Investigation Into Conditions Created by Canadian Ballast Water Regulations in the U.S./Canada Great Lakes Trade, 37453-37454 [2020-13313]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Notices
Federal Communications Commission.
Gregory Haledjian,
Legal Advisor, Office of the Bureau Chief,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2020–13372 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[GN Docket No. 18–122; DA 20–609; FRS
16871]
Order Denying Stay Petition
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) denies the Joint Petition
for Stay of Report and Order and Order
of Proposed Modification Pending
Judicial Review of ABS Global Ltd.,
Empresa Argentina de Soluciones
Satelitales S.A., and Hispamar Sate´lites
S.A., and Hispasat S.A.
DATES: The Order Denying Stay Petition
(DA 20–609) was released on June 10,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Gentry of the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility
Division, at (202) 418–7769 or
Anna.Gentry@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Order Denying Stay
Petition (DA 20–609) released on June
10, 2020. The complete text of the Order
is available for viewing via the
Commission’s ECFS website by entering
the docket number, GN Docket No. 18–
122. The complete text of the Order is
also available for public inspection and
copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET) Monday through
Thursday or from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 202–488–5300, fax 202–488–
5563, or you may contact BCPI at its
website: https://www.BCPIWEB.com.
When ordering documents from BCPI,
please provide the appropriate FCC
document number, for example, DA 20–
609.
ADDRESSES:
Synopsis
On May 15, 2020, ABS Global Ltd.,
Empresa Argentina de Soluciones
Satelitales S.A., and Hispamar Sate´lites
S.A., and Hispasat S.A. filed a Joint
Petition for Stay Pending Judicial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Jun 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
Review of the Commission’s Report and
Order and Order of Proposed
Modification in the above-captioned
proceeding. Petitioners asked the
Commission to stay the C-band auction
and transition process while their
challenges to the 3.7 GHz Report and
Order are pending before the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia. In their Stay Petition,
Petitioners argue that the 3.7 GHz
Report and Order will trigger a chain of
events—beginning with the May 29,
2020 election by eligible space station
operators to relocate on an accelerated
basis—that may be irreversible and that
will harm them by benefiting competing
space station operators that are eligible
for relocation and accelerated relocation
payments and depriving them of
spectrum access rights without
compensation. They argue that the
Commission exceeded its authority to
modify their spectrum access rights,
allocated too much money available to
certain space station incumbents in the
form of accelerated relocation payments
and reimbursement of relocation costs
associated with new satellites, and
arbitrarily excluded Petitioners from
receiving any relocation payments.
The Commission denies the Stay
Petition. First, Petitioners have not
shown that they will suffer irreparable
harm. The harm that Petitioners allege
is not imminent, is conjectural, and
consists of economic injuries that are
not severe enough to be cognizable as
irreparable harm. Second, Petitioners
have not shown a likelihood of success
on the merits. The Commission
addressed Petitioners’ principal
arguments at length in the 3.7 GHz
Report and Order. The Stay Petition
does not persuade the Commission that
the Petitioners’ arguments are likely to
succeed in court any more than they did
before the agency. Third, Petitioners
have not shown that the equities favor
a stay. Petitioners have not met their
burden of showing that the public
interest militates in favor of a stay and
that others would not be harmed by a
stay. Moreover, Petitioners have not
shown that the public interest would
favor grant of the stay. The
Commission’s actions to repurpose the
C-band are an indispensable element of
its overall strategy of promoting the
deployment of fifth generation (5G)
wireless services, with millions of jobs,
and billions of dollars in economic
growth and other public benefits, at
stake. Grant of a stay pending judicial
review would significantly delay the
auction and transition process and harm
multiple stakeholders, including
prospective bidders and the diverse
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37453
incumbents involved in the transition
process. The cost of such delay and
disruption could be enormous. In
addition to the public interest harms,
grant of a stay would undercut the
specific goal of U.S. leadership in 5G
and the general goals of the auction
program. Accordingly, we conclude that
a stay of the Order and Order and
Proposed Modification Pending Judicial
Review is not warranted.
Federal Communications Commission.
