Qualified Business Income Deduction, 38060-38068 [2020-11832]
Download as PDF
38060
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Background
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9899]
RIN 1545–BP12
Qualified Business Income Deduction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final regulations.
This document contains final
regulations concerning the deduction
for qualified business income (QBI)
under section 199A of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The regulations
will affect certain individuals,
partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and
estates. The regulations provide
guidance on the treatment of previously
suspended losses included in qualified
business income. The regulations also
provide guidance on the determination
of the section 199A deduction for
taxpayers that hold interests in
regulated investment companies, splitinterest trusts, and charitable remainder
trusts.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are
effective on August 24, 2020.
Applicability Dates: These regulations
apply to taxable years beginning after
August 24, 2020. Pursuant to section
7805(b)(7), taxpayers may choose to
apply the amendments to §§ 1.199A–3
and 1.199A–6 set forth in this Treasury
decision to taxable years beginning on
or before August 24, 2020. Alternatively,
taxpayers who chose to rely on the
February 2019 Proposed Regulations for
taxable years beginning on or before
August 24, 2020 may continue to do so
for such years. However, taxpayers who
choose to apply any section of these
regulations or continue to rely on any
section of the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations for taxable years beginning
on or before August 24, 2020 must
follow the rules of the applicable
section in a consistent manner for each
such year.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning § 1.199A–3(d), Michael Y.
Chin or Steven Harrison at (202) 317–
6842; concerning §§ 1.199A–3(b) and
1.199A–6, Vishal R. Amin or Sonia
Kothari at (202) 317–6850 or Robert D.
Alinsky or Margaret Burow at (202)
317–5279.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
This document contains amendments
to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 1) under section 199A of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on
December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
Public Law 115–97, 131 Stat. 2054,
commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act (TCJA), and was amended
on March 23, 2018, retroactively to
January 1, 2018, by section 101 of
Division T of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2018, Public Law
115–141, 132 Stat. 348 (2018 Act).
Section 199A applies to taxable years
beginning after 2017 and before 2026.
Section 199A provides a deduction of
up to 20 percent of QBI from a U.S.
trade or business operated as a sole
proprietorship or through a partnership,
S corporation, trust, or estate (section
199A deduction). The section 199A
deduction may be taken by individuals
and by some trusts and estates. A
section 199A deduction is not available
for wage income or for income earned
by a C corporation (as defined in section
1361(a)(2)). If the taxpayer’s taxable
income exceeds the statutorily defined
amount in section 199A(e)(2) (threshold
amount), the taxpayer’s section 199A
deduction may be limited based on (i)
the type of trade or business conducted,
(ii) the amount of W–2 wages paid with
respect to the trade or business (W–2
wages), and/or (iii) the unadjusted basis
immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of
qualified property held for use in the
trade or business (UBIA of qualified
property). These statutory limitations
are subject to phase-in rules in section
199A(b)(3)(B) based upon taxable
income above the threshold amount
(phase-in rules).
Section 199A also provides
individuals and some trusts and estates,
but not corporations, a deduction of up
to 20 percent of their combined
qualified real estate investment trust
(REIT) dividends and qualified publicly
traded partnership (PTP) income,
including qualified REIT dividends and
qualified PTP income earned through
passthrough entities. This component of
the section 199A deduction is not
limited by W–2 wages or UBIA of
qualified property.
Overall, the section 199A deduction is
the lesser of (1) the sum of the combined
QBI and qualified REIT and PTP
components described in the prior two
paragraphs or (2) an amount equal to 20
percent of the excess (if any) of the
taxpayer’s taxable income for the
taxable year over the taxpayer’s net
capital gain for the taxable year.
Additionally, section 199A(g)
provides that specified agricultural or
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
horticultural cooperatives may claim a
special entity-level deduction that is
substantially similar to the domestic
production activities deduction under
former section 199.
The statute expressly grants the
Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate
(Secretary) authority to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out
the purposes of section 199A (section
199A(f)(4)), and provides specific grants
of authority with respect to certain
issues including: The treatment of
acquisitions, dispositions, and short
taxable years (section 199A(b)(5));
certain payments to partners for services
rendered in a non-partner capacity
(section 199A(c)(4)(C)); the allocation of
W–2 wages and UBIA of qualified
property (section 199A(f)(1)(A)(iii));
restricting the allocation of items and
wages under section 199A and such
reporting requirements as the Secretary
determines appropriate (section
199A(f)(4)(A)); the application of section
199A in the case of tiered entities
(section 199A(f)(4)(B)); preventing the
manipulation of the depreciable period
of qualified property using transactions
between related parties (section
199A(h)(1)); and determining the UBIA
of qualified property acquired in likekind exchanges or involuntary
conversions (section 199A(h)(2)).
The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the IRS
published final regulations (TD 9847)
interpreting section 199A on February 8,
2019 (February 2019 Final Regulations)
in the Federal Register (84 FR 2952).
Along with the publication of the
February 2019 Final Regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG 134652–18) in the
Federal Register (84 FR 3015) providing
additional guidance under section 199A
relating to the treatment of previously
suspended losses included in qualified
business income and determining the
section 199A deduction for taxpayers
that hold interests in regulated
investment companies, split-interest
trusts, and charitable remainder trusts
(February 2019 Proposed Regulations).
No public hearing on the February 2019
Proposed Regulations was requested or
held. After full consideration of the
comments received on the February
2019 Proposed Regulations, this
Treasury decision adopts the proposed
regulations with clarifying changes and
additional modifications in response to
comments as described in the Summary
of Comments and Explanation of
Revisions. Comments on issues related
to the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations that are beyond the scope of
these final regulations are not discussed
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
in this preamble, but may be addressed
in future guidance.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also received comments on the February
2019 Final Regulations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS continue to
study the issues raised in those
comments and may address them in
future guidance.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
These final regulations contain
amendments to two substantive sections
of the February 2019 Final Regulations,
§§ 1.199A–3 and 1.199A–6, each of
which provides rules relevant to the
calculation of the section 199A
deduction. The amendments to
§ 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv) provide additional
rules and clarification on the treatment
of suspended losses. Section 1.199A–
3(d) provides guidance that allows a
shareholder in a regulated investment
company (RIC) within the meaning of
section 851(a) to take a section 199A
deduction with respect to certain
income of, or distributions from, the
RIC. The amendments to § 1.199A–6(d)
include additional rules related to trusts
and estates under section 663 of the
Code. This Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions describes each
of the final rules contained in this
document in turn.
I. Treatment of Previously Suspended
Losses Included in QBI
Section 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv) of the
February 2019 Final Regulations
provides that previously disallowed
losses or deductions (including under
sections 465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d))
allowed in the taxable year are generally
taken into account for purposes of
computing QBI, except to the extent the
losses or deductions were disallowed,
suspended, limited, or carried over from
taxable years ending before January 1,
2018. These losses are used, for
purposes of section 199A, in order from
the oldest to the most recent on a firstin, first-out (FIFO) basis. The February
2019 Proposed Regulations expanded
this rule to provide that previously
disallowed losses or deductions are
treated as losses from a separate trade or
business in the year they are taken into
account in determining taxable income.
Further, the attributes of the previously
disallowed losses or deductions,
including whether they are attributable
to a trade or business and whether they
would otherwise be included in QBI, are
determined in the year the loss or
deduction is incurred.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are aware that taxpayers and
practitioners have questioned whether
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
the exclusion of section 461(l) from the
list of loss disallowance and suspension
provisions in § 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv) means
that losses disallowed under section
461(l) are not considered QBI in the year
the losses are taken into account in
determining taxable income. Generally,
for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020, and before January
1, 2026, section 461(l) disallows an
excess business loss for taxpayers other
than C corporations. See section 2304(a)
of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act),
Public Law 116–136, 134 Stat. 281
(2020). Any disallowed excess business
loss is treated as a net operating loss
carryover for the taxable year for
purposes of determining any net
operating loss carryover under section
172(b) in subsequent taxable years. See
section 172(b) as amended by section
2304(b) of the CARES Act.
The list of loss disallowance and
suspension provisions in § 1.199A–
3(b)(1)(iv) is not exhaustive. If a loss or
deduction that would otherwise be
included in QBI under the rules of
§ 1.199A–3 is disallowed or suspended
under any provision of the Code, such
loss or deduction is generally taken into
account for purposes of computing QBI
in the year it is taken into account in
determining taxable income. These final
regulations clarify this point by
amending § 1.199A–3(b)(1)(iv)(A) to
specifically reference excess business
losses disallowed by section 461(l) and
treated as a net operating loss carryover
for the taxable year for purposes of
determining any net operating loss
carryover under section 172(b) in
subsequent taxable years.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are also aware that taxpayers and
practitioners have questioned how the
phase-in rules apply when a taxpayer
has a suspended or disallowed loss or
deduction from a Specified Service
Trade or Business (SSTB). Whether an
individual has taxable income at or
below the threshold amount, within the
phase-in range, or in excess of the
phase-in range, the determination of
whether a suspended or disallowed loss
or deduction attributable to an SSTB is
from a qualified trade or business is
made in the year the loss or deduction
is incurred. If the individual’s taxable
income is at or below the threshold
amount in the year the loss or deduction
is incurred, and such loss would
otherwise be QBI, the entire disallowed
loss or deduction is treated as QBI from
a separate trade or business in the
subsequent taxable year in which the
loss is allowed. If the individual’s
taxable income is within the phase-in
range, then only the applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38061
percentage of the disallowed loss or
deduction is taken into account in the
subsequent taxable year. If the
individual’s taxable income exceeds the
phase-in range, none of the disallowed
loss or deduction will be taken into
account in the subsequent taxable year.
These final regulations clarify this
treatment and provide an example of a
taxpayer with taxable income in the
phase-in range and a suspended loss
from an SSTB.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
received one comment requesting
further clarification of the FIFO ordering
rule. The commenter questioned
whether the FIFO ordering rule should
continue to apply for losses incurred in
taxable years beginning on or after
January 1, 2018. The commenter also
asked for clarification regarding whether
the rule applied on an annual basis such
that each year is tracked separately and
FIFO is applied for losses that are
incurred each year or whether FIFO
applies such that there is a single bucket
of losses no matter the year incurred.
The commenter recommended
additional supporting worksheets or
other forms to assist in the calculation,
particularly if every year must be
tracked individually.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that in order to
properly calculate the deduction, it is
necessary for the FIFO rule to apply for
losses incurred in taxable years
beginning on or after January 1, 2018,
and that the rule must be applied on an
annual basis by category (i.e., sections
465, 469, etc.). Accordingly, these final
regulations retain the FIFO rule as
proposed. The Treasury Department and
the IRS continue to consider whether
new worksheets or forms are necessary
to assist in the calculation.
The February 2019 Proposed
Regulations also provide that if a loss or
deduction is partially disallowed, QBI
in the year of disallowance must be
reduced proportionately. These final
regulations retain this rule, but with
slight modifications, and provide
examples.
II. RICs With Interests in REITs and
PTPs
If a RIC has certain items of income
or gain, subchapter M of chapter 1 of the
Code provides rules under which a RIC
may pay dividends that a shareholder in
the RIC may treat in the same manner
(or a similar manner) as the shareholder
would treat the underlying item of
income or gain if the shareholder
realized it directly. Like the preamble to
the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations, this preamble refers to this
treatment as ‘‘conduit treatment.’’ The
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
38062
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
February 2019 Proposed Regulations
include rules providing conduit
treatment for qualified REIT dividends
earned by a RIC. The Treasury
Department and the IRS received one
comment requesting that the proposed
rules providing this treatment be
finalized. These final regulations adopt
those proposed rules.
