Air Plan Approval; TN; Nitrogen Oxides SIP Call Plan, 34686-34688 [2020-12141]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
34686
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 29, 2020.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020–12044 Filed 6–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0631; FRL–10010–
11–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; TN; Nitrogen Oxides
SIP Call Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision concerning nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emissions submitted by the State
of Tennessee, through the Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation (TDEC), through a letter
dated December 19, 2019, which revises
the Tennessee Air Pollution Control
Rule (TAPCR) titled ‘‘NOX SIP Call
Requirements for Stationary Boilers and
Combustion Turbines’’ (TN 2017 NOX
SIP Call Rule) to correct the definition
of ‘‘affected unit’’ and to clarify
requirements related to stationary
boilers and combustion turbines. EPA is
also proposing to convert the
conditional approval of the TN 2017
NOX SIP Call Rule to a full approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2018–0631 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gobeail McKinley, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9230. Ms. McKinley can also be reached
via electronic mail at mckinley.gobeail@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which EPA has
traditionally termed the good neighbor
provision, states are required to address
the interstate transport of air pollution.
Specifically, the good neighbor
provision requires that each state’s
implementation plan contain adequate
provisions to prohibit air pollutant
emissions from within the state that will
significantly contribute to
nonattainment of the national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS), or that
will interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS, in any other state.
In October 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA
finalized the ‘‘Finding of Significant
Contribution and Rulemaking for
Certain States in the Ozone Transport
Assessment Group Region for Purposes
of Reducing Regional Transport of
Ozone’’ (‘‘NOX SIP Call’’). The NOX SIP
Call required eastern states, including
Tennessee, to submit SIPs that prohibit
excessive emissions of ozone season
NOX by implementing statewide
emissions budgets.1 The NOX SIP Call
addressed the good neighbor provision
for the 1979 ozone NAAQS and was
designed to mitigate the impact of
transported NOX emissions, one of the
precursors of ozone. EPA developed the
NOX Budget Trading Program, an
allowance trading program that states
could adopt to meet their obligations
under the NOX SIP Call. This trading
program allowed the following sources
to participate in a regional cap and trade
program: Generally electric generating
1 See 63 FR 57356 (October 27, 1998). As
originally promulgated, the NOX SIP Call also
addressed good neighbor obligations under the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS, but EPA subsequently stayed
and later rescinded the rule’s provisions with
respect to that standard. See 65 FR 56245
(September 18, 2000); 84 FR 8422 (March 8, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
units (EGUs) with capacity greater than
25 megawatts (MW); and large industrial
non-EGUs, such as boilers and
combustion turbines, with a rated heat
input greater than 250 million British
thermal units per hour (MMBtu/hr). The
NOX SIP Call also identified potential
reductions from cement kilns and
stationary internal combustion engines.
On January 22, 2004, EPA approved
into the Tennessee SIP the State’s NOX
Budget Trading Program rule.2 The NOX
Budget Trading Program was
implemented from 2003 to 2008. The
provisions required EGUs and large
non-EGUs in the state to participate in
the NOX Budget Trading Program.
In 2005, EPA published the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR), which required
eastern states, including Tennessee, to
submit SIPs that prohibited emissions
consistent with ozone season (and
annual) NOX budgets. See 70 FR 25162
(May 12, 2005). CAIR addressed the
good neighbor provision for the 1997
ozone NAAQS and 1997 fine particulate
matter (PM2.5) NAAQS and was
designed to mitigate the impact of
transported NOX emissions with respect
to not only ozone but also PM2.5. CAIR
established several trading programs
that EPA implemented through federal
implementation plans (FIPs) for EGUs
greater than 25 MW in each affected
state, but not large non-EGUs; states
could submit SIPs to replace the FIPs
that achieved the required emission
reductions from EGUs and/or other
types of sources.3 When the CAIR
trading program for ozone season NOX
was implemented beginning in 2009,
EPA discontinued administration of the
NOX Budget Trading Program; however,
the requirements of the NOX SIP Call
continued to apply.