Amy Brett,
Associate Division Chief, Competition and
Infrastructure Policy Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2020–13314 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 20–10; Petition No. P1–20]
Investigation Into Conditions Created
by Canadian Ballast Water Regulations
in the U.S./Canada Great Lakes Trade
Federal Maritime Commission.
Notice of investigation and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission has initiated an
investigation into the allegations made
in a petition filed by the Lake Carriers’
Association that conditions created by
the Government of Canada are
unfavorable to shipping in the United
States/Canada trade.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. 20–10, by the
following method:
• Email: secretary@fmc.gov. For
comments, include in the subject line:
‘‘Docket No. 20–10, Comments on
Conditions Created by Canadian Ballast
Water Regulations in the U.S./Canada
Great Lakes Trade.’’ Comments should
be attached to the email as a Microsoft
Word or text-searchable PDF document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or public
comments received, go to the
Commission’s Electronic Reading Room
at: www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/
proceeding/20-10/.
Unless otherwise directed by the
commenter, all comments will be
treated as confidential under 46 U.S.C.
42105 and 46 CFR 550.104.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions regarding submitting
comments or the treatment of
confidential information, contact Rachel
E. Dickon, Secretary; Phone: (202) 523–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
37454
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Notices
5725; Email: secretary@fmc.gov. For
technical questions, contact: Peter J.
King, Deputy Managing Director; Phone
(202) 523–5800; Email: OMD@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
On March 6, 2020, the Lake Carriers’
Association (Petitioner), a trade
association made up of U.S. owners and
operators of vessels serving the Great
Lakes (Lakers), filed a petition alleging
that conditions created by Transport
Canada, an agency of the Government of
Canada, are unfavorable to shipping in
the United States/Canada trade,
pursuant to Section 19(1)(b) of the
Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (Section 19)
codified in 46 U.S.C. 42101. Section 19
authorizes the Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission) to
investigate these conditions and to
adopt regulations to adjust or meet such
conditions. In this instance, Petitioner
requests that the Commission adopt
regulations in order to remedy a
condition it alleges will result in
irreparable harm to Petitioner’s
members.
II. Summary of Petition
Petitioner argues that Transport
Canada’s proposed regulations to
require the installation of ballast water
management systems (BWMS) on Laker
vessels will effectively drive out U.S.flag vessels from the cross-lakes U.S.
export trade to Canada. These
regulations, which were proposed by
Transport Canada on June 8, 2019,
would require Canadian vessels and
vessels in waters under Canadian
jurisdiction to develop and implement a
ballast water management plan and
comply with a performance standard
that would limit the number of
organisms discharged, with a
compliance date of September 8, 2024.
Ballast Water Regulations, Canada
Gazette, Part 1, Vol. 153, No. 23 at 15.
The proposed regulations would
exempt vessels of a non-signatory party
to the International Maritime
Organization (IMO) International
Convention on the Management of
Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments,
such as the United States, if those
vessels operate exclusively within the
Great Lakes Basin and do not load
ballast water from or release ballast
water into Canadian waters. Petitioner
alleges that this exemption would not
apply to its members’ vessels because
they need to load ballast water after
offloading export cargo at Canadian
ports, and that in order for its members’
vessels to comply with the proposed
regulations, they would need to install
a BWMS on each vessel.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:08 Jun 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
Petitioner argues that because of the
vessel type and age differences between
the Canadian and U.S. fleets, the
respective costs of implementing the
proposed regulations will be very
different. Transport Canada estimates
the cost of implementing the
requirements on all Canadian vessels
currently serving the trade would be
approximately 632 million Canadian
dollars. Petitioner argues that
implementing these same regulations on
all U.S. vessels currently serving the
trade would cost nearly 1.132 billion
Canadian dollars. Ultimately, Petitioner
argues the proposed regulations will
essentially double the U.S. Laker cost of
participating in the trade while
Canadian carriers would experience a
less than 1 Canadian dollar per ton cost
increase.
Petitioner argues that its members
cannot comply with the regulations
because of the prohibitive cost, and they
cannot avoid the regulations and
continue to carry United States exports
to Canada because they must load
ballast water as they offload cargo at
Canadian ports. Petitioner also states
that its members cannot operate their
vessels outside of the Great Lakes and
St. Lawrence River because of their ship
design and current U.S. Coast Guard
certification is restricted to service on
the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River.