The February 2019 Proposed
Regulations do not provide conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income
earned by a RIC. Instead, the preamble
to the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations requested comments on
issues relating to whether and how to
provide conduit treatment for qualified
PTP income, including the treatment of
items attributable to an SSTB of a PTP
allocated to a RIC and the treatment of
losses of a PTP allocated to a RIC. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
received several comments addressing
conduit treatment for qualified PTP
income earned by a RIC. Two
commenters recommended that conduit
treatment be extended to qualified PTP
income earned by RICs, excluding any
items attributable to SSTBs. Both
commenters suggested that any losses
allocated to RICs from PTPs could be
carried forward by the RIC for purposes
of section 199A. Another commenter
suggested methods by which RICs could
track, and pay dividends attributable to,
an SSTB of a PTP.
Another commenter suggested that
RICs, particularly business development
companies that conduct lending
activities, be allowed to pay ‘‘QBI
dividends’’ to their shareholders in
cases where the RIC had income from an
activity that would generate QBI if
conducted by a partnership or an S
corporation.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to consider those comments
and evaluate whether it is appropriate
and practicable to provide conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income or
other income of a RIC to further the
purposes of section 199A(b)(1)(B).
III. Special Rules for Trusts and Estates
Section 1.199A–6 provides guidance
that certain specified entities (including
trusts and estates) might need to
compute the section 199A deduction of
the entity and/or passthrough
information to each of its owners or
beneficiaries, so they may compute their
section 199A deduction. Section
1.199A–6(d) contains special rules for
applying section 199A to trusts and
decedents’ estates.
Under § 1.199A–6(d)(3)(ii), the QBI,
W–2 wages, UBIA of qualified property,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified
PTP income of a trust or estate are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
allocated to each beneficiary and to the
trust or estate based on the relative
proportion of the trust’s or estate’s
distributable net income (DNI) for the
taxable year that is distributed or
required to be distributed to the
beneficiary or is retained by the trust or
estate. Proposed § 1.199A–6(d)(3)(iii)
further provides that a trust described in
section 663(c) with substantially
separate and independent shares for
multiple beneficiaries will be treated as
a single trust for purposes of
determining whether the taxable income
of the trust exceeds the threshold
amount.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
received comments requesting guidance
on the interaction between section 199A
and the separate share rule in section
663(c). In particular, the commenters
requested guidance on the allocation of
QBI, W–2 wages, UBIA of qualified
property, qualified REIT dividends, and
qualified PTP income of a trust or estate
to beneficiaries and the trust or estate
based on DNI. The commenters noted
differences in the allocation of overall
DNI to beneficiaries of a trust or estate
under sections 643(a) and 663(c) and
asked about the allocation of these items
in circumstances involving tax-exempt
income and charitable deductions, as
well as situations in which no DNI is
allocated to a beneficiary. The
commenters asserted that under
§ 1.663(c)–2(b)(5), deductions, including
the section 199A deduction, attributable
solely to one share are not available to
any other separate share of the trust or
estate. The commenters recommended
that the allocation of QBI, W–2 wages,
UBIA of qualified property, qualified
REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income of a trust or estate should be
based on the portion of such items that
are attributable to the income of each
separate share. In addition, the
commenters recommended that
§ 1.663(c)–2(b) be amended to clarify
how gross income not included in
accounting income is allocated among
separate shares.
After considering the comments and
studying the separate share rule in more
depth, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have clarified the separate share
rule in these final regulations to provide
that, in the case of a trust or estate
described in section 663(c) with
substantially separate and independent
shares for multiple beneficiaries, the
trust or estate will be treated as a single
trust or estate not only for purposes of
determining whether the taxable income
of the trust or estate exceeds the
threshold amount but also in
determining taxable income, net capital
gain, net QBI, W–2 wages, UBIA of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
qualified property, qualified REIT
dividends, and qualified PTP income for
each trade or business of the trust or
estate, and computing the W–2 wage
and UBIA of qualified property
limitations. Further clarification of the
separate share rule under section 663 is
beyond the scope of these final
regulations, but the Treasury
Department and the IRS intend to
continue to study the issues raised by
the commenters. Accordingly, these
final regulations provide that the
allocation of these items to the separate
shares of a trust or estate described in
section 663(c) will be governed by the
rules under section 663(e) and such
guidance as may be published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)).
Section 1.199A–6(d)(3)(v) of the
February 2019 Proposed Regulations
provides rules under which the taxable
recipient of a unitrust or annuity
amount from a charitable remainder
trust described in section 664 can take
into account QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, or qualified PTP income for
purpose of determining the recipient’s
section 199A deduction. The Treasury
Department and the IRS received no
comments on these rules and these final
regulations adopt these rules as
proposed.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13771, 13563, and
12866 direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
These final regulations have been
designated by the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) as subject to review under
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and OMB regarding review of tax
regulations. OIRA has designated this
final regulation as economically
significant under section 1(c) of the
Memorandum of Agreement.
Accordingly, OIRA has reviewed these
final regulations. For purposes of
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13771 this rule is
regulatory.
A. Background and Need for Final
Regulations
Section 199A of the TCJA provides
taxpayers other than corporations a
deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI
from domestic businesses plus up to 20
percent of their combined qualified
REIT dividends and qualified publicly
traded partnership income. Because the
section 199A deduction had not
previously been available, regulations
are necessary to provide taxpayers with
computational and definitional
guidance regarding the application of
section 199A.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
previously issued the February 2019
Final Regulations regarding various
items related to the calculation of the
section 199A deduction. However, the
February 2019 Final Regulations did not
address treatment of REIT dividends
received by RICs. Because RICs are
taxed as C corporations, dividends paid
by RICs are generally ineligible for the
section 199A deduction under the
statute, which excludes C corporation
income from the definition of QBI.
However, the statute also directs the
Secretary to prescribe such regulations
as are necessary to carry out the
purposes of section 199A, including
regulations for its application in the
case of tiered entities. These final
regulations establish rules under which
RIC dividends associated with qualified
REIT dividends may be eligible for a
section 199A deduction.
In addition, these final regulations
establish rules for the treatment of
previously suspended losses in
calculation of QBI and rules for
applying section 199A to trusts and
decedents’ estates.
B. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
The analysis in this section compares
these final regulations (these
regulations) to a no-action baseline
reflecting anticipated Federal income
tax-related behavior in the absence of
these regulations.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
2. Summary of Economic Effects
To assess the economic effects of
these regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS considered the
economic effects of (i) rules for the
treatment of previously suspended
losses in calculation of QBI; (ii) rules
providing conduit treatment for
qualified REIT dividends earned by a
RIC; and (iii) rules for applying section
199A to trusts and decedents’ estates.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Regarding items (i) and (iii): These
regulations provide certainty and clarity
to taxpayers regarding terms and
calculations necessary for taxpayers to
determine their section 199A deduction.
In the absence of this clarity, the
likelihood would be exacerbated that
different taxpayers would hold different
interpretations of the tax treatment of
previously suspended losses or the
application of section 199A to trusts and
decedents’ estates. These regulations
help taxpayers to hold more similar
interpretations of the tax treatment of
these items. In general, overall
economic performance is enhanced
when individuals and businesses face
more uniform signals about tax
treatment. Certainty and clarity over tax
treatment also reduce compliance costs
for taxpayers.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
do not project meaningful changes in
economic activity as a result of these
provisions, relative to the no-action
baseline.
Regarding item (ii): These regulations
provide that an individual who is a
shareholder of a RIC that has an
ownership interest in a REIT may, for
section 199A purposes, treat certain
dividends received from a RIC in the
same way the shareholder would treat
dividends received directly from the
REIT. Specifically, under these
regulations RIC shareholders are
generally eligible for the section 199A
deduction on their section 199A
dividends. In the absence of these
regulations, dividends received from a
RIC that has an ownership interest in a
REIT would not qualify for the section
199A deduction while dividends
received directly from that REIT would
generally qualify for the deduction.
Thus, in the absence of these
regulations, direct ownership of REITs
is tax-advantaged relative to indirect
ownership of REITs through RICs even
though the underlying economic
activity is similar.
As a general principle, overall
economic performance is improved to
the extent that the tax consequences of
investment through a financial
intermediary (such as a RIC) are
equivalent to the tax consequences of
direct investment. In the absence of
these regulations, a tax incentive would
arise for individuals to invest directly in
REITs rather than through RIC
intermediaries. This would distort
investment allocation relative to a taxneutral treatment of financial
intermediaries, leading investors to
make decisions based on differential tax
treatment rather than purely based on
the value of investments. In particular,
it would likely cause investors to hold
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38063
less diversified portfolios.1 The
Treasury Department and the IRS
therefore project that, under these
regulations, individual investors seeking
to invest in real estate would in general
hold more diversified portfolios relative
to the no-action baseline.
Another economic loss that would
likely arise in the absence of these
regulations is due to the costs of
acquiring information. RICs, including
mutual funds and exchange-traded
funds, simplify decision-making for
investors by finding, indexing, and
vetting REITs. This is an efficient
market organization due to economies of
scale in gathering relevant information.
In the absence of these regulations,
individual investors face substantial
incentives to invest directly in REITs
due to asymmetric tax treatment, and
face larger time costs to evaluate REIT
investment options than RICs. The same
level of investment can be achieved
with substantially less resource use if
research costs are incurred by RICs
rather than individual investors, and
therefore this rule will lead to more
efficient resource use in making
aggregate investment decisions.
On the basis of these effects, the
Treasury Department and the IRS also
project that these regulations will lead
investors, on average, to hold more real
estate in their portfolios (relative to the
no-action baseline) and thus hold a
smaller share of investment in other
industries.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that the economic effects of
these regulations will exceed $100
million per year relative to the no-action
baseline. The compliance costs alone
are estimated to be approximately $149
million (excluding any compliance cost
savings), as described in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of these analyses.
These compliance costs arise because
the regulations require a RIC to compute
and report section 199A dividends to its
shareholders in order for them to benefit
from the section 199A deduction on
qualified REIT dividends earned by the
RIC. In some sense, these costs are
optional since RICs that do not pay
section 199A dividends, either because
they do not receive qualified REIT
dividends or because they choose not to
take on the additional record-keeping,
avoid these compliance costs entirely.
Nonetheless, we expect that many RICs
will choose to incur the compliance
costs to facilitate their shareholders’
section 199A deductions.
1 RICs include mutual funds, which facilitate the
diversification of an individual investor’s financial
portfolio.
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
38064
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Though many RICs keep detailed
records of their investment portfolios,
these regulations nonetheless create
non-trivial administrative costs for any
RICs that wish to provide section 199A
dividends to their shareholders.
However, this increase in compliance
costs may be accompanied by a decrease
in compliance costs for REITs who
would otherwise see an influx of
individual investors holding direct
interest in REITs. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have not
estimated this compliance cost savings.
Beyond any potential compliance cost
reduction, several other economic
benefits result from these regulations,
including those flowing from enhanced
financial diversification and reduced
information-gathering costs. While we
have not attempted to quantify the
economic benefits of these effects, we
project that they are likely to be
substantial as well. We estimate that up
to $6.0 billion in REIT dividends
accrued to individual taxpayers through
RICs in taxable year 2018. Of this, $5.6
billion went to taxpayers with positive
taxable income, who thus could
potentially use section 199A
deductions. This corresponds to
aggregate potential deductions of up to
$1.1 billion (20 percent of $5.6 billion).
Under an assumption that the effective
tax rate for these investors was 30
percent, then under the no-action
baseline taxpayers would theoretically
be willing to incur up to $336 million
in economic costs in order to receive the
section 199A deduction on their income
derived from REITs that currently flows
through RICs. Thus, relative to the noaction baseline, these regulations
provide up to $336 million in annual
benefits by allowing investors to avoid
these costs.
Another way of gauging the potential
economic benefits from these
regulations is to consider them relative
to the investment returns currently
flowing to REIT investors through RICs.
