Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Isotonitazene in Schedule I, 36819-36823 [2020-12304]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–631]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Isotonitazene
in Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed amendment; notice of
intent.
AGENCY:
The Acting Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this notice of intent to publish
a temporary order to schedule N,Ndiethyl-2-(2-(4 isopropoxybenzyl)-5nitro-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1amine (commonly known as
isotonitazene), including its isomers,
esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers,
esters, and ethers whenever the
existence of such isomers, esters, ethers,
and salts is possible, in schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act. When it is
issued, the temporary scheduling order
will impose the regulatory controls and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to schedule I
controlled substances on persons who
handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse
distribute, import, export, engage in
research, conduct instructional
activities or chemical analysis, or
possess), or propose to handle
isotonitazene.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
June 18, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott A. Brinks, Regulatory Drafting and
Policy Support Section, Diversion
Control Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (571) 362–3261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document is issued pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of 21
U.S.C. 811(h). The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) intends to issue a
temporary scheduling order (in the form
of a temporary amendment) to add
isotonitazene to schedule I under the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA).1 The
temporary scheduling order will be
published in the Federal Register on or
after July 20, 2020.
1 Though DEA has used the term ‘‘final order’’
with respect to temporary scheduling orders in the
past, this notice of intent adheres to the statutory
language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a
‘‘temporary scheduling order.’’ No substantive
change is intended.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
Legal Authority
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance in schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b), if he
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1) while
the substance is temporarily controlled
under section 811(h), the Attorney
General may extend the temporary
scheduling for up to one year. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308. The
Attorney General has delegated
scheduling authority under 21 U.S.C.
811 to the Administrator of DEA
(Administrator). 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of his intention to
temporarily place a substance in
schedule I of the CSA.2 The Acting
Administrator transmitted notice of his
intent to place isotonitazene in schedule
I on a temporary basis to the Assistant
Secretary for Health of HHS (Assistant
Secretary) by letter dated March 2, 2020.
The Assistant Secretary responded to
this notice by letter dated March 31,
2020, and advised that based on a
review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug
applications (INDs) or approved new
drug applications (NDAs) for
isotonitazene. The Assistant Secretary
also stated that HHS had no objection to
the temporary placement of
isotonitazene in schedule I of the CSA.
Isotonitazene is not currently listed in
any schedule under the CSA, and no
exemptions or approvals are in effect for
isotonitazene under section 505 of the
FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355.
To find that placing a substance
temporarily in schedule I of the CSA is
2 The Secretary of HHS has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS the authority
to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36819
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety, the Administrator is
required to consider three of the eight
factors set forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(c): The
substance’s history and current pattern
of abuse; the scope, duration and
significance of abuse; and what, if any,
risk there is to the public health. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(3). Consideration of these
factors includes actual abuse, diversion
from legitimate channels, and
clandestine importation, manufacture,
or distribution. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). Substances in schedule
I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(1).
Isotonitazene
The availability of synthetic opioids
in the illicit drug market continues to
pose an imminent hazard to the public
safety. Adverse health effects associated
with the abuse of synthetic opioids and
the continued evolution and increased
popularity of these substances have
been a serious concern in recent years.
As the United States continues to
experience an unprecedented epidemic
of opioid misuse and abuse, the
presence of new synthetic opioids with
no approved medical use exacerbates
the epidemic. The trafficking and abuse
of new synthetic opioids are deadly new
trends.
The identification of isotonitazene in
the illicit drug market has been reported
in Canada, Estonia, Germany, Latvia,
Sweden, and the United States (see
Factor 4 below). Data obtained from
preclinical pharmacology studies show
that isotonitazene has the
pharmacological profile similar to that
of the potent synthetic opioid
etonitazene, a schedule I controlled
substance. Because of the
pharmacological similarities of
isotonitazene to etonitazene, the use of
isotonitazene presents a high risk of
abuse and may negatively affect users
and communities. The abuse of
isotonitazene has been associated with
at least 19 fatalities in the United States
(see Factor 5 below). The positive
identification of this substance in postmortem cases is a serious concern for
public safety. Thus, isotonitazene poses
an imminent hazard to public safety.
Available data and information for
isotonitazene, as summarized below,
indicates that this substance has a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
36820
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical
supervision. DEA’s three-factor analysis
is available in its entirety under
‘‘Supporting and Related Material’’ of
the public docket for this action at
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number DEA–631.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
The chemical syntheses of
isotonitazene (a benzimidazole
derivative) and other benzimidazole
derivatives (including schedule I
substances such as synthetic opioids
etonitazene and clonitazene) were first
reported in the scientific literature in
1957. Isotonitazene is not an approved
pharmaceutical product and is not
approved for medical use anywhere in
the world. As discussed in the
background section, the Assistant
Secretary stated in a March 31, 2020
letter to DEA that there are no INDs or
FDA-approved NDAs for isotonitazene
in the United States. Hence, DEA notes
there is no legitimate channel for
isotonitazene as a marketed drug
product.
Since 2014, numerous synthetic
opioids structurally related to fentanyl
and several opioids from other
structural classes have begun to emerge
in the illicit drug market as evidenced
by the identification of these drugs in
forensic drug exhibits and toxicology
samples. Beginning in April 2019,
isotonitazene emerged on the illicit
synthetic drug market in the United
States as evidenced by its identification
in drug seizures and in biological
samples collected and submitted to
National Medical Services (NMS)
Laboratory 3 in August 2019. In August
2019, isotonitazene was first reported in
a drug case in Belgium and toxicology
casework in Canada (toxicological
sample was collected in March 2019). In
the United States, the Center for
Forensic Science Research and
Education (under the novel
psychoactive substances discovery
program) first reported isotonitazene in
November 2019.
