Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 36879-36880 [2020-13141]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Telemanagement Forum
Notice is hereby given that, on May
19, 2020, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), TM Forum, A New
Jersey Non-Profit Corporation (‘‘The
Forum’’) filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, the following entities
have become members of the Forum:
Optiva Inc., Mississauga, CANADA;
International Free and Open Source
Solutions Foundation, Pleasanton, CA;
Future Internet Consulting and
Development Solutions S.L., Madrid,
SPAIN; Ulster University,
Newtownabbey, UNITED KINGDOM;
MDS Global Ltd, Warrington, UNITED
KINGDOM; Eastwind, Ekaterinburg,
RUSSIA; Triple-Innovations Ltd,
Zagreb, CROATIA; SoftBank Corp,
Minato-ku, JAPAN; Brightcomms,
Miami, FL; ONIS Solutions, San Pedro
Garza Garcı´a, MEXICO; Nile University,
Giza, EGYPT; Calicsi LTD, MUSCAT,
OMAN; Tekpaths, Riyadh, SAUDI
ARABIA; Sorbonne University, Paris,
FRANCE; Sarathi Softech Pvt. Ltd.,
¨ BITAK BILGEM
Pune, INDIA; TU
Software Research Technologies
Institute, Gebze, TURKEY; Scorecard
Systems Inc., Stouffville, CANADA; Red
Dawn Consulting, Northwood, UNITED
KINGDOM; Meiji University, Tokyo,
JAPAN; Vanrise Solutions, Beirut,
LEBANON; OmniSci, San Francisco,
CA; Consilience Technologies,
Naperville, IL; Bartr Technologies
Limited, Birmingham, UNITED
KINGDOM; Avistas, Irving, TX; AWTG
Ltd, London, UNITED KINGDOM;
Creativity Software, Kingston upon
Thames, UNITED KINGDOM; Compax
Software Development GmbH, Vienna,
AUSTRIA; SATEC GROUP, Madrid,
SPAIN; Software AG (UK) Ltd, Derby,
UNITED KINGDOM; Norconsult
Telematics, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA;
Symbox Ltd, Theale, UNITED
KINGDOM; Telecom Egypt, Giza,
EGYPT.
Also, the following members have
changed their names: OSSEra, Inc. to
OSSEra, Sacramento, CA; GCI to GCI
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
Communication Corp, Anchorage, AK;
Torry Harris Integrated Solutions Pvt
Ltd to Torry Harris Integration
Solutions, Bangalore, INDIA; Mahindra
Comviva to Comviva, Haryana, INDIA.
In addition, the following parties have
withdrawn as parties to this venture:
BASE Company, Brussels, BELGIUM;
Biplus Vietnam Software Solution JSC,
Hanoi, VIETNAM; Business-intelligence
of Oriental Nations Corporation Ltd.,
Beijing, PEOPLES’ REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; China Mobile Online Service
Company Limited Yunnan Branch,
Kunming, PEOPLES’ REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; Clementvale, Dublin, IRELAND;
Corporate Software, Casablanca,
MOROCCO; Couchbase Limited,
London, UNITED KINGDOM; Emersion
Software, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA;
ePLDT Inc., Makati City, PHILIPPINES;
gen-E, Irvine, CA; Mercato, Birmingham,
UNITED KINGDOM; NetYCE,
Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS; Optix
Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited, Lahore,
PAKISTAN; Polaris Technology,
Amman, JORDAN; SAS Institute, Inc,
Cary, NC; Sitronics Telecom Solutions
Co. (Pvt.) Ltd, Lahore, PAKISTAN;
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.,
Bridgewater, NJ; Tawhiri Networks,
Brewster, NY; Tel Aviv University—
Urban Innovation and Sustainability
Lab, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL; Telecom
Personal (Paraguay), Asuncion,
PARAGUAY; Telenet NV, Mechelen,
BELGIUM; Tempest IT services a. s.,
Bratislava, SLOVAKIA; Unitel one
source limited, London, UNITED
KINGDOM; VenKizmet PERU SAC,
Lima, PERU; Virgin Media, Hook,
UNITED KINGDOM; Wavelength
Communications Ltd, St Albans,
UNITED KINGDOM.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open and The Forum
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On October 21, 1988, The Forum filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on December 8, 1988 (53
FR 49615).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on January 14, 2020. A
notice was published in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36879
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 5, 2020 (85 FR 6575).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020–13171 Filed 6–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On May 28, 2020, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Kansas in the
lawsuit entitled United States and State
of Kansas, ex rel. Kansas Department of
Health and Environment v.