If RIC intermediaries provide economic
benefits (relative to direct ownership of
REITs) equal to five percent of
investment returns, then the benefits of
these regulations relative to the noaction baseline would be up to $280
million (five percent of $5.6 billion),
assuming the same levels of economic
activity as in taxable year 2018.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that more taxpayers will claim
the section 199A deduction under these
regulations, reducing government
revenue relative to the no-action
baseline. On its own, this reduction in
revenue itself would affect the United
States economy. Either the deficit would
increase or other taxes would need to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
raised. This effect should be weighed
against the enhanced efficiency arising
from the regulations. We have not
attempted to quantify these effects.
Similarly, we have not attempted to
quantify the efficiency effects of the
shift in investment away from other
industries and toward real estate that
may result from these regulations,
relative to the no-action baseline.
3. Number of Affected Taxpayers
The Treasury Department and the IRS
estimate that the rules regarding RICs as
financial intermediaries for REIT
investors will affect up to 2,500 RICs
and up to 4.8 million individual tax
units. These estimates are derived from
the universe of taxable year 2018
administrative tax records. For taxable
year 2018, taxpayers were able to rely
on the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations, which meant that RICs
could provide conduit treatment for
REIT dividends for section 199A
purposes (as in these regulations).
Accordingly, 2,500 entities that did not
file Form 1120–REIT issued at least one
Form 1099–DIV with section 199A
dividends. For comparison,
approximately 1,400 REITs issued at
least one Form 1099–DIV with section
199A dividends. Approximately 5.2
million tax units received at least one
Form 1099–DIV with section 199A
dividends from the 2,500 non-REIT
entities. Among these tax units, roughly
4.8 million had positive taxable income
and therefore could have potentially
benefited from the section 199A
deduction.2
II. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The collection of information
contained in these regulations will be
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control number
1545–0110. The collection of
information required by this regulation
is in § 1.199A–3. The collection of
information in § 1.199A–3 is required
for RICs that choose to report
information regarding qualified REIT
dividends to their shareholders. It is
necessary to report the information to
the IRS and relevant taxpayers to ensure
that taxpayers properly report in
2 For this analysis, entities are proxied by
Employer Identification Numbers (EINs). EINs are
tax identification numbers that do not perfectly
align with the relevant entity concept. In particular,
it is possible that one REIT may operate using
multiple EINs, one to file its Form 1120–REIT and
one to issue its Form 1099–DIVs. In this case, we
will misclassify the 1099-issuing EIN as a non-REIT.
Therefore the estimates for the number of RICs, and
the individuals receiving section 199A dividends
from RICs, are upper bounds.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accordance with the rules of these
regulations the correct amount of
deduction under section 199A. The
collection of information in § 1.199A–3
is satisfied by providing information
about section 199A dividends as Form
1099–DIV (OMB control number 1545–
0110) and its instructions may
prescribe.
For purposes of the PRA, the
reporting burden associated with
§ 1.199A–3 will be reflected in the next
revision to Form 1099–DIV. The burden
associated with the information
collection in the regulation represents
1.567 million hours and $149 million
(2018 dollars) annually to comply with
the information collection requirement
in the regulation. These estimates
capture both changes made by the TCJA
and those that arise out of these
regulations. The burden hours estimate
was derived from IRS’s legacy burden
model and is discussed in further detail
on Form 1099–DIV. The hourly rate is
derived from the IRS’s office of
Research, Applied Analytics, and
Statistics Business Taxpayer Burden
model that relates time and out-ofpocket costs of business tax preparation,
derived from survey data, to assets and
receipts of affected taxpayers along with
other relevant variables, and converted
by the Treasury Department to $2017.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
request comment on all aspects of
information collection burdens related
to these regulations. Proposed revisions
(if any) to these forms that reflect the
information collections contained in
these regulations will be made available
for public comment at www.irs.gov/
draftforms and will not be finalized
until after the forms have been approved
by OMB under the PRA.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is
hereby certified that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
The final rule is not likely to affect a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 1.199A–3 applies to RICs that
pay section 199A dividends. Congress
created RICs to give small investors
access to the professional management
and asset diversification that are
available only with very large
investment portfolios. To insure
appropriate non-tax regulation of these
substantial investment portfolios,
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Code
requires that such RICs must be eligible
for registration, and must actually be
registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the
Investment Company Act of 1940. There
are some small businesses that are
publicly traded, but most publicly
traded businesses are not small entities
as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. Thus, the Treasury Department and
IRS expect that most RICs are not small
entities for purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Accordingly, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that this Treasury decision
will not affect a substantial number of
small entities. Finally, no comments
regarding the economic impact of these
regulations on small entities were
received.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding these regulations was
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business and no
comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Michael Y. Chin and
Steven Harrison, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products) and Robert Alinsky,
Vishal Amin, Margaret Burow, and
Sonia Kothari, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, other
personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
(d)(2)(i) through (iii), (d)(2)(iii)(A) and
(B), (d)(3), (d)(3)(i) through (v), (d)(4),
(d)(4)(i) and (ii), (d)(5), and (e)(2)(iii)
and (iv).
■ 2. Adding entries for § 1.199A–
6(d)(3)(iii) and (v) and (e)(2)(iii) and (iv).
The additions read as follows:
§ 1.199A–0
*
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Charitable remainder trusts.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Section 1.199A–0 is amended
by:
■ 1. Adding entries for § 1.199A–
3(b)(1)(iv)(A) through (C), (b)(1)(iv)(C)(1)
and (2), (b)(1)(iv)(D), (d), (d)(1) and (2),
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
(iv) Charitable remainder trusts.
Section 1.199A–6 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(f)(1)(B) and (f)(4).
*
■
Jkt 250001
*
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a
regulated investment company.
(1) In general.
(2) Definition of section 199A dividend.
(i) In general.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess
reported amounts.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported amount.
(A) In general.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year RICs.
(3) Definitions.
(i) Reported section 199A dividend
amount.
(ii) Excess reported amount.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount.
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A dividends by
shareholders.
(i) In general.
(ii) Holding period.
(5) Example.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Previously disallowed losses.
(iv) Section 199A dividends.
*
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) In general.
(B) Partial allowance.
(C) Attributes of disallowed loss
determined in year loss is incurred.
(1) In general.
(2) Specified service trades or businesses.
(D) Examples.
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
Section 1.199A–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 199A(c)(4)(C) and (f)(4).
*
*
§ 1.199A–6 Relevant passthrough entities
(RPEs), publicly traded partnerships
(PTPs), trusts, and estates.
■
*
Table of contents.
*
§ 1.199A–3 Qualified business income,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified
PTP income.
*
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
*
*
Par. 3. Section 1.199A–3 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv) and
adding paragraphs (d) and (e)(2)(iii) and
(iv) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38065
§ 1.199A–3 Qualified business income,
qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Previously disallowed losses—(A)
In general. Previously disallowed losses
or deductions allowed in the taxable
year generally are taken into account for
purposes of computing QBI to the extent
the disallowed loss or deduction is
otherwise allowed by section 199A.
These previously disallowed losses
include, but are not limited to losses
disallowed under sections 461(l), 465,
469, 704(d), and 1366(d). These losses
are used for purposes of section 199A
and this section in order from the oldest
to the most recent on a first-in, first-out
(FIFO) basis and are treated as losses
from a separate trade or business. To the
extent such losses relate to a PTP, they
must be treated as a loss from a separate
PTP in the taxable year the losses are
taken into account. However, losses or
deductions that were disallowed,
suspended, limited, or carried over from
taxable years ending before January 1,
2018 (including under sections 465,
469, 704(d), and 1366(d)), are not taken
into account in a subsequent taxable
year for purposes of computing QBI.
(B) Partial allowance. If a loss or
deduction attributable to a trade or
business is only partially allowed
during the taxable year in which
incurred, only the portion of the
allowed loss or deduction that is
attributable to QBI will be considered in
determining QBI from the trade or
business in the year the loss or
deduction is incurred. The portion of
the allowed loss or deduction
attributable to QBI is determined by
multiplying the total amount of the
allowed loss by a fraction, the
numerator of which is the portion of the
total loss incurred during the taxable
year that is attributable to QBI and the
denominator of which is the amount of
the total loss incurred during the taxable
year.
(C) Attributes of disallowed loss or
deduction determined in year loss is
incurred—(1) In general. Whether a
disallowed loss or deduction is
attributable to a trade or business, and
otherwise meets the requirements of this
section, is determined in the year the
loss is incurred.
(2) Specified service trades or
businesses. If a disallowed loss or
deduction is attributable to a specified
service trade or business (SSTB),
whether an individual has taxable
income at or below the threshold
amount as defined in § 1.199A–1(b)(12),
within the phase-in range as defined in
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
38066
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 1.199A–1(b)(4), or in excess of the
phase-in range is determined in the year
the loss or deduction is incurred. If the
individual’s taxable income is at or
below the threshold amount in the year
the loss or deduction is incurred, the
entire disallowed loss or deduction
must be taken into account when
applying paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(A) of this
section. If the individual’s taxable
income is within the phase-in range,
then only the applicable percentage, as
defined in § 1.199A–1(b)(2), of the
disallowed loss or deduction is taken
into account when applying paragraph
(b)(1)(iv)(A) of this section. If the
individual’s taxable income exceeds the
phase-in range, none of the disallowed
loss or deduction will be taken into
account in applying paragraph
(b)(1)(iv)(A) of this section.
(D) Examples. The following
examples illustrate the provisions of
this paragraph (b)(1)(iv).
(1) Example 1. A is an unmarried
individual and a 50% owner of LLC, an
entity classified as a partnership for Federal
income tax purposes. In 2018, A’s allocable
share of loss from LLC is $100,000 of which
$80,000 is negative QBI. Under section 465,
$60,000 of the allocable loss is allowed in
determining A’s taxable income. A has no
other previously disallowed losses under
section 465 or any other provision of the
Code for 2018 or prior years. Because 80%
of A’s allocable loss is attributable to QBI
($80,000/$100,000), A will reduce the
amount A takes into account in determining
QBI proportionately. Thus, A will include
$48,000 of the allowed loss in negative QBI
(80% of $60,000) in determining A’s section
199A deduction in 2018. The remaining
$32,000 of negative QBI is treated as negative
QBI from a separate trade or business for
purposes of computing the section 199A
deduction in the year the loss is taken into
account in determining taxable income as
described in § 1.199A–1(d)(2)(iii).
(2) Example 2. B is an unmarried
individual and a 50% owner of LLC, an
entity classified as a partnership for Federal
income tax purposes. After allowable
deductions other than the section 199A
deduction, B’s taxable income for 2018 is
$177,500. In 2018, LLC has a single trade or
business that is an SSTB. B’s allocable share
of loss is $100,000, all of which is suspended
under section 465. B’s allocable share of
negative QBI is also $100,000. B has no other
previously disallowed losses under section
465 or any other provision of the Code for
2018 or prior years. Because the entire loss
is suspended, none of the negative QBI is
taken into account in determining B’s section
199A deduction for 2018. Further, because
the negative QBI is from an SSTB and B’s
taxable income before the section 199A
deduction is within the phase-in range, B
must determine the applicable percentage of
the negative QBI that must be taken into
account in the year that the loss is taken into
account in determining taxable income. B’s
applicable percentage is 100% reduced by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
40% (the percentage equal to the amount that
B’s taxable income for the taxable year
exceeds B’s threshold amount ($20,000 =
$177,500¥$157,500) over $50,000). Thus, B’s
applicable percentage is 60%. Therefore, B
will have $60,000 (60% of $100,000) of
negative QBI from a separate trade or
business to be applied proportionately to QBI
in the year(s) the loss is taken into account
in determining taxable income, regardless of
the amount of taxable income and how rules
under § 1.199A–5 apply in the year the loss
is taken into account in determining taxable
income.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a
regulated investment company—(1) In
general. If section 852(b) applies to a
regulated investment company (RIC) for
a taxable year, the RIC may pay section
199A dividends, as defined in this
paragraph (d).
