under section 831, the rules of
section 832(b)(5)(E) apply.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(ii) Any taxes described in Sec. 1.1502-2 (other than in Sec.
1.1502-2(a)(1), (a)(6), and (a)(7)).
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Carrybacks. The portion of the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for the nonlife subgroup described in paragraph
(f)(2)(vi) of this section, if any, that is eligible to be carried back
to prior taxable years under Sec. 1.1502-21 is carried back to the
appropriate years (whether consolidated or separate) before the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss may be used as a nonlife subgroup loss
under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this section to set off consolidated
LICTI in the year the loss arose. The election under section 172(b)(3)
to relinquish the entire carryback period for the net operating loss of
the nonlife subgroup may be made by the agent for the group within the
meaning of Sec. 1.1502-77.
(v) * * * For limitations on the use of nonlife carryovers to
offset nonlife consolidated taxable income or consolidated LICTI, see
Sec. 1.1502-21(a).
(vi) Portion of nonlife consolidated net operating loss that is
carried back to prior taxable years. The portion of the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss that (absent an election to waive
carrybacks) is carried back to the two preceding taxable years is the
sum of the nonlife subgroup's farming loss (within the meaning of
section 172(B)(1)(b)(ii)) and the amount of the subgroup's net
operating loss that is attributable to nonlife insurance companies (as
determined under Sec. 1.1502-21). For rules governing the absorption
of net operating loss carrybacks, including limitations on the amount
of net operating loss carrybacks that may be absorbed in prior taxable
years, see Sec. 1.1502-21(b).
(vii) Example. P, a holding company that is not an insurance
company, owns all of the stock of S, a nonlife insurance company, and
L1, a life insurance company. L1 owns all of the stock of L2, a life
insurance company. Both L1 and L2 satisfy the eligibility requirements
of Sec. 1.1502-47(b)(11). Each corporation uses the calendar year as
its taxable year and none of P, S, L1 or L2 are engaged in a farming
business (within the meaning of section 263A(e)(4)). For 2021, the
group first files a consolidated return for which the election under
section 1504(c)(2) is effective. P and S filed consolidated returns for
2019 and 2020. In 2021, the P-S group sustains a nonlife consolidated
net operating loss that is attributable entirely to S (see Sec.
1.1502-21(b)). The election in 2020 under section 1502(c)(2) does not
result under paragraph (d)(1) of this section in the creation of a new
group or the termination of the P-S group. The loss is carried back to
the consolidated return years 2019 and 2020 of P and S. Pursuant to
Sec. 1.1502-21(b), the loss may be used to offset S's income in 2019
and 2020 without limitation, and the loss may be used to offset P's
income in those years, subject to the limitation in section 172(a) (see
Sec. 1.1502-21(b)). The portion of the loss not absorbed in 2019 and
2020 may serve as a nonlife subgroup loss in 2021 that may set off the
consolidated LICTI of L1 and L2 under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this
section.
(3) * * *
(ii) Additional principles. In applying Sec. 1.1502-22 to nonlife
consolidated net capital loss carryovers and carrybacks, the principles
set forth in paragraph (f)(2)(iii) through (v) of this section for
applying Sec. 1.1502-21 to nonlife consolidated net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks also apply, without regard to the limitation
in paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(g) Consolidated LICTI--(1) General rule. Consolidated LICTI is the
consolidated taxable income of the life subgroup, computed under Sec.
1.1502-11 as modified by this paragraph (g).
(2) Life consolidated net operating loss deduction--(i) In general.
In applying Sec. 1.1502-21, the rules in this paragraph (g)(2) apply
in determining for the life subgroup the life net operating loss and
the portion of the life net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to
the taxable year.
(ii) Life CNOL. The life consolidated net operating loss is
determined under Sec. 1.1502-21(e) by treating the life subgroup as
the group.
(iii) Carrybacks--(A) General rule. The portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss for the life subgroup, if any, that is
eligible to be carried back under Sec. 1.1502-21 is carried back to
the appropriate years (whether consolidated or separate) before the
life consolidated net operating loss may be used as a life subgroup
loss under paragraphs (e)(1) and (j) of this section to set off nonlife
consolidated taxable income in the year the loss arose. The election
under section 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period for
the consolidated net operating loss of the life subgroup may be made by
the common parent of the group.
(B) Special rule for life consolidated net operating losses arising
in 2018, 2019, or 2020. If a life consolidated net operating loss
arising in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before
January 1, 2021, is carried back to a life insurance company taxable
year beginning before January 1, 2018, then such life consolidated net
operating loss is treated as an operations loss carryback (within the
meaning of section 810, as in effect prior to its repeal) of such
company to such taxable year.
