Federal Acquisition Regulation: Increased Micro-Purchase and Simplified Acquisition Thresholds, 40064-40068 [2020-12763]
Download as PDF
40064
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 128 / Thursday, July 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Commercial and Government Entity Code
Reporting (Aug 2020)
contract for each location of contract,
including subcontract, performance. * * *
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
*
*
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
*
*
*
*
(b) The Offeror shall provide its CAGE
code with its offer with its name and location
address or otherwise include it prominently
in its proposal. The CAGE code must be for
that name and location address. Insert the
word ‘‘CAGE’’ before the number. The CAGE
code is required prior to award.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) When a CAGE code is required for the
immediate owner and/or the highest-level
owner by Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) 52.204–17 or 52.212–3(p), the Offeror
shall obtain the respective CAGE code from
that entity to supply the CAGE code to the
Government.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) If the solicitation includes FAR clause
52.204–2, Security Requirements, a
subcontractor requiring access to classified
information under a contract shall be
identified with a CAGE code on the DD Form
254. The Contractor shall require a
subcontractor requiring access to classified
information to provide its CAGE code with
its name and location address or otherwise
include it prominently in the proposal. Each
location of subcontractor performance listed
on the DD Form 254 is required to reflect a
corresponding unique CAGE code for each
listed location unless the work is being
performed at a Government facility, in which
case the agency location code shall be used.
The CAGE code must be for that name and
location address. Insert the word ‘‘CAGE’’
before the number. The CAGE code is
required prior to award.
*
*
*
(End of clause)
10. Amend section 52.204–20 by—
■ a. Revising the date of the provision;
and
■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(1)
‘‘entity; or’’ and adding ‘‘entity by
unique location; or’’ in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.204–20
Predecessor of Offeror.
*
*
*
*
*
Predecessor of Offeror (Aug 2020)
*
*
*
*
*
PART 53—FORMS
11. Amend section 53.204–1 by
revising the introductory text to read as
follows:
■
53.204–1 Safeguarding classified
information within industry (DD Form 254,
DD Form 441).
Ownership or Control of Offeror (Aug 2020)
*
53.300
■
■
■
■
8. Amend section 52.204–17 by
revising the title and the date of the
provision and removing from paragraph
(a)(1) ‘‘entity; or’’ and adding ‘‘entity by
unique location; or’’ in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.204–17
Offeror.
Ownership or Control of
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9. Amend section 52.204–18 by—
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Removing from paragraph (a)(1)
‘‘entity; or’’ and adding ‘‘entity by
unique location; or’’ in its place;
■ c. Revising the first sentence of
paragraph (b); and
■ d. Adding paragraph (f).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
[Amended]
Commercial and Government Entity Code
Maintenance (Aug 2020)
12. In section 53.300 amend the table
in paragraph (b) in the table 53–2 by
removing from Form DD 254 url, https://
www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/
eforms/dd0254.pdf and adding https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd0254.pdf;
and removing from Form DD 441 url,
https://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/
forms/eforms/dd0441_2017.pdf and
adding https://www.esd.whs.mil/
Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/
dd0441_2020.pdf in their places,
respectively.
*
[FR Doc. 2020–12762 Filed 7–1–20; 8:45 am]
52.204–18 Commercial and Government
Entity Code Maintenance.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Contractors shall ensure that the CAGE
code is maintained throughout the life of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:45 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, and
52
[FAC 2020–07; FAR Case 2018–004; Item
II; Docket No. FAR–2018–0011; Sequence
No. 1]
RIN 9000–AN65
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Increased Micro-Purchase and
Simplified Acquisition Thresholds
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 and several
sections of the NDAA for FY 2018 that
increase the micro-purchase threshold
(MPT), increase the simplified
acquisition threshold (SAT), and clarify
certain procurement terms, as well as
align some non-statutory thresholds
with the MPT and SAT.
DATES: Effective: August 31, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–208–4949 or
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755.
Please cite FAC 2020–07, FAR Case
2018–004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
The following forms, which are
prescribed by the Department of
Defense, shall be used by DoD
components and those nondefense
agencies with which DoD has
agreements to provide industrial
security services for the National
Industrial Security Program if contractor
access to classified information is
required, as specified in subpart 4.4 and
the clause at 52.204–2:
*
*
*
*
*
(End of provision)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES3
*
(f) If the contract includes Federal
Acquisition Regulation clause 52.204–2,
Security Requirements, the contractor shall
ensure that subcontractors maintain their
CAGE code(s) throughout the life of the
contract.
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule on October 2, 2019, at 84
FR 52420, to implement section 217(b)
of the NDAA for FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114–
328) and sections 805, 806, and 1702(a)
of the NDAA for FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115–
91).
Section 217(b) amends 41 U.S.C. 1902
to increase the MPT for acquisitions
from institutions of higher education or
related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or
from nonprofit research organizations or
independent research institutes, from
$3,500 to $10,000, or a higher amount
as determined appropriate by the head
of the agency and consistent with clean
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 128 / Thursday, July 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
audit findings under 31 U.S.C. Chapter
75, an internal institutional risk
assessment, or State law.
Section 806 increases the MPT in 41
U.S.C. 1902(a) to $10,000.
Section 805 increases the SAT to
$250,000.
Section 1702(a) amends section
15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) to replace specific
dollar thresholds with the terms ‘‘micropurchase threshold’’ and ‘‘simplified
acquisition threshold.’’
