Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Free and Restricted Percentages for the 2019-20 Crop Year, 40867-40873 [2020-13125]
Download as PDF
40867
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 131
Wednesday, July 8, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 66
[Document No. AMS–FTPP–19–0104]
National Bioengineered Food
Disclosure Standard; Guidance on
Validation of a Refining Process and
Selecting a Testing Method
ACTION:
Notification of guidance.
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) posts final guidance
to validate a refining process and selects
a testing method as it pertains to the
National Bioengineered Food Disclosure
Standard (Standard).
DATES: The guidance documents are
available and effective July 7, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The final guidance and
accompanying question and answer
documents can be found at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trevor Findley, Deputy Director, Food
Disclosure and Labeling Division, Fair
Trade Practices Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, telephone (202) 690–3460,
email trevor.findley@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Background
On July 29, 2016, Public Law 114–216
amended the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.) (amended
Act) to require USDA to establish a
national, mandatory standard for
disclosing any food that is or may be
bioengineered. In accordance with the
amended Act, USDA published final
regulations to implement the Standard
on December 21, 2018 (83 FR 65814).
The regulations became effective on
February 19, 2019, with a mandatory
compliance date of January 1, 2022.
Foods that do not contain detectable
modified genetic material are not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
bioengineered foods and do not require
disclosure under the Standard. Under
the definition of bioengineered food at
7 CFR 66.1, food does not contain
modified genetic material if the genetic
material is not detectable pursuant to
§ 66.9. The recordkeeping requirements
for detectability at 7 CFR 66.9 specify,
among other things, (1) the requirements
to validate that a refining process
renders modified genetic material in a
food undetectable and (2) standards of
performance for detectability testing.
A refining process is validated
through analytical testing that meets the
standards described in paragraph (c) of
7 CFR 66.9. Paragraph (c) requires that
analytical testing meet the following
standard: (1) Laboratory quality
assurance must ensure the validity and
reliability of test results; (2) analytical
method selection, validation, and
verification must ensure that the testing
method used is appropriate (fit for
purpose) and that the laboratory can
successfully perform the testing; (3) the
demonstration of testing validity must
ensure consistent accurate analytical
performance; and (4) method
performance specifications must ensure
analytical tests are sufficiently sensitive
for the purposes of the detectability
requirements of Part 66.
In the preamble to the final
regulations, USDA indicated that it
would provide instructions to the
industry to explain how they can ensure
(1) acceptable validation of refining
processes in accordance with AMS
standards and (2) acceptable testing
methodology used to satisfy that a food
does not contain detectable modified
genetic material (83 FR 65843).
On December 17, 2019, AMS
published a document in the Federal
Register announcing the publication of
a draft Instruction to Ensure Acceptable
Validation of Refining Processes (84 FR
68816), with a comment period that
closed on January 16, 2020. On January
23, 2020, in response to multiple
requests for an extension of the
comment period, AMS extended the
comment period another 15 days (85 FR
3860). The new comment period closed
on February 7, 2020.
On February 3, 2020, AMS published
a document in the Federal Register
announcing publication of Draft
Instructions on Testing Methods (85 FR
5927), with a comment period that
closed on March 4, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This document announces the
publication of the final guidance to
validate a refining process and to select
an acceptable testing method. In
addition to these two guidance
documents, AMS is publishing two
corresponding question and answer
documents that respond to a number of
questions and comments it received
during the public comment periods.
These four documents are available on
the AMS bioengineered food disclosure
website at https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/be. These final
instructions pertain to the requirements
of the existing regulations, which can be
found at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2018/12/21/2018-27283/nationalbioengineered-food-disclosure-standard.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1639.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–14643 Filed 7–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 930
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–19–0100; SC–20–930–1
FR]
Tart Cherries Grown in the States of
Michigan, et al.; Free and Restricted
Percentages for the 2019–20 Crop Year
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the Cherry
Industry Administrative Board (Board)
to establish free and restricted
percentages for the 2019–20 crop year
pursuant to the marketing order for tart
cherries grown in the states of Michigan,
New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wisconsin. This action
establishes the proportion of tart
cherries from the 2019–20 crop that may
be handled in commercial outlets. This
action should stabilize marketing
conditions by adjusting supply to meet
market demand and help improve
grower returns. Also, a correction is
made to section 930.151 to reflect the
correct desirable carry-out inventory not
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
40868
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
to exceed a maximum of 100 million
pounds (81 FR 63676).
DATES: Effective August 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian D. Nissen, Regional
Director, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or Email:
Jennie.Varela@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends
regulations issued to carry out a
marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This final rule is issued under
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
930, both as amended (7 CFR part 930),
regulating the handling of tart cherries
produced in the states of Michigan, New
York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah,
Washington and Wisconsin. Part 930
(referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Board locally
administers the Order and is comprised
of producers and handlers of tart
cherries operating within the
production area, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this final rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This final rule falls
within a category of regulatory action
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the Order, free
and restricted percentages may be
established for tart cherries handled
during the crop year. This rule
establishes free and restricted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
percentages for tart cherries for the
2019–20 crop year, beginning July 1,
2019, through June 30, 2020.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with the
law and request a modification of the
order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This final rule establishes the
proportion of tart cherries from the
2019–20 crop that may be handled in
commercial outlets at 67 percent free
and 33 percent restricted. The Secretary
of Agriculture (Secretary) has
determined that designating free and
restricted percentages of tart cherries for
the 2019–20 crop year effectuates the
declared policy of the Act to stabilize
marketing conditions by adjusting
supply to meet market demand and help
improve grower returns. A correction is
also made to § 930.151 to reflect the
correct desirable carry-out inventory not
to exceed a maximum of 100 million
pounds (81 FR 63676). These
recommendations were made by the
Board at meetings on June 27, 2019, and
September 12, 2019.
Section 930.51(a) provides the
Secretary authority to regulate volume
by designating free and restricted
percentages for any tart cherries
acquired by handlers in a given crop
year. Section 930.50 prescribes
procedures for computing an optimum
supply based on sales history and for
calculating these free and restricted
percentages. Free percentage volume
may be shipped to any market, while
restricted percentage volume must be
held by handlers in a primary or
secondary reserve, or be diverted or
used for exempt purposes as prescribed
in §§ 930.159 and 930.162. Exempt
purposes include, in part, the
development of new products, sales into
new markets, the development of export
markets, and charitable contributions.
Sections 930.55 through 930.57
prescribe procedures for inventory
reserve. For cherries held in reserve,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
handlers would be responsible for
storage and would retain title of the tart
cherries.
Section 930.52 states that only
districts with an annual average
production over the prior three years of
at least six million pounds are subject
to regulation, and any district producing
a crop that is less than 50 percent of its
annual average of the previous five
years is exempt. The regulated districts
for the 2019–20 crop year are: District
1—Northern Michigan; District 2—
Central Michigan; District 3—Southern
Michigan; District 7—Utah; District 8—
Washington; and District 9—Wisconsin.
Districts 4, 5, and 6 (New York, Oregon
and Pennsylvania, respectively) will not
be regulated for the 2019–20 season.
