Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial Surface Coating Operations, 37411-37413 [2020-13049]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
the same model version (i.e., AERMOD
version 14134) and modeling inputs
(i.e., source characteristics and
emissions rates, meteorological data,
background value, etc.) that the State
used in its attainment plan modeling
demonstration. The only modification
the EPA made for its evaluation was
adding receptors at 50-meter spacing
within each facility’s boundary. The
EPA modeled scenarios specific to each
of the four facilities’ property, which
included receptors only on the property
of the facility in question and has all
emissions sources from that facility
removed from the analysis. For
example, a scenario to evaluate the
impacts on GPC’s facility property
included receptors placed within GPC’s
facility fence line and with the emission
sources from LGS, Monsanto, and MPW
operating and GPC not operating.
Table 1 provides the results of EPA’s
modeling analysis, which showed no
violations within each of the four
facilities’ property when emissions from
the other facilities were considered. The
greatest impacts occurred within Grain
Processing Corporation’s property with
a modeled highest 4th high of 164
micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3).
proposing approval of Iowa’s SIP for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS for the
Muscatine nonattainment area,
including the attainment plan control
strategy.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
TABLE 1—THE HIGHEST-4TH-HIGH
PREDICTED IMPACTS ON EACH FA- collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
CILITY’S PROPERTY
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
[Including background]
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
1-hour
Model
substantial number of small entities
SO2
Impacted facility
impacts
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
NAAQS
3
(μg/m )
(μg/m3)
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
Grain Processing
mandate or significantly or uniquely
Corporation .......
164
196
affect small governments, as described
Muscatine Power
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
and Water .........
110
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
Monsanto ..............
97
• Does not have federalism
Louisa Generating
implications as specified in Executive
Station ...............
110
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
The EPA proposes that the modeling
1999);
submitted by Iowa with its
• Is not an economically significant
nonattainment area plan, in addition to
regulatory action based on health or
the supplemental modeling performed
safety risks subject to Executive Order
by the EPA and described above,
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
demonstrates that the area is attaining
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
the NAAQS.
28355, May 22, 2001);
VII. What action is EPA Region 7
• Is not subject to requirements of the
taking?
National Technology Transfer and
In this second supplemental notice of Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
proposed rulemaking, the EPA is: (1)
rulemaking does not involve technical
Considering adoption of an alternative
standards; and
policy regarding exemptions for excess
• Does not provide EPA with the
emissions in the State of Iowa from the
discretionary authority to address, as
national policy detailed in the EPA’s
appropriate, disproportionate human
2015 SSM SIP Action; (2) proposing
health or environmental effects, using
simultaneously withdrawal of the SSM
practicable and legally permissible
SIP call for Iowa if the alternative SSM
methods, under Executive Order 12898
policy for the State is adopted; and (3)
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jun 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37411
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, SSM policy, Start-up,
shutdown and malfunction, Sulfur
oxides.
Dated: June 16, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2020–13380 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0289; FRL–10010–
55–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Industrial Surface
Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP) received on
March 20, 2019. The submission revises
a Missouri regulation that restricts
emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from industrial
surface coating operations in Clay,
Jackson, and Platte Counties in
Missouri. Specifically, the revisions to
the rule remove unnecessary restrictive
words, adds exemptions, including
definitions specific to the rule, corrects
test method references, removes
obsolete requirements specific to
sources that have closed, changes
sections to the standard rule format, and
makes minor clarifications and
grammatical changes. The new
exemptions are consistent with the
Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG)
for several types of surface coating or
apply to activities that are regulated
under other federal or state regulations
that limit emissions of VOCs. The new
exemptions are needed to make the rule
consistent with the St. Louis version of
this rule, 10 Code of State Regulation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
37412
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(CSR) 10–5.330 Industrial Surface
Coating Operations. These exemptions
are not expected to result in an emission
increase.
The other revisions are administrative
in nature and do not impact the
stringency of the SIP or air quality.
Approval of these revisions will ensure
consistency between State and
federally-approved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2020–0289 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7714;
email address stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–
0289, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
18:06 Jun 19, 2020
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to 10 CSR 10–2.230 ‘‘Control
of Emissions from Industrial Surface
Coating Operations’’, which restricts
emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from industrial
surface coating operations in Clay,
Jackson, and Platte Counties in
Missouri. These revisions are described
in detail in the technical support
document (TSD) included in the docket
for this action.
Missouri received three comments
from EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all three
comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for
this action. In response to EPA’s
comments, Missouri submitted a letter
providing supplemental information
regarding the revisions.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing to
approve the revisions to this rule
because it will not have a negative
impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
Table of Contents
VerDate Sep<11>2014
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Jkt 250001
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The state provided
public notice of the revisions from
August 1, 2018, to October 4, 2018, and
held a public hearing on September 27,
2018. The state received and addressed
eight comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this
docket, the SIP revision submission
meets the substantive requirements of
the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to amend the
Missouri SIP by approving the State’s
request to revise 10 CSR 10–2.230
‘‘Control of Emissions from Industrial
Surface Coating Operations’’. Approval
of these revisions will ensure
consistency between State and
federally-approved rules. The EPA has
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determined that these changes will not
adversely impact air quality.
