Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Little Rock, Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 38273-38274 [2020-12805]
Download as PDF
38273
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 124
Friday, June 26, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AN95
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition
of the Little Rock, Arkansas, and Tulsa,
Oklahoma, Appropriated Fund Federal
Wage System Wage Areas
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to redefine the geographic
boundaries of the Little Rock, Arkansas,
and Tulsa, Oklahoma, appropriated
fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage
areas. The final rule will redefine the
Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin County,
AR, to the Tulsa wage area. This change
is based on a consensus
recommendation of the Federal
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee
(FPRAC).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
DATES:
Effective date: June 26, 2020.
Applicability date: This change
applies on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after July 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606–2858 or by email at pay-leavepolicy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 13, 2020, OPM issued a
proposed rule (85 FR 8205) to redefine
the Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin
County, AR, from the Little Rock, AR,
wage area to the Tulsa, OK, wage area.
FPRAC, the national labormanagement committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning
the pay of FWS employees, reviewed
and recommended these changes by
consensus.
The 30-day comment period ended on
March 16, 2020. OPM received one
16:24 Jun 25, 2020
not a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to review under E.O. 12866
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011).
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This rule is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
comment supporting the move of the
Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin County
to the Tulsa wage area and asking OPM
to define Monroe County, PA, from the
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA, wage area to
the New York, NY, wage area. The wage
area definition of Monroe County is
beyond the scope of this rule.
Jkt 250001
OPM certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, and have determined that
this rule will not have any negative
impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal
governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in Executive Order
12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR
part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—
Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend
the table by revising the wage area
listings for the States of Arkansas and
Oklahoma to read as follows:
■
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage
Area Survey Areas
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of
nonagency parties and, accordingly, is
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
ARKANSAS
Little Rock
Survey Area
*
*
Arkansas:
Jefferson
Pulaski
Saline
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Arkansas:
Arkansas
Ashley
Baxter
Boone
Bradley
Calhoun
Chicot
Clay
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
38274
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Clark
Cleburne
Cleveland
Conway
Dallas
Desha
Drew
Faulkner
Franklin (Does not include the Fort
Chaffee portion)
Fulton
Garland
Grant
Greene
Hot Spring
Independence
Izard
Jackson
Johnson
Lawrence
Lincoln
Logan
Lonoke
Marion
Monroe
Montgomery
Newton
Ouachita
Perry
Phillips
Pike
Polk
Pope
Prairie
Randolph
Scott
Searcy
Sharp
Stone
Union
Van Buren
White
Woodruff
Yell
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma City
Survey Area
*
Oklahoma:
Canadian
Cleveland
McClain
Oklahoma
Pottawatomie
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Oklahoma:
Alfalfa
Atoka
Beckham
Blaine
Bryan
Caddo
Carter
Coal
Custer
Dewey
Ellis
Garfield
Garvin
Grady
Grant
Harper
Hughes
Johnston
Kingfisher
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Jun 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
Lincoln
Logan
Love
Major
Marshall
Murray
Noble
Payne
Pontotoc
Roger Mills
Seminole
Washita
Woods
Woodward
final rule to revise the component
designations of three agencies for
purposes of the one-year postemployment conflict of interest
restriction for senior employees.
Specifically, based on the
recommendations of the agencies
concerned, OGE is designating two new
components in appendix B to 5 CFR
part 2641, and correcting an inadvertent
error in the current appendix B listing
of a previously-designated component.
Tulsa
Survey Area
DATES:
Oklahoma:
Creek
Mayes
Muskogee
Osage
Pittsburg
Rogers
Tulsa
Wagoner
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Arkansas:
Benton
Carroll
Crawford
Franklin (Only includes the Fort Chaffee
portion)
Madison
Sebastian
Washington
Missouri:
McDonald
Oklahoma:
Adair
Cherokee
Choctaw
Craig
Delaware
Haskell
Kay
Latimer
LeFlore
McCurtain
McIntosh
Nowata
Okfuskee
Okmulgee
Ottawa
Pawnee
Pushmataha
Sequoyah
Washington
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–12805 Filed 6–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
5 CFR Part 2641
RIN 3209–AA44
Post-Employment Conflict of Interest
Restrictions; Revision of Departmental
Component Designations
AGENCY: Office of Government
ACTION: Final rule.
Ethics.
