Denial of Deduction for Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts; Information With Respect to Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts; Correction, 35606-35607 [2020-12628]
Download as PDF
35606
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 113 / Thursday, June 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2018–26–02, Amendment 39–19532 (83
FR 66093, December 26, 2018), and
adding the following new AD:
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2020–
0570; Product Identifier 2019–SW–121–
AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to the following Airbus
Helicopters helicopters, certificated in any
category:
(1) Model AS350B3 helicopters with an
ARRIEL 2B1 engine with the two-channel
Full Authority Digital Engine Control
(FADEC) and with new twist grip
modification (MOD) 073254 or with an
ARRIEL 2D engine installed;
(2) Model EC130B4 helicopters with an
ARRIEL 2B1 engine with the two-channel
FADEC and with new twist grip MOD 073773
installed; and
(3) Model EC130T2 helicopters with an
ARRIEL 2D engine installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
failure of one of the two contactors, 53Ka or
53Kb, which can prevent switching from
‘‘IDLE’’ mode to ‘‘FLIGHT’’ mode during
autorotation training making it impossible to
recover from a practice autorotation and
compelling the pilot to continue the
autorotation to the ground. This condition
could result in unintended touchdown to the
ground at a flight-idle power setting during
a practice autorotation, damage to the
helicopter, and injury to occupants.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2018–26–02,
Amendment 39–19532 (83 FR 66093,
December 26, 2018).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(d) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by July
27, 2020.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Before the next practice autorotation,
within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS), or 6
months, whichever occurs first, inspect the
wiring, perform an insulation test, inspect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jun 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
the pilot and copilot throttle twist grip
controls, and test the pilot and copilot
throttle twist grip controls for proper
functioning by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.B.1 through 3.B.6, of Airbus Helicopters
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No.
05.00.61, Revision 3, dated June 15, 2015, for
Model AS350B3 helicopters with an ARRIEL
2B1 engine; EASB No. 05.00.77, Revision 1,
dated June 15, 2015, for Model AS350B3
helicopters with an ARRIEL 2D engine; EASB
No. 05A009, Revision 3, dated June 15, 2015,
for Model EC130B4 helicopters; or EASB No.
05A014, Revision 1, dated June 15, 2015, for
Model EC130T2 helicopters, as appropriate
for your model helicopter.
(2) Repeat the inspections in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD at intervals not to exceed the
following compliance times. For purposes of
this AD, salt laden conditions exist when a
helicopter performs a flight from a takeoff
and landing area, heliport, or airport less
than 0.5 statute mile from salt water or
performs a flight within 0.5 statute mile from
salt water below an altitude of 1,000 ft. above
ground or sea level.
(i) For helicopters that have operated in
salt laden conditions since the previous
inspection required by this AD, at intervals
not to exceed 330 hours TIS or 6 months,
whichever occurs first.
(ii) For helicopters that have not operated
in salt laden conditions since the previous
inspection required by this AD, at intervals
not to exceed 660 hours TIS or 12 months,
whichever occurs first.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Rotorcraft Standards
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: George Schwab,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas
76177; telephone 817–222–5110; email 9ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD No. 2017–0059, dated April 6,
2017. You may view the EASA AD on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the
AD Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 7697, Engine Control System Wiring.
Issued on June 4, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–12530 Filed 6–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–104591–18]
RIN 1545–BO67
Denial of Deduction for Certain Fines,
Penalties, and Other Amounts;
Information With Respect to Certain
Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts;
Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to a notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains a
correction to a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–104591–18) that was
published in the Federal Register on
May 13, 2020. The guidance on section
162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code), as amended by legislation
enacted in 2017, concerning the
deduction of certain fines, penalties,
and other amounts.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing are
still being accepted and must be
received by July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to
Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:
LPD:PR (REG–104591–18), Room 5205,
P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submission of
comments electronically is strongly
suggested, as the ability to respond to
mail may be delayed. It is recommended
that comments and requests for a public
hearing be submitted electronically via
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–
104591–18).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Sharon Y. Horn (202) 317–4426;
concerning the information reporting
requirement, Nancy L. Rose (202) 317–
5147; concerning submissions of
comments and requests for a public
hearing, Regina L. Johnson, (202) 317–
5177 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The proposed regulations that are the
subject of this correction are under
section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Need for Correction
As published, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–104591–18) contains
errors that needs to be corrected.
