Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 37473-37474 [2020-13318]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Notices Transportation Systems (ITS) CodeHub (DAA–0406–2020–0001). projects for use in planning. The draft version of the NSF BSR Guide is available on the NSF website at: https:// Laurence Brewer, www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp. Chief Records Officer for the U.S. To facilitate review, a Change Log with Government. brief comment explanations of the [FR Doc. 2020–13335 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am] changes is provided in the guide. BILLING CODE 7515–01–P DATES: Written comments should be received by August 21, 2020 to be assured of consideration. Comments NATIONAL CREDIT UNION received after that date will be ADMINISTRATION considered to the extent practicable. Sunshine Act: Notice of Agency ADDRESSES: Written comments Meeting regarding the information collection and requests for copies of the proposed TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, information collection request should be June 25, 2020. addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports PLACE: Due to the COVID–19 Pandemic, Clearance Officer, National Science the meeting will be open to the public Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. via live webcast only. Visit the agency’s 1265, Arlington, VA 22230, or by email homepage (www.ncua.gov) and access to splimpto@nsf.gov. the provided webcast link. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: STATUS: This meeting will be open to the Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or public. send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Board Briefing, Minority Depository telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Institution Annual Report. Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 2. Board Briefing, NCUA Guaranteed 8339, which is accessible 24 hours a Notes Oversight Program. day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year 3. Request for Information, Strategies for Future Examination and Supervision (including Federal holidays). Utilizing Digital Technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 4. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Comments: In addition to the type of Technical Amendments. comments identified above, comments 5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Risk- are also invited on: (a) Whether the Based Net Worth. proposed collection of information is CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: necessary for the proper performance of Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, the functions of the Agency, including Telephone: 703–518–6304. whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Gerard Poliquin, Agency’s estimate of the burden of the Secretary of the Board. proposed collection of information; (c) [FR Doc. 2020–13534 Filed 6–18–20; 4:15 pm] ways to enhance the quality, utility, and BILLING CODE 7535–01–P clarity of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of Agency Information Collection the collection of information on Activities: Proposed Collection; respondents, including through the use Comment Request of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. AGENCY: National Science Foundation. After obtaining and considering public ACTION: Notice and request for comment, NSF will prepare the comments. submission requesting OMB clearance of this collection for no longer than 3 SUMMARY: In accordance with the years. requirement of the Paperwork Title of Collection: Business Systems Reduction Act of 1995, the National Review Guide. Science Foundation (NSF) is providing OMB Approval Number: 3145–NEW. opportunity for public comment on the Expiration Date of Approval: Not NSF Business Systems Review Guide applicable. (BSR). This is the first clearance of Type of Request: Intent to seek Business Systems Review Guide. It approval to extend with revision an aligns with the Uniform Guidance and the NSF Major Facilities Guide which is information collection for three years. intended for use by NSF staff and by Proposed Project: The National external proponents of major facility Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. L. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Jun 19, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 37473 81–507) set forth NSF’s mission and purpose: ‘‘To promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. * * * ’’ The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support: b Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the engineering process; b Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research potential; b Science and engineering education programs at all levels and in all the various fields of science and engineering; b Programs that provide a source of information for policy formulation; and b Other activities to promote these ends. Among Federal agencies, NSF is a leader in providing the academic community with advanced instrumentation needed to conduct state-of-the-art research and to educate the next generation of scientists, engineers and technical workers. The knowledge generated by these tools sustains U.S. leadership in science and engineering (S&E) to drive the U.S. economy and secure the future. NSF’s responsibility is to ensure that the research and education communities have access to these resources, and to provide the support needed to utilize them optimally, and implement timely upgrades. The scale of advanced instrumentation ranges from small research instruments to shared resources or facilities that can be used by entire communities. The demand for such instrumentation is very high, and is growing rapidly, along with the pace of discovery. For major facilities and shared infrastructure, the need is particularly high. This trend