Demand for tart cherries and tart
cherry products tends to be relatively
stable from year to year. Conversely,
annual tart cherry production can vary
greatly. In addition, tart cherries are
processed and can be stored and carried
over from crop year to crop year, further
impacting supply. As a result, supply
and demand for tart cherries are rarely
in balance.
Because demand for tart cherries is
inelastic, total sales volume is not very
responsive to changes in price.
However, prices are very sensitive to
changes in supply. As such, an
oversupply of cherries would have a
sharp negative effect on prices, driving
down grower returns. Aware of this
economic relationship, the Board
focuses on using the volume control
provisions in the Order to balance
supply and demand to stabilize industry
returns.
Pursuant to § 930.50, the Board meets
on or about July 1, to review sales data,
inventory data, current crop forecasts,
and market conditions for the upcoming
season and, if necessary, to recommend
preliminary free and restricted
percentages if anticipated supply would
exceed demand. After harvest is
complete, but no later than September
15, the Board meets again to update its
calculations using actual production
data, consider any necessary
adjustments to the preliminary
percentages, and determine if final free
and restricted percentages should be
recommended to the Secretary.
The Board uses sales history,
inventory, and production data to
determine whether there is a surplus
and, if so, how much volume should be
restricted to maintain optimum supply.
The optimum supply represents the
desirable volume of tart cherries that
should be available for sale in the
coming crop year. Optimum supply is
defined as the average free sales of the
prior three years plus desirable carry-
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
out inventory. Desirable carry-out is the
amount of fruit needed by the industry
to be carried into the succeeding crop
year to meet market demand until the
new crop is available. In June 2015, after
considering market circumstances and
needs, the Board recommended a
desirable carry-out inventory not to
exceed a maximum of up to 100 million
pounds beginning with the 2016 crop
year. That action was subsequently
approved by the Secretary (81 FR
63676). Therefore, a correction will be
made to § 930.151 to reflect the correct
desirable carry-out inventory not to
exceed a maximum of 100 million
pounds.
In addition, USDA’s ‘‘Guidelines for
Fruit, Vegetable, and Specialty Crop
Marketing Orders’’ (https://
www.ams.usda.gov/publications/
content/1982-guidelines-fruit-vegetablemarketing-orders) specify that 110
percent of recent years’ sales should be
made available to primary markets each
season before recommendations for
volume regulation are approved. This
requirement is codified in § 930.50(g),
which specifies that in years when
restricted percentages are established,
the Board shall make available tonnage
equivalent to an additional 10 percent of
the average sales of the prior three years
for market expansion (market growth
factor).
After the Board determines optimum
supply, desirable carry-out, and market
growth factor, it must examine the
current year’s available volume to
determine whether there is an
oversupply situation. Available volume
includes carry-in inventory (any
inventory available at the beginning of
the season) along with that season’s
production. If production is greater than
the optimum supply minus carry-in, the
difference is considered surplus. This
surplus tonnage is divided by the sum
of production in the regulated districts
to reach a restricted percentage. This
percentage must be held in reserve or
used for approved diversion activities,
such as exports.
The Board met on June 27, 2019, and
computed an optimum supply of 313
million pounds for the 2019–20 crop
year using the average of free sales for
the three previous seasons and desirable
carry-out. To determine the carry-out
figure, the Board discussed and
considered a range of alternatives. One
member suggested a carry-out value of
20 million pounds, noting high carryout puts downward pressure on grower
prices. Another member agreed, noting
the actual carry-out is often twice what
the Board has estimated as desirable.
Some members favored a carry-out of 50
million pounds. Other members were
concerned that too low of a carry-out
may push the restricted percentage too
high for the industry to implement and
suggested repeating the carry-out of 80
million pounds from the previous
season. The Board’s executive director
noted average sales are about 21 million
pounds a month. Using that average, it
would take 84 million pounds to supply
the industry for four months. After
considering the alternatives, the Board
determined a carry-out of 85 million
pounds would be enough to supply the
industry’s needs at the beginning of the
next season.
The Board subtracted the estimated
carry-in of 174 million pounds from the
optimum supply to calculate the
production quantity needed from the
2019–20 crop to meet optimum supply.
This number, 139 million pounds, was
subtracted from the Board’s estimated
2019–20 total production (from
regulated and unregulated districts) of
248.2 million pounds to calculate a
surplus of 109.2 million pounds of tart
cherries. The Board also complied with
the market growth factor requirement by
removing 22.8 million pounds (average
sales for prior three years of 228 million
times 10 percent) from the surplus. The
adjusted surplus of 86.4 million pounds
was then divided by the expected
production in the regulated districts
(240 million pounds) to reach a
preliminary restricted percentage of 36
percent for the 2019–20 crop year.
The Board then discussed whether
this calculation would supply enough
cherries to grow sales and fulfil orders
that have not yet shipped. Some
members reported that there had been
excessive rainfall, especially in
Michigan, during the growing season.
This could lead to poor fruit quality and
handlers would need additional
available tonnage to meet sales needs.
As a result, the Board recommended an
additional economic adjustment of 20
40869
million pounds, which is subtracted
from the surplus. The Board also
anticipated that orchard diversion
would be about 50 million pounds,
which is subtracted from the expected
production. With these modifications,
the preliminary restricted percentage
was calculated at 35 percent.
The Board met again on September
12, 2019, to consider final volume
regulation percentages for the 2019–20
season. The final percentages are based
on the Board’s reported production
figures and the supply and demand
information available in September.
The total production for the 2019–20
season was 257.2 million pounds, 9
million pounds above the Board’s June
estimate. In addition, growers diverted
18.3 million pounds in the orchard,
about a third of what had been
anticipated. As a result, 238.9 million
pounds would be available to market,
230.2 million pounds of which are in
the restricted districts. Using the actual
production numbers, and accounting for
the recommended desirable carry-out
and economic adjustment, as well as the
market growth factor, the restricted
percentage was recalculated.
The Board subtracted the carry-in
figure used in June of 174 million
pounds, from the optimum supply of
313 million pounds to determine 139
million pounds of 2019–20 production
would be necessary to reach optimum
supply. The Board subtracted the 139
million pounds from the actual
production of 257.2 million pounds,
resulting in a surplus of 118.2 million
pounds of tart cherries.
The recalculated surplus was reduced
by subtracting the revised economic
adjustment of 20 million pounds and
the market growth factor of 22.8 million
pounds, resulting in an adjusted surplus
of 75.4 million pounds. The Board then
divided this final surplus by the
available production of 230.2 million
pounds in the regulated districts (248.5
million pounds minus 18.3 million
pounds of in-orchard diversion) to
calculate a restricted percentage of 33
percent with a corresponding free
percentage of 67 percent for the 2019–
20 crop year, as outlined in the
following table:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Millions
of pounds
Final Calculations:
(1) Average sales of the prior three years ...................................................................................................................................
(2) Plus desirable carry-out ..........................................................................................................................................................
(3) Optimum supply calculated by the Board ...............................................................................................................................
(4) Carry-in as of July 1, 2019 .....................................................................................................................................................
