Tri Star Energy, LLC; Analysis of Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment, 40653-40655 [2020-14508]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 130 / Tuesday, July 7, 2020 / Notices
this settlement, it has also struck a deal
to purchase Bally’s, its first foray into
the large Atlantic City market.11 These
acquisitions will require significant
management attention, and I did not
find any compelling evidence that Twin
River will prioritize the divested assets
to fully restore competitive intensity in
the markets that the Commission
believes would suffer from killed-off
competition.
Finally, the Commission should avoid
acting without the benefit of a full
review by the state gaming regulators.
State regulatory agencies have unique
insights and expertise into the
industries they regulate; their findings
inform the issues the Commission takes
into consideration, and not just relating
to the appointment of casino managers.
Some states have a specific mandate to
look at the ownership and financial
conditions of the transacting firms, and
we would benefit from that expertise.
Their analysis is particularly important
during this period of uncertainty, as the
industry is roiling from closures due to
the current COVID–19 pandemic. It is
important that we consider all of the
information and work across
government bodies to protect
competition. While the Commission
does work with some of these
authorities, I am not convinced that
acting before state regulators have
completed their analysis is the right
approach.
Conclusion
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
The proposed resolution in this
transaction offers a unique window into
the assumptions and philosophy of the
Federal Trade Commission. The merger
is clearly anticompetitive in the markets
where the Commission alleged a
violation, and offers no meaningful
benefits to the public. Since the
Commission would not need to go to
trial to block the transaction because the
state regulators have yet to act, there is
no immediate concern about limiting
FTC resources or weighing the litigation
risk. Given these facts, why would the
Commission put the public at risk with
delayed divestitures to a questionable
Signs Definitive Agreement To Acquire Two
Casinos From Eldorado Resorts (July 11, 2019),
https://investors.twinriverwwholdings.com/news/
news-details/2019/Twin-River-Worldwide-HoldingsSigns-Definitive-Agreement-To-Acquire-TwoCasinos-From-Eldorado-Resorts/default.aspx.
11 Press Release, Twin River Worldwide
Holdings, Inc., Twin River Worldwide Holdings to
Acquire Three Casinos from Eldorado and Caesars
(Apr. 24, 2020), https://
investors.twinriverwwholdings.com/news/newsdetails/2020/Twin-River-Worldwide-Holdings-toAcquire-Three-Casinos-from-Eldorado-and-Caesars/
default.aspx.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:21 Jul 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
buyer that has no guarantee of obtaining
a license?
I am concerned that the Commission
is rolling the dice with this complex
settlement that will clearly not lead to
an immediate restoration of lost
competition. It is also clear that we must
revamp our approach when it comes to
vetting proposed divestiture buyers,
particularly when a new financial
investor is in charge in the boardroom.
Our state partners will obviously need
to scrutinize the financial aspects of the
proposed transaction between Caesars
and Eldorado, given the harms inflicted
on the public and regional economies
from past leveraged buyouts—and
resulting bankruptcies—in the
industry.12 They will also need to
carefully assess whether the restoration
of competition will come too late, and
whether Twin River can guarantee that
it will actually accomplish this goal.
The stakes are high right now. For these
reasons, I dissent.
[FR Doc. 2020–14582 Filed 7–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 201–0074]
Tri Star Energy, LLC; Analysis of
Consent Orders To Aid Public
Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair methods
of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the
allegations in the complaint and the
terms of the consent order—embodied
in the consent agreement—that would
settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file
comments online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Please write: ‘‘Tri Star Energy,
LLC; File No. 201–0074’’ on your
comment, and file your comment online
at https://www.regulations.gov by
following the instructions on the webbased form. If you prefer to file your
comment on paper, please mail your
SUMMARY:
12 See, e.g., Sujeet Indap, What happens in
Vegas...the messy bankruptcy of Caesars
Entertainment, THE FIN. TIMES (Sept. 16, 2017),
https://www.ft.com/content/a0ed27c6-a2d4-11e7b797-b61809486fe2.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40653
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex
D), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Masters (202–326–2291), Bureau
of Competition, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
website (for June 24, 2020), at this web
address: https://www.ftc.gov/newsevents/commission-actions.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before August 6, 2020. Write ‘‘Tri Star
Energy, LLC; File No. 201–0074’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
Due to the public health emergency in
response to the COVID–19 outbreak and
the agency’s heightened security
screening, postal mail addressed to the
Commission will be subject to delay. We
strongly encourage you to submit your
comments online through the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, write ‘‘Tri Star Energy, LLC; File
No. 201–0074’’ on your comment and
on the envelope, and mail your
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex D),
Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
40654
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 130 / Tuesday, July 7, 2020 / Notices
D), Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Because your comment will be placed
on the publicly accessible website at
https://www.regulations.gov, you are
solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any
sensitive or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information, such as your or anyone
else’s Social Security number; date of
birth; driver’s license number or other
state identification number, or foreign
country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure your
comment does not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not
include any ‘‘trade secret or any
commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or
confidential’’—as provided by Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public
record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted on the public FTC
website—as legally required by FTC
Rule 4.9(b)—we cannot redact or
remove your comment from the FTC
website, unless you submit a
confidentiality request that meets the
requirements for such treatment under
FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General
Counsel grants that request.