According to a report by the European
Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug
addiction and Europol,4 between April
3 NMS Labs, in collaboration with the Center for
Forensic Science Research and Education at the
Fredric Rieders Family Foundation and the
Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force at
the U.S. Department of Justice, has received funding
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
to develop systems for the early identification and
notification of novel psychoactive substances in the
drug supply within the United States.
4 European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug
Addiction and Europol (2020), EMCDDA initial
report on the new psychoactive substance N,N-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
2019 and January 2020, four member
states (Estonia, Latvia, Germany, and
Sweden) have reported 24 isotonitazene
cases involving 109.6 g of powder (22
cases) and 4.5 g of liquid (two cases).
Isotonitazene has been encountered by
US law enforcement primarily in
powder form. In March 2020, Canada
law enforcement also encountered
isotonitazene in tablet form as a white
triangular tablet with ‘M’ logo on one
side and ‘8’ logo on the other side and
as a blue tablet in Dilaudid counterfeit
pills. Identification of isotonitazene in
counterfeit pills is deeply concerning
because the identity, purity, and
quantity of isotonitazene in this
formulation are uncertain, thus
presenting additional safety concerns
for unsuspecting users.
In the United States, isotonitazene has
been identified as a single substance or
in combination with other substances.
In April 2019, the United States
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
seized 1.6 grams of isotonitazene in
California. In addition, Wisconsin State
Crime Laboratories identified
isotonitazene mixed with heroin and
bromazolam, a nonscheduled
benzodiazepine, in seized powder.
Further, isotonitazene was identified in
a substance obtained from the scene of
a death investigation case in Iowa.
Evidence suggests that individuals are
using isotonitazene as a replacement to
heroin or other opioids, either
knowingly or unknowingly.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration, and
Significance of Abuse
Isotonitazene, similar to etonitazene
(schedule I), has been described as a
potent synthetic opioid and evidence
suggests it is being abused for its
opioidergic effects (see Factor 6). The
abuse of isotonitazene, similar to other
synthetic opioids, has resulted in
adverse health effects. Isotonitazene has
been positively identified in 18 death
investigation cases spanning between
August 2019 and January 2020. These
reports were from four states—Illinois
(9), Indiana (7), Minnesota (1), and
Wisconsin (1). Most (n = 12) of the
decedents were male. The ages ranged
from 24 to 66 years old with an average
age of 41. Other substances identified in
postmortem blood specimens obtained
from these decedents include etizolam
(6); flualprazolam, a nonscheduled
benzodiazepine (7); fentanyl (6); heroin
(3); tramadol, a schedule IV substance
diethyl-2-[[4-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl]methyl]-5nitro-1H-benzimidazole-1-ethanamine
(isotonitazene). In accordance with Article 5b of
Regulation (EC) No. 1920/2006 (as amended),
Publications Office of the European Union,
Luxembourg.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2); and U–47700, a schedule I
substance (1). The average concentration
of isotonitazene in these biological
samples (blood) was 2.2 ± 2.1
nanogram/milliliter (ng/ml) (range 0.4 to
9.5 ng/ml). Isotonitazene was detected
as the only opioid in 50 percent (n = 9)
of the specimens for these decedents.
DEA is aware of another postmortem
case in Pennsylvania where
isotonitazene was identified in a
biological sample. In total, isotonitazene
has been positively identified in 19
postmortem cases.
Law enforcement data indicate that
isotonitazene has appeared in the
United States’ illicit drug market.
According to the National Forensic
Laboratory Information System
(NFLIS) 5 database, which collects drug
identification results from drug cases
submitted to and analyzed by Federal,
State and local forensic laboratories,
there have been eight encounters of
isotonitazene in the United States
(queried March 5, 2020). These eight
encounters were in 2019 and in two
states, Tennessee (7) and California (1).
One of these encounters consisted of 1.6
grams of isotonitazene seized by the
CBP in California in April 2019.
The population likely to abuse
isotonitazene appears to be the same as
those abusing prescription opioid
analgesics, heroin, tramadol, fentanyl,
and other synthetic opioid substances.
This is evidenced by the types of other
drugs co-identified in isotonitazene fatal
overdose cases. Because abusers of
isotonitazene are likely to obtain it
through unregulated sources, the
identity, purity, and quantity are
uncertain and inconsistent, thus posing
significant adverse health risks to the
end user. The misuse and abuse of
opioids have been demonstrated and are
well characterized. According to the
most recent data from the National
Survey on Drug Use and Health
(NSDUH),6 as of 2018, an estimated 10.3
5 NFLIS represents an important resource in
monitoring illicit drug trafficking, including the
diversion of legally manufactured pharmaceuticals
into illegal markets. NFLIS-Drug is a comprehensive
information system that includes data from forensic
laboratories that handle the nation’s drug analysis
cases. NFLIS-Drug participation rate, defined as the
percentage of the national drug caseload
represented by laboratories that have joined NFLIS,
is currently 98.5 percent. NFLIS includes drug
chemistry results from completed analyses only.
While NFLIS data is not direct evidence of abuse,
it can lead to an inference that a drug has been
diverted and abused. See 76 FR 77330, 77332, Dec.
12, 2011. NFLIS data was queried on March 5, 2020.