(5) Adjusted optimum supply (item 3 minus item 4) ....................................................................................................................
(6) Board reported production ......................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
228
85
313
174
139
257.2
40870
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Millions
of pounds
(7) Surplus (item 6 minus item 5) ................................................................................................................................................
(8) Total economic adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
(9) Market growth factor ...............................................................................................................................................................
(10) Adjusted Surplus (item 7 minus items 8 and 9) ...................................................................................................................
118.2
20
22.8
75.4
(11) Production in regulated districts ...........................................................................................................................................
(12) In-Orchard Diversion .............................................................................................................................................................
248.5
18.3
(13) Production minus in orchard diversion .................................................................................................................................
Final Percentages:
Restricted (item 10 divided by item 13 × 100) .............................................................................................................................
Free (100 minus restricted percentage) .......................................................................................................................................
230.2
The final restriction of 33 percent is
lower than the preliminary restriction
percentage of 35 percent. The change is
due to the increase in production from
the June estimate and lower in-orchard
diversion volume. The desired carry-out
remained the same at 85 million
pounds. In discussing the calculation,
members indicated the quality concerns
that led to the adjustment were accurate.
Members did not propose any changes
to the adjustment following harvest.
During the preliminary and final
discussions, attendees raised concerns
about the age of free inventory and the
impact of imported tart cherry products.
The Board voted to form a committee to
develop a proposal for collecting
additional data regarding inventory.
Regarding the impact of imports, the
Board approved a research proposal to
gather additional data. The Board
anticipates these actions will help
provide additional data for future
volume regulation discussions.
Establishing free and restricted
percentages is an attempt to bring
supply and demand into balance. If the
primary market is oversupplied with
cherries, grower prices decline
substantially. Restricted percentages
have benefited grower returns and
helped stabilize the market as compared
to those seasons prior to the
implementation of the Order. The
Board, based on its discussion of this
issue and the result of the above
calculations, believes the available
information indicates a restricted
percentage should be established for the
2019–20 crop year to avoid
oversupplying the market with tart
cherries.
Consequently, the Board
recommended final percentages of 67
percent free and 33 percent restricted by
a vote of 15 in favor, and 3 opposed.
The Board could meet and recommend
the release of additional volume during
the crop year if conditions so warranted.
The Secretary finds, from the
recommendation and supporting
information supplied by the Board, that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
designating final percentages of 67
percent free and 33 percent restricted
tends to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act, and so designates these
percentages.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 400
producers of tart cherries in the
regulated area and approximately 40
handlers of tart cherries who are subject
to regulation under the Order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $1,000,000, and small
agricultural service firms have been
defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $30,000,000 (13 CFR
121.201).
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
and Board data, the average annual
grower price for tart cherries utilized for
processing during the 2018–19 season
was approximately $0.196 per pound.
With total utilization at 288.8 million
pounds for the 2018–19 season, the total
2018–19 value of the crop utilized for
processing is estimated at $56.6 million.
Dividing the crop value by the estimated
number of producers (400) yields an
estimated average receipt per producer
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33%
67%
of $141,500. This is well below the SBA
threshold for small producers.
A free on board (FOB) price of $0.80
per pound for frozen tart cherries was
reported by the Food Institute during
the 2018–19 season. Based on
utilization, this price represents a good
estimate of the price for processed
cherries. Multiplying this FOB price by
total utilization of 288.8 million pounds
results in an estimated handler-level tart
cherry value of $231 million. Dividing
this figure by the number of handlers
(40) yields estimated average annual
handler receipts of $5.8 million, which
is below the SBA threshold for small
agricultural service firms. Assuming a
normal distribution, the majority of
producers and handlers of tart cherries
may be classified as small entities.
The tart cherry industry in the United
States is characterized by wide annual
fluctuations in production. According to
NASS, the pounds of utilized tart cherry
production for the years 2014 through
2018 were 301 million, 251 million, 319
million, 254 million, and 289 million,
respectively. Because of these
fluctuations, supply and demand for tart
cherries are rarely in balance.
Demand for tart cherries is inelastic,
meaning changes in price have a
minimal effect on total sales volume.
However, prices are very sensitive to
changes in supply, and grower prices
vary widely in response to the large
swings in annual supply. Grower prices
per pound for processed utilization have
ranged from a low of $0.073 in 1987 to
a high of $0.588 per pound in 2012
when a weather event substantially
reduced supply.
Because of this relationship between
supply and price, oversupplying the
market with tart cherries would have a
sharp negative effect on prices, driving
down grower returns. Aware of this
economic relationship, the Board
focuses on using the volume control
authority in the Order to align supply
with demand and stabilize industry
returns. This authority allows the
industry to set free and restricted
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
percentages as a way to bring supply
and demand into balance. Free
percentage cherries can be marketed by
handlers to any outlet, while restricted
percentage volume must be held by
handlers in reserve, diverted, or used for
exempted purposes.
This rule controls the supply of tart
cherries by establishing percentages of
67 percent free and 33 percent restricted
for the 2019–20 crop year. These
percentages should stabilize marketing
conditions by adjusting supply to meet
market demand and help improve
grower returns. This action regulates tart
cherries handled in Michigan, Utah,
Washington, and Wisconsin. The
authority for this action is provided in
§§ 930.50, 930.51(a), and 930.52. The
Board recommended this action at a
meeting on September 12, 2019.
This rule will result in some fruit
being diverted from the primary
domestic markets. However, as
mentioned earlier, the USDA’s
‘‘Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and
Specialty Crop Marketing Orders’’
(https://www.ams.usda.gov/
publications/content/1982-guidelinesfruit-vegetable-marketing-orders)
specify that 110 percent of recent years’
sales should be made available to
primary markets each season before
recommendations for volume regulation
are approved. The available quantity
under this regulation (337.5 million
pounds) is 148 percent of the average
sales for the last three years (228 million
pounds).
In addition, there are secondary uses
available for restricted fruit, including
the development of new products, sales
into new markets, the development of
export markets, and being placed in
reserve. While these alternatives may
provide different levels of return than
the sales to primary markets, they play
an important role for the industry. The
areas of new products, new markets,
and the development of export markets
utilize restricted fruit to develop and
expand the markets for tart cherries. In
2018–19, these activities accounted for
over 88 million pounds in sales, a
6-million-pound increase from the
previous season.
Placing tart cherries into reserves is
also a key part of balancing supply and
demand. Although handlers bear the
handling and storage costs for fruit in
reserve, reserves stored in large crop
years are used to supplement supplies
in short crop years. The reserves help
the industry to mitigate the impact of
oversupply in large crop years, while
allowing the industry to supply markets
in years when production falls below
demand. Further, storage and handling
costs are more than offset by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
increase in price when moving from a
large crop to a short crop year.