is expected to accelerate in the future as increasing numbers of researchers and educators rely on such large facilities, instruments, and databases to provide the reach to make the next intellectual leaps. NSF currently provides support for facility construction from two accounts: The Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction (MREFC) account, and the Research and Related Activities (R&RA) account. The MREFC account, established in FY 1995, is a separate budget line item that provides an agency-wide mechanism, permitting directorates to undertake large facility projects that exceed 10% of the Directorate’s annual budget; or roughly $70M or greater. Smaller projects continue to be supported from the R&RA Account. E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1 37474 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Notices Facilities are defined as shared-use infrastructure, instrumentation and equipment that are accessible to a broad community of researchers and/or educators. Facilities may be centralized or may consist of distributed installations. They may incorporate large-scale networking or computational infrastructure, multi-user instruments or networks of such instruments, or other infrastructure, instrumentation and equipment having a major impact on a broad segment of a scientific or engineering discipline. Historically, awards have been made for such diverse projects as accelerators, telescopes, research vessels and aircraft, and geographically distributed but networked sensors and instrumentation. The growth and diversification of large facility projects require that NSF remain attentive to the ever-changing issues and challenges inherent in their planning, construction, operation, management and oversight. Most importantly, dedicated, competent NSF and awardee staff are needed to manage and oversee these projects; giving the attention and oversight that good practice dictates and that proper accountability to taxpayers and Congress demands. To this end, there is also a need for consistent, documented requirements and procedures to be understood and used by NSF program managers and awardees for all such major projects. Use of the Information: Facilities are an essential part of the science and engineering enterprise and supporting them is one major responsibility of the National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF makes awards to external entities— primarily universities, consortia of universities or non-profit organizations—to undertake construction, management and operation of facilities. Such awards frequently take the form of cooperative agreements. NSF does not directly construct or operate the facilities it supports. However, NSF retains responsibility for overseeing their development, management and successful performance. Business Systems Reviews (BSR) of the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Major Facilities are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the business systems (people, processes, and technologies) of NSF Recipients are effective in meeting administrative responsibilities and satisfying Federal regulatory requirements, including those listed in NSF’s Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG). These reviews are not considered audits but are intended to be assistive in nature; aiding the Recipient in following VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Jun 19, 2020 Jkt 250001 good practices where appropriate and bringing them into compliance, if needed. A team of BSR Participants is assembled to assess the Recipient’s policies, procedures, and practices to determine whether, taken collectively, these administrative business systems used in managing the Facility meet NSF award expectations and comply with Federal regulations. The BSR Guide is designed for use by both our customer community and NSF staff for guidance in leading these reviews. The BSR Guide defines the overall framework and structure and summarizes the details outlined in the internal operating guidelines and procedures used by BSR Participants to execute the review process. Management principles and practices are specified for seven core functional areas (CFA) and are used by BSR Participants in performing these evaluations. Roles and responsibilities of the NSF stakeholders involved in the process are outlined in the BSR Guide as well as the expectations of the Recipient. This version of the Business Systems Guide aligns with the Uniform Guidance and the NSF Major Facilities Guide. This Guide will be updated periodically to reflect changes in requirements, policies and/or procedures. Award Recipients are expected to monitor and adopt the requirements and best practices included in the Guide. The submission of Award Recipient and Project administrative business process and procedural documentation used in support of operations of the Major Facilities is part of the collection of information. This information is used to help NSF fulfill this responsibility in supporting merit-based research and education projects in all the scientific and engineering disciplines. The Foundation also has a continuing commitment to provide oversight on facilities design and construction which must be balanced against monitoring its information collection so as to identify and address any excessive review and reporting burdens. NSF has approximately twenty-four (24) Major Facilities in various stages of design, construction, operations and divestment. The need for a BSR and review scope is based on NSF’s internal annual Major Facility Portfolio Risk Assessment and the assessment of various risks factors. Burden to the Public: The Foundation estimates that approximately one and half (1.5) Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are necessary for each major facility project to respond to a BSR PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 requirements on an annual basis; or 2,824 hours per year. With an average of four (4) conducted a year, this equates to roughly 5 FTEs or 11,296 public burden hours annually. Dated: June 16, 2020. Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation. [FR Doc. 2020–13318 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 72–27; NRC–2018–0282] Pacific Gas & Electric Company; Humboldt Bay Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License renewal; issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued a renewed license to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), (‘‘licensee’’) for Special Nuclear Materials (SNM) License No. SNM–2514 for the receipt, possession, transfer, and storage of spent fuel from the Humboldt Bay Nuclear Plant in the Humboldt Bay Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI), located in Humboldt County, California. The renewed license authorizes operation of the Humboldt ISFSI in accordance with the provisions of the renewed license and its technical specifications. The renewed license expires on November 17, 2065. DATES: The license referenced in this document is available on June 10, 2020. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2018–0282 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2018–0282. Address questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127; email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM 22JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 120 (Monday, June 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37473-37474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13318]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is providing 
opportunity for public comment on the NSF Business Systems Review Guide 
(BSR). This is the first clearance of Business Systems Review Guide. It 
aligns with the Uniform Guidance and the NSF Major Facilities Guide 
which is intended for use by NSF staff and by external proponents of 
major facility projects for use in planning. The draft version of the 
NSF BSR Guide is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp. To facilitate review, a Change Log with 
brief comment explanations of the changes is provided in the guide.

DATES: Written comments should be received by August 21, 2020 to be 
assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be 
considered to the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and 
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request 
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 1265, Arlington, VA 
22230, or by email to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292-7556 or 
send email to [email protected]. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including Federal 
holidays).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments: In addition to the type of 
comments identified above, comments are also invited on: (a) Whether 
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. After obtaining 
and considering public comment, NSF will prepare the submission 
requesting OMB clearance of this collection for no longer than 3 years.
    Title of Collection: Business Systems Review Guide.
    OMB Approval Number: 3145-NEW.
    Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
    Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to extend with revision an 
information collection for three years.
    Proposed Project: The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. 
L. 81-507) set forth NSF's mission and purpose:
    ``To promote the progress of science; to advance the national 
health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. * * * 
''
    The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support:
    [squ] Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the 
engineering process;
    [squ] Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research 
potential;
    [squ] Science and engineering education programs at all levels and 
in all the various fields of science and engineering;
    [squ] Programs that provide a source of information for policy 
formulation; and
    [squ] Other activities to promote these ends.
    Among Federal agencies, NSF is a leader in providing the academic 
community with advanced instrumentation needed to conduct state-of-the-
art research and to educate the next generation of scientists, 
engineers and technical workers. The knowledge generated by these tools 
sustains U.S. leadership in science and engineering (S&E) to drive the 
U.S. economy and secure the future. NSF's responsibility is to ensure 
that the research and education communities have access to these 
resources, and to provide the support needed to utilize them optimally, 
and implement timely upgrades.
    The scale of advanced instrumentation ranges from small research 
instruments to shared resources or facilities that can be used by 
entire communities. The demand for such instrumentation is very high, 
and is growing rapidly, along with the pace of discovery. For major 
facilities and shared infrastructure, the need is particularly high. 
This trend is expected to accelerate in the future as increasing 
numbers of researchers and educators rely on such large facilities, 
instruments, and databases to provide the reach to make the next 
intellectual leaps.
    NSF currently provides support for facility construction from two 
accounts: The Major Research Equipment and Facility Construction 
(MREFC) account, and the Research and Related Activities (R&RA) 
account. The MREFC account, established in FY 1995, is a separate 
budget line item that provides an agency-wide mechanism, permitting 
directorates to undertake large facility projects that exceed 10% of 
the Directorate's annual budget; or roughly $70M or greater. Smaller 
projects continue to be supported from the R&RA Account.