Should the regulations be finalized and
if U.S. vessels were thereby forced out
of the trade, Petitioner contends that
Canadian vessels would enjoy a
monopoly on the cross-lakes U.S. export
trade to Canada.
Petitioner argues that prohibiting the
loading of ballast water without a
BWMS serves no environmental
purpose because, unlike discharging
ballast water, loading ballast water in
Canadian waters does not result in the
potential introduction of nonnative
organisms into Canadian waters.
Petitioner asserts that the regulations
serve no environmental purpose and the
cost of compliance is prohibitively high
for U.S. vessels, and suggests that the
real purpose of the regulations is to
drive out U.S. vessels from this trade.
Petitioner is asking the Commission to
issue a regulation to meet the unfair
competitive conditions created by
Transport Canada. Petitioner has
provided a proposed regulation that
would assess a fee of 300,000.00 U.S.
dollars each time a Canadian vessel
enters any U.S. port.
III. Investigation and Initial Request for
Comments
The Commission has reviewed the
Petition and determined that it meets
the threshold requirements for
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consideration under the Commission’s
regulations. See 46 CFR part 550,
subpart D. The Commission has
therefore determined to initiate an
investigation into whether the proposed
Transport Canada regulations create
unfavorable conditions to shipping in
the foreign trade of the United States. To
that end, the Commission has
designated the Deputy Managing
Director to lead an investigation into the
Petitioner’s allegations and to prepare a
report on the investigation’s findings
and recommendations for Commission
consideration.
As an initial step in the investigation,
interested persons are requested to
submit views, arguments and/or data on
the Petition. Comments may address
any aspect of the Petition.
As the Commission proceeds with
this investigation, it may determine the
need to request additional comment or
gather information through other means
as authorized under 46 U.S.C. 42104
and 46 CFR part 550.
By the Commission.
Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–13313 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[Docket No. NIOSH 278]
Board of Scientific Counselors,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (BSC, NIOSH)
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of meeting and request
for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the
CDC announces the following virtual
meeting of the Board of Scientific
Counselors, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (BSC,
NIOSH). This meeting is open to the
public, limited only by the availability
of telephone ports and webinar
capacity. Time will be available for
public comment. If you wish to attend
by webcast or teleconference, please
register at the NIOSH website https://
www.cdc.gov/niosh/bsc/ or call (404–
498–2581) at least five business days in
advance of the meeting.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNN1.SGM
22JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 120 (Monday, June 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37453-37454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13313]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 20-10; Petition No. P1-20]
Investigation Into Conditions Created by Canadian Ballast Water
Regulations in the U.S./Canada Great Lakes Trade
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.
ACTION: Notice of investigation and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission has initiated an investigation
into the allegations made in a petition filed by the Lake Carriers'
Association that conditions created by the Government of Canada are
unfavorable to shipping in the United States/Canada trade.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 20-10, by
the following method:
Email: [email protected]. For comments, include in the
subject line: ``Docket No. 20-10, Comments on Conditions Created by
Canadian Ballast Water Regulations in the U.S./Canada Great Lakes
Trade.'' Comments should be attached to the email as a Microsoft Word
or text-searchable PDF document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
public comments received, go to the Commission's Electronic Reading
Room at: www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/20-10/.
Unless otherwise directed by the commenter, all comments will be
treated as confidential under 46 U.S.C. 42105 and 46 CFR 550.104.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding submitting
comments or the treatment of confidential information, contact Rachel
E. Dickon, Secretary; Phone: (202) 523-
[[Page 37454]]
5725; Email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact: Peter
J. King, Deputy Managing Director; Phone (202) 523-5800; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
On March 6, 2020, the Lake Carriers' Association (Petitioner), a
trade association made up of U.S. owners and operators of vessels
serving the Great Lakes (Lakers), filed a petition alleging that
conditions created by Transport Canada, an agency of the Government of
Canada, are unfavorable to shipping in the United States/Canada trade,
pursuant to Section 19(1)(b) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (Section
19) codified in 46 U.S.C. 42101. Section 19 authorizes the Federal
Maritime Commission (Commission) to investigate these conditions and to
adopt regulations to adjust or meet such conditions. In this instance,
Petitioner requests that the Commission adopt regulations in order to
remedy a condition it alleges will result in irreparable harm to
Petitioner's members.