(2) Definition of section 199A
dividend—(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this
section, a section 199A dividend is any
dividend or part of such a dividend that
a RIC pays to its shareholders and
reports as a section 199A dividend in
written statements furnished to its
shareholders.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess
reported amounts. If the aggregate
reported amount with respect to the RIC
for any taxable year exceeds the RIC’s
qualified REIT dividend income for the
taxable year, then a section 199A
dividend is equal to—
(A) The reported section 199A
dividend amount; reduced by
(B) The excess reported amount that
is allocable to that reported section
199A dividend amount.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported
amount—(A) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(B) of
this section, the excess reported amount
(if any) that is allocable to the reported
section 199A dividend amount is that
portion of the excess reported amount
that bears the same ratio to the excess
reported amount as the reported section
199A dividend amount bears to the
aggregate reported amount.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year
RICs. In the case of any taxable year that
does not begin and end in the same
calendar year, if the post-December
reported amount equals or exceeds the
excess reported amount for that taxable
year, paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section is applied by substituting ‘‘postDecember reported amount’’ for
‘‘aggregate reported amount,’’ and no
excess reported amount is allocated to
any dividend paid on or before
December 31 of that taxable year.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of
paragraph (d) of this section—
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) Reported section 199A dividend
amount. The term reported section 199A
dividend amount means the amount of
a dividend distribution reported to the
RIC’s shareholders under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as a section 199A
dividend.
(ii) Excess reported amount. The term
excess reported amount means the
excess of the aggregate reported amount
over the RIC’s qualified REIT dividend
income for the taxable year.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount. The
term aggregate reported amount means
the aggregate amount of dividends
reported by the RIC under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as section 199A
dividends for the taxable year
(including section 199A dividends paid
after the close of the taxable year and
described in section 855).
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
The term post-December reported
amount means the aggregate reported
amount determined by taking into
account only dividends paid after
December 31 of the taxable year.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
The term qualified REIT dividend
income means, with respect to a taxable
year of a RIC, the excess of the amount
of qualified REIT dividends, as defined
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
includible in the RIC’s taxable income
for the taxable year over the amount of
the RIC’s deductions that are properly
allocable to such income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A
dividends by shareholders—(i) In
general. For purposes of section 199A,
and §§ 1.199A–1 through 1.199A–6, a
section 199A dividend is treated by a
taxpayer that receives the section 199A
dividend as a qualified REIT dividend.
(ii) Holding period. Paragraph (d)(4)(i)
of this section does not apply to any
dividend received with respect to a
share of RIC stock—
(A) That is held by the shareholder for
45 days or less (taking into account the
principles of section 246(c)(3) and (4))
during the 91-day period beginning on
the date which is 45 days before the
date on which the share becomes exdividend with respect to such dividend;
or
(B) To the extent that the shareholder
is under an obligation (whether
pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to
make related payments with respect to
positions in substantially similar or
related property.
(5) Example. The following example
illustrates the provisions of this
paragraph (d).
(i) X is a corporation that has elected to be
a RIC. For its taxable year ending March 31,
2021, X has $25,000x of net long-term capital
gain, $60,000x of qualified dividend income,
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
$25,000x of taxable interest income, $15,000x
of net short-term capital gain, and $25,000x
of qualified REIT dividends. X has $15,000x
of deductible expenses, of which $3,000x is
allocable to the qualified REIT dividends. On
December 31, 2020, X pays a single dividend
of $100,000x, and reports $20,000x of the
dividend as a section 199A dividend in
written statements to its shareholders. On
March 31, 2021, X pays a dividend of
$35,000x, and reports $5,000x of the
dividend as a section 199A dividend in
written statements to its shareholders.
(ii) X’s qualified REIT dividend income
under paragraph (d)(3)(v) of this section is
$22,000x, which is the excess of X’s $25,000x
of qualified REIT dividends over $3,000x in
allocable expenses. The reported section
199A dividend amounts for the December 31,
2020, and March 31, 2021, distributions are
$20,000x and $5,000x, respectively. For the
taxable year ending March 31, 2021, the
aggregate reported amount of section 199A
dividends is $25,000x, and the excess
reported amount under paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of
this section is $3,000x. Because X is a
noncalendar-year RIC and the post-December
reported amount of $5,000x exceeds the
excess reported amount of $3,000x, the entire
excess reported amount is allocated under
paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B) of this
section to the reported section 199A
dividend amount for the March 31, 2021,
distribution. No portion of the excess
reported amount is allocated to the reported
section 199A dividend amount for the
December 31, 2020, distribution. Thus, the
section 199A dividend on March 31, 2021, is
$2,000x, which is the reported section 199A
dividend amount of $5,000x reduced by the
$3,000x of allocable excess reported amount.
The section 199A dividend on December 31,
2020, is the $20,000x that X reports as a
section 199A dividend.
(iii) Shareholder A, a United States person,
receives a dividend from X of $100x on
December 31, 2020, of which $20x is
reported as a section 199A dividend. If A
meets the holding period requirements in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with
respect to the stock of X, A treats $20x of the
dividend from X as a qualified REIT dividend
for purposes of section 199A for A’s 2020
taxable year.
(iv) A receives a dividend from X of $35x
on March 31, 2021, of which $5x is reported
as a section 199A dividend. Only $2x of the
dividend is a section 199A dividend. If A
meets the holding period requirements in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with
respect to the stock of X, A may treat the $2x
section 199A dividend as a qualified REIT
dividend for A’s 2021 taxable year.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Previously disallowed losses. The
provisions of paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this
section apply to taxable years beginning
after August 24, 2020. Taxpayers may
choose to apply the rules in paragraph
(b)(1)(iv) of this section for taxable years
beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently
apply the rules in paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of
this section for each such year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
(iv) Section 199A dividends. The
provisions of paragraph (d) of this
section apply to taxable years beginning
after August 24, 2020. Taxpayers may
choose to apply the rules in paragraph
(d) of this section for taxable years
beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently
apply the rules in paragraph (d) of this
section for each such year.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.199A–6 is amended
by adding paragraphs (d)(3)(iii) and (v)
and (e)(2)(iii) and (iv) to read as follows:
§ 1.199A–6 Relevant passthrough entities
(RPEs), publicly traded partnerships (PTPs),
trusts, and estates.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. In the case of a
trust or estate described in section
663(c) with substantially separate and
independent shares for multiple
beneficiaries, such trust or estate will be
treated as a single trust or estate for
purposes of determining whether the
taxable income of the trust or estate
exceeds the threshold amount;
determining taxable income, net capital
gain, net QBI, W–2 wages, UBIA of
qualified property, qualified REIT
dividends, and qualified PTP income for
each trade or business of the trust and
estate; and computing the W–2 wage
and UBIA of qualified property
limitations. The allocation of these
items to the separate shares of a trust or
estate will be governed by the rules
under §§ 1.663(c)–1 through 1.663(c)–5,
as they may be adjusted or clarified by
publication in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter).
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Charitable remainder trusts. A
charitable remainder trust described in
section 664 is not entitled to and does
not calculate a section 199A deduction,
and the threshold amount described in
section 199A(e)(2) does not apply to the
trust. However, any taxable recipient of
a unitrust or annuity amount from the
trust must determine and apply the
recipient’s own threshold amount for
purposes of section 199A taking into
account any annuity or unitrust
amounts received from the trust. A
recipient of a unitrust or annuity
amount from a trust may take into
account QBI, qualified REIT dividends,
or qualified PTP income for purposes of
determining the recipient’s section
199A deduction for the taxable year to
the extent that the unitrust or annuity
amount distributed to such recipient
consists of such section 199A items
under § 1.664–1(d). For example, if a
charitable remainder trust has
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38067
investment income of $500, qualified
dividend income of $200, and qualified
REIT dividends of $1,000, and
distributes $1,000 to the recipient, the
trust would be treated as having income
in two classes within the category of
income, described in § 1.664–
1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1), for purposes of § 1.664–
1(d)(1)(ii)(b). Because the annuity
amount first carries out income in the
class subject to the highest income tax
rate, the entire annuity payment comes
from the class with the investment
income and qualified REIT dividends.
Thus, the charitable remainder trust
would be treated as distributing a
proportionate amount of the investment
income ($500 / (1,000 + 500) * 1,000 =
$333) and qualified REIT dividends
($1000 / (1,000 + 500) * 1000 = $667)
because the investment income and
qualified REIT dividends are taxed at
the same rate and within the same class,
which is higher than the rate of tax for
the qualified dividend income in a
separate class. The charitable remainder
trust in this example would not be
treated as distributing any of the
qualified dividend income until it
distributed all the investment income
and qualified REIT dividends (more
than $1,500 in total) to the recipient. To
the extent that a trust is treated as
distributing QBI, qualified REIT
dividends, or qualified PTP income to
more than one unitrust or annuity
recipient in the taxable year, the
distribution of such income will be
treated as made to the recipients
proportionately, based on their
respective shares of total QBI, qualified
REIT dividends, or qualified PTP
income distributed for that year. The
trust allocates and reports any W–2
wages or UBIA of qualified property to
the taxable recipient of the annuity or
unitrust interest based on each
recipient’s share of the trust’s total QBI
(whether or not distributed) for that
taxable year. Accordingly, if 10 percent
of the QBI of a charitable remainder
trust is distributed to the recipient and
90 percent of the QBI is retained by the
trust, 10 percent of the W–2 wages and
UBIA of qualified property is allocated
and reported to the recipient and 90
percent of the W–2 wages and UBIA of
qualified property is treated as retained
by the trust. However, any W–2 wages
retained by the trust cannot be used to
compute W–2 wages in a subsequent
taxable year for section 199A purposes.
Any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or
qualified PTP income of the trust that is
unrelated business taxable income is
subject to excise tax and that tax must
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
38068
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
be allocated to the corpus of the trust
under § 1.664–1(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. The provisions
of paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this section
apply to taxable years beginning after
August 24, 2020. Taxpayers may choose
to apply the rules in paragraph (d)(3)(iii)
of this section for taxable years
beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently
apply the rules in paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of
this section for each such year.
(iv) Charitable remainder trusts. The
provisions of paragraph (d)(3)(v) of this
section apply to taxable years beginning
after August 24, 2020. Taxpayers may
choose to apply the rules in paragraph
(d) of this section for taxable years
beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently
apply the rules in paragraph (d)(3)(v) of
this section for each such year.
Sunita Lough,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: May 12, 2020.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2020–11832 Filed 6–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0082]
RIN 1625–AA08; AA00
Special Local Regulations and Safety
Zones; Coast Guard Sector Long
Island Sound Annual and Recurring
Safety Zone and Special Local
Regulation Update
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is modifying
the special local regulations and annual
recurring marine events and safety
zones regulations for firework displays
and swim events in the Coast Guard
Sector Long Island Sound Captain of the
Port Zone. When enforced, these special
local regulations and safety zones will
restrict vessels from transiting regulated
areas during certain annually recurring
events. The special local regulations and
safety zones are intended to expedite
public notification and ensure the
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
protection of the maritime public and
event participants from the hazards
associated with certain marine events.
DATES: This rule is effective July 27,
2020.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2020–
0082 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Marine Science Technician 2nd
Class Melanie Hughes, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Long
Island Sound; telephone (203) 468–
4583; email Melanie.A.Hughes1@
uscg.mil.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Swim events, fireworks displays, and
marine events are held on an annual
recurring basis on the navigable waters
within the Coast Guard Sector Long
Island Sound Captain of the Port (COTP)
Zone. The Coast Guard has established
special local regulations and safety
zones for some of these annual recurring
events on a case by case basis to ensure
the protection of the maritime public
and event participants from potential
hazards. In the past, the Coast Guard has
not received public comments or
concerns regarding the impact to
waterway traffic from regulations
associated with these annually recurring
events. Events were either added or
deleted to the table of annual events
based on their likelihood to recur in
subsequent years. Additionally, minor
changes to existing events such as
position, date, or title, were made to
ensure the accuracy of event details.