On August 20, 2007, EPA approved
into the Tennessee SIP an abbreviated
CAIR SIP revision with allowance
allocations and opt-in provisions.4 On
November 25, 2009, EPA approved into
the Tennessee SIP a further abbreviated
CAIR SIP revision expanding
applicability of the CAIR ozone season
NOX trading program to NOX SIP Call
non-EGUs.5
In 2011, EPA published the CrossState Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to
replace CAIR and address the good
neighbor provisions for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS, the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, and
the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR
48208 (August 8, 2011). Through FIPs,
2 See
69 FR 3015 (January 22, 2004).
had separate trading programs for annual
sulfur dioxide emissions, seasonal NOX emissions
and annual NOX emissions.
4 See 72 FR 46388.
5 See 74 FR 61535.
3 CAIR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
CSAPR required EGUs in eastern states,
including Tennessee, to meet annual
and ozone season NOX emission budgets
and annual SO2 emission budgets
implemented through new trading
programs. Implementation of CSAPR
began on January 1, 2015.6 CSAPR also
contained provisions that would sunset
CAIR-related obligations on a schedule
coordinated with the implementation of
the CSAPR compliance requirements.
In 2016, EPA published the CSAPR
Update to address the good neighbor
provision for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
See 81 FR 74504 (October 26, 2016).
Although for most covered states the
CSAPR Update may only partially
address the states’ good neighbor
obligations for this NAAQS, the rule
fully addresses Tennessee’s good
neighbor obligation for this NAAQS.7
The CSAPR Update trading program
replaced the original CSAPR trading
program for ozone season NOX for most
covered states. Tennessee’s EGUs
participate in the CSAPR Update trading
program, generally also addressing the
state’s obligations under the NOX SIP
Call for EGUs. However, Tennessee has
not chosen to expand applicability of
the CSAPR Update trading program to
its large non-EGUs.
Through a letter to EPA dated
February 27, 2017,8 Tennessee provided
a SIP revision to incorporate a new
provision—TACPR 1200–03–27–.12,
‘‘NOX SIP Call Requirements for
Stationary Boilers and Combustion
Turbines’’ (TN 2017 NOX SIP Call
Rule)—into the SIP. The TN 2017 NOX
SIP Call Rule established a state control
program for sources that are subject to
the NOX SIP Call, but not covered under
CSAPR or the CSAPR Update. The TN
2017 NOX SIP Call Rule contains several
subsections that together comprise a
non-EGU control program under which
Tennessee will allocate a specified
budget of allowances to affected
sources. Subsequently, on May 11, 2018
and October 11, 2018, Tennessee
submitted letters requesting conditional
approval of the 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule
and committing to provide a SIP
revision to EPA by December 31, 2019,
to address a deficiency by revising the
definition of ‘‘affected unit’’ to remove
the unqualified exclusion for any unit
that serves a generator that produces
power for sale. Based on the State’s
6 See 79 FR 71663 (December 3, 2014) and 81 FR
13275 (March 14, 2016).
7 See 81 FR at 74540. EPA notes that the aspects
of the CSAPR Update affecting Tennessee were not
challenged in the litigation over the rule and are not
affected by the remand of the rule in Wisconsin v.
EPA, 983 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
8 EPA notes that it received the submittal on
February 28, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34687
commitment to submit a SIP revision
addressing the identified deficiency,
EPA conditionally approved the
February 27, 2017, submission. In the
same action, EPA approved removal of
the state’s NOX Budget Trading Program
and CAIR rules from the State’s SIP. See
84 FR 7998 (March 6, 2019).
II. EPA’s Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve
Tennessee’s December 19, 2019, SIP
submittal, which revises TAPCR 1200–
03–27–.12, ‘‘NOX SIP Call Requirements
for Stationary Boilers and Combustion
Turbines’’ to correct the definition of
‘‘affected unit’’ and to clarify
requirements related to stationary
boilers and combustion turbines
(additional details are provided in
section III of this proposal). In addition,
EPA is proposing to convert EPA’s
March 6, 2019, conditional approval to
a full approval.
