Ocean Dumping: Cancellation of Final Designation for an Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site, 35564-35566 [2020-11029]
Download as PDF
35564
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 113 / Thursday, June 11, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Disposal Site (ODMDS), referred to as
the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS, pursuant
to the Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA), as amended.
The 1987 Wilmington ODMDS, which
was designated in 1987, is in the
Atlantic Ocean offshore Wilmington,
North Carolina. This action is being
taken because the 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS was previously replaced in
2002 by the existing New Wilmington
ODMDS and is no longer needed. In
addition, this action changes the name
of New Wilmington ODMDS to the
Wilmington, North Carolina ODMDS.
DATES: This rule is effective July 13,
2020.
40 CFR Part 228
ADDRESSES:
and evidence of insurability are
received by the administrative office
within 1 year and 210 days following
termination of duty, except that
evidence of insurability is not required
during the initial 330 days following
termination of duty.
(2) Paragraph (f)(1) of this section
shall not apply to an application or
initial premium received after June 11,
2021.
[FR Doc. 2020–12559 Filed 6–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
[EPA–R04–OW–2019–0592; FRL–10009–39–
Region 4]
Ocean Dumping: Cancellation of Final
Designation for an Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Site
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) cancels the final
designation of the original Wilmington,
North Carolina Ocean Dredged Material
SUMMARY:
Gary
W. Collins, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, Water
Division, Oceans and Estuarine
Management Section, 61 Forsyth Street,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303; phone number:
(404) 562–9395; email: collins.garyw@
epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Potentially Affected Persons
Persons potentially affected by this
action include those who seek or might
seek permits or approval to dispose of
dredged material into ocean waters
pursuant to the MPRSA (33 U.S.C. 1401
et seq.), 33 U.S.C. 1401 to 1445. The
EPA’s action would be relevant to
persons, including organizations, and
government bodies seeking to dispose of
dredged material in ocean waters
offshore of Wilmington, North Carolina.
Currently, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) would be most
affected by this action. Potentially
affected categories and persons include:
Category
Examples of potentially regulated persons
Federal Government .......................
Industry and general public ............
State, local and tribal governments
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works projects, U.S. Navy and other Federal agencies.
Port authorities, marinas and harbors, shipyards and marine repair facilities, berth owners.
Governments owning and/or responsible for ports, harbors, and/or berths, government agencies requiring
disposal of dredged material associated with public works projects.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding persons likely to
be affected by this action. For any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular person, please
refer to the contact person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Docket: All documents in
the Docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index, some
information may not be publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available or in hard copy at the EPA
Region 4 Office, 61 Forsyth Street SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303. The file will be
made available for public inspection in
the Region 4 library between the hours
of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays.
Contact the person listed in the FOR
section
below to make an appointment. If
possible, please make your appointment
at least two working days in advance of
your visit. There will be a 15 cent per
page fee for making photocopies of
documents.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
II. Background
Section 102(c) of the MPRSA, 33
U.S.C. 1412(c), gives the Administrator
of the EPA authority to designate sites
where ocean disposal may be permitted.
On October 1, 1986, the Administrator
delegated the authority to designate
ocean disposal sites to the Regional
Administrator of the Region in which
the sites are located. This cancellation is
being made pursuant to that authority.
The EPA Ocean Dumping Regulations
promulgated under MPRSA at 40 CFR
228.11, state that modifications in
disposal site use which involve
withdrawal of disposal sites from use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
will be made by promulgation pursuant
to 40 CFR part 228. This site
cancellation is being published as final
rulemaking in accordance with 40 CFR
228.11(a) of the Ocean Dumping
Regulations, which permits the
withdrawal of designated disposal sites
from use based upon changed
circumstances concerning use of the
site.
III. Action
The cancellation of the designation of
the ODMDS, which was designated
offshore Wilmington, North Carolina, in
1987 at 40 CFR 228.15(h)(2), is needed
as a housekeeping measure. This 1987
Wilmington ODMDS is no longer a
suitable disposal option and has no
foreseeable need. The 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS was replaced by the larger New
Wilmington ODMDS, which was
designated in 2002 at 40 CFR
228.15(h)(20), due to changes in
alignment of the Federal navigation
channel, which now cuts through the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1987 ODMDS, and for other applicable
reasons. In this action, the EPA also
changes the name of the New
Wilmington ODMDS to the Wilmington,
North Carolina ODMDS.