On April 21, 2020, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Special Local
Regulations and Safety Zones; Coast
Guard Sector Long Island Sound Annual
and Recurring Safety Zone and Special
Local Regulation Update (85 FR 22049).
There we stated why we issued the
NPRM and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action. During the
comment period that ended on May 21,
2020, we received five comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard issues this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
COTP Sector Long Island Sound is
amending 33 CFR 100.100 Special Local
Regulations; Regattas and Boat Races in
the Coast Guard Sector Long Island
Sound Captain of the Port Zone, Table
to § 100.100 and 33 CFR 165.151 Safety
Zones; Fireworks Displays, Air Shows,
and Swim Events in the Captain of the
Port Long Island Sound Zone, Table to
§ 165.151.
The marine events listed therein
include air shows, fireworks displays,
and other marine related events
requiring a limited access area
restricting vessel traffic for safety
purposes. The amendments to the tables
will more accurately reflect the dates of
marine events based on historical
occurrences.
The rule applies to the annual
recurring events listed in the Table to
100.100 and Table 165.151 in 33 CFR.
The tables provide the event name and
the locations of the events. Notifications
will be made to the local maritime
community through all appropriate
means such as Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners well
in advance of the events. If the event
does not have a date listed, then exact
dates and times of the enforcement
period will be announced through a
Notice of Enforcement in the Federal
Register.
This rule expands date ranges for
marine events listed in 33 CFR parts 100
and 165 with the goal of significantly
reducing the administrative burden on
personnel. This rule is also removes
four marine events from 33 CFR
165.151.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received five
comments on our NPRM published
April 21, 2020. There are no changes in
the regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
Two comments were general
questions regarding the marking of
fireworks safety zones. This rule
expands the date ranges for events that
are published in 33 CFR parts 100 and
165. In past years, some of these events
fell outside the date range published in
the CFR. In those circumstances, the
Coast Guard would have to publish a
temporary rule in the Federal Register
with the revised date. Making these
changes will better align the date ranges
with the events and will also reduce the
Coast Guard’s administrative burden
associated with publishing a temporary
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 123 (Thursday, June 25, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38060-38068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11832]
[[Page 38060]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9899]
RIN 1545-BP12
Qualified Business Income Deduction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations concerning the
deduction for qualified business income (QBI) under section 199A of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The regulations will affect certain
individuals, partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates. The
regulations provide guidance on the treatment of previously suspended
losses included in qualified business income. The regulations also
provide guidance on the determination of the section 199A deduction for
taxpayers that hold interests in regulated investment companies, split-
interest trusts, and charitable remainder trusts.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on August 24, 2020.
Applicability Dates: These regulations apply to taxable years
beginning after August 24, 2020. Pursuant to section 7805(b)(7),
taxpayers may choose to apply the amendments to Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3 and
1.199A-6 set forth in this Treasury decision to taxable years beginning
on or before August 24, 2020. Alternatively, taxpayers who chose to
rely on the February 2019 Proposed Regulations for taxable years
beginning on or before August 24, 2020 may continue to do so for such
years. However, taxpayers who choose to apply any section of these
regulations or continue to rely on any section of the February 2019
Proposed Regulations for taxable years beginning on or before August
24, 2020 must follow the rules of the applicable section in a
consistent manner for each such year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning Sec. 1.199A-3(d), Michael
Y. Chin or Steven Harrison at (202) 317-6842; concerning Sec. Sec.
1.199A-3(b) and 1.199A-6, Vishal R. Amin or Sonia Kothari at (202) 317-
6850 or Robert D. Alinsky or Margaret Burow at (202) 317-5279.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26
CFR part 1) under section 199A of the Code.
Section 199A was enacted on December 22, 2017, by section 11011 of
Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act (TCJA), and was amended on March 23, 2018, retroactively
to January 1, 2018, by section 101 of Division T of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2018, Public Law 115-141, 132 Stat. 348 (2018 Act).
Section 199A applies to taxable years beginning after 2017 and before
2026.
Section 199A provides a deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI from a
U.S. trade or business operated as a sole proprietorship or through a
partnership, S corporation, trust, or estate (section 199A deduction).
The section 199A deduction may be taken by individuals and by some
trusts and estates. A section 199A deduction is not available for wage
income or for income earned by a C corporation (as defined in section
1361(a)(2)). If the taxpayer's taxable income exceeds the statutorily
defined amount in section 199A(e)(2) (threshold amount), the taxpayer's
section 199A deduction may be limited based on (i) the type of trade or
business conducted, (ii) the amount of W-2 wages paid with respect to
the trade or business (W-2 wages), and/or (iii) the unadjusted basis
immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property held for use
in the trade or business (UBIA of qualified property). These statutory
limitations are subject to phase-in rules in section 199A(b)(3)(B)
based upon taxable income above the threshold amount (phase-in rules).
Section 199A also provides individuals and some trusts and estates,
but not corporations, a deduction of up to 20 percent of their combined
qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified
publicly traded partnership (PTP) income, including qualified REIT
dividends and qualified PTP income earned through passthrough entities.
This component of the section 199A deduction is not limited by W-2
wages or UBIA of qualified property.
Overall, the section 199A deduction is the lesser of (1) the sum of
the combined QBI and qualified REIT and PTP components described in the
prior two paragraphs or (2) an amount equal to 20 percent of the excess
(if any) of the taxpayer's taxable income for the taxable year over the
taxpayer's net capital gain for the taxable year.
Additionally, section 199A(g) provides that specified agricultural
or horticultural cooperatives may claim a special entity-level
deduction that is substantially similar to the domestic production
activities deduction under former section 199.
The statute expressly grants the Secretary of the Treasury or his
delegate (Secretary) authority to prescribe such regulations as are
necessary to carry out the purposes of section 199A (section
199A(f)(4)), and provides specific grants of authority with respect to
certain issues including: The treatment of acquisitions, dispositions,
and short taxable years (section 199A(b)(5)); certain payments to
partners for services rendered in a non-partner capacity (section
199A(c)(4)(C)); the allocation of W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified
property (section 199A(f)(1)(A)(iii)); restricting the allocation of
items and wages under section 199A and such reporting requirements as
the Secretary determines appropriate (section 199A(f)(4)(A)); the
application of section 199A in the case of tiered entities (section
199A(f)(4)(B)); preventing the manipulation of the depreciable period
of qualified property using transactions between related parties
(section 199A(h)(1)); and determining the UBIA of qualified property
acquired in like-kind exchanges or involuntary conversions (section
199A(h)(2)).
The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS
published final regulations (TD 9847) interpreting section 199A on
February 8, 2019 (February 2019 Final Regulations) in the Federal
Register (84 FR 2952). Along with the publication of the February 2019
Final Regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG 134652-18) in the Federal Register
(84 FR 3015) providing additional guidance under section 199A relating
to the treatment of previously suspended losses included in qualified
business income and determining the section 199A deduction for
taxpayers that hold interests in regulated investment companies, split-
interest trusts, and charitable remainder trusts (February 2019
Proposed Regulations). No public hearing on the February 2019 Proposed
Regulations was requested or held. After full consideration of the
comments received on the February 2019 Proposed Regulations, this
Treasury decision adopts the proposed regulations with clarifying
changes and additional modifications in response to comments as
described in the Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions.
Comments on issues related to the February 2019 Proposed Regulations
that are beyond the scope of these final regulations are not discussed
[[Page 38061]]
in this preamble, but may be addressed in future guidance.
The Treasury Department and the IRS also received comments on the
February 2019 Final Regulations. The Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to study the issues raised in those comments and may address
them in future guidance.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
These final regulations contain amendments to two substantive
sections of the February 2019 Final Regulations, Sec. Sec. 1.199A-3
and 1.199A-6, each of which provides rules relevant to the calculation
of the section 199A deduction. The amendments to Sec. 1.199A-
3(b)(1)(iv) provide additional rules and clarification on the treatment
of suspended losses. Section 1.199A-3(d) provides guidance that allows
a shareholder in a regulated investment company (RIC) within the
meaning of section 851(a) to take a section 199A deduction with respect
to certain income of, or distributions from, the RIC. The amendments to
Sec. 1.199A-6(d) include additional rules related to trusts and
estates under section 663 of the Code. This Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions describes each of the final rules contained in
this document in turn.
I. Treatment of Previously Suspended Losses Included in QBI
Section 1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv) of the February 2019 Final Regulations
provides that previously disallowed losses or deductions (including
under sections 465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d)) allowed in the taxable
year are generally taken into account for purposes of computing QBI,
except to the extent the losses or deductions were disallowed,
suspended, limited, or carried over from taxable years ending before
January 1, 2018. These losses are used, for purposes of section 199A,
in order from the oldest to the most recent on a first-in, first-out
(FIFO) basis. The February 2019 Proposed Regulations expanded this rule
to provide that previously disallowed losses or deductions are treated
as losses from a separate trade or business in the year they are taken
into account in determining taxable income. Further, the attributes of
the previously disallowed losses or deductions, including whether they
are attributable to a trade or business and whether they would
otherwise be included in QBI, are determined in the year the loss or
deduction is incurred.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware that taxpayers and
practitioners have questioned whether the exclusion of section 461(l)
from the list of loss disallowance and suspension provisions in Sec.
1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv) means that losses disallowed under section 461(l)
are not considered QBI in the year the losses are taken into account in
determining taxable income. Generally, for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020, and before January 1, 2026, section 461(l)
disallows an excess business loss for taxpayers other than C
corporations. See section 2304(a) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law 116-136, 134 Stat. 281
(2020). Any disallowed excess business loss is treated as a net
operating loss carryover for the taxable year for purposes of
determining any net operating loss carryover under section 172(b) in
subsequent taxable years. See section 172(b) as amended by section
2304(b) of the CARES Act.
The list of loss disallowance and suspension provisions in Sec.
1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv) is not exhaustive. If a loss or deduction that would
otherwise be included in QBI under the rules of Sec. 1.199A-3 is
disallowed or suspended under any provision of the Code, such loss or
deduction is generally taken into account for purposes of computing QBI
in the year it is taken into account in determining taxable income.
These final regulations clarify this point by amending Sec. 1.199A-
3(b)(1)(iv)(A) to specifically reference excess business losses
disallowed by section 461(l) and treated as a net operating loss
carryover for the taxable year for purposes of determining any net
operating loss carryover under section 172(b) in subsequent taxable
years.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are also aware that taxpayers
and practitioners have questioned how the phase-in rules apply when a
taxpayer has a suspended or disallowed loss or deduction from a
Specified Service Trade or Business (SSTB). Whether an individual has
taxable income at or below the threshold amount, within the phase-in
range, or in excess of the phase-in range, the determination of whether
a suspended or disallowed loss or deduction attributable to an SSTB is
from a qualified trade or business is made in the year the loss or
deduction is incurred. If the individual's taxable income is at or
below the threshold amount in the year the loss or deduction is
incurred, and such loss would otherwise be QBI, the entire disallowed
loss or deduction is treated as QBI from a separate trade or business
in the subsequent taxable year in which the loss is allowed. If the
individual's taxable income is within the phase-in range, then only the
applicable percentage of the disallowed loss or deduction is taken into
account in the subsequent taxable year. If the individual's taxable
income exceeds the phase-in range, none of the disallowed loss or
deduction will be taken into account in the subsequent taxable year.
These final regulations clarify this treatment and provide an example
of a taxpayer with taxable income in the phase-in range and a suspended
loss from an SSTB.