These FAR changes also replace nonstatutory, stated numerical dollar
thresholds that are intended to
correspond with the MPT and SAT,
with the text ‘‘micro-purchase
threshold’’ and ‘‘simplified acquisition
threshold.’’ Referencing some stated
thresholds by name instead of by a
specific dollar value will ease
maintenance of regulations, given the
likelihood of future changes to the
threshold amounts. Text clarifying the
use of the approval thresholds, based on
the increase of the SAT, for sole source
justifications executed under the
simplified procedures for certain
commercial items has been added to
FAR subpart 13.5.
Six respondents submitted comments
on the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
A. Summary of Changes
There are no changes as a result of
comments on the proposed rule.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES3
B. Analysis of Public Comments
Comment: Several respondents
expressed support for the rule.
Response: The Councils acknowledge
the public support for the rule.
Comment: One respondent questioned
whether the FAR text change at FAR
22.1803 was made in error. This
respondent also questioned whether the
change should have been at FAR
22.1303 in lieu of FAR 22.1803. The
respondent noted that there are two
more sections in FAR part 22 that reflect
the amount of $150,000, and if they
should have been updated to the
‘‘simplified acquisition threshold.’’
Response: The change at FAR 22.1803
was not in error; the change from
simplified acquisition threshold to
$150,000 was intentional. The sections
cited by the respondent are not based on
the SAT statute but on other statutes: 38
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:45 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
U.S.C. 4212 and 40 U.S.C.
3701(b)(3)(iii). The Councils have no
other changes for FAR part 22.
Comment: One respondent
commented that the rule proposes a
change to the prime contract coverage
threshold for E-Verify (FAR 22.1803)
from the simplified acquisition
threshold to $150,000, thereby not
exempting contracts between $150,000
and $250,000, from E-Verify. The
respondent stated that by setting the
prime contract threshold below the
SAT, particularly when the threshold
was previously set at the SAT, goes
against the spirit of 41 U.S.C. 1905(b)(2).
Response: The Administration has
stated its broad desire to ‘‘require the
use of the electronic status-verification
system (‘‘E-Verify’’) to ensure the
maintenance of a legal workforce in the
United States.’’ See: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/briefingsstatements/president-donald-j-trumpsletter-house-senate-leadersimmigration-principles-policies/.
Exempting contracts between $150,000
and $250,000 would run counter to the
stated policy objective.
C. Other Changes
Some changes included in the
proposed rule are not required in the
final rule as a result of publication of
the final rule under FAR Case 2018–007
in FAC 2020–06 on May 6, 2020,
effective June 5, 2020.
III. Expected Impact of the Final Rule
and Proposed Cost Savings
DoD, GSA, and NASA have performed
a regulatory cost analysis on this rule.
The following is a summary of the
estimated public and Government cost
savings. This rule impacts any business,
large or small, that prepares quotes
exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DoD) and
not exceeding $10,000 (or higher for
select educational institutions);
proposals exceeding $150,000 and not
exceeding $250,000; and proposals
exceeding $300,000 and not exceeding
$500,000, in support of humanitarian or
peacekeeping operations. This rule does
not add any new solicitation provisions
or contract clauses. Rather, it reduces
burden on contractors by increasing the
thresholds at which various regulatory
burdens apply.
Increasing the MPT and SAT means
additional awards could be made under
the MPT and additional awards could
be made under the SAT. The additional
awards at or below the MPT would not
require provisions or clauses, except as
provided in FAR 13.202 and FAR
32.1110, and the additional awards at or
below the SAT would be awarded
without provisions and clauses which
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
40065
are prescribed only above the SAT. In
addition to including fewer regulations
in applicable awards, the rule allows
more awards based on quotes in lieu of
a formal proposal, thereby reducing the
contractor’s bid and proposal costs.
Costs associated with contractor
financing could also be reduced by
increasing the number of micropurchases, for which the
Governmentwide purchase card is the
preferred method of purchase and
payment (see FAR 13.201(b)).
To determine the dollar amounts and
entities affected, data was pulled from
the Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS) from fiscal years 2015–2018. For
the micro-purchase value change, there
was an annual average in total impacted
contract awards of $2,442,317 for small
businesses and $1,359,916 for other
than small businesses for contracts with
values exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for
DOD), but less than or equal to $10,000
(or higher, for educational institutions).
For the simplified acquisition threshold
change, there was an annual average in
total impacted contract awards of
$300,073,039 for small businesses and
$161,715,144 for other than small
businesses for contracts with values
exceeding $150,000, but less than or
equal to $250,000 (from $300,000 to
$500,000 for contingency, humanitarian,
or peacekeeping awards).
Commercial item awards, as well as
orders placed through indefinitequantity contract orders and other large
contracting schedule orders, were
removed from this calculation to
determine the cost reduction on offerors
and contractors. Commercial items were
removed from this calculation because
the simplified threshold for commercial
item awards is set at $7 million, so the
increased SAT threshold would not
impact compliance or business
procedures for contractors with awards
conducted through commercial item
procedures. To calculate the burden
reduction on Government by raising
these thresholds, indefinite-quantity
contracts were included, as the
threshold changes would impact
Government acquisition procedures.
The Federal Acquisition Streamlining
Act (FASA) made a number of laws
inapplicable to items procured under
the SAT. This was meant to save both
the Government and service providers
money while also expediting the entire
contract process. This rule decreases the
number of regulatory requirements
agencies need to include in awards.