(iv) Subgroup rule. In determining the portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss that is absorbed when the loss is
carried back to a consolidated return year, Sec. 1.1502-21 is applied
by treating the life subgroup as the group. Therefore, the absorption
is determined without taking into account any nonlife subgroup losses
that were previously reported on a consolidated return as setting off
life consolidated taxable income for the year to which the life
subgroup loss is carried back.
(v) Carryovers. The portion of the life consolidated net operating
loss that is not absorbed in a prior year as a carryback, or as a life
subgroup loss that set off nonlife consolidated taxable income for the
year the loss arose, constitutes a life carryover under this paragraph
(g)(2) to reduce consolidated LICTI before that portion may constitute
a life subgroup loss that sets off nonlife consolidated taxable income
for that particular year. For limitations on the use of nonlife
carryovers to offset nonlife consolidated taxable income or
consolidated LICTI, see Sec. 1.1502-21(b).
(3) Life consolidated capital gain net income or loss--(i)
[Reserved]
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Additionally, the amount of consolidated LICTI that may
be offset by nonlife consolidated net operating loss
[[Page 40950]]
carryovers may be subject to limitation (see section 172 and Sec.
1.1502-21(a)).
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The amount of consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss carryovers may be subject to
limitation (see section 172 and Sec. 1.1502-21(a)).
* * * * *
(4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (h). In the examples, L indicates a life company, S is a
nonlife insurance company, another letter indicates a nonlife company
that is not an insurance company, no company has farming losses (within
the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)), and each corporation uses the
calendar year as its taxable year.
* * * * *
(ii) Example 2. (A) The facts are the same as in paragraph
(h)(4)(i) of this section, except that, for 2021, S's separate net
operating loss is $200. Assume further that L's consolidated LICTI is
$200. Under paragraph (h)(3)(vi) of this section, the offsettable
nonlife consolidated net operating loss is $100 (the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss computed under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of
this section ($200), reduced by the separate net operating loss of I
($100)). The offsettable nonlife consolidated net operating loss that
may be set off against consolidated LICTI in 2021 is $35 (35 percent of
the lesser of the offsettable $100 or consolidated LICTI of $200). See
section 1503(c)(1) and paragraph (h)(3)(x) of this section. S carries
over a loss of $65, and I carries over a loss of $100, to 2022 under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section to be used against nonlife
consolidated taxable income (consolidated net operating loss ($200)
less amount used in 2020 ($35). Under paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this
section, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net operating loss that
may be carried to 2022 is $65 ($100 minus $35). The facts and results
are summarized in the following table.
Table 1 to Paragraph (h)(4)(ii)(A)
[Dollars omitted]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Offsettable Limit Unused loss
(a) (b) (c) (d)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. P............................................ 100 .............. .............. ..............
2. S............................................ (200) (100) .............. (65)
3. I............................................ (100) .............. .............. (100)
4. Nonlife Subgroup............................. (200) (100) (100) (165)
5. L............................................ 200 200 .............. ..............
6. 35% of lower of line 4(c) or 5(c)............ .............. .............. 35 ..............
7. Unused offsettable loss...................... .............. .............. .............. (65)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Accordingly, under paragraph (e) of this section, consolidated
taxable income is $165 (line 5(a) minus line 6(c)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(4)(ii)
of this section, with the following additions for 2022. The nonlife
subgroup has nonlife consolidated taxable income of $50 (all of which
is attributable to I) before the nonlife consolidated net operating
loss deduction under paragraph (f)(2) of this section. Consolidated
LICTI is $100. Under paragraph (f)(2) of this section, $50 of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss carryover ($165) is used in
2022 and, under paragraph (h)(3)(vi) and (vii) of this section, the
portion used in 2021 is attributable to I, the ineligible nonlife
member. Accordingly, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net operating
loss from 2021 under paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of this section is $65, the
unused loss from 2020. The offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss in 2022 is $22.75 (35 percent of the lesser of the
offsettable loss of $65 or consolidated LICTI of $100). Accordingly,
under paragraph (e) of this section, consolidated taxable income is
$77.25 (consolidated LICTI of $100 minus the offsettable loss of
$22.75).
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (j). In the examples, L indicates a life company, S is a
nonlife insurance company, another letter indicates a nonlife company
that is not an insurance company, no company has farming losses (within
the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)), and each corporation uses the
calendar year as its taxable year.