6 The National Survey on Drug Use and Health
(NSDUH), formerly known as the National
Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), is
conducted annually by HHS’ Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
It is the primary source of estimates of the
prevalence and incidence of nonmedical use of
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
million people aged 12 years or older
had misused opioids in the past year,
including 9.9 million prescription pain
reliever misusers and 808,000 heroin
users. In 2018, an estimated 2.0 million
people had an opioid use disorder
which included 1.7 million people with
a prescription pain reliever use disorder
and 0.5 million people with heroin use
disorder. This population abusing
opioids is likely to be at risk of abusing
isotonitazene. Individuals who initiate
(i.e., use a drug for the first time) use of
isotonitazene are likely to be at risk of
developing substance use disorder,
overdose, and death similar to that of
other opioid analgesics (e.g., fentanyl,
morphine, etc.). Law enforcement and
toxicology reports demonstrate that
isotonitazene is being illicitly
distributed and abused.
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to
the Public Health
The increase in opioid overdose
deaths in the United States has been
exacerbated recently by the availability
of potent synthetic opioids in the illicit
drug market. Data obtained from preclinical studies demonstrate that
isotonitazene exhibits a
pharmacological profile similar to that
of etonitazene and other mu-opioid
receptor agonists. In an in vivo (in mice)
study, isotonitazene was 500 times more
potent than morphine as an analgesic in
a tail-flick assay. The tail-flick assay is
useful in evaluating antinociceptive
effect. Data from in vitro studies showed
that isotonitazene activated the muopioid receptor and acted as a muopioid receptor agonist. Isotonitazene,
similar to hydromorphone and fentanyl,
activated the mu-opioid receptor and
acted as an agonist via interaction at the
mu-opioid receptor with b-arrestin-2, a
regulatory protein, in a live cell-based
receptor assay. Naloxone, an opioid
receptor antagonist, blocked
isotonitazene’s activation of the muopioid receptor. Substances that act as
an agonist at the mu-opioid receptors
have a high potential for addiction and
pharmaceutical drugs, illicit drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco use in the United States. The survey is
based on a nationally representative sample of the
civilian, non-institutionalized population 12 years
of age and older. The survey excludes homeless
people who do not use shelters, active military
personnel, and residents of institutional group
quarters such as jails and hospitals. The NSDUH
provides yearly national and state level estimates of
drug abuse, and includes prevalence estimates by
lifetime (i.e., ever used), past year, and past month
abuse or dependence. The 2018 NSDUH annual
report is available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/
NSDUHNationalFindingsReport2018/
NSDUHNationalFindingsReport2018.pdf (last
accessed April 9, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
can induce dose-dependent respiratory
depression.
As with any mu-opioid receptor
agonist, the potential health and safety
risks for users are high. The public
health risks attendant to the abuse of
heroin and other mu-opioid receptor
agonists are well established and have
resulted in large numbers of drug
treatment admissions, emergency
department visits, and fatal overdoses.
According to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), opioids,
mainly synthetic opioids other than
methadone, are predominantly
responsible for drug overdose deaths in
recent years. A CDC report shows that
from 2013 to 2018,7 opioid-related
overdose deaths in the United States
increased from 25,052 to 46,802. Of the
drug overdose death data for 2018,
opioids were involved in about 69.5
percent of all drug-involved overdose
deaths.
Isotonitazene has been co-identified
with other substances in 18 postmortem
cases and DEA is aware of an additional
death case that occurred in January 2020
involving isotonitazene in the United
States. These deaths associated with
isotonitazene occurred in five statesIllinois (9), Indiana (7), Minnesota (1),
Pennsylvania (1), and Wisconsin (1).
Information gathered from case histories
and autopsy findings shows that
isotonitazene use is similar to that of
classic opioid agonists. Evidence
obtained from reported cases of death
scenes suggests that isotonitazene,
similar to heroin, can be used
intravenously.8
The introduction of potent synthetic
opioids such as isotonitazene into the
illicit market is a portal to problematic
opioid use for those seeking these
powerful opioids. As documented by a
published toxicology report, polysubstance abuse remains common in
fatalities associated with the abuse of
isotonitazene.9
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information summarized above, the
uncontrolled manufacture, distribution,
reverse distribution, importation,
exportation, conduct of research and
7 CDC—National Center for Health Statistics
(NCHS), National Vital Statistics System, Mortality.
NCHS Data Brief, Number 356, January 2020.
8 Krotulski AJ, Papsun DM, Kacinko SL, and
Logan BK (2020). Isotonitazene Quantitation and
Metabolite Discovery in Authentic Forensic
Casework. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. [Epub
ahead of print].
9 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36821
chemical analysis, possession, and
abuse of isotonitazene pose an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
DEA is not aware of any currently
accepted medical uses for isotonitazene
in the United States. A substance
meeting the statutory requirements for
temporary scheduling, found in 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may only be placed in
schedule I. Substances in schedule I are
those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. Available
data and information for isotonitazene
indicate that this substance has a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical
supervision. As required by 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the Acting Administrator,
through a letter dated March 2, 2020,
notified the Assistant Secretary for
Health of DEA’s intention to temporarily
place isotonitazene in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent provides the 30day notice pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1) of DEA’s intent to issue a
temporary scheduling order. In
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and
(3), the Acting Administrator considered
available data and information, herein
set forth the grounds for his
determination that it is necessary to
temporarily schedule isotonitazene in
schedule I of the CSA, and finds that
placement of this substance in schedule
I of the CSA is necessary in order to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety.