Because this rule reduces bid and
proposal costs and other administrative
burdens and since it does not
implement any new requirements on
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
40066
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 128 / Thursday, July 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
offerors, this rule is considered to be
deregulatory.
The following is a summary of the
estimated public and Government cost
Summary
Public
Government
Total
Present Value Cost Savings ..........................................................................................
Annualized Cost Savings ...............................................................................................
Annualized Value Cost Savings as of 2016 if Year 1 is 2020 ......................................
¥$662,413,271
¥46,368,929
¥37,850,858
¥$2,216,678,757
¥155,167,513
¥126,662,911
¥$2,879,092,029
¥201,536,442
¥164,513,770
To access the full Regulatory Cost
Analysis for this rule, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov, search for ‘‘FAR
Case 2018–004,’’ click ‘‘Open Docket,’’
and view ‘‘Supporting Documents.’’
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf (COTS) Items
The rule applies to contracts at or
below the simplified acquisition
threshold, and to contracts for
commercial items, including COTS
items. However, it does not add any
new solicitation provisions or contract
clauses, and it reduces burden on
contractors by increasing the thresholds
at which various regulatory burdens
apply.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is an economically
significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was subject to review under
section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September
30, 1993. This rule is a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Congressional Review Act
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES3
savings calculated in perpetuity in 2016
dollars at a 7 percent discount rate:
This rule is subject to the
Congressional Review Act provisions of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and was transmitted
to the Congress and to the Comptroller
General for review in accordance with
such provisions.
VII. Executive Order 13771
This final rule is considered to be an
E.O. 13771 deregulatory action. The
total annualized value of the cost
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:45 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
savings, discounted at a 7 percent rate
relative to year 2016 over a perpetual
time horizon, is ¥$164,513,770. Details
on the estimated cost savings can be
found in Section III of this preamble.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared
a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The
FRFA is summarized as follows:
This rule is required to implement section
217(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017 (Pub. L.
114–328) and sections 805, 806, and 1702(a)
of the NDAA for FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91).
This final rule increases the MPT, increases
the SAT, clarifies certain procurement terms,
as well as aligns non-statutory, stated dollar
thresholds that are intended to correspond
with the MPT and SAT, with word-based
thresholds to ensure continued alignment
with the current increase to these thresholds
and any future change to the threshold
amounts.
There were no significant issues raised by
the public in response to the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis.
This rule applies to all entities who do
business with the Federal Government. This
rule will likely have a positive significant
economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. According to data from the
Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS),
there were 505 contracts awarded in FY 2018
with a value exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for
DOD), but less than or equal to $10,000
wherein contractors would have a change in
compliance requirements. Of the 505 new
awards, 358 (71 percent) of these actions
were awarded to 198 unique small business
entities.
Data from FPDS also indicates that in FY
2018, there were no (0) small business
entities that had additional contract actions
for educational or related institutions for
contracts with a value exceeding $10,000, but
less than or equal to $15,000 (equivalent to
the upper bound of the expected micropurchase value for these types of institutions)
wherein contractors would have a change in
compliance requirements.
Data from FPDS also indicates there were
3,653 new contracts awarded in FY 2018
with a value exceeding 150,000, but less than
or equal to $250,000 wherein contractors
would have a change in compliance
requirements. Of these, 2,621 (72 percent) of
these actions were awarded to 1,680 unique
small business entities.
As mentioned previously, commercial
items were removed from this calculation
because the simplified threshold for
commercial item awards is set at $7 million,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
so the increased SAT threshold would not
impact compliance or business procedures
for contractors with awards conducted
through commercial item procedures.
Data from the FPDS further indicates that
for contingency, humanitarian, or
peacekeeping contract actions, there were 11
new total contracts awarded in FY 2018 with
a value exceeding $300,000 but less than or
equal to $500,000 wherein contractors would
have a change in compliance requirements.
Of these, 4 (36 percent) of these actions were
awarded to 4 unique small business entities.
This rule changes the small business set
aside threshold under FAR 19.502; instead of
being from greater than $3,500 to less than
or equal to $150,000, the threshold will be
from greater than $10,000 to less than or
equal to $250,000. This is expected to
increase the number of small business
entities able to do business with the
Government; for contracts affected by this
threshold change, (please see full regulatory
cost analysis for explanation of excepted
contract types), in FY 2018, there were 3,653
records exceeding $150,000 and less than or
equal to $250,000, while there were 505
records exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DOD)
and less than or equal to $10,000.
As of September 30, 2017, there were
637,791 active entity registrations in SAM. Of
those active entity registrations, 452,310 (71
percent) completed all four modules of the
registration, in accordance with the
definition ‘‘Registered in the System for
Award Management (SAM)’’ at FAR 52.204–
7(a), including Assertions (where they enter
their size metrics and select their NAICS
Codes) and Reps & Certs (where they certify
to the information they provided and the size
indicator by NAICS). Of the possible 452,310
active SAM entity registrations, 338,207 (75
percent) certified to meeting the size
standard of small for their primary NAICS
Code. Therefore, this rule may be beneficial
to 338,207 small business entities that submit
solicitation responses that may now fall
under the MPT or SAT and have streamlined
procedures as a result of this rule.
The rule does not include additional
reporting or record keeping requirements.
There are no available alternatives to the
rule to accomplish the desired objective of
the statute.