HollyFrontier El Dorado Refining LLC,
Civil Action No. 2:20–cv–2270. On June
10, 2020, the Department of Justice
lodged a corrected proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Kansas in the
same action to correct cross-reference
errors in the appendices to the proposed
Consent Decree. In the filed Complaint,
the United States on behalf of the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’), and the State of
Kansas, on behalf of the Kansas
Department of Health and Environment
(‘‘KDHE’’), allege that HollyFrontier El
Dorado Refining LLC (‘‘HollyFrontier’’)
has violated and, in some instances,
continues to violate, the following
environmental statutes, regulations, and
permits applicable to the petroleum
refining industry:
(a) The Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’), 42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq., specifically Section
110 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410, and the
Kansas State Implementation Plan
(‘‘SIP’’) issued thereunder; Section 111
of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7411, and the
New Source Performance Standards
(‘‘NSPS’’), 40 CFR part 60; Section 112
of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412, and the
National Emission Standards For
Hazardous Air Pollutants (‘‘NESHAPs’’),
40 CFR part 63; Section 112(r)(1) of the
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(1); and Section
112(r)(7) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(7), and the Risk Management
Program, 40 CFR part 68;
(b) the Kansas Air Quality Act
(‘‘KAQA’’), Kan. Stat. Ann. section 65–
3001 et seq., and Kan. Admin. Regs.
sections 28–19–302, 28–19–650, and
28–19–20; and
(c) the federally enforceable permits
issued to HollyFrontier by KDHE
pursuant to Title V of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7661–7661f; the KAQA, Kan.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
36880
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Notices
Stat. Ann. section 65–3001 et seq.; and
the regulations promulgated thereunder.
The Consent Decree requires
HollyFrontier El Dorado Refining LLC to
implement injunctive relief at its
petroleum refinery in El Dorado,
Kansas, and to pay a $4 million civil
penalty for a covenant-not-to-sue for
some of the claims in the filed
Complaint. The injunctive relief
includes, but is not limited to: (1)
Installation and operation of a new flare
tip; (2) installation of an additional
compressor on the flare gas recovery
system; and (3) internal and third-party
audits. The proposed Consent Decree
does not resolve the United States’
claims for civil penalties for the alleged
violations of Section 112(r)(1) of the
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(1); and Section
112(r)(7) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(7), and the Risk Management
Program, 40 CFR part 68.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States and State of
Kansas, ex rel. Kansas Department of
Health and Environment v.
HollyFrontier El Dorado Refining LLC,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–08660/1. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
proposed Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $20.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a paper copy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
without the exhibits and signature
pages, the cost is $13.00.
Susan M. Akers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2020–13141 Filed 6–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Application No. D–12010]
Z–RIN: 1210–ZA28
Prohibited Transactions Involving
Pooled Employer Plans Under the
SECURE Act and Other Multiple
Employer Plans
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The Setting Every Community
Up for Retirement Enhancement Act
(SECURE Act) amended the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) to allow for pooled employer
plans (PEPs). PEPs are required to
designate a pooled plan provider who is
a named fiduciary of the PEP. As a
fiduciary, the pooled plan provider is
subject to standards and restrictions in
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code,
including the prohibited transaction
provisions restricting fiduciaries of
plans from engaging in conflict of
interest transactions. This document
requests information on the possible
parties, business models, and conflicts
of interest that respondents anticipate
will be involved in the formation and
ongoing operation of PEPs. This
document also requests information on
similar issues involving multiple
employer plans sponsored by employer
groups or associations or professional
employer organizations (referred to
herein as ‘‘MEPs’’). The Department of
Labor (the Department) is considering
whether to propose a class exemption
on its own motion to cover prohibited
transactions involving PEPs and MEPs.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
to the Department on or before July 20,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments to the Office of Exemption
Determinations by any of the following
methods, identified by Z–RIN 1210–
ZA28:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket ID
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
number: EBSA–2020–0001. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email to: e-OED@dol.gov.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
below for additional information
regarding comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Hesse, telephone (202) 693–8546, Office
of Exemption Determinations, Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor (this is not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment Instructions
All comments received must include
the agency name and Regulation
Identifier Number (Z–RIN) for this
request for information. In light of the
current circumstances surrounding the
COVID–19 pandemic caused by the
novel coronavirus which may result in
disruption to the receipt of comments
by U.S. Mail or hand delivery/courier,
persons are encouraged to submit all
comments electronically and not to
follow with paper copies. Comments
will be available to the public, without
charge, online at https://
www.regulations.gov and https://
www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa, and at the
Public Disclosure Room, Employee
Benefits Security Administration, Suite
N–1513, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: All comments and hearing
requests will be made available to the
public. Do not include any personally
identifiable information (such as Social
Security number, name, address, or
other contact information) or
confidential business information that
you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments and hearing requests may be
posted on the internet and can be
retrieved by most internet search
engines.