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 113 / Thursday, June 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–104591–18) that was
the subject of FR Doc.2020–08649,
published at 85 FR 28524 (May 13,
2020), is corrected to read as follows:
1. On page 28529, first column, the
fourth line, the language ‘‘amounts or
incurred paid’’ is corrected to read
‘‘amounts paid or incurred’’.
2. On page 28531, second column, the
sixth line from the top of the second full
paragraph, the language ‘‘and by the
Office’’ is corrected to read ‘‘and the
Office’’.
§ 1.162–21
[Corrected]
3. On page 28536, the third column,
paragraph (f)(4), the language ‘‘A suit,
agreement, or otherwise includes, but is
not limited to, settlement agreements,
non-prosecution agreements, deferred
prosecution agreements, judicial
proceedings, administrative
adjudications, decisions issued by
officials, committees, commissions,
boards of a government or governmental
entity, and any legal actions or hearings
which impose a liability on the taxpayer
or pursuant to which the taxpayer
assumes liability’’. is corrected to read
‘‘A suit, agreement agreements; nonprosecution agreements; deferred
prosecution agreements; judicial
proceedings; administrative
adjudications; decisions issued by
officials, committees, commissions,
boards of a government or governmental
entity; and any legal actions or hearings
which impose a liability on the taxpayer
or pursuant to which the taxpayer
assumes liability’’.
■ 4. On page 28537, second column, the
last sentence of paragraph (g)(3)(i), the
language ‘‘Corp. B presents evidence, as
described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section, to substantiate that the
expenses Corp. B will incur to upgrade
the engines will be amounts paid to
come into compliance with State X’s
law’’. is corrected to read ‘‘Corp. B
presents invoices to substantiate that the
expenses Corp. B will incur to upgrade
the engines will be amounts paid to
come into compliance with State X’s
law.’’.
■ 5. On page 28537, second column, the
first sentence of paragraph (g)(3)(ii), the
language ‘‘Because the agreement
describes the specific action Corp. B
must take to come into compliance with
State X’s law, and Corp. B presents
invoices to establish that the agreement
obligates it to incur costs to come into
compliance with a law, paragraph (a) of
this section would not preclude a
deduction for the amounts Corp. B
incurs to come into compliance.’’ is
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Jun 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
corrected to read ‘‘Because the
agreement describes the specific action
Corp. B must take to come into
compliance with State X’s law, and
Corp. B provides evidence, as described
in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section to
establish that the agreement obligates it
to incur costs to come into compliance
with a law, paragraph (a) of this section
would not preclude a deduction for the
amounts Corp. B incurs to come into
compliance.’’.
■ 6. On page 28537, second column, the
third sentence of paragraph (g)(4)(ii), the
language, ‘‘Provided Corp. D establishes,
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
that the $60,000 constitutes restitution,
paragraph (a) does not apply.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘Provided Corp. D
establishes, under paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, that the $60,000 constitutes
restitution, paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply.
Martin V. Franks,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations
Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate
Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
[FR Doc. 2020–12628 Filed 6–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0618; FRL–10010–
05–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; TN; Removal of the
Vehicle I/M Program, Middle
Tennessee Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Tennessee, through the Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation (TDEC), through a letter
dated February 26, 2020. Specifically,
EPA is proposing to approve the
removal of Tennessee’s inspection and
maintenance (I/M) program
requirements for Davidson, Sumner,
Rutherford, Williamson and Wilson
Counties in Tennessee (also known as
the Middle Tennessee Area) from the
federally-approved SIP because
removing the requirements is consistent
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and
applicable regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 13, 2020.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35607
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2019–0618 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Sheckler, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9222. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached
via electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
Davidson County began implementing
an I/M program in 1985. See Davidson
County Resolution No. R83–1471. The
program required all light-duty motor
vehicles registered in Davidson County
to be inspected annually for compliance
with emissions performance and antitampering test criteria.