The temporary placement of
isotonitazene in schedule I of the CSA
will take effect pursuant to a temporary
scheduling order, which will not be
issued before July 20, 2020. Because the
Acting Administrator hereby finds that
it is necessary to temporarily place
isotonitazene in schedule I to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety,
the temporary order scheduling this
substance will be effective on the date
the order is published in the Federal
Register, and will be in effect for a
period of two years, with a possible
extension of one additional year,
pending completion of the regular
(permanent) scheduling process. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2). It is the
intention of the Acting Administrator to
issue a temporary scheduling order as
soon as possible after the expiration of
30 days from the date of publication of
this document. Upon publication of the
temporary order, isotonitazene will then
be subject to the CSA’s schedule I
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
36822
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
regulatory controls and administrative,
civil, and criminal sanctions applicable
to the manufacture, distribution, reverse
distribution, importation, exportation,
research, conduct of instructional
activities and chemical analysis, and
possession.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
done ‘‘on the record after opportunity
for a hearing’’ conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking affords
interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any
additional relevant information needed
to make a determination. Final
decisions that conclude the regular
scheduling process of formal
rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary
scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Analyses
21 U.S.C. 811(h) provides for a
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As provided in this subsection, the
Attorney General may, by order,
schedule a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. Such an order may not
be issued before the expiration of 30
days from: (1) The publication of a
notice in the Federal Register of the
intention to issue such order and the
grounds upon which such order is to be
issued, and (2) the date that notice of
the proposed temporary scheduling
order is transmitted to the Assistant
Secretary of HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as 21 U.S.C. 811(h) directs
that temporary scheduling actions be
issued by order and sets forth the
procedures by which such orders are to
be issued, including the requirement of
a publication in the Federal Register of
a notice of intent, the notice-andcomment requirements of section 553 of
the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this
Notice of Intent. The APA expressly
differentiates between an order and a
rule, as it defines an ‘‘order’’ to mean a
‘‘final disposition, whether affirmative,
negative, injunctive, or declaratory in
form, of an agency in a matter other
than rule making.’’ 5 U.S.C. 551(6)
(emphasis added). The specific language
chosen by Congress indicates an
intention for DEA to proceed through
the issuance of an order instead of
proceeding by rulemaking. Given that
Congress specifically requires the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
Attorney General to follow rulemaking
procedures for other kinds of scheduling
actions, see 21 U.S.C. 811(a), it is
noteworthy that, in 21 U.S.C. 811(h),
Congress authorized the issuance of
temporary scheduling actions by order
rather than by rule.
In the alternative, even assuming that
this notice of intent might be subject to
section 553 of the APA, the Acting
Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice-and-comment
requirements of section 553, as any
further delays in the process for
issuance of temporary scheduling orders
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although DEA believes this notice of
intent to issue a temporary scheduling
order is not subject to the notice-andcomment requirements of section 553 of
the APA, DEA notes that in accordance
with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Acting
Administrator took into consideration
comments submitted by the Assistant
Secretary in response to the notice that
DEA transmitted to the Assistant
Secretary pursuant to such subsection.
Further, DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The requirements for the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are
not applicable where, as here, DEA is
not required by section 553 of the APA
or any other law to publish a general
notice of proposed rulemaking.
In accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771, this action is not a significant
regulatory action. Executive Order
12866 directs agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and
equity). Executive Order 13563 is
supplemental to and reaffirms the
principles, structures, and definitions
governing regulatory review as
established in Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12866 classifies a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’
requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), as any
regulatory action that is likely to result
in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy; a sector of the
economy; productivity; competition;
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
jobs; the environment; public health or
safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. Because this is not a rulemaking
action, this is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866. In
addition, this action does not meet the
definition of an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action, and the repeal and
cost offset requirements of Executive
Order 13771 have not been triggered.
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA
proposes to amend 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
956(b), unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 1308.11, add paragraph (h)(48)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.11
*
Schedule I
*
*
(h) * * *
*
*
(48) N,N-diethyl-2-(2-(4
isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1Hbenzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1amine, its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers (Other
name: Isotonitazene) ..................
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
9614
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 118 / Thursday, June 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
Timothy J. Shea,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–12304 Filed 6–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2020–0048; FRL–10010–
93–Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology for the 2008 and 2015
Ozone Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Rhode
Island. The SIP revision consists of a
demonstration that Rhode Island meets
the requirements of reasonably available
control technology (RACT) for the two
precursors for ground-level ozone,
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), set forth by
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) with
respect to the 2008 and 2015 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQSs or standards). Additionally,
we are proposing approval of specific
regulations that implement the RACT
requirements by limiting air emissions
of NOX and VOC pollutants from
sources within the State. This action is
being taken in accordance with the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 20, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2020–0048 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
mackintosh.david@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA Region 1 Regional Office, Air and
Radiation Division, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays and
facility closures due to COVID–19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David L. Mackintosh, Air Quality
Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (Mail Code 05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, tel. 617–918–
1584, email Mackintosh.David@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Summary of Rhode Island’s SIP Revision
III. EPA’s Evaluation of the Submittal
A. NOX RACT for Major Sources
B. Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources
C. CTG VOC RACT
IV. Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Rhode Island is part of the Ozone
Transport Region (OTR) under Section
184(a) of the CAA. Sections 182(b)(2),
182(f) and 184 of the CAA require states
with ozone nonattainment areas that are
classified as moderate or above, as well
as areas in the OTR, to submit a SIP
revision requiring the implementation
of VOC RACT for sources covered by a
control techniques guideline (CTG) and
for all major sources of VOC and NOX.