The EPA is soliciting comment on the
substantive and administrative revisions
detailed in this proposal and the TSD.
The EPA is not soliciting comment on
existing rule text that has been
previously approved by the EPA into
the SIP. Final rulemaking will occur
after consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
an EPA final rule that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri
State Implementation Plan and
Supplemental modeling analyses
described in the proposed amendments
to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve State choices, if they meet the
criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
37413
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 120 / Monday, June 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Dated: June 10, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–2.230’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
10–2.230 .........
*
Control of Emissions from Industrial Surface Coating
Operations.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule].
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 282
[EPA–R06–UST–2018–0704; FRL–10009–
04–Region 6]
Texas: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Revisions and Incorporation by
Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Jkt 250001
*
Send written comments by July
22, 2020.
DATES:
Pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA
or Act), the Environmental Protection
SUMMARY:
*
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the State of Texas
Underground Storage Tank (UST)
program submitted by the State. This
action is based on EPA’s determination
that these revisions satisfy all
requirements needed for program
approval. This action also proposes to
codify EPA’s approval of Texas’s State
program and to incorporate by reference
those provisions of the State regulations
that we have determined meet the
requirements for approval. The
provisions will be subject to EPA’s
inspection and enforcement authorities
under sections 9005 and 9006 of RCRA
subtitle I and other applicable statutory
and regulatory provisions.
*
18:06 Jun 19, 2020
3/30/2019
*
[FR Doc. 2020–13049 Filed 6–19–20; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Submit any comments,
identified by EPA–R06–UST–2018–0704
by one of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: lincoln.audray@epa.gov.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–UST–2018–
0704. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or email. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means the EPA will not
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 120 (Monday, June 22, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37411-37413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13049]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0289; FRL-10010-55-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Industrial
Surface Coating Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP)
received on March 20, 2019. The submission revises a Missouri
regulation that restricts emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) from industrial surface coating operations in Clay, Jackson, and
Platte Counties in Missouri. Specifically, the revisions to the rule
remove unnecessary restrictive words, adds exemptions, including
definitions specific to the rule, corrects test method references,
removes obsolete requirements specific to sources that have closed,
changes sections to the standard rule format, and makes minor
clarifications and grammatical changes. The new exemptions are
consistent with the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for several
types of surface coating or apply to activities that are regulated
under other federal or state regulations that limit emissions of VOCs.
The new exemptions are needed to make the rule consistent with the St.
Louis version of this rule, 10 Code of State Regulation
[[Page 37412]]
(CSR) 10-5.330 Industrial Surface Coating Operations. These exemptions
are not expected to result in an emission increase.
The other revisions are administrative in nature and do not impact
the stringency of the SIP or air quality. Approval of these revisions
will ensure consistency between State and federally-approved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0289 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-
7714; email address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0289, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to 10 CSR 10-2.230
``Control of Emissions from Industrial Surface Coating Operations'',
which restricts emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
industrial surface coating operations in Clay, Jackson, and Platte
Counties in Missouri. These revisions are described in detail in the
technical support document (TSD) included in the docket for this
action.
Missouri received three comments from EPA during the comment
period. Missouri responded to all three comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for this action. In response to EPA's
comments, Missouri submitted a letter providing supplemental
information regarding the revisions.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to this
rule because it will not have a negative impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
state provided public notice of the revisions from August 1, 2018, to
October 4, 2018, and held a public hearing on September 27, 2018. The
state received and addressed eight comments. As explained in more
detail in the TSD which is part of this docket, the SIP revision
submission meets the substantive requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to amend the Missouri SIP by approving the
State's request to revise 10 CSR 10-2.230 ``Control of Emissions from
Industrial Surface Coating Operations''. Approval of these revisions
will ensure consistency between State and federally-approved rules. The
EPA has determined that these changes will not adversely impact air
quality.
The EPA is soliciting comment on the substantive and administrative
revisions detailed in this proposal and the TSD. The EPA is not
soliciting comment on existing rule text that has been previously
approved by the EPA into the SIP. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri State Implementation Plan and
Supplemental modeling analyses described in the proposed amendments to
40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State
choices, if they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described
[[Page 37413]]
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 10, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-2.230'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Missouri citation Title date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-2.230........................ Control of 3/30/2019 [Date of publication of
Emissions from the final rule in the
Industrial Surface Federal Register],
Coating Operations. [Federal Register
citation of the final
rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-13049 Filed 6-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