On November 6, 2019, the EPA issued
a draft rule for public review and
comment in the Federal Register [84 FR
59744 (Nov. 6, 2019)] which proposed
the cancelation of the designation of the
1987 Wilmington ODMDS and renaming
the New Wilmington ODMDS to the
Wilmington, North Carolina ODMDS.
Four comments were received on the
proposed rule. Of the four comments,
two were not related to this action and
do not need responses. Of the two
remaining comments, one stated that
ODMDS designations seem to trend
toward a pattern of moving further and
further offshore which the individual
attributes to improper long-term
planning by the EPA. The second
comment stated that ‘‘[s]ome evidence
showed that shrimpers have complained
that wood debris attributed to dredged
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 113 / Thursday, June 11, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
materials placed within the [1987
Wilmington ODMDS] interfere with
shrimping.’’
Regarding the issue of long-term
planning, the EPA historically
designates sites that are
environmentally suitable, minimizes the
haul distance and associated costs, and
maximizes the feasibility and ease for
monitoring while considering the
known longer-term needs of federally
authorized projects. With the recent
improvements to the Panama Canal,
nearly every port in the southeastern
U.S. has proceeded with plans to
deepen and widen navigation channels
for federally authorized projects, as well
as all the associated turning basins and
terminal berthing areas. Prudent use of
the Agency’s resources does not allow
for planning beyond the known needs of
the major site users at any given time
and thus the site designated in 1987 was
not designated with adequate capacity
to meet the current need.
The EPA understands that the
comment regarding wood debris in
dredged material and its interference
with shrimping is referencing historical
events that occurred at shrimping
grounds that lie offshore of Frying Pan
Shoals. In 1987–1988, shrimp fishermen
operating in areas outside the 1987
Wilmington ODMDS had reported
fouling and tearing of their nets with
roots, tree limbs, and other natural
origin wood debris. The fishermen
attributed the wood debris to ‘‘short
dumped’’ (i.e., outside the disposal area)
ocean disposal of dredged material from
the ‘‘river’’ reaches of the Wilmington
Harbor navigation channel as well as
reaches of the Military Ocean Terminal
Sunny Point (MOTSU). To remedy this,
the dredging contractor at the time
conducted a cleanup of the impacted
areas using heavy-duty scallop-style
nets for 20 days (approximately 228
tows were made). In an effort to
maximize the distance from the disposal
location to the shrimp fishing area,
between 1988 and 2002, dredged
materials from river sources were placed
in the most seaward (southern) half of
the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS.
However, in 1996, fishermen complaints
regarding wood debris in areas near the
1987 Wilmington ODMDS were again
received. In July 1996, the USACE
Wilmington District employed two
trawlers to drag heavy-duty nets in the
shrimp-trawling areas in order to assess
the wood debris problem. This USACE
determined that wood debris was
present in the traditional shrimping
bottoms in sufficient amounts to
interfere with shrimping but the USACE
was unable to determine the source of
the wood debris. The contention that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
the dredged material placed in the 1987
Wilmington ODMDS was a source of the
wood debris impacting shrimpers’
towing bottoms was neither confirmed
nor denied. Extreme weather events,
including hurricanes, periodically pass
over the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS and
surrounding areas and may naturally
redistribute debris on the sea floor,
regardless of their source. The 1987
Wilmington ODMDS, currently inactive,
has not received dredged material since
2002. There are no plans to remove any
wood debris or other material from the
1987 Wilmington ODMDS; rather, the
1987 Wilmington ODMDS footprint will
be allowed to continue its transition
back to a more natural state as it has
been for the past 18 years. Since its
designation in 2002, all dredged
materials originating from Wilmington
Harbor and MOTSU have been placed in
the New Wilmington ODMDS. The New
Wilmington ODMDS is located further
seaward (south) than the 1987
Wilmington ODMDS, and was
specifically sited to keep disposal
operations and any wood debris that
might be associated with the dredged
material as far as possible from these
shrimping grounds while maintaining
the economic feasibility of federally
authorized projects that require the
transport and disposal of dredged
material.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action complies with applicable
Executive orders and statutory
provisions as follows:
a. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is therefore not
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
b. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This action
does not require persons to obtain,
maintain, retain, report, or publicly
disclose information to or for a Federal
agency.
c. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., generally requires
Federal agencies to prepare a regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35565
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., or
any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impacts of this
rule on small entities, small entity is
defined as: (1) A small business defined
by the U.S. Small Business
Administration’s size regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district, or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. After considering
the economic impacts of this rule, the
EPA certifies that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not impose any
requirements on small entities.
d. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq., for state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
action imposes no new enforceable duty
on any state, local, or tribal governments
or the private sector. Therefore, this
action is not subject to the requirements
of Sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of Section 203 of the
UMRA because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small government
entities.
e. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on States, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government, as specified in Executive
Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this action. The
EPA specifically solicited comment on
this action from State and local officials.
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
35566
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 113 / Thursday, June 11, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
f. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the action will not
have a direct effect on Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action. The EPA specifically
solicited additional comments on this
action from tribal officials.
g. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885) as applying only to
those regulatory actions that concern
health or safety risks, such that the
analysis required under Section 5–501
of the Executive order has the potential
to influence the regulation. This action
is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not establish an
environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks.
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355) because it is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
i. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Jkt 250001
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228
Environmental protection, Water
pollution control.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, The EPA amends chapter I,
title 40 of the Code of Federal Register
as follows:
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
45 CFR Part 1168
RIN 3136–AA39
Implementing the Federal Civil
Penalties Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015
National Endowment for the
Humanities; National Foundation on the
Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities (NEH) is adopting as
final, without change, its interim final
rule that adjusted the civil monetary
penalties NEH may impose for
violations of its New Restrictions on
Lobbying regulation, pursuant to the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (the 2015 Act).
DATES: Effective date: This final rule is
effective on June 11, 2020. Applicability
date: The adjusted penalty amounts will
apply to penalties assessed on or after
January 15, 2020 if the associated
violations occurred after November 2,
2015.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, 400 7th Street SW, Room
4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202) 606–
8322; gencounsel@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113 (15
U.S.C. 3701 et seq.), directs the EPA to
use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus bodies.
The NTTAA directs the EPA to provide
Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards. This action does
not involve technical standards.
Therefore, the EPA is not considering
the use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
16:20 Jun 10, 2020
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629)
establishes Federal executive policy on
environmental justice. Its main
provision directs Federal agencies, to
the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make
environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States. The
EPA determined that this rule will not
have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income
populations because it does not affect
the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment. This
action is only cancelling the designation
of an ODMDS which is no longer viable.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of Section 102 of the Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as
amended, 33 U.S.C. 1412.
h. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
j. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
PART 228—CRITERIA FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSAL SITES
FOR OCEAN DUMPING
1. The authority citation for part 228
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
2. Section 228.15 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph (h)(2)
and revising paragraph (h)(20)
introductory text to read as follows:
■
§ 228.15 Dumping sites designated on a
final basis.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(20) Wilmington, North Carolina;
Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–11029 Filed 6–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On April 21, 2020, NEH published in
the Federal Register an interim final
rule to adjust the civil penalties found
in its New Restrictions on Lobbying
regulation (45 CFR part 1168) pursuant
to the 2015 Act. (See 85 FR 22025).
For each regulation that imposes a
civil monetary penalty, the 2015 Act
requires agencies to: (1) Adjust the level
of civil monetary penalties with an
initial ‘‘catch-up’’ inflation adjustment
through an interim final rulemaking;
and (2) make subsequent annual
adjustments for inflation. The formula
for the amount of a civil monetary
penalty inflation adjustment is
prescribed by law, as explained in
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Memorandum M–16–06
(February 24, 2016).
NEH’s interim final rule, which
implemented the initial ‘‘catch-up’’
inflation adjustment and the 2020
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 113 (Thursday, June 11, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35564-35566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11029]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 228
[EPA-R04-OW-2019-0592; FRL-10009-39-Region 4]
Ocean Dumping: Cancellation of Final Designation for an Ocean
Dredged Material Disposal Site
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cancels the final
designation of the original Wilmington, North Carolina Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Site (ODMDS), referred to as the 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS, pursuant to the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act
(MPRSA), as amended. The 1987 Wilmington ODMDS, which was designated in
1987, is in the Atlantic Ocean offshore Wilmington, North Carolina.