Interested parties may obtain a copy
of the FRFA from the Regulatory
Secretariat Division. The Regulatory
Secretariat Division has submitted a
copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 128 / Thursday, July 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 9,
13, 16, 22, 25, and 52
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
2. Amend section 2.101, in paragraph
(b) by—
■ a. In the definition ‘‘Micro-purchase
threshold’’ removing from the
introductory text ‘‘$3,500’’ and adding
‘‘$10,000’’ in its place, removing from
paragraph (2) the word ‘‘and’’ at the end
of the sentence, removing from
paragraph (3)(ii) ‘‘States.’’ and adding
‘‘States; and’’ in its place, and adding
paragraph (4); and
■ b. In the definition ‘‘Simplified
acquisition threshold’’ removing from
the introductory text ‘‘$150,000’’ and
adding ‘‘$250,000’’ in its place, and
removing from paragraph (2)
‘‘$300,000’’ and adding ‘‘$500,000’’ in
its place.
The addition reads as follows:
Definitions.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES3
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Micro-purchase threshold * * *
(4) For acquisitions of supplies or
services from institutions of higher
education (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)) or related
or affiliated nonprofit entities, or from
nonprofit research organizations or
independent research institutes—
(i) $10,000; or
(ii) A higher threshold, as determined
appropriate by the head of the agency
and consistent with clean audit findings
under 31 U.S.C. chapter 75,
Requirements for Single Audits; an
internal institutional risk assessment; or
State law.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 250001
PART 9—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
[Amended]
13.501
[Amended]
8. Amend section 13.501 by removing
from paragraph (a)(2)(ii) ‘‘$700,000’’ and
adding ‘‘$700,000 or the thresholds in
paragraph (1) of the definition of
simplified acquisition threshold in
2.101,’’ in its place.
■
PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
4. Amend section 9.104–5 by
removing from paragraph (a)(2)
‘‘$3,500’’ and adding ‘‘$10,000’’ in its
place.
9.406–2
[Amended]
5. Amend section 9.406–2 by
removing from paragraph (b)(1)(v)
‘‘$3,500’’ and adding ‘‘the threshold at
9.104–5(a)(2)’’ in its place.
16.206–2
[Amended]
9. Amend section 16.206–2 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘$150,000’’ and adding ‘‘the simplified
acquisition threshold’’ in its place.
■
■
[Amended]
6. Amend section 9.407–2 by
removing from paragraph (a)(7)
‘‘$3,500’’ and adding ‘‘the threshold at
9.104–5(a)(2)’’ in its place.
16.206–3
[Amended]
10. Amend section 16.206–3 by
removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$150,000’’
and adding ‘‘the simplified acquisition
threshold’’ in its place.
■
■
■
21:45 Jul 01, 2020
3. Amend section 3.502–3 by
removing ‘‘the simplified acquisition
threshold’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its
place.
■
9.407–2
PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[Amended]
(The requirement at 22 U.S.C.
2593e(c)(3)(B) to provide a certification
does not apply).
*
*
*
*
*
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
*
3.502–3
9.104–5
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22,
25, and 52 as set forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, and 52
continues to read as follows:
2.101
PART 3—IMPROPER BUSINESS
PRACTICES AND PERSONAL
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
40067
PART 13—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
7. Amend section 13.005 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
13.005 List of laws inapplicable to
contracts and subcontracts at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold.
(a) The following laws are
inapplicable to all contracts and
subcontracts (if otherwise applicable to
subcontracts) at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold pursuant to 41
U.S.C. 1905:
(1) 41 U.S.C. 8102(a)(1) (Drug-Free
Workplace), except for individuals.
(2) 10 U.S.C. 2306(b) and 41 U.S.C.
3901(b) (Contract Clause Regarding
Contingent Fees).
(3) 10 U.S.C. 2313 and 41 U.S.C. 4706
(Authority to Examine Books and
Records of Contractors).
(4) 10 U.S.C. 2402 and 41 U.S.C. 4704
(Prohibition on Limiting Subcontractors
Direct Sales to the United States).
(5) 15 U.S.C. 631 note (HUBZone Act
of 1997), except for 15 U.S.C.
657a(b)(2)(B), which is optional for the
agencies subject to the requirements of
the Act.
(6) 31 U.S.C. 1354(a) (Limitation on
use of appropriated funds for contracts
with entities not meeting veterans
employment reporting requirements).
(7) 22 U.S.C. 2593e (Measures Against
Persons Involved in Activities that
Violate Arms Control Treaties or
Agreements with the United States).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
16.207–3
[Amended]
11. Amend section 16.207–3 by
removing from paragraph (d)
‘‘$150,000’’ and adding ‘‘the simplified
acquisition threshold’’ in its place.
■
PART 22—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
22.1803
[Amended]
12. Amend section 22.1803 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘the simplified acquisition threshold’’
and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place.
■
PART 25—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
25.703–2
[Amended]
13. Amend section 25.703–2 by
removing from paragraph (a)(2)
‘‘$3,500’’ and adding ‘‘$10,000’’ in its
place.
■
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
14. Amend section 52.209–5 by
revising the date of the provision and
removing from paragraph (a)(1)(i)(D)
introductory text ‘‘$3,500’’ and adding
‘‘the threshold at 9.104–5(a)(2)’’ in its
place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.209–5 Certification Regarding
Responsibility Matters.
*
*
*
*
*
Certification Regarding Responsibility
Matters (Aug 2020)
*
■
*
*
*
*
15. Amend section 52.212–3 by—
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
40068
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 128 / Thursday, July 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(a) Revising the date of the provision;
and
■ (b) Removing from paragraph (h)(4)
introductory text ‘‘$3,500’’ and adding
‘‘the threshold at 9.104–5(a)(2)’’ in its
place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
52.212–3 Offeror Representations and
Certifications—Commercial Items.