Visit the FTC website at https://
www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the
news release describing this matter. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding, as
appropriate. The Commission will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Jul 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before August 6, 2020. For information
on the Commission’s privacy policy,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/
site-information/privacy-policy.
Analysis of Consent Orders To Aid
Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted for public
comment, subject to final approval, an
Agreement Containing Consent Orders
(‘‘Consent Agreement’’) from Tri Star
Energy, LLC (‘‘Tri Star’’) and
Hollingsworth Oil Company, Inc., C & H
Properties, and Ronald L. Hollingsworth
(‘‘Hollingsworth’’ and collectively, the
‘‘Respondents’’). The Consent
Agreement is designed to remedy the
anticompetitive effects that likely would
result from Tri Star’s proposed
acquisition of retail fuel assets from
Hollingsworth.
Under the terms of the proposed
Consent Agreement, Tri Star must divest
to the upfront buyer, Cox Oil Company,
Inc. (‘‘Cox’’), retail fuel assets in two
local markets in Tennessee. Tri Star
must complete the divestiture within 10
days after the closing of Tri Star’s
acquisition of Hollingsworth. The
Commission and Respondents have
agreed to an Order to Maintain Assets
that requires Respondents to operate
and maintain each divestiture outlet in
the normal course of business through
the date Cox acquires the outlet.
The Commission has placed the
proposed Consent Agreement on the
public record for 30 days to solicit
comments from interested persons.
Comments received during this period
will become part of the public record.
After 30 days, the Commission will
again review the proposed Consent
Agreement and the comments received,
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the Consent Agreement,
modify it, or make it final.
II. The Respondents
Respondent Tri Star, a company
headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee,
owns and operates convenience stores
and retail fuel outlets throughout
Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and
Kentucky. Tri Star operates 89
convenience stores with attached retail
fuel outlets, including 82 in Tennessee.
Tri Star’s convenience stores operate
under the Twice Daily, Hightail, and tFuel names, and its retail fuel outlets
sell under a variety of third-party
branded and unbranded fuel banners.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Tri Star also supplies fuel to a network
of 285 dealer locations.
Respondent Mr. Ronald L.
Hollingsworth, a resident of the state of
Tennessee, controls both Hollingsworth
Oil Company, Inc. and C & H Properties,
entities operating in Tennessee.
Hollingsworth operates a network of 54
convenience stores under the Sudden
Service name with attached retail fuel
outlets throughout middle Tennessee.
Hollingsworth provides a variety of
third-party branded and unbranded
fuels at its Sudden Service outlets and
to 172 wholesale fuel locations.
III. The Proposed Acquisition
On March 6, 2020, Tri Star entered
into an agreement to acquire certain
retail fuel outlets and other interests,
from Hollingsworth and related entities
(the ‘‘Acquisition’’). The Acquisition
would expand Tri Star’s presence
throughout middle Tennessee.
The Commission’s Complaint alleges
that the Acquisition, if consummated,
would violate Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and that
the Acquisition agreement constitutes a
violation of Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 45, by substantially lessening
competition for the retail sale of
gasoline and the retail sale of diesel in
each of two local markets in Tennessee.