A CTG is a document issued by EPA
which establishes a ‘‘presumptive
norm’’ for RACT for a specific VOC
source category. RACT is defined as the
lowest emission limitation that a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36823
particular source is capable of meeting
by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility.1
The CTGs usually identify a particular
control level which EPA recommends as
being RACT. States are required to
address RACT for the source categories
covered by CTGs through adoption of
rules as part of the SIP.
On October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58745),
EPA issued four new CTGs: Industrial
Cleaning Solvents; Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing;
Flexible Package Printing; and Flat
Wood Paneling Coatings, and applicable
areas were required to address them by
October 5, 2007. On October 9, 2007 (72
FR 57215), EPA issued three more
CTGs: Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings;
Large Appliance Coatings; and Metal
Furniture Coatings, and applicable areas
were required to address them by
October 9, 2008. On October 7, 2008 (73
FR 58841), EPA issued an additional
four CTGs: Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coatings; Fiberglass Boat
Manufacturing Materials; Miscellaneous
Industrial Adhesives; and Automobile
and Light-Duty Truck Assembly
Coatings. Applicable areas were
required to address these CTGs by
October 7, 2009. Lastly, on Oct 27, 2016
(81 FR 74798), EPA issued a new CTG
for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry,
and applicable areas were required to
address it by October 27, 2018.
On March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436),
EPA revised the health-based NAAQS
for ozone to 0.075 parts per million
(ppm), averaged over an 8-hour
timeframe. EPA determined that the
revised 8-hour standard would be more
protective of human health, especially
with regard to children and adults who
are active outdoors and individuals with
a pre-existing respiratory disease such
as asthma.
On March 6, 2015 (80 FR 12264), EPA
published a final rule outlining the
obligations for areas in nonattainment
with the 2008 ozone standard, as well
as obligations for areas in the OTR. This
rule, referred to as the ‘‘2008 Ozone
Implementation Rule,’’ contains a
description of EPA’s expectations for
states with RACT obligations, and
required states in the OTR to certify
RACT requirements by July 20, 2014.
The 2008 Ozone Implementation Rule
gives states several options for meeting
RACT requirements for the 2008 ozone
1 See Memorandum from Roger Strelow, Assistant
Administrator for Air and Waste Management, U.S.
EPA, to Regional Administrators, U.S. EPA,
‘‘Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP
Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas’’ (Dec. 9,
1976); see also 44 FR 53761, 53762 (September 17,
1979).
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 118 (Thursday, June 18, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36819-36823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12304]
[[Page 36819]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-631]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of
Isotonitazene in Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed amendment; notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration is issuing this notice of intent to publish a temporary
order to schedule N,N-diethyl-2-(2-(4 isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H-
benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine (commonly known as isotonitazene),
including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers,
esters, and ethers whenever the existence of such isomers, esters,
ethers, and salts is possible, in schedule I of the Controlled
Substances Act. When it is issued, the temporary scheduling order will
impose the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to schedule I controlled substances on persons who
handle (manufacture, distribute, reverse distribute, import, export,
engage in research, conduct instructional activities or chemical
analysis, or possess), or propose to handle isotonitazene.
DATES: June 18, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott A. Brinks, Regulatory Drafting
and Policy Support Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug
Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (571) 362-3261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document is issued pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h). The Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) intends to issue a temporary
scheduling order (in the form of a temporary amendment) to add
isotonitazene to schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA).\1\ The temporary scheduling order will be published in the
Federal Register on or after July 20, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Though DEA has used the term ``final order'' with respect to
temporary scheduling orders in the past, this notice of intent
adheres to the statutory language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers
to a ``temporary scheduling order.'' No substantive change is
intended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal Authority
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811, provides the Attorney
General with the authority to temporarily place a substance in schedule
I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements of 21
U.S.C. 811(b), if he finds that such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1) while the substance is temporarily controlled under section
811(h), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling for up
to one year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
section 202 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or
approval in effect for the substance under section 505 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308. The Attorney General has delegated
scheduling authority under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of DEA
(Administrator). 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) of his intention to temporarily place a substance
in schedule I of the CSA.\2\ The Acting Administrator transmitted
notice of his intent to place isotonitazene in schedule I on a
temporary basis to the Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS (Assistant
Secretary) by letter dated March 2, 2020. The Assistant Secretary
responded to this notice by letter dated March 31, 2020, and advised
that based on a review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there
are currently no investigational new drug applications (INDs) or
approved new drug applications (NDAs) for isotonitazene. The Assistant
Secretary also stated that HHS had no objection to the temporary
placement of isotonitazene in schedule I of the CSA. Isotonitazene is
not currently listed in any schedule under the CSA, and no exemptions
or approvals are in effect for isotonitazene under section 505 of the
FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Secretary of HHS has delegated to the Assistant
Secretary for Health of HHS the authority to make domestic drug
scheduling recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find that placing a substance temporarily in schedule I of the
CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider three of the eight factors set
forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(c): The substance's history and current pattern
of abuse; the scope, duration and significance of abuse; and what, if
any, risk there is to the public health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
Consideration of these factors includes actual abuse, diversion from
legitimate channels, and clandestine importation, manufacture, or
distribution. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling may only be placed in schedule I. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Substances in schedule I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
Isotonitazene
The availability of synthetic opioids in the illicit drug market
continues to pose an imminent hazard to the public safety. Adverse
health effects associated with the abuse of synthetic opioids and the
continued evolution and increased popularity of these substances have
been a serious concern in recent years. As the United States continues
to experience an unprecedented epidemic of opioid misuse and abuse, the
presence of new synthetic opioids with no approved medical use
exacerbates the epidemic. The trafficking and abuse of new synthetic
opioids are deadly new trends.