The Board recommended a carry-out
of 85 million pounds and made a
demand adjustment of 20 million
pounds in order to make the regulation
less restrictive to account for fruit
quality concerns. With 174 million
pounds of carry-in, 8.7 million pounds
of production in the unregulated
districts, and 154.8 million pounds of
free tonnage from the regulated districts,
337.5 million pounds of fruit will be
available for the domestic market. This
amount is comparable to the 336.9
million pounds made available in the
previous season. Even with the
recommended restriction, the domestic
market will have an ample supply of tart
cherries. Further, should marketing
conditions change, and market demand
exceed existing supplies, the Board
could meet and recommend the release
of an additional volume of cherries.
Consequently, it is not anticipated that
this rule will unduly burden growers or
handlers.
While this action could result in some
additional costs to the industry, these
costs are outweighed by the benefits.
The purpose of setting restricted
percentages is to attempt to bring supply
and demand into balance. If the primary
market (domestic) is oversupplied with
cherries, grower prices decline
substantially. Without volume control,
the primary market would likely be
oversupplied, resulting in lower grower
prices.
An econometric model has been
developed to assess the impact volume
control has on the price growers receive
for their product. Based on the model,
the use of volume control would have
a positive impact on grower returns for
this crop year. With volume control,
grower prices are estimated to be
approximately $0.04 per pound higher
than without restrictions. In addition, in
the absence of volume control, the
industry could start to build large
amounts of unwanted inventories.
These inventories would have a
depressing effect on grower prices.
Retail demand is assumed to be
highly inelastic, which indicates that
the changes in price do not result in
significant changes in the quantity
demanded. Consumer prices largely do
not reflect fluctuations in cherry
supplies. Therefore, this action should
have little or no effect on consumer
prices and should not result in a
reduction in retail sales.
The free and restricted percentages
established by this action will provide
the market with optimum supply and
will apply uniformly to all regulated
handlers in the industry, regardless of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40871
size. As the restriction represents a
percentage of a handler’s volume, the
costs, when applicable, are
proportionate and should not place an
extra burden on small entities as
compared to large entities.
The stabilizing effects of this action
benefit all handlers by helping them
maintain and expand markets, despite
seasonal supply fluctuations. Likewise,
price stability positively impacts all
growers and handlers by allowing them
to better anticipate the revenues that
their tart cherries would generate.
Growers and handlers, regardless of
size, benefit from the stabilizing effects
of the volume restriction.
As noted earlier, the Board had
extensive discussions on carry-out
inventory alternatives. The alternatives
ranged from 20 million pounds to 100
million pounds. Some expressed a
concern that the relatively low reserves
compared to high carry-in signaled that
not enough fruit had been put in reserve
in previous seasons. Some attendees
indicated excess carry-in over the past
few seasons has had a negative effect on
returns and growers are seeking relief.
The Board noted if the carry-out number
was too large, it could have a negative
impact on grower returns, but enough
fruit was needed to supply processors
before the new harvest. After
consideration of the alternatives, the
Board recommended a carry-out of 85
million pounds.
The Board also weighed alternatives
when discussing the economic
adjustment. Some members suggested
making no adjustment to the formula.
However, at its June meeting, the Board
recommended a 20-million-pound
adjustment to account for fruit quality
concerns. When fruit is too large or too
small, it does not move as efficiently
through the pitting process. The Board
was concerned excessive rainfall would
result in large, soft, fruit that would not
process as well as average-sized fruit. As
a result, more fruit would be necessary
to get the needed final product.
Following harvest, Board members
confirmed weather had indeed affected
the size of fruit, and that the
recommended adjustment was accurate
and should not be changed.
In discussing the preliminary
recommendation, the Board heard a
report from a committee that examined
import issues. During the discussion
there was a suggestion that the Board
might consider using the previous year’s
import numbers to estimate imported
volume in the coming year. However,
there was no motion to make an
adjustment for imports. To better
address these issues, the Board allocated
funds to a research project to provide
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
40872
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
additional information on the volume
and impact of imported cherry products.
Given the concerns with regulation
expressed by Board members and
industry members in attendance, the
Board also considered recommending
no volume regulation. However, the
data indicated a high carryover from
previous seasons has created a
substantial surplus. During this
discussion, attendees questioned the age
of the products in inventory. While all
types of products can be stored for
multiple years, their value does
diminish over time. Reserve inventory
must be under two years old, but there
are no restrictions on free inventory.
Industry members expressed concern
that not all inventory is of equal value
and suggested the Board should collect
information on the age and quality of
free inventory. A vote to recommend no
volume regulation failed, but the Board
did agree to form a committee to
investigate potential reporting
requirements to provide the industry
better data regarding the available
inventory. Thus, the alternatives were
rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0177, Tart
Cherries Grown in the States of
Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wisconsin. No changes to those
requirements are necessary as a result of
this action. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to
OMB for approval.
This final rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
tart cherry handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Board’s meetings were widely
publicized throughout the tart cherry
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meetings and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the June
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
27, 2019, and September 12, 2019,
meetings were public meetings, and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 23, 2020 (85 FR
16273). Copies of the proposed rule
were sent via email to all Board
members and tart cherry handlers. The
proposed rule was also made available
through the internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day
comment period was provided to allow
interested persons to respond to the
proposal.
One comment was received in
opposition to the proposal. This
comment came from a tart cherry
handler who expressed concern that the
marketing order does not allow
flexibility to serve changing markets.
The comment also stated that the
handler submitted a request to the
Board to release reserves. Finally, the
comment also attributed difficulties in
meeting changing demands to current
food safety regulations and food
industry practices.
Regarding the flexibility of supplying
different tart cherry products, it is
correct that the marketing order does
not distinguish between product
segments. The marketing order
authorizes the Secretary to designate
free and restricted percentages that
apply to all handlers, regardless of the
type of tart cherry product. Thus, the
regulation is spread proportionally
among handlers. Under any regulation,
handlers can move restricted tonnage
through approved diversion channels
including but not limited to, supplying
new markets or making charitable
donations.
Regarding a release of reserves, as
mentioned earlier in this rule, the Board
can meet and recommend a release of
reserves at any time. The Board can
make such a recommendation,
regardless of whether a volume
regulation is in place for the current
fiscal year. This process is described in
§ 930.154. The Board may request this
action, which releases apportioned
volume to handlers based on their total
volume handled in the three previous
years. In its discussions regarding
volume regulation the Board indicated
174 million pounds of carry-in were
available; the unregulated districts
accounted for 8.7 million pounds of
production; and this volume restriction
will place 154.8 million pounds of free
tonnage from the regulated districts on
the market for a total of 337.5 million
pounds of fruit available for the
domestic market. This is well above the
average sales of 228 million pounds.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Board met multiple times
following the volume regulation
recommendation, and neither Board
members nor public participants offered
any evidence that sales had increased to
the point of needing a release of
reserves. Further, at these meetings, no
requests for a release were made, nor
were any motions introduced regarding
a release. The Board’s most recent sales
report indicates that as of February 29,
2020, some product category sales
reported by handlers were up and others
were down. In total, year over year sales
were virtually unchanged; down one
tenth of a percent, or 146,322 pounds.
Given this information, there should be
more than adequate fruit available to
supply the market following this action.
The concerns expressed regarding the
limitations of food safety practices are
outside the authorities of the marketing
order and therefore not relevant to this
action.