The Treasury Department and the IRS received one comment requesting
further clarification of the FIFO ordering rule. The commenter
questioned whether the FIFO ordering rule should continue to apply for
losses incurred in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
The commenter also asked for clarification regarding whether the rule
applied on an annual basis such that each year is tracked separately
and FIFO is applied for losses that are incurred each year or whether
FIFO applies such that there is a single bucket of losses no matter the
year incurred. The commenter recommended additional supporting
worksheets or other forms to assist in the calculation, particularly if
every year must be tracked individually.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that in order
to properly calculate the deduction, it is necessary for the FIFO rule
to apply for losses incurred in taxable years beginning on or after
January 1, 2018, and that the rule must be applied on an annual basis
by category (i.e., sections 465, 469, etc.). Accordingly, these final
regulations retain the FIFO rule as proposed. The Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to consider whether new worksheets or forms are
necessary to assist in the calculation.
The February 2019 Proposed Regulations also provide that if a loss
or deduction is partially disallowed, QBI in the year of disallowance
must be reduced proportionately. These final regulations retain this
rule, but with slight modifications, and provide examples.
II. RICs With Interests in REITs and PTPs
If a RIC has certain items of income or gain, subchapter M of
chapter 1 of the Code provides rules under which a RIC may pay
dividends that a shareholder in the RIC may treat in the same manner
(or a similar manner) as the shareholder would treat the underlying
item of income or gain if the shareholder realized it directly. Like
the preamble to the February 2019 Proposed Regulations, this preamble
refers to this treatment as ``conduit treatment.'' The
[[Page 38062]]
February 2019 Proposed Regulations include rules providing conduit
treatment for qualified REIT dividends earned by a RIC. The Treasury
Department and the IRS received one comment requesting that the
proposed rules providing this treatment be finalized. These final
regulations adopt those proposed rules.
The February 2019 Proposed Regulations do not provide conduit
treatment for qualified PTP income earned by a RIC. Instead, the
preamble to the February 2019 Proposed Regulations requested comments
on issues relating to whether and how to provide conduit treatment for
qualified PTP income, including the treatment of items attributable to
an SSTB of a PTP allocated to a RIC and the treatment of losses of a
PTP allocated to a RIC. The Treasury Department and the IRS received
several comments addressing conduit treatment for qualified PTP income
earned by a RIC. Two commenters recommended that conduit treatment be
extended to qualified PTP income earned by RICs, excluding any items
attributable to SSTBs. Both commenters suggested that any losses
allocated to RICs from PTPs could be carried forward by the RIC for
purposes of section 199A. Another commenter suggested methods by which
RICs could track, and pay dividends attributable to, an SSTB of a PTP.
Another commenter suggested that RICs, particularly business
development companies that conduct lending activities, be allowed to
pay ``QBI dividends'' to their shareholders in cases where the RIC had
income from an activity that would generate QBI if conducted by a
partnership or an S corporation.
The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to consider those
comments and evaluate whether it is appropriate and practicable to
provide conduit treatment for qualified PTP income or other income of a
RIC to further the purposes of section 199A(b)(1)(B).
III. Special Rules for Trusts and Estates
Section 1.199A-6 provides guidance that certain specified entities
(including trusts and estates) might need to compute the section 199A
deduction of the entity and/or passthrough information to each of its
owners or beneficiaries, so they may compute their section 199A
deduction. Section 1.199A-6(d) contains special rules for applying
section 199A to trusts and decedents' estates.
Under Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(ii), the QBI, W-2 wages, UBIA of
qualified property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income
of a trust or estate are allocated to each beneficiary and to the trust
or estate based on the relative proportion of the trust's or estate's
distributable net income (DNI) for the taxable year that is distributed
or required to be distributed to the beneficiary or is retained by the
trust or estate. Proposed Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(iii) further provides
that a trust described in section 663(c) with substantially separate
and independent shares for multiple beneficiaries will be treated as a
single trust for purposes of determining whether the taxable income of
the trust exceeds the threshold amount.
The Treasury Department and the IRS received comments requesting
guidance on the interaction between section 199A and the separate share
rule in section 663(c). In particular, the commenters requested
guidance on the allocation of QBI, W-2 wages, UBIA of qualified
property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income of a trust
or estate to beneficiaries and the trust or estate based on DNI. The
commenters noted differences in the allocation of overall DNI to
beneficiaries of a trust or estate under sections 643(a) and 663(c) and
asked about the allocation of these items in circumstances involving
tax-exempt income and charitable deductions, as well as situations in
which no DNI is allocated to a beneficiary. The commenters asserted
that under Sec. 1.663(c)-2(b)(5), deductions, including the section
199A deduction, attributable solely to one share are not available to
any other separate share of the trust or estate. The commenters
recommended that the allocation of QBI, W-2 wages, UBIA of qualified
property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income of a trust
or estate should be based on the portion of such items that are
attributable to the income of each separate share. In addition, the
commenters recommended that Sec. 1.663(c)-2(b) be amended to clarify
how gross income not included in accounting income is allocated among
separate shares.
After considering the comments and studying the separate share rule
in more depth, the Treasury Department and the IRS have clarified the
separate share rule in these final regulations to provide that, in the
case of a trust or estate described in section 663(c) with
substantially separate and independent shares for multiple
beneficiaries, the trust or estate will be treated as a single trust or
estate not only for purposes of determining whether the taxable income
of the trust or estate exceeds the threshold amount but also in
determining taxable income, net capital gain, net QBI, W-2 wages, UBIA
of qualified property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP
income for each trade or business of the trust or estate, and computing
the W-2 wage and UBIA of qualified property limitations. Further
clarification of the separate share rule under section 663 is beyond
the scope of these final regulations, but the Treasury Department and
the IRS intend to continue to study the issues raised by the
commenters. Accordingly, these final regulations provide that the
allocation of these items to the separate shares of a trust or estate
described in section 663(c) will be governed by the rules under section
663(e) and such guidance as may be published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)).
Section 1.199A-6(d)(3)(v) of the February 2019 Proposed Regulations
provides rules under which the taxable recipient of a unitrust or
annuity amount from a charitable remainder trust described in section
664 can take into account QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified
PTP income for purpose of determining the recipient's section 199A
deduction. The Treasury Department and the IRS received no comments on
these rules and these final regulations adopt these rules as proposed.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13771, 13563, and 12866 direct agencies to assess
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
These final regulations have been designated by the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) as subject to review under Executive Order 12866
pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the
Treasury Department and OMB regarding review of tax regulations. OIRA
has designated this final regulation as economically significant under
section 1(c) of the Memorandum of Agreement. Accordingly, OIRA has
reviewed these final regulations. For purposes of
[[Page 38063]]
Executive Order 13771 this rule is regulatory.
A. Background and Need for Final Regulations
Section 199A of the TCJA provides taxpayers other than corporations
a deduction of up to 20 percent of QBI from domestic businesses plus up
to 20 percent of their combined qualified REIT dividends and qualified
publicly traded partnership income. Because the section 199A deduction
had not previously been available, regulations are necessary to provide
taxpayers with computational and definitional guidance regarding the
application of section 199A.
The Treasury Department and the IRS previously issued the February
2019 Final Regulations regarding various items related to the
calculation of the section 199A deduction. However, the February 2019
Final Regulations did not address treatment of REIT dividends received
by RICs. Because RICs are taxed as C corporations, dividends paid by
RICs are generally ineligible for the section 199A deduction under the
statute, which excludes C corporation income from the definition of
QBI. However, the statute also directs the Secretary to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of section 199A,
including regulations for its application in the case of tiered
entities. These final regulations establish rules under which RIC
dividends associated with qualified REIT dividends may be eligible for
a section 199A deduction.
In addition, these final regulations establish rules for the
treatment of previously suspended losses in calculation of QBI and
rules for applying section 199A to trusts and decedents' estates.
B. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
The analysis in this section compares these final regulations
(these regulations) to a no-action baseline reflecting anticipated
Federal income tax-related behavior in the absence of these
regulations.
2. Summary of Economic Effects
To assess the economic effects of these regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS considered the economic effects of (i) rules for
the treatment of previously suspended losses in calculation of QBI;
(ii) rules providing conduit treatment for qualified REIT dividends
earned by a RIC; and (iii) rules for applying section 199A to trusts
and decedents' estates.
Regarding items (i) and (iii): These regulations provide certainty
and clarity to taxpayers regarding terms and calculations necessary for
taxpayers to determine their section 199A deduction. In the absence of
this clarity, the likelihood would be exacerbated that different
taxpayers would hold different interpretations of the tax treatment of
previously suspended losses or the application of section 199A to
trusts and decedents' estates. These regulations help taxpayers to hold
more similar interpretations of the tax treatment of these items. In
general, overall economic performance is enhanced when individuals and
businesses face more uniform signals about tax treatment. Certainty and
clarity over tax treatment also reduce compliance costs for taxpayers.
The Treasury Department and the IRS do not project meaningful
changes in economic activity as a result of these provisions, relative
to the no-action baseline.
Regarding item (ii): These regulations provide that an individual
who is a shareholder of a RIC that has an ownership interest in a REIT
may, for section 199A purposes, treat certain dividends received from a
RIC in the same way the shareholder would treat dividends received
directly from the REIT. Specifically, under these regulations RIC
shareholders are generally eligible for the section 199A deduction on
their section 199A dividends. In the absence of these regulations,
dividends received from a RIC that has an ownership interest in a REIT
would not qualify for the section 199A deduction while dividends
received directly from that REIT would generally qualify for the
deduction. Thus, in the absence of these regulations, direct ownership
of REITs is tax-advantaged relative to indirect ownership of REITs
through RICs even though the underlying economic activity is similar.
As a general principle, overall economic performance is improved to
the extent that the tax consequences of investment through a financial
intermediary (such as a RIC) are equivalent to the tax consequences of
direct investment. In the absence of these regulations, a tax incentive
would arise for individuals to invest directly in REITs rather than
through RIC intermediaries. This would distort investment allocation
relative to a tax-neutral treatment of financial intermediaries,
leading investors to make decisions based on differential tax treatment
rather than purely based on the value of investments. In particular, it
would likely cause investors to hold less diversified portfolios.\1\
The Treasury Department and the IRS therefore project that, under these
regulations, individual investors seeking to invest in real estate
would in general hold more diversified portfolios relative to the no-
action baseline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ RICs include mutual funds, which facilitate the
diversification of an individual investor's financial portfolio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another economic loss that would likely arise in the absence of
these regulations is due to the costs of acquiring information. RICs,
including mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, simplify decision-
making for investors by finding, indexing, and vetting REITs. This is
an efficient market organization due to economies of scale in gathering
relevant information. In the absence of these regulations, individual
investors face substantial incentives to invest directly in REITs due
to asymmetric tax treatment, and face larger time costs to evaluate
REIT investment options than RICs. The same level of investment can be
achieved with substantially less resource use if research costs are
incurred by RICs rather than individual investors, and therefore this
rule will lead to more efficient resource use in making aggregate
investment decisions.
On the basis of these effects, the Treasury Department and the IRS
also project that these regulations will lead investors, on average, to
hold more real estate in their portfolios (relative to the no-action
baseline) and thus hold a smaller share of investment in other
industries.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that the economic
effects of these regulations will exceed $100 million per year relative
to the no-action baseline. The compliance costs alone are estimated to
be approximately $149 million (excluding any compliance cost savings),
as described in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of these analyses.
These compliance costs arise because the regulations require a RIC to
compute and report section 199A dividends to its shareholders in order
for them to benefit from the section 199A deduction on qualified REIT
dividends earned by the RIC. In some sense, these costs are optional
since RICs that do not pay section 199A dividends, either because they
do not receive qualified REIT dividends or because they choose not to
take on the additional record-keeping, avoid these compliance costs
entirely. Nonetheless, we expect that many RICs will choose to incur
the compliance costs to facilitate their shareholders' section 199A
deductions.