The identification of isotonitazene in the illicit drug market has
been reported in Canada, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Sweden, and the
United States (see Factor 4 below). Data obtained from preclinical
pharmacology studies show that isotonitazene has the pharmacological
profile similar to that of the potent synthetic opioid etonitazene, a
schedule I controlled substance. Because of the pharmacological
similarities of isotonitazene to etonitazene, the use of isotonitazene
presents a high risk of abuse and may negatively affect users and
communities. The abuse of isotonitazene has been associated with at
least 19 fatalities in the United States (see Factor 5 below). The
positive identification of this substance in post-mortem cases is a
serious concern for public safety. Thus, isotonitazene poses an
imminent hazard to public safety.
Available data and information for isotonitazene, as summarized
below, indicates that this substance has a high potential for abuse, no
currently accepted medical use in treatment in the
[[Page 36820]]
United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. DEA's three-factor analysis is available in its entirety
under ``Supporting and Related Material'' of the public docket for this
action at www.regulations.gov under Docket Number DEA-631.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
The chemical syntheses of isotonitazene (a benzimidazole
derivative) and other benzimidazole derivatives (including schedule I
substances such as synthetic opioids etonitazene and clonitazene) were
first reported in the scientific literature in 1957. Isotonitazene is
not an approved pharmaceutical product and is not approved for medical
use anywhere in the world. As discussed in the background section, the
Assistant Secretary stated in a March 31, 2020 letter to DEA that there
are no INDs or FDA-approved NDAs for isotonitazene in the United
States. Hence, DEA notes there is no legitimate channel for
isotonitazene as a marketed drug product.
Since 2014, numerous synthetic opioids structurally related to
fentanyl and several opioids from other structural classes have begun
to emerge in the illicit drug market as evidenced by the identification
of these drugs in forensic drug exhibits and toxicology samples.
Beginning in April 2019, isotonitazene emerged on the illicit synthetic
drug market in the United States as evidenced by its identification in
drug seizures and in biological samples collected and submitted to
National Medical Services (NMS) Laboratory \3\ in August 2019. In
August 2019, isotonitazene was first reported in a drug case in Belgium
and toxicology casework in Canada (toxicological sample was collected
in March 2019). In the United States, the Center for Forensic Science
Research and Education (under the novel psychoactive substances
discovery program) first reported isotonitazene in November 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NMS Labs, in collaboration with the Center for Forensic
Science Research and Education at the Fredric Rieders Family
Foundation and the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force at
the U.S. Department of Justice, has received funding from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to develop systems for
the early identification and notification of novel psychoactive
substances in the drug supply within the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to a report by the European Monitoring Center for Drugs
and Drug addiction and Europol,\4\ between April 2019 and January 2020,
four member states (Estonia, Latvia, Germany, and Sweden) have reported
24 isotonitazene cases involving 109.6 g of powder (22 cases) and 4.5 g
of liquid (two cases). Isotonitazene has been encountered by US law
enforcement primarily in powder form. In March 2020, Canada law
enforcement also encountered isotonitazene in tablet form as a white
triangular tablet with `M' logo on one side and `8' logo on the other
side and as a blue tablet in Dilaudid counterfeit pills. Identification
of isotonitazene in counterfeit pills is deeply concerning because the
identity, purity, and quantity of isotonitazene in this formulation are
uncertain, thus presenting additional safety concerns for unsuspecting
users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and
Europol (2020), EMCDDA initial report on the new psychoactive
substance N,N-diethyl-2-[[4-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl]methyl]-5-nitro-
1H-benzimidazole-1-ethanamine (isotonitazene). In accordance with
Article 5b of Regulation (EC) No. 1920/2006 (as amended),
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the United States, isotonitazene has been identified as a single
substance or in combination with other substances. In April 2019, the
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized 1.6 grams of
isotonitazene in California. In addition, Wisconsin State Crime
Laboratories identified isotonitazene mixed with heroin and bromazolam,
a nonscheduled benzodiazepine, in seized powder. Further, isotonitazene
was identified in a substance obtained from the scene of a death
investigation case in Iowa. Evidence suggests that individuals are
using isotonitazene as a replacement to heroin or other opioids, either
knowingly or unknowingly.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration, and Significance of Abuse
Isotonitazene, similar to etonitazene (schedule I), has been
described as a potent synthetic opioid and evidence suggests it is
being abused for its opioidergic effects (see Factor 6). The abuse of
isotonitazene, similar to other synthetic opioids, has resulted in
adverse health effects. Isotonitazene has been positively identified in
18 death investigation cases spanning between August 2019 and January
2020. These reports were from four states--Illinois (9), Indiana (7),
Minnesota (1), and Wisconsin (1). Most (n = 12) of the decedents were
male. The ages ranged from 24 to 66 years old with an average age of
41. Other substances identified in postmortem blood specimens obtained
from these decedents include etizolam (6); flualprazolam, a
nonscheduled benzodiazepine (7); fentanyl (6); heroin (3); tramadol, a
schedule IV substance (2); and U-47700, a schedule I substance (1). The
average concentration of isotonitazene in these biological samples
(blood) was 2.2 2.1 nanogram/milliliter (ng/ml) (range 0.4
to 9.5 ng/ml). Isotonitazene was detected as the only opioid in 50
percent (n = 9) of the specimens for these decedents. DEA is aware of
another postmortem case in Pennsylvania where isotonitazene was
identified in a biological sample. In total, isotonitazene has been
positively identified in 19 postmortem cases.