The U.S. Office of
Government Ethics (OGE) is issuing this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule is effective June 26,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly L. Sikora Panza, Associate
Counsel, Telephone: (202) 482–9300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Director of OGE (Director) is
authorized by 18 U.S.C. 207(h) to
designate distinct and separate
departmental or agency components in
the executive branch for purposes of 18
U.S.C. 207(c), the one-year postemployment conflict of interest
restriction for senior employees. Under
18 U.S.C. 207(h)(2), component
designations do not apply to persons
employed at a rate of pay specified in
or fixed according to subchapter II of 5
U.S.C. chapter 53 (the Executive
Schedule). Component designations are
listed in appendix B to 5 CFR part 2641.
The representational bar of 18 U.S.C.
207(c) usually extends to the whole of
any department or agency in which a
former senior employee served in any
capacity during the year prior to
termination from a senior employee
position. However, 18 U.S.C. 207(h)
provides that whenever the Director
determines that an agency or bureau
within a department or agency in the
executive branch exercises functions
which are distinct and separate from the
remaining functions of the department
or agency and there exists no potential
for use of undue influence or unfair
advantage based on past Government
service, the Director shall by rule
designate such agency or bureau as a
separate component of that department
or agency.
Pursuant to the procedures prescribed
in 5 CFR 2641.302(e), three agencies
forwarded written requests to OGE to
amend their listings in appendix B to
part 2641, and on February 7, 2020,
OGE published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register that proposed to revise
the component designations of those
agencies (85 FR 7252). The proposed
rule provided a 30-day comment period,
which ended on March 9, 2020. OGE
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 124 (Friday, June 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38273-38274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12805]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 38273]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AN95
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the Little Rock,
Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System
Wage Areas
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final
rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the Little Rock,
Arkansas, and Tulsa, Oklahoma, appropriated fund Federal Wage System
(FWS) wage areas. The final rule will redefine the Fort Chaffee portion
of Franklin County, AR, to the Tulsa wage area. This change is based on
a consensus recommendation of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee (FPRAC).
DATES:
Effective date: June 26, 2020.
Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the
first applicable pay period beginning on or after July 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at
(202) 606-2858 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 13, 2020, OPM issued a proposed
rule (85 FR 8205) to redefine the Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin
County, AR, from the Little Rock, AR, wage area to the Tulsa, OK, wage
area.
FPRAC, the national labor-management committee responsible for
advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed
and recommended these changes by consensus.
The 30-day comment period ended on March 16, 2020. OPM received one
comment supporting the move of the Fort Chaffee portion of Franklin
County to the Tulsa wage area and asking OPM to define Monroe County,
PA, from the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA, wage area to the New York, NY,
wage area. The wage area definition of Monroe County is beyond the
scope of this rule.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will
affect only Federal agencies and employees.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any
negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
local, or tribal governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as
that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
0
2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area
listings for the States of Arkansas and Oklahoma to read as follows:
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas
* * * * *
ARKANSAS
Little Rock
Survey Area
Arkansas:
Jefferson
Pulaski
Saline
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Arkansas:
Arkansas
Ashley
Baxter
Boone
Bradley
Calhoun
Chicot
Clay
[[Page 38274]]
Clark
Cleburne
Cleveland
Conway
Dallas
Desha
Drew
Faulkner
Franklin (Does not include the Fort Chaffee portion)
Fulton
Garland
Grant
Greene
Hot Spring
Independence
Izard
Jackson
Johnson
Lawrence
Lincoln
Logan
Lonoke
Marion
Monroe
Montgomery
Newton
Ouachita
Perry
Phillips
Pike
Polk
Pope
Prairie
Randolph
Scott
Searcy
Sharp
Stone
Union
Van Buren
White
Woodruff
Yell
* * * * *
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma City
Survey Area
Oklahoma:
Canadian
Cleveland
McClain
Oklahoma
Pottawatomie
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Oklahoma:
Alfalfa
Atoka
Beckham
Blaine
Bryan
Caddo
Carter
Coal
Custer
Dewey
Ellis
Garfield
Garvin
Grady
Grant
Harper
Hughes
Johnston
Kingfisher
Lincoln
Logan
Love
Major
Marshall
Murray
Noble
Payne
Pontotoc
Roger Mills
Seminole
Washita
Woods
Woodward
Tulsa
Survey Area
Oklahoma:
Creek
Mayes
Muskogee
Osage
Pittsburg
Rogers
Tulsa
Wagoner
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Arkansas:
Benton
Carroll
Crawford
Franklin (Only includes the Fort Chaffee portion)
Madison
Sebastian
Washington
Missouri:
McDonald
Oklahoma:
Adair
Cherokee
Choctaw
Craig
Delaware
Haskell
Kay
Latimer
LeFlore
McCurtain
McIntosh
Nowata
Okfuskee
Okmulgee
Ottawa
Pawnee
Pushmataha
Sequoyah
Washington
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-12805 Filed 6-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P