This action is being taken because the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS was
previously replaced in 2002 by the existing New Wilmington ODMDS and is
no longer needed. In addition, this action changes the name of New
Wilmington ODMDS to the Wilmington, North Carolina ODMDS.
DATES: This rule is effective July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Docket: All documents in the Docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index, some information may not be publicly
available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 4 Office, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303. The file will be made available for public inspection in
the Region 4 library between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
weekdays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below to make an appointment. If possible, please make
your appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit.
There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of
documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary W. Collins, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, Water Division, Oceans and Estuarine
Management Section, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; phone
number: (404) 562-9395; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Potentially Affected Persons
Persons potentially affected by this action include those who seek
or might seek permits or approval to dispose of dredged material into
ocean waters pursuant to the MPRSA (33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), 33 U.S.C.
1401 to 1445. The EPA's action would be relevant to persons, including
organizations, and government bodies seeking to dispose of dredged
material in ocean waters offshore of Wilmington, North Carolina.
Currently, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) would be most
affected by this action. Potentially affected categories and persons
include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of potentially regulated
Category persons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Government................ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil
Works projects, U.S. Navy and other
Federal agencies.
Industry and general public....... Port authorities, marinas and
harbors, shipyards and marine
repair facilities, berth owners.
State, local and tribal Governments owning and/or
governments. responsible for ports, harbors, and/
or berths, government agencies
requiring disposal of dredged
material associated with public
works projects.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding persons likely to be affected by this
action. For any questions regarding the applicability of this action to
a particular person, please refer to the contact person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
II. Background
Section 102(c) of the MPRSA, 33 U.S.C. 1412(c), gives the
Administrator of the EPA authority to designate sites where ocean
disposal may be permitted. On October 1, 1986, the Administrator
delegated the authority to designate ocean disposal sites to the
Regional Administrator of the Region in which the sites are located.
This cancellation is being made pursuant to that authority.
The EPA Ocean Dumping Regulations promulgated under MPRSA at 40 CFR
228.11, state that modifications in disposal site use which involve
withdrawal of disposal sites from use will be made by promulgation
pursuant to 40 CFR part 228. This site cancellation is being published
as final rulemaking in accordance with 40 CFR 228.11(a) of the Ocean
Dumping Regulations, which permits the withdrawal of designated
disposal sites from use based upon changed circumstances concerning use
of the site.
III. Action
The cancellation of the designation of the ODMDS, which was
designated offshore Wilmington, North Carolina, in 1987 at 40 CFR
228.15(h)(2), is needed as a housekeeping measure. This 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS is no longer a suitable disposal option and has no foreseeable
need. The 1987 Wilmington ODMDS was replaced by the larger New
Wilmington ODMDS, which was designated in 2002 at 40 CFR 228.15(h)(20),
due to changes in alignment of the Federal navigation channel, which
now cuts through the 1987 ODMDS, and for other applicable reasons. In
this action, the EPA also changes the name of the New Wilmington ODMDS
to the Wilmington, North Carolina ODMDS.
On November 6, 2019, the EPA issued a draft rule for public review
and comment in the Federal Register [84 FR 59744 (Nov. 6, 2019)] which
proposed the cancelation of the designation of the 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS and renaming the New Wilmington ODMDS to the Wilmington, North
Carolina ODMDS. Four comments were received on the proposed rule. Of
the four comments, two were not related to this action and do not need
responses. Of the two remaining comments, one stated that ODMDS
designations seem to trend toward a pattern of moving further and
further offshore which the individual attributes to improper long-term
planning by the EPA. The second comment stated that ``[s]ome evidence
showed that shrimpers have complained that wood debris attributed to
dredged
[[Page 35565]]
materials placed within the [1987 Wilmington ODMDS] interfere with
shrimping.''
Regarding the issue of long-term planning, the EPA historically
designates sites that are environmentally suitable, minimizes the haul
distance and associated costs, and maximizes the feasibility and ease
for monitoring while considering the known longer-term needs of
federally authorized projects. With the recent improvements to the
Panama Canal, nearly every port in the southeastern U.S. has proceeded
with plans to deepen and widen navigation channels for federally
authorized projects, as well as all the associated turning basins and
terminal berthing areas. Prudent use of the Agency's resources does not
allow for planning beyond the known needs of the major site users at
any given time and thus the site designated in 1987 was not designated
with adequate capacity to meet the current need.