[[Page 38064]]
Though many RICs keep detailed records of their investment
portfolios, these regulations nonetheless create non-trivial
administrative costs for any RICs that wish to provide section 199A
dividends to their shareholders. However, this increase in compliance
costs may be accompanied by a decrease in compliance costs for REITs
who would otherwise see an influx of individual investors holding
direct interest in REITs. The Treasury Department and the IRS have not
estimated this compliance cost savings.
Beyond any potential compliance cost reduction, several other
economic benefits result from these regulations, including those
flowing from enhanced financial diversification and reduced
information-gathering costs. While we have not attempted to quantify
the economic benefits of these effects, we project that they are likely
to be substantial as well. We estimate that up to $6.0 billion in REIT
dividends accrued to individual taxpayers through RICs in taxable year
2018. Of this, $5.6 billion went to taxpayers with positive taxable
income, who thus could potentially use section 199A deductions. This
corresponds to aggregate potential deductions of up to $1.1 billion (20
percent of $5.6 billion). Under an assumption that the effective tax
rate for these investors was 30 percent, then under the no-action
baseline taxpayers would theoretically be willing to incur up to $336
million in economic costs in order to receive the section 199A
deduction on their income derived from REITs that currently flows
through RICs. Thus, relative to the no-action baseline, these
regulations provide up to $336 million in annual benefits by allowing
investors to avoid these costs.
Another way of gauging the potential economic benefits from these
regulations is to consider them relative to the investment returns
currently flowing to REIT investors through RICs. If RIC intermediaries
provide economic benefits (relative to direct ownership of REITs) equal
to five percent of investment returns, then the benefits of these
regulations relative to the no-action baseline would be up to $280
million (five percent of $5.6 billion), assuming the same levels of
economic activity as in taxable year 2018.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that more taxpayers
will claim the section 199A deduction under these regulations, reducing
government revenue relative to the no-action baseline. On its own, this
reduction in revenue itself would affect the United States economy.
Either the deficit would increase or other taxes would need to be
raised. This effect should be weighed against the enhanced efficiency
arising from the regulations. We have not attempted to quantify these
effects. Similarly, we have not attempted to quantify the efficiency
effects of the shift in investment away from other industries and
toward real estate that may result from these regulations, relative to
the no-action baseline.
3. Number of Affected Taxpayers
The Treasury Department and the IRS estimate that the rules
regarding RICs as financial intermediaries for REIT investors will
affect up to 2,500 RICs and up to 4.8 million individual tax units.
These estimates are derived from the universe of taxable year 2018
administrative tax records. For taxable year 2018, taxpayers were able
to rely on the February 2019 Proposed Regulations, which meant that
RICs could provide conduit treatment for REIT dividends for section
199A purposes (as in these regulations). Accordingly, 2,500 entities
that did not file Form 1120-REIT issued at least one Form 1099-DIV with
section 199A dividends. For comparison, approximately 1,400 REITs
issued at least one Form 1099-DIV with section 199A dividends.
Approximately 5.2 million tax units received at least one Form 1099-DIV
with section 199A dividends from the 2,500 non-REIT entities. Among
these tax units, roughly 4.8 million had positive taxable income and
therefore could have potentially benefited from the section 199A
deduction.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For this analysis, entities are proxied by Employer
Identification Numbers (EINs). EINs are tax identification numbers
that do not perfectly align with the relevant entity concept. In
particular, it is possible that one REIT may operate using multiple
EINs, one to file its Form 1120-REIT and one to issue its Form 1099-
DIVs. In this case, we will misclassify the 1099-issuing EIN as a
non-REIT. Therefore the estimates for the number of RICs, and the
individuals receiving section 199A dividends from RICs, are upper
bounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The collection of information contained in these regulations will
be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control
number 1545-0110. The collection of information required by this
regulation is in Sec. 1.199A-3. The collection of information in Sec.
1.199A-3 is required for RICs that choose to report information
regarding qualified REIT dividends to their shareholders. It is
necessary to report the information to the IRS and relevant taxpayers
to ensure that taxpayers properly report in accordance with the rules
of these regulations the correct amount of deduction under section
199A. The collection of information in Sec. 1.199A-3 is satisfied by
providing information about section 199A dividends as Form 1099-DIV
(OMB control number 1545-0110) and its instructions may prescribe.
For purposes of the PRA, the reporting burden associated with Sec.
1.199A-3 will be reflected in the next revision to Form 1099-DIV. The
burden associated with the information collection in the regulation
represents 1.567 million hours and $149 million (2018 dollars) annually
to comply with the information collection requirement in the
regulation. These estimates capture both changes made by the TCJA and
those that arise out of these regulations. The burden hours estimate
was derived from IRS's legacy burden model and is discussed in further
detail on Form 1099-DIV. The hourly rate is derived from the IRS's
office of Research, Applied Analytics, and Statistics Business Taxpayer
Burden model that relates time and out-of-pocket costs of business tax
preparation, derived from survey data, to assets and receipts of
affected taxpayers along with other relevant variables, and converted
by the Treasury Department to $2017. The Treasury Department and the
IRS request comment on all aspects of information collection burdens
related to these regulations. Proposed revisions (if any) to these
forms that reflect the information collections contained in these
regulations will be made available for public comment at www.irs.gov/draftforms and will not be finalized until after the forms have been
approved by OMB under the PRA.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
OMB control number.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6), it is hereby certified that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The final rule is not likely to affect a substantial number of
small entities. Section 1.199A-3 applies to RICs that pay section 199A
dividends. Congress created RICs to give small investors access to the
professional management and asset diversification that are available
only with very large investment portfolios. To insure appropriate non-
tax regulation of these substantial investment portfolios,
[[Page 38065]]
subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Code requires that such RICs must be
eligible for registration, and must actually be registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of
1940. There are some small businesses that are publicly traded, but
most publicly traded businesses are not small entities as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Thus, the Treasury Department and IRS
expect that most RICs are not small entities for purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and
the IRS have determined that this Treasury decision will not affect a
substantial number of small entities. Finally, no comments regarding
the economic impact of these regulations on small entities were
received.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed
rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business and no comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Michael Y. Chin and
Steven Harrison, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products) and Robert Alinsky, Vishal Amin, Margaret
Burow, and Sonia Kothari, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries). However, other personnel from
the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
Section 1.199A-3 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(c)(4)(C) and
(f)(4).
* * * * *
Section 1.199A-6 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 199A(f)(1)(B) and
(f)(4).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.199A-0 is amended by:
0
1. Adding entries for Sec. 1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv)(A) through (C),
(b)(1)(iv)(C)(1) and (2), (b)(1)(iv)(D), (d), (d)(1) and (2), (d)(2)(i)
through (iii), (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), (d)(3), (d)(3)(i) through (v),
(d)(4), (d)(4)(i) and (ii), (d)(5), and (e)(2)(iii) and (iv).
0
2. Adding entries for Sec. 1.199A-6(d)(3)(iii) and (v) and (e)(2)(iii)
and (iv).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-0 Table of contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.199A-3 Qualified business income, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) In general.
(B) Partial allowance.
(C) Attributes of disallowed loss determined in year loss is
incurred.
(1) In general.
(2) Specified service trades or businesses.
(D) Examples.
* * * * *
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a regulated investment
company.
(1) In general.
(2) Definition of section 199A dividend.
(i) In general.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess reported amounts.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported amount.
(A) In general.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year RICs.
(3) Definitions.
(i) Reported section 199A dividend amount.
(ii) Excess reported amount.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount.
(iv) Post-December reported amount.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A dividends by shareholders.
(i) In general.
(ii) Holding period.
(5) Example.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Previously disallowed losses.
(iv) Section 199A dividends.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.199A-6 Relevant passthrough entities (RPEs), publicly traded
partnerships (PTPs), trusts, and estates.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
* * * * *
(v) Charitable remainder trusts.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Separate shares.
(iv) Charitable remainder trusts.
0
Par. 3. Section 1.199A-3 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv)
and adding paragraphs (d) and (e)(2)(iii) and (iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-3 Qualified business income, qualified REIT dividends,
and qualified PTP income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Previously disallowed losses--(A) In general. Previously
disallowed losses or deductions allowed in the taxable year generally
are taken into account for purposes of computing QBI to the extent the
disallowed loss or deduction is otherwise allowed by section 199A.
These previously disallowed losses include, but are not limited to
losses disallowed under sections 461(l), 465, 469, 704(d), and 1366(d).
These losses are used for purposes of section 199A and this section in
order from the oldest to the most recent on a first-in, first-out
(FIFO) basis and are treated as losses from a separate trade or
business. To the extent such losses relate to a PTP, they must be
treated as a loss from a separate PTP in the taxable year the losses
are taken into account. However, losses or deductions that were
disallowed, suspended, limited, or carried over from taxable years
ending before January 1, 2018 (including under sections 465, 469,
704(d), and 1366(d)), are not taken into account in a subsequent
taxable year for purposes of computing QBI.
(B) Partial allowance. If a loss or deduction attributable to a
trade or business is only partially allowed during the taxable year in
which incurred, only the portion of the allowed loss or deduction that
is attributable to QBI will be considered in determining QBI from the
trade or business in the year the loss or deduction is incurred. The
portion of the allowed loss or deduction attributable to QBI is
determined by multiplying the total amount of the allowed loss by a
fraction, the numerator of which is the portion of the total loss
incurred during the taxable year that is attributable to QBI and the
denominator of which is the amount of the total loss incurred during
the taxable year.
(C) Attributes of disallowed loss or deduction determined in year
loss is incurred--(1) In general. Whether a disallowed loss or
deduction is attributable to a trade or business, and otherwise meets
the requirements of this section, is determined in the year the loss is
incurred.
(2) Specified service trades or businesses. If a disallowed loss or
deduction is attributable to a specified service trade or business
(SSTB), whether an individual has taxable income at or below the
threshold amount as defined in Sec. 1.199A-1(b)(12), within the phase-
in range as defined in
[[Page 38066]]
Sec. 1.199A-1(b)(4), or in excess of the phase-in range is determined
in the year the loss or deduction is incurred. If the individual's
taxable income is at or below the threshold amount in the year the loss
or deduction is incurred, the entire disallowed loss or deduction must
be taken into account when applying paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(A) of this
section. If the individual's taxable income is within the phase-in
range, then only the applicable percentage, as defined in Sec. 1.199A-
1(b)(2), of the disallowed loss or deduction is taken into account when
applying paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(A) of this section. If the individual's
taxable income exceeds the phase-in range, none of the disallowed loss
or deduction will be taken into account in applying paragraph
(b)(1)(iv)(A) of this section.
(D) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
this paragraph (b)(1)(iv).
(1) Example 1. A is an unmarried individual and a 50% owner of
LLC, an entity classified as a partnership for Federal income tax
purposes. In 2018, A's allocable share of loss from LLC is $100,000
of which $80,000 is negative QBI. Under section 465, $60,000 of the
allocable loss is allowed in determining A's taxable income. A has
no other previously disallowed losses under section 465 or any other
provision of the Code for 2018 or prior years. Because 80% of A's
allocable loss is attributable to QBI ($80,000/$100,000), A will
reduce the amount A takes into account in determining QBI
proportionately. Thus, A will include $48,000 of the allowed loss in
negative QBI (80% of $60,000) in determining A's section 199A
deduction in 2018. The remaining $32,000 of negative QBI is treated
as negative QBI from a separate trade or business for purposes of
computing the section 199A deduction in the year the loss is taken
into account in determining taxable income as described in Sec.
1.199A-1(d)(2)(iii).