The Department of Labor (the
Department) is considering whether to
propose a class exemption on its own
motion to cover prohibited transactions
involving PEPs and MEPs under the
authority of section 408(a) of ERISA,
and section 4975(c)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (76
FR 66637, 66644, October 27, 2011).
I. Background
A. Setting Every Community Up for
Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE
Act)
The SECURE Act was signed into law
on December 20, 2019. It amended the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) to allow for a type
of employee benefit plan called a pooled
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 118 (Thursday, June 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36879-36880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13141]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On May 28, 2020, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District
of Kansas in the lawsuit entitled United States and State of Kansas, ex
rel. Kansas Department of Health and Environment v. HollyFrontier El
Dorado Refining LLC, Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-2270. On June 10, 2020,
the Department of Justice lodged a corrected proposed Consent Decree
with the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in the
same action to correct cross-reference errors in the appendices to the
proposed Consent Decree. In the filed Complaint, the United States on
behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA''),
and the State of Kansas, on behalf of the Kansas Department of Health
and Environment (``KDHE''), allege that HollyFrontier El Dorado
Refining LLC (``HollyFrontier'') has violated and, in some instances,
continues to violate, the following environmental statutes,
regulations, and permits applicable to the petroleum refining industry:
(a) The Clean Air Act (``CAA''), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.,
specifically Section 110 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410, and the Kansas
State Implementation Plan (``SIP'') issued thereunder; Section 111 of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7411, and the New Source Performance Standards
(``NSPS''), 40 CFR part 60; Section 112 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412, and
the National Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants
(``NESHAPs''), 40 CFR part 63; Section 112(r)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(1); and Section 112(r)(7) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(7), and
the Risk Management Program, 40 CFR part 68;
(b) the Kansas Air Quality Act (``KAQA''), Kan. Stat. Ann. section
65-3001 et seq., and Kan. Admin. Regs. sections 28-19-302, 28-19-650,
and 28-19-20; and
(c) the federally enforceable permits issued to HollyFrontier by
KDHE pursuant to Title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661-7661f; the KAQA,
Kan.
[[Page 36880]]
Stat. Ann. section 65-3001 et seq.; and the regulations promulgated
thereunder.
The Consent Decree requires HollyFrontier El Dorado Refining LLC to
implement injunctive relief at its petroleum refinery in El Dorado,
Kansas, and to pay a $4 million civil penalty for a covenant-not-to-sue
for some of the claims in the filed Complaint. The injunctive relief
includes, but is not limited to: (1) Installation and operation of a
new flare tip; (2) installation of an additional compressor on the
flare gas recovery system; and (3) internal and third-party audits. The
proposed Consent Decree does not resolve the United States' claims for
civil penalties for the alleged violations of Section 112(r)(1) of the
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(1); and Section 112(r)(7) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7412(r)(7), and the Risk Management Program, 40 CFR part 68.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division,
and should refer to United States and State of Kansas, ex rel. Kansas
Department of Health and Environment v. HollyFrontier El Dorado
Refining LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-08660/1. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of
this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ [email protected].
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may
be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of
the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent
Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-
7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $20.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper
copy without the exhibits and signature pages, the cost is $13.00.
Susan M. Akers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-13141 Filed 6-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P