*
*
*
*
*
Offeror Representations and
Certifications—Commercial Items (Aug
2020)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–12763 Filed 7–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 4, 13, 15, and 16
[FAC 2020–07; FAR Case 2017–010; Item
III; Docket No. FAR–2017–0010; Sequence
No. 1]
RIN 9000–AN54
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Evaluation Factors for Multiple-Award
Contracts
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2017.
DATES: Effective: August 3, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–208–4949 or
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755.
Please cite FAC 2020–07, FAR Case
2017–010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES3
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule at 83 FR 48271 on
September 24, 2018, to implement
section 825 of the NDAA for FY 2017
(Pub. L. 114–328). Section 825 of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:45 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
NDAA for FY 2017 amends 10 U.S.C.
2305(a)(3) to modify the requirement to
consider price or cost as an evaluation
factor for the award of certain multipleaward task-order contracts issued by
DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.
Section 825 provides that, at the
Government’s discretion, solicitations
for multiple-award contracts that will be
awarded for the same or similar services
and state the Government intends to
award a contract to each qualifying
offeror do not require price or cost as an
evaluation factor for contract award.
This exception does not apply to
solicitations for multiple-award
contracts that provide for sole-source
orders pursuant to 8(a) of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)). When
price or cost is not evaluated during
contract award, the contracting officer
shall consider price or cost as a factor
for the award of each order under the
contract. In accordance with statute, the
rule specifies that, when using the
authority of section 825, the solicitation
must be for the ‘‘same or similar
services.’’ This language aligns with the
guidance at FAR 16.504(c)(1)(i), which
requires contracting officers, to the
maximum extent practicable, to give
preference to making multiple awards of
indefinite-quantity contracts under a
single solicitation for the same or
similar supplies or services to two or
more sources. By ensuring that a
solicitation using the authority of
section 825 is for the ‘‘same or similar
services,’’ the contracting officer will
avoid situations in which awardees
specialize exclusively in one or a few
areas within the statement of work, thus
creating the likelihood that orders in
those areas will be awarded on a solesource basis (FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(A))
and, in turn, negating the purpose of the
statute to obtain price competition at the
task order level–where service
requirements are apt to be more definite
and offers more meaningfully
comparable.
Section 825 also amends 10 U.S.C.
2304c(b) to add the exceptions for the
use of other than full and open
competition found in FAR 6.302 to the
list of exceptions to the fair opportunity
process at FAR 16.505(b)(2) when
placing an order under a multiple-award
contract. Contracting officers shall still
follow all of the applicable justification
documentation, approval, and posting
requirements of part 16.5 when
providing an exception to the fair
opportunity process and using one of
the exceptions of FAR 6.302.
Five respondents submitted
comments on the proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. No
significant changes were made to the
rule as a result of public comments.
Changes were made to the final rule to
clarify the intent of section 825 and the
rule text, as a result of public comments.
A change is made in the final rule to
make the guidance in FAR subpart 4.10
consistent with section 825. A change is
made to a sentence in FAR 16.504 to
make the text consistent with the policy
in FAR part 13. Changes were made to
the format of the rule text to enhance
readability. The definition of
‘‘qualifying offeror’’ is moved from FAR
13.106–1 and FAR 15.304 to FAR part
2. Discussion of the edits and comments
are provided as follows:
A. Summary of Changes
FAR subpart 4.10, Uniform Use of
Line Items, is amended to align
guidance on the information required
for a contract line item with usage of the
rule. Currently, FAR 4.1005 requires
price or cost to be included for each
contract line item or subline item. In
order to conform the subpart with
section 825, the rule amends FAR
4.1005–2 to permit the omission of cost
or price at the contract line item or
subline item level when awarding
multiple-award IDIQ contracts in
accordance with the authority of section
825, provided that a total contract
minimum and maximum is stated, in
accordance with FAR subpart 16.5. This
addition does not change the intent of
the rule; instead, it conforms internal
Government procedures to facilitate use
of the rule.
In FAR subpart 16.5, section 16.504,
Indefinite-Delivery Contracts, is
amended to make the policy for the use
of the multiple-award approach
consistent with the policy in FAR part
13. Currently, FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(B)(5)
states that contracting officers must not
use the multiple award approach if the
estimated value of the contract is ‘‘less
than’’ the simplified acquisition
threshold (SAT). This statement was
included in FAR 16.504 to comply with
the policy in FAR 13.003, which
requires the use of simplified
acquisition procedures (SAP), to the
maximum extent practicable, for
purchases not exceeding the SAT. This
rule changes the text of FAR 16.504
from ‘‘less than’’ the SAT to ‘‘at or
below’’ the SAT, to be consistent with
the policy of FAR part 13. Paragraph (G)
at FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i) of the proposed
E:\FR\FM\02JYR3.SGM
02JYR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 128 (Thursday, July 2, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40064-40068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12763]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, and 52
[FAC 2020-07; FAR Case 2018-004; Item II; Docket No. FAR-2018-0011;
Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AN65
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Increased Micro-Purchase and
Simplified Acquisition Thresholds
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 and
several sections of the NDAA for FY 2018 that increase the micro-
purchase threshold (MPT), increase the simplified acquisition threshold
(SAT), and clarify certain procurement terms, as well as align some
non-statutory thresholds with the MPT and SAT.