III. Tennessee’s SIP Submission and
EPA’s Analysis
In accordance with its commitment
letters, Tennessee submitted a SIP
revision on December 19, 2019,
requesting EPA approval of revisions to
TAPCR 1200–03–27–.12, ‘‘NOX SIP Call
Requirements for Stationary Boilers and
Combustion Turbines.’’ To address the
deficiency in the TN 2017 NOX SIP Call
Rule identified by EPA, in the December
19, 2019 submission, the State revises
the definition of ‘‘affected unit’’ to
remove the unqualified exclusion for
any unit that serves a generator that
produces power for sale and add
exclusions for units that are subject to
the current CSAPR Update trading
program for ozone season NOX. In
addition, Tennessee is requesting EPA
approve the following modifications to
the rule: (1) Amending the definition of
‘‘maximum design heat input’’ by
adding ‘‘MM’’ to ‘‘BTU/hr’’ to correct a
minor typo; (2) clarifying the formula
for the allocation of NOX allowances to
include the number of hours in
Tennessee’s ozone season; and (3)
clarifying the requirements for a
Responsible Official for purposes of
compliance with 40 CFR part 75.9
EPA has reviewed the December 19,
2019, SIP submission and is proposing
to find that the revisions to TAPCR
1200–03–27–.12 comply with the NOX
SIP Call requirements for non-EGUs and
the CAA. With respect to the changes to
the definition of ‘‘affected unit,’’ if
9 In addition, EPA is proposing to approve
TAPCR 1200–03–27–.12(7)(b)4, which currently
reads [Reserved] and thus has no substantive
requirements, into the SIP. TAPCR 1200–03–27–
.12(7)(b)4 has not previously been approved into
the Tennessee SIP. See 84 FR 7998 (March 6, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
34688
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
approved, Tennessee’s SIP will address
all types of sources that must be covered
to fully address NOX SIP Call
requirements. See 83 FR 64497
(December 17, 2018) (including a
discussion of both sources covered
under CSAPR and the sources subject to
1200–03–27–.12). With respect to the
additional modifications to correct
minor typographical errors, the formula
for NOX allocations, and the
requirements for the Responsible
Official, EPA preliminarily agrees that
the modifications provide additional
clarity to the SIP. In addition, EPA has
preliminarily determined that the
December 19, 2019, SIP revision
satisfies the conditions listed in EPA’s
March 6, 2019 conditional approval and
is proposing to convert its prior
conditional approval to full approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
TAPCR 1200–03–27-.12, ‘‘NOX SIP Call
Requirements for Stationary Boilers and
Combustion Turbines,’’ state effective
December 12, 2019, which revises
Tennessee’s state control program to
comply with the obligations of the NOX
SIP Call. EPA has made and will
continue to make the State
Implementation Plan generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve
Tennessee’s December 19, 2019,
submission, which revises TAPCR
1200–03–27–.12, ‘‘NOX SIP Call
Requirements for Stationary Boilers and
Combustion Turbines,’’ to correct the
definition of ‘‘affected unit’’ and to
clarify requirements related to
stationary boilers and combustion
turbines. In addition, EPA is proposing
to convert the March 6, 2019
conditional approval of TAPCR 1200–
03–27-.12 to a full approval. EPA
requests comment on these proposals.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely proposes to approve state
law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this proposed
action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 29, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020–12141 Filed 6–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 80
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2020–0240; FRL–10009–02–
OAR]
Proposed Anti-Backsliding
Determination for Renewable Fuels
and Air Quality
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing that no
additional measures are necessary
pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) section
211(v) to mitigate the adverse air quality
impacts of the renewable fuel volumes
required under CAA section 211(o). EPA
is providing an opportunity for the
public to comment on this proposed
determination.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2020–0240, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 110 (Monday, June 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34686-34688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12141]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0631; FRL-10010-11-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; TN; Nitrogen Oxides SIP Call Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision concerning nitrogen
oxides (NOX) emissions submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation
(TDEC), through a letter dated December 19, 2019, which revises the
Tennessee Air Pollution Control Rule (TAPCR) titled ``NOX
SIP Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines''
(TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule) to correct the definition of
``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements related to stationary
boilers and combustion turbines. EPA is also proposing to convert the
conditional approval of the TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule to a
full approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2018-0631 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gobeail McKinley, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9230. Ms. McKinley can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which
EPA has traditionally termed the good neighbor provision, states are
required to address the interstate transport of air pollution.
Specifically, the good neighbor provision requires that each state's
implementation plan contain adequate provisions to prohibit air
pollutant emissions from within the state that will significantly
contribute to nonattainment of the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS), or that will interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS, in any other state.