II. Summary of Petition
Petitioner argues that Transport Canada's proposed regulations to
require the installation of ballast water management systems (BWMS) on
Laker vessels will effectively drive out U.S.-flag vessels from the
cross-lakes U.S. export trade to Canada. These regulations, which were
proposed by Transport Canada on June 8, 2019, would require Canadian
vessels and vessels in waters under Canadian jurisdiction to develop
and implement a ballast water management plan and comply with a
performance standard that would limit the number of organisms
discharged, with a compliance date of September 8, 2024. Ballast Water
Regulations, Canada Gazette, Part 1, Vol. 153, No. 23 at 15.
The proposed regulations would exempt vessels of a non-signatory
party to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) International
Convention on the Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments,
such as the United States, if those vessels operate exclusively within
the Great Lakes Basin and do not load ballast water from or release
ballast water into Canadian waters. Petitioner alleges that this
exemption would not apply to its members' vessels because they need to
load ballast water after offloading export cargo at Canadian ports, and
that in order for its members' vessels to comply with the proposed
regulations, they would need to install a BWMS on each vessel.
Petitioner argues that because of the vessel type and age
differences between the Canadian and U.S. fleets, the respective costs
of implementing the proposed regulations will be very different.
Transport Canada estimates the cost of implementing the requirements on
all Canadian vessels currently serving the trade would be approximately
632 million Canadian dollars. Petitioner argues that implementing these
same regulations on all U.S. vessels currently serving the trade would
cost nearly 1.132 billion Canadian dollars. Ultimately, Petitioner
argues the proposed regulations will essentially double the U.S. Laker
cost of participating in the trade while Canadian carriers would
experience a less than 1 Canadian dollar per ton cost increase.
Petitioner argues that its members cannot comply with the
regulations because of the prohibitive cost, and they cannot avoid the
regulations and continue to carry United States exports to Canada
because they must load ballast water as they offload cargo at Canadian
ports. Petitioner also states that its members cannot operate their
vessels outside of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River because of
their ship design and current U.S. Coast Guard certification is
restricted to service on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Should
the regulations be finalized and if U.S. vessels were thereby forced
out of the trade, Petitioner contends that Canadian vessels would enjoy
a monopoly on the cross-lakes U.S. export trade to Canada.
Petitioner argues that prohibiting the loading of ballast water
without a BWMS serves no environmental purpose because, unlike
discharging ballast water, loading ballast water in Canadian waters
does not result in the potential introduction of nonnative organisms
into Canadian waters. Petitioner asserts that the regulations serve no
environmental purpose and the cost of compliance is prohibitively high
for U.S. vessels, and suggests that the real purpose of the regulations
is to drive out U.S. vessels from this trade.
Petitioner is asking the Commission to issue a regulation to meet
the unfair competitive conditions created by Transport Canada.
Petitioner has provided a proposed regulation that would assess a fee
of 300,000.00 U.S. dollars each time a Canadian vessel enters any U.S.
port.
III. Investigation and Initial Request for Comments
The Commission has reviewed the Petition and determined that it
meets the threshold requirements for consideration under the
Commission's regulations. See 46 CFR part 550, subpart D. The
Commission has therefore determined to initiate an investigation into
whether the proposed Transport Canada regulations create unfavorable
conditions to shipping in the foreign trade of the United States. To
that end, the Commission has designated the Deputy Managing Director to
lead an investigation into the Petitioner's allegations and to prepare
a report on the investigation's findings and recommendations for
Commission consideration.
As an initial step in the investigation, interested persons are
requested to submit views, arguments and/or data on the Petition.
Comments may address any aspect of the Petition.
As the Commission proceeds with this investigation, it may
determine the need to request additional comment or gather information
through other means as authorized under 46 U.S.C. 42104 and 46 CFR part
550.
By the Commission.
Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13313 Filed 6-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P