DATES: Effective: August 31, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-208-4949 or [email protected] for clarification
of content. For information pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755.
Please cite FAC 2020-07, FAR Case 2018-004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule on October 2, 2019, at
84 FR 52420, to implement section 217(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017 (Pub.
L. 114-328) and sections 805, 806, and 1702(a) of the NDAA for FY 2018
(Pub. L. 115-91).
Section 217(b) amends 41 U.S.C. 1902 to increase the MPT for
acquisitions from institutions of higher education or related or
affiliated nonprofit entities, or from nonprofit research organizations
or independent research institutes, from $3,500 to $10,000, or a higher
amount as determined appropriate by the head of the agency and
consistent with clean
[[Page 40065]]
audit findings under 31 U.S.C. Chapter 75, an internal institutional
risk assessment, or State law.
Section 806 increases the MPT in 41 U.S.C. 1902(a) to $10,000.
Section 805 increases the SAT to $250,000.
Section 1702(a) amends section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) to replace specific dollar thresholds with the
terms ``micro-purchase threshold'' and ``simplified acquisition
threshold.''
These FAR changes also replace non-statutory, stated numerical
dollar thresholds that are intended to correspond with the MPT and SAT,
with the text ``micro-purchase threshold'' and ``simplified acquisition
threshold.'' Referencing some stated thresholds by name instead of by a
specific dollar value will ease maintenance of regulations, given the
likelihood of future changes to the threshold amounts. Text clarifying
the use of the approval thresholds, based on the increase of the SAT,
for sole source justifications executed under the simplified procedures
for certain commercial items has been added to FAR subpart 13.5.
Six respondents submitted comments on the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils) reviewed the public comments in the
development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
A. Summary of Changes
There are no changes as a result of comments on the proposed rule.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
Comment: Several respondents expressed support for the rule.
Response: The Councils acknowledge the public support for the rule.
Comment: One respondent questioned whether the FAR text change at
FAR 22.1803 was made in error. This respondent also questioned whether
the change should have been at FAR 22.1303 in lieu of FAR 22.1803. The
respondent noted that there are two more sections in FAR part 22 that
reflect the amount of $150,000, and if they should have been updated to
the ``simplified acquisition threshold.''
Response: The change at FAR 22.1803 was not in error; the change
from simplified acquisition threshold to $150,000 was intentional. The
sections cited by the respondent are not based on the SAT statute but
on other statutes: 38 U.S.C. 4212 and 40 U.S.C. 3701(b)(3)(iii). The
Councils have no other changes for FAR part 22.
Comment: One respondent commented that the rule proposes a change
to the prime contract coverage threshold for E-Verify (FAR 22.1803)
from the simplified acquisition threshold to $150,000, thereby not
exempting contracts between $150,000 and $250,000, from E-Verify. The
respondent stated that by setting the prime contract threshold below
the SAT, particularly when the threshold was previously set at the SAT,
goes against the spirit of 41 U.S.C. 1905(b)(2).
Response: The Administration has stated its broad desire to
``require the use of the electronic status-verification system (``E-
Verify'') to ensure the maintenance of a legal workforce in the United
States.'' See: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-letter-house-senate-leaders-immigration-principles-policies/. Exempting contracts between $150,000 and $250,000
would run counter to the stated policy objective.
C. Other Changes
Some changes included in the proposed rule are not required in the
final rule as a result of publication of the final rule under FAR Case
2018-007 in FAC 2020-06 on May 6, 2020, effective June 5, 2020.
III. Expected Impact of the Final Rule and Proposed Cost Savings
DoD, GSA, and NASA have performed a regulatory cost analysis on
this rule. The following is a summary of the estimated public and
Government cost savings. This rule impacts any business, large or
small, that prepares quotes exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DoD) and not
exceeding $10,000 (or higher for select educational institutions);
proposals exceeding $150,000 and not exceeding $250,000; and proposals
exceeding $300,000 and not exceeding $500,000, in support of
humanitarian or peacekeeping operations. This rule does not add any new
solicitation provisions or contract clauses. Rather, it reduces burden
on contractors by increasing the thresholds at which various regulatory
burdens apply.
Increasing the MPT and SAT means additional awards could be made
under the MPT and additional awards could be made under the SAT. The
additional awards at or below the MPT would not require provisions or
clauses, except as provided in FAR 13.202 and FAR 32.1110, and the
additional awards at or below the SAT would be awarded without
provisions and clauses which are prescribed only above the SAT. In
addition to including fewer regulations in applicable awards, the rule
allows more awards based on quotes in lieu of a formal proposal,
thereby reducing the contractor's bid and proposal costs. Costs
associated with contractor financing could also be reduced by
increasing the number of micro-purchases, for which the Governmentwide
purchase card is the preferred method of purchase and payment (see FAR
13.201(b)).
To determine the dollar amounts and entities affected, data was
pulled from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) from fiscal
years 2015-2018. For the micro-purchase value change, there was an
annual average in total impacted contract awards of $2,442,317 for
small businesses and $1,359,916 for other than small businesses for
contracts with values exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DOD), but less than
or equal to $10,000 (or higher, for educational institutions). For the
simplified acquisition threshold change, there was an annual average in
total impacted contract awards of $300,073,039 for small businesses and
$161,715,144 for other than small businesses for contracts with values
exceeding $150,000, but less than or equal to $250,000 (from $300,000
to $500,000 for contingency, humanitarian, or peacekeeping awards).