Law enforcement data indicate that isotonitazene has appeared in
the United States' illicit drug market. According to the National
Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) \5\ database, which
collects drug identification results from drug cases submitted to and
analyzed by Federal, State and local forensic laboratories, there have
been eight encounters of isotonitazene in the United States (queried
March 5, 2020). These eight encounters were in 2019 and in two states,
Tennessee (7) and California (1). One of these encounters consisted of
1.6 grams of isotonitazene seized by the CBP in California in April
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NFLIS represents an important resource in monitoring illicit
drug trafficking, including the diversion of legally manufactured
pharmaceuticals into illegal markets. NFLIS-Drug is a comprehensive
information system that includes data from forensic laboratories
that handle the nation's drug analysis cases. NFLIS-Drug
participation rate, defined as the percentage of the national drug
caseload represented by laboratories that have joined NFLIS, is
currently 98.5 percent. NFLIS includes drug chemistry results from
completed analyses only. While NFLIS data is not direct evidence of
abuse, it can lead to an inference that a drug has been diverted and
abused. See 76 FR 77330, 77332, Dec. 12, 2011. NFLIS data was
queried on March 5, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The population likely to abuse isotonitazene appears to be the same
as those abusing prescription opioid analgesics, heroin, tramadol,
fentanyl, and other synthetic opioid substances. This is evidenced by
the types of other drugs co-identified in isotonitazene fatal overdose
cases. Because abusers of isotonitazene are likely to obtain it through
unregulated sources, the identity, purity, and quantity are uncertain
and inconsistent, thus posing significant adverse health risks to the
end user. The misuse and abuse of opioids have been demonstrated and
are well characterized. According to the most recent data from the
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH),\6\ as of 2018, an
estimated 10.3
[[Page 36821]]
million people aged 12 years or older had misused opioids in the past
year, including 9.9 million prescription pain reliever misusers and
808,000 heroin users. In 2018, an estimated 2.0 million people had an
opioid use disorder which included 1.7 million people with a
prescription pain reliever use disorder and 0.5 million people with
heroin use disorder. This population abusing opioids is likely to be at
risk of abusing isotonitazene. Individuals who initiate (i.e., use a
drug for the first time) use of isotonitazene are likely to be at risk
of developing substance use disorder, overdose, and death similar to
that of other opioid analgesics (e.g., fentanyl, morphine, etc.). Law
enforcement and toxicology reports demonstrate that isotonitazene is
being illicitly distributed and abused.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), formerly
known as the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), is
conducted annually by HHS' Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA). It is the primary source of
estimates of the prevalence and incidence of nonmedical use of
pharmaceutical drugs, illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco use in the
United States. The survey is based on a nationally representative
sample of the civilian, non-institutionalized population 12 years of
age and older. The survey excludes homeless people who do not use
shelters, active military personnel, and residents of institutional
group quarters such as jails and hospitals. The NSDUH provides
yearly national and state level estimates of drug abuse, and
includes prevalence estimates by lifetime (i.e., ever used), past
year, and past month abuse or dependence. The 2018 NSDUH annual
report is available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NSDUHNationalFindingsReport2018/NSDUHNationalFindingsReport2018.pdf (last accessed April 9, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
The increase in opioid overdose deaths in the United States has
been exacerbated recently by the availability of potent synthetic
opioids in the illicit drug market. Data obtained from pre-clinical
studies demonstrate that isotonitazene exhibits a pharmacological
profile similar to that of etonitazene and other mu-opioid receptor
agonists. In an in vivo (in mice) study, isotonitazene was 500 times
more potent than morphine as an analgesic in a tail-flick assay. The
tail-flick assay is useful in evaluating antinociceptive effect. Data
from in vitro studies showed that isotonitazene activated the mu-opioid
receptor and acted as a mu-opioid receptor agonist. Isotonitazene,
similar to hydromorphone and fentanyl, activated the mu-opioid receptor
and acted as an agonist via interaction at the mu-opioid receptor with
[beta]-arrestin-2, a regulatory protein, in a live cell-based receptor
assay. Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, blocked isotonitazene's
activation of the mu-opioid receptor. Substances that act as an agonist
at the mu-opioid receptors have a high potential for addiction and can
induce dose-dependent respiratory depression.
As with any mu-opioid receptor agonist, the potential health and
safety risks for users are high. The public health risks attendant to
the abuse of heroin and other mu-opioid receptor agonists are well
established and have resulted in large numbers of drug treatment
admissions, emergency department visits, and fatal overdoses. According
to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), opioids,
mainly synthetic opioids other than methadone, are predominantly
responsible for drug overdose deaths in recent years. A CDC report
shows that from 2013 to 2018,\7\ opioid-related overdose deaths in the
United States increased from 25,052 to 46,802. Of the drug overdose
death data for 2018, opioids were involved in about 69.5 percent of all
drug-involved overdose deaths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ CDC--National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National
Vital Statistics System, Mortality. NCHS Data Brief, Number 356,
January 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isotonitazene has been co-identified with other substances in 18
postmortem cases and DEA is aware of an additional death case that
occurred in January 2020 involving isotonitazene in the United States.
These deaths associated with isotonitazene occurred in five states-
Illinois (9), Indiana (7), Minnesota (1), Pennsylvania (1), and
Wisconsin (1). Information gathered from case histories and autopsy
findings shows that isotonitazene use is similar to that of classic
opioid agonists. Evidence obtained from reported cases of death scenes
suggests that isotonitazene, similar to heroin, can be used
intravenously.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Krotulski AJ, Papsun DM, Kacinko SL, and Logan BK (2020).