The EPA understands that the comment regarding wood debris in
dredged material and its interference with shrimping is referencing
historical events that occurred at shrimping grounds that lie offshore
of Frying Pan Shoals. In 1987-1988, shrimp fishermen operating in areas
outside the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS had reported fouling and tearing of
their nets with roots, tree limbs, and other natural origin wood
debris. The fishermen attributed the wood debris to ``short dumped''
(i.e., outside the disposal area) ocean disposal of dredged material
from the ``river'' reaches of the Wilmington Harbor navigation channel
as well as reaches of the Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point (MOTSU).
To remedy this, the dredging contractor at the time conducted a cleanup
of the impacted areas using heavy-duty scallop-style nets for 20 days
(approximately 228 tows were made). In an effort to maximize the
distance from the disposal location to the shrimp fishing area, between
1988 and 2002, dredged materials from river sources were placed in the
most seaward (southern) half of the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS. However, in
1996, fishermen complaints regarding wood debris in areas near the 1987
Wilmington ODMDS were again received. In July 1996, the USACE
Wilmington District employed two trawlers to drag heavy-duty nets in
the shrimp-trawling areas in order to assess the wood debris problem.
This USACE determined that wood debris was present in the traditional
shrimping bottoms in sufficient amounts to interfere with shrimping but
the USACE was unable to determine the source of the wood debris. The
contention that the dredged material placed in the 1987 Wilmington
ODMDS was a source of the wood debris impacting shrimpers' towing
bottoms was neither confirmed nor denied. Extreme weather events,
including hurricanes, periodically pass over the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS
and surrounding areas and may naturally redistribute debris on the sea
floor, regardless of their source. The 1987 Wilmington ODMDS, currently
inactive, has not received dredged material since 2002. There are no
plans to remove any wood debris or other material from the 1987
Wilmington ODMDS; rather, the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS footprint will be
allowed to continue its transition back to a more natural state as it
has been for the past 18 years. Since its designation in 2002, all
dredged materials originating from Wilmington Harbor and MOTSU have
been placed in the New Wilmington ODMDS. The New Wilmington ODMDS is
located further seaward (south) than the 1987 Wilmington ODMDS, and was
specifically sited to keep disposal operations and any wood debris that
might be associated with the dredged material as far as possible from
these shrimping grounds while maintaining the economic feasibility of
federally authorized projects that require the transport and disposal
of dredged material.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action complies with applicable Executive orders and statutory
provisions as follows:
a. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
b. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This action does not require
persons to obtain, maintain, retain, report, or publicly disclose
information to or for a Federal agency.
c. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., generally
requires Federal agencies to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under
the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., or any other
statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of
this rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small
business defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration's size
regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction
that is a government of a city, county, town, school district, or
special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of this rule, the EPA certifies
that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule will not impose any
requirements on small entities.
d. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531 et seq., for state, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This action imposes no new enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this
action is not subject to the requirements of Sections 202 or 205 of the
UMRA. This action is also not subject to the requirements of Section
203 of the UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect small government entities.
e. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on States, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to
this action. The EPA specifically solicited comment on this action from
State and local officials.
[[Page 35566]]
f. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the action will not have a direct effect
on Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action. The EPA specifically solicited
additional comments on this action from tribal officials.
g. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885) as applying
only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks,
such that the analysis required under Section 5-501 of the Executive
order has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an
environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
h. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355)
because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined under
Executive Order 12866.
i. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113 (15 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.), directs the EPA
to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs the EPA to provide Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, explanations when the
Agency decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus
standards. This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore,
the EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
j. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629) establishes Federal executive
policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs Federal
agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and
addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the
United States. The EPA determined that this rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This action is only cancelling the designation of an ODMDS
which is no longer viable.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228
Environmental protection, Water pollution control.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section
102 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as
amended, 33 U.S.C. 1412.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, The EPA amends chapter I,
title 40 of the Code of Federal Register as follows:
PART 228--CRITERIA FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSAL SITES FOR OCEAN
DUMPING
0
1. The authority citation for part 228 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
0
2. Section 228.15 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (h)(2)
and revising paragraph (h)(20) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 228.15 Dumping sites designated on a final basis.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(20) Wilmington, North Carolina; Ocean Dredged Material Disposal
Site.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-11029 Filed 6-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P