Commercial item awards, as well as orders placed through
indefinite-quantity contract orders and other large contracting
schedule orders, were removed from this calculation to determine the
cost reduction on offerors and contractors. Commercial items were
removed from this calculation because the simplified threshold for
commercial item awards is set at $7 million, so the increased SAT
threshold would not impact compliance or business procedures for
contractors with awards conducted through commercial item procedures.
To calculate the burden reduction on Government by raising these
thresholds, indefinite-quantity contracts were included, as the
threshold changes would impact Government acquisition procedures.
The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) made a number of
laws inapplicable to items procured under the SAT. This was meant to
save both the Government and service providers money while also
expediting the entire contract process. This rule decreases the number
of regulatory requirements agencies need to include in awards.
Because this rule reduces bid and proposal costs and other
administrative burdens and since it does not implement any new
requirements on
[[Page 40066]]
offerors, this rule is considered to be deregulatory.
The following is a summary of the estimated public and Government
cost savings calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars at a 7 percent
discount rate:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary Public Government Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Value Cost Savings............................... -$662,413,271 -$2,216,678,757 -$2,879,092,029
Annualized Cost Savings.................................. -46,368,929 -155,167,513 -201,536,442
Annualized Value Cost Savings as of 2016 if Year 1 is -37,850,858 -126,662,911 -164,513,770
2020....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To access the full Regulatory Cost Analysis for this rule, go to
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov, search for ``FAR
Case 2018-004,'' click ``Open Docket,'' and view ``Supporting
Documents.''
IV. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
The rule applies to contracts at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold, and to contracts for commercial items, including
COTS items. However, it does not add any new solicitation provisions or
contract clauses, and it reduces burden on contractors by increasing
the thresholds at which various regulatory burdens apply.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is an economically significant regulatory action and, therefore,
was subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Congressional Review Act
This rule is subject to the Congressional Review Act provisions of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and was transmitted to the Congress and to the
Comptroller General for review in accordance with such provisions.
VII. Executive Order 13771
This final rule is considered to be an E.O. 13771 deregulatory
action. The total annualized value of the cost savings, discounted at a
7 percent rate relative to year 2016 over a perpetual time horizon, is
-$164,513,770. Details on the estimated cost savings can be found in
Section III of this preamble.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is summarized as follows:
This rule is required to implement section 217(b) of the NDAA
for FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328) and sections 805, 806, and 1702(a) of
the NDAA for FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91). This final rule increases the
MPT, increases the SAT, clarifies certain procurement terms, as well
as aligns non-statutory, stated dollar thresholds that are intended
to correspond with the MPT and SAT, with word-based thresholds to
ensure continued alignment with the current increase to these
thresholds and any future change to the threshold amounts.
There were no significant issues raised by the public in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
This rule applies to all entities who do business with the
Federal Government. This rule will likely have a positive
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. According to data from the Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS), there were 505 contracts awarded in FY 2018 with a value
exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DOD), but less than or equal to $10,000
wherein contractors would have a change in compliance requirements.
Of the 505 new awards, 358 (71 percent) of these actions were
awarded to 198 unique small business entities.
Data from FPDS also indicates that in FY 2018, there were no (0)
small business entities that had additional contract actions for
educational or related institutions for contracts with a value
exceeding $10,000, but less than or equal to $15,000 (equivalent to
the upper bound of the expected micro-purchase value for these types
of institutions) wherein contractors would have a change in
compliance requirements.
Data from FPDS also indicates there were 3,653 new contracts
awarded in FY 2018 with a value exceeding 150,000, but less than or
equal to $250,000 wherein contractors would have a change in
compliance requirements. Of these, 2,621 (72 percent) of these
actions were awarded to 1,680 unique small business entities.
As mentioned previously, commercial items were removed from this
calculation because the simplified threshold for commercial item
awards is set at $7 million, so the increased SAT threshold would
not impact compliance or business procedures for contractors with
awards conducted through commercial item procedures.
Data from the FPDS further indicates that for contingency,
humanitarian, or peacekeeping contract actions, there were 11 new
total contracts awarded in FY 2018 with a value exceeding $300,000
but less than or equal to $500,000 wherein contractors would have a
change in compliance requirements. Of these, 4 (36 percent) of these
actions were awarded to 4 unique small business entities.
This rule changes the small business set aside threshold under
FAR 19.502; instead of being from greater than $3,500 to less than
or equal to $150,000, the threshold will be from greater than
$10,000 to less than or equal to $250,000. This is expected to
increase the number of small business entities able to do business
with the Government; for contracts affected by this threshold
change, (please see full regulatory cost analysis for explanation of
excepted contract types), in FY 2018, there were 3,653 records
exceeding $150,000 and less than or equal to $250,000, while there
were 505 records exceeding $3,500 ($5,000 for DOD) and less than or
equal to $10,000.
As of September 30, 2017, there were 637,791 active entity
registrations in SAM. Of those active entity registrations, 452,310
(71 percent) completed all four modules of the registration, in
accordance with the definition ``Registered in the System for Award
Management (SAM)'' at FAR 52.204-7(a), including Assertions (where
they enter their size metrics and select their NAICS Codes) and Reps
& Certs (where they certify to the information they provided and the
size indicator by NAICS). Of the possible 452,310 active SAM entity
registrations, 338,207 (75 percent) certified to meeting the size
standard of small for their primary NAICS Code. Therefore, this rule
may be beneficial to 338,207 small business entities that submit
solicitation responses that may now fall under the MPT or SAT and
have streamlined procedures as a result of this rule.