In October 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA finalized the ``Finding of
Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone
Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional
Transport of Ozone'' (``NOX SIP Call''). The NOX
SIP Call required eastern states, including Tennessee, to submit SIPs
that prohibit excessive emissions of ozone season NOX by
implementing statewide emissions budgets.\1\ The NOX SIP
Call addressed the good neighbor provision for the 1979 ozone NAAQS and
was designed to mitigate the impact of transported NOX
emissions, one of the precursors of ozone. EPA developed the
NOX Budget Trading Program, an allowance trading program
that states could adopt to meet their obligations under the
NOX SIP Call. This trading program allowed the following
sources to participate in a regional cap and trade program: Generally
electric generating
[[Page 34687]]
units (EGUs) with capacity greater than 25 megawatts (MW); and large
industrial non-EGUs, such as boilers and combustion turbines, with a
rated heat input greater than 250 million British thermal units per
hour (MMBtu/hr). The NOX SIP Call also identified potential
reductions from cement kilns and stationary internal combustion
engines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 63 FR 57356 (October 27, 1998). As originally
promulgated, the NOX SIP Call also addressed good
neighbor obligations under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, but EPA
subsequently stayed and later rescinded the rule's provisions with
respect to that standard. See 65 FR 56245 (September 18, 2000); 84
FR 8422 (March 8, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 22, 2004, EPA approved into the Tennessee SIP the
State's NOX Budget Trading Program rule.\2\ The
NOX Budget Trading Program was implemented from 2003 to
2008. The provisions required EGUs and large non-EGUs in the state to
participate in the NOX Budget Trading Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 69 FR 3015 (January 22, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2005, EPA published the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which
required eastern states, including Tennessee, to submit SIPs that
prohibited emissions consistent with ozone season (and annual)
NOX budgets. See 70 FR 25162 (May 12, 2005). CAIR addressed
the good neighbor provision for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and 1997 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS and was designed to
mitigate the impact of transported NOX emissions with
respect to not only ozone but also PM2.5. CAIR established
several trading programs that EPA implemented through federal
implementation plans (FIPs) for EGUs greater than 25 MW in each
affected state, but not large non-EGUs; states could submit SIPs to
replace the FIPs that achieved the required emission reductions from
EGUs and/or other types of sources.\3\ When the CAIR trading program
for ozone season NOX was implemented beginning in 2009, EPA
discontinued administration of the NOX Budget Trading
Program; however, the requirements of the NOX SIP Call
continued to apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ CAIR had separate trading programs for annual sulfur dioxide
emissions, seasonal NOX emissions and annual
NOX emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 20, 2007, EPA approved into the Tennessee SIP an
abbreviated CAIR SIP revision with allowance allocations and opt-in
provisions.\4\ On November 25, 2009, EPA approved into the Tennessee
SIP a further abbreviated CAIR SIP revision expanding applicability of
the CAIR ozone season NOX trading program to NOX
SIP Call non-EGUs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 72 FR 46388.
\5\ See 74 FR 61535.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2011, EPA published the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)
to replace CAIR and address the good neighbor provisions for the 1997
ozone NAAQS, the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, and the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011). Through FIPs,
CSAPR required EGUs in eastern states, including Tennessee, to meet
annual and ozone season NOX emission budgets and annual
SO2 emission budgets implemented through new trading
programs. Implementation of CSAPR began on January 1, 2015.\6\ CSAPR
also contained provisions that would sunset CAIR-related obligations on
a schedule coordinated with the implementation of the CSAPR compliance
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 79 FR 71663 (December 3, 2014) and 81 FR 13275 (March
14, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2016, EPA published the CSAPR Update to address the good
neighbor provision for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 81 FR 74504 (October
26, 2016). Although for most covered states the CSAPR Update may only
partially address the states' good neighbor obligations for this NAAQS,
the rule fully addresses Tennessee's good neighbor obligation for this
NAAQS.\7\ The CSAPR Update trading program replaced the original CSAPR
trading program for ozone season NOX for most covered
states. Tennessee's EGUs participate in the CSAPR Update trading
program, generally also addressing the state's obligations under the
NOX SIP Call for EGUs. However, Tennessee has not chosen to
expand applicability of the CSAPR Update trading program to its large
non-EGUs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 81 FR at 74540. EPA notes that the aspects of the CSAPR
Update affecting Tennessee were not challenged in the litigation
over the rule and are not affected by the remand of the rule in
Wisconsin v. EPA, 983 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through a letter to EPA dated February 27, 2017,\8\ Tennessee
provided a SIP revision to incorporate a new provision--TACPR 1200-03-