(i) Example 1. P, S, L1 and L2 constitute a group that elects under
section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return for 2021. In 2021, the
nonlife subgroup consolidated taxable income is $100 and there is $20
of nonlife consolidated net capital loss that cannot be carried back
under paragraph (f) of this section to taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) preceding 2021. The nonlife subgroup has no
carryover from years prior to 2021. The life consolidated net operating
loss is $150, which under paragraph (g) of this section includes life
consolidated capital gain net income of $25. Since life consolidated
capital gain net income is zero for 2021, the nonlife capital loss
offset is zero. However, $100 of life consolidated net operating loss
sets off the $100 nonlife consolidated taxable income in 2021. The life
subgroup carries under paragraph (g)(2) of this section to 2022 $50 of
the life consolidated net operating loss ($150 minus $100). The $50
carryover will be used in 2022 (subject to the limitation in section
172(a)) against life subgroup income before it may be used in 2022 to
setoff nonlife consolidated taxable income.
(ii) Example 2. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of
this section, except that, for 2021, the nonlife consolidated taxable
income is $150 (this amount is entirely attributable to S and includes
nonlife consolidated capital gain net income of $50), consolidated
LICTI is $200, and a life consolidated net capital loss is $50. Assume
that the $50 life consolidated net capital loss sets off the $50
nonlife consolidated capital gain net income. Consolidated taxable
income under paragraph (e) of this section is $300 (nonlife
consolidated taxable income ($150) minus the setoff of the life
consolidated net capital loss ($50), plus consolidated LICTI ($200)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(ii)
of this section, except that, for 2022, the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss is $150. This entire amount is attributable to S; thus,
it is eligible to be carried back to 2021 against nonlife consolidated
[[Page 40951]]
taxable income under paragraph (f)(2) of this section and Sec. 1.1502-
21(b). If P, the common parent, does not elect to relinquish the
carryback under section 172(b)(3), the entire $150 will be carried
back, reducing 2021 nonlife consolidated taxable income to zero and
nonlife consolidated capital gain net income to zero. Under paragraph
(h)(3)(xii) of this section, the setoff in 2021 of the nonlife
consolidated capital gain net income ($50) by the life consolidated net
capital loss ($50) is restored. Accordingly, the 2021 life consolidated
net capital loss may be carried over by the life subgroup to 2022.
Under paragraph (e) of this section, after the carryback, consolidated
taxable income for 2021 is $200 (nonlife consolidated taxable income
($0) plus consolidated LICTI ($200)).
(iv) Example 4. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(iii)
of this section, except that P elects under section 172(b)(3)to
relinquish the carryback of $150 arising in 2022. The setoff in Example
2 is not restored. However, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for 2022 (or that may be carried over from 2022) is
zero. See paragraph (h)(3)(viii) of this section. Nevertheless, the
$150 nonlife consolidated net operating loss may be carried over to be
used by the nonlife group.
(v) Example 5. P owns all of the stock of S1 and of L1. On January
1, 2017, L1 purchases all of the stock of L2. For 2021, the group
elects under section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return. For
2021, L1 is an eligible corporation under paragraph (c)(11) of this
section but L2 is ineligible. Thus, L1 but not L2 is a member for 2021.
For 2021, L2 sustains a net operating loss, which cannot be carried
back (see section 172(b)). For 2021, L2 is treated under paragraph
(d)(6) of this section as a member of a controlled group of
corporations under section 1563 with P, S, and L1. For 2022, L2 is
eligible and is included on the group's consolidated return. L2's net
operating loss for 2021 that may be carried to 2022 is not treated
under paragraph (b)(10) of this section as having been sustained in a
separate return limitation year for purposes of computing consolidated
LICTI of the L1-L2 life subgroup for 2022. Furthermore, the portion of
L2's net operating loss not used under paragraph (g)(2) of this section
against life subgroup income in 2022 may be included in offsettable
life consolidated net operating loss under paragraph (j)(2) and
(h)(3)(i) of this section that reduces in 2022 nonlife consolidated
taxable income (subject to the limitation in section 172(a)) because
L2's loss in 2021 was not sustained in a separate return limitation
year under paragraph (j)(2) and (h)(3)(ix)(A) of this section or in a
separate return year (2021) when an election was not in effect under
section 1504(c)(2) or section 243(b)(2).
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(4) The rules of paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (b)(1) through
(b)(4), (b)(9), (b)(10), (b)(12), (b)(13)(ii), (d)(5)(i), (d)(5)(ii),
(d)(7)(ii), (f)(2)(iii), (f)(2)(vi), (f)(2)(vii), (f)(3)(ii), (g),
(h)(4)(ii), (h)(4)(iii), and (j)(3) of this section apply to taxable
years beginning after [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
Douglas W. O'Donnell,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2020-14427 Filed 7-2-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P