With the passage of the 1990 CAA
amendments, the Middle Tennessee
Area was designated as a moderate
ozone nonattainment area for the 1979
1-hour ozone NAAQS. See 56 FR 56694
(November 6, 1991). Under section 182
of the CAA, I/M programs are required
for areas that are designated as moderate
or above nonattainment for ozone, and
the existing I/M program in Davidson
County was expanded to the Middle
Tennessee Area. In 1994, Tennessee
submitted a SIP revision containing an
I/M program for the Middle Tennessee
Area, which EPA approved. See 60 FR
38694 (July 28, 1995). As part of that
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 113 (Thursday, June 11, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35606-35607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12628]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-104591-18]
RIN 1545-BO67
Denial of Deduction for Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other
Amounts; Information With Respect to Certain Fines, Penalties, and
Other Amounts; Correction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG-104591-18) that was published in the Federal Register
on May 13, 2020. The guidance on section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code), as amended by legislation enacted in 2017, concerning the
deduction of certain fines, penalties, and other amounts.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
are still being accepted and must be received by July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA: LPD:PR
(REG-104591-18), Room 5205, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submission of comments electronically is strongly
suggested, as the ability to respond to mail may be delayed. It is
recommended that comments and requests for a public hearing be
submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-104591-18).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Sharon Y. Horn (202) 317-4426; concerning the information reporting
requirement, Nancy L. Rose (202) 317-5147; concerning submissions of
comments and requests for a public hearing, Regina L. Johnson, (202)
317-5177 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The proposed regulations that are the subject of this correction
are under section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-104591-18)
contains errors that needs to be corrected.
[[Page 35607]]
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-104591-18) that
was the subject of FR Doc.2020-08649, published at 85 FR 28524 (May 13,
2020), is corrected to read as follows:
1. On page 28529, first column, the fourth line, the language
``amounts or incurred paid'' is corrected to read ``amounts paid or
incurred''.
2. On page 28531, second column, the sixth line from the top of the
second full paragraph, the language ``and by the Office'' is corrected
to read ``and the Office''.
Sec. 1.162-21 [Corrected]
0
3. On page 28536, the third column, paragraph (f)(4), the language ``A
suit, agreement, or otherwise includes, but is not limited to,
settlement agreements, non-prosecution agreements, deferred prosecution
agreements, judicial proceedings, administrative adjudications,
decisions issued by officials, committees, commissions, boards of a
government or governmental entity, and any legal actions or hearings
which impose a liability on the taxpayer or pursuant to which the
taxpayer assumes liability''. is corrected to read ``A suit, agreement
agreements; non-prosecution agreements; deferred prosecution
agreements; judicial proceedings; administrative adjudications;
decisions issued by officials, committees, commissions, boards of a
government or governmental entity; and any legal actions or hearings
which impose a liability on the taxpayer or pursuant to which the
taxpayer assumes liability''.
0
4. On page 28537, second column, the last sentence of paragraph
(g)(3)(i), the language ``Corp. B presents evidence, as described in
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, to substantiate that the expenses
Corp. B will incur to upgrade the engines will be amounts paid to come
into compliance with State X's law''. is corrected to read ``Corp. B
presents invoices to substantiate that the expenses Corp. B will incur
to upgrade the engines will be amounts paid to come into compliance
with State X's law.''.
0
5. On page 28537, second column, the first sentence of paragraph
(g)(3)(ii), the language ``Because the agreement describes the specific
action Corp. B must take to come into compliance with State X's law,
and Corp. B presents invoices to establish that the agreement obligates
it to incur costs to come into compliance with a law, paragraph (a) of
this section would not preclude a deduction for the amounts Corp. B
incurs to come into compliance.'' is corrected to read ``Because the
agreement describes the specific action Corp. B must take to come into
compliance with State X's law, and Corp. B provides evidence, as
described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section to establish that the
agreement obligates it to incur costs to come into compliance with a
law, paragraph (a) of this section would not preclude a deduction for
the amounts Corp. B incurs to come into compliance.''.
0
6. On page 28537, second column, the third sentence of paragraph
(g)(4)(ii), the language, ``Provided Corp. D establishes, under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, that the $60,000 constitutes
restitution, paragraph (a) does not apply.'' is corrected to read
``Provided Corp. D establishes, under paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
that the $60,000 constitutes restitution, paragraph (a) of this section
does not apply.
Martin V. Franks,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2020-12628 Filed 6-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P