27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers
and Combustion Turbines'' (TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule)--into
the SIP. The TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule established a state
control program for sources that are subject to the NOX SIP
Call, but not covered under CSAPR or the CSAPR Update. The TN 2017
NOX SIP Call Rule contains several subsections that together
comprise a non-EGU control program under which Tennessee will allocate
a specified budget of allowances to affected sources. Subsequently, on
May 11, 2018 and October 11, 2018, Tennessee submitted letters
requesting conditional approval of the 2017 NOX SIP Call
Rule and committing to provide a SIP revision to EPA by December 31,
2019, to address a deficiency by revising the definition of ``affected
unit'' to remove the unqualified exclusion for any unit that serves a
generator that produces power for sale. Based on the State's commitment
to submit a SIP revision addressing the identified deficiency, EPA
conditionally approved the February 27, 2017, submission. In the same
action, EPA approved removal of the state's NOX Budget
Trading Program and CAIR rules from the State's SIP. See 84 FR 7998
(March 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ EPA notes that it received the submittal on February 28,
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. EPA's Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Tennessee's December 19, 2019, SIP
submittal, which revises TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP
Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines'' to
correct the definition of ``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements
related to stationary boilers and combustion turbines (additional
details are provided in section III of this proposal). In addition, EPA
is proposing to convert EPA's March 6, 2019, conditional approval to a
full approval.
III. Tennessee's SIP Submission and EPA's Analysis
In accordance with its commitment letters, Tennessee submitted a
SIP revision on December 19, 2019, requesting EPA approval of revisions
to TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements for
Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines.'' To address the deficiency
in the TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule identified by EPA, in the
December 19, 2019 submission, the State revises the definition of
``affected unit'' to remove the unqualified exclusion for any unit that
serves a generator that produces power for sale and add exclusions for
units that are subject to the current CSAPR Update trading program for
ozone season NOX. In addition, Tennessee is requesting EPA
approve the following modifications to the rule: (1) Amending the
definition of ``maximum design heat input'' by adding ``MM'' to ``BTU/
hr'' to correct a minor typo; (2) clarifying the formula for the
allocation of NOX allowances to include the number of hours
in Tennessee's ozone season; and (3) clarifying the requirements for a
Responsible Official for purposes of compliance with 40 CFR part 75.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In addition, EPA is proposing to approve TAPCR 1200-03-
27-.12(7)(b)4, which currently reads [Reserved] and thus has no
substantive requirements, into the SIP. TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12(7)(b)4
has not previously been approved into the Tennessee SIP. See 84 FR
7998 (March 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has reviewed the December 19, 2019, SIP submission and is
proposing to find that the revisions to TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12 comply
with the NOX SIP Call requirements for non-EGUs and the CAA.
With respect to the changes to the definition of ``affected unit,'' if
[[Page 34688]]
approved, Tennessee's SIP will address all types of sources that must
be covered to fully address NOX SIP Call requirements. See
83 FR 64497 (December 17, 2018) (including a discussion of both sources
covered under CSAPR and the sources subject to 1200-03-27-.12). With
respect to the additional modifications to correct minor typographical
errors, the formula for NOX allocations, and the
requirements for the Responsible Official, EPA preliminarily agrees
that the modifications provide additional clarity to the SIP. In
addition, EPA has preliminarily determined that the December 19, 2019,
SIP revision satisfies the conditions listed in EPA's March 6, 2019
conditional approval and is proposing to convert its prior conditional
approval to full approval.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements
for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines,'' state effective
December 12, 2019, which revises Tennessee's state control program to
comply with the obligations of the NOX SIP Call. EPA has
made and will continue to make the State Implementation Plan generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office
(please contact the person identified in the For Further Information
Contact section of this preamble for more information).
V. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Tennessee's December 19, 2019,
submission, which revises TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP
Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines,'' to
correct the definition of ``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements
related to stationary boilers and combustion turbines. In addition, EPA
is proposing to convert the March 6, 2019 conditional approval of TAPCR
1200-03-27-.12 to a full approval. EPA requests comment on these
proposals.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 29, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020-12141 Filed 6-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P