IV. The Retail Sales of Gasoline and
Diesel
The Commission’s Complaint alleges
that the relevant product markets in
which to analyze the Acquisition are the
retail sale of gasoline and the retail sale
of diesel fuel. Consumers require
gasoline for their gasoline-powered
vehicles and can purchase gasoline only
at retail fuel outlets. Likewise,
consumers require diesel for their
diesel-powered vehicles and can
purchase diesel only at retail fuel
outlets. The retail sale of gasoline and
the retail sale of diesel fuel constitute
separate relevant markets because the
two are not interchangeable—vehicles
that run on gasoline cannot run on
diesel and vehicles that run on diesel
cannot run on gasoline.
The Commission’s Complaint alleges
the relevant geographic markets in
which to assess the competitive effects
of the Acquisition are two local markets
in and around Whites Creek, Tennessee,
and Greenbrier, Tennessee.
The geographic markets for retail
gasoline and retail diesel are highly
localized, ranging up to a few miles,
depending on local circumstances. Each
relevant market is distinct and factdependent, reflecting a number of
considerations, including commuting
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 130 / Tuesday, July 7, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
patterns, traffic flows, and outlet
characteristics. Consumers typically
choose between nearby retail fuel
outlets with similar characteristics along
their planned routes. The geographic
markets for the retail sale of diesel are
likely similar to the corresponding
geographic markets for retail gasoline as
many diesel consumers exhibit the same
preferences and behaviors as gasoline
consumers.
The Acquisition would eliminate
competition in these local markets,
resulting in a merger to monopoly in
each market for the retail sale of
gasoline and the retail sale of diesel
fuel. Retail fuel outlets compete on
price, store format, product offerings,
and location, and pay close attention to
competitors in close proximity, on
similar traffic flows, and with similar
store characteristics. The combined
entity would be able to raise prices
unilaterally in the two local markets.
Absent the Acquisition, Tri Star and
Hollingsworth would continue to
compete head to head in these local
markets.
Entry into each relevant market would
not be timely, likely, or sufficient to
deter or counteract the anticompetitive
effects arising from the Acquisition.
Significant entry barriers include the
availability of attractive real estate, the
time and cost associated with
constructing a new retail fuel outlet, and
the time associated with obtaining
necessary permits and approvals.
V. The Proposed Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement
would remedy the Acquisition’s likely
anticompetitive effects by requiring Tri
Star to divest certain Tri Star and
Hollingsworth retail fuel assets to Cox
in each local market.
The proposed Consent Agreement
requires that the divestiture be
completed no later than 10 days after
Tri Star consummates the Acquisition.
The proposed Consent Agreement
further requires Tri Star and
Hollingsworth to maintain the economic
viability, marketability, and
competitiveness of each divestiture
asset until the divestiture to Cox is
complete. For up to twelve months
following the divestiture, Tri Star and
Hollingsworth must make available
transitional services, as needed, to assist
Cox with the divestiture assets.
In addition to requiring outlet
divestitures, the proposed Consent
Agreement also requires Respondents to
provide the Commission notice before
re-acquiring the divested outlets for ten
years. The prior notice provision is
necessary because an acquisition of
either or both divested assets would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Jul 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
40655
likely raise the same competitive
concerns and may fall below the HSR
Act premerger notification thresholds.
The proposed Consent Agreement
contains additional provisions designed
to ensure the effectiveness of the
proposed relief. For example,
Respondents have agreed to an Order to
Maintain Assets that will issue at the
time the proposed Consent Agreement is
accepted for public comment. The Order
to Maintain Assets requires
Respondents to operate and maintain
each divestiture outlet in the normal
course of business, through the date the
Respondents complete the divestiture.
The Commission may appoint an
independent third party as a Monitor to
oversee the Respondents’ compliance
with the requirements of the proposed
Consent Agreement.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent agreement, and the
Commission does not intend this
analysis to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement or to modify its terms in any
way.
response to the notice. This notice
solicits comments on a new collection
of information to collect entitled
‘‘Generic Clearance for Data to Support
Cross-Center Collaboration for Social
Behavioral Sciences Associated with
Disease Prevention, Treatment, and the
Safety, Efficacy, and Usage of FDA
Regulated Products.’’
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by September 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before September 8,
2020. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
at the end of September 8, 2020.
Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper
submissions) will be considered timely
if they are postmarked or the delivery
service acceptance receipt is on or
before that date.