The rule does not include additional reporting or record keeping
requirements.
There are no available alternatives to the rule to accomplish
the desired objective of the statute.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the
Regulatory Secretariat Division. The Regulatory Secretariat Division
has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.
[[Page 40067]]
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, and 52
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16,
22, 25, and 52 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 2, 3, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, and
52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 2--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
0
2. Amend section 2.101, in paragraph (b) by--
0
a. In the definition ``Micro-purchase threshold'' removing from the
introductory text ``$3,500'' and adding ``$10,000'' in its place,
removing from paragraph (2) the word ``and'' at the end of the
sentence, removing from paragraph (3)(ii) ``States.'' and adding
``States; and'' in its place, and adding paragraph (4); and
0
b. In the definition ``Simplified acquisition threshold'' removing from
the introductory text ``$150,000'' and adding ``$250,000'' in its
place, and removing from paragraph (2) ``$300,000'' and adding
``$500,000'' in its place.
The addition reads as follows:
2.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Micro-purchase threshold * * *
(4) For acquisitions of supplies or services from institutions of
higher education (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)) or related or affiliated nonprofit
entities, or from nonprofit research organizations or independent
research institutes--
(i) $10,000; or
(ii) A higher threshold, as determined appropriate by the head of
the agency and consistent with clean audit findings under 31 U.S.C.
chapter 75, Requirements for Single Audits; an internal institutional
risk assessment; or State law.
* * * * *
PART 3--IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
3.502-3 [Amended]
0
3. Amend section 3.502-3 by removing ``the simplified acquisition
threshold'' and adding ``$150,000'' in its place.
PART 9--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
9.104-5 [Amended]
0
4. Amend section 9.104-5 by removing from paragraph (a)(2) ``$3,500''
and adding ``$10,000'' in its place.
9.406-2 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 9.406-2 by removing from paragraph (b)(1)(v)
``$3,500'' and adding ``the threshold at 9.104-5(a)(2)'' in its place.
9.407-2 [Amended]
0
6. Amend section 9.407-2 by removing from paragraph (a)(7) ``$3,500''
and adding ``the threshold at 9.104-5(a)(2)'' in its place.
PART 13--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
0
7. Amend section 13.005 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
13.005 List of laws inapplicable to contracts and subcontracts at or
below the simplified acquisition threshold.
(a) The following laws are inapplicable to all contracts and
subcontracts (if otherwise applicable to subcontracts) at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1905:
(1) 41 U.S.C. 8102(a)(1) (Drug-Free Workplace), except for
individuals.
(2) 10 U.S.C. 2306(b) and 41 U.S.C. 3901(b) (Contract Clause
Regarding Contingent Fees).
(3) 10 U.S.C. 2313 and 41 U.S.C. 4706 (Authority to Examine Books
and Records of Contractors).
(4) 10 U.S.C. 2402 and 41 U.S.C. 4704 (Prohibition on Limiting
Subcontractors Direct Sales to the United States).
(5) 15 U.S.C. 631 note (HUBZone Act of 1997), except for 15 U.S.C.
657a(b)(2)(B), which is optional for the agencies subject to the
requirements of the Act.
(6) 31 U.S.C. 1354(a) (Limitation on use of appropriated funds for
contracts with entities not meeting veterans employment reporting
requirements).
(7) 22 U.S.C. 2593e (Measures Against Persons Involved in
Activities that Violate Arms Control Treaties or Agreements with the
United States). (The requirement at 22 U.S.C. 2593e(c)(3)(B) to provide
a certification does not apply).
* * * * *
13.501 [Amended]
0
8. Amend section 13.501 by removing from paragraph (a)(2)(ii)
``$700,000'' and adding ``$700,000 or the thresholds in paragraph (1)
of the definition of simplified acquisition threshold in 2.101,'' in
its place.
PART 16--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
16.206-2 [Amended]
0
9. Amend section 16.206-2 by removing from the introductory text
``$150,000'' and adding ``the simplified acquisition threshold'' in its
place.
16.206-3 [Amended]
0
10. Amend section 16.206-3 by removing from paragraph (a) ``$150,000''
and adding ``the simplified acquisition threshold'' in its place.
16.207-3 [Amended]
0
11. Amend section 16.207-3 by removing from paragraph (d) ``$150,000''
and adding ``the simplified acquisition threshold'' in its place.
PART 22--APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
22.1803 [Amended]
0
12. Amend section 22.1803 by removing from the introductory text ``the
simplified acquisition threshold'' and adding ``$150,000'' in its
place.
PART 25--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
25.703-2 [Amended]
0
13. Amend section 25.703-2 by removing from paragraph (a)(2) ``$3,500''
and adding ``$10,000'' in its place.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
14. Amend section 52.209-5 by revising the date of the provision and
removing from paragraph (a)(1)(i)(D) introductory text ``$3,500'' and
adding ``the threshold at 9.104-5(a)(2)'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
52.209-5 Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters.
* * * * *
Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters (Aug 2020)
* * * * *
0
15. Amend section 52.212-3 by--
[[Page 40068]]
0
(a) Revising the date of the provision; and
0
(b) Removing from paragraph (h)(4) introductory text ``$3,500'' and
adding ``the threshold at 9.104-5(a)(2)'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial
Items.
* * * * *
Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items (Aug 2020)
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-12763 Filed 7-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P