Accordingly, based on the comment
received, no changes will be made to the
rule as proposed.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board, and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tart
cherries.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend 7 CFR part 930 as
follows:
PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN
IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON,
UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND
WISCONSIN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 930 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
■
2. Revise § 930.151 to read as follows:
§ 930.151
Desirable Carry-out inventory.
Beginning with the crop year starting
July 1, 2016, for the purposes of
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
determining an optimum supply
volume, the Board may recommend a
desirable carry-out inventory not to
exceed 100 million pounds.
■ 3. Revise § 930.256 to read as follows:
§ 930.256 Free and restricted percentages
for the 2019–20 crop year.
The percentages for tart cherries
handled by handlers during the crop
year beginning on July 1, 2019, which
shall be free and restricted, respectively,
are designated as follows: Free
percentage, 67 percent and restricted
percentage, 33 percent.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–13125 Filed 7–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0638; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–00308–E; Amendment
39–21158; AD 2020–14–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Type
Certificate Previously Held by RollsRoyce plc) Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd. & Co KG
(RRD) Trent 1000–A, Trent 1000–AE,
Trent 1000–C, Trent 1000–CE, Trent
1000–D, Trent 1000–E, Trent 1000–G,
and Trent 1000–H model turbofan
engines. This AD requires removing and
replacing one or both affected engines,
depending on whether the engine
pairing combinations are compliant or
non-compliant, as described in the
service information. This AD was
prompted by occurrences of in-service
engine surges on affected RRD Trent
model turbofan engines with a high
number of intermediate pressure
compressor (IPC) module flight hours
since new (HSN) or cycles since new
(CSN). The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 23,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jul 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of July 23, 2020.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by August 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg
11, 15827 Blankenfelde-Mahlow,
Germany; phone: +49 (0) 33 708 6 0;
email: https://www.rolls-royce.com/
contact-us.aspx. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7759.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0638.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0638; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is
listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Elwin, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7236; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: stephen.l.elwin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40873
Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA
AD 2020–0010R2, dated March 4, 2020
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
address an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Occurrences have been reported of engine
surges on certain Trent 1000 engines,
particularly those that have accumulated a
high number of flight hours (FH) and engine
flight cycles (EFC). The investigation into the
cause(s) of these events is on-going. This
condition, if not corrected, could lead to a
dual engine surge, possibly resulting in a
dual engine in-flight shut-down and
consequent reduced control of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Rolls-Royce published the NMSB to provide
de-pairing instructions, reducing the risk of
a dual surge event. Instructions for in-shop
performance recovery are being developed.
Prompted by some errors detected in Table
1 of the NMSB, Appendix 1 of this [EASA]
AD must be used instead. Rolls-Royce will
revise the NMSB to correct those errors.
For the reasons described above, EASA
issued AD 2020–0010 (later revised) to
require de-pairing of the affected engines.
Since EASA AD 2020–0010R1 was issued,
Rolls-Royce issued NMSB TRENT 1000 72–
K494, providing instructions for in-shop
action to restore the surge margin.
Embodiment of Part B of this NMSB allows
relaxation of the de-pairing actions as
required by this [EASA] AD. Rolls-Royce
have revised NMSB TRENT 1000 72–AK468
accordingly, including a new Table 1,
defining de-pairing upper and lower
thresholds (pre- and post-NMSB 72–K494
embodied) and Table 2 (which was Table 1
in the NMSB 72–AK468 at original issue) for
de-pairing when one engine has embodied
Part B of NMSB TRENT 1000 72–K494, and
when both engines have embodied Part B of
NMSB TRENT 1000 72–K494.
Consequently, this [EASA] AD is revised to
include references to NMSB TRENT 1000 72–
K494 and to NMSB TRENT 1000 72–AK468
Revision 1, and Table 2 thereof.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0638.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Rolls-Royce plc
(RR) Alert Non-Modification Service
Bulletin (NMSB) Trent 1000 72–AK468,
Revision 1, dated March 3, 2020. The
Alert NMSB describes compliant and
non-compliant engine pairing
combinations based on IPC module
flight HSN or CSN. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 131 (Wednesday, July 8, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40867-40873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13125]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 930
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-19-0100; SC-20-930-1 FR]
Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Free and
Restricted Percentages for the 2019-20 Crop Year
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Cherry Industry
Administrative Board (Board) to establish free and restricted
percentages for the 2019-20 crop year pursuant to the marketing order
for tart cherries grown in the states of Michigan, New York,
Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin. This action
establishes the proportion of tart cherries from the 2019-20 crop that
may be handled in commercial outlets. This action should stabilize
marketing conditions by adjusting supply to meet market demand and help
improve grower returns. Also, a correction is made to section 930.151
to reflect the correct desirable carry-out inventory not
[[Page 40868]]
to exceed a maximum of 100 million pounds (81 FR 63676).
DATES: Effective August 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie M. Varela, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 291-8614, or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in
7 CFR 900.2(j). This final rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and
Order No. 930, both as amended (7 CFR part 930), regulating the
handling of tart cherries produced in the states of Michigan, New York,
Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. Part 930
(referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Board locally administers
the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of tart cherries
operating within the production area, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this final rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This final rule
falls within a category of regulatory action that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order, free and restricted percentages
may be established for tart cherries handled during the crop year. This
rule establishes free and restricted percentages for tart cherries for
the 2019-20 crop year, beginning July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with the law
and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule establishes the proportion of tart cherries from
the 2019-20 crop that may be handled in commercial outlets at 67
percent free and 33 percent restricted. The Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary) has determined that designating free and restricted
percentages of tart cherries for the 2019-20 crop year effectuates the
declared policy of the Act to stabilize marketing conditions by
adjusting supply to meet market demand and help improve grower returns.
A correction is also made to Sec. 930.151 to reflect the correct
desirable carry-out inventory not to exceed a maximum of 100 million
pounds (81 FR 63676). These recommendations were made by the Board at
meetings on June 27, 2019, and September 12, 2019.
Section 930.51(a) provides the Secretary authority to regulate
volume by designating free and restricted percentages for any tart
cherries acquired by handlers in a given crop year. Section 930.50
prescribes procedures for computing an optimum supply based on sales
history and for calculating these free and restricted percentages. Free
percentage volume may be shipped to any market, while restricted
percentage volume must be held by handlers in a primary or secondary
reserve, or be diverted or used for exempt purposes as prescribed in
Sec. Sec. 930.159 and 930.162. Exempt purposes include, in part, the
development of new products, sales into new markets, the development of
export markets, and charitable contributions. Sections 930.55 through
930.57 prescribe procedures for inventory reserve. For cherries held in
reserve, handlers would be responsible for storage and would retain
title of the tart cherries.
Section 930.52 states that only districts with an annual average
production over the prior three years of at least six million pounds
are subject to regulation, and any district producing a crop that is
less than 50 percent of its annual average of the previous five years
is exempt. The regulated districts for the 2019-20 crop year are:
District 1--Northern Michigan; District 2--Central Michigan; District
3--Southern Michigan; District 7--Utah; District 8--Washington; and
District 9--Wisconsin. Districts 4, 5, and 6 (New York, Oregon and
Pennsylvania, respectively) will not be regulated for the 2019-20
season.