(2) Example 2. B is an unmarried individual and a 50% owner of
LLC, an entity classified as a partnership for Federal income tax
purposes. After allowable deductions other than the section 199A
deduction, B's taxable income for 2018 is $177,500. In 2018, LLC has
a single trade or business that is an SSTB. B's allocable share of
loss is $100,000, all of which is suspended under section 465. B's
allocable share of negative QBI is also $100,000. B has no other
previously disallowed losses under section 465 or any other
provision of the Code for 2018 or prior years. Because the entire
loss is suspended, none of the negative QBI is taken into account in
determining B's section 199A deduction for 2018. Further, because
the negative QBI is from an SSTB and B's taxable income before the
section 199A deduction is within the phase-in range, B must
determine the applicable percentage of the negative QBI that must be
taken into account in the year that the loss is taken into account
in determining taxable income. B's applicable percentage is 100%
reduced by 40% (the percentage equal to the amount that B's taxable
income for the taxable year exceeds B's threshold amount ($20,000 =
$177,500-$157,500) over $50,000). Thus, B's applicable percentage is
60%. Therefore, B will have $60,000 (60% of $100,000) of negative
QBI from a separate trade or business to be applied proportionately
to QBI in the year(s) the loss is taken into account in determining
taxable income, regardless of the amount of taxable income and how
rules under Sec. 1.199A-5 apply in the year the loss is taken into
account in determining taxable income.
* * * * *
(d) Section 199A dividends paid by a regulated investment company--
(1) In general. If section 852(b) applies to a regulated investment
company (RIC) for a taxable year, the RIC may pay section 199A
dividends, as defined in this paragraph (d).
(2) Definition of section 199A dividend--(i) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section, a section 199A
dividend is any dividend or part of such a dividend that a RIC pays to
its shareholders and reports as a section 199A dividend in written
statements furnished to its shareholders.
(ii) Reduction in the case of excess reported amounts. If the
aggregate reported amount with respect to the RIC for any taxable year
exceeds the RIC's qualified REIT dividend income for the taxable year,
then a section 199A dividend is equal to--
(A) The reported section 199A dividend amount; reduced by
(B) The excess reported amount that is allocable to that reported
section 199A dividend amount.
(iii) Allocation of excess reported amount--(A) In general. Except
as provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, the excess
reported amount (if any) that is allocable to the reported section 199A
dividend amount is that portion of the excess reported amount that
bears the same ratio to the excess reported amount as the reported
section 199A dividend amount bears to the aggregate reported amount.
(B) Special rule for noncalendar-year RICs. In the case of any
taxable year that does not begin and end in the same calendar year, if
the post-December reported amount equals or exceeds the excess reported
amount for that taxable year, paragraph (d)(2)(iii)(A) of this section
is applied by substituting ``post-December reported amount'' for
``aggregate reported amount,'' and no excess reported amount is
allocated to any dividend paid on or before December 31 of that taxable
year.
(3) Definitions. For purposes of paragraph (d) of this section--
(i) Reported section 199A dividend amount. The term reported
section 199A dividend amount means the amount of a dividend
distribution reported to the RIC's shareholders under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section as a section 199A dividend.
(ii) Excess reported amount. The term excess reported amount means
the excess of the aggregate reported amount over the RIC's qualified
REIT dividend income for the taxable year.
(iii) Aggregate reported amount. The term aggregate reported amount
means the aggregate amount of dividends reported by the RIC under
paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section as section 199A dividends for the
taxable year (including section 199A dividends paid after the close of
the taxable year and described in section 855).
(iv) Post-December reported amount. The term post-December reported
amount means the aggregate reported amount determined by taking into
account only dividends paid after December 31 of the taxable year.
(v) Qualified REIT dividend income. The term qualified REIT
dividend income means, with respect to a taxable year of a RIC, the
excess of the amount of qualified REIT dividends, as defined in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, includible in the RIC's taxable
income for the taxable year over the amount of the RIC's deductions
that are properly allocable to such income.
(4) Treatment of section 199A dividends by shareholders--(i) In
general. For purposes of section 199A, and Sec. Sec. 1.199A-1 through
1.199A-6, a section 199A dividend is treated by a taxpayer that
receives the section 199A dividend as a qualified REIT dividend.
(ii) Holding period. Paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section does not
apply to any dividend received with respect to a share of RIC stock--
(A) That is held by the shareholder for 45 days or less (taking
into account the principles of section 246(c)(3) and (4)) during the
91-day period beginning on the date which is 45 days before the date on
which the share becomes ex-dividend with respect to such dividend; or
(B) To the extent that the shareholder is under an obligation
(whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related
payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related
property.
(5) Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of
this paragraph (d).
(i) X is a corporation that has elected to be a RIC. For its
taxable year ending March 31, 2021, X has $25,000x of net long-term
capital gain, $60,000x of qualified dividend income,
[[Page 38067]]
$25,000x of taxable interest income, $15,000x of net short-term
capital gain, and $25,000x of qualified REIT dividends. X has
$15,000x of deductible expenses, of which $3,000x is allocable to
the qualified REIT dividends. On December 31, 2020, X pays a single
dividend of $100,000x, and reports $20,000x of the dividend as a
section 199A dividend in written statements to its shareholders. On
March 31, 2021, X pays a dividend of $35,000x, and reports $5,000x
of the dividend as a section 199A dividend in written statements to
its shareholders.
(ii) X's qualified REIT dividend income under paragraph
(d)(3)(v) of this section is $22,000x, which is the excess of X's
$25,000x of qualified REIT dividends over $3,000x in allocable
expenses. The reported section 199A dividend amounts for the
December 31, 2020, and March 31, 2021, distributions are $20,000x
and $5,000x, respectively. For the taxable year ending March 31,
2021, the aggregate reported amount of section 199A dividends is
$25,000x, and the excess reported amount under paragraph (d)(3)(ii)
of this section is $3,000x. Because X is a noncalendar-year RIC and
the post-December reported amount of $5,000x exceeds the excess
reported amount of $3,000x, the entire excess reported amount is
allocated under paragraphs (d)(2)(iii)(A) and (B) of this section to
the reported section 199A dividend amount for the March 31, 2021,
distribution. No portion of the excess reported amount is allocated
to the reported section 199A dividend amount for the December 31,
2020, distribution. Thus, the section 199A dividend on March 31,
2021, is $2,000x, which is the reported section 199A dividend amount
of $5,000x reduced by the $3,000x of allocable excess reported
amount. The section 199A dividend on December 31, 2020, is the
$20,000x that X reports as a section 199A dividend.
(iii) Shareholder A, a United States person, receives a dividend
from X of $100x on December 31, 2020, of which $20x is reported as a
section 199A dividend. If A meets the holding period requirements in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with respect to the stock of X,
A treats $20x of the dividend from X as a qualified REIT dividend
for purposes of section 199A for A's 2020 taxable year.
(iv) A receives a dividend from X of $35x on March 31, 2021, of
which $5x is reported as a section 199A dividend. Only $2x of the
dividend is a section 199A dividend. If A meets the holding period
requirements in paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section with respect to
the stock of X, A may treat the $2x section 199A dividend as a
qualified REIT dividend for A's 2021 taxable year.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Previously disallowed losses. The provisions of paragraph
(b)(1)(iv) of this section apply to taxable years beginning after
August 24, 2020. Taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in paragraph
(b)(1)(iv) of this section for taxable years beginning on or before
August 24, 2020, so long as the taxpayers consistently apply the rules
in paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section for each such year.
(iv) Section 199A dividends. The provisions of paragraph (d) of
this section apply to taxable years beginning after August 24, 2020.
Taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in paragraph (d) of this
section for taxable years beginning on or before August 24, 2020, so
long as the taxpayers consistently apply the rules in paragraph (d) of
this section for each such year.
0
Par. 4. Section 1.199A-6 is amended by adding paragraphs (d)(3)(iii)
and (v) and (e)(2)(iii) and (iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.199A-6 Relevant passthrough entities (RPEs), publicly traded
partnerships (PTPs), trusts, and estates.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. In the case of a trust or estate described
in section 663(c) with substantially separate and independent shares
for multiple beneficiaries, such trust or estate will be treated as a
single trust or estate for purposes of determining whether the taxable
income of the trust or estate exceeds the threshold amount; determining
taxable income, net capital gain, net QBI, W-2 wages, UBIA of qualified
property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income for each
trade or business of the trust and estate; and computing the W-2 wage
and UBIA of qualified property limitations. The allocation of these
items to the separate shares of a trust or estate will be governed by
the rules under Sec. Sec. 1.663(c)-1 through 1.663(c)-5, as they may
be adjusted or clarified by publication in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
* * * * *
(v) Charitable remainder trusts. A charitable remainder trust
described in section 664 is not entitled to and does not calculate a
section 199A deduction, and the threshold amount described in section
199A(e)(2) does not apply to the trust. However, any taxable recipient
of a unitrust or annuity amount from the trust must determine and apply
the recipient's own threshold amount for purposes of section 199A
taking into account any annuity or unitrust amounts received from the
trust. A recipient of a unitrust or annuity amount from a trust may
take into account QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP
income for purposes of determining the recipient's section 199A
deduction for the taxable year to the extent that the unitrust or
annuity amount distributed to such recipient consists of such section
199A items under Sec. 1.664-1(d). For example, if a charitable
remainder trust has investment income of $500, qualified dividend
income of $200, and qualified REIT dividends of $1,000, and distributes
$1,000 to the recipient, the trust would be treated as having income in
two classes within the category of income, described in Sec. 1.664-
1(d)(1)(i)(a)(1), for purposes of Sec. 1.664-1(d)(1)(ii)(b). Because
the annuity amount first carries out income in the class subject to the
highest income tax rate, the entire annuity payment comes from the
class with the investment income and qualified REIT dividends. Thus,
the charitable remainder trust would be treated as distributing a
proportionate amount of the investment income ($500 / (1,000 + 500) *
1,000 = $333) and qualified REIT dividends ($1000 / (1,000 + 500) *
1000 = $667) because the investment income and qualified REIT dividends
are taxed at the same rate and within the same class, which is higher
than the rate of tax for the qualified dividend income in a separate
class. The charitable remainder trust in this example would not be
treated as distributing any of the qualified dividend income until it
distributed all the investment income and qualified REIT dividends
(more than $1,500 in total) to the recipient. To the extent that a
trust is treated as distributing QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or
qualified PTP income to more than one unitrust or annuity recipient in
the taxable year, the distribution of such income will be treated as
made to the recipients proportionately, based on their respective
shares of total QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income
distributed for that year. The trust allocates and reports any W-2
wages or UBIA of qualified property to the taxable recipient of the
annuity or unitrust interest based on each recipient's share of the
trust's total QBI (whether or not distributed) for that taxable year.
Accordingly, if 10 percent of the QBI of a charitable remainder trust
is distributed to the recipient and 90 percent of the QBI is retained
by the trust, 10 percent of the W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified
property is allocated and reported to the recipient and 90 percent of
the W-2 wages and UBIA of qualified property is treated as retained by
the trust. However, any W-2 wages retained by the trust cannot be used
to compute W-2 wages in a subsequent taxable year for section 199A
purposes. Any QBI, qualified REIT dividends, or qualified PTP income of
the trust that is unrelated business taxable income is subject to
excise tax and that tax must
[[Page 38068]]
be allocated to the corpus of the trust under Sec. 1.664-1(c).
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Separate shares. The provisions of paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of
this section apply to taxable years beginning after August 24, 2020.
Taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of
this section for taxable years beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently apply the rules in paragraph
(d)(3)(iii) of this section for each such year.
(iv) Charitable remainder trusts. The provisions of paragraph
(d)(3)(v) of this section apply to taxable years beginning after August
24, 2020. Taxpayers may choose to apply the rules in paragraph (d) of
this section for taxable years beginning on or before August 24, 2020,
so long as the taxpayers consistently apply the rules in paragraph
(d)(3)(v) of this section for each such year.
Sunita Lough,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: May 12, 2020.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2020-11832 Filed 6-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P