[[Page 37474]]

    Facilities are defined as shared-use infrastructure, 
instrumentation and equipment that are accessible to a broad community 
of researchers and/or educators. Facilities may be centralized or may 
consist of distributed installations. They may incorporate large-scale 
networking or computational infrastructure, multi-user instruments or 
networks of such instruments, or other infrastructure, instrumentation 
and equipment having a major impact on a broad segment of a scientific 
or engineering discipline. Historically, awards have been made for such 
diverse projects as accelerators, telescopes, research vessels and 
aircraft, and geographically distributed but networked sensors and 
instrumentation.
    The growth and diversification of large facility projects require 
that NSF remain attentive to the ever-changing issues and challenges 
inherent in their planning, construction, operation, management and 
oversight. Most importantly, dedicated, competent NSF and awardee staff 
are needed to manage and oversee these projects; giving the attention 
and oversight that good practice dictates and that proper 
accountability to taxpayers and Congress demands. To this end, there is 
also a need for consistent, documented requirements and procedures to 
be understood and used by NSF program managers and awardees for all 
such major projects.
    Use of the Information: Facilities are an essential part of the 
science and engineering enterprise and supporting them is one major 
responsibility of the National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF makes 
awards to external entities--primarily universities, consortia of 
universities or non-profit organizations--to undertake construction, 
management and operation of facilities. Such awards frequently take the 
form of cooperative agreements. NSF does not directly construct or 
operate the facilities it supports. However, NSF retains responsibility 
for overseeing their development, management and successful 
performance. Business Systems Reviews (BSR) of the National Science 
Foundation's (NSF) Major Facilities are designed to provide reasonable 
assurance that the business systems (people, processes, and 
technologies) of NSF Recipients are effective in meeting administrative 
responsibilities and satisfying Federal regulatory requirements, 
including those listed in NSF's Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures 
Guide (PAPPG).
    These reviews are not considered audits but are intended to be 
assistive in nature; aiding the Recipient in following good practices 
where appropriate and bringing them into compliance, if needed. A team 
of BSR Participants is assembled to assess the Recipient's policies, 
procedures, and practices to determine whether, taken collectively, 
these administrative business systems used in managing the Facility 
meet NSF award expectations and comply with Federal regulations.
    The BSR Guide is designed for use by both our customer community 
and NSF staff for guidance in leading these reviews. The BSR Guide 
defines the overall framework and structure and summarizes the details 
outlined in the internal operating guidelines and procedures used by 
BSR Participants to execute the review process. Management principles 
and practices are specified for seven core functional areas (CFA) and 
are used by BSR Participants in performing these evaluations. Roles and 
responsibilities of the NSF stakeholders involved in the process are 
outlined in the BSR Guide as well as the expectations of the Recipient.
    This version of the Business Systems Guide aligns with the Uniform 
Guidance and the NSF Major Facilities Guide.
    This Guide will be updated periodically to reflect changes in 
requirements, policies and/or procedures. Award Recipients are expected 
to monitor and adopt the requirements and best practices included in 
the Guide.
    The submission of Award Recipient and Project administrative 
business process and procedural documentation used in support of 
operations of the Major Facilities is part of the collection of 
information. This information is used to help NSF fulfill this 
responsibility in supporting merit-based research and education 
projects in all the scientific and engineering disciplines. The 
Foundation also has a continuing commitment to provide oversight on 
facilities design and construction which must be balanced against 
monitoring its information collection so as to identify and address any 
excessive review and reporting burdens.
    NSF has approximately twenty-four (24) Major Facilities in various 
stages of design, construction, operations and divestment. The need for 
a BSR and review scope is based on NSF's internal annual Major Facility 
Portfolio Risk Assessment and the assessment of various risks factors.
    Burden to the Public: The Foundation estimates that approximately 
one and half (1.5) Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) are necessary for each 
major facility project to respond to a BSR requirements on an annual 
basis; or 2,824 hours per year. With an average of four (4) conducted a 
year, this equates to roughly 5 FTEs or 11,296 public burden hours 
annually.

    Dated: June 16, 2020.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2020-13318 Filed 6-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.