Demand for tart cherries and tart cherry products tends to be
relatively stable from year to year. Conversely, annual tart cherry
production can vary greatly. In addition, tart cherries are processed
and can be stored and carried over from crop year to crop year, further
impacting supply. As a result, supply and demand for tart cherries are
rarely in balance.
Because demand for tart cherries is inelastic, total sales volume
is not very responsive to changes in price. However, prices are very
sensitive to changes in supply. As such, an oversupply of cherries
would have a sharp negative effect on prices, driving down grower
returns. Aware of this economic relationship, the Board focuses on
using the volume control provisions in the Order to balance supply and
demand to stabilize industry returns.
Pursuant to Sec. 930.50, the Board meets on or about July 1, to
review sales data, inventory data, current crop forecasts, and market
conditions for the upcoming season and, if necessary, to recommend
preliminary free and restricted percentages if anticipated supply would
exceed demand. After harvest is complete, but no later than September
15, the Board meets again to update its calculations using actual
production data, consider any necessary adjustments to the preliminary
percentages, and determine if final free and restricted percentages
should be recommended to the Secretary.
The Board uses sales history, inventory, and production data to
determine whether there is a surplus and, if so, how much volume should
be restricted to maintain optimum supply. The optimum supply represents
the desirable volume of tart cherries that should be available for sale
in the coming crop year. Optimum supply is defined as the average free
sales of the prior three years plus desirable carry-
[[Page 40869]]
out inventory. Desirable carry-out is the amount of fruit needed by the
industry to be carried into the succeeding crop year to meet market
demand until the new crop is available. In June 2015, after considering
market circumstances and needs, the Board recommended a desirable
carry-out inventory not to exceed a maximum of up to 100 million pounds
beginning with the 2016 crop year. That action was subsequently
approved by the Secretary (81 FR 63676). Therefore, a correction will
be made to Sec. 930.151 to reflect the correct desirable carry-out
inventory not to exceed a maximum of 100 million pounds.
In addition, USDA's ``Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and
Specialty Crop Marketing Orders'' (https://www.ams.usda.gov/publications/content/1982-guidelines-fruit-vegetable-marketing-orders)
specify that 110 percent of recent years' sales should be made
available to primary markets each season before recommendations for
volume regulation are approved. This requirement is codified in Sec.
930.50(g), which specifies that in years when restricted percentages
are established, the Board shall make available tonnage equivalent to
an additional 10 percent of the average sales of the prior three years
for market expansion (market growth factor).
After the Board determines optimum supply, desirable carry-out, and
market growth factor, it must examine the current year's available
volume to determine whether there is an oversupply situation. Available
volume includes carry-in inventory (any inventory available at the
beginning of the season) along with that season's production. If
production is greater than the optimum supply minus carry-in, the
difference is considered surplus. This surplus tonnage is divided by
the sum of production in the regulated districts to reach a restricted
percentage. This percentage must be held in reserve or used for
approved diversion activities, such as exports.
The Board met on June 27, 2019, and computed an optimum supply of
313 million pounds for the 2019-20 crop year using the average of free
sales for the three previous seasons and desirable carry-out. To
determine the carry-out figure, the Board discussed and considered a
range of alternatives. One member suggested a carry-out value of 20
million pounds, noting high carry-out puts downward pressure on grower
prices. Another member agreed, noting the actual carry-out is often
twice what the Board has estimated as desirable. Some members favored a
carry-out of 50 million pounds. Other members were concerned that too
low of a carry-out may push the restricted percentage too high for the
industry to implement and suggested repeating the carry-out of 80
million pounds from the previous season. The Board's executive director
noted average sales are about 21 million pounds a month. Using that
average, it would take 84 million pounds to supply the industry for
four months. After considering the alternatives, the Board determined a
carry-out of 85 million pounds would be enough to supply the industry's
needs at the beginning of the next season.
The Board subtracted the estimated carry-in of 174 million pounds
from the optimum supply to calculate the production quantity needed
from the 2019-20 crop to meet optimum supply. This number, 139 million
pounds, was subtracted from the Board's estimated 2019-20 total
production (from regulated and unregulated districts) of 248.2 million
pounds to calculate a surplus of 109.2 million pounds of tart cherries.
The Board also complied with the market growth factor requirement by
removing 22.8 million pounds (average sales for prior three years of
228 million times 10 percent) from the surplus. The adjusted surplus of
86.4 million pounds was then divided by the expected production in the
regulated districts (240 million pounds) to reach a preliminary
restricted percentage of 36 percent for the 2019-20 crop year.
The Board then discussed whether this calculation would supply
enough cherries to grow sales and fulfil orders that have not yet
shipped. Some members reported that there had been excessive rainfall,
especially in Michigan, during the growing season. This could lead to
poor fruit quality and handlers would need additional available tonnage
to meet sales needs. As a result, the Board recommended an additional
economic adjustment of 20 million pounds, which is subtracted from the
surplus. The Board also anticipated that orchard diversion would be
about 50 million pounds, which is subtracted from the expected
production. With these modifications, the preliminary restricted
percentage was calculated at 35 percent.
The Board met again on September 12, 2019, to consider final volume
regulation percentages for the 2019-20 season. The final percentages
are based on the Board's reported production figures and the supply and
demand information available in September.
The total production for the 2019-20 season was 257.2 million
pounds, 9 million pounds above the Board's June estimate. In addition,
growers diverted 18.3 million pounds in the orchard, about a third of
what had been anticipated. As a result, 238.9 million pounds would be
available to market, 230.2 million pounds of which are in the
restricted districts. Using the actual production numbers, and
accounting for the recommended desirable carry-out and economic
adjustment, as well as the market growth factor, the restricted
percentage was recalculated.
The Board subtracted the carry-in figure used in June of 174
million pounds, from the optimum supply of 313 million pounds to
determine 139 million pounds of 2019-20 production would be necessary
to reach optimum supply. The Board subtracted the 139 million pounds
from the actual production of 257.2 million pounds, resulting in a
surplus of 118.2 million pounds of tart cherries.
The recalculated surplus was reduced by subtracting the revised
economic adjustment of 20 million pounds and the market growth factor
of 22.8 million pounds, resulting in an adjusted surplus of 75.4
million pounds. The Board then divided this final surplus by the
available production of 230.2 million pounds in the regulated districts
(248.5 million pounds minus 18.3 million pounds of in-orchard
diversion) to calculate a restricted percentage of 33 percent with a
corresponding free percentage of 67 percent for the 2019-20 crop year,
as outlined in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Millions of
pounds
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Calculations:
(1) Average sales of the prior three years.......... 228
(2) Plus desirable carry-out........................ 85
(3) Optimum supply calculated by the Board.......... 313
(4) Carry-in as of July 1, 2019.................... 174
(5) Adjusted optimum supply (item 3 minus item 4)... 139
(6) Board reported production....................... 257.2
[[Page 40870]]
(7) Surplus (item 6 minus item 5)................... 118.2
(8) Total economic adjustments...................... 20
(9) Market growth factor............................ 22.8
(10) Adjusted Surplus (item 7 minus items 8 and 9).. 75.4
---------------
(11) Production in regulated districts.............. 248.5
(12) In-Orchard Diversion........................... 18.3
---------------
(13) Production minus in orchard diversion.......... 230.2
Final Percentages:
Restricted (item 10 divided by item 13 x 100)....... 33%
Free (100 minus restricted percentage).............. 67%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final restriction of 33 percent is lower than the preliminary
restriction percentage of 35 percent. The change is due to the increase
in production from the June estimate and lower in-orchard diversion
volume. The desired carry-out remained the same at 85 million pounds.