Isotonitazene Quantitation and Metabolite Discovery in Authentic
Forensic Casework. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. [Epub ahead of
print].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The introduction of potent synthetic opioids such as isotonitazene
into the illicit market is a portal to problematic opioid use for those
seeking these powerful opioids. As documented by a published toxicology
report, poly-substance abuse remains common in fatalities associated
with the abuse of isotonitazene.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3), based on the available data
and information summarized above, the uncontrolled manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution, importation, exportation, conduct
of research and chemical analysis, possession, and abuse of
isotonitazene pose an imminent hazard to the public safety. DEA is not
aware of any currently accepted medical uses for isotonitazene in the
United States. A substance meeting the statutory requirements for
temporary scheduling, found in 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may only be placed
in schedule I. Substances in schedule I are those that have a high
potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in
the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. Available data and information for isotonitazene indicate
that this substance has a high potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and a lack of
accepted safety for use under medical supervision. As required by 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Acting Administrator, through a letter dated
March 2, 2020, notified the Assistant Secretary for Health of DEA's
intention to temporarily place isotonitazene in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent provides the 30-day notice pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1) of DEA's intent to issue a temporary scheduling order.
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (3), the Acting
Administrator considered available data and information, herein set
forth the grounds for his determination that it is necessary to
temporarily schedule isotonitazene in schedule I of the CSA, and finds
that placement of this substance in schedule I of the CSA is necessary
in order to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
The temporary placement of isotonitazene in schedule I of the CSA
will take effect pursuant to a temporary scheduling order, which will
not be issued before July 20, 2020. Because the Acting Administrator
hereby finds that it is necessary to temporarily place isotonitazene in
schedule I to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
temporary order scheduling this substance will be effective on the date
the order is published in the Federal Register, and will be in effect
for a period of two years, with a possible extension of one additional
year, pending completion of the regular (permanent) scheduling process.
21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1) and (2). It is the intention of the Acting
Administrator to issue a temporary scheduling order as soon as possible
after the expiration of 30 days from the date of publication of this
document. Upon publication of the temporary order, isotonitazene will
then be subject to the CSA's schedule I
[[Page 36822]]
regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions
applicable to the manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution,
importation, exportation, research, conduct of instructional activities
and chemical analysis, and possession.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling a drug or other
substance. Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(a) are subject to formal rulemaking procedures done ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. 21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling process
of formal rulemaking affords interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any additional relevant information
needed to make a determination. Final decisions that conclude the
regular scheduling process of formal rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Analyses
21 U.S.C. 811(h) provides for a temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. As provided in this subsection, the Attorney General may, by
order, schedule a substance in schedule I on a temporary basis. Such an
order may not be issued before the expiration of 30 days from: (1) The
publication of a notice in the Federal Register of the intention to
issue such order and the grounds upon which such order is to be issued,
and (2) the date that notice of the proposed temporary scheduling order
is transmitted to the Assistant Secretary of HHS. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as 21 U.S.C. 811(h) directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by which such
orders are to be issued, including the requirement of a publication in
the Federal Register of a notice of intent, the notice-and-comment
requirements of section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this Notice of Intent. The APA expressly
differentiates between an order and a rule, as it defines an ``order''
to mean a ``final disposition, whether affirmative, negative,
injunctive, or declaratory in form, of an agency in a matter other than
rule making.'' 5 U.S.C. 551(6) (emphasis added). The specific language
chosen by Congress indicates an intention for DEA to proceed through
the issuance of an order instead of proceeding by rulemaking. Given
that Congress specifically requires the Attorney General to follow
rulemaking procedures for other kinds of scheduling actions, see 21
U.S.C. 811(a), it is noteworthy that, in 21 U.S.C. 811(h), Congress
authorized the issuance of temporary scheduling actions by order rather
than by rule.
In the alternative, even assuming that this notice of intent might
be subject to section 553 of the APA, the Acting Administrator finds
that there is good cause to forgo the notice-and-comment requirements
of section 553, as any further delays in the process for issuance of
temporary scheduling orders would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest in view of the manifest urgency to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although DEA believes this notice of intent to issue a temporary
scheduling order is not subject to the notice-and-comment requirements
of section 553 of the APA, DEA notes that in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the Acting Administrator took into consideration comments
submitted by the Assistant Secretary in response to the notice that DEA
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary pursuant to such subsection.
Further, DEA believes that this temporary scheduling action is not
a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
requirements for the preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where, as here, DEA is
not required by section 553 of the APA or any other law to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking.
In accordance with the principles of Executive Orders 12866, 13563,
and 13771, this action is not a significant regulatory action.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety effects;
distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 is
supplemental to and reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review as established in Executive
Order 12866. Executive Order 12866 classifies a ``significant
regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a
rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of
the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public
health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. Because this is not a rulemaking action, this is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. In addition, this action does not meet the definition of
an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action, and the repeal and cost
offset requirements of Executive Order 13771 have not been triggered.
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132 (Federalism), it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA proposes to amend 21 CFR part
1308 as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 956(b), unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.11, add paragraph (h)(48) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(48) N,N-diethyl-2-(2-(4 isopropoxybenzyl)-5-nitro-1H- 9614
benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine, its isomers, esters, ethers,
salts and salts of isomers, esters and ethers (Other name:
Isotonitazene)...............................................
[[Page 36823]]
* * * * *
Timothy J. Shea,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-12304 Filed 6-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P