By direction of the Commission,
Commissioner Slaughter not participating.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
[FR Doc. 2020–14508 Filed 7–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2020–N–1411]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Generic Clearance
for Data to Support Cross-Center
Collaboration for Social Behavioral
Sciences Associated With Disease
Prevention, Treatment, and the Safety,
Efficacy, and Usage of Food and Drug
Administration Regulated Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing an opportunity for public
comment on the proposed collection of
certain information by the Agency.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA), Federal Agencies are
required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information and
to allow 60 days for public comment in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Electronic Submissions
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 130 (Tuesday, July 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40653-40655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 201-0074]
Tri Star Energy, LLC; Analysis of Consent Orders To Aid Public
Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition.
The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the
allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent order--
embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Please write: ``Tri Star
Energy, LLC; File No. 201-0074'' on your comment, and file your comment
online at https://www.regulations.gov by following the instructions on
the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, please
mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610
(Annex D), Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex
D), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Masters (202-326-2291), Bureau
of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
following Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC website (for
June 24, 2020), at this web address: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/commission-actions.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before August 6, 2020.
Write ``Tri Star Energy, LLC; File No. 201-0074'' on your comment. Your
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable,
on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Due to the public health emergency in response to the COVID-19
outbreak and the agency's heightened security screening, postal mail
addressed to the Commission will be subject to delay. We strongly
encourage you to submit your comments online through the https://www.regulations.gov website.
If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ``Tri Star
Energy, LLC; File No. 201-0074'' on your comment and on the envelope,
and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC-5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20580; or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex
[[Page 40654]]
D), Washington, DC 20024. If possible, submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible
website at https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or
confidential information. In particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal information, such as your or anyone
else's Social Security number; date of birth; driver's license number
or other state identification number, or foreign country equivalent;
passport number; financial account number; or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible for making sure your comment
does not include any sensitive health information, such as medical
records or other individually identifiable health information. In
addition, your comment should not include any ``trade secret or any
commercial or financial information which . . . is privileged or
confidential''--as provided by Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in
particular competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted on the public FTC website--as legally required by FTC Rule
4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment from the FTC website,
unless you submit a confidentiality request that meets the requirements
for such treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General Counsel
grants that request.
Visit the FTC website at https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and
the news release describing this matter. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before August 6, 2020. For information on the
Commission's privacy policy, including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
Analysis of Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted for
public comment, subject to final approval, an Agreement Containing
Consent Orders (``Consent Agreement'') from Tri Star Energy, LLC (``Tri
Star'') and Hollingsworth Oil Company, Inc., C & H Properties, and
Ronald L. Hollingsworth (``Hollingsworth'' and collectively, the
``Respondents''). The Consent Agreement is designed to remedy the
anticompetitive effects that likely would result from Tri Star's
proposed acquisition of retail fuel assets from Hollingsworth.
Under the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, Tri Star must
divest to the upfront buyer, Cox Oil Company, Inc. (``Cox''), retail
fuel assets in two local markets in Tennessee. Tri Star must complete
the divestiture within 10 days after the closing of Tri Star's
acquisition of Hollingsworth. The Commission and Respondents have
agreed to an Order to Maintain Assets that requires Respondents to
operate and maintain each divestiture outlet in the normal course of
business through the date Cox acquires the outlet.
The Commission has placed the proposed Consent Agreement on the
public record for 30 days to solicit comments from interested persons.
Comments received during this period will become part of the public
record. After 30 days, the Commission will again review the proposed
Consent Agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it
should withdraw from the Consent Agreement, modify it, or make it
final.
II. The Respondents
Respondent Tri Star, a company headquartered in Nashville,
Tennessee, owns and operates convenience stores and retail fuel outlets
throughout Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and Kentucky. Tri Star operates
89 convenience stores with attached retail fuel outlets, including 82
in Tennessee. Tri Star's convenience stores operate under the Twice
Daily, Hightail, and t-Fuel names, and its retail fuel outlets sell
under a variety of third-party branded and unbranded fuel banners. Tri
Star also supplies fuel to a network of 285 dealer locations.
Respondent Mr. Ronald L. Hollingsworth, a resident of the state of
Tennessee, controls both Hollingsworth Oil Company, Inc. and C & H
Properties, entities operating in Tennessee. Hollingsworth operates a
network of 54 convenience stores under the Sudden Service name with
attached retail fuel outlets throughout middle Tennessee. Hollingsworth
provides a variety of third-party branded and unbranded fuels at its
Sudden Service outlets and to 172 wholesale fuel locations.