In discussing the calculation, members indicated the quality concerns
that led to the adjustment were accurate. Members did not propose any
changes to the adjustment following harvest.
During the preliminary and final discussions, attendees raised
concerns about the age of free inventory and the impact of imported
tart cherry products. The Board voted to form a committee to develop a
proposal for collecting additional data regarding inventory. Regarding
the impact of imports, the Board approved a research proposal to gather
additional data. The Board anticipates these actions will help provide
additional data for future volume regulation discussions.
Establishing free and restricted percentages is an attempt to bring
supply and demand into balance. If the primary market is oversupplied
with cherries, grower prices decline substantially. Restricted
percentages have benefited grower returns and helped stabilize the
market as compared to those seasons prior to the implementation of the
Order. The Board, based on its discussion of this issue and the result
of the above calculations, believes the available information indicates
a restricted percentage should be established for the 2019-20 crop year
to avoid oversupplying the market with tart cherries.
Consequently, the Board recommended final percentages of 67 percent
free and 33 percent restricted by a vote of 15 in favor, and 3 opposed.
The Board could meet and recommend the release of additional volume
during the crop year if conditions so warranted. The Secretary finds,
from the recommendation and supporting information supplied by the
Board, that designating final percentages of 67 percent free and 33
percent restricted tends to effectuate the declared policy of the Act,
and so designates these percentages.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 400 producers of tart cherries in the
regulated area and approximately 40 handlers of tart cherries who are
subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $1,000,000, and small agricultural service
firms have been defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$30,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
and Board data, the average annual grower price for tart cherries
utilized for processing during the 2018-19 season was approximately
$0.196 per pound. With total utilization at 288.8 million pounds for
the 2018-19 season, the total 2018-19 value of the crop utilized for
processing is estimated at $56.6 million. Dividing the crop value by
the estimated number of producers (400) yields an estimated average
receipt per producer of $141,500. This is well below the SBA threshold
for small producers.
A free on board (FOB) price of $0.80 per pound for frozen tart
cherries was reported by the Food Institute during the 2018-19 season.
Based on utilization, this price represents a good estimate of the
price for processed cherries. Multiplying this FOB price by total
utilization of 288.8 million pounds results in an estimated handler-
level tart cherry value of $231 million. Dividing this figure by the
number of handlers (40) yields estimated average annual handler
receipts of $5.8 million, which is below the SBA threshold for small
agricultural service firms. Assuming a normal distribution, the
majority of producers and handlers of tart cherries may be classified
as small entities.
The tart cherry industry in the United States is characterized by
wide annual fluctuations in production. According to NASS, the pounds
of utilized tart cherry production for the years 2014 through 2018 were
301 million, 251 million, 319 million, 254 million, and 289 million,
respectively. Because of these fluctuations, supply and demand for tart
cherries are rarely in balance.
Demand for tart cherries is inelastic, meaning changes in price
have a minimal effect on total sales volume. However, prices are very
sensitive to changes in supply, and grower prices vary widely in
response to the large swings in annual supply. Grower prices per pound
for processed utilization have ranged from a low of $0.073 in 1987 to a
high of $0.588 per pound in 2012 when a weather event substantially
reduced supply.
Because of this relationship between supply and price,
oversupplying the market with tart cherries would have a sharp negative
effect on prices, driving down grower returns. Aware of this economic
relationship, the Board focuses on using the volume control authority
in the Order to align supply with demand and stabilize industry
returns. This authority allows the industry to set free and restricted
[[Page 40871]]
percentages as a way to bring supply and demand into balance. Free
percentage cherries can be marketed by handlers to any outlet, while
restricted percentage volume must be held by handlers in reserve,
diverted, or used for exempted purposes.
This rule controls the supply of tart cherries by establishing
percentages of 67 percent free and 33 percent restricted for the 2019-
20 crop year. These percentages should stabilize marketing conditions
by adjusting supply to meet market demand and help improve grower
returns. This action regulates tart cherries handled in Michigan, Utah,
Washington, and Wisconsin. The authority for this action is provided in
Sec. Sec. 930.50, 930.51(a), and 930.52. The Board recommended this
action at a meeting on September 12, 2019.
This rule will result in some fruit being diverted from the primary
domestic markets. However, as mentioned earlier, the USDA's
``Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and Specialty Crop Marketing
Orders'' (https://www.ams.usda.gov/publications/content/1982-guidelines-fruit-vegetable-marketing-orders) specify that 110 percent
of recent years' sales should be made available to primary markets each
season before recommendations for volume regulation are approved. The
available quantity under this regulation (337.5 million pounds) is 148
percent of the average sales for the last three years (228 million
pounds).
In addition, there are secondary uses available for restricted
fruit, including the development of new products, sales into new
markets, the development of export markets, and being placed in
reserve. While these alternatives may provide different levels of
return than the sales to primary markets, they play an important role
for the industry. The areas of new products, new markets, and the
development of export markets utilize restricted fruit to develop and
expand the markets for tart cherries. In 2018-19, these activities
accounted for over 88 million pounds in sales, a 6-million-pound
increase from the previous season.
Placing tart cherries into reserves is also a key part of balancing
supply and demand. Although handlers bear the handling and storage
costs for fruit in reserve, reserves stored in large crop years are
used to supplement supplies in short crop years. The reserves help the
industry to mitigate the impact of oversupply in large crop years,
while allowing the industry to supply markets in years when production
falls below demand. Further, storage and handling costs are more than
offset by the increase in price when moving from a large crop to a
short crop year.
The Board recommended a carry-out of 85 million pounds and made a
demand adjustment of 20 million pounds in order to make the regulation
less restrictive to account for fruit quality concerns. With 174
million pounds of carry-in, 8.7 million pounds of production in the
unregulated districts, and 154.8 million pounds of free tonnage from
the regulated districts, 337.5 million pounds of fruit will be
available for the domestic market. This amount is comparable to the
336.9 million pounds made available in the previous season. Even with
the recommended restriction, the domestic market will have an ample
supply of tart cherries. Further, should marketing conditions change,
and market demand exceed existing supplies, the Board could meet and
recommend the release of an additional volume of cherries.
Consequently, it is not anticipated that this rule will unduly burden
growers or handlers.
While this action could result in some additional costs to the
industry, these costs are outweighed by the benefits. The purpose of
setting restricted percentages is to attempt to bring supply and demand
into balance. If the primary market (domestic) is oversupplied with
cherries, grower prices decline substantially. Without volume control,
the primary market would likely be oversupplied, resulting in lower
grower prices.
An econometric model has been developed to assess the impact volume
control has on the price growers receive for their product. Based on
the model, the use of volume control would have a positive impact on
grower returns for this crop year. With volume control, grower prices
are estimated to be approximately $0.04 per pound higher than without
restrictions. In addition, in the absence of volume control, the
industry could start to build large amounts of unwanted inventories.
These inventories would have a depressing effect on grower prices.
Retail demand is assumed to be highly inelastic, which indicates
that the changes in price do not result in significant changes in the
quantity demanded. Consumer prices largely do not reflect fluctuations
in cherry supplies. Therefore, this action should have little or no
effect on consumer prices and should not result in a reduction in
retail sales.
The free and restricted percentages established by this action will
provide the market with optimum supply and will apply uniformly to all
regulated handlers in the industry, regardless of size. As the
restriction represents a percentage of a handler's volume, the costs,
when applicable, are proportionate and should not place an extra burden
on small entities as compared to large entities.
The stabilizing effects of this action benefit all handlers by
helping them maintain and expand markets, despite seasonal supply
fluctuations. Likewise, price stability positively impacts all growers
and handlers by allowing them to better anticipate the revenues that
their tart cherries would generate. Growers and handlers, regardless of
size, benefit from the stabilizing effects of the volume restriction.
As noted earlier, the Board had extensive discussions on carry-out
inventory alternatives. The alternatives ranged from 20 million pounds
to 100 million pounds. Some expressed a concern that the relatively low
reserves compared to high carry-in signaled that not enough fruit had
been put in reserve in previous seasons. Some attendees indicated
excess carry-in over the past few seasons has had a negative effect on
returns and growers are seeking relief. The Board noted if the carry-
out number was too large, it could have a negative impact on grower
returns, but enough fruit was needed to supply processors before the
new harvest. After consideration of the alternatives, the Board
recommended a carry-out of 85 million pounds.
The Board also weighed alternatives when discussing the economic
adjustment. Some members suggested making no adjustment to the formula.
However, at its June meeting, the Board recommended a 20-million-pound
adjustment to account for fruit quality concerns. When fruit is too
large or too small, it does not move as efficiently through the pitting
process. The Board was concerned excessive rainfall would result in
large, soft, fruit that would not process as well as average-sized
fruit. As a result, more fruit would be necessary to get the needed
final product. Following harvest, Board members confirmed weather had
indeed affected the size of fruit, and that the recommended adjustment
was accurate and should not be changed.
In discussing the preliminary recommendation, the Board heard a
report from a committee that examined import issues. During the
discussion there was a suggestion that the Board might consider using
the previous year's import numbers to estimate imported volume in the
coming year. However, there was no motion to make an adjustment for
imports. To better address these issues, the Board allocated funds to a
research project to provide
[[Page 40872]]
additional information on the volume and impact of imported cherry
products.
Given the concerns with regulation expressed by Board members and
industry members in attendance, the Board also considered recommending
no volume regulation. However, the data indicated a high carryover from
previous seasons has created a substantial surplus. During this
discussion, attendees questioned the age of the products in inventory.
While all types of products can be stored for multiple years, their
value does diminish over time. Reserve inventory must be under two
years old, but there are no restrictions on free inventory. Industry
members expressed concern that not all inventory is of equal value and
suggested the Board should collect information on the age and quality
of free inventory. A vote to recommend no volume regulation failed, but
the Board did agree to form a committee to investigate potential
reporting requirements to provide the industry better data regarding
the available inventory. Thus, the alternatives were rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0177, Tart
Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin. No changes to those
requirements are necessary as a result of this action. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large tart cherry
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Board's meetings were widely publicized throughout the tart
cherry industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the
meetings and participate in Board deliberations on all issues. Like all
Board meetings, the June 27, 2019, and September 12, 2019, meetings
were public meetings, and all entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 23, 2020 (85 FR 16273). Copies of the proposed rule
were sent via email to all Board members and tart cherry handlers. The
proposed rule was also made available through the internet by USDA and
the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period was
provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal.
One comment was received in opposition to the proposal. This
comment came from a tart cherry handler who expressed concern that the
marketing order does not allow flexibility to serve changing markets.
The comment also stated that the handler submitted a request to the
Board to release reserves. Finally, the comment also attributed
difficulties in meeting changing demands to current food safety
regulations and food industry practices.
Regarding the flexibility of supplying different tart cherry
products, it is correct that the marketing order does not distinguish
between product segments. The marketing order authorizes the Secretary
to designate free and restricted percentages that apply to all
handlers, regardless of the type of tart cherry product. Thus, the
regulation is spread proportionally among handlers. Under any
regulation, handlers can move restricted tonnage through approved
diversion channels including but not limited to, supplying new markets
or making charitable donations.
Regarding a release of reserves, as mentioned earlier in this rule,
the Board can meet and recommend a release of reserves at any time. The
Board can make such a recommendation, regardless of whether a volume
regulation is in place for the current fiscal year. This process is
described in Sec. 930.154. The Board may request this action, which
releases apportioned volume to handlers based on their total volume
handled in the three previous years. In its discussions regarding
volume regulation the Board indicated 174 million pounds of carry-in
were available; the unregulated districts accounted for 8.7 million
pounds of production; and this volume restriction will place 154.8
million pounds of free tonnage from the regulated districts on the
market for a total of 337.5 million pounds of fruit available for the
domestic market. This is well above the average sales of 228 million
pounds.
The Board met multiple times following the volume regulation
recommendation, and neither Board members nor public participants
offered any evidence that sales had increased to the point of needing a
release of reserves. Further, at these meetings, no requests for a
release were made, nor were any motions introduced regarding a release.
The Board's most recent sales report indicates that as of February 29,
2020, some product category sales reported by handlers were up and
others were down. In total, year over year sales were virtually
unchanged; down one tenth of a percent, or 146,322 pounds. Given this
information, there should be more than adequate fruit available to
supply the market following this action.
The concerns expressed regarding the limitations of food safety
practices are outside the authorities of the marketing order and
therefore not relevant to this action.
Accordingly, based on the comment received, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Board, and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Tart cherries.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend 7 CFR part 930 as
follows:
PART 930--TART CHERRIES GROWN IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW YORK,
PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND WISCONSIN
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 930 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Revise Sec. 930.151 to read as follows:
Sec. 930.151 Desirable Carry-out inventory.
Beginning with the crop year starting July 1, 2016, for the
purposes of
[[Page 40873]]
determining an optimum supply volume, the Board may recommend a
desirable carry-out inventory not to exceed 100 million pounds.
0
3. Revise Sec. 930.256 to read as follows:
Sec. 930.256 Free and restricted percentages for the 2019-20 crop
year.
The percentages for tart cherries handled by handlers during the
crop year beginning on July 1, 2019, which shall be free and
restricted, respectively, are designated as follows: Free percentage,
67 percent and restricted percentage, 33 percent.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-13125 Filed 7-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P