III. The Proposed Acquisition
On March 6, 2020, Tri Star entered into an agreement to acquire
certain retail fuel outlets and other interests, from Hollingsworth and
related entities (the ``Acquisition''). The Acquisition would expand
Tri Star's presence throughout middle Tennessee.
The Commission's Complaint alleges that the Acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and that the Acquisition agreement constitutes a violation
of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
45, by substantially lessening competition for the retail sale of
gasoline and the retail sale of diesel in each of two local markets in
Tennessee.
IV. The Retail Sales of Gasoline and Diesel
The Commission's Complaint alleges that the relevant product
markets in which to analyze the Acquisition are the retail sale of
gasoline and the retail sale of diesel fuel. Consumers require gasoline
for their gasoline-powered vehicles and can purchase gasoline only at
retail fuel outlets. Likewise, consumers require diesel for their
diesel-powered vehicles and can purchase diesel only at retail fuel
outlets. The retail sale of gasoline and the retail sale of diesel fuel
constitute separate relevant markets because the two are not
interchangeable--vehicles that run on gasoline cannot run on diesel and
vehicles that run on diesel cannot run on gasoline.
The Commission's Complaint alleges the relevant geographic markets
in which to assess the competitive effects of the Acquisition are two
local markets in and around Whites Creek, Tennessee, and Greenbrier,
Tennessee.
The geographic markets for retail gasoline and retail diesel are
highly localized, ranging up to a few miles, depending on local
circumstances. Each relevant market is distinct and fact-dependent,
reflecting a number of considerations, including commuting
[[Page 40655]]
patterns, traffic flows, and outlet characteristics. Consumers
typically choose between nearby retail fuel outlets with similar
characteristics along their planned routes. The geographic markets for
the retail sale of diesel are likely similar to the corresponding
geographic markets for retail gasoline as many diesel consumers exhibit
the same preferences and behaviors as gasoline consumers.
The Acquisition would eliminate competition in these local markets,
resulting in a merger to monopoly in each market for the retail sale of
gasoline and the retail sale of diesel fuel. Retail fuel outlets
compete on price, store format, product offerings, and location, and
pay close attention to competitors in close proximity, on similar
traffic flows, and with similar store characteristics. The combined
entity would be able to raise prices unilaterally in the two local
markets. Absent the Acquisition, Tri Star and Hollingsworth would
continue to compete head to head in these local markets.
Entry into each relevant market would not be timely, likely, or
sufficient to deter or counteract the anticompetitive effects arising
from the Acquisition. Significant entry barriers include the
availability of attractive real estate, the time and cost associated
with constructing a new retail fuel outlet, and the time associated
with obtaining necessary permits and approvals.
V. The Proposed Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement would remedy the Acquisition's
likely anticompetitive effects by requiring Tri Star to divest certain
Tri Star and Hollingsworth retail fuel assets to Cox in each local
market.
The proposed Consent Agreement requires that the divestiture be
completed no later than 10 days after Tri Star consummates the
Acquisition. The proposed Consent Agreement further requires Tri Star
and Hollingsworth to maintain the economic viability, marketability,
and competitiveness of each divestiture asset until the divestiture to
Cox is complete. For up to twelve months following the divestiture, Tri
Star and Hollingsworth must make available transitional services, as
needed, to assist Cox with the divestiture assets.
In addition to requiring outlet divestitures, the proposed Consent
Agreement also requires Respondents to provide the Commission notice
before re-acquiring the divested outlets for ten years. The prior
notice provision is necessary because an acquisition of either or both
divested assets would likely raise the same competitive concerns and
may fall below the HSR Act premerger notification thresholds.
The proposed Consent Agreement contains additional provisions
designed to ensure the effectiveness of the proposed relief. For
example, Respondents have agreed to an Order to Maintain Assets that
will issue at the time the proposed Consent Agreement is accepted for
public comment. The Order to Maintain Assets requires Respondents to
operate and maintain each divestiture outlet in the normal course of
business, through the date the Respondents complete the divestiture.
The Commission may appoint an independent third party as a Monitor to
oversee the Respondents' compliance with the requirements of the
proposed Consent Agreement.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent agreement, and the Commission does not intend this
analysis to constitute an official interpretation of the proposed
Consent Agreement or to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Slaughter not
participating